Page 1 : ee, , OURCHS OF avis ‘, TTERATURE RE ¥ 105, , SOURCES OF LITERATURE REVIEW, , Literature can be reviewed from two main sources, Le. primary and econdar ur, however, literature review mostly relies on primary source, , Primary Sources, , Primary sources are original, peer-reviewed, and published research journal artic les. rey, by original researchers. In other words, primary sources are the research reports, hi hare, “gestription of studies written by researchers who conducted them. A primary ne eisw, ten by a person who developed the theory or conducted the researe h, or is the descrig, of an investigation written by the person who conducted it. Most primary source 4, in published literature; for example, a nursing research article. A credible literature ©, reflects the use of mainly primary sources., , , , , , , , , , An original qualitative study on patient ex- _ patients Journal of Nursing Scholarshsp, periences in the ICU: Hupcey, J. E. (2000). 361-367., Feeling safe: the psychosocial needs of ICU, , , , , , Secondary Sources, , ——————, , Secondary source research documents are description of studies.prepared by som, other than the original researcher. They are written by people other than the indivi, who developed the theory or conducted the research. The secondary sources inclucie, the comments and summaries of multiple research studies on one topic, e.g. system, reviews, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, etc. Secondary sources are usually paraphrased, and may be based on the secondary author's interpretation of the primary work; itis, necessary then to review primary source whenever possible to ensure accuracy. However, be used when primary sources are not available or if research, the secondary sources may, ers want external opinions on an issue or problem or even the results of their own research, , , , , , , , , , , , , , intensive care unit: a select literature, , A literature review on patient experiences in, American Journal of Critical Care, 9, 20-27, , the ICU: Stein-Parbury, J. & Mckinley, 8., (2000). Patient experiences of being in an, , can be searched are as follows (Fig. 5.1):, , literature search has revolutionized the review, , The main sources from where literature, , 1. Herronie sources; Computer-assisted literatut \ 1, of literature. These searchés, however, for a variety of reasons may not provide the, , ”, , I. FUNDAMENTALS OF NURSING RESEARCH