Page 2 :
Session overview, , This session will present the implementation guidelines for the Results-Based Performance, Management-Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers for SY 2021-2022., Learning objectives, •Terminal Objective:, Explain confidently the salient points of the implementation guidelines for the Results-Based Performance, Management-Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers for SY 2021-2022, •Enabling Objectives:, Determine the 18 priority strands, Respond to commonly asked questions re: RPMS-PPST SY 2021-2022, Standards, , Domain 1, , Leading Strategically, , Domain 4, , Developing Self and Others
Page 3 :
1. Introduction
Page 4 :
1. Introduction
Page 5 :
1. Introduction
Page 6 :
1. Introduction
Page 7 :
1. Introduction
Page 8 :
1. Introduction
Page 9 :
1. Introduction
Page 10 :
1. Introduction
Page 13 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , A total of 18 indicators, 9 Classroom Observable Objectives, Classroom, Observation as, MOVs, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, , SET A OR SET B, MOVs, 7, 8, 9, 10, , 7 Classroom Observable Objectives, Classroom, Observation as, MOVs, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, , SET A OR SET B, MOVs, , The performance indicators for these objectives are identified for QUALITY, Only two (2) observations are required for both P & HP for the entire school year., , 9, 10
Page 14 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy, , 1. Applied knowledge of content, within and across curriculum, teaching areas, , Classroom Observation Tool (COT), rating sheet or inter-observer agreement, form from, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online, teaching, or two-way radio instruction), 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation, of a recorded video lesson or audio lesson, that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching*, via LAC
Page 15 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , *For modular approach, demonstration teaching via LAC must reflect the, teaching-learning process in the said modality. The MOV (COT rating, sheet or inter-observer agreement form) shall also be complemented with, any annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging,, note/s showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow, through, monitoring, etc.
Page 16 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 6, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 5, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 17 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy, , 2. Used research-based, knowledge and principles of, teaching and learning to, enhance professional practice, , One (1) lesson plan, with annotations identifying the researchbased knowledge and/or principles of, teaching and learning used as basis for, planning / designing the lesson, , Research-based knowledge – Information, knowledge or data acquired through systematic, investigation and logical study (PPST, 2017), Principles of teaching and learning – Teachers’ views, understandings and, conceptualization of teaching and learning (PPST, 2017), Components of instruction – learning objectives, instructional activities, and, assessments
Page 18 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy, , 3. Displayed proficient use of, Mother Tongue, Filipino and, English to facilitate teaching and, learning, , Classroom Observation Tool (COT), rating sheet or inter-observer agreement, form from, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online, teaching, or two-way radio instruction), 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation, of a recorded video lesson or audio lesson, that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching* via, LAC
Page 19 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 6, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 5, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 20 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy, , 4. Used effective verbal and nonverbal classroom, communication strategies to, support learner understanding,, participation, engagement and, achievement, , Classroom Observation Tool (COT), rating sheet or inter-observer agreement, form from, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online, teaching, or two-way radio instruction), 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation, of a recorded video lesson or audio lesson, that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching* via, LAC
Page 21 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 6, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 5, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 22 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 2: Learning Environment, , 5. Established safe and secure, learning environments to, enhance learning through the, consistent implementation of, policies, guidelines and, procedures, , Classroom Observation Tool (COT), rating sheet or inter-observer agreement, form from, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online, teaching, or two-way radio instruction), 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation, of a recorded video lesson or audio lesson, that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching* via, LAC
Page 23 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 6, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 5, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 24 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 2: Learning Environment, , 6. Maintained learning, environments that promote, fairness, respect and, care to encourage learning, , Classroom Observation Tool (COT), rating sheet or inter-observer agreement, form from, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online, teaching, or two-way radio instruction), 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation, of a recorded video lesson or audio lesson, that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching* via, LAC
Page 25 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 6, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 5, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 26 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 2: Learning Environment, , 7. Maintained learning, environments that nurture and, inspire learners to participate,, cooperate and collaborate in, continued learning, , SET A, Any supplementary material (in print/digital format) made, by the ratee* and used in the lesson delivery that highlights, maintaining learning environments that nurture and inspire, learners to participate, cooperate and collaborate in, continued learning, ● activity sheet/s, ●, ●, ●, ●, ●, , one lesson from a self-learning module (SLM), lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, lesson exemplars, and the likes), video lesson, audio lesson, other learning materials in print/digital format (please specify and provide, annotations), , with client/learner feedback on how the material encouraged, the learners to participate, cooperate, and collaborate
Page 27 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , *If the supplementary material is a product of a group work / collaborative effort of two (2) or more, , teachers, ratee should specify and provide annotations of one’s contribution to a material., , Note for SET A: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the, rating for Quality, calculate the average rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted RPMS rating., See sample computation below:, Means of Verification, MOV 1: Activity Sheet, MOV 2: One lesson from a SLM, , RPMS 5-point, Scale Rating, 3, 4, , Average, 3.500, , RPMS Rating for, Quality, 4, (Very Satisfactory), , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 28 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 2: Learning Environment, , 7. Maintained learning, environments that nurture and, inspire learners to participate,, cooperate and collaborate in, continued learning, , SET B, Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or, inter-observer agreement form from, 1.an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online teaching,, or two-way radio instruction), 2.if option 1 is not possible, an observation of a, recorded video lesson or audio lesson that is, SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3.if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching** via, LAC
Page 29 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 6, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 5, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 30 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 2: Learning Environment, , 8. Applied a range of successful, strategies that maintain learning, environments that motivate, learners to work productively by, assuming responsibility for their, own learning, , SET A, Any supplementary material (in print/digital format), made by the ratee* and used in the lesson delivery that, highlights a range of strategies that maintain learning, environments that motivate learners to work, productively by assuming responsibility for their own, learning, ● activity sheet/s, ● one lesson from a self-learning module (SLM), ● lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, lesson, exemplars, and the likes), ● video lesson, ● audio lesson, ● other learning materials in print/digital format (please, specify and provide annotations)
Page 31 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , *If the supplementary material is a product of a group work / collaborative effort of two (2) or more, , teachers, ratee should specify and provide annotations of one’s contribution to a material., , Note for SET A: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the, rating for Quality, calculate the average rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted RPMS rating., See sample computation below:, Means of Verification, MOV 1: Activity Sheet, MOV 2: One lesson from a SLM, , RPMS 5-point, Scale Rating, 3, 4, , Average, 3.500, , RPMS Rating for, Quality, 4, (Very Satisfactory), , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 32 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 2: Learning Environment, , 8. Applied a range of successful, strategies that maintain learning, environments that motivate, learners to work productively by, assuming responsibility for their, own learning, , SET B, Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or, inter-observer agreement form from, 1.an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online teaching,, or two-way radio instruction), 2.if option 1 is not possible, an observation of a, recorded video lesson or audio lesson that is, SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3.if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching** via, LAC
Page 33 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 6, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 5, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 34 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , SET A, 9. Designed, adapted and, implemented teaching strategies Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or, inter-observer agreement form from, that are responsive to learners, 1.an observation of synchronous teaching, with disabilities, giftedness, (limited face-to-face teaching, online teaching,, and talents, or two-way radio instruction), 2.if option 1 is not possible, an observation of a, recorded video lesson or audio lesson that is, SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3.if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching** via, LAC
Page 35 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 6, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 5, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 36 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 9. Designed, adapted and, implemented teaching strategies, that are responsive to learners, with disabilities, giftedness, and talents, , SET B, Teacher Reflection Form (TRF) on designing,, adapting, and/or implementing teaching strategies, that are responsive to learners with disabilities,, giftedness and talents and a certification from the, school head that the ratee’s classes have no, identified learner/s with disabilities, giftedness, and/or talents
Page 37 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , “Learners with disability, giftedness and talents” is operationally defined as persons 1) who are, gifted or talented and those 2) who have physical, mental, social, or sensory impairment., ●, , ●, , ●, , ●, , These persons may be gifted/talented, a fast learner, mentally retarded, visually impaired, hearing, impaired, with behavior problems, orthopedically handicapped, with special health problems,, learning disabled, speech impaired, multiple handicapped (DO 117, s. 1987)., “Disability shall mean a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more, psychological, physiological or anatomical function of an individual or activities of such individual.”, (RA 7277), “Students with gifts and talents perform - or have the capability to perform - at higher levels, compared to others of the same age, experience, and environment in one or more domains. They, require modification(s) to their educational experience(s) to learn and realize their potential.”, (National Association for Gifted Children, 2019), For reference, other issuances that relate to learners with disability, giftedness and talents are: DECS, Order 26, s.1997 or the Institutionalization of SPED Programs in All Schools, and DepEd Order No., 72, s. 2009 or the Inclusive Education as Strategy for Increasing Participation Rate of Children.
Page 38 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note for SET B: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the, entire school year. In computing the rating for Quality, calculate the, average rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted RPMS, rating. See sample computation below:, Means of Verification, TRF 1, , RPMS 5-point, Scale Rating, 3, , TRF 2, , 4, , Average, 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499, , RPMS Rating for, Quality, 4, (Very Satisfactory)
Page 39 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 10. Adapted and used culturally, appropriate teaching strategies, to address the needs of learners, from indigenous groups, , SET A, Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or, inter-observer agreement form from, 1.an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online teaching,, or two-way radio instruction), 2.if option 1 is not possible, an observation of a, recorded video lesson or audio lesson that is, SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3.if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching** via, LAC
Page 40 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 6, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 5, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 41 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 10. Adapted and used culturally, appropriate teaching strategies, to address the needs of learners, from indigenous groups, , SET A, Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or, inter-observer agreement form from, 1.an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online teaching,, or two-way radio instruction), 2.if option 1 is not possible, an observation of a, recorded video lesson or audio lesson that is, SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3.if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching** via, LAC
Page 42 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 6, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 5, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 43 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 10. Adapted and used culturally, appropriate teaching strategies, to address the needs of learners, from indigenous groups, , SET B, Teacher Reflection Form (TRF) on designing,, adapting, and/or implementing teaching strategies, that are responsive to learners with disabilities,, giftedness and talents and a certification from the, school head that the ratee’s classes have no, identified learner/s with disabilities, giftedness, and/or talents
Page 44 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , “Learners from indigenous groups” is operationally defined as people who, have, under claims of ownership since time immemorial, occupied,, possessed, and utilized ancestral territories, shared common bonds of, language, customs, traditions, and other unique cultural traits (RA 8371 or, IPRA of 1997)., *For modular approach, demonstration teaching via LAC must reflect the, teaching-learning process in the said modality. The MOV (COT rating, sheet or inter-observer agreement form) shall also be complemented with, any annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging,, note/s showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow, through, monitoring, etc.
Page 45 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note for SET B: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the, entire school year. In computing the rating for Quality, calculate the, average rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted RPMS, rating. See sample computation below:, Means of Verification, TRF 1, TRF 2, , RPMS 5-point, Scale Rating, 3, 4, , Average, 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499, , RPMS Rating for, Quality, 4, (Very Satisfactory)
Page 46 :
RPMS, RPMSPerformance, PerformanceObjective,, Objective,Indicators, Indicatorsand, andMOVs, MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 11. Adapted and implemented, learning programs that ensure, relevance and responsiveness, to the needs of all learners, , 1. Proof of evaluation* on the implementation of, the adapted / contextualized learning program, 2. Progress report on the implementation of the, adapted / contextualized learning program, 3. Accomplishment / completion / technical, report on the implementation of an adapted /, contextualized learning program, 4. Action plan / activity proposal / activity matrix, that shows an adapted / contextualized learning, program, , * Proof of evaluation may be the Individual Learning Monitoring Plan enclosed in DM-CI-2020-00162, (Suggested Strategies in Implementing Distance Learning Delivery Modalities (DLDM) for School Year 20202021) or any other similar/contextualized tool used by the school or prescribed by the DepEd Central Office Curriculum & Instruction Strand in succeeding issuances.
Page 47 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Learning programs are organized and sequenced set of strategies, activities and, tasks that effect learning (PPST, 2017) that may include, but not limited to, literacy, programs, numeracy programs, Strategic Intervention Materials (SIM), enrichment, programs, remediation programs, intervention modules, ALS modular programs,, SPED Individualized Education Programs (IEP), among others. A group of teachers or, an entire school may collaborate on a learning program. The implementor/s, themselves may also evaluate the effectiveness of their adapted / implemented, learning program.
Page 48 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 12. Utilized assessment data to, inform the modification of, teaching and learning practices, and programs, , A list of identified least / most mastered skills based on, the frequency of errors / correct responses with any of, the following supporting MOV, 1. accomplishment report for remedial / enhancement, activities (e.g., remedial sessions, Summer Reading, Camp, Phil-IRI-based reading program), 2. intervention material used for remediation /, reinforcement /, enhancement, 3. lesson plan/activity log for remediation / enhancement, utilizing of assessment data to modify teaching and, learning practices or programs
Page 49 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, , 13. Maintained learning, environments that are, responsive to community, contexts, , 1. Accomplishment report of a program / project /, activity that maintains a learning environment, 2. Program / Project / Activity plan on maintaining a, learning environment, 3. Minutes of a consultative meeting / community, stakeholders meeting about a program / project /, activity that maintains a learning environment, with proof of attendance, 4. Communication letter about a program / project /, activity that maintains a learning environment, , Learning environment is the classroom and other physical learning areas outside the classroom., Community contexts refer to situations and all the circumstances in which learners learn from instruction (PPST, 2017)., Community/wider school community refers to both internal and external stakeholders (PPST, 2017).
Page 50 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Notes:, This objective refers to classroom and school programs, projects, and activities that, enrich the learning environment and the wider school community’s engagement in, the educative process., A group of teachers or even the entire school may collaborate on a classroom/ school, program, project, or activity., Education can be conducted better by focusing on community and community building, and seeking ways in which community can improve student learning; one of which is by, “using community to improve pedagogical, curricular, and cocurricular environments”, (Bickford, D. & Wright, D., 2006)., , ●, , ●, , ●
Page 51 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , o, , o, , o, , Pedagogical approaches – active learning activities in class use cooperative, techniques; team-based projects are conducted outside class and culminate in, student-led presentations; classroom visitors such as civic leaders or alumni can, broaden classroom community and enrich discussion; learners meet with faculty in, office spaces that are easy to find and conducive to dialogue;, Curricular approaches – tutoring programs are offered for at-risk learners and, learners with learning needs; learner research projects culminate in school, presentations with appropriate grade/credit;, Cocurricular approaches – social and cultural activities explore and build on the, community’s heritage and mission; learners participate in volunteer work to expand, their understanding of social responsibilities and develop leadership skills; cocurricular activities involve students, faculty, and staff in shared dialogue; learners, participate in experiential learning opportunities and in campus management, decisions to create a sense of ownership and responsibility.
Page 52 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, 14. Reviewed regularly personal 1. Annotated video / audio recording of one’s teaching, that shows impact of regularly reviewing one’s teaching, teaching practice using existing, practice/s, laws and regulations that apply, 2. Annotated teaching material that shows impact of, to the teaching profession and, regularly reviewing one’s teaching practice/s, the responsibilities specified in, ● lesson plan, the Code of Ethics for, ● activity sheet, Professional, ● assessment materials, ● others (please specify), Teachers, 3. Personal reflection notes as outputs from participation, in review of personal teaching practices in four (4), quarters, 4. Proof of attendance (with date) in LAC or coaching and, mentoring sessions for review of personal teaching, practices
Page 53 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note:, • The video / audio recordings and teaching materials should be made by, the ratee and annotated based on how their use in the classroom shows, impact of regularly reviewing one’s teaching practice/s., • For Senior High School (SHS) teachers who follow a semestral structure,, MOV 3 will be two (2) reflection notes per semester.
Page 54 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, 1. Proof of participation / involvement in a school15. Complied with and, community partnership for the implementation of a, implemented school policies, school policy / procedure (e.g., certificate as committee, and procedures consistently to, member, narrative report), foster harmonious relationships, 2. Minutes of parent-teacher conference / stakeholders’, with learners, parents, and other, meeting about an implemented school policy /, stakeholders, procedure with proof of attendance, 3. Communication letter about an implemented school, policy / procedure sent to parent / guardian
Page 55 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, One (1) lesson plan with annotations explaining the, 16. Applied a personal, application of a learner-centered teaching philosophy, philosophy of teaching that is, (e.g., constructivism, existentialism) used as basis for, learner-centered, planning / designing the lesson, , Components of instruction – learning objectives, instructional activities, and assessments
Page 56 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, , 17. Adopted practices that, uphold the dignity of teaching as, a profession by exhibiting, qualities such as caring attitude,, respect and integrity, , 1. Documented feedback from superiors, colleagues, learners,, parents / guardian, or other stakeholders directly reflecting the, ratee’s good practices that uphold the dignity of teaching as a, profession, 2. Annotated evidence of practice indirectly linking to the, upholding of the dignity of teaching as a profession by exhibiting, qualities such as caring attitude, respect and integrity, ● Screenshot of text message / chat / email / any form of, communication with parents / guardian or learners (name or, any identifier removed), ● Remarks from mentor / master teacher / school head about, one’s qualities (e.g., entries in Performance Monitoring and, Coaching Form [PMCF] or in Mid-Year Review Form), ● Recognition from the school / school community about one’s, qualities, ● Others (please specify)
Page 57 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 5: Plus Factor, , 19. Performed various related, works / activities that contribute, to the teachinglearning process, , Any proof of:, ● committee involvement, ● advisorship of cocurricular activities, ● book or journal authorship / contributorship, ● coordinatorship / chairpersonship, ● coaching and mentoring learners in competitions, ● serving as reliever of classes in the absence of teachers, ● mentoring pre-service teachers, ● participation in demonstration teaching, ● participation as technical working group member, ● others (please specify and provide annotations)
Page 58 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy, , 1. Modelled effective, applications of content, knowledge within and across, curriculum teaching areas, , Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating, sheet from, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online teaching,, or two-way radio instruction), 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation of a, recorded video lesson or audio lesson that is, SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching* via, LAC, , with proof of attendance of colleague/s
Page 59 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , *For modular approach, demonstration teaching via LAC must reflect the, teaching-learning process in the said modality. The MOV (COT rating sheet, or inter-observer agreement form) shall also be complemented with any, annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging, note/s, showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow through,, monitoring, etc.
Page 60 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 7, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 6, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 61 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy, , 2. Evaluated with colleagues the, effectiveness of teaching, strategies that promote, learner achievement, in literacy and numeracy, , *If the supplementary material is a, , product of a group work / collaborative, effort of two (2) or more teachers,, ratee should specify and provide, annotations of one’s contribution to a, material., , Any supplementary material (in print / digital format), made by the ratee* and used in the lesson delivery that, highlights teaching strategies that promote learner, achievement in literacy and numeracy, ● activity sheet/s, ●, ●, ●, ●, ●, , one lesson from a self-learning module (SLM), lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and the, likes), video lesson, audio lesson, other learning materials in print / digital format (please specify and, provide annotations), , with minutes of focus group discussion (FGD) with fellow, mentors or minutes of coaching and mentoring session, with teachers that show evaluated teaching strategies that, promote learner achievement in literacy and numeracy
Page 62 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality, calculate the average rating of the two MOV and, find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sample computation below:, Means of Verification, MOV 1: Activity Sheet with minutes of FGD, MOV 2: Lesson Plan with minutes of coaching and mentoring, , RPMS 5-point, Scale Rating, 3, 4, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499, , Average, 3.500, , RPMS Rating for, Quality, 4, (Very Satisfactory)
Page 63 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy, , Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating, 3. Modelled and supported, sheet, from, colleagues in the proficient use, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching, of Mother Tongue, Filipino and, (limited face-to-face teaching, online, English to improve teaching and, teaching, or two-way radio instruction), learning, as well as to develop, learners’ pride of their language, 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation, heritage and culture., of a recorded video lesson or audio lesson, that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching*, via LAC, with proof of attendance of colleague/s
Page 64 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , *For modular approach, demonstration teaching via LAC must reflect the, teaching-learning process in the said modality. The MOV (COT rating sheet, or inter-observer agreement form) shall also be complemented with any, annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging, note/s, showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow through,, monitoring, etc.
Page 65 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 7, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 6, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 66 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy, , 4. Displayed a wide range of, effective verbal and non-verbal, classroom communication, strategies to support learner, understanding, participation,, engagement and achievement, , Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating, sheet from, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online, teaching, or two-way radio instruction), 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation, of a recorded video lesson or audio lesson, that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching*, via LAC, with proof of attendance of colleague/s
Page 67 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , *For modular approach, demonstration teaching via LAC must reflect the, teaching-learning process in the said modality. The MOV (COT rating sheet, or inter-observer agreement form) shall also be complemented with any, annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging, note/s, showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow through,, monitoring, etc.
Page 68 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 7, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 6, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 69 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 2: Learning Area, , 5. Exhibited effective strategies, that ensure safe and secure, learning environments to, enhance learning through the, consistent implementation of, policies, guidelines and, procedures, , Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating, sheet from, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching, (limited face-to-face teaching, online, teaching, or two-way radio instruction), 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation, of a recorded video lesson or audio lesson, that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching*, via LAC, with proof of attendance of colleague/s
Page 70 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , *For modular approach, demonstration teaching via LAC must reflect the, teaching-learning process in the said modality. The MOV (COT rating sheet, or inter-observer agreement form) shall also be complemented with any, annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging, note/s, showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow through,, monitoring, etc.
Page 71 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 7, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 6, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 72 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 2: Learning Area, , Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating, 6. Exhibited effective practices to, sheet, from, foster learning environments, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching, that promote fairness, respect, (limited face-to-face teaching, online, and care to encourage learning, teaching, or two-way radio instruction), 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation, of a recorded video lesson or audio lesson, that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an, observation of a demonstration teaching*, via LAC, with proof of attendance of colleague/s
Page 73 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , *For modular approach, demonstration teaching via LAC must reflect the, teaching-learning process in the said modality. The MOV (COT rating sheet, or inter-observer agreement form) shall also be complemented with any, annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging, note/s, showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow through,, monitoring, etc.
Page 74 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 7, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 6, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 75 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 2: Learning Area, , 7. Worked with colleagues to, share successful strategies that, sustain supportive learning, environments that nurture and, inspire learners to, participate, cooperate and, collaborate in continued learning, , Any supplementary material (in print / digital format) made by, the ratee* and used in the lesson delivery that highlights, successful strategies that sustain supportive learning, environments that nurture and inspire learners to participate,, cooperate and collaborate in continued learning, ● activity sheet/s, ● one lesson from a self-learning module (SLM), ● Lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson, Exemplars, and the likes), ● video lesson, ● audio lesson, ● other learning materials in print / digital format (please, specify and provide annotations), with minutes of focus group discussion (FGD) with fellow, mentors or minutes of coaching and mentoring session with, teachers that show sharing of strategies for increased learner, participation, cooperation, and collaboration
Page 76 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, Elements of collaborative learning – positive interdependence, individual accountability, and shared authority in assessing and, facilitating one’s learning., *If the supplementary material is a product of a group work / collaborative effort of two (2) or more teachers, ratee should specify, and provide annotations of one’s contribution to a material., Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the rating for Quality, calculate the average, rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sample computation below:, Means of Verification, MOV 1: Activity Sheet with minutes of FGD, MOV 2: Lesson Plan with minutes of coaching and mentoring, , RPMS 5-point, Scale Rating, 3, 4, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499, , Average, 3.500, , RPMS Rating for, Quality, 4, (Very Satisfactory)
Page 77 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 9. Assisted colleagues to design, SET A, Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet from, adapt and implement teaching, strategies that are responsive to 1. an observation of synchronous teaching (limited, face-to-face teaching, online teaching, or two-way, learners with disabilities,, radio instruction), giftedness and talents, 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation of a, recorded video lesson or audio lesson that is SLMbased or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an observation, of a demonstration teaching* via LAC, with proof of attendance of colleague/s
Page 78 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , *For modular approach, demonstration teaching via LAC must reflect the, teaching-learning process in the said modality. The MOV (COT rating sheet, or inter-observer agreement form) shall also be complemented with any, annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging, note/s, showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow through,, monitoring, etc.
Page 79 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 7, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 6, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 80 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 9. Assisted colleagues to design,, adapt and implement teaching, strategies that are responsive to, learners with disabilities,, giftedness and talents, , SET B, Teacher Reflection Form (TRF) on assisting, colleagues in designing, adapting, and/or, implementing teaching strategies that are, responsive to learners with disabilities,, giftedness and talents and a certification, from the school head that the ratee’s classes, have no identified learner/s with, disabilities, giftedness and/or talents
Page 81 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , “Learners with disability, giftedness and talents” is operationally defined as persons 1) who are, gifted or talented and those 2) who have physical, mental, social, or sensory impairment., ●, , ●, , ●, , ●, , These persons may be gifted/talented, a fast learner, mentally retarded, visually impaired, hearing, impaired, with behavior problems, orthopedically handicapped, with special health problems,, learning disabled, speech impaired, multiple handicapped (DO 117, s. 1987)., “Disability shall mean a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more, psychological, physiological or anatomical function of an individual or activities of such individual.”, (RA 7277), “Students with gifts and talents perform - or have the capability to perform - at higher levels, compared to others of the same age, experience, and environment in one or more domains. They, require modification(s) to their educational experience(s) to learn and realize their potential.”, (National Association for Gifted Children, 2019), For reference, other issuances that relate to learners with disability, giftedness and talents are: DECS, Order 26, s.1997 or the Institutionalization of SPED Programs in All Schools, and DepEd Order No., 72, s. 2009 or the Inclusive Education as Strategy for Increasing Participation Rate of Children.
Page 82 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note for SET B: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the, entire school year. In computing the rating for Quality, calculate the, average rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted RPMS, rating. See sample computation below:, Means of Verification, TRF 1, , RPMS 5-point, Scale Rating, 3, , TRF 2, , 4, , Average, 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499, , RPMS Rating for, Quality, 4, (Very Satisfactory)
Page 83 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 10. Developed and applied, teaching strategies to address, effectively the needs of learners, from indigenous groups, , SET A, Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet from, 1. an observation of synchronous teaching (limited, face-to-face teaching, online teaching, or two-way, radio instruction), 2. if option 1 is not possible, an observation of a, recorded video lesson or audio lesson that is SLMbased or MELC-aligned, 3. if options 1 and 2 are not possible, an observation, of a demonstration teaching* via LAC, with proof of attendance of colleague/s
Page 84 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , *For modular approach, demonstration teaching via LAC must reflect the, teaching-learning process in the said modality. The MOV (COT rating sheet, or inter-observer agreement form) shall also be complemented with any, annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging, note/s, showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow through,, monitoring, etc.
Page 85 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In, computing the rating for Quality:, (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;, (ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and, (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating., Means of, , COT, , RPMS 5-point, , Verification, , Rating, , Scale Rating, , COT Rating Sheet 1, , 7, , 4, , COT Rating Sheet 2, , 6, , 3, , RPMS Rating for, Average, , Quality, 4, , 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, , (Very, , Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory), , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499
Page 86 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 10. Developed and applied, teaching strategies to address, effectively the needs of learners, from indigenous groups, , SET B, Teacher Reflection Form (TRF) on assisting, colleagues in designing, adapting, and/or, implementing teaching strategies that are, responsive to learners with disabilities,, giftedness and talents and a certification from, the school head that the ratee’s classes have, no identified learner/s with, disabilities, giftedness and/or talents
Page 87 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , “Learners from indigenous groups” is operationally defined as people who, have, under claims of ownership since time immemorial, occupied,, possessed, and utilized ancestral territories, shared common bonds of, language, customs, traditions, and other unique cultural traits (RA 8371 or, IPRA of 1997)., *For modular approach, demonstration teaching via LAC must reflect the, teaching-learning process in the said modality. The MOV (COT rating, sheet or inter-observer agreement form) shall also be complemented with, any annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging,, note/s showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow, through, monitoring, etc.
Page 88 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , Note for SET B: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the, entire school year. In computing the rating for Quality, calculate the, average rating of the two MOV and find the transmuted RPMS, rating. See sample computation below:, Means of Verification, TRF 1, , RPMS 5-point, Scale Rating, 3, , TRF 2, , 4, , Average, 3.500, , RPMS Rating Transmutation, Table, Outstanding (5), 4.500-5.000, Very Satisfactory (4), , 3.500-4.499, , Satisfactory (3), , 2.500-3.499, , Unsatisfactory (2), , 1.500-2.499, , Poor (1), , 1.000-1.499, , RPMS Rating for, Quality, 4, (Very Satisfactory)
Page 89 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 1. New / improved design of learning, 11. Worked collaboratively with, colleagues to evaluate the, programs, design of learning programs that 2. Detailed recommendations on the design, develop the knowledge, of learning programs, and skills of learners at different 3. Synthesis of the evaluation of the learning, ability levels, programs, 4. Own evaluation of the existing learning, programs, , Learning programs are organized and sequenced set of strategies, activities and tasks that effect learning (PPST, 2017), that may include, but not limited to, literacy programs, numeracy programs, Strategic Intervention Materials (SIM),, enrichment programs, remediation programs, intervention modules, ALS modular programs, SPED Individualized, Education Programs (IEP), among others.
Page 90 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 3: Diversity of Learners, Curriculum and Planning, & Assessment and Reporting, , 12. Worked collaboratively with, colleagues to analyze and, utilize assessment data to, modify practices and programs, to further support learner, progress and achievement, , Accomplished LAC plan anchored with the school LAC plan (Annex 1, of DO 35, s. 2016) to analyze and utilize assessment data to modify, practice and/or program to further support learner progress and, achievement with any 1 used in the implementation of the LAC plan, ● minutes of LAC session on the analysis of assessment data to modify teaching, ●, ●, , ●, ●, , ●, , practices and programs, any proof of collaborative review of learner assessment data, lesson plan with accomplished part VI: Reflection and Index of Mastery, o, test item analysis, o, list of identified least mastered skills based on frequency of errors /, correct responses, o intervention / remediation / enhancement / enrichment plan, any proof of collaborative review of intervention materials developed for, remediation / enhancement, accomplishment report of intervention / remediation / enhancement /, enrichment activities (e.g., remedial sessions, Summer Reading Camp, PhilIRI-based program), others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Page 91 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, 1. Synthesis of evaluation of a program / project / activity, 13. Reflected on and evaluated, that maintains the learning environment responsive to, learning environments that are, community, contexts, responsive to community, 2. Minutes of consultative meeting with parents / other, contexts, external stakeholders on programs, projects, and/or, activities that maintain a learning environment,, highlighting the evaluations made, with proof of, attendance, 3. Minutes of focus group discussion (FGD) with teachers on a, program / project / activity that maintains a learning, environment, highlighting the evaluations made, with, proof of attendance, 4. Survey on programs / projects / activities that maintain a, learning environment
Page 92 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, , 1. Minutes of LAC sessions / professional meetings to, 14. Discussed with colleagues, discuss the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers, teaching and learning practices, and the reviewed annotated evidence of practice of, that apply existing codes, laws, colleagues, and regulations that apply to the, 2. Minutes of LAC sessions / professional meetings to, teaching profession, and the, discuss the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers, responsibilities specified in the, and the reviewed personal reflection notes of, Code of Ethics for Professional, colleagues, Teachers, 3. Minutes of LAC sessions / professional meetings to, discuss the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers, 4. Activity proposal / Learning Action Cell (LAC) Plan, (refer to Annex 1 of DO 35, s. 2016) to discuss the, Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers
Page 93 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, 15. Exhibited commitment to and 1. Evaluation report on the implementation of school policies, / procedures or minutes of subject area / grade level, supported teachers in the, meetings, or, professional, meetings, on, evaluating, school, implementation of school, policies/procedures, policies and procedures to, 2. Minutes of subject area / grade level meetings or, foster harmonious relationships, professional meetings on the implementation progress of, with learners, parents and other, school policies / procedures [provide at least 2 to show, stakeholders, discussions held], 3. Minutes of subject area / grade level meeting or, professional meeting on disseminating information and, implementing school policies / procedures [provide at least, 2 to show discussions held], 4. Proof of implementation of school policies and procedures
Page 94 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, , 16. Manifested a learner-centered 1. Sample lesson plans of colleague/s with annotations, about enhancing their learner-centered teaching, teaching philosophy in various, philosophy, aspects of practice and support, 2. Minutes of LAC session/s about enhancing teachers’, colleagues in enhancing their, learner-centered teaching philosophy through, own learner-centered teaching, lesson planning, philosophy, 3. LAC plan (refer to Annex 1 of DO 35, s. 2016) that, details supporting teachers in enhancing their, learner-centered teaching philosophy through, lesson planning, 4. Lesson plan exemplar used during a Learning Action, Cell (LAC) session
Page 95 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, , 17. Identified and utilized, personal professional strengths, to uphold the dignity of teaching, as a profession to help build a, positive teaching and learning, culture within the school, , 1. Performance Coaching and Mentoring Form (PMCF) showing guidance, given to teachers and remarks in terms of upholding the dignity of, teaching, 2. Documented feedback from superiors, colleagues, learners, parents /, guardian, or other stakeholders directly reflecting the ratee’s good, practices that uphold the dignity of teaching as a profession, 3. Annotated evidence of practice indirectly linking to the upholding of the, dignity of teaching as a profession, ● screenshot of text message / chat / email / any form of, communication with parents / guardian or learners (name or any, identifier removed), ● remarks from superior / school head about one’s personal, professional qualities (e.g., entries in Performance Monitoring and, Coaching Form [PMCF] or in Mid-Year Review Form), ● recognition from the school / school community about one’s qualities, ● others (please specify), 4. Personal notes on one’s personal professional strengths
Page 96 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, , 18. Reflected on the Philippine, Professional Standards for, Teachers to plan personal, professional development goals, and assist colleagues in, planning and achieving their own, goals, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II, Mid-year Review Form (MRF), Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form (PMCF), IPCRF-DP, Certification from the ICT Coordinator / School Head, / Focal Person in charge of e-SAT and IPCRF-DP
Page 97 :
RPMS Performance Objective, Indicators and MOVs, , KRA 4: Community Linkages and Professional Engagement & Personal Growth and Professional, Development, Any proof that the master teacher:, 19. Performed various related, ●, served as facilitator / speaker, works/activities that contribute, , to the teaching-learning process, , ●, ●, ●, ●, ●, ●, , ●, ●, ●, ●, ●, ●, ●, , served as demonstration teacher, served as a member of the technical working group, served as OIC in the absence of the principal, represented the principal in meetings and conference, observed classes of Teachers I-III, assisted the school selection committee in the evaluation of, credentials when hiring or promoting teachers, served in a committee, served as adviser to cocurricular activities, served as coordinator / chairperson, authored / contributed to a book or journal, coached and mentored learners in competitions, mentored pre-service / in-service teachers, others (please specify and provide annotations)
Page 98 :
General Guidelines for the RPMS Alternative Classroom Observation
Page 99 :
General Guidelines for the RPMS Alternative Classroom Observation
Page 100 :
General Guidelines for the RPMS Alternative Classroom Observation
Page 101 :
General Guidelines for the RPMS Alternative Classroom Observation
Page 102 :
General Guidelines for the RPMS Alternative Classroom Observation
Page 103 :
General Guidelines for the RPMS Alternative Classroom Observation
Page 104 :
General Guidelines for the RPMS Alternative Classroom Observation
Page 106 :
Self-Assessment Tools
Page 107 :
Classroom Observation Tools
Page 110 :
Frequently Ask Questions, , Q: What are the alternative classroom observations for SY 2021-2022?, A: There are 3 modes of observation for SY 2021-2022 namely, online, observation (option 1), observation of a video lesson (option 2), and, observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC (option 3).
Page 111 :
Frequently Ask Questions, , Q: Who/what will determine the mode of observation?, A: The modality adopted by the teacher will determine the mode of, observation.
Page 112 :
Frequently Ask Questions, , Q: I will adopt 2-3 learning modalities (blended learning) for the school year., What do I consider for observation?, A: If online synchronous is one of your modalities, take option 1, (online observation) as the sole mode of observation. If online, asynchronous is one of your modalities and online synchronous is not, possible, take option 2 (observation of a video lesson). If online, learning (synchronous or asynchronous) is neither of your modalities,, take option 3 (observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC).
Page 113 :
Frequently Ask Questions, , Q: Can I shift between modes of observation?, A: No. Use only one mode of observation for the entire year.
Page 114 :
Frequently Ask Questions, , Q: How many observations are required for SY 2021-2022?, A: Only 2 observations are required.
Page 115 :
Frequently Ask Questions, Observation of a video lesson, , Q: How do I create a video lesson?, A: You record yourself while teaching a lesson using any video, recording device.
Page 116 :
Frequently Ask Questions, Observation of a video lesson, , Q: Can I submit a video lesson that is not used in any of my classes?, A: No. A video lesson must have been used in your lesson delivery as, part of your supplementary materials or as one of your learning, materials for online asynchronous learning.
Page 117 :
Frequently Ask Questions, Observation of a video lesson, , Q: Is the video lesson used for TV-based instruction?, A: No. The video lesson is a teacher-made learning material used for, online asynchronous learning.
Page 118 :
Frequently Ask Questions, Observation of a video lesson, , Q: How do I let my observers access my video lesson intended for, observation?, A: Give your observers access to the storage cloud (e.g., Google, Drive) or any storage device (e.g., flash drive) where the video lesson, is saved. You can also give access to your online classroom (e.g.,, Google Classroom) or a Learning Management System where the, video lesson is uploaded.
Page 119 :
Frequently Ask Questions, Observation of a demonstration teaching via Learning Action Cell (LAC), , Q: In what learning modality does observation of a demonstration teaching, via Learning Action Cell (LAC) apply?, A: This mode of observation applies to purely modular learning, (print/digital), radio-based instruction, and TV-based instruction.
Page 120 :
Frequently Ask Questions, Observation of a demonstration teaching via Learning Action Cell (LAC), , Q: Why is LAC utilized for teaching observation?, A: This may be the best time to use LAC as an opportunity for both, ratees and observers to discuss collegially strategies in improving the, teaching and learning processes especially in addressing challenges, in learning delivery brought by the pandemic.
