Page 2 :
www.wadsworth.com, www.wadsworth.com is the World Wide Web site for Thomson, Wadsworth and is your direct source to dozens of online resources., At www.wadsworth.com you can find out about supplements,, demonstration software, and student resources. You can also send, e-mail to many of our authors and preview new publications and, exciting new technologies., www.wadsworth.com, Changing the way the world learns®

Page 3 :
WAYNE WEITEN is a graduate of Bradley University and received his Ph.D. in social, psychology from the University of Illinois, Chicago in 1981. He currently teaches at the, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. He has received distinguished teaching awards from Division Two of the American Psychological Association (APA) and from the College of, DuPage, where he taught until 1991. He is a Fellow of Divisions 1 and 2 of the American, Psychological Association. In 1991, he helped chair the APA National Conference on Enhancing the Quality of Undergraduate Education in Psychology and in 1996–1997 he, served as President of the Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Weiten has conducted, research on a wide range of topics, including educational measurement, jury decisionmaking, attribution theory, stress, and cerebral specialization. His recent interests have, included pressure as a form of stress and the technology of textbooks. He is also the author of Psychology: Themes & Variations (Wadsworth, 2004) and the creator of an educational CD-ROM titled PsykTrek: A Multimedia Introduction to Psychology., MARGARET (MARKY) A. LLOYD received her B.A. from the University of Denver and, her M.A. and Ph.D. in psychology from the University of Arizona. She is the author of, Adolescence (Harper and Row, 1985). She has served as chair of the psychology departments at Suffolk University and Georgia Southern University and is the founding Chair, of the Council for Undergraduate Psychology Programs. She is a past President of the, Society for the Teaching of Psychology (Division 2 of the American Psychological Association), past Executive Director of the Society’s Office of Teaching Resources in Psychology, and currently serves on APA’s Council of Representatives for the Society. She is, Emerita Professor and Chair of Psychology at Georgia Southern University and a recipient of that institution’s Award for Excellence for Contributions to Instruction.

Page 4 :
EIGHTH EDITION, , Psychology, Applied to, Modern Life, ADJUSTMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, , WAYNE WEITEN, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, , MARGARET A. LLOYD, Georgia Southern University, , Australia • Brazil • Canada • Mexico • Singapore, Spain • United Kingdom • United States

Page 5 :
To two pillars of stability in this era of turmoil—my parents, W.W., To the memory of my mother and father—models of integrity and courage, M.A.L., , Psychology Applied to Modern Life: Adjustment in the 21st Century, Eighth Edition, Wayne Weiten and Margaret A. Lloyd, , Senior Acquisitions Editor, Psychology: Michele Sordi, Development Editor: Jennifer Wilkinson, Assistant Editor: Jennifer Keever, Editorial Assistant: Jessica Kim, Technology Project Manager: Erik Fortier, Marketing Manager: Dory Schaeffer, Marketing Assistant: Nicole Morinon, Marketing Communications Manager: Tami Strang, Project Manager, Editorial Production: Jennie Redwitz, Creative Director: Rob Hugel, Art Director: Vernon Boes, Print Buyer: Barbara Britton, , Permissions Editor: Linda L. Rill, Production Service: Tom Dorsaneo, Text Designer: Linda Beaupre, Photo Researcher: Linda L. Rill, Copy Editor: Jackie Estrada, Illustrator: Carol Zuber-Mallison, Cover Designer: Irene Morris, Cover Images: “Clock Parts Face,” Pete McArthur; “Looking for, Solutions” © Pierre-Yves Goavec/Getty Images Inc., Compositor: Thompson Type, Text and Cover Printer: Transcontinental Printing/Interglobe, , © 2006 Thomson Wadsworth, a part of The Thomson Corporation., Thomson, the Star logo, and Wadsworth are trademarks used herein, under license., , Thomson Higher Education, 10 Davis Drive, Belmont, CA 94002-3098, USA, , ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any meansgraphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording,, taping, Web distribution, information storage and retrieval systems, or, in any other manner-without the written permission of the publisher., Printed in Canada, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 09 08 07 06 05, ExamView® and ExamView Pro® are registered trademarks of, FSCreations, Inc. Windows is a registered trademark of the Microsoft, Corporation used herein under license. Macintosh and Power, Macintosh are registered trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc., Used herein under license., © 2006 Thomson Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Thomson Learning WebTutor™ is a trademark of Thomson Learning, Inc., Library of Congress Control Number: 2005921490, Student Edition: ISBN 0-534-60859-0, , For more information about our products, contact us at:, Thomson Learning Academic Resource Center, 1-800-423-0563, For permission to use material from this text or product,, submit a request online at, http://www.thomsonrights.com., Any additional questions about permissions can be, submitted by email to [email protected].

Page 6 :
To the Instructor, Many students enter adjustment courses with great expectations. They’ve ambled through their local bookstores, and in the “Psychology” section they’ve seen numerous self-help books that offer highly touted recipes, for achieving happiness for a mere $12.95. After paying, far more money to enroll in a college course that deals, with the same issues as the self-help books, many students expect a revelatory experience. However, the majority of us with professional training in psychology or, counseling take a rather dim view of self-help books and, the pop psychology they represent. Psychologists tend to, see this literature as oversimplified, intellectually dishonest, and opportunistic and often summarily dismiss the, pop psychology that so many students have embraced., Instructors try to supplant pop psychology with more sophisticated academic psychology, which is more complex, and less accessible., In this textbook, we have tried to come to grips with, this problem of differing expectations between student, and teacher. Our goal has been to produce a comprehensive, serious, research-oriented treatment of the topic of, adjustment that also acknowledges the existence of popular psychology and looks critically at its contributions., Our approach involves the following:, ■ In Chapter 1 we confront the phenomenon of popular self-help books. We try to take the student beneath, the seductive surface of such books and analyze some of, their typical flaws. Our goal is to make the student a more, critical consumer of this type of literature., ■ While encouraging a more critical attitude toward, self-help books, we do not suggest that they should all be, dismissed. Instead, we acknowledge that some of them, offer authentic insights. With this in mind, we highlight, some of the better books in Recommended Reading boxes, sprinkled throughout the text. These recommended books, tie in with the adjacent topical coverage and show the, student the interface between academic and popular, psychology., ■ We try to provide the student with a better appreciation of the merits of the empirical approach. This effort, to clarify the role of research, which is rare for an adjustment text, appears in the first chapter., ■ Recognizing that adjustment students want to leave, the course with concrete, personally useful information,, we end each chapter with an application section. The Applications are “how to” discussions that address everyday, problems. While they focus on issues that are relevant to, the content of the particular chapter, they contain more, explicit advice than the text proper., , In summary, we have tried to make this book both, rigorous and applied. We hope that our approach will, help students to better appreciate the value of scientific, psychology., , Philosophy, A certain philosophy is inherent in any systematic treatment of the topic of adjustment. Our philosophy can be, summarized as follows:, ■ We believe that an adjustment text should be a resource book for students. We have tried to design this, book so that it encourages and facilitates the pursuit of, additional information on adjustment-related topics. It, should serve as a point of departure for more learning., ■ We believe in theoretical eclecticism. This book will, not indoctrinate your students along the lines of any, single theoretical orientation. The psychodynamic, behavioral, and humanistic schools of thought are all treated, with respect, as are cognitive, biological, evolutionary,, and other perspectives., ■ We believe that effective adjustment requires taking, charge of one’s own life. Throughout the book we try to, promote the notion that active coping efforts are generally superior to passivity and complacency., , Changes in the Eighth Edition, One of the exciting things about psychology is that it is not, a stagnant discipline. It continues to progress at what, seems a faster and faster pace. A good textbook must evolve, with the discipline. Although the professors and students, who used the earlier editions of this book did not clamor, for change, we’ve made some significant alterations., For example, we have implemented an entirely new, design that is intended to be more open and friendly, looking. All of the figures in the book have been redrawn., This process has allowed us to achieve greater consistency, in style, make the graphics more attractive and modern, looking, and enhance the pedagogical clarity of many figures. Color has been added to the integrated running, glossary to make this pedagogical feature more prominent, and the look of the Applications has been changed, so that students will no longer wonder whether these elements are an integral part of the chapters. And, of course,, we have made countless content changes to keep up with, new developments in psychology—adding and deleting, some topics, condensing and reorganizing others, and, updating everything (there are 1198 new references)., , To t h e I n s t r u c t o r, , v

Page 7 :
The principal other change is the addition of boxes, called “Living in Today’s World.” These features were, originally developed in the previous edition to address issues that surfaced in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist, attacks in the United States (they were called Sidebars on, Current Events). Continuing in this vein, many of the, boxes in this edition deal with concerns raised by the ongoing specter of terrorism in today’s world. For example,, we discuss how people tend to be affected by traumatic, events, how people can cope more effectively with personal trauma, and how people can think more rationally, about the threat of terrorism. However, in this edition we, have broadened the scope of coverage in this series of, boxes to include additional adjustment issues that are especially pertinent in light of current events, such as the, controversy over whether the government should promote marriage and problems associated with living up to, today’s unrealistic ideals of physical attractiveness., , Writing Style, This book has been written with the student reader in, mind. We have tried to integrate the technical jargon of, our discipline into a relatively informal and down-toearth writing style. We use concrete examples extensively, to clarify complex concepts and to help maintain student, interest., , Features, This text contains a number of features intended to stimulate interest and enhance students’ learning. These special features include Applications, Recommended Reading boxes, Internet-related features, Practice Tests, a, didactic illustration program, and cartoons., Applications, , The Applications should be of special interest to most, students. They are tied to chapter content in a way that, should show students how practical applications emerge, out of theory and research. Although some of the material covered in these sections shows up frequently in adjustment texts, much of it is unique. Some of the Applications include the following:, ■, ■, ■, ■, ■, ■, ■, , Understanding Intimate Violence, Monitoring Your Stress, Understanding Eating Disorders, Getting Ahead in the Job Game, Building Self-Esteem, Enhancing Sexual Relationships, Bridging the Gender Gap in Communication, , Recommended Reading Boxes, , Recognizing students’ interest in self-help books, we have, sifted through hundreds of them to identify some that, may be especially useful. These books are featured in, boxes that briefly review some of the higher-quality books., vi, , To t h e I n s t r u c t o r, , These Recommended Reading boxes are placed where, they are germane to the material being covered in the, text. Some of the recommended books are well known,, while others are obscure. Although we make it clear that, we don’t endorse every idea in every book, we think they, all have something worthwhile to offer. This feature replaces the conventional suggested readings lists that usually appear at the ends of chapters, where they are almost, universally ignored by students., Internet-Related Features, , The Internet is rapidly altering the landscape of modern, life, and students clearly need help dealing with the information explosion in cyberspace. To assist them, we, have included two features. First, we recruited web expert, Vincent Hevern to write a concise essay that explains the, essentials of the Internet to the uninitiated. This essay,, which appears in the front of the book, briefly explains, URLs, domain names, hyperlinks, search engines, and so, forth. It also provides students with realistic warnings, about the instability of URLs and the questionable validity of much of the information available on the web. Second, we also asked Professor Hevern to evaluate hundreds, of psychology- and adjustment-related sites on the web, and come up with some recommended sites that appear, to provide reasonably accurate, balanced, and empirically, sound information. Short descriptions of these recommended websites are dispersed throughout the chapters,, adjacent to related topical coverage. Because URLs change, frequently, we have not included the URLs for the Web, Links in the book. Insofar as students are interested in visiting these sites, we recommend that they do so through the, Psychology Applied to Modern Life home page at the Wadsworth Psychology Website (http://psychology.wadsworth., com/weiten_lloyd8e). Links to all the recommended websites are maintained there, and the Wadsworth webmaster will periodically update the URLs. Of course, students, can also use search engines such as Google to locate the, recommended websites., Practice Tests, , Each chapter ends with a ten-item multiple-choice Practice Test that should give students a fairly realistic assessment of their mastery of that chapter and valuable practice, in taking the type of test that many of them will face in the, classroom (if the instructor uses the Test Bank). This feature grew out of some research on students’ use of textbook, pedagogical devices (see Weiten, Guadagno, & Beck, 1996)., This research indicated that students pay scant attention to, some standard pedagogical devices. When students were, grilled to gain a better understanding of this perplexing, finding, it quickly became apparent that students are pragmatic about pedagogy. Essentially, their refrain was, “We, want study aids that will help us pass the next test.” With, this mandate in mind, we added the Practice Tests. They, should be very realistic, as many of the items came from, the Test Bank for previous editions (these items do not appear in the Test Bank for the current edition).

Page 8 :
Didactic Illustration Program, , The illustration program is once again in full color, and, many new figures have been added along with the redrawing of all the graphics. Although the illustrations are, intended to make the book attractive and to help maintain student interest, they are not merely decorative: They, have been carefully selected and crafted for their didactic, value to enhance the educational goals of the text., Cartoons, , A little comic relief usually helps keep a student interested, so we’ve sprinkled numerous cartoons throughout, the book. Like the figures, most of these have been chosen to reinforce ideas in the text., , Learning Aids, Because this book is rigorous, substantive, and sizable, a, number of learning aids have been incorporated into the, text to help the reader digest the wealth of material:, ■ The outline at the beginning of each chapter provides the student with a preview and overview of what, will be covered., ■ Headings are used extensively to keep material well, organized., ■ To help alert your students to key points, learning, objectives are distributed throughout the chapters, after, the level-1 headings., ■ Key terms are identified with blue italicized boldface type to indicate that these are important vocabulary, items that are part of psychology’s technical language., ■ An integrated running glossary provides an on-thespot definition of each key term as it is introduced in the, text. These formal definitions are printed in blue boldface type., ■ An alphabetical glossary is found in the back of the, book, as key terms are usually defined in the integrated, running glossary only when they are first introduced., ■ Italics are used liberally throughout the text to emphasize important points., ■ A chapter review is found at the end of each chapter., Each review includes a concise but thorough summary of, the chapter’s key ideas, a list of the key terms that were, introduced in the chapter, and a list of important theorists and researchers who were discussed in the chapter., , educational endeavors. It provides a thorough overview, of each chapter, along with a list of relevant films and InfoTrac College Edition® integration. It also includes a, wealth of suggestions for lecture topics, class demonstrations, exercises, and discussion questions, organized, around the content of each chapter in the text., Test Bank (0-495-03029-5), , The Test Bank, written by Mary Ann Valentino of Fresno, City College and David Ward of Arkansas Tech University,, contains an extensive collection of multiple-choice questions for objective tests, all closely tied to the learning objectives found in the text chapters. We’re confident that, you will find this to be a dependable and usable test bank., ExamView® Computerized Testing, (0-495-00418-9), , Windows®/Macintosh® CD-ROM, Preloaded with all of the questions in the Test Bank, ExamView allows you to create, deliver, and customize tests, and study guides (both print and online) in minutes. ExamView offers both a Quick Test Wizard and an Online, Test Wizard that guides you step by step through the, process of creating tests, while its unique “what you see is, what you get” capability allows you to see the test you are, creating onscreen exactly as it will print or display online. You can build tests of up to 250 questions using up, to 12 question types. Using ExamView’s complete wordprocessing capabilities, you can enter an unlimited number of new questions or edit existing questions., Multimedia Manager Instructor’s, Resource CD-ROM (0-534-24863-2), , This one-stop lecture and class preparation tool makes it, easy for you to assemble, edit, publish, and present custom lectures for your course, using Microsoft® PowerPoint®. The Multimedia Manager lets you bring together, text-specific lecture outlines, written by Lisa Garner of, Tallahassee Community College, and art from the text,, along with video and animations from the web or your, own materials—culminating in a powerful, personalized,, media-enhanced presentation. The CD-ROM also contains the full Instructor’s Manual, Test Bank, and other, instructor resources., Transparency Acetates Set (0-495-03028-7), , Supplementary Materials, A complete teaching/learning package has been developed to supplement Psychology Applied to Modern Life., These supplementary materials have been carefully coordinated to provide effective support for the text. (Available to qualified adopters. Please consult your local sales, representative for details.), Instructor’s Manual (0-495-03031-7), , The Instructor’s Manual, written by Lenore Frigo of, Shasta College, is available as a convenient aid for your, , There are 50 acetates in this package, compiled by Susan, Shapiro of Indiana University East, along with general, comments on using these acetates., Study Guide (0-495-03032-5), , The Study Guide, written by William Addison of Eastern, Illinois University, is designed to help students master the, information contained in the text. It contains a programmed review of learning objectives, quiz boxes, and a, self-test for each chapter. Your students should find it, helpful in their study efforts., To t h e I n s t r u c t o r, , vii

Page 9 :
Critical Thinking with Psychology:, Separating Sense from Nonsense,, Second Edition (0-534-53659-X), , Students may have a difficult time distinguishing between, the true science of human thought and behavior and pop, psychology. This small paperback, written by John Ruscio, provides a tangible and compelling framework for, making that distinction, teaching the fundamentals of, scientific reasoning., InfoTrac® College Edition . . . now with, InfoMarks®!, , Southern Nevada and Wayne Weiten. It contains experiential exercises for each text chapter, designed to help your, students achieve personal insights. The questionnaires are, psychological tests or scales that your students can administer and score for themselves. The “Personal Probes” consist of questions intended to help students think about, themselves in relation to issues raised in the text. In addition to generating student interest, these exercises can be, fruitful in stimulating class discussion. The Personal Explorations Workbook can be ordered shrinkwrapped with, the text., , NOT SOLD SEPARATELY. Available for packaging with, the text! Now FREE four-month access to InfoTrac College Edition’s online database of more than 18 million reliable, full-length articles from 5000 academic journals, and periodicals includes access to InfoMarks—stable, URLs that can be linked to articles, journals, and searches., InfoMarks allow you to use a simple copy and paste technique to create instant and continually updated online, readers, content services, bibliographies, electronic “reserve” readings, and current topic sites. And to help students use the research they gather, their free four-month, subsciption to InfoTrac College Edition includes access, to InfoWrite, a complete set of online critical thinking, and paper-writing tools. To take a quick tour of InfoTrac, College Edition, visit http://www.infotrac-college.com/, and select the User Demo. (Journals subject to change. Certain restrictions may apply. For additional information,, please consult your local Thomson representative.), , Critical Thinking Exercises, , Culture and Modern Life (0-534-49688-1), , WebTutor™ ToolBox for WebCT®, WebTutor™ ToolBox for Blackboard®, , Culture and Modern Life is a small paperback intended to, help your students appreciate how cultural factors moderate psychological processes and how the viewpoint of, one’s own culture can distort one’s interpretation of the, behavior of people from other cultures. Written by David, Matsumoto, a leading authority on cross-cultural psychology, this supplementary book should greatly enhance, your students’ understanding of how culture can influence adjustment. Culture and Modern Life can be ordered, shrinkwrapped with the text., Personal Explorations Workbook, (0-495-03035-X), , The Personal Explorations Workbook is a small booklet assembled by John Pulver of the Community College of, , viii, , To t h e I n s t r u c t o r, , We have developed a set of critical thinking exercises that, will be posted on the Internet at the Wadsworth Psychology Website (http://psychology.wadsworth.com/weiten_, lloyd8e). Written by Jeffry Ricker, these exercises are intended to introduce students to specific critical thinking, skills, such as recognizing extraneous variables, sampling, bias, and fallacies in reasoning. The exercises also challenge students to apply these skills to adjustment-related, topics on a chapter-by-chapter basis., Book Companion Website:, http://psychology.wadsworth.com/, weiten_lloyd8e, , This comprehensive website includes learning objectives,, a full glossary, flashcards, crossword puzzles, InfoTrac, College Edition articles with questions, web links, and tutorial quizzes., , Preloaded with content and available via a free access, code when packaged with this text, WebTutor ToolBox, pairs all the content of this text’s rich Book Companion, Website with sophisticated course management functionality. You can assign materials (including online quizzes), and have the results flow automatically to your grade, book. WebTutor ToolBox is ready to use as soon as you, log on—or you can customize its preloaded content by, uploading images and other resources, adding web links,, or creating your own practice materials.

Page 10 :
Acknowledgments, This book has been an enormous undertaking, and we, want to express our gratitude to the innumerable people, who have influenced its evolution. To begin with, we, must cite the contribution of our students who have, taken the adjustment course. It is trite to say that they, have been a continuing inspiration—but they have., We also want to express our appreciation for the time, and effort invested by the authors of our Internet essay, and various ancillary books and materials: Vinny Hevern, (LeMoyne College), Bill Addison (Eastern Illinois University), Jeffry Ricker (Scottsdale Community College),, John Pulver (Community College of Southern Nevada),, David Matsumoto (San Francisco State University),, Lenore Frigo (Shasta College), Lisa Garner (Tallahassee, Community College), Susan Shapiro (Indiana University, East), Mary Ann Valentino (Fresno City College), and, David Ward (Arkansas Tech University). In spite of tight, schedules, they all did commendable work., The quality of a textbook depends greatly on the, quality of the prepublication reviews by psychology professors around the country. The reviewers listed on page x, have contributed to the development of this book by providing constructive reviews of various portions of the, manuscript in this or earlier editions. We are grateful to, all of them., We would also like to thank Michele Sordi, who has, served as editor of this edition. She has done a wonderful, job following in the footsteps of Claire Verduin, Eileen, Murphy, and Edith Beard Brady, to whom we remain indebted. We are also grateful to Jackie Estrada, for an excel-, , lent job of copy editing and indexing; Tom Dorsaneo, who, performed superbly as our production editor; Linda, Beaupre, who created the colorful, inviting new design;, Linda Rill, who provided outstanding photo and permissions research; Carol Zuber-Mallison, who created the, new graphics; Alma Bell of Thompson Type who oversaw, the composition; and Fiorella Ljunggren, who shepherded, previous editions into existence. Others who have made, significant contributions to this project include Jennie, Redwitz (project manager), Jennifer Wilkinson (development editor), Jennifer Keever (ancillaries editor), Dory, Schaefer and Marlene Veach (marketing), Jessica Kim (editorial assistant), and Vernon Boes (art director)., In addition, Wayne Weiten would like to thank his, wife, Beth Traylor, who has been a steady source of emotional support despite the demands of her medical career,, and his twelve-year-old son, T. J., who adds a wealth of, laughter to his dad’s life. He is also grateful to his former, colleagues at the College of DuPage and at Santa Clara, University, for their counsel and assistance, and to Mike, Beede for his assistance with the references. Marky Lloyd, would like to thank graduate student Gizelle George for, preparing much of the reference list. She is also grateful, to Janis Bohan and Glenda Russell for their suggestions, for resources on gay and lesbian issues. She also wishes to, thank Judith A. Holleman for her assistance and support., Wayne Weiten, Margaret A. Lloyd, , Acknowledgments, , ix

Page 11 :
Reviewers, Bette Ackerman, Rhodes College, Jeff Banks, Pepperdine University, Marsha K. Beauchamp, Mt. San Antonio College, John R. Blakemore, Monterey Peninsula College, Barbara A. Boccaccio, Tunxis Community College, Paul Bowers, Grayson County College, Tamara L. Brown, University of Kentucky, George Bryant, East Texas State University, James F. Calhoun, University of Georgia, Robert Cameron, Fairmont State College, M. K. Clampit, Bentley College, Meg Clark, California State Polytechnic, University–Pomona, Stephen S. Coccia, Orange County Community College, Dennis Coon, Santa Barbara City College, Katherine A. Couch, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Tori Crews, American River College, Salvatore Cullari, Lebanon Valley College, Kenneth S. Davidson, Wayne State University, Richard Fuhrer, University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire, R. Kirkland Gable, California Lutheran University, Lee Gills, Georgia College, Lawrence Grebstein, University of Rhode Island, Bryan Gros, Louisiana State University, Barbara Hansen Lemme, College of DuPage, Robert Helm, Oklahoma State University, Barbara Hermann, Gainesville College, Jeanne L. Higbee, University of Minnesota, Robert Higgins, Central Missouri State University, Clara E. Hill, University of Maryland, , x, , Reviewers, , Michael Hirt, Kent State University, Fred J. Hitti, Monroe Community College, William M. Hooper, Clayton College and State University, Joseph Horvat, Weber State University, Kathy Howard, Harding University, Teresa A. Hutchens, University of Tennessee–Knoxville, Jerry Jensen, Minneapolis Community &, Technical College, Walter Jones, College of DuPage, Wayne Joose, Calvin College, Bradley Karlin, Texas A&M University, Margaret Karolyi, University of Akron, Lambros Karris, Husson College, Martha Kuehn, Central Lakes College, Susan Kupisch, Austin Peay State University, Robert Lawyer, Delgado Community College, Jimi Leopold, Tarleton State University, Harold List, Massachusetts Bay Community College, Corliss A. Littlefield, Morgan Community College, Louis A. Martone, Miami Dade Community College, Richard Maslow, San Joaquin Delta College, Sherri McCarthy, Northern Arizona University, William T. McReynolds, University of Tampa, Fred Medway, University of South Carolina–, Columbia, Frederick Meeker, California State Polytechnic, University–Pomona, Mitchell Metzger, Pennsylvania State University—, Shenago Campus, John Moritsugu, Pacific Lutheran University, Jeanne O’Kon, Tallahassee Community College, , Gary Oliver, College of DuPage, William Penrod, Middle Tennessee State University, Joseph Philbrick, California State Polytechnic, University–Pomona, Barbara M. Powell, Eastern Illinois University, James Prochaska, University of Rhode Island, Katherine Elaine Royal, Middle Tennessee State University, Joan Royce, Riverside Community College, Joan Rykiel, Ocean County College, John Sample, Slippery Rock University, Thomas K. Savill, Metropolitan State College of Denver, Patricia Sawyer, Middlesex Community College, Carol Schachat, De Anza College, Norman R. Schultz, Clemson University, Dale Simmons, Oregon State University, Sangeeta Singg, Angelo State University, Valerie Smead, Western Illinois University, Dolores K. Sutter, Tarrant County College–Northeast, Karl Swain, Community College of Southern Nevada, Kenneth L. Thompson, Central Missouri State University, David L. Watson, University of Hawaii, Deborah S. Weber, University of Akron, Clair Wiederholt, Madison Area Technical College, J. Oscar Williams, Diablo Valley College, Raymond Wolf, Moraine Park Technical College, Raymond Wolfe, State University of New York at Geneseo, Michael Wolff, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Madeleine E. Wright, Houston Community College, Norbert Yager, Henry Ford Community College

Page 12 :
Brief Contents, PART O N E, , 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Adjusting to Modern Life 1, APPLICATION: IMPROVING ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE 24, , 2, , Theories of Personality 32, APPLICATION: ASSESSING YOUR PERSONALITY 64, , 3, , Stress and Its Effects 70, APPLICATION: MONITORING YOUR STRESS 97, , 4, , Coping Processes 104, APPLICATION: ACHIEVING SELF-CONTROL 130, , PART T WO, , 5, , The Interpersonal Realm, , The Self 138, APPLICATION: BUILDING SELF-ESTEEM 165, , 6, , Social Thinking and Social Influence 170, APPLICATION: SEEING THROUGH COMPLIANCE TACTICS 195, , 7, , Interpersonal Communication 200, APPLICATION: DEVELOPING AN ASSERTIVE COMMUNICATION STYLE 227, , 8, , Friendship and Love 234, APPLICATION: OVERCOMING LONELINESS 260, , 9, , Marriage and Intimate Relationships 268, APPLICATION: UNDERSTANDING INTIMATE VIOLENCE 295, , PART TH R E E, , 10, , Development al Transitions, , Gender and Behavior 302, APPLICATION: BRIDGING THE GENDER GAP IN COMMUNICATION 329, , 11, , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood 336, APPLICATION: BECOMING AN EFFECTIVE PARENT 362, , 12, , Careers and Work 372, APPLICATION: GETTING AHEAD IN THE JOB GAME 399, , 13, , Development and Expression of Sexuality 406, APPLICATION: ENHANCING SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS 434, , PART F O U R, , 14, , Ment al and Physical Health, , Psychology and Physical Health 442, APPLICATION: UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTS OF DRUGS 472, , 15, , Psychological Disorders 480, APPLICATION: UNDERSTANDING EATING DISORDERS 509, , 16, , Psychotherapy 516, APPLICATION: LOOKING FOR A THERAPIST 544, Brief Contents, , xi

Page 13 :
This page intentionally left blank

Page 14 :
Contents, PART O N E, , The Dynami c s of Adjus tment, , CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life 1, THE PARADOX OF PROGRESS 2, THE SEARCH FOR DIRECTION 5, Self-Help Books, The Approach of This Textbook, , Extraversion, , THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ADJUSTMENT 11, What Is Psychology?, What Is Adjustment?, Social, activity, , Happiness, , THE SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO BEHAVIOR 12, The Commitment to Empiricism, Advantages of the Scientific Approach, Experimental Research: Looking for Causes, Correlational Research: Looking for Links, THE ROOTS OF HAPPINESS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS 19, What Isn’t Very Important?, What Is Somewhat Important?, What Is Very Important?, Conclusions, , CHAPTER 1 REVIEW, , © David Young-Wolff/PhotoEdit, , APPLICATION: IMPROVING ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE 24, Developing Sound Study Habits, Improving Your Reading, Getting More Out of Lectures, Applying Memory Principles, 30, , PRACTICE TEST 31, , Successful students, Always or, almost always, in class, 84%, , Unsuccessful students, Sometimes absent, 8%, , Often, absent, 45%, , Always or, almost, always, in class, 47%, , Sometimes, absent, Often absent, 8%, 8%, , Contents, , xiii

Page 15 :
CHAPTER 2, , Theories of Personality 32, , Neuroticism, (negative, emotionality), , Extraversion, (positive, emotionality), , Conscientiousness, (constraint), , Openness, to experience, , PSYCHODYNAMIC PERSPECTIVES 35, Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory, Jung’s Analytical Psychology, Adler’s Individual Psychology, Evaluating Psychodynamic Perspectives, BEHAVIORAL PERSPECTIVES 44, Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning, Skinner’s Operant Conditioning, Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, Evaluating Behavioral Perspectives, HUMANISTIC PERSPECTIVES 51, Rogers’s Person-Centered Theory, Maslow’s Theory of Self-Actualization, Evaluating Humanistic Perspectives, BIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES 55, Eysenck’s Theory, Recent Research in Behavioral Genetics, The Evolutionary Approach to Personality, Evaluating Biological Perspectives, A CONTEMPORARY EMPIRICAL APPROACH:, TERROR MANAGEMENT THEORY 59, Essentials of Terror Management Theory, Applications of Terror Management Theory, AN EPILOGUE ON THEORETICAL DIVERSITY 62, APPLICATION: ASSESSING YOUR PERSONALITY 64, Key Concepts in Psychological Testing, Self-Report Inventories, Projective Tests, CHAPTER 2 REVIEW 68, PRACTICE TEST 69, , xiv, , Contents, , Showing, off, , Approval or, disapproval, , Response, , Reinforcer, or punisher, , © Laura Dwight/PhotoEdit, , Agreeableness, , THE NATURE OF PERSONALITY 34, What Is Personality?, What Are Personality Traits?

Page 16 :
CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects 70, THE NATURE OF STRESS 72, Stress Is an Everyday Event, Stress Lies in the Eye of the Beholder, Stress May Be Embedded in the Environment, Stress May Be Self-Imposed, Stress Is Influenced by Culture, , Quiet, communities, Epinephrine Noisy, communities, Quiet, communities, Norepinephrine, , Noisy, communities, 200, , 400, 600, 800, Nanograms/hour, , 1000, , 1200, , Tennis, Pizza, Blue sweater, , RESPONDING TO STRESS 81, Emotional Responses, Physiological Responses, Behavioral Responses, , Unemployment, Painful, backache, , THE POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF STRESS 89, Impaired Task Performance, Disruption of Cognitive Functioning, Burnout, Posttraumatic Stress Disorders, Psychological Problems and Disorders, Physical Illness, Positive Effects, , APPROACH-AVOIDANCE, Date with, an attractive, person, Rejection, Investment, returns, Loss of capital, , Racquetball, Spaghetti, Gray jacket, , AVOIDANCE-AVOIDANCE, Degrading job, Surgery, , FACTORS INFLUENCING STRESS TOLERANCE 94, Social Support, Hardiness, Optimism, APPLICATION: MONITORING YOUR STRESS 97, Problems with the SRRS, The Life Experiences Survey, A Cautionary Note, CHAPTER 3 REVIEW 102, PRACTICE TEST 103, , Resistance to stress, , 0, , APPROACH-APPROACH, , MAJOR TYPES OF STRESS 75, Frustration, Conflict, Change, Pressure, , Normal level of resistance, , Phase 1, Alarm, reaction, , Phase 2, Stage of resistance, , Phase 3, Stage, of exhaustion, , Time, , Contents, , xv

Page 17 :
CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes 104, THE CONCEPT OF COPING 106, COMMON COPING PATTERNS OF LIMITED VALUE 107, Giving Up, Striking Out at Others, Indulging Yourself, Blaming Yourself, Using Defensive Coping, , 80, 60, , Low, , or, hum, , 40, umor, High h, , 20, 0, 0, , 10, , 20, Stress, , 30, , 40, , THE NATURE OF CONSTRUCTIVE COPING 113, APPRAISAL-FOCUSED CONSTRUCTIVE COPING 115, Ellis’s Rational Thinking, Humor as a Stress Reducer, Positive Reinterpretation, , EMOTION-FOCUSED CONSTRUCTIVE COPING 125, Enhancing Emotional Intelligence, Releasing Pent-Up Emotions, Managing Hostility and Forgiving Others, Meditating, Using Relaxation Procedures, APPLICATION: ACHIEVING SELF-CONTROL 130, Specifying Your Target Behavior, Gathering Baseline Data, Designing Your Program, Executing and Evaluating Your Program, Ending Your Program, CHAPTER 4 REVIEW 136, PRACTICE TEST 137, Before, , During meditation, , After, , 260, , 240, , 200, , 180, , 160, , xvi, , Oxygen, consumption, , 220, , Carbon dioxide, elimination, , 0, , 10, , Contents, , 20, , 30, Minutes, , 40, , 50, , 60, , © Paul Thomas/The Image Bank/Getty Images, , PROBLEM-FOCUSED CONSTRUCTIVE COPING 118, Using Systematic Problem Solving, Seeking Help, Using Time More Effectively, Improving Self-Control, , Cubic centimeters per minute, , Mood disturbance, , 100

Page 18 :
PART T WO, , The Interpersonal Realm, , CHAPTER 5, , The Self 138, SELF-CONCEPT 140, The Nature of the Self-Concept, Self-Discrepancies, Factors Shaping the Self-Concept, , Low, self-esteem, , Negative, expectations, , Self-blame, , Failure, , Low effort, High anxiety, , SELF-ESTEEM 146, The Importance of Self-Esteem, The Development of Self-Esteem, Ethnicity, Gender, and Self-Esteem, BASIC PRINCIPLES OF SELF-PERCEPTION 152, Cognitive Processes, Self-Attributions, Explanatory Style, Motives Guiding Self-Understanding, Methods of Self-Enhancement, , © GDT/Stone/Getty Images, , SELF-REGULATION 158, Self-Efficacy, Self-Defeating Behavior, SELF-PRESENTATION 161, Impression Management, Self-Monitoring, APPLICATION: BUILDING SELF-ESTEEM 165, CHAPTER 5 REVIEW 168, PRACTICE TEST 169, , Oversensitivity, to rejection, , Low, self-esteem, , Actual, rejection, by others, , Negative,, hurtful ways of, relating to people, , Contents, , xvii

Page 19 :
CHAPTER 6, , FORMING IMPRESSIONS OF OTHERS 172, Key Sources of Information, Snap Judgments Versus Systematic Judgments, Attributions, Perceiver Expectations, Cognitive Distortions, Key Themes in Person Perception, , 40, , 30, , 20, , 10, , 0, , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15, Size of incorrect majority, , THE PROBLEM OF PREJUDICE 181, “Old-Fashioned” Versus Modern Discrimination, Causes of Prejudice, Reducing Prejudice, THE POWER OF PERSUASION 185, The Elements of the Persuasion Process, The Whys of Persuasion, THE POWER OF SOCIAL PRESSURE 190, Conformity and Compliance Pressures, Pressure from Authority Figures, Culture and Social Influence, APPLICATION: SEEING THROUGH COMPLIANCE TACTICS 195, The Consistency Principle, The Reciprocity Principle, The Scarcity Principle, CHAPTER 6 REVIEW 198, PRACTICE TEST 199, , Threat to, personal identity, , Threat to, social identity, , Personal, achievements, , Favoritism, toward ingroups, Derogation, of outgroups, , xviii, , Contents, , Self-esteem, , © RNT Productions/Corbis, , Trials on which subjects conform (%), , Social Thinking and Social Influence 170

Page 20 :
CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication 200, , Noise, , Encoding, , Decoding, , NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION 205, General Principles, Elements of Nonverbal Communication, Detecting Deception, The Significance of Nonverbal Communication, , Channel, Message, Noise, Sender, , Receiver, , TOWARD MORE EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION 213, Creating a Positive Interpersonal Climate, Conversational Skills, Self-Disclosure, Effective Listening, , Context, , © Eric K. K. Yu/Corbis, , Noise, , THE PROCESS OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION 202, Components of the Communication Process, Technology and Interpersonal Communication, Communication and Adjustment, , COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS 219, Communication Apprehension, Barriers to Effective Communication, INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT 221, Beliefs About Conflict, Types of Conflict, Styles of Managing Conflict, Dealing Constructively with Conflict, Public Communication in an Adversarial Culture, APPLICATION: DEVELOPING AN ASSERTIVE COMMUNICATION STYLE 227, The Nature of Assertiveness, Steps in Assertiveness Training, CHAPTER 7 REVIEW 232, PRACTICE TEST 233, , Concern for self, , Competing/, forcing, , Collaborating, , Compromising, , Avoiding/, withdrawing, , Accommodating, , Concern for others, , Contents, , xix

Page 21 :
CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love 234, , Romantic love, (intimacy + passion), , INTIMACY, , Liking, (intimacy alone), , Companionate love, (intimacy + commitment), , Consummate love, (intimacy +, passion +, commitment), , N, , CO, , MM, , ITM, , SIO, , EN, , S, PA, Infatuation, (passion alone), , Fatuous love, (passion + commitment), , T, , Empty love, (commitment alone), , PERSPECTIVES ON CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS 236, The Ingredients of Close Relationships, Culture and Relationships, The Internet and Relationships, INITIAL ATTRACTION AND RELATIONSHIP DEVELOPMENT 239, Initial Encounters, Getting Acquainted, Established Relationships, FRIENDSHIP 248, What Makes a Good Friend?, Gender Differences in Friendship, , APPLICATION: OVERCOMING LONELINESS 260, The Nature of Loneliness, Prevalence of Loneliness, The Roots of Loneliness, Correlates of Loneliness, Conquering Loneliness, CHAPTER 8 REVIEW 266, PRACTICE TEST 267, , Commitment, , Level of intensity, , Intimacy, , Passion, , Time, , xx, , Contents, , © 2004 AP/Wide World Photos, , ROMANTIC LOVE 250, Sexual Orientation and Love, Gender Differences Regarding Love, Theories of Love, The Course of Romantic Love

Page 22 :
CHAPTER 9, , Marriage and Intimate Relationships 268, CHALLENGES TO THE TRADITIONAL MODEL OF MARRIAGE 270, MOVING TOWARD MARRIAGE 272, The Motivation to Marry, Selecting a Mate, Predictors of Marital Success, , 26, 25, Males, , 24, 23, 22, , Females, 21, 20, 1970, , 1960, , Year, , 1980, , 1990, , 2000, , MARITAL ADJUSTMENT ACROSS THE FAMILY LIFE CYCLE 275, Between Families: The Unattached Young Adult, Joining Together: The Newly Married Couple, Family with Young Children, Family with Adolescent Children, Launching Children into the Adult World, The Family in Later Life, VULNERABLE AREAS IN MARITAL ADJUSTMENT 279, Gaps in Role Expectations, Work and Career Issues, Financial Difficulties, Inadequate Communication, DIVORCE 285, Increasing Rate of Divorce, Deciding on a Divorce, Adjusting to Divorce, Effects of Divorce on Children, Remarriage, , © Matthew McVay/Corbis Saba, , 19, 1950, , ALTERNATIVES TO MARRIAGE 290, Remaining Single, Cohabitation, Gay Relationships, APPLICATION: UNDERSTANDING INTIMATE VIOLENCE 295, Date Rape, Partner Abuse, CHAPTER 9 REVIEW 300, PRACTICE TEST 301, 40, Hours per week of housework, , Median age at first marriage, , 27, , 35, 30, Married women, , 25, 20, 15, , Married men, , 10, 5, 0, 1965, , 1975, , Year, , 1985, , 1995, , Contents, , xxi

Page 23 :
PART TH R E E, , Development al Transitions, , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior 302, , Distribution, for females, , Distribution, for males, , Low, , Score on the trait, , High, , GENDER SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES 306, Cognitive Abilities, Personality Traits and Social Behavior, Psychological Disorders, Putting Gender Differences in Perspective, BIOLOGICAL ORIGINS OF GENDER DIFFERENCES 311, Evolutionary Explanations, Brain Organization, Hormonal Influences, ENVIRONMENTAL ORIGINS OF GENDER DIFFERENCES 313, Processes in Gender-Role Socialization, Sources of Gender-Role Socialization, GENDER ROLES 318, Role Expectations for Males, Problems with the Male Role, Role Expectations for Females, Problems with the Female Role, Sexism: A Special Problem for Females, , © Michelle D. Bridwell/PhotoEdit, , Persons receiving each score, , GENDER STEREOTYPES 304, Mean, score for, females, , Mean, score for, males, , GENDER IN THE PAST AND IN THE FUTURE 326, Why Are Gender Roles Changing?, Alternatives to Traditional Gender Roles, A Gender-Free Society?, APPLICATION: BRIDGING THE GENDER GAP IN COMMUNICATION 329, The Clash of Two “Cultures”, Instrumental and Expressive Styles, Common Mixed-Gender Communication Problems, Toward a “Shared Language”, CHAPTER 10 REVIEW 334, PRACTICE TEST 335, , a, , xxii, , Contents, , b, , c, , d, , e

Page 24 :
CHAPTER 11, , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood 336, THE TRANSITION OF ADOLESCENCE 338, Physical Changes, Cognitive Changes, Personality Changes, Adolescent Suicide, , Optimum, , THE EXPANSE OF ADULTHOOD 345, Early Adulthood (From About Age 20 to 40), Middle Adulthood (From About Age 40 to 65), Late Adulthood (After Age 65), , Girls, , AGING: A GRADUAL PROCESS 352, Physical Changes, Cognitive Changes, Personality Changes, , Poor, Early, , © David Young-Wolff/Stone/Getty Images, , Quality of outcome, , Boys, , Late, Teenagers’ perception, of their pubertal timing, , DEATH AND DYING 358, Attitudes About Death, The Process of Dying, Bereavement and Grieving, APPLICATION: BECOMING AN EFFECTIVE PARENT 362, Maternal Behavior and Infant-Mother Attachment, Day Care and Attachment, Dimensions of Childrearing, Correlates of Parenting Styles, Rearing Adolescents, Toward Effective Parenting, Using Punishment Effectively, CHAPTER 11 REVIEW 370, PRACTICE TEST 371, , ge, , 85, , Subjective age in years, , ua, , la, , 75, , en, , Ac, t, , 65, , :m, , e, ag, , ive, ct, en, je, om, b, Su ge: w, ea, tiv, , 55, 45, c, , bje, , Su, , 35, 25, 15, 15, , 25, , 35 45 55 65, Actual age in years, , 75, , 85, , Contents, , xxiii

Page 25 :
CHAPTER 12, , Careers and Work 372, CHOOSING A CAREER 374, Examining Personal Characteristics and Family Influences, Researching Job Characteristics, Using Psychological Tests for Career Decisions, Taking Important Considerations into Account, , Percentage of respondents who . . ., get a sense of identity from job, work just to earn a living, 70, 60, , 30, , THE CHANGING WORLD OF WORK 382, Workplace Trends, Education and Earnings, The Changing Workforce, , 20, 10, , Less than, $30,000, , $30,000– $50,000–, $50,000, $75,000, Annual income, , $75,000+, , COPING WITH OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS 387, Job Stress, Sexual Harassment, Unemployment, BALANCING WORK AND OTHER SPHERES, OF LIFE 395, Workaholism, Work and Family Roles, Leisure and Recreation, APPLICATION: GETTING AHEAD IN THE JOB GAME 399, Putting Together a Résumé, Finding Companies You Want to Work For, Landing an Interview, Polishing Your Interview Technique, CHAPTER 12 REVIEW 404, PRACTICE TEST 405, , All employees, Women, , 0, , All managers, Executives, , Minorities, , Percent, , 40, , All employees, All managers, Executives, 0, , xxiv, , 10, 20, 30, 40, Percentage at different levels, of Fortune 1000 corporations, , Contents, , © B. Busco/The Image Bank/Getty Images, , MODELS OF CAREER CHOICE AND DEVELOPMENT 378, Holland’s Trait Measurement and Matching Model, Super’s Developmental Model, Women’s Career Development, , 50

Page 26 :
CHAPTER 13, , Development and Expression of Sexuality 406, BECOMING A SEXUAL PERSON 408, Key Aspects of Sexual Identity, Physiological Influences, Psychosocial Influences, Gender Differences in Sexual Socialization, Sexual Orientation, , © Paul Wright/Masterfile, , INTERACTION IN SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS 418, Motives for Engaging in Sex, Communicating About Sex, THE HUMAN SEXUAL RESPONSE 419, The Sexual Response Cycle, Gender Differences in Patterns of Orgasm, SEXUAL EXPRESSION 422, Fantasy, Kissing and Touching, Self-Stimulation, Oral and Anal Sex, Intercourse, , Among, prime-time, broadcast, shows, Among, top 20, teen, programs, 0, , 20, 100, 40, 60, 80, Percentage of programs, with sexual content (2001–2002), , PATTERNS OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR 424, Sex in the Age of AIDS, Early Sexual Experiences, Sex in Committed Relationships, Infidelity in Committed Relationships, PRACTICAL ISSUES IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY 429, Contraception, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, APPLICATION: ENHANCING SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS 434, General Suggestions, Understanding Sexual Dysfunction, Coping with Specific Problems, CHAPTER 13 REVIEW 440, PRACTICE TEST 441, , © Mark Romanelli/The Image Bank/Getty Images, , Among, all, programs, , Contents, , xxv

Page 27 :
PART F O U R, , M en t al and Phys ical Health, , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health 442, STRESS, PERSONALITY, AND ILLNESS 445, Personality, Emotions, and Heart Disease, Stress and Cancer, Stress and Other Diseases, Stress and Immune Functioning, Conclusions, , 3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, 0, , Low, , Moderate, Anger level, , High, , HABITS, LIFESTYLES, AND HEALTH 452, Smoking, Drinking, Overeating, Poor Nutrition, Lack of Exercise, Behavior and AIDS, REACTIONS TO ILLNESS 469, The Decision to Seek Treatment, The Sick Role, Communicating with Health Providers, Adherence to Medical Advice, APPLICATION: UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTS OF DRUGS 472, Drug-Related Concepts, Narcotics, Sedatives, Stimulants, Hallucinogens, Marijuana, Ecstasy (MDMA), CHAPTER 14 REVIEW 478, PRACTICE TEST 479, , Aspects, of personality,, physiology,, memory, , High stress, , xxvi, , Contents, , High, incidence, of illness, , © Jim Cummings/Taxi/Getty Images, , Relative risk of coronary events, , 3.5

Page 28 :
CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders 480, ABNORMAL BEHAVIOR: MYTHS AND REALITIES 482, The Medical Model Applied to Abnormal Behavior, Criteria of Abnormal Behavior, Psychodiagnosis: The Classification of Disorders, The Prevalence of Psychological Disorders, ANXIETY DISORDERS 487, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Phobic Disorder, Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Etiology of Anxiety Disorders, , Neurochemical, changes, , SOMATOFORM DISORDERS 491, Somatization Disorder, Conversion Disorder, Hypochondriasis, Etiology of Somatoform Disorders, , Right ventricle, Left, ventricle, , Negative, thinking,, attributions, , Depression, , DISSOCIATIVE DISORDERS 494, Dissociative Amnesia and Fugue, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Etiology of Dissociative Disorders, , Third, ventricle, , Fourth, ventricle, , MOOD DISORDERS 496, Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Etiology of Mood Disorders, SCHIZOPHRENIC DISORDERS 502, General Symptoms, Subtypes, Course and Outcome, Etiology of Schizophrenia, PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS AND THE LAW 508, Insanity, Involuntary Commitment, APPLICATION: UNDERSTANDING EATING DISORDERS 509, Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, History and Prevalence, Etiology of Eating Disorders, Course and Outcome, , Deviance, , CHAPTER 15 REVIEW 514, PRACTICE TEST 515, , Normal, , Personal, distress, , Abnormal, , Maladaptive, behavior, , Contents, , xxvii

Page 29 :
CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy 516, , Psychologists, 35.5%, , Psychiatrists, 26.9%, General medical, professionals, 9.3%, , National Library of Medicine, , Other mental, health, specialists, 28.3%, , THE ELEMENTS OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS 518, Treatments: How Many Types Are There?, Clients: Who Seeks Therapy?, Therapists: Who Provides Professional Treatment?, INSIGHT THERAPIES 522, Psychoanalysis, Client-Centered Therapy, Cognitive Therapy, Group Therapy, Evaluating Insight Therapies, Therapy and the Recovered Memories Controversy, BEHAVIOR THERAPIES 532, General Principles, Systematic Desensitization, Aversion Therapy, Social Skills Training, Evaluating Behavior Therapies, BIOMEDICAL THERAPIES 536, Treatment with Drugs, Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), CURRENT TRENDS AND ISSUES IN TREATMENT 541, Grappling with the Constraints of Managed Care, Blending Approaches to Treatment, Increasing Multicultural Sensitivity in Treatment, APPLICATION: LOOKING FOR A THERAPIST 544, When Should You Seek Professional Treatment?, Where Do You Find Therapeutic Services?, Is the Therapist’s Profession Important?, Is the Therapist’s Gender Important?, Is Therapy Always Expensive?, Is the Therapist’s Theoretical Approach Important?, What If There Isn’t Any Progress?, What Is Therapy Like?, CHAPTER 16 REVIEW 550, PRACTICE TEST 551, , Gloss ary, , 553, , References, Credits, , 559, , 611, , Name Index, Subject Index, , xxviii, , Contents, , 619, 637, , CS, Bridge, , UCS, Lightning, strikes, , Desensitization is intended, to weaken and replace, this association, , CR, Fear, UCR

Page 30 :
To the Student, In most college courses students spend more time with, their textbooks than with their professors. Given this reality, it helps if you like your textbook. Making textbooks, likable, however, is a tricky proposition. By its very nature, a textbook must introduce a great many new concepts, ideas, and theories. If it doesn’t, it isn’t much of a, textbook, and instructors won’t choose to use it—so, you’ll never see it anyway. Consequently, we have tried to, make this book as likable as possible without compromising the academic content that your instructor demands. Thus, we have tried to make the book lively, informal, engaging, well organized, easy to read, practical,, and occasionally humorous. Before you plunge into, Chapter 1, let us explain some of the key features that can, help you get the most out of the book., , Learning Aids, Mastering the content of this text involves digesting a, great deal of information. To facilitate this learning, process, we’ve incorporated a number of instructional, aids into the book., ■ Outlines at the beginning of each chapter provide, you with both a preview and an overview of what will be, covered., ■ Headings are used extensively to keep material well, organized., ■ To help alert you to key points, learning objectives, are found throughout the chapters, immediately after the, level-1 headings., ■ Key terms are identified with blue italicized boldface type to indicate that these are important vocabulary, items that are part of psychology’s technical language., ■ An integrated running glossary provides an on-thespot definition of each key term as it’s introduced in the, text. These formal definitions are printed in blue boldface type. It is often difficult for students to adapt to the, jargon used by scientific disciplines. However, learning, this terminology is an essential part of your educational, experience. The integrated running glossary is meant to, make this learning process as painless as possible., ■ An alphabetical glossary is provided in the back of, the book, as key terms are usually defined in the running, glossary only when they are first introduced. If you run, into a technical term that was introduced in an earlier, chapter and you can’t remember its meaning, you can, look it up in the alphabetical glossary instead of backtracking to find the place where it first appeared., ■ Italics are used liberally throughout the book to emphasize important points., , ■ A chapter review near the end of each chapter includes a thorough summary of the chapter, and lists key, terms and important theorists, with page references., Reading over these review materials can help ensure that, you’ve digested the key points in the chapter., ■ Each chapter ends with a ten-item practice test that, should give you a realistic assessment of your mastery of, that chapter and valuable practice taking multiple-choice, tests that will probably be representative of what you will, see in class (if your instructor uses the test bank designed, for this book)., , Recommended Reading Boxes, This text should function as a resource book. To facilitate, this goal, particularly interesting self-help books on various topics are highlighted in boxes within the chapters., Each box provides a brief description of the book. We do, not agree with everything in these recommended books,, but all of them are potentially useful or intriguing. The, main purpose of this feature is to introduce you to some, of the better self-help books that are available., , Living in Today’s World Boxes, These boxes were originally developed to address issues, that surfaced in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, in the United States. Continuing in this vein, many of the, boxes in this edition deal with concerns raised by the threat, of terrorism in today’s world. For example, we discuss, how people tend to be affected by traumatic events, how, people can cope more effectively with personal trauma,, and how people can think more rationally about the, threat of terrorism. However, in this edition we have, broadened the scope of coverage in these boxes to include, additional adjustment issues that are especially pertinent, in light of current events, such as the controversy over, whether the government should promote marriage and, problems associated with living up to today’s unrealistic, ideals of physical attractiveness. We hope these digressions on pressing, contemporary issues prove helpful., , Web Links (by Vincent Hevern), To help make this book a rich resource guide, we have, included Web Links, which are recommended websites, that can provide you with additional information on, adjustment-related topics. The recommended sites were, selected by Vincent Hevern, the Internet editor for the, Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Professor Hevern, sought out sites that are interesting, that are relevant to, , To t h e S t u d e n t, , xxix

Page 31 :
adjustment, and that provide accurate, empirically sound, information. As with the Recommended Reading boxes,, we cannot say that we agree with everything posted on, these web pages, but we think they have some real value., The Web Links are dispersed throughout the chapters, adjacent to related topical coverage. Because URLs change, frequently, we have not included the URLs for the Web, Links in the book. If you are interested in visiting these, sites, we recommend that you do so through the Psychology Applied to Modern Life home page at the Wadsworth, Psychology Website (http://psychology.wadsworth.com/, weiten_lloyd8e). Links to all the recommended websites, will be maintained there, and the Wadsworth webmaster, will periodically update the URLs. Of course, you can also, use a search engine, such as Google, to locate the recommended websites. By the way, if you are not particularly, sophisticated about the Internet, we strongly suggest that, you read Professor Hevern’s essay on the Internet, which, follows this preface., , Study Guide (0-495-03032-5), The study guide that accompanies this text, written by, William Addison of Eastern Illinois University, is an excellent resource designed to assist you in mastering the, information contained in the book. It includes a wealth, of review exercises to help you organize information and, a self-test for assessing your mastery. You should be able, to purchase it at your college bookstore., , InfoTrac®, , College Edition . . . now, with InfoMarks®!, NOT SOLD SEPARATELY. Available for packaging with, the text! Now FREE four-month access to InfoTrac College Edition’s online database of more than 18 million reliable, full-length articles from 5000 academic journals, and periodicals includes access to InfoMarks—stable, URLs that can be linked to articles, journals, and searches., InfoMarks allow you to use a simple copy and paste technique to create instant and continually updated online, , xxx, , To t h e S t u d e n t, , readers, content services, bibliographies, electronic “reserve” readings, and current topic sites. And to help you, use the research you gather, your free four-month subsciption to InfoTrac College Edition includes access to, InfoWrite, a complete set of online critical thinking and, paper-writing tools. To take a quick tour of InfoTrac College Edition, visit http://www.infotrac-college.com/ and, select the User Demo., , Personal Explorations Workbook, (0-495-03035-X), The Personal Explorations Workbook is a small booklet, that contains interesting, thought-provoking experiential, exercises for each text chapter. These exercises are designed to help you achieve personal insights. The Questionnaires are psychological tests or scales that you can, administer, so you can see how you score on various traits, discussed in the text. The Personal Probes consist of questions intended to help you think about issues in your personal life in relation to concepts and ideas discussed in, the text. Many students find these exercises to be quite, interesting, even fun. Hence, we encourage you to use the, Personal Explorations Workbook. The exercises related to, each chapter are listed at the end of each chapter on the, same page as the Practice Test., , A Concluding Note, We sincerely hope that you find this book enjoyable. If, you have any comments or advice that might help us improve the next edition, please write to us in care of the, publisher, Wadsworth Publishing Company, 10 Davis, Drive, Belmont, California 94002. There is a form in the, back of the book that you can use to provide us with feedback. Finally, let us wish you good luck. We hope you, enjoy your course and learn a great deal., Wayne Weiten, Margaret A. Lloyd

Page 32 :
Applied Psychology and the Internet:, What Should a Student Know?, by Vincent W. Hevern, Le Moyne College, Imagine walking into a huge bookstore at a mall to look, for a good book in “applied psychology.” Your first reaction, is confusion. The store is gigantic and you’re unsure even, where to begin your search. No one seems to be around to, tell you where to look. Eventually you discover that some, titles of interest are shelved in a “Psychology” section but a, lot of others are found in a separate “Self-Help” section., What’s the difference, you wonder? After a careful look at, the books, you begin to notice that many (not all) of the, psychology books contain research references to support, their conclusions. But, many (not all) of the self-help books, don’t have any references. Indeed, many self-help books, have catchy titles, flashy covers, and bold claims, but little, scientific support for the claims they make., The World Wide Web (WWW or “the web”) on the, Internet (“the Net”) is much like one of those huge bookstores. The selection is enormous, and it’s sometimes difficult to find what you’re looking for. For many users, the, Net can seem intimidating, and students may feel they, don’t know how the Net works. On top of that, much of, the web is filled with weak or poor resources of dubious, validity. So what can you do?, Wayne Weiten and Marky Lloyd, the authors of this, textbook, asked me to put together some advice and, guidelines for students like yourself who may turn to the, Net for help. They know that I’ve been using the Net intensively for years in teaching and research with undergraduates. So I’m going to share with you what I believe, to be the really important stuff about the Internet—information that should make your life as a student easier, and, in the end, help you to learn even more about the, fascinating world of applied psychology., , General Comments, About the Internet, We now know that something of a fundamental change, in the way people exchange ideas and information took, place around the time many of you were attending elementary school. For over twenty years, the Internet had, been the tool of a relatively small group of lab scientists, communicating mostly with each other. Suddenly, in the, mid-1990s, the Net began to expand rapidly beyond the, research laboratory. It first reached tens and then hundreds of millions of people as vast numbers of computers, large and small, were interconnected to form what is, , often called cyberspace. Thus, in the 21st century learning, to navigate the Internet is as crucial as learning to read or, to write—most of us will probably use the Net in some, form at work or at home for the rest of our lives., So, what are some basic notions to understand the, Internet and how it works? Let me propose briefly eight, crucial ideas., 1. The goal of the Internet is communication—the, rapid exchange of information—between people separated, from each other. Electronic mail (e-mail) and the World, Wide Web (WWW, of just “the web”) are currently the two, most important ways of communicating in cyberspace, even though the Net also uses other formats to do so., 2. Every piece of information on the Net—every web, page, every graphic, every movie or sound, every e-mail, box—has a unique, short, and structured address called a, URL (or uniform resource locator). Take, for example, the, URL for materials related to psychology maintained by, the publisher of this book:, http://psychology.wadsworth.com/, This example shows all three elements of a URL: (a) to, the left of the double forward slashes (// ) is the protocol, that tells the Net how to transfer the information. Here it, is http: which means “use hypertext transfer protocol”—, the most frequent protocol on the Net; (b) to the right of, the double slashes up to the first forward slash (/ ) is the, domain name that indicates which computer on the Net, from which to get the information. Here the name of the, computer is “www.wadsworth.com”. (c) finally, everything after the first forward slash is called the pathway,, which indicates where the information is located within, that particular computer. Here the pathway consists of, the location “psychology_d/”., 3. The foundation of the web rests on hypertext links, (“hyperlinks”) that are contained within documents (or, web pages) displayed online. A hyperlink is a highlighted, word, phrase, or graphic image within an onscreen document that refers to some other document or web page, elsewhere. Part of every hyperlink on a computer screen, includes the URL of the document which is hidden from, view on the screen but stored within the computer displaying the document. Users can easily move from one, document to another on screen because of hypertext, links and their URLs., 4. The last element of the domain name (the “domain” itself) indicates what type of organization sponsors, the link. Four important domains are .com (commercial, , Applied Psychology and the Internet: What Should a Student Know?, , xxxi

Page 33 :
businesses), .edu (colleges and universities), .gov (governmental agencies), and .org (non-profit organizations)., 5. The Internet is too large for any one individual to, know all the important resources that can be found there., Users, even experienced ones, often need help to find, what they’re looking for. In the chapters ahead, you will, find many recommended websites that I have carefully, selected based on their quality and their suitability for, undergraduates. In making these selections, I emphasized, quality over quantity and strived to send you to excellent, gateway sites that are rich in links to related sites. I hope, these links help you to begin to explore the field of psychology on the Internet., 6. URLs are relatively unstable. Many websites are, moved or changed each year, as new computer systems are, installed to replace older ones. Thus, links or URLs that, are good one day may be useless the next. That is why we, have not included the URLs for our recommended websites in the book. If you want to check out a recommended, website, we suggest that you do so through the Psychology Applied to Modern Life home page at the Wadsworth, Psychology Website (http://psychology.wadsworth.com/, weiten_lloyd8e). Links to all the recommended websites, will be maintained there, and the Wadsworth webmaster, will periodically update the URLs. Of course, you can also, use a search engine, such as Google, to locate the recommended websites., 7. The web is a world-wide democracy on which anyone can post materials. Hence, the quality of information, found online varies tremendously. Some material is first, rate, up to date, and backed up by good research and professional judgment. But a great deal of information online is junk—second rate, based on poor or invalid research, and filled with many errors. Frankly, some sites, are downright wacky, and others are run by hucksters and, hate-mongers. Thus, users need to learn to tell the difference between reputable and disreputable web resources., 8. Knowledge has a monetary value. Although the Internet started out as a noncommercial enterprise where, almost everything was free, things have changed swiftly., Owners of knowledge (the holders of commercial “copyrights”) usually expect to be paid for sharing what they, own over the Net. Thus, many commercial businesses,, such as the publishers of academic journals or books, either do not make journal articles available on line for free, or expect users to pay some type of fee for accessing their, materials. Cognizant of this problem, the publisher of, this text has entered into an agreement with a major online resource for magazine and journal articles and other, types of information called InfoTrac College Edition., Your text may have come bundled with a free four-month, subscription to InfoTrac College Edition, which provides, easy access to full-text versions of thousands of periodicals. If you received an InfoTrac College Edition subscription with this book, it would be wise to take advantage of, this valuable resource., , xxxii, , Some Suggestions for Action, In light of these ideas, how might students approach the, Internet? What should you do to make the most of your, time online? Let’s review some general suggestions for exploring the Internet., 1. Learn to navigate the Net before you get an assignment requiring you to do so. If you’ve never used the Net, before, start now to get a feel for it. Consider doing what, lots of students do: Ask a friend who knows the Net to, work with you directly so you can quickly get personal, experience in cyberspace. What if you “hate” computers, or they make you uncomfortable? Recent research has, shown that students’ fears of using computers tend to diminish once they get some practical experience during, the course of a single semester., 2. Learn how the software browser on your computer, works. Every popular web browser, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, or Safari (for Mac users),, is filled with many simple tricks and helpful shortcuts. Ask your friends or the computer consultants at, school. Learning the tricks makes Net-based research, much easier. (Hint: Find out what happens when you, hold down the right-hand mouse button on a PC or the, whole button on a Mac once you have the cursor on top, of a hyperlink.), 3. Get to know the different types of online help to find, resources on the web. These resources currently fall into, three general categories: (a) General guides or directories, such as Yahoo! (www.yahoo.com) are similar to the Yellow Pages for telephones. You ask the online guide to, show you what’s listed in its directory under a category, heading you supply. (b) Search engines such as Google, (www.google.com), Scirus (www.scirus.com), AllTheWeb, (www.alltheweb.com), and Teoma (www.teoma.com) are, huge databases that generally collect the names and URLs, of millions of pages on the Net along with many lines of, text from these pages. They can be searched by either keywords or phrases and provide ranked listings of web pages, that contain the search target words or phrases. (c) Expert subject guides such as Russ Dewey’s PsychWeb (www., psychwww.com) or Scott Plous’ Social Psychology Network (www.socialpsychology.org) provide links to online, resources in more narrow or specific fields. Volunteer specialists who claim to be experts on the topic select the links., Recent innovative features of websites include the vast, graphic image database at Google, the “between the covers”, text search capability of many books at Amazon.com, and, the Wayback Machine’s post-1995 archive of more than, 30 billion pages of the web itself (www.archive.org)., 4. Carefully check everything you type online because, even the slightest error in spelling a URL or an e-mail address will cause a failure to retrieve the web page or to deliver the e-mail message. Remember that computers are, stupid and will do exactly and only what you tell them to, do. They don’t read minds., , Applied Psychology and the Internet: What Should a Student Know?

Page 34 :
Using the Internet in Psychology, Are there specific suggestions for students of psychology, about using the Net? Here are five that I think are very, important., 1. Plan what to look for before going online. Too, many psychology students jump right to the web when, they’re given a research task, before giving careful thought, to what they’re looking for. They get frustrated easily because the web doesn’t seem to have anything about the, topic. It would be better (a) to think about the subject, you are researching and what specifically you want to, learn about that topic, (b) to recall what you already, know that relates to the topic, especially psychological, concepts and vocabulary words associated with the topic,, and (c) to devise a strategy for getting the information, you desire. Consult your school’s reference library staff, or your teachers for suggestions., 2. Do not rely on the Internet as your principal or only, source of data or references in a research project (especially, if you want a good grade). The Net may be easy to use,, but your teachers will expect you to cite journal articles,, books, and other printed sources more than you cite Internet materials in research. Developing your library skills, is essential., 3. As noted before, don’t expect to find many full-text, journal articles or other copyrighted commercial materials, online for free. Consult your school’s reference librarians, about online access to such materials. Many schools now, subscribe to online full-text databases that allow you to, research articles and other information sources with your, own computer. On the web itself, you are more likely to, , uncover government reports, specialized technical materials from nonprofit organizations, current news and, opinion, and general sorts of information rather than, findings of specific research studies (though, if they were, recently in the news, you may find some of these, too.), 4. Learn to recognize the characteristics of a good online resource site. Good sites have webmasters or editors, personally identified by name and affiliation. Such persons may be professionals or staff members at a reputable, institution such as a hospital or university. These sites, seem to provide a broad set of resources, are balanced and, reasonably objective in their content, and avoid sensational or one-sided viewpoints. Reputable sites tend not, to promote specific products or services for money or, if, they do, acknowledge there are other resources that, browsers may consider., 5. If you contact anyone online for help, be courteous., Introduce yourself as you would if you were standing in a, faculty member’s office. Give your name, your school,, and a full statement of what help you are asking for and, what you’ve tried to do that hasn’t worked. Don’t demand, that someone help you. Be sure you’ve done adequate research on your own before contacting an expert on the, web. And don’t be surprised if your request for help is, turned down by a webmaster or editor. Frankly, he or she, has already done a lot of volunteer work by editing the, site online., I hope some of these ideas and suggestions help. The, Internet offers an awesome array of learning resources, related to psychology. Welcome to an exciting new world, of discovery., , Applied Psychology and the Internet: What Should a Student Know?, , xxxiii

Page 36 :
˚, , EIGHTH EDITION, , Psychology, Applied to, Modern Life, ADJUSTMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Page 37 :
THE PARADOX OF PROGRESS, THE SEARCH FOR DIRECTION, Self-Help Books, The Approach of This Textbook, THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ADJUSTMENT, What Is Psychology?, What Is Adjustment?, , THE SCIENTIFIC APPROACH, TO BEHAVIOR, The Commitment to Empiricism, Advantages of the Scientific Approach, Experimental Research:, Looking for Causes, Correlational Research: Looking for Links, , APPLICATION: IMPROVING, ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE, Developing Sound Study Habits, Improving Your Reading, Getting More Out of Lectures, Applying Memory Principles, CHAPTER 1 REVIEW, , THE ROOTS OF HAPPINESS:, AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS, What Isn’t Very Important?, What Is Somewhat Important?, What Is Very Important?, Conclusions, , PRACTICE TEST

Page 38 :
CHAPTER, , Adjusting to, Modern Life, , 1, , The immense Boeing 747 lumbers into position to accept its human cargo., The eager passengers-to-be scurry on board. In a tower a few hundred yards, away, air traffic controllers diligently monitor radar screens, radio transmissions, and digital readouts of weather information. At the reservation desks, in the airport terminal, clerks punch up the appropriate ticket information, on their computer terminals and quickly process the steady stream of passengers. Mounted on the wall are video terminals displaying up-to-theminute information on flight arrivals, departures, and delays. Back in the, cockpit of the plane, the flight crew calmly scans the complex array of dials,, meters, and lights to assess the aircraft’s readiness for flight. In a few minutes, the airplane will slice into the cloudy, snow-laden skies above Chicago., In a mere three hours its passengers will be transported from the piercing, cold of a Chicago winter to the balmy beaches of the Bahamas. Another everyday triumph for technology will have taken place., , CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 1

Page 39 :
The Paradox of Progress, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Describe four examples of the paradox of progress., Explain what is meant by the paradox of progress and how theorists, have explained it., , We are the children of technology. We take for granted, such impressive feats as transporting 300 people over, 1500 miles in a matter of hours. After all, we live in a, time of unparalleled progress. Our modern Western society has made extraordinary strides in transportation,, energy, communication, agriculture, and medicine. Yet, despite our technological progress, social problems, and personal difficulties seem more prevalent and, more prominent than ever before. This paradox is evident in many aspects of contemporary life, as seen in, the following examples., Point. Modern technology has provided us with, countless time-saving devices—automobiles, telephones, vacuum cleaners, dishwashers, photocopiers,, fax machines. Today, cell phones allow people to talk, to friends or colleagues and battle rush hour at the, same time. In a matter of seconds a personal computer, can perform calculations that would take months if, done by hand., Counterpoint. Nonetheless, most of us complain, about not having enough time. Our schedule books, are overflowing with appointments, commitments,, and plans. Surveys suggest that most of us spend more, and more time working and have less and less time for, ourselves (Schor, 1991). Time has become such a precious commodity, one national survey found that, 51 percent of the adult respondents would rather have, more time than more money (Weil & Rosen, 1997). As, social critic Jeremy Rifkin (1989) notes, “It is ironic in, a culture so committed to saving time that we feel increasingly deprived of the very thing we value” (p. 19)., Where has all our free time gone? Recent research suggests that virtually all the additional leisure time gained, over the last 30 years has been absorbed by one of technology’s most seductive inventions—television (Robinson & Godbey, 1997)., Point. Thanks in large part to technological advances,, we live in extraordinary affluence. Undeniably, there, are pockets of genuine poverty, but social critics Paul, Wachtel (1989), David Myers (2000), and Gregg Easterbrook (2003) argue convincingly that in North America, and Europe the middle and upper classes are larger and, wealthier than ever before. Most of us take for granted, things that were once considered luxuries, such as, color television and air conditioning. People spend, vast amounts of money on expensive automobiles,, 2, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , audio systems, computers, projection TVs, clothing,, and vacations. In the late 1990s, the amount of money, spent on luxury goods increased four times faster than, overall spending (Frank, 1999). Wachtel quotes a New, York museum director who asserts that “shopping is, the chief cultural activity in the United States” (p. 23)., Counterpoint. In spite of this economic abundance,, research suggests that most people do not feel very good, about their financial well-being. For example, when, one survey inquired about Americans’ satisfaction with, 13 aspects of their lives, the results showed that people, were least satisfied with their finances (Myers, 2000)., In his book titled The High Price of Materialism, Tim, Kasser (2002) summarizes research showing that people who are especially concerned with money and possessions tend to report lower levels of happiness than, others. Why are people so dissatisfied with their economic well-being? One problem is that advertising helps, foster an insatiable thirst for consumption and the belief that material goods are the key to happiness (Kanner & Soule, 2004; Kasser et al., 2004). Hence, studies, find that the gap between what people have and what, they desire is greater in the material domain than in, other areas of life (Solberg, Diener, & Robinson, 2004)., Point. The range of life choices available to people, in modern societies has increased exponentially in recent decades. For example, Barry Schwartz (2004) describes how a simple visit to a local supermarket can, require a consumer to choose from 285 varieties of, cookies, 61 suntan lotions, 150 lipsticks, and 175 salad, dressings. Although increased choice is most tangible, in the realm of consumer goods and services, Schwartz, argues that it also extends into more significant domains, of life. Today, people tend to have unprecedented opportunities to make choices about how they will be educated (e.g., vastly more flexible college curricula are, available), how and where they will work (e.g., telecommuting presents employees with all sorts of new choices, about how to accomplish their work), how their intimate relationships will unfold (e.g., people have increased freedom to delay marriage, cohabit, not have, children, and so forth), and even how they will look (advances in plastic surgery have made personal appearance a matter of choice)., Counterpoint. Although increased freedom of choice, sounds attractive, Schwartz (2004) argues that the overabundance of choices in modern life has unexpected

Page 40 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , The citizens of the United States received a gigantic, wake-up call on September 11, 2001, in the form of the, horrific, tragic terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, and the Pentagon. Life in the United States and much of, the Western world may never be quite the same again. The, specter of terrorism has psychological repercussions for, virtually everyone in the United States (Danieli, Engdahl,, & Schlenger, 2004). People are upset about the many, things that they used to take for granted but have lost,, such as being able to fly to a business meeting without, a second thought, to pick up mail without worrying about, contamination, to walk into a tall building without being, searched, and to interact with strangers without being, suspicious. They are angry about the injustice of it all,, disgusted by the senseless violence, and anxious about, what future terrorist attacks might bring. Above all else,, Americans have lost their sense of invulnerability., In light of the fundamental ways in which our lives, have been changed, you might wonder whether the principal premise of this book—that the basic challenge of, modern life is the quest for meaning and direction—, might suddenly seem irrelevant. In reality, the situation, is quite the opposite. Perhaps more than before, because, of the threat of terrorism, people are questioning the, meaning of their lives. Americans are wondering whether, what they do matters, whether what they cherish is important, and whether what they have worked for has, been worth it. The terrorist-induced jolt to our collective, psyche has made the search for a sense of direction even, more relevant to contemporary life., That said, the threat of terrorism raises some important issues that an adjustment textbook should attempt, to address. Fortunately, the field of psychology has much, to contribute to the battle against terrorism (Marsella,, 2004). After all, terrorism is psychological warfare (Lev-, , costs. He argues that people routinely make errors even, when choosing among a handful of alternatives and, that errors become much more likely when decisions, become vastly more complex. And he explains how having more alternatives increases the potential for rumination, postdecision regret, and anticipated regret. Ultimately, he argues, the malaise associated with choice, overload undermines individuals’ happiness and con-, , © AP/Wide World Photos, , Life May Never Be the Same Again: Implications for Adjustment, , ant, Barbanel, & DeLeon, 2004). The goal of terrorism, is to provoke psychological vulnerability and agitation in, a population. The death, destruction, and havoc wreaked, by terrorists is not an end in itself, but a means to an, end—the creation of widespread anxiety, alarm, and panic., In each chapter you will find boxes labeled “Living, in Today’s World,” which address some of the adjustment, issues raised by the threat of terrorism itself, related, problems spawned by terrorism, and a variety of other, challenges unique to our modern world. These boxes, discuss such topics as how people tend to react to traumatic events, how people can cope more effectively with, personal trauma, whether the government should promote marriage, how resilience can be enhanced in children, how workers can cope with unemployment, and, other contemporary issues. We sincerely hope that this, feature proves helpful., , tributes to depression. Consistent with this analysis,, studies have found that the incidence of depressive disorders has increased dramatically—perhaps tenfold—, over the last 50 years (Diener & Seligman, 2004). Average anxiety levels have also gone up substantially in, recent decades (Twenge, 2000). It is hard to say whether, choice overload is the chief culprit underlying these, trends, but it is clear that increased freedom of choice, CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 3

Page 41 :
© Randy Faris/Corbis, , Barry Schwartz argues that people, in modern societies suffer from, choice overload. He maintains, that the endless choices people, are presented with lead them to, waste countless hours weighing, trivial decisions and ruminating, about whether their decisions, were optimal., , has not resulted in enhanced tranquillity or improved, mental health., Point. Modern technology has gradually provided us, with unprecedented control over the world around us., Advances in agriculture have dramatically increased, food production, and biotechnology advocates claim, that genetically modified crops will make our food supply more reliable that ever before. Elaborate water supply systems, made up of hundreds of miles of canals,, tunnels, and pipelines, along with dams, reservoirs, and, pumping stations, permit massive metropolitan areas, to grow in inhospitable deserts. Thanks to progress in, medicine, doctors can reattach severed limbs, use lasers, to correct microscopic defects in the eye, and even replace the human heart., Counterpoint. Unfortunately, modern technology, has also had a devastating negative impact on the world, around us, leading to environmental problems such as, global warming, destruction of the ozone layer, deforestation, exhaustion of much of the world’s fisheries,, widespread air and water pollution, and extensive exposure of plants and animals to toxic chemicals (Oskamp,, 2000). Many experts worry that in a few generations the, earth’s resources will be too depleted to sustain an adequate quality of life (Winter, 2004). To most people, these, crises sound like technical problems that call for technological answers, but they are also behavioral problems, in that they are fueled by overpopulation and overconsumption (Howard, 2000). In North America, the crucial problem is excessive consumption of the world’s, natural resources. For example, the United States houses, 5 percent of the world’s population but guzzles 25 percent of its commercial energy (Flavin & Dunn, 1999)., , 4, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , All these apparent contradictions reflect the same, theme: The technological advances of the past century,, impressive though they may be, have not led to perceptible, improvement in our collective health and happiness. Indeed, many social critics argue that the quality of our, lives and our sense of personal fulfillment have declined, rather than increased. This is the paradox of progress., What is the cause of this paradox? Many explanations have been offered. Erich Fromm (1963, 1981) has, argued that the progress we value so much has scrambled our value systems and undermined our traditional, sources of emotional security, such as family, community, and religion. Alvin Toffler (1970, 1980) attributes, our collective alienation and distress to our being overwhelmed by rapidly accelerating cultural change. Robert, Kegan (1994) maintains that the mental demands of, modern life have become so complex, confusing, and, contradictory that most of us are “in over our heads.”, Tim Kasser (2002) speculates that excessive materialism weakens the social ties that bind us, stokes the fires, of insecurity, and undermines our collective sense of, well-being. Whatever the explanation, many theorists, agree that the basic challenge of modern life has become, the search for meaning or a sense of direction (Naylor,, Willimon, & Naylor, 1994). This search involves struggling with such problems as forming a solid sense of, identity, arriving at a coherent philosophy of life, and, developing a clear vision of a future that realistically, promises fulfillment. Centuries ago, problems of this, kind were probably much simpler. As we’ll see in the, next section, today it appears that many of us are floundering in a sea of confusion.

Page 42 :
The Search for Direction, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, ■, ■, , Provide some examples of people’s search for direction., Describe three problems that are common to popular self-help books., Summarize advice about what to look for in quality self-help books., Summarize the philosophy underlying this textbook., , We live in a time of unparalleled social and technological mutation. According to a host of social critics, the, kaleidoscope of change that we see around us creates, feelings of anxiety and uncertainty, which we try to alleviate by searching for a sense of direction. This, search, which sometimes goes awry, manifests itself in, many ways., ■ For example, we could discuss how hundreds of, thousands of Americans have invested large sums of, money to enroll in “self-realization” programs such as, est training, Scientology, and Silva Mind Control. These, programs typically promise to provide profound enlightenment and quickly turn one’s life around. Many, participants claim that the programs have revolutionized their lives. However, most experts characterize such, programs as intellectually bankrupt, and magazine exposés reveal that they are simply lucrative moneymaking schemes (Behar, 1991; Pressman, 1993). More, than anything else, the success of these programs demonstrates just how desperate some people are for a sense, of direction and purpose in their lives., , ■ We could also discuss how a host of unorthodox, religious groups—commonly called cults—have attracted hundreds of thousands of converts who voluntarily embrace a life of regimentation, obedience, and, zealous ideology. Most of these cults flourish in obscurity, unless bizarre incidents—such as the mass suicide, of the Heaven’s Gate cult—attract public attention. It, is widely believed that cults use brainwashing and, mind control to seduce lonely outsiders, but in reality, converts are a diverse array of normal people who are, swayed by remarkably ordinary social influence strategies (Baron, 2000; Deikman, 1990). According to Philip, Zimbardo (1992), people join cults because these groups, appear to provide simple solutions to complex problems, a sense of purpose, and a structured lifestyle that, reduces feelings of uncertainty., ■ And, if you would like a mundane, everyday example of people’s search for direction, you need look, no farther than your radio, where you will find that the, hottest nationally syndicated personality is “Dr. Laura,”, who doles out advice to more than 15 million listeners, a week over a network of nearly 300 stations (Bendis,, , There are many manifestations of our search for a sense of direction, including, the emergence of cults, such as the Raelian UFO cult, and the astonishing popularity of “Dr. Laura.”, , © Christopher J. Morris/Corbis, , © Blake Little/Corbis Sygma, , ■, , CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 5

Page 43 :
Copyright © 2000. Used by permission [email protected], , 1997). Although only seven or eight people get through, to her during each show, an astonishing 75,000 people, call each day to seek her unique brand of blunt, outspoken, judgmental advice. Dr. Laura, who is not a, psychologist or psychiatrist (her doctorate is in physiology), analyzes callers’ problems in more of a moral, than psychological framework. Unlike most therapists,, she unabashedly preaches to her audience about how, they ought to lead their lives. In many instances she is, insulting and abusive to her callers, models remarkable intolerance, and provides terrible advice (Epstein,, 2001). In an editorial in Psychology Today, Robert Epstein (2001) concludes that “no legitimate mental health, professional would ever give the kind of hateful, divisive, advice that Schlessinger doles out daily” (p. 5). Yet, the, remarkable popularity of her highly prescriptive ad-, , WE B LI N K 1.1, , Psychological Self-Help, Clinical psychologist and professor Clayton E. Tucker-Ladd, has spent some 25 years exploring how individuals may, help themselves deal with personal issues and problems, from a psychological perspective. Here he has assembled, an online 15-chapter book, grounded in up-to-date research,, that complements this textbook extremely well. Note:, The URLs (addresses) for the Web Links can be found on, the website for this text (http://www.psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e), or you can find them, using a search engine such as Google., , 6, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , vice demonstrates once again that many people are eager, for guidance and direction., Although we might choose to examine any of these, examples of people’s search for a sense of direction, we, will reserve our in-depth analysis for a manifestation, of this search that is even more germane to our focus on, everyday adjustment: the spectacular success of bestselling “self-help” books., , Self-Help Books, In the year 2000, Americans spent $563 million on, “self-help books” that offer do-it-yourself treatments, for common personal problems (Paul, 2001). Their, fascination with self-improvement is nothing new. For, decades American readers have displayed a voracious, appetite for self-help books such as I’m OK—You’re, OK (Harris, 1967), Your Erroneous Zones (Dyer, 1976),, How to Be Awake and Alive (Newman & Berkowitz,, 1976), Living, Loving & Learning (Buscaglia, 1982),, Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus (Gray,, 1992), Ageless Body, Timeless Mind (Chopra, 1993),, Don’t Sweat the Small Stuff . . . and It’s All Small Stuff, (Carlson, 1997), Life Strategies (McGraw, 1999), Making, Peace with Your Past (Bloomfield, 2000), Self-Nurture, (Domar & Dreher, 2000), and Happiness Is Free (Dwoskin & Levenson, 2002). With their simple recipes for, achieving happiness, these books have generally not, been timid about promising to change the quality of, the reader’s life. Consider the following excerpt from

Page 44 :
DOONESBURY © 1978 G. B. Trudeau. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , the back cover of a self-help book titled Self Creation, (Weinberg, 1979):, More than any book ever written, Self Creation shows you, who you are and reveals the secret to controlling your, own life. It contains an action blueprint built around a, clear-cut principle as basic and revolutionary as the law, of gravity. With it you will discover how to conquer bad, habits, solve sexual problems, overcome depression and, shyness, deal with infuriating people, be decisive, enhance, your career, increase creativity. And it will show you how, to love and be loved. You created you. Now you can start to, reap the boundless benefits of self-confidence, self-reliance,, self-determination with Self Creation., , Thus, it would be foolish to dismiss all these books as, shallow drivel. In fact, some of the better self-help books, are highlighted in the Recommended Reading boxes, that appear throughout this text. Unfortunately, however, the gems are easily lost in the mountains of rubbish. A great many self-help books offer little of real, value to the reader. Generally, they suffer from three, fundamental shortcomings., , If only it were that easy! If only someone could hand, you a book that would solve all your problems! Unfortunately, it is not that simple. Merely reading a book is, not likely to turn your life around. If the consumption, of these literary narcotics were even remotely as helpful as their publishers claim, we would be a nation of, serene, happy, well-adjusted people. It is clear, however,, that serenity is not the dominant national mood. Quite, the contrary, as already noted, in recent decades Americans’ average anxiety level has moved upward (Twenge,, 2000) and the prevalence of depression has increased, dramatically (Ingram, Scott, & Siegle, 1999). The multitude of self-help books that crowd bookstore shelves, represent just one more symptom of our collective distress and our search for the elusive secret of happiness., It is somewhat unfair to lump all self-help books together for a critique, because they vary widely in quality (Fried & Schultis, 1995; Norcross et al., 2003). Surveys exploring psychotherapists’ opinions of self-help, books suggest that there are some excellent books that, offer authentic insights and sound advice (Starker, 1990,, 1992). Many therapists encourage their patients to read, selected self-help books (Campbell & Smith, 2003),, and some books that have been tested in clinical trials, have proven helpful (Floyd, 2003; Gregory et al., 2004)., , © David Young-Wolff/PhotoEdit, , The Value of Self-Help Books, , A glance at bookstore shelves verifies that the boom in self-help, books continues unabated, fueled by people’s ongoing need for, guidance and direction in their personal lives., CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 7

Page 45 :
WE B LI N K 1.2, , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , The Paradox of Choice:, Why More Is Less, by Barry Schwartz, (HarperCollins, 2004), In The Paradox of Choice, Barry Schwartz argues that, people in modern, affluent societies suffer a variety of, negative consequences because they face an overabundance of choices in their personal lives (see p. 2)., Schwartz recognizes that his argument seems counterintuitive, as most people cherish their freedom of choice., But he maintains that “the fact that some choice is, good doesn’t necessarily mean that more choice is better” (p. 3). In perhaps the most interesting part of the, book, Schwartz outlines the differences between maximizers and satisficers. Maximizers need to feel confident, that virtually every decision has yielded the best possible outcome. In contrast, satisficers are frequently, willing to settle for outcomes that are good enough., He emphasizes that satisficers try to meet certain standards—sometimes very high standards—in making, their decisions, but they do not feel compelled to select the best possible printer, mattress, vacation, and, so forth. Although maximizing sounds like an admirable, goal, Schwartz reports that high maximization scores, are associated with reduced optimism and happiness, and increased depression—and he raises doubts about, whether maximizing tends to lead to better decisions., Does Schwartz have a solution for the problem of, excessive choice? Yes, his final chapter offers advice for, making the overabundance of choices in our modern, world less painful. Among other things, he suggests, that people should (1) decide which choices really matter, (2) satisfice more and maximize less, (3) avoid rumination about decisions, (4) let go of decision regrets,, and (5) recognize that constraints on choice can sometimes be liberating. Schwartz’s writing is clear, concise,, and engaging. The book is loaded with charming anecdotes that provide real-life examples of the issues, discussed, but Schwartz’s conclusions are based on, research rather than anecdotal evidence. In the final, analysis, The Paradox of Choice delivers an enticing, two-for-one bargain: it is a thought-provoking essay in, social criticism and a sound, realistic self-help book., Entire hardcover book cover copyright © 2004 by Barry Schwartz. Reprinted by, permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., , First, they are dominated by “psychobabble.” The, term psychobabble, coined by R. D. Rosen (1977), seems, appropriate to describe the “hip” but hopelessly vague, language used in many of these books. Statements such, as “It’s beautiful if you’re unhappy,” “You’ve got to get, in touch with yourself,”“You have to be up front,”“You, 8, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Quackwatch, Stephen Barrett, a retired psychiatrist, has sought to, alert the public to “health-related frauds, myths, fads,, and fallacies” for over 30 years. This site offers no-holdsbarred evaluations of Internet-based medical resources, that Barrett and his board of scientific and technical advisers judge to be dubious, fraudulent, or dangerous to, one’s health., , gotta be you ’cause you’re you,” and “You need a real, high-energy experience” are typical examples of this, language. At best, such terminology is ill-defined; at, worst, it is meaningless. Consider the following example, taken from a question/answer booklet promoting, est training:, The EST training doesn’t change the content of anyone’s, life, nor does it change what anyone knows. It deals with, the context or the way we hold the content. . . . Transformation occurs as a recontextualization. . . . “Getting it”, means being able to discover when you have been maintaining (or are stuck with) a position which costs you more, in aliveness than it is worth, realizing that you are the, source of that position, and being able to choose to give, up that position or hold it in a way that expands the quality of your life., What exactly does this paragraph say? Who knows?, The statements are so ambiguous and enigmatic that, you can read virtually any meaning into them. Therein, lies the problem with psychobabble; it is often so obscure as to be unintelligible. Clarity is sacrificed in favor, of a hip jargon that prevents, rather than enhances, effective communication., A second problem is that self-help books tend to, place more emphasis on sales than on scientific soundness. The advice offered in these books is far too rarely, based on solid, scientific research (Ellis, 1993; Paul, 2001;, Rosen, 1987). Instead, the ideas are frequently based, on the authors’ intuitive analyses, which may be highly, speculative. Moreover, even when responsible authors, provide scientifically valid advice and are careful not, to mislead their readers, sales-hungry publishers often, slap outrageous, irresponsible promises on the books’, covers (much to the dismay of some authors)., The third shortcoming is that self-help books don’t, usually provide explicit directions about how to change, your behavior. These books tend to be smoothly written and “touchingly human” in tone. They often strike, responsive chords in the reader by aptly describing a, common problem that many of us experience. The, reader says, “Yes, that’s me!” Unfortunately, when the, book focuses on how to deal with the problem, it usu-

Page 46 :
CALVIN AND HOBBES © 1993 Watterson. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , ally provides only a vague distillation of simple common sense, which could be covered in 2 rather than, 200 pages. These books often fall back on inspirational, cheerleading in the absence of sound, explicit advice., What to Look for in Self-Help Books, , Because self-help books vary so widely in quality, it, seems a good idea to provide you with some guidelines, about what to look for in seeking genuinely helpful, books. The following thoughts give you some criteria, for judging books of this type., 1. Clarity in communication is essential. Advice, , won’t do you much good if you can’t understand it. Try, to avoid drowning in the murky depths of psychobabble., 2. This may sound backward, but look for books, that do not promise too much in the way of immediate, change. The truly useful books tend to be appropriately, cautious in their promises and realistic about the challenge of altering your behavior., 3. Try to select books that mention, at least briefly,, the theoretical or research basis for the program they, advocate. It is understandable that you may not be interested in a detailed summary of research that supports, a particular piece of advice. However, you should be, , interested in whether the advice is based on published, research, widely accepted theory, anecdotal evidence,, clinical interactions with patients, or pure speculation, by the author. Books that are based on more than personal anecdotes and speculation should have a list of, references in the back (or at the end of each chapter)., 4. Look for books that provide detailed, explicit, directions about how to alter your behavior. Generally, these directions represent the crucial core of the, book. If they are inadequate in detail, you have been, shortchanged., 5. More often than not, books that focus on a particular kind of problem, such as overeating, loneliness,, or marital difficulties, deliver more than those that, promise to cure all of life’s problems with a few simple, ideas. Books that cover everything are usually superficial and disappointing. Books that devote a great deal of, thought to a particular topic tend to be written by authors with genuine expertise on that topic. Such books, are more likely to pay off for you., , The Approach of This Textbook, Clearly, in spite of our impressive technological progress, we are a people beset by a great variety of personal, CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 9

Page 47 :
problems. Living in our complex, modern society is a, formidable challenge. This book is about that challenge., It is about you. It is about life. Specifically, it summarizes for you the scientific research on human behavior, that appears relevant to the challenge of living effectively in contemporary society. It draws primarily, but, not exclusively, from the science we call psychology., This text deals with the same kinds of problems addressed by self-help books, self-realization programs,, and Dr. Laura: anxiety, stress, interpersonal relationships, frustration, loneliness, depression, self-control., However, it makes no boldly seductive promises about, solving your personal problems, turning your life, around, or helping you achieve tranquility. Such promises simply aren’t realistic. Psychologists have long rec-, , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , What You Can Change, and What You Can’t, by Martin E. P. Seligman, (Knopf, 1994), Martin Seligman is a prominent psychologist who has, conducted influential research on learned helplessness,, attributional style, optimism, depression, and phobias., He is also one of the chief architects of the new positive psychology movement (see Chapter 3). In this, book he synthesizes research on a host of issues to, help people understand what they can and cannot, change about themselves. Seligman points out that, self-improvement programs of all types—from meditation, to self-help books, to professional therapy—are, predicated on the assumption that people can permanently change themselves for the better. He notes,, however, that recent, highly publicized research in biological psychiatry is at odds with this assumption. This, research suggests that personality, intelligence, physique,, and vulnerability to psychological disorders are predominantly determined by genetic inheritance and hence, are largely unchangeable. Seligman asserts that both, viewpoints are too extreme, that the architects of selfimprovement programs are too optimistic while the, authorities on biological psychiatry are too pessimistic, about people’s capacity for change. Thus, he sets out, to review the empirical evidence on what can be modified with reasonable success, and what can’t be. Seligman covers such wide-ranging topics as treatments for, sexual difficulties, alcoholism, weight problems, anxiety, depression, obsessions, and posttraumatic stress, syndrome. His discussions are lively, readable, objective,, sophisticated, and thoroughly grounded in research., Cover copyright © 1994 Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. Reprinted by permission., , 10, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , ognized that changing a person’s behavior is a difficult, challenge, fraught with frustration and failure (Seligman,, 1994). Troubled individuals sometimes spend years in, therapy without resolving their problems., This reality does not mean that you should be pessimistic about your potential for personal growth. You, most certainly can change your behavior. Moreover, you, can often change it on your own without consulting a, professional psychologist. We would not be writing, this text if we did not believe that some of our readers, could derive some personal benefit from this encounter., But it is important that you have realistic expectations., Reading this book will not be a revelatory experience., No mysterious secrets are about to be unveiled. All this, book can do is give you some potentially useful information and point you in some potentially beneficial directions. The rest is up to you., In view of our criticisms of self-realization programs and self-help books, it seems essential that we, explicitly lay out the philosophy that underlies the writing of this text. The following statements summarize, the assumptions and goals of this book., 1. This text is based on the premise that accurate, knowledge about the principles of psychology can be of, value to you in everyday life. It has been said that knowledge is power. Greater awareness of why people behave, as they do should help you in interacting with others as, well as in trying to understand yourself., 2. This text attempts to foster a critical attitude, about psychological issues and to enhance your critical, thinking skills. Information is important, but people, also need to develop effective strategies for evaluating, information. Critical thinking involves subjecting, ideas to systematic, skeptical scrutiny. Critical thinkers, ask tough questions, such as: What exactly is being asserted? What assumptions underlie this assertion? What, evidence or reasoning supports this assertion? Are, there alternative explanations? Some general guidelines for thinking critically are outlined in Figure 1.1., We have already attempted to illustrate the importance, of a critical attitude in our evaluation of self-help, books, and we’ll continue to model critical thinking, strategies throughout the text., , WE B LI N K 1.3, , Foundation for Critical Thinking, How can students best develop those skills that go beyond, merely acquiring information to actively weighing and, judging information? The many resources of the Foundation, for Critical Thinking at Sonoma State University are directed, primarily toward teachers at every level to help them develop their students’ critical thinking abilities.

Page 48 :
•, , Guidelines for Thinking Critically, 1 Ask questions; be willing to wonder. To think critically you must be willing to think creatively—, that is, to be curious about the puzzles of human behavior, to wonder why people act the way they, do, and to question received explanations and examine new ones., 2 Define the problem. Identify the issues involved in clear and concrete terms, rather than vague, generalities such as “happiness,” “potential,” or “meaningfulness.” What does meaningfulness mean,, exactly?, 3 Examine the evidence. Consider the nature of the evidence that supports all aspects of the problem, under examination. Is it reliable? Valid? Is it someone’s personal assertion or speculation? Does the, evidence come from one or two narrow studies, or from repeated research?, 4 Analyze biases and assumptions—your own and those of others. What prejudices, deeply held, values, and other personal biases do you bring to your evaluation of a problem? Are you willing to, consider evidence that contradicts your beliefs? Be sure you can identify the bias of others, in order, to evaluate their arguments as well., 5 Avoid emotional reasoning (“If I feel this way, it must be true”). Remember that everyone holds, convictions and ideas about how the world should operate and that your opponents are as serious, about their convictions as you are about yours. Feelings are important, but they should not substitute for careful appraisal of arguments and evidence., , FIG U R E 1.1, , Guidelines for thinking critically. Critical thinking should, not be equated with negative, thinking; it’s not a matter of, learning how to tear down, others’ ideas. Rather, critical, thinkers carefully subject, others’ ideas—and their own—, to careful, systematic, objective evaluation. The guidelines, shown here, taken from Wade, and Tavris (1990), provide a, succinct overview of what it, means to think critically., From Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (1990). Learning, to Think Critically: A Handbook to Accompany, Psychology. New York: Harper & Row. Copyright © 1990 by Harper & Row Publishers,, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Pearson, Education, Inc., , 6 Don’t oversimplify. Look beyond the obvious. Reject simplistic, either-or thinking. Look for logical, contradictions in arguments. Be wary of “arguments by anecdote.”, 7 Consider other interpretations. Before you leap to conclusions, think about other explanations., Be especially careful about assertions of cause and effect., 8 Tolerate uncertainty. This may be the hardest step in becoming a critical thinker, for it requires, the ability to accept some guiding ideas and beliefs—yet the willingness to give them up when, evidence and experience contradict them., , 3. This text should open doors. The coverage in this, , book is broad; we tackle many topics. Therefore, in some, places it may lack the depth or detail that you would, like. However, you should think of it as a resource book, that can introduce you to other books or techniques, or therapies, which you can then pursue on your own., 4. This text assumes that the key to effective adjustment is to take charge of your own life. If you are dissatis-, , fied with some aspect of your life, it does no good to, sit around and mope about it. You have to take an active role in attempting to improve the quality of your, life. Doing so may involve learning a new skill or pursuing a particular kind of help. In any case, it is generally, best to meet problems head-on rather than trying to, avoid them., , The Psychology of Adjustment, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Describe the two key facets of psychology., Explain the concept of adjustment., , Now that we have spelled out our approach in writing, this text, it is time to turn to the task of introducing you, to some basic concepts. In this section, we’ll discuss the, nature of psychology and the concept of adjustment., , What Is Psychology?, Psychology is the science that studies behavior and, the physiological and mental processes that underlie, it, and it is the profession that applies the accumulated, knowledge of this science to practical problems. Psychology leads a complex dual existence as both a science, , and a profession. Let’s examine the science first. Psychology is an area of scientific study, much like biology or, physics. Whereas biology focuses on life processes and, physics focuses on matter and energy, psychology focuses on behavior and related mental and physiological, processes., Psychology looks at behavior. Behavior is any overt, (observable) response or activity by an organism., Psychology does not confine itself to the study of human, behavior. Many psychologists believe that the principles of behavior are much the same for all animals, including humans. As a result, these psychologists often, CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 11

Page 49 :
What Is Adjustment?, , prefer to study animals—mainly because they can exert, more control over the factors influencing the animals’, behavior., Psychology is also interested in the mental processes—the thoughts, feelings, and wishes—that accompany behavior. Mental processes are more difficult to, study than behavior because they are private and not, directly observable. However, they exert critical influence over human behavior, so psychologists have strived, to improve their ability to “look inside the mind.”, Finally, psychology includes the study of the physiological processes that underlie behavior. Thus, some, psychologists try to figure out how bodily processes, such as neural impulses, hormonal secretions, and genetic coding regulate behavior., Practically speaking, all this means that psychologists study a great variety of phenomena. Psychologists, are interested in maze running in rats, salivation in dogs,, and brain functioning in cats, as well as visual perception in humans, play in children, and social interaction, in adults., As you probably know, psychology is not all pure, science. It has a highly practical side, represented by the, many psychologists who provide a variety of professional services to the public. Although the profession of, psychology is quite prominent today, this aspect of psychology was actually slow to develop. Until the 1950s, psychologists were found almost exclusively in the halls, of academia, teaching and doing research. However,, the demands of World War II in the 1940s stimulated, rapid growth in psychology’s first professional specialty—clinical psychology. Clinical psychology is the, branch of psychology concerned with the diagnosis, and treatment of psychological problems and disorders. During World War II, a multitude of academic, psychologists were pressed into service as clinicians to, screen military recruits and treat soldiers suffering from, trauma. Many found their clinical work interesting and, returned from the war to set up training programs to, meet the continued high demand for clinical services., Soon, about half of the new Ph.D.’s in psychology were, specializing in clinical work. Psychology had come of, age as a profession., , We have used the term adjustment several times without clarifying its exact meaning. The concept of adjustment was originally borrowed from biology. It was, modeled after the biological term adaptation, which, refers to efforts by a species to adjust to changes in its, environment. Just as a field mouse has to adapt to an, unusually brutal winter, a person has to adjust to, changes in circumstances such as a new job, a financial, setback, or the loss of a loved one. Thus, adjustment, refers to the psychological processes through which, people manage or cope with the demands and challenges of everyday life., The demands of everyday life are diverse, so in, studying the process of adjustment we will encounter a, broad variety of topics. In the first section of this book,, “The Dynamics of Adjustment,” we discuss general issues, such as how personality affects people’s patterns, of adjustment, how individuals are affected by stress,, and how they use coping strategies to deal with stress., In the second section, “The Interpersonal Realm,” we, examine the adjustments that people make in their social relationships, exploring such topics as individuals’, perceptions of others, interpersonal communication,, behavior in groups, friendship, and intimate relationships. In the third section, “Developmental Transitions,”, we look at how individuals adjust to changing demands, as they grow older. We discuss such topics as the development of gender roles, the emergence of sexuality,, phases of adult development, and transitions in the, world of work. Finally, in the fourth section, “Mental, and Physical Health,” we discuss how the process of adjustment influences a person’s psychological and physical wellness., As you can see, the study of adjustment delves into, nearly every corner of people’s lives, and we’ll be discussing a diverse array of issues and topics. Before we, begin considering these topics in earnest, however, we, need to take a closer look at psychology’s approach to, investigating behavior—the scientific method., , The Scientific Approach to Behavior, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , 12, , Explain the nature of empiricism., Explain two advantages of the scientific approach to, understanding behavior., Describe the experimental method, distinguishing, between independent and dependent variables and, between experimental and control groups., , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , ■, , ■, ■, , Distinguish between positive and negative correlation, and explain what the size of a correlation coefficient, means., Describe three correlational research methods., Compare the advantages and disadvantages of, experimental versus correlational research.

Page 50 :
We all expend a great deal of effort in trying to understand our own behavior as well as the behavior of others. We wonder about any number of behavioral questions: Why am I so anxious when I interact with new, people? Why is Sam always trying to be the center of, attention at the office? Why does Joanna cheat on her, wonderful husband? Are extraverts happier than introverts? Is depression more common during the Christmas holidays? Given that psychologists’ principal goal, is to explain behavior, how are their efforts different, from everyone else’s? The key difference is that psychology is a science, committed to empiricism., , The Commitment to Empiricism, Empiricism is the premise that knowledge should be, acquired through observation. When we say that scientific psychology is empirical, we mean that its conclusions are based on systematic observation rather than, on reasoning, speculation, traditional beliefs, or common sense. Scientists are not content with having ideas, that sound plausible; they must conduct research to test, their ideas. Whereas our everyday speculations are informal, unsystematic, and highly subjective, scientists’, investigations are formal, systematic, and objective., In these investigations, scientists formulate testable hypotheses, gather data (make observations) relevant to their hypotheses, use statistics to analyze these, data, and report their results to the public and other scientists, typically by publishing their findings in a technical journal. The process of publishing scientific studies allows other experts to evaluate and critique new, research findings., , Advantages of the, Scientific Approach, Science is certainly not the only method that can be used, to draw conclusions about behavior. We can also turn, to logic, casual observation, and good old-fashioned, common sense. Because the scientific method often, requires painstaking effort, it seems reasonable to, ask: What exactly are the advantages of the empirical, approach?, The scientific approach offers two major advantages. The first is its clarity and precision. Commonsense notions about behavior tend to be vague and ambiguous. Consider the old truism “Spare the rod and, spoil the child.” What does this generalization about, child-rearing amount to? How severely should children, be punished if parents are not to “spare the rod”? How, do parents assess whether a child qualifies as “spoiled”?, Such statements can have different meanings to different people. When people disagree about this assertion,, it may be because they are talking about entirely different things. In contrast, the empirical approach requires, , that scientists specify exactly what they are talking about, when they formulate hypotheses. This clarity and precision enhance communication about important ideas., The second advantage offered by the scientific approach is its relative intolerance of error. Scientists subject their ideas to empirical tests. They also scrutinize, one another’s findings with a critical eye. They demand, objective data and thorough documentation before, they accept ideas. When the findings of two studies, conflict, they try to figure out why the studies reached, different conclusions, usually by conducting additional, research. In contrast, common sense and casual observation often tolerate contradictory generalizations,, such as “Opposites attract” and “Birds of a feather flock, together.” Furthermore, commonsense analyses involve, little effort to verify ideas or detect errors, so that many, myths about behavior come to be widely believed., All this is not to say that science has a copyright, on truth. However, the scientific approach does tend, to yield more accurate and dependable information, than casual analyses and armchair speculation. Knowledge of empirical data can thus provide a useful benchmark against which to judge claims and information, from other kinds of sources., Now that we have an overview of how the scientific enterprise works, we can look at some of the specific research methods that psychologists depend on, most. The two main types of research methods in psychology are experimental and correlational. We discuss, them separately because there is an important distinction between them., , Experimental Research:, Looking for Causes, Does misery love company? This question intrigued, social psychologist Stanley Schachter. How does anxiety affect people’s desire to be with others? When they, feel anxious, do they want to be left alone, or do they, prefer to have others around? Schachter’s hypothesis, was that increases in anxiety would cause increases in, the desire to be with others, which psychologists call the, need for affiliation. To test this hypothesis, Schachter, (1959) designed a clever experiment. The experiment, is a research method in which the investigator manipulates one (independent) variable under carefully, controlled conditions and observes whether any, changes occur in a second (dependent) variable as a, result. Psychologists depend on this method more than, any other., Independent and Dependent Variables, , An experiment is designed to find out whether changes, in one variable (let’s call it x) cause changes in another, variable (let’s call it y). To put it more concisely, we want, to know how x affects y. In this formulation, we refer, CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 13

Page 51 :
to x as the independent variable, and we call y the dependent variable. An independent variable is a condition or event that an experimenter varies in order to, see its impact on another variable. The independent, variable is the variable that the experimenter controls, or manipulates. It is hypothesized to have some effect, on the dependent variable. The experiment is conducted to verify this effect. The dependent variable is, the variable that is thought to be affected by the manipulations of the independent variable. In psychology studies, the dependent variable usually is a measurement of some aspect of the subjects’ behavior., In Schachter’s experiment, the independent variable was the participants’ anxiety level, which he manipulated in the following way. Subjects assembled in, his laboratory were told by a Dr. Zilstein that they would, be participating in a study on the physiological effects, of electric shock and that they would receive a series of, electric shocks. Half of the participants were warned, that the shocks would be very painful. They made up, the high-anxiety group. The other half of the participants, assigned to the low-anxiety group, were told that, the shocks would be mild and painless. These procedures were simply intended to evoke different levels of, anxiety. In reality, no one was actually shocked at any, time. Instead, the experimenter indicated that there, would be a delay while he prepared the shock apparatus for use. The participants were asked whether they, would prefer to wait alone or in the company of others., This measure of the subjects’ desire to affiliate with others was the dependent variable., , WE B LI N K 1.4, , Research Methods Tutorials, Bill Trochim’s classes in research and program design at, Cornell University have assembled tutorial guides for undergraduate and graduate students for more than 50 topics, at this subpage of the Web Center for Social Research, Methods. Students new to research design may find these, tutorials particularly helpful., , between the two groups on the dependent variable must, be due to this manipulation of the independent variable., In this way researchers isolate the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. In his experiment, Schachter isolated the impact of anxiety on, need for affiliation. What did he find? As predicted, he, found that increased anxiety led to increased affiliation., The percentage of people who wanted to wait with others was nearly twice as high in the high-anxiety group, as in the low-anxiety group., The logic of the experimental method rests heavily, on the assumption that the experimental and control, groups are alike in all important matters except for their, different treatment with regard to the independent, variable. Any other differences between the two groups, cloud the situation and make it difficult to draw solid, conclusions about the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable. To summarize our discussion of the experimental method, Figure 1.2 provides an overview of the various elements in, an experiment, using Schachter’s study as an example., , Experimental and Control Groups, , To conduct an experiment, an investigator typically assembles two groups of participants who are treated, differently in regard to the independent variable. We, call these groups the experimental and control groups., The experimental group consists of the subjects who, receive some special treatment in regard to the independent variable. The control group consists of similar subjects who do not receive the special treatment, given to the experimental group., Let’s return to the Schachter study to illustrate. In, this study, the participants in the high-anxiety condition were the experimental group. They received a special treatment designed to create an unusually high level, of anxiety. The participants in the low-anxiety condition were the control group., It is crucial that the experimental and control, groups be similar except for the different treatment, they receive in regard to the independent variable. This, stipulation brings us to the logic that underlies the experimental method. If the two groups are alike in all, respects except for the variation created by the manipulation of the independent variable, then any differences, , 14, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Advantages and Disadvantages, , The experiment is a powerful research method. Its principal advantage is that it allows scientists to draw conclusions about cause-and-effect relationships between, variables. Researchers can draw these conclusions about, causation because the precise control available in the, experiment permits them to isolate the relationship, between the independent variable and the dependent, variable. No other research method can duplicate this, advantage., For all its power, however, the experimental method, has its limitations. One disadvantage is that researchers are often interested in the effects of variables that, cannot be manipulated (as independent variables) because of ethical concerns or practical realities. For example, you might want to know whether being brought, up in an urban area as opposed to a rural area affects, people’s values. A true experiment would require you, to assign similar families to live in urban and rural, areas, which obviously is impossible to do. To explore, this question, you would have to use correlational research methods, which we turn to next.

Page 52 :
Correlational Research:, Looking for Links, As we just noted, in some situations psychologists cannot exert experimental control over the variables they, want to study. In such situations, all a researcher can, do is make systematic observations to see whether a link, or association exists between the variables of interest., Such an association is called a correlation. A correla-, , tion exists when two variables are related to each other., The definitive aspect of correlational studies is that the, researchers cannot control the variables under study., Measuring Correlation, , The results of correlational research are often summarized with a statistic called the correlation coefficient., We’ll be refering to this widely used statistic frequently, as we discuss studies throughout the remainder of this, text. A correlation coefficient is a numerical index of the degree of relationship that, exists between two variables. A correlation, coefficient indicates (1) how strongly reHYPOTHESIS:, Anxiety increases desire to affiliate, lated two variables are and (2) the direction, (positive or negative) of the relationship., Two kinds of relationships can be deChoice, College students, scribed, by a correlation. A positive correof subjects, lation indicates that two variables covary, in the same direction. This means that, high scores on variable x are associated, Assignment, Control, Experimental, with high scores on variable y and that low, to groups, scores on variable x are associated with, low scores on variable y. For example, there, Standardized, is a positive correlation between high school, Laboratory setting with Dr. Zilstein, (similar), grade point average (GPA) and subsequent, conditions, college GPA. That is, people who do well in, high school tend to do well in college, and, those who perform poorly in high school, ”Shocks, ”Shocks, tend to perform poorly in college (see Figwill be mild, will be, Manipulation, ure 1.3 on the next page)., and painless . . . ”, very painful . . . ”, of independent, In contrast, a negative correlation in(low, anxiety), (high, anxiety), variable, dicates that two variables covary in the opposite direction. This means that people, who score high on variable x tend to score, low on variable y, whereas those who score, ”Would you prefer to wait, Measurement, low on x tend to score high on y. For examalone or with others?", of dependent, ple, in most college courses, there is a neg(desire to affiliate), variable, ative correlation between how frequently a, student is absent and how well the student, performs on exams. Students who have a, high number of absences tend to earn low, High-anxiety group wanted, Comparison, to wait with others more, exam scores, while students who have a, of results, than low-anxiety group did, low number of absences tend to get higher, exam scores (see Figure 1.3)., While the positive or negative sign inCONCLUSION:, Anxiety does increase desire to affiliate, dicates whether an association is direct or, inverse, the size of the coefficient indicates, the strength of the association between two, variables. A correlation coefficient can vary, between 0 and ⫹1.00 (if positive) or between 0 and ⫺1.00 (if negative). A coeffiF I G U R E 1.2, cient near zero tells us there is no relationThe basic elements of an experiment. This diagram provides an overview of the, ship between the variables. The closer the, key features of the experimental method, as illustrated by Schachter’s study of anxicorrelation to either ⫺1.00 or ⫹1.00, the, ety and affiliation. The logic of the experiment rests on treating the experimental, stronger the relationship. Thus, a correlaand control groups alike except for the manipulation of the independent variable., , •, , CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 15

Page 53 :
•, , FIG U R E 1.3, , Positive and negative, correlations. Variables, are positively correlated if, they tend to increase and, decrease together and are, negatively correlated if, one variable tends to, increase when the other, decreases. Hence, the, terms positive correlation, and negative correlation, refer to the direction of, the relationship between, two variables., , y, , Exam, scores, , Frequency, of absences, , x, , Naturalistic Observation, , In naturalistic observation a researcher engages in, careful observation of behavior without intervening, directly with the subjects. This type of research is called, , x, , y, Positive correlation, , naturalistic because behavior is allowed to unfold naturally (without interference) in its natural environment—that is, the setting in which it would normally, occur., As an example, consider a study by Stoffer, Davis,, and Brown (1977), which sought to determine whether, it is a good idea for students to reconsider and change, answers on multiple-choice tests. The conventional wisdom is that “your first hunch is your best hunch,” and, it is widely believed that students should not go back, and change their answers. To put this idea to an empirical test, Stoffer and his colleagues studied the answer, changes made by college students on their regular exams, in a psychology course. They simply examined students’, answer sheets for evidence of response changes, such, as erasures or crossing out of responses. As Figure 1.5, shows, they found that changes that went from a wrong, answer to a right answer outnumbered changes that, went from a right answer to a wrong answer by a mar-, , FIG U R E 1.4, , 1.00, , Coefficient of determination, , Interpreting correlation coefficients., The magnitude of a, correlation coefficient, indicates the strength, of the relationship between two variables., The closer a correlation, is to either ⫹1.00 or, ⫺1.00, the stronger, the relationship between the variables., The square of a correlation, which is, called the coefficient, of determination, is an, index of a correlation’s, strength and predictive, power., , High, , High, , .75, , Negative, correlation, , .50, , PART 1, , Positive, correlation, , Moderate, , Moderate, , .25, , Low, , Low, Negligible, , –1.00, , –.80, , –.60, , –.40, , Increasing, , 16, , College, GPA, , Negative correlation, , tion of ⫹.90 represents a stronger tendency for variables to be associated than a correlation of ⫺.40 does, (see Figure 1.4). Likewise, a correlation of ⫺.75 represents a stronger relationship than a correlation of ⫺.45., Keep in mind that the strength of a correlation depends, only on the size of the coefficient. The positive or negative sign simply shows whether the correlation is direct or inverse. Therefore, a correlation of ⫺.60 reflects, a stronger relationship than a correlation of ⫹.30., Correlational research methods comprise a number of approaches, including naturalistic observation,, case studies, and surveys. Let’s examine each of these to, see how researchers use them to detect associations between variables., , •, , High, school, GPA, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , –.20, , 0, +.20, Correlation, , +.40, , +.60, , Increasing, , +.80, , +1.00

Page 54 :
Right to wrong, 22%, Wrong to, wrong, 15%, , Wrong to right, 63%, , more nicely by others than homely people are, suggesting that attractive patients may have an easier time adjusting to life outside the hospital. To find out, the research team compiled case history data (and ratings of, physical attractiveness) for patients just before their, discharge from a mental hospital and six months later., A modest positive correlation (.38) was found between, patients’ attractiveness and their postdischarge social, adjustment. Thus, the better-looking patients were better off, suggesting that physical attractiveness plays a, role in psychiatric patients’ readjustment to community living., Surveys, , •, , F I G U R E 1.5, , The effects of answer changing on multiple-choice exams., In a study of answer changes, Stoffer et al. (1977) found that, wrong-to-right changes outnumbered right-to-wrong changes, by a sizable margin. These results are similar to those of other, studies on this issue., , gin of nearly 3 to 1! The correlation between the number of changes students made and their net gain from, answer changing was ⫹.49, indicating that the more, answer changing students engaged in, the more they, improved their scores. These results, which have been, replicated in a number of other studies (Benjamin,, Cavell, & Shallenberger, 1984), show that popular beliefs about the harmful effects of answer changing are, inaccurate., Case Studies, , A case study is an in-depth investigation of an individual participant. Psychologists typically assemble, case studies in clinical settings where an effort is being, made to diagnose and treat some psychological problem. To achieve an understanding of an individual, a, clinician may use a variety of procedures, including interviewing the person, interviewing others who know, the individual, direct observation, examination of records, and psychological testing. Usually, a single case, study does not provide much basis for deriving general, laws of behavior. If researchers have a number of case, studies available, however, they can look for threads of, consistency among them, and they may be able to draw, some general conclusions., This was the strategy used by a research team (Farina et al., 1986) that studied psychiatric patients’ readjustment to their community after their release from, a mental hospital. The researchers wanted to know, whether the patients’ physical attractiveness was related, to their success in readjustment. As we’ll discuss in upcoming chapters, good-looking people tend to be treated, , Surveys are structured questionnaires designed to, solicit information about specific aspects of participants’ behavior. They are sometimes used to measure, dependent variables in experiments, but they are mainly, used in correlational research. Surveys are commonly, used to gather data on people’s attitudes and on aspects, of behavior that are difficult to observe directly (marital interactions, for instance). As an example, consider a, study by Alvin Cooper and his colleagues (1999) which, examined people’s Internet sexual pursuits. Cooper and, his associates gathered data from an online questionnaire that was posted for seven weeks at the MSNBC, website. The final sample consisted of 9,177 anonymous, volunteers. The self-selected sample clearly was not, representative of the general adult population in the, United States, but the participants’ demographic data, suggested that they were reasonably representative of, that portion of the population that visits sexually explicit websites., What did the survey reveal? Male respondents outnumbered female respondents by about 6 to 1. Men reported mostly going to sites that featured visual erotica,, whereas women were more likely to visit sexually themed, chat rooms. Only 8–9 percent of the respondents reported spending more than 10 hours per week in online sexual pursuits (see Figure 1.6 on the next page)., Although 87 percent of the subjects indicated that they, never felt guilty about their behavior, 70 percent admitted keeping the extent of their online sexual activities secret from others. Among “heavy users” of Internet sex sites (more than 10 hours per week), about, , WE B LI N K 1.5, , American Psychological Association (APA), As the largest professional organization of psychologists,, the APA continually publicizes the latest research findings, for most topics discussed in this textbook. Students should, consider using the excellent search engines at the APA’s, online site when looking for leads to new scientific research, on adjustment issues., , CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 17

Page 55 :
HOURS PER WEEK, IN ONLINE SEXUAL PURSUITS, , 1 to 10, , Men, Women, Men, Women, , © David Young-Wolff/PhotoEdit, , Less, than 1, , More Men, than 10 Women, 0, , •, , 10, , 20, 30, 40, PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS, , 50, , 60, , FIG U R E 1.6, , Time devoted to Internet sexual pursuits. In the online survey conducted by Cooper and his colleagues, (1999), over 9,000 respondents provided information on how much time they spend weekly visiting sexually oriented websites. As you can see, the vast majority of participants reported that they spend 10 hours, or less each week in online sexual pursuits. (Based on Cooper et al., 1999), , one-half admitted that their online activities were interfering with their lives. The authors conclude that, “the vast majority of online users generally seem to use, Internet sexual venues in casual ways that may not be, problematic,” but they emphasize that heavy users may, be at risk for psychological difficulties., Advantages and Disadvantages, , Correlational research methods give psychologists a, way to explore questions that they could not examine, with experimental procedures. Consider the study of, the association between attractiveness and adjustment, in psychiatric patients. Obviously, Farina et al. (1986), could not manipulate the physical attractiveness of their, subjects. But correlational methods allowed them to, gather useful information on whether a link exists between attractiveness and adjustment. Thus, correlational, , •, , FIG U R E 1.7, , Possible causal relations between correlated variables., When two variables are correlated, there are several possible, explanations. It could be that, x causes y, that y causes x, or, that a third variable, z, causes, changes in both x and y. As the, correlation between marital, satisfaction and sexual satisfaction illustrates, the correlation, itself does not provide the, answer., , 18, , research broadens the scope of phenomena that psychologists can study., Unfortunately, correlational methods have one, major disadvantage. The investigator does not have the, opportunity to control events in a way to isolate cause, and effect. Consequently, correlational research cannot, demonstrate conclusively that two variables are causally, related. The crux of the problem is that correlation is, no assurance of causation., When we find that variables x and y are correlated,, we can safely conclude only that x and y are related. We, do not know how x and y are related. We do not know, whether x causes y, whether y causes x, or whether both, are caused by a third variable. For example, survey studies show a positive correlation between marital satisfaction and sexual satisfaction (Hunt, 1974; Christopher, & Sprecher, 2000). Although it’s clear that good sex and, , PART 1, , Compatibility, in values, , z, , x, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , y, , Marital, satisfaction, , Sexual, satisfaction

Page 56 :
a healthy marriage go hand in hand, it’s hard to tell, what’s causing what. We don’t know whether healthy, marriages promote good sex or whether good sex promotes healthy marriages. Moreover, we can’t rule out, the possibility that both are caused by a third variable., Perhaps sexual satisfaction and marital satisfaction are, both caused by compatibility in values. The plausible, , causal relationships in this case are diagrammed for, you in Figure 1.7, which illustrates the “third-variable, problem” in interpreting correlations. This problem, occurs frequently in correlational research. Indeed, it, will surface in the next section, where we review the, empirical research on the determinants of happiness., , The Roots of Happiness:, An Empirical Analysis, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Discuss the prevalence of reported happiness in modern, society., List the various factors that are surprisingly unrelated to, happiness., Explain how health, social activity, and religion are, related to happiness., , ■, , ■, , Discuss how love, work, and personality are related to, happiness., Summarize the conclusions drawn about the, determinants of happiness., , Percent, , What exactly makes a person happy? This question has, themselves below the neutral point on the various scales, been the subject of much speculation. Commonsense, used (see Figure 1.8). When the average subjective wellhypotheses about the roots of happiness abound. For, being of entire nations is computed, based on almost, example, you have no doubt heard that money cannot, 1000 surveys, the means cluster toward the positive end, buy happiness. But do you believe it? A television comof the scale, as shown in Figure 1.9 on the next page, mercial says, “If you’ve got your health, you’ve got just, (Veenhoven, 1993). That’s not to say that everyone is, about everything.” Is health indeed the key? What if, equally happy. Researchers have found substantial and, you’re healthy but poor, unemployed, and lonely?, We often hear about the joys of parenthood, the, joys of youth, and the joys of the simple, rural life., 50, Are these the factors that promote happiness?, In recent years, social scientists have begun, 40, putting these and other hypotheses to empirical, test. Quite a number of survey studies have been, conducted to explore the determinants of subjec30, tive well-being—individuals’ personal assessments of their overall happiness or life satis20, faction. The findings of these studies are quite, interesting. We review this research because it is, central to the topic of adjustment and because it, 10, illustrates the value of collecting data and putting, ideas to an empirical test. As you will see, many, 0, commonsense notions about happiness appear to, be inaccurate., Which of these faces represents, The first of these is the apparently widespread, the way you feel about your life as a whole?, assumption that most people are relatively unhappy. Writers, social scientists, and the general, public seem to believe that people around the, FIG U R E 1.8, world are predominantly dissatisfied, yet empirical surveys consistently find that the vast majority, Measuring happiness with a nonverbal scale. Researchers have used a, variety of methods to estimate the distribution of happiness. For example,, of respondents—even those who are poor or disin one study in the United States, respondents were asked to examine the, abled—characterize themselves as fairly happy, seven facial expressions shown and to select the one that “comes closest to, (Diener & Diener, 1996). When people are asked, expressing how you feel about your life as a whole.” As you can see, the vast, to rate their happiness, only a small minority place, majority of participants chose happy faces. (Data adapted from Myers, 1992), , •, , CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 19

Page 57 :
What Isn’t Very Important?, Let us begin our discussion of individual differences in happiness by highlighting those, things that turn out to be relatively unimportant determinants of subjective well-being., Quite a number of factors that one might expect to be influential appear to bear little or, no relationship to general happiness., , 20, , Number of nations, , thought-provoking disparities among people in subjective well-being, which we will analyze momentarily. But the overall picture, seems rosier than anticipated., , 15, , 10, , Money. There is a positive correlation between income and subjective feelings of happiness, but the association is surprisingly weak (Diener, & Seligman, 2004). For example, one study found a, correlation of just .13 between income and happiness, in the United States (Diener et al., 1993). Admittedly,, being very poor can make people unhappy, but once, people ascend above the poverty level, there is little relation between income and happiness. On the average,, even wealthy people are only marginally happier than, those in the middle classes. The problem with money, is that in this era of voracious consumption, rising income contributes to escalating material desires (Frey &, Stutzer, 2002). When these growing material desires, outstrip what people can afford, dissatisfaction is likely, (Solberg et al., 2002). Thus, complaints about not having enough money are routine even among people, who earn hefty six-figure incomes. Interestingly, there, is some evidence that people who place an especially, strong emphasis on the pursuit of wealth and materialistic goals tend to be somewhat less happy than others (Ryan & Deci, 2001). Perhaps they are so focused on, financial success that they don’t derive much satisfaction from their family life (Nickerson et al, 2003)., Age. Age and happiness are consistently found to be, unrelated. Age accounts for less than 1 percent of the, variation in people’s happiness (Inglehart, 1990; Myers, & Diener, 1997). The key factors influencing subjective, well-being may shift some as people grow older—work, becomes less important, health more so—but people’s, average level of happiness tends to remain remarkably, stable over the life span., Gender. Women are treated for depressive disorders, about twice as often as men, so one might expect that, women are less happy on the average. However, like, age, gender accounts for less than 1 percent of the variation in people’s subjective well-being (Myers, 1992)., Parenthood. Children can be a tremendous source of, joy and fulfillment, but they can also be a tremendous, 20, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , 5, , 0, , 0, , 1, , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, Subjective well-being on 0 to 10 scale, , •, , 9, , 10, , FIG U R E 1.9, , The subjective well-being of nations. Veenhoven (1993) combined the results of almost 1000 surveys to calculate the average, subjective well-being reported by representative samples from, 43 nations. The mean happiness scores clearly pile up at the, positive end of the distribution, with only two scores falling, below the neutral point of 5. (Data adapted from Diener and, Diener, 1996), , source of headaches and hassles. Compared to childless couples, parents worry more and experience more, marital problems (Argyle, 1987). Apparently, the good, and bad aspects of parenthood balance each other out,, because the evidence indicates that people who have, children are neither more nor less happy than people, without children (Argyle, 2001)., Intelligence. Intelligence is a highly valued trait in, modern society, but researchers have not found an association between IQ scores and happiness (Diener, 1984)., Educational attainment also appears to be unrelated to, life satisfaction (Ross & Van Willigen, 1997)., Physical attractiveness. Good-looking people enjoy, a variety of advantages in comparison to unattractive, people. Given that physical attractiveness is an important resource in Western society, we might expect attractive people to be happier than others, but the available, data indicate that the correlation between attractiveness and happiness is negligible (Diener, Wolsic, & Fujita, 1995)., , What Is Somewhat Important?, Research has identified three facets of life that appear, to have a moderate impact on subjective well-being:, health, social activity, and religious belief., Health. Good physical health would seem to be an, essential requirement for happiness, but people adapt

Page 58 :
to health problems. Research reveals that individuals, who develop serious, disabling health conditions aren’t, as unhappy as one might guess (Myers, 1992). Good, health may not, by itself, produce happiness, because, people tend to take good health for granted. Such considerations may help explain why researchers find only, a moderate positive correlation (average ⫽ .32) between health status and subjective well-being (Argyle,, 1999)., Social activity. Humans are social animals, and people’s interpersonal relations do appear to contribute to, their happiness. People who are satisfied with their, friendship networks and who are socially active report, above-average levels of happiness (Diener & Seligman,, 2004; Myers, 1999). And people who are exceptionally, happy tend to report greater satisfaction with their social relations than others (Diener & Seligman, 2002)., Religion. The link between religiosity and subjective well-being is modest, but a number of surveys suggest that people with heartfelt religious convictions are, more likely to be happy than people who characterize, themselves as nonreligious (Argyle, 1999; Ferris, 2002)., Researchers aren’t sure how religious faith fosters happiness, but Myers (1992) offers some interesting conjectures. Among other things, he discusses how religion, can give people a sense of purpose and meaning in, their lives, help them accept their setbacks gracefully,, connect them to a caring, supportive community, and, comfort them by putting their ultimate mortality in, perspective., , What Is Very Important?, The list of factors that turn out to be very important ingredients of happiness is surprisingly short. Only a few, variables are strongly related to overall happiness., Love and marriage. Romantic relationships can be, stressful, but people consistently rate being in love as, one of the most critical ingredients of happiness (Myers,, 1999). Furthermore, although people complain a lot, about their marriages, the evidence indicates that marital status is a key correlate of happiness. Among both, men and women, married people are happier than people who are single or divorced (see Figure 1.10 on the, next page; Myers & Diener, 1995) and this relationship, holds around the world in widely different cultures, (Diener et al., 2000). However, the causal relations underlying this correlation are unclear. It may be that happiness causes marital satisfaction more than marital, satisfaction promotes happiness. Perhaps people who, are happy tend to have better intimate relationships and, more stable marriages, while people who are unhappy, have greater difficulty finding and keeping mates., , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , The Pursuit of Happiness, by David G. Myers (William, Morrow, 1992), The Pursuit of Happiness provides a thorough, accurate, review of empirical research on the determinants of, happiness, seasoned nicely with personal anecdotes, and low-key, practical advice. Myers is a respected social psychologist and hard-nosed scientist who acknowledges that his reflections on happiness are “colored, by Christian values and spirituality.” Emphasizing the, finding that objective circumstances have limited impact on happiness, Myers discusses how people might, alter their subjective assessments of their lives to foster greater happiness. Working from the insight that, happiness is relative, he offers suggestions for managing our comparisons to others and restraining our expectations to enhance our well-being. Myers’s book, is a superb example of what self-help books could and, should be, but rarely are. It is clearly written and appropriately cautious about the limits of our knowledge., It is carefully documented, and assertions are closely, tied to research and theory. The author’s conjectures—, which are often fascinating—are accurately presented, as learned speculation rather than scientific fact, and, readers are encouraged to think for themselves. Complicated issues are not reduced to sound bites and, bumper sticker slogans. Myers does not encourage a selfcentered approach to life (quite the opposite!), nor, does he offer simple prescriptions about how to live., Given these realities, The Pursuit of Happiness has not, topped any best-seller lists, but it is well worth reading., Cover copyright © 1992 by the David G. and Carol P. Myers Charitable Foundation., Reprinted by permission of HarperCollinsPublishers, Inc., , Work. Given the way people often complain about, their jobs, we might not expect work to be a key source, of happiness, but it is. Although less critical than love, and marriage, job satisfaction is strongly associated, with general happiness (Warr, 1999). Studies also show, that unemployment has very negative effects on subjective well-being (Lucas et al., 2004). It is difficult to, sort out whether job satisfaction causes happiness or, vice versa, but evidence suggests that causation flows, both ways (Argyle, 2001)., Personality. The best predictor of individuals’ future happiness is their past happiness (Diener & Lucas,, 1999). Some people seem destined to be happy and others unhappy, regardless of their triumphs or setbacks., The limited influence of life events was apparent in a, stunning study that found only marginal differences, CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 21

Page 59 :
•, , FIG U R E 1.10, , Happiness and marital, status. This graph shows the, percentage of adults characterizing themselves as “Very, happy” as a function of, marital status. Among both, women and men, happiness, shows up more in those who, are married, as opposed to, those who are separated, who, are divorced, or who have, never married. These data, and many other findings, suggest that marital satisfaction is a key ingredient, of happiness., , Married, Never married, , MEN, , Separated, Divorced, , Married, Never married, WOMEN, Separated, Divorced, 0, , 5, , 10, , Adapted from Myers, D. G. (1999). Close, relationships and quality of life. In, D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz, (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of, hedonic psychology. New York: Russell, Sage Foundation. Copyright © 1999., Reprinted by permission of the Russell, Sage Foundation., , in overall happiness between recent lottery winners and, recent accident victims who became quadriplegics, (Brickman, Coates, & Janoff-Bulman, 1978). Investigators were amazed that extremely fortuitous and horrible, events like these didn’t have a dramatic impact on happiness. Actually, several lines of evidence suggest that, happiness does not depend on external circumstances—, buying a nice house, getting promoted—as much as on, internal factors, such as one’s outlook on life (Lykken &, Tellegen, 1996). With this reality in mind, researchers, have begun to look for links between personality and, subjective well-being, and they have found some rela-, , 22, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , 20, 25, 30, Percent “very happy”, , 35, , 40, , 45, , tively strong correlations. For example, extraversion, (sometimes referred to as positive emotionality) is one of, the better predictors of happiness. People who are outgoing, upbeat, and sociable tend to be happier than others (Fleeson, Malanos, & Achille, 2002). Additional personality correlates of happiness include self-esteem and, optimism (Lucas, Diener, & Suh, 1996)., , Conclusions, , © Stuart Hughes/Corbis, , Research shows that happiness does not depend on people’s, positive and negative experiences as much as one would expect., Some people, presumably because of their personality, seem, destined to be happy in spite of major setbacks, and others, seem destined to cling to unhappiness even though their lives, seem reasonably pleasant., , 15, , We must be cautious in drawing inferences about the, causes of happiness, because most of the available data, are correlational data (see Figure 1.11). Nonetheless,, the empirical evidence suggests that many popular beliefs about the sources of happiness are unfounded. The, data also demonstrate that happiness is shaped by a, complex constellation of variables. Despite this complexity, however, a number of worthwhile insights, about human adjustment can be gleaned from research on the correlates of subjective well-being., First, research on happiness demonstrates that the, determinants of subjective well-being are precisely that:, subjective. Objective realities are not as important as, subjective feelings. In other words, your health, your, wealth, your job, and your age are not as influential as, how you feel about your health, wealth, job, and age, (Schwarz & Strack, 1999)., Second, when it comes to happiness everything is, relative (Argyle, 1999; Hagerty, 2000). In other words,, you evaluate what you have relative to what the people, around you have. Thus, people who are wealthy assess, what they have by comparing themselves with their, wealthy friends and neighbors. This is one reason for, the low correlation between wealth and happiness. You

Page 60 :
© Charles Gupton/Corbis, , © Rolf Bruderer/Masterfile, , Research on the correlates of happiness, suggests that two, key ingredients of, happiness are a rewarding work life and, satisfaction in intimate, relationships., , might have a lovely home, but if it sits next to a neighbor’s palatial mansion, it might be a source of more, dissatisfaction than happiness. People’s evaluations are, also made relative to their expectations. Research suggests that bad outcomes feel worse when unexpected,, than when expected, while good outcomes feel better, , Extraversion, , Social, activity, , •, , Happiness, , F I G U R E 1.11, , Possible causal relations among the correlates of happiness., Although we have considerable data on the correlates of happiness, it is difficult to untangle the possible causal relationships., For example, we know that a moderate positive correlation exists, between social activity and happiness, but we can’t say for sure, whether high social activity causes happiness or whether happiness, causes people to be more socially active. Moreover, in light of, the finding that a third variable—extraversion—correlates with, both variables, we have to consider the possibility that extraversion causes both greater social activity and greater happiness., , when unexpected than when expected (Shepperd &, McNulty, 2002). Thus, the same objective event, such, as a pay raise of $2000 annually, may generate positive, feelings in someone who wasn’t expecting a raise and, negative feelings in someone expecting a much larger, increase in salary., Third, research on subjective well-being indicates, that people often adapt to their circumstances. This adaptation effect is one reason that an increase in income, doesn’t necessarily bring an increase in happiness. Thus,, hedonic adaptation occurs when the mental scale that, people use to judge the pleasantness-unpleasantness, of their experiences shifts so that their neutral point,, or baseline for comparison, is changed. Unfortunately,, when people’s experiences improve, hedonic adaptation, may sometimes put them on a hedonic treadmill—their, neutral point moves upward, so that the improvements yield no real benefits (Kahneman, 1999). However, when people have to grapple with major setbacks,, hedonic adaptation probably helps protect their mental and physical health. For example, people who are, sent to prison and people who develop debilitating diseases are not as unhappy as one might assume because, they adapt to their changed situations and evaluate, events from a new perspective (Frederick & Loewenstein,, 1999). That’s not to say that hedonic adaptation in the, face of life’s difficulties is inevitable or complete (Lucas, et al., 2003). People who suffer major setbacks, such as, the death of a spouse or serious illness, often are not as, happy as they were before the setback, but generally, they are not nearly as unhappy as they or others would, have predicted., CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 23

Page 61 :
Improving Academic Performance, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , List three steps for developing sound study habits., Describe the SQ3R method of effective reading., Summarize advice on how to get more out of lectures., , Answer the following “true” or “false.”, ___ 1. If you have a professor who delivers chaotic,, hard-to-follow lectures, there is little point in attending class., ___ 2. Cramming the night before an exam is an efficient way to study., ___ 3. In taking lecture notes, you should try to be a, “human tape recorder” (that is, take down everything, exactly as said by your professor)., ___ 4. Outlining reading assignments is a waste of time., As you will soon learn, all of these statements are false., If you answered them all correctly, you may already, have acquired the kinds of skills and habits that lead to, academic success. If so, however, you are not typical., Today, a huge number of students enter college with, remarkably poor study skills and habits—and it’s not, entirely their fault. The U.S. educational system generally does not provide much in the way of formal instruction on good study techniques. In this first Application, we will try to remedy this deficiency to some, extent by sharing some insights that psychology can, provide on how to improve your academic performance. We will discuss how to promote better study, habits, how to enhance reading efforts, how to get more, out of lectures, and how to make your memory more, effective., , Developing Sound, Study Habits, Effective study is crucial to success in college. You may, run into a few classmates who boast about getting good, grades without studying, but you can be sure that if, they perform well on exams, they study. Students who, claim otherwise simply want to be viewed as extremely, bright rather than as studious., Learning can be immensely gratifying, but studying usually involves hard work. The first step toward, effective study habits is to face this reality. You don’t, have to feel guilty if you don’t look forward to studying. Most students don’t. Once you accept the premise, , 24, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , ■, , ■, , Summarize how memory is influenced by practice,, interference, depth of processing, and organization., Describe several verbal and visual mnemonic devices., , that studying doesn’t come naturally, it should be clear, that you need to set up an organized program to promote adequate study. Such a program should include, the following three considerations (Siebert, 1995)., Set up a schedule for studying. If you wait until, the urge to study hits you, you may still be waiting when, the exam rolls around. Thus, it is important to allocate, definite times to studying. Review your time obligations (work, housekeeping, and so on) and figure out, in advance when you can study. In allotting certain, times to studying, keep in mind that you need to be, wide awake and alert. Be realistic, too, about how long, you can study at one time before you wear down from, fatigue. Allow time for study breaks; they can revive, sagging concentration., It’s important to write down your study schedule., Doing so serves as a reminder and increases your commitment to the schedule. As shown in Figure 1.12, you, should begin by setting up a general schedule for the, quarter or semester. Then, at the beginning of each, week, plan the specific assignments that you intend to, work on during each study session. This approach, should help you to avoid cramming for exams at the, last minute., In planning your weekly schedule, try to avoid the, tendency to put off working on major tasks such as term, papers and reports. Time management experts such as, Alan Lakein (1996) point out that many of us tend to, tackle simple, routine tasks first, saving larger tasks for, later, when we supposedly will have more time. This, common tendency leads many of us to delay working, on major assignments until it’s too late to do a good, job. You can avoid this trap by breaking major assignments into smaller component tasks that you schedule, individually., Find a place to study where you can concentrate., Where you study is also important. The key is to find a, place where distractions are likely to be minimal. Most, people cannot study effectively while watching TV, listening to loud music, or overhearing conversations.

Page 62 :
Don’t depend on willpower to carry you through these, distractions. It’s much easier to plan ahead and avoid, the distractions altogether., Reward your studying. One of the reasons it is so, difficult to motivate oneself to study regularly is that, the payoffs for studying often lie in the distant future., The ultimate reward, a degree, may be years away. Even, shorter-term rewards, such as an A in the course, may be, weeks or months off. To combat this problem, it helps, to give yourself immediate rewards for studying. It is, easier to motivate yourself to study if you reward yourself with a tangible payoff, such as a snack, TV show,, or phone call to a friend, when you finish. Thus, you, should set realistic study goals and then reward yourself when you meet them. This systematic manipulation of rewards involves harnessing the principles of, behavior modification, which are described in some detail in the Chapter 4 Application., , Improving Your Reading, , WE B LI N K 1.6, , CalREN Project Study Tips, The staff at the University of California–Berkeley have, assembled an excellent set of study resources with an, emphasis on the needs and questions of “nontraditional”, students., , going, you can better appreciate and organize the information you are about to read., Step 2: Question, , Once you have an overview of your reading assignment,, proceed through it one section at a time. Take a look, at the heading of the first section and convert it into a, question. This is usually quite simple. If the heading is, “prenatal risk factors,” your question should be “what, are sources of risk during prenatal development?” If, the heading is “stereotyping,” your question should be, “what is stereotyping?” Asking these questions gets you, actively involved in your reading and helps you identify the main ideas., , Much of your study time is spent reading and absorbing information. These efforts must be active. If you enStep 3: Read, gage in passive reading, the information will pass right, Only now, in the third step, are you ready to sink your, through you. Many students deceive themselves into, teeth into the reading. Read only the specific section that, thinking that they are studying if they run a marker, you have decided to tackle. Read it with an eye toward, through a few sentences here and there in their text., If such highlighting isn’t done with thoughtful selectivity, the student is simply turning, a textbook into a coloring book. Research, F I G U R E 1. 12, suggests that highlighting selected textbook, Example of an activity schedule. One student’s general activity schedule for a, material is a useful strategy—if students are, semester is shown here. Each week the student fills in the specific assignments to, reasonably effective in identifying the main, work on during the upcoming study sessions., ideas in the material and if they subsequently, review the main ideas they have highlighted, Mon, Tues, Wed, Thurs, Fri, Sat, Sun, (Caverly, Orlando, & Mullen, 2000)., You can choose from a number of meth8 A.M., Work, ods for actively attacking your reading assign9 A.M., History, Study, History, Study, History, Work, ments. One of the more worthwhile strategies, 10, A.M., Psych, Psych, Psych, Work, is Robinson’s (1970) SQ3R method. SQ3R is, French, French, 11 A.M., Study, Study, Study, Work, a study system designed to promote effecNoon, Math, Study, Math, Study, Math, Work, Study, tive reading that includes five steps: survey,, question, read, recite, and review. Its name, 1 P.M., Study, is an abbreviation for the five steps in the, 2 P.M., Study, Study, Study, Study, English, English, procedure:, 3 P.M., Study, Study, Study, Study, , •, , Step 1: Survey, , Before you plunge into the actual reading,, glance over the topic headings in the chapter, and try to get an overview of the material. Try, to understand how the various chapter segments are related. If there is a chapter outline, or summary, consult it to get a feel for the, chapter. If you know where the chapter is, , 4 P.M., 5 P.M., 6 P.M., , Work, , Study, , Work, , Study, , 7 P.M., , Work, , Study, , Work, , Study, , 8 P.M., , Work, , Study, , Work, , Study, , 9 P.M., , Work, , Study, , Work, , Study, , 10 P.M., , Work, , CHAPTER 1, , Work, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 25

Page 63 :
© Esbin-Anderson/The Image Works, , questions and try to answer them without consulting, your book or notes. This review should fortify your retention of the main ideas and alert you to any key ideas, that you haven’t mastered. It should also help you to see, the relationships between the main ideas., , Although some students downplay the importance of study, efforts, the reality is that effective study habits are crucial to, academic success., , answering the question that you just formulated. If, necessary, reread the section until you can answer that, question. Decide whether the segment addresses any, other important questions and answer them as well., Step 4: Recite, , Now that you can answer the key question for the section, recite it out loud to yourself. Use your own words, for the answer, because that requires understanding, instead of simple memorization. Don’t move on to the, next section until you understand the main idea(s) of, the current section. You may want to write down these, ideas for review later. When you have fully digested the, first section, go on to the next. Repeat steps 2 through, 4 with the next section. Once you have mastered the, crucial points there, you can continue. Keep repeating, steps 2 through 4, section by section, until you finish, the chapter., Step 5: Review, , When you have read the chapter, test and refresh your, memory by going back over the key points. Repeat your, , 26, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , The SQ3R method does not have to be applied rigidly. For example, it is often wise to break your reading, assignment into smaller segments than those separated, by section headings. In fact, you should probably apply, SQ3R to many texts on a paragraph by paragraph, basis. Obviously, doing so will require you to formulate some questions without the benefit of topic headings. However, the headings are not absolutely necessary to use this technique. If you don’t have enough, headings, you can simply reverse the order of steps 2, and 3. Read the paragraph first and then formulate a, question that addresses the basic idea of the paragraph., The point is that you can be flexible in your use of the, SQ3R technique., Using the SQ3R method does not automatically, lead to improved mastery of textbook reading assignments. It won’t be effective unless it is applied diligently, and skillfully and it tends to be more helpful to students, with low to medium reading ability (Caverly, Orlando,, & Mullen, 2000). Any strategy that facilitates active processing of text material, the identification of key ideas,, and effective review of these ideas should enhance your, reading., , Getting More Out of Lectures, Although lectures are sometimes boring and tedious, it, is a simple fact that poor class attendance is associated, with poor grades. For example, in one study, Lindgren, (1969) found that absences from class were much more, common among “unsuccessful” students (grade average of C⫺ or below) than among “successful” students, (grade average of B or above), as is shown in Figure 1.13., Even when you have an instructor who delivers hardto-follow lectures from which you learn virtually nothing, it is still important to go to class. If nothing else,, you’ll get a feel for how the instructor thinks. Doing so, can help you anticipate the content of exams and respond in the manner your professor expects., Fortunately, most lectures are reasonably coherent. Studies indicate that attentive note taking is associated with enhanced learning and performance in college classes (Cohn, Cohn, & Bradley, 1995; O’Donnell, & Dansereau, 1993). However, research also shows that, many students’ lecture notes are surprisingly incomplete, with the average student often recording less, than 40 percent of the crucial ideas in a lecture (Armbruster, 2000). Thus, the key to getting more out of lectures is to stay motivated, stay attentive, and expend

Page 64 :
Successful students, Always or, almost always, in class, 84%, , Unsuccessful students, Sometimes absent, 8%, , Always or, almost, always, in class, 47%, , ries of insightful studies. Since then, psychologists have discovered a number of, principles about memory that are relevant, to helping you improve your study skills., Engage in Adequate Practice, , Practice makes perfect, or so you’ve heard., In reality, practice is not likely to guarantee, Often, perfection, but repeatedly reviewing inforabsent, 45%, mation usually leads to improved retention., Studies show that retention improves with inSometimes, creased rehearsal (Greene, 1992). Continued, absent, Often, absent, rehearsal may also pay off by improving your, 8%, 8%, understanding of assigned material (Bromage & Mayer, 1986). As you go over information again and again, your increased faF I G U R E 1.13, miliarity with the material may permit you, Successful and unsuccessful students’ class attendance. Lindgren (1969), to focus selectively on the most important, found that attendance was much better among successful students than unsucpoints, thus enhancing your understanding., cessful students. (Data from Lindgren, 1969.), Evidence suggests that it even pays to, overlearn material (Driskell, Wilis, & Copper,, 1992). Overlearning is continued rehearsal of matethe effort to make your notes as complete as possible., rial, after you have first appeared to master it. In one, Books on study skills (Longman & Atkinson, 2002; Sostudy,, after participants mastered a list of nouns (they, tiriou, 2002) offer a number of suggestions on how, recited, the list without error), Krueger (1929) required, to take good-quality lecture notes. These suggestions, them, to, continue rehearsing for 50 percent or 100 perinclude:, cent more trials. Measuring retention at intervals of up, to 28 days, Kreuger found that overlearning led to bet■ Use active listening procedures. With active listenter recall of the list. The implication of this finding is, ing, you focus full attention on the speaker. Try to ansimple: You should not quit rehearsing material just, ticipate what’s coming and search for deeper meanbecause you appear to have mastered it., ings. Pay attention to nonverbal signals that may serve, , •, , to further clarify the lecturer’s intent or meaning., ■ When course material is especially complex and, difficult, it is a good idea to prepare for the lecture by, reading ahead on the scheduled subject in your text., Then you have less information to digest that is brand, new., ■ Don’t try to be a human tape recorder. Instead,, try to write down the lecturer’s thoughts in your own, words. Doing so forces you to organize the ideas in a, way that makes sense to you. In taking notes, look for, subtle and not-so-subtle clues about what the instructor considers to be important. These clues may range, from simply repeating main points to saying things, like “You’ll run into this again.”, ■ Ask questions during lectures. Doing so keeps you, actively involved and allows you to clarify points you, may have misunderstood. Many students are more bashful about asking questions than they should be. They, don’t realize that most professors welcome questions., , Applying Memory Principles, Scientific investigation of memory processes dates back, to 1885, when Hermann Ebbinghaus published a se-, , Use Distributed Practice, , Let’s assume that you are going to study 9 hours for an, exam. Is it better to “cram” all of your study into one, 9-hour period (massed practice) or distribute it among,, say, three 3-hour periods on successive days (distributed practice)? The evidence indicates that retention, tends to be greater after distributed practice than massed, practice (Glenberg, 1992; Payne & Wenger, 1996). This, advantage is especially apparent if the intervals between practice periods are fairly long, such as 24 hours, (Zechmeister & Nyberg, 1982). The inefficiency of, massed practice means that cramming is an ill-advised, study strategy for most students (Dempster, 1996)., Cramming will strain your memorization capabilities, and tax your energy level. It may also stoke the fires of, test anxiety., Minimize Interference, , Interference occurs when people forget information, because of competition from other learned material., Research suggests that interference is a major cause of, forgetting, so you’ll probably want to think about how, you can minimize interference. Doing so is especially, , CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 27

Page 65 :
important for students, because memorizing information for one course can interfere with retaining information in another course. It may help to allocate study, for specific courses to specific days. Thorndyke and, Hayes-Roth (1979) found that similar material produced less interference when it was learned on different days. Thus, the day before an exam in a course, it is, probably best to study for that course only. If demands, in other courses make that impossible, study the test, material last. Of course, studying for other classes is, not the only source of interference in a student’s life., Other normal waking activities also produce interference. Therefore, it is a good idea to conduct one last,, thorough review of material as close to exam time as, possible (Anderson, 1980)., Organize Information, , Retention tends to be greater when information is well, organized. Hierarchical organization is particularly, helpful when it is applicable (Tigner, 1999). Thus, it may, be a good idea to outline reading assignments for school., Consistent with this reasoning, there is some empirical, evidence that outlining material from textbooks can, enhance retention of the material (McDaniel, Waddill,, & Shakesby, 1996)., Emphasize Deep Processing, , Research suggests that how often you go over material, is less critical than the depth of processing that you engage in (Craik & Tulving, 1975). Thus, if you expect to, remember what you read, you have to wrestle fully with, its meaning. Many students could probably benefit if, they spent less time on rote repetition and devoted more, effort to actually paying attention to and analyzing the, meaning of their reading assignments. In particular, it, is useful to make material personally meaningful. When, you read your textbooks, try to relate information to, your own life and experience. For example, if you’re, reading in your psychology text about the personality, trait of assertiveness, you can think about which peo-, , DOONESBURY © G. B. Trudeau. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , 28, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , ple you know who are particularly assertive and why, you would characterize them as being that way., Use Verbal Mnemonics, , Of course, it’s not always easy to make something personally meaningful. When you study chemistry, you, may have a hard time relating to polymers at a personal, level. This problem has led to the development of many, mnemonic devices, or strategies for enhancing memory, that are designed to make abstract material more, meaningful., Acrostics and acronyms. Acrostics are phrases (or, poems) in which the first letter of each word (or line), functions as a cue to help you recall the abstract words, that begin with the same letter. For instance, you may, remember the order of musical notes with the saying, “Every good boy does fine” (or “deserves favor”). A variation on acrostics is the acronym—a word formed out, of the first letters of a series of words. Students memorizing the order of colors in the light spectrum often, store the name “Roy G. Biv” to remember red, orange,, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet., Narrative methods. Another useful way to remember a list of words is to create a story that includes each, of the words in the right order. The narrative increases, the meaningfulness of the words and links them in a, specific order. Examples of this technique can be seen, in Figure 1.14. Bower and Clark (1969) found that this, procedure enhanced subjects’ recall of lists of unrelated words., Rhymes. Another verbal mnemonic that people often, rely on is rhyming. You’ve probably repeated, “I before, E except after C” thousands of times. Perhaps you also, remember the number of days in each month with the, old standby, “Thirty days hath September . . .” Rhyming, something to remember it is an old and useful trick.

Page 66 :
Word Lists to Be Memorized and, Stories Constructed from Them, Word lists, , •, , Stories, , Bird, Costume, Mailbox, Head, River, , Nurse, Theater, Wax, Eyelid, Furnace, , A man dressed in a Bird Costume, and wearing a Mailbox on his, Head was seen leaping into the, River. A Nurse ran out of a nearby, Theater and applied Wax to his, Eyelids, but her efforts were in, vain. He died and was tossed into, the Furnace., , Rustler, Penthouse, Mountain, Sloth, Tavern, , Fuzz, Gland, Antler, Pencil, Vitamin, , A Rustler lived in a Penthouse on, top of a Mountain. His specialty, was the three-toed Sloth. He, would take his captive animals, to a Tavern where he would remove Fuzz from their Glands., Unfortunately, all this exposure, to sloth fuzz caused him to grow, Antlers. So he gave up his profession and went to work in a Pencil, factory. As a precaution he also, took a lot of Vitamin E., , F I G U R E 1.14, , The narrative method. Two examples of the narrative method, for memorizing lists are shown here (Bower & Clark, 1969). The, words to be memorized are listed on the left, and the stories, constructed to remember them are shown on the right., Adapted from Bower, G. H., & Clark, M. C. (1969). Narrative stories as mediators of serial, learning. Psychonomic Science, 14, 181–182. Copyright © 1969 by the Psychonomic Society., Adapted by permission of the Psychonomic Society and the author., , Use Visual Mnemonics, , Memory can be improved through the use of visual imagery. One influential theory (Paivio, 1986) proposes, , •, , that visual images create a second memory code and, that two codes are better than one. Many popular mnemonic devices depend on visual imagery, including the, link method and the method of loci., Link method. The link method involves forming a, mental image of items to be remembered in a way that, links them together. For instance, suppose that you are, going to stop at the drugstore on the way home and you, need to remember to pick up a news magazine, shaving cream, film, and pens. To remember these items,, you might visualize a public figure likely to be in the, magazine shaving with a pen while being photographed., Some researchers suggest that bizarre images may be, remembered better (Iaccino, 1996; Worthen, 1997)., Method of loci. The method of loci involves taking, an imaginary walk along a familiar path where you, have associated images of items you want to remember with certain locations. The first step is to commit, to memory a series of loci, or places along a path. Usually these loci are specific locations in your home or, neighborhood. Then envision each thing you want to, remember in one of these locations. Try to form distinctive, vivid images. When you need to remember the, items, imagine yourself walking along the path. The, various loci on your path should serve as retrieval cues, for the images that you formed (see Figure 1.15). The, method of loci assures that items are remembered in, their correct order because the order is determined by, the sequence of locations along the pathway. Empirical studies have supported the value of this method for, memorizing lists (Crovitz, 1971; De Beni, Mo, &, Cornoldi, 1997)., , F I G U R E 1.15, , The method of loci. In this example, from Bower (1970), a person about, to go shopping pairs items to be, remembered with familiar places, (loci) arranged in a natural sequence:, (1) hot dogs/driveway; (2) cat food/, garage; (3) tomatoes/front door;, (4) bananas/coat closet; (5) whiskey/, kitchen sink. As the last panel shows,, the shopper recalls the items by mentally touring the loci associated with, them., Adapted from Bower, G. H. (1970). Analysis of a, mnemonic device. American Scientist, 58, 496–499., Copyright © 1970 by Scientific Research Society., Reprinted by permission of the publisher and author., , CHAPTER 1, , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 29

Page 67 :
The Roots of Happiness: An Empirical Analysis, ■, , KEY IDEAS, The Paradox of Progress, ■, , CHAPTER 1 REVIEW, , Although our modern era has seen great technological progress, personal problems have not diminished. In spite of many, time-saving devices, people tend to have less free time. Although, affluence is widespread, most people worry about economic, decline., ■ The life choices available to people have increased greatly,, but Schwartz argues that choice overload undermines individuals’ happiness. Although we have unprecedented control over, the world around us, we seem to create as many problems as we, solve. Thus, many theorists argue that technological progress has, brought new, and possibly more difficult, adjustment problems., The Search for Direction, ■, , According to many theorists, the basic challenge of modern, life has become the search for a sense of direction and meaning., This search has many manifestations, including the appeal of, self-realization programs, religious cults, and media “therapists”, such as Dr. Laura., ■ The enormous popularity of self-help books is an interesting, manifestation of people’s struggle to find a sense of direction., Some self-help books offer worthwhile advice, but most are, dominated by psychobabble and are not based on scientific research. Many also lack explicit advice on how to change behavior., ■ Although this text deals with many of the same issues as selfrealization programs, self-help books, and other types of pop, psychology, its philosophy and approach are quite different., The Psychology of Adjustment, , A scientific analysis of happiness reveals that many commonsense notions about the roots of happiness appear to be incorrect, including the notion that most people are unhappy. Factors such as money, age, gender, parenthood, intelligence, and, attractiveness are not correlated with subjective well-being., ■ Physical health, social relationships, and religious faith appear, to have a modest impact on feelings of happiness. The only factors that are clearly and strongly related to happiness are love and, marriage, work satisfaction, and personality., ■ There are no simple recipes for achieving happiness, but it, helps to understand that happiness is a relative concept mediated by people’s highly subjective assessments of their lives., Application: Improving Academic Performance, ■, , To foster sound study habits, you should devise a written, study schedule and reward yourself for following it. You should, also try to find places for studying that are relatively free of, distractions., ■ You should use active reading techniques, such as SQ3R, to, select the most important ideas from the material you read. Good, note taking can help you get more out of lectures. It’s important to use active listening techniques and to record lecturers’, ideas in your own words., ■ Rehearsal, even when it involves overlearning, facilitates retention. Distributed practice and deeper processing tend to improve memory. It is wise to plan study sessions so as to minimize, interference. Evidence also suggests that organization facilitates, retention, so outlining reading assignments can be valuable., ■ Meaningfulness can be enhanced through the use of verbal, mnemonics such as acrostics, acronyms, and narrative methods. The link method and the method of loci are mnemonic devices that depend on the value of visual imagery., , ■, , Psychology is both a science and a profession that focuses, on behavior and related mental and physiological processes., ■ Adjustment is a broad area of study in psychology concerned, with how people adapt effectively or ineffectively to the demands, and pressures of everyday life., The Scientific Approach to Behavior, ■, , The scientific approach to understanding behavior is empirical. Psychologists base their conclusions on formal, systematic,, objective tests of their hypotheses, rather than reasoning, speculation, or common sense. The scientific approach is advantageous in that it puts a premium on clarity and has little tolerance for error., ■ Experimental research involves manipulating an independent variable to discover its effects on a dependent variable. The, experimenter usually does so by comparing experimental and, control groups, which must be alike except for the variation created by the manipulation of the independent variable. Experiments permit conclusions about cause-effect relationships between variables, but this method isn’t usable for the study of, many questions., ■ Psychologists conduct correlational research when they are, unable to exert control over the variables they want to study. The, correlation coefficient is a numerical index of the degree of relationship between two variables. Correlational research methods include naturalistic observation, case studies, and surveys., Correlational research facilitates the investigation of many issues that are not open to experimental study, but it cannot demonstrate that two variables are causally related., , 30, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , KEY TERMS, Adjustment p. 12, Behavior p. 11, Case study p. 17, Clinical psychology p. 12, Control group p. 14, Correlation p. 15, Correlation coefficient p. 15, Dependent variable p. 14, Empiricism p. 13, Experiment p. 13, Experimental group p. 14, , Hedonic adaptation p. 23, Independent variable p. 14, Interference p. 27, Mnemonic devices p. 28, Naturalistic observation, p. 16, Overlearning p. 27, Psychology p. 11, SQ3R p. 25, Subjective well-being p. 19, Surveys p. 17, , KEY PEOPLE, David Myers p. 2, Barry Schwartz pp. 2–3, , Martin Seligman, , p. 2

Page 68 :
7. A psychologist collected background information, about a psychopathic killer, talked to him and people, who knew him, and gave him psychological tests., Which research method was she using?, a. Case study, b. Naturalistic observation, c. Survey, d. Experiment, , Personal Explorations Workbook, The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 1.1: Testwiseness Scale. Personal Probe 1.1: What Are Your Study Habits, Like? Personal Probe 1.2: What Factors Affect Your Current, Adjustment in Life?, , ANSWERS, , Page 14, Page 17, Page 14, Pages 20–21, Page 27, , 6. A researcher wants to determine whether a certain diet, causes children to learn better in school. In the study,, the independent variable is, a. the type of diet., b. a measure of learning performance., c. the age or grade level of the children., d. the intelligence level of the children., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , a, a, d, d, d, , 5. An experiment is a research method in which the investigator manipulates the __________ variable and, observes whether changes occur in a (an) __________, variable as a result., a. independent; dependent, b. control; experimental, c. experimental; control, d. dependent; independent, , Book Companion Website, , CHAPTER 1, , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. The adaptation of animals when environments change, is similar to __________ in humans., a. orientation, c. evolution, b. assimilation, d. adjustment, , 10. A good reason for taking notes in your own words,, rather than verbatim, is that, a. most lecturers are quite wordy., b. “translating” on the spot is good mental exercise., c. it reduces the likelihood that you’ll later engage in, plagiarism., d. it forces you to assimilate the information in a way, that makes sense to you., , Page 4, Page 2, Pages 8–9, Page 12, Pages 13–14, , 3. Which of the following is not offered in the text as a, criticism of self-help books?, a. They are infrequently based on solid research., b. Most don’t provide explicit directions for changing, behavior., c. The topics they cover are often quite narrow., d. Many are dominated by psychobabble., , 9. Research has shown that which of the following is, moderately correlated with happiness?, a. Income, b. Intelligence, c. Parenthood, d. Social activity, , d, b, c, d, a, , 2. Kasser argues that the correlation between happiness, and materialism (a strong focus on money and possessions) is, a. positive., c. zero., b. negative., d. about ⫹1.24., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Technological advances have not led to perceptible, improvement in our collective health and happiness., This statement defines, a. escape from freedom., b. the point/counterpoint phenomenon., c. modern society., d. the paradox of progress., , Adjusting to Modern Life, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 8. The principal advantage of experimental research is that, a. it has a scientific basis and is therefore convincing to, people., b. experiments replicate real-life situations., c. an experiment can be designed for any research, problem., d. it allows the researcher to draw cause-and-effect, conclusions., , 31

Page 69 :
THE NATURE OF PERSONALITY, What Is Personality?, What Are Personality Traits?, , HUMANISTIC PERSPECTIVES, Rogers’s Person-Centered Theory, Maslow’s Theory of Self-Actualization, Evaluating Humanistic Perspectives, , PSYCHODYNAMIC PERSPECTIVES, Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory, Jung’s Analytical Psychology, Adler’s Individual Psychology, Evaluating Psychodynamic, Perspectives, , BIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES, Eysenck’s Theory, Recent Research in Behavioral Genetics, The Evolutionary Approach to Personality, Evaluating Biological Perspectives, , BEHAVIORAL PERSPECTIVES, Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning, Skinner’s Operant Conditioning, Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, Evaluating Behavioral Perspectives, , A CONTEMPORARY, EMPIRICAL APPROACH: TERROR, MANAGEMENT THEORY, Essentials of Terror Management Theory, Applications of Terror Management Theory, , 32, , AN EPILOGUE ON THEORETICAL, DIVERSITY, APPLICATION: ASSESSING, YOUR PERSONALITY, Key Concepts in Psychological Testing, Self-Report Inventories, Projective Tests, CHAPTER 2 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST

Page 70 :
CHAPTER, , Theories of, Personality, , 2, , Imagine that you are hurtling upward in an elevator with three other persons when suddenly a power blackout brings the elevator to a halt 45 stories above the ground. Your three companions might adjust to this predicament differently. One might crack jokes to relieve tension. Another might, make ominous predictions that “we’ll never get out of here.” The third might, calmly think about how to escape from the elevator. These varied ways of, coping with the same stressful situation occur because each person has a, different personality. Personality differences significantly influence people’s, patterns of adjustment. Thus, theories intended to explain personality can, contribute to our effort to understand adjustment processes., In this chapter, we will introduce you to various theories that attempt to, explain the structure and development of personality. Our review of personality theory will also serve to acquaint you with four major theoretical perspectives in psychology: the psychodynamic, behavioral, humanistic, and biological perspectives. These theoretical approaches are conceptual models that, help explain behavior. Familiarity with them will help you understand many, of the ideas that you will encounter in this book, as well as in other books, about psychology., , CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 33

Page 71 :
The Nature of Personality, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Explain the concepts of personality and traits., Describe the “Big Five” personality traits., , To discuss theories of personality effectively, we need, to digress momentarily to come up with a definition, of personality and to discuss the concept of personality traits., , What Is Personality?, What does it mean if you say that a friend has an optimistic personality? Your statement suggests that the person has a fairly consistent tendency to behave in a cheerful, hopeful, enthusiastic way, looking at the bright side, of things, across a wide variety of situations. In a similar vein, if you note that a friend has an “outgoing” personality, you mean that she or he consistently behaves, in a friendly, open, and extraverted manner in a variety, of circumstances. Although no one is entirely consistent, in his or her behavior, this quality of consistency across, situations lies at the core of the concept of personality., Distinctiveness is also central to the concept of personality. Everyone has traits seen in other people, but, each individual has her or his own distinctive set of, personality traits. Each person is unique. Thus, as illustrated by our elevator scenario, the concept of personality helps explain why people don’t all act alike in, the same situation., In summary, we use the idea of personality to explain (1) the stability in a person’s behavior over time, and across situations (consistency) and (2) the behavioral differences among people reacting to the same, situation (distinctiveness). We can combine these ideas, into the following definition: personality refers to an, individual’s unique constellation of consistent behavioral traits. Let’s look more closely at the concept, of traits., , (1950, 1966) assume that some traits are more basic, than others. According to this notion, a small number, of fundamental traits determine other, more superficial, traits. For example, a person’s tendency to be impulsive, restless, irritable, boisterous, and impatient might, all derive from a more basic tendency to be excitable., In recent years, Robert McCrae and Paul Costa, (1987, 1997, 1999) have stimulated a lively debate, among psychologists by arguing that the vast majority, of personality traits derive from just five higher-order, traits that have come to be known as the “Big Five”: extraversion, neuroticism, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness (see Figure 2.1). Let’s, take a closer look at these traits:, 1. Extraversion. People who score high in extraversion are characterized as outgoing, sociable, upbeat,, friendly, assertive, and gregarious. Referred to as positive emotionality in some trait models, extraversion has, been studied extensively in research for many decades, (Watson & Clark, 1997)., 2. Neuroticism. People who score high in neuroticism tend to be anxious, hostile, self-conscious, inse-, , Agreeableness, , Neuroticism, (negative, emotionality), , What Are Personality Traits?, We all make remarks like “Melanie is very shrewd” or, “Doug is too timid to succeed in that job” or “I wish I, could be as self-assured as Antonio.” When we attempt, to describe an individual’s personality, we usually do so, in terms of specific aspects of personality, called traits., A personality trait is a durable disposition to behave, in a particular way in a variety of situations. Adjectives, such as honest, dependable, moody, impulsive, suspicious, anxious, excitable, domineering, and friendly describe dispositions that represent personality traits., Most trait theories of personality, such as those of, Gordon Allport (1937, 1961) and Raymond Cattell, 34, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Extraversion, (positive, emotionality), , •, , Conscientiousness, (constraint), , Openness, to experience, , FIG U R E 2.1, , The five-factor model of personality. Trait models attempt to, break down personality into its basic dimensions. McCrae and, Costa (1987, 1997) maintain that personality can be described, adequately with the five higher-order traits identified here, widely, known as the Big Five traits.

Page 72 :
cure, and vulnerable. Like extraversion, this trait has, been the subject of thousands of studies. In some trait, models it is called negative emotionality (Church, 1994)., 3. Openness to experience. Openness is associated, with curiosity, flexibility, vivid fantasy, imaginativeness, artistic sensitivity, and unconventional attitudes., McCrae (1996) maintains that its importance has been, underestimated. Citing evidence that openness fosters, liberalism, he argues that this trait is the key determinant of people’s political attitudes and ideology., 4. Agreeableness. Those who score high in agreeableness tend to be sympathetic, trusting, cooperative,, modest, and straightforward. People who score at the, opposite end of this personality dimension are characterized as suspicious, antagonistic, and aggressive. Agreeableness may have its roots in childhood temperament, and appears to promote altruistic (helping) behavior, in social interactions (Graziano & Eisenberg, 1997)., 5. Conscientiousness. Conscientious people tend, to be diligent, disciplined, well organized, punctual,, and dependable. Referred to as constraint in some trait, models, conscientiousness is associated with higher, productivity in a variety of occupational areas (Hogan, & Ones, 1997)., , traits that they’ve identified. Their bold claim has been, supported in many studies by other researchers, and, the five-factor model has become the dominant conception of personality structure in contemporary psychology (John & Srivastava, 1999; Wiggins & Trapnell,, 1997). These traits have been characterized as the “latitude and longitude” along which personality should, be mapped (Ozer & Reise, 1994, p. 361). Thousands of, studies have been conducted exploring correlations, between the Big Five traits and such other characteristics as self-esteem (Watson, Suls, & Haig, 2002), transformational leadership (Judge & Bono, 2000), social, status (Anderson et al., 2001), and well-being at midlife, (Siegler & Brummett, 2000)., However, some theorists maintain that more than, five traits are necessary to account for most of the variation seen in human personality (Benet & Waller, 1995;, Ashton et al., 2004). Ironically, other theorists have argued for three- or four-factor models of personality, (Church & Burke, 1994; Eysenck, 1992)., The debate about how many dimensions are necessary to describe personality is likely to continue for, many years to come. As you’ll see throughout the chapter, the study of personality is an area in psychology, that has a long history of “dueling theories.” We’ll begin, our tour of these theories by examining the influential, work of Sigmund Freud and his followers., , McCrae and Costa maintain that personality can, be described adequately by measuring the five basic, , Psychodynamic Perspectives, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , ■, ■, , Describe Freud’s three components of personality and, how they are distributed across levels of awareness., Explain the importance of sexual and aggressive conflicts, in Freud’s theory., Describe seven defense mechanisms identified by Freud., Outline Freud’s stages of psychosexual development and, their theorized relations to adult personality., , Psychodynamic theories include all the diverse theories descended from the work of Sigmund Freud that, focus on unconscious mental forces. Freud inspired, many brilliant scholars who followed in his intellectual footsteps. Some of these followers simply refined, and updated Freud’s theory. Others veered off in new, directions and established independent, albeit related,, schools of thought. Today, the psychodynamic umbrella, covers a large collection of related theories. In this section, we’ll examine Freud’s ideas in some detail and, then take a brief look at the work of two of his most, significant followers, Carl Jung and Alfred Adler. Another psychodynamic theorist, Erik Erikson, is covered, in a later chapter on adolescent and adult development, (see Chapter 11)., , ■, ■, , ■, , Summarize Jung’s views on the unconscious., Summarize Adler’s views on key issues relating to, personality., Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of psychodynamic, theories of personality., , Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory, Born in 1856, Sigmund Freud grew, up in a middle-class Jewish home, in Vienna, Austria. He showed an, early interest in intellectual pursuits and became an intense, hardworking young man. He dreamed, of achieving fame by making an, important discovery. His determination was such that in medical, Sigmund Freud, school he dissected 400 male eels, to prove for the first time that they, had testes. His work with eels did not make him famous., However, his later work with people made him one of, CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 35, , National Library of Medicine, , ■

Page 73 :
36, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , © Peter Aprahamian/Corbis, , the most influential and controversial figures of modern times., Freud was a physician specializing in, neurology when he began his medical practice in Vienna near the end of the 19th century. Like other neurologists in his era, he, often treated people troubled by nervous, problems such as irrational fears, obsessions,, and anxieties. Eventually he devoted himself, to the treatment of mental disorders using an, innovative procedure he developed, called, psychoanalysis, which required lengthy verbal interactions in which Freud probed deeply, into patients’ lives. Decades of experience, with his patients provided much of the inspiration for Freud’s theory of personality., Although Freud’s theory gradually gained, Freud’s psychoanalytic theory was based on decades of clinical work. He treated, prominence, most of Freud’s contemporaries, a great many patients in the consulting room pictured here. The room contains, were uncomfortable with the theory, for at, numerous artifacts from other cultures—and the original psychoanalytic couch., least three reasons. First, he argued that unconscious forces govern human behavior. This, ciding how to behave. The ego is guided by the reality, idea was disturbing because it suggested that people, principle, which seeks to delay gratification of the id’s, are not masters of their own minds. Second, he claimed, urges until appropriate outlets and situations can be, that childhood experiences strongly determine adult, found. In short, to stay out of trouble, the ego often, personality. This notion distressed many, because it, works to tame the unbridled desires of the id. As Freud, suggested that people are not masters of their own desput it, the ego is “like a man on horseback, who has to, tinies. Third, he said that individuals’ personalities are, hold in check the superior strength of the horse” (Freud,, shaped by how they cope with their sexual urges. This, 1923, p. 15)., assertion offended the conservative, Victorian values of, In the long run, the ego wants to maximize gratihis time. Thus, Freud endured a great deal of criticism,, fication, just like the id. However, the ego engages in, condemnation, and outright ridicule, even after his, secondary process thinking, which is relatively rational,, work began to attract more favorable attention. What, realistic, and oriented toward problem solving. Thus,, were these ideas that generated so much controversy?, the ego strives to avoid negative consequences from soStructure of Personality, ciety and its representatives (for example, punishment, Freud (1901, 1920) divided personality structure into, by parents or teachers) by behaving “properly.” It also, three components: the id, the ego, and the superego. He, attempts to achieve long-range goals that sometimes, saw a person’s behavior as the outcome of interactions, require putting off gratification., among these three components., While the ego concerns itself with practical realiThe id is the primitive, instinctive component of, ties, the superego is the moral component of personpersonality that operates according to the pleasure, ality that incorporates social standards about what, principle. Freud referred to the id as the reservoir of, represents right and wrong. Throughout their lives,, psychic energy. By this he meant that the id houses the, but especially during childhood, individuals receive, raw biological urges (to eat, sleep, defecate, copulate,, training about what is good and bad behavior. Eventuand so on) that energize human behavior. The id operally they internalize many of these social norms, meanates according to the pleasure principle, which demands, ing that they truly accept certain moral principles, then, immediate gratification of its urges. The id engages in, they put pressure on themselves to live up to these stanprimary process thinking, which is primitive, illogical,, dards. The superego emerges out of the ego at around, irrational, and fantasy oriented., 3 to 5 years of age. In some people, the superego can beThe ego is the decision-making component of percome irrationally demanding in its striving for moral, sonality that operates according to the reality principerfection. Such people are plagued by excessive guilt., ple. The ego mediates between the id, with its forceful, According to Freud, the id, ego, and superego are, desires for immediate satisfaction, and the external sodistributed across three levels of awareness. He concial world, with its expectations and norms regarding, trasted the unconscious with the conscious and preconsuitable behavior. The ego considers social realities—, scious (see Figure 2.2). The conscious consists of whatsociety’s norms, etiquette, rules, and customs—in deever one is aware of at a particular point in time. For

Page 74 :
•, CONSCIOUS:, Contact with outside world, EGO, Reality principle, Secondary process thinking, , SUPEREGO, Moral, imperatives, ID, Pleasure principle, Primary process thinking, , PRECONSCIOUS:, Material just beneath, the surface of awareness, , UNCONSCIOUS:, Difficult to retrieve material;, well below the surface, of awareness, , example, at this moment your conscious may include, the current train of thought in this text and a dim, awareness in the back of your mind that your eyes are, getting tired and you’re beginning to get hungry. The, preconscious contains material just beneath the surface of awareness that can be easily retrieved. Examples might include your middle name, what you had, for supper last night, or an argument you had with a, friend yesterday. The unconscious contains thoughts,, memories, and desires that are well below the surface, of conscious awareness but that nonetheless exert, great influence on one’s behavior. Examples of material that might be found in your unconscious would, include a forgotten trauma from childhood or hidden, feelings of hostility toward a parent., Conflict and Defense Mechanisms, , Freud assumed that behavior is the outcome of an ongoing series of internal conflicts. Internal battles among, the id, ego, and superego are routine. Why? Because the, id wants to gratify its urges immediately, but the norms, of civilized society frequently dictate otherwise. For example, your id might feel an urge to clobber a co-worker, , WE B LI N K 2.1, , Sigmund Freud Museum, Vienna, Austria, This online museum, in both English and German versions,, offers a detailed chronology of Freud’s life and explanations of the most important concepts of psychoanalysis., The highlights, though, are the rich audiovisual resources,, including online photos, amateur movie clips, and voice, recordings of Freud., , FIG U R E 2.2, , Freud’s model of personality structure. Freud theorized that people, have three levels of awareness: the, conscious, the preconscious, and the, unconscious. To dramatize the size of, the unconscious, he compared it to, the portion of an iceberg that lies beneath the water’s surface. Freud also, divided personality structure into, three components—id, ego, and, superego—that operate according, to different principles and exhibit, different modes of thinking. In Freud’s, model, the id is entirely unconscious,, but the ego and superego operate, at all three levels of awareness., , who constantly irritates you. However, society frowns, on such behavior, so your ego would try to hold this urge, in check, and you would find yourself in a conflict. You, may be experiencing conflict at this very moment. In, Freudian terms, your id may be secretly urging you to, abandon reading this chapter so you can watch television or go online. Your ego may be weighing this appealing option against your society-induced need to excel, in school., Freud believed that conflicts dominate people’s, lives. He asserted that individuals careen from one conflict to another. The following scenario provides a fanciful illustration of how the three components of personality interact to create constant conflicts., Imagine your alarm clock ringing obnoxiously as you, lurch across the bed to shut it off. It’s 7 a.m. and time to, get up for your history class. However, your id (operating, according to the pleasure principle) urges you to return, to the immediate gratification of additional sleep. Your, ego (operating according to the reality principle) points, out that you really must go to class since you haven’t been, able to decipher the stupid textbook on your own. Your id, (in its typical unrealistic fashion) smugly assures you that, you will get the A that you need. It suggests lying back to, dream about how impressed your roommate will be. Just, as you’re relaxing, your superego jumps into the fray. It, tries to make you feel guilty about the tuition your parents paid for the class that you’re about to skip. You haven’t, even gotten out of bed yet—and there is already a pitched, battle in your psyche., Let’s say your ego wins the battle. You pull yourself, out of bed and head for class. On the way, you pass a, donut shop and your id clamors for cinnamon rolls. Your, CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 37

Page 75 :
ego reminds you that you’re gaining weight and that you, are supposed to be on a diet. Your id wins this time. After, you’ve attended your history lecture, your ego reminds, you that you need to do some library research for a paper, in philosophy. However, your id insists on returning to, your apartment to watch some sitcom reruns. It’s only, midmorning—and already you have been through a series of internal conflicts., , Cartoon © 1999 by Sidney Harris, , Freud believed that conflicts centering on sexual, and aggressive impulses are especially likely to have, far-reaching consequences. Why did he emphasize sex, and aggression? Two reasons were prominent in his, thinking. First, Freud thought that sex and aggression, are subject to more complex and ambiguous social, controls than other basic motives. The norms governing sexual and aggressive behavior are subtle, and people often get mixed messages about what is appropriate. Thus, he believed that these two drives are the, source of much confusion., Second, Freud noted that the sexual and aggressive drives are thwarted more regularly than other, basic biological urges. Think about it: If you get hungry or thirsty, you can simply head for a nearby vending machine or a drinking fountain. But if a department store clerk infuriates you, you aren’t likely to slug, the clerk, because that isn’t socially acceptable. Likewise, when you see an attractive person who inspires, lustful urges, you don’t normally walk up and propose, a tryst in a nearby broom closet. There is nothing comparable to vending machines or drinking fountains for, the satisfaction of sexual and aggressive urges. Thus,, Freud gave great importance to these needs because, social norms dictate that they are routinely frustrated., Most psychic conflicts are trivial and are quickly, resolved one way or the other. Occasionally, however, a, conflict will linger for days, months, and even years,, , creating internal tension. Indeed, Freud believed that, lingering conflicts rooted in childhood experiences, cause most personality disturbances. More often than, not, these prolonged and troublesome conflicts involve, sexual and aggressive impulses that society wants to, tame. These conflicts are often played out entirely in, the unconscious. Although you may not be aware of, these unconscious battles, they can produce anxiety, that slips to the surface of conscious awareness. This, anxiety is attributable to your ego worrying about the, id getting out of control and doing something terrible., The arousal of anxiety is a crucial event in Freud’s, theory of personality functioning (see Figure 2.3). Anxiety is distressing, so people try to rid themselves of this, unpleasant emotion any way they can. This effort to, ward off anxiety often involves the use of defense mechanisms. Defense mechanisms are largely unconscious, reactions that protect a person from painful emotions, such as anxiety and guilt. Typically, they are mental, , Ego, , Id, Intrapsychic, conflict, , Anxiety, , Reliance, on defense, mechanisms, , Superego, , •, , F I G U R E 2.3, , Freud’s model of personality dynamics. According to Freud, unconscious conflicts between the id,, ego, and superego sometimes lead to anxiety. This discomfort may lead to the use of defense mechanisms, which may temporarily relieve anxiety., 38, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment

Page 76 :
maneuvers that work through self-deception. A common example is rationalization, which involves creating false but plausible excuses to justify unacceptable, behavior. You would be rationalizing if, after cheating, someone in a business transaction, you tried to reduce, your guilt by explaining that “everyone does it.”, Characterized as “the flagship in the psychoanalytic, fleet of defense mechanisms” (Paulhus, Fridhandler, &, Hayes, 1997, p. 545), repression is the most basic and, widely used defense mechanism. Repression involves, keeping distressing thoughts and feelings buried in the, unconscious. People tend to repress desires that make, them feel guilty, conflicts that make them anxious, and, memories that are painful. Repression is “motivated forgetting.” If you forget a dental appointment or the name, of someone you don’t like, repression may be at work., Self-deception can also be seen in the mechanisms, of projection and displacement. Projection involves, attributing one’s own thoughts, feelings, or motives, to another. For example, if your lust for a co-worker, makes you feel guilty, you might attribute any latent, sexual tension between the two of you to the other person’s desire to seduce you. Displacement involves diverting emotional feelings (usually anger) from their, original source to a substitute target. If your boss gives, you a hard time at work and you come home and slam, the door, kick the dog, and scream at your spouse, you, are displacing your anger onto irrelevant targets. Unfortunately, social constraints often force people to hold, back their anger until they end up lashing out at the, people they love the most., Other prominent defense mechanisms include reaction formation, regression, and identification. Reaction formation involves behaving in a way that is ex-, , actly the opposite of one’s true feelings. Guilt about, sexual desires often leads to reaction formation. Freud, theorized that many males who ridicule homosexuals, are defending against their own latent homosexual impulses. The telltale sign of reaction formation is the exaggerated quality of the opposite behavior., Regression involves a reversion to immature patterns of behavior. When anxious about their self-worth,, some adults respond with childish boasting and bragging (as opposed to subtle efforts to impress others). For, example, a fired executive having difficulty finding a, new job might start making ridiculous statements about, his incomparable talents and achievements. Such bragging is regressive when it is marked by massive exaggerations that anyone can see through., Identification involves bolstering self-esteem by, forming an imaginary or real alliance with some person or group. For example, youngsters often shore up, precarious feelings of self-worth by identifying with, rock stars, movie stars, or famous athletes. Adults may, join exclusive country clubs or civic organizations with, which they identify., Additional examples of the defense mechanisms, we’ve described can be found in Figure 2.4. If you see, defensive maneuvers that you have used, you shouldn’t, be surprised. According to Freud, everyone uses defense, mechanisms to some extent. They become problematic only when a person depends on them excessively., The seeds for psychological disorders are sown when, defenses lead to wholesale distortion of reality., Development: Psychosexual Stages, , Freud made the startling assertion that the foundation, of an individual’s personality is laid down by the ten-, , •, , Defense Mechanisms, with Examples, Definition, , Example, , Repression involves keeping distressing thoughts, and feelings buried in the unconscious., , A traumatized soldier has no recollection of the, details of a close brush with death., , Projection involves attributing one’s own, thoughts, feelings, or motives to another person., , A woman who dislikes her boss thinks she likes, her boss but feels that the boss doesn’t like her., , Displacement involves diverting emotional feelings (usually anger) from their original source to, a substitute target., , After a parental scolding, a young girl takes her, anger out on her little brother., , Reaction formation involves behaving in a way, that is exactly the opposite of one’s true feelings., , A parent who unconsciously resents a child spoils, the child with outlandish gifts., , Regression involves a reversion to immature patterns of behavior., , An adult has a temper tantrum when he doesn’t, get his way., , Rationalization involves the creation of false but, plausible excuses to justify unacceptable behavior., , A student watches TV instead of studying, saying, that “additional study wouldn’t do any good, anyway.”, , Identification involves bolstering self-esteem by, forming an imaginary or real alliance with some, person or group., , An insecure young man joins a fraternity to boost, his self-esteem., , CHAPTER 2, , FIG U R E 2.4, , Defense mechanisms. According to Freud, people use, a variety of defense mechanisms to protect themselves, from painful emotions. Definitions of seven commonly, used defense mechanisms, are shown on the left, along, with examples of each on, the right. This list is not exhaustive; additional defense, mechanisms are discussed, in Chapter 4., , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 39

Page 77 :
der age of 5! To shed light on these crucial early years,, Freud formulated a stage theory of development. He, emphasized how young children deal with their immature, but powerful, sexual urges (he used the term “sexual” in a general way to refer to many urges for physical pleasure, not just the urge to copulate). According, to Freud, these sexual urges shift in focus as children, progress from one stage to another. Indeed, the names, for the stages (oral, anal, genital, and so on) are based, on where children are focusing their erotic energy at the, time. Thus, psychosexual stages are developmental, periods with a characteristic sexual focus that leave, their mark on adult personality., Freud theorized that each psychosexual stage has, its own unique developmental challenges or tasks, as, outlined in Figure 2.5. The way these challenges are handled supposedly shapes personality. The notion of fixation plays an important role in this process. Fixation, is a failure to move forward from one stage to another, as expected. Essentially, the child’s development stalls, for awhile. Fixation is caused by excessive gratification, of needs at a particular stage or by excessive frustration, of those needs. Either way, fixations left over from childhood affect adult personality. Generally, fixation leads, to an overemphasis on the psychosexual needs that were, prominent during the fixated stage., Freud described a series of five psychosexual stages., Let’s examine some of the major features of each stage., Oral stage. This stage usually encompasses the first, year of life. During this stage the main source of erotic, stimulation is the mouth (in biting, sucking, chewing,, and so on). How caretakers handle the child’s feeding, experiences is supposed to be crucial to subsequent development. Freud attributed considerable importance, to the manner in which the child is weaned from the, breast or the bottle. According to Freud, fixation at the, oral stage could form the basis for obsessive eating or, smoking later in life (among many other things)., , •, , FIG U R E 2.5, , PART 1, , Phallic stage. Around age 4, the genitals become the, focus for the child’s erotic energy, largely through selfstimulation. During this pivotal stage, the Oedipal complex emerges. Little boys develop an erotically tinged, preference for their mother. They also feel hostility toward their father, whom they view as a competitor for, mom’s affection. Little girls develop a special attachment to their father. At about the same time, they learn, that their genitals are very different from those of little, boys, and they supposedly develop penis envy. According to Freud, girls feel hostile toward their mother because they blame her for their anatomical “deficiency.”, To summarize, in the Oedipal complex children, manifest erotically tinged desires for their othergender parent, accompanied by feelings of hostility, toward their same-gender parent. The name for this, syndrome was taken from the Greek myth of Oedipus,, who was separated from his parents at birth. Not knowing the identity of his real parents, he inadvertently killed, his father and married his mother., According to Freud, the way parents and children, deal with the sexual and aggressive conflicts inherent in, , Freud’s Stages of Psychosexual Development, , Freud’s stages of psychosexual development., Freud theorized that people, evolve through the series, of psychosexual stages, summarized here. The manner in which certain key, tasks and experiences are, handled during each stage, is thought to leave a lasting imprint on one’s adult, personality., , 40, , Anal stage. In their second year, children supposedly get their erotic pleasure from their bowel movements, through either the expulsion or retention of the, feces. The crucial event at this time involves toilet training, which represents society’s first systematic effort to, regulate the child’s biological urges. Severely punitive, toilet training is thought to lead to a variety of possible, outcomes. For example, excessive punishment might, produce a latent feeling of hostility toward the “trainer,”, who usually is the mother. This hostility might generalize to women in general. Another possibility is that, heavy reliance on punitive measures might lead to an, association between genital concerns and the anxiety, that the punishment arouses. This genital anxiety derived from severe toilet training could evolve into anxiety about sexual activities later in life., , Stage, , Approximate ages, , Erotic focus, , Key tasks and experiences, , Oral, , 0–1, , Mouth, (sucking, biting), , Weaning (from breast or bottle), , Anal, , 2–3, , Anus, (expelling or retaining feces), , Toilet training, , Phallic, , 4–5, , Genitals, (masturbating), , Identifying with adult role models;, coping with Oedipal crisis, , Latency, , 6–12, , None, (sexually repressed), , Expanding social contacts, , Genital, , Puberty, onward, , Genitals, (being sexually intimate), , Establishing intimate relationships;, contributing to society through working, , The Dynamics of Adjustment

Page 78 :
© Michael Newman/PhotoEdit, , According to Freudian theory, a, child’s feeding experiences are, crucial to later development., Fixation at the oral stage could, lead to an overemphasis on, for, example, smoking or eating in, adulthood., , Latency and genital stages. Freud believed that, from age 6 through puberty, the child’s sexuality is, suppressed—it becomes “latent.” Important events, during this latency stage center on expanding social, contacts beyond the family. With the advent of puberty, the child evolves into the genital stage. Sexual, urges reappear and focus on the genitals once again., At this point the sexual energy is normally channeled, toward peers of the other sex, rather than toward oneself, as in the phallic stage., In arguing that the early years shape personality,, Freud did not mean that personality development comes, to an abrupt halt in middle childhood. However, he, did believe that the foundation for one’s adult personality is solidly entrenched by this time. He maintained, that future developments are rooted in early, formative experiences and that significant conflicts in later, years are replays of crises from childhood., In fact, Freud believed that unconscious sexual, conflicts rooted in childhood experiences cause most, personality disturbances. His steadfast belief in the, , psychosexual origins of psychological disorders eventually led to bitter theoretical disputes with two of his, most brilliant colleagues: Carl Jung and Alfred Adler., Jung and Adler both argued that Freud overemphasized, sexuality. Freud summarily rejected their ideas, and, the other two theorists felt compelled to go their own, way, developing their own psychodynamic theories of, personality., , Jung’s Analytical Psychology, Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung called, his new approach analytical psychology to differentiate it from, Freud’s psychoanalytic theory. Like, Freud, Jung (1921, 1933) emphasized the unconscious determinants, of personality. However, he proposed that the unconscious consists of two layers. The first layer,, Carl Jung, called the personal unconscious, is, essentially the same as Freud’s version of the unconscious. The personal unconscious, houses material that is not within one’s conscious awareness because it has been repressed or forgotten. In addition, Jung theorized the existence of a deeper layer, he called the collective unconscious. The collective unconscious is a storehouse of latent memory traces inherited from people’s ancestral past that is shared, with the entire human race. Jung called these ancestral memories archetypes. They are not memories of, actual, personal experiences. Instead, archetypes are, emotionally charged images and thought forms that, , CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 41, , © Bettmann/Corbis, , the Oedipal complex is of paramount importance. The, child has to resolve the dilemma by giving up the sexual longings for the other-sex parent and the hostility, toward the same-sex parent. Healthy psychosexual development is supposed to hinge on the resolution of the, Oedipal conflict. Why? Because continued hostile relations with the same-sex parent may prevent the child, from identifying adequately with that parent. Without, such identification, Freudian theory predicts that many, aspects of the child’s development won’t progress as, they should.

Page 79 :
WE B LI N K 2.2, , C. G. Jung, Analytical Psychology and Culture, Synchronicity, archetypes, collective unconscious, introversion, extraversion—these and many other important, concepts arising from analytical psychology and Jung’s, tremendously influential theorizing are examined at this, comprehensive site., , have universal meaning. These archetypal images and, ideas show up frequently in dreams and are often manifested in a culture’s use of symbols in art, literature,, and religion. Jung felt that an understanding of archetypal symbols helped him make sense of his patients’, dreams. Doing so was of great concern to him because, he depended extensively on dream analysis in his treatment of patients., Jung’s unusual ideas about the collective unconscious had little impact on the mainstream of thinking, in psychology. Their influence was felt more in other, fields, such as anthropology, philosophy, art, and religious studies. However, many of Jung’s other ideas have, been incorporated into the mainstream of psychology., For instance, Jung was the first to describe the introverted (inner-directed) and extraverted (outer-directed), personality types. Introverts tend to be preoccupied, with the internal world of their own thoughts, feelings,, and experiences. They generally are contemplative and, aloof. In contrast, extraverts tend to be interested in, the external world of people and things. They’re more, likely to be outgoing, talkative, and friendly, instead of, reclusive., , Alfred Adler was a charter member, of Freud’s inner circle—the Vienna, Psychoanalytic Society. However, he, soon began to develop his own theory of personality, which he christened individual psychology. Adler, (1917, 1927) argued that the foremost human drive is not sexuality,, but a striving for superiority. Adler, Alfred Adler, viewed striving for superiority as, a universal drive to adapt, improve, oneself, and master life’s challenges. He noted that young, children understandably feel weak and helpless in comparison to more competent older children and adults., These early inferiority feelings supposedly motivate individuals to acquire new skills and develop new talents., Adler asserted that everyone has to work to overcome some feelings of inferiority. Compensation involves efforts to overcome imagined or real inferiorities by developing one’s abilities. Adler believed that, 42, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , © Bettmann/Corbis, , Adler’s Individual Psychology, , compensation is entirely normal. However, in some, people inferiority feelings can become excessive, resulting in what is widely known today as an inferiority, complex—exaggerated feelings of weakness and inadequacy. Adler thought that either parental pampering, or parental neglect (or actual physical handicaps) could, cause an inferiority problem. Thus, he agreed with Freud, on the importance of early childhood, although he focused on different aspects of parent-child relations., Adler explained personality disturbances by noting that an inferiority complex can distort the normal, process of striving for superiority (see Figure 2.6). He, maintained that some people engage in overcompensation in order to conceal, even from themselves, their, feelings of inferiority. Instead of working to master life’s, challenges, people with an inferiority complex work to, achieve status, gain power over others, and acquire the, trappings of success (fancy clothes, impressive cars, or, whatever looks important to them). They tend to flaunt, their success in an effort to cover up their underlying, inferiority complex. The problem is that such people, engage in unconscious self-deception, worrying more, about appearances than reality., Adler’s theory stressed the social context of personality development (Hoffman, 1994). For instance, it was, Adler who first focused attention on the possible importance of birth order as a factor governing personality. He noted that firstborns, second children, and laterborn children enter varied home environments and are, treated differently by parents and that these experiences, are likely to affect their personality. For example, he hypothesized that only children are often spoiled by excessive attention from parents and that firstborns are often, problem children because they become upset when, they’re “dethroned” by a second child. Adler’s theory, stimulated hundreds of studies on the effects of birth, order, but these studies generally failed to support his, hypotheses and did not uncover any reliable correlations, between birth order and personality (Ernst & Angst,, 1983; Harris, 2000)., In recent years, however, Frank Sulloway (1995,, 1996) has argued persuasively that birth order does have, an impact on personality. Sulloway’s reformulated hypotheses focus on how the Big Five traits are shaped, by competition among siblings as they struggle to find, a “niche” in their family environments. For example,, he hypothesizes that firstborns should be more conscientious but less agreeable and open to experience than, later-borns. In light of these personality patterns, he, further speculates that firstborns tend to be conventional and achievement oriented, whereas later-borns, tend to be liberal and rebellious. To evaluate his hypotheses, Sulloway reexamined decades of research on, birth order. After eliminating many studies that failed, to control for important confounding variables, such, as social class and family size, he concluded that the re-

Page 80 :
Superiority, complex, Competence, , Overcompensation,, underdeveloped, social interests, , yielded some bold new insights for their time., Psychodynamic theory and research have, demonstrated that (1) unconscious forces, can influence behavior, (2) internal conflict, often plays a key role in generating psychological distress, (3) early childhood experiences can exert considerable influence over, adult personality, and (4) people do rely on, defense mechanisms to reduce their experience of unpleasant emotions (Westen, 1998;, Westen & Gabbard, 1999)., In a more negative vein, psychodynamic, formulations have been criticized on several, grounds, including the following (Fine, 1990;, Macmillan, 1991; Torrey, 1992):, , 1. Poor testability. Scientific investigations require testable hypotheses. Psychodynamic ideas have often been too vague to perInferiority, mit a clear scientific test. Concepts such as, complex, the superego, the preconscious, and collecSocial, tive unconscious are difficult to measure., interest, 2. Inadequate evidence. The empirical, evidence on psychodynamic theories has often been characterized as inadequate. The, Compensation, Parental, approach depends too much on case studies,, neglect, in which it is easy for clinicians to see what, WEAKNESS,, HELPLESSNESS, they expect to see based on their theory. ReOrganic, Pampering,, inferiority, cent reexaminations of Freud’s own clinical, spoiling, (illness,, work suggest that he sometimes distorted his, physical handicap), patients’ case histories to mesh with his theory (Esterson, 1993; Sulloway, 1991) and that, a substantial disparity existed between Freud’s, writings and his actual therapeutic methods, (Lynn & Vaillant, 1998). Insofar as researchers have accumulated evidence on psychoF I G U R E 2.6, dynamic theories, it has provided only modest support for the central hypotheses (Fisher, Adler’s view of personality development. Like Freud, Adler believed that early, & Greenberg, 1985, 1996; Westen & Gabbard,, childhood experiences exert momentous influence over adult personality. However,, he focused on children’s social interactions rather than on their grappling with their, 1999)., sexuality. According to Adler, the roots of personality disturbances typically lie in, 3. Sexism. Many critics have argued that, excessive parental neglect or pampering, which can lead to overcompensation., psychodynamic theories harbor a bias against, women. Freud believed that females’ penis, sults of the remaining, well-controlled studies provided, envy made them feel inferior to males. He also thought, impressive evidence in favor of his hypotheses. Some, that females tended to develop weaker superegos and, subsequent studies have provided additional support, to be more prone to neurosis than males. He dismissed, for Sulloway’s analyses (Paulhus, Trapnell, & Chen,, female patients’ reports of sexual molestation during, 1999), but others have not (Freese, Powell, & Steelman,, childhood as mere fantasies. Admittedly, sexism isn’t, 1999; Harris, 2000). More studies will be needed, as reunique to Freudian theories, and the sex bias in modsearch on birth order is enjoying a bit of a renaissance., ern psychodynamic theories has been reduced to some, degree. But the psychodynamic approach has generally, provided a rather male-centered viewpoint (Lerman,, Evaluating Psychodynamic, 1986; Person, 1990)., Perspectives, Normal, growth, , •, , The psychodynamic approach has given us a number, of far-reaching theories of personality. These theories, , It’s easy to ridicule Freud for concepts such as penis, envy and to point to ideas that have turned out to be, CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 43

Page 81 :
wrong. Remember, though, that Freud, Jung, and Adler, began to fashion their theories over a century ago. It, is not entirely fair to compare these theories to other, models that are only a decade old. That’s like asking, the Wright brothers to race a supersonic jet. Freud and, his psychodynamic colleagues deserve great credit for, , breaking new ground. Standing at a distance a century, later, we have to be impressed by the extraordinary impact that psychodynamic theory has had on modern, thought. No other theoretical perspective in psychology has been as influential, except for the one we turn, to next—behaviorism., , Behavioral Perspectives, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Describe Pavlov’s classical conditioning and its, contribution to understanding personality., Discuss how Skinner’s principles of operant conditioning, can be applied to personality development., , Behaviorism is a theoretical orientation based on the, premise that scientific psychology should study observable behavior. Behaviorism has been a major, school of thought in psychology since 1913, when John, B. Watson published an influential article. Watson argued that psychology should abandon its earlier focus, on the mind and mental processes and focus exclusively on overt behavior. He contended that psychology could not study mental processes in a scientific, manner because they are private and not accessible to, outside observation., In completely rejecting mental processes as a suitable subject for scientific study, Watson took an extreme, position that is no longer dominant among modern, behaviorists. Nonetheless, his influence was enormous,, as psychology did shift its primary focus from the study, of the mind to the study of behavior., The behaviorists have shown little interest in internal personality structures such as Freud’s id, ego, and, superego, because such structures can’t be observed., They prefer to think in terms of “response tendencies,”, which can be observed. Thus, most behaviorists view, , •, , FIG U R E 2.7, , A behavioral view of, personality. Behaviorists, devote little attention to, the structure of personality because it is unobservable, but they implicitly, view personality as an individual’s collection of, response tendencies. A, possible hierarchy of response tendencies for a, specific stimulus situation, is shown here., , 44, , PART 1, , ■, , ■, , Describe Bandura’s social cognitive theory and his, concept of self-efficacy., Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of behavioral, theories of personality., , an individual’s personality as a collection of response, tendencies that are tied to various stimulus situations. A, specific situation may be associated with a number of, response tendencies that vary in strength, depending, on an individual’s past experience (see Figure 2.7)., Although behaviorists have shown relatively little interest in personality structure, they have focused, extensively on personality development. They explain, development the same way they explain everything, else—through learning. Specifically, they focus on how, children’s response tendencies are shaped through classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and observational learning. Let’s look at these processes., , Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning, Do you go weak in the knees when you get a note at work, that tells you to go see your boss? Do you get anxious, when you’re around important people? When you’re, driving, does your heart skip a beat at the sight of a police car—even when you’re driving under the speed, limit? If so, you probably acquired these common re-, , RESPONSE TENDENCIES, speaking to others, R 1 Circulate,, only if they approach you first, , STIMULUS, SITUATION, Large party where, you know relatively, few people, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , R2, , Stick close to the people you, already know, , R3, , Politely withdraw by getting wrapped, up in host’s book collection, , R4, , Leave at the first opportunity

Page 82 :
© Bettmann/Corbis, , sponses through classical condiIn contrast, the link between the tone and salivationing. Classical conditioning is, tion was established through conditioning. In condia type of learning in which a neutioned bonds, the conditioned stimulus (CS) is a pretral stimulus acquires the capacity, viously neutral stimulus that has acquired the capacity, to evoke a response that was origito evoke a conditioned response through conditionnally evoked by another stimulus., ing. The conditioned response (CR) is a learned reacThis process was first described, tion to a conditioned stimulus that occurs because of, back in 1903 by Ivan Pavlov., previous conditioning. Note that the unconditioned, Pavlov was a prominent Rusresponse and conditioned response often involve the, Ivan Pavlov, sian physiologist who did Nobel, same behavior (although there may be subtle differPrize–winning research on digesences). In Pavlov’s initial demonstration, salivation, tion. He was a dedicated scientist who was, obsessed with his research. Legend has it, that Pavlov severely reprimanded an asBEFORE CONDITIONING, sistant who was late for an experiment, NS, The unconditioned, Bell, because he was trying to avoid street fightstimulus elicits the, No response, unconditioned response,, ing in the midst of the Russian Revolubut the neutral stimulus, tion. The assistant defended his tardiness,, does not., saying, “But Professor, there’s a revolution, Elicits, UCS, UCR, going on, with shooting in the streets!”, Meat powder, Salivation, Pavlov supposedly replied, “Next time, there’s a revolution, get up earlier!” (Fancher, 1979; Gantt, 1975)., The Conditioned Reflex, , Pavlov (1906) was studying digestive processes in dogs when he discovered that, the dogs could be trained to salivate in response to the sound of a tone. What was, so significant about a dog salivating when, a tone was rung? The key was that the tone, started out as a neutral stimulus; that is,, originally it did not produce the response, of salivation (after all, why should it?)., However, Pavlov managed to change that, by pairing the tone with a stimulus (meat, powder) that did produce the salivation, response. Through this process, the tone, acquired the capacity to trigger the response of salivation. What Pavlov had, demonstrated was how learned reflexes are, acquired., At this point we need to introduce, the special vocabulary of classical conditioning (see Figure 2.8). In Pavlov’s experiment the bond between the meat powder, and salivation was a natural association, that was not created through conditioning. In unconditioned bonds, the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is a stimulus, that evokes an unconditioned response, without previous conditioning. The, unconditioned response (UCR) is an unlearned reaction to an unconditioned, stimulus that occurs without previous, conditioning., , DURING CONDITIONING, The neutral stimulus, is paired with the, unconditioned, stimulus., , NS, Bell, , UCS, Meat powder, , AFTER CONDITIONING, The neutral stimulus, alone elicits the, response; the neutral, stimulus is now a, conditioned stimulus,, and the response to it is, a conditioned response, , SUMMARY, An originally neutral, stimulus comes to elicit, a response that it did, not previously elicit., , UCR, Salivation, , CS, Bell, , CR, Salivation, , CS, Bell, , Comes, to elicit, , UCS, Meat powder, , •, , Elicits, , Elicits, , CR, Salivation, UCR, , FIG U R E 2.8, , The process of classical conditioning. The sequence of events in classical conditioning is outlined here. As we encounter new examples of classical conditioning throughout, the book, you will see diagrams like that shown in the fourth panel, which summarizes, the process., CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 45

Page 83 :
CS, Newsroom, , CS, Bridge, , CR, Fear, UCR, , UCS, Father’s, scare tactics, , •, , •, , FIG U R E 2.9, , Classical conditioning of a phobia. Many emotional responses, that would otherwise be puzzling can be explained as a result of, classical conditioning. In the case of one woman’s bridge phobia,, the fear originally elicited by her father’s scare tactics became a, conditioned response to the stimulus of bridges., , was an unconditioned response when evoked by the, UCS (meat powder) and a conditioned response when, evoked by the CS (the tone). The procedures involved, in classical conditioning are outlined in Figure 2.8., Pavlov’s discovery came to be called the conditioned, reflex. Classically conditioned responses are viewed as, reflexes because most of them are relatively involuntary., Responses that are a product of classical conditioning, are said to be elicited. This word is meant to convey the, idea that these responses are triggered automatically., Classical Conditioning in Everyday Life, , What is the role of classical conditioning in shaping personality in everyday life? Among other things, it contributes to the acquisition of emotional responses, such, as anxieties, fears, and phobias (Ayres, 1998; McAllister, & McAllister, 1995). This is a relatively small but important class of responses, as maladaptive emotional reactions underlie many adjustment problems. For example, one middle-aged woman reported being troubled, by a bridge phobia so severe that she couldn’t drive on, interstate highways because of all the viaducts she would, have to cross. She was able to pinpoint the source of, her phobia. Many years before, when her family would, drive to visit her grandmother, they had to cross a littleused, rickety, dilapidated bridge out in the countryside., Her father, in a misguided attempt at humor, made a, major production out of these crossings. He would stop, , WE B LI N K 2.3, , Behavior Analysis and Learning, A multitude of annotated links, all focusing on learning, through conditioning, have been compiled at the excellent, Psychology Centre site at Athabasca University (Alberta,, Canada)., , 46, , PART 1, , UCS, Reprimands,, criticism, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , CR, Anxiety, UCR, , F I G U R E 2. 10, , Classical conditioning of anxiety. A stimulus (in this case,, a newsroom) that is frequently paired with anxiety-arousing, events (reprimands and criticism) may come to elicit anxiety, by itself, through classical conditioning., , short of the bridge and carry on about the enormous, danger of the crossing. Obviously, he thought the bridge, was safe or he wouldn’t have driven across it. However,, the naive young girl was terrified by her father’s scare, tactics, and the bridge became a conditioned stimulus, eliciting great fear (see Figure 2.9). Unfortunately, the, fear spilled over to all bridges, and 40 years later she, was still carrying the burden of this phobia. Although, a number of processes can cause phobias, it is clear that, classical conditioning is responsible for many of our, irrational fears., Classical conditioning also appears to account for, more realistic and moderate anxiety responses. For example, imagine a news reporter in a high-pressure job, where he consistently gets negative feedback about his, work from his bosses. The negative comments from his, supervisors function as a UCS eliciting anxiety. These, reprimands are paired with the noise and sight of the, newsroom, so that the newsroom becomes a CS triggering anxiety, even when his supervisors are absent (see, Figure 2.10). Our poor reporter might even reach a, point at which the mere thought of the newsroom elicits anxiety when he is elsewhere., Fortunately, not every frightening experience leaves, a conditioned fear in its wake. A variety of factors influence whether a conditioned response is acquired in, a particular situation. Furthermore, a newly formed, stimulus-response bond does not necessarily last indefinitely. The right circumstances can lead to extinction—the gradual weakening and disappearance of a, conditioned response tendency. What leads to extinction in classical conditioning? It is the consistent presentation of the CS alone, without the UCS. For example,, when Pavlov consistently presented only the tone to a, previously conditioned dog, the tone gradually stopped, eliciting the response of salivation. How long it takes to, extinguish a conditioned response depends on many, factors. Foremost among them is the strength of the con-

Page 84 :
ditioned bond when extinction begins. Some conditioned responses extinguish quickly, while others are, difficult to weaken., , other. For example, peer approval is a potent reinforcer, for most people, but not all., Positive reinforcement motivates much of everyday behavior. You study hard because good grades are, likely to follow as a result. You go to work because this, behavior produces paychecks. Perhaps you work extra, hard in the hopes of winning a promotion or a pay raise., In each of these examples, certain responses occur because they have led to positive outcomes in the past., Positive reinforcement influences personality development in a straightforward way. Responses followed by pleasant outcomes are strengthened and tend, to become habitual patterns of behavior. For example,, a youngster might clown around in class and gain appreciative comments and smiles from schoolmates., This social approval will probably reinforce clowningaround behavior (see Figure 2.11). If such behavior is, reinforced with some regularity, it will gradually become an integral element of the youth’s personality. Similarly, whether or not a youngster develops traits such, as independence, assertiveness, or selfishness depends, on whether the child is reinforced for such behaviors, by parents and by other influential persons., Negative reinforcement occurs when a response, is strengthened (increases in frequency) because it is, followed by the removal of a (presumably) unpleasant stimulus. Don’t let the word negative here confuse, you. Negative reinforcement is reinforcement. Like positive reinforcement, it strengthens a response. How-, , Even Pavlov recognized that classical conditioning is, not the only form of conditioning. Classical conditioning best explains reflexive responding controlled by stimuli that precede the response. However, both animals, and humans make many responses that don’t fit this, description. Consider the response you are engaging, in right now—studying. It is definitely not a reflex (life, might be easier if it were). The stimuli that govern it, (exams and grades) do not precede it. Instead, your, studying response is mainly influenced by events that, follow it—specifically, its consequences., This kind of learning is called operant conditioning. Operant conditioning is a form of learning in, which voluntary responses come to be controlled by, their consequences. Operant conditioning probably, governs a larger share of human behavior than classical conditioning, since most human responses are voluntary rather than reflexive. Because they are voluntary,, operant responses are said to be emitted rather than, elicited., The study of operant conditioning was led by B. F. Skinner, (1953, 1974, 1990), a Harvard, University psychologist who spent, most of his career studying simple, responses made by laboratory rats, and pigeons. The fundamental principle of operant conditioning is uncommonly simple. Skinner demB. F. Skinner, onstrated that organisms tend to, repeat those responses that are followed by favorable consequences, and they tend not to, repeat those responses that are followed by neutral or unfavorable consequences. In Skinner’s scheme, favorable,, neutral, and unfavorable consequences involve reinforcement, extinction, and punishment, respectively., We’ll look at each of these concepts in turn., , Courtesy of B. F. Skinner, , Skinner’s Operant Conditioning, , POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT, Pleasant stimulus presented, Clowning, around, , Attention,, appreciation, , Response, , Reinforcer, , NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT, Aversive stimulus, removed, Calling, in sick, , Reduced, anxiety, , The Power of Reinforcement, , According to Skinner, reinforcement can occur in two, ways, which he called positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement. Positive reinforcement occurs when, a response is strengthened (increases in frequency), because it is followed by the arrival of a (presumably), pleasant stimulus. Positive reinforcement is roughly, synonymous with the concept of reward. Notice, however, that reinforcement is defined after the fact, in terms, of its effect on behavior. Why? Because reinforcement, is subjective. Something that serves as a reinforcer for, one person may not function as a reinforcer for an-, , Response, , •, , Reinforcer, , F I G U R E 2. 11, , Positive and negative reinforcement in operant conditioning., Positive reinforcement occurs when a response is followed by, a favorable outcome, so that the response is strengthened. In, negative reinforcement, the removal (symbolized here by the, “No” sign) of an aversive stimulus serves as a reinforcer. Negative reinforcement produces the same result as positive reinforcement: The person’s tendency to emit the reinforced response is, strengthened (the response becomes more frequent)., CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 47

Page 85 :
Extinction and Punishment, , In punishment, a response leads to the arrival of something aversive, and this response tends to be weakened., The second source of confusion involves assuming that punishment as only a disciplinary procedure, used by parents, teachers, and other authority figures., In the operant model, punishment occurs whenever a, response leads to negative consequences. Defined in this, way, the concept goes far beyond actions such as parents spanking children or teachers handing out detentions. For example, if you wear a new outfit and your, friends make fun of it and hurt your feelings, your behavior has been punished, and your tendency to wear, this clothing will decline. Similarly, if you go to a restaurant and have a horrible meal, in Skinner’s terminology your response has led to punishment., The impact of punishment on personality development is just the opposite of reinforcement. Generally, speaking, those patterns of behavior that lead to punishing (that is, negative) consequences tend to be weakened. For instance, if your impulsive decisions always, backfire, your tendency to be impulsive should decline., According to Skinner (1987), conditioning in humans operates much as it does in the rats and pigeons, that he has studied in his laboratory. Hence, he assumes, that conditioning strengthens and weakens people’s, response tendencies “mechanically”—that is, without, their conscious participation. Like John Watson (1913), before him, Skinner asserted that we can explain behavior without being concerned about individuals’ mental, processes., Skinner’s ideas continue to be influential, but his, mechanical view of conditioning has not gone unchallenged by other behaviorists. Theorists such as Albert, , Like the effects of classical conditioning, the effects of, operant conditioning may not last forever. In both types, of conditioning, extinction refers to the gradual weakening and disappearance of a response. In operant conditioning, extinction begins when a previously reinforced response stops producing positive consequences., As extinction progresses, the response typically becomes less and less frequent and eventually disappears., Thus, the response tendencies that make up one’s, personality are not necessarily permanent. For example,, the youngster who found that his classmates reinforced, clowning around in grade school might find, that his attempts at comedy earn nothing but, The behavioral approach to personality centers around the principle of reinforceindifferent stares in high school. This termiment—behaviors that are followed by favorable outcomes, such as attention,, laughter, approval, and appreciation, tend to be strengthened and become more, nation of reinforcement would probably lead, frequent., to the gradual extinction of the clowningaround behavior. How quickly an operant response extinguishes depends on many factors, in the person’s earlier reinforcement history., Some responses may be weakened by, punishment. In Skinner’s scheme, punishment occurs when a response is weakened, (decreases in frequency) because it is followed by the arrival of a (presumably) unpleasant stimulus. The concept of punishment in operant conditioning confuses many, students on two counts. First, it is often, mixed up with negative reinforcement because both involve aversive (unpleasant), stimuli. Please note, however, that they are, altogether different events with opposite, outcomes! In negative reinforcement, a response leads to the removal of something, aversive, and this response is strengthened., 48, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , © J. Clarke/Taxi/Getty Images, , ever, this strengthening occurs because the response gets, rid of an aversive stimulus. Consider a few examples:, You rush home in the winter to get out of the cold. You, clean your house to get rid of a mess. Parents give in to, their child’s begging to halt his whining., Negative reinforcement plays a major role in the, development of avoidance tendencies. As you may have, noticed, many people tend to avoid facing up to awkward situations and sticky personal problems. This, personality trait typically develops because avoidance, behavior gets rid of anxiety and is therefore negatively, reinforced. Recall our imaginary newspaper reporter,, whose work environment (the newsroom) elicits anxiety, (as a result of classical conditioning). He might notice, that on days when he calls in sick, his anxiety evaporates, so that this response is gradually strengthened—, through negative reinforcement (shown in Figure 2.11)., If his avoidance behavior continues to be successful in, reducing his anxiety, it might carry over into other areas, of his life and become a central aspect of his personality.

Page 86 :
Bandura have developed somewhat different behavioral models in which cognition plays a role. Cognition, is another name for the thought processes that behaviorists have traditionally shown little interest in., , Albert Bandura is one of several, theorists who have added a cognitive flavor to behaviorism since, the 1960s. Bandura (1977), Walter, Mischel (1973), and Julian Rotter, (1982) take issue with Skinner’s, view. They point out that humans, Albert Bandura, obviously are conscious, thinking,, feeling beings. Moreover, these theorists argue that in neglecting cognitive processes, Skinner ignores the most distinctive and important feature, of human behavior. Bandura and like-minded theorists originally called their modified brand of behaviorism social learning theory. Today, Bandura refers to, his model as social cognitive theory., Bandura (1986, 1999) agrees with the basic thrust, of behaviorism in that he believes that personality is, largely shaped through learning. However, he contends, that conditioning is not a mechanical process in which, people are passive participants. Instead, he maintains, that individuals actively seek out and process information about their environment in order to maximize, their favorable outcomes., , Courtesy, Albert Bandura, , Bandura’s Social, Cognitive Theory, , The theories of Skinner and Pavlov make no allowance for this type of indirect learning. After all, this, observational learning requires that you pay attention, to your friend’s behavior, that you understand its consequences, and that you store this information in memory. Obviously, attention, understanding, information,, and memory involve cognition, which behaviorists, used to ignore., As social cognitive theory has been refined, some, models have become more influential than others (Bandura, 1986). Both children and adults tend to imitate, people they like or respect more so than people they, don’t. People are also especially prone to imitate the, behavior of those they consider attractive or powerful, (such as celebrities). In addition, imitation is more likely, when individuals see similarity between the model and, themselves. Thus, children imitate same-sex role models, somewhat more than other-sex models. Finally, as noted, before, people are more likely to copy a model if they, see the model’s behavior leading to positive outcomes., According to social cognitive theory, models have, a great impact on personality development. Children, learn to be assertive, conscientious, self-sufficient, dependable, easygoing, and so forth by observing others, behaving in these ways. Parents, teachers, relatives, siblings, and peers serve as models for young children. Bandura and his colleagues have done extensive research, showing how models influence the development of aggressiveness, gender roles, and moral standards in children (Bandura, 1973; Bussey & Bandura, 1984; Mischel & Mischel, 1976). Their research on modeling and, aggression has been particularly influential., , Observational Learning, , Bandura’s foremost theoretical contribution has been, Self-Efficacy, Bandura (1993, 1997) believes that self-efficacy is a cruhis description of observational learning. Observacial element of personality. Self-efficacy is one’s belief, tional learning occurs when an organism’s responding is influenced by the observation of others, who are called models. Bandura does, not view observational learning as entirely, separate from classical and operant conditioning. Instead, he asserts that both classical and operant conditioning can take place, indirectly when one person observes another’s conditioning (see Figure 2.12)., Approval or, Showing, To illustrate, suppose you observe a, disapproval, off, friend behaving assertively with a car salesman. Let’s say that her assertiveness is reinReinforcer, Response, or punisher, forced by the exceptionally good buy she gets, on the car. Your own tendency to behave, assertively with salespeople might well be, strengthened as a result. Notice that the faF I G U R E 2. 12, vorable consequence is experienced by your, Observational learning. In observational learning, an observer attends to and, friend, not you. Your friend’s tendency to barstores a mental representation of a model’s behavior (for example, showing off) and, gain assertively should be reinforced directly., its consequences (such as approval or disapproval from others). According to social, But your tendency to bargain assertively may, cognitive theory, many of our characteristic responses are acquired through obseralso be reinforced indirectly., vation of others’ behavior., , •, , CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 49

Page 87 :
about one’s ability to perform behaviors that should, lead to expected outcomes. When a person’s selfefficacy is high, he or she feels confident in executing, the responses necessary to earn reinforcers. When selfefficacy is low, the individual worries that the necessary, responses may be beyond her or his abilities. Perceptions of self-efficacy are subjective and specific to different kinds of tasks. For instance, you might feel extremely, confident about your ability to handle difficult social, situations but doubtful about your ability to handle, academic challenges. Although specific perceptions of, self-efficacy predict behavior best, these perceptions are, influenced by general feelings of self-efficacy, which, can be measured with the scale shown in Figure 2.13, (Sherer et al., 1982)., Perceptions of self-efficacy can influence which, challenges people tackle and how well they perform., Studies have found that feelings of greater self-efficacy, are associated with greater success in giving up smoking, (Boudreaux et al., 1998); greater adherence to an exercise regimen (Rimal, 2001); better outcomes in substance abuse treatment (Bandura, 1999); more success, in coping with medical rehabilitation (Waldrop et al.,, 2001); better self-care among diabetics (Williams &, Bond, 2002); greater persistence and effort in academic, pursuits (Zimmerman, 1995); higher levels of academic, performance (Chemers, Hu, & Garcia, 2001); reduced, vulnerability to anxiety and depression in childhood, (Muris, 2002); enhanced performance in athletic competition (Kane et al., 1996); greater receptiveness to, technological training (Christoph, Schoenfeld, & Tan-, , •, , FIG U R E 2.13, , sky, 1998); higher work-related performance (Stajkovic & Luthans, 1998); and greater resistance to stress, (Jex et al., 2001), among many other things., , Evaluating Behavioral Perspectives, Behavioral theories are firmly rooted in empirical research rather than clinical intuition. Pavlov’s model has, shed light on how conditioning can account for people’s, sometimes troublesome emotional responses. Skinner’s, work has demonstrated how personality is shaped by, the consequences of behavior. Bandura’s social cognitive theory has shown how people’s observations mold, their characteristic behavior., Behaviorists, in particular Walter Mischel (1973,, 1990), have also provided the most thorough account of, why people are only moderately consistent in their behavior. For example, a person who is shy in one context, might be quite outgoing in another. Other models of, personality largely ignore this inconsistency. The behaviorists have shown that this inconsistency occurs because, people behave in ways they think will lead to reinforcement in the situation at hand. In other words, situational, factors play a significant role in controlling behavior., Of course, each theoretical approach has its shortcomings, and the behavioral approach is no exception., Major lines of criticism include the following (Liebert, & Liebert, 1998; Maddi, 1989):, 1. Dilution of the behavioral approach. The behaviorists used to be criticized because they neglected cog-, , The Self-Efficacy Scale, , Sample items from the SelfEfficacy Scale. The eight, items shown here are taken, from the Self-Efficacy Scale,, developed by Sherer et al., (1982), a 23-item measure of, general expectations of selfefficacy that are not tied to, specific situations. The more, items you agree with, the, stronger your self-efficacy., High scores on the complete, scale are predictive of vocational and educational success., Adapted from Sherer, M., Maddox, J. E.,, Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs,, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The Self-Efficacy, Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671. Copyright ©, Psychological Reports 1982. Reproduced with, permission of the authors and publisher., , Instructions: This questionnaire is a series of statements about your personal attitudes and traits., Each statement represents a commonly held belief. Read each statement and decide to, what extent it describes you. There are no right or wrong answers. You will probably, agree with some statements and disagree with others. Please indicate your own personal, feelings about each statement below by marking the letter that describes your attitude, or feeling. Please be very truthful and describe yourself as you really are, not as you, would like to be., A = Disagree strongly, B = Disagree moderately, C = Neither agree nor disagree, , D = Agree moderately, E = Agree strongly, , 1. ________ When I make plans I am certain I can make them work., 2. ________ If I can’t do a job the first time, I keep trying until I can., 3. ________ If I see someone I would like to meet, I go to that person instead of waiting for him or, her to come to me., 4. ________ When I have something unpleasant to do, I stick to it until I finish it., 5. ________ When I decide to do something, I go right to work on it., 6. ________ When I’m trying to become friends with someone who seems uninterested at first, I, don’t give up very easily., 7. ________ Failure just makes me try harder., 8. ________ I am a self-reliant person., , 50, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment

Page 88 :
nitive processes, which clearly are important factors in, human behavior. The rise of social cognitive theory, blunted this criticism. However, social cognitive theory undermines the foundation on which behaviorism, was built—the idea that psychologists should study, only observable behavior. Thus, some critics complain, that behavioral theories aren’t very behavioral anymore., , 2. Overdependence on animal research. Many principles in behavioral theories were discovered through, research on animals. Some critics, especially humanistic theorists, argue that behaviorists depend too much, on animal research and that they indiscriminately generalize from the behavior of animals to the behavior of, humans., , Humanistic Perspectives, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , Discuss humanism as a school of thought in psychology., Explain Rogers’s views on self-concept, development, and, defensive behavior., , Humanistic theory emerged in the 1950s as something, of a backlash against the behavioral and psychodynamic, theories (Cassel, 2000; DeCarvalho, 1991). The principal charge hurled at these two models was that they, were dehumanizing. Freudian theory was criticized for, its belief that primitive, animalistic drives dominate, behavior. Behaviorism was criticized for its preoccupation with animal research. Critics argued that both, schools view people as helpless pawns controlled by, their environment and their past, with little capacity, for self-direction. Many of these critics blended into a, loose alliance that came to be known as humanism because of its exclusive interest in human behavior. Humanism is a theoretical orientation that emphasizes, the unique qualities of humans, especially their free, will and their potential for personal growth. Humanistic psychologists do not believe that we can learn anything of significance about the human condition from, animal research., Humanistic theorists take an optimistic view of, human nature. In contrast to most psychodynamic, and behavioral theorists, humanistic theorists believe, that (1) human nature includes an innate drive toward, personal growth, (2) individuals have the freedom to, chart their courses of action and are not pawns of their, environment, and (3) humans are largely conscious, , WE B LI N K 2.4, , Personality Theories, C. George Boeree, who teaches personality theory at Shippensburg University, has assembled an online textbook, that discusses more than 20 important personality theorists in depth. All of the important figures cited in this, chapter (except for the behaviorists such as Skinner and, Pavlov) receive attention at this valuable site., , ■, , ■, , Describe Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, and summarize his, findings on self-actualizing persons., Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of humanistic, theories of personality., , and rational beings who are not dominated by unconscious, irrational needs and conflicts. Humanistic theorists also maintain that one’s subjective view of the, world is more important than objective reality. According to this notion, if you think you are homely, or bright,, or sociable, these beliefs will influence your behavior, more than the actual realities of how homely, bright,, or sociable you are., The humanistic approach clearly provides a different perspective on personality than either the psychodynamic or behavioral approach. In this section we’ll, review the ideas of the two most influential humanistic theorists, Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow., , Rogers’s Person-Centered Theory, Carl Rogers (1951, 1961, 1980) was, one of the founders of the human, potential movement, which emphasizes personal growth through, sensitivity training, encounter, groups, and other exercises intended to help people get in touch, with their true selves. Working at, the University of Chicago in the, Carl Rogers, 1940s, Rogers devised a major new, approach to psychotherapy. Like, Freud, Rogers based his personality theory on his extensive therapeutic interactions with many clients. Because, of his emphasis on a person’s subjective point of view,, Rogers called his approach a person-centered theory., The Self and Its Development, , Rogers viewed personality structure in terms of just, one construct. He called this construct the self, although, it is more widely known today as the self-concept. A, self-concept is a collection of beliefs about one’s own, , CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 51, , Carl Rogers Memorial Library, , ■

Page 89 :
CONGRUENCE, , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , Three Psychologies:, Perspectives from Freud,, Skinner, and Rogers, by Robert D. Nye (Wadsworth, 2000), One would be hard pressed to identify anyone who has, had more influence over the evolution of psychology in, the 20th century than the three theorists profiled in, this book: Sigmund Freud, B. F. Skinner, and Carl Rogers., In this concise (159 pages), highly readable book,, Robert Nye gives readers a simple—but not oversimplified—introduction to the theories of Freud, Rogers,, and Skinner. After providing a brief overview of all, three theories—the psychodynamic, behavioral, and, humanistic—in the first chapter, Nye devotes a chapter, to each theorist, attempting to present each man’s, ideas as convincingly as possible, holding criticisms, until later. These chapters include short biographical, sketches of each man and discuss practical examples, and real-world implications of each theorist’s provocative ideas. In the final chapter, Nye systematically compares the three theorists, reviews criticism of each, and, adds his own personal comments. All in all, this is a, superb introduction to the three major perspectives, that have shaped contemporary psychology., , nature, unique qualities, and typical behavior. Your, self-concept is your mental picture of yourself. It is a collection of self-perceptions. For example, a self-concept, might include such beliefs as “I am easygoing” or “I am, pretty” or “I am hardworking.”, Rogers stressed the subjective nature of the selfconcept. Your self-concept may not be entirely consistent with your actual experiences. To put it more bluntly,, your self-concept may be inaccurate. Most people are, prone to distort their experiences to some extent to promote a relatively favorable self-concept. For example,, you may believe that you are quite bright academically,, but your grade transcript might suggest otherwise. Rogers used the term incongruence to refer to the disparity between one’s self-concept and one’s actual experience. In contrast, if a person’s self-concept is reasonably, accurate, it is said to be congruent with reality. Everyone experiences some incongruence; the crucial issue, is how much (see Figure 2.14). Rogers maintained that, a great deal of incongruence undermines a person’s psychological well-being., In terms of personality development, Rogers was, concerned with how childhood experiences promote, congruence or incongruence. According to Rogers,, everyone has a strong need for affection, love, and accep52, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Self-concept, , Self-concept, meshes well with, actual experience, (some incongruence, is probably, unavoidable), , Actual, experience, , INCONGRUENCE, Self-concept, does not mesh, well with actual, experience, , Self-concept, , •, , Actual, experience, , F I G U R E 2. 14, , Rogers’s view of personality structure. In Rogers’s model, the, self-concept is the only important structural construct. However,, Rogers acknowledged that one’s self-concept may not jell with, the realities of one’s actual experience—a condition called incongruence. Different people have varied amounts of incongruence, between their self-concept and reality., , tance from others. Early in life, parents provide most, of this affection. Rogers maintained that some parents, make their affection conditional. That is, they make it, depend on the child’s behaving well and living up to expectations. When parental love seems conditional, children often distort and block out of their self-concept, those experiences that make them feel unworthy of love., At the other end of the spectrum, Rogers asserted that, some parents make their affection unconditional. Their, children have less need to block out unworthy experiences because they have been assured that they are, worthy of affection no matter what they do., Rogers believed that unconditional love from parents fosters congruence and that conditional love fosters incongruence. He further theorized that individuals, who grow up believing that affection from others (besides their parents) is conditional go on to distort more, and more of their experiences to feel worthy of acceptance from a wider and wider array of people, making, the incongruence grow., Anxiety and Defense, , According to Rogers, experiences that threaten people’s personal views of themselves are the principal, cause of troublesome anxiety. The more inaccurate, your self-concept, the more likely you are to have experiences that clash with your self-perceptions. Thus,, people with highly incongruent self-concepts are espe-

Page 90 :
Belief that, affection from others, is conditional, , Need to distort, shortcomings to feel, worthy of affection, , Relatively, incongruent, self-concept, , Recurrent, anxiety, , Defensive behavior, to protect inaccurate, self-concept, , •, , F I G U R E 2.15, , cially likely to be plagued by recurrent anxiety (see Figure 2.15)., To ward off this anxiety, such people often behave, defensively. Thus, they ignore, deny, and twist reality to, protect their self-concept. Consider a young woman, who, like most of us, considers herself a “nice person.”, Let us suppose that in reality she is rather conceited and, selfish, and she gets feedback from both boyfriends and, girlfriends that she is a “self-centered, snotty brat.” How, might she react in order to protect her self-concept?, She might ignore or block out those occasions when, she behaves selfishly and then deny the accusations by, her friends that she is self-centered. She might also attribute her girlfriends’ negative comments to their jealousy of her good looks and blame the boyfriends’ negative remarks on their disappointment because she, won’t get more serious with them. Meanwhile, she, might start doing some kind of charity work to show, everyone (including herself ) that she really is a nice, person. As you can see, people often go to great lengths, to defend their self-concept., Rogers’s theory can explain defensive behavior and, personality disturbances, but he also emphasized the importance of psychological health. Rogers held that psychological health is rooted in a congruent self-concept., In turn, congruence is rooted in a sense of personal, worth, which stems from a childhood saturated with unconditional affection from parents and others. These, themes are similar to those emphasized by the other, major humanistic theorist, Abraham Maslow., , Maslow’s Theory, of Self-Actualization, Abraham Maslow grew up in Brooklyn and spent much, of his career at Brandeis University, where he provided, crucial leadership for the fledgling humanistic move-, , ment. Like Rogers, Maslow (1968,, 1970) argued that psychology should, take a greater interest in the nature, of the healthy personality, instead, of dwelling on the causes of disorders. “To oversimplify the matter somewhat,” he said, “it is as if, Freud supplied to us the sick half, of psychology and we must now fill, Abraham Maslow, it out with the healthy half ” (Maslow, 1968, p. 5). Maslow’s key contributions were his analysis of how motives are organized hierarchically and his description of the healthy, personality., Hierarchy of Needs, , Maslow proposed that human motives are organized, into a hierarchy of needs—a systematic arrangement, of needs, according to priority, in which basic needs, must be met before less basic needs are aroused. This, hierarchical arrangement is usually portrayed as a pyramid (see Figure 2.16 on the next page). The needs toward the bottom of the pyramid, such as physiological, or security needs, are the most basic. Higher levels in, the pyramid consist of progressively less basic needs., When a person manages to satisfy a level of needs reasonably well (complete satisfaction is not necessary),, this satisfaction activates needs at the next level., Like Rogers, Maslow argued that humans have, an innate drive toward personal growth—that is, evolution toward a higher state of being. Thus, he described the needs in the uppermost reaches of his hierarchy as growth needs. These include the needs for, knowledge, understanding, order, and aesthetic beauty., Foremost among the growth needs is the need for selfactualization, which is the need to fulfill one’s potential; it is the highest need in Maslow’s motivational hiCHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 53, , Courtesy, Abraham Maslow, , Rogers’s view of personality development and dynamics. Rogers’s theory of development posits, that conditional love leads to a need to distort experiences, which fosters an incongruent self-concept., Incongruence makes one prone to recurrent anxiety, which triggers defensive behavior, which fuels, more incongruence.

Page 91 :
•, , FIG U R E 2.16, , Maslow’s hierarchy of, needs. According to Maslow,, human needs are arranged in, a hierarchy, and individuals, must satisfy their basic needs, first, before they progress to, higher needs. In the diagram,, higher levels in the pyramid, represent progressively less, basic needs. People progress, upward in the hierarchy when, lower needs are satisfied reasonably well, but they may, regress back to lower levels, if basic needs cease to be, satisfied., , Need for self-actualization:, Realization of potential, Aesthetic needs:, Order and beauty, Cognitive needs:, Knowledge and understanding, Esteem needs:, Achievement and, gaining of recognition, Belongingness and love needs:, Affiliation and acceptance, , able with solitude. They thrive on their work, and they, enjoy their sense of humor. Maslow also noted that they, have “peak experiences” (profound emotional highs), more often than others. Finally, he found that they, strike a nice balance between many polarities in personality, so that they can be both childlike and mature,, rational and intuitive, conforming and rebellious., , The Healthy Personality, , Because of his interest in self-actualization, Maslow set, out to discover the nature of the healthy personality., He tried to identify people of exceptional mental health, so that he could investigate their characteristics. In one, case, he used psychological tests and interviews to sort, out the healthiest 1 percent of a sizable population of, college students. He also studied admired historical, figures (such as Thomas Jefferson and psychologistphilosopher William James) and personal acquaintances, characterized by superior adjustment. Over a period, of years, he accumulated his case histories and gradually sketched, in broad strokes, a picture of ideal psychological health., Maslow called people with exceptionally healthy, personalities self-actualizing persons because of their, commitment to continued personal growth. He identified various traits characteristic of self-actualizing, people, which are listed in Figure 2.17. In brief, Maslow, found that self-actualizers are accurately tuned in to, reality and are at peace with themselves. He found that, they are open and spontaneous and that they retain a, fresh appreciation of the world around them. Socially,, they are sensitive to others’ needs and enjoy rewarding, interpersonal relations. However, they are not dependent on others for approval, nor are they uncomfortPART 1, , Regression, if lower needs, are not being, satisfied, , Safety and security needs:, Long-term survival and stability, Physiological needs:, Hunger, thirst,, and so forth, , erarchy. Maslow summarized this concept with a simple, statement: “What a man can be, he must be.” According to Maslow, people will be frustrated if they are unable to fully utilize their talents or pursue their true interests. For example, if you have great musical talent, but must work as an accountant, or if you have scholarly interests but must work as a sales clerk, your need, for self-actualization will be thwarted., , 54, , Progression, if lower needs, are satisfied, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Characteristics of, Self-Actualizing People, , •, , ■, , Clear, efficient perception of reality and comfortable relations with it, , ■, , Spontaneity, simplicity, and naturalness, , ■, , Problem centering (having something outside themselves, they “must” do as a mission), , ■, , Detachment and need for privacy, , ■, , Autonomy, independence of culture and environment, , ■, , Continued freshness of appreciation, , ■, , Mystical and peak experiences, , ■, , Feelings of kinship and identification with the human race, , ■, , Strong friendships, but limited in number, , ■, , Democratic character structure, , ■, , Ethical discrimination between means and ends, between, good and evil, , ■, , Philosophical, unhostile sense of humor, , ■, , Balance between polarities in personality, , F I G U R E 2. 17, , Characteristics of self-actualizing people. Humanistic theorists, emphasize psychological health instead of maladjustment. Maslow’s, sketch of the self-actualizing person provides a provocative picture, of the healthy personality.

Page 92 :
PEANUTS reprinted by permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., , Evaluating Humanistic, Perspectives, , WE B LI N K 2.5, , The humanists added a refreshing perspective to the, study of personality. Their argument that a person’s, subjective views may be more important than objective, reality has proven compelling. Today, even behavioral, theorists have begun to consider subjective personal, factors such as beliefs and expectations. The humanistic approach also deserves credit for making the selfconcept an important construct in psychology. Finally,, one could argue that the humanists’ optimistic, growth,, and health-oriented approach laid the foundation for, the emergence of the positive psychology movement, that is increasingly influential in contemporary psychology (Sheldon & Kasser, 2001b; Taylor, 2001)., Of course, there is a negative side to the balance, sheet as well. Critics have identified some weaknesses in, the humanistic approach to personality, including the, following (Burger, 2000):, , Great Ideas in Personality, At this site, personality psychologist G. Scott Acton demonstrates that scientific research programs in personality, generate broad and compelling ideas about what it is to, be a human being. He charts the contours of 12 research, perspectives, including behaviorism, behavioral genetics,, and sociobiology, and supports them with extensive links, to published and online resources associated with each, perspective., , For instance, Maslow’s self-actualizing people sound, perfect. In reality, Maslow had a hard time finding selfactualizing persons. When he searched among the living,, the results were so disappointing that he turned to the, study of historical figures. Thus, humanistic portraits, of psychological health are perhaps a bit unrealistic., 3. Inadequate evidence. Humanistic theories are, based primarily on discerning but uncontrolled observations in clinical settings. Case studies can be valuable, in generating ideas, but they are ill-suited for building, a solid database. More experimental research is needed, to catch up with the theorizing in the humanistic camp., This situation is precisely the opposite of the one you’ll, encounter in the next section, on biological perspectives, where more theorizing is needed to catch up with, the research., , 1. Poor testability. Like psychodynamic theorists,, the humanists have been criticized for proposing hypotheses that are difficult to put to a scientific test. Humanistic concepts such as personal growth and selfactualization are difficult to define and measure., 2. Unrealistic view of human nature. Critics also, charge that the humanists have been overly optimistic, in their assumptions about human nature and unrealistic in their descriptions of the healthy personality., , Biological Perspectives, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Describe Eysenck’s views on personality structure and, development., Summarize recent twin studies that support the idea, that personality is largely inherited., , Like many identical twins reared apart, Jim Lewis and, Jim Springer found they had been leading eerily similar, lives. Separated four weeks after birth in 1940, the Jim, twins grew up 45 miles apart in Ohio and were reunited, in 1979. Eventually, they discovered that both drove the, , ■, , ■, , Summarize evolutionary analyses of why certain, personality traits appear to be important., Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of biological, theories of personality., , same model blue Chevrolet, chain-smoked Salems, chewed, their fingernails, and owned dogs named Toy. Each had, spent a good deal of time vacationing at the same threeblock strip of beach in Florida. More important, when, tested for such personality traits as flexibility, self-control,, CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 55

Page 93 :
and sociability, the twins responded almost exactly alike., (Leo, 1987, p. 63), So began a Time magazine summary of a major twin, study conducted at the University of Minnesota, where, investigators have been exploring the hereditary roots, of personality. The research team has managed to locate and complete testing on 44 rare pairs of identical, twins separated early in life. Not all the twin pairs have, been as similar as Jim Lewis and Jim Springer, but many, of the parallels have been uncanny (Lykken et al., 1992)., Identical twins Oskar Stohr and Jack Yufe were separated, soon after birth. Oskar was sent to a Nazi-run school, in Czechoslovakia, while Jack was raised in a Jewish, home on a Caribbean island. When they were reunited, for the first time during middle age, they both showed, up wearing similar mustaches, haircuts, shirts, and wirerimmed glasses. A pair of previously separated female, twins both arrived at the Minneapolis airport wearing, seven rings on their fingers. One had a son named Richard Andrew, and the other had a son named Andrew, Richard!, Could personality be largely inherited? These anecdotal reports of striking resemblances between identical twins reared apart certainly raise this possibility., In this section we’ll discuss Hans Eysenck’s theory,, which emphasizes the influence of heredity, and look, at behavioral genetics and evolutionary perspectives, on personality., , Eysenck’s Theory, Hans Eysenck was born in Germany but fled to London, during the era of Nazi rule. He went on to become one, 56, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , of Britain’s most prominent psychologists. According to Eysenck, (1967), “Personality is determined, to a large extent by a person’s genes”, (p. 20). How is heredity linked to, personality in Eysenck’s model? In, part, through conditioning concepts borrowed from behavioral, theory. Eysenck (1967, 1982, 1991), Hans Eysenck, theorizes that some people can be, conditioned more readily than others because of inherited differences in their physiological functioning (specifically, their level of arousal)., These variations in “conditionability” are assumed to, influence the personality traits that people acquire, through conditioning., Eysenck views personality structure as a hierarchy, of traits. Numerous superficial traits are derived from a, smaller number of more basic traits, which are derived, from a handful of fundamental higher-order traits, as, shown in Figure 2.18. Eysenck has shown a special interest in explaining variations in extraversion-introversion,, the trait dimension first described years earlier by Carl, Jung. He has proposed that introverts tend to have, higher levels of physiological arousal than extraverts., This higher arousal purportedly motivates them to, avoid social situations that will further elevate their, arousal and makes them more easily conditioned than, extraverts. According to Eysenck, people who condition easily acquire more conditioned inhibitions than, others. These inhibitions, coupled with their relatively, high arousal, make them more bashful, tentative, and, uneasy in social situations. This social discomfort leads, them to turn inward. Hence, they become introverted., , Courtesy, Hans Eysenck, photo by Mark Gerson, , © Michael Nichols/Magnum Photos, , The striking parallels in the lives, of Jim Lewis and Jim Springer,, identical twins separated soon, after birth and reunited as adults,, suggest that heredity may have a, powerful impact on personality.

Page 94 :
Extraversion, , Higher-order traits, , Traits, , Sociability, , Impulsiveness, , Activity, , Liveliness, , Excitability, , Habitual, responses, Specific, responses, , •, , F I G U R E 2.18, , Eysenck’s model of personality structure. Eysenck describes personality structure as a hierarchy of traits., In this scheme, a few higher-order traits (such as extraversion) determine a host of lower-order traits, (such as sociability), which determine one’s habitual responses (such as going to lots of parties)., From Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality, p. 36. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Courtesy of Charles C. Thomas., , Recent Research, in Behavioral Genetics, Recent twin studies have provided impressive support, for Eysenck’s hypothesis that personality is largely inherited. In twin studies researchers assess hereditary, influence by comparing the resemblance of identical, twins and fraternal twins on a trait. The logic underlying this comparison is as follows. Identical twins emerge, from one egg that splits, so that their genetic makeup is, exactly the same (100 percent overlap). Fraternal twins, result when two eggs are fertilized simultaneously; their, genetic overlap is only 50 percent. Both types of twins, usually grow up in the same home, at the same time, exposed to the same relatives, neighbors, peers, teachers,, events, and so forth. Thus, both kinds of twins normally, develop under similar environmental conditions, but, identical twins share more genetic kinship. Hence, if, sets of identical twins exhibit more personality resemblance than sets of fraternal twins, this greater similarity, is probably attributable to heredity rather than to environment. The results of twin studies can be used to, estimate the heritability of personality traits and other, characteristics. A heritability ratio is an estimate of, the proportion of trait variability in a population that, is determined by variations in genetic inheritance., Heritability can be estimated for any trait. For example, the heritability of height is estimated to be around, 90 percent (Plomin, 1994), whereas the heritability of, intelligence appears to be about 50–70 percent (Bouchard et al., 1990)., The accumulating evidence from twin studies suggests that heredity exerts considerable influence over, many personality traits (Rowe, 1997, 1999). For instance,, , in research on the Big Five personality traits, identical, twins have been found to be much more similar than, fraternal twins on all five traits (Loehlin, 1992). Some, skeptics still wonder whether identical twins might exhibit more personality resemblance than fraternal twins, because they are raised more similarly. In other words,, they wonder whether environmental factors (rather, than heredity) could be responsible for identical twins’, greater similarity. This nagging question can be answered only by studying identical twins who have been, reared apart. Which is why the twin study at the University of Minnesota was so important., The Minnesota study (Tellegen et al., 1988) was the, first to administer the same personality test to identical and fraternal twins reared together as well as apart., Most of the twins reared apart were separated quite, early in life (median age of 2.5 months) and remained, separated for a long time (median period of almost 34, years). Nonetheless, on all three of the higher-order, traits examined, the identical twins reared apart displayed more personality resemblance than fraternal, twins reared together. Based on the pattern of correlations observed, the researchers estimated that the heritability of personality is around 50 percent. Another, large-scale twin study of the Big Five traits conducted, in Germany and Poland yielded similar conclusions, (Riemann, Angleitner, & Strelau, 1997). The heritability estimates based on the data from this study, which, are shown in Figure 2.19 on the next page, are in the, same range as the estimates from the Minnesota study., Research on the genetic bases of personality has inadvertently turned up another interesting finding that, is apparent in the data shown in Figure 2.19. A numCHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 57

Page 95 :
•, , FIG U R E 2.19, , Heritability and environmental, variance for the Big Five traits., Based on the twin study data of, Riemann et al. (1997), Plomin and, Caspi (1999) estimated the heritability of each of the Big Five, traits. The data also allowed them, to estimate the amount of variance, on each trait attributable to shared, environment and nonshared environment. As you can see, the heritability estimates hovered in the, vicinity of 40 percent, with two, exceeding 50 percent. As in other, studies, the influence of shared, environment was very modest., , Source of variance, Genetic, Shared environment, , Conscientiousness, , Agreeableness, , Neuroticism, , Extraversion, , Based on Plomin, R., & Caspi, A. (1999). Behavioral genetics and personality. In L. A. Pervin & O., P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and, Research. New York: The Guilford Press. Adapted by, permission., , 0, , ber of recent studies have found that shared family environment has surprisingly little impact on personality, (Beer, Arnold, & Loehlin, 1998; Plomin & Caspi, 1999)., This finding is surprising in that social scientists have, long assumed that the family environment shared by, children growing up together led to some personality, resemblance among them. These findings have led some, theorists to conclude that parents don’t matter—that, they wield very little influence over how their children, develop (Cohen, 1999; Harris, 1998; Rowe, 1994)., Critics of this conclusion have argued that the methods used in behavioral genetics studies have probably, underestimated the impact of shared environment on, personality (Collins et al., 2000; Stoolmiller, 1999)., They also note that shared experiences—such as being, raised with authoritarian discipline—may often have, different effects on two siblings, which obscures the impact of environment but is not the same result as having, no effect (Turkheimer & Waldron, 2000). Furthermore,, the critics argue, decades of research in developmental, psychology have clearly demonstrated that parents have, significant influence on their children (Maccoby, 2000)., Although the assertion that “parents don’t matter”, seems premature and overstated, the perplexing findings in behavioral genetics studies of personality have, led researchers to investigate why children from the, same family are often so different. Thus far, the evidence suggests that children in the same family experience home environments that are not nearly as homogeneous as previously assumed (Hetherington, Reiss,, & Plomin, 1994; Pike et al., 2000). Children in the same, home may be treated quite differently, because gender, and birth order can influence parents’ approaches to, child-rearing. Temperamental differences between children may also evoke differences in parenting. Focusing, , 58, , PART 1, , Nonshared environment, , TRAITS, Openness, to experience, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , 10, , 20, , 40, 80, 30, 50, 60, 70, Percent of variance accounted for, , 90, , 100, , on how environmental factors vary within families, represents a promising new way to explore the determinants of personality., , The Evolutionary, Approach to Personality, In the realm of biological approaches to personality, the, most recent development has been the emergence of an, evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary psychologists, assert that the patterns of behavior seen in a species are, products of evolution in the same way that anatomical, characteristics are. Evolutionary psychology examines, behavioral processes in terms of their adaptive value, for members of a species over the course of many, generations. The basic premise of evolutionary psychology is that natural selection favors behaviors that, enhance organisms’ reproductive success—that is, passing on genes to the next generation. Thus, evolutionary, analyses of personality focus on how various traits—, and the ability to recognize these traits in others—may, have contributed to reproductive fitness in ancestral, human populations., For example, David Buss (1991, 1995, 1997) has, argued that the Big Five personality traits stand out as, important dimensions of personality across a variety, of cultures because those traits have had significant, adaptive implications. Buss points out that humans, have historically depended heavily on groups, which, afford protection from predators or enemies, opportunities for sharing food, and a diverse array of other, benefits. In the context of these group interactions,, people have had to make difficult but crucial judgments, about the characteristics of others, asking such questions as: Who will make a good member of my coali-

Page 96 :
tion? Who can I depend on when in need? Who will, share their resources? Thus, Buss (1995) argues, “Those, individuals able to accurately discern and act upon, these individual differences likely enjoyed a considerable reproductive advantage” (p. 22). According to, Buss, the Big Five emerge as fundamental dimensions, of personality because humans have evolved special, sensitivity to variations in the ability to bond with others (extraversion), the willingness to cooperate and, collaborate (agreeableness), the tendency to be reliable, and ethical (conscientiousness), the capacity to be an, innovative problem solver (openness to experience),, and the ability to handle stress (low neuroticism). In a, nutshell, the Big Five supposedly reflect the most salient personality features in ancestral humans’ adaptive landscape., , Evaluating Biological Perspectives, Although evolutionary analyses of personality are, pretty speculative, recent research in behavioral genetics has provided convincing evidence that biological, , factors help shape personality. Nonetheless, we must, take note of some weaknesses in biological approaches, to personality:, 1. Problems with estimates of hereditary influence., , Efforts to carve personality into genetic and environmental components with statistics are ultimately artificial. The effects of heredity and environment are twisted, together in complicated interactions that can’t be separated cleanly (Brody & Crowley, 1995; Funder, 2001)., Although heritability ratios sound precise, they are estimates based on a complicated chain of inferences, that are subject to debate., 2. Lack of adequate theory. At present there is no, comprehensive biological theory of personality. Eysenck’s model does not provide a systematic overview, of how biological factors govern personality development (and it was never intended to). Evolutionary, analyses of personality are even more limited in scope., Additional theoretical work is needed to catch up with, recent empirical findings on the biological basis for, personality., , A Contemporary Empirical Approach:, Terror Management Theory, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Explain the chief concepts and hypotheses of terror management theory., Describe how reminders of death influence people’s behavior., , So far, our coverage has been largely devoted to grand,, panoramic theories of personality. In this section we’ll, examine a new approach to understanding personality functioning that has a narrower focus than the classic theories of personality. Terror management theory, emerged as an influential perspective in the 1990s. Although the theory borrows from Freudian and evolutionary formulations, it provides its own unique analysis of the human condition. This fresh perspective is, currently generating a huge volume of research, and it, seems especially relevant to contemporary adjustment, issues., , Essentials of Terror, Management Theory, One of the chief goals of terror management theory is to, explain why people need self-esteem (Solomon, Greenberg, & Pyszczynski, 1991). The theory begins with the, assumption that humans share an evolutionary heritage, with other animals that includes an instinctive drive for, , self-preservation. However, unlike other animals, humans have evolved complex cognitive abilities that permit self-awareness and contemplation of the future., These cognitive capacities make humans keenly aware, of the inevitability of death—they appreciate that life, can be snuffed out unpredictably at any time. The collision between humans’ self-preservation instinct and, their awareness of the inevitability of death creates, the potential for experiencing anxiety, alarm, and terror when people think about their mortality (see Figure 2.20)., How do humans deal with this potential for terror?, According to terror management theory, “What saves, us is culture. Cultures provide ways to view the world—, worldviews—that ‘solve’ the existential crisis engendered by the awareness of death” (Pyszczynski, Solomon, & Greenberg, 2004, p. 16). Cultural worldviews, diminish anxiety by providing answers to universal questions such as Why am I here? and What is the meaning, of life? Cultures create stories, traditions, and institutions that give their members a sense of being part of, , CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 59

Page 97 :
an enduring legacy through their, ty buffer, contributions to their families, tribes,, Anxie, schools, churches, professions, and, so forth. Thus, faith in a cultural, Self-preservation, Need to defend, worldview can give people a sense of, instinct, cultural, order, meaning, and context that can, worldview, soothe their fear of death., Potential for, Where does self-esteem fit into, death-related, the picture? Self-esteem is viewed as, anxiety, and terror, a sense of personal worth that depends on one’s confidence in the vaNeed to, lidity of one’s cultural worldview, enhance feelings, and the belief that one is living up, of self-esteem, Awareness of, the inevitability, to the standards prescribed by that, of death, worldview. “It is the feeling that one, An, x iety, is a valuable contributor to a meanb uffer, ingful universe” (Pyszczynski et al.,, 2004, p. 437). Hence, self-esteem, buffers people from the profound, F I G U R E 2. 20, anxiety associated with the awareOverview of terror management theory. This graphic maps out the relations among the key, ness that they are transient animals, concepts proposed by terror management theory. The theory asserts that humans’ unique, destined to die. In other words, selfawareness of the inevitability of death fosters a need to defend one’s cultural worldview and, esteem serves a terror management, one’s self-esteem, which serve to protect one from mortality-related anxiety., function (refer to Figure 2.20)., The notion that self-esteem functions as an anxiety buffer has been, supported by numerous studies (Pyszczynski et al.,, opposing political views (McGregor et al., 1998; Schimel, 2004). In many of these experiments, researchers have, et al., 1999)., manipulated what they call mortality salience by asking, Terror management theory asserts that much of our, subjects to briefly think about their own death. Consisbehavior is motivated by the overlapping needs to defend, tent with the anxiety buffer hypothesis, reminding peoour cultural worldview and to preserve our self-esteem., ple of their mortality leads subjects to engage in a variety, This perspective yields novel hypotheses regarding many, of behaviors that are likely to bolster their self-esteem,, phenomena. For instance, Solomon, Greenberg, and, thus reducing anxiety (see Chapter 5 for more on the, Pyszczynski (2004) explain excessive materialism in, terror management function of self-esteem)., terms of the anxiety-buffering function of self-esteem., Specifically, they argue that “conspicuous possession, and consumption are thinly veiled efforts to assert that, Applications of Terror, one is special and therefore more than just an animal, Management Theory, fated to die and decay” (p. 134). In another thoughtIncreasing mortality salience also leads people to work, provoking analysis, the architects of terror management, harder at defending their cultural worldview. For intheory argue that people high in neuroticism tend to be, stance, after briefly pondering their mortality, research, especially uptight about sex because sexuality lies at the, participants (1) hand out harsher penalties to moral, core of humans’ animal nature and hence their ultimate, transgressors, (2) respond more negatively to people, mortality (Goldenberg et al., 1999). Terror managewho criticize their country, (3) give larger rewards to, ment theory has also been used to explain depressive, people who uphold cultural standards, and (4) show, disorders. According to Arndt et al. (2000), depression, more respect for cultural icons, such as a flag (Greenberg, occurs when individuals’ anxiety buffer fails and they, et al., 1990; Rosenblatt et al., 1989). This need to delose faith in the cultural worldview that gave their life, fend one’s cultural worldview may even fuel prejudice, meaning. One recent study even applied terror manand aggression. Reminding subjects of their mortality, agement theory to the political process. Cohen et al., leads to (1) more negative evaluations of people from, (2004) found that mortality salience increases subjects’, different religious or ethnic backgrounds, (2) more, preference for “charismatic” candidates who articulate, stereotypic thinking about minority group members,, a grand vision that makes people feel like they are part, and (3) more aggressive behavior toward people with, of an important movement of lasting significance., , •, , 60, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment

Page 98 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Understanding Reactions to 9/11, Although its name might suggest otherwise, terror, management theory was not developed to deal with, the phenomenon of terrorism in the aftermath of 9/11., Terror management theory has been around since the, mid-1980s, and as the text explains, it is a wide-ranging, theory that analyzes the many ramifications of humans’, existential struggle with the inevitability of death (see, pp. 59–60, 62). Nonetheless, given its central focus on, the effects of reminding people of their mortality, the, theory can help us understand the psychological impact, of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States., In their book In the Wake of 9/11, Tom Pyszczynski,, Sheldon Solomon, and Jeff Greenberg (2003) point out, that the tragic events of 9/11 produced a powerful,, nationwide manipulation of mortality salience. The televised images of death and destruction seen that day, made most Americans feel extremely vulnerable. Moreover, the terrorists dealt Americans a double blow in, that the destruction was inflicted on two respected icons, of American culture: the Pentagon and the World Trade, Center. Thus, the 9/11 terrorist strikes were attacks on, Americans’ cultural worldview, which terror management, theory asserts is humanity’s main defense against death, anxiety., According to the architects of terror management, theory, many of the reactions seen across the country, after 9/11 were exactly what one would expect based, on their theory. Included among these reactions were, the following., Reaffirmation of cultural worldviews. When mortality salience is elevated, terror management theory, predicts that people will embrace their cultural worldviews even more strongly than before. Consistent with, this prediction, in the months following 9/11, church, attendance and the sale of bibles both increased dramatically. Thus, people reaffirmed their faith in organized, religion, which represents the foundation of many individuals’ cultural worldview. People also became much, more overtly patriotic. Flags flew everywhere, patriotic, songs were all over the radio, and corporate logos were, redesigned in red, white, and blue. Thus, people proudly, proclaimed their faith in the American way., , Reduced tolerance. Research on terror management, processes has shown that when death anxiety is heightened, people become less tolerant of opposing views and, more prejudiced against those who are different. Consistent with this analysis, in the aftermath of 9/11, individuals who questioned government policies met more, hostility than usual. Increased prejudice and bigotry, toward Arab Americans and people of Middle Eastern, descent was also readily apparent., Increased altruism. Altruism, which consists of, unselfish concern for the welfare of others, is a highly, respected virtue in most cultures. Behaving in an altruistic manner makes people feel like they are good, citizens, thus reaffirming their commitment to their, cultural worldview and enhancing their self-esteem., Hence, terror management theory would anticipate that, increased mortality salience would stimulate increased, altruism, which clearly was seen in the months after the, terrorist assaults. Many people traveled to New York or, Washington to help in whatever way they could after the, attacks. Blood donations reached unprecedented levels,, and charitable giving skyrocketed., Intensified need for heroes. Research indicates, that reminders of mortality increase the tendency to, admire those who uphold cultural standards. More than, ever, people need heroes who personify cultural values., This need was apparent in the aftermath of 9/11 in the, way the media made firefighters into larger-than-life, heroes. This analysis is not meant to suggest that firefighters did not deserve to be characterized as heroic., Rather, the point is that firefighters had a long history, of heroic behavior that largely went unrecognized until, a massive increase in mortality salience created an urgent need for uplifting heroes., Admittedly, some of the reactions to 9/11 predicted, by terror management theory could also be explained, by other theoretical perspectives. Nonetheless, terror, management theory seems to provide a perspective that, is uniquely well suited to understanding some of the, effects of terrorism on our collective psyche., , CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 61

Page 99 :
© Andy Sacks/Stone/Getty Images, , © Cheryl Maeder/Corbis, , Terror management theory has been applied to a remarkably diverse array of phenomena. For example, it has been used to explain conspicuous consumption and to predict people’s voting preferences., , Although terror management theory is narrower, in scope than psychoanalytic, behavioral, and humanistic theories, it has wide-ranging implications and is, being applied to more and more aspects of human behavior. In particular, given its focus on death anxiety,, it has much to say about people’s reactions to terrorism, (see the Living in Today’s World box on page 61)., At first glance, a theory that explains everything, from prejudice to compulsive shopping in terms of death, anxiety may seem highly implausible. After all, most, people do not appear to walk around all day obsessing, about the possibility of their death. The architects of, terror management theory are well aware of this reality. They explain that the defensive reactions uncovered in their research generally occur when death anx-, , iety surfaces on the fringes of conscious awareness and, that these reactions are automatic and subconscious, (Pyszczynski, Greenberg, & Solomon, 1999). They also, assert that people experience far more reminders of, their mortality than most of us appreciate. They point, out that people may be reminded of their mortality by, a host of everyday events, such as driving by a cemetery or funeral home, reading about an auto accident,, visiting a doctor’s office, hearing about a celebrity’s, heart attack, learning about alarming medical research,, skipping over the obituaries in the newspaper, and, so forth. Thus, the processes discussed by terror management theory may be more commonplace that one, might guess., , An Epilogue on Theoretical Diversity, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Discuss why the subject of personality has generated so much, theoretical diversity., Compare and contrast the personality theories of Freud, Skinner,, Rogers, and Eysenck., , Figure 2.21 provides a comparative overview of the, ideas of Freud, Skinner, Rogers, and Eysenck, as representatives of the psychodynamic, behavioral, humanistic, and biological approaches to personality. Most of, this information was covered in the chapter, but the, figure organizes it so that the similarities and differences between the theories become more apparent. As, you can see, there are many fundamental points of disagreement. Our review of perspectives on personality, should have made one thing abundantly clear: Psychology is marked by theoretical diversity., , 62, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Why do we have so many competing points of view?, One reason is that no single theory can adequately explain everything that we know about personality. Sometimes different theories focus on different aspects of, behavior. Sometimes there is simply more than one way, to look at something. Is the glass half empty or half full?, Obviously, it is both. To take an example from another, science, physicists wrestled for years with the nature of, light. Is it a wave, or is it a particle? In the end, it proved, useful to think of light sometimes as a wave, and sometimes as a particle. Similarly, if a business executive

Page 100 :
Overview of Four Approaches to Personality, , •, , Sigmund Freud:, A psychodynamic view, , B. F. Skinner:, A behavioral view, , Carl Rogers:, A humanistic view, , Hans Eysenck:, A biological view, , Source of data, and observations, , Case studies from, clinical practice of, psychoanalysis, , Laboratory experiments primarily with, animals, , Case studies from clinical practice of clientcentered therapy, , Twin, family, and adoption studies of hereditary influence; factor, analysis studies of, personality structure, , Key motivational, forces, , Sex and aggression;, need to reduce tension produced by, internal conflicts, , Pursuit of primary (unlearned) and secondary, (learned) reinforcers;, priorities depend on, personal history, , Actualizing tendency, (need for personal, growth) and selfactualizing tendency, (need to maintain selfconcept), , No specific motivational, forces singled out, , Model of personality, structure, , Three interacting components (id, ego, superego) operating at three, levels of consciousness, , Collection of response, tendencies tied to, specific stimulus, situations, , Self-concept, which may, or may not be congruent, with actual experience, , Hierarchy of traits,, with specific traits derived from more fundamental, general traits, , View of personality, development, , Emphasis on fixation, or progress through, psychosexual stages;, experiences in early, childhood leave, lasting mark on, adult personality, , Personality evolves, gradually over the life, span (not in stages);, responses followed by, reinforcement become, more frequent, , Children who receive, unconditional love have, less need to be defensive; they develop more, accurate, congruent selfconcepts; conditional, love fosters incongruence, , Emphasis on unfolding, of genetic blueprint, with maturation; inherited predispositions, interact with learning, experiences, , Roots of disorders, , Unconscious fixations, and unresolved conflicts, from childhood, usually, centered on sex and, aggression, , Maladaptive behavior, due to faulty learning;, the “symptom” is the, problem, not a sign of, underlying disease, , Incongruence between, self-concept and actual, experience; overdependence on others for approval and sense of worth, , Genetic vulnerability, activated in part by, environmental factors, , Importance of, nature (biology,, heredity) vs. nurture (environment,, experience), , Nature: emphasis on, biological basis of instinctual drives, , Nurture: strong emphasis on learning,, conditioning, role of, experience, , Nurture: interested in, innate potentials, but, humanists believe we, can rise above our biological heritage, , Nature: strong emphasis on how hereditary, predispositions shape, personality, , Importance of, person factors vs., situation factors, , Person: main interest, is in internal factors, (id, ego, conflicts,, defenses, etc.), , Situation: strong emphasis on how one, responds to specific, stimulus situations, , Person: focus on, self-concept, which, is stable, , Person: interested in, stable traits molded by, heredity, , F I G U R E 2.21, , Comparison of four theoretical perspectives on personality. This chart compares the theories of, Freud, Skinner, Rogers, and Eysenck to highlight the similarities and differences between the psychodynamic, behavioral, humanistic, and biological approaches to personality., , lashes out at her employees with stinging criticism, is, she releasing pent-up aggressive urges (a psychoanalytic, view)? Is she making a habitual response to the stimulus, of incompetent work (a behavioral view)? Is she trying, to act like a tough boss because that’s a key aspect of her, self-concept (a humanistic view)? Or is she exhibiting, an inherited tendency to be aggressive (a biological, view)? In some cases, all four of these explanations, might have some validity., In short, it is an oversimplification to expect that, one view has to be right while all others are wrong. Life, is rarely that simple. In view of the complexity of per-, , sonality, it would be surprising if there were not a number of different theories. It’s probably best to think of the, various theoretical orientations in psychology as complementary viewpoints, each with its own advantages, and limitations. Indeed, modern psychologists increasingly recognize that theoretical diversity is a strength, rather than a weakness (Hilgard, 1987; Kleinginna &, Kleinginna, 1988). As we proceed through this text,, you will see how differing theoretical perspectives often, inspire fruitful research and how they sometimes converge on a more complete understanding of behavior, than could be achieved by any one perspective alone., , CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 63

Page 101 :
Assessing Your Personality, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, ■, , Explain the concepts of standardization, test norms, reliability, and, validity., Discuss the value and the limitations of self-report inventories., Discuss the value and limitations of projective tests., , Answer the following “true” or “false.”, ___ 1. Responses to personality tests are subject to unconscious distortion., ___ 2. The results of personality tests are often misunderstood., ___ 3. Personality test scores should be interpreted, with caution., ___ 4. Personality tests may be quite useful in helping, people to learn more about themselves., If you answered “true” to all four questions, you earned, a perfect score. Yes, personality tests are subject to distortion. Admittedly, test results are often misunderstood,, and they should be interpreted cautiously. In spite of, these problems, however, psychological tests can be, very useful., We all engage in efforts to size up our own personality as well as that of others. When you think to yourself that “this salesman is untrustworthy,” or when you, remark to a friend that “Howard is too timid and submissive,” you are making personality assessments. In a, sense, then, personality assessment is part of daily life., However, psychological tests provide much more systematic assessments than casual observations do., The value of psychological tests lies in their ability, to help people form a realistic picture of their personal, qualities. In light of this value, we have included a variety, of personality tests in the Personal Explorations Workbook that is available to accompany this text, and we have, sprinkled a number of short tests throughout the text, itself. Most of these questionnaires are widely used personality tests. We hope that you may gain some insights, by responding to these scales. But it’s important to understand the logic and limitations of such tests. To facilitate your use of these and other tests, this Application, discusses some of the basics of psychological testing., , Key Concepts in, Psychological Testing, A psychological test is a standardized measure of a, sample of a person’s behavior. Psychological tests are, , 64, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , measurement instruments. They are used to measure, abilities, aptitudes, and personality traits., Note that your responses to a psychological test, represent a sample of your behavior. This fact should, alert you to one of the key limitations of psychological, tests: It’s always possible that a particular behavior sample is not representative of your characteristic behavior. We all have our bad days. A stomachache, a fight, with a friend, a problem with your car—all might affect your responses to a particular test on a particular, day. Because of the limitations of the sampling process,, test scores should always be interpreted cautiously. Most, psychological tests are sound measurement devices, but, test results should not be viewed as the “final word”, on one’s personality and abilities because of the everpresent sampling problem., Most psychological tests can be placed in one of two, broad categories: (1) mental ability tests, and (2) personality tests. Mental ability tests, such as intelligence, tests, aptitude tests, and achievement tests, often serve, as gateways to schooling, training programs, and jobs., Personality tests measure various aspects of personality, including motives, interests, values, and attitudes., Many psychologists prefer to call these tests personality scales, since the questions do not have right and, wrong answers as do those on tests of mental abilities., Standardization and Norms, , Both personality scales and tests of mental abilities are, standardized measures of behavior. Standardization, refers to the uniform procedures used to administer, and score a test. All subjects get the same instructions,, the same questions, the same time limits, and so on, so, that their scores can be compared meaningfully., The standardization of a test’s scoring system includes the development of test norms. Test norms provide information about where a score on a psychological test ranks in relation to other scores on that test., Why do we need test norms? Because in psychological, testing, everything is relative. Psychological tests tell, you how you score relative to other people. They tell you,

Page 102 :
for instance, that you are average in impulsiveness, or, slightly above average in assertiveness, or far below average in anxiety. These interpretations are derived from, the test norms., Reliability and Validity, , Any kind of measuring device, whether it’s a tire gauge,, a stopwatch, or a psychological test, should be reasonably consistent. That is, repeated measurements should, yield reasonably similar results. To appreciate the importance of reliability, think about how you would react, if a tire pressure gauge gave you several different readings for the same tire. You would probably conclude, that the gauge was broken and toss it into the garbage,, because you know that consistency in measurement is, essential to accuracy., Reliability refers to the measurement consistency, of a test. A reliable test is one that yields similar results, upon repetition of the test (see Figure 2.22). Like most, other types of measuring devices, psychological tests, are not perfectly reliable. They usually do not yield the, exact same score when repeated. A certain amount of, inconsistency is unavoidable because human behavior, is variable. Personality tests tend to have lower reliability than mental ability tests because daily fluctuations, in mood influence how people respond to such tests., Even if a test is quite reliable, we still need to be concerned about its validity. Validity refers to the ability, of a test to measure what it was designed to measure., If we develop a new test of assertiveness, we have to provide some evidence that it really measures assertiveness. Validity can be demonstrated in a variety of ways., Most of them involve correlating scores on a test with, other measures of the same trait, or with related traits., , •, , F I G U R E 2.22, , Test reliability. Subjects’, scores on the first administration of an assertiveness test are represented, on the left, and their scores, on a second administration (a few weeks later), are represented on the, right. If subjects obtain, similar scores on both, administrations, the test, measures assertiveness, consistently and is said to, have high reliability. If, subjects get very different, scores when they take the, assertiveness test a second time, the test is said, to have low reliability., , High, , HIGH, RELIABILITY, , Self-Report Inventories, The vast majority of personality tests are self-report, inventories. Self-report inventories are personality, scales that ask individuals to answer a series of questions about their characteristic behavior. When you, respond to a self-report personality scale, you endorse, statements as true or false as applied to you, you indicate how often you behave in a particular way, or you, rate yourself with respect to certain qualities. For example, on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, people respond “true,” “false,” or “cannot say”, to 567 statements such as the following:, I get a fair deal from most people., I have the time of my life at parties., I am glad that I am alive., Several people are following me everywhere., The logic underlying this approach is simple: Who, knows you better than you do? Who has known you, longer? Who has more access to your private feelings?, The entire range of personality traits can be measured with self-report inventories. Some scales measure just one trait dimension, such as the Self-Efficacy, Scale discussed earlier or the measure of sensation, seeking shown in Figure 2.23 on the next page. Others, simultaneously assess a multitude of traits. The Sixteen, Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF), developed, by Raymond Cattell and his colleagues (Cattell, Eber, &, Tatsuoka, 1970), is a representative example of a multitrait inventory. The 16PF is a 187-item scale that, measures 16 basic dimensions of personality, called, source traits, which are shown in Figure 2.24 on p. 67., , High, , High, Pam, , Pam, Tyrone, Deb, , Tyrone, Deb, , LOW, RELIABILITY, , High, , Pam, Tyrone, , Mike, Ed, Pam, Dawn, , Deb, , Mike, , Mike, , Maria, Maria, Dave, , Ed, , Ed, Dawn, , Dave, Dawn, Low, Scores on, first testing, , Mike, Maria, Dave, , Maria, , Deb, Dave, , Ed, Dawn, , Low, Scores on, second testing, , Tyrone, Low, Scores on, first testing, , CHAPTER 2, , Low, Scores on, second testing, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 65

Page 103 :
•, , FIG U R E 2.23, , Measuring Sensation Seeking, , A brief scale to assess sensation seeking as a trait. First, described by Marvin Zuckerman, (1979, 1995), sensation seeking is a personality trait characterized by a generalized, preference for high or low, levels of sensory stimulation., People who are high in sensation seeking need a high level, of stimulation. They are easily, bored and they like activities, that may involve some physical, risk. They may satisfy their, appetite for stimulation by, experimenting with drugs,, numerous sexual partners, and, novel experiences. Follow the, instructions for this version of, the Sensation Seeking Scale to, obtain a rough estimate of, your sensation seeking tendencies. (Adapted from Grasha &, Kirschenbaum, 1986), , Answer true or false to each of the items listed below. A “T” means that the item expresses your preference most of the time. An “F” means that you do not agree that the item is generally true for you., After completing the test, score your responses according to the instructions that follow the test items., T, , F, , 1. I would really enjoy skydiving., , T, , F, , 2. I can imagine myself driving a sports car in a race and loving it., , T, , F, , 3. My life is very secure and comfortable—the way I like it., , T, , F, , 4. I usually like emotionally expressive or artistic people, even if they are sort of wild., , T, , F, , 5. I like the idea of seeing many of the same warm, supportive faces in my everyday life., , T, , F, , 6. I like doing adventurous things and would have enjoyed being a pioneer in the early, days of this country., , T, , F, , 7. A good photograph should express peacefulness creatively., , T, , F, , 8. The most important thing in living is fully experiencing all emotions., , T, , F, , T, , F, , 10. Doing the same things each day really gets to me., , T, , F, , 11. I love snuggling in front of a fire on a wintry day., , T, , F, , 12. I would like to try several types of drugs as long as they didn’t harm me permanently., , T, , F, , 13. Drinking and being rowdy really appeals to me on the weekend., , T, , F, , 14. Rational people try to avoid dangerous situations., , T, , F, , 15. I prefer Figure A to Figure B., , 9. I like creature comforts when I go on a trip or vacation., , A, , B, , Give yourself 1 point for answering “T” to the following items: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 13. Also give, yourself 1 point for answering “F” to the following items: 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14, and 15. Add up your, points, and compare your total to the following norms: 11–15, high sensation seeker; 6–10, moderate, sensation seeker; 0–5, low sensation seeker. Bear in mind that this is a shortened version of the, Sensation Seeking Scale and that it provides only a rough approximation of your status on this personality trait., , As we noted earlier, some theorists believe that, only five trait dimensions are required to provide a full, description of personality. This view led to the creation, of the NEO Personality Inventory. Developed by Paul, Costa and Robert McCrae (1985, 1992), the NEO Inventory is designed to measure the Big Five traits: neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. The NEO Inventory, is widely used in research and clinical work., To appreciate the strengths of self-report inventories, consider how else you might assess your personality. For instance, how assertive are you? You probably, have some vague idea, but can you accurately estimate, how your assertiveness compares to others’? To do that,, you need a great deal of comparative information about, others’ usual behavior—information that all of us lack., In contrast, a self-report inventory inquires about your, typical behavior in a wide variety of circumstances requiring assertiveness and generates an exact comparison with the typical behavior reported by many other, 66, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , respondents for the same circumstances. Thus, self-report inventories are much more thorough and precise, than casual observations are., However, these tests are only as accurate as the information that the test-takers provide. Deliberate deception can be a problem with these tests, and some people, are unconsciously influenced by the social desirability, or acceptability of the statements (Kline, 1995; Paulhus,, 1991). Without realizing it, they endorse only those statements that make them look good. This problem provides another reason why personality test results should, always be regarded as suggestive rather than definitive., , Projective Tests, Projective tests, which all take a rather indirect approach, to the assessment of personality, are used extensively, in clinical work. Projective tests ask people to respond, to vague, ambiguous stimuli in ways that may reveal, the respondents’ needs, feelings, and personality traits.

Page 104 :
Less intelligent, Affected by feelings, Submissive, Serious, Expedient, Timid, Tough-minded, , More intelligent, Emotionally stable, Dominant, Happy-go-lucky, Conscientious, Venturesome, Sensitive, , Trusting, , Suspicious, , Practical, , Imaginative, , Forthright, , •, , Outgoing, , Shrewd, Apprehensive, , Conservative, , Experimenting, , Group-dependent, , Self-sufficient, , Relaxed, , The Sixteen Personality, Factor Questionnaire, (16PF). Cattell’s 16PF is, designed to assess 16 basic, dimensions of personality., The pairs of traits listed, across from each other in, the figure define the 16 factors measured by this selfreport inventory. The profile, shown is the average profile, seen among a group of airline pilots who took the test., Adapted from Cattell, R. B. (1973, July)., Personality pinned down. Psychology, Today, 40–46. Reprinted by permission, of Psychology Today Magazine. Copyright, © 1973 Sussex Publishers, Inc., , Self-assured, , Uncontrolled, , FIG U R E 2.24, , Controlled, Tense, , The Rorschach test, for instance, consists of a series of, inadequate evidence for the reliability and validity of, ten inkblots. Respondents are asked to describe what, projective measures (Lanyon & Goodstein, 1997; Lilienthey see in the blots (see the adjacent photo). In the, feld, Wood, & Garb, 2000). In particular, serious doubts, Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), a series of pictures, have been raised about the research evidence on the, of simple scenes is presented to subjects who are asked, Rorschach test (Garb, Florio, & Grove, 1998; Hunsley,, to tell stories about what is happening in the scenes, Lee, & Wood, 2003). In spite of these problems, proand what the characters are feeling. For instance, one, jective tests continue to be widely used by clinicians, TAT card shows a young boy contemplating a violin, (Watkins et al., 1995). About 40 years ago, a reviewer, resting on a table in front of him., characterized the critics of projective tests as “doubtThe assumption underlying projective testing is, ing statisticians” and the users of projective tests as, that ambiguous materials can serve as a blank screen, “enthusiastic clinicians” (Adcock, 1965). Decades of reonto which people project their characteristic concerns,, search notwithstanding, little has changed since then., conflicts, and desires. Thus, a competitive, person who is shown the TAT card of the boy, at the table with the violin might concoct a, story about how the boy is contemplating an, upcoming musical competition at which he, hopes to excel. The same card shown to a person high in impulsiveness might elicit a story, about how the boy is planning to sneak out, the door to go dirt-bike riding with friends., Proponents of projective tests assert that, the tests have two unique strengths. First, they, are not transparent to subjects. That is, the, subject doesn’t know how the test provides, information to the tester. Hence, it’s difficult, for people to engage in intentional deception., Second, the indirect approach used in these, tests may make them especially sensitive to, unconscious features of personality., In projective tests, such as the Rorschach, stimuli are deliberately vague and, Unfortunately, these alleged strengths are, ambiguous to serve as a blank screen onto which subjects can project their, based on mere speculation. Moreover, there is, concerns, conflicts, and desires., CHAPTER 2, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 67, , © Laura Dwight/PhotoEdit, , Reserved

Page 105 :
An Epilogue on Theoretical Diversity, ■, , KEY IDEAS, The Nature of Personality, ■, , CHAPTER 2 REVIEW, , The concept of personality explains the consistency in individuals’ behavior over time and situations while also explaining, their distinctiveness. Personality traits are dispositions to behave in certain ways. Some theorists suggest that the complexity, of personality can be reduced to just five basic traits: extraversion, neuroticism, openness to experience, agreeableness, and, conscientiousness., , Psychodynamic Perspectives, ■, , Freud’s psychoanalytic theory emphasizes the importance of, the unconscious. Freud described personality structure in terms, of three components (id, ego, and superego) that are involved, in internal conflicts, which generate anxiety., ■ According to Freud, people often ward off anxiety and other, unpleasant emotions with defense mechanisms, which work, through self-deception. Freud believed that the first five years of, life are extremely influential in shaping adult personality. He, describes five psychosexual stages that children undergo in their, personality development., ■ Jung’s analytical psychology stresses the importance of the, collective unconscious. Adler’s individual psychology emphasizes how people strive for superiority to compensate for feelings of inferiority., Behavioral Perspectives, ■, , Behavioral theories view personality as a collection of response, tendencies shaped through learning. Pavlov’s classical conditioning can explain how people acquire emotional responses., ■ Skinner’s model of operant conditioning shows how consequences such as reinforcement, extinction, and punishment, shape behavior. Bandura’s social cognitive theory shows how people can be conditioned indirectly through observation. He views, self-efficacy as an especially important personality trait., Humanistic Perspectives, ■, , Humanistic theories take an optimistic view of people’s conscious, rational ability to chart their own courses of action. Rogers, focused on the self-concept as the critical aspect of personality., He maintained that incongruence between one’s self-concept, and reality creates anxiety and leads to defensive behavior., ■ Maslow theorized that needs are arranged hierarchically. He, asserted that psychological health depends on fulfilling the need, for self-actualization., Biological Perspectives, ■, , Eysenck believes that inherited individual differences in physiological functioning affect conditioning and thus influence, personality. Recent twin studies have provided impressive evidence that genetic factors shape personality. Behavioral genetics, research also suggests that the family has surprisingly little influence over personality. Evolutionary psychologists maintain, that natural selection has favored the emergence of the Big Five, traits as crucial dimensions of personality., , The study of personality illustrates how great the theoretical, diversity in psychology is. This diversity is a strength in that it, fuels research that helps psychology move toward a more complete understanding of behavior., , Application: Assessing Your Personality, ■, , Psychological tests are standardized measures of behavior—, usually mental abilities or aspects of personality. Test norms indicate what represents a high or low score. Psychological tests, should produce consistent results upon retesting, a quality called, reliability. Validity refers to the degree to which a test measures, what it was designed to measure., ■ Self-report inventories, such as the 16PF and NEO Personality Inventory, ask respondents to describe themselves. Self-report, inventories can provide a better snapshot of personality than, casual observations can, but they are vulnerable to deception and, social desirability bias., ■ Projective tests, such as the Rorschach and TAT, assume that, people’s responses to ambiguous stimuli reveal something about, their personality. Projective tests’ reliability and validity appear, to be disturbingly low., , KEY TERMS, Archetypes pp. 41–42, Behaviorism p. 44, Classical conditioning p. 45, Collective unconscious p. 41, Compensation p. 42, Conditioned response (CR), p. 45, Conditioned stimulus (CS), p. 45, Conscious p. 36, Defense mechanisms p. 38, Displacement p. 39, Ego p. 36, Evolutionary psychology, p. 58, Extinction p. 46, Fixation p. 40, Heritability ratio p. 57, Hierarchy of needs p. 53, Humanism p. 51, Id p. 36, Identification p. 39, Incongruence p. 52, Need for self-actualization, p. 13, Negative reinforcement p. 47, Observational learning p. 49, Oedipal complex p. 40, Operant conditioning p. 47, , A Contemporary Empirical Approach:, Terror Management Theory, , Personality p. 34, Personality trait p. 34, Positive reinforcement p. 47, Preconscious p. 37, Projection p. 39, Projective tests p. 66, Psychodynamic theories, p. 34, Psychological test p. 64, Psychosexual stages p. 40, Punishment p. 47, Rationalization p. 39, Reaction formation p. 39, Regression p. 35, Reliability p. 65, Repression p. 39, Self-concept pp. 51–52, Self-efficacy pp. 49–50, Self-report inventories p. 65, Standardization p. 64, Superego p. 36, Test norms p. 64, Unconditioned response, (UCR) p. 45, Unconditioned stimulus, (UCS) p. 45, Unconscious p. 37, Validity p. 65, , KEY PEOPLE, , ■, , Terror management theory proposes that self-esteem and, faith in a cultural worldview shield people from the profound, anxiety associated with their mortality. Consistent with this, analysis, increasing mortality salience leads people to make efforts to bolster their self-esteem and defend their worldviews., These defensive reactions are automatic and subconscious., , 68, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Alfred Adler pp. 42–43, Albert Bandura pp. 49–50, Hans Eysenck pp. 56–58, Sigmund Freud pp. 35–41, Carl Jung pp. 41–42, , Abraham Maslow pp. 53–54, Ivan Pavlov pp. 44–46, Carl Rogers pp. 51–53, B. F. Skinner pp. 47–48

Page 106 :
7. According to Maslow, which of the following is not, characteristic of self-actualizing persons?, a. Accurate perception of reality, b. Being open and spontaneous, c. Being uncomfortable with solitude, d. Sensitivity to others’ needs, , The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 2.1: Desirability, of Control Scale. Personal Probe 2.1: Who Are You? Personal, Probe 2.2: How You See Personality., , ANSWERS, , Page 52, Page 54, Pages 57–58, Pages 59–62, Page 65, , 6. According to Rogers, disparity between one’s selfconcept and actual experience is referred to as, a. a delusional system., b. dissonance., c. conflict., d. incongruence., , Personal Explorations Workbook, , d, c, b, d, d, , 5. Self-efficacy is, a. the ability to fulfill one’s potential., b. one’s belief about one’s ability to perform behaviors, that should lead to expected outcomes., c. a durable disposition to behave in a particular way, in a variety of situations., d. a collection of beliefs about one’s nature, unique, qualities, and typical behavior., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. The strengthening of a response tendency by virtue, of the fact that the response leads to the removal of an, unpleasant stimulus is, a. positive reinforcement., b. negative reinforcement., c. primary reinforcement., d. punishment., , Book Companion Website, , CHAPTER 2, , Pages 34–35, Page 39, Page 42, Pages 47–48, Pages 49–50, , 3. According to Adler, __________ is a universal drive to, adapt, improve oneself, and master life’s challenges., a. compensation, b. striving for superiority, c. avoiding inferiority, d. social interest, , 10. In psychological testing, consistency of results over, repeated measurements refers to, a. standardization., b. validity., c. statistical significance., d. reliability., , d, c, b, b, b, , 2. You’re feeling guilty after your third bowl of ice cream., You tell yourself it’s all right because yesterday you, skipped lunch. Which defense mechanism is at work?, a. Conceptualization, b. Displacement, c. Rationalization, d. Identification, , 9. Research on terror management theory has shown that, increased mortality salience leads to all of the following, except:, a. increased striving for self-esteem., b. more stereotypic thinking about minorities., c. more aggressive behavior toward people with opposing views., d. reduced respect for cultural icons., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Which of the following is not included in McCrae and, Costa’s five-factor model of personality?, a. Neuroticism, b. Extraversion, c. Conscientiousness, d. Authoritarianism, , T h e o r i e s o f Pe r s o n a l i t y, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 8. If identical twins exhibit more personality resemblance, than fraternal twins, it’s probably due mostly to, a. similar treatment from parents., b. their greater genetic overlap., c. their strong identification with each other., d. others’ expectations that they should be similar., , 69

Page 107 :
THE NATURE OF STRESS, Stress Is an Everyday Event, Stress Lies in the Eye of the Beholder, Stress May Be Embedded in the, Environment, Stress May Be Self-Imposed, Stress Is Influenced by Culture, MAJOR TYPES OF STRESS, Frustration, Conflict, Change, Pressure, RESPONDING TO STRESS, Emotional Responses, Physiological Responses, Behavioral Responses, , 70, , THE POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF STRESS, Impaired Task Performance, Disruption of Cognitive Functioning, Burnout, Posttraumatic Stress Disorders, Psychological Problems and Disorders, Physical Illness, Positive Effects, , APPLICATION: MONITORING, YOUR STRESS, Problems with the SRRS, The Life Experiences Survey, A Cautionary Note, CHAPTER 3 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST, , FACTORS INFLUENCING, STRESS TOLERANCE, Social Support, Hardiness, Optimism

Page 108 :
CHAPTER, , Stress and, Its Effects, , 3, , You’re in your car headed home from school with a classmate. Traffic is barely, moving. A radio report indicates that the traffic jam is only going to get worse., You groan as you fiddle impatiently with the radio. Another motorist nearly, takes your fender off trying to cut into your lane. Your pulse quickens as, you shout insults at the driver, who cannot even hear you. You think about, the term paper that you have to work on tonight. Your stomach knots up as, you recall all the crumpled drafts you tossed into the wastebasket last night., If you don’t finish the paper soon, you won’t be able to find any time to study, for your math test, not to mention your biology quiz. Suddenly you remember, that you promised the person you’re dating that the two of you would get, together tonight. There’s no way. Another fight looms on the horizon. Your, classmate asks how you feel about the tuition increase the college announced, yesterday. You’ve been trying not to think about it. You’re already in debt up, to your ears. Your parents are bugging you about changing schools, but you, don’t want to leave your friends. Your heartbeat quickens as you contemplate the debate you’ll have to wage with your parents. You feel wired with, tension as you realize that the stress in your life never seems to let up., Many circumstances can create stress in people’s lives. Stress comes in, all sorts of packages: large and small, pretty and ugly, simple and complex., All too often, the package is a surprise. In this chapter, we try to sort out, these packages. We analyze the nature of stress, outline the major types of, stress, and discuss how people respond to stressful events at several levels., In a sense, stress is what a course on adjustment is all about. Recall from, Chapter 1 that adjustment essentially deals with how people manage to cope, with various demands and pressures. These demands or pressures represent the, core of stressful experience. Thus, the central theme in a course such as this is:, How do people adjust to stress, and how might they adjust more effectively?, , CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 71

Page 109 :
The Nature of Stress, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, ■, ■, , Describe the nature of stress and discuss how common it is., Distinguish between primary and secondary appraisal of stress., Summarize the evidence on ambient stress., Explain how culture and ethnicity are related to stress., , Over the years, the term stress has been used in different ways by different theorists. Some have viewed stress, as a stimulus event that presents difficult demands (a, divorce, for instance), while others have viewed stress, as the response of physiological arousal elicited by a, troublesome event (Cooper & Dewe, 2004). However,, the emerging consensus among contemporary researchers is that stress is neither a stimulus nor a response but, a special stimulus-response transaction in which one, feels threatened (McEwen, 2000). Hence, we will define, stress as any circumstances that threaten or are perceived to threaten one’s well-being and thereby tax, one’s coping abilities. The threat may be to one’s immediate physical safety, long-range security, self-esteem,, reputation, or peace of mind. Stress is a complex concept—so let’s dig a little deeper., , Stress Is an Everyday Event, The term stress tends to spark images of overwhelming,, traumatic crises. People think of hijackings, hurricanes,, military combat, and nuclear accidents. Undeniably,, these are extremely stressful events. Studies conducted, in the aftermath of tornadoes, floods, earthquakes, and, the like typically find elevated rates of psychological, problems and physical illness in the communities affected by these disasters (Brende, 2000; Raphael & Dobson, 2000). However, these unusual and infrequent, events represent the tip of the iceberg. Many everyday, events, such as waiting in line, having car trouble, shopping for Christmas presents, misplacing your checkbook, and staring at bills you can’t pay, are also stressful., Of course, major and minor stressors are not entirely, independent. A major stressful event, such as going, through a divorce, can trigger a cascade of minor stressors, such as looking for an attorney, taking on new, household responsibilities, and so forth (Pillow, Zautra,, & Sandler, 1996)., You might guess that minor stressors would produce minor effects, but that isn’t necessarily true. Research shows that routine hassles may have significant, negative effects on a person’s mental and physical health, (Delongis, Folkman, & Lazarus, 1988). Richard Lazarus, and his colleagues have devised a scale to measure stress, in the form of daily hassles. Their scale lists 117 everyday problems, such as misplacing things, struggling, , 72, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , with rising prices, dealing with delays, and so forth. When they compared their hassles scale against, another scale that assessed stress in, the form of major life events, they, found that scores on their hassles, scale were more strongly related to, subjects’ mental health than the, scores on the other scale were (KanRichard Lazarus, ner et al., 1981). Other investigators, working with different types, of samples and different measures of hassles, have also, found that everyday hassles are predictive of mental and, physical health (Chang & Sanna, 2003; Sher, 2003)., Why would minor hassles be more strongly related, to mental health than major stressful events? The answer isn’t entirely clear yet, but many theorists believe, that stressful events can have a cumulative or additive, impact (Seta, Seta, & McElroy, 2002). In other words,, stress can add up. Routine stresses at home, at school,, and at work might be fairly benign individually, but, collectively they could create great strain., , Stress Lies in the Eye, of the Beholder, The experience of feeling threatened depends on what, events you notice and how you choose to appraise or, interpret them (Monroe & Kelley, 1995). Events that are, stressful for one person may be “ho-hum” routine for, another. For example, many people find flying in an airplane somewhat stressful, but frequent fliers may not, even raise an eyebrow. Some people enjoy the excitement, of going out on a date with someone new; others find, the uncertainty terrifying., In discussing appraisals of stress, Lazarus and, Folkman (1984) distinguish between primary and secondary appraisal (see Figure 3.1). Primary appraisal, is an initial evaluation of whether an event is (1) irrelevant to you, (2) relevant, but not threatening, or, (3) stressful. When you view an event as stressful, you, are likely to make a secondary appraisal, which is an, evaluation of your coping resources and options for, dealing with the stress. Thus, your primary appraisal, would determine whether you saw an upcoming job, interview as stressful. Your secondary appraisal would, , Courtesy of Richard Lazarus, , ■

Page 110 :
mands on people. Features of the, environment such as excessive noise,, Stress, Coping resources, heat, and pollution can threaten wellappear inadequate, being and leave their mark on menPrimary appraisal, or likely to be taxed, tal and physical health., Situation perceived, Coping, resources, For example, investigators have, as relevant and, appear adequate, threatening, found, an association between chronStimulus, No, Situation perceived, ic, exposure, to high levels of noise, event, stress, as irrelevant or, and, elevated, blood pressure among, harmless, No, children, attending, school near Los, stress, Angeles International Airport (Cohen et al., 1980). Similarly, studies, of children living near Munich InF I G U R E 3.1, ternational Airport (Evans, Hygge, & Bullinger, 1995;, Hygge, Evans, & Bullinger, 2002) have found elevated, Primary and secondary appraisal of stress. Primary appraisal is, stress hormones, reading and memory deficits, and, an initial evaluation of whether an event is (1) irrelevant to you,, (2) relevant, but not threatening, or (3) stressful. When you view, poor task persistence in samples of schoolchildren (see, an event as stressful, you are likely to make a secondary appraisal,, Figure 3.2)., which is an evaluation of your coping resources and options for, Crowding is another source of environmental stress., dealing with the stress. Thus, your primary appraisal would deterTemporary experiences of crowding, such as being, mine whether you saw an upcoming job interview as stressful., Your secondary appraisal would determine how stressful the, packed into a rock concert venue with thousands of, interview appeared in light of your assessment of your ability, other fans, can be stressful. However, most of the reto deal with the event. (Based on Lazarus & Folkman, 1994), search on crowding has focused on the effects of residential density. Generally, studies find an association between high density and increased physiological arousal,, determine how stressful the interview appeared, in, psychological distress, and social withdrawal (Evans,, light of your assessment of your ability to deal with, 2001; Evans, LePore, & Schroeder, 1996). Psychologists, the event., have also explored the repercussions of living in areas, Often, people are not very objective in their appraisthat are at risk for disaster. For instance, studies suggest, als of potentially stressful events. A study of hospitalized, that people who live near a nuclear power plant or in an, patients awaiting surgery showed only a slight correlaarea prone to earthquakes or hurricanes may experience, tion between the objective seriousness of a person’s upincreased stress (Carr, 2000; Dougall & Baum, 2000)., coming surgery and the amount of fear the, person experienced (Janis, 1958). Clearly,, some people are more prone to feel threatened by life’s difficulties than others. A, Quiet, communities, number of studies have shown that anxious,, Epinephrine Noisy, neurotic people report more stress than othcommunities, ers (Cooper & Bright, 2001; Watson, David,, & Suls, 1999), as do people who are relatively, Quiet, unhappy (Seidlitz & Diener, 1993). Thus,, communities, Norepinephrine, stress lies in the eye (actually, the mind) of the, Noisy, communities, beholder, and people’s appraisals of stressful, events are highly subjective., Secondary appraisal, , •, , 0, , Stress May Be Embedded, in the Environment, Although the perception of stress is a highly, personal matter, many kinds of stress come, from the environmental circumstances that, individuals share with others. Ambient stress, consists of chronic environmental conditions that, although not urgent, are negatively valued and that place adaptive de-, , •, , 200, , 400, 600, 800, Nanograms/hour, , 1000, , 1200, , FIG U R E 3.2, , Excessive noise and stress hormones. Evans, Hygge, and Bullinger (1995) compared children from noisy areas near Munich International Airport with similar, children from quiet neighborhoods in Munich. They found elevated levels of two, hormones associated with stress reactions in the children exposed to the high noise, of the airport., Adapted from Evans, G. W., Hygge, S., & Bullinger, M. (1995). Chronic noise and psychological stress. Psychological, Science, 6, 333–338. Copyright © 1995 Blackwell Publishers. Adapted by permission., , CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 73

Page 111 :
© AP/Wide World Photos, , Recently, investigators have examined urban poverty and violence as a source of environmental stress., Ewart and Suchday (2002) developed a scale called the, City Stress Index to measure participants’ exposure to, street crime, gang activity, drug dealing, neighborhood, decay, and unruly behavior. They found that scores on, the City Stress Index correlated (modestly) with measures of subjects’ depressive symptoms, hostility, and, irritability. In retrospect, it should come as no surprise, that urban decay and violence produce ambient stress., It is hoped that the creation of the City Stress Index will, facilitate more research on the long-term repercussions, of this type of stress., , Stress May Be Self-Imposed, We tend to think of stress as something imposed on us, from without. However, a study of college students’, stress found that stress is self-imposed surprisingly often, (Epstein & Katz, 1992). For example, you might sign, up for extra classes to get through school quickly. Or, you might actively seek additional responsibilities at, work to impress your boss. People frequently put pressure on themselves to get good grades or to climb the, corporate ladder rapidly. Many people create stress by, embracing unrealistic expectations for themselves. In, short, people have more control over their stress than, they probably realize., , © Richard Lord/PhotoEdit, , Stress can be caused by environmental circumstances such as pollution,, excessive noise and crowding, traffic jams, and urban decay., , Western cities like Montreal or Philadelphia are quite, different from the day-to-day difficulties experienced in, indigenous societies in Africa or South America. The, potential importance of culture is illustrated by the substantial body of evidence that cultural change—such as, increased modernization and urbanization and shifting, values and customs—has been a major source of stress, in many societies around the world (Dessler, 2000). In, some cases, a specific cultural group may be exposed to, pervasive stress that is unique to that group (Berry &, Ataca, 2000). For example, the devastating drought and, famine in Sudan in 1985 and the ethnic cleansing of Albanians in Kosovo in 1999 were extraordinary forms of, stress distinctive to these societies. Our discussion of, stress will largely focus on the types of stressors confronted in everyday life in contemporary, Western society, but you should be aware that life in our society is, not necessarily representative of life around the world., Moreover, even within the modern, Western world,, disparities can be found in the constellation of stressors, experienced by specific cultural groups (Mino, Profit,, & Pierce, 2000). In recent years, researchers have shown, a new interest in the effects of ethnicity-related sources, , Stress Is Influenced by Culture, , WE B LI N K 3.1, , Although certain types of events (such as the loss of a, loved one) are probably viewed as stressful in virtually, all human societies, cultures vary greatly in the predominant forms of stress their people experience. Obviously,, the challenges of daily living encountered in modern,, , Centre for Stress Management, This British website houses a diverse collection of brief, online articles concerned with many aspects of the stress, process. It also features links to many other sites around, the world that provide information on stress., , 74, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment

Page 112 :
of stress experienced by African Americans, Hispanic, Americans, and other minority groups (Contrada et al.,, 2000). Social scientists interested in ethnicity have traditionally focused their attention on the causes of institutional racism, such as discrimination in hiring and, in access to health care. But their focus has been shifting to the effects of subtle discrimination in day-to-day, living. Although overt racial discrimination in America, clearly has declined in recent decades, covert expressions of ethnic prejudice continue to be commonplace, (Dovidio & Gaertner, 1999). For example, in one study, of 520 African Americans, 96 percent of the respondents, reported experiencing some type of racist discrimination in the most recent year—and 95 percent of these, subjects indicated that they found this discrimination, to be stressful (Klonoff & Landrine, 1999)., Everyday discrimination can take many forms, including verbal insults (ethnic slurs), negative evaluations, avoidance, denial of equal treatment, and threats, of aggression. Feldman-Barrett and Swim (1998) emphasize that these acts of discrimination are often ambiguous (examples: “the clerk seemed to be ignoring, me,” “the teacher seemed disdainful of me”). Hence,, theorists assert that minority group members may experience stress not only from explicit discrimination but, also from the subjective perception of discrimination, in ambiguous situations and even from the anticipation of the possibility of discrimination at upcoming, events (example: “I’m worried that no one will talk to, me at the get-together for new employees”)., In addition to discrimination, members of ethnic, minorities experience stress because they are keenly, aware of negative racial stereotypes and often worry that, others will interpret their behavior in ways that confirm these derogatory stereotypes (Steele, 1997). So the, threat of stereotype confirmation can become a source, of chronic apprehension. At the other extreme, individuals are often chastised by members of their own group, for “acting white” or abandoning their cultural heritage, , END, R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , The End of Stress, as We Know It, by Bruce McEwen with, Elizabeth Norton Lasley (Joseph Henry Press, 2002), The title of this book is a bit misleading, as it suggests, that the author will provide some stunning new secret, that will permit readers to bring the stress in their lives, to an end. In reality, one of the principal points that, McEwen makes is that stress is normal, inevitable, and, not necessarily bad. McEwen is a renowned stress researcher whose main focus has been on neuroendocrine, responses to stress. In keeping with his background,, what he provides in this book is an exceptionally lucid, account of how stress affects brain function and cardiovascular and immune system processes. This potentially, difficult material is presented in a lively and understandable fashion. The coverage of “how not to be stressed, out” is relatively modest in volume. The author’s advice, is empirically sound but fairly conventional and not overly, detailed. In sum, this book provides an outstanding overview of the physiology of stress, but it offers less than, you might expect—given its title—on coping with stress., Cover © 2002 Joseph Henry Press. Reprinted by permission of National Academies, Press., , (Contrada et al., 2000). Thus, ethnic minorities may, be under constant pressure to conform to the expectations and values of their own group. It seems likely that, the extra layer of stress experienced by minority group, members takes its toll on them, but scientists have just, begun to investigate the degree to which ethnicityrelated stress may have detrimental effects on individuals’ mental and physical health (Clark et al., 1999)., , Major Types of Stress, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , Distinguish between acute and chronic stressors., Describe frustration as a form of stress., Outline the three types of conflict, and discuss typical, reactions to conflicts., , An enormous variety of events can be stressful for one, person or another. To achieve a better understanding of, stress, theorists have tried to analyze the nature of stressful events and divide them into subtypes. One sensible, distinction involves differentiating between acute stressors and chronic stressors (Dougall & Baum, 2001). Acute, , ■, ■, , Summarize evidence on life change as a form of stress., Discuss evidence on pressure as a form of stress., , stressors are threatening events that have a relatively, short duration and a clear endpoint. Examples would, include having a difficult encounter with a belligerent, drunk, waiting for the results of a medical test, or having your home threatened by severe flooding. Chronic, stressors are threatening events that have a relatively, CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 75

Page 113 :
Frustration, “It has been very frustrating to watch the rapid deterioration of my parents’ relationship. Over the last year or, two they have argued constantly and have refused to seek, any professional help. I have tried to talk to them, but they, kind of shut me and my brother out of their problem. I, feel very helpless and sometimes even very angry, not at, them, but at the whole situation.”, This scenario illustrates frustration. As psychologists, use the term, frustration occurs in any situation in, which the pursuit of some goal is thwarted. In essence,, you experience frustration when you want something, and you can’t have it. Everyone has to deal with frustration virtually every day. Traffic jams, difficult daily, commutes, and annoying drivers, for instance, are a, routine source of frustration that can elicit anger and, aggression (Hennessy & Wiesenthal, 1999; Rasmussen,, Knapp, & Garner, 2000). Fortunately, most frustrations, are brief and insignificant. You may be quite upset when, you go to the auto shop to pick up your car and find, that it hasn’t been fixed as promised. However, a few, days later you’ll probably have your precious car back,, and all will be forgotten., Of course, some frustrations can be sources of significant stress. Failures and losses are two common kinds, of frustration that are often very stressful. All people, fail in at least some of their endeavors. Some make failure almost inevitable by setting unrealistic goals for, themselves. People tend to forget that for every newly, appointed vice-president in the business world, there, are dozens of middle-level executives who don’t get, promoted. Losses may be especially frustrating when, people are deprived of something they are accustomed, to having. For example, there are few things that are, , 76, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , more frustrating than losing a dearly loved friend or, family member., More often than not, frustration appears to be the, culprit at work when people feel troubled by environmental stress (Graig, 1993). Excessive noise, heat, pollution, and crowding are most likely stressful because, they frustrate the desire for quiet, a comfortable body, temperature, clean air, and adequate privacy., , Conflict, “Should I or shouldn’t I? I became engaged at Christmas., My fiancé surprised me with a ring. I knew if I refused, the ring he would be terribly hurt and our relationship, would suffer. However, I don’t really know whether or not, I want to marry him. On the other hand, I don’t want to, lose him either.”, Like frustration, conflict is an unavoidable feature of, everyday life. That perplexing question “Should I or, shouldn’t I?” comes up countless times on a daily basis., Conflict occurs when two or more incompatible motivations or behavioral impulses compete for expression. As we discussed in Chapter 2, Sigmund Freud proposed over a century ago that internal conflicts generate, considerable psychological distress. This link between, conflict and distress was measured with precision in, studies by Laura King and Robert Emmons (1990,, 1991). They used an elaborate questionnaire to assess, the overall amount of internal conflict experienced by, subjects. They found higher levels of conflict to be associated with higher levels of psychological distress., Conflicts come in three types,, which were originally described by, Kurt Lewin (1935) and investigated, extensively by Neal Miller (1944,, 1959). These types—approachapproach, avoidance-avoidance,, and approach-avoidance—are diagrammed in Figure 3.3., In an approach-approach conNeal Miller, flict a choice must be made between two attractive goals. The, problem, of course, is that you can choose just one of, the two goals. For example, you have a free afternoon;, , WE B LI N K 3.2, , Stress, Trauma, Anxiety, Fears,, and Psychosomatic Disorders, This resource, which constitutes Chapter 5 of Clayton E., Tucker-Ladd’s online text, Psychological Self-Help, provides, a particularly fine discussion of the nature of stress and, its relationship to psychological and physical disorders., , Courtesy, Neal Miller, , long duration and no readily apparent time limit. Examples would include persistent financial strains produced by huge credit card debts, ongoing pressures from, a hostile boss at work, or the demands of caring for a, sick family member over a period of years. Of course,, this distinction is far from perfect. It is hard to decide, where to draw the line between a short-lived versus, lengthy stressor, and even brief stressors can have longlasting effects., None of the proposed schemes for classifying stressful events has turned out to be altogether satisfactory., Classifying stressful events into nonintersecting categories is virtually impossible. Although this problem, presents conceptual headaches for researchers, it need, not prevent us from describing four major types of, stress: frustration, conflict, change, and pressure. As you, read about each of them, you’ll surely recognize some, familiar situations.

Page 114 :
APPROACH-APPROACH, Tennis, Pizza, Blue sweater, , Racquetball, Spaghetti, Gray jacket, , AVOIDANCE-AVOIDANCE, Unemployment, Painful, backache, , Degrading job, Surgery, , APPROACH-AVOIDANCE, Date with, an attractive, person, Rejection, Investment, returns, Loss of capital, , •, , F I G U R E 3.3, , Types of conflict. Psychologists have identified three basic types, of conflict. In approach-approach and avoidance-avoidance conflicts, the person is torn between two goals. In an approachavoidance conflict only one goal is under consideration, but it, has both positive and negative aspects., , should you play tennis or go to the movies? You’re out, for a meal; do you want to order the pizza or the spaghetti? You can’t afford both; should you buy the blue, sweater or the gray jacket? Among the three kinds of, conflict, the approach-approach type tends to be the, least stressful. People usually don’t stagger out of restaurants, exhausted by the stress of choosing which of several appealing entrees to eat. In approach-approach, conflicts you typically have a reasonably happy ending,, whichever way you decide to go. Nonetheless, approachapproach conflicts centering on important issues may, , sometimes be troublesome. If you are torn between, two appealing college majors or two attractive boyfriends, you may find the decision-making process, quite stressful., In an avoidance-avoidance conflict a choice must, be made between two unattractive goals. Forced to, choose between two repelling alternatives, you are, as, they say, “caught between a rock and a hard place.” For, example, let’s say you have painful backaches. Should, you submit to surgery that you dread, or should you, continue to live with the pain? Obviously, avoidanceavoidance conflicts are most unpleasant and highly, stressful. Typically, people keep delaying their decision, as long as possible, hoping that they will somehow be, able to escape the conflict situation. For example, you, might delay surgery in the hope that your backaches, will disappear on their own., In an approach-avoidance conflict a choice must, be made about whether to pursue a single goal that, has both attractive and unattractive aspects. For instance, imagine that you’re offered a career promotion, that will mean a large increase in pay. The catch is that, you will have to move to a city that you hate. Approachavoidance conflicts are common, and they can be highly, stressful. Any time you have to take a risk to pursue some, desirable outcome, you are likely to find yourself in an, approach-avoidance conflict. Should you risk rejection, by asking out that attractive person in class? Should you, risk your savings by investing in a new business that, could fail?, Approach-avoidance conflicts often produce vacillation. That is, people go back and forth, beset by indecision. They decide to go ahead, then not to, then to, go ahead again. Humans are not unique in this respect., Many years ago, Neal Miller (1944) observed the same, vacillation in his groundbreaking research with rats. He, created approach-avoidance conflicts in hungry rats, by alternately feeding and shocking them at one end, of a runway apparatus. Eventually, these rats tended to, hover near the center of the runway. They would alternately approach and retreat from the goal box at the, end of the alley., , BLONDIE © 2001. Reprinted with special permission of King Features Syndicate., , CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 77

Page 115 :
a, , FIG U R E 3.4, , Avoidance stronger, than approach, , Approach stronger, than avoidance, , na, igi, Or, la, t, ien, rad, eg, nc, ida, vo, , nt, die, gra, , c, an, oid, av, red, we, Lo, , Near, , h gr, adie, , nt, , DISTANCE FROM GOAL, , “After my divorce, I lived alone for four years. Six months, ago, I married a wonderful woman who has two children, from her previous marriage. My biggest stress is suddenly, having to adapt to living with three people instead of by, myself. I was pretty set in my ways. I had certain routines., Now everything is chaos. I love my wife and I’m fond of, the kids, and they’re not really doing anything wrong, but, The Dynamics of Adjustment, , App, , roac, , hg, , radi, e, , nt, , t, ien, rad, eg, , Vacillation point, , roac, , Change, , PART 1, , Approach stronger, than avoidance, , App, , In a series of studies, Miller (1959) plotted out how, an organism’s tendency to approach a goal (the approach, gradient in Figure 3.4a) and to retreat from a goal (the, avoidance gradient in Figure 3.4a) increase as the organism nears the goal. He found that avoidance motivation increases more rapidly than approach motivation, (as reflected by the avoidance gradient’s steeper slope, in Figure 3.4a). Based on this principle, Miller concluded that in trying to resolve an approach-avoidance, conflict, we should focus more on decreasing avoidance, motivation than on increasing approach motivation., How would this insight apply to complex human, dilemmas? Imagine that you are counseling a friend, who is vacillating over whether to ask someone out on, a date. Miller would assert that you should attempt to, downplay the negative aspects of possible rejection (thus, lowering the avoidance gradient) rather than dwelling, on how much fun the date could be (thus raising the approach gradient). Figure 3.4b shows the effects of lowering the avoidance gradient. If it is lowered far enough,, the person should reach the goal (make a decision and, take action)., , 78, , b, , ce, an, oid, Av, , Approach-avoidance conflict., (a) According to Neal Miller, (1959), as you near a goal that, has positive and negative features,, avoidance motivation tends to, rise faster than approach motivation (that’s why the avoidance, gradient has a steeper slope than, the approach gradient), sending, you into retreat. However, if you, retreat far enough, you’ll eventually reach a point where approach, motivation is stronger than avoidance motivation, and you may, decide to go ahead once again., The ebb and flow of this process, leads to vacillation around the, point where the two gradients, intersect. (b) As the avoidance, gradient is lowered, the person, comes closer and closer to the, goal. If the avoidance gradient, can be lowered far enough, the, person should be able to resolve, the conflict and reach the goal., , Increasing strength of tendency, to approach or avoid, , •, , Far, , Near, , DISTANCE FROM GOAL, , Far, , my house and my life just aren’t the same and I am having trouble dealing with it all.”, Life changes may represent a key type of stress. Life, changes are any noticeable alterations in one’s living, circumstances that require readjustment. Research, on life change began when Thomas Holmes, Richard, Rahe, and their colleagues set out to explore the relation between stressful life events and physical illness, (Holmes & Rahe, 1967; Rahe & Arthur, 1978). They interviewed thousands of tuberculosis patients to find out, what kinds of events preceded the onset of their disease., Surprisingly, the frequently cited events were not uniformly negative. The list included plenty of aversive, events, as expected, but patients also mentioned many, seemingly positive events, such as getting married, having a baby, or getting promoted., Why would positive events, such as moving to a, nicer home, produce stress? According to Holmes and, Rahe, it is because they produce change. Their thesis is, that disruptions of daily routines are stressful. According to their theory, changes in personal relationships,, changes at work, changes in finances, and so forth can, be stressful even when the changes are welcomed., Based on this analysis, Holmes and Rahe (1967) developed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS), to measure life change as a form of stress. The scale assigns numerical values to 43 major life events that are, supposed to reflect the magnitude of the readjustment, required by each change (see Figure 3.5). In responding, to the scale, respondents are asked to indicate how often, they experienced any of these 43 events during a cer-

Page 116 :
Social Readjustment Rating Scale, Life event, Death of a spouse, , Mean value, 100, , Life event, , Mean value, , Son or daughter leaving home, , 29, , Divorce, , 73, , Trouble with in-laws, , 29, , Marital separation, , 65, , Outstanding personal achievement, , 28, , Jail term, , 63, , Spouse begins or stops work, , 26, , Death of close family member, , 63, , Begin or end school, , 26, , Personal injury or illness, , 53, , Change in living conditions, , 25, , Marriage, , 50, , Revision of personal habits, , 24, , Fired at work, , 47, , Trouble with boss, , 23, , Marital reconciliation, , 45, , Change in work hours or conditions, , 20, , Retirement, , 45, , Change in residence, , 20, , Change in health of family member, , 44, , Change in school, , 20, , Pregnancy, , 40, , Change in recreation, , 19, , Sex difficulties, , 39, , Change in church activities, , 19, , Gain of a new family member, , 39, , Change in social activities, , 18, , Business readjustment, , 39, , Loan for lesser purchase (car, TV, etc.), , 17, , Change in financial state, , 38, , Change in sleeping habits, , 16, , Death of a close friend, , 37, , Change in number of family get-togethers, , 15, , Change to a different line of work, , 36, , Change in eating habits, , 15, , Change in number of arguments with spouse, , 35, , Vacation, , 13, , Mortgage or loan for major purchase, , 31, , Christmas, , 12, , Foreclosure of mortgage or loan, , 30, , Minor violations of the law, , 11, , Change in responsibilities at work, , 29, , •, , F I G U R E 3.5, , Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS). Devised by Holmes and Rahe (1967), this scale is designed, to measure the change-related stress in one’s life. The numbers on the right are supposed to reflect the, average amount of stress (readjustment) produced by each event. Respondents check off the events that, have occurred to them recently and add up the associated numbers to arrive at their stress scores. See, the Application for a detailed critique of the SRRS., Adapted from Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218. Copyright, © 1967 by Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Reprinted by permission., , tain time period (typically, the past year). The person, then adds up the numbers associated with each event, checked. This sum is an index of the amount of changerelated stress the person has recently experienced., The SRRS and similar scales have been used in thousands of studies by researchers all over the world. Overall, these studies have shown that people with higher, scores on the SRRS tend to be more vulnerable to many, kinds of physical illness—and many types of psychological problems as well (Derogatis & Coons, 1993; Rahe, et al., 2000; Scully, Tosi, & Banning, 2000). These results, have attracted a great deal of attention, and the SRRS has, been reprinted in many newspapers and popular magazines. The attendant publicity has led to the widespread, conclusion that life change is inherently stressful., More recently, however, experts have criticized this, research, citing problems with the methods used and, , raising questions about the meaning of the findings, (Hobson & Delunas, 2001; Jones & Kinman, 2001; Monroe & McQuaid, 1994). At this point, it is a key interpretive issue that concerns us. Many critics have argued, that the SRRS does not measure change exclusively. The, list of life changes on the SRRS is dominated by events, that are clearly negative or undesirable (death of a, spouse, fired at work, and so on). These negative events, probably generate great frustration. So even though, the scale contains some positive events, it could be that, frustration (generated by negative events), rather than, change, creates most of the stress assessed by the scale., To investigate this possibility, researchers came up, with ways to take into account the desirability and undesirability of subjects’ life changes. Participants were asked, to indicate the desirability of the events that they checked, off on the SRRS and similar scales. The findings in these, CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 79

Page 117 :
© Kelvin Murray/Stone/Getty Images, , © Allen Birnbach/Masterfile, , Pressure comes in two varieties: pressure to perform and pressure to conform. For example, workers, on assembly lines are often expected to maintain high productivity with few mistakes (performance, pressure) and suburban homeowners are typically expected to maintain well-groomed exteriors (conformity pressure)., , studies clearly indicated that life change is not the crucial, dimension measured by the SRRS. Undesirable or negative life events cause most of the stress tapped by the, SRRS (McLean & Link, 1994; Turner & Wheaton, 1995)., Should we discard the notion that change is stressful? Not entirely. Other lines of research, independent, of work with the SRRS, support the hypothesis that, change is an important form of stress. For instance, researchers have found associations between geographic, mobility and impaired mental and physical health that, presumably reflect the impact of change (Brett, 1980;, Shuval, 1993). A study by Brown and McGill (1989), suggests that desirable life changes may be stressful for, some people but not for others. More research is needed,, but it is quite plausible that change constitutes a major, type of stress in people’s lives. However, we have little, reason to believe that change is inherently or inevitably, stressful. Some life changes may be quite challenging,, while others may be quite benign., , expression mean? Pressure involves expectations or, demands that one behave in a certain way. Pressure, can be divided into two subtypes: the pressure to perform and the pressure to conform. You are under pressure to perform when you are expected to execute tasks, and responsibilities quickly, efficiently, and successfully., For example, salespeople are usually under pressure to, move lots of merchandise. Professors at research institutions are often under pressure to publish in prestigious journals. Comedians are under pressure to be, amusing. Secretaries are often under pressure to complete lots of clerical work in very little time. Pressures, to conform to others’ expectations are also common., , Pressure (PI), Life change (SRSS), , Pressure, “My father questioned me at dinner about some things I, did not want to talk about. I know he doesn’t want to hear, my answers, at least not the truth. My father told me when, I was little that I was his favorite because I was ‘pretty, near perfect’ and I’ve spent my life trying to keep that up,, even though it’s obviously not true. Recently, he has begun, to realize this and it’s made our relationship very strained, and painful.”, At one time or another, most of us have probably remarked that we were “under pressure.” What does that, 80, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , 0, , •, , .10, , .20, .30, .40, .50, .60, Correlation with total index, of psychological symptoms, , .70, , FIG U R E 3.6, , Pressure and psychological symptoms. A comparison of pressure and life change as sources of stress suggests that pressure, may be more strongly related to mental health than change is., In one study, Weiten (1988) found a correlation of .59 between, scores on the Pressure Inventory (PI) and symptoms of psychological distress. In the same sample, the correlation between, SRRS scores and psychological symptoms was only .28.

Page 118 :
Businessmen are expected to wear suits and ties. Suburban homeowners are expected to keep their lawns, manicured. Teenagers are expected to adhere to their, parents’ values and rules. Young adults are expected to, get themselves married by the time they’re 30., Although widely discussed by the general public,, the concept of pressure has received scant attention, from researchers. However, one scale has been developed to measure pressure as a form of life stress (Weiten,, , 1988). Studies with this scale have found a strong relationship between pressure and a variety of psychological symptoms and problems (Weiten, 1988, 1998). In, fact, pressure has turned out to be more strongly related, to measures of mental health than are the SRRS and, other established measures of stress (see Figure 3.6)., These findings suggest that pressure may be an important form of stress that merits more attention from, researchers., , Responding to Stress, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , List three categories of negative emotions commonly, elicited by stress., Discuss the role of positive emotions in the stress, process., Explain the effects of emotional arousal on coping, efforts, and describe the inverted-U hypothesis., , ■, , ■, , ■, , The human response to stress is complex and multidimensional. Stress affects people at several levels. Consider again the chapter’s opening scenario, in which, you’re driving home in heavy traffic, thinking about, overdue papers, tuition increases, and parental pressures. Let’s look at some of the reactions we mentioned., When you groan in reaction to the traffic report, you’re, experiencing an emotional response to stress—in this, case, annoyance and anger. When your pulse quickens, and your stomach knots up, you’re exhibiting physiological responses to stress. When you shout insults at, another driver, your verbal aggression is a behavioral, , Describe the fight-or-flight response and the three stages, of the general adaptation syndrome., Distinguish between the two major pathways along which, the brain sends signals to the endocrine system in, response to stress., Explain the concept of coping., , response to the stress at hand. Thus, we can analyze people’s reactions to stress at three levels: (1) their emotional responses, (2) their physiological responses, and, (3) their behavioral responses. Figure 3.7 depicts these, three levels of response., , Emotional Responses, Emotion is an elusive concept. Psychologists debate, about how to define emotion, and many conflicting theories purport to explain emotion. However, everybody, has had extensive personal experience with emotions., , Emotional response, Potentially, stressful, objective events, , Subjective cognitive, appraisal, , A major exam, a big date,, trouble with your boss, or, a financial setback, which, may lead to frustration,, conflict, change, or, pressure, , Primary and secondary, appraisals of threat, which, are influenced by familiarity, with the event, its, controllability, its, predictability, and so on, , Annoyance, anger, anxiety, fear,, dejection, grief, guilt, shame, envy,, disgust, , Physiological response, Autonomic arousal, hormonal, fluctuations, neurochemical changes,, and so on, , Behavioral response, Coping efforts, such as lashing out at, others, blaming oneself, seeking help,, solving problems, and releasing emotions, , •, , F I G U R E 3.7, , The multidimensional response to stress. A potentially stressful event, such as a major exam, will, elicit a subjective, cognitive appraisal of how threatening the event is. If the event is viewed with, alarm, the stress may trigger emotional, physiological, and behavioral reactions. The human response, to stress is multidimensional., CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 81

Page 119 :
Everyone has a good idea of what it means to be anxious, elated, gloomy, jealous, disgusted, excited, guilty,, or nervous. So rather than pursue the technical debates, about emotion, we’ll rely on your familiarity with the, concept and simply note that emotions are powerful,, largely uncontrollable feelings, accompanied by physiological changes. When people are under stress, they, often react emotionally. More often than not, stress tends, to elicit unpleasant emotions (Lazarus, 1993)., , Negative Emotions, , There are no simple one-to-one connections between, certain types of stressful events and particular emotions,, but researchers have begun to uncover some strong links, between specific cognitive reactions to stress (appraisals), and specific emotions (Smith & Lazarus, 1993). For example, self-blame tends to lead to guilt, helplessness to, sadness, and so forth. Although stressful events can, evoke many negative emotions, some are certainly more, , LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Common Reactions to Traumatic Events, In this post-9/11 world, social scientists and the lay, public are increasingly interested in understanding people’s reactions to traumatic events. The 2001 terrorist, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, exposed millions of television viewers to death and destruction of unprecedented magnitude in real time, and, virtually everyone saw the horrific events replayed again, and again in the ensuing weeks. Moreover, the threat, of additional terrorist attacks, which could have even, more far-reaching consequences, lingers. In light of these, unpleasant realities, what can psychological research tell, us about how people respond to traumatic events? There, is a rich research literature on reactions to major disasters (such as earthquakes and hurricanes) and to personal trauma (such as automobile accidents and armed, robberies). Based on this research, common reactions to, traumatic events include the following (Danieli, Engdahl,, & Schlenger, 2004; Flannery, 1999; Foa et al., 2001):, Fear and anxiety. Anxiety is a normal response to, threatening events. Many people find that certain cues, associated with a traumatic event repeatedly trigger their, anxiety., Reexperiencing the trauma. Many people are troubled by unwanted thoughts of the traumatic event that, they are unable to control. Some experience flashbacks, in which they vividly relive the traumatic moments. Nightmares about traumatic experiences are also common., Increased arousal. In the aftermath of traumatic, events people tend to feel jumpy, jittery, and physically, on edge. This physiological arousal may make sleep, difficult., Avoidance. Many people try to avoid situations or, cues that remind them of their trauma. People also tend, , 82, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , to suppress painful thoughts and feelings. This coping, strategy sometimes results in feelings of psychological, numbness., Anger and irritability. Anger is a normal response, to the perceived injustice of disastrous events. Coupled, with increased arousal, this anger makes many people, highly irritable. Ironically, some people get angry with, themselves about their irritability., Grief and depression. In the wake of traumatic, events, people often experience sadness, despair, and, hopelessness. Future plans that once were important, seem trivial. Activities that were once enjoyable seem, empty. People understandably grieve for what they, have lost., Increased sense of vulnerability. Traumatic events, often lead to negative changes in one’s view of the world., People come to believe that the world is a dangerous, place and that others cannot be trusted. One’s sense of, self-efficacy may be undermined by feelings of helplessness, vulnerability, and the perception that events are, uncontrollable., These reactions are normal short-term responses to, traumatic events. Experiencing such reactions does not, mean that you are weak or that you are “losing it.” For, most people these reactions usually dissipate within, three months, although others may recover more slowly., If reactions such as these persist indefinitely and interfere with one’s social, occupational, or family functioning, a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder may be, applicable (see pages 90–91 and Chapter 15). If your, reactions to a traumatic event are especially severe, persistent, and disabling, it may be wise to seek professional, help (see Chapter 16).

Page 120 :
likely than others. Common negative emotional responses to stress include (Lazarus, 1993):, ■ Annoyance, anger, and rage. Stress often produces, feelings of anger ranging in intensity from mild annoyance to uncontrollable rage. Frustration is particularly, likely to generate anger., ■ Apprehension, anxiety, and fear. Stress probably, evokes anxiety and fear more frequently than any other, emotions. As we saw in Chapter 2, Freudian theory has, long recognized the link between conflict and anxiety., However, anxiety can also be elicited by the pressure, to perform, the threat of impending frustration, or the, uncertainty associated with change., ■ Dejection, sadness, and grief. Sometimes stress—, especially frustration—simply brings one down. Routine setbacks, such as traffic tickets and poor grades,, often produce feelings of dejection. More profound setbacks, such as deaths and divorces, typically leave one, grief-stricken., , Of course, the above list is not exhaustive. In his, insightful analyses of stress-emotion relations, Richard, Lazarus (1991, 1993) mentions five other negative emotions that often figure prominently in reactions to stress:, guilt, shame, envy, jealousy, and disgust., , WE B LI N K 3.3, , Stress Management, From the University of Nebraska’s (Lincoln) Department of, Health and Human Performance, Wesley Sime provides both, a general overview and an educational tutorial for issues, involved in human stress management., , found that the frequency of pleasant emotions correlated positively with a measure of subjects’ resilience,, whereas unpleasant emotions correlated negatively with, resilience (see Figure 3.8). Based on their analyses, the, researchers concluded that “positive emotions in the, aftermath of crises buffer resilient people against depression and fuel thriving” (p. 365). Thus, contrary to, common sense, positive emotions do not vanish during, times of severe stress. Moreover, these positive emotions appear to play a key role in helping people bounce, back from the negative emotions associated with stress, (Tugade & Fredrickson, 2004)., How do positive emotions promote resilience in the, face of stress? Susan Folkman and Judith Moskowitz, (2000) argue that positive emotions experienced while, under duress can promote creativity and flexibility in, problem solving, facilitate the processing of important, , Positive Emotions, , Although investigators have tended to focus heavily on, the connection between stress and negative emotions,, research shows that positive emotions also occur during periods of stress (Folkman, 1997). Although this, finding seems counterintuitive, researchers have found, that people experience a diverse array of pleasant emotions even while enduring the most dire of circumstances. Consider, for example, the results of a five-year, study of coping patterns in 253 caregiving partners of, men with AIDS (Folkman et al., 1997). Surprisingly,, over the course of the study, the caregivers reported experiencing positive emotions about as often as they experienced negative emotions—except during the time, immediately surrounding the death of their partners., Similar findings have been observed in some other, studies of serious stress that made an effort to look for, positive emotions. The most interesting was a recent, study that examined subjects’ emotional functioning, early in 2001 and then again in the weeks following the, 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States (Fredrickson, et al., 2003). Like most U.S. citizens, these subjects reported many negative emotions in the aftermath of, 9/11, including anger, sadness, and fear. However, within, this “dense cloud of anguish” positive emotions also, emerged. For example, people felt gratitude for the safety, of their loved ones; many took stock and counted their, blessings; and quite a few reported renewed love for, their friends and family. Fredrickson et al. (2003) also, , Correlation Between Resilience, and the Frequency of Selected, Emotions in the Aftermath of 9/11, Correlation, with resilience, , Specific emotions, Negative emotions, Angry/irritated/annoyed, , ⫺.44*, , Sad/downhearted/unhappy, , ⫺.29*, , Scared/fearful/afraid, , ⫺.19, , Disgust/distate/revulsion, , ⫺.09, , Positive emotions, Grateful/appreciative/thankful, , .13, , Glad/happy/joyful, , .52*, , Hopeful/optimistic/encouraged, , .40*, , Content/serene/peaceful, , .47*, , *Statistically significant, , •, , FIG U R E 3.8, , Positive and negative emotions as correlates of resilience. In, their study of emotional responses to the 9/11 terrorist attacks,, Fredrickson et al. (2003) asked subjects to rate the frequency, with which they experienced 20 different emotions in the aftermath of 9/11. The frequency ratings for specific emotions were, then correlated with a measure of participants’ resiliency. Representative results (for 8 of the 20 emotions studied) are shown, here. As you can see, the frequency of pleasant emotions correlated positively with resiliency, whereas the opposite was true, for negative emotions. (Adapted from Fredrickson et al., 2003), CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 83

Page 121 :
Effects of Emotional Arousal, , Emotional responses are a natural and normal part of, life. Even unpleasant emotions serve important purposes. Like physical pain, painful emotions can serve as, warnings that one needs to take action. However, strong, emotional arousal can also hamper efforts to cope with, stress. For example, research has found that high emotional arousal can sometimes interfere with attention, and memory retrieval and can impair judgment and, decision making (Janis, 1993; Mandler, 1993)., The well-known problem of test anxiety illustrates, how emotional arousal can hurt performance. Often, students who score poorly on an exam will nonetheless insist that they know the material. Many of them, are probably telling the truth. Several researchers have, , Simple, , Courtesy, Susan Folkman, , information about oneself, and reduce the adverse physiological effects of stress. Positive emotions, can also enhance immune system, functioning, increase valuable social support available from friends, and family, and promote proactive, coping efforts (Salovey et al., 2000)., In sum, positive emotions can conSusan Folkman, tribute to building social, intellectual, and physical resources that can, be helpful in dealing with stress (Fredrickson, 1998,, 2001). Research on the interface between stress and, positive emotions is in its infancy, and much remains, to be learned., , found a negative correlation between test-related anxiety and exam performance. That is, students who display high test anxiety tend to score low on exams (Hancock, 2001; Naveh-Benjamin et al., 1997). Test anxiety, can interfere with test taking in several ways, but one, critical consideration appears to be the disruption of, attention to the test (Keough et al., 2004). Many testanxious students waste too much time worrying about, how they’re doing and wondering whether others are, having similar problems. In other words, their minds, wander too much from the task of taking the test., Although emotional arousal may hurt coping efforts, this isn’t necessarily the case. The inverted-U hypothesis predicts that task performance should improve, with increased emotional arousal—up to a point, after, which further increases in arousal become disruptive and, performance deteriorates (Anderson, 1990; Mandler,, 1993). This idea is referred to as the inverted-U hypothesis because plotting performance as a function of, arousal results in graphs that approximate an upsidedown U (see Figure 3.9). In these graphs, the level of, arousal at which performance peaks is characterized as, the optimal level of arousal for a task., This optimal level of arousal appears to depend in, part on the complexity of the task at hand. The conventional wisdom is that as tasks become more complex, the, optimal level of arousal (for peak performance) tends to, decrease. This relationship is depicted in Figure 3.9. As, you can see, a fairly high level of arousal should be optimal on simple tasks (such as driving eight hours to, help a friend in a crisis). However, performance should, , LEVEL OF TASK COMPLEXITY, Medium, , Complex, , Performance level, , High, , Low, Low, , •, , High, Optimal, Level of arousal, , Low, Optimal, Level of arousal, , High, , Low, Optimal, Level of arousal, , FIG U R E 3.9, , Arousal and performance. Graphs of the relationship between emotional arousal and task performance, tend to resemble an inverted U, as increased arousal is associated with improved performance up to, a point, after which higher arousal leads to poorer performance. The optimal level of arousal for a task, depends on the complexity of the task. On complex tasks, a relatively low level of arousal tends to be, optimal. On simple tasks, however, performance may peak at a much higher level of arousal., 84, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , High

Page 122 :
peak at a lower level of arousal on complex tasks (such, as making a major decision in which you have to weigh, many factors)., The research evidence on the inverted-U hypothesis is inconsistent and subject to varied interpretations, (Neiss, 1988, 1990). Hence, it may be risky to generalize this principle to the complexities of everyday coping efforts. Nonetheless, the inverted-U hypothesis provides a plausible model of how emotional arousal could, have either beneficial or disruptive effects on coping,, depending on the nature of the stressful demands., , Physiological Responses, As we have seen, stress frequently elicits strong emotional responses. These responses bring about important physiological changes. Even in cases of moderate, stress, you may notice that your heart has started beating faster, you have begun to breathe harder, and you, are perspiring more than usual. How does all this (and, much more) happen? Let’s see., The “Fight-or-Flight” Response, , The fight-or-flight response is a physiological reaction to threat that mobilizes an organism for attacking (fight) or fleeing (flight) an enemy. First described, by Walter Cannon (1932), the fight-or-flight response, occurs in the body’s autonomic nervous system. The, autonomic nervous system (ANS) is made up of the, , nerves that connect to the heart, blood vessels, smooth, muscles, and glands. As its name hints, the autonomic, nervous system is somewhat autonomous. That is, it, controls involuntary, visceral functions that people, don’t normally think about, such as heart rate, digestion, and perspiration., The autonomic nervous system can be broken into, two divisions (see Figure 3.10). The parasympathetic, division of the ANS generally conserves bodily resources., For instance, it slows heart rate and promotes digestion, to help the body save and store energy. The fight-orflight response is mediated by the sympathetic division, of the autonomic nervous system, which mobilizes, bodily resources for emergencies. In one experiment,, Cannon studied the fight-or-flight response in cats by, confronting them with dogs. Among other things, he, noticed an immediate acceleration in breathing and, heart rate and a reduction in digestive processes., Shelley Taylor and her colleagues (2000) have questioned whether the fight-or-flight model applies equally, well to both males and females. They note that in most, species females have more responsibility for the care of, young offspring than males do. Using an evolutionary, perspective, they argue that this disparity may make, fighting and fleeing less adaptive for females, as both, responses may endanger offspring and thus reduce the, likelihood of an animal passing on its genes. Taylor, and colleagues maintain that evolutionary processes, have fostered more of a “tend and befriend” response, , SYMPATHETIC, Pupils dilated; dry; far vision, , Eyes, , PARASYMPATHETIC, Pupils constricted; moist;, near vision, , Goosebumps, , Skin, , No goosebumps, , Dry, , Mouth, , Salivating, , Sweaty, , Palms, , Dry, , Passages dilated, , Lungs, , Passages constricted, , Increased rate, Supply maximum, to muscles, Increased activity, , Heart, Blood, , Decreased rate, Supply maximum, to internal organs, Decreased activity, , Adrenal, glands, , Inhibited Digestion Stimulated, Orgasm, , •, , Sexual, functions, , Arousal, , F I G U R E 3.10, , The autonomic nervous system (ANS). The ANS is composed of the nerves that connect to the heart,, blood vessels, smooth muscles, and glands. The ANS is subdivided into the sympathetic division, which, mobilizes bodily resources in times of need, and the parasympathetic division, which conserves bodily, resources. Some of the key functions controlled by each division of the ANS are summarized in the center, of the diagram., CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 85

Page 123 :
DILBERT reprinted by permission of United Features Syndicate, Inc., , WE B LI N K 3.4, , The American Institute of Stress, The American Institute of Stress is a nonprofit organization established in 1978 at the request of stress pioneer, Hans Selye. Its Board of Trustees reads like a who’s who, of stress research. The resources available online are a bit, limited, as one has to send for the information packets, published by the institute. But the site contains an interesting tribute to Selye., , 86, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , complex responses. Moreover, these chronic stressors, often continue for lengthy periods of time, so that the, fight-or-flight response leaves one in a state of enduring, physiological arousal. Concern about the effects of prolonged physical arousal was first voiced by Hans Selye,, a Canadian scientist who conducted extensive research, on stress., The General Adaptation Syndrome, , The concept of stress was popularized in both scientific and lay circles, by Hans Selye (1936, 1956, 1982)., Although born in Vienna, Selye, spent his entire professional career, at McGill University in Montreal., Beginning in the 1930s, Selye exposed laboratory animals to a diverse array of both physical and, Hans Selye, psychological stressors (heat, cold,, pain, mild shock, restraint, and so, on). The patterns of physiological arousal he observed, in the animals were largely the same, regardless of the, type of stress. Thus, Selye concluded that stress reactions are nonspecific. In other words, they do not vary, according to the specific type of stress encountered., Initially, Selye wasn’t sure what to call this nonspecific, response to a variety of noxious agents. In the 1940s,, he decided to call it stress, and his influential writings, gradually helped make the word part of our everyday, vocabulary (Cooper & Dewe, 2004)., Selye (1956, 1974) formulated a seminal theory, of stress reactions called the general adaptation syndrome (see Figure 3.11). The general adaptation, syndrome is a model of the body’s stress response,, consisting of three stages: alarm, resistance, and exhaustion. In the first stage of the general adaptation, syndrome, an alarm reaction occurs when an organism recognizes the existence of a threat. Physiological, arousal increases as the body musters its resources to, combat the challenge. Selye’s alarm reaction is essentially the fight-or-flight response originally described, by Cannon., , © Bettmann/Corbis, , to stress in females. According to this analysis, in reacting to stress, females allocate more effort to the care, of offspring and to seeking help and support. More research is needed to evaluate this provocative analysis., Although there may be sex differences in behavioral responses to stress, as hypothesized by Taylor and her colleagues, they are quick to note that the “basic neuroendocrine core of stress responses” is largely the same, for males and females., The fight-or-flight response is not limited to the animal kingdom. Elements of the fight-or-flight response, are also seen in humans. Imagine your reaction if your, car were to spin out of control on the highway. Your, heart would race, and your blood pressure would surge., You might get “goosebumps” and experience a “knot in, your stomach.” These reflex responses are part of the, fight-or-flight syndrome seen in many species., In a sense, this automatic reaction is a leftover from, our evolutionary past. It is clearly an adaptive response, for many animals, as the threat of predators often requires a swift response of fighting or fleeing. Likewise,, the fight-or-flight response probably was adaptive, among ancestral humans who routinely had to deal, with acute stressors involving threats to their physical, safety. But in our modern world, the fight-or-flight response may be less adaptive for human functioning than, it was thousands of generations ago (Neese & Young,, 2000). Most modern stressors cannot be handled simply through fight or flight. Work pressures, marital, problems, and financial difficulties require far more

Page 124 :
Resistance to stress, , model provided guidance for generations of researchers who worked out the details of how stress reverberates throughout the body. Let’s look at some of those, details., Brain-Body Pathways, , When you experience stress, your brain sends signals to, the endocrine system along two major pathways (Clow,, 2001; Dallman, Bhatnagar, & Viau, 2000; Felker & Hubbard, 1998). The endocrine system consists of glands, that secrete chemicals called hormones into the bloodstream. The major endocrine glands, such as the pituitary, pineal, thyroid, and adrenal glands, are shown in, Figure 3.12., The hypothalamus, a small structure near the base, of the brain, appears to initiate action along both pathways. The first pathway (shown on the right in Figure 3.13 on the next page) is routed through the autonomic nervous system. The hypothalamus activates the, sympathetic division of the ANS. A key part of this acti-, , Normal level of resistance, , Phase 1, Alarm, reaction, , Phase 2, Stage of resistance, , Phase 3, Stage, of exhaustion, , Time, , •, , F I G U R E 3.11, , The general adaptation syndrome. According to Selye, the, physiological response to stress can be broken into three phases., During the first phase, the body mobilizes its resources for resistance after a brief initial shock. In the second phase, resistance, levels off and eventually begins to decline. If the third phase, of the general adaptation syndrome is reached, resistance is, depleted, leading to health problems and exhaustion., , However, Selye took his investigation of stress, a couple of steps further by exposing laboratory, animals to prolonged stress, similar to the chronic, stress often endured by humans. If stress continues,, the organism may progress to the second phase of, the general adaptation syndrome, called the stage of, resistance. During this phase, physiological changes, stabilize as coping efforts get under way. Typically,, physiological arousal continues to be higher than, normal, although it may level off somewhat as the, organism becomes accustomed to the threat., If the stress continues over a substantial period of time, the organism may enter the third stage,, called the stage of exhaustion. According to Selye,, the body’s resources for fighting stress are limited., If the stress cannot be overcome, the body’s resources may be depleted, and physiological arousal, will decrease. Eventually, the individual may collapse from exhaustion. During this phase, the organism’s resistance declines. This reduced resistance may lead to what Selye called “diseases of, adaptation,” such as ulcers or high blood pressure., Selye’s theory and research forged a link between stress and physical illness. He showed how, prolonged physiological arousal that is meant to, be adaptive could lead to diseases. His theory has, been criticized because it ignores individual differences in the appraisal of stress (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984), and his belief that stress reactions are, nonspecific remains the subject of debate (Kemeny, 2003; McCarty & Pacak, 2000). However, his, , Pineal, gland, , Hypothalamus, Anterior pituitary, , Posterior, pituitary, , Parathyroids, (behind, thyroid), , Thyroid, , Adrenal gland, Pancreas, , Ovary, (female), , Testis, (male), , •, , F I G U R E 3. 12, , The endocrine system. The endocrine glands secrete hormones into the, bloodstream. The locations of the principal endocrine glands are shown, here. The hormones released by these glands regulate a variety of physical, functions and play a key role in the physiological response to stress., CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 87

Page 125 :
Stress, , Pituitary, , Hypothalamus, , Autonomic, nervous, system, (sympathetic, division), , Adrenocorticotropic, hormone (ACTH), , Adrenal medulla, Adrenal cortex, , SECRETION OF, CORTICOSTEROIDS, Increased protein, and fat, mobilization, Increased access, to energy storage, Decreased, inflammation, , •, , SECRETION OF, CATECHOLAMINES, Increased cardiovascular response, Increased respiration, Increased perspiration, Increased blood flow, to active muscles, Increased muscle, strength, Increased mental, activity, , FIG U R E 3.13, , Brain-body pathways in stress. In times of stress, the brain, sends signals along two pathways. The pathway through the, autonomic nervous system (shown in blue on the right) controls, the release of catecholamine hormones that help mobilize the, body for action. The pathway through the pituitary gland and, the endocrine system (shown in brown on the left) controls the, release of corticosteroid hormones that increase energy and ward, off tissue inflammation., , tating alertness. Digestive processes are inhibited to conserve your energy. The pupils of your eyes dilate, increasing visual sensitivity., The second pathway (shown on the left in Figure 3.13) involves more direct communication between, the brain and the endocrine system. The hypothalamus, sends signals to the so-called master gland of the endocrine system, the pituitary gland. The pituitary secretes, a hormone (ACTH) that stimulates the outer part of the, adrenal glands (the adrenal cortex) to release another, important set of hormones—corticosteroids. These hormones stimulate the release of chemicals that help increase your energy and help inhibit tissue inflammation in case of injury (Munck, 2000)., Stress can also produce other physiological changes, that we are just beginning to understand. The most critical changes occur in the immune system. Your immune system provides you with resistance to infections., However, evidence indicates that stress can suppress, certain aspects of the multifaceted immune response,, reducing its overall effectiveness in repelling invasions, by infectious agents (Chiappelli & Hodgson, 2000). In, a thorough review of 30 years of research on stress and, immunity, Segerstrom and Miller (2004) conclude that, chronic stress can reduce both cellular immune responses, (which attack intracellular pathogens, such as viruses), and humoral immune responses (which attack extracellular pathogens, such as bacteria). They also report that, the duration of a stressful event is a key factor determining its impact on immune function. Long-lasting stressors, such as caring for a seriously ill spouse or enduring, unemployment for months, are associated with greater, immune suppression than relatively brief stressors., The exact mechanisms underlying immune suppression are complicated, but it appears likely that both, sets of stress hormones (catecholamines and corticosteroids) contribute (Dantzer & Mormede, 1995). In any, case, it is becoming clear that physiological responses, to stress extend into every corner of the body. Moreover,, some of these responses may persist long after a stressful event has ended (Esterling et al., 1994). As you will, see, these physiological reactions can have an impact, on both mental and physical health., , Behavioral Responses, vation involves stimulating the central part of the adrenal glands (the adrenal medulla) to release large amounts, of catecholamines into the bloodstream. These hormones radiate throughout your body, producing many, important physiological changes. The net result of catecholamine elevation is that your body is mobilized for, action (Lundberg, 2000). Heart rate and blood flow increase, pumping more blood to your brain and muscles., Respiration and oxygen consumption speed up, facili-, , 88, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Although people respond to stress at several levels, their, behavior is the crucial dimension of these reactions., Emotional and physiological responses to stress—which, are often undesirable—tend to be largely automatic., However, dealing effectively with stress at the behavioral level may shut down these potentially harmful, emotional and physiological reactions., Most behavioral responses to stress involve coping. Coping refers to active efforts to master, reduce,

Page 126 :
or tolerate the demands created by stress. Notice that, this definition is neutral as to whether coping efforts, are healthy or maladaptive. The popular use of the term, often implies that coping is inherently healthy. When, we say that someone “coped with her problems,” we, imply that she handled them effectively., In reality, coping responses may be either healthy, or unhealthy (Moos & Schaefer, 1993). For example, if, you were flunking a history course at midterm, you, might cope with this stress by (1) increasing your study, efforts, (2) seeking help from a tutor, (3) blaming your, professor for your poor grade, or (4) giving up on the, , class. Clearly, the first two coping responses would be, healthier than the second two., People cope with stress in an endless variety of, ways. Because of the complexity and importance of, coping processes, we’ll devote all of the next chapter to, ways of coping. At this point, it is sufficient to note that, coping strategies help determine whether stress has, any positive or negative effects on an individual. In the, next section, we’ll see what some of those effects can be, as we discuss the possible outcomes of people’s struggles with stress., , The Potential Effects of Stress, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, ■, , Explain the phenomenon of choking under pressure., Summarize evidence on how stress can affect cognitive, functioning., Describe the symptoms and causes of burnout., Discuss the prevalence, symptoms, and causes of, posttraumatic stress disorder., , People struggle with many stressors every day, most of, which come and go without leaving any enduring imprint. However, when stress is severe or when demands, pile up, stress may have long-lasting effects. These effects, often called “adaptational outcomes,” are relatively, durable (though not necessarily permanent) consequences of exposure to stress. Although stress can have, beneficial effects, research has focused mainly on possible negative outcomes, so you’ll find our coverage, slanted in that direction., , ■, , ■, , Discuss the potential impact of stress on mental and, physical health., Describe positive psychology and three ways in which, stress might lead to beneficial effects., , professional sports teams in championship contests, (Baumeister, 1995; Baumeister & Steinhilber, 1984)., These findings were particularly impressive in that gifted, professional athletes are probably less likely to choke, under pressure than virtually any other sample one, might assemble. Laboratory research on “normal” subjects is more pertinent to the issue, and it suggests that, choking under pressure is fairly common (Butler &, Baumeister, 1998; Lewis & Linder, 1997)., , Impaired Task Performance, , Disruption of, Cognitive Functioning, , Frequently, stress takes its toll on the ability to perform, effectively on a task at hand. For instance, Roy Baumeister (1984) theorized that pressure to perform often makes people self-conscious and that this elevated, self-consciousness disrupts their attention, thereby interfering with performance. He theorizes that attention may be distorted in two ways. First, elevated selfconsciousness may divert attention from the demands, of the task, creating distractions. Second, on well-learned, tasks that should be executed almost automatically, the, self-conscious person may focus too much attention, on the task. Thus, the person thinks too much about, what he or she is doing., Baumeister (1984) found support for his theory, in a series of laboratory experiments in which he manipulated the pressure to perform well on a simple, perceptual-motor task. His theory also garnered some, support in a pair of studies of the past performance of, , An interesting experimental study suggests that Baumeister is on the right track in looking to attention to, explain how stress impairs task performance. In a study, of stress and decision making, Keinan (1987) was able, to measure three specific aspects of subjects’ attention, under stressful and nonstressful conditions. Keinan, found that stress disrupted two out of the three aspects, of attention measured in the study. Stress increased subjects’ tendency (1) to jump to a conclusion too quickly, without considering all their options and (2) to do an, unsystematic, poorly organized review of their available, options. The results of some studies also suggest that, stress can have detrimental effects on certain aspects of, memory functioning (Kellogg, Hopko, & Ashcraft, 1999;, Shors, 2004)., Severe stress may leave people dazed and confused,, in a state of shock (Valent, 2000; Weisaeth, 1993). In, these states, people report feeling emotionally numb,, , CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 89

Page 127 :
and they respond in a flat, apathetic fashion to events, around them. They often stare off into space and have, difficulty maintaining a coherent train of thought. Their, behavior frequently has an automatic, rigid, stereotyped, quality. Fortunately, this disorientation usually occurs, only in extreme situations involving overwhelming, stress, such as surviving a fire, a flood, or a tornado., , Antecedents, of burnout, , Burnout, Burnout is an overused buzzword that means different, things to different people. Nonetheless, a few researchers have described burnout in a systematic way that has, facilitated scientific study of the syndrome (Maslach &, Leiter, 1997; Pines, 1993). Burnout involves physical, and emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and a lowered, sense of self-efficacy that is attributable to workrelated stress. Exhaustion, which is central to burnout,, includes chronic fatigue, weakness, and low energy., Cynicism is manifested in highly negative attitudes toward oneself, one’s work, and life in general. Reduced, self-efficacy involves declining feelings of competence, at work that give way to feelings of hopelessness and, helplessness., What causes burnout? According to Leiter and Maslach (2001), “burnout is a cumulative stress reaction to, ongoing occupational stressors” (p. 418). The conventional wisdom is that burnout occurs because of some, flaw or weakness within the person, but Christina, Maslach (2003) asserts that “the research case is much, stronger for the contrasting argument that burnout is, more a function of the situation than of the person”, (p. 191). Factors in the workplace that appear to promote, burnout include work overload, interpersonal conflicts, at work, lack of control over work responsibilities and, outcomes, and inadequate recognition for one’s work, (see Figure 3.14). As you might expect, burnout is associated with increased absenteeism and reduced productivity at work, as well as increased vulnerability to, a variety of health problems (Maslach & Leiter, 2000)., , Posttraumatic Stress Disorders, Extremely stressful, traumatic incidents can leave a, lasting imprint on victims’ psychological functioning., Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) involves enduring psychological disurbance attributed to the experience of a major traumatic event. Researchers began, to appreciate the frequency and severity of posttraumatic stress disorders after the Vietnam war ended in, 1975 and a great many psychologically scarred veterans, returned home. These veterans displayed a diverse array, of psychological problems and symptoms that in many, cases lingered much longer than expected. Studies suggest that nearly a half million Vietnam veterans were, , 90, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Components, of burnout, , Consequences, of burnout, , Work, overload, , Increased, physical, illness, , Lack of, social, support, , Increased, absenteeism,, turnover, , Exhaustion, Cynicism, , Lack of, control,, autonomy, , Inadequate, recognition,, rewards, , •, , Lowered, self-efficacy, , Decreased, commitment, to job, , Reduced, productivity, , F I G U R E 3. 14, , The antecedents, components, and consequences of burnout., Christina Maslach and Michael Leiter have developed a systematic, model of burnout that specifies its antecedents, components,, and consequences. The antecedents on the left in the diagram, are the stressful features of the work environment that cause, burnout. The burnout syndrome itself consists of the three components shown in the center of the diagram. Some of the unfortunate results of burnout are listed on the right. (Based on Leiter &, Maslach, 2001), , still suffering from PTSD over a decade after the end of, the war (Schlenger et al., 1992)., Although posttraumatic stress disorders are widely, associated with the experiences of Vietnam veterans,, they are seen in response to other cases of traumatic, stress as well, and they appear to be much more common than originally believed. Research suggests that, 7–8 percent of people have suffered from PTSD at some, point in their lives, with prevalence higher among, women (10 percent) than men (5 percent) (Ozer et al.,, , WE B LI N K 3.5, , National Center for PTSD, Maintained by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs,, this exceptionally rich site is devoted to the understanding, and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. The site, has well-organized materials for both professionals and, the public and includes a wealth of new postings related, to the psychological consequences of terrorism.

Page 128 :
2003). PTSD is seen in children as well as adults (La, Greca, 2000). In some instances, PTSD does not surface, until many months or years after a person’s exposure, to severe stress (Holen, 2000)., What types of stress besides combat are severe, enough to produce PTSD? The syndrome is frequently, seen after a rape, a serious automobile accident, a robbery or assault, or the witnessing of someone’s death, (Koren, Arnon, & Klein, 1999; Stein et al., 1997b)., Studies indicate that PTSD is also common in the wake, of major disasters, such as floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, and so forth (Koopman, Classen, & Spiegel,, 1994; Vernberg et al., 1996). Vulnerability to PTSD is, not limited to victims, survivors, and witnesses of traumatic events. Rescue workers and cleanup crews who, have to grapple with the gruesome carnage of major, disasters, dangerous working conditions, and tremendous fatigue also have an elevated risk for PTSD and, often are “forgotten victims” of disasters (Ursano et al.,, 1999). Unfortunately, research by Stein et al. (1997b), suggests that the various types of traumatic events that, can cause PTSD are more common than most people, realize (see Figure 3.15)., What are the symptoms of posttraumatic stress, disorders? Common symptoms include reexperiencing the traumatic event in the form of nightmares and, flashbacks, emotional numbing, alienation, problems, in social relations, and elevated arousal, anxiety, and, guilt (Flannery, 1999; Shalev, 2001). PTSD is also associated with an elevated risk for substance abuse, depression, and anxiety disorders, as well as a great variety of physical health problems (Fairbank, Ebert, &, Caddell, 2001). The frequency and severity of post-, , WE B LI N K 3.6, , David Baldwin’s Trauma Information Pages, This site has long been recognized as the premier repository for web-based and other resources relating to emotional trauma, traumatic stress, and posttraumatic stress, disorder. David Baldwin has assembled more than 1000, links to information about these issues., , traumatic symptoms usually decline gradually over, time, but in many cases the symptoms never completely, disappear., Although PTSD is fairly common in the wake of, traumatic events, the vast majority of people who experience such events do not develop PTSD (Ozer & Weiss,, 2004). Hence, a current focus of research is to determine what factors make certain people more susceptible than others to the ravages of severe stress. According, to McKeever and Huff (2003), this vulnerability probably depends on complex interactions among a host of, biological and environmental factors. One key predictor, that emerged in a recent review of the relevant research, is the intensity of one’s reaction at the time of the traumatic event (Ozer et al., 2003). Individuals who have, especially intense emotional reactions during or immediately after the traumatic event go on to show elevated, vulnerability to PTSD. Vulnerability seems to be greatest among people whose reactions are so intense that, they report dissociative experiences (a sense that things, are not real, that time is stretching out, that one is watching oneself in a movie). You can consult Chapter 15 for, a fuller discussion of PTSD risk factors., , •, , The prevalence of traumatic, events. We tend to think that, traumatic events are relatively, unusual and infrequent, but, research by Stein et al. (1997b), suggests otherwise. When they, interviewed over 1000 people, in Winnipeg, they found that, 74.2 percent of the women, and 81.3 percent of the men, reported having experienced, at least one highly traumatic, event. The percentage of respondents reporting specific types of, traumatic events are summarized, in this graph., , Men, Women, , Natural disaster, , FIG U R E 3.15, , Men, Physical attack Women, Men, Robbery/holdup Women, Serious Men, auto accident Women, Witnessing severe Men, injury or death Women, Sexual molestation Men, before 18 Women, Men, Rape Women, 0, , 5, , 10, , 15, 20, 25, 30, PERCENT REPORTING TRAUMA, , 35, , 40, , CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 91

Page 129 :
© Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters/Corbis, , Major disasters, such as the, December 2004 tsunami that, devastated vast regions of, Southeast Asia, are just one, of about a half-dozen types of, calamitous events that frequently lead to posstraumatic, stress disorders., , Psychological Problems, and Disorders, Posttraumatic stress disorders are caused by an acute, episode of extreme stress. Of greater relevance to most, of us are the effects of chronic, prolonged, everyday, stress. On the basis of clinical impressions, psychologists have long suspected that chronic stress might, contribute to many types of psychological problems, and mental disorders. Since the late 1960s, advances in, the measurement of stress have allowed researchers to, verify these suspicions in empirical studies. In the domain of common psychological problems, studies indicate that stress may contribute to poor academic performance (Akgun & Ciarrochi, 2003), insomnia and, other sleep disturbances (Vgontzas, Bixler, & Kales,, 2000), sexual difficulties (Lemack, Uzzo, & Poppas,, 1998), alcohol abuse (Colder, 2001), and drug abuse, (Goeders, 2004)., Above and beyond these everyday problems, research reveals that stress often contributes to the onset, of full-fledged psychological disorders, including depression (Rehm, Wagner, & Ivens-Tyndal, 2001), schizophrenia (McGlashan & Hoffman, 2000), anxiety disorders (Falsetti & Ballenger, 1998), and eating disorders, (Cooper, 1995). We’ll discuss the complex relations, between stress and mental disorders in detail in Chapter 15., , Physical Illness, Stress can also have an impact on one’s physical health., The idea that stress can contribute to physical ailments, is not entirely new. Evidence that stress can cause phys92, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , ical illness began to accumulate back in the 1930s. By, the 1950s, the concept of psychosomatic disease was, widely accepted. Psychosomatic diseases were defined, as genuine physical ailments thought to be caused in, part by stress and other psychological factors. The classic psychosomatic illnesses were high blood pressure,, peptic ulcers, asthma, skin disorders such as eczema and, hives, and migraine and tension headaches (Kaplan,, 1989; Rogers, Fricchione, & Reich, 1999). Please note,, these diseases were not regarded as imagined physical, ailments. The term psychosomatic has often been misused to refer to physical ailments that are “all in one’s, head,” but that is an entirely different syndrome (see, Chapter 15). Rather, psychosomatic diseases were viewed, as authentic organic maladies that were heavily stress, related., Since the 1970s, the concept of psychosomatic disease has gradually fallen into disuse because research, has shown that stress can contribute to the development, of a diverse array of other diseases previously believed, to be purely physiological in origin. Although there is, room for debate on some specific diseases, stress may, influence the onset and course of heart disease, stroke,, tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, diabetes, leukemia, cancer, various types of infectious disease, and, probably many other types of illnesses (Critelli & Ee,, 1996; Dougall & Baum, 2001; Hubbard & Workman,, 1998). Thus, it has become apparent that there is nothing unique about the psychosomatic diseases that requires a special category. Modern evidence continues, to demonstrate that the classic psychosomatic diseases, are influenced by stress, but so are numerous other diseases (Levenson et al., 1999). Of course, stress is only, one of many factors that may contribute to the develop-

Page 130 :
ment of physical illness. Nonetheless, it is sobering to, realize that stress can have an impact on one’s physical, health., , Positive Effects, The effects of stress are not entirely negative. Recent, years have brought increased interest in positive aspects, of the stress process, including favorable outcomes that, follow in the wake of stress (Folkman & Moskowitz,, 2000). To some extent, the new focus on the possible, benefits of stress reflects a new emphasis on “positive, psychology.” Some influential theorists have argued, that the field of psychology has historically devoted too, much attention to pathology, weakness, and damage, and how to heal suffering (Seligman, 2003). This approach has yielded valuable insights and progress, but it, has also resulted in an unfortunate neglect of the forces, that make life worth living. The positive psychology, movement seeks to shift the field’s focus away from, negative experiences. As Martin Seligman and Mihaly, Csikszentmihalyi (2000) put it, “The aim of positive, psychology is to begin to catalyze a change in the focus, of psychology from preoccupation with only repairing, the worst things in life to also building positive qualities” (p. 5). The advocates of positive psychology argue, for increased research on well-being, contentment, hope,, courage, perseverance, nurturance, tolerance, and other, human strengths and virtues (Aspinwall & Staudinger,, 2003; Peterson & Seligman, 2004). One of these strengths, is resilience in the face of stress, which promises to be, a burgeoning area of research in the years to come., The beneficial effects of stress may prove more difficult to pinpoint than the harmful effects because they, may be more subtle. Although research data are sparse,, there appear to be at least three ways in which stress can, have positive effects., First, stressful events help satisfy the need for stimulation and challenge. Studies suggest that most people, prefer an intermediate level of stimulation and challenge in their lives (Sutherland, 2000). Although we, think of stress in terms of stimulus overload, underload, can be stressful as well (Goldberger, 1993). Thus, most, people would experience a suffocating level of boredom if they lived a stress-free existence. In a sense, then,, stress fulfills a basic need of the human organism., Second, stress can promote personal growth or selfimprovement (Tedeschi, Park, & Calhoun, 1998). For, example, studies of people grappling with major health, problems show that the majority report having derived, benefits from their adversity (Tennen & Affleck, 1999)., Stressful events sometimes force people to develop, new skills, reevaluate priorities, learn new insights, and, acquire new strengths. In other words, the adaptation, process initiated by stress may lead to personal changes, that are changes for the better. Confronting and con-, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , Why Zebras Don’t Get, Ulcers: The Acclaimed Guide, to Stress, Stress-Related, Diseases, and Coping, by Robert M. Sapolsky (W. H. Freeman, 1998), This book provides a superb, wide-ranging discussion of, the nature and effects of stress. The author is a neuroscientist at Stanford University whose research focuses, on such issues as the relationship between stress and, the cellular and molecular events underlying neural, decay in the hippocampal area of the brain. That is not, the type of résumé that you would normally associate, with lively, witty discourse, but the book is written, with flair and humor. Sapolsky’s basic thesis is that the, physiological response to stress is a remnant of evolution that is no longer adaptive for the majority of stressful situations that humans face. He outlines in detail, how neuroendocrine responses to stress can cause or, worsen a host of physical and psychological afflictions,, including cardiovascular disease, ulcers, colitis, diarrhea, infectious diseases, and depression. Sapolsky, does an excellent job of making complicated research, understandable. Although opinionated, his overviews of, research are scientifically sound and thoroughly documented in notes at the back of the book. Although this, is not a coping manual, it is probably the most insightful and interesting dissection of the stress response, available today and is highly worthwhile reading., Cover © 1998 by Henry Holt and Co. Reprinted by permission, Henry Holt &, Co., LLC., , quering a stressful challenge may lead to improvements, in specific coping abilities and to an enhanced selfconcept. For example, a breakup with a boyfriend or a, girlfriend may lead individuals to change aspects of, their behavior that they find unsatisfactory. Moreover,, even if people do not conquer stressors, they may be, able to learn from their mistakes. Thus, researchers have, begun to explore the growth potential of stressful events, (Calhoun & Tedeschi, 2001; Park & Fenster, 2004)., Third, today’s stress can inoculate individuals so, that they are less affected by tomorrow’s stress. Some, studies suggest that exposure to stress can increase stress, tolerance—as long as the stress isn’t overwhelming, (Meichenbaum, 1993). Thus, a woman who has previously endured business setbacks may be much better, prepared than most people to deal with a bank foreclosure on her home. In light of the negative effects that, stress can have, improved stress tolerance is a desirable, goal. We’ll look next at the factors that influence the, ability to tolerate stress., CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 93

Page 131 :
Factors Influencing Stress Tolerance, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , Explain how social support moderates the impact of stress., Describe the hardiness syndrome and how it influences stress, tolerance., Discuss how optimism is related to stress tolerance., , Some people seem to be able to withstand the ravages, of stress better than others (Holahan & Moos, 1990,, 1994). Why? Because a number of moderator variables, can soften the impact of stress on physical and mental, health. To shed light on differences in how well people, tolerate stress, we’ll look at a number of key moderator variables, including social support, hardiness, and, optimism. As you’ll see, these factors influence people’s emotional, physical, and behavioral responses to, stress. These complexities are diagrammed in Figure, 3.16, which builds on Figure 3.7 to provide a more, , complete overview of the factors involved in individual reactions to stress., , Social Support, Friends may be good for your health! This startling, conclusion emerges from studies on social support as, a moderator of stress. Social support refers to various, types of aid and succor provided by members of, one’s social networks. For example, Jemmott and Magloire (1988) examined the effect of social support on, , Moderating variables influencing, stress tolerance, Social support, hardiness, optimism,, sensation seeking, autonomic reactivity, , Emotional, response, , Annoyance, anger,, anxiety, fear, dejection, grief, guilt,, shame, envy, disgust, , •, , Potentially, stressful, objective events, , Subjective, cognitive, appraisal, , A major exam, a big date,, trouble with your boss, or, a financial setback, which, may lead to frustration,, conflict, change, or, pressure, , Primary and secondary appraisals of, threat, which are, influenced by familiarity with the event,, its controllability,, its predictability,, and so on, , Physiological, response, Autonomic arousal,, hormonal fluctuations, neurochemical, changes, and so on, , Behavioral, response, Coping efforts, such, as lashing out at, others, blaming oneself, seeking help,, solving problems, and, releasing emotions, , FIG U R E 3.16, , Overview of the stress process. This diagram builds on Figure 3.7 (the multidimensional response to, stress) to provide a more complete overview of the factors involved in stress. This diagram adds the, potential effects of stress (seen on the far right) by listing some of the positive and negative adaptational outcomes that may result from stress. It also completes the picture by showing that moderating, variables (seen at the top) can intervene to influence the effects of stress., , 94, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Positive, adaptational, outcomes, Desirable effects, such as learning a, new skill, increased, self-esteem, and, improved coping, ability, , Negative, adaptational, outcomes, Undesirable effects, such as physical, illness, psychological, problems, burnout,, and impaired task, performance

Page 132 :
CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 95, , © Ghislain & Marie David de Lossy/The Image Bank/Getty Images, Courtesy, Suzanne Ouellette, , immune response in a group of students going through the stress of, final exams. They found that students who reported stronger social, support had higher levels of an antibody that plays a key role in warding off respiratory infections. Positive correlations between high social, support and greater immunal functioning have been observed in quite a, number of studies with diverse samples (Uchino, Cacioppo, & KiecoltGlaser, 1996)., Over the last two decades, a vast, body of studies have found evidence, that social support is favorably related to physical health (Wills &, Fegan, 2001). Social support seems, to be good medicine for the mind as, The availability of social support is a key factor influencing stress tolerance. Decades of, well as the body, as most studies also, research have shown that social support reduces the negative effects of stress and has, positive effects of its own., find an association between social, support and mental health (Davis,, Morris, & Kraus, 1998; Sarason, Pierce, & Sarason,, Hardiness, 1994). It appears that social support serves as a protecAnother line of research indicates, tive buffer during times of high stress, reducing the, that a syndrome called hardiness, negative impact of stressful events—and that social supmay moderate the impact of stressport has its own positive effects on health, which may, ful events. Suzanne (Kobasa) Ouelbe apparent even when people aren’t under great stress, lette reasoned that if stress affects, (Peirce et al., 1996; Wills & Fegan, 2001). The stresssome people less than others, then, buffering effects of social support were apparent in a, some people must be hardier than, study that found strong social support to be a key facothers. Hence, she set out to detertor reducing the likelihood of posttraumatic stress dismine what factors might be the key Suzanne Ouellette, orders among Vietnam veterans (King et al., 1998)., to these differences in hardiness., The mechanisms underlying the connection beKobasa (1979) used a modified version of the, tween social support and wellness have been the subHolmes and Rahe (1967) stress scale (SRRS) to meaject of considerable debate (Hobfoll & Vaux, 1993). A, sure the amount of stress experienced by a group of, variety of mechanisms may be at work. Among other, executives. As in most other studies, she found a modthings, social support could promote wellness by: makest correlation between stress and the incidence of, ing appraisals of stressful events more benign, dampphysical illness. However, she carried her investigation, ening the intensity of physiological reactions to stress,, one step further than previous studies. She compared, reducing health-impairing behaviors such as smoking, the high-stress executives who exhibited the expected, and drinking, encouraging preventive behaviors such as, high incidence of illness against the high-stress execuregular exercise and medical checkups, and fostering, tives who stayed healthy. She administered a battery of, more constructive coping efforts (Wills & Fegan, 2001)., psychological tests and found that the hardier execuInterestingly, a recent study suggests that providing, tives “were more committed, felt more in control, and, social support to others can also be beneficial (Brown et, had bigger appetites for challenge” (Kobasa, 1984, p., al., 2003). Another study found that the personality trait, 70). These traits have also shown up in many other studof sociability (being friendly and agreeable), which ceries of hardiness (Maddi, 1999, 2002; Ouellette, 1993)., tainly helps people to build supportive social networks,, Thus, hardiness is a syndrome marked by comis independently associated with reduced susceptibility, mitment, challenge, and control that is purportedly, to infectious disease (Cohen et al., 2003). Yet another, associated with strong stress resistance. Hardiness, study has demonstrated that pet owners view their pets, may reduce the effects of stress by altering stress apas sources of support in their lives, with resultant health, praisals or fostering more active coping (Crowley, Haybenefits (Allen, Blascovich, & Mendes, 2002). Thus, it, slip, & Hobdy, 2003; Maddi & Hightower, 1999). The, appears that social support is not the only feature of our, benefits of hardiness showed up in a study of Vietnam, social relations that has some bearing on our wellness.

Page 133 :
CALVIN AND HOBBES © Watterson. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , veterans, which found that higher hardiness was related to a lower likelihood of developing posttraumatic, stress disorders (King et al., 1998). Although the research on hardiness is promising, there is extensive debate about how to measure hardiness and about its key, elements (Klag & Bradley, 2004; Oullette & DiPlacido,, 2001; Younkin & Betz, 1996)., , their own personal shortcomings, versus an optimistic, explanatory style, which leads people to attribute setbacks to temporary situational factors. In two retrospective studies of people born many decades ago, they, found an association between this optimistic explanatory style and relatively good health (Peterson, Seligman, & Vaillant, 1988) and increased longevity (Peter-, , Optimism, Measuring Optimism, , Defining optimism as a general tendency to expect, good outcomes, Michael Scheier and Charles Carver, (1985) found a correlation between optimism as measured by the Life Orientation Test (see Figure 3.17) and, relatively good physical health in a sample of college, students. In another study that focused on surgical patients, optimism was found to be associated with a faster, recovery and a quicker return to normal activities after, coronary artery bypass surgery (Scheier et al., 1989)., Yet another study found optimism to be associated, with more effective immune functioning (Segerstrom, et al., 1998). Twenty years of research with the Life Orientation Test has consistently shown that optimism, is associated with better mental and physical health, (Scheier, Carver, & Bridges, 2001)., In a related line of research, Christopher Peterson, and Martin Seligman have studied how people explain, bad events (personal setbacks, mishaps, disappointments, and such). They identified a pessimistic explanatory style, in which people tend to blame setbacks on, , In the following spaces, mark how much you agree with, each of the items, using the following scale:, 4 = strongly agree, 3 = agree, 2 = neutral, 1 = disagree, 0 = strongly disagree, ______, , 1. In uncertain times, I usually expect the best., , ______, , 2. It’s easy for me to relax., , ______, , 3. If something can go wrong for me, it will., , ______, , 4. I always look on the bright side of things., , ______, , 5. I’m always optimistic about my future., , ______, , 6. I enjoy my friends a lot., , ______, , 7. It’s important for me to keep busy., , ______, , 8. I hardly ever expect things to go my way., , ______, , 9. Things never work out the way I want them to., , ______ 10. I don’t get upset too easily., ______ 11. I’m a believer in the idea that “every cloud has, a silver lining.”, ______ 12. I rarely count on good things happening to me., , •, , FIG U R E 3.17, , The Life Orientation Test (LOT). The personality trait of optimism, which appears to foster resilience in the face of stress,, can be measured by the Life Orientation Test (LOT) developed by, Scheier and Carver (1985). Follow the instructions for this scale, to obtain an estimate of your own optimism. High and low scores, are based on scoring three-fifths of a standard deviation above, or below the mean., Adapted from Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247., Copyright © 1985 Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates. Adapted by permission of the publisher, and authors., , 96, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Scoring, Cross out and ignore the responses you entered for items 2,, 6, 7, and 10, which are “filler” items. For items 3, 8, 9, and, 12, you need to reverse the numbers you entered. If you, entered a 4, change it to 0. If you entered a 3, change it to, 1. If you entered a 2, leave it unchanged. If you entered a, 1, change it to 3. If you entered a 0, change it to 4. Now, add up the numbers for items 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, using, the new numbers for the reversed items. This sum is your, score on the Life Orientation Test. For college students, approximate norms are as follows: High score (25–32), intermediate score (18–24), low score (0–17).

Page 134 :
son et al., 1998). Many other studies have linked the, optimistic explanatory style to superior physical health, (Peterson & Bossio, 2001), as well as higher academic, achievement, increased job productivity, enhanced athletic performance, and higher marital satisfaction (Gillham et al., 2001)., Why does optimism promote a host of desirable, outcomes? Above all else, research suggests that opti-, , mists cope with stress in more adaptive ways than pessimists (Aspinwall, Richter, & Hoffman, 2001; Carver, & Scheier, 2002; Chang, 1996). Optimists are more likely, to engage in action-oriented, problem-focused, carefully, planned coping and are more willing than pessimists, to seek social support. In comparison, pessimists are, more likely to deal with stress by avoiding it, giving up,, or engaging in denial., , Monitoring Your Stress, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , ■, , List five problems with the SRRS., Summarize how the LES corrects some of the problems that are, characteristic of the SRRS., Explain why one should be cautious in interpreting scores on stress, scales., , Rank the following five events in terms of how stressful they, would be for you (1 = most stressful, 5 = least stressful):, ___ 1. Change in residence, ___ 2. Fired at work, ___ 3. Death of a close family member, ___ 4. Pregnancy, ___ 5. Personal injury or illness, All five events appear on the Social Readjustment Rating, Scale (SRRS), developed by Holmes and Rahe (1967),, which we described earlier (see Figure 3.5). If you ranked, them in the same order as Holmes and Rahe’s subjects,, the rankings would be 5, 3, 1, 4, and 2. If you didn’t rank, them in that order, don’t worry about it. That merely, shows that the perception of stress is personal and subjective. Unfortunately, the SRRS fails to take this subjectivity into account. That is just one of a number of, basic problems with the SRRS., The SRRS and the research associated with it have, received a great deal of publicity. The scale has been, reprinted in many popular newspapers and magazines., In these articles, readers have been encouraged to attribute great significance to their scores. They have, sometimes been told that they should reduce or minimize change in their lives if their scores are high (Cohen,, 1979). Such bold advice could be counterproductive, and needs to be qualified carefully. Therefore, in this, application section we’ll elaborate on some of the problems with the SRRS as a measurement scale, introduce, you to an improved scale for measuring stress, and explain why scores on any stress scale should be interpreted with caution., , Problems with the SRRS, As you learned earlier in this chapter, the SRRS was developed in the, early 1960s by Thomas Holmes, and Richard Rahe (1967). They, designed the scale to measure the, amount of change-related stress, that people experience. In a host, of studies, these scores have been, found to be related to the likeliThomas Holmes, hood of developing an intimidating array of physical illnesses and, psychological problems (Derogatis & Coons, 1993;, Dougall & Baum, 2001; Turner & Wheaton, 1995)., Before we discuss the shortcomings of the SRRS,, we should emphasize that Holmes and Rahe deserve, enormous credit for recognizing the potential importance of stress and for developing a scale that would, permit its measurement. They pioneered a new area of, research that has turned out to be extremely productive., However, their groundbreaking foray into the assessment of stress was not without its flaws, and their scale, has been improved on. So, borrowing from the analyses, of a number of critics (Derogatis, 1982; Rabkin, 1993;, Schroeder & Costa, 1984), let’s look at some of the major, problems with the SRRS. Although our list is not exhaustive, we highlight the key problems., First, as already discussed, the assumption that the, SRRS measures change exclusively has been shown to, be inaccurate. We now have ample evidence that the desirability of events affects adaptational outcomes more, CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 97, , Courtesy, Eleanor Holmes Williams, , ■

Page 135 :
than the amount of change that they require (Turner, & Wheaton, 1995). Thus, it seems prudent to view the, SRRS as a measure of diverse forms of stress, rather, than as a measure of change-related stress (McLean &, Link, 1994)., Second, the SRRS fails to take into account differences among people in their subjective perception of, how stressful an event is. For instance, while divorce, may deserve a stress value of 73 for most people, a particular person’s divorce might generate much less stress, and merit a value of only 25., Third, many of the events listed on the SRRS and, similar scales are highly ambiguous, leading people to, be inconsistent as to which events they report experiencing (Monroe & McQuaid, 1994). For instance, what, qualifies as “trouble with boss”? Should you check that, because you’re sick and tired of your supervisor? What, constitutes a “change in living conditions”? Does your, purchase of a great new sound system qualify? As you, can see, the SRRS includes many “events” that are described inadequately, producing considerable ambiguity about the meaning of one’s response. Problems in, recalling events over a period of a year also lead to inconsistent responding on stress scales, thus lowering, their reliability (Klein & Rubovits, 1987)., Fourth, the SRRS does not sample from the domain, of stressful events very thoroughly. Do the 43 events, listed on the SRRS exhaust all the major stresses that, people typically experience? Studies designed to explore, that question have found many significant omissions, (Dohrenwend et al, 1993; Wheaton, 1994)., Fifth, the correlation between SRRS scores and, health outcomes may be inflated because subjects’ neuroticism affects both their responses to stress scales and, their self-reports of health problems. Neurotic individuals have a tendency to recall more stress than others and to recall more symptoms of illness than others, (Watson, David, & Suls, 1999). These tendencies mean, that some of the correlation between high stress and, high illness may simply reflect the effects of subjects’, neuroticism (Critelli & Ee, 1996). This is another case, of the third variable problem in correlation that we introduced in Chapter 1 (see Figure 3.18). The possible, contaminating effects of neuroticism obscure the meaning of scores on the SRRS and similar measures of stress., , The Life Experiences Survey, In light of these problems, a number of researchers have, attempted to develop improved versions of the SRRS., For example, the Life Experiences Survey (LES), assembled by Irwin Sarason and colleagues (1978), has become a widely used measure of stress in contemporary, research (for examples see Ames et al., 2001; Denisoff, & Endler, 2000; Malefo, 2000). The LES revises and, builds on the SRRS in a variety of ways that correct, at, 98, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Neuroticism, (tendency to be, anxious, insecure,, self-conscious), , High stress, (self-report), , •, , High incidence, of illness, (self-report), , F I G U R E 3. 18, , Neuroticism as a possible factor underlying the stress-illness, correlation. Many studies have found a correlation between, subjects’ scores on self-report stress scales, such as the SRRS, and, their reports of how much illness they have experienced. However,, neurotic subjects, who are anxious, insecure, and self-conscious,, tend to recall more stress and more illness than others. Although, there is a great deal of evidence that stress contributes to the, causation of illness, some of the stress-illness correlation may be, due to neuroticism causing high recall of both stress and illness., , least in part, most of the problems just discussed (see, Hobson & Delunas, 2001 and Rahe et al., 2000 for other, modernized versions of the SRRS)., Specifically, the LES recognizes that stress involves, more than mere change and asks respondents to indicate whether events had a positive or negative impact, on them. This strategy permits the computation of positive change, negative change, and total change scores,, which helps researchers gain much more insight into, which facets of stress are most crucial., The LES also takes into consideration differences, among people in their appraisal of stress, by dropping, the normative weights and replacing them with personally assigned weightings of the impact of relevant, events. Ambiguity in items is decreased by providing, more elaborate descriptions of many items to clarify, their meaning. The scale still contains some ambiguity, but there is no complete solution for this problem., The LES deals with the failure of the SRRS to sample the full domain of stressful events in several ways., First, some significant omissions from the SRRS have, been added to the LES. Second, the LES allows the respondent to write in personally important events that, are not included on the scale. Third, the LES reprinted, here (in Figure 3.19) has an extra section just for students. Sarason et al. (1978) suggest that special, tailored, sections of this sort be added for specific populations, whenever it is useful., Arriving at your scores on the LES is very simple., Respond to the items in Figure 3.19 and add up all the, positive impact ratings on the right side. The total is

Page 136 :
•, , F I G U R E 3.19, , The Life Experiences Survey (LES). Like the SRRS, the LES is designed to measure change-related stress. However, Sarason, Johnson, and, Siegel (1978) corrected many of the problems apparent in the SRRS. Follow the instructions in the text to determine your positive, negative,, and total change scores., Instructions. Listed below are a number of events that sometimes bring about change in the lives of those who experience them and that, necessitate social readjustment. Examine each event on the list and if that event has occurred in your life during the past year please indicate, the extent to which you viewed the event as having either a positive or negative impact on your life at the time the event occurred. That is,, circle a number on the appropriate line to indicate the type and extent of impact that the event had. A rating of –3 would indicate an extremely, negative impact. A rating of 0 suggests no impact, either positive or negative. A rating of +3 would indicate an extremely positive impact., The Life Experiences Survey (LES), Extremely, negative, , Moderately, negative, , Somewhat, No, Slightly, negative impact positive, , Moderately, positive, , Extremely, positive, , Section 1, 1. Marriage, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 2. Detention in jail or comparable institution, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 3. Death of spouse, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 4. Major change in sleeping habits, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 5. Death of a close family member, a. Mother, b. Father, c. Brother, d. Sister, e. Grandmother, f. Grandfather, g. Other (specify), , −3, −3, −3, −3, −3, −3, −3, −3, , −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, , −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, , +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, , +2, +2, +2, +2, +2, +2, +2, +2, , +3, +3, +3, +3, +3, +3, +3, +3, , 6. Major change in eating habits (much more or, much less food intake), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 7. Foreclosure on mortgage or loan, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 8. Death of a close friend, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 9. Outstanding personal achievement, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 10. Minor law violations, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 11. Male: Wife/girlfriend’s pregnancy, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 12. Female: Pregnancy, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 13. Changed work situation (different work, responsibility, major change in working, conditions, working hours, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 14. New job, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 15. Serious illness or injury of close family member:, a. Mother, b. Father, c. Brother, d. Sister, e. Grandmother, f. Grandfather, g. Spouse, h. Other (specify), , −3, −3, −3, −3, −3, −3, −3, −3, , −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, , −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, , +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, , +2, +2, +2, +2, +2, +2, +2, +2, , +3, +3, +3, +3, +3, +3, +3, +3, , 16. Sexual difficulties, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 17. Trouble with employer (in danger of losing job,, being suspended, being demoted, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 18. Trouble with in-laws, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 19. Major change in financial status (a lot better off, or a lot worse off), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, (continued), , Adapted from Sarason, I. G., Johnson, J. H., & Siegel, J. M. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932–946. Copyright © 1978 by the American, Psychological Association. Reprinted by permission of the authors., , CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 99

Page 137 :
The Life Experiences Survey (LES) (continued), Extremely, negative, , Moderately, negative, , Somewhat, No, Slightly, negative impact positive, , Moderately, positive, , Extremely, positive, , 20. Major change in closeness of family members, (increased or decreased closeness), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 21. Gaining a new family member (through birth,, adoption, family member moving in, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 22. Change in residence, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 23. Marital separation from mate (due to conflict), , −3, , 24. Major change in church activities (increased or, decreased attendance), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 26. Major change in number of arguments with, spouse (a lot more or a lot fewer), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 27. Married male: Change in wife’s work outside the, home (beginning work, ceasing work, changing, to a new job, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 28. Married female: Change in husband’s work (loss, of job, beginning new job, retirement, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 29. Major change in usual type and/or amount of, recreation, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 30. Borrowing for a major purchase (buying a home,, business, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 31. Borrowing for a smaller purchase (buying a car, or TV, getting school loan, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 32. Being fired from job, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 34. Female: Having abortion, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 35. Major personal illness or injury, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 36. Major change in social activities, e.g., parties,, movies, visiting (increased or decreased, participation), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 37. Major change in living conditions of family, (building new home, remodeling, deterioration, of home or neighborhood, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 25. Marital reconciliation with mate, , 33. Male: Wife/girlfriend having abortion, , (continued), , your positive change score. Your negative change score, is the sum of all of the negative impact ratings that you, made on the left. Adding these two values yields your, total change score. Approximate norms for all three of, these scores are listed in Figure 3.20 so that you can get, some idea of what your score means., , •, , FIG U R E 3.20, , Norms for LES, , Norms for the Life Experiences Survey (LES). Approximate norms, for college students taking the LES are shown for negative, positive,, and total change scores. These norms are based on 345 undergraduates, studied by Sarason, Johnson, and Siegel (1978). Data for males and, females were combined, as gender differences were negligible. Negative change scores are the best predictor of adaptational outcomes., Adapted from Sarason, I. G., Johnson, J. H., & Siegel, J. M. (1978). Assessing the impact of life, changes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932–946. Copyright © 1978 by the American Psychological Association. Reprinted by permission of the authors., , 100, , PART 1, , Research to date suggests that the negative change, score is the crucial one; positive change has not been, found to be a good predictor of adaptational outcomes., Thus far, research has shown that negative change, scores are related to a variety of negative adaptational, outcomes., , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Score, category, , Negative, change, , Positive, change, , Total, change, , High, , 14 and, above, , 16 and, above, , 28 and, above, , Medium, , 4–13, , 7–15, , 12–27, , Low, , 0–3, , 0–6, , 0–11

Page 138 :
The Life Experiences Survey (LES) (continued), Extremely, negative, , Moderately, negative, , Somewhat, No, Slightly, negative impact positive, , Moderately, positive, , Extremely, positive, , 38. Divorce, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 39. Serious injury or illness of close friend, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 40. Retirement from work, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 41. Son or daughter leaving home (due to marriage,, college, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 42. End of formal schooling, , −3, , 43. Separation from spouse (due to work, travel, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 44. Engagement, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 45. Breaking up with boyfriend/girlfriend, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 46. Leaving home for the first time, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 47. Reconciliation with boyfriend/girlfriend, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 48. ______________________________________, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 49. ______________________________________, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 50. ______________________________________, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 51. Beginning a new school experience at a higher, academic level (college, graduate school,, professional school), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 52. Changing to a new school at the same academic, level (undergraduate, graduate, etc.), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 53. Academic probation, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 54. Being dismissed from dormitory or other residence, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 55. Failing an important exam, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 56. Changing a major, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 57. Failing a course, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , Other recent experiences that have had an impact, on your life. List and rate., , Section 2. Students only, , 58. Dropping a course, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 59. Joining a fraternity/sorority, , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , 60. Financial problems concerning school (in danger, of not having sufficient money to continue), , −3, , −2, , −1, , 0, , +1, , +2, , +3, , A Cautionary Note, There is merit in getting an estimate of how much stress, you have experienced lately, but scores on the LES or, any measure of stress should be interpreted with caution. You need not panic if you add up your negative, change score and find that it falls in the “high” category. Although it is clear that a connection exists between stress and a variety of undesirable adaptational, outcomes, a high score shouldn’t cause undue concern., For one thing, the strength of the association between stress and adaptational problems is modest. Most, of the correlations observed between stress scores and, illness have been low to moderate in magnitude, often, less than .30 (Monroe & McQuaid, 1994). For researchers and theorists, it is interesting to find any relationship at all. However, the link between stress and adap-, , tational problems is too weak to permit us to make, confident predictions about individuals. Many people, endure high levels of stress without developing significant problems., Second, stress is only one of a multitude of variables, that affect susceptibility to various maladies. Stress interacts with many other factors, such as lifestyle, coping skills, social support, hardiness, and genetic inheritance, in influencing one’s mental and physical health., It’s important to remember that stress is only one, actor on a crowded stage. In light of these considerations, you should evaluate the potential meaning of, SRRS or LES scores with caution. A high score should, be food for thought, but not reason for alarm., , CHAPTER 3, , Stress and Its Effects, , 101

Page 139 :
■, , KEY IDEAS, , However, stress can also have positive effects. Stress fulfills a, basic human need for challenge and can lead to personal growth, and self-improvement., , Factors Influencing Stress Tolerance, , CHAPTER, , 3 REVIEW, , The Nature of Stress, ■, , Stress involves transactions with the environment that are, perceived to be threatening. Stress is a common, everyday event,, and even routine hassles can be problematic. To a large degree,, stress lies in the eye of the beholder. According to Lazarus and, Folkman, primary appraisal determines whether events appear, threatening, and secondary appraisal assesses whether one has, the resources to cope with challenges., ■ Some of the stress that people experience comes from their, environment. Examples of environmental stimuli that can be, stressful include excessive noise, crowding, and urban decay., Much everyday stress is self-imposed. Stress can vary with culture. Within Western culture, ethnicity can be a source of stress, in a variety of ways., Major Types of Stress, ■, , Major types of stress include frustration, conflict, change,, and pressure. Frustration occurs when an obstacle prevents one, from attaining some goal. There are three principal types of conflict: approach-approach, avoidance-avoidance, and approachavoidance. The latter is especially stressful. Vacillation is a common response to approach-avoidance conflict., ■ A large number of studies with the SRRS suggest that change, is stressful. Although that may be true, it is now clear that the, SRRS is a measure of general stress rather than just changerelated stress. Two kinds of pressure (to perform and to conform) also appear to be stressful., Responding to Stress, ■, , Emotional reactions to stress typically involve anger, fear, or, sadness. However, people also experience positive emotions while, under stress and these positive emotions may promote resilience., Emotional arousal may interfere with coping. As tasks get more, complex, the optimal level of arousal declines., ■ Physiological arousal in response to stress was originally, called the fight-or-flight response by Cannon. Selye’s general, adaptation syndrome describes three stages in the physiological, reaction to stress: alarm, resistance, and exhaustion. Diseases of, adaptation may appear during the stage of exhaustion., ■ In response to stress, the brain sends signals along two major, pathways to the endocrine system. Actions along these paths release two sets of hormones into the bloodstream, catecholamines, and corticosteroids. Stress can also lead to suppression of the, immune response, especially when the stress is chronic and longlasting. Behavioral responses to stress involve coping, which, may be healthy or maladaptive. If people cope effectively with, stress, they can short-circuit potentially harmful emotional and, physical responses., The Potential Effects of Stress, ■, , Common negative effects of stress include impaired task performance, disruption of attention and other cognitive processes,, pervasive emotional exhaustion known as burnout, posttraumatic stress disorders, a host of everyday psychological problems,, full-fledged psychological disorders, and varied types of damage to physical health., , 102, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , ■, , People differ in how much stress they can tolerate without, experiencing ill effects. A person’s social support can be a key, consideration in buffering the effects of stress. The personality, factors associated with hardiness—commitment, challenge, and, control—may increase stress tolerance. People high in optimism, also have advantages in coping with stress., , Application: Monitoring Your Stress, ■, , It can be useful to attempt to measure the amount of stress, in one’s life, but the much-used SRRS is marred by a variety of, shortcomings. It does not really measure change exclusively, and, it fails to account for the subjective nature of stress. Some of the, items on the SRRS are ambiguous, and the scale does not sample, the domain of stress thoroughly., ■ In contrast, the LES is an improved measure of stress that, recognizes the subjectivity of stress and the importance of the, desirability of life events. The LES also samples the domain of, stressful events a little more thoroughly and has less ambiguity, than the SRRS. Negative change scores on the LES have been, found to be predictive of a variety of adaptational outcomes., , KEY TERMS, Acute stressors p. 75, Ambient stress p. 73, Approach-approach conflict, p. 76, Approach-avoidance conflict, p. 77, Autonomic nervous system, (ANS) p. 85, Avoidance-avoidance conflict, p. 77, Burnout p. 90, Chronic stressors pp. 75–76, Conflict p. 76, Coping pp. 88–89, Emotions p. 82, Endocrine system p. 86, Fight-or-flight response, p. 85, , Frustration p. 76, General adaptation syndrome, p. 86, Hardiness p. 95, Life changes p. 78, Optimism p. 96, Posttraumatic stress disorder, (PTSD) p. 90, Pressure p. 80, Primary appraisal p. 72, Psychosomatic diseases, p. 92, Secondary appraisal p. 72, Social support p. 94, Stress p. 72, , KEY PEOPLE, Susan Folkman pp. 83–84, Thomas Holmes and Richard, Rahe pp. 68–70, Suzanne (Kobasa) Ouellette, pp. 95–96, , Richard Lazarus p. 72, Neal Miller pp. 76–78, Hans Selye pp. 86–87, Shelley Taylor pp. 85–86

Page 140 :
7. Selye exposed lab animals to various stressors and, found that:, a. each type of stress caused a particular physiological, response., b. each type of animal responded to stress differently., , Personal Explorations Workbook, The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 3.1: SensationSeeking Scale. Personal Probe 3.1: Where's the Stress in, Your Life? Personal Probe 3.2: Stress—How Do You Control, It? Personal Probe 3.3: Working Through and Assessing the, Impact of a Stressful Event., , ANSWERS, , Pages 85–86, Pages 86–87, Page 88, Page 90, Pages 95–96, , 6. The fight-or-flight response is mediated by the:, a. sympathetic division of the autonomic nervous, system., b. sympathetic division of the endocrine system., c. visceral division of the peripheral nervous system., d. parasympathetic division of the autonomic nervous, system., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , a, c, c, b, a, , 5. The optimal level of arousal for a task appears to depend in part on:, a. one’s position on the optimism/pessimism scale., b. how much physiological change an event stimulates., c. the complexity of the task at hand., d. how imminent a stressful event is., , Book Companion Website, , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. José just completed writing an 8-page term paper., When he went to save it, the computer crashed, and he lost all his work. What type of stress is José, experiencing?, a. Frustration, c. Life change, b. Conflict, d. Pressure, , 10. A personality syndrome marked by commitment,, challenge, and control and that appears to be related to, stress resistance is called:, a. hardiness., c. courage., b. optimism., d. conscientiousness., , CHAPTER 3, , Pages 72–73, Pages 72–73, Pages 77–78, Page 76, Pages 77–78, , 3. An approach-avoidance conflict may best be resolved, by __________ the avoidance motivation rather than, __________ the approach motivation., a. decreasing, decreasing, b. decreasing, increasing, c. increasing, decreasing, d. increasing, increasing, , 9. Salvador works as a security guard at a shopping center. His boss overloads him with responsibility but, never gives him any credit for all his hard work. He, feels worn down, disillusioned, and helpless at work., Salvador is probably experiencing:, a. an alarm reaction., b. burnout., c. posttraumatic stress disorder., d. a psychosomatic disorder., , Stress and Its Effects, , d, d, b, a, c, , 2. Secondary appraisal refers to:, a. second thoughts about what to do in a stressful, situation., b. second thoughts about whether an event is genuinely threatening., c. initial evaluation of an event’s relevance, threat, and, stressfulness., d. evaluation of coping resources and options for, dealing with a stressful event., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Concerning the nature of stress, which statement is not, accurate?, a. Stress is an everyday event., b. Stress lies in the eye of the beholder., c. Stress may be embedded in the environment., d. Stress is always imposed on us by others., , 8. Stress can __________ the functioning of the immune, system., a. stimulate, c. suppress, b. destroy, d. enhance, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , c. patterns of physiological arousal were similar, regardless of the type of stress., d. patterns of physiological arousal were different,, even when stressors were similar., , 103

Page 141 :
THE CONCEPT OF COPING, COMMON COPING PATTERNS, OF LIMITED VALUE, Giving Up, Striking Out at Others, Indulging Yourself, Blaming Yourself, Using Defensive Coping, THE NATURE OF CONSTRUCTIVE COPING, APPRAISAL-FOCUSED, CONSTRUCTIVE COPING, Ellis’s Rational Thinking, Humor as a Stress Reducer, Positive Reinterpretation, , 104, , PROBLEM-FOCUSED, CONSTRUCTIVE COPING, Using Systematic Problem Solving, Seeking Help, Using Time More Effectively, Improving Self-Control, EMOTION-FOCUSED, CONSTRUCTIVE COPING, Enhancing Emotional Intelligence, Releasing Pent-Up Emotions, Managing Hostility and Forgiving Others, Meditating, Using Relaxation Procedures, , APPLICATION: ACHIEVING, SELF-CONTROL, Specifying Your Target Behavior, Gathering Baseline Data, Designing Your Program, Executing and Evaluating Your Program, Ending Your Program, CHAPTER 4 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST

Page 142 :
CHAPTER, , Coping, Processes, , 4, “I have begun to believe that I have intellectually and emotionally outgrown my husband. However, I’m not really sure what this means or what, I should do. Maybe this feeling is normal and I should ignore it and continue my present relationship. This seems to be the safest route. Maybe I, should seek a lover while continuing with my husband. Then again, maybe, I should start anew and hope for a beautiful ending with or without a, better mate.”, The woman quoted above is in the throes of a thorny conflict. Although it is, hard to tell just how much emotional turmoil she is experiencing, it’s clear, that she is under substantial stress. What should she do? Is it psychologically healthy to remain in an emotionally hollow marriage? Is seeking a secret lover a reasonable way to cope with this unfortunate situation? Should, she just strike out on her own and let the chips fall where they may? These, questions have no simple answers. As you’ll soon see, decisions about how, to cope with life’s difficulties can be terribly complex., In the previous chapter we discussed the nature of stress and its effects., We learned that stress can be a challenging, exciting stimulus to personal, growth. However, we also saw that stress can prove damaging to people’s, psychological and physical health because it often triggers physiological responses that may be harmful. These responses to stress tend to be largely, automatic. Controlling them depends on the coping responses people make, to stressful situations. Thus, a person’s mental and physical health depends,, in part, on his or her ability to cope effectively with stress., This chapter focuses on how people cope with stress. We begin with a, general discussion of the concept of coping. Then we review some common, coping patterns that tend to have relatively little value. After discussing, , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 105

Page 143 :
these ill-advised coping techniques, we offer an overview of what it means to engage in healthier, “constructive” coping. The remainder of the chapter expands on, , the specifics of constructive coping. We hope our discussion provides you with some new ideas about how, to deal with the stresses of modern life., , The Concept of Coping, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Describe the variety of coping strategies that people use., Discuss whether individuals display distinctive styles of coping., , In Chapter 3, you learned that coping refers to efforts, to master, reduce, or tolerate the demands created by, stress. Let’s take a closer look at this concept and discuss some general points about coping., People cope with stress in many ways. A number of, researchers have attempted to identify and classify the, various coping techniques that people use in dealing, with stress. Their work reveals quite a variety of coping strategies. For instance, in a study of how 255 adult, subjects dealt with stress, McCrae (1984) identified 28, coping techniques. In another study, Carver, Scheier,, and Weintraub (1989) found that they could sort their, participants’ coping tactics into 14 categories, which, are listed in Figure 4.1. Thus, in grappling with stress,, people select their coping tactics from a large and varied menu of options., Individuals have their own styles of coping. Even with, a large menu of coping tactics to choose from, most, people come to rely on some strategies more than oth-, , •, , FIG U R E 4.1, , Types of Coping Strategies, , Classifying coping strategies. Carver, Scheier, and, Weintraub (1989) sorted, their subjects’ coping responses into 14 categories., The categories are listed here, (column 1) with a representative example from each, category (column 2). As you, can see, people use quite a, variety of coping strategies., From Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., &, Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping, strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. Copyright, 1989 by the American Psychological, Association. Reprinted by permission of, the authors., , 106, , PART 1, , ers (Carver & Scheier, 1994; Heszen-Niejodek, 1997)., Of course, an individual’s coping strategies are also influenced by situational demands, and Cheng (2001), has argued that flexibility in coping is more desirable, than consistently relying on the same strategy. The, need for flexibility may explain why people’s coping, strategies show only moderate stability across varied, situations (Schwartz et al., 1999). Nonetheless, to some, extent, each person has an individual style of coping, with life’s difficulties. As we progress through this chapter, it may be fruitful for you to analyze your own style, of coping., Coping strategies vary in their adaptive value. In, everyday terms, when we say that someone “coped with, her problems,” we imply that she handled them effectively. In reality, however, coping processes range from, the helpful to the counterproductive (Carver et al.,, 1989; Vaillant, 2000). For example, coping with the disappointment of not getting a promotion by plotting to, , Coping strategy, , Example, , Active coping, , I take additional action to try to get rid of the problem., , Planning, , I come up with a strategy about what to do., , Suppression of competing activities, , I put aside other activities in order to concentrate on this., , Restraint coping, , I force myself to wait for the right time to do something., , Seeking social support for instrumental, reasons, , I ask people who have had similar experiences what, they did., , Seeking social support for emotional, reasons, , I talk to someone about how I feel., , Positive reinterpretation and growth, , I look for the good in what is happening., , Acceptance, , I learn to live with it., , Turning to religion, , I seek God’s help., , Focus on and venting of emotions, , I get upset and let my emotions out., , Denial, , I refuse to believe that it has happened., , Behavioral disengagement, , I give up the attempt to get what I want., , Mental disengagement, , I turn to work or other substitute activities to take my, mind off things., , Alcohol-drug disengagement, , I drink alcohol or take drugs in order to think about it less., , The Dynamics of Adjustment

Page 144 :
sabotage your company’s computer system would be a, negative way of coping. Hence, we will distinguish between coping patterns that tend to be helpful and those, that tend to be maladaptive. Bear in mind, however, that, our generalizations about the adaptive value of various coping strategies are based on trends or tendencies., , No coping strategy can guarantee a successful outcome., Furthermore, the adaptive value of a coping technique, depends on the exact nature of the situation. As you’ll, see in the next section, even ill-advised coping strategies may have adaptive value in some instances., , Common Coping Patterns, of Limited Value, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Analyze the adaptive value of giving up as a response, to stress., Describe the adaptive value of aggression as a response, to stress., Evaluate the adaptive value of indulging yourself as a, response to stress., , “Recently, after an engagement of 22 months, my fiancée, told me that she was in love with someone else, and that, we were through. I’ve been a wreck ever since. I can’t study, because I keep thinking about her. I think constantly, about what I did wrong in the relationship and why I, wasn’t good enough for her. Getting drunk is the only, way I can get her off my mind. Lately, I’ve been getting, plastered about five or six nights a week. My grades are, really hurting, but I’m not sure that I care.”, This young man is going through a difficult time and, does not appear to be handling it very well. He’s blaming himself for the breakup with his fiancée. He’s turning to alcohol to dull the pain that he feels, and it sounds, like he may be giving up on school. These coping responses aren’t particularly unusual in such situations,, but they’re only going to make his problems worse., In this section, we’ll examine some relatively common coping patterns that tend to be less than optimal., Specifically, we’ll discuss giving up, aggression, selfindulgence, blaming yourself, and defense mechanisms., Some of these coping tactics may be helpful in certain circumstances, but more often than not, they are, counterproductive., , When confronted with stress, people sometimes simply give up and, withdraw from the battle. This response of apathy and inaction tends, to be associated with the emotional, reactions of sadness and dejection., Martin Seligman (1974, 1992) has, , Courtesy of Martin E. P. Seligman, , Giving Up, , Martin Seligman, , ■, , ■, ■, , Discuss the adaptive value of negative self-talk as a, response to stress., Explain how defense mechanisms work., Evaluate the adaptive value of defense mechanisms,, including recent work on healthy illusions., , developed a model of this giving-up syndrome that appears to shed light on its causes. In Seligman’s original, research, animals were subjected to electric shocks they, could not escape. The animals were then given an opportunity to learn a response that would allow them to, escape the shock. However, many of the animals became so apathetic and listless they didn’t even try to, learn the escape response. When researchers made similar manipulations with human subjects using inescapable noise (rather than shock) as the stressor, they observed parallel results (Hiroto & Seligman, 1975). This, syndrome is referred to as learned helplessness. Learned, helplessness is passive behavior produced by exposure to unavoidable aversive events. Unfortunately,, this tendency to give up may be transferred to situations, in which one is not really helpless. Hence, some people, routinely respond to stress with fatalism and resignation, passively accepting setbacks that might be dealt, with effectively. Interestingly, Evans and Stecker (2004), argue that environmental stressors, such as excessive, noise, crowding, and traffic (see Chapter 3), often produce a syndrome that resembles learned helplessness., Seligman originally viewed learned helplessness as, a product of conditioning. However, research with human participants has led Seligman and his colleagues to, revise their theory. Their current model proposes that, people’s cognitive interpretation of aversive events determines whether they develop learned helplessness., Specifically, helplessness seems to occur when individuals come to believe that events are beyond their control. This belief is particularly likely to emerge in people who exhibit a pessimistic explanatory style. Among, other things, such people tend to attribute setbacks to, personal inadequacies instead of situational factors, , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 107

Page 145 :
(Abramson, Seligman, & Teasdale, 1978; Seligman,, 1990)., As you might guess, giving up is not a highly regarded method of coping. Carver and his colleagues, (1989, 1993) have studied this coping strategy, which, they refer to as behavioral disengagement, and found that, it is associated with increased rather than decreased distress. Furthermore, many studies suggest that learned, helplessness can contribute to depression (Seligman &, Isaacowitz, 2000). However, giving up could be adaptive, in some instances. For example, if you were thrown into, a job that you were not equipped to handle, it might, be better to quit rather than face constant pressure and, diminishing self-esteem. There is something to be said, for recognizing one’s limitations and unrealistic goals., , Striking Out at Others, A young man, aged 17, cautiously edged his car into traffic on the Corona Expressway in Los Angeles. His slow, speed apparently irritated the men in a pickup truck behind him. Unfortunately, he angered the wrong men—, they shot him to death. During that same weekend there, were six other roadside shootings in the Los Angeles area., All of them were triggered by minor incidents or “fender, , benders.” Frustrated motorists are attacking each other, more and more frequently, especially on the overburdened, highways of Los Angeles., These tragic incidents of highway violence—so-called, “road rage”—vividly illustrate that people often respond to stressful events by striking out at others with, aggressive behavior. Aggression is any behavior intended to hurt someone, either physically or verbally., Snarls, curses, and insults are much more common, than shootings or fistfights, but aggression of any kind, can be problematic. Many years ago, a team of psychologists (Dollard et al., 1939) proposed the frustrationaggression hypothesis, which held that aggression is always due to frustration. Decades of research eventually, showed that there isn’t an inevitable link between frustration and aggression, but this research also supported, the basic idea that frustration frequently elicits aggression (Berkowitz, 1989)., People often lash out aggressively at others who had, nothing to do with their frustration, especially when they, can’t vent their anger at the real source of their frustration. Thus, you’ll probably suppress your anger rather, , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , Anger: The Misunderstood, Emotion, by Carol Tavris (Simon, & Schuster, 1989), , Book cover, Copyright © 1989 by Simon & Schuster, Inc. Reproduction by permission of the publisher. All rights reserved., , 108, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , © Paul Thomas/The Image Bank/Getty Images, , With the possible exception of anxiety, anger is the, emotion elicited by stress more than any other. It’s a, powerful emotion that can be harnessed to achieve, admirable goals. The work of some of the world’s great, reformers and leaders has been fueled by moral outrage. However, anger also lies at the center of many, human woes—wrecked friendships, destroyed marriages,, murders, and wars. Hence, anger is a profoundly important emotion. Carol Tavris analyzes virtually every facet, of anger in her book. She carefully scrutinizes common, beliefs about anger and concludes that many of them, are inaccurate. For instance, she argues convincingly, against the idea that aggression can drain off anger, through catharsis and the idea that anger and aggression are overpowering, instinctual responses. Tavris’s, book is a delight to read. It’s witty, lively, practical,, thought provoking, and frequently eloquent., Lashing out at others with verbal aggression tends to be an, ineffective coping tactic that often backfires, creating additional, stress.

Page 146 :
Indulging Yourself, Stress sometimes leads to reduced impulse control, or, self-indulgence (Tice, Bratslavsky, & Baumeister, 2001)., , © Rachel Epstein/The Image Works, , than lash out verbally at a police officer who gives you, a speeding ticket. Twenty minutes later, however, you, might be downright brutal in rebuking a waiter who, is slow in serving your lunch. As we discussed in Chapter 2, this diversion of anger to a substitute target was, noticed long ago by Sigmund Freud, who called it displacement. Unfortunately, research suggests that when, people are provoked, displaced aggression is a common, response (Marcus-Newhall et al., 2000)., Freud theorized that behaving aggressively could get, pent-up emotion out of one’s system and thus be adaptive. He coined the term catharsis to refer to this release, of emotional tension. The Freudian notion that it is a, good idea to vent anger has become widely disseminated, and accepted in modern society. Books, magazines, and, self-appointed experts routinely advise that it is healthy, to “blow off steam” and thereby release and reduce anger., However, experimental research generally has not, supported the catharsis hypothesis. Indeed, most studies find just the opposite: behaving in an aggressive manner tends to fuel more anger and aggression (Bushman,, 2002; Bushman, Baumeister, & Stack, 1999). Moreover,, Carol Tavris (1982, 1989) points out that aggressive behavior frequently backfires because it elicits aggressive, responses from others that generate more anger. She, asserts, “Aggressive catharses are almost impossible to, find in continuing relationships because parents, children, spouses and bosses usually feel obliged to aggress, back at you” (1982, p. 131). Thus, the adaptive value of, aggressive behavior tends to be minimal. Hurting someone, especially an irrelevant someone, is not likely to alleviate frustration. Moreover, the interpersonal conflicts, that often emerge from aggressive behavior may produce, additional stress. If you pick a fight with your spouse, after a terrible day at work, you may create new stress, and lose valuable empathy and social support as well., , Experts disagree about whether excessive Internet use should be, characterized as an addiction, but inability to control online, use appears to be an increasingly common syndrome., , For instance, after an exceptionally stressful day, some, people head for their kitchen, a grocery store, or a restaurant in pursuit of something chocolate. In a similar, vein, others cope with stress by making a beeline for the, nearest shopping mall for a spending spree. Still others, respond to stress by indulging in injudicious patterns, of drinking, smoking, gambling, and drug use., In their classification of coping responses, Moos, and Billings (1982) list developing alternative rewards as, a common response to stress. It makes sense that when, things are going poorly in one area of your life, you may, try to compensate by pursuing substitute forms of satisfaction. Thus, it is not surprising that there is evidence, relating stress to increases in eating (Laitinen, Ek, &, Sovio, 2002), smoking (Kassel, Stroud, & Paronis, 2003),, and consumption of alcohol and drugs (Colder, 2001;, Goeders, 2004)., A new manifestation of this coping strategy is the, tendency to immerse oneself in the online world of the, Internet. Kimberly Young (1998) has described a syndrome called Internet addiction, which consists of, , CATHY © Cathy Guisewite Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 109

Page 147 :
spending an inordinate amount of time on the Internet and inability to control online use (see Figure 4.2)., People who exhibit this syndrome tend to feel anxious,, depressed, or empty when they are not online (Kandell,, 1998). Their Internet use is so excessive, it begins to interfere with their functioning at work, at school, or at, home, leading victims to start concealing the extent of, their dependence on the Internet. Some people exhibit, pathological Internet use for one particular purpose,, such as online sex or online gambling, whereas others, exhibit a general, global pattern of Internet addiction, (Davis, 2001). It is difficult to estimate the prevalence, of Internet addiction, but the syndrome does not appear, to be rare (Greenfield, 1999; Morahan-Martin & Schumacher, 2000). Research suggests that Internet addic-, , tion is not limited to shy, male computer whizzes, as one, might expect (Young, 1998). Although there is active, debate about the wisdom of characterizing excessive Internet surfing as an addiction (Griffiths, 1999), it is clear, that this new coping strategy is likely to become increasingly common., There is nothing inherently maladaptive about indulging oneself as a way of coping with life’s stresses. If, a hot fudge sundae or some new clothes can calm your, nerves after a major setback, who can argue? However,, if a person consistently responds to stress with excessive self-indulgence, obvious problems are likely to develop. Excesses in eating may produce obesity. Excesses, in drinking and drug use may endanger one’s health and, affect work quality. Excesses in spending may create, , Internet Addiction Test, To assess your level of addiction, answer the following questions using this scale:, 1 = Not at all, , 2 = Rarely, , 3 = Occasionally, , 4 = Often, , 5 = Always, , 1. How often do you find that you stay online longer than you intended?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 2. How often do you neglect household chores to spend more time online?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 3. How often do you prefer the excitement of the Internet to intimacy with your partner?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 4. How often do you form new relationships with fellow online users?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 5. How often do others in your life complain to you about the amount of time you spend online?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6. How often do your grades or school work suffer because of the amount of time you spend online?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 7. How often do you check your e-mail before something else that you need to do?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 8. How often does your job performance or productivity suffer because of the Internet?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 9. How often do you become defensive or secretive when anyone asks you what you do online?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 10. How often do you block out disturbing thoughts about your life with soothing thoughts of the Internet?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 11. How often do you find yourself anticipating when you will go online again?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 12. How often do you fear that life without the Internet would be boring, empty, and joyless?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 13. How often do you snap, yell, or act annoyed if someone bothers you while you are online?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 14. How often do you lose sleep due to late-night log-ins?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 15. How often do you feel preoccupied with the Internet when off-line, or fantasize about being online?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 16. How often do you find yourself saying “just a few more minutes” when online?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 17. How often do you try to cut down the amount of time you spend online and fail?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 18. How often do you try to hide how long you’ve been online?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 19. How often do you choose to spend more time online over going out with others?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 20. How often do you feel depressed, moody, or nervous when you are off-line, which goes away once you are, back online?, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , After you’ve answered all the questions, add the numbers you selected for each response to obtain a final score. The higher your score, the, greater your level of addiction and the problems your Internet usage causes. Here’s a general scale to help measure your score., 20–39 points: You are an average online user. You may surf the Web a bit too long at times, but you have control over your usage., 40–69 points: You are experiencing frequent problems because of the Internet. You should consider their full impact on your life., 70–100 points: Your Internet usage is causing significant problems in your life. You need to address them now., , •, , FIG U R E 4.2, , Measuring addiction to the Internet. The questions on Young’s (1998) Internet Addiction Test highlight the traits that make up this syndrome. You can check to see whether you exhibit any signs of Internet addiction by responding to the items and computing your score., From Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the Net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction—and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: John Wiley. Copyright ©1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. This, material is used by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., , 110, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment

Page 148 :
havoc in one’s personal finances. Given the risks associated with self-indulgence, it has rather marginal adaptive value., , Blaming Yourself, In a postgame interview after a tough defeat, a prominent football coach was brutally critical of himself. He, said that he had been outcoached, that he had made, poor decisions, and that his game plan was faulty. He, almost eagerly assumed all the blame for the loss himself. In reality, he had taken some reasonable chances, that didn’t go his way and had suffered the effects of, poor execution by his players. Looking at it objectively,, the loss was attributable to the collective failures of 50, or so players and coaches. However, the coach’s unrealistically negative self-evaluation was a fairly typical response to frustration. When confronted by stress (especially frustration and pressure), people often become, highly self-critical., The tendency to engage in “negative self-talk” in, response to stress has been noted by a number of influential theorists. As we will discuss in greater detail, later in this chapter, Albert Ellis (1973, 1987) calls this, phenomenon “catastrophic thinking” and focuses on, how it is rooted in irrational assumptions. Aaron Beck, (1976, 1987) analyzes negative self-talk into specific tendencies. Among other things, he asserts that people often (1) unreasonably attribute their failures to personal, shortcomings, (2) focus on negative feedback from others while ignoring favorable feedback, and (3) make, unduly pessimistic projections about the future. Thus,, if you performed poorly on an exam, you might blame, , it on your woeful stupidity, dismiss a classmate’s comment that the test was unfair, and hysterically predict, that you will flunk out of school., Although recognizing one’s weaknesses has value,, Ellis and Beck agree that self-blame tends to be counterproductive. According to Ellis, catastrophic thinking, causes, aggravates, and perpetuates emotional reactions, to stress that are often problematic. Along even more, serious lines, Beck marshals evidence that negative selftalk can contribute to the development of depressive, disorders., , Using Defensive Coping, Defensive coping is a common response to stress. We, noted in Chapter 2 that the concept of defense mechanisms was originally developed by Sigmund Freud., Though rooted in the psychoanalytic tradition, this, concept has gained acceptance from psychologists of, most persuasions (Cramer, 2000). Building on Freud’s, initial insights, modern psychologists have broadened, the scope of the concept and added to Freud’s list of defense mechanisms., The Nature of Defense Mechanisms, , Defense mechanisms are largely unconscious reactions that protect a person from unpleasant emotions, such as anxiety and guilt. A number of strategies fit, this definition. For example, Laughlin (1979) lists 49, different defenses. In our discussion of Freud’s theory, in Chapter 2, we described seven common defenses., Figure 4.3 introduces another five defenses that people, use with some regularity. Although widely discussed in, , Common Defense Mechanisms, Mechanism, , Example, , Denial of reality. Protecting oneself from unpleasant reality by refusing to perceive or face it., , A smoker concludes that the evidence linking cigarette use to health, problems is scientifically worthless., , Fantasy. Gratifying frustrated desires by imaginary achievements., , A socially inept and inhibited young man imagines himself chosen, by a group of women to provide them with sexual satisfaction., , Intellectualization (isolation). Cutting off emotion from hurtful, situations or separating incompatible attitudes in logic-tight, compartments., , A prisoner on death row awaiting execution resists appeal on his, behalf and coldly insists that the letter of the law be followed., , Undoing. Atoning for or trying to magically dispel unacceptable, desires or acts., , A teenager who feels guilty about masturbation ritually touches door, knobs a prescribed number of times after each occurrence of the act., , Overcompensation. Covering up felt weaknesses by emphasizing, some desirable characteristic, or making up for frustration in one, area by overgratification in another., , A dangerously overweight woman goes on eating binges when she, feels neglected by her husband., , •, , F I G U R E 4.3, , Additional defense mechanisms. Like the seven defense mechanisms described in our discussion of, Freudian theory in Chapter 2 (see Figure 2.4), these five defenses are frequently used in our efforts to, cope with stress., Adapted from Carson, R. C., Butcher, J. N., & Coleman, J. C. (1988). Abnormal psychology and modern life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. Copyright ©, 1988 by Scott, Foresman and Company. Adapted by permission., , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 111

Page 149 :
defense mechanisms work their magic by bending reality in self-serving ways (Bowins, 2004)., , WE B LI N K 4.1, , American Self-Help Clearinghouse Sourcebook, This online clearinghouse provides contact information, for hundreds of self-help groups and organizations across, the United States. For individuals trying to cope with specific problems or challenging life situations, one of these, groups may be particularly helpful with focused advice, and suggestions., , the popular press, defense mechanisms are often misunderstood. We will use a question-answer format to, elaborate on the nature of defense mechanisms in the, hopes of clearing up any misconceptions., What do defense mechanisms defend against?, Above all else, defense mechanisms shield the individual from the emotional discomfort elicited by stress., Their main purpose is to ward off unwelcome emotions, or to reduce their intensity. Foremost among the emotions guarded against is anxiety. People are especially, defensive when the anxiety is the result of some threat, to their self-esteem. They also use defenses to prevent, dangerous feelings of anger from exploding into acts, of aggression. Guilt and dejection are two other emotions that people often try to evade through defensive, maneuvers., How do they work? Defense mechanisms work, through self-deception. They accomplish their goals by, distorting reality so it does not appear so threatening., Let’s say you’re doing poorly in school and are in danger of flunking out. Initially, you might use denial to, block awareness of the possibility that you could flunk, out. This tactic might temporarily fend off feelings of, anxiety. If it becomes difficult to deny the obvious, you, might resort to fantasy, daydreaming about how you will, salvage adequate grades by getting spectacular scores, on the upcoming final exams, when the objective fact, is that you are hopelessly behind in your studies. Thus,, , CALVIN AND HOBBES © Watterson. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , 112, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Are they conscious or unconscious? Mainstream, Freudian theory originally assumed that defenses operate entirely at an unconscious level. However, the, concept of defense mechanisms has been broadened to, include maneuvers that people may have some awareness of. Thus, defense mechanisms operate at varying, levels of awareness and can be conscious or unconscious, reactions (Erdelyi, 2001)., Are they normal? Definitely. Everyone uses defense, mechanisms on a fairly regular basis. They are entirely, normal patterns of coping. The notion that only neurotic people use defense mechanisms is inaccurate., Can Illusions Be Healthy?, , The most critical question concerning defense mechanisms is: Are they healthy? This is a complicated question. More often than not, the answer is no. Generally,, defense mechanisms are poor ways of coping, for a number of reasons. First, defensive coping is an avoidance, strategy, and avoidance rarely provides a genuine solution to our problems. Holahan and Moos (1985, 1990), have found that people who exhibit relatively high resistance to stress use avoidance strategies less than people who are frequently troubled by stress. Second, defenses such as denial, fantasy, and projection represent, “wishful thinking,” which is likely to accomplish little., In fact, in a study of how students coped with the stress, of taking the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT),, Bolger (1990) found that students who engaged in a lot, of wishful thinking experienced greater increases in, anxiety than other students as the exam approached., Third, a repressive coping style has been related to poor, health, in part because repression often leads people to, delay facing up to their problems (Weinberger, 1990)., For example, if you were to block out obvious warning, signs of cancer or diabetes and fail to obtain needed, medical care, your defensive behavior could be fatal.

Page 150 :
Courtesy, Shelley Taylor, , Although defensive behavior tends to be relatively, unhealthy, some defenses are healthier than others,, and defense mechanisms can sometimes be adaptive, (Cramer, 2002; Vaillant, 2000). For example, overcompensation for athletic failures could lead you to work, extra hard in the classroom. And creative use of fantasy is sometimes the key to helping people deal effectively with a temporary period of frustration, such as a, period of recovery in the hospital., Most theorists used to regard, accurate contact with reality as the, hallmark of sound mental health, (Jahoda, 1958; Jourard & Landsman, 1980). However, Shelley Taylor and Jonathon Brown (1988,, 1994) have reviewed several lines, of evidence suggesting that “illusions” may be adaptive for mental, Shelley Taylor, health and well-being. First, they, note that “normal” people tend to, have overly favorable self-images. In contrast, depressed, subjects exhibit less favorable—but more realistic—, self-concepts. Second, normal subjects overestimate, the degree to which they control chance events. In comparison, depressed participants are less prone to this, illusion of control. Third, normal individuals are more, , likely than depressed subjects to display unrealistic optimism in making projections about the future., A variety of other studies have also provided support for the hypothesis that positive illusions promote, well being. For example, studies of individuals diagnosed with AIDS show that those with unrealistically, optimistic expectations of the likely course of their disease actually experience a less rapid course of illness, (Reed et al., 1999). In a laboratory study, Taylor et al., (2003) found that subjects who tended to exhibit positive illusions showed lower cardiovascular responses, to stress, quicker cardiovascular recovery from stress,, and lower levels of a stress hormone., As you might guess, critics have expressed considerable skepticism about the idea that illusions are adaptive. For example, Colvin and Block (1994) make an, eloquent case for the traditional view that accuracy and, realism are healthy. Moreover, they report data showing that overly favorable self-ratings are correlated with, maladaptive personality traits (Colvin, Block, & Funder, 1995). One possible resolution to this debate is Roy, Baumeister’s (1989) theory that it’s all a matter of degree and that there is an “optimal margin of illusion.”, According to Baumeister, extreme self-deception is maladaptive, but small illusions may often be beneficial., , The Nature of Constructive Coping, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Discuss whether constructive coping is related to intelligence., Describe the nature of constructive coping., , Our discussion thus far has focused on coping strategies, that tend to be less than ideal. Of course, people also, exhibit many healthful strategies for dealing with stress., We will use the term constructive coping to refer to, efforts to deal with stressful events that are judged to, be relatively healthful. No strategy of coping can guarantee a successful outcome. Even the healthiest coping, responses may turn out to be ineffective in some cases., Thus, the concept of constructive coping is simply meant, to convey a healthy, positive connotation, without promising success., Constructive coping does not appear to depend, particularly on one’s intelligence—at least not the abstract, “academic” intelligence measured by conventional IQ tests. Seymour Epstein (1990) has shown an, interest in “why smart people think dumb.” His interest, was stimulated in part by a course that he taught in, which students kept daily records of their most positive, and negative emotional experiences, for class discussion. Commenting on these discussions, Epstein noted,, , “One cannot help but be impressed, when observing, students in such a situation, with the degree to which, some otherwise bright people lead their lives in a manifestly unintelligent and self-defeating manner” (Epstein, & Meier, 1989, p. 333)., To investigate this matter more systematically, Epstein and Petra Meier (1989) devised an elaborate scale, to assess the degree to which people engage in constructive coping and thinking. They found constructive thinking to be favorably related to mental and physical health, and to measures of “success” in work, love, and social, relationships. However, participants’ IQ scores were, only weakly related to their constructive coping scores, and were largely unrelated to the measures of success in, work, love, and social relationships., What makes a coping strategy constructive? Frankly,, in labeling certain coping responses constructive or, healthy, psychologists are making value judgments. It’s, a gray area in which opinions will vary to some extent., Nonetheless, some consensus emerges from the bur-, , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 113

Page 151 :
Cartoon, Sally Forth, Copyright © 1984 News Group Chicago, reprinted by permission of North American Syndicate., , geoning research on coping and stress management., Key themes in this literature include the following:, 1. Constructive coping involves confronting problems directly. It is task-relevant and action oriented. It, involves a conscious effort to rationally evaluate your, options in an effort to solve your problems., 2. Constructive coping is based on reasonably realistic appraisals of your stress and coping resources. A, little self-deception may sometimes be adaptive, but excessive self-deception and highly unrealistic negative, thinking are not., 3. Constructive coping involves learning to recognize and manage potentially disruptive emotional, reactions to stress., , 4. Constructive coping involves learning to exert, some control over potentially harmful or destructive, habitual behaviors. It requires the acquisition of some, behavioral self-control., , These points should give you a general idea of what, we mean by constructive coping. They will guide our, discourse in the remainder of this chapter as we discuss, how to cope more effectively with stress. To organize our, discussion, we will use a classification scheme proposed, by Moos and Billings (1982) to divide constructive coping techniques into three broad categories: appraisalfocused coping, problem-focused coping, and emotionfocused coping (see Figure 4.4)., , Constructive coping tactics, , Appraisal-focused, strategies, Detecting and disputing, negative self-talk, Rational thinking, Using positive, reinterpretation, Finding humor in the, situation, Turning to religion, , •, , Problem-focused, strategies, Active problem solving, Seeking social support, Enhancing time, management, Improving self-control, Becoming more assertive, , Emotion-focused, strategies, Releasing pent-up, emotions, Distracting oneself, Managing hostile feelings, Meditating, Using systematic, relaxation procedures, , F I G U R E 4.4, , Overview of constructive coping tactics. Coping tactics can be organized in several ways, but we will use, the classification scheme shown here, which consists of three categories: appraisal-focused, problem-focused,, and emotion-focused. The list of coping tactics in each category is not exhaustive. We will discuss most, but, not all, of the listed strategies in our coverage of constructive coping., , 114, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment

Page 152 :
Appraisal-Focused Constructive Coping, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, ■, , Explain Ellis’s analysis of the causes of maladaptive emotions., Describe some assumptions that contribute to catastrophic thinking., Discuss the merits of positive reinterpretation and humor as coping, strategies., , are the foundation for his widely, used system of therapy. Rationalemotive behavior therapy is an, approach to therapy that focuses, on altering clients’ patterns of irrational thinking to reduce maladaptive emotions and behavior., Ellis maintains that you feel the, way you think. He argues that probAlbert Ellis, lematic emotional reactions are, caused by negative self-talk, which,, as we mentioned earlier, he calls catastrophic thinking., Catastrophic thinking involves unrealistic appraisals, of stress that exaggerate the magnitude of one’s, problems. Ellis uses a simple A-B-C sequence to explain his ideas (see Figure 4.5)., , People often underestimate the importance of the appraisal phase in the stress process. They fail to appreciate the highly subjective feelings that color the perception of threat to one’s well-being. A useful way to deal, with stress is to alter your appraisal of threatening events., In this section, we’ll examine Albert Ellis’s ideas about, reappraisal and discuss the value of using humor and, positive reinterpretation to cope with stress., , Ellis’s Rational Thinking, Albert Ellis (1977, 1985, 1996, 2001) is a prominent theorist who believes that people can short-circuit their, emotional reactions to stress by altering their appraisals, of stressful events. Ellis’s insights about stress appraisal, , A. Activating event. The A in, , The commonsense view, , A, , Activating event, Stress:, Someone stands you up on a, date you looked forward to, , Ellis’s view, , A Activating, event, Stress:, Someone stands you, up on a date you, looked forward to, , •, , C Consequence, Emotional turmoil:, You feel angry, anxious,, agitated, dejected, , B Belief system, , C Consequence, , Irrational appraisal:, ”This is terrible. I’ll, have a boring, weekend. I’ll never, find anyone. I must be, a worthless person.”, , Emotional turmoil:, You feel angry,, anxious, agitated,, dejected, , Rational appraisal:, ”This is unfortunate, but I’ll salvage the, weekend. Someday I’ll, find someone who is, mature and, dependable.”, , Emotional calm:, You feel annoyed, and subdued but, remain hopeful, , F I G U R E 4.5, , Albert Ellis’s A-B-C model of emotional reactions. Most people are prone to attribute their, negative emotional reactions (C) directly to stressful events (A). However, Ellis argues that, emotional reactions are really caused by the way individuals think about these events (B)., , Ellis’s system stands for the activating event that produces the stress., The activating event may be any, potentially stressful transaction., Examples might include an automobile accident, the cancellation, of a date, a delay while waiting in, line at the bank, or a failure to get, a promotion you were expecting., B. Belief system. B stands for, your belief about the event. This, represents your appraisal of the, stress. According to Ellis, people, often view minor setbacks as disasters, engaging in catastrophic, thinking: “How awful this is. I, can’t stand it! Things never turn, out fairly for me. I’ll be in this line, forever. I’ll never get promoted.”, C. Consequence. C stands for, the consequence of your negative, thinking. When your appraisals of, stressful events are highly negative, the consequence tends to be, emotional distress. Thus, you feel, angry, outraged, anxious, panicstricken, disgusted, or dejected., , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 115, , Courtesy, Albert Ellis Institute, , ■

Page 153 :
WE B LI N K 4.2, , The Albert Ellis Institute, Albert Ellis developed rational-emotive behavior therapy in, the mid-1950s as an effective alternative to psychoanalytically inspired treatment approaches. This site demonstrates, the growth of Ellis’s approach over the subsequent decades., , Ellis asserts that most people do not understand, the importance of phase B in this three-stage sequence., They unwittingly believe that the activating event (A), causes the consequent emotional turmoil (C). However, Ellis maintains that A does not cause C. It only, appears to do so. Instead, Ellis asserts that B causes C., Emotional distress is actually caused by one’s catastrophic thinking in appraising stressful events., According to Ellis, it is common for people to turn, inconvenience into disaster and make “mountains out, of molehills.” For instance, imagine that someone stands, you up on a date that you were eagerly looking forward, to. You might think, “Oh, this is terrible. I’m going to, have another rotten, boring weekend. People always, mistreat me. I’ll never find anyone to fall in love with. I, must be a crummy, worthless person.” Ellis would argue, that such thoughts are irrational. He would point out, that it does not follow logically from being stood up that, you (1) must have a lousy weekend, (2) will never fall, in love, or (3) are a worthless person., The Roots of Catastrophic Thinking, , Ellis (1994, 1995) theorizes that unrealistic appraisals of, stress are derived from the irrational assumptions that, people hold. He maintains that if you scrutinize your, catastrophic thinking, you will find that your reasoning, is based on an unreasonable premise, such as “I must, have approval from everyone” or “I must perform well, in all endeavors.” These faulty assumptions, which most, people hold unconsciously, generate catastrophic thinking and emotional turmoil. To facilitate emotional selfcontrol, it is important to learn to spot irrational assumptions and the unhealthy patterns of thought that, they generate. Let’s look at four particularly common, irrational assumptions., 1. I must have love and affection from certain people. Everyone wants to be liked and loved. There is, nothing wrong with that. However, many people foolishly believe that they should be liked by everyone they, come into contact with. If you stop to think about it,, that’s clearly unrealistic. Once individuals fall in love,, they tend to believe that their future happiness depends, absolutely on the continuation of that one, special relationship. They believe that if their current love relationship were to end, they would never again be able, 116, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , to achieve a comparable one. This is an unrealistic view, of the future. Such views make the person anxious, during a relationship and severely depressed if it comes, to an end., 2. I must perform well in all endeavors. We live in, a highly competitive society. We are taught that victory brings happiness. Consequently, we feel that we, must always win. For example, many sports enthusiasts are never satisfied unless they perform at their best, level. However, by definition, their best level is not their, typical level, and they set themselves up for inevitable, frustration., 3. Other people should always behave competently, and be considerate of me. People are often angered by, others’ stupidity and selfishness. For example, you may, become outraged when a mechanic fails to fix your car, properly or when a salesperson treats you rudely. It, would be nice if others were always competent and considerate, but you know better—they are not! Yet many, people go through life unrealistically expecting others’, efficiency and kindness., , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , How to Stubbornly Refuse, to Make Yourself Miserable, About Anything—Yes, Anything!, by Albert Ellis (Carol Communications, 1988), This is one of the better “popular” books by Albert, Ellis, the world-renowned architect of rational-emotive, behavior therapy. At last count, Ellis had written around, 50 books, about evenly divided between popular books, intended for a general audience and technical books, intended for mental health professionals. This book, doesn’t break any new ground for Ellis, but it does bring, his ideas together in one succinct, readable summary,, complete with exercises. Ellis is a bit prone to overstatement, asserting that his book “will help you, achieve a profound philosophic change and a radically, new outlook on life.” Whether it does so or not, his, ideas can clearly be helpful in coping with stress more, effectively. If you tend to fall into the trap of overly, negative thinking, this book is worth reading. Other, recent self-help titles from Ellis that cover much of the, same ground include How to Make Yourself Happy and, Remarkably Less Disturbable (1999), Feeling Better, Getting Better, Staying Better: Profound Self-Help Therapy, for Your Emotions (2001), and Ask Albert Ellis: Straight, Answers and Sound Advice from America’s Best-Known, Psychologist (2003)., Cover image reprinted by permission of Carol Publishing Group.

Page 154 :
100, , Mood disturbance, , 4. Events should always go the way I like. Some, people simply won’t tolerate any kind of setback. They, assume that things should always go their way. For example, some commuters become tense and angry each, time they get stuck in a rush-hour traffic jam. They seem, to believe that they are entitled to coast home easily, every day, even though they know that rush hour rarely, is a breeze. Such expectations are clearly unrealistic, and doomed to be violated. Yet few people recognize the, obvious irrationality of the assumption that underlies, their anger unless it is pointed out to them., , 80, , r, , o, hum, Low, , 60, 40, , umor, High h, , 20, 0, 0, , Reducing Catastrophic Thinking, , How can you reduce your unrealistic appraisals of stress?, Ellis asserts that you must learn (1) how to detect catastrophic thinking and (2) how to dispute the irrational, assumptions that cause it. Detection involves acquiring the ability to spot unrealistic pessimism and wild, exaggeration in your thinking. Examine your self-talk, closely. Ask yourself why you’re getting upset. Force, yourself to verbalize your concerns, covertly or out loud., Look for key words that often show up in catastrophic, thinking, such as should, ought, never, and must., Disputing your irrational assumptions requires, subjecting your entire reasoning process to scrutiny., Try to root out the assumptions from which your conclusions are derived. Most of us are unaware of these, assumptions. Once they are unearthed, their irrationality may be quite obvious. If your assumptions seem reasonable, ask yourself whether your conclusions follow, logically. Try to replace your catastrophic thinking with, more low-key, rational analyses. These strategies should, help you to redefine stressful situations in ways that, are less threatening. Strangely enough, another way to, defuse such situations is to turn to humor., , Humor as a Stress Reducer, A number of years ago, the Chicago area experienced, its worst flooding in about a century. Thousands of people saw their homes wrecked when two rivers spilled, over their banks. As the waters receded, the flood victims returning to their homes were subjected to the inevitable TV interviews. A remarkable number of victims, surrounded by the ruins of their homes, joked, about their misfortune. When the going gets tough, it, may pay to laugh about it. In a study of coping styles,, McCrae (1984) found that 40 percent of his subjects, reported using humor to deal with stress., Empirical evidence showing that humor moderates the impact of stress has been accumulating over, the last 25 years (Lefcourt, 2001). For instance, in one, influential study, Martin and Lefcourt (1983) found, that a good sense of humor functioned as a buffer to, lessen the negative impact of stress on mood. Some of, their results are presented in Figure 4.6, which shows, , •, , 10, , 20, Stress, , 30, , 40, , FIG U R E 4.6, , Humor and coping. Martin and Lefcourt (1983) related stress to, mood disturbance in subjects who were either high or low in their, use of humor. Increased stress led to smaller increases in mood, disturbance in the high-humor group, suggesting that humor has, some value in efforts to cope with stress., Adapted from Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the, relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (6),, 1313–1324. Copyright © 1983 by the American Psychological Association. Adapted by permission., , how mood disturbance increased as stress went up in, two groups of participants—those who were high or low, in their use of humor. Notice how higher stress leads, to a smaller increase in mood disturbance in the highhumor group. Similar findings have been observed in, other studies (Abel, 1998; Martin, 1996). Although there, are some inconsistencies in the data, researchers have, also found an association between humor and enhanced, immune function, greater pain tolerance, and fewer, symptoms of illness (Martin, 2001)., How does humor help to reduce the effects of stress, and promote wellness? Several explanations have been, proposed (see Figure 4.7 on the next page). One possibility is that humor affects appraisals of stressful events, (Abel, 2002). Jokes can help people put a less-threatening, spin on their trials and tribulations. Another possibility is that humor increases the experience of positive, emotions (Martin, 2002). As we discussed in Chapter 3,, positive emotions can help people bounce back from, stressful events (Tugade & Fredrickson, 2004). Another, hypothesis is that a good sense of humor facilitates positive social interactions, which promote social support,, which is known to buffer the effects of stress (Martin,, 2002). Finally, Lefcourt and colleagues (1995) argue, that high-humor people may benefit from not taking, themselves as seriously as low-humor people do. As they, put it,“If persons do not regard themselves too seriously, and do not have an inflated sense of self-importance,, then defeats, embarrassments, and even tragedies should, have less pervasive emotional consequences for them”, (p. 375). Thus, humor is a rather versatile coping strategy that may have many benefits., CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 117

Page 155 :
However, comparing your own plight with, others’ even tougher struggles can help you, Less threatening, appraisals of stressful, put your problems in perspective. Research, events, suggests that this strategy of making positive, comparisons with others is a common coping mechanism that can result in improved, Increased, experience of positive, mood and self-esteem (Wills & Sandy, 2001)., emotions, Wellness,, Moreover, this strategy does not depend on, reduced effects, Good sense, knowing others who are clearly worse off., from stressful, of humor, You can simply imagine yourself in a similar, life events, Rewarding social, relations, greater social, situation with an even worse outcome (exsupport, ample: two broken legs after a horse-riding, accident instead of just one). One healthy, aspect of positive reinterpretation is that it, Takes self less, can facilitate calming reappraisals of stress, seriously than others, without the necessity of distorting reality., Another way to engage in positive reinterpretation is to search for something good, in a bad experience. Distressing though they, FIG U R E 4.7, may be, many setbacks have positive elements. After experiencing divorces, illnesses,, Possible explanations for the link between humor and wellness. Research suggests that a good sense of humor buffers the effects of stress and promotes wellfirings, financial losses, and such, many peoness. Four hypothesized explanations for the link between humor and wellness are, ple remark that “I came out of the experience, outlined in the middle column of this diagram. As you can see, humor may have, better than I went in,” or “I grew as a pera variety of beneficial effects., son.” Studies of victims of natural disasters,, heart attacks, and bereavement have found, an association between this type of benefit, Positive Reinterpretation, finding under duress and relatively sound psychologiWhen you are feeling overwhelmed by life’s difficulties,, cal and physical health (Tennen & Affleck, 2002). Of, you might try the commonsense strategy of recognizcourse, the positive aspects of a personal setback may, ing that “things could be worse.” No matter how terribe easy to see after the stressful event is behind you., ble your problems seem, you probably know someone, The challenge is to recognize these positive aspects while, who has even bigger troubles. That is not to say that, you are still struggling with the setback, so that it beyou should derive satisfaction from others’ misfortune., comes less stressful., , •, , Problem-Focused Constructive Coping, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , List and describe four steps in systematic problem, solving., Discuss the adaptive value of seeking help as a coping, strategy., Explain five common causes of wasted time., , Problem-focused coping includes efforts to remedy or, conquer the stress-producing problem itself. In this, category, we’ll discuss systematic problem solving, the, importance of seeking help, effective time management, and improvement of self-control., , Using Systematic Problem Solving, In dealing with life’s problems, the most obvious course, of action is to tackle the problems head-on. Obviously,, people vary in their problem-solving skills. However,, 118, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , ■, , ■, , Describe evidence on the causes and consequences of, procrastination., Summarize advice on managing time effectively., , evidence suggests that problem-solving skills can be enhanced through training (Heppner & Lee, 2002). With, this thought in mind, we will sketch a general outline, of how to engage in more systematic problem solving., The problem-solving plan described here is a synthesis, of observations by various experts, especially Mahoney, (1979), Miller (1978), and Chang and Kelly (1993)., Clarify the Problem, , You can’t tackle a problem if you’re not sure what the, problem is. Therefore, the first step in any systematic

Page 156 :
problem-solving effort is to clarify the nature of the, problem. Sometimes the problem will be all too obvious. At other times the source of trouble may be quite, difficult to pin down. In any case, you need to arrive at, a specific concrete definition of your problem., Two common tendencies typically hinder people’s, efforts to get a clear picture of their problems. First, they, often describe their problems in vague generalities (“My, life isn’t going anywhere” or “I never have enough time”)., Second, they tend to focus too much on negative feelings, thereby confusing the consequences of problems, (“I’m so depressed all the time” or “I’m so nervous I, can’t concentrate”) with the problems themselves., Generate Alternative Courses of Action, , The second step in systematic problem solving is to generate alternative courses of action. Notice that we did, not call these alternative solutions. Many problems do, not have a readily available solution that will completely, resolve the problem. If you think in terms of searching, for complete solutions, you may prevent yourself from, considering many worthwhile courses of action. Instead,, it is more realistic to search for alternatives that may, produce some kind of improvement in your situation., Besides avoiding the tendency to insist on solutions,, you need to avoid the temptation to go with the first alternative that comes to mind. Many people are a little, trigger-happy. They thoughtlessly try to follow through, on the first response that occurs to them. Various lines, of evidence suggest that it is wiser to engage in brainstorming about a problem. Brainstorming is generating as many ideas as possible while withholding criticism and evaluation. In other words, you generate, alternatives without paying any attention to their apparent practicality. This approach facilitates creative, expression of ideas., Evaluate Your Alternatives, and Select a Course of Action, , Once you generate as many alternatives as you can, you, need to start evaluating the possibilities. There are no, simple criteria for judging the relative merits of your, alternatives. However, you will probably want to address, three general issues. First, ask yourself whether each, alternative is realistic. In other words, what is the probability that you can successfully execute the intended, course of action? Try to think of any obstacles you may, have failed to anticipate. In making this assessment, it, is important to try to avoid both foolish optimism and, unnecessary pessimism., Second, consider any costs or risks associated with, each alternative. The “solution” to a problem is sometimes worse than the problem itself. Assuming you can, successfully implement your intended course of action,, what are the possible negative consequences? Finally,, compare the desirability of the probable outcomes of, , each alternative. After eliminating the unrealistic possibilities, list the probable consequences (both good, and bad) associated with each alternative. Then review, and compare the desirability of these potential outcomes. In making your decision, you have to ask yourself “What is important to me? Which outcomes do I, value the most?”, Take Action While Maintaining Flexibility, , After you have chosen your course of action, you should, follow through in implementing your plan. In so doing, try to maintain flexibility. Do not get locked into a, particular course of action. Few choices are truly irreversible. You need to monitor results closely and be willing to revise your strategy., In evaluating your course of action, try to avoid, the simplistic success/failure dichotomy. You should, simply look for improvement of any kind. If your plan, doesn’t work out too well, consider whether it was undermined by any circumstances that you could not have, anticipated. Finally, remember that you can learn from, your failures. Even if things did not work out, you may, now have new information that will facilitate a new attack on the problem., , Seeking Help, In Chapter 3, we learned that social support can be a, powerful force that helps buffer the deleterious effects, of stress and that has positive effects of its own (Wills, & Fegan, 2001). We discussed social support as if it were, a stable, external resource available to different people, in varying degrees. In reality, social supports fluctuate, over time and evolve out of individuals’ interactions, with others (Newcomb, 1990). Some people have more, support than others because they have personal characteristics that attract more support or because they make, more effort to seek support., In trying to tackle problems directly, it pays to keep, in mind the value of seeking aid from friends, family,, co-workers, and neighbors. Because of potential embarrassment, many people are reluctant to acknowledge, their problems and look for help from others. What, makes this reluctance so lamentable is that others can, provide a great deal of help in many ways., , WE B LI N K 4.3, , Mind Tools, James Manktelow’s site in England offers practical techniques to help people deal with the world more efficiently, and effectively. The site houses useful information on several of the topics discussed in this chapter, including stress, management, time management, and effective problem, solving., , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 119

Page 157 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Thinking Rationally About the Threat of Terrorism, Acts of terrorism are intended to provoke psychological, instability in a population. The death, destruction, and, havoc wreaked by terrorists is not an end in itself, but, a means to an end—the creation of widespread anxiety,, fear, and alarm (Everly & Mitchell, 2001). Unfortunately,, a normal feature of human mental processing makes it, much too easy for terrorists to achieve their goal. However, being aware of this cognitive tendency can help, people to be more rational about the threat of terrorist, acts. To introduce you to this cognitive tendency, consider the following problem:, Various causes of death are paired up below. For each, pairing, decide which is the more likely cause of death., Asthma or tornadoes?, Syphilis or botulism (food poisoning)?, Tuberculosis or floods?, Would you believe that the first choice in each pair, causes at least 18 times as many deaths as the second, choice? If your guesses were wrong, don’t feel bad. Most, people tend to greatly overestimate the likelihood of dramatic, vivid—but infrequent—events that receive heavy, media coverage. Thus, the number of fatalities caused, by tornadoes, floods, and food poisonings is usually, overestimated (Slovic, Fischhoff, & Lichtenstein, 1982),, whereas fatalities caused by asthma and other run-ofthe-mill diseases tend to be underestimated. This tendency to overestimate the improbable reflects the operation of the availability heuristic, which involves basing, the estimated probability of an event on the ease with, which relevant instances come to mind., , Using Time More Effectively, Do you constantly feel that you have too much to do,, and too little time to do it in? Do you feel overwhelmed, by your responsibilities at work, at school, and at home?, Do you feel like you’re always rushing around, trying, to meet an impossible schedule? If you answered yes, to some of these questions, you’re struggling with time, pressure. You can estimate how well you manage time, by responding to the brief questionnaire in Figure 4.8., If the results suggest that your time is out of your con-, , 120, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Relying on the availability heuristic is a normal, cognitive tendency. However, to the extent that certain, events occur infrequently but are easily available in memory, your estimates will be biased. Instances of floods,, tornadoes, and other disasters are readily available in, memory because these events receive a great deal of publicity. The same principle applies to terrorist acts. The, round-the-clock news coverage of terrorist attacks means, that they are constantly on people’s minds and highly, available in memory. The result is that people tend to, greatly exaggerate the likelihood that they might be, a victim of terrorism, and such overestimates fuel the, anxiety and alarm that terrorists seek to create., Admittedly, no one knows what the future might, bring in the way of terrorist attacks. However, based, on what has happened in recent years, your chances of, being harmed by a terrorist are microscopic in comparison to your chances of perishing in an automobile accident (Myers, 2001). Since 9/11, many Americans have, been reluctant to fly because the airplane hijackings, that occurred on 9/11 remain salient in their minds. But, think about: Even if you knew in advance that terrorists, planned to blow up a commercial flight next week, your, chances of choosing that specific flight would only be, about 1 in 173,000., In sum, it is wise to be mindful of the natural tendency to overestimate the likelihood that you might be, harmed by terrorist attacks. Thinking more rationally about, the probability of being victimized by terrorism can, reduce people’s collective sense of alarm and thwart the, main objective of terrorism, which is the cultivation, of fear., , trol, you may be able to make your life less stressful by, learning sound time-management strategies., R. Alec Mackenzie (1997), a prominent timemanagement researcher, points out that time is a nonrenewable resource. It can’t be stockpiled like money,, food, or other precious resources. You can’t turn back, the clock. Furthermore, everyone, whether rich or poor,, gets an equal share of time—24 hours per day, 7 days a, week. Although time is our most equitably distributed, resource, some people spend it much more wisely than

Page 158 :
others. Let’s look at some of the ways in which people, let time slip through their fingers without accomplishing much., The Causes of Wasted Time, , When people complain about “wasted time,” they’re, usually upset because they haven’t accomplished what, they really wanted to do with their time. Wasted time is, time devoted to unnecessary, unimportant, or unenjoyable activities. Why waste time on such activities? There, are many reasons., , How Well Do You Manage Your Time?, Listed below are ten statements that reflect generally accepted principles of good time management. Answer these, items by circling the response most characteristic of how, you perform your job. Please be honest. No one will know, your answers except you., 1. Each day I set aside a small amount of time for planning and thinking about my job., 0. Almost never 1. Sometimes 2. Often 3. Almost always, 2. I set specific, written goals and put deadlines on them., 0. Almost never 1. Sometimes 2. Often 3. Almost always, 3. I make a daily “to do list,” arrange items in order of, importance, and try to get the important items done as, soon as possible., 0. Almost never 1. Sometimes 2. Often 3. Almost always, , Inability to set or stick to priorities. Time consultant Alan Lakein (1996) emphasizes that it’s often, tempting to deal with routine, trivial tasks ahead of, larger and more difficult tasks. Thus, students working, on a major term paper often read their mail, do the, dishes, fold the laundry, reorganize their desk, or dust, the furniture instead of concentrating on the paper., Routine tasks are easy, and working on them allows people to rationalize their avoidance of more important, tasks. Unfortunately, many of us spend too much time, on trivial pursuits, leaving our more important tasks, undone., Inability to say no. Other people are constantly, making demands on our time. They want us to exchange, gossip in the hallway, go out to dinner on Friday night,, cover their hours at work, help with a project, listen to, their sales pitch on the phone, join a committee, or coach, Little League. Clearly, we can’t do everything that everyone wants us to. However, some people just can’t say no, to others’ requests for their time. Such people end up, fulfilling others’ priorities instead of their own. Thus,, McDougle (1987) concludes, “Perhaps the most successful way to prevent yourself from wasting time is by, saying no” (p. 112)., Inability to delegate responsibility. Some tasks, should be delegated to others—secretaries, subordinates, fellow committee members, assistant coaches,, spouses, children, and so on. However, many people, have difficulty delegating work to others. Barriers to, delegation include unwillingness to give up any control, lack of confidence in subordinates, fear of being, disliked, the need to feel needed, and the attitude that, “I can do it better myself ” (Mitchell, 1987). The problem, of course, is that people who can’t delegate waste, a lot of time on trivial work or others’ work., Inability to throw things away. Some people are, pack rats who can’t throw anything into the wastebasket. Their desks are cluttered with piles of mail, newspapers, magazines, reports, and books. Their filing cabinets overflow with old class notes or ancient memos., , 4. I am aware of the 80/20 rule and use it in doing my, job. (The 80/20 rule states that 80 percent of your, effectiveness will generally come from achieving only, 20 percent of your goals.), 0. Almost never 1. Sometimes 2. Often 3. Almost always, 5. I keep a loose schedule to allow for crises and the, unexpected., 0. Almost never 1. Sometimes 2. Often 3. Almost always, 6. I delegate everything I can to others., 0. Almost never 1. Sometimes 2. Often 3. Almost always, 7. I try to handle each piece of paper only once., 0. Almost never 1. Sometimes 2. Often 3. Almost always, 8. I eat a light lunch so I don’t get sleepy in the afternoon., 0. Almost never 1. Sometimes 2. Often 3. Almost always, 9. I make an active effort to keep common interruptions, (visitors, meetings, telephone calls) from continually, disrupting my work day., 0. Almost never 1. Sometimes 2. Often 3. Almost always, 10. I am able to say no to others’ requests for my time that, would prevent my completing important tasks., 0. Almost never 1. Sometimes 2. Often 3. Almost always, To get your score, give yourself, 3 points for each “almost always”, 2 points for each “often”, 1 point for each “sometimes”, 0 points for each “almost never”, Add up your points to get your total score., If you scored, 0–15, 15–20, 20–25, 25–30, , •, , Better give some thought to managing your time., You’re doing OK, but there’s room for improvement., Very good., You cheated!, , FIG U R E 4.8, , Assessing your time management. The brief questionnaire, shown here is designed to evaluate the quality of one’s time, management. Although it is geared more for working adults than, college students, it should allow you to get a rough handle on, how well you manage your time., From Le Boeuf, M. (1980, February). Managing time means managing yourself. Business, Horizons Magazine, p. 45. Copyright © by the Foundation for the School of Business at, Indiana University. Used with permission., , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 121

Page 159 :
© Bruce Ayres/Stone/Getty Images, , For many people, an inability to throw things away is a key, factor promoting wasted time., , At home, their kitchen drawers bulge with rarely used, utensils, their closets bulge with old clothes that are, never worn, and their attics bulge with discarded junk., Pack rats waste time in at least two ways. First, they lose, time looking for things that have disappeared among, all the chaos. Second, they end up reshuffling the same, paper, rereading the same mail, resorting the same reports, and so on. According to Mackenzie (1997), they, would be better off if they made more use of their, wastebaskets., Inability to accept anything less than perfection., High standards are admirable, but some people have, difficulty finishing projects because they expect them, to be flawless. They can’t let go. They dwell on minor, problems and keep making microscopic changes in, their papers, projects, and proposals. They are caught, in what Emanuel (1987) calls the “paralysis of perfection.” They end up spinning their wheels, redoing the, same work over and over., The Problem of Procrastination, , Another time-related problem is procrastination—, the tendency to delay tackling tasks until the last, minute. Almost everyone procrastinates on occasion., For example, 70–90 percent of college students procrastinate before beginning academic assignments, (Knaus, 2000). However, research suggests that about, 20 percent of adults are chronic procrastinators (Ferrari, 2001). Procrastination is more likely when people, have to work on aversive tasks or when they are worried about their performance being evaluated (Milgram, Marshevsky, & Sadeh, 1995; Senecal, Lavoie, &, Koestner, 1997)., Although many people rationalize their delaying, tactics by claiming that “I work best under pressure”, (Ferrari, 1992; Lay, 1995), the empirical evidence suggests otherwise. Studies show that procrastination tends, , 122, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , to have a negative impact on the quality of task performance (Ferrari, Johnson, & McCown, 1995; Tice & Baumeister, 1997). Why? Late starters may often underestimate how much time will be required to complete a, task effectively, or they experience unforeseen delays, and then run out of time because they didn’t allow any, “cushion.” Another consideration is that waiting until, the last minute may make a task more stressful—and as, we saw in Chapter 3, performance often suffers under, conditions of high stress. Moreover, performance may, not be the only thing that suffers when people procrastinate. Studies indicate that as a deadline looms, procrastinators tend to experience elevated anxiety and, increased health problems (Lay et al., 1989; Tice &, Baumeister, 1997)., Why do people procrastinate? Personality factors, that contribute to procrastination include low conscientiousness (Watson, 2001), low self-efficacy (Haycock,, McCarthy, & Skay, 1998), and excessive perfectionism, (Flett, Hewitt, & Martin, 1995). The type of irrational, thinking described by Albert Ellis also seems to foster, procrastination (Bridges & Roig, 1997), as does a strong, fear of failure (Lay, 1992). Roy Baumeister (1997) argues that procrastination is one of many types of selfdefeating behavior in which people choose courses of, action that yield short-term gains despite their longterm costs. In the case of procrastination, the shortterm payoff is the avoidance of an unpleasant task,, whereas the long-term costs consist of impaired performance and increased stress., Procrastination can also be a frequent problem in, relation to health care. People who recognize that they, need to alter their eating behavior or start an exercise, regimen routinely put off these commitments, promising themselves that they will start tomorrow, or next, week, or next month. In a similar vein, many people, procrastinate about getting health checkups or even, seeking medical treatment for existing maladies (Sirois,, Melia-Gordon, & Pychyl, 2003). People who struggle, with procrastination often impose deadlines and penalties on themselves. This practice can be helpful, but, self-imposed deadlines are not as effective as externally, imposed deadlines (Ariely & Wertenbroch, 2002)., Time-Management Techniques, , What’s the key to better time management? Most people assume that it’s increased efficiency—that is, learning to perform tasks more quickly. Improved efficiency, may help a little, but time-management experts maintain that efficiency is overrated. They emphasize that, the key to better time management is increased effectiveness—that is, learning to allocate time to your most, important tasks. This distinction is captured by a widely, quoted slogan in the time-management literature: “Efficiency is doing the job right, while effectiveness is doing

Page 160 :
the right job.” Let’s look at the experts’ suggestions about, how to use time more effectively (based on Lakein, 1996;, Mackenzie, 1997; Morgenstern, 2000):, 1. Monitor your use of time. The first step toward, , better time management is to monitor your use of time, to see where it all goes (Douglass & Douglass, 1993)., Doing so requires keeping a written record of your activities, similar to that shown in Figure 4.9. At the end, of each week, you should analyze how your time was, allocated. Based on your personal roles and responsibilities, create categories of time use such as studying,, , Monday, 7 a.m., 8, 9, 10, , Tuesday Wednesday Thursday, , Friday, , p,, Wake-u, ,, jogging, shower,, breakfast, ily, with fam, , Bus to, campus, , Molly to, daycare, , Bus to, campus, , Medical, Anthropology, , Teach, class, , 12 noon, , lunch, , 1 p.m., , Biology, seminar, , lunch, , Molly to, daycare, Prepare, lecture, , Bus to, campus, , Medical, Anthropology, , lunch, , pick up Molly writing at, home, at daycare, , lunch and, shopping, with, Barbara, , Lab work, , Sunday, Sleep in, , ach Waffles for, at be, Walk ic, family. Read, V, with, Sunday, paper, , •, , FIG U R E 4.9, , Example of a time log. Experts, recommend keeping a detailed, record of how you use your time, if you are to improve your time, management. The example depicted here shows the kind, of record keeping that should, be done., , Clean, house, , Teach, class, , writing at, home, , 2, , Saturday, Sleep in, , Prepare, Medical, gy lecture, Anthropolo, , 11, , child care, housework, commuting, working at the office, working at home, going online, eating, and sleeping. For each day, add up the hours allocated to each, category. Record this information on a summary sheet, like that in Figure 4.10 (on the next page). Two weeks, of record keeping should allow you to draw some conclusions about where your time goes. Your records will, help you make informed decisions about reallocating, your time. When you begin your time-management program, these records will also give you a baseline for comparison, so that you can see whether your program is, working., , lunch, , pick up Molly, at daycare, , Work in, garden, , Hiking, and picnic, with family, and Tom, , writing at, home, , 3, Drive Florrie, to piano, lesson, , 4, , 6, , Dinner, at home, , 7, , Spend time, with Vic, and kids, , 8, , Guitar, lesson, , Dinner, at home, , Dinner, at home, , Dinner, at home, Spend time, with Vic, and kids, , Women’s, meeting, Practice, guitar, , 9, , 11, , Practice, guitar, , Grocery, shopping, , 5, , 10, , Molly to, dentist, , Practice, guitar, , Dinner out, with Vic, , Pick up, babysitter, , t, , Party a, Reid’s, , Call, mother, , Band, rehearsal, Watch, TV, , Reading, al, and journ, , Sleep, , 12, 1 a.m., , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 123

Page 161 :
•, , FIG U R E 4.10, , Time Use Summary Form, , Time use summary. To analyze where your time goes,, you need to review your time, log and create a weekly time, use summary, like the one, shown here. The exact categories to be listed on the, left depend on your circumstances and responsibilities., , Activity, , Mon., , Tues., , Wed., , Thurs., , Fri., , Sat., , Sun., , Total, , %, , 8, , 6, , 8, , 6, , 8, , 7, , 9, , 52, , 31, , 1. Sleeping, 2. Eating, , 2, , 2, , 3, , 2, , 3, , 2, , 3, , 17, , 10, , 3. Commuting, , 2, , 2, , 2, , 2, , 2, , 0, , 0, , 10, , 6, , 4. Housework, , 0, , 1, , 0, , 3, , 0, , 0, , 2, , 6, , 4, , 5. In class, , 4, , 2, , 4, , 2, , 4, , 0, , 0, , 16, , 9, , 6. Part-time job, , 0, , 5, , 0, , 5, , 0, , 3, , 0, , 13, , 8, , 7. Studying, , 3, , 2, , 4, , 2, , 0, , 4, , 5, , 20, , 12, , 8. Relaxing, , 5, , 4, , 3, , 2, , 7, , 8, , 5, , 34, , 20, , 9., 10., , 2. Clarify your goals. You can’t wisely allocate your, time unless you decide what you want to accomplish, with your time. Lakein (1996) suggests that you ask, yourself, “What are my lifetime goals?” Write down all, the goals that you can think of, even relatively frivolous, things like going deep-sea fishing or becoming a wine, , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , Time Management from the, Inside Out: The Foolproof, System for Taking Control of, Your Schedule—and Your Life, by Julie Morgenstern (Henry Holt, 2000), If you’re locked in a perennial struggle with time—and, if you’re losing the battle—this book may be worth, your time. Julie Morgenstern, whose first book dealt, with improving personal organization, offers insightful, analyses of why most of us never have enough time., She begins by describing a host of barriers to effective, time use, such as unrealistic workloads, interruptionrich environments, unclear priorities, fear of failure,, and perfectionism. She then discusses how to evaluate, your use of time and how to prioritize your goals. She, devotes quite a bit of attention to scheduling and, planning and to modern devices intended to aid these, processes (datebooks, computerized calendar programs,, personal digital assistants, and so forth). This discussion is followed by a wealth of advice on how to be, more efficient and make better choices in allocating, your time. Time Management from the Inside Out is succinct, entertaining, and practical., Cover image © 2000 by Henry Holt and Co. Reprinted by permission of Henry Holt, & Co., LLC., , 124, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , expert. Some of your goals will be in conflict. For instance, you can’t become a vice-president at your company in Wichita and still move to the West Coast. Thus,, the tough part comes next. You have to wrestle with, your goal conflicts. Figure out which goals are most, important to you, and order them in terms of priority., These priorities should guide you as you plan your activities on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis., 3. Plan your activities using a schedule. People resist planning because it takes time, but in the long run, it saves time. Thorough planning is essential to effective, time management (McGee-Cooper & Trammell, 1994)., At the beginning of each week, you should make up a, list of short-term goals. This list should be translated, into daily “to do” lists of planned activities. To avoid, the tendency to put off larger projects, break them into, smaller, manageable components, and set deadlines for, completing the components. Your planned activities, should be allocated to various time slots on a written, schedule. Schedule your most important activities into, the time periods when you tend to be most energetic, and productive., 4. Protect your prime time. The best-laid plans can, quickly go awry because of interruptions. There isn’t, any foolproof way to eliminate interruptions, but you, may be able to shift most of them into certain time, slots while protecting your most productive time. The, trick is to announce to your family, friends, and coworkers that you’re blocking off certain periods of “quiet, time” when visitors and phone calls will be turned, away. Of course, you also have to block off periods of, “available time” when you’re ready to deal with everyone’s problems., 5. Increase your efficiency. Although efficiency is, not the key to better time management, it’s not irrelevant. Time-management experts do offer some suggestions for improving efficiency, including the following, (Klassen, 1987; Schilit, 1987):

Page 162 :
Improving Self-Control, , ■ Handle paper once. When memos, letters, reports,, and such arrive on your desk, they should not be stashed, away to be read again and again before you deal with, them. Most paperwork can and should be dealt with, immediately., ■ Tackle one task at a time. Jumping from one problem to another is inefficient. Insofar as possible, stick, with a task until it’s done. In scheduling your activities,, try to allow enough time to complete tasks., ■ Group similar tasks together. It’s a good idea to, bunch up small tasks that are similar. This strategy is, useful when you’re paying bills, replying to letters, returning phone calls, and so forth., ■ Make use of your downtime. Most of us endure a, lot of “downtime,” waiting in doctors’ offices, sitting, in needless meetings, riding on buses and trains. In, many of these situations, you may be able to get some, of your easier work done—if you think ahead and, bring it along., , Self-discipline and self-control are the key to handling, many of life’s problems effectively. All four forms of, stress described in Chapter 3 can create challenges to, your self-control. Whether you’re struggling with the, frustration of poor grades in school, constant conflicts, about your overeating, pressure to do well in sports, or, downhill changes in finances that require readjustment,, you will need reasonable self-control if you expect to, make much progress., For many people, however, satisfactory self-control, is difficult to achieve. Fortunately, the last several decades have produced major advances in the technology of self-control. These advances have emerged from, research on behavior modification, an approach to controlling behavior that utilizes the principles of learning, and conditioning. Because of its importance, we’ll devote the entire Application at the end of this chapter to, improving self-control through behavior modification., , Emotion-Focused Constructive Coping, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , Describe the nature and value of emotional intelligence., Analyze the adaptive value of releasing pent-up, emotions., Discuss the importance of managing hostility and, forgiving others’ transgressions., , Let’s be realistic: There are going to be occasions when, appraisal-focused coping and problem-focused coping, are not successful in warding off emotional turmoil., Some problems are too serious to be whittled down, much by reappraisal, and others simply can’t be “solved.”, Moreover, even well-executed coping strategies may, take time to work before emotional tensions begin to, subside. Hence, it is helpful to be able to recognize and, modulate one’s emotions. In this section, we will discuss a variety of coping abilities and strategies that relate mainly to the regulation of one’s emotions., , Enhancing Emotional Intelligence, According to some theorists, emotional intelligence is, the key to being resilient in the face of stress (Slaski &, Cartwright, 2003). The concept of emotional intelligence was originally formulated by Peter Salovey and, John Mayer (1990). Emotional intelligence consists of, the ability to perceive and express emotion, assimilate emotion in thought, understand and reason with, emotion, and regulate emotion. Emotional intelligence includes four essential components (Salovey,, Mayer, & Caruso, 2002). First, people need to be able, , ■, ■, , Summarize the evidence on the effects of meditation., Describe the requirements and procedure for Benson’s, relaxation response., , to accurately perceive emotions in themselves and others and have the ability to express their own emotions, effectively. Second, people need to be aware of how, their emotions shape their thinking, decision making,, and coping with stress. Third, people need to be able, to understand and analyze their emotions, which may, often be complex and contradictory. Fourth, people, need to be able to regulate their emotions so that they, can dampen negative emotions and make effective use, of positive emotions., Several tests have been developed to measure the relatively new concept of emotional intelligence. The test, that has the strongest empirical foundation is the MayerSalovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (2002). The, authors have strived to make this test a performance-, , WE B LI N K 4.4, , International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, This site offers a vast storehouse of information relating to, coping with traumatic events. The resources are divided, into those for the general public, for professionals, and for, the news media., , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 125

Page 163 :
Releasing Pent-Up Emotions, Try as you might to redefine situations as less stressful,, you no doubt still go through times when you feel wired, with stress-induced tension. When this happens, there’s, , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , Emotional Intelligence: Why, It Can Matter More Than IQ, by Daniel Goleman (Bantam, Books, 1995), It’s great to see a book like this make the best-seller, lists. It is a serious, scholarly, yet readable analysis of, how emotional functioning is important in everyday, life. Daniel Goleman is both a psychologist and a journalist who writes about the behavioral sciences for the, New York Times. In this book, he synthesizes the research, of many investigators as he argues that emotional intelligence may be more important to success than high, IQ. The concept of emotional intelligence, as originally, developed by Peter Salovey and John Mayer (1990),, languished in relative obscurity until Goleman’s book, attracted attention. He views emotional intelligence, more broadly than Salovey and Mayer, who focused primarily on people’s ability to access, monitor, and express their own emotions and to interpret and understand, others’ emotions. Goleman includes all of their ingredients but adds social poise and skill, strong motivation, and persistence, and some desirable personality traits,, such as optimism and conscientiousness. One can argue, that Goleman’s concept of emotional intelligence is too, much of a hodgepodge of traits to be measureable or, meaningful, but his broad view yields a wide-ranging, book that discusses innumerable examples of how social finesse and emotional sensitivity can foster career, success, marital satisfaction, and physical and mental, health. In the course of this analysis, Goleman discusses, research on a diverse array of topics in an exceptionally, lucid manner., Cover image reprinted by permission of Bantam Books., , 126, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , merit in the commonsense notion that you should try, to release the emotions welling up inside. Why? Because the physiological arousal that accompanies emotions can become problematic. For example, research, suggests that people who inhibit the expression of anger, and other emotions are somewhat more likely than, other people to have elevated blood pressure (Jorgensen, et al., 1996). Moreover, research suggests that efforts to, actively suppress emotions result in increased stress and, autonomic arousal (Butler et al., 2003; Gross, 2001)., One interesting study looked at the repercussions, of “psychological inhibition” in gay men who conceal, their homosexual identity (Cole et al., 1996). Many gay, individuals inhibit the public expression of their homosexuality to avoid stigmatization, discrimination,, and even physical assault. Although hiding one’s gay, identity may be a sensible strategy, it entails vigilant, inhibition of one’s true feelings. To investigate the possible effects of this inhibition, Cole et al. (1996) tracked, the incidence of cancer, pneumonia, bronchitis, sinusitis, and tuberculosis in a sample of 222 HIV-negative, gay and bisexual men over a period of five years. As you, can see in Figure 4.11, they found that the overall incidence of these diseases was noticeably higher among, the men who concealed their homosexual identity. The, investigators speculate that psychological inhibition, may be detrimental to people’s health., If inhibition is bad, perhaps expression is good., James Pennebaker and his colleagues have shown that, , Incidence (cases per person–year), , based measure of the ability to deal effectively with emotions rather than a measure of personality or temperament. Preliminary results suggest that they have made, considerable progress toward this goal, as evidenced by, the scale’s ability to predict intelligent management of, emotions in real-world situations (Ciarrochi, Dean, &, Anderson, 2002; Lam & Kirby, 2002; Mayer et al., 2001)., Illustrating the practical importance of emotional intelligence, scores on the scale also predict the quality, of subjects’ social interactions (Lopes et al., 2004)., , 0.45, 0.40, 0.35, 0.30, 0.25, 0.20, 0.15, 0.10, 0.05, 0.00, Completely Mostly, Half in/ Mostly or, out, out, half out completely, Concealment (degree to which in, person is in or out of closet), , •, , F I G U R E 4. 11, , Elevated health risk among gay men who conceal their homosexual identity. In a sample of gay and bisexual men, Cole et al., (1996) found that the more the men concealed their homosexual, identity, the more likely they were to experience various diseases., The investigators speculate that the elevated incidence of disease, may reflect the costs of inhibiting one’s true feelings. (Data from, Cole et al., 1996)

Page 164 :
© Stephanie Maze/Corbis, , © Bill Ling/Taxi/Getty Images, , In times of stress, seeking support from one’s friends is a very useful coping strategy. Releasing, pent-up emotions by talking about one’s difficulties appears to be a particularly beneficial coping, mechanism., , talking or writing about traumatic events can have beneficial effects. For example, in one study of college students, half the subjects were asked to write three essays, about their difficulties in adjusting to college. The other, half wrote three essays about superficial topics. The, participants who wrote about their personal problems, and traumas enjoyed better health in the following, months than the other subjects did (Pennebaker, Colder,, & Sharp, 1990). A host of subsequent studies have replicated the finding that emotional disclosure, or “opening up,” is associated with improved mood, more positive self-perceptions, fewer visits to physicians, and, enhanced immune functioning (Hemenover, 2003;, Smyth, 1998; Smyth & Pennebaker, 2001). Summarizing this research, Smyth and Pennebaker (1999) assert, that “when people put their emotional upheavals into, words, their physical and mental health seems to improve markedly.” They conclude that “the act of disclosure itself is a powerful therapeutic agent” (p. 70)., The research on emotional disclosure indicates that, both writing and talking about important personal issues can be beneficial (Smyth & Pennebaker, 2001)., Thus, if you can find a good listener, it may be wise to, let your secret fears, misgivings, and suspicions spill, out in a candid conversation. Of course, confiding in, others about one’s problems can be awkward and difficult. Therein lies the beauty and appeal of the writing approach, which can be kept private. Figure 4.12, summarizes some guidelines for writing about personal issues and trauma that should make this coping, strategy more effective., , should strive to learn how to manage their feelings of, hostility more effectively (Williams & Williams, 2001)., The goal of hostility management is not merely to suppress the overt expression of hostility that may continue, to seethe beneath the surface, but to actually reduce, the frequency and intensity of one’s hostile feelings. The, first step toward this goal is to learn to quickly recognize one’s anger. A variety of strategies can be used to, decrease hostility, including reinterpretation of annoying events, distraction, and the kind of rational self-talk, advocated by Ellis (Williams & Williams, 1993). Efforts, to increase empathy and tolerance can also contribute to, , Guidelines for Writing, About Emotional Experiences, , •, Managing Hostility, and Forgiving Others, Scientists have compiled quite a bit of evidence that hostility is related to increased risk for heart attacks and, other types of illness (Williams, 2001; see Chapter 14)., In light of this reality, many experts assert that people, , ■, , Find a location where there will be no disturbances (from, others, the phone, etc.), , ■, , Set aside about 30 minutes each day: 20 minutes for, writing, with a few minutes afterward to compose yourself if necessary., , ■, , Write for three or four days, usually consecutively., , ■, , Explore your deepest thoughts and feelings about any, experiences or topics that are weighing heavily upon you., , ■, , Explore how this topic is related to a variety of issues in, your life: your childhood, your relationships, who you are,, who you would like to be, and so forth., , ■, , Write continuously, without regard for spelling or grammar., , ■, , Remember that the writing is for you, not someone else., , F I G U R E 4. 12, , Using writing about emotional experiences as a coping strategy., Many studies have shown that writing about traumatic experiences and sensitive issues can have beneficial effects on mental, and physical health. These guidelines can help you to use this, coping strategy., From Smyth, J. M. & Pennebaker, J. W. (1999). Sharing one’s story. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.),, Coping: The psychology of what works. Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press. Reprinted, by permission., , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 127

Page 165 :
hostility management, as can forgiveness, which has become the focus of a new line of research in psychology., We tend to experience hostility and other negative, emotions when we feel “wronged”—that is, when we, believe that the actions of another person were harmful,, immoral, or unjust. Our natural inclination is either, to seek revenge or to avoid further contact with the offender (McCullough, 2001). Forgiving someone involves, counteracting these natural tendencies and releasing, the person from further liability for his or her transgression. Research suggests that forgiving is an effective, emotion-focused coping strategy that is associated with, better adjustment and well-being (McCullough & Witvliet, 2002; Worthington & Scherer, 2004). For example, in one study of divorced or permanently separated, women reported by McCollough (2001), the extent to, which the women had forgiven their former husbands, was positively related to several measures of well-being, and was inversely related to measures of anxiety and, depression. In another study, when participants were, instructed to actively think about a grudge they had, nursed and to think about forgiving the grudge, forgiving thoughts were associated with more positive, , emotions and reduced physiological arousal (Witvliet,, Ludwig, & Vander Laan, 2001). Research also shows, that vengefulness is correlated with more rumination, and negative emotion and with lower life satisfaction, (McCullough et al., 2001). Taken together, these findings suggest that it may be healthful for people to learn, to forgive others more readily., , © Acey Harper/Time Life Pictures/Getty Images, , Meditating, Recent years have seen an explosion of interest in meditation as a method for relieving stress. Meditation, refers to a family of mental exercises in which a conscious attempt is made to focus attention in a nonanalytical way. There are many approaches to meditation. In the United States, the most widely practiced, approaches are those associated with yoga, Zen, and, transcendental meditation (TM). However, meditation, has been practiced throughout history as an element, of all religious and spiritual traditions, including Judaism and Christianity. Moreover, the practice of meditation can be largely divorced from religious beliefs., In fact, most Americans who meditate have only vague, ideas regarding its religious significance. Of interest to, us is the possibility that meditation can calm inner emotional turmoil., Most meditative techniques look deceptively simple. For example, in TM a person is supposed to sit in, a comfortable position with eyes closed and silently, focus attention on a mantra, a specially assigned Sanskrit word that creates a resonant sound. This exercise, in mental self-discipline is to be practiced twice daily, for 20 minutes. The technique has been described as, “diving from the active surface of the mind to its quiet, depths” (Bloomfield & Kory, 1976, p. 49)., Advocates of meditation claim that it can improve, learning, energy level, work productivity, physical health,, mental health, and general happiness while reducing tension and anxiety caused by stress (Alexander et al., 1990;, Andresen, 2000). These are not exactly humble claims., Let’s examine the scientific evidence on meditation., What are the physical effects of going into the meditative state? Most studies find decreases in participants’, heart rate, respiration rate, oxygen consumption, and, carbon dioxide elimination (see Figure 4.13). Many researchers have also observed increases in skin resistance, , WE B LI N K 4.5, , In September 1994, Reg and Maggie Green were vacationing in, Italy when their seven-year-old son Nicholas was shot and killed, during a highway robbery. In an act of forgiveness that stunned, Europe, the Greens chose to donate their son’s organs, which, went to seven Italians. The Greens, shown here five years after, the incident, have weathered their horrific loss better than, most, perhaps in part because of their willingness to forgive., 128, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , Stress Management and Emotional Wellness Links, This website functions as a gateway to a host of other, sites that may be relevant to the subject of coping with, stress. Included are links to sites that deal with humor,, relaxation, meditation, increasing social support, crisis, intervention, and stress management for college students.

Page 166 :
Cubic centimeters per minute, , and decreases in blood lactate—physiologiBefore, During meditation, After, cal indicators associated with relaxation., 260, Taken together, these bodily changes suggest that meditation can lead to a potentially beneficial physiological state charac240, terized by relaxation and suppression of, arousal (Carrington, 1993; Fenwick, 1987;, Oxygen, Travis, 2001)., 220, consumption, To shed additional light on the physical, effects of meditation, some researchers have, begun to use new brain-imaging technolo200, gies in an effort to identify the neural circuits that are affected by meditation. For example, using a special type of brain scan to, 180, Carbon dioxide, track blood flow in the brain, Andrew Newelimination, berg and his colleagues (2001) examined patterns of brain activity during meditation in, 160, 0, 10, 20, 30, 50, 60, 40, a sample of eight experienced Tibetan BudMinutes, dhist meditators. Among other things, they, observed high activity in the prefrontal cortex, which is consistent with the focused atF I G U R E 4. 13, tention that is central to meditation. They, Transcendental meditation (TM) and physiological arousal. The physiological, also found unusually low activity in an area, changes shown on this graph (based on Wallace & Benson, 1972) indicate that, in the parietal lobe that is known to process, meditation suppresses arousal, thus leading to a physical state that may have, information on the body’s location in space., beneficial effects., This finding is interesting in that skilled, Adapted from Wallace, R. K., & Benson, H. (1972, February). The physiology of meditation. Scientific American, 226,, 85–90. Graphic redrawn from illustration on p. 86 by Lorelle A. Raboni. Copyright © 1972 by Scientific American, Inc., meditators often report that their sense of, individuality and separateness from others, diminishes as they experience a sense of oneness with, Shapiro, 1987). In a recent and relatively enthusiastic, the world. Although the findings of Newberg and colreview of meditation research, Shapiro, Schwartz, &, leagues are preliminary, they suggest that it may be, Santerre (2002) acknowledge that many meditation, possible to pinpoint the neural bases of meditative exstudies “do not use rigorous research design (includperiences that previously seemed inexplicable., ing lack of randomization, lack of followup, and imWhat about the long-term psychological benefits, precise measurement of constructs) and sometimes are, that have been claimed for meditation? Research sugbased on small samples” (p. 634)., gests that meditation may have some value in reducing, the effects of stress (Anderson et al., 1999; Winzelberg, Using Relaxation Procedures, & Luskin, 1999). In particular, regular meditation is, Ample evidence suggests that systematic relaxation, associated with lower levels of some “stress hormones”, procedures can soothe emotional turmoil and reduce, (Infante et al., 2001). Research also suggests that medistress-induced physiological arousal (Lehrer & Wooltation can improve mental health while reducing anxifolk, 1984, 1993; Smyth et al., 2001). There are a numety and drug abuse (Alexander et al., 1994). Other studber of worthwhile approaches to achieving beneficial, ies report that meditation may have beneficial effects, relaxation. The most prominent systems are Jacobson’s, on blood pressure (Barnes, Treiber, & Davis, 2001), self(1938) progressive relaxation (see McGuigan, 1993),, esteem (Emavardhana & Tori, 1997), mood and one’s, Schultz and Luthe’s (1969) autogenic training (see Linsense of control (Easterlin & Cardena, 1999), happiness, den, 1993), and Benson’s (1975; Benson & Klipper, 1988), (Smith, Compton, & West, 1995), and overall physical, relaxation response. We’ll discuss Benson’s approach, health and well-being (Reibel et al., 2001)., because it is a simple one that virtually anyone can learn, At first glance these results are profoundly impresto use., sive, but they need to be viewed with some caution. At, After studying various approaches to meditation,, least some of these effects may be just as attainable, Herbert Benson, a Harvard Medical School cardiologist,, through systematic relaxation or other mental focusing, concluded that elaborate religious rituals and beliefs are, procedures (Shapiro, 1984; Smith, 1975). Critics also, not necessary for someone to profit from meditation., wonder whether placebo effects, sampling bias, and, He also concluded that what makes meditation benefiother methodological problems may contribute to some, cial is the relaxation it induces. After “demystifying”, of the reported benefits of meditation (Bishop, 2002;, , •, , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 129

Page 167 :
•, , FIG U R E 4.14, , Benson’s relaxation response., The relaxation procedure advocated by Herbert Benson is a, simple one that should be practiced daily., From Benson, H., & Klipper, M. Z. (1975, 1988)., The relaxation response. New York: Morrow. Copyright © 1975 by William Morrow & Co. Reprinted, by permission of HarperCollins Publishers., , 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, , Sit quietly in a comfortable position., Close your eyes., Deeply relax all your muscles, beginning at your, feet and progressing up to your face. Keep them relaxed., Breathe through your nose. Become aware of your breathing. As, you breathe out, say the word ”one” silently to yourself. For, example, breathe in . . . out ”one”; in . . . out ”one”; and so forth., Breathe easily and naturally., Continue for 10 to 20 minutes. You may open your eyes to check, the time, but do not use an alarm. When you finish, sit quietly for several minutes,, at first with your eyes closed and later with your eyes opened. Do not stand up for a, few minutes., Do not worry about whether you are successful in achieving a deep level of relaxation., Maintain a passive attitude and permit relaxation to occur at its own pace. When, distracting thoughts occur, try to ignore them by not dwelling on them, and return to, repeating ”one.” With practice, the response should come with little effort. Practice the, technique once or twice daily but not within two hours after any meal, since digestive, processes seem to interfere with the elicitation of the relaxation response., , meditation, Benson (1975) set out to devise a simple,, nonreligious procedure that could provide similar, benefits. He calls his procedure the “relaxation response.”, According to Benson, four factors are critical to effective practice of the relaxation response:, , 3. A passive attitude. It is important not to get upset, , when your attention strays to distracting thoughts. You, must realize that such distractions are inevitable. Whenever your mind wanders from your attentional focus,, calmly redirect attention to your mental device., 4. A comfortable position. Reasonable body comfort is essential to avoid a major source of potential distraction. Simply sitting up straight works well for most, people. Some people can practice the relaxation response, lying down, but for most people such a position is too, conducive to sleep., , 1. A quiet environment. It is easiest to induce the, relaxation response in a distraction-free environment., After you become skilled at the relaxation response,, you may be able to accomplish it in a crowded subway., Initially, however, you should practice it in a quiet,, calm place., 2. A mental device. To shift attention inward and, keep it there, you need to focus it on a constant stimulus,, such as a sound or word that you recite over and over., You may also choose to gaze fixedly at a bland object,, such as a vase. Whatever the case, you need to focus your, attention on something., , Benson’s deceptively simple procedure for inducing the relaxation response is described in Figure 4.14., For full benefit, it should be practiced daily., , Achieving Self-Control, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , 130, , Explain why traits cannot be target behaviors in selfmodification programs., Describe the three kinds of information you should, pursue in gathering your baseline data., Discuss how to use reinforcement to increase the, strength of a response., , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , ■, , ■, , Explain how to use reinforcement, control of antecedents,, and punishment to decrease the strength of a response., Analyze issues related to fine-tuning and ending a selfmodification program.

Page 168 :
Answer the following “yes” or “no.”, ___ 1. Do you have a hard time passing up food, even, when you’re not hungry?, ___ 2. Do you wish you studied more often?, ___ 3. Would you like to cut down on your smoking, or drinking?, ___ 4. Do you experience difficulty in getting yourself, to exercise regularly?, ___ 5. Do you wish you had more willpower?, If you answered “yes” to any of these questions, you, have struggled with the challenge of self-control. This, Application discusses how you can use the techniques, of behavior modification to improve your self-control., If you stop to think about it, self-control—or rather a, lack of it—underlies many of the personal problems that, people struggle with in everyday life., Behavior modification is a systematic approach, to changing behavior through the application of the, principles of conditioning. Advocates of behavior modification assume that behavior is a product of learning,, conditioning, and environmental control. They further, assume that what is learned can be unlearned. Thus, they, set out to “recondition” people to produce more desirable patterns of behavior., The technology of behavior modification has been, applied with great success in schools, businesses, hospitals, factories, child-care facilities, prisons, and mental health centers (Goodall, 1972; Kazdin, 1982, 2001;, Rachman, 1992). Moreover, behavior modification techniques have proven particularly valuable in efforts to, improve self-control. Our discussion will borrow liberally from an excellent book on self-modification by, David Watson and Roland Tharp (2002). We will discuss, five steps in the process of self-modification, which are, outlined in Figure 4.15., , Step, , 1, Step, , 2, , Specify your target behavior, , Gather baseline data, Identify possible controlling antecedents, Determine initial level of response, Identify possible controlling consequences, , Step, , 3, Step, , 4, , Step, , 5, •, , Design your program, Select strategies to increase, response strength, or, Select strategies to decrease, response strength, , Execute and evaluate your program, , Bring your program to an end, , F I G U R E 4. 15, , Steps in a self-modification program. This flowchart provides, an overview of the steps necessary to execute a self-modification, program., , scription. For instance, the man who regards himself, as “too irritable” might identify two overly frequent responses, such as arguing with his wife and snapping at, his children. These are specific behaviors for which he, could design a self-modification program., , Specifying Your Target Behavior, The first step in a self-modification program is to specify the target behavior(s) that you want to change. Behavior modification can only be applied to a clearly defined, overt response, yet many people have difficulty, pinpointing the behavior they hope to alter. They tend, to describe their problems in terms of unobservable, personality traits rather than overt behaviors. For example, asked what behavior he would like to change, a, man might say, “I’m too irritable.” That may be true, but, it is of little help in designing a self-modification program. To use a behavioral approach, you need to translate vague statements about traits into precise descriptions of specific target behaviors., To identify target responses, you need to ponder past, behavior or closely observe future behavior and list, specific examples of responses that lead to the trait de-, , Gathering Baseline Data, The second step in behavior modification is to gather, baseline data. You need to systematically observe your, target behavior for a period of time (usually a week or, two) before you work out the details of your program., In gathering your baseline data, you need to monitor, three things., First, you need to determine the initial response, level of your target behavior. After all, you can’t tell, whether your program is working effectively unless, you have a baseline for comparison. In most cases, you, would simply keep track of how often the target response occurs in a certain time interval. Thus, you might, count the daily frequency of snapping at your children,, smoking cigarettes, or biting your fingernails. If studying is your target behavior, you will probably monitor, , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 131

Page 169 :
FIG U R E 4.16, , 3500, , Example of record keeping in a selfmodification program for losing, weight. Graphic records are ideal for, tracking progress in behavior modification efforts., , 3000, Caloric total for food eaten, , 2500, Calories, , •, , 2000, 1500, 1000, 500, 0, , Caloric value of exercise, 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, 9, February, , 10, , 11, , 12, , 13, , 14, , 15, , 14, , 15, , Weight, , 220, 218, Morning weight, , 216, 214, 212, , 1, , 2, , hours of study. If you want to modify your eating, you, will probably keep track of how many calories you consume. Whatever the unit of measurement, it is crucial, to gather accurate data. You should keep permanent, written records, preferably in the form of some type of, chart or graph (see Figure 4.16)., Second, you need to monitor the antecedents of, your target behavior. Antecedents are events that typically precede the target response. Often these events, play a major role in evoking your target behavior. For, example, if your target is overeating, you might discover, that the bulk of your overeating occurs late in the evening while you watch TV. If you can pinpoint this kind, of antecedent-response connection, you may be able to, design your program to circumvent or break the link., Third, you need to monitor the typical consequences of your target behavior. Try to identify the reinforcers that are maintaining an undesirable target, behavior or the unfavorable outcomes that are suppressing a desirable target behavior. In trying to identify reinforcers, remember that avoidance behavior is usually, maintained by negative reinforcement (see Chapter 2)., That is, the payoff for avoidance is usually the removal, of something aversive, such as anxiety or a threat to selfesteem. You should also take into account the fact that, a response may not be reinforced every time, as most, behavior is maintained by intermittent reinforcement., , Designing Your Program, Once you have selected a target behavior and gathered, adequate baseline data, it is time to plan your intervention program. Generally speaking, your program will, , 132, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, 9, February, , 10, , 11, , 12, , 13, , be designed either to increase or to decrease the frequency of a target response., Increasing Response Strength, , Efforts to increase the frequency of a target response, depend largely on the use of positive reinforcement. In, other words, you reward yourself for behaving properly., Although the basic strategy is quite simple, doing it skillfully involves a number of considerations., Selecting a reinforcer. To use positive reinforcement,, you need to find a reward that will be effective for you., Reinforcement is subjective—what is reinforcing for, one person may not be reinforcing for another. Figure 4.17 lists questions you can ask yourself to help you, determine your personal reinforcers. Be sure to be realistic and choose a reinforcer that is really available to you., You don’t have to come up with spectacular new reinforcers that you’ve never experienced before. You can, use reinforcers that you are already getting. However,, you have to restructure the contingencies so that you, get them only if you behave appropriately. For example, if you normally buy two compact discs per week,, you might make these purchases contingent on studying a certain number of hours during the week. Making yourself earn rewards that you used to take for, granted is often a useful strategy in a self-modification, program., Arranging the contingencies. Once you have chosen your reinforcer, you have to set up reinforcement, contingencies. These contingencies will describe the, exact behavioral goals that must be met and the rein-

Page 170 :
What Are Your Reinforcers?, , Responses Earning Tokens, , 1. What will be the rewards of achieving your goal?, , Response, , Amount, , Number of Tokens, , 2. What kind of praise do you like to receive, from yourself, and others?, , Jogging, , 1/2 mile, , 4, , Jogging, , 1 mile, , 8, , 3. What kinds of things do you like to have?, , Jogging, , 2 miles, , 16, , 4. What are your major interests?, , Tennis, , 1 hour, , 4, , 5. What are your hobbies?, , Tennis, , 2 hours, , 8, , 6. What people do you like to be with?, , Sit-ups, , 25, , 1, , 7. What do you like to do with those people?, , Sit-ups, , 50, , 2, , 8. What do you do for fun?, Redemption Value of Tokens, , 9. What do you do to relax?, 10. What do you do to get away from it all?, , Reinforcer, , 11. What makes you feel good?, , Purchase one compact disc of your choice, , 30, , 12. What would be a nice present to receive?, , Go to movie, , 50, , 13. What kinds of things are important to you?, , Go to nice restaurant, , 100, , 14. What would you buy if you had an extra $20? $50? $100?, , Take special weekend trip, , 500, , Tokens required, , 15. On what do you spend your money each week?, 16. What behaviors do you perform every day? (Don’t overlook the obvious or commonplace.), 17. Are there any behaviors you usually perform instead of, the target behavior?, 18. What would you hate to lose?, 19. Of the things you do every day, which would you hate, to give up?, 20. What are your favorite daydreams and fantasies?, 21. What are the most relaxing scenes you can imagine?, , •, , F I G U R E 4.17, , Selecting a reinforcer. The questions listed here may help you, to identify your personal reinforcers., Adapted from Watson, D. L., & Tharp, R. G. (1997). Self-directed behavior: Self-modification, for personal adjustment. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Reprinted by permission., , forcement that may then be awarded. For example, in, a program to increase exercise, you might make spending $40 on clothes (the reinforcer) contingent on having, jogged 15 miles during the week (the target behavior)., Try to set behavioral goals that are both challenging, and realistic. You want your goals to be challenging so, that they lead to improvement in your behavior. However, setting unrealistically high goals—a common mistake in self-modification—often leads to unnecessary, discouragement., You also need to be concerned about doling out, too much reinforcement. If reinforcement is too easy, to get, you may become satiated, and the reinforcer may, lose its motivational power. For example, if you were to, reward yourself with virtually all the compact discs you, wanted, this reinforcer would lose its incentive value., One way to avoid the satiation problem is to put, yourself on a token economy. A token economy is a, , •, , F I G U R E 4. 18, , Example of a token economy to reinforce exercise. This token, economy was set up to strengthen three types of exercise behavior. The person can exchange tokens for four types of reinforcers., , system for doling out symbolic reinforcers that are, exchanged later for a variety of genuine reinforcers., Thus, you might develop a point system for exercise, behavior, accumulating points that can be spent on, compact discs, movies, restaurant meals, and so forth., You can also use a token economy to reinforce a variety, of related target behaviors, as opposed to a single, specific response. The token economy in Figure 4.18, for, instance, is set up to strengthen three different, though, related, responses (jogging, tennis, and sit-ups)., Shaping. In some cases, you may want to reinforce a, target response that you are not currently capable of, making, such as speaking in front of a large group or, jogging ten miles a day. This situation calls for shaping, which is accomplished by reinforcing closer and, closer approximations of the desired response. Thus,, you might start jogging two miles a day and add a halfmile each week until you reach your goal. In shaping, your behavior, you should set up a schedule spelling out, how and when your target behaviors and reinforcement contingencies should change. Generally, it is a, good idea to move forward gradually., Decreasing Response Strength, , Let’s turn now to the challenge of reducing the frequency, of an undesirable response. You can go about this task, in a number of ways. Your principal options are reinforcement, control of antecedents, and punishment., , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 133

Page 171 :
Reinforcement. Reinforcers can be used in an indirect way to decrease the frequency of a response. This, may sound paradoxical, since you have learned that reinforcement strengthens a response. The trick lies in, how you define the target behavior. For example, in, the case of overeating you might define your target behavior as eating more than 1600 calories a day (a response that you want to decrease) or eating less than, 1600 calories a day (a response that you want to increase). You can choose the latter definition and reinforce yourself whenever you eat less than 1600 calories, in a day. Thus, you can reinforce yourself for not emitting a response, or for emitting it less, and thereby decrease a response through reinforcement., , Controlling the Antecedents, of Overeating, A. Shopping for food, 1. Do not purchase problematic foods. These include, a. very fattening, high-calorie foods, b. your favorite foods, unless they have very low caloric, values (you will be tempted to overconsume favorite, foods), c. foods requiring little preparation (they make it too easy, to eat), 2. To facilitate the above, you should, a. use a shopping list from which you do not deviate, b. shop just after eating (your willpower is reduced to, jelly when you’re hungry), c. carry only enough money to pay for items on your list, B. In your kitchen, , Control of antecedents. A worthwhile strategy for, decreasing the occurrence of an undesirable response, may be to identify its antecedents and avoid exposure, to them. This strategy is especially useful when you are, trying to decrease the frequency of a consummatory, response, such as smoking or eating. In the case of, overeating, for instance, the easiest way to resist temptation is to avoid having to face it. Thus, you might stay, away from enticing restaurants, minimize time spent in, your kitchen, shop for groceries just after eating (when, willpower is higher), and avoid purchasing favorite, foods. Figure 4.19 lists a variety of suggestions for controlling antecedents to reduce overeating. Control of antecedents can also be helpful in a program to increase, studying. The key often lies in where you study. You can, reduce excessive socializing by studying somewhere devoid of people. Similarly, you can reduce loafing by, studying someplace where there is no TV, stereo, or, phone to distract you., , 1. Don’t use your kitchen for anything other than food, preparation and consumption., 2. Keep food stock stored out of sight., 3. If you have problematic foods in your kitchen (for other, household members, of course), arrange cupboards and, the refrigerator so that these foods are out of reach or in, the rear., 4. Don’t hover over cooking food. It will cook itself., 5. Prepare only enough food for immediate consumption., C. While eating, 1. Don’t do anything besides eating. Watching TV or reading, promotes mindless consumption., 2. Leave serving dishes on the kitchen counter or stove., Don’t set them right in front of you., 3. Eat from a smaller dish. It will make a quantity of food, appear greater., 4. Slow the pace of eating. Relax and enjoy your food., D. After eating, 1. Quickly put away or dispose of leftover foods., 2. Leave the kitchen as soon as you are through., , Punishment. The strategy of decreasing unwanted, behavior by punishing yourself for that behavior is an, obvious option that people tend to overuse. The biggest, problem with punishment in a self-modification effort, is the difficulty in following through and punishing, oneself. Nonetheless, there may be situations in which, your manipulations of reinforcers need to be bolstered, by the threat of punishment. If you’re going to use punishment, keep two guidelines in mind. First, do not use, punishment alone. Use it in conjunction with positive, reinforcement. If you set up a program in which you can, earn only negative consequences, you probably won’t, stick to it. Second, use a relatively mild punishment so, that you will actually be able to administer it to yourself. Nurnberger and Zimmerman (1970) developed a, creative method of self-punishment. They had subjects, write out a check to an organization they hated (for, instance, the campaign of a political candidate whom, they despised). The check was held by a third party who, mailed it if subjects failed to meet their behavioral goals., 134, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , E. In regard to restaurants, 1. Insofar as possible, do not patronize restaurants. Menus are, written in a much too seductive style., 2. If social obligations require that you eat out, go to a, restaurant that you don’t particularly like., 3. When in restaurants, don’t linger over the menu, and, don’t gawk at the food on other tables., 4. Avoid driving down streets and going to shopping centers that are loaded with alluring fast-food enterprises., F. In general, 1. Try to avoid boredom. Keep yourself busy., 2. Try to avoid excessive sleep loss and fatigue. Your selfcontrol diminishes when you are tired., 3. Avoid excessive fasting. Skipping meals often leads to, overeating later., , •, , F I G U R E 4. 19, , Control of antecedents. Controlling antecedents that trigger, overeating is often a crucial part of behavioral programs for weight, loss. The tips listed here have proven useful to many people.

Page 172 :
Such a punishment is relatively harmless, but it can serve, as a strong source of motivation., , Executing and Evaluating, Your Program, Once you have designed your program, the next step is, to put it to work by enforcing the contingencies that, you have carefully planned. During this period, you, need to continue to accurately record the frequency of, your target behavior so you can evaluate your progress., The success of your program depends on your not, “cheating.” The most common form of cheating is to, reward yourself when you have not actually earned it., You can do two things to increase the likelihood, that you will comply with your program. One is to make, up a behavioral contract—a written agreement outlining a promise to adhere to the contingencies of a, behavior modification program (see Figure 4.20). The, formality of signing such a contract in front of friends, or family seems to make many people take their program more seriously. You can further reduce the likelihood of cheating by having someone other than yourself dole out the reinforcers and punishments., Behavior modification programs often require some, fine-tuning. So don’t be surprised if you need to make, a few adjustments. Several flaws are especially com-, , mon in designing self-modification programs. Among, those that you should look out for are (1) depending, on a weak reinforcer, (2) permitting lengthy delays between appropriate behavior and delivery of reinforcers,, and (3) trying to do too much too quickly by setting, unrealistic goals. Often, a small revision or two can, turn a failing program around and make it a success., , Ending Your Program, Generally, when you design your program you should, spell out the conditions under which you will bring it, to an end. Doing so involves setting terminal goals such, as reaching a certain weight, studying with a certain regularity, or going without cigarettes for a certain length of, time. Often, it is a good idea to phase out your program, by planning a gradual reduction in the frequency or potency of your reinforcement for appropriate behavior., If your program is successful, it may fade away without a conscious decision on your part. Often, new, improved patterns of behavior become self-maintaining., Responses such as eating right, exercising regularly, and, studying diligently may become habitual. Whether you, end your program intentionally or not, you should always be prepared to reinstitute the program if you find, yourself slipping back to your old patterns of behavior., , I, ____________________, do hereby agree to initiate my self-change strategy as of, (date) ____________________ and to continue it for a minimum period of ____________________, weeks—that is, until (date) ____________________., My specific self-change strategy is to ______________________________________________________, _____________________________________________________________________________________, _____________________________________________________________________________________, I will do my best to execute this strategy to my utmost ability and to evaluate its effectiveness only, after it has been honestly tried for the specified period of time., Optional Self-Reward Clause: For every ____________________ day(s) that I successfully comply with, my self-change contract, I will reward myself with ____________________________________________, _____________________________________________________________________________________, , •, , FIG U R E 4.20, , A behavioral contract., Behavior modification experts recommend the use of, a formal, written contract, similar to that shown here, to increase commitment, to one’s self-modification, program., , In addition, at the end of my minimum period of personal experimentation, I will reward myself for having persisted in my self-change efforts. My reward at that time will be ____________________________, _____________________________________________________________________________________, I hereby request that the witnesses who have signed below support me in my self-change efforts and, encourage my compliance with the specifics of this contract. Their cooperation and encouragement, throughout the project will be appreciated., Signed ____________________, Date ____________________, Witness:, Witness:, , CHAPTER 4, , Coping Processes, , 135

Page 173 :
■, , Coping involves behavioral efforts to master, reduce, or tolerate the demands created by stress. People cope with stress in, many ways, but most have certain styles of coping. Coping strategies vary in their adaptive value., , Research suggests that it is wise for people to learn how to, manage their feelings of hostility. New evidence also suggests, that forgiving people for their offenses is healthier than nursing, grudges., ■ Meditation can be helpful in soothing emotional turmoil., Meditation is associated with lower levels of stress hormones,, improved mental health, and other indicators of wellness. Although less exotic, systematic relaxation procedures, such as, Benson’s relaxation response, can also be effective in reducing, troublesome emotional arousal., , Common Coping Patterns of Limited Value, , Application: Achieving Self-Control, , KEY IDEAS, The Concept of Coping, , CHAPTER 4 REVIEW, , ■, , ■, , Giving up, possibly best understood in terms of learned helplessness, is a common coping pattern that tends to be of limited, value. Another is striking out at others with acts of aggression., Frequently caused by frustration, aggression tends to be counterproductive because it often creates new sources of stress., ■ Indulging oneself is a common coping strategy that is not inherently unhealthy, but it is frequently taken to excess and thus, becomes maladaptive. Internet addiction is a new form of selfindulgence. Blaming yourself with negative self-talk is associated, with depression., ■ Defensive coping is common and may involve any of a number of defense mechanisms. Although the adaptive value of defensive coping tends to be less than optimal, it depends on the, situation. Taylor and Brown have argued that some illusions may, be healthful, but their thesis has been controversial., The Nature of Constructive Coping, ■, , Constructive coping, which includes efforts to deal with stress, that are judged as relatively healthful, does not appear to depend, on one’s intelligence. Constructive coping is rational, realistic,, and action oriented. It also involves managing emotions and, learning self-control., , ■, , In behavior modification, the principles of learning are used, to change behavior directly. Behavior modification techniques, can be used to increase one’s self-control. The first step in selfmodification is to specify the overt target behavior to be increased, or decreased., ■ The second step is to gather baseline data about the initial, rate of the target response and identify any typical antecedents, and consequences associated with the behavior. The third step, is to design a program. If you are trying to increase the strength, of a response, you’ll depend on positive reinforcement. The reinforcement contingencies should spell out exactly what you have, to do to earn your reinforcer. A number of strategies can be used, to decrease the strength of a response, including reinforcement,, control of antecedents, and punishment., ■ The fourth step is to execute and evaluate the program. Selfmodification programs often require some fine-tuning. The, final step is to determine how and when you will phase out your, program., , Appraisal-Focused Constructive Coping, ■, , Appraisal-focused constructive coping is facilitated by Ellis’s, suggestions on how to reduce catastrophic thinking by digging, out the irrational assumptions that cause it. Other valuable strategies include using humor to deal with stress and looking for the, positive aspects of setbacks and problems., , Problem-Focused Constructive Coping, ■, , Systematic problem solving can be facilitated by following a, four-step process: (1) clarify the problem, (2) generate alternative courses of action, (3) evaluate your alternatives and select a, course of action, and (4) take action while maintaining flexibility., ■ Other problem-focused coping tactics with potential value, include seeking social support and acquiring strategies to improve self-control. Better time management can also aid problemfocused coping. Effective time management doesn’t depend on, increased efficiency so much as on setting priorities and allocating time wisely. It is also helpful to avoid the common tendency, to procrastinate on aversive tasks., , KEY TERMS, Aggression p. 108, Antecedents p. 132, Behavior modification p. 131, Behavioral contract p. 135, Brainstorming p. 119, Catastrophic thinking, p. 115, Catharsis p. 109, Constructive coping p. 113, Coping p. 106, Defense mechanisms p. 111, , Emotional intelligence, p. 125, Internet addiction, pp. 109–110, Learned helplessness p. 107, Meditation p. 128, Procrastination p. 122, Rational-emotive therapy, p. 115, Shaping p. 133, Token economy p. 133, , Emotion-Focused Constructive Coping, ■, , Emotional intelligence may help people to be more resilient, in the face of stress. Inhibition of emotions appears to be associated with increased health problems. Hence, it appears that releasing pent-up emotions is adaptive. Research shows that writing, or talking about traumatic events or sensitive issues is associated with enhanced wellness., , 136, , PART 1, , The Dynamics of Adjustment, , KEY PEOPLE, Herbert Benson pp. 129–130, Albert Ellis pp. 115–117, Sigmund Freud pp. 111–112, , Martin Seligman pp., 107–108, Shelley Taylor p. 113

Page 174 :
Personal Explorations Workbook, The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook, may enhance your self-understanding in relation to issues, raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 4.1: Barnes-Vulcano, Rationality Test. Personal Probe 4.1: Can You Detect Your, Irrational Thinking? Personal Probe 4.2: Analyzing Coping, Strategies. Personal Probe 4.3: Recognizing Coping Tactics., , ANSWERS, , Pages 115–117, Pages 121–122, Pages 126–127, Page 131, Page 133, , 6. According to Albert Ellis, people’s emotional reactions, to life events result mainly from:, a. their arousal level at the time., b. their beliefs about events., c. congruence between events and expectations., d. the consequences following events., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , b, b, c, c, b, , 5. Taylor and Brown found that normal people’s selfimages tend to be __________; depressed people’s tend, to be __________., a. accurate, inaccurate, b. less favorable, more favorable, c. overly favorable, more realistic, d. more realistic, overly favorable, , Book Companion Website, , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. Defense mechanisms involve the use of _________ to, guard against negative _________., a. self-deception, behaviors, b. self-deception, emotions, c. self-denial, behaviors, d. self-denial, emotions, , 10. A system providing for symbolic reinforcers is called, a(n):, a. extinction system., b. token economy., c. endocrine system., d. symbolic reinforcement system., , CHAPTER 4, , Page 109, Pages 108–109, Pages 109–110, Page 112, Page 113, , 3. Bill feels sure that he failed his calculus exam and that, he will have to retake the course. He is very upset., When he gets home, he orders himself a jumbo-size, pizza and drinks two six-packs of beer. Bill’s behavior, illustrates which of the following coping strategies?, a. Catastrophic thinking, b. Defensive coping, c. Self-indulgence, d. Positive reinterpretation, , 9. The first step in a self-modification program is:, a. design your program., b. gather baseline data., c. specify your target behavior., d. any of the above; it doesn’t matter., , b, b, c, b, c, , 2. Reggie works at a software firm. Today his boss unfairly, blamed him for the fact that a new program is way, behind schedule. The unjustified public criticism really, had an impact on Reggie. Later that night at home,, when Reggie couldn’t find some tools that he misplaced,, he lashed out at his wife in annoyance. Reggie’s behavior illustrates:, a. overcompensation., b. displaced aggression., c. self-indulgence., d. catastrophic thinking., , 8. Research by James Pennebaker and his colleagues suggests that wellness is promoted by:, a. depending on more mature defense mechanisms., b. strong self-criticism., c. writing about one’s traumatic experiences., d. Iihibiting the expression of anger., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. The release of emotional tension as termed by Freud is, called:, a. flushing., b. catharsis., c. discharge., d. diversion., , Coping Processes, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 7. Which of the following is not listed in your text as a, cause of wasted time?, a. Inability to set priorities, b. Inability to work diligently, c. Inability to delegate responsibility, d. Inability to throw things away, , 137

Page 175 :
SELF-CONCEPT, The Nature of the Self-Concept, Self-Discrepancies, Factors Shaping the Self-Concept, SELF-ESTEEM, The Importance of Self-Esteem, The Development of Self-Esteem, Ethnicity, Gender, and Self-Esteem, , 138, , BASIC PRINCIPLES, OF SELF-PERCEPTION, Cognitive Processes, Self-Attributions, Explanatory Style, Motives Guiding Self-Understanding, Methods of Self-Enhancement, , SELF-PRESENTATION, Impression Management, Self-Monitoring, , SELF-REGULATION, Self-Efficacy, Self-Defeating Behavior, , PRACTICE TEST, , APPLICATION: BUILDING SELF-ESTEEM, CHAPTER 5 REVIEW

Page 176 :
CHAPTER, , The Self, , 5, You’ve just taken your first exam in your first psychology course. Expecting, a B, you’re looking forward to getting your test back. Your instructor hands, you your exam and you look at your grade: a C–. You’re stunned! How could, this be? You thought that you knew the material really well. As you sit there, taking in this disappointing and disturbing turn of events, you anxiously, search for possible explanations for your performance. “Did I read the chapters carefully? Do I need to revamp my study methods? Is this course a lot, harder than I had thought? Am I really ‘college material’?” As you leave the, class, your mood has shifted from up to down. You’re feeling dejected and, already worrying about how you’ll do on the next exam. This scenario illustrates the process of self-perception and the effect it can have on emotions,, motivation, and goal setting. People engage in this process constantly to, understand the causes of their own behavior., In this chapter, we highlight the self and its role in adjustment. We, start off by looking at two major components of the self: self-concept and, self-esteem. Then we review some key principles of the self-perception, process. Next, we turn to the important topic of self-regulation. Finally, we, focus on how people present themselves to others. In the Application, we, offer some suggestions for building self-esteem., , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 139

Page 177 :
Self-Concept, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , Describe some key aspects of the self-concept., Cite two types of self-discrepancies and describe their, effects., Describe two ways of coping with self-discrepancies., , ■, ■, , If you were asked to describe yourself, what would you, say? You’d probably start off with some physical attributes such as “I’m tall,” “I’m of average weight,” or “I’m, blonde.” Soon you’d move on to psychological characteristics: “I’m friendly,” “I’m honest,” “I’m reasonably, intelligent,” and so forth. How did you develop these, beliefs about yourself ? Have your self-views changed, over time? Read on., , Discuss important factors that help form the self-concept., Discuss how individualism and collectivism influence the, self-concept., , you receive in that setting. Similarly, when you’re at a, party (or thinking about a party when you’re in class!),, you tap into your social self-schema and the thoughts, and feelings related to it., Jason’s self-concept, Athlete, , Tall, , Friendly, , The Nature of the Self-Concept, , 140, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Aspiring, sales, manager, , Son, Sense of, humor, , Optimistic, Helpful, , Liberal, Student, , Fraternity, member, , Attractive, Intelligent, , Chris’s self-concept, Stanford University News Service, photo, by L. A. Cicero, , Although we usually talk about the self-concept as a, single entity, it is actually a multifaceted structure, (Mischel & Morf, 2003). That is, the self-concept is an, organized collection of beliefs about the self. These, beliefs, also called self-schemas, are developed from past, experience and are concerned with one’s personality, traits, abilities, physical features, values, goals, and social roles (Campbell, Assanand, & DiPaula, 2000). People have self-schemas on dimensions that are important to them, including both strengths and weaknesses., Figure 5.1 depicts the self-concepts of two hypothetical individuals., Each of these self-schemas is, characterized by relatively distinct, thoughts and feelings. For instance,, you might have considerable information about your social skills, and feel quite self-assured about, them but have limited information, and less confidence about your, physical skills. Current thinking is, Hazel Markus, that only a portion of the total selfconcept operates at any one time., The self-concept that is accessible at any given moment, has been termed the working self-concept by Hazel, Markus, a leading researcher in this area (Markus &, Wurf, 1987)., Self-schemas are dynamic and play a major role in, processing self-relevant information. For example,, when a particular self-schema is operating, its attendant thoughts and feelings strongly influence the way, individuals process information about that aspect of, the self. When you’re in class, for example, the beliefs, and emotions associated with your intellectual selfschema will influence how you process information, , Masculine, , Son, , Averagelooking, , Masculine, Aspiring, journalist, , Energetic, , Helpful, Cynical, , Intelligent, , Student, , Ambitious, , Introverted, , Conservative, Inquisitive, , •, , Determined, , FIG U R E 5.1, , The self-concept and self-schemas. The self-concept is composed of various self-schemas, or beliefs about the self. Jason, and Chris have different self-concepts, in part, because they, have different self-schemas.

Page 178 :
Beliefs about the self influence not only current, behavior but also future behavior. Possible selves refer, to one’s conceptions about the kind of person one, might become in the future (Markus & Nurius, 1986)., If you have narrowed your career choices to personnel, manager and psychologist, these represent two possible, selves in the career realm. Possible selves are developed, from past experiences, current behavior, and future expectations. They make people attentive to goal-related, information and role models and mindful of the need, to practice goal-related skills. As such, they help individuals not only to envision desired future goals but, also to achieve them (Cross & Markus, 1991). Interestingly, it has been found that, for individuals who have, experienced traumatic events, psychological adjustment is best among those who are able to envision a, variety of positive selves (Morgan & Janoff-Bulman,, 1994). Sometimes, possible selves are negative and represent what you fear you might become—such as an, alcoholic like Uncle George or an adult without an intimate relationship like your next-door neighbor. In this, case, possible selves function as images to be avoided., Individuals’ beliefs about themselves are not set in, concrete—but neither are they easily changed. People, are strongly motivated to maintain a consistent view, of the self across time and situations. Thus, once the, self-concept is established, the individual has a tendency to preserve and defend it. In the context of this, stability, however, self-beliefs do have a certain dynamic, quality (Markus & Wurf, 1987). They seem to be most, susceptible to change when people shift from an important and familiar social setting to an unfamiliar, one—for example, when moving off to college or to a, new city for one’s first “real” job. This finding clearly, underscores the social foundations of the self-concept., , Self-Discrepancies, Some people perceive themselves pretty, much the way they’d like to see themselves. Others experience a gap between, what they actually see and what they’d, like to see. For example, Nathan describes, his actual self as “shy” but his ideal self, as “outgoing.” Such mismatching of selfperceptions is termed self-discrepancy., According to E. Tory Higgins (1987), individuals have several self-perceptions:, an actual self (qualities you believe you, actually possess), an ideal self (characteristics you would like to have), and an ought, self (traits you believe you should possess). The ideal and ought selves serve as, personal standards or self-guides that direct behavior., , •, , WE B LI N K 5.1, , Research Sources: Concepts of Person and Self, Over the past century psychologists, philosophers, and, many others have wondered what we mean when we use, terms like “person” and “self.” Professor Shaun Gallagher, of the University of Central Florida’s Philosophy and Cognitive Science Department provides visitors with a variety, of resources to explore these concepts., , Self-Discrepancies and Their Effects, , According to Higgins, when people live up to their personal standards (ideal or ought selves), they experience high self-esteem; when they don’t meet their own, expectations, their self-esteem suffers (Moretti & Higgins, 1990). In addition, he says, certain types of selfdiscrepancies are associated with specific emotions, (see Figure 5.2). One type of self-discrepancy occurs, when the actual self is at odds with the ideal self. Such, instances trigger dejection-related emotions (sadness,, disappointment). As actual-ideal discrepancies outnumber actual-ideal congruencies, sadness increases, and cheerfulness decreases (Higgins, Shah, & Friedman, 1997). Consider Tiffany’s situation: She knows, that she’s attractive, but she is also overweight and would, like to be thinner. Self-discrepancy theory predicts that, she would feel dissatisfied and dejected. Interestingly,, research has shown an association between discrepant, actual/ideal views of body shape and eating disorders, (Strauman et al., 1991)., A second type of discrepancy involves a mismatch, between actual and ought selves. Let’s say you don’t stay, in touch with your grandparents as often as you feel, you should. According to Higgins, actual/ought self-, , Self-discrepancy, , Emotional state, , Possible consequences, , Actual self, vs., ideal self, , Disappointment, Dejection, Sadness, , Depression, , Actual self, vs., ought self, , Anxiety, Irritability, Guilt, , Anxiety-related, disorders, , FIG U R E 5.2, , Types of self-discrepancies, their effects on emotional states, and possible consequences. According to E. Tory Higgins (1989), discrepancies between actual and ideal, selves produce disappointment and sadness, whereas discrepancies between actual and, ought selves result in irritability and guilt. Such self-discrepancies can make individuals, vulnerable to more serious psychological problems, such as depression and anxietyrelated disorders., , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 141

Page 179 :
discrepancies produce agitation-related emotions (irtest to improve your grade. But what about the times, ritability, anxiety, and guilt). As actual-ought discrepyou can’t match your ideal standards? Perhaps you had, ancies outnumber actual-ought congruencies, anxiety, your heart set on making the varsity tennis team, but, increases and calm emotions decrease (Higgins, Shah,, didn’t make the cut. Maybe you had planned to go to, & Friedman, 1997). Extreme discrepancies of this type, medical school, but barely managed to eek out C’s in, can result in anxiety-related psychological disorders., your science courses. One way to ease the discomfort, Everyone experiences self-discrepancies, yet most, associated with such discrepancies is to bring your, people manage to feel reasonably good about themideal self a bit more in line with your actual abilities., selves. How is this possible? Three factors seem to be, Another option is to blunt your self-awareness. You can, important: the amount of discrepancy you experience,, do so by avoiding situations that increase your selfawareness—you don’t go to a party if you expect to, your awareness of the discrepancy, and whether the disspend a miserable evening talking to yourself., crepancy is actually important to you (Higgins, 1999)., Some people use alcohol to blunt self-awareness., Thus, a pre-med major who gets a C in calculus will, In one study, college students were first put into either, probably feel a lot worse than an English major who gets, a high or a low self-awareness group based on test scores, a C in the course., (Hull & Young, 1983). Then, both groups were given a, Although people use both ideal and ought selves as, brief version of an intelligence test as well as false feedpersonal standards, they usually rely on just one of these, back on their test performance. Half of the high selfself-guides. These “preferences” are rooted in parentawareness group were told that they had done quite well, child interactions and individual temperament (Higon the test and the other half were told that they had, gins, 1987). If Kyle’s parents typically communicate, done quite poorly. Next, supposedly as part of a sepawith him in terms of what they would like him to do,, rate study, these participants were asked to taste and, he will probably develop a strong ideal self-guide. If, evaluate various wines for 15 minutes. The experitheir communications usually take the form of what, menters predicted that the high self-awareness particithey think he ought to do, Kyle will probably develop a, pants who had been told that they had done poorly on, strong ought self-guide., the IQ test would drink more than the other groups, and, One study took a closer look at self-guide “preferthis is precisely what the study found (see Figure 5.3)., ences.” The researchers first tested college students to, Those who couldn’t escape negative information about, determine their temperament and the self-guides (ideal, themselves drank more alcohol to reduce their selfor ought) students “preferred” (Manian, Strauman, &, awareness. Similarly, in the real world, it has been found, Denney, 1998). Then they asked participants to recall, that alcoholics who have high self-awareness and who, the parenting style their parents used. A preference for, experience negative or painful life events relapse more, the ideal self-guide was strongly associated with a posquickly and completely (Hull, Young, & Jouriles, 1986)., itive temperament and parental warmth, while a prefHeightened self-awareness doesn’t always make, erence for the ought self-guide was strongly associated, people focus on self-discrepancies and negative aspects, with a negative temperament and parental rejection., of the self. If that were true, most people would feel a, Of course, a retrospective study can’t show that parlot worse about themselves than they actually do. As, enting style determines self-guide preferences, but the, results are interesting. Other researchers report that “ideals” look for opportunities to, advance their aspirations, while “oughts”, keep an eye out for obstacles to their goals, Failure feedback, High, to avoid possible failures (Dweck, Higgins,, Success feedback, self-awareness, & Grant-Pillow, 2003). Thus, self-guides can, determine the types of goals you pursue and, Failure feedback, Low, the way you pursue them., self-awareness Success feedback, Coping with Self-Discrepancies, , Can individuals do anything to blunt the, negative emotions and blows to self-esteem, associated with self-discrepancies? Yes! For, one thing, people can change their behavior, to bring it more in line with their ideal or, ought selves. For instance, if your ideal self, is a person who gets above-average grades, and your actual self just got a D on a test,, you can study more effectively for the next, 142, , PART 2, , 0, , •, , 1, , 2, , 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, Ounces of wine consumed, , 9, , 10, , FIG U R E 5.3, , Self-awareness and alcohol consumption. Individuals who were high in selfawareness drank significantly more wine in a 15-minute period if they believed, that they had performed poorly on an IQ test than did any other group., From Hull, J. G., & Young, R. D. (1983), Self-consciousness, self-esteem, and success-failure as determinants of, alcohol consumption in male social drinkers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1097–1109. Copyright ©, 1983 American Psychological Association. Reprinted by permission of the author., , The Interpersonal Realm

Page 180 :
© Spencer Grant/PhotoEdit, , When people don’t live up to their personal standards, selfesteem suffers, and some turn to alcohol to blunt their, awareness of the discrepancy., , you recall, self-concepts are made up of numerous selfbeliefs—many of them positive, some negative. Because, individuals have a need to feel good about themselves,, they tend to focus on their positive features rather than, their “warts” (Tesser, 2001)., , Factors Shaping the Self-Concept, A variety of sources influence one’s self-concept. Chief, among them are one’s own observations, feedback from, others, and cultural values., Your Own Observations, , Your observations of your own behavior are obviously, a major source of information about what you are like., Individuals begin observing their own behavior and, drawing conclusions about themselves early in life. Children will make statements about who is the tallest, who, can run fastest, or who can swing the highest. Leon, Festinger’s (1954) social comparison theory proposes, that individuals compare themselves with others in, order to assess their abilities and opinions. People, compare themselves to others to determine how attractive they are, how they did on the history exam, how, their social skills stack up, and so forth., , Although Festinger’s original theory claimed that, people engage in social comparison for the purpose of, accurately assessing their abilities, research suggests that, they also engage in social comparison to improve their, skills and to maintain their self-image (Wood & Wilson, 2003). Furthermore, the reasons people engage in, social comparison determine whom they choose for a, point of comparison. A reference group is a set of people against whom individuals compare themselves., For example, if you want to know how you did on your, first test in social psychology (ability appraisal), your, reference group will be the entire class. On the other, hand, if you want to improve your tennis game (skill development), your reference group will probably be limited to those of superior ability, because their skills give, you something to strive for. And, if your self-esteem, needs bolstering, you will probably compare yourself, to those whom you perceive to be worse off than you, so you can feel better about yourself., The potential impact of such social comparisons, was dramatically demonstrated in the classic “Mr. Clean/, Mr. Dirty” study (Morse & Gergen, 1970). Subjects, thought they were being interviewed for a job. Half the, participants met another applicant who was neatly, dressed and who appeared to be very competent. The, other half encountered a competitor who was unkempt, and disorganized. All subjects filled out measures of, self-esteem both before and after the bogus job interviews. The results indicated that subjects who encountered the impressive competitor showed a decrease in, self-esteem after the interview while those who met the, unimpressive competitor showed increases in selfesteem. Thus, comparisons with others can have immediate effects on one’s self-concept., People’s observations of their own behavior are not, entirely objective. The general tendency is to distort reality in a positive direction (see Figure 5.4 on the next, page). In other words, most people tend to evaluate, themselves in a more positive light than they really merit, (Taylor & Brown, 1988, 1994). The strength of this tendency was highlighted in a large survey of high school, seniors conducted as part of the Scholastic Aptitude Test, (SAT) (Myers, 1980). By definition, 50 percent of the students must be “above average” and 50 percent “below average” on specific questions. However, 100 percent of the, , WE B LI N K 5.2, , Identity and Self, Professor Andy Lock at Massey University in New Zealand, has posted the outline of a possible upper-level course that, would explore contemporary psychological conceptions, of the self and identity development, particularly from the, social constructivist and cultural viewpoints. His site includes a full set of bibliographical and topical guides., , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 143

Page 181 :
As the husband, sees her: Older, than her years., Someone more, suited to suburban domesticity and PTA., , As he sees, himself: Stylish, haircut, rakish, moustache,, benevolent,, generous, powerful. A smooth, operator., , As the wife, sees him:, Somewhat of, a slob, moody,, not very decisive or strong., , Brooks/Cole Collection, , As she sees, herself: Unchanged since, age 22. Sociable, scintillating, sexy., , •, , F I G U R E 5.4, , Distortions in self-images. How people see themselves may be different from how others see them., These pictures and text illustrate the subjective quality of self-concept and people’s perception of others., Generally, self-images tend to be distorted in a positive direction., , respondents saw themselves as above average in “ability, to get along with others.” And 25 percent of the respondents thought that they belonged in the top 1 percent!, Although the general tendency is to distort reality, in a positive direction, most people make both positive, and negative distortions. For example, you might overrate your social skill, emotional stability, and intellectual ability while underrating your physical attractiveness. Also, a minority of people consistently evaluate, themselves in an unrealistically negative way. Thus, the, tendency to see oneself in an overly favorable light is, strong but not universal., Feedback from Others, , Your self-concept is shaped significantly by the feedback you get from important people in your life. Early, on, parents and other family members play a dominant role. Parents give their children a great deal of di-, , 144, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , rect feedback, saying such things as “We’re so proud of, you” or “If you just tried harder, you could do a lot better in math.” Most people, especially when young, take, this sort of feedback to heart. Thus, it comes as no surprise that studies find a link between parents’ views of, a child and the child’s self-concept (Berne & Savary,, 1993; Burhans & Dweck, 1995). There is even stronger, evidence for a relationship between children’s perceptions of their parents’ attitudes toward them and their, own self-views (Felson, 1989, 1992)., Teachers, Little League coaches, Scout leaders, classmates, and friends also provide feedback during childhood. In later childhood and adolescence, parents and, classmates are particularly important sources of feedback and support (Harter, 2003). Later in life, feedback, from close friends and marriage partners assumes importance. In fact, there is evidence that a close partner’s, support and affirmation can bring the loved one’s ac-

Page 182 :
© David Young-Wolff/PhotoEdit, , ahead of group goals and defining, one’s identity in terms of personal, attributes rather than group memberships. In contrast, collectivism, involves putting group goals ahead, of personal goals and defining one’s, identity in terms of the groups one, belongs to (such as one’s family,, tribe, work group, social class, caste,, and so on). Although it’s tempting, to think of these perspectives in, either-or terms, it is more appropriate to view them as points along a, continuum. Thus, it is more accurate to say that certain cultures are, more or less individualistic (or collectivist) than others rather than seeing them as either individualistic or, collectivist., Whether positive or negative, feedback from others plays an important role in shaping a, In comparison to individualisyoungster’s self-concept., tic cultures, collectivist cultures place, a higher priority on shared values, tual self-views and behavior more in line with his or, and resources, cooperation, and concern for how one’s, her ideal self (Drigotas et al., 1999). For this situation, actions will affect other group members. Child-rearing, to happen, the partner needs to hold views of the loved, patterns in collectivist cultures emphasize the imporone that match the target person’s ideal self and betance of obedience, reliability, and proper behavior,, have in ways to bring out the best in the person. If the, whereas individualistic cultures stress the development, target person’s behavior can closely match the ideal, of independence, self-esteem, and self-reliance., self, then self-views can move nearer to the ideal self., A variety of factors influence societies’ tendencies, Researchers have labeled this process the Michelangelo, to cherish individualism or collectivism. Among other, phenomenon to reflect the partner’s role in “sculpting”, things, increases in a culture’s affluence, education, urinto reality the ideal self of a loved one., banization, and social mobility tend to foster more inKeep in mind that people filter feedback from othdividualism (Triandis, 1994). Many contemporary soers through their existing self-perceptions. That is, indicieties are in transition, but generally speaking North, viduals don’t see themselves exactly as others see them,, American and Western European cultures tend to be inbut rather as they believe others see them (Baumeister, dividualistic, whereas Asian, African, and Latin Ameri& Twenge, 2003; Tice & Wallace, 2003). Thus, feedback, can cultures tend to be collectivist (Hofstede, 1980, 1983)., from others usually reinforces people’s self-views., Individuals reared in individualistic cultures usually, have an independent view of the self, perceiving themCultural Values, selves as unique, self-contained, and distinct from othYour self-concept is also shaped by cultural values., ers. In contrast, individuals reared in collectivist cultures, Among other things, the society in which you are reared, typically have an interdependent view of the self. They, defines what is desirable and undesirable in personalsee themselves as inextricably connected to others and, ity and behavior. For example, American culture puts, believe that harmonious relationships with others are of, a high premium on individuality, competitive success,, utmost importance. Thus, in describing herself, a person, strength, and skill. When individuals meet cultural exliving in an individualistic culture might say,“I am kind,”, pectations, they feel good about themselves and expewhereas someone in a collectivist culture might respond,, rience increases in self-esteem and vice-versa (Cross &, “My family thinks I am kind” (Triandis, 2001). FigGore, 2003)., ure 5.5 (on the next page) depicts the self-conceptions, Cross-cultural studies suggest that different culof individuals from these contrasting cultures., tures shape different conceptions of the self (Cross &, Individuals with an independent view of the self are, Markus, 1999; Cross & Gore, 2003). One important way, socialized to maintain their sense of self as a separate, cultures differ is on the dimension of individualism, person—to “look out for number one,” claim more, versus collectivism (Hofstede, 1983; Triandis, 1989,, than their share of credit for group successes, and dis2001). Individualism involves putting personal goals, avow responsibility for group failure. Those with an, , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 145

Page 183 :
•, , FIG U R E 5.5, , b) Interdependent self-system, , a) Independent self-system, , Independent and interdependent, views of the self. (a) Individuals, in cultures that support an independent view perceive the self as, clearly separated from significant, others. (b) Individuals in cultures, that support an interdependent, view perceive the self as inextricably connected to others., Adapted from Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S., (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for, cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253., , Father, Father, Mother, , Mother, Sibling, , Sibling, , Self, , Self, Friend, , Friend, Friend, , Co-worker, , interdependent view of the self are taught to adjust, themselves to the needs of the groups to which they, belong and to maintain the interdependence among, individuals. In this situation, social duties and obligations assume great importance and people are likely to, see themselves as responsible for group failures (Cross &, Gore, 2003)., Researchers have noted parallels between the selfviews promoted by individualistic and collectivist cultures and the self-views of some groups. For example,, women usually have more interdependent self-views, than men (Cross & Madson, 1997). But don’t take this, to mean that men are less social than women; instead it, means that men and women get their social needs met, in different ways (Baumeister & Sommer, 1997). Thus, , Friend, , Co-worker, , women are usually involved in close relationships involving intimate friends and family members (relational interdependence), while men interact in social, groups such as clubs and sports teams (collective interdependence) (Gabriel & Gardner, 1999). These gender, differences in self-views may explain other observed, gender differences, such as women being more likely, than men to share their feelings and thoughts with others. We’ll take up such issues in subsequent chapters., Cultural values are also responsible for various, stereotypes that can mold people’s self-perceptions and, behavior. And stereotypes—about gender, ethnicity,, class, sexual orientation, and religion—can influence, self-conceptions., , Self-Esteem, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe the implications of self-concept confusion and, self-esteem instability., Discuss how high and low self-esteem are related to, adjustment., Distinguish between high self-esteem and narcissism,, and discuss narcissism and aggression., , One of the functions of the self-concept is to evaluate, the self; the result of this self-evaluation is termed selfesteem. Self-esteem refers to one’s overall assessment, of one’s worth as a person. Self-esteem is a global selfevaluation that blends many specific evaluations about, one’s adequacy as a student, an athlete, a worker, a, spouse, a parent, or whatever is personally relevant., Figure 5.6 shows how specific elements of the selfconcept may contribute to self-esteem. If you feel ba-, , 146, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , ■, , ■, , Discuss some key influences in the development of, self-esteem., Summarize the findings on ethnicity and gender regarding, self-esteem., , sically good about yourself, you probably have high, self-esteem., It has long been thought that individuals with low, self-esteem hold strong negative views about themselves. In reality, it seems that the self-views of these, individuals are not more negative, but more confused, and tentative (Campbell, 1990; Campbell & Lavallee,, 1993). In other words, their self-concepts seem to be, less clear, less complete, more self-contradictory, and

Page 184 :
•, , Self-esteem, , Emotional, self-image, , Academic, self-image, , Physical, self-image, , Relationships, , Emotional, expression, , Course, work, , Physical, appearance, , Peers, Significant, others, , Anger, Happiness, Love, , English, History, Psychology, , Weight, Smile, Hairstyle, , more susceptible to short-term, fluctuations than the self-views of, high self-esteem individuals. According to Roy Baumeister (1998),, an eminent researcher on the self,, this “self-concept confusion” means, that individuals with low selfesteem simply don’t know themselves well enough to strongly enRoy Baumeister, dorse many personal attributes on, self-esteem tests, which results in, lower self-esteem scores., Studies generally show self-esteem to be quite stable over time, once past childhood (Trzesniewski, Donnellan, & Robins, 2003). In other words, if you have, high self-esteem today, you are likely to have high selfesteem six months or two years from now. While it’s, true that baseline self-esteem is stable, it’s also true, that the ups and downs of daily life can produce shortterm fluctuations in self-esteem. Recall your elation, when that great-looking person at work asked you out, and your distress when you saw that C– staring back at, you on your last calculus exam. People vary in the stability of their self-esteem. Those whose self-esteem, fluctuates in response to daily experiences are highly, sensitive to interactions and events that have potential, relevance to their self-worth, and they may even mistakenly view irrelevant events as having significance, (Kernis & Goldman, 2003). Thus, in their eyes, their, self-worth is always on the line. These tendencies have, important implications for adjustment, as you’ll see, shortly., , Courtesy, Roy Baumeister, , Social, self-image, , FIG U R E 5.6, , The structure of self-esteem., Self-esteem is a global evaluation that combines assessments, of various aspects of one’s selfconcept, each of which is built, up from many specific behaviors, and experiences. (Adapted from, Shavelson, Hubner, & Stanton,, 1976), , Investigating self-esteem is challenging for several, reasons. For one thing, it is difficult to obtain accurate, measures of self-esteem. The problem is that researchers tend to rely on self-reports from subjects, which obviously may be biased. As you’ve seen, most individuals, typically hold unrealistically positive views about themselves; moreover, some people may choose not to disclose their actual self-esteem on a questionnaire. Second, in probing self-esteem it is often quite difficult to, separate cause from effect. Thousands of correlational, studies report that high and low self-esteem are associated with various behavioral characteristics. For instance, you saw in Chapter 1 that self-esteem is a good, predictor of happiness. However, it is hard to tell whether, high self-esteem causes happiness or vice versa. You, should keep this problem in pinpointing causation in, mind as we zoom in on this fascinating topic., , The Importance of Self-Esteem, Popular wisdom holds that self-esteem is the key to, practically all positive outcomes in life. In fact, its actual benefits are much fewer—but, we hasten to add,, not unimportant. A recent comprehensive review of, research looked at the purported and actual advantages, of self-esteem (Baumeister et al., 2003). Let’s look at, the findings that relate to self-esteem and adjustment., Self-Esteem and Adjustment, , The clearest advantages of self-esteem are in the emotional sphere. Namely, self-esteem is strongly and consistently related to happiness. In fact, Baumeister and, his colleagues are persuaded that high self-esteem ac-, , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 147

Page 185 :
tually leads to greater happiness, although they acknowledge that research has not clearly established the, direction of causation. On the other side, low self-esteem, is more likely than high self-esteem to lead to depression., In the area of achievement, high self-esteem has, not been shown to be a reliable cause of good academic, performance. In fact, it may actually be the (weak) result of doing well in school. Baumeister and his colleagues speculate that other factors may underlie both, self-esteem and academic performance. Regarding job, performance, the results are mixed. Some studies find, that high self-esteem is linked to better performance,, but others find no difference. And it may be that occupational success leads to high self-esteem., In the interpersonal realm, Baumeister and his colleagues report that people with high self-esteem claim, to be more likable and attractive, to have better relationships, and to make better impressions on others, than people with low self-esteem. Interestingly, these, advantages seem to exist mainly in the minds of the, beholders because objective data (ratings of peers) do, not support these views. In fact, Mark Leary’s sociometer theory suggests that self-esteem is actually a subjective measure of one’s interpersonal popularity and success (Leary et al., 1995; Leary & Baumeister, 2000)., Regarding romantic relationships, those with low selfesteem are more likely to distrust their partners’ expressions of love and support and to worry about rejection, compared to high self-esteem individuals. Still there is, no evidence that self-esteem (high or low) is related to, how quickly relationships end. When it comes to groups,, high self-esteem people are more likely to speak up and, to criticize the group’s approach. And they are perceived as contributing more to groups., What about self-esteem and coping, a key aspect, of adjustment? Individuals with low self-esteem and a, self-blaming attributional style are definitely at a disadvantage here. For one thing, they become more demoralized after a failure experience than those with, high self-esteem do. For them, failure contributes to, depression and undermines their motivation to do, better the next time. By contrast, individuals with high, self-esteem persist longer in the face of failure. Second,, as can be seen in Figure 5.7, individuals with low selfesteem often have negative expectations about their performance (in a social situation, at a job interview, on a, test). Because self-esteem affects expectations, it operates in a self-perpetuating fashion. As a result, they feel, anxious and may not prepare for the challenge. Then,, if they blame themselves when they do poorly, they feel, depressed and deliver one more blow to their already, battered self-esteem. Of course, this cycle also works, (in the opposite way) for those with high self-esteem., In either case, the important point is that self-esteem, can affect not only the present, but also the future., , 148, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Low, self-esteem, , Self-blame, , Failure, , •, , Negative, expectations, , Low effort, High anxiety, , FIG U R E 5.7, , The vicious circle of low self-esteem and poor performance., Low self-esteem is associated with low or negative expectations, about performance. These low expectations often result in inadequate preparation and high anxiety, which heighten the likelihood of poor performance. Unsuccessful performance triggers, self-blame, which feeds back to low self-esteem., Adapted from Brehm, S. S., & Kassin, S. M. (1993). Social Psychology. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin. Copyright © 1993 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Adapted with permission., , High Self-Esteem Versus Narcissism, , Although feeling good about oneself is desirable, problems arise when people’s self-views are inflated and, unrealistic. Narcissism is the tendency to regard oneself as grandiosely self-important. Narcissistic individuals passionately want to think well of themselves, and are highly sensitive to criticism (Twenge & Campbell, 2003). They are preoccupied with fantasies of success, believe that they deserve special treatment, and, react aggressively when they experience threats to their, self-views (ego threats). Those with fragile (unstable), self-esteem also respond in this manner (Kernis, 2003a,, 2003b). On the other hand, individuals whose positive, self-appraisals are secure or realistic are not so susceptible to ego threats and are less likely to resort to hostility, and aggression in the face of them. Note that narcissists’, aggression must be provoked; without provocation, they, , WE B LI N K 5.3, , Self-Esteem vs. Narcissism:, Implications for Teachers of Young Children, Self-esteem in early childhood can be undermined by wellintentioned, but ill-informed, teachers who misunderstand, how self-esteem is developed. Lilian G. Katz explores durable, foundations for a child’s self-worth in this online book, from ERIC, the Education Resources Information Center.

Page 186 :
are no more likely to aggress than nonnarcissists (Baumeister, Bushman, & CampHigh, High, Perception, bell, 2000; Twenge & Campbell, 2003)., aggression, narcissism, of high threat, Baumeister speculates that narcissists, who experience ego threats are likely to, Negative, engage in aggression such as partner abuse,, evaluation, rape, gang violence, individual and group, hate crimes, and political terrorism (BauLow, Low, meister, 1999; Baumeister, Smart, & Boden,, Perception, aggression, narcissism, of low threat, 1996). Is there any evidence to support this, idea? In a series of studies, researchers gave, participants the opportunity to aggress, against someone who had either insulted, or praised an essay they had written (BushFIG U R E 5.8, man & Baumeister, 1998). The narcissistic, The path from narcissism to aggression. Individuals who score high on narcissism, participants reacted to their “insultors”, perceive negative evaluations by others to be extremely threatening. This experience, with exceptionally high levels of aggresof ego threat triggers strong hostile feelings and aggressive behavior toward the, sion (see Figure 5.8). Another study comevaluator in retaliation for the perceived criticism. Low scorers are less likely to perceive negative evaluations as threatening and, therefore, behave much less aggrespared male prisoners and college men on, sively toward evaluators. (Adapted from Bushman & Baumeister, 1998)., narcissism and self-esteem. Violent offenders scored significantly higher in narcissism, but their self-esteem scores were similar to those, correlations between parenting styles and children’s, of the college men (Bushman & Baumeister, 2002)., traits and behaviors, including self-esteem (Furnham, These findings have important practical implica& Cheng, 2000; Maccoby & Martin, 1983). Authoritations (Baumeister et al., 1996). Most rehabilitation, tive parenting is associated with the highest self-esteem, programs for spousal abusers, delinquents, and crimiscores. Authoritarian parenting, permissive parenting,, nals are based on the faulty belief that these individuand neglectful parenting are second, third, and fourth, als suffer from low self-esteem. In opposition to this, in line. These studies were correlational, so they don’t, view, current research suggests that efforts to boost (aldemonstrate that parenting style causes high or low, ready inflated) self-esteem are misguided; a better apself-esteem., proach is to help such individuals develop more selfOf course, parents are not the only significant othcontrol and more realistic views of themselves., ers in a person’s life: teachers, classmates, and close, friends also play important roles. As you would expect,, children who perceive they have the most support, The Development of Self-Esteem, from significant others have the highest self-esteem,, Because the foundations of self-esteem are laid early in, whereas those who have the lowest perceived support, life (Harter, 2003), psychologists have focused much of, their attention on the role of parenting in self-esteem, Parental acceptance, development. Indeed, there is ample evidence that parHigh, Low, ental involvement, acceptance, support, and exposure, to clearly defined limits have marked influence on chilAuthoritarian, Authoritative, dren’s self-esteem (Felson, 1989; Harter, 1998). Two, (low acceptance,, (high acceptance,, high control), high control), major dimensions underlie parenting behavior: acceptance and control (Maccoby & Martin, 1983). Diana, Neglectful, Permissive, Baumrind (1967, 1971, 1978) identified four distinct, (low acceptance,, (high acceptance,, parenting styles as interactions between these two dilow control), low control), mensions (see Figure 5.9). Authoritative parenting uses, high emotional support and firm, but reasonable limits (high acceptance, high control). Authoritarian parenting entails low emotional support with rigid limits, FIG U R E 5.9, (low acceptance, high control). Permissive parenting, uses high emotional support with few limits (high acBaumrind’s parenting styles. Four parenting styles result from, the interactions of parental acceptance and parental control., ceptance, low control), and neglectful parenting inAdapted from Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority [Monograph]., volves low emotional support and few limits (low accepDevelopmental Psychology, 4(1, Part 2), 1–103. American Psychological Association. Adapted, tance, low control). Baumrind and others have found, by permission of the author., Parental control, Low, High, , •, , •, , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 149

Page 187 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Self-Esteem and Threats to Mortality, One consequence of living in a post–9-11 world is anxiety about subsequent terrorist attacks in the United, States, as well as elsewhere. As explained in Chapter 2,, terror management theory (TMT) (Greenberg, Solomon, &, Pyszczynski, 1997) is an influential new theoretical perspective asserting that self-esteem plays a pivotal role, in people’s efforts to deal with the threats to mortality, posed by modern terrorism. As you may recall, terror management theory notes that human beings are the only, creatures who live with the knowledge that they will die., According to TMT, the instinctive desire to live is juxtaposed against the inevitability of death, which produces, the potential for paralyzing terror (Pyszczynski, Greenberg, & Goldenberg, 2003). To diminish the existential, terror resulting from the awareness of their mortality,, people are thought to rely on two defenses: the first, involves efforts aimed at validating one’s cultural worldview, while the second bolsters self-esteem., First, belonging to a culture supposely reduces the, fear of death because it provides a sense of meaning, beyond oneself and a sense of belonging to a larger entity that will live beyond one’s own lifetime. This idea, has considerable support. Compared to participants who, are not reminded about their own death, those for whom, death is made salient are more likely to endorse negative, evaluations of outgroup members (Schimel et al., 1999), and to endorse harsh punishments for those who violate, cultural values (Greenberg et al., 1990)., More relevant to the current discussion is the second terror management mechanism, which ascribes great, importance to self-esteem. Terror management theory, proposes that the principal function of self-esteem is to, serve as a buffer against death-related anxiety. The idea, , have the lowest self-esteem (Harter, 2003). For older, children and adolescents, approval from parents and, approval from classmates are the two strongest predictors of high self-esteem; by college age, peers have much, more impact on self-esteem than parents do (Harter,, 1993)., Children (and adults) also make their own judgments about themselves. Perceiving oneself as success-, , 150, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , is that people can reduce or ward off their fear of death, by focusing on thoughts and experiences that help them, feel good about themselves. This idea was supported in, a series of experiments in which people were shown, graphic scenes of death aimed at building anxiety about, their own mortality (Greenberg et al., 1992). Prior to, viewing these scenes, half of the participants were given, positive feedback to temporarily increase their self-esteem., Interestingly, the group that got the “self-esteem boost”, showed less anxiety and less defensiveness in viewing, the gruesome scenes than did a control group that didn’t, receive the prior positive feedback., Thus, terror management theory has generated some, interesting hypotheses about the role that self-esteem, plays in modulating reactions to rumors and media discussion about the possibility of terrorist attacks. According to TMT, when the specter of future attacks is elevated, people should increase their self-esteem striving., In other words, they will be more likely than usual to, engage in behaviors and patterns of thinking that are, likely to bolster their self-esteem. TMT also posits that, people who are relatively high in self-esteem should, be somewhat less vulnerable to the threat of terrorism., That is, they should be less easily rattled and shaken by, media speculation about possible terrorist strikes., Although TMT offers an intriguing perspective on, the function of self-esteem, there are alternative explanations as well (Leary, 2004). That said, there is quite, a bit of empirical support for the specific idea that high, self-esteem counteracts anxiety (Baumeister et al., 2003)., This anxiety-buffering function of high self-esteem seems, particularly relevant in these troubled times., , ful in domains that are highly valued is important in, these self-evaluations (Harter, 2003; MacDonald, Saltzman, & Leary, 2003). For instance, if Maria values success in the academic and social areas and sees herself, as competent in these arenas, she will have higher selfesteem than Heather, who also values these domains, but rates herself low on one or both of them. An important basis for self-judgments is how well one “stacks

Page 188 :
© Robert W. Ginn/PhotoEdit, , Ethnicity, Gender,, and Self-Esteem, , Significant others play a key role in shaping self-esteem., , up” against a selected reference group (recall social, comparison theory). A classic study reported that preadolescents’ academic (but not global) self-esteem, was affected by the quality of competition they faced, in school (Marsh & Parker, 1984). In this study, children from schools in higher socioeconomic class areas, with “high-quality” competition (high-ability reference group) were compared to children of similar ability from schools in lower-class areas with “low-quality”, competition (low-ability reference group). Surprisingly,, the children in the low-quality schools tended to display greater academic self-esteem than children of similar academic ability enrolled in the high-quality schools., This finding that academic self-esteem is boosted by, being a “big fish in a small pond” has found widespread, support, even in many other countries (Marsh & Hau,, 2003). Thus, it seems that individuals compare themselves to others in their specific reference group (other, students in their school), not to a general reference, group (other students in the country). The fact that, individuals with similar talents may vary in self-esteem, depending on their reference group demonstrates the, importance of social comparison in the development, of self-esteem., , Because prejudice and discrimination are still pervasive, in the United States, people commonly assume that, members of minority groups have lower self-esteem, than members of the majority group. Research both, supports and contradicts this assumption. On the one, hand, the self-esteem of Asians, Hispanics, and American Indians is lower than that of whites, although the, differences are small (Twenge & Crocker, 2002). On, the other, the self-esteem of blacks is higher than, that of whites (Gray-Little & Hafdahl, 2000; Twenge &, Crocker, 2002). Adding gender to the mix complicates, the picture even more. White males have higher selfesteem than white females, but minority males have, lower self-esteem than minority females (Twenge &, Crocker, 2002)., Thus, ethnicity and gender interact in complex, ways in self-esteem. The fact of cultural differences in, the self-concept may provide some insight here. Recall, our earlier discussion of individualism and collectivism. Note that differences on this dimension are found, not only between different nations but also within a, given country. And here’s another fact: High individualism is associated with high self-esteem. What’s interesting here is that the pattern of ethnic differences in, individualism closely mirrors the pattern of ethnic differences in self-esteem (Twenge & Crocker, 2002). That, is, blacks score higher than whites, whites do not differ, significantly from Hispanics, and Hispanics score higher, than Asian Americans. Thus, the ethnic differences in, self-esteem are likely rooted in how the different groups, view themselves, based on cultural messages., Although females are not a minority group, they, resemble ethnic minorities in that they tend to have, lower status and less power than males. The popular, press abounds with reports of low self-esteem in adolescent girls and women (Orenstein, 1994; Pipher, 1994)., Is there any empirical basis for this assertion? In a massive undertaking, researchers examined gender differences in self-esteem by statistically summarizing the, results of several hundred studies (with respondents, ranging from 7 to 60 years of age) as well as the data, from three nationally representative surveys of adolescents and young adults (Kling et al., 1999). In both analyses, males scored higher on self-esteem than females,, although the differences were small for the most part., The largest difference occurred in the 15- to 18-yearold age group. Also, white girls have lower self-esteem, than minority girls do. The fact that white girls have, more negative body images than minority girls may be, a factor in their lower self-esteem (Twenge & Crocker,, 2002)., , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 151

Page 189 :
Basic Principles of Self-Perception, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , Distinguish between automatic and controlled processing., Define self-attributions, and identify the key dimensions, of attributions., Explain how optimistic and pessimistic explanatory styles, are related to adjustment., , Now that you’re familiar with some of the major aspects of the self, let’s consider how people construct and, maintain a coherent and positive view of the self., , Cognitive Processes, What do I want for breakfast? What shall I wear today?, You’re barely awake and you’re already making decisions. People are faced with an inordinate number of, decisions on a daily basis. How do they keep from being, overwhelmed? The key lies in how people process information. According to Shelley Taylor (1981a), people are “cognitive misers.” In this model, cognitive resources (attention, memory, and so forth) are limited,, so the mind works to “hoard” them by taking cognitive, short-cuts. For example, you probably have the same, morning routine—shower, drink coffee, read the paper, as you eat breakfast, check e-mail, and so forth. Because you do these things without a lot of thought, you, can conserve your attentional, decision-making, and, memory capacities for important cognitive tasks. This, example illustrates the default mode of handling information: automatic processing. On the other hand,, when important decisions arise or when you’re trying, to understand why you didn’t get that job you wanted,, you spend those precious cognitive resources. This mode, is termed controlled processing. Ellen Langer (1989) describes these two states as mindlessness and mindfulness, respectively. In addition to guiding the processing, of self-relevant information, these two modes of information processing operate in a variety of social situations, as you’ll see in subsequent chapters., Another way that cognitive resources are protected, is through selective attention, with high priority given, to information pertaining to the self (Bargh, 1997). An, example of this tendency is a phenomenon known as, the “cocktail party effect”—the ability to pick out the, mention of your name in a roomful of chattering people (Moray, 1959; Wood & Cowan, 1995)., Another principle of self-cognition is that people, strive to understand themselves. One way they do so,, as you saw in our discussion of social comparison theory, is to compare themselves with others (Wood &, Wilson, 2003). Yet another is to engage in attributional, thinking, our next topic., , 152, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , ■, ■, , Discuss four motives that guide self-understanding., Describe four strategies people use to maintain positive, feelings about the self., , Self-Attributions, Let’s say that you win a critical match for your school’s, tennis team. To what do you attribute your success? Is, your new practice schedule starting to pay off ? Did you, have the home court advantage? Perhaps your opponent was playing with a minor injury? This example, from everyday life illustrates the nature of the selfattribution process. Self-attributions are inferences, that people draw about the causes of their own behavior. People routinely make attributions to make, sense out of their experiences. These attributions involve inferences that ultimately represent guesswork, on each person’s part., Fritz Heider (1958) was the first to assert that people tend to locate the cause of a behavior either within, a person, attributing it to personal factors, or outside, of a person, attributing it to environmental factors. He, thus established one of the crucial dimensions along, which attributions are made: internal versus external., The other two dimensions are stable/unstable and controllable/uncontrollable., Internal or external. Elaborating on Heider’s insight, various theorists have agreed that explanations, of behavior and events can be categorized as internal, or external attributions (Jones & Davis, 1965; Kelley,, 1967; Weiner, 1974). Internal attributions ascribe the, causes of behavior to personal dispositions, traits,, abilities, and feelings. External attributions ascribe, the causes of behavior to situational demands and, environmental constraints. For example, if you credit, your poor statistics grade to your failure to prepare adequately for the test or to getting overly anxious during the test, you are making internal attributions., Whether one’s self-attributions are internal or external can have a tremendous impact on one’s personal, adjustment. As you’ll see in Chapter 8, lonely people, tend to attribute the cause of their loneliness to internal, stable causes (“I’m unlovable”). Similarly, studies, suggest that people who ascribe their setbacks to internal, personal causes while discounting external, situational explanations may be more prone to depression, than people who display opposite tendencies (Riso et al.,, 2003).

Page 190 :
Controllable or uncontrollable. A third dimension, in the attribution process acknowledges the fact that, sometimes events are under one’s control and sometimes they are not (Weiner, 1986, 1994). For example,, the amount of effort you expend on a task is typically, perceived as something under your control, whereas, an aptitude for music is viewed as something you are, born with (beyond your control). Controllability can, vary with each of the other two factors., These three dimensions appear to be the central, ones in the attribution process. Research has documented that self-attributions can influence future expectations (success or failure) and emotions (pride,, hopelessness, guilt), and that these expectations and, emotions combine to influence subsequent performance, (Weiner, 1986, 1994). Thus, self-attributions play a key, role in one’s feelings, motivational state, and behavior., , Explanatory Style, Julio and Josh are freshmen who have just struck out, trying to get their first college dates. After this disappointment, they reflect on the possible reasons for it., Julio speculates that his approach was too subtle. Look-, , Stability dimension, Stable cause, Unstable cause, (permanent), (temporary), Internal-external, dimension, , Stable or unstable. A second dimension people use, in making causal attributions is the stability of the causes, underlying behavior (Weiner, 1986, 1994). A stable, cause is one that is more or less permanent and unlikely to change over time. A sense of humor and intelligence are stable internal causes of behavior. Stable external causes of behavior include such things as laws, and rules (speed limits, no smoking areas). Unstable, causes of behavior are variable or subject to change., Unstable internal causes of behavior include such things, as mood (good or bad) and motivation (strong or weak)., Unstable external causes could be the weather and the, presence or absence of other people. According to Bernard Weiner (1986, 1994), the stable-unstable dimension in attribution cuts across the internal-external dimension, creating four types of attributions for success, and failure, as shown in Figure 5.10., Let’s apply Weiner’s model to a concrete event., Imagine that you are contemplating why you just landed, the job you wanted. You might credit your good fortune to internal factors that are stable (excellent ability) or unstable (hard work on your eye-catching résumé). Or you might attribute the outcome to external, factors that are stable (lack of top-flight competition), or unstable (luck). If you didn’t get the job, your explanations would fall in the same four categories: internalstable (lack of ability), internal-unstable (inadequate, effort on your résumé), external-stable (too much competition in your field), and external-unstable (bad luck)., , •, , Internal, cause, , Effort, Mood, Fatigue, , Ability, Intelligence, , External, cause, , Luck, Chance, Opportunity, , Task, difficulty, , F I G U R E 5. 10, , Key dimensions of attributional thinking. Weiner’s model, assumes that people’s explanations for success and failure emphasize internal versus external causes and stable versus unstable, causes. For example, if you attribute an outcome to great effort, or to lack of effort, you are citing causes that lie within the person. Since effort can vary over time, the causal factors at work, are unstable. Other examples of causal factors that fit into each, of the four cells in Weiner’s model are shown in the diagram., From Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L.. & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1972). Perceiving the, causes of success and failure. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanuouse, H. H. Kelly, R. E. Nisbett,, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Perceiving causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning, Press. Reprinted by permission of the author., , ing back, he realizes that he wasn’t very direct because, he was nervous about asking the woman out. When she, didn’t reply, he didn’t follow up for fear that she didn’t, really want to go out with him. On further reflection,, he reasons that she probably didn’t respond because, she wasn’t sure of his intentions. He vows to be more, direct the next time. Josh, on the other hand, mopes,, “I’ll never have a relationship. I’m a total loser.” On the, basis of these comments, who do you think is likely to, get a date in the future? If you guessed Julio, you are, probably correct. Let’s see why., Explanatory style refers to the tendency to use, similar causal attributions for a wide variety of events, in one’s life. According to Martin Seligman (1991),, people tend to exhibit, to varying degrees, an optimistic, explanatory style or a pessimistic explanatory style (see, Figure 5.11 on the next page). The person with an, optimistic explanatory style usually attributes setbacks, to external, unstable, and specific factors. A person, who failed to get a desired job, for example, might attribute this misfortune to factors in the interview situation (“The room was really hot,” “The questions were, slanted”) rather than to personal shortcomings. This, style can help people discount their setbacks and thus, maintain a favorable self-image. It also helps people, bounce back from failure. One study found that optimistic students had more confidence and performed, better than pessimistic students after a sports failure, (Martin-Krumm et al., 2003)., , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 153

Page 191 :
Pessimistic, explanatory, style, Negative, event, Failing, an exam, , Attributional, style, Optimistic, explanatory, style, , •, , Internal stable,, global, “I failed the exam, because, I’m stupid.”, , Lack of control, over future, events, “There’s nothing, I can do about it., I’ll never get, through college.”, , Chronic negative, feelings,, depression, , Attributions, , Expectations, , Outcomes, , External, unstable,, specific, “I failed the exam, because unusual, pressures at work, prevented me from, studying.”, , Control over, future events, “I‘ll have more, time to study, next time and I’ll, do much better.”, , Passive behavior,, learned, helplessness, , Temporary, negative, feelings, Active,, goal-directed, behavior, , FIG U R E 5.11, , The effects of attributional style on expectations, emotions, and behavior. The pessimistic explanatory style is seen in the top set of boxes. This attributional style, which attributes setbacks to internal, stable, and global causes, tends to result in an expectation of lack of control over future events,, depressed feelings, and passive behavior. A more adaptive, optimistic attributional style is shown in, the bottom set of boxes., , In contrast, people with a pessimistic explanatory, style tend to attribute their setbacks to internal, stable,, and global (or pervasive) factors. These attributions, make them feel bad about themselves and pessimistic, about their ability to handle challenges in the future., Such a style can foster passive behavior and make people more vulnerable to learned helplessness and depression (Peterson, Maier, & Seligman, 1993). Luckily,, cognitive-behavioral therapy appears to be successful, in helping depressed individuals change their pessimistic explanatory style (Seligman et al., 1999). Thus,, individuals can learn to stop always blaming themselves for negative outcomes (especially when they can’t, be avoided) and to take personal credit for positive, outcomes., , Motives Guiding, Self-Understanding, Whether people evaluate themselves by social comparisons, attributional thinking, or other means, they are, highly motivated to pursue self-understanding. In seeking self-understanding, people are driven by four major, motives: assessment, verification, improvement, and, enhancement (Biernat & Billings, 2001; Sedikides &, Strube, 1997)., Self-Assessment, , The self-assessment motive is reflected in people’s desire for truthful information about themselves (Trope,, , 154, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , 1983, 1986). Individuals seek accurate feedback about, many types of information—their personal qualities,, abilities, physical features, and so forth. It’s obvious, why people look for accurate information. After all, it, helps them set realistic goals and behave in appropriate ways (Oettingen & Gollwitzer, 2001). Still, the bald, truth is not always welcome. Accordingly, people are, also motivated by other concerns., Self-Verification, , The self-verification motive drives people toward information that matches what they already know about, themselves, whether it is positive or negative. This tendency to strive for a consistent self-image ensures that, individuals’ self-concepts are relatively stable. Individuals maintain consistent self-perceptions in a number of, subtle ways and are often unaware of doing so (Schlenker, & Pontari, 2000). For example, people maintain consistency between their past and present behavior by, erasing past memories that conflict with present ones., To illustrate, people who were once shy and who later, became outgoing have been shown to recall memories, about themselves that indicate that they perceive themselves as always having been outgoing (Ross & Conway, 1986). This inclination to revise the past in favor, of the present may lie behind the oft-heard parental, reproof, “When I was your age . . .” Here, parents conveniently erase memories of their childhood behavior—, which was probably similar to that of their children—, and, instead, compare their children’s behavior to their

Page 192 :
own current behavior (Ross, McFarland, & Fletcher,, 1981)., Another way people maintain self-consistency is, by seeking out feedback and situations that will confirm their existing self-perceptions and avoiding potentially disconfirming situations or feedback. According to William Swann’s self-verification theory, people, prefer to receive feedback from others that is consistent with their own self-views. Thus, those with positive self-concepts should prefer positive feedback from, others and those with negative self-concepts should, prefer negative feedback. Research usually finds this to, be the case (Swann, Rentfrow, & Guinn, 2003). In one, study, college men were divided into either a positive, self-concept group or a negative self-concept group, based on test scores. They were then asked to choose a, partner for a subsequent 2- to 3-hour interaction. Participants were led to believe that one of the prospective partners held views of him that were consistent, with his self-view and that the other held views of him, that were inconsistent with his self-view. As predicted,, subjects with positive self-views preferred partners who, viewed them positively, whereas those with negative, self-views chose partners who viewed them negatively, (Swann, Stein-Seroussi, & Geisler, 1992)., Self-Improvement, , What is your current self-improvement project? To, study more? To get more exercise? When people seek, to better themselves, the self-improvement motive, comes into play. In trying to improve, individuals typically look to successful others for inspiration (Collins,, 1996). Advertisers of personal care products (tooth, whiteners, exercise machines, and so forth) tap into, this motive by showing before-and-after photographs, of individuals who have used the products., Self-Enhancement, , Finally, people are motivated by self-enhancement, or, the tendency to maintain positive feelings about the, self. One example of self-enhancement is the tendency, to hold flattering views of one’s personal qualities, a, tendency termed the better-than-average effect (Alicke,, 1985; Buckingham & Alicke, 2002). You’ve already seen, an example of this effect in our earlier report that 70 percent of students who took the SAT rated themselves, above average in leadership ability—a mathematical, impossibility. Students can take perverse pleasure in, knowing that faculty also succumb to this bias: 94 percent of them regard their teaching as above average, (Cross, 1977)!, A second example of self-enhancement concerns, illusions of control (Langer, 1975), in which people, overestimate their degree of control over outcomes., Thus, individuals who pick their own “lucky” numbers, , on lottery tickets falsely believe that they can influence, the outcome of such random events. A third form of, self-enhancement is the tendency to have unrealistic, optimism about future events (Weinstein, 1980). For example, most people believe that they will have a brighter, future and experience fewer negative events than others (Helweg-Larsen & Shepperd, 2001)., While self-enhancement is quite common, it is not, universal. Individuals who have low self-esteem or who, are depressed are less likely to use self-enhancement, than others (Taylor & Brown, 1988, 1994). Culture also, plays a role. A number of studies have found that selfenhancement is more pronounced in Western than in, Eastern cultures (Kanagawa, Cross, & Markus, 2001)., Still, self-enhancement motives are not entirely absent, in collectivist cultures. It seems that American subjects, self-enhance on individualistic attributes and Japanese participants on collectivist attributes (Sedikides,, Gaertner, & Toguchi, 2003). In other words, people, tend to self-enhance on the characteristics that their, culture designates as important. Thus, people may selfenhance on different (culturally valued) attributes, but, self-enhancement appears to be a universal motive., The four self-motives of assessment, verification,, improvement, and enhancement permit flexibility in, making self-evaluations. Although you would think that, accurate information would be the most useful to people, that doesn’t seem to be the case. In a series of studies that pitted self-assessment, self-verification, and selfenhancement against each other, the self-enhancement, motive was found to be the strongest, the self-verification, motive a distant second, and the self-assessment motive an even more distant third (Sedikides, 1993)., , Methods of Self-Enhancement, The powerful self-enhancement motive drives individuals to seek positive (and reject negative) information, about themselves. Let’s examine four cognitive strategies people commonly use., Downward Comparisons, , We’ve already mentioned that people compare themselves to others as a means of learning more about themselves (social comparison), whether or not they expect, to receive esteem-threatening information. Once threat, enters the picture, people often change their strategy, and choose to compare themselves with someone who, is worse off than they are (Wood, 1989). This defensive, tendency to compare oneself with someone whose, troubles are more serious than one’s own is termed, downward social comparison. Why do people switch, strategies under threat? It seems that downward social, comparisons are associated with increases in both mood, and self-esteem (Reis, Gerrard, & Gibbons, 1993)., , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 155

Page 193 :
A dramatic example of downward comparison can, be found in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on, the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in September 2001: Compared to the devastating losses suffered, by the victims and families, most people’s problems, suddenly appeared insignificant. There are also more, common examples. If you have ever been in a serious, car accident in which your car was “totaled,” you probably reassured yourself by reflecting on the fact that at, least no one was seriously injured. Similarly, people with, chronic illnesses may compare themselves with those, who have life-threatening diseases. On television talk, and “reality” shows (Dr. Phil, for example), people with, assorted life tragedies provide numerous opportunities for downward social comparison. This aspect no, doubt contributes to their popularity., , prevalent in individualistic, Western societies, where, the emphasis on competition and high self-esteem motivates people to try to impress others, as well as themselves. In contrast, Japanese subjects exhibit a selfeffacing bias in explaining successes (Akimoto & Sanbonmatsu, 1999; Markus & Kitayama, 1991), as they, tend to attribute their successes to the help they receive, from others or to the ease of the task, while downplaying, the importance of their ability. When they fail, Japanese subjects tend to be more self-critical than subjects, from individualistic cultures (Heine & Renshaw, 2002)., They are more likely to accept responsibility for their, failures and to use their setbacks as an impetus for selfimprovement (Heine et al., 2001). Studies have also, failed to find the usual self-serving bias in Nepalese and, Chinese samples (Lee & Seligman, 1997; Smith & Bond,, 1994)., , Suppose that you and three other individuals apply for, Basking in Reflected Glory, When your favorite sports team won the national, a part-time job in the parks and recreation department, championship last year, did you make a point of wearand you are selected for the position. How do you exing the team cap? And when Ben, your best friend, won, plain your success? Chances are, you tell yourself that, that special award, do you remember how often you, you were hired because you were the most qualified for, told others the good news about him? If you played a, the job. But how do the other three people interpret, role in someone’s success, it’s understandable that you, their negative outcome? Do they tell themselves that, would want to share in the recognition; however, peoyou got the job because you were the most able? Unlikely! Instead, they probably attribute their, loss to “bad luck” or to not having had time, to prepare for the interview. These different, explanations for success and failure reflect, the self-serving bias, or the tendency to, attribute one’s successes to personal factors and one’s failures to situational factors, (Miller and Ross, 1975)., Research indicates that people are more, likely to take credit for their successes than, they are to disavow their failures (Campbell, & Sedikides, 1999). To illustrate: In an experiment, two strangers jointly took a test. They, then received bogus success or failure feedback about their test performance and were, asked to assign responsibility for the test results. Successful participants claimed credit,, but those who failed blamed their partners, (Campbell et al., 2000). Still, people don’t always rush to take credit. In another experiment in the just-cited study, participants, were actual friends. In this case, participants, shared responsibility for both successful, and unsuccessful outcomes. Thus, friendship places limits on the self-serving bias., Although the self-serving bias has been, documented in a variety of cultures (Fletcher, People frequently claim association with others who are successful (bask in, & Ward 1988), it seems to be particularly, reflected glory) to maintain positive feelings about the self., , 156, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , © GDT/Stone/Getty Images, , Self-Serving Bias

Page 194 :
PEANUTS reprinted by permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., , ple often want to share recognition even when they are, on the sidelines of an outstanding achievement. Basking in reflected glory is the tendency to enhance one’s, image by publicly announcing one’s association with, those who are successful., Robert Cialdini and his colleagues (1976) studied, this phenomenon on college campuses with nationally, ranked football teams. They predicted that, when asked, how their team had fared in a recent football game,, students would be more likely to say, “We won” (in, other words, to bask in reflected glory, or to “BIRG”—, pronounced with a soft “g”) when the home team had, been successful than to respond “We lost” when it had, been defeated. As predicted, students were more likely, to BIRG when their team won than when it lost. Also,, subjects who believed that they had just failed a bogus, test were more likely to use the words “we won” than, those who believed they had performed well., A related self-enhancement strategy is “CORFing,”, or cutting off reflected failure. Because self-esteem is, partly tied to an individual’s associations with others,, people often protect their self-esteem by distancing, themselves from those who are unsuccessful (Cialdini, et al., 1976; Boen, Vanbeselaere, & Feys, 2002). Thus, if, your cousin is arrested for drunk driving, you may tell, others that you don’t really know him very well., Self-Handicapping, , When people fail at an important task, they need to, save face. In such instances, individuals can usually, come up with a face-saving excuse (“I had a terrible, stomachache”). Curiously, some people actually behave in a way that sets them up to fail so that they have, a ready-made excuse for failure, should it occur. Selfhandicapping is the tendency to sabotage one’s performance to provide an excuse for possible failure., For example, when a big test is looming, they put off, studying until the last minute or go out drinking the, night before the test. If, as is likely, they don’t do well, , on the exam, they explain their poor performance by, saying they didn’t prepare. (After all, wouldn’t you, rather have others believe that your poor performance, is due to inadequate preparation rather than lack of, ability?) People use a variety of tactics for handicapping their performance: alcohol, drugs, procrastination, a bad mood, a distracting stimulus, anxiety, depression, and being overcommitted (Baumeister, 1998)., A related tactic is sandbagging, in which people attempt to reduce performance expectations by playing, down their abilities and predicting they’ll fail (Gibson, & Sachau, 2000)., Individuals differ in their reasons for selfhandicapping. People with low self-esteem more often, use it to maintain a positive impression (or to avoid, failing), whereas those with high self-esteem are more, likely to use it to enhance their image (Tice, 1991). That, is, if they happen to do well, they can claim that they are, especially capable because they performed so well with, minimal preparation., Self-handicapping seems like a “win-win” strategy: If you fail, you have a face-saving excuse ready,, and if you happen to succeed, you can claim that you, are unusually gifted! However, it probably has not escaped your attention that self-handicapping is highly, risky. By giving yourself an attributional “out” in case, of failure, your self-defeating behavior will likely result, in poor performance (Zuckerman, Kieffer, & Knee,, 1998). Moreover, while self-handicapping may save you, from negative self-attributions about your ability, it, does not prevent others from making different negative attributions about you. For example, people believe that individuals are less competent when they, self-handicap than when they don’t (Rhodewalt et al.,, 1995). Also, others may perceive you as lazy, inclined, to drink too much, or highly anxious, depending on, the means you use to self-handicap. Consequently, this, self-enhancement tactic has serious drawbacks., , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 157

Page 195 :
Self-Regulation, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, ■, ■, , Define self-regulation, and explain the ego-depletion model of, self-regulation., Explain why self-efficacy is important to psychological adjustment., Describe how individuals develop self-efficacy., Describe the three categories of self-defeating behavior., , “Should I have that hot fudge sundae or not?” “I guess, I’d better get started on that English paper.” People are, constantly trying to resist impulses and make themselves do things they don’t want to do. They also determine the various goals they want to pursue and how, to reach them. This work of directing and controlling, one’s behavior is termed self-regulation. Clearly, the, ability to manage and direct what you think, how you, feel, and how you behave is tied to your success at work,, your relationships, and your mental and physical health, (Baumeister & Vohs, 2003). Being able to forgo immediate gratification (studying instead of partying) and, focus one’s behavior toward important, longer-range, goals (graduating and getting a good job) is of paramount importance if one is to be successful in life., It’s possible that people have a limited amount of, self-control resources. So if you tax these resources resisting temptation in a given situation, you may have a, hard time resisting the next immediate temptation or, persisting at a new task. At least that’s the idea behind, the ego-depletion model of self-regulation (Baumeister, et al., 1998). To investigate this hypothesis, researchers, asked college students to participate in a study of taste, perception (the study was actually on self-control), (Baumeister et al., 1998). Some participants were asked, to eat two or three radishes in 5 minutes but not to, touch the chocolate candy and chocolate chip cookies, that were nearby. Others were asked to eat some candy, or some cookies but were told not to eat any of the, nearby radishes. A control group didn’t participate in, this part of the study. Then all subjects were asked to, solve what were, unbeknownst-to-them, unsolvable, puzzles while they supposedly waited for another part, of the study. Researchers measured the subjects’ selfcontrol by the amount of time they persisted at the, puzzles and the number of attempts they made. According to the ego-depletion model, the radish-eaters, would use more self-control resources (resisting the, chocolate) than would the chocolate-eaters (resisting the, radishes) or the subjects in the no-food control group., Thus, this group should have the fewest self-control, resources to use for persisting at a difficult task. As you, can see in Figure 5.12, the radish-eaters gave up sooner, and made fewer attempts on the puzzles than the, chocolate-eaters or the control group. One of the rea-, , 158, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , sons people rely so often on habit and automatic processing is to conserve these important self-control resources (Baumeister, Muraven, & Tice, 2000)., Self-regulation seems to develop early and remain, relatively stable. One study reported that 4-year-olds, who were better at delaying gratification did better both, in terms of academic performance and social competence some ten years later (Mischel, Shoda, & Peake,, 1988; Shoda, Mischel, & Peake, 1990). In this section,, we examine self-efficacy, a key aspect of self-regulation,, as well as self-defeating behavior, a case of self-control, failure., , Self-Efficacy, As explained in Chapter 2, self-efficacy refers to people’s, conviction that they can achieve specific goals. According to Albert Bandura (1997, 2000), efficacy beliefs, vary according to the person’s skills. You may have high, , Persistence (time on task), Radish, , Condition, , ■, , •, , 8.35 minutes, , Chocolate, , 18.90 minutes, , No food, contol, , 20.86 minutes, Persistence (number of attempts), , Radish, , 19.40, , Chocolate, , 34.29, , No food, contol, , 32.81, , F I G U R E 5. 12, , Persistence on unsolvable puzzles. Participants who were, instructed to eat radishes and not to eat chocolate chip cookies, or chocolate candy used more self-control resources than participants who were instructed to eat the chocolate and not to touch, the radishes or participants in the no-food control group. Because, the radish-eaters had relatively few self-control resources to help, them persist at a difficult task (unsolvable puzzles), they persisted, for the shortest time and made the fewest attempts to solve, the puzzles compared to the other two groups. (Adapted from, Baumeister et al., 1998)

Page 196 :
A number of studies have shown that self-efficacy affects individuals’ commitments to goals, their performance on tasks, and their persistence toward goals in, the face of obstacles (Maddux & Gosselin, 2003). In, addition, people with high self-efficacy anticipate success in future outcomes and are able to tune out negative thoughts that can lead to failure. Self-efficacy is related to academic success (Schunk, 2003), career choice, (Betz & Klein, 1996), and job performance (Stajkovic, & Luthans, 1998)., Because of the importance of self-efficacy in psychological adjustment, it is worth keeping in mind that, it is learned and can be changed. Research shows that, increasing self-efficacy is an effective way to improve, health (losing weight, stopping smoking) (Maddux &, Gosselin, 2003) and to treat a variety of psychological, problems, including test anxiety (Smith, 1989), phobias (Williams, 1995), fear of sexual assault (Ozer &, Bandura, 1990), eating disorders (Goodrick et al., 1999),, , Developing Self-Efficacy, , Self-efficacy is obviously a valuable quality. How does, one acquire it? Bandura (1997, 2000) identifies four, sources of self-efficacy: mastery experiences, vicarious, experiences, persuasion/encouragement, and interpretation of emotional arousal., Mastery experiences. The most effective path to selfefficacy is through mastering new skills. Sometimes, new skills come easily—learning how to use the copy, machine in the library, for instance. Some things are, harder to master, such as learning how to use a spreadsheet program or how to play the piano. In acquiring, more difficult skills, people usually make mistakes., How they handle these failure experiences is the key to, learning self-efficacy. If you give up when you make, mistakes, your failure instills self-doubts or low selfefficacy. On the other hand, if you persist through failure, experiences to eventual success, you learn the lesson of, self-efficacy: I can do it! A practical implication for parents, teachers, and coaches is that they should set high,, but attainable, goals for children and encourage them to, learn from their mistakes and to persevere until they succeed. This approach provides children with the mastery, experiences they need to build self-efficacy and approach, future challenges with confidence. Well-intentioned, parents, teachers, and supervisors unwittingly deprive, individuals of opportunities to develop self-efficacy, when they do others’ work or regularly allow others to, opt out of obligations with no consequences., Vicarious experiences. Another way to improve selfefficacy is by watching others perform a skill you want, , Ironically, difficulties and failures can, ultimately contribute to the development, of a strong sense of self-efficacy. Selfefficacy tends to improve when youngsters learn to persist through difficulties, and overcome failures., , © Mary Kate Denny/PhotoEdit, , Correlates of Self-Efficacy, , and substance abuse (DiClemente, Fairhurst, & Piotrowski, 1995)., Courtesy, Albert Bandura, , self-efficacy when it comes to making friends but low self-efficacy, when it comes to speaking in front, of a group. However, simply having, a skill doesn’t guarantee that you, will be able to put it into practice., Like The Little Engine that Could,, you must also believe that you are, capable of doing so (“I think I can,, Albert Bandura, I think I can . . .”). In other words,, self-efficacy is concerned not with, the skills you have, but with your beliefs about what you, can do with these skills., , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 159

Page 197 :
to learn. It’s important that you choose a model who is, competent at the task, and it helps if the model is similar to you (in age, gender, and ethnicity). For example,, if you’re shy about speaking up for yourself, observing, someone who is good at doing so can help you develop, the confidence to do it yourself. Picking successful role, models is important—watching unsuccessful ones can, undermine self-efficacy., Persuasion and encouragement. Although it is less, effective than the first two approaches, a third way to, develop self-efficacy is through the encouragement of, others. For example, if you’re having a hard time asking, someone for a date, a friend’s encouragement might, give you just the push you need. Of course, persuasion, doesn’t always work. And, unless encouragement is accompanied by specific and concrete suggestions, this, tactic is unlikely to be successful., Interpretation of emotional arousal. The physiological responses that accompany feelings and one’s interpretations of these responses are another source of, self-efficacy. Let’s say you’re sitting in class waiting for, your professor to distribute an exam. You notice that, your palms are moist and your heart is pounding. If you, attribute these behaviors to fear, you can temporarily, dampen your self-efficacy, thus decreasing your chances, of doing well. Alternatively, if you attribute your sweaty, palms and racing heart to the arousal everyone needs, to perform well, you may be able to boost your selfefficacy and increase your chances of doing well. Of, course, self-regulation doesn’t always succeed. That’s, the case in self-defeating behavior, our next topic., , Self-Defeating Behavior, It’s adaptable for people to act in their own self-interest,, and typically they do. But sometimes people knowingly, do things that are bad for them—such as smoking, having unprotected sex, and completing important assignments at the last minute. Self-defeating behaviors, are seemingly intentional actions that thwart a person’s self-interest. According to Roy Baumeister (1997;, Baumeister & Scher, 1988), there are three categories, of intentional self-defeating behaviors: deliberate selfdestruction, tradeoffs, and counterproductive strategies., The key difference among these three behaviors lies in, how intentional they are. As you can see in Figure 5.13,, attempts at deliberate self-destruction involve the most, intent; counterproductive strategies are the least intentional, and tradeoffs fall in between., In deliberate self-destruction, people want to harm, themselves and they choose courses of action that will, forseeably lead to that result. Although this type of behavior may occur in individuals with psychological, disorders, deliberate self-destruction appears to be infrequent in normal populations., , 160, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , In tradeoffs, people foresee the possibility of harming themselves but accept it as a necessary accompaniment to achieving a desirable goal. Overeating, smoking, and drinking to excess are examples that come, readily to mind. Other examples include procrastinating (putting off tasks feels good in the short-run, but, the struggle to meet looming deadlines results in poor, performance and increased stress and illness), failing, to follow prescribed health care advice (it’s easier to, slack off now, but doing so leads to future problems),, shyness (avoiding social situations protects against, anxiety but makes loneliness more likely), and selfhandicapping (getting drunk before an exam explains, poor performance but increases the chances of failure)., One factor that underlies most self-defeating tradeoffs is poor judgment. That is, people choose immediate benefits (pleasant sensations, escape from painful, thoughts or feelings) over long-term costs (heart disease, lung cancer, few intimate relationships). To bolster their choices, they usually ignore or downplay the, long-term risks of their behavior. Two other factors, that underlie tradeoffs are emotional distress (anxiety), and high self-awareness. Because negative emotions, are distressing, people want quick escape. Thus, they, light a cigarette or have a drink to bring immediate relief, and they tune out the long-term negative consequences of their actions. In short, people engage in tradeoffs because they bring immediate, positive, and reliable, outcomes, not because they want to kill themselves., In counterproductive strategies, a person pursues a, desirable outcome but misguidedly uses an approach, that is bound to fail. Of course, you can’t always know, in advance if a strategy will pay off. Thus, people must, habitually use this strategy for it to qualify as selfdefeating. For example, some people tend to persist in, , Three Categories of, Self-Defeating Behavior, , Type of self-defeating behavior, , •, , Harm, foreseen?, , Harm, desired?, , Deliberate self-destruction, , Yes, , Yes, , Tradeoffs, , Yes, , No, , Counterproductive strategies, , No, , No, , F I G U R E 5. 13, , Three categories of self-defeating behavior. Roy Baumeister, and Steven Scher (1988) distinguished three categories of selfdefeating behaviors, based on how intentional the behaviors are., Intentionality is determined by two factors: an individual’s awareness that a behavior could bring possible harm and an individual’s desire to harm himself or herself. Deliberate self-destruction, is the most intentional, followed by tradeoffs, then counterproductive strategies. (Based on Baumeister & Scher, 1988)

Page 198 :
R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , © Marc Vaughn/Masterfile, , Self-Defeating Behaviors, by Milton R. Cudney and, Robert E. Hardy (Harper, San Francisco, 1991), , Self-defeating behaviors come in many forms with many underlying motivations. Overeating is a matter of tradeoffs. People, realize that excessive eating may be harmful in the long run,, but it is enjoyable at the time., , unproductive endeavors, such as pursuing an unreachable career goal or an unrequited love. Such behavior, costs valuable time, generates painful emotions, and, blocks the discovery of productive approaches. The, key cause of counterproductive behavior seems to be, errors in judgment, such as misjudging one’s abilities, or the actions required to produce a desired result., People persist in these behaviors because they believe, they’ll be successful, not because they are intent on, self-defeat., , Having successfully treated thousands of clients, the, authors (two counseling psychologists) decided to share, their approach with a wider audience. (Dr. Cudney died, in 1992.) They offer insights on a wide array of selfdefeating behaviors, including procrastination, substance, abuse, smoking, overeating, worrying, compulsive actions, shyness, and perfectionism. They assert that selfdefeating behavior develops as an ineffective way of, protecting oneself against hurt and disappointment., Thus, a woman who is afraid of being lonely grasps at, any man she meets. Predictably, men are put off by her, desperation, and she finds herself alone. The tragic irony, of self-defeating behavior is that the fear of a particular consequence (loneliness) leads to behaviors that, virtually guarantee the feared outcome. The authors explain the genesis and dynamics of self-defeating behavior and offer practical advice to guide individuals away, from self-defeating behaviors and toward life-enhancing, actions. Although short on documentation, the book is, highly readable, provides useful examples, and is sprinkled with numerous charts and helpful self-tests., Copyright © 1975 by Lifegiving Enterprises, Inc. Copyright © 1991 by Milton R., Cudney and Robert E. Hardy. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., , To conclude, although most people engage in selfdefeating behavior at some time, there is little evidence, that they deliberately try to harm themselves or to fail, at a task. Instead, self-defeating behavior appears to be, the result of people’s distorted judgments or strong desires to escape from immediate, painful feelings. If you’re, plagued by self-defeating behavior, the Recommended, Reading titled Self-Defeating Behaviors (Cudney &, Hardy, 1991) provides additional insights and suggestions for dealing with this frustrating problem., , Self-Presentation, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , Explain why and when individuals engage in impression management., Cite some strategies people use to make positive impressions on others., Describe how high self-monitors are different from low self-monitors., , Whereas your self-concept involves how you see yourself, your public self involves how you want others, , to see you. A public self is an image presented to others in social interactions. This presentation of a pub-, , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 161

Page 199 :
lic self may sound deceitful, but it is perfectly normal,, and everyone does it (Schlenker, 2003). Many selfpresentations (ritual greetings, for example) take place, automatically and without awareness. But when it really counts (job interviews, for example), people consciously strive to make the best possible impression., Typically, individuals have a number of public, selves that are tied to certain situations and certain, people. For instance, you may have one public self for, your parents and another for your peers. (Do you cover, your tattoo when you go home?) You may have still, others for your teachers, your boss, your co-workers,, and so forth. Also, people differ in the degree of overlap or congruence among their various public selves, (see Figure 5.14). Does it matter whether you perceive, yourself to be essentially the same person in different, situations? It seems so. People who see themselves as, being similar across different social roles (with friends,, at work, at school, with parents, with romantic partners) are better adjusted than those who perceive less, integration in their self-views across these roles (Donahue et al., 1993; Lutz & Ross, 2003)., , at a study of behavior in simulated job interviews (von, Baeyer, Sherk, & Zanna, 1981). In this study, female job, applicants were led to believe that the man who would, interview them held either traditional, chauvinistic, views of women or just the opposite. The researchers, found that applicants who expected a chauvinist presented themselves in a more traditionally feminine, manner than subjects in the other condition. Their selfpresentation efforts extended to both their appearance (they wore more makeup) and their communication style (they talked less and gave more traditional, answers to a question about marriage and children)., In a job interview, people are particularly attentive to, making a good impression, but impression management also operates in everyday interactions, although, , Impression Management, Interestingly, people think others notice and evaluate, them more than is the actual case (Gilovich & Savitsky, 1999). This common tendency is aptly termed the, spotlight effect. People also normally strive to make a, positive impression on others to be liked, respected,, hired, and so forth (Baumeister & Twenge, 2003). Impression management refers to usually conscious efforts by people to influence how others think of them., To see impression management in operation, let’s look, , Public selves for, (a) spouse, (b) parents, , (c) neighbors, (d) boss, (e) colleagues at work, , b, d, , e, , c, , d, , c, b, , Person 1, , •, , e, a, © 2004 AP/Wide World Photos, , a, , Person 2, , FIG U R E 5.14, , Public selves and adjustment. Person 1 has very divergent, public selves with relatively little overlap among them. Person 2,, whose public selves are more congruent with each other, is likely, to be better adjusted than Person 1., 162, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Singer Christina Aguilera attracts press attention for her unusual self-presentation behavior.

Page 200 :
individuals may be less aware of it (Schlenker, 2003)., Let’s look at some common impression management, strategies., Impression Management Strategies, , One reason people engage in impression management, is to claim a particular identity (Baumeister, 1998)., Thus, you select a type of dress, hairstyle, and manner, of speech to present a certain image of yourself. Tattoos and body piercings also create a specific image. A, second motive for impression management is to gain, liking and approval from others—by editing what you, say about yourself and by using various nonverbal cues, such as smiles, gestures, and eye contact. Because selfpresentation is practiced so often, people usually do, it automatically. At other times, however, impression management may be used intentionally—to get a, job, a date, a promotion, and so forth. Some common, self-presentation strategies include ingratiation, selfpromotion, exemplification, intimidation, and supplication (Jones, 1990)., Ingratiation. Of all the self-presentation strategies,, ingratiation is the most fundamental and most frequently used. Ingratiation is behaving in ways to make, oneself likable to others. For example, giving compliments is effective, as long as you are sincere (people, dislike insincerity and can often detect it). Doing favors, for others is also a common tactic, as long as your gestures aren’t so spectacular they leave others feeling indebted (Gordon, 1996). Other ingratiation tactics include expressing liking for others and going along with, others (to get others to like you, it helps to do the things, that they want to do)., Self-promotion. The motive behind self-promotion, is earning respect. You do so by playing up your strong, points so you will be perceived as competent. For instance, in a job interview, you might find ways to mention that you earned high honors at school and that you, were president of the student body and a member of, the soccer team. To keep from coming across as a braggart, you shouldn’t go overboard with self-promotion., For this reason, false modesty often works well., Exemplification. Because most people try to project an honest image, you have to demonstrate exemplary behavior to claim special credit for integrity or, character. Danger-fraught occupations such as those, in the military or law enforcement provide obvious, opportunities to exemplify moral virtue. A less dramatic, but still effective, strategy is to behave consistently according to high ethical standards—as long as, you don’t come across as self-righteous. Also, your words, and deeds need to match unless you want to be labeled, a hypocrite., Intimidation. This strategy sends the message,, “Don’t mess with me.” Intimidation usually works only, in nonvoluntary relationships—for instance, when it’s, , WE B LI N K 5.4, , Impression Management, This short article at TheFreeDictionary.com explains impression management and provides a number of links to, other articles on related issues., , hard for workers to find another employer or for an, economically dependent spouse to leave a relationship., Obvious intimidation tactics include threats and the, withholding of valuable resources (salary increases,, promotions, sex). A more subtle tactic is emotional intimidation—holding over a person’s head the threat of, an aggressive outburst if you don’t get your way. The, other self-presentation strategies work by creating a, favorable impression; intimidation usually generates, dislike. Nonetheless, it can work., Supplication. This is usually the tactic of last resort. To get favors from others, individuals try to present themselves as weak and dependent—as in the song,, “Ain’t Too Proud to Beg.” Students may plead or break, into tears in an instructor’s office in an attempt to get, a grade changed. Because of the social norm to help, those in need, supplication may work; however, unless, the supplicator has something to offer the potential, benefactor, it’s not an effective strategy., Individuals tailor their use of self-presentation, strategies to match the situation. For instance, it’s unlikely that you’d try intimidating your boss; you’d be, more likely to ingratiate or promote yourself with her., As you can see in Figure 5.15 on the next page, all of, these strategies carry risks. Thus, to make a good impression, you must use these strategies skillfully., Perspectives on Impression Management, , Curiously, almost all research on self-presentation has, been conducted on first meetings between strangers,, yet the vast majority of actual social interactions take, place between people who already know each other., Noting the gap between reality and research, Dianne, Tice and her colleagues (1995) investigated whether, self-presentation varied in these two situations. They, found that people strive to make positive impressions, when they interact with strangers but shift toward, modesty and neutral self-presentations when they are, with friends. Why the difference? Because strangers, don’t know you, you want to give them positive information so they’ll form a good impression of you. Besides, strangers have no way of knowing whether you, are bending the truth. On the other hand, your friends, already know your positive qualities. Thus, belaboring, them is unnecessary and may make you seem immodest., Likewise, your friends know you well enough to know, whether you are grandstanding, so you don’t bother., CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 163

Page 201 :
Strategic Self-Presentation Strategies, , •, , Presentation strategy, , Impression sought, , Emotion to be aroused in target, , Negative impressions risked, , Ingratiation, , Likable, , Affection, , Boot-licker, conformist, , Self-promotion, , Competent, , Respect, , Conceited, defensive, , Exemplification, , Morally superior, , Guilt, , Hypocrite, sanctimonious, , Intimidation, , Dangerous, , Fear, , Blusterer, ineffectual, , Supplication, , Helpless, , Obligation, , Undeserving, lazy, , FIG U R E 5.15, , Strategic self-presentation strategies. Individuals rely on a variety of self-presentation strategies to, present a certain image of themselves to others (Jones, 1990). To avoid the risks associated with the, strategies, it’s important to use the tactics skillfully., , Sometimes the need to project a positive public, image can lead to dangerous practices (Leary, Tchividjian, & Kraxberger, 1994). For instance, to avoid the embarrassment of buying condoms or talking with their, sex partners, people will practice unprotected sex and, heighten their risk of contracting AIDS. In pursuit of an, attractive tan, people spend hours in the sun, thereby, increasing their chances of getting skin cancer. To keep, thin, many (especially women) use strong diet medications and develop full-blown eating disorders (see, the Chapter 15 Application). To impress their peers,, some adolescents take up drinking and smoking and, even drug abuse. Finally, out of the desire to appear, brave and daring, some people engage in reckless behavior that ends in accidents and death., How good are people at discerning the results of, their impression management attempts? As we noted, earlier, individuals are much better judges of how people, in general, view them than they are of how specific, persons evaluate them., , Self-Monitoring, According to Mark Snyder (1979, 1986), people vary, in their awareness of how they are perceived by others., Self-monitoring refers to the degree to which people, attend to and control the impressions they make, on others. People who are high self-monitors seem, to be very sensitive to their impact on others. Low, , WE B LI N K 5.5, , Building Self-Esteem, The Counseling Center at the University of Florida offers, tips on how to build self-esteem and self-confidence at, this website., , 164, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , self-monitors, on the other hand,, are less concerned about impression management and behave more, spontaneously., Compared to low self-monitors,, high self-monitors want to make a, favorable impression and try to tailor their actions accordingly; they, are skilled at deciphering what othMark Snyder, ers want to see. Because they control their emotions well and deliberately regulate nonverbal signals, they are talented at, self-presentation (Gangestad & Snyder, 2000). In contrast, low self-monitors are more likely to express their, true beliefs or, possibly, to try to convey the impression that they are sincere and genuine individuals., As you might infer, these two personality types view, themselves differently (Gangestad & Snyder, 2000)., Low self-monitors see themselves as having strong principles and behaving in line with them, whereas high, self-monitors perceive themselves as flexible and pragmatic. Because high self-monitors don’t see a necessary connection between their private beliefs and their, public actions, they aren’t troubled by discrepancies, between beliefs and behavior., You may be wondering whether these groups differ, on psychological adjustment. It seems that more adjustment problems are found among individuals who, score either very high or very low on self-monitoring, compared to those who score closer to the middle, (Miller & Thayer, 1989). On a final note, we’ll add that, self-monitoring scores decline as people age—probably because individuals become more comfortable with, themselves over time (Reifman, Klein, & Murphy, 1989)., In the upcoming Application, we redirect our attention, to the critical issue of self-esteem and outline seven, steps for boosting it., , Courtesy, Mark Snyder, , Based on Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company, p. 198.

Page 202 :
Building Self-Esteem, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Explain when it is inadvisable to increase one’s self-esteem and why, this is so., List seven ways to build self-esteem., , Answer the following “yes” or “no.”, ___ 1. I worry that others don’t like me., ___ 2. I have very little confidence in my abilities., ___ 3. I often feel awkward in social situations and, just don’t know how to take charge., ___ 4. I have difficulty accepting praise or flattery., ___ 5. I have a hard time bouncing back from failure, experiences., If you answered “yes” to most of these questions, you, may suffer from low self-esteem. As we noted earlier,, people with low self-esteem are less happy and more, prone to depression, become demoralized after failures, and are anxious in relationships. Too, people with, high global self-esteem may have pockets of low selfesteem—for example, you may feel great about your, “social self ” but not so good about your “academic self.”, Thus, this Application can be useful to many people., We have one caveat, however: It is possible for selfesteem to be too high—recall our earlier discussion, about narcissism, ego threats, and violence. Better adjustment is associated with realistically high (and stable) self-esteem. Thus, our suggestions are directed to, those whose self-esteem could use a legitimate boost, not, to those whose self-esteem is inflated. The latter group, can benefit from developing more realistic self-views., As you saw in our discussion of self-efficacy, there, is ample evidence that efforts at self-improvement can, pay off by boosting self-esteem. Following are seven, guidelines for building self-esteem. These suggestions, are distilled from the advice of many experts, including Baumeister et al. (2003), Ellis (1989), McKay and, Fanning (2000), Rogers (1977), and Zimbardo (1990)., 1. Recognize That You, Control Your Self-Image, , The first thing you must do is recognize that you ultimately control how you see yourself. You do have the, power to change your self-image. True, we have discussed at length how feedback from others influences, your self-concept. Yes, social comparison theory suggests that people need such feedback and that it would, , be unwise to ignore it completely. However, the final, choice about whether to accept or reject such feedback, rests with you. Your self-image resides in your mind and, is a product of your thinking. Although others may influence your self-concept, you are the final authority., 2. Learn More About Yourself, , People with low self-esteem don’t seem to know themselves in as much detail as those with high self-esteem., Accordingly, to boost your self-esteem, you need to take, stock of yourself. The Recommended Reading titled, Self-Esteem (McKay & Fanning, 2000) contains a selfconcept inventory that includes areas such as physical, appearance, personality characteristics, relating to others, school and job performance, intellectual functioning, and sexuality. In taking inventory, you may discover, that you’re fuzzy about certain aspects of yourself., To get a clearer picture, pay careful attention to your, thoughts, feelings, and behavior and utilize feedback, from others., 3. Don’t Let Others Set Your Goals, , A common trap that many people fall into is letting, others set the standards by which they evaluate themselves. Others are constantly telling you that you should, do this or you ought to do that. Thus, you hear that, you “should study computer science” or “ought to lose, weight.” Most of this advice is well intentioned and, may contain good ideas. Still, it is important that you, make your own decisions about what you will do and, what you will believe in. For example, consider a business executive in his early forties who sees himself in a, negative light because he has not climbed very high in, the corporate hierarchy. The crucial question is: Did, he ever really want to make that arduous climb? Perhaps he has gone through life thinking he should pursue that kind of success only because that standard was, imposed on him by his family. Think about the source, of and basis for your personal goals and standards. Do, they really represent ideals that you value? Or are they, beliefs that you have passively accepted from others, without thinking?, , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 165

Page 203 :
4. Recognize Unrealistic Goals, , Even if you truly value certain ideals and sincerely want, to achieve certain goals, another question remains. Are, your goals realistic? Many people demand too much of, themselves. They want to always perform at their best,, which is obviously impossible. For instance, you may, have a burning desire to achieve national acclaim as an, actress. However, the odds against such an achievement are enormous. It is important to recognize this, reality so that you do not condemn yourself for failure. Some overly demanding people pervert the social, comparison process by always comparing themselves, against the best rather than against similar others. They, assess their looks by comparing themselves with famous models, and they judge their finances by comparing themselves with the wealthiest people they know., Such comparisons are unrealistic and almost inevitably, undermine self-esteem., , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , Self-Esteem, by Matthew McKay and, Patrick Fanning (New Harbinger, Publications, 2000), If you want to assess, raise, and maintain your selfesteem, this book can help you. The authors work from, the premise that everyone has a “pathological critic,”, an inner voice that is judgmental and fault finding., Some people have an overly active and harsh pathological critic that, over time, erodes self-esteem. The, reader is shown how to deal with these destructive, self-statements through the use of cognitive restructuring. This book is easily understood, is written in, an interesting style, and packs a lot of information, in a few pages. It is most useful for those whose selfesteem problems are limited to a specific area (work,, parenting, sex, etc.). While the book is also helpful to, those whose esteem problems are more serious, the, authors suggest that it will be most effective for this, group when used along with psychotherapy., , 166, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , © Evan Agostini/Getty Images, , © Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images, , Cover image Copyright © 2000 New Harbinger Publications. Reprinted by permission., , If you like singing star Usher or actress Jennifer Aniston, that’s, fine, but they are not sensible benchmarks for evaluating your, attractiveness or success. Some people distort the social comparison process.

Page 204 :
FRANK & ERNEST reprinted by permission of Newspaper Enterprise Association, Inc., , 5. Modify Negative Self-Talk, , How you think about your life influences how you see, yourself (and vice versa). People who are low in selfesteem tend to engage in various counterproductive, modes of thinking. For example, when they succeed, they, may attribute their success to good luck, and when, they fail, they may blame themselves. Quite to the contrary, you should take credit for your successes and, consider the possibility that your failures may not be, your fault. As discussed in Chapter 4, Albert Ellis has, pointed out that people often think irrationally and, draw unwarranted negative conclusions about themselves. If someone breaks off a romantic relationship, with you, do you think, “He doesn’t love me. I must be, a worthless, unlovable person?” The conclusion that, you are a “worthless person” does not follow logically, from the fact of the break-up. Such irrational thinking, and negative self-talk breed poor self-esteem. Recognize, the destructive potential of negative self-talk and bring, it to a halt., , This faultfinding and negative approach does not go, over well. Instead, it leads to tension, antagonism, and, rejection. This rejection lowers self-esteem still further, (see Figure 5.16). You can boost your esteem-building, efforts by recognizing and reversing this self-defeating, tendency. Cultivate the habit of maintaining a positive,, supportive outlook when you approach people. Doing, so will promote rewarding interactions and help you, earn others’ acceptance. There is probably nothing that, enhances self-esteem more than acceptance and genuine affection from others., , Oversensitivity, to rejection, , 6. Emphasize Your Strengths, , This advice may seem trite, but it has some merit. People with low self-esteem often derive little satisfaction, from their accomplishments and virtues. They pay little heed to their good qualities while talking constantly, about their defeats and frailties. The fact is that everyone has strengths and weaknesses. You should accept, those personal shortcomings that you are powerless to, change and work on those that are changeable, without becoming obsessed about it. At the same time, you, should take stock of your strengths and learn to appreciate them., 7. Approach Others with a Positive Outlook, , Some people with low self-esteem try to cut others down, to their (subjective) size through constant criticism., , Low, self-esteem, , Actual, rejection, by others, , Negative,, hurtful ways of, relating to people, , •, , F I G U R E 5. 16, , The vicious circle of low self-esteem and rejection. A negative, self-image can make expectations of rejection a self-fulfilling, prophecy, because people with low self-esteem tend to approach, others in negative, hurtful ways. Real or imagined rejections, lower self-esteem still further, creating a vicious circle., , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , 167

Page 205 :
Self-Regulation, ■, , KEY IDEAS, Self-Concept, , CHAPTER 5 REVIEW, , ■, , The self-concept is composed of a number of beliefs about, what one is like, and it is not easily changed. It governs both, present and future behavior. Discrepancies between one’s ideal, self and one’s actual or ought self can produce negative emotions and lowered self-esteem. To cope with these negative, states, individuals may bring their behavior in line with their, ideal selves or blunt their awareness of self-discrepancies., ■ The self-concept is shaped by several factors, including individuals’ observations of their own behavior, which often involve, social comparisons with others. Self-observations tend to be biased in a positive direction. In addition, feedback from others, shapes the self-concept; this information is also filtered to some, extent. Cultural guidelines also affect the way people see themselves. Members of individualistic cultures usually have an independent view of the self, whereas those in collectivist cultures, often have an interdependent view of the self., ■, , Self-esteem is a person’s global evaluation of his or her worth., Like the self-concept, it tends to be stable, but it can fluctuate in, response to daily ups and downs., ■ Compared to those with high self-esteem, individuals with, low self-esteem are less happy, are more likely to be depressed,, are more prone to giving up after failure, and are less trusting of, others., ■ Narcissistic individuals are prone to violence when their selfesteem is threatened. Self-esteem develops through interactions, with significant others. Self-esteem, ethnicity, and gender interact in complex ways., Basic Principles of Self-Perception, ■, , To avoid being overwhelmed with information, people use, automatic processing; for important decisions, they use controlled processing. To explain the causes of their behavior, individuals make self-attributions. Generally, people attribute their, behavior to internal or external factors and to stable or unstable, factors. Controllability-uncontrollability is another key dimension of self-attributions. People tend to use either an optimistic, explanatory style or a pessimistic explanatory style to explain, various events that occur in their lives, and these attributional, styles are related to psychological adjustment., ■ People are guided by four distinct motives in seeking to understand themselves. The self-assessment motive directs people, toward accurate feedback about the self. The self-verification, motive drives people toward information that matches their, current self-views, even though doing so may involve some distortion of reality. The self-improvement motive underlies people’s attempts to better themselves. The self-enhancement motive enables people to maintain positive views of themselves., Common self-enhancement strategies include downward comparisons, the self-serving bias, basking in reflected glory, and, self-handicapping., , PART 2, , Self-Presentation, ■, , Public selves are the various images that individuals project, to others. Generally, people try to manage the impressions they, make by using a variety of strategies, including ingratiation,, self-promotion, exemplification, intimidation, and supplication., Impression management can be dangerous to one’s health. High, self-monitors seem to be more concerned about making favorable impressions than low self-monitors are., , Application: Building Self-Esteem, , Self-Esteem, , 168, , Self-regulation involves setting goals and directing behavior, to meet those goals. A key aspect of self-regulation is selfefficacy—an individual’s belief that he or she can achieve specific goals. Engaging in self-control can temporarily deplete, what appears to be a limited underlying resource. Self-efficacy, plays a key role in adjustment and can be learned through mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, persuasion, and positive, interpretations of emotional arousal., ■ Sometimes normal people knowingly do things that are bad, for them. These self-defeating actions fall into three categories:, deliberate self-destruction, tradeoffs, and counterproductive, strategies., , The Interpersonal Realm, , ■, , The seven building blocks to higher self-esteem are (1) recognize that you control your self-image, (2) learn more about, yourself, (3) don’t let others set your goals, (4) recognize unrealistic goals, (5) modify negative self-talk, (6) emphasize your, strengths, and (7) approach others with a positive outlook., , KEY TERMS, Basking in reflected glory, p. 157, Collectivism p. 145, Downward social comparison, p. 155, Explanatory style p. 153, External attributions p. 152, Impression management, p. 162, Individualism p. 145, Ingratiation p. 163, Internal attributions p. 152, Narcissism p. 148, Possible selves p. 141, Public self p. 161, Reference group p. 143, , Self-attributions p. 152, Self-concept p. 140, Self-defeating behaviors, p. 160, Self-discrepancy p. 141, Self-efficacy p. 158, Self-enhancement p. 155, Self-esteem p. 146, Self-handicapping p. 157, Self-monitoring p. 164, Self-regulation p. 158, Self-serving bias p. 156, Self-verification theory, p. 155, Social comparison theory, p. 143, , KEY PEOPLE, Albert Bandura pp. 158–160, Roy Baumeister p. 147, , Hazel Markus p. 140, Mark Snyder p. 164

Page 206 :
7. Keisha is upset when a textbook is stolen, but she feels, better after she hears that a classmate’s book bag, including her cell phone, was stolen. This is an example of:, a. the self-serving bias., b. basking in reflected glory., c. downward comparison., d. self-handicapping., , Personal Explorations Workbook, The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook, may enhance your self-understanding in relation to issues, raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 5.1: Self-Monitoring, Scale. Personal Probe 5.1: How Does Your Self-Concept, Compare to Your Self Ideal? Personal Probe 5.2: Examining, Your Self Evaluation. Personal Probe 5.3: Analyzing Your, Emerging Self., , ANSWERS, , Pages 152–155, Pages 155–156, Pages 158–159, Page 163, Pages 165–167, , 6. Which of the following is not a basic principle of selfperception?, a. People are “cognitive spenders.”, b. People’s explanatory style is related to adjustment., c. People most want to receive information that is, consistent with their self-views., d. People most want to maintain positive feelings, about the self., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , a, c, a, d, b, , 5. Aggression in response to self-esteem threats is more, likely to occur in people who are:, a. high in self-esteem., b. low in self-esteem., c. narcissistic., d. self-defeating., , Book Companion Website, , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. Low self-esteem is associated with:, a. happiness., b. high trust of others., c. self-concept confusion., d. recovering after failure experiences., , 10. Which of the following will not help you build higher, self-esteem?, a. Minimizing negative self-talk, b. Comparing yourself with those who are the best in, a given area, c. Working to improve yourself, d. Approaching others with positive expectations, , Page 140, Pages 141–142, Page 145, Pages 146–147, Pages 148–149, , 3. A person reared in a collectivist culture is likely to, have a(n) _____ self-view, whereas a person reared in, an individualistic culture is likely to have a(n) _____, self-view., a. self-discrepant; self-consistent, b. self-consistent; self-discrepant, c. independent; interdependent, d. interdependent; independent, , 9. The self-presentation strategy of ingratiation involves, trying to make others:, a. respect you., b. fear you., c. feel sorry for you., d. like you., , CHAPTER 5, , The Self, , a, b, d, c, c, , 2. Mismatches between one’s actual and ought selves, result in lower self-esteem and:, a. dejection-related feelings., b. agitation-related feelings., c. feelings of self-enhancement., d. no particular feelings., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Which of the following statements about the selfconcept is false?, a. It is composed of one dominant belief about the self., b. It is composed of many self-beliefs., c. It is relatively stable over time., d. It influences present as well as future behavior., , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 8. Which of the following statements about self-efficacy, is true?, a. It can be developed by persevering through failure, until one achieves success., b. It is something that one is born with., c. It refers to a person’s general self-confidence., d. It refers to conscious efforts to make a certain impression on others., , 169

Page 207 :
FORMING IMPRESSIONS OF OTHERS, Key Sources of Information, Snap Judgments Versus Systematic, Judgments, Attributions, Perceiver Expectations, Cognitive Distortions, Key Themes in Person Perception, , THE PROBLEM OF PREJUDICE, “Old-Fashioned” Versus Modern, Discrimination, Causes of Prejudice, Reducing Prejudice, , APPLICATION: SEEING THROUGH, COMPLIANCE TACTICS, The Consistency Principle, The Reciprocity Principle, The Scarcity Principle, , THE POWER OF PERSUASION, The Elements of the Persuasion Process, The Whys of Persuasion, , CHAPTER 6 REVIEW, , THE POWER OF SOCIAL PRESSURE, Conformity and Compliance Pressures, Pressure from Authority Figures, Culture and Social Influence, , 170, , PRACTICE TEST

Page 208 :
CHAPTER, , Social Thinking, and Social, Influence, , 6, , You’ve had your eye on that attractive brunette in the first row of your English Lit class since the term began. Should you ask her out? As you ponder, the wisdom of this action, you watch her, hoping to pick up some clues to, help you make your decision. You notice a sorority decal on her notebook., But, you don’t belong to a fraternity and you’ve never dated a sorority woman., You’ve heard that some of them can be snobbish, although she seems to be, friendly and approachable. Still, you’re only a sophomore; what if she’s a senior? That could be awkward. As you contemplate what to do, similar thoughts, flit through your mind., In this scenario, you can see the process of person perception at work., People are constantly constructing impressions of others in order to understand them and predict their behavior. In this chapter, we explore what’s involved in forming these impressions and how and why they can be inaccurate., Expanding our discussion of social cognition, we then turn to the problem, of prejudice. Next, we look at how others try to influence your beliefs and, behavior. Specifically, we focus on the power of persuasive messages and, the pressures to conform and obey. As you’ll see, social thinking and social, influence play significant roles in personal adjustment., , CHAPTER 6, , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 171

Page 209 :
Forming Impressions of Others, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , ■, , Cite the five sources of information people use to form, impressions of others., Describe the key differences between snap judgments, and systematic judgments., Define attributions and explain when people are likely, to make them., , Do you recall the first time you met your current boss?, She seemed pleasant, but distant, and you were worried, that she might be difficult to work with. Thankfully,, your concerns diminished as you got to know her better. As people interact with others, they constantly engage in person perception, the process of forming impressions of others. Because impression formation is, usually such an easy and automatic process, people are, unaware that it is taking place. Nonetheless, the process is a complex one. Let’s review some of its essential, aspects., , Key Sources of Information, Because you can’t read other people’s minds, you are, dependent on observations of others to determine what, they are like. In forming impressions of others, people, rely on five key sources of observational information:, appearance, verbal behavior, actions, nonverbal messages, and situational cues., Appearance. Despite the admonition, “You can’t, judge a book by its cover,” people frequently do exactly, that. Physical features such as height, weight, skin color,, and hair color are some of the cues used to “read” other, people. Regardless of their accuracy, beliefs about, physical features are used to form impressions of others (Hellström & Tekle, 1994). For example, Americans, learn to associate the wearing of eyeglasses with studiousness. Style of dress, clothing or jewelry that designates religious beliefs, body piercings, and tattoos, also provide clues about others., Verbal behavior. Another obvious source of information about others is what they say. People form impressions based on what and how much others selfdisclose, how often they give advice and ask questions,, and how judgmental they are (Berry et al., 1997). If Tanisha speaks negatively about most people she knows,, you will probably conclude that she is a critical person., Actions. Because people don’t always tell the truth,, you have to rely on their behavior to provide insights, about them. For instance, when you learn that Jamal volunteers five hours a week at the local homeless shelter,, you are likely to infer that he is a caring person. In impression formation, “actions speak louder than words.”, Nonverbal messages. Another key source of information about others is nonverbal communication: fa172, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe two expectancies that can distort observer’s, perceptions., Describe four important cognitive distortions and how they, operate., Describe some ways in which perceptions of others are, efficient, selective, and consistent., , cial expressions, eye contact, body language, and gestures (Forrest & Feldman, 2000; Frank & Ekman, 1997)., These nonverbal cues provide information about people’s emotional states and dispositions. For example, in, our culture a bright smile and good eye contact signal, friendliness and openness. Also, because people know, that verbal behavior is easily manipulated, they often, rely on nonverbal cues to determine the truth of what, others say (Frank & Ekman, 1997)., Situations. The setting in which behavior occurs, provides crucial information about how to interpret a, person’s behavior (Trope & Gaunt, 2003). For instance,, without situational cues, it would be hard to know, whether a crying person is happy or sad., , Snap Judgments Versus, Systematic Judgments, In their interactions with others, people are bombarded, with more information than they can possibly handle., To avoid being overwhelmed, people rely on alternative, ways to process information. Snap judgments about, others are those made quickly and based on only a few, bits of information and preconceived notions. Thus,, they may not be particularly accurate. Nevertheless,, people can get by with superficial assessments of others, quite often. As Susan Fiske (1993) puts it: “People are, , © RNT Productions/CCorbis, , ■, , In forming impressions of others, people rely on cues such as, appearance, actions, and verbal and nonverbal messages, as, well as the nature of the situation.

Page 210 :
Perceiver‘s observations of, • Target’s appearance, • Target’s verbal statements, • Target’s actions, • Target’s nonverbal messages, • Situational clues, , •, , Accuracy, is not, a priority, , Accuracy, is a priority, , WE B LI N K 6.1, , Social Psychology Network, Wesleyan University social psychologist Scott Plous offers, a broad collection of more than 5,000 web links related to, all aspects of social and general psychology, including how, people understand and influence each other interpersonally., , Courtesy, Susan Fiske, , good enough perceivers” (p. 156)., Often, interactions with others are, so fleeting or inconsequential that, it makes little difference that such, judgments are imprecise. Does it, really matter that you mistakenly, infer that the blonde postal clerk, is a fun-loving person, or that your, bespectacled restaurant server is, Susan Fiske, an intellectual? You may never interact with them again, and even if, you do, your interactions are not likely to be significant to either of you., On the other hand, when it comes to selecting a, friend, a mate, a boss, or an employee, it’s essential that, your impressions be as accurate as possible. Hence, it’s, not surprising that people are motivated to take more, care in these assessments. In forming impressions of, those who can affect their welfare and happiness, people make systematic judgments rather than snap decisions (see Figure 6.1). That is, they take the time to observe the person in a variety of situations and to compare, that person’s behavior with that of others in similar, situations., In Chapter 5, we noted that people are “cognitive, misers” (Taylor, 1981b). This fact has important implications for impression formation. To conserve their, time, energy, and cognitive resources (attention, memory, and so forth), people often depend on automatic, processing. Controlled processing, or mindfulness, which, requires more cognitive effort, kicks in only when individuals expect others to be personally relevant., In assessing what a significant individual is like,, people are particularly interested in learning why the, person behaves in a certain way. This deeper level of, understanding is vital if one is to make accurate predictions about the person’s future behavior. After all,, when you’re looking for a roommate, you don’t want, , to end up with an inconsiderate slob. To determine the, cause of others’ behavior, people engage in the process, of causal attribution., , Attributions, As we have noted in earlier chapters, attributions are, inferences that people draw about the causes of their, own behavior, others’ behavior, and events. In Chapter 5, we focused on self-attributions. Here, we’ll apply, attribution theory to the behavior of other people. For, example, suppose that your boss bawls you out for doing, a sloppy job on an insignificant project. To what do you, attribute this tongue lashing? Was your work really, that bad? Is your boss just in a grouchy mood? Is your, boss under too much pressure?, In Chapter 5, we noted that attributions have three, key dimensions: internal versus external, stable versus, unstable, and controllable versus uncontrollable (Jones &, Davis, 1965; Kelley, 1950; Weiner, 1974). For this discussion, we focus only on the internal/external dimension., When people ascribe the causes of someone’s behavior, to personal dispositions, traits, abilities, or feelings,, they are making internal attributions. When they impute the causes of their behavior to situational demands and environmental constraints, they are making external attributions. For example, if a friend’s, business fails, you might attribute the failure to your, friend’s lack of business skills (an internal factor) or to, , Snap, judgments, , Systematic, judgments,, including, attributions, , Impression, of the person, , F I G U R E 6.1, , The process of person perception. In forming impressions of others, perceivers rely on various sources, of observational information. When it’s important to form accurate impressions of others, people are, motivated to make systematic judgments, including attributions. When accuracy isn’t a priority, people, make snap judgments about others., Adapted from Brehm, S. S., & Kassin, S. M. (1993) Social Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Copyright © 1993 by Houghton Mifflin Company., Adapted with permission., , CHAPTER 6, , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 173

Page 211 :
DILBERT Reprinted by permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., , negative trends in the economy (an external factor)., Parents who discover that their teenage son has banged, up the family car may blame it on his carelessness (an, internal attribution) or on slippery road conditions, (an external attribution)., The types of attributions people make about others, can have a tremendous impact on everyday social interactions. For example, blaming a friend’s business failure, on poor business “smarts” rather than on a poor economy will obviously affect how you view your friend—, not to mention whether you’ll lend her money! Likewise, if parents attribute their son’s automobile accident, to slippery road conditions, they are likely to deal with, him very differently than if they attribute it to his carelessness. In addition, there is evidence that spouses’ attributions for each other’s behavior can affect their, marital satisfaction (Fletcher & Thomas, 2000)., Obviously, people don’t make attributions about, every person they meet. Research suggests that people, are relatively selective in this process (Jones, 1990; Malle, & Knobe, 1997). It seems that people are most likely to, make attributions (1) when others behave in unexpected or negative ways, (2) when events are personally, relevant, and (3) when they are suspicious about another person’s motives. For example, if Serena laughs, loudly at the local student hangout, no one bats an eye., But if she does so in the middle of a serious lecture, it, raises eyebrows and generates speculation about why, she behaved this way., Some aspects of the attribution process are logical, (Trope & Gaunt, 2003). Nonetheless, research also shows, that the process of person perception is sometimes illogical and unsystematic, as in the case of snap judgments. Other sources of error also creep into the process,, a topic we take up next., , Perceiver Expectations, Remember Evan, that bully from the fourth grade? He, made your life a total misery—constantly looking for, opportunities to poke fun at you and beat you up. Now, 174, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , when you meet someone named Evan, your initial reaction is negative, and it takes a while to warm up to, him. Why? Your negative past experiences with an Evan, have led you to expect the worst, whether or not it’s, warranted. This is just one example of how perceiver, expectations can influence the perception of others., Confirmation Bias, , Shortly after you begin interacting with someone, you, start forming hypotheses about what the person is like., In turn, these hypotheses can influence your behavior, toward that person in such a way as to confirm your expectations. Thus, if on your first encounter with Xavier,, he has a camera around his neck, you will probably hypothesize that he has an interest in photography and, question him selectively about his shutterbug activities. You might also neglect to ask more wide-ranging, questions that would give you a more accurate picture, of him. This tendency to behave toward others in ways, that confirm your expectations about them is termed, confirmation bias., Confirmation bias is a well-documented phenomenon (Snyder & Swann, 1978; Dougherty, Turban, &, Callendar, 1994). It occurs in casual social interactions, as well as in job interviews and in courtrooms, where, the interviewer or attorney may ask leading questions, (Fiske & Taylor, 1991). When it comes to forming first, impressions of others, it is not so much that “seeing is, believing” but rather that “believing is seeing.”, Confirmation bias also occurs because individuals, selectively recall facts to fit their views of others. In one, experiment (Cohen, 1981), participants watched a, , WE B LI N K 6.2, , Social Cognition Paper Archive and Information Center, Eliot R. Smith at Indiana University maintains a popular, site that includes information about papers (abstracts,, mostly) and people and that links to the wider social psychological research community.

Page 212 :
videotape of a woman engaging in a variety of activities, including listening to classical music, drinking, beer, and watching TV. Half of them were told that the, woman was a waitress and the other half were told that, she was a librarian. When asked to recall the woman’s, actions on the videotape, participants tended to remember activities consistent with their stereotypes of waitresses and librarians. Thus, those who thought that the, woman was a waitress recalled her drinking beer; those, who thought she was a librarian recalled her listening, to classical music., Although confirmation bias does occur, just how, pervasive is it? Susan Fiske (1993) notes that when people have a high need for accuracy in their impression, of someone, they are less likely to engage in selective, questioning. Instead, they ask diagnostic questions such, as, “Would you rather have a few close relationships or, a lot of less intimate ones?” Diagnostic questions provide people with information about the accuracy of, their expectations, in contrast to biased questions that, seek mainly to confirm their initial hypotheses., Normally, people remain unaware of the biases in, their perceptions. They go blithely along, assuming that, their version of reality is accurate. And, most of the, time, this approach works (Fiske, 1993). It’s only when, someone disagrees that a perceiver is brought up short., When this happens, the individual may alter his or her, views, conclude that the other person’s perception is, “off,” or look for another satisfactory explanation for, the difference in perceptions., Self-Fulfilling Prophecies, , Sometimes a perceiver’s expectations can actually change, another person’s behavior. A self-fulfilling prophecy, occurs when expectations about a person cause the, person to behave in ways that confirm the expectations. This term was originally coined by sociologist, Robert Merton (1948) to explain such phenomena as, “runs” on banks that occurred during the Depression., That is, when unfounded rumors would circulate that, a bank couldn’t cover its deposits, people would rush, to the bank and withdraw their funds, thereby draining the deposits from the bank and making real what, was initially untrue. This phenomenon is also called, behavioral confirmation or the Pygmalion effect (named, after the Greek myth in which King Pygmalion carved, a statue of the perfect woman and fell in love with it)., Figure 6.2 depicts the three steps in the self-fulfilling, prophecy. First, the perceiver has an initial impression, of someone. (A teacher believes that Jennifer is highly, intelligent.) Then the perceiver behaves toward the target person in line with his or her expectations. (He asks, her interesting questions and praises her answers.) The, third step occurs when the target person adjusts his or, her behavior to the perceiver’s actions, which confirms, the perceiver’s hypothesis about the target person. (JenCHAPTER 6, , Perceiver’s impression of other person., She is really funny., leads to, , confirms, , Perceiver’s behavior based on that, impression., “Tell us the story about the time, when . . .”, (laughter at her witty comments), produces, Corresponding behavior elicited from, the other person., She tells humorous story as requested, and tries to make witty comments., , •, , FIG U R E 6.2, , The three steps of the self-fulfilling prophecy. Through a, three-step process, your expectations about a person can cause, that person to behave in ways that confirm those expectations., First, you form an impression of someone. Second, you behave, toward that person in a way that is consistent with your impression. Third, the person exhibits the behavior you encourage,, which confirms your initial impression., Adapted from Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (1995). Social Psychology. New York: Worth,, p. 103. Copyright © 1995 Worth Publishing. Reprinted with permission., , nifer performs well in class.) Note that both individuals are unaware that this process is operating. Also note, that because perceivers are unaware of their expectations and of the effect they can have on others, they mistakenly attribute the target person’s behavior to an internal cause (Jennifer is smart), rather than an external, one (their own expectations)., The best-known experiments on the self-fulfilling, prophecy have been conducted in classroom settings,, looking at the effect of teachers’ expectations on students’ academic performance (Rosenthal, 1985). A review of 400 studies of this phenomenon over a period, of 30 years reported that teacher expectations significantly influenced student performance in 36 percent, of the experiments. The self-fulfilling prophecy also, operates with adults and in noneducational settings, such as the military, factories and businesses, courtrooms, and physicians’ offices (Ambady et al., 2002; Halverson et al., 1997; Kierein & Gold, 2000; Rosenthal,, 2003)., Although a perceiver’s expectations can produce, corresponding changes in another person’s behavior,, this outcome is not inevitable (Smith, Jussim, & Eccles,, 1999). For one thing, self-fulfilling prophecies are less, likely to operate if perceivers are motivated to form accurate impressions of others (Harris & Perkins, 1995)., Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 175

Page 213 :
Second, if target persons are aware of another’s beliefs, and these beliefs contradict their self-views, they work, hard to change the perceiver’s perceptions and are often, successful (Hilton & Darley, 1985). Third, when target, persons are confident about their self-views, they are, less likely to be influenced by a perceiver with different, perceptions (Swann & Ely, 1984)., , Cognitive Distortions, Another source of error in person perception comes, from distortions in the minds of perceivers. These errors in judgment are most likely to occur when a perceiver is in a hurry, is distracted, or is not motivated to, pay careful attention to another person., Social Categorization, , One of the ways people efficiently process information, is to classify objects (and people) according to their distinctive features (Fiske, 1998). Thus, people quite often, categorize others on the basis of nationality, race, ethnicity, gender, age, religion, sexual orientation, and so, forth. People frequently take the easy path of categorizing others to avoid expending the cognitive effort that, would be necessary for a more accurate impression., People perceive similar individuals to be members, of their ingroup (“us”) and those who are dissimilar to, them, in the outgroup (“them”). Such categorizing has, three important results. First, people usually have less, favorable attitudes toward outgroup members than ingroup members (Brewer & Brown, 1998). Second, individuals usually see outgroup members as being much, more alike than they really are, whereas they see members of the ingroup as unique individuals (Oakes, 2001)., In other words, people frequently explain the behavior, of outgroup members on the basis of the characteristic, that sets them apart (“Those Nerdians are all drunks”),, but attribute the same behavior by an ingroup member to individual personality traits (“Brett’s a heavy, drinker”). This phenomenon is termed the outgroup, homogeneity effect. Anne Frank alluded to this tendency, when she wrote, “What one Christian does is his own, responsibility, what one Jew does is thrown back at all, Jews.”, A third result of categorizing is that it heightens, the visibility of outgroup members when there are only, a few of them within a larger group. In other words,, minority group status in a group makes more salient, the quality that distinguishes the person—ethnicity,, gender, whatever. When people are perceived as being, unique or distinctive, they are also seen as having more, influence in a group, and their good and bad qualities, are given extra weight (Crocker & McGraw, 1984). Significantly, distinctiveness also triggers stereotyping., This phenomenon explains why many people notice, , 176, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , nagging women (but not men), noisy blacks (but not, whites), and jolly fat (but not thin) people., Stereotypes, , Stereotypes are widely held beliefs that people have, certain characteristics because of their membership, in a particular group. For example, many people assume that Jews are shrewd and ambitious, that African, Americans have special athletic and musical abilities,, and that Muslims are religious fanatics. Although a, kernel of truth may underlie some stereotypes, it should, be readily apparent that not all Jews, African Americans, Muslims, and so forth behave alike. If you take, the time to think about it, you recognize that there is, enormous diversity in behavior within any group., The most prevalent stereotypes in America are, those based on gender, age, and ethnicity (Fiske, 1993)., Gender stereotypes, although in transition, remain pervasive. For example, in a study of gender stereotypes in, 30 countries, males were typically characterized as adventurous, powerful, and independent, while females, were characterized as sentimental, submissive, and superstitious (Williams & Best, 1982, 1990). Because of, their wide-ranging significance, gender stereotypes, will be covered in detail in our chapter (10) on gender., Stereotypes may also be based on physical appearance. In particular, there is plenty of evidence that physically attractive people are believed to have desirable, personality traits. This widespread perception is termed, the “what-is-beautiful-is-good” stereotype (Dion, Berscheid, & Walster, 1972). Specifically, beautiful people, are usually viewed as more socially competent, more assertive, better adjusted, and more intellectually competent than those who are less attractive (Eagly et al., 1991)., Yet most of these perceptions have little basis in fact., Attractive people do have an advantage in the social, arena. For example, they have better social skills, are, more popular, are less socially anxious (especially about, interactions with the other gender), are less lonely, and, are more sexually experienced (Feingold, 1992b). However, they are not any different from others in intelligence, happiness, mental health, or self-esteem (Feingold, 1992b; Langlois et al., 2000). Thus, attractive, people are perceived in a more favorable light than is, actually justified. Unfortunately, the positive biases toward attractive people also operate in reverse. Thus,, unattractive people are unjustifiably seen as less well, adjusted and less intellectually competent than others., Most Americans believe that good looks are an advantage in everyday life (see Figure 6.3)., This tendency to associate attractiveness with positive qualities also occurs outside the United States—with, an important twist. You’ll recall from our discussion in, Chapter 5 that Western societies tend to be individualistic, viewing people as autonomous individuals who

Page 214 :
Most Americans Believe Good Looks, Are an Advantage, , Poll Question, “How important do you, think a person’s physical, attractiveness is in our, society today in terms, of his or her happiness,, social life, and ability, to get ahead?, , •, , “Fairly important” or, “Very important” answers, Men, , Women, , Total, , 1990, , 82%, , 85%, , 84%, , 1999, , 76%, , 76%, , 76%, , F I G U R E 6.3, , Physical attractiveness as a social advantage. A Gallup poll, reported that a large majority of men and women believe that, physical attractiveness is an advantage when it comes to happiness, social life, and the ability to get ahead. Affirmative responses to the poll question decreased a little between 1990 and, 1999, but it is clear that most people continue to believe that, good looks are advantageous., Data from Newport, F. (1999, September 15), Americans agree that being attractive is a plus in, American society. Retrieved June 10, 2001 from http://gallup.com/poll/releases/pr990915., , are responsible for their actions. In contrast, members, of collectivist societies value interdependence and obedience. In a study conducted in Korea, a collectivist, culture, participants were asked to view photographs, of Korean men and women and then to describe the, personal qualities of those in the pictures (Wheeler &, Kim, 1997). The participants described the attractive, individuals as possessing qualities that are valued in, collectivist cultures (“a concern for others” and “integrity,” for instance), but they did not choose terms, that are desirable in individualistic cultures (“dominant” and “assertive,” for example). Thus, it is likely, that although people in many cultures associate attractiveness with positive qualities, cultural values determine what characteristics are considered desirable., Stereotypes can be spontaneously triggered when, people encounter members of commonly stereotyped, groups—even in those who are not prejudiced (Devine,, 1989; Dunning & Sherman, 1997). Stereotypes can exist, outside a person’s awareness (Bodenhausen, Macrae,, & Hugenberg, 2003; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995). Because stereotyping is automatic, some psychologists are, pessimistic about being able to control it (Bargh, 1999);, others take a more optimistic view (Uleman et al., 1996)., Why do stereotypes persist? For one thing, they, are cognitively functional (Quinn, Macrae, & Bodenhausen, 2003). Recall that people are “cognitive misers.” Because they are deluged with much more information than they can process, the tendency is to reduce, complexity to simplicity. But, as we noted earlier, the, tradeoff for simplification is inaccuracy. Stereotypes, also endure because of confirmation bias. Thus, when, , CHAPTER 6, , individuals encounter members of groups that they, view with prejudice, they are likely to see what they expect to see. The self-fulfilling prophecy is a third reason stereotypes persist: Beliefs about another person, may actually elicit the anticipated behavior and confirm biased expectations., The Fundamental Attribution Error, , When explaining the causes of others’ behavior, people invoke personal attributions and discount the importance of situational factors. Although this tendency, is not universal (Choi, Nisbett, & Norenzayan, 1999;, Miyamoto & Kitayama, 2002), it is strong enough that, Lee Ross (1977) called it the “fundamental attribution, error.” The fundamental attribution error refers to, the tendency to explain other people’s behavior as the, result of personal, rather than situational, factors., This tendency (sometimes termed correspondence, bias) differs from stereotyping in that inferences are, based on actual behavior. Nonetheless, those inferences, may still be inaccurate. If Jeremy leaves class early, you, may be correct in inferring that he is inconsiderate, but, he might also have had a previously scheduled job interview. Thus, a person’s behavior at a given time may, or may not be reflective of his or her personality—but, observers tend to assume that it is., What’s behind this tendency to discount situational, influences on people’s behavior? Once again, the culprit is people’s tendency to be cognitive misers. It seems, that making attributions is a two-step process (Gilbert, & Malone, 1995). As you can see in Figure 6.4 (on the, next page), in the first step, which occurs automatically,, observers make an internal attribution because they, are focusing on the person (not the situation). (At your, bank, if you observe the man ahead of you yell at the, teller, you might infer that he is a hostile person.) In, the second step, observers weigh the impact of the situation on the target person’s behavior and adjust their, inference. (If you overhear the customer say that this, is the third time in three weeks that the bank has made, the same error in his account, you’re likely to temper, your initial judgment about his hostile tendencies.), The first step in the attribution process occurs spontaneously, but the second step requires cognitive effort, and attention. Thus, it is easy to stop after step one—, especially, if one is in a hurry or distracted. Failure to, take the effortful second step can result in the fundamental attribution error. However, when people are motivated to form accurate impressions of others (Webster, 1993) or when they are suspicious about another’s, motives (Fein, 1996), they do expend the effort to complete the second step. In these cases, they are more likely, to make accurate attributions. Some evidence suggests, that these two steps may be related to different types, of brain activity (Lieberman et al., 2004)., , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 177

Page 215 :
•, , FIG U R E 6.4, , Explaining the fundamental, attribution error. People automatically take the first step in, the attribution process (making a personal attribution)., However, they often fail to take, the second step (considering, the possible influence of situational factors on a person’s, behavior) because that requires, extra effort. The failure to, consider situational factors, causes observers to exaggerate, the role of personal factors in, behavior—that is, they make, the fundamental attribution, error. (Adapted from Brehm,, Kassin, & Fein, 2002), , Step 1, Step 2, (automatic, mindless) (effortful, mindful), Observer, makes initial, observation of, actor’s behavior, , Observer makes, a personal, attribution, , Observer, becomes aware, of situational, influences, on actor’s, behavior., , A customer, argues loudly, with a bank, teller., , ”He’s a, hostile person.”, , Observer hears, customer say, that the bank, has often made, the same error., , Cultural values seem to promote different attributional errors. In individualistic cultures, where independence is valued, it is assumed that people are responsible for their actions. In collectivist societies, conformity, and obedience to group norms are valued, so it is assumed that one’s behavior reflects adherence to group, norms. Some experts speculate that different styles of, thinking underlie cultural differences in attributional, styles (Nisbett et al., 2001). They suggest that the Western mentality is analytical (attention is focused on an, object and causality is ascribed to it), whereas the East, Asian mentality is holistic (attention is focused on the, field surrounding an object, and causality is understood to reside in the relationship between the object, and its field). Consistent with both of these views, researchers have found that Americans explain others’, behavior in terms of internal attributions, more often than do Hindus (Miller, 1984),, Chinese (Morris & Peng, 1994), Japanese, (Weisz, Rothbaum, & Blackburn, 1984), or, Koreans (Choi et al., 2003)., , Observer, modifies initial, attribution, based on, situational, information., ”He’s probably, not such a, hostile person, after all.”, , ilar way. Blaming victims for their calamities also helps, people maintain their belief that they live in a “just, world” where people get what they deserve and deserve, what they get (Lerner, 1980, 1998). Acknowledging, that the world is not just—that unfortunate events can, happen as a result of chance factors—would mean, having to admit the frightening possibility that the catastrophes that happen to others could also happen to, oneself. Defensive attributions are a self-protective,, but irrational, strategy that allows people to avoid such, unnerving thoughts and helps them feel in control of, their lives (Hafer, 2000; Lipkus, Dalbert, & Siegler,, 1996). Unfortunately, when victims are blamed for, their setbacks, people unfairly attribute undesirable, traits to them, such as incompetence, foolishness, and, laziness., , Observers are especially likely to make internal attributions in trying to explain the, calamities and tragedies that befall other, people. Examples easily come to mind. When, a woman is abused by a boyfriend or husband, people frequently blame the victim by, remarking how stupid she is to stay with the, man, rather than condemning the aggressor, for his behavior. Similarly, rape victims are, often judged to have “asked for it.”, Defensive attribution is a tendency to, blame victims for their misfortune, so that, one feels less likely to be victimized in a sim-, , 178, , PART 2, , © Andrew Holbrooke/The Image Works, , Defensive Attribution, , A common example of defensive attribution is the tendency to blame the homeless for their plight., , The Interpersonal Realm

Page 216 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Beliefs, Revenge, and Intergroup Conflict, Knowing that terrorist attacks could come at any time, and in any location in the country disturbs Americans’, sense of control over their own and their loved ones’, safety. This experience strikes at a fundamental need, to see one’s world as stable and predictable (Greenberg,, Solomon, & Pyszczynski, 1997). A foundation of this, need for order is the belief in a just world (BJW). As we, discuss elsewhere in this chapter, this belief is the idea, that good things happen to good people and bad things, happen to bad people. Individuals differ on how strongly, they endorse BJW. Compared to weak endorsers, strong, endorsers are more likely to have an internal locus of, control (believe that their fate is under their own control, versus chance), to espouse the Protestant work ethic,, and to be more authoritarian and more politically conservative (Furnham & Procter, 1989)., Having to face incontrovertible evidence that the, world is not just (the 9-11 attacks, for example) triggers, fear, stress, and vulnerability, especially among strong, endorsers of BJW. One way to deal with these painful, feelings is to restore justice cognitively—by persuading, themselves that the victims of tragedies actually deserve, their fate (because they are “bad” people). These defensive attributions help individuals maintain the comforting, but false, belief that nothing bad will happen to them, (because they are “good” people). “Blaming the victim”, is reduced when individuals identify with the victim. For, example, because the 9-11 attacks were perceived as an, attack against the United States (versus an individual or, a group), Americans identified and sympathized with the, victims of the 9-11 attacks rather than blaming them., A second response to challenges to BJW is to seek, revenge—to punish those responsible for the perceived, , injustice (and for threatening their BJW). If the perpetrators can be punished, justice can be restored (when, bad things do happen to good people, the perpetrators, will get what they deserve). A recent study investigated, the psychological dynamics involved in BJW after the 9-11, events (Kaiser, Vick, & Major, 2004). Prior to the 9-11, attacks, participants (college students) completed a test, of BJW. Several months after 9-11, the subjects were, assessed on a number of measures, including terrorismrelated distress and the desire for revenge. The more, strongly participants endorsed BJW, the more distressed, they were about the attacks and the more they desired, revenge against the terrorists., Contrary to popular opinion, terrorists are not deranged; rather, they are usually enraged young males, seeking revenge for perceived injustices (Silke, 2003)., Therefore, it seems likely that some terrorists would have, strong beliefs in a just world. Although we deplore the, acts of terrorists, it is possible to understand them as, attempts to seek revenge for perceived injustices perpetrated by other countries., When some people feel vulnerable, they engage, in aggression (revenge) to feel less vulnerable. Unfortunately, large-scale military strikes against terrorism can, actually increase terrorist behavior when they “unwittingly reinforce terrorists’ views of their enemies as, aggressive, make it easier for terrorist groups to recruit, new members, and strengthen alliances among terrorist, organizations” (Plous & Zimbardo, 2004, p. B9). Ironically and tragically, engaging in vengeful aggression, to reduce feelings of vulnerability may actually increase, vulnerability when it perpetuates intergroup conflict., , Key Themes in Person Perception, The process of person perception is a complex one., Nonetheless, we can detect three recurrent themes in, this process: efficiency, selectivity, and consistency., Efficiency, , In forming impressions of others, people prefer to exert, no more cognitive effort or time than is necessary. Thus,, , CHAPTER 6, , much social information is processed automatically, and effortlessly. According to Susan Fiske (1993), people, are like government bureaucrats, who “only bother to, gather information on a ‘need to know’ basis” (p. 175)., After all, you’re a busy person with many important, things to do. It boggles the mind to consider what life, would be like if you had to take the time to make careful observations and judgments of everyone you meet., Efficiency has two important advantages: People can, , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 179

Page 217 :
make judgments quickly, and it keeps things simple., The big disadvantage is that judgments are error-prone., Still, on balance, efficiency works pretty well as an operating principle., Selectivity, , The old saying that “people see what they expect to see”, has been confirmed repeatedly by social scientists. In a, classic study, Harold Kelley (1950) showed how a person is preceded by his or her reputation. Students in a, class at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology were, told that a new lecturer would be speaking to them that, day. Before the instructor arrived, the students were, given a short description of him, with one important, variation. Half the students were led to expect a “warm”, person, while the other half were led to expect a “cold”, one (see Figure 6.5). All the participants were exposed, to exactly the same 20 minutes of lecture and interaction with the new instructor. However, those who were, led to expect a warm person rated the instructor as significantly more considerate, sociable, humorous, goodnatured, informal, and humane than those who were, led to expect a cold person., Especially if someone’s behavior is ambiguous,, people are likely to interpret what they see in a way that, fits their expectations (Bodenhausen et al., 2003). Thus,, after dealing with an assertive female customer, a salesman who holds traditional gender stereotypes might, characterize the woman as “pushy.” By contrast, he, might fail to notice the same behavior in a man because, he would have automatically interpreted it as appropriate male behavior., Consistency, , How many times did your parents remind you to be, on your best behavior when you were meeting someone for the first time? As it turns out, they were onto, something! Considerable research supports the idea, that first impressions are powerful (Asch, 1956; Belmore, 1987). A primacy effect occurs when initial information carries more weight than subsequent information. It is worth noting that initial negative, impressions may be especially hard to change (Mellers,, Richards, & Birnbaum, 1992). Thus, getting off on the, wrong foot may be particularly damaging., First impressions tend to be particularly potent for, several reasons. For one thing, it seems that once people believe that they have formed an accurate impression of someone, they tend to tune out later information (Belmore, 1987). But if people are motivated to, form an accurate impression and are not tired, they are, less likely to lock in their initial impressions (Webster,, Richter, & Kruglanski, 1996). Also, confirmation biases, may lead people to discount later information that con-, , 180, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Mr. Blank is a graduate, student in the Department, of Economics and Social, Science here at M.I.T. He, has had three semesters, of teaching experience, in psychology at another, college. This is his first, semester teaching Ec. 70., He is 26 years old, a veteran, and married. People, who know him consider, him to be a rather cold, person, industrious,, critical, practical, and, determined., , •, , Mr. Blank is a graduate, student in the Department, of Economics and Social, Science here at M.I.T. He, has had three semesters, of teaching experience, in psychology at another, college. This is his first, semester teaching Ec. 70., He is 26 years old, a veteran, and married. People, who know him consider, him to be a very warm, person, industrious,, critical, practical, and, determined., , FIG U R E 6.5, , Descriptions of the guest lecturer in Kelley’s (1950) study., These two descriptions, provided to two groups of students before, the lecturer spoke, differ by only an adjective. But this seemingly, small difference caused the two groups to form altogether different perceptions of the lecturer., , tradicts their initial impression. Of course, it is possible to override a primacy effect. If you’re actively looking for change in a person or have compelling evidence, that contradicts your initial impression, you can alter, your opinion. Still, since people usually expect others, to stay the same, their initial impressions don’t change, too often., Thus far, our discussion of impression formation, has been based on face-to-face encounters. What about, impressions based on virtual encounters? In the first, study to look at this issue, researchers reported that, viewers of personal websites were able to form clear, and coherent impressions of site authors and that there, was general agreement on what the authors were like, (Vazire & Gosling, 2004). The study also measured the, accuracy of the observer’s impressions by comparing, the observers’ trait ratings of the authors to criterion, ratings of what the authors were really like. (The criterion ratings included the authors’ scores on a test of, five key personality traits as well as personality trait, ratings by two friends of the authors.) Interestingly,, the accuracy of observers’ web-based impressions was, comparable to the accuracy of impressions based on, face-to-face encounters in both long-term and zeroacquaintance studies., To conclude, although the process of person perception is highly subjective, people are relatively accurate perceivers of others (Fiske, 1998). Even when misperceptions occur, they are often harmless. However,, there clearly are occasions when such inaccuracies are, problematic. This is certainly true in the case of prejudice, which we consider next.

Page 218 :
The Problem of Prejudice, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , Explain how “old-fashioned” and modern discrimination differ., Describe some of the key determinants of prejudice, and explain how, they work., Describe the operation of several strategies for reducing prejudice., , Discrimination, , The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Prejudice, were an extreme demonstration of the deAbsent, Present, structive power of prejudice—hatred of one, A restaurant owner who, group by another. Unfortunately, antagonism, is bigoted against, No relevant, Hispanics treats them, between groups continues to be a problem,, Absent, behavior, fairly because she, both on the international scene and at home., needs their business., For example, after the September 11 attacks,, hate crimes increased against Americans, An executive with, A professor who is, favorable attitudes toward, hostile toward women, presumed to be Muslims or Arabs. Why is it, grades his female, Present blacks doesn’t hire them, so hard for members of different groups to, because he would get in, students unfairly., get along?, trouble with his boss., Let’s begin our discussion by clarifying, a couple of terms that are often confused., Prejudice is a negative attitude toward members of a group; discrimination involves beFIG U R E 6.6, having differently, usually unfairly, toward, Prejudice and discrimination. Prejudice and discrimination are highly correlated,, the members of a group. Prejudice and disbut they don’t necessarily go hand in hand. As the examples in the blue cells show,, crimination do tend to go together, but that, there can be prejudice without discrimination and discrimination without prejudice., is not always the case (see Figure 6.6). For, example, a restaurant owner might be prejudiscrimination based on race, ethnicity, gender, and, diced against Chicanos and yet treat them like anyone, religion is much less common now than it was in the, else because he needs their business. This is an exam1950s and 1960s. Thus, the good news is that overt, or, ple of prejudice without discrimination. Although it is, “old-fashioned,” discrimination against minority groups, probably less common, discrimination without prejuhas declined (but not disappeared, as we noted above)., dice may also occur. For example, an executive who has, The bad news is that a more subtle form of prejudice, favorable attitudes toward blacks may not hire them, and discrimination has emerged (Dovidio & Gaertner,, because his boss would be upset., 1996; Gaertner & Dovidio, 1986). That is, people may, privately harbor negative attitudes toward minority, “Old-Fashioned” Versus, groups (including women) but express them only when, Modern Discrimination, they feel that such views are justified or that it’s safe, to do so. This new phenomenon has been termed, James Byrd Jr., a 49-year-old black man, was walking, modern discrimination (also called “modern racism”)., home from a family gathering in the summer of 1998, Modern discrimination is also operating when people, when he was offered a ride by three white men, one of, endorse equality as an abstract principle but oppose, whom he knew. Shortly thereafter, pieces of Byrd’s savconcrete programs intended to promote equality on, agely beaten body were found strewn along a rural road, the grounds that discrimination against minority, in Texas. Apparently, he had been beaten, then shackgroups no longer exists (Wright & Taylor, 2003). Similed by his ankles to the back of the truck and dragged, lar distinctions between blatant and subtle discriminato death over 21⁄2 miles of road. Police say that Byrd, tion have been found in European countries as well—, was targeted simply because he was black. Thankfully,, for example, in British attitudes toward West Indians, such tragic events are relatively rare in the United States., and Asians, in French attitudes toward North Africans, Nonetheless, they remind us that discrimination still, and Asians, and in German attitudes toward Turks (Petexists., tigrew & Meertens, 1995). In Figure 6.7 (on the next, Over the past 40 years, prejudice and discriminapage), you can see the kinds of items used to measure, tion against minority groups have diminished in the, old-fashioned and modern sexism., United States. Racial segregation is no longer legal, and, , •, , CHAPTER 6, , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 181

Page 219 :
Authoritarianism, Items Related to Old-Fashioned Sexism, 1. Women are generally not as smart as men., 2. It is more important to encourage boys than to encourage, girls to participate in athletics., Items Related to Modern Sexism, 1. Discrimination against women is no longer a problem in, the United States., 2. Over the past few years, the government and news media, have been showing more concern about the treatment of, women than is warranted by women’s actual experiences., Scoring: Possible responses to the statements range from, “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree.” Individuals who, moderately or strongly agree with the above items reflect, old-fashioned or modern sexism, respectively., , •, , FIG U R E 6.7, , Measuring old-fashioned and modern sexism. Research shows, similarities between old-fashioned and modern beliefs about both, racism and sexism. Janet Swim and colleagues have developed a, scale to measure the presence of both types of sexism. Four items, from the 13-item scale are shown here. Old-fashioned sexism is, characterized by endorsement of traditional gender roles and acceptance of stereotypes that portray females as less competent, than males. In contrast, subtle, modern sexism is characterized, by denial of continued discrimination and rejection of policies, intended to help women., From Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Oldfashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214., Copyright © 1995 American Psychological Association. Reprinted by permission of the author., , While modern racists do not wish to return to the, days of segregation, they also feel that minority groups, should not push too fast for advancement or receive, special treatment by the government. Individuals who, endorse statements that favor “modern” discrimination (“Blacks are getting too demanding in their push, for equal rights”) are much more likely to vote against, a black political candidate, to oppose school busing,, and to favor tax laws that benefit whites at the expense, of blacks, compared to those who do not endorse such, views (Murrell et al., 1994). Interestingly, endorsing, statements such as “I do not like black people” (“oldfashioned” racism) does not reliably predict an individual’s political actions (because many people who might, personally agree with such a statement are reluctant to, publicly endorse it)., , Causes of Prejudice, Prejudice is obviously a complex issue and has multiple causes. Although we can’t thoroughly examine all, of the causes of prejudice, we’ll examine some of the, major psychological and social factors that contribute, to this vexing problem., , 182, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , In some of the earliest research on prejudice, Robert, Adorno and his colleagues (1950) identified the authoritarian personality, a personality type characterized by, prejudice toward any group perceived to be different, from oneself. Subsequent research found serious methodological weaknesses in the study, calling into question the validity of the personality type., Over the past 50 years, both the definition and, measurement of authoritarianism have evolved (Dion,, 2003). The construct is now termed right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) (Altemeyer, 1988a, 1988b), and it is, characterized by authoritarian submission (exaggerated deference to those in power), authoritarian aggression (hostility toward targets sanctioned by authorities), and conventionalism (strong adherence to values, endorsed by authorities). Because authoritarians tend, to support established authority, RWA is more commonly found among political conservatives than among, political liberals (who are more likely to challenge the, status quo)., Studies in Canada and the United States show that, RWA correlates with prejudice and discrimination toward various minority groups—African Americans,, ethnic minorities, women, homosexuals—(Altemeyer,, 1998; Whitley, 1999). Among Russians and citizens of, the former Soviet Union, authoritarianism is also correlated with prejudice (McFarland, Ageyev, & AbalakinaPaap, 1992; McFarland, Ageyev, & Djintcharadze, 1996)., What causes RWAs to be prejudiced? According to, Robert Altemeyer (1998), there are two key factors. First,, they organize their social world into ingroups and outgroups, and they view outgroups as threatening their, cherished traditional values. Second, they tend to be, self-righteous: They believe that they are more moral, than others, and they feel justified in derogating groups, that authority figures define as less moral than themselves. RWAs have typically been reared in highly religious and socially homogeneous groups, with little exposure to minority groups and unconventional behavior., They feel unduly threatened by social change—a fear, picked up from their parents who believe that “the world, is a dangerous and hostile place” (Altemeyer, 1988b,, p. 38). Altemeyer also notes that fearful attitudes are, reinforced by the mass media’s emphasis on crime and, violence. Exposure to various kinds of people and perspectives can reduce RWA (Peterson & Lane, 2001)., Cognitive Distortions and Expectations, , Much of prejudice is rooted in cognitive processes that, kick in automatically and operate without conscious, intent (Wright & Taylor, 2003). As you recall, social categorization predisposes people to divide the social world, into ingroups and outgroups. This distinction can trigger negativity toward outgroup members.

Page 220 :
Perhaps no factor plays a larger role in prejudice, than stereotyping. Many people subscribe to derogatory, stereotypes of various ethnic groups. Although racial, stereotypes have declined over the last 50 years, they’re, not entirely a thing of the past (Dovidio et al., 2003)., Racial profiling, in which officials stop motorists, pedestrians, and airline passengers solely on the basis of skin, color, is a case in point. Similarly, the events of September 11, 2001 caused some Americans to view all Muslims and Arabs as terrorists., It seems that people are particularly likely to make, the fundamental attribution error when evaluating targets of prejudice (Hewstone, 1990; Levy, Stroessner, &, Dweck, 1998). Thus, when people take note of ethnic, neighborhoods dominated by crime and poverty, they, blame these problems on the residents (they’re lazy and, ignorant) and downplay or ignore situationally based, explanations (job discrimination, poor police service,, and so on). The old saying, “They should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps” is a blanket dismissal, of how situational factors may make it especially difficult for minorities to achieve upward mobility. Similarly, in trying to understand why individuals in some, countries hold negative views of the United States, many, Americans depict such people as “crazy” or “evil” rather, than looking at possible situational causes, such as the, negative effects of American foreign policy on their, countries or the negative portrayal of the United States, in their media., Defensive attributions, in which people unfairly, blame victims of adversity to reassure themselves that, the same thing won’t happen to them, can also contribute to prejudice. For example, individuals who claim, that people who contract AIDS deserve it may be trying to reassure themselves that they won’t suffer a similar fate., Expectations can also foster and maintain prejudice. You already know that once people have formed, impressions, they are invested in maintaining them., For instance, people note and recall behavior that confirms their stereotypes better than information that is, inconsistent with their beliefs (Bodenhausen, 1988)., Also, when an outgroup member’s behavior contradicts, a stereotype, people often “explain away” such behavior to leave their stereotype intact. A study demonstrating this phenomenon involved male college students, who were randomly assigned to pairs (Ickes et al., 1982)., In one condition, one member of each pair was casually informed that his partner was extremely friendly;, in a second condition, one man in each pair learned, that his partner was just the opposite—very unfriendly., All the men were instructed to behave very positively, toward each other during the study, which they did., After the interaction, the participants were asked to, describe their partners. Those who expected their part-, , CHAPTER 6, , ners to be very friendly described them this way. However, those who expected their partners to be very unfriendly described the friendly behavior as fake and, merely a temporary response to their own friendly behavior. Thus, they interpreted their partner’s behavior, in line with their expectations., Unfortunately, the fact that social thinking is automatic, selective, and consistent means that people usually see what they expect to see when they look through, prejudiced eyes., Competition Between Groups, , Back in 1954, Muzafer Sherif and his colleagues conducted a now-classic study at Robbers’ Cave State Park, in Oklahoma to look at competition and prejudice, (Sherif et al., 1961). In this study, 11-year-old white boys, were invited, with parental permission, to attend a, three-week summer camp. What the boys didn’t know, was that they were participants in an experiment. The, boys were randomly assigned to one of two groups; at, camp, they went directly to their assigned campsites and, had no knowledge of the other group’s presence. During the first week, the boys got to know the other members of their own group through typical camp activities (hiking, swimming, and camping out); each group, also chose a name (the Rattlers and the Eagles)., In the second week, the Rattlers and Eagles were, introduced to each other through intergroup competitions. Events included a football game, a treasure hunt,, and a tug of war, with medals, trophies, and other desirable prizes for the winning team. Almost immediately, after competitive games were introduced, hostile feelings erupted between the two groups and quickly escalated to highly aggressive behavior: Food fights broke, out in the mess hall, cabins were ransacked, and group, flags were burned., This experimental demonstration of the effects of, competition on prejudice is often mirrored in the real, world. For example, disputes over territory often provoke antagonism, as is the case in the former Yugoslavia and in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The lack, of jobs or other important resources can also create, competition between social groups. Still, competition, does not always breed prejudice. In fact, the perception, of threats to one’s ingroup (loss of status, for example), is much more likely to cause hostility between groups, than actual threats to the ingroup are (Brown et al.,, 2001; Dovidio et al., 2003). Unfortunately, such perceptions are quite common because ingroup members usually assume that outgroup members are competitive and will try to thwart the ingroup’s success, (Fiske & Ruscher, 1993). To conclude, there is ample, evidence that conflict over actual and perceived scarce, resources can prejudice individuals toward outgroup, members., , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 183

Page 221 :
Threats to Social Identity, , Although group membership provides indiPersonal, Threat to, achievements, personal identity, viduals with a sense of identity and pride, it, can also foster prejudice and discrimination,, as we just noted. To explore a different facet, Self-esteem, Favoritism, of this idea, we turn to social identity theory,, toward, ingroups, Threat to, developed by Henri Tajfel (1982) and John, social identity, Turner (1987). According to this theory, selfDerogation, esteem is partly determined by one’s social, of outgroups, identity, or collective self, which is tied to, one’s group memberships (nationality, religion, gender, major, occupation, and so forth), FIG U R E 6.8, (Luhtanen & Crocker, 1992). Whereas your personal, self-esteem is elevated by individual accomplishments, Social identity theory. According to Tajfel (1982) and Turner, (you got an A on a history exam), your collective self(1987), individuals have both a personal identity (based on a, unique sense of self) and a social identity (based on group memesteem is boosted when an ingroup is successful (your, berships). When social identity is threatened, people are motiteam wins the football game, your country wins a war)., vated to restore self-esteem by either showing favoritism to, Likewise, your self-esteem can be threatened on both, ingroup members or derogating members of outgroups. These, the personal level (you didn’t get called for that job intactics contribute to prejudice and discrimination., terview) and the collective level (your football team, Adapted from Brehm, S. S., & Kassin, S. M. (1993). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin. Copyright © 1993 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Adapted with permission., loses the championship game, your country is defeated, in a war)., Threats to both personal and social identity motivarious groups. This means that stereotyped thinking, vate individuals to restore self-esteem, but threats to, about others becomes a mindless habit—even for insocial identity are more likely to provoke responses that, dividuals who have been taught to be tolerant of those, foster prejudice and discrimination (Crocker & Luhtawho are different from themselves (Devine, 1989; Fiske,, nen, 1990). When collective self-esteem is threatened,, 2002)., individuals react in two key ways to bolster it. The most, Although it’s true that stereotypes kick in autocommon response is to show ingroup favoritism—for, matically, unintentionally, and unconsciously, individexample, tapping an ingroup member for a job openuals can override them—with some cognitive effort, ing or rating the performance of an ingroup member, (Fiske, 2002). Thus, if you meet someone who speaks, higher than that of an outgroup member (Branscombe, with an accent, your initial, automatic reaction might, et al., 1993). The second way to deal with threats to sobe negative. However, if you believe that prejudice is, cial identity is to engage in outgroup derogation—in, wrong and if you are aware that you are stereotyping,, other words, to “trash” outgroups that are perceived as, you can intentionally inhibit such thoughts. According, threatening. This latter tactic is more often used by into Patricia Devine’s (1989) model of prejudice reducdividuals who identify especially strongly with an intion, this process requires an intentional shift from augroup (Perreault & Bourhis, 1999). Figure 6.8 depicts, tomatic processing to controlled processing, or from mindthe various elements of social identity theory., lessness to mindfulness, in Ellen Langer’s terms (see, Significantly, it is “ingroup love,” not “outgroup, Chapter 5)., hate” that underlies most discrimination (Brewer, 1999)., Research supports the idea that controlled, mindIn other words, ingroups reward their own members, ful thinking can actually reduce stereotyping and prejand withhold rewards from outgroups, rather than deudice. In one study, children who were shown slides of, liberately blocking outgroups from desired resources, handicapped individuals and who were asked questions, (Fiske, 2002)., that required them to think carefully about the disabled, individuals showed less prejudice and more willingness to play with a handicapped peer than did children, Reducing Prejudice, who saw the same slides but who were asked to make, For decades, psychologists have searched for ways to, only mindless responses to the slides (Langer, Bashner,, reduce prejudice. Such a complicated problem requires, & Chanowitz, 1985). Thus, you can reduce prejudice if, solutions on a number of levels. Let’s look at a few inyou are motivated to pay careful attention to what and, terventions that have been shown to work., how you think., , •, , Cognitive Strategies, , Intergroup Contact, , Because stereotypes are part of the social air that people breathe, practically everyone learns stereotypes about, , Let’s return to the Robbers’ Cave study. When we left, them, the Rattlers and Eagles were engaged in food fights, , 184, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm

Page 222 :
and flag burning. Understandably, the experimenters, were eager to restore peace. First, they tried speaking, with each group, talking up the other group’s good, points and minimizing their differences. They also made, the Eagles and the Rattlers sit together at meals and, “fun” events like movies. Unfortunately, these tactics, fell flat., Next, the experimenters designed intergroup activities based on the principle of superordinate goals—, goals that require two or more groups to work together to achieve mutual ends. For example, each boy, had to contribute in some way (building a fire, preparing the food) on a cookout so that all could eat. After, the boys had participated in a variety of such activities,, the hostility between the two groups was much reduced., In fact, at the end of the three-week camping period,, the Eagles and the Rattlers voted to ride the same bus, back home., Researchers have identified four necessary ingredients in the recipe for reducing intergroup hostility, (Brewer & Brown, 1998). First, groups must work together for a common goal (merely bringing hostile, groups into contact is not an effective way to reduce, intergroup antagonism and may in fact worsen it)., Second, cooperative efforts must have successful outcomes (if groups fail at a cooperative task, they are, likely to blame each other for the failure). Third, group, members must have the opportunity to establish mean-, , ingful connections with one another and not merely go, through the motions of interacting. The fourth factor, of equal status contact requires bringing together members of different groups in ways that ensure that everyone has equal status. A large meta-analysis demonstrated, clear support for intergroup contact as a means of reducing prejudice (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2000)., The “jigsaw classroom” uses these principles to reduce prejudice in schoolchildren (Aronson & Patnoe,, 1997). In this intervention, six children are first assigned, to an “expert group” in which they help each other learn, specialized information prepared by the teacher about, a study topic. Thus, each child becomes an “expert” on, a subtopic. Then the children are assigned to ethnically, mixed groups of six where they teach each other their, school lessons. This arrangement puts all children on an, equal footing (equal-status contact) and reduces competition for the teacher’s attention and grades (scarce, resources)., Children taught in a jigsaw classroom learn as much, as peers taught in a traditional classroom setting. In, addition, “jigsaw” children get an important bonus:, Prejudice is replaced with positive feelings for ethnically different children, and the self-esteem of minority kids gets a big boost., To conclude, although prejudice remains a complex and distressing social problem, a number of effective strategies are available to combat it., , The Power of Persuasion, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , Cite the key elements in the persuasion process., Describe several source factors that influence persuasion., Discuss the evidence on one-sided versus two-sided, messages and the value of arousing fear or positive, feelings in persuasion., , ■, ■, , Every day you are bombarded by attempts to alter your, attitudes through persuasion. You may not even be out, of bed before you start hearing radio advertisements, that are meant to persuade you to buy specific toothpastes, cell phones, and athletic shoes. When you watch, the morning news, you hear statements from numerous government officials, all of which have been carefully crafted to shape your opinions. On your way to, school, you see billboards showing attractive models, draped over cars in the hopes that they can induce positive feelings that will transfer to the vehicles. Walking, to class, a friend tries to get you to vote for his candidate for student body president. “Does it ever let up?”, you wonder., When it comes to persuasion, the answer is “no.”, As Anthony Pratkanis and Elliot Aronson (2000) note,, CHAPTER 6, , Describe several receiver factors that influence persuasion., Explain how the two cognitive routes to persuasion, operate., , Americans live in the “age of propaganda.” In light of, this reality, let’s examine some of the factors that determine whether persuasion works., Persuasion involves the communication of arguments and information intended to change another, person’s attitudes. What are attitudes? For the pur-, , WE B LI N K 6.3, , Social Influence and Persuasion, How are people influenced or affected by others? Shelley, Wu has assembled a collection of web resources that seek, to answer this question, covering such topics as cults,, propaganda, and healthy approaches to influencing other, people., , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 185

Page 223 :
tive deterrent to crime. The “feeling” component of attitudes refers to the positivity and negativity of one’s, feelings about an issue as well as how strongly one feels, about it. For example, you may strongly favor equal pay, for equal work but only mildly disagree with the idea, that capital punishment reduces the crime rate., , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , Age of Propaganda: The, Everyday Use and Abuse, of Persuasion, by Anthony R. Pratkanis and Elliot Aronson, (W. H. Freeman, 2000), , The Elements of the, Persuasion Process, The process of persuasion includes four basic elements, (see Figure 6.9). The source is the person who sends, a communication, and the receiver is the person to, whom the message is sent. Thus, if you watched a, presidential address on TV, the president would be the, source, and you and millions of other viewers would, be the receivers in this persuasive effort. The message, is the information transmitted by the source; the, channel is the medium through which the message is, sent. In examining communication channels, investigators have often compared face-to-face interaction, against appeals sent via mass media (such as television, and radio). Although the research on communication, channels is interesting, we’ll confine our discussion to, source, message, and receiver variables., , The two social psychologists who wrote this book did, so out of their concern about the harmful consequences, of the increased use of propaganda in contemporary, American society. Propaganda discourages careful reasoning and scrutiny, and the authors see its use by, contemporary political leaders and the advertising industry as particularly problematic in a democracy. According to Pratkanis and Aronson, for a democratic, form of government to survive in an age of propaganda,, it must have “communicators who know how to present, their message clearly and fairly, coupled with an informed electorate that knows the difference between, a fair presentation and a con job” (p. xv). The authors, have written the book to help Americans understand, how their attitudes are being manipulated. Using an, engaging writing style, they do an excellent job of applying research evidence to historical events (Nazi Germany, the Vietnam war, Iran-Contra, and the Persian, Gulf War) and contemporary situations (political incidents and campaigns, televangelism, and commercials)., , Source Factors, , Persuasion tends to be more successful when the source, has high credibility (Petty, Wegener, & Fabrigar, 1997)., Two subfactors make a communicator credible: expertise and trustworthiness. People try to convey their expertise by mentioning their degrees, their training, and, their experience, or by showing an impressive grasp of, the issue at hand (Wood & Kallgren, 1988). As to trustworthiness, whom would you believe if you were told, that your state needs to reduce corporate taxes to stimulate its economy—the president of a huge corporation in your state or an economics professor from out, of state? Probably the latter. Trustworthiness is undermined when a source, such as the corporation presi-, , Cover reprinted by permission., , poses of our discussion, we’ll define attitudes as beliefs and feelings about people, objects, and ideas., Let’s look more closely at two of the terms in this definition. We use the term beliefs to mean thoughts and, judgments about people, objects, and ideas. For example, you may believe that equal pay for equal work is a, fair policy or that capital punishment is not an effec-, , •, , FIG U R E 6.9, , Overview of the persuasion, process. The process of persuasion essentially boils down, to who (the source) communicates what (the message), by what means (the channel), to whom (the receiver). Thus,, four sets of variables influence, the process of persuasion:, source, message, channel, and, receiver factors. The diagram, lists some of the more important factors in each category, (including some that are not, discussed in the text due to, space limitations)., 186, , PART 2, , Who, , What, , By what means, , To whom, , Source factors, , Message factors, , Channel factors, , Receiver factors, , Credibility, Expertise, Trustworthiness, Likability, Attractiveness, Similarity, , Fear appeal, versus logic, , In person, , Personality, , On television, , Expectations, (e.g., forewarning), , The Interpersonal Realm, , One-sided, versus two-sided, argument, Repetition, , Via audiotape, Via Internet, , Preexisting, attitudes

Page 224 :
Message Factors, , Imagine that you are going to advocate the selection of, a high-profile entertainer as the speaker at your commencement ceremony. In preparing your argument,, you ponder the most effective way to structure your, message. On the one hand, you’re convinced that having a well-known entertainer on campus would be popular with students and would boost the image of your, university in the community and among alumni. Still,, you realize that this performer would cost a lot and, that some people believe that an entertainer is not an, appropriate commencement speaker. Should you present a one-sided argument that ignores the possible problems? Or should you present a two-sided argument that, acknowledges concern about the problems and then, downplays them?, In general, two-sided arguments seem to be more, effective (Crowley & Hoyer, 1994). In fact, just menCHAPTER 6, , AFP/AFP/Getty Images, , © 2004 AP/ Wide World Photos, , dent, appears to have something, to gain. In contrast, trustworthiness is enhanced when people appear to argue against their own, interests (Petty et al., 2001). This, effect explains why salespeople, often make remarks like “Frankly,, my snowblower isn’t the best and, they have a better brand down, the street if you’re willing to, spend a bit more . . .”, Likability is a second major, source factor and includes a host, of subfactors (Petty et al., 1997)., A key consideration is a person’s, physical attractiveness (Petty et, al., 1997). For example, one researcher found that attractive students were more successful than, less attractive students in obtaining signatures for a petition, (Chaiken, 1979). People also respond better to sources who are, similar to them in ways that are relevant to the issue at, hand (Mackie, Worth, & Asuncion, 1990). Thus, politicians stress the values they and their constituents hold, in common., Source variables are used to great effect in advertising. Many companies spend a fortune to obtain a, spokesperson such as George Foreman, who combines, trustworthiness, likability, and a knack for connecting, with the average person. Companies quickly abandon, spokespersons whose likability declines. For example,, McDonald’s and Sprite cancelled advertising contracts, with basketball star Kobe Bryant after he was accused, of rape. Thus, source variables are extremely important factors in persuasion., , Advertisers frequently employ well-liked, celebrities like James Earl Jones and, Catherine Zeta-Jones to pitch their products, hoping that the positive feelings of, the audience toward the source will transfer to the product., , tioning that there are two sides to an issue can increase, your credibility with an audience (Jones & Brehm,, 1970). One-sided messages work only when your audience is uneducated about the issue or when they already favor your point of view., Persuaders also use emotional appeals to shift attitudes. Insurance companies show scenes of homes on, fire to arouse fear. Antismoking campaigns emphasize, the threat of cancer. Deodorant ads prey on the fear of, embarrassment. Does fear arousal work? Yes, studies, involving a wide range of issues (nuclear policy, auto, safety, and dental hygiene among others) have shown, that the arousal of fear often increases persuasion (Perloff, 1993). However, there are limiting conditions (Rogers & Prentice-Dunn, 1997). Fear appeals are most likely, to work when your listeners view the dire consequences, that you describe as exceedingly unpleasant, as fairly, probable if they don’t take your advice, and as avoidable if they do (Das, deWit, & Stroebe, 2003). If you, induce strong fear in your audience without providing, a workable solution to the problem (such as a surefire, stop-smoking or weight-loss program), you may make, your audience defensive, causing them to tune you out, (Petty & Wegener, 1998)., Generating positive feelings is also an effective way, to persuade people. Familiar examples of such tactics, include the use of music and physically attractive actors, in TV commercials, the use of laugh tracks in TV programs, and the practice of wining and dining prospective customers. Shortly after the terrorist attacks on, America, you probably noticed that patriotic themes, and images in ads increased dramatically. Producing, positive feelings to win people over can be effective—, Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 187

Page 225 :
What about the receiver of the persuasive message? Are, some people easier to persuade than others? Yes, but, the answer is complicated. Transient factors, such as, forewarning the receiver about a persuasive effort and, a receiver’s initial position on an issue, seem to be more, influential than a receiver’s personality. When you, shop for a new TV, you expect salespeople to work at, persuading you. To some extent, this forewarning reduces the impact of their arguments (Petty & Wegener,, 1998). When receivers are forewarned about a persuasion attempt on a personally important topic, it is harder, to persuade them than when they are not forewarned, (Wood & Quinn, 2003). But when they are told to expect a persuasive message on an unimportant topic,, their attitudes shift in the direction of the persuasive, appeal even before it occurs—to avoid appearing gullible! Thus, the old saying, “To be forewarned is to be, forearmed” is often, but not always, true., Understandably, receivers are harder to persuade, when they encounter a position that is incompatible, with their existing beliefs. In general, people display a, disconfirmation bias in evaluating such arguments (Edwards & Smith, 1996). Also, people from different cultures respond to different themes in persuasive messages. In one study, participants from an individualistic, culture (the United States) preferred magazine ads that, stressed the theme of uniqueness, while those from a, collectivist culture (Korea) preferred ads that stressed, conformity (Kim & Markus, 1999)., , The Whys of Persuasion, In the previous section, we looked at a number of effective persuasion techniques. Clearly, you can’t incorporate all of these factors into a single persuasive ap-, , •, , FIG U R E 6.10, , The peripheral and central routes to attitude, change. Persuasion can, occur via two different, routes. The central route,, which results in high elaboration, tends to produce, longer-lasting attitude, change., , 188, , PART 2, , Central, route, , Persuasion based on, content and logic of, the message, , High elaboration:, Careful processing, of the information, , Persuasion is more, durable, more difficult, to change, more, predictive of behavior, , Peripheral, route, , Persuasion based on, nonmessage factors, such as attractiveness,, credibility, emotion, , Low elaboration:, Minimal processing, of the information, , Persuasion is more, temporary, easier to, change, less predictive, of behavior, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Courtesy, Richard E. Petty, , Receiver Factors, , peal. Which ones should you use?, To answer that important question,, you need to understand why people change their attitudes. Thanks, to the work of Richard Petty and, John Cacioppo (1986), psychologists have a good understanding of, the cognitive processes that underlie attitude change., Richard Petty, According to the elaboration, likelihood model, an individual’s, thoughts about a persuasive message (rather than the actual message itself) will determine whether, attitude change will occur (Petty &, Cacioppo, 1986). As we have noted,, at some times people make quick,, sloppy decisions (automatic processing, mindlessness, snap judgments), whereas at other times they, John Cacioppo, process information carefully (controlled processing, mindfulness,, systematic judgments). These processes also operate in, persuasion., When people are distracted, tired, or uninterested, in a persuasive message, they fail to key in on the true, merits of the product or issue. They process information, but not mindfully. Being in a happy mood produces the same effect (Sinclair, Mark, & Clore, 1994)., Surprisingly, even when people do not carefully evaluate, a message, attitude change can occur (Petty & Cacioppo,, 1990). What happens is that the receiver is persuaded by, cues that are peripheral to the message—hence the term, the peripheral route (see Figure 6.10). Just because you’re, not mindfully analyzing a TV commercial for a new fruit, drink doesn’t mean that you’re totally tuned out. You, may not be paying attention to the substance of the, commercial, but you are aware of superficial aspects of, the ad—you like the music, your favorite basketball, player is pitching the product, and so forth., Although persuasion usually occurs via the peripheral route, senders can also use another route to attitude change—the central route (see Figure 6.10). In this, , Courtesy, John T. Cacioppo, , provided they don’t care too much about the issue. If, people do care about the topic, it takes more than good, feelings to move them. For example, one study showed, that the use of music in TV commercials was effective, in persuading viewers, but only when the message concerned a trivial topic (Park & Young, 1986).

Page 226 :
© Scott Olsen/Getty Images, , letting biases influence their judgments, they, overcorrected to the extent that a dislikable, source was more persuasive than a likable, one (Petty, Wegener, & White, 1998)., Ultimately, the two routes to persuasion, are not equally effective. Attitudes formed, via the central route are longer lasting and, more resistant to challenge than those formed, via the peripheral route (Petty & Wegener,, 1998). They are also better predictors of a, person’s behavior (Petty, Priester, & Wegener,, 1994)., To conclude, although we can’t stem, the tide of persuasive messages bombarding you every day, we hope we’ve alerted you, to the need to be a vigilant recipient of persuasion attempts. Of course, persuasion is, not the only method through which people, try to influence you, as you’ll see in the next, section., , Political candidates use music, flags, and slogans to persuade, via the peripheral route; when they present their views on an, issue, they are going for the central route., , case, receivers process persuasive messages mindfully,, by thinking about the logic and merits of the pertinent, (or central) arguments. In other words, the receiver, cognitively elaborates on the persuasive message—, hence, the name of the model. If people have a favorable reaction to their thoughtful evaluation of a message, positive attitude change occurs; an unfavorable, reaction results in negative attitude change., For the central route to override the peripheral, route, there are two requirements. First, receivers must, be motivated to process the persuasive message carefully. Motivation is triggered when people are interested, in the issue, find it personally relevant, and have time, and energy to think about it carefully. For example, if, your university is considering changing its grading system, you will probably make a point of thinking carefully about the various options and their implications., Second, receivers must have the ability to grasp the, message—that is, the message must be comprehensible,, and individuals must be capable of understanding it. If, people are distracted, tired, or find the message uninteresting or irrelevant, they will not pay careful attention to it, and superficial cues will become salient., If people mindfully process persuasive messages,, does doing so ensure that their decisions are objective, or unbiased? It seems not. Biased processing can result, from both motivational factors (having a vested interest) and ability factors (one-sided knowledge of an, issue) (Wood, 2000). And alerting people to possible, biases in their thinking doesn’t necessarily help. For, example, when participants were cautioned to avoid, CHAPTER 6, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , Influence: Science, and Practice, by Robert B. Cialdini, (Allyn and Bacon, 2001), Cialdini, a social psychologist, has conducted extensive, empirical research on influence tactics such as the, door-in-the-face technique and lowballing (see the, Application). As you might expect, Cialdini’s book is, based on his studies and his review of other scientific, research on the topic. However, what makes his book, unique is that he went far beyond laboratory research, in his effort to better understand the ins and outs of, social influence. For three years, he immersed himself, in the real world of influence artists, becoming a “spy, of sorts.” As he puts it, “When I wanted to learn about, the compliance tactics of encyclopedia (or vacuum, cleaner, or portrait photography, or dance lessons), sales organizations, I would answer a newspaper ad for, sales trainees and have them teach me their methods., Using similar but not identical approaches, I was able, to penetrate advertising, public relations, and fundraising agencies to examine their techniques” (from the, preface). The result is an insightful book that bolsters, scientific data with anecdotal accounts of how influence, artists ply their trade. Familiarity with their strategies, can help you avoid being an easy mark, or “patsy.”, Published by Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA. Copyright © 2001 by Pearson Education. Reprinted by permission of the publisher., , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 189

Page 227 :
The Power of Social Pressure, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , Summarize what Asch discovered about conformity., Discuss the difference between normative and, informational influence., Describe some conformity pressures in everyday life and, how people can resist them., , In the previous section, we showed you how others attempt to change your attitudes. Now you’ll see how, others attempt to change your behavior—by trying to, get you to agree to their requests and demands., , Conformity and, Compliance Pressures, If you extol the talent of popular singer Beyoncé Knowles, or keep a well-manicured lawn, are you exhibiting conformity? According to social psychologists, it depends, on whether your behavior is freely chosen or the result, of group pressure. Conformity occurs when people, yield to real or imagined social pressure. For example, if you like Beyoncé because you truly enjoy her, music, that’s not conformity. However, if you like her, because it’s “cool” and your friends would question your, taste if you didn’t, then you’re conforming. Similarly, if, you maintain a well-groomed lawn just to avoid complaints from your neighbors, you’re yielding to social, pressure., The Dynamics of Conformity, , To introduce this topic, we’ll re-create a classic experiment devised by Solomon Asch (1955). The participants are male undergraduates recruited for a study of, visual perception. A group of seven participants are, shown a large card with a vertical line on it and asked to, indicate which of three lines on a second card matches, the original “standard line” in length (see Figure 6.11)., All seven participants are given a turn at the task, and, each announces his choice to the group. The subject in, the sixth chair doesn’t know it, but everyone else in the, group is an accomplice of the experimenter., The accomplices give accurate responses on the, first two trials. On the third trial, line 2 clearly is the, correct response, but the first five participants all say, that line 3 matches the standard line. The genuine subject can’t believe his ears. Over the course of the experiment, the accomplices all give the same incorrect response on 12 out of 18 trials. Asch wanted to see how, the subject would respond in these situations. The line, judgments are easy and unambiguous. Without group, pressure, people make matching errors less than 1 per-, , 190, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe some situational and personality factors involved, in obedience to authority., Cite an important factor in resisting inappropriate, demands of authority figures., Describe how culture can affect people’s responses to, social influence., , cent of the time. So, if the subject consistently agrees, with the accomplices, he isn’t making honest mistakes—, he is conforming. Will the subject stick to his guns, or, will he go along with the group? Averaging across 123, participants, Asch (1955) found that the men conformed (made mistakes) on 37 percent of the 12 trials., However, the participants varied considerably in their, tendency to conform: 25 percent never caved in to the, group, while 75 percent conformed on at least one trial., Although a meta-analysis of 133 Asch-type studies reported that conformity has declined over the past 50, years, it also concluded that majority influence remains, a powerful force (Bond & Smith, 1996)., In subsequent studies, Asch (1956) determined, that group size and group unanimity are key determinants of conformity. To examine group size, Asch repeated his procedure with groups that included 1 to 15, accomplices. Little conformity was seen when a subject was pitted against just one accomplice. Conformity increased rapidly as group size went from 2 to 4,, peaked at a group size of 7, and then leveled off (see, Figure 6.12). Thus, Asch concluded that as group size, increases, conformity increases—up to a point. Subsequent research has confirmed this finding (Nemeth &, Chiles, 1988). Significantly, Asch found that group size, made little difference if just one accomplice “broke”, with the others, wrecking their unanimous agreement., The presence of another dissenter lowered conformity, to about one-quarter of its peak, even when the dis-, , •, , F I G U R E 6. 11, , Stimuli used in Asch’s conformity, studies. Subjects were asked to match, a standard line (top) with one of three, other lines displayed on another card, (bottom). The task was easy—until, experimental accomplices started, responding with obviously incorrect, answers, creating a situation in which, Asch evaluated subjects’ conformity., Adapted from illustration on p. 35 by Sarah Love in, Asch, S. (1995, November). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31–35. Copyright ©, 1955 by Scientific American, Inc., , 1 2 3

Page 228 :
Trials on which subjects conform (%), , •, , 40, , 30, , 20, , 10, , 0, , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15, Size of incorrect majority, , F I G U R E 6.12, , Conformity and group size. This graph shows the percentage of, trials on which subjects conformed as a function of the number, of individuals with an opposing view. Asch found that conformity, became more frequent as group size increased, up to about 7, persons, and then leveled off., Adapted from illustration on p. 32 by Sarah Love in Asch, S. (1995, November). Opinions, and social pressure. Scientific American,193(5), 31–35. Copyright © 1955 by Scientific, American, Inc., , senter made inaccurate judgments that happened to, conflict with the majority view. Apparently, the participants just needed to hear a second person question the, accuracy of the group’s perplexing responses., Conformity Versus Compliance, , Did the conforming participants in Asch’s study really, change their beliefs in response to social pressure,, or did they just pretend to change them? Subsequent, studies asked participants to make their responses privately, instead of publicly (Deutsch & Gerard, 1955;, Insko et al., 1985). Conformity declined dramatically, when participants wrote down their responses. Thus,, it is likely that Asch’s participants did not really change, their beliefs. Based on this evidence, theorists concluded that Asch’s experiments evoked a particular type, of conformity, called compliance. Compliance occurs, when people yield to social pressure in their public, behavior, even though their private beliefs have not, changed., The Whys of Conformity, , People often conform or comply because they are afraid, of being criticized or rejected. Normative influence, operates when people conform to social norms for, fear of negative social consequences. For example,, around the time of the Supreme Court decision in 1954, that outlawed segregated schools, many ministers in, Little Rock, Arkansas favored integration. However,, they kept their opinions to themselves because they, , CHAPTER 6, , feared that they would lose church members and contributions if they went against the views of the majority (Campbell & Pettigrew, 1959). Compliance often, results from subtle, implied pressure. For example, for, fear of making a negative impression, you may remove, your eyebrow ring for a job interview. However, compliance also occurs in response to explicit rules, requests,, and commands. Thus, you’ll probably follow your boss’s, directions even when you think they’re lousy ideas., People are also likely to conform when they are uncertain how to behave (Cialdini, 2001; Sherif, 1936)., Thus, if you’re at a nice restaurant and don’t know which, fork to use, you may watch others to see what they’re, doing. Informational influence operates when people, look to others for how to behave in ambiguous situations. In situations like this, using others as a source of, information about appropriate behavior is a good thing., But relying on others to know how to behave in unfamiliar situations can sometimes be problematic, as, you’ll see shortly., It may have occurred to you that it is not always, easy to distinguish normative from informational influence. Such concerns have prompted researchers to, find alternative explanations for conformity (Martin, & Hewstone, 2003). One viewpoint reconceptualizes, normative and informational influence into three motives that underlie conformity (Cialdini & Goldstein,, 2004): positive self-evaluations and having good relationships with others (normative-based motives) and, better understanding a situation to reduce uncertainty, (information-based motive). Another perspective looks, at the role of group identification on conformity. For, example, young adults who strongly identified with, peer groups that endorsed smoking were more likely, to smoke than were those who had a weak group identification (Schofield et al. 2001)., Resisting Conformity Pressures, , Sometimes conforming is just harmless fun—such as, participating in Internet-generated “flash mobs.” At, other times, people conform on relatively trivial matters—such as dressing up for a nice restaurant. In this, case, conformity and compliance minimize the confusion and anxiety people experience in unfamiliar situations. However, when individuals feel pressured to, conform to antisocial norms, tragic consequences may, result. Negative examples of “going along with the, crowd” include drinking more than one knows one, should because others say, “C’mon, have just one more”, and driving at someone’s urging when under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Other instances include, refusing to socialize with someone simply because the, person isn’t liked by one’s social group and failing, to come to another’s defense when it might make one, unpopular., , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 191

Page 229 :
know in advance that you’re heading into this kind of, situation, consider inviting a friend with similar views, to go along., , “Flash mobs” are an example of harmless conformity to social, pressure. Participants follow instructions on the Internet to, appear at a designated time and place to engage in specified,, nonsensical behavior., , The above examples all concern normative influence, but pressure can come from informational influence as well. A useful example concerns a paradox called, the bystander effect—the tendency for individuals to, be less likely to provide help when others are present, than when they are alone. Numerous studies have, confirmed that people are less helpful in emergency, situations when others are around (Latané and Nida,, 1981; Levine et al., 1994). This effect even shows up, on the Internet, when members of different-sized chat, groups receive requests for assistance (Markey, 2000)., Thankfully, the bystander effect is less likely to occur, when the need for help is very clear., What accounts for the bystander effect? A number, of factors are at work, and conformity is one of them., The bystander effect is most likely to occur in ambiguous, situations, because people look around to see whether, others are acting as if there’s an emergency (Harrison, & Wells, 1991). If everyone hesitates, this inaction (informational influence) suggests that help isn’t needed., So the next time you witness what you think might be, an emergency, don’t automatically give in to the informational influence of inaction., To resist conformity pressures, we offer these suggestions: First, make an effort to pay more attention to, the social forces operating on you. Second, if you find, yourself in a situation where others are pressuring you,, try to identify someone in the group whose views match, yours. Recall that just one dissenter in Asch’s groups, significantly reduced conformity pressures. And, if you, , 192, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Obedience is a form of compliance that occurs when, people follow direct commands, usually from someone in a position of authority. In itself, obedience isn’t, good or bad; it depends on what one is being told to, do. For example, if the fire alarm goes off in your classroom building and your instructor “orders” you to, leave, obedience is a good idea. On the other hand, if, your boss asks you to engage in an unethical or illegal, act, disobedience is probably in order., The Dynamics of Obedience, , Like many other people after World, War II, social psychologist Stanley, Milgram was troubled by how readily the citizens of Germany had followed the orders of dictator Adolf, Hitler, even when the orders required morally repugnant actions,, such as the slaughter of millions, of Jews, as well as Russians, Poles,, Stanley Milgram, Gypsies, and homosexuals. This, was Milgram’s motivation to study, the dynamics of obedience. Milgram’s (1963) participants were a diverse collection of 40 men from the local, community who volunteered for a study on the effects, of punishment on learning. When they arrived at the, lab, they drew slips of paper from a hat to get their assignments. The drawing was rigged so that the subject, always became the “teacher” and an experimental accomplice (a likable 47-year-old accountant) became, the “learner.”, The teacher watched while the learner was strapped, into a chair and as electrodes were attached to his arms, (to be used to deliver shocks whenever he made a mistake on the task). The subject was then taken to an adjoining room that housed the shock generator that he, would control in his role as the teacher. Although the, apparatus looked and sounded realistic, it was a fake,, and the learner was never shocked. The experimenter, played the role of the authority figure who told the, teacher what to do and who answered any questions, that arose., The experiment was designed such that the learner, would make many mistakes, and the teacher was instructed to increase the shock level after each wrong, answer. At 300 volts, the learner began to pound on the, wall between the two rooms in protest and soon stopped, responding to the teacher’s questions. From this point, , © 1981 Eric Kroll, courtesy of Alexandra Milgram, , © Scott Barbour/Getty Images, , Pressure from, Authority Figures

Page 230 :
forward, participants frequently turned to the experimenter for guidance. Whenever they did so, the experimenter (authority figure) firmly stated that the teacher, should continue to give stronger and stronger shocks, to the now-silent learner. Milgram wanted to know the, maximum shock the teacher was willing to administer, before refusing to cooperate., As Figure 6.13 shows, 65 percent of the subjects administered all 30 levels of shock. Although they tended, to obey the experimenter, many participants voiced, and displayed considerable distress about harming the, learner. They protested, groaned, bit their lips, trembled,, and broke into a sweat—but they continued administering the shocks. Based on these findings, Milgram, concluded that obedience to authority was even more, common than he or others had anticipated., The Causes of Obedience, , After his initial demonstration, Milgram (1974) tried, about 20 variations on his experimental procedure, looking for factors that influenced participants’ obedience., For instance, he studied female participants to look at, gender differences in obedience (he found no evidence, of such differences). In another condition, two confederates played the role of teachers who defied the experimenter’s demands to continue, one at 150 volts and, one at 210 volts. In this condition, only 10 percent of, the subjects shocked at the maximum level., , What caused the obedient behavior observed by, Milgram? First, the demands on the participants (to, shock the learner) escalated gradually so that very strong, shocks were demanded only after the participant was, well into the experiment. Second, participants were told, that the authority figure, not the teacher, was responsible if anything happened to the learner. Third, subjects, evaluated their actions in terms of how well they lived, up to the authority figure’s expectations, not by their, harmful effects on the victim. Taken together, these, findings suggest that human behavior is determined, not so much by the kind of person one is as by the kind, of situation one is in. Applying this insight to Nazi war, crimes and other atrocities, Milgram made a chilling, assertion: Inhuman and evil visions may originate in the, disturbed mind of an authority figure like Hitler, but it, is only through the obedient actions of normal people, that such ideas can be turned into frightening reality., Research has also identified personality variables, that correlate with greater obedience. Authoritarianism is one of those (Elms & Milgram, 1966). Recall from, our earlier discussion of this concept that, in addition, to being prejudiced, those who score high on authoritarianism tend to be overly submissive to people in authority. On the other hand, individuals who have a, strong sense of social responsibility and those who believe that they are in control of their destiny are less obedient than those with a weaker sense of social respon-, , •, Number of subjects who stopped giving shocks, , 28, 26, 24, 22, 20, 18, 16, 14, 65%, of, subjects, , 12, 10, 8, , FIG U R E 6.13, , Milgram’s (1963) experiment on obedience., The photos show the fake, shock generator and the, “learner” being connected to the shock, generator during an experimental session. The, results of the study are, summarized in the bar, graph. The vast majority, of subjects (65%) delivered the entire series of, shocks to the learner., Photos copyright 1965 by Stanley, Milgram. From the film Obedience,, distributed by The Pennsylvania, State University. Reprinted by, permission of Alexandra Milgram., , 6, 4, 2, 0, 15, , 45, , Slight, shock, , 75, , 105 135 165 195 225 255 285 315 345 375 405 435 450, Volts, Danger:, Extreme, Moderate Strong Very strong Intense, XXX, shock intensity shock severe shock, shock, shock, shock, Level of shock (as labeled on Milgram’s shock machine), , CHAPTER 6, , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 193

Page 231 :
sibility and those who believe that fate controls their, destiny (Berkowitz, 1999; Blass, 1999). Thus, a few personality factors do play a role in obedient behavior., Still, the pervasive tendencies toward obedience demonstrate that situational factors have greater impact., Milgram’s study has been consistently replicated, for many years, in diverse settings, with a variety of, participants and procedural variations (Blass, 1999)., Overall, the weight of evidence supports Milgram’s results. Of course, critics have questioned the ethics of, Milgram’s procedure (Baumrind, 1964). Today, at most, universities it would be difficult to obtain permission, to replicate Milgram’s study—an ironic epitaph for what, may be psychology’s best-known experiment., To Obey or Not to Obey?, , The findings of obedience research confront us with the, chilling fact that most people can be coerced into engaging in actions that violate their morals and values. Recall, the 1968 My Lai incident, an American “crime of obedience,” in which U.S. military forces killed 400–500 Vietnamese women, children, and elderly men (Kelman &, Hamilton, 1989). The Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq, is a more recent reminder that strong social pressures, can produce morally repugnant behavior. Nonetheless,, some individuals are able to resist pressure from authority figures. A dramatic example is Karen Silkwood,, who probably died because she tried to report unsafe, practices at the nuclear power plant where she worked., Thankfully, disobedience to authority is usually less, dramatic and less dangerous, but “ethical resisters” also, risk the loss of credibility, friends, and jobs for the sake, of important principles (Glazer & Glazer, 1990). Examples of “whistleblowers” include Erin Brockovich, who, helped expose hazardous-waste dangers, and Sherron, Watkins, who warned Ken Lay, her boss at Enron Corporation, about accounting irregularities there., In keeping with Milgram’s finding that participants, in the condition with two disobedient confederates, found it easier to defy authority, it seems that social, support plays a critical role in disobedient behavior., The findings of a study on college students’ decisions to, ride with an intoxicated driver are relevant here (Powell, & Drucker, 1997). Participants were randomly assigned, to one of four conditions: (1) driver with one beer,, (2) intoxicated driver, (3) intoxicated driver and confederate who enters the car, and (4) intoxicated driver, and confederate who refuses to enter the car. Participants consistently chose to enter the car in all conditions except when the confederate refused. Especially, when disobedience involves risk, aligning oneself with, , 194, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , WE B LI N K 6.4, , The Stanford Prison Experiment: A Simulation Study, of the Psychology of Imprisonment, The Stanford Prison experiment, conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971, is one of psychology’s most famous studies., At this site, Zimbardo provides an in-depth set of online, slides, supplemental materials, discussion questions, and, links to other sites detailing all aspects of the original, study and important reflections after more than 30 years., , supportive others (family, friends, labor unions, for, example) can decrease anxiety and increase safety., In dealing with pressure from authority figures, remember that social influence is a two-way street: You, are not merely a helpless victim. Being mindful of how, obedience pressures operate and of some strategies that, make it easier to resist these pressures should make you, a stronger player in these situations., , Culture and Social Influence, As we have discussed, Western cultures tend to have an, individualistic orientation and other cultures, a collectivist orientation. This observed difference in orientations appears to influence people’s attitudes about the, desirability or undesirability of conformity, compliance,, and obedience. For example, among East Asians, conformity is associated with the valued characteristics of harmony and connectedness; among Americans, uniqueness is associated with the positive values of freedom, and interdependence (Kim & Markus, 1999). Thus, East, Asians view conformity and obedience more positively, than either Americans or citizens of some other Western countries (Matsumoto, 1994)., Is conformity behavior more common in collectivist than in individualistic cultures? Yes, as you might, expect. A meta-analysis compared conformity rates in, 17 countries and reported that conformity rates were, higher in collectivist cultures than in individualistic cultures (Bond & Smith, 1996). Studies have found that, both Japanese and Koreans are more conforming than, Americans (Buck, Newton, & Muramatsu, 1984; Kim, & Markus, 1999). Thus, beliefs about the desirability, of yielding to social influence as well as conforming, behavior are consistent with cultural orientations., In the Application, we’ll alert you to some social, influence strategies that people use to get you and others to agree to their requests.

Page 232 :
Seeing Through Compliance Tactics, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, ■, , Describe two compliance strategies based on the principles of, commitment and consistency., Describe several compliance strategies based on the principle of reciprocity., Discuss how the principle of scarcity can increase a person’s desire for, something., , Which of the following statements is true?, ___ 1. It’s a good idea to ask for a small favor before, soliciting the larger favor that you really want., ___ 2. It’s a good idea to ask for a large favor before, soliciting the smaller favor that you really want., , The Foot-in-the-Door Technique, , Courtesy, Robert Cialdini, , Would you believe that both of the, statements are true? Although the, two approaches work for different, reasons, both can be effective ways, to get people to do what you want., It pays to understand these and, other social influence strategies, because advertisers, salespeople,, and fundraisers (not to mention, Robert Cialdini, friends and neighbors) use them, frequently to influence people’s behavior. So you can see the relevance of these strategies, to your own life, we’ve grouped them by the principles, that make them work. Much of our discussion is based, on the work of Robert Cialdini (2001), a social psychologist who spent several years observing social influence, tactics used by salespeople, fundraisers, advertisers, and, other compliance professionals. His book, Influence:, Science and Practice, is an excellent and entertaining, discussion of social influence principles in action., , volve a person getting another individual to commit to, an initial request and then changing the terms of the, agreement to the requestor’s advantage. Because people, often stay with their initial commitments, the target will, likely agree to the revised proposal, even though it may, not be to his or her benefit., , The Consistency Principle, Once people agree to something, they tend to stick with, their initial commitment (Cialdini, 2001). This principle is used to gain compliance in two ways. Both in-, , WE B LI N K 6.5, , Influence at Work, This website, by researchers Robert Cialdini and Kelton, Rhodes, offers an intriguing set of pages that explore, a wide variety of social influence phenomena: persuasion,, propaganda, brainwashing, and the tactics of various, types of cults., , CHAPTER 6, , Door-to-door salespeople have long recognized the, importance of gaining a little cooperation from sales, targets (getting a “foot in the door”) before hitting, them with the real sales pitch. The foot-in-the-door, (FITD) technique involves getting people to agree to, a small request to increase the chances that they will, agree to a larger request later (see Figure 6.14a on the, next page). This technique is widely used. For example, groups seeking donations often ask people to simply sign a petition first. Salespeople routinely ask individuals to try a product with “no obligations” before, they launch their hard sell. In a similar vein, a wife, might ask her husband to get her a cup of coffee, and, when he gets up to fetch it say, “While you’re up, would, you fix me a peanut butter sandwich?”, The FITD technique was first investigated by Jonathon Freedman and his colleagues. In one study (Freedman & Fraser, 1966), the large request involved telephoning homemakers to ask whether a team of six men doing, consumer research could come into their home to classify all their household products. Imagine six strangers, tramping through your home, pulling everything out of, your closets and cupboards, and you can understand, why only 22 percent of the subjects in the control group, agreed to this outlandish request. Subjects in the experimental group were contacted three days before the unreasonable request was made and were asked to answer a, few questions about the soaps used in their home. When, the large request was made three days later, 53 percent of, the experimental group complied with that request., Of course, no strategy works all the time. A review, of research reported that the FITD tactic increases compliance rates, on the average, about 13 percent (Burger,, 1999). The technique may be ineffective if the second, Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 195

Page 233 :
Goal: Obtain $50 contribution for youth group, a. Foot-in-the-Door Technique, ”Would you, Small, donate, request some old, first clothes for, one of our, charity, programs?”, , If yes,, then . . ., , Larger, request (the, one desired, in the first, place), , ”Would, you, donate, $50, to our, program?”, , b. Door-in-the-Face Technique, , Large, request, first, , •, , ”Would you, volunteer, to run a, weekly, program for, our youth, group?”, , If no,, then . . ., , Smaller, request (the, one desired, in the first, place), , ”Would, you, donate, $50, to our, program?”, , FIG U R E 6.14, , The foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face techniques. These two influence techniques are essentially the reverse of each other, but both can work. (a) In the foot-in-the-door technique, you begin, with a small request and work up to a larger one. (b) In the door-in-the-face technique, you begin, with a large request and work down to a smaller one., , request follows too quickly on the heels of the first one, (Chartrand, Pinckert, & Burger, 1999), if the initial request is too trivial to register, or if the second request is, so large it is unreasonable (Burger, 1999)., Why does this strategy work? The best explanation, is rooted in Daryl Bem’s self-perception theory or the, idea that people sometimes infer their attitudes by observing their own behavior (Burger & Caldwell, 2003;, Burger & Guadagno, 2003). When Joe agrees to sign a, petition, he infers that he is a helpful person. So when, he is confronted with a second, larger request to collect, petition signatures, “helpful person” comes to mind,, and Joe complies with the request., The Lowball Technique, , A second commitment-based strategy is the lowball, technique, which involves getting someone to commit to an attractive proposition before its hidden, costs are revealed. The name for this technique derives from a common practice in automobile sales, in, which a customer is offered a terrific bargain on a car., The bargain price gets the customer to commit to buying, but soon after, the dealer starts revealing some, hidden costs. Typically, the customer discovers that options apparently included in the original price are actually going to cost extra. Once they have committed, to buying a car, most customers are unlikely to cancel, the deal. Car dealers aren’t the only ones who use this, 196, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , technique. For instance, a friend might ask if you want, to spend a week with him at his charming backwoods, cabin. After you accept this seemingly generous offer,, he may add, “Of course, there’s a little work to do. We, need to paint the doors, repair the pier, and . . .” You, might think that people would become angry and back, out of a deal once its hidden costs are revealed. Sometimes this does happen, but once people make a public, commitment, lowballing is a surprisingly effective, strategy (Burger & Cornelius, 2003)., , The Reciprocity Principle, Most people have been socialized to believe in the reciprocity principle—the rule that one should pay back, in kind what one receives from others. Charities frequently make use of this principle. Groups seeking donations for the disabled, the homeless, and so forth, routinely send “free” address labels, key rings, and other, small gifts with their pleas for donations. The belief that, we should reciprocate others’ kindness is a powerful, norm; thus, people often feel obliged to reciprocate by, making a donation in return for the gift. According to, Cialdini (2001), the reciprocity norm is so powerful, that it often works even when (1) the gift is uninvited,, (2) the gift comes from someone you dislike, or (3) the, gift results in an uneven exchange. Let’s review some, reciprocity-based influence tactics.

Page 234 :
CALVIN AND HOBBES © Watterson. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , The door-in-the-face technique reverses the sequence, of requests employed with the foot-in-the-door technique. The door-in-the-face (DITF) technique involves, making a large request that is likely to be turned down, in order to increase the chances that people will agree, to a smaller request later (see Figure 6.14b). The name, for this strategy is derived from the expectation that, an initial request will be quickly rejected. For example,, a wife who wants to coax her frugal husband into agreeing to buy a $25,000 sports car might begin by proposing that they purchase a $35,000 sports car. By the time, he has talked his wife out of the pricier car, the $25,000, price tag may look quite reasonable to him. For the, DITF to work, there must be no delay between the two, requests (O’Keefe & Hale, 2001)., Other Reciprocity-Based Techniques, , Salespeople who distribute free samples to prospective, customers are also using the reciprocity principle. Cialdini (2001) describes the procedures used by the Amway, Corporation, which sells such household products as, detergent, floor wax, and insect spray. Amway’s doorto-door salespeople give homemakers many bottles of, their products for a “free trial.” When they return a few, days later, most of the homemakers feel obligated to, buy some of the products., The reciprocity norm is meant to promote fair exchanges in social interactions. However, when people, manipulate the reciprocity rule, they usually give something of minimal value in the hopes of getting far more, in return. For example, a person selling large computer, systems may treat a potential customer at an exclusive, restaurant in an effort to close a deal worth hundreds, of thousands of dollars., , First, people have learned that items that are hard to get, are of better quality than items that are easy to get. From, there, they often assume, erroneously, that anything that, is scarce must be good. Second, when people’s choices, (of products, services, romantic partners, job candidates) are constrained in some way, they often want, what they can’t have even more (Brehm & Brehm, 1981;, Williams et al., 1993). The psychological term for this, is reactance (Brehm, 1966)., Companies and advertisers frequently use the scarcity principle to drive up the demand for their products., Thus, you constantly see ads that scream “limited supply, available,” “for a limited time only,” “while they last,”, and “time is running out.”, In summary, people use a variety of methods to, coax compliance from one another. Despite the fact, that many of these influence techniques are more or, less dishonest, they’re still widely used. There is no way, to completely avoid being hoodwinked by influence, strategies. However, being alert to them can reduce the, likelihood that you’ll be a victim of influence artists., As we noted in our discussion of persuasion,“to be forewarned is to be forearmed.”, , © Tony Freeman/PhotoEdit, , The Door-in-the-Face Technique, , The Scarcity Principle, It’s no secret that telling people they can’t have something only makes them want it more. According to Cialdini (2001), this principle derives from two sources., CHAPTER 6, , Advertisers often try to artificially create scarcity to make their, products seem more desirable., Social Thinking and Social Influence, , 197

Page 235 :
■, , KEY IDEAS, Forming Impressions of Others, , CHAPTER 6 REVIEW, , ■, , In forming impressions of other people, individuals rely on, appearance, verbal behavior, actions, nonverbal messages, and, situational cues. Individuals usually make snap judgments about, others unless accurate impressions are important. To explain, the causes of other people’s behavior, individuals make attributions (either internal or external)., ■ People often try to confirm their expectations about what, others are like, which can result in biased impressions. Selffulfilling prophecies can actually change a target person’s behavior in the direction of a perceiver’s expectations. Cognitive, distortions are caused by categorizing, stereotyping, the fundamental attribution error, and defensive attributions. The process, of person perception is characterized by the themes of efficiency,, selectivity, and consistency., , In Milgram’s landmark study of obedience to authority, subjects showed a remarkable tendency to follow orders to shock, an innocent stranger. Personality factors can influence obedient, behavior, but situational pressures are more powerful determinants. Although people often obey authority figures, sometimes, they are disobedient, usually because they have social support., ■ The value cultures place on conformity influences the extent, to which individuals are likely to conform. Conformity tends to, be greater in collectivistic cultures., Application: Seeing Through, Compliance Tactics, ■, , Although they work for different reasons, all compliance tactics have the same goal: getting people to agree to requests. The, foot-in-the-door and the lowball technique are based on the, principle of consistency, while the door-in-the-face technique, and the tactic of offering “give-away” items rely on the principle, of reciprocity. When advertisers suggest that products are in short, supply, they are using the scarcity principle. Understanding, these strategies can make you less vulnerable to manipulation., , The Problem of Prejudice, ■, , Prejudice is a particularly unfortunate outcome of the tendency to view others inaccurately. Blatant (“old-fashioned”), discrimination occurs relatively infrequently today, but subtle, expressions of prejudice and discrimination (“modern discrimination”) have become more common. Common causes of prejudice include right-wing authoritarianism, cognitive distortions,, competition between groups, and threats to social identity. Strategies for reducing prejudice are rooted in social thinking and intergroup contact., , The Power of Persuasion, ■, , The success of persuasive efforts depends on several factors., A source of persuasion who is expert, trustworthy, likable, physically attractive, and similar to the receiver tends to be relatively, effective. Although there are some limitations, two-sided arguments, arousal of fear, and generation of positive feelings are effective elements in persuasive messages. Persuasion is undermined when receivers are forewarned or have beliefs that are, incompatible with the position being advocated., ■ Persuasion takes place via two processes. The central route, to persuasion requires a receiver to be motivated to process persuasive messages carefully (elaboration). A favorable reaction to, such an evaluation will result in positive attitude change. When, a receiver is unmotivated or unable to process persuasive messages carefully, persuasion may take place via the peripheral route, (on the basis of simple cues such as a catchy tune)., The Power of Social Pressure, ■, , Asch found that subjects often conform to the group, even, when the group reports inaccurate judgments. Asch’s experiments may have produced public compliance while subjects’ private beliefs remained unchanged. Both normative and informational influence can produce conformity. Being mindful of social, pressures and getting support from others with similar views, are ways to resist conformity pressures., , 198, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , KEY TERMS, Attitudes p. 186, Attributions p. 173, Bystander effect p. 192, Channel p. 186, Compliance p. 191, Confirmation bias p. 174, Conformity p. 190, Defensive attribution p. 178, Discrimination p. 181, Door-in-the-face technique, p. 197, Elaboration likelihood model, p. 188, Foot-in-the-door technique, p. 195, Fundamental attribution, error p. 177, , Informational influence, p. 191, Lowball technique p. 196, Message p. 186, Normative influence p. 191, Obedience p. 192, Person perception p. 172, Persuasion p. 185, Prejudice p. 181, Primacy effect p. 180, Receiver p. 186, Reciprocity principle p. 196, Self-fulfilling prophecy, p. 175, Source p. 186, Stereotypes p. 176, Superordinate goals p. 185, , KEY PEOPLE, Solomon Asch pp. 190–191, Robert Cialdini pp. 189,, 195–197, Susan Fiske pp. 172–173, , Stanley Milgram, pp. 192–194, Richard Petty and John, Cacioppo pp. 188–189, Muzafer Sherif p. 183

Page 236 :
8. When people change their outward behavior but not, their private beliefs, __________ is operating., a. conformity, b. persuasion, c. obedience, d. compliance, , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Mindfulness operates when people:, a. make snap judgments., b. are on “cognitive automatic pilot.”, c. make systematic judgments., d. are not concerned about forming accurate, impressions., 2. Which of the following is not a type of cognitive distortion in perception?, a. Categorizing, b. “Old-fashioned” discrimination, c. Stereotypes, d. Defensive attribution, 3. Which of the following is not a theme in person, perception?, a. Efficiency, b. Selectivity, c. Consistency, d. Mindfulness, , PRACTICE TEST, , 9. Conformity is, a. more common in collectivist countries., b. more common in individualistic countries., c. not affected by culture., d. viewed very positively in all cultures., 10. When charities send prospective donors free address, labels and the like, which of the following social influence principles are they using?, a. The consistency principle, b. The scarcity principle, c. The reciprocity principle, d. The foot-in-the-door principle, , Book Companion Website, , c, b, d, a, c, , Page 188, Page 189, Page 191, Page 194, Page 196, , CHAPTER 6, , ANSWERS, , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 7. Compared to attitudes formed via the peripheral route,, those formed via the central route, a. operate subliminally., b. are hard to change., c. last only a short time., d. are poor predictors of behavior., , The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 6.1: Argumentativeness Scale. Personal Probe 6.1: Can You Identify Your, Prejudicial Stereotypes? Personal Probe 6.2: How Do You, Operate in a Group?, , Page 173, Page 176, Pages 179–180, Pages 181–182, Page 182, , 6. Receivers who are forewarned that someone will try to, persuade them will most likely, a. be very open to persuasion., b. get up and stomp out of the room., c. not be very open to persuasion., d. heckle the persuader., , Personal Explorations Workbook, , Social Thinking and Social Influence, , c, b, d, a, b, , 5. Which of the following is a cause of prejudice?, a. Mindfulness, b. Right-wing authoritarianism, c. Jigsaw classrooms, d. Activities based on superordinate goals, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , 4. “Old-fashioned” discrimination is __________; modern discrimination is ___________., a. blatant; subtle, b. legal; illegal, c. common; rare, d. race-based; gender-based, , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , 199

Page 237 :
THE PROCESS OF INTERPERSONAL, COMMUNICATION, Components of the Communication, Process, Technology and Interpersonal, Communication, Communication and Adjustment, , TOWARD MORE EFFECTIVE, COMMUNICATION, Creating a Positive Interpersonal, Climate, Conversational Skills, Self-Disclosure, Effective Listening, , INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT, Beliefs About Conflict, Types of Conflict, Styles of Managing Conflict, Dealing Constructively with Conflict, Public Communication in an Adversarial, Culture, , NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION, General Principles, Elements of Nonverbal Communication, Detecting Deception, The Significance of Nonverbal, Communication, , COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS, Communication Apprehension, Barriers to Effective Communication, , APPLICATION: DEVELOPING AN, ASSERTIVE COMMUNICATION STYLE, The Nature of Assertiveness, Steps in Assertiveness Training, CHAPTER 7 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST, , 200

Page 238 :
CHAPTER, , Interpersonal, Communication, , 7, , “Why don’t you wear your new tie?” Robin suggests to Brian, as they are, dressing to go out. “There you go again, telling me what to wear!” Brian retorts. To which Robin zings back with, “Oh, wear whatever you want. I don’t, care if you want to look like you’re colorblind!” Could this couple have sidestepped the bad feelings and fight that are brewing? You bet! The keys to, managing such encounters are recognizing the pitfalls of interpersonal communication and honing one’s skills to deal effectively with them—two things, you’ll learn about in this chapter., Communication skills are highly relevant to adjustment because they, can be critical to happiness and success in life. In this chapter, we begin, with an overview of the communication process and then turn to the important topic of nonverbal communication. Next, we discuss ways to communicate more effectively and examine common communication problems. Finally, we look at interpersonal conflict, including constructive ways to deal, with it. In the Application, we consider ways to develop an assertive communication style., , CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 201

Page 239 :
The Process of Interpersonal, Communication, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , List and explain the six components of the communication process., List several important differences between face-to-face and computermediated communication., Discuss how interpersonal communication is important to adjustment., , Communication can be defined as the process of sending and receiving messages that have meaning. Your, personal thoughts have meaning, of course, but when, you “talk to yourself,” you are engaging in intrapersonal communication. In this chapter, we will focus on, interpersonal communication—the transmission of, meaning between two or more people. For the most, part, we’ll concentrate on two-person interactions., We define interpersonal communication as an, interactional process in which one person sends a, message to another. Note several points about this definition. First, for communication to qualify as interpersonal, at least two people must be involved. Second,, interpersonal communication is a process. By this, we, simply mean that it usually involves a series of actions:, Kelli talks/Jason listens, Jason responds/Kelli listens,, and so on. Third, this process is interactional. Communication is generally not a one-way street: Both participants send as well as receive information when they’re, interacting. A key implication of this fact is that you, need to pay attention to both speaking and listening if, you want to be an effective communicator., , sion of messages: Speakers encode or transform their, ideas and feelings into symbols and organize them into, a message; receivers decode or translate a speaker’s message into their own ideas and feelings (see Figure 7.1)., Generally, fluent speakers of a language are unaware of, these processes. If you’ve ever learned a new language,, however, you have consciously experienced encoding, (groping for the right word to express an idea) and decoding (trying to discover a word’s meaning by how it, is used)., The primary means of sending messages is language, but people also communicate to others nonverbally. Nonverbal communication includes the facial, expressions, gestures, and vocal inflections used to supplement (and sometimes entirely change) the meaning, of verbal messages. For example, when you say, “Thanks, a lot,” your nonverbal communication can convey either sincere gratitude or heavy sarcasm., The channel refers to the sensory channel through, which the message reaches the receiver. Typically, people receive information from multiple channels simultaneously. They not only hear what the other person, , Components of the, Communication Process, Let’s take a look at the essential components of the interpersonal communication process. The key elements are, (1) the sender, (2) the receiver, (3) the message, (4) the, channel through which the message is sent, (5) noise, or interference, and (6) the context in which the message is communicated. As we describe these components, refer to Figure 7.1 to see how they work together., The sender is the person who initiates the message., In a typical two-way conversation, both people serve, as senders (as well as receivers). Keep in mind that each, person brings a unique set of expectations and understandings to each communication situation. The receiver is the person to whom the message is targeted., The message refers to the information or meaning, that is transmitted from the sender to the receiver. The, message is the content of the communication—that is,, the ideas and feelings conveyed to another person. Two, important cognitive processes underlie the transmis-, , 202, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Noise, , Noise, , Encoding, , Decoding, Channel, Message, Noise, , Sender, , Receiver, Context, , •, , F I G U R E 7. 1, , A model of interpersonal communication. Interpersonal communication involves six elements: the sender, the receiver, the, message, the channel through which the message is transmitted,, distorting noise, and the context in which the message is sent. In, conversations, both participants function as sender and receiver.

Page 240 :
RE C O M M E N D E D, READING, , Multicultural Manners:, New Rules of Etiquette, for a Changing Society, by Norine Dresser (John Wiley & Sons, 1996), This interesting book seeks to help Americans interact, more comfortably and effectively as the nation becomes, increasingly ethnically diverse. Written with humor, the, book covers a wealth of practical issues that arise in a, variety of settings: business, social, educational, and, medical. The majority of the book addresses issues and, situations that can result in miscommunication: body, language, childrearing practices, classroom behavior,, gifts, male/female relations, verbal expressions, and so, on. Each chapter includes real-life incidents of miscommunication, explanations of what happened in the situation, and verbal and behavioral guidelines for avoiding, such problems. In two smaller sections of the book,, Dresser explores the diversity in rules for holidays and, worship (to help people feel comfortable when they, visit unfamiliar places of worship) as well as multicultural health practices (some of which are benign, others of which are dangerous). Examples involve African, Americans, Native Americans, Caribbean Islanders,, Asians, Latinos, and recently arriving groups of immigrants. The author also provides information about the, practices of a number of diverse religious groups., Cover image used by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., , says, they also see the person’s facial expressions, observe his or her gestures, experience eye contact, and, sometimes feel the person’s touch. Note that the messages in the various channels may be consistent or inconsistent with each other, making their interpretation, more or less difficult. Sometimes sound is the only, channel available for receiving information—when you, talk on the telephone, for instance. Through sound,, people hear both the literal content of messages and, vocal inflections. In computer-mediated communication (e-mail, chat rooms, and so on), only the visual, channel is called into play, as individuals communicate, in writing., Whenever two people interact, miscommunication, can occur. Any stimulus that interferes with accurately, expressing or understanding a message is termed, noise. Sources of noise include environmental factors, (street traffic, loud music) and physical factors (poor, hearing, poor vision). Noise can also have semantic, origins (Verderber & Verderber, 2005). For instance,, profanity, ethnic slurs, or sexist language can cause a lis-, , tener to disregard the larger message. In addition, psychological factors such as defensiveness and anxiety, can contribute to noise, a topic we’ll consider later in, the chapter., All social communication occurs in and is influenced by a context, the environment in which communication takes place. Context includes the physical, environment (location, time of day, and noise level)., Another aspect of the physical environment is how a, conversation takes place: face to face, in a telephone call,, or via the Internet. Other important aspects of context, include the nature of the participants’ relationship (work, associates, friends, family), their history (previous interactions), their current mood (happy, stressed), and their, cultural backgrounds (Verderber & Verderber, 2005)., Culture is especially important in the United States because of the varieties of subcultures, many with different rules of communication. The Recommended Reading Multicultural Manners is an excellent guide to the, cultural variety in communication practices in our diverse nation. Cultural context is also important in the, global marketplace, as the marketers of Coca-Cola in, China discovered too late (Petras & Petras, 1993). It, seems that the symbols they used for the brand name, translated to something like “Bite the wax tadpole” in, Chinese!, , Technology and Interpersonal, Communication, The recent explosion in electronic and wireless communication technology has dramatically altered our notions of interpersonal communication. Today, communication via cellular telephones and the Internet must, be considered along with face-to-face interactions., Cell phones have both advantages and disadvantages (Verderber & Verderber, 2004). On the positive, side, they are a convenient way to keep in touch with others, provide a sense of security, and can summon aid in, an emergency. On the down side, they tie people to their, jobs, can disrupt classrooms and public events, and, bring private conversations into public places. Who, hasn’t been exasperated by being forced to listen to a, loud-mouth yelling his or her personal business into a, cell phone in a public place? New rules of etiquette, have been devised to guide cell phone use in public., Three basic guidelines are (1) turn off your phone (or, put it on “vibrate” mode) when the ringing will disturb, others, (2) keep your calls short, and (3) make and receive calls unobtrusively or out of earshot from others, (Farnsworth, 2002)., In the area of computer-mediated communication,, e-mail is by far the most popular application, but newsgroups and chat rooms are also popular (Verderber &, Verderber, 2004). As we have noted, face-to-face com-, , CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 203

Page 241 :
clarifying details, and describe your, feelings, if necessary. It’s also a good, idea to review what you have written before you send it! The lack of, nonverbal cues and the anonymous, nature of computer-mediated communication also have important implications for relationship development (Bargh & McKenna, 2004), an, issue we will take up in Chapter 8., , © Martin Parr/Magnum Photos, , Communication, and Adjustment, Before we plunge further into the, topic of interpersonal communication, let’s take a moment to emphasize its significance. Communication, with others—friends, lovers, parents, spouses, children, employers,, workers—is such an essential and, commonplace aspect of everyday, Cell phone etiquette in public places calls for turning off your phone or putting it on, life that it’s hard to overstate its role, vibrate mode, keeping your voice low and your calls short., in adjustment. Many of life’s gratifications (and frustrations and heartmunication relies on the spoken word while Internet, aches, as well) hinge on one’s ability to communicate, communication depends on the written word. You can, effectively with others. Numerous studies have shown, see other important differences in Figure 7.2. The abthat good communication can enhance satisfaction in, sence of nonverbal cues in computer-mediated commurelationships (Meeks, Hendrick, & Hendrick, 1998) and, nication means that you need to take special care that, that poor communication ranks high as a cause of, the other person understands your intended meaning., breakups among both straight and gay couples (KurThus, you should choose your words carefully, provide, dek, 1994, 1998)., , Dimension, , Face-to-Face, , Internet, , Physical distance, , People need to be in the same place at the same time, to meet., , People can meet and develop a relationship with someone thousands of miles away., , Anonymity, , One can’t be anonymous in real-life interactions., , People take greater risks in disclosing personal information than they otherwise do. Thus, feelings of intimacy, can develop more quickly., , Richness of, communication, , People have access to nonverbal cues such as facial, expressions and tone of voice to detect nuances in, meaning or deception., , In cyberspace, these cues are absent., , Visual cues, , Physical appearance and visual cues play a big role in, attraction in face-to-face relationships., , These cues are generally absent on the Internet (although, people can exchange photographs online)., , Time, , Two people have to connect at the same time., , There is no need for an immediate response, so time, becomes relatively unimportant. On the Internet, you, can take as long as you like to craft a response so you, can more completely explain yourself., , •, , F I G U R E 7.2, , Differences between face-to-face and Internet communication. Computer-mediated communication, applications (e-mail, chat rooms, news groups, and so forth) have dramatically changed the ways people, interact and develop relationships. Internet communication differs from face-to-face communication in, five important ways. (Adapted from Bargh & McKenna, 2004; Verderber & Verderber, 2004), , 204, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm

Page 242 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Communication in Uncertain Times, we discuss in the chapter. The computer is another important communication vehicle that connects people, through e-mail, chat rooms, and newsgroups (Verderber, & Verderber, 2004)., Mass communication has also assumed a higher profile in these unsettling times. People want to have fast, access to the news in case of terrorist attacks or other, disasters. Thus, in addition to their regular news programming, many radio stations and television channels, provide hourly news updates and special bulletins. Some, TV channels provide news on a 24-hour basis, and scrawls, run continuously across the bottom of the screen to give, viewers instant access to unfolding national and world, events. The Internet is another source of news. An obvious advantage of computer–mediated news is that coverage of breaking events is much more timely than is, possible with print newspapers., Thus, both interpersonal and mass communication, play a major role in helping people cope with the unfortunate and stressful reality of life in today’s United, States., , The possibility of additional terrorist attacks in the, United States continues to haunt many Americans. In, such uncertain times, people have a strong need to be, able to communicate with their family and friends. And, for those who are employed on the front lines in emergencies, being in close communication with work sites, is essential., Luckily, recent advances in communications technology support individuals’ needs to make fast contact with, each other (Verderber & Verderber, 2004). Take cell phones,, for example. Through both text-messaging and telephone, mode, they provide a popular and convenient way for, people to keep in touch. On college campuses, students, with cell phones at their ears are a familiar sight. Cell, phones also provide a sense of security for parents, children, and others who may want to contact each other or, summon aid in an emergency. Recall that it was the cell, phone calls between airline passengers and their loved, ones that sparked the “Let’s roll” rebellion on the hijacked, plane that crashed in Pennsylvania on September 11. Of, course, portable phones have their down sides, too, as, , Nonverbal Communication, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , ■, , ■, , List five general principles of nonverbal communication., Define proxemics and discuss personal space., Discuss display rules and what can be discerned from, facial cues., Summarize the characteristics associated with effective, eye contact., Describe the roles of body movement, posture, and, gestures in communication., , You’re standing at the bar in your favorite hangout, gazing across a dimly lit room filled with people drinking,, dancing, and talking. You signal to the bartender that, you’d like another drink. Your companion comments, on the loudness of the music, and you nod your head, in agreement. You spot an attractive stranger across the, bar; your eyes meet for a moment and you smile. In a, matter of seconds, you have sent three messages with-, , ■, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Summarize the research findings on touching and, paralanguage., Discuss the difficulty of detecting deception and the, nonverbal cues linked to deception., Explain what polygraphs do, and cite some problems with, their use., Describe the significance of nonverbal messages in, interpersonal interactions., , out uttering a syllable. To put it another way, you have, just sent three nonverbal messages. Nonverbal communication is the transmission of meaning from one person to another through means or symbols other than, words. Communication at the nonverbal level takes, place through a variety of behaviors: interpersonal distance, facial expression, eye contact, body posture and, movement, gestures, physical touch, and tone of voice., , CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 205

Page 243 :
© 2004 AP/Wide World Photos, , The power of nonverbal communication was dramatically illustrated during the first Presidential Debate of the 2004 election., President Bush’s poor performance during the debate was attributed, in part, to facial expressions that conveyed a variety, of negative emotions., , Clearly, a great deal of information is exchanged, through nonverbal channels—probably more than most, people realize. You can significantly enhance your communication skills by learning more about this important, aspect of communication., , General Principles, Let’s begin by examining some general principles of, nonverbal communication., 1. Nonverbal communication is multichanneled., Nonverbal communication typically involves simultaneous messages sent through a number of channels., For instance, information may be transmitted through, gestures, facial expressions, eye contact, and vocal tone, at the same time. In contrast, verbal communication is, limited to a single channel: speech. If you have ever tried, to follow two people speaking at once, you understand, how difficult it is to process multiple inputs of information. This means that many nonverbal transmissions, can sail by the receiver unnoticed., 2. Nonverbal communication is ambiguous. A shrug, or a raised eyebrow can mean different things to different people. Moreover, it can be difficult to know whether, nonverbal messages are being sent intentionally. Although some popular books on body language imply, otherwise, few nonverbal signals carry universally accepted meanings, even within the same culture. Thus,, nonverbal cues are informative, but they are most reliable when accompanied by verbal messages and embedded in a familiar cultural and social context (Samovar & Porter, 2004)., 3. Nonverbal communication conveys emotions., People often communicate their feelings without say206, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , ing a word—for example, “a look that kills.” Nonverbal, demonstrations of positive feelings include sitting or, standing close to those you care for, touching them often,, and looking at them frequently. Still, nonverbal signals,, on their own, are not the precise indicators of emotional states that they were once believed to be (Samovar & Porter, 2004), so you should be cautious in making inferences., 4. Nonverbal communication may contradict verbal messages. How often have you seen people proclaim, “I’m not angry” even though their bodies shout that they, are positively furious? When confronted with such an, inconsistency, which message should you believe? Because of their greater spontaneity, you’re probably better off heeding the nonverbal signs. Research shows that, when someone is instructed to tell a lie, deception is, most readily detected through nonverbal signals (DePaulo, LeMay, & Epstein, 1991)., 5. Nonverbal communication is culture-bound. Like, language, nonverbal signals are different in different cultures (Samovar & Porter, 2004). Sometimes cultural differences can be quite dramatic. For example, in Tibet, people greet their friends by sticking out their tongues, (Ekman, 1975)., , Elements of Nonverbal, Communication, Nonverbal signals can provide a great deal of information in interpersonal interactions. As we discuss specific nonverbal behaviors, we will focus on what they, communicate about interpersonal attraction and social status., Personal Space, , Proxemics is the study of people’s use of interpersonal, space. Personal space is a zone of space surrounding a, person that is felt to “belong” to that person. Personal, space is like an invisible bubble you carry around with, you in your social interactions. The size of this mobile, zone is related to your cultural background, social status,, personality, age, and gender., The amount of interpersonal distance people prefer depends on the nature of the relationship and the, , WE B LI N K 7.1, , Nonverbal Communication Research Page, Social psychologist Marvin A. Hecht, this site’s editor, makes, clear that the Internet is not an adequate realm for the, preparation of a research paper on the topic of nonverbal, communication. But the links provided here can serve to, introduce students and others to major issues, researchers,, current news, and examples drawn from this fascinating, field.

Page 244 :
situation (Darley & Gilbert, 1985; J. A. Hall, 1990). The, appropriate distance between people is also regulated, by social norms and varies by culture (J. A. Hall, 1990)., For instance, people of Northern European heritage, tend to engage in less physical contact and keep a greater, distance between themselves than people of Latin or, Middle Eastern heritage. The United States is usually, characterized as a medium-contact culture, but there, is a lot of variability among ethnic groups., Anthropologist Edward T. Hall (1966) has described, four interpersonal distance zones that are appropriate, for middle-class encounters in American culture (see, Figure 7.3). The general rule is that the more you like, someone, the more comfortable you feel being physically close to that person. Of course, there are obvious, exceptions, such as in crowded subways and elevators,, but these situations are often experienced as stressful., Women seem to have smaller personal-space zones, than men do (Remland, Jones, & Brinkman, 1995)., When talking, women sit or stand closer together than, men do., Like other aspects of nonverbal communication,, personal distance can convey information about status., People of similar status tend to stand closer together, than people whose status is unequal (J. A. Hall, 1990)., Moreover, it is the prerogative of the more powerful, person in an interaction to set the “proper” distance, (Henley, 1977)., , ZONE AND DISTANCE, Zone 2:, Zone 1:, Personal, Intimate, distance zone, distance zone, (0–18"), , (18"–4'), , Invasions of personal space usually produce discomfort and stimulate attempts to restore your privacy, zone. To illustrate, if someone stands too close, you may, back up. Or, if a stranger sits down at “your” table in, the library and forces you to share it, you may reorient, your body away from the intruder, place a barrier (for, example, a stack of books) between you and the invader,, or move to a different table. Invasions of personal space, rarely go unnoticed, and they usually elicit a variety of, reactions., Facial Expression, , More than anything else, facial expressions convey emotions. Paul Ekman and Wallace Friesen have identified, six distinctive facial expressions that correspond with, six basic emotions: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise (Ekman, 1994; Ekman & Friesen,, 1984). Early research involving participants from many, countries supported the idea that these six emotions, are universally recognized (Ekman, 1972). In such studies, researchers show photographs depicting different, emotions to subjects from a variety of Western and nonWestern cultures and ask them to match the photographs, with an emotion. Some representative results from this, research are depicted in Figure 7.4 on the next page., A recent meta-analysis of 97 studies (over 42 countries) looked at whether these six emotions are universally recognized or are culturally specific (Elfenbein &, , Zone 4:, Public, distance zone, , Zone 3:, Social, distance zone, (4'–12'), , (12'+), , APPROPRIATE PEOPLE AND SITUATIONS, Close friends, Co-workers, social, Parents, gatherings, friends,, and children,, work situations, lovers, husband, and wife, , •, , Actors, total strangers, important officials, , F I G U R E 7.3, , Interpersonal distance zones. According to Edward Hall (1966), people like to keep a certain amount, of distance between themselves and others. The distance that makes one feel comfortable depends on, whom one is interacting with and the nature of the situation., CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 207

Page 245 :
F I G U R E 7.4, , Facial expressions and emotions., Ekman and Friesen (1984) found, that people in highly disparate, cultures showed fair agreement on, the emotions portrayed in these, photos. This consensus across, cultures suggests that the facial, expressions associated with certain emotions may have a biological basis., Photos from Unmasking the Face, © 1975 by Paul, Ekman, photographs courtesy of Paul Ekman, , Fear, , Country, United States, Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Japan, New Guinea, , Emotion Displayed, Disgust, Happiness, , Anger, , Agreement in judging photos (%), 85, 67, 68, 54, 66, 54, , 92, 97, 92, 92, 90, 44, , 97, 95, 95, 98, 100, 82, , 67, 90, 94, 90, 90, 50, , Ambady, 2002). Interestingly, there was evidence for, 2000). Also, as you might expect, high self-monitors, both perspectives. In support of the universal view, inare better than low self-monitors at managing their fadividuals do accurately recognize emotions in photocial expressions (Gangestad & Snyder, 2000)., graphs of people from other cultures. Favoring cultural, Eye Contact, specificity, there was evidence of an “ingroup advanEye contact (also called mutual gaze) is another major, tage.” Thus, observers are better at recognizing the emochannel of nonverbal communication. The duration of, tions in photographs from their own cultural groups, eye contact is its most meaningful aspect. Because there, than from cultural outgroups. A few basic facial exis considerable research on “eye communication,” we, pressions are universally recognizable, but other emowill summarize the most relevant findings., tional expressions vary from culture to culture—as we, Among European Americans, people who engage, noted in the earlier example of Tibetans sticking out, in high levels of eye contact are usually judged to have, their tongues to greet their friends., effective social skills and credibility. Similarly, speakers,, Each society has rules that govern whether and, interviewers, and experimenters receive higher ratings, when it is appropriate to express one’s feelings. These, of competence when they maintain high rather than, norms that govern the appropriate display of emotions are termed display rules. In the United, States, for instance, it is considered bad form, to gloat over one’s victories or to show envy, or anger in defeat. This regulation of facial expression is an aspect of impression, management that we discussed in Chapter 5. Is it possible to deliberately deceive, others through facial expression? Absolutely., In fact, people are better at sending deceptive messages with their faces than with other, areas of their bodies (Ekman & O’Sullivan,, 1991). You are no doubt familiar with the, term “poker face,” an allusion to poker players who are experts at controlling their excitement about a good hand of cards (or their, dismay about a bad one)., Besides cultural differences, there are, gender differences in facial expression (Hall,, Carter, & Horgan, 2000). For example, men, typically show less facial expression than, women do, a finding linked to social pressures, Display rules require unsuccessful contestants in beauty pageants to suppress, for males to inhibit such displays (Kilmartin,, the display of resentful, envious, or angry feelings., 208, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , © 2004 AP/Wide World Photos, , •

Page 246 :
© Tony Freeman/PhotoEdit, , © Walter Hodges /Corbis, , The eyes can be used to convey either very positive or very negative feelings., , low eye contact with their audience. As a rule, people, engage in more eye contact when they’re listening than, when they’re talking (Bavelas, Coates, & Johnson, 2002)., Gaze also communicates the intensity (but not the, positivity or negativity) of feelings. For example, couples who say they are in love spend more time gazing at, each other than other couples do (Patterson, 1988). Also,, maintaining moderate (versus constant or no) eye contact with others typically generates positive feelings in, them. These positive feelings may also translate into, higher tips! One study found that food servers who, squatted down next to their customers to take drink, orders got higher tips than servers who stood next to, their customers (Lynn & Mynier, 1993). Supposedly,, the increased eye contact and closeness produced more, positive feelings., In a negative interpersonal context, a steady gaze, becomes a stare that causes most people to feel uncomfortable (Kleinke, 1986). Moreover, like threat displays, among nonhuman primates such as baboons and rhesus monkeys, a stare can convey aggressive intent (Henley, 1986). Thus, if you want to avoid road rage incidents, avoid making eye contact with hostile motorists, (“Road rage plagues drivers,” 1997). People also communicate by reducing eye contact with others. Unpleasant interactions, embarrassing situations, or invasions, of personal space usually trigger this behavior (Kleinke,, 1986)., Culture strongly affects patterns of eye contact, (Samovar & Porter, 2004). For example, Americans, should be sensitive to the fact that direct eye contact is, perceived as an insult in some Native American tribes, and in Mexico, Latin America, Japan, and Africa. By, contrast, people from Arab countries look directly into, the eyes of their conversational partners for longer periods than Americans are used to., In the United States, gender and racial differences, have been found in eye contact. For instance, women, tend to gaze at others more than men do (Cegala & Sillars, 1989). However, the patterning of eye contact also, , reflects status, and gender and status are often confounded. Higher-status individuals look at the other, person more when speaking than when listening, while, lower-status people behave just the opposite. Women, usually show the lower-status visual pattern because they, are typically accorded lower status than men. As you, can see in Figure 7.5, when women are in high-power, positions, they show the high-status visual pattern to, the same extent that men do (Dovidio et al., 1988)., African Americans use more continuous eye contact, than European Americans when speaking, but less when, listening (Samovar & Porter, 2004). Misunderstandings can arise if eye-gaze behaviors that are intended, to convey interest and respect are interpreted as being, disrespectful or dishonest., , Man in, high power, position, , Men, Women, , Control, group, , Men, Women, , Woman in, high power, position, , Men, Women, 0, Low, , •, , .20, , .40, , .60, , .80, , Visual dominance behavior, , 1.00, High, , F I G U R E 7.5, , Visual dominance, status, and gender. Women typically show, low visual dominance (see control condition) because they are, usually accorded lower status than men (Dovidio et al. 1988)., However, when researchers placed women in a high-power position and measured their visual behavior, women showed the high, visual dominance pattern and men showed the low visual dominance pattern. When men were placed in the high-power position, the visual dominance patterns reversed. Thus, visual dominance seems to be more a function of status than of gender., CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 209

Page 247 :
Body movements—those of the head, trunk,, hands, legs, and feet—also provide nonverbal avenues of communication. Kinesics is, the study of communication through body, movements. Through a person’s body movements, observers may be able to tell an individual’s level of tension or relaxation. For, instance, frequent touching or scratching, suggests nervousness (Harrigan et al., 1991)., Posture also conveys information. Leaning back with arms or legs arranged in an, asymmetrical or “open” position conveys a, feeling of relaxation. Posture can also indicate, someone’s attitude toward you (McKay, Davis,, & Fanning, 1995). When people lean toward, you, it typically indicates interest and a positive attitude. When people angle their bodies away from you or cross their arms, their, People in higher-status positions tend to adopt an “open” body posture, and, posture may indicate a negative attitude or, those in lower-status roles usually adopt a “closed” position., defensiveness., Posture can also convey status differences. Generstatus and power. In the United States, people typically, ally, a higher-status person will look more relaxed. By, “touch downward”—i.e., higher-status individuals are, contrast, a lower-status person will tend to exhibit a, freer to touch subordinates than vice versa (Henley &, more rigid body posture, often sitting up straight with, Freeman, 1995). How people interpret the possible mesfeet together, flat on the floor, and arms close to the, sages communicated by touch depends on the age and, body (a “closed” position) (J. A. Hall, 1984; Vrugt &, gender of the individuals involved, the setting in which, Luyerink, 2000). Again, status and gender differences, the touching takes place, and the relationship between, are frequently parallel. That is, men are more likely to, the toucher and recipient, among other things (Major,, exhibit the high-status “open” posture and women the, Schmidlin, & Williams, 1990). Also, there are strong, lower-status “closed” posture (J. A. Hall, 1990)., norms about where people are allowed to touch friends., People use hand gestures to describe and emphasize, These norms are quite different for same-gender as opthe words they speak. You might point to give directions, posed to cross-gender interactions, as can be seen in, or slam your fist onto a desk to emphasize an assertion., Figure 7.6., As travelers frequently discover, the meaning of gesOther findings about touching behavior come from, tures is not universal (Samovar & Porter, 2004). For, an observational study of 4,500 pairs of Bostonians ininstance, a circle made with the thumb and forefinger, teracting in a variety of public places (shopping malls,, means that everything is “OK” to an American but is, hotel lobbies, subway stations) (Hall & Veccia, 1990,, considered an obscene gesture in some countries., 1991). For one thing, female-female pairs touched each, other significantly more than male-male pairs. Second,, Touch, in younger pairs, men touched women more, but in, Touch takes many forms and can express a variety of, older pairs, the pattern was reversed. Comparable age, meanings: support, consolation, and sexual intimacy, changes were not found for same-gender pairs., (Anderson, 1999). Touch can also convey messages of, Women typically perceive touch to be an expressive, behavior signifying affection or support, whereas men, often view touch as an instrumental behavior used to, assert power or to show sexual interest. These gender, differences in the meaning of touch can contribute to, WE B LI N K 7.2, misunderstandings: In the workplace, touching is more, UCSC Perceptual Science Laboratory, likely to be perceived as sexual harassment by women, Will the day come when interpersonal communication will, than by men (LaPoire, Burgoon, & Parrott, 1992)., allow us to talk directly to a computer, with the computer, responding as if it were another person? The resources, at this University of California, Santa Cruz laboratory and, its extensive links provide a state-of-the-art view of research into the visual and auditory components of personal, perception., , 210, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Paralanguage, , The term paralanguage refers to how something is said, rather than to what is said. Thus, paralanguage includes all vocal cues other than the content of the ver-, , © Bob Daemmrich/The Image Works, , Body Language

Page 248 :
Where men and women tend to be touched, by friends of the . . ., Same gender, Other gender, , Seldom (0–25%), Quite often (26–50%), Often (51–75%), Very often (51–75%), , may indicate anxiety. Slow speech, low volume, and low, pitch are often associated with sadness. Thus, vocal quality provides another window on someone’s true feelings. Keep in mind, however, that it is easy to assign, meanings to voice quality that aren’t valid, such as associating a deep voice with masculinity and maturity, and a high, breathy voice with femininity and youth., In cyberspace communication, e-mailers use various substitutes for the paralanguage cues used in spoken communication. For instance, capital letters are used, for emphasis (“I had a GREAT vacation”); however,, using capital letters throughout a message is viewed as, shouting and considered rude behavior. Using emoticons, (punctuation marks arranged to indicate the writer’s, emotions) has also become a common practice; thus,, :-) indicates a smile and :-( indicates a frown. Interestingly, just as women display more emotion in their, faces than men, women are more likely than men to use, emoticons (Witmer & Katzman, 1999)., , Detecting Deception, , •, , F I G U R E 7.6, , Where friends touch each other. Social norms govern where, friends tend to touch each other. As these figures show, the, patterns of touching are different in same-gender as opposed, to cross-gender interactions., Adapted from Marsh, P. (Ed.). (1988). Eye to eye: How people interact. Topsfield, MA: Salem, House. Copyright © 1988 by Andromeda Oxford Ltd. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins,, Publishers, Inc. and Andromeda Oxford Ltd., , bal message itself. These cues include how loudly or, softly people speak, how fast they talk, and the rhythm, and quality of their speech. Each of these vocal characteristics can affect the message being transmitted., Variations in vocal emphasis can give the same set, of words very different meanings. Consider the sentence “I really enjoyed myself ” By varying the word that, is accented, you can speak this sentence in three ways,, each resulting in a different meaning:, ■ I really enjoyed myself! (Even though others may, not have had a good time, I did.), ■ I really enjoyed myself! (My enjoyment was, exceptional.), ■ I really enjoyed myself! (Much to my surprise, I, had a great time.), , As you can see from these examples, you can actually, reverse the literal meaning of a verbal message by how, you say it (such as with sarcasm)., Aspects of vocalization can also communicate emotions (Banse & Scherer, 1996). For example, rapid speech, may mean that a person is happy, frightened, or nervous., Slower speech might be used when people are uncertain or when they want to emphasize a point. Loud vocalization often signals anger. A relatively high pitch, , Like it or not, lying is a part of everyday life (DePaulo, et al., 2003). People typically tell one to two lies a day, (DePaulo et al., 1996). Most of these everyday lies are, inconsequential “white lies,” such as claiming to be better than one actually is or lying to avoid hurting someone’s feelings., Is it possible to catch people in a lie? Yes, but it’s difficult (DePaulo et al., 2003). In fact, even trained experts, are not spectacular lie detectors (Ekman & O’Sullivan,, 1991). While it’s true that people in occupations with, expertise or an interest in detecting deception (including, some types of psychologists) are more accurate judges, of liars than others (Ekman, O’Sullivan, & Frank, 1999),, even these individuals are not remarkably skilled at lie, detection. Regardless, people overestimate their ability, to detect liars (DePaulo et al., 1997)., The popular stereotypes about how liars give themselves away don’t necessarily correspond to the actual, clues related to dishonesty. For example, observers tend, to focus on the face (the least revealing channel) and to, ignore more useful information (Burgoon, 1994). In, Figure 7.7 (on the next page), you can review the research findings on the nonverbal behaviors actually, associated with deception (based on DePaulo, Stone,, & Lassiter, 1985). By comparing the second and third, columns in the figure, you can see which cues are actually associated with deception and those that are erroneously linked with deception. Contrary to popular, belief, lying is not associated with slow talking, long, pauses before speaking, excessive shifting of posture,, reduced smiling, or lack of eye contact. A recent metaanalysis of over 300 studies generally supported these, findings, concluding that liars say less, tell less compelling stories, make a more negative impression, are, CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 211

Page 249 :
•, , F I G U R E 7.7, , Nonverbal Cues and Deceptions, , Detecting deception from, nonverbal behaviors. This, chart summarizes evidence, on which nonverbal cues are, actually associated with, deception and which are, believed to be a sign of, deception, based on a research review by DePaulo,, Stone, and Lassiter (1985)., , Are cues associated, with actual deception?, , Are cues believed to, be a sign of deception?, , Speech hesitations, , YES: Liars hesitate more, , YES, , Voice pitch, , YES: Liars speak with higher pitch, , YES, , Speech errors (stutters,, stammers), , YES: Liars make more errors, , YES, , Speech latency (pause, before starting to speak, or answer), , NO, , YES: People think liars pause, more, , Speech rate, , NO, , YES: People think liars talk slower, , Response length, , YES: Liars give shorter answers, , NO, , Pupil dilation, , YES: Liars show more dilation, , (No research data), , Adapters (self-directed, gestures), , YES: Liars touch themselves more, , NO, , Blinking, , YES: Liars blink more, , (No research data), , Postural shifts, , NO, , YES: People think liars shift more, , Smile, , NO, , YES: People think liars smile less, , Gaze (eye contact), , NO, , YES: People think liars engage, in less eye contact, , Kind of Cue, Vocal Cues, , more tense, and include less unusual content in their, stories than truth tellers do (DePaulo et al., 2003)., So, how do liars give themselves away? As you may, have noted in Figure 7.7, many of the clues “leak” from, nonverbal channels, because speakers have a hard time, controlling information from these channels (DePaulo, & Friedman, 1998; Ekman and Friesen, 1974). Vocal, cues include speaking with a higher pitch, giving relatively short answers, and excessive hesitations. Visual, cues include dilation of the pupils. It’s also helpful to, look for inconsistencies between facial expressions and, lower body movements. For example, a friendly smile, accompanied by a nervous shuffling of feet could signal deception., Bella DePaulo (1994), a noted, researcher in this area, isn’t too, optimistic about the prospects of, teaching people to spot lies, because, the cues are usually subtle. If she’s, correct, perhaps machines can do, better. The polygraph is a device, that records fluctuations in physiological arousal as a person anBella DePaulo, swers questions. Although called a, “lie detector,” it’s really an emotion, detector. The polygraph monitors key indicators of autonomic arousal such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiration rate, and perspiration, or galvanic skin response, (GSR). The assumption is that when people lie, they, 212, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Courtesy, Bella DePaulo, , Visual Cues, , experience emotion that produces noticeable changes, in these physiological indicators (see Figure 7.8)., Polygraph experts claim that lie detector tests are, 85–90 percent accurate and that there is research support for the validity of polygraph testing (Iacono &, Lykken, 1997; Iacono & Patrick, 1999). These claims are, clearly not supported by the evidence. Methodologically sound research on this question is surprisingly, sparse (largely because the research is difficult to do),, and the limited evidence available is not very impressive (Lykken, 1998; Saxe & Ben-Shakhar, 1999). One, problem is that when people respond to incriminating, questions, they may experience emotional arousal even, when they are telling the truth. Thus, polygraph tests, often lead to accusations against the innocent. Another, problem is that some people can lie without experiencing physiological arousal. Thus, because of high error, rates, polygraph results are not admitted as evidence in, most types of courtrooms. Yet, many companies require, prospective and current employees to take lie detector, tests to weed out thieves. In 1988, Congress passed a law, curtailing this practice in certain occupations (Camara, & Schneider, 1994). Perhaps computers will succeed, where polygraphs have not—at least one laboratory is, developing a computer program to detect the emotions, underlying facial expressions (Bartlett et al., 1999)., To summarize, deception is potentially detectable,, but the nonverbal behaviors that accompany lying are, subtle and difficult to spot.

Page 250 :
Respiration, , © Bob Daemmrich/ The Image Works, , GSR, , •, , Blood, pressure, What, department, do you, work in?, , Have you, ever taken, money from, this bank?, , Who is, your, supervisor?, , Have you, ever, falsified bank, records?, , F I G U R E 7.8, , The polygraph measures emotional reactions. A lie detector measures the physiological arousal that, most people experience when they tell a lie. After using nonthreatening questions to establish a baseline, a polygraph examiner looks for signs of arousal (such as the sharp change in GSR shown here) on, incriminating questions., , Accuracy in reading the emotions of others is related to, social and academic competence even in children (Hubbard & Coie, 1994; Izard et al., 2001)., Is there any truth in the stereotype that females are, better “readers” of nonverbal cues than men? Some researchers have found women to be better at this skill, (1998; Hall & Matsumoto, 2004). However, motivation, rather than ability, may account for supposed, gender differences in this area (Klein & Hodges, 2001)., Some experts claim that this supposed gender difference, is actually a status difference (Henley, 1977; Snodgrass,, 1985, 1992). That is, people in subordinate roles are, better at reading the nonverbal behaviors of those in, dominant roles than vice versa. Later research has not, supported this interpretation, however (Hall & Friedman, 1999; Snodgrass, Hecht, & Ploutz-Snyder, 1998)., , The Significance of Nonverbal, Communication, Although you are often unaware of nonverbal communication, you constantly use these cues to convey your, own feelings to others and to “read” theirs. Let’s consider some ways that nonverbal communication is, linked to interpersonal relationships., In our society, if you dislike someone, you don’t, usually say so. Instead, your negative feelings will leak, out through nonverbal channels. Unfortunately, individuals with negative self-concepts attend to the positive verbal cues from others but disregard the negative, nonverbal ones. Deprived of this important information, they may fail to learn why they alienate others,, making it difficult for them to correct their behavior., , Toward More Effective Communication, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, ■, , List five suggestions for creating a positive interpersonal, climate., Give five steps involved in making small talk., Cite some ways to reduce the risks of self-disclosure., , As we’ve noted, the importance of communication in, everyday life can hardly be exaggerated. In this section,, we’ll turn to some practical issues that will help you be-, , ■, , ■, ■, , Describe the role of self-disclosure in relationship, development., Discuss cultural and gender differences in self-disclosure., Cite four points good listeners need to keep in mind., , come a more effective communicator with your family,, friends, romantic partner, and co-workers. We’ll review, conversational skills, self-disclosure, and effective listenCHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 213

Page 251 :
WE B LI N K 7.3, , Tools for Communication:, A Model of Effective Communication, Communicating effectively is essential to success in most, aspects of life, including relationships and work. This online manual provides helpful advice on key issues related, to effective communication. It is one of many online manuals on coping with various life stresses at Coping.org, a, site maintained by James J. Messina, Ph.D. and Constance, M. Messina, Ph.D., , ■ Express your opinions tentatively. Instead of coming across as a know-it-all, let others know that your, beliefs and attitudes are flexible and subject to revision. Using qualifying words or phrases is helpful. For, instance, instead of announcing, “Here’s the plan,” you, might say, “There seem to be several options; I lean toward . . . What do you think?”, , Keep these points in mind as we delve further into, the topic of interpersonal communication., , Conversational Skills, ing. Effective communication rests on the foundation, of a positive interpersonal climate, so we’ll start there., , Creating a Positive, Interpersonal Climate, A positive interpersonal climate exists when people, feel they can be open rather than guarded or defensive, in their communication. You can do your part to create, such an atmosphere by putting the following suggestions into practice., ■ Learn to feel and communicate empathy. Empathy, is adopting another’s frame of reference so you can, understand his or her point of view. Being sensitive, to others’ needs and accepting of their feelings are hallmarks of empathy. Note that being accepting of others, doesn’t require you to condone or endorse their behavior. For example, if your roommate confides his concerns, about his drinking, you can support him as a person, by continuing to be his friend—without encouraging, him to continue drinking., ■ Practice withholding judgment. You can promote, an open climate by trying to be nonjudgmental. That, doesn’t mean that you can’t express opinions and make, judgments. It merely means that you should strive to interact with people in ways that don’t make them feel inadequate or that put them down or force them to offer, an opinion when they would rather not., ■ Strive for honesty. Mutual trust and respect thrive, on authenticity and honesty. So-called hidden agendas, don’t stay hidden for long. Even if others don’t know exactly what your underlying motives are, they often can, sense that you’re not being entirely honest. Of course,, striving for honesty does not require you to communicate everything at any time to any person. For those, conversations that are unavoidably painful—such as, breaking up with a romantic partner—you should strive, to be honest without being needlessly hurtful., ■ Approach others as equals. Most people don’t like, to be reminded of another’s higher status or greater, ability. When you have the higher status, it helps to approach people on equal terms., , 214, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , When it comes to meeting strangers, some people launch, right into a conversation,while others break into a cold, sweat as their minds go completely blank. If you fall, into the second category, don’t despair! The art of conversation is actually based on conversational skills. And, these skills can be learned. To get you started, we’ll offer, a few general principles, gleaned primarily from Messages: The Communication Skills Book by McKay and, associates (1995). If you want to explore this topic in, greater depth, this book is an excellent source of practical advice., , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , Messages: The, Communication Skills Book, by Matthew McKay, Martha, Davis, and Patrick Fanning (New Harbinger, Publications, 1995), In this short book, you will find a wealth of information by which to improve your communication skills in, a wide variety of situations. Messages is organized according to six types of communication skills: basic,, advanced, conflict, social, family, and public. Within, each of these sections, chapters address important issues. For example, the section on family skills includes, chapters on sexual communication, parent effectiveness, and family communications; the section on public, skills addresses communication in small groups and, public speaking; and “advanced skills” deals with hidden agendas, transactional analysis, and the role of, culture and gender in communication. The authors have, a breezy writing style and use lots of examples to illustrate their points. They have also included numerous, exercises to help you assess your communication skills, and practice more effective ways of interacting with, others., Cover design by Shelby Design & Associates. Reprinted by permission.

Page 252 :
1. Indicate that you are open to conversation by commenting on your surroundings. (“This line sure is long.”)., Of course, you can begin with other topics, too, but you, should be careful about your opening line. In one study,, participants viewed videotapes of a man or a woman, approaching an other-gender stranger and initiating a, conversation using a cute/flippant, an innocuous, or a, direct opening line (Kleinke, Meeker, & Staneski, 1986)., The preferred openers were either innocuous (“Where, are you from?”) or direct (“Hi, I’m a little embarrassed, about this, but I’d like to get to know you”). In contrast,, the least preferred openers were of the cute/flippant, variety (“Hi, I’m easy—are you?”). Because cute lines, often backfire, your best bet is probably the conventional approach., 2. Introduce yourself. Do so early in the conversation and use specifics to give the other person information to relate to. (“I’m Jeremy Jackson. I’m a psychology major at the university.”), 3. Select a topic others can relate to. (“I saw a great, movie last night.”) Keep an eye out for similarities and, differences between you and your conversational partner (McKay et al., 1995). Thus, look for things you have, in common—a tattoo, a class, a hometown—and build, a conversation around that. Alternatively, work off of, your differences. (“How did you get interested in science fiction? I’m a mystery fan myself.”), 4. Keep the conversational ball rolling. You can keep, things going by elaborating on your initial topic. (“After, the movie, I met some friends at the new coffee house, and tried their dessert special.”) Alternatively, you can, introduce a related topic or start a new one., 5. Make a smooth exit. Politely end the conversation. (“Well, I’ve got to be going, but I really enjoyed, talking with you.”), , After you’ve learned a little about another person, you, may want to move the relationship to a deeper level., , This is where self-disclosure comes into play, the topic, we’ll address next., , Self-Disclosure, Self-disclosure is the act of sharing information, about yourself with another person. In other words,, self-disclosure involves opening up about yourself, to others. The information you share doesn’t have to, be a deep, dark secret, but it may be. Conversations, with strangers and acquaintances typically start with, superficial self-disclosure—the TV show you saw last, night or your views on who will win the World Series., Only when people have come to like and trust each, other do they begin to share private information—such, as self-consciousness about one’s weight, or jealousy of, one’s brother (Collins & Miller, 1994). Figure 7.9 illustrates how self-disclosure varies according to type of, relationship., Self-disclosure is critically important to adjustment for several reasons. First, sharing fears and problems with others who are trustworthy and supportive, plays a key role in mental health. Recall from Chapter 4, that sharing your feelings can reduce stress. And after, mutual self-disclosures, people experience a boost in, positive feelings (Vittengl & Holt, 2000). Second, emotional (but not factual) self-disclosures lead to feelings, of closeness, as long as disclosers feel that listeners are, , Breadth of self-disclosure, Nonintimate, topic areas, , Depth of self-disclosure, , First, follow the Golden Rule: Give to others what, you would like to receive from them. In other words,, give others your attention and respect and let them, know that you like them. Second, focus on the other, person instead of yourself. Keep your attention focused, on what the person is saying, rather than on how you, look, what you’re going to say next, or winning the argument. Third, as we have noted, use nonverbal cues to, communicate your interest in the other person. Like, you, others also find it easier to interact with a person, who signals friendliness. A welcoming smile can make, a big difference in initial contacts., Now, how do you actually get the conversational, ball rolling? Psychologist Bernardo Carducci (1999), suggests five steps for making successful small talk., We’ll use his template and fill in with additional, suggestions:, , Stranger, , Casual, acquaintance, Best friend, , Intimate topic areas, , •, , F I G U R E 7.9, , Breadth and depth of self-disclosure. Breadth of self-disclosure, refers to how many topics one opens up about; depth refers to, how far one goes in revealing private information. Both the breadth, and depth of one’s disclosures are greater with best friends as, opposed to casual acquaintances or strangers. (Adapted from Altman & Taylor, 1973), CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 215

Page 253 :
understanding and accepting (Laurenceau, Barrett, &, Pietromonaco, 1998; Reis & Shaver, 1988). And, as you, saw in Chapter 1, having close relationships is an important ingredient of happiness., Third, self-disclosure in romantic relationships correlates positively with relationship satisfaction (Meeks, et al., 1998). More specifically, equity in self-disclosure,, rather than high self-disclosure, may be the critical factor that helps couples avoid stress (Bowers, Metts, &, Duncanson, 1985)., Reducing the Risks, of Self-Disclosure, , Let’s face it: Disclosing private information to others is, risky business. When you reveal private things about, yourself to others, they might reject you or divulge your, confidences to someone else. A study of European college students reported that they revealed others’ personal emotional disclosures to third parties in 66–, 78 percent of the cases (Christophe & Rime, 1997). Although the researchers did not ask the students if they, had been sworn to secrecy, in 85 percent of the cases the, students were intimates (versus acquaintances) of the, self-disclosers. Moreover, more emotionally intense disclosures were more likely to be shared—and with more, people—than less emotionally intense revelations. Thus,, if you have a secret you cannot risk others knowing but, that is troubling you, it is probably safer to share it with, a trained counselor. Alternatively, writing about an issue, such as in a journal, can help you feel better (Pennebaker, 1997; Sloan & Marx, 2004)., While it pays to be discriminating about sharing, private business, limiting your conversations to superficial topics won’t deepen a relationship. To safely steer, the conversation toward more intimate topics, we advise using the strategy of gradual self-disclosure. Moving, gradually gives you the chance to observe how the other, person responds to your self-disclosures. Of course, the, principle of gradual self-disclosure doesn’t always hold., Many people can tell, early on, which relationships they, want to remain relatively superficial and which they, would like to become more intimate. But, for most sit-, , © 2005 Dave Miller, , 216, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , uations, we advise gradual self-disclosure as the optimal, route to close relationships, because it entails less risk, and stress., How can you gauge whether it’s safe to share personal information with someone? It should reassure, you to know that self-disclosure is usually reciprocated, in depth and topic (Collins & Miller, 1994). Thus, a good, strategy is to monitor your partners’ verbal and nonverbal cues for their reactions to your disclosures. If you, make a personal disclosure and the other person reciprocates with a parallel disclosure, this ordinarily signals comfort with more intimacy. Of course, some people who aren’t comfortable engaging in self-disclosure, themselves are sincerely willing to listen to you anyway. Thus, you can’t depend on reciprocity alone as an, indicator of another’s interest., That’s why tuning in to nonverbal signals is of crucial importance. When people are uncomfortable, they, will usually send you a nonverbal message to that effect, to avoid embarrassing you with a more obvious verbal, warning. “Stop” cues include reducing eye contact and, displaying a puzzled, apprehensive, or pained facial expression. Your partner may angle his or her body away, from you, increase the distance between you, or shuffle, his or her feet impatiently. In contrast, when listeners, lean forward, appear relaxed, and maintain good eye, contact, they are likely interested in your self-disclosure., What about the risk of self-disclosure in computermediated communication? Because of the relative anonymity of the Internet, self-disclosure in e-mail and, chat rooms involves less risk (Bargh & McKenna, 2004)., We’ll explore the implications of this fact for relationship development in Chapter 8., Self-Disclosure and, Relationship Development, , Earlier, we noted that self-disclosure leads to feelings of, intimacy. Actually, the process is a little more complicated than that. Research suggests that only certain types, of disclosures lead to feelings of closeness (Laurenceau, et al., 1998). For instance, emotional self-disclosures do,, but factual self-disclosures do not. Moreover, for inti-

Page 254 :
Culture, Gender, and Self-Disclosure, , Americans generally assume that personal sharing is, essential to close friendships and happy marriages. This, view is consistent with an individualistic culture that, emphasizes the individual and the expression of each, person’s unique feelings and experiences. In collectivist, cultures such as China and Japan, people are open about, their group memberships and status because these factors guide social interactions. However, sharing personal, information is reserved for established relationships, (Smith & Bond, 1999)., In the United States, it has been found that females, tend to be more openly self-disclosing than males, although the disparity seems smaller than once believed, (Dindia, 2000). This gender difference is strongest in, same-gender friendships (Reis, 1998), with female friends, , WE B LI N K 7.4, , Cross-Cultural Communication Strategies, Citizens of the 21st century are challenged to communicate sensitively with individuals from other cultural groups, both within the United States and around the world. This, site, maintained by the Conflict Research Consortium at, the University of Colorado, provides commentaries by experts on a variety of intercultural communication settings., , © Mary Kate Denny/PhotoEdit, , macy to develop in a relationship, a discloser must feel, understood and cared for (Reis & Patrick, 1996). In other, words, self-disclosure alone doesn’t lead to intimacy., Self-disclosure varies over the course of relationships. At the beginning of a relationship, high levels of, mutual disclosure prevail (Taylor & Altman, 1987)., Once a relationship is well established, the level of disclosure tapers off, although responsiveness remains, high (Reis & Patrick, 1996). Also, in established relationships, people are less likely to reciprocate disclosures. Thus, when a lover or a good friend reveals private information, you frequently respond with words, of sympathy and understanding rather than a like disclosure. This movement away from equal exchanges of, self-disclosure appears to be based on twin needs that, emerge as intimate relationships develop: (1) the need, for support and (2) the need to maintain privacy (Altman, Vinsel, & Brown, 1981). By reciprocating support, (versus information), individuals can strengthen relationships while maintaining a sense of privacy. In fact,, successfully balancing these two needs seems to be an, important factor in relationship satisfaction (Finkenauer & Hazam, 2000)., When relationships are in distress, self-disclosure, patterns change. For example, one or both individuals may decrease the breadth and depth of their selfdisclosures, indicating that they are emotionally withdrawing (Baxter, 1988)., , Self-disclosure can be a risky business. In many instances selfdisclosure can lead to increased intimacy, but that depends on, the nature of the relationship and the disclosure. Hence, when, making disclosures it is important to pay attention to others’, nonverbal reactions., , sharing more personal information than male friends., (As we’ll discuss in Chapter 8, male friends tend to share, activities versus personal talk.) In other-gender relationships, self-disclosure is more equal, although men, with traditional gender-role attitudes are less likely to, self-disclose, because they view sharing personal information as a sign of weakness. Also, women share more, personal information and feelings, whereas men share, more nonpersonal information (Dolgin, 2001)., Gender disparities in self-disclosure are attributed, to socialization. In American culture, most men are, taught to conceal tender emotions and feelings of vulnerability, especially from other men (Kilmartin, 2000)., But different gender patterns are found in other countries (Reis & Wheeler, 1991). For example, in Jordan and, Japan, where early intimacy between male and female, friends is discouraged, close contacts between samegender friends is encouraged., And, in the early stages of other-gender relationships, American men often disclose more than women, (Derlega et al., 1985). This finding is consistent with the, traditional expectations that males should initiate relationships and females should encourage males to talk., Thus, it is an oversimplification to say that American, women are always more open than men. (We will take, up other aspects of gender and communication in the, Chapter 10 Application.), CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 217

Page 255 :
Effective listening is a vastly underappreciated skill. There’s a lot of truth in the old saying, “We have two ears and only one mouth,, so we should listen more than we speak.” Because listeners process speech much more, rapidly than people speak (between 500 and, 1,000 words per minute versus 125–175 words, per minute), it’s easy for them to become, bored, distracted, and inattentive (Hanna,, 2003). Fatigue and preoccupation with one’s, own thoughts are other factors that interfere, with effective listening., To be a good listener, you need to keep, four points in mind. First, signal your interest in the speaker by using nonverbal cues. Face, the speaker squarely and lean toward him or, her (rather than slouching or leaning back, in a chair). This posture signals that you are, interested in what the other person has to say., Try not to cross your arms and legs, as this, posture can signal defensiveness. Maintaining eye contact with the speaker also indicates your attentiveness. (You know how anBeing a good listener is an essential skill that contributes to success in relationnoying it is to talk with someone whose eyes, ships and on the job., are roaming around the room.) Communicate your feelings about what the speaker is, saying by nodding your head or raising your eyebrows., right . . .” or “Do you mean . . .?” It’s obviously ludiSecond, hear the other person out before you respond., crous to paraphrase every single thing the speaker says;, Listeners often tune out or interrupt a conversational, you only need to paraphrase when the speaker says, partner when (1) they know someone well (because, something important. Paraphrasing has a number of, they believe that they already know what the speaker, benefits: It reassures the speaker that you are “with”, will say), (2) a speaker has mannerisms listeners find, him or her, it derails misinterpretations, and it keeps, frustrating (stuttering, mumbling, speaking in a moyou focused on the conversation., notone), and (3) a speaker discusses ideas (abortion,, Paraphrasing can take several forms (Verderber &, politics) that generate strong feelings or uses terms, Verderber, 2005). In content paraphrasing, you focus, (welfare cheat, redneck) that push “red buttons” (Veron the literal meaning of the message. In feelings paraderber & Verderber, 2001). Although it is challenging, phrasing, You focus on the emotions connected to the, not to tune out a speaker or to lob an insult in these, content of the message. If your friend declares, “I just, situations, you’ll be better able to formulate an approcan’t believe he showed up at the party with his old, priate response if you allow the speaker to complete his, girlfriend!,” a feelings paraphrase is obviously in order, or her thought., (“You were really hurt by that”)., Third, engage in active listening (McKay et al., 1995)., To develop your skill at paraphrasing, try practicPay careful attention to what the speaker is saying and, ing it with a friend. Have the friend tell you about somemindfully process the information. Active listening also, thing; your job is to paraphrase from time to time to, involves the skills of clarifying and paraphrasing. Inbe sure that you really understand what your friend is, evitably, a speaker will skip over an essential point or say, trying to communicate. After each paraphrase, your, something that is confusing. When this happens, you, friend can tell you whether he or she agrees with your, need to ask for clarification. “Was Bill her boyfriend or, interpretation. Don’t be surprised if you have to reher brother?” Clarifying ensures that you have an acparaphrase several times. Keep trying until you get it, curate picture of the message and also tells the speaker, right. You’ll probably discover that paraphrasing is, that you are interested., harder than you think!, Paraphrasing takes clarifying another step. To paraFinally, pay attention to the other person’s nonverphrase means to state concisely what you believe the, bal signals. Listeners use a speaker’s words to get the, speaker said. You might say, “Let me see if I’ve got this, “objective” meaning of a message, but they rely on non-, , 218, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , © Dana Hursey/Masterfile, , Effective Listening

Page 256 :
verbal cues for the emotional and interpersonal meanings of a message. Your knowledge of body language,, tone of voice, and other nonverbal cues can give you, deeper understanding of what others are communicating. Remember that these cues are available not, only when the other person is speaking but also when, you are talking. If you often get signals that your listener, is drifting away, you might be going overboard on ir-, , relevant details or, perhaps, hogging the conversation., The antidote is active listening., Most people are ineffective listeners because they, are unaware of the elements of effective listening—information you now have. Also, effective listening hinges, largely on your attitude. If you’re willing to work at it,, you can definitely become a good listener fairly quickly., , Communication Problems, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , Discuss four responses to communication apprehension., Describe five barriers to effective communication., , In this section, we focus on two problems that can interfere with effective communication: anxiety and communication barriers., , Communication Apprehension, It’s the first day of your child psychology class and you, have just learned that 30-minute oral reports are a, course requirement. Do you welcome this requirement, as an opportunity to polish your public speaking skills, or, panic-stricken, do you race to the registrar’s office, to drop the class? If you opted for the latter, you may, suffer from communication apprehension, or anxiety, caused by having to talk with others. Some people experience communication apprehension in all speaking, situations (including one-on-one encounters), but most, people who have the problem notice it only when they, have to speak before groups., Bodily experiences associated with communication, apprehension can range from “butterflies” in the stomach to cold hands, dry mouth, and a racing heart rate., These physiological effects are stress-induced “fight or, flight” responses of the autonomic nervous system (see, Chapter 3). The physiological responses themselves, aren’t the root of communication apprehension; rather,, the problem lies in the speaker’s interpretation of these, bodily responses. That is, high scorers on measures of, communication apprehension frequently interpret the, , bodily changes they experience in public speaking situations as indications of fear. In contrast, low scorers, often chalk up these reactions to the normal excitement, in such a situation (Richmond & McCroskey, 1995)., Researchers have identified four responses to communication apprehension (Richmond & McCroskey,, 1995). The most common is avoidance, or choosing not, to participate when confronted with a voluntary com-, , © Michael Newman/PhotoEdit, , ■, , WE B LI N K 7.5, , Effective Presentations, Students often tell teachers that they are terrified of making a presentation in front of a class. Professor Jeff Radel, (University of Kansas Medical Center) has crafted an excellent set of guides to show the best ways of communicating, by means of oral presentations, visual materials, and posters., , Being able to speak effectively before a group is a highly, useful skill, so it is important to overcome communication, apprehension., , CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 219

Page 257 :
munication opportunity. If people believe that speaking will make them uncomfortable, they will typically, avoid the experience. Withdrawal occurs when people, unexpectedly find themselves trapped in a communication situation they can’t escape. Here they may clam up, entirely or say as little as possible. Disruption refers to, the inability to make fluent oral presentations or to engage in appropriate verbal or nonverbal behavior. Of, course, inadequate communication skills can produce, this same behavioral effect, and it isn’t always possible, for the average person to identify the actual cause of the, problem. Overcommunication is a relatively unusual, response to high communication apprehension, but it, does occur. An example would be someone who attempts to dominate social situations by talking nonstop., Although such individuals are seen as poor communicators, they are not usually perceived to have communication apprehension. That’s because we expect to see, it only in those who talk very little. Of course, overcommunication may be caused by other factors as well., Obviously, avoidance and withdrawal tactics are, merely short-term strategies for coping with communication apprehension (Richmond & McCroskey, 1995)., Because it is unlikely that you can go though life without having to speak in front of a group, it is important, to learn to cope with this stressful event rather than, avoid it time and again. Allowing the problem to get, out of hand can result in self-limiting behavior, such, as refusing a job promotion that would entail public, speaking. People with high communication apprehension are likely to have difficulties in relationships, at, work, and at school (Richmond & McCroskey, 1995)., Happily, both cognitive restructuring (Chapter 4) and, systematic desensitization (Chapter 16) are highly effective methods for dealing with this problem., , Barriers to Effective, Communication, Earlier in the chapter, we discussed noise and its disruptive effects on interpersonal communication. Now, we want to check out some psychological factors that, contribute to noise. These barriers to effective communication can reside in the sender, in the receiver, or, sometimes in both. Common obstacles include defensiveness, motivational distortion, self-preoccupation, and game playing., Defensiveness, , Perhaps the most basic barrier to effective communication is defensiveness—an excessive concern with protecting oneself from being hurt. People usually react, defensively when they feel threatened, such as when, they believe that others are evaluating them or trying, to control or manipulate them. Defensiveness is also, triggered when others act in a superior manner. Thus,, 220, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , those who flaunt their status, wealth, brilliance, or power, often put receivers on the defensive. Dogmatic people, who project “I’m always right” also breed defensiveness., A threat need not be real to elicit defensive behavior. If you persuade yourself that Brandon won’t like, you, your interactions with him will probably not be, very positive. And, if the self-fulfilling prophecy kicks, in, you may produce the negative reaction you fear. You, want to cultivate a communication style that minimizes, defensiveness in others. Still it’s good to keep in mind, that you don’t have complete control over others’ perceptions and reactions., Motivational Distortion, , In Chapter 6, we discussed distortions and expectancies in person perception. These same processes operate in communication. That is, people can hear what, they want to hear instead of what is actually being said., Each person has a unique frame of reference—certain attitudes, values, and expectations—that can influence what he or she hears. Information that contradicts, an individual’s own views often produces emotional, discomfort. One way people avoid such unpleasant, feelings is to engage in selective attention, or actively, choosing to attend to information that supports their, beliefs and ignoring information that contradicts, them. Similarly, an individual may read meanings that, are not intended into statements or jump to erroneous, conclusions. This tendency to distort information occurs most often when people are discussing issues they, feel strongly about, such as politics, racism, sexism, homosexuality, or abortion., Self-Preoccupation, , Who hasn’t experienced the frustration of trying to, communicate with someone who is so self-focused as, to make two-way conversation impossible? These annoying individuals seem to talk to hear themselves talk., If you try to slip in a word about your problems, they, cut you off by proclaiming, “That’s nothing. Listen to, what happened to me!” Further, self-preoccupied people are poor listeners. When someone else is talking,, they’re mentally rehearsing their next comments. Because they are self-focused, these individuals are usually oblivious to their negative impact on others., Self-preoccupied people arouse negative reactions, in others for several reasons. First, their remarks are, usually so self-serving (seeking to impress, to gain unwarranted sympathy, and so on) that others find it offensive. Another problem is that they consistently take, up more than their fair share of conversation time., Some individuals do both—talking only about themselves and going on at great length. After a “conversation” with someone like this, listeners feel ignored. No, wonder people try to avoid such people if they can. If, they can’t, they usually respond only minimally to end

Page 258 :
the conversation quickly. Needless to say, you risk alienating others if you ignore the norm that conversations, should involve a mutual sharing of information., , with others, she “innocently” inquires, “Say, has anyone seen Rodrigo lately?” Here, the hidden agenda is, to make Carlos feel bad. If Yvonne’s behavior produces, the desired response, she “wins.” In the broadest sense,, game playing can include the deliberate (or sometimes, unintentional) use of ambiguous, indirect, or deceptive, statements. Some game playing involves “verbal fencing” to avoid having to make clear one’s meaning or intent. Particularly problematic are repetitive games that, result in bad feelings and that erode the trust and respect that are essential to good relationships. Games interfere with effective communication and are a destructive element in relationships., , Game Playing, , “Game playing” is another barrier to effective communication. Game playing was first described by Eric Berne, (1964), who originated transactional analysis, a theory, of personality and interpersonal relations that emphasizes patterns of communication. In Berne’s scheme,, games are manipulative interactions with predictable, outcomes, in which people conceal their real motives., For instance, Yvonne knows that Carlos gets upset when, her former boyfriend is mentioned. So when they’re out, , Interpersonal Conflict, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Cite some positive outcomes associated with constructive, interpersonal conflict., Describe five personal styles of dealing with interpersonal, conflict., List six tips for coping effectively with interpersonal, conflict., , People do not have to be enemies to be in conflict, and, being in conflict does not make people enemies. Interpersonal conflict exists whenever two or more people, disagree. By this definition, conflict occurs between, friends and lovers as well as between competitors and, enemies. The discord may be caused by a simple misunderstanding, or it may be a product of incompatible, goals, values, attitudes, or beliefs. Because conflict is an, unavoidable aspect of interactions, it’s essential to know, how to deal constructively with it., , ■, , ■, , ■, , Explain why Deborah Tannen characterizes America as, “the argument culture.”, Describe some reasons for increased social contentiousness, today., Describe what individuals and social institutions can do, to reduce the level of public conflict., , ture of the relationship. When relationships and issues, are important to you, avoiding conflict is generally, counterproductive. For one thing, it can lead to a selfperpetuating cycle (see Figure 7.10)., , We think of, conflict as bad., , Beliefs About Conflict, Many people assume that any kind of conflict is inherently bad and that it should be suppressed if at all possible. In reality, conflict is neither inherently bad nor, inherently good. It is a natural phenomenon that may, lead to either good or bad outcomes, depending on how, people deal with it. When people see conflict as negative, they tend to avoid coping with it. Of course, sometimes avoiding conflict can be good. If a relationship, or an issue is of little importance to you, or if you believe that the costs of confrontation are too high (your, boss might fire you), avoidance might be the best way, to handle a conflict. Also, cultures differ in how conflict, should be handled. Collectivist cultures (such as China, and Japan) often avoid conflict, whereas individualistic cultures tend to encourage direct confrontations, (Ting-Toomey, 2000). In individualistic cultures, the, consequences of avoiding conflict depend on the na-, , We handle, it badly., , The conflict gets out, of control and must, be confronted., , •, , We get nervous, about conflict, we’re experiencing., , We avoid it as, long as possible., , F I G U R E 7. 10, , The conflict avoidance cycle. Avoiding conflict can lead to, a self-perpetuating cycle: (1) People think of conflict as bad,, (2) they get nervous about a conflict they are experiencing,, (3) they avoid the conflict as long as possible, (4) the conflict, gets out of control and must be confronted, and (5) they handle, the confrontation badly. In turn, this negative experience sets, the stage for avoiding conflict the next time—usually with the, same negative outcome. (Adapted from Lulofs, 1994), CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 221

Page 259 :
Types of Conflict, To manage conflict effectively, you need to know what, you’re dealing with. A useful scheme categorizes conflicts into five types: pseudoconflicts, fact conflicts,, policy conflicts, value conflicts, and ego conflicts (Verderber & Verderber, 2004)., A pseudoconflict is just what it says: a false conflict., The game playing between Yvonne and Carlos is one, type of pseudoconflict. The goal of the game is to get, the other person “hooked” so that an unresolved issue, comes out. The “fight” between Brian and Robin that, introduced the chapter is another example of a pseudoconflict. When Brian said, “There you go again, telling, me what to wear,” he intended to draw Robin into a, fight about power issues in their relationship. Robin’s, comeback that Brian looked like he was colorblind was, an acceptance of Brian’s invitation to fight. Had Robin, been able to identify the interchange as a pseudoconflict,, she could have declined his invitation using a nondefensive tone of voice (“I was just making a suggestion., Wear what you like”). The key to managing such encounters is being able to recognize the game and not, allowing yourself to be drawn in., A second type of conflict occurs when people disagree about issues of a factual nature. For instance,, Keisha and DeWayne disagree about whether they are, supposed to meet another couple at the restaurant or, be picked up so they can all drive in one car. The way, to deal with such fact-based conflicts is to check the, facts and then not dwell on who was right and who was, wrong. But, note that either party can escalate the disagreement into an argument with insulting comments, (“Can’t you ever get anything straight?”)., Policy conflicts arise when people disagree about, how to handle a particular situation. Take the case of, Brad and Julia, who are planning their trip to Europe., Brad earns more than Julia. Should they split the expenses down the middle, or should they share the, expenses based on the proportion of their incomes?, Obviously, there is no right or wrong answer here. Successfully resolving a policy conflict depends on finding, 222, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , a solution that addresses the problem and the feelings, of both people. Policy conflicts can reerupt when two, people agree on a policy but one or both fail to follow, through on it., Differing personal values can also lead to conflicts., Values are beliefs people use to evaluate the worth of, various aspects of life—religion, politics, and various social and aesthetic issues. Some values are obviously more, important to people than others, and higher-ranked, values usually have more influence on behavior. Thus,, if you believe that your family’s happiness is more important than your work, you may opt for a career with, minimal stress and time demands. Value-based conflicts, are a particular problem in intimate relationships. If, couples can recognize conflicts as value based, they can, understand that an issue is important to the other person and that he or she is not just being stubborn. When, conflicts can’t be resolved, two people may be willing, to take turns obliging each other to maintain the relationship. For example, they might alternate going to, each other’s favorite hangout. Too, sometimes people, can agree to disagree. Nonetheless, when unresolvable, conflicts become an ongoing source of distress in relationships, they can lead to breakups. You can minimize, value-based conflicts by matching up with a person, who has similar values., The most difficult conflicts to manage are those in, which one or both parties view the outcome as a measure of self-worth—how competent one is, how much, , © Eric K.K. Yu/Corbis, , Suppression of discord usually has a negative effect, on a relationship in spite of efforts to conceal it. For example, people in distressed marriages use more avoidance than people in nondistressed or satisfied marriages, (Noller et al., 1994)., When dealt with openly and constructively, interpersonal conflict can lead to a variety of valuable outcomes (Clark & Grote, 2003). Among other things,, constructive confrontation may (1) bring problems, out into the open where they can be solved, (2) put an, end to chronic sources of discontent in a relationship,, and (3) lead to new insights through the airing of divergent views., , Disagreements are a fact of everyday life, so effective communicators need to learn how to deal with them constructively.

Page 260 :
Styles of Managing Conflict, How do you react to conflict? Most people have a habitual way or personal style of dealing with dissension., Studies have consistently revealed five distinct patterns, of dealing with conflict: avoiding/withdrawing, accommodating, competing/forcing, compromising, and collaborating (Lulofs & Cahn, 2000). Two dimensions underlie these different styles: interest in satisfying one’s, own concerns and interest in satisfying others’ concerns, (Rahim & Magner, 1995). You can see the location of, these five styles on these two dimensions in Figure 7.11., As you read about these styles, try to determine where, you fit:, ■ Avoiding/withdrawing (low concern for self and, others). Some people simply find conflict extremely, distasteful. When a conflict emerges, the avoider will, change the subject, deflect discussion with humor, make, a hasty exit, or pretend to be preoccupied with something else. People who prefer this style believe that ignoring a problem will make it go away. For minor problems, this tactic is often a good one—there’s no need, to react to every little annoyance. For bigger conflicts,, avoiding/withdrawing is not a good strategy; it usually, just delays the inevitable clash. If Maria consistently, wants to discuss a problem and Tony consistently does, not, relationship difficulties can arise. A particular problem occurs when an avoider has greater power in a relationship (parent, supervisor, romantic partner). This, situation prevents the less powerful person from airing, his or her concerns and breeds frustration and resentment. Of course, in some cases it is good to postpone a, discussion, especially if one or both individuals is tired, or rushed or needs time to cool off. Postponing qualifies as avoiding only if the promised discussion never, takes place., , Competing/, forcing, Concern for self, , one knows, how much power one has, and so forth. In, these ego-based conflicts, “winning” becomes more important than finding a fair solution to the problem., Ego-based conflicts often arise when one or both parties lapse into negative personal judgments about a, content- or value-based issue under discussion. People, most often slip into judgmental statements when they, have expertise or a special stake in the discussion. Before you realize it, you are hooked by your emotions,, lose the ability for rational thought, and find yourself, saying things you can’t take back. Because individuals, perceive so much to be at stake, ego-based conflicts are, difficult to manage. For this reason, the best way to, handle them is to recognize them early on and to move, the conflict back to a content level. Unfortunately, even, minor disagreements can erupt into aggressive (and, possibly lethal) confrontations. Thus, learning how to, manage conflict is an essential skill in today’s world., , Collaborating, , Compromising, , Avoiding/, withdrawing, , Accommodating, , Concern for others, , •, , F I G U R E 7. 11, , Five styles of handling interpersonal conflict. In dealing with, discord, individuals typically prefer one of five styles. The two, dimensions of “concern for self” and “concern for others” underlie, each of the five styles., , ■ Accommodating (low concern for self, high concern for others). Like the avoider, the accommodator, feels uncomfortable with conflict. However, instead of, ignoring the disagreement, this person brings the conflict to a quick end by giving in easily. People who are, overly concerned about acceptance and approval from, others commonly use this strategy of surrender. Habitual accommodating is a poor way of dealing with conflict because it does not generate creative thinking and, effective solutions. Moreover, feelings of resentment (on, both sides) may develop because the accommodator, often likes to play the role of a martyr. Of course, when, you don’t have strong preferences (for instance, where, to eat out), occasional accommodating is perfectly appropriate. Also, in some cultures (such as Japan), it is, the preferred style of dealing with conflict (Samovar &, Porter, 2004)., ■ Competing/forcing (high concern for self, low concern for others). The competitor turns every conflict, into a black-and-white, win-or-lose situation. Competitors will do virtually anything to emerge victorious, from confrontations; thus, they can be deceitful and, aggressive—including using verbal attacks and physical threats. They rigidly adhere to one position and will, use threats and coercion to force the other party to submit. Giving no quarter, competitors often get personal, and “hit below the belt.” This style is undesirable because, like accommodation, it fails to generate creative, solutions to problems. Moreover, this approach is especially likely to lead to postconflict tension, resentment,, and hostility., ■ Compromising (moderate concern for self and others). Compromising is a pragmatic approach to conflict, , CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 223

Page 261 :
that acknowledges the divergent needs of both parties., Compromisers are willing to negotiate and to meet the, other person halfway. With this approach, each person, gives up something so both can have partial satisfaction. Because both parties gain some satisfaction, compromising is a fairly constructive approach to conflict,, especially when the issue is moderately important., ■ Collaborating (high concern for self and others)., Whereas compromising simply entails “splitting the, difference” between positions, collaborating involves a, sincere effort to find a solution that will maximally satisfy both parties. In this approach, conflict is viewed as, a mutual problem to be solved as effectively as possible., Collaborating thus encourages openness and honesty., It also stresses the importance of criticizing the other, person’s ideas in a disagreement rather than the other, person. To collaborate, you have to work on clarifying, differences and similarities in positions so that you can, build on the similarities. Generally, this is the most productive approach for dealing with conflict. Instead of, resulting in a postconflict residue of tension and resentment, collaborating tends to produce a climate of trust., , Dealing Constructively, with Conflict, As you have seen, the most effective approach to conflict management is collaborating. To help you implement such an approach, we will offer some specific suggestions. But, before we get down to specifics, there are, a few principles to keep in mind (Alberti & Emmons,, 2001; Verderber & Verderber, 2004). First, in a conflict, situation, try to give the other person the benefit of the, doubt; don’t automatically assume that those who disagree with you are ignorant or mean-spirited. Show respect for their position, and do your best to empathize, with, and fully understand, their frame of reference., Second, approach the other person as an equal. If you, have a higher status or more power (parent, supervisor),, try to set this difference aside. Third, define the conflict as a mutual problem to be solved cooperatively,, rather than as a win-lose proposition. Fourth, choose, a mutually acceptable time to sit down and work on, resolving the conflict. It is not always best to tackle the, conflict when and where it first arises. Finally, commu-, , WE B LI N K 7.6, , The Conflict Resolution Information Source, This excellent resource on conflict management is provided, by the University of Colorado’s Conflict Research Consortium. The site is actually a gateway to a huge variety of, resources on conflict management and is easy to navigate., , 224, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , nicate your flexibility and willingness to modify your, position., Here are some explicit guidelines for dealing effectively with interpersonal conflict (Alberti & Emmons,, 2001; Johnson & Johnson, 1999; Verderber & Verderber, 2004):, ■ Make communication honest and open. Don’t withhold information or misrepresent your position. Avoid, deceit and manipulation., ■ Use specific behaviors to describe another person’s, annoying habits rather than general statements about, their personality. You’ll probably get further with your, roommate if you say something like, “Please throw your, clothes in the hamper” rather than “You’re such an inconsiderate slob.” Remarks about specific actions are, less threatening and are less likely to be taken personally. They also clarify what you hope will change., ■ Avoid “loaded” words. Certain words are “loaded”, in the sense that they tend to trigger negative emotional, reactions in listeners. For example, you can discuss politics without using terms such as “right-winger” and, “knee-jerk liberal.”, ■ Use a positive approach and help the other person, save face. Saying “I love it when we cook dinner together”, will go over better than “You never help with dinner,, and I resent it.” Similarly, you can increase your chances, of having a request accepted if you say, “I realize that you, are very busy, but I’d really appreciate it if you would, look at my paper again. I’ve marked the places I’d like, you to reconsider.”, ■ Limit complaints to recent behavior and to the current situation. Dredging up past grievances only rekindles old resentments and distracts you from the current problem. And avoid saying things like “You always, say you’re too busy” or “You never do your fair share of, the housework.” Such categorical statements are bound, to put the other person on the defensive., ■ Assume responsibility for your own feelings and preferences. Rather than “You make me mad,” say “I am, angry.” Or, try “I’d appreciate it if you’d water the garden”, instead of “Do you think the garden needs watering?”, , Finally, if you can use an assertive (as opposed to, submissive or aggressive) communication style, you, will find it easier to head off and deal constructively, with conflict situations. You can learn more about assertive communication in this chapter’s Application., Up to this point, we’ve been focusing on communication in the private sphere—interactions between, people in personal relationships. To complete our discussion, we need to examine communication in the public sphere—interactions among members of the same, society or community who do not personally know one, another.

Page 262 :
Political attack ads, vicious reality TV shows, “flame, wars,” hate-generating Internet sites, road rage—hostile incidents assault Americans on a daily basis. In fact,, some universities have instituted speech and behavior, codes to counteract hate speech and disrespectful behavior. Profanities and vulgarities in the workplace have, become so commonplace that some employers have, instituted anti-swearing policies (DuFrene & Lehman,, 2002). Ominously, aggression among nonemotionally, disturbed kindergartners is on the rise, including hitting,, biting, and swearing at teachers; assaulting peers; and, even carrying weapons (Wallis, 2003). What is going on?, , Sociolinguist Deborah Tannen, (1998) characterizes contemporary, America as “the argument culture.”, According to Tannen, an atmosphere of “unrelenting contention”, (p. 3) pervades American culture, and is fueled by a growing tendency, for Americans to automatically take, an adversarial approach in almost, Deborah Tannen, any public situation. She worries, that this constant exposure to public arguments is having a “corrosive” effect on Americans’ spirits and is creating serious social problems., Hostile public debates confuse and frustrate listeners,, inflame emotions, and alienate Americans from each, other and their leaders., , Photo by Sara Barrett, courtesy,, Random House, , Public Communication, in an Adversarial Culture, , Contributing Factors, , The Argument Culture:, Moving from Debate, to Dialogue, by Deborah Tannen (Random House, 1998), In this thought-provoking work, Tannen claims that, public interchanges in America are increasingly framed, as battles or games. Hence, the focus has become trying to win arguments rather than trying to understand, what is being said. While acknowledging that opposition can be useful and necessary, Tannen is concerned, with what she sees as a trend for Americans to use an, adversarial approach to the exclusion of other ways of, communicating in public. And living in “the argument, culture” is having negative effects on Americans and, the larger society. With an easygoing style, Tannen brings, in research and wide-ranging examples from politics,, the media, the legal profession, the classroom, and the, Internet to bolster her thesis., To halt the growth of “the argument culture,” Tannen advocates using nonadversarial ways to negotiate, disagreements and mediate conflicts. For instance, she, urges people to start looking for ways that both sides, can win disagreements (as opposed to thinking in terms, of one side “winning” and the other “losing”). In addition, she urges people to get out of the “dualism trap.”, Instead of asking, “What is the other side?” individuals, can ask, “What are the other sides?” Tannen recommends, setting up discussions with three or more people rather, than using the debate-prone two-person format. She, also suggests reducing the use of war metaphors (the, battle of the sexes, the war on drugs, “annihilating”, the other team, and so forth) and replacing them with, less combative figures of speech., Cover copyright © 1997 by Random House. Inc. Used by permission of Random, House, Inc., , Obviously, numerous factors contribute to social contentiousness, and we can touch on only a few. We’ll start, with the fact that the United States is a strongly individualistic culture. This culture predisposes Americans, to be adversarial because the self is perceived to be an, isolated entity and in opposition to society. Second,, Americans (and those in other Western cultures) have, a dualistic view of nature and tend to see things in terms, of opposites—good versus bad, strong versus weak, and, so on (Tannen, 1998). On the other hand, most Eastern, cultures have a nondualistic perspective, in which opposites are seen as complementary partners, both essential to a larger whole (good and bad, strong and weak)., A third factor is that face-to-face communication is, on the decline, fed by economic pressures and advances, in technology. Parents are working longer hours, and, many come home exhausted. This can mean less “quality time” for children. Many families gather only rarely, for meals. Instead, to accommodate busy schedules,, family members each pop frozen dinners into the micro-, , © Jose Luis Pelaez/Corbis, , RE C O M M E N D E D, READING, , Road rage is one example of increased public conflict in, American society., , CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 225

Page 263 :
wave. Whereas families used to gather around a single, radio or television, now family members each have, their own radios and TVs (as well as computers and cell, phones). In the same vein, distance-learning classes, permit many individuals to take classes they would not, otherwise be able to attend, but students have limited, social interactions with peers and instructors. Taken together, such changes mean that individuals spend more, time on their own, rather than learning to interact effectively with others., Excessive exposure to the high levels of physical and, verbal aggression, especially in the media, is a fourth, factor in the equation. Children spend from two to four, hours a day watching television, with viewing time increasing up through early adolescence. The National, Television Violence Study, a large-scale study of the content of network and cable television shows during the, 1994–1997 viewing seasons, determined that 61 percent, of programs airing between 6 A.M. and 11 P.M. contain, violence (Center for Communication and Social Policy, 1998). By the time a child finishes grade school, he, or she will have witnessed approximately 8,000 murders and 100,000 other acts of violence on TV (Huston, et al., 1992). Of course, aggression also appears in other, types of media: video games, the Internet, music videos,, and music lyrics., Over time, excessive exposure to these various forms, of media violence takes its toll in a variety of ways. Numerous studies suggest that extensive exposure to media, violence contributes to the development of aggressiveness in some children (Anderson et al., 2003), and aggressive children grow up to be aggressive adults (Broidy, et al., 2003; Huesmann & Moise, 1998). In addition,, repeated exposure to aggression causes viewers to become numb or desensitized to violence and its effects, on victims (Anderson et al., 2003), causing viewers to, be more accepting of it. Furthermore, there is evidence, that some people come to believe that “television reality” depicts actual reality. Thus, people who are exposed, to considerable TV violence come to believe that society is more hostile and dangerous than it actually is. In, turn, they become more distrustful, view aggression as, an acceptable way to solve problems, and are more likely, to carry a weapon (Nabi & Sullivan, 2001)., , weapons and reduce poverty. Newspapers could encourage reporters to emphasize substance in their reporting and minimize sensationalism; producers could, voluntarily reduce the amount of gratuitous violence, portrayed on television and in films and increase the, number of programs and movies with nonviolent and, prosocial messages. And schools could institute programs that teach children social skills and nonviolent, ways of resolving conflicts (Aber, Brown, & Jones, 2003)., But what can individuals do? By applying the principles of effective interpersonal communication discussed in this chapter, you can do a lot. Tune in to nonverbal signals, create a positive interpersonal climate,, be a good listener, overcome the barriers to effective, communication, and practice your conflict management skills. Practice these principles when you’re on the, phone or Internet, as well. When you’re on the road,, avoid antagonizing other drivers (see Figure 7.12). And, minimize the amount of media violence you expose, yourself to—be selective about the TV programs and, movies you watch., Efforts to reduce aggression in children are most, effective when they occur at relatively young ages (Anderson & Huesmann, 2003). Therefore, parents have a, special role to play. They can limit their children’s exposure to physical and verbal aggression—on television, in movies, in video games, in books, and on the, Internet. Also, parents can watch TV with their children and comment negatively about violent scenes., Children of such parents are less likely to have aggressive attitudes than children whose parents watch TV, with them but say nothing about aggressive content, (Nathanson, 1999). Too, parents can ensure that their, kids are exposed to TV programs and movies that model, , Tips for Avoiding Road Rage, Don’t tailgate., Don’t use obscene gestures., Don’t lean on your horn; tap it lightly., Signal before switching lanes and don’t cut someone off, when you change lanes., Don’t display bumperstickers or slogans that might antagonize others., , Restoring Productive, Public Communication, , Must Americans resign themselves to living in an increasingly contentious society, or are there ways to reduce public hostility? Social institutions—the government, media, and schools, for instance—could institute, broad-ranging changes that could significantly affect, this problem (Anderson et al., 2003). Politicians could, agree to desist from hostile campaign rhetoric, and governments could enact legislation to reduce access to, , 226, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Avoid making eye contact with a hostile motorist., Be polite and courteous even if the other driver is not., Don’t drive when you are angry, upset, or fatigued., , •, , F I G U R E 7. 12, , Steering clear of road rage. Studies have shown that these, strategies can reduce your chances of being a victim of road rage., From Road Rage Plagues Drivers. (1997, November-December). AAA Going Places, 41–42., Copyright © 1997 by the American Automobile Association.

Page 264 :
positive ways of interacting with others to increase helpfulness and cooperation in children (Huston & Wright,, 1998). Parents can also help by encouraging and rewarding nonaggressive rather than aggressive ways of resolving childhood conflicts (especially in boys). Finally,, they can use disciplinary methods that don’t model aggressive behavior (for more information, see the Application for Chapter 11, on effective parenting)., , In summary, individuals and social institutions, can take many positive actions to reduce the level of, conflictual communication in the public arena. In our, upcoming Application, we will discuss assertiveness, a, communication style that has proved extremely effective across a wide variety of interpersonal communication situations—for example, making acquaintances,, developing relationships, and resolving conflicts., , Developing an Assertive Communication Style, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Differentiate assertive communication from submissive and aggressive, communication., List five steps that lead to more assertive communication., , Answer the following questions “yes” or “no.”, ___ 1. When someone asks you for an unreasonable, favor, is it difficult to say no?, ___ 2. Do you feel timid about returning flawed, merchandise?, ___ 3. Do you have a hard time requesting even small, favors from others?, ___ 4. When a group is hotly debating an issue, are, you shy about speaking up?, ___ 5. When a salesperson pressures you to buy something you don’t want, is it hard for you to resist?, If you answered “yes” to several of these questions, you, may need to increase your assertiveness. Many people, have a hard time being assertive; however, this problem is more common among females because they are, socialized to be more submissive than males—for example, to “be nice.” Consequently, assertiveness training is especially popular among women. Men, too, find, assertiveness training helpful, both because some males, have been socialized to be passive and because others, want to learn to be less aggressive and more assertive., We’ll elaborate on the differences between assertive,, submissive, and aggressive behavior and discuss some, procedures for increasing assertiveness., Keep in mind that our perspective reflects an individualistic perspective. Other cultures may have different views on submissiveness, assertiveness, and aggressiveness (Samovar & Porter, 2004). For instance, some, Native American tribes disdain both assertiveness and, aggression. Similarly, such collectivist societies as China,, Japan, Thailand, and the Philippines place a high value, , on interpersonal harmony. By contrast, Israelis and, members of the Jewish culture tend to have a confrontational interactional style in which vigorous debate is, expected., , The Nature of Assertiveness, Assertiveness involves acting in your own best interests by expressing your thoughts and feelings directly and honestly (Alberti & Emmons, 2001; Bower, & Bower, 1991, 2004). Essentially, assertiveness involves, standing up for your rights when someone else is about, to infringe on them. To be assertive is to speak out rather, than pull your punches., The nature of assertive communication can best be, clarified by contrasting it with other types of communication. Submissive communication involves consistently giving in to others on points of possible contention. Submissive people often let others take advantage, of them. Typically, their biggest problem is that they, cannot say no to unreasonable requests. A common, example is the college student who can’t tell her roommate not to borrow her clothes. Submissive people also, , WE B LI N K 7.7, , Assertiveness, In an online brochure, this site clarifies the nature of assertiveness and describes specific techniques for becoming, more assertive. The site is maintained by the Counseling, Center at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign., , CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 227

Page 265 :
© Tribune Media Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted with permission., , have difficulty voicing disagreement with others and, making requests themselves. In traditional trait terminology, they are timid., Although the roots of submissiveness have not been, investigated fully, they appear to lie in excessive concern, about gaining the social approval of others. However,, the strategy of “not making waves” is more likely to garner others’ contempt than their approval. Moreover, individuals who use this style often feel bad about themselves (for being “pushovers”) and resentful of those, whom they allow to take advantage of them. These feelings often lead the submissive individual to try to punish the other person by withdrawing, sulking, or crying (Bower & Bower, 1991, 2004). These manipulative, attempts to get one’s own way are sometimes referred, to as “passive aggression” or “indirect aggression.”, At the other end of the spectrum, aggressive communication focuses on saying and getting what you want,, but at the expense of others’ feelings and rights. With, assertive behavior, you strive to respect others’ rights, and defend your own. The problem in real life is that, assertive and aggressive behaviors may overlap. When, someone is about to infringe on their rights, people, often lash out at the other party (aggression) while defending their rights (assertion). The challenge, then, is, to be firm and assertive without becoming aggressive., Advocates of assertive communication argue that it, is much more adaptive than either submissive or aggressive communication (Alberti & Emmons, 2001; Bower, & Bower, 1991, 2004). They maintain that submissive, behavior leads to poor self-esteem, self-denial, emotional, suppression, and strained interpersonal relationships., Conversely, aggressive communication tends to promote guilt, alienation, and disharmony. In contrast,, assertive behavior is said to foster high self-esteem, satisfactory interpersonal relationships, and effective conflict management., The essential point with assertiveness is that you are, able to state what you want clearly and directly. Being, , 228, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , able to do so makes you feel good about yourself and, will usually make others feel good about you, too. And,, although being assertive doesn’t guarantee your chances, for getting what you want, it certainly enhances them., , Steps in Assertiveness Training, Numerous assertiveness training programs are available in book form, on CDs or videotapes, or through, seminars. Some recommendations about books appear, in the Recommended Readings box in this section. Most, of the programs are behavioral and emphasize gradual, improvement and reinforcement of appropriate behavior. Here we will summarize the key steps in assertiveness training., 1. Understand What Assertive, Communication Is, , To produce assertive behavior, you need to understand, what it looks and sounds like. Thus, most programs, begin by clarifying the nature of assertive communication. Assertiveness trainers often ask clients to imagine, situations calling for assertiveness and compare hypothetical submissive (or passive), assertive, and aggressive responses. Let’s consider one such comparison. In, this example, a woman in assertiveness training is asking her roommate to cooperate in cleaning their apartment once a week. The roommate, who is uninterested, in the problem, is listening to music when the conversation begins. In this example, the roommate is playing the role of the antagonist—called a “downer” in, the following scripts (excerpted from Bower & Bower,, 1991, 2004, pp. 8, 9, 11)., The Passive Scene, SHE: Uh, I was wondering if you would be willing to take, time to decide about the housecleaning., DOWNER: (listening to the music) Not now, I’m busy., SHE: Oh, okay.

Page 266 :
The Aggressive Scene, SHE: Listen, I’ve had it with you not even talking about, cleaning this damn apartment. Are you going to help, me?, DOWNER: (listening to the music) Not now, I’m busy., SHE: Why can’t you look at me when you turn me down?, You don’t give a damn about the housework or me!, You only care about yourself!, DOWNER: That’s not true., SHE: You never pay any attention to the apartment or to, me. I have to do everything around here!, DOWNER: Oh, shut up! You’re just neurotic about cleaning, all the time. Who are you, my mother? Can’t I relax, with my stereo for a few minutes without you pestering me? This was my apartment first, you know!, The Assertive Scene, SHE: I know housework isn’t the most fascinating subject,, but it needs to be done. Let’s plan when we’ll do it., DOWNER: (listening to music) Oh, c’mon—not now! I’m, busy., SHE: This won’t take long. I feel that if we have a schedule, it will be easier to keep up with the chores., DOWNER: I’m not sure I’ll have time for all of them., SHE: I’ve already drawn up a couple of rotating schedules, for housework, so that each week we have an equal, division of tasks. Will you look at them? I’d like to hear, your decisions about them, say, tonight after supper?, DOWNER: [indignantly] I have to look at these now?, SHE: Is there some other time that’s better for you?, DOWNER: Oh, I don’t know., SHE: Well, then let’s discuss plans after supper for 15 minutes. Is that agreed?, DOWNER: I guess so., SHE: Good! It won’t take long, and I’ll feel relieved when, we have a schedule in place., Reading two or three books on assertiveness is a, way to get a good picture of assertive behavior. A helpful way to distinguish among the three types of communication is in terms of how people deal with their, own rights and the rights of others. Submissive people, sacrifice their own rights. Aggressive people tend to ignore the rights of others. Assertive people consider both, their own rights and the rights of others., As we have noted, the nonverbal aspect of communication is extremely important. To ensure that your, assertive words have impact, it is important to back, them up with congruent nonverbal messages. Thus,, you’ll come across as more assertive if you face the person you’re talking with, look directly at him or her, and, maintain eye contact, rather than looking away from, the other person, fidgeting, slouching, and shuffling, your feet (Bower & Bower, 1991, 2004). You’ll find some, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , Asserting Yourself:, A Practical Guide, for Positive Change, by Sharon Anthony Bower and Gordon H. Bower, (Perseus, 1991, 2004), Bower and Bower put the problem of nonassertiveness, into perspective, relating it to self-esteem and anxiety., They then lay out a systematic program for increasing, assertive behavior. The book makes extensive use of, probing questions to help you work out a personally, relevant plan of action. The authors also provide sample verbal scripts for numerous common situations that, typically call for assertive behavior. Among other topics, covered are requesting a raise, saying “no” to unreasonable demands, protesting unjust criticism, dealing, with a substance abuser, protesting annoying habits,, and dealing with the silent treatment. The Bowers devote a full chapter to the role of assertive behavior in, developing friendships—initiating and ending conversations, keeping conversations going, making dates, selfdisclosure, listening, and coping with social anxieties., Among other books on assertiveness, we highly recommend Your Perfect Right, by Robert E. Alberti and, Michael L. Emmons (2001), which is now in its eighth, edition. Many assertiveness books target women, focusing on the communication problems women tend to, encounter. The Assertive Woman, by Stanlee Phelps and, Nancy Austin (2002) is particularly useful., Cover image and excerpts on pp. 228–229 from Asserting Yourself: A Practical Guide, for Positive Change by Sharon Anthony Bower and Gordon H. Bower. Copyright ©, 1991 by Sharon Anthony Bower and Gordon H. Bower. Reprinted by permission of, Perseus Books Publishers, a member of Perseus Books, L.L.C., , additional guidelines for behaving assertively in Figure 7.13 (on the next page)., 2. Monitor Your Assertive Communication, , Most people’s assertiveness varies from one situation to, another. In other words, they may be assertive in some, social contexts and timid in others. Consequently, once, you understand the nature of assertive communication,, you should monitor yourself and identify when you are, nonassertive. In particular, you should figure out who, intimidates you, on what topics, and in which situations., 3. Observe a Model’s, Assertive Communication, , Once you have identified the situations in which you, are nonassertive, think of someone who communicates, , CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 229

Page 267 :
•, , F I G U R E 7. 1 3, , Rules for Assertive Scripts, , Guidelines for assertive, behavior. Gordon and, Sharon Bower (1991, 2004), outline a four-step program, intended to help readers, create successful assertive, scripts for themselves. The, four steps are (1) describe, the unwanted behavior from, another person (called your, “Downer”) that is troubling, you, (2) express your feelings, about the behavior to the, other person, (3) specify the, changes needed, and (4) try, to provide rewarding consequences for the change., Using this framework, the, table shown here provides, some useful dos and don’ts, for achieving effective assertive behavior., Adapted from Bower, S. A., & Bower,, G. H. (1991). Asserting yourself: A practical guide for positive change (2nd ed.)., Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Copyright, © 1991 by Sharon Anthony Bower and, Gordon H. Bower. Reprinted by permission of Perseus Books Publishers,, a member of Perseus Books, L.L.C., , Do, , Don’t, , Describe, Describe the other person’s behavior objectively., , Describe your emotional reaction to it., , ■, , Use concrete terms., , Use abstract, vague terms., , ■, , Describe a specified time, place, and frequency, of the action., , Generalize for “all time.”, , ■, , Describe the action, not the “motive.”, , Guess at your Downer’s motives or goals., , ■, , Express, Express your feelings., , Deny your feelings., , ■, , Express them calmly., , Unleash emotional outbursts., , ■, , State feelings in a positive manner, as, relating to a goal to be achieved., , State feelings negatively, making Downer, attack., , ■, , Direct yourself to the specific offending, behavior, not to the whole person., , Attack the entire character of the person., , ■, , Specify, ■, , Ask explicitly for change in your Downer’s behavior., , Merely imply that you’d like a change., , ■, , Request a small change., , Ask for too large a change., , ■, , Request only one or two changes at one time., , Ask for too many changes., , ■, , Specify the concrete actions you want to see, stopped and those you want to see performed., , Ask for changes in nebulous traits or qualities., , ■, , Take account of whether your Downer can meet, your request without suffering large losses., , Ignore your Downer’s needs or ask only for your, satisfaction., , ■, , Specify (if appropriate) what behavior you are, willing to change to make the agreement., , Consider that only your Downer has to change., , Consequences, ■, , Make the consequences explicit., , Be ashamed to talk about rewards and penalties., , ■, , Give a positive reward for change in the, desired direction., , Give only punishments for lack of change., , ■, , Select something that is desirable and, reinforcing to your Downer., , Select something that only you might find, rewarding., , ■, , Select a reward that is big enough to maintain, the behavior change., , Offer a reward you can’t or won’t deliver., , ■, , Select a punishment of a magnitude that, “fits the crime” of refusing to change behavior., , Make exaggerated threats., , ■, , Select a punishment that you are actually, willing to carry out., , Use unrealistic threats or self-defeating, punishment., , assertively in those situations and observe that person’s, behavior closely. In other words, find someone to model, yourself after. This is an easy way to learn how to behave, assertively in situations crucial to you. Your observations, should also allow you to see how rewarding assertive, communication can be, which should strengthen your, assertive tendencies. If an assertive model isn’t available, you can adapt the relevant scenarios in most selfhelp books on assertiveness., 4. Practice Assertive Communication, , The key to achieving assertive communication is to practice it and work toward gradual improvement. Your, , 230, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , practice can take several forms. In covert rehearsal, you, imagine a situation requiring assertion and the dialogue that you would engage in. In role playing, you ask, a friend or therapist to play the role of an antagonist., Then practice communicating assertively in this artificial situation., Eventually, of course, you want to transfer your assertiveness skills to real-life situations. Most experts, recommend that you use shaping to increase your assertive communication gradually. As we discussed in, the Chapter 4 Application, shaping involves rewarding, yourself for making closer and closer approximations, of a desired behavior. For example, in the early stages

Page 268 :
of your behavior-change program, your goal might be, to make at least one assertive comment every day, while, toward the end you might be striving to make at least, eight such comments a day. Obviously, in designing a, shaping program, it is important to set realistic goals, for yourself., , vious that real-life situations only rarely match those, portrayed in books. Hence, some experts maintain that, acquiring a repertoire of verbal responses for certain, situations is not as important as developing a new attitude that you’re not going to let people push you around, (or let yourself push others around, if you’re the aggressive type) (Alberti & Emmons, 2001). Although most, programs don’t talk explicitly about attitudes, they do, appear to instill a new attitude indirectly. A change in, attitude is probably crucial to achieving flexible, assertive behavior., , 5. Adopt an Assertive Attitude, , Most assertiveness training programs have a behavioral orientation and focus on specific responses for, specific situations (see Figure 7.14). However, it’s ob-, , •, , Assertive Responses to Some Common Putdowns, Nature of Remark, , Put-Down Sentence, , Suggested Assertive Reply, , Nagging about details, , “Haven’t you done this yet?”, , “No, when did you want it done?”, (Answer without hedging, and follow, up with a question.), , Prying, , “I know I maybe shouldn’t ask,, but . . .”, , “If I don’t want to answer, I’ll let, you know.” (Indicate that you won’t, make yourself uncomfortable just, to please this person.), , Putting you on the, spot socially, , “Are you busy Tuesday?”, , “What do you have in mind?” (Answer, the question with a question.), , Pigeonholing you, , “That’s a woman for you!”, , “That’s one woman, not all women.”, (Disagree—assert your individuality.), , Using insulting labels for, your behavior, , “That’s a dumb way to . . .”, , “I’ll decide what to call my behavior.”, (Refuse to accept the label.), , Basing predictions on an, amateur personality analysis, , “You’ll have a hard time., You’re too shy.”, , “In what ways do you think I’m too, shy?” (Ask for clarification of the, analysis.), , CHAPTER 7, , F I G U R E 7. 1 4, , Assertive responses to, common put-downs. Having some assertive replies at, the ready can increase your, confidence in difficult social, interactions., Adapted from Bower, S. A., & Bower,, G. H. (1991). Asserting yourself: A practical guide for positive change (2nd ed.)., Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Copyright, © 1991 by Sharon Anthony Bower and, Gordon H. Bower. Reprinted by permission, of Perseus Books Publishers, a member, of Perseus Books, L.L.C., , Interpersonal Communication, , 231

Page 269 :
Interpersonal Conflict, ■, , KEY IDEAS, The Process of Interpersonal Communication, , CHAPTER 7 REVIEW, , ■, , Interpersonal communication is the interactional process, that occurs when one person sends a message to another. Communication takes place when a sender transmits a message to a, receiver either verbally or nonverbally. The widespread use of, cellular telephones and computers for communication has raised, new issues in interpersonal communication. Although people, often take it for granted, effective communication contributes, to their adjustment in school, in relationships, and at work., , Nonverbal Communication, ■, , Nonverbal communication tends to be more spontaneous, than verbal communication, and it is more ambiguous. Sometimes it contradicts what is communicated verbally. It is often, multichanneled and, like language, is culturally bound. Nonverbal communication usually conveys emotions. Elements of nonverbal communication include personal space, facial expression, eye contact, body language, touch, and paralanguage., ■ Certain nonverbal cues are associated with deception, but, many of these cues do not correspond to popular beliefs about, how liars give themselves away. Discrepancies between facial expressions and other nonverbal signals may suggest dishonesty., The vocal and visual cues associated with lying are so subtle, however, that the detection of deception is difficult. Machines used, to detect deception (polygraphs) are not particularly accurate., ■ Nonverbal communication plays an important role in adjustment, especially in the quality of interpersonal relationships., , Dealing constructively with interpersonal conflict is an important aspect of effective communication. Individualistic cultures tend to encourage direct confrontations, whereas collectivist cultures often avoid them. Nonetheless, many Americans, have negative attitudes about conflict., ■ Conflicts can be classified as one of four types: pseudoconflicts, content conflicts, value conflicts, or ego conflicts. In dealing with conflict, most people have a preferred style: avoiding/, withdrawing, accommodating, competing, compromising, or, collaborating. The latter style is the most effective in managing, conflict., ■ Public communication in America is becoming increasingly, contentious. Contributing factors include living in an individualistic culture, having a dualistic perspective, having reduced faceto-face interactions, and being exposed to high levels of physical and verbal aggression, especially on television. Individuals, and social institutions can institute a number of changes to restore productive communication in the public sphere., Application: Developing an Assertive, Communication Style, ■, , An assertive style enables individuals to stand up for themselves and to respect the rights of others. To become more assertive, individuals need to understand what assertive communication is, monitor assertive communication, observe a model’s, assertive communication, practice being assertive, and adopt an, assertive attitude., , KEY TERMS, , Toward More Effective Communication, ■, , Effective communication rests on a foundation of a positive, interpersonal climate. To promote a positive interpersonal climate, it helps to show empathy, treat people as equals, withhold, judgment, strive for honesty, and express opinions tentatively., To be an effective communicator, it’s important to develop good, conversational skills, including knowing how to make small talk, with strangers., ■ Self-disclosure—opening up to others—can foster emotional intimacy in relationships. Emotional (but not factual), self-disclosures lead to feelings of closeness. To reduce the risks, of self-disclosure, it’s best to self-disclose gradually. The receiver’s, nonverbal signals help the speaker know whether to continue, or stop disclosing., ■ The level of self-disclosure varies over the course of relationships. Cultures vary in the preferred level of self-disclosure., American women tend to self-disclose more than men, but this, disparity is not so large as it once was. Effective listening is an, essential aspect of interpersonal communication., Communication Problems, ■, , A number of problems can arise that interfere with effective, communication. Individuals who become overly anxious when, they talk with others suffer from communication apprehension., This difficulty can cause problems in relationships and in work, and educational settings. Sometimes communication can produce negative interpersonal outcomes. Barriers to effective communication include defensiveness, motivational distortion, selfpreoccupation, and game playing., , 232, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Assertiveness p. 227, Communication, apprehension p. 219, Context p. 203, Display rules p. 208, Empathy p. 214, Games p. 221, Interpersonal, communication p. 202, Interpersonal conflict p. 221, , Kinesics p. 210, Noise p. 203, Nonverbal communication, p. 205, Paralanguage pp. 210–211, Personal space p. 206, Polygraph p. 212, Proxemics p. 206, Self-disclosure p. 215, , KEY PEOPLE, Sharon Anthony Bower and, Gordon Bower, pp. 228–231, Bella DePaulo pp. 211–212, , Paul Ekman and Wallace, Friesen pp. 207–208, Edward T. Hall p. 207, Deborah Tannen, pp. 225–226

Page 270 :
The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 7.1: Opener, Scale. Personal Probe 7.1: How Do You Feel about SelfDisclosure? Personal Probe 7.2: Reflections on Your Communication Style and Feelings about Conflict., , ANSWERS, , Page 217, Page 220, Pages 222–223, Page 225, Pages 227–228, , 6. Regarding self-disclosure in same-gender friendships:, a. most men disclose more to their friends than, women., b. most women disclose more to their friends than, men., c. men and women disclose about the same amount, to their friends., d. men and women disclose about the same amount,, but women start disclosing sooner., , Personal Explorations Workbook, , b, c, d, a, d, , 5. With regard to self-disclosure, it is best to:, a. share a lot about yourself when you first meet, someone., b. share very little about yourself for a long time., c. gradually share information about yourself., d. give no personal information on a first encounter,, but share a lot the next time., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. According to research, which of the following cues is, associated with dishonesty?, a. Speaking with a higher-than-normal pitch, b. Speaking slowly, c. Giving relatively long answers to questions, d. Lack of eye contact, , Book Companion Website, , Pages 202–203, Pages 207–208, Page 210, Pages 211–212, Page 216, , 3. Which of the following is not an aspect of body language?, a. Body movement, b. Personal space, c. Posture, d. Gestures, , 10. Expressing your thoughts directly and honestly without trampling on other people is a description of, which communication style?, a. Aggressive, b. Empathic, c. Submissive, d. Assertive, , d, c, b, a, c, , 2. Research shows that individuals from a variety of, cultures:, a. agree on the facial expressions that correspond with, all emotions., b. agree on the facial expressions that correspond with, 15 basic emotions., c. agree on the facial expressions that correspond with, 6 basic emotions., d. do not agree on the facial expressions that correspond, with any emotions., , 9. Generally, the most productive style for managing, conflict is:, a. collaboration., b. compromise., c. accommodation., d. avoidance., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Which of the following is not a component of the, interpersonal communication process?, a. The sender, b. The receiver, c. The channel, d. The monitor, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 8. The most difficult conflicts to manage are:, a. pseudoconflicts., b. content-based conflicts., c. value-based conflicts., d. ego-based conflicts., , 7. When people hear what they want to hear instead of, what is actually said, _______ is operating., a. defensiveness, b. self-preoccupation, c. motivational distortion, d. game playing, , CHAPTER 7, , Interpersonal Communication, , 233

Page 271 :
PERSPECTIVES ON, CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS, The Ingredients of Close Relationships, Culture and Relationships, The Internet and Relationships, INITIAL ATTRACTION AND, RELATIONSHIP DEVELOPMENT, Initial Encounters, Getting Acquainted, Established Relationships, , 234, , FRIENDSHIP, What Makes a Good Friend?, Gender Differences in Friendship, ROMANTIC LOVE, Sexual Orientation and Love, Gender Differences Regarding Love, Theories of Love, The Course of Romantic Love, , APPLICATION:, OVERCOMING LONELINESS, The Nature of Loneliness, Prevalence of Loneliness, The Roots of Loneliness, Correlates of Loneliness, Conquering Loneliness, CHAPTER 8 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST

Page 272 :
CHAPTER, , Friendship, and Love, , 8, , Antonio was so keyed up, he tossed and turned all night. When morning finally arrived, he was elated. In less than two hours, he would be meeting, Sonia for coffee! In his first class that morning, thoughts and images of Sonia, constantly distracted him from the lecture. When class was finally over, he, had to force himself not to walk too fast to the Student Union, where they, had agreed to meet. Sound familiar? Chances are that you recognize Antonio’s, behavior as that of someone falling in love., Friendship and love play a major role in psychological adjustment. Recall from Chapter 1 that the strongest predictor of happiness, after personality, is social connectedness. And, social exclusion is associated with poor, physical and mental health and antisocial behavior (Baumeister & Leary, 1995;, Baumeister &Twenge, 2003). We begin this chapter by defining close relationships, including a discussion of how culture and the Internet influence, relationships. Next, we consider why people are attracted to each other and, why they stay in or leave relationships. Following that, we probe more deeply, into friendship and romantic love. In the Application section, we focus on the, painful problem of loneliness and how to overcome it., , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 235

Page 273 :
Perspectives on Close Relationships, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , ■, , Define close relationships and give some examples., Describe how members from individualistic cultures and collectivist, cultures view love and marriage., Describe the differences between Internet and face-to-face, interactions and how the Internet affects relationship development., , Culture and Relationships, , Before diving into the fascinating topic of romantic, love, it would be helpful to have some background, information. Let’s examine the variety of close relationships, how culture influences people’s views of relationships, and how the Internet affects relationships., , Cross-cultural research on close relationships is largely, limited to romantic relationships, so we’ll focus on them., Although it appears that romantic love is experienced, in most cultures (Jankowiak & Fischer, 1992), cultures, do vary in their emphasis on romantic love as a prerequisite for marriage. Interestingly, love as the basis for, marriage goes back only to the 18th century of Western culture (Stone, 1977). According to Elaine Hatfield, and Richard Rapson (1993), “Marriage-for-love represents an ultimate expression of individualism” (p. 2)., By contrast, marriages arranged by families and other, go-betweens remain common in cultures high in collectivism, including India (Gupta, 1992), Japan (Iwao,, 1993), China (Xiaohe & Whyte, 1990), and West African, countries (Adams, Anderson, & Adonu, 2004). This, practice is declining in some societies as a result of Westernization. Still, when people in collectivist societies, , The Ingredients of, Close Relationships, , © Earl & Nazima Kowalt/Corbis, , Typically, close relationships are those that are important, interdependent, and long lasting. In other words,, people in close relationships spend a lot of time and, energy maintaining the relationship, and what one person says and does affects the other. As you are aware,, close relationships can arouse intense feelings—both, positive (passion, concern, caring) and negative (rage,, jealousy, despair)., Close relationships come in many forms: family, relationships, friendships and work relationships, romantic relationships, and marriage. Although many, close relationships are based on mutual, intimate selfdisclosure, many are not. When college students were, asked to identify that person to whom they felt closest,, 47 percent named a romantic partner, 36 percent listed, a friend, 14 percent mentioned a family member, and, 3 percent named another individual such as a co-worker, (Berscheid, Snyder, & Omoto, 1989). Thus, not all close, relationships are characterized by emotional intimacy., , Marriages based on romantic love are the norm in Western, cultures, whereas arranged marriages prevail in collectivist, cultures., , 236, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , © Michael Newman/PhotoEdit, , ■

Page 274 :
contemplate marriage, they give strong consideration, to the impact a relationship will have on their family, rather than rely solely on what their heart says (Triandis, 1994). Studies show that attitudes about love in, India, Pakistan, Thailand, and West African countries, reflect these cultural priorities (Levine et al., 1995; Medora et al., 2002; Adams et al., 2004)., Cultural views of love and marriage are linked to, both a culture’s values and its economic health. In one, study, researchers asked college students in 11 countries the following question: “If a man (woman) had all, the other qualities you desired, would you marry this, person if you were not in love with him (her)?” (Levine, et al., 1995). Students in countries with more individualistic values and higher standards of living were significantly less likely to answer “yes” to the question than, were those in countries with more collectivist values, and lower standards of living (see Figure 8.1). And a, different cross-cultural investigation of the meaning, of various emotions found that Italians and Americans, equated love with happiness, whereas Chinese respondents associated it with sadness and tended to envision, unrequited love (Shaver, Wu, & Schwartz, 1991)., People from Western societies are often dumbfounded by collectivist cultures’ deemphasis of roman-, , Cross-Cultural Views on Love, and Marriage, Country, , Yes, , No, , Undecided, , Japan, , 2.3, , 62.0, , 35.7, , United States, , 3.5, , 85.9, , 10.6, , Brazil, , 4.3, , 85.7, , 10.0, , Australia, , 4.8, , 80.0, , 15.2, , Hong Kong, , 5.8, , 77.6, , 16.7, , England, , 7.3, , 83.6, , 9.1, , Mexico, , 10.2, , 80.5, , 9.3, , Philippines, , 11.4, , 63.6, , 25.0, , Thailand, , 18.8, , 33.8, , 47.5, , India, , 49.0, , 24.0, , 26.9, , Pakistan, , 50.4, , 39.1, , 10.4, , •, , F I G U R E 8.1, , Cross-cultural views on love and marriage. College students in, ten countries and Hong Kong responded to the following question: “If a man (woman) had all the other qualities you desired,, would you marry this person if you were not in love with him, (her)?” Generally, students in countries with higher standards of, living and more individualistic values were significantly less likely, to answer “yes” to the question than those in countries with, lower standards of living and more collectivist values., Adapted from Levine, R., Sato, S., Hashimoto, T., & Verma, J. (1995). Love and marriage in, eleven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 26(5), pp. 561, 564. Copyright © 1995, by Sage Publications, Inc. Adapted by permission of Sage Publications., , tic love and their penchant for arranged marriages. Most, Westerners assume that the modern conception of romantic love as the basis for marriage must result in better marital relationships than collectivist cultures’ “antiquated” beliefs and practices. However, there is little, empirical support for this ethnocentric view (Dion &, Dion, 1993; Triandis, 1994). Take, for example, a study, of couples in India, which found that love grew over the, years in arranged marriages, whereas it declined among, couples who married for romantic love (Gupta & Singh,, 1982). Also, the expectation that marriage will fill diverse psychological needs places greater pressure on, marital relationships in individualistic societies than, on those in collectivist cultures (Dion & Dion, 1993)., These high expectations for personal fulfillment in marriage may be linked to the rapidly escalating divorce, rates in these societies (Dion & Dion, 1993). The dearth, of cross-cultural research on love means that we can, only speculate on these matters. But smug assumptions, about the superiority of Western ways look shaky, given, our extremely high divorce rates., , The Internet and Relationships, To meet prospective friends and romantic partners,, people used to be limited to school, work, and church, settings. Then came the “bar scene,” personal ads in, newspapers, singles mixers, and video dating services., More recently, the Internet has dramatically expanded, opportunities for people to meet and develop relationships through online dating services, e-mail, chat rooms,, and news groups., Critics see these trends as leading to the demise of, face-to-face interactions, widespread loneliness and, alienation, and millions being lured into dangerous, liaisons by unscrupulous people. But research to date, generally paints a very positive picture of the Internet’s, impact on people’s connections with one another. For, example, it offers a wealth of new opportunities to interact for those normally separated because of geography,, physical infirmity, or social anxiety (McKenna & Bargh,, 2000). Also, Internet groups provide a safer venue than, real life for individuals with stigmatized identities (for, example, gay people) to interact and receive support., Similarly, Internet groups for those with grave illnesses, (cancer, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, AIDS) provide important support and information to their subscribers, (Bargh & McKenna, 2004). Of course, the anonymous, nature of Internet communication does make it easy, for dishonest individuals to take advantage of others, so, it’s important to exercise caution in revealing personal, information online., In a relatively short period of time, the Internet has, become an indispensable vehicle for making acquain-, , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 237

Page 275 :
© Mary Kate Denny/PhotoEdit, , tances and developing relationships. One survey of several hundred randomly selected newsgroup users reported that 60 percent of the participants had formed, an online personal relationship of some kind with another newsgroup user (Parks & Floyd, 1996). Are Internet relationships more superficial than face-to-face, ones? Research to date suggests that virtual relationships are just as intimate as face-to-face ones and are, sometimes even closer (McKenna, Green, & Gleason,, 2002; Bargh, McKenna, & Fitzsimons, 2002). The relative anonymity of the Internet facilitates the formation, of close relationships because it reduces the risks of selfdisclosure (Bargh & McKenna, 2004). For example, people in chat rooms were better able to express their true, selves (aspects of the self they felt were important but, that they were usually unable to present in public) to, the Internet partner than when in person (Bargh et al.,, 2002). The Internet also encourages relationship formation based on shared interests and values instead of, on physical appearance, as is more often the situation, in offline interactions (Bargh & McKenna, 2004)., In many cases virtual relationships move to faceto-face interactions. In a survey of participants from, 20 randomly selected newsgroups, 54 percent reported, that they had met face to face with an Internet friend, (McKenna et al. 2002). When people do decide to move, beyond an Internet-based relationship, they typically, first exchange letters via “snail mail” or talk on the telephone. Actual meetings usually take place only after, telephone contact. These researchers also found that, romantic relationships that begin on the Internet seem, to be just as stable over two years as traditional relationships (McKenna et al., 2002). This same study of, Internet chat room users reported that 22 percent of the, participants said that they were either living with, had, become engaged to, or were married to someone they, had first met on the Internet., , The Internet is playing a larger and larger role in the formation, and maintenance of interpersonal relationships., , 238, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , The Internet has also assumed importance in maintaining established relationships. In a poll of 1,000 Internet users, 94 percent reported that the Internet made, it easier for them to communicate with friends and family who live far away, and 87 percent said that they use, it regularly for that purpose (D’Amico, 1998). Some social critics have predicted that Internet use will reduce, face-to-face interactions. However, it seems that heavy, Internet users maintain their involvement with friends, and family, but cut back on time devoted to television, and newspapers (Nie & Erbring, 2000)., The differences between Internet and face-to-face, communication (see Figure 7.2 in the previous chapter) require psychologists to reexamine the established, theories and principles of relationship development that, we discuss in this chapter (Bargh & McKenna, 2004)., For example, good looks and close physical proximity, are powerful factors in initial attraction in the real, world. In Internet relationships, where people form relationships sight-unseen, these factors are irrelevant., Online, where people rely on self-disclosure to develop, relationships, similarity of interests and values kicks in, earlier and assumes more power than it does in faceto-face relationships. One study found that pairs of, strangers who first interacted on the Internet and then, talked face to face ended up liking each other more than, did pairs of people who had two successive face-to-face, encounters (McKenna & Bargh, 2000). But in another, study of pairs randomly assigned to either face-to-face, or Internet chat conversations, the face-to-face group, felt more satisfied with the experience and felt a higher, degree of closeness and self-disclosure with their partners (Mallen, Day, & Green, 2003)., Self-disclosure is another relationship issue affected, by the differences in the two types of communication., Because the Internet is shrouded under the cloak of, anonymity, people take greater risks in self-disclosure., Thus, feelings of intimacy can develop more quickly, (McKenna & Bargh, 2000). Sometimes this experience, can set up a false sense of intimacy, which can create uncomfortable feelings if a face-to-face meeting ensues—, that is, meeting with a stranger who knows “too much”, about you (Hamilton, 1999). Of course, face-to-face, meetings can also go smoothly; some people even marry, someone they met online. Anonymity also allows people to construct a virtual identity. Obviously, this can, be a problem if one person adopts a fictional persona, and another assumes that it is authentic and begins to, take the relationship seriously., Researchers have just begun to study the impact, of the Internet on relationships. The findings in this, fascinating area will not only provide much-needed, information about virtual relationships, but should, also reveal interesting new perspectives on face-to-face, relationships.

Page 276 :
Initial Attraction and, Relationship Development, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Discuss the roles of proximity and familiarity in initial, attraction., Summarize the findings on physical attractiveness in, initial attraction., Discuss the role of reciprocal liking and similarity in, getting acquainted., Describe the personality qualities that people like in, others., , ■, , ■, , Individuals use a multitude of factors to assess another, person’s appeal as a mate or a friend. Furthermore, because attraction is a two-way street, intricate interactions occur between variables. To simplify this complex issue, we’ll divide our coverage into four segments., First, we’ll review the factors that operate in initial encounters. Then we’ll consider elements that come into, play as relationships begin to develop. Next, we’ll review what’s involved in maintaining relationships. Finally, we’ll look at what influences people to stay in or, get out of relationships., Our review of research in this section pertains to, both friendships and romantic relationships. In some, cases, a particular factor (such as physical attractiveness) may play a more influential role in love than in, friendship, or vice versa. However, all the factors discussed in this section enter into both types of relationships. These factors also operate the same in the friendships and romantic relationships of gay and straight, individuals (Garnets & Kimmel, 1991). But we should, note that homosexuals face three unique dating challenges (Peplau & Spaulding, 2003). They have a small, pool of potential partners, they are under pressure to, conceal their sexual orientation, and they have limited, ways to meet prospective partners. Also, fears of hos-, , Give some commonly used relationship maintenance, strategies, and explain what is meant by “minding”, relationships., Summarize interdependence theory and explain how, rewards, costs, and investments influence relationship, satisfaction and commitment., , tility may cause them to limit their self-disclosures to, acquaintances and friends., , Initial Encounters, Sometimes initial encounters begin dramatically with, two strangers’ eyes locking across a room. More often,, two people become aware of their mutual interest, usually triggered by each other’s looks and conversations., What draws two strangers together? Three factors stand, out: proximity, familiarity, and physical attractiveness., Proximity, , Attraction usually depends on proximity: People have, to be in the same place at the same time. Proximity, refers to geographic, residential, and other forms of, spatial closeness. Of course, proximity is not an issue, in cyberspace interactions. But in everyday life people, become acquainted with, and attracted to, someone, who lives, works, shops, and plays nearby., The importance of proximity was apparent in a classic study of friendship patterns among married graduate students living in a university housing project (Festinger, Schachter, & Back, 1950). People whose doors, were close together were most likely to become friends., , CATHY © 1993 by Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 239

Page 277 :
Moreover, those whose homes faced the central court, area had more than twice as many friends in the complex as those whose homes faced outward. Using the, centralized court area apparently increased the likelihood that people would meet and befriend others., Proximity effects were also found in a study of, Maryland state police trainees (Segal, 1974). At the, training academy, both dormitory rooms and classroom seats were assigned on the basis of alphabetical, order. Six months after their arrival, participants were, asked to name their three closest friends among the, group of trainees. The trainees whose last names were, closer together in the alphabet were much more likely, to be friends than trainees whose names were widely, separated in the alphabet., Proximity effects may seem self-evident, but it is, sobering to realize that your friendships and love interests are shaped by seating charts, apartment availability,, shift assignments, and office locations (Berscheid &, Reis, 1998)., Familiarity, , You probably walk the same route to your classes several times a week. As the semester progresses, you begin, to recognize some familiar faces on your route. Have, you also found yourself nodding or smiling at these, people? If so, you’ve experienced the mere exposure effect, or an increase in positive feelings toward a novel, stimulus (person) based on frequent exposure to it, (Zajonc, 1968). Note that the positive feelings arise just, on the basis of seeing someone frequently—not because, of any interaction., The implications of the mere exposure effect on, initial attraction should be obvious. Generally, the more, familiar someone is, the more you will like him or her., And greater liking increases the probability that you will, strike up a conversation and, possibly, develop a relationship with the person. And when it comes to actual, interactions (versus mere exposure), more interchanges, typically result in greater attraction, at least up to a point., There is, however, an important exception to the familiarity principle: If your initial reaction to someone is, negative, increased exposure will only intensify your, dislike (Swap, 1977)., Physical Attractiveness, , Physical attractiveness plays a major role in initial faceto-face encounters (Peretti & Abplanalp, 2004). In other, words, most people disregard the advice in statements, such as “Beauty is only skin deep” and “You can’t judge, a book by its cover.”, Research on the role of physical beauty in attraction has been conducted in a variety of settings, from, college dances to get-acquainted dates to commercial, dating services (Walster et al., 1966; Sprecher & Duck,, 1994). All show that attractiveness is a key factor in, 240, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , dating. Good looks play a role in friendships as well., People, especially males, prefer attractiveness in their, same- and other-gender friends (Aboud & Mendelson,, 1996; Fehr, 2000)., On self-reports, women may downplay the importance of physical attractiveness compared to men (Feingold, 1990; Stevens, Owens, & Schaefer, 1990). However, when it comes to their actual behavior, women, are as influenced by physical attractiveness as men. Because most of the research on physical attractiveness is, based on self-reports, this gender difference is artificially heightened., Do gays and straights differ in the importance they, place on the physical attractiveness of prospective dating, partners? Probably not, although the evidence is mixed, and plagued by the same problems with self-reports just, noted. Researchers often find gender rather than sexual, orientation to be the more important factor in partner, preferences (Hatala & Prehodka, 1996). For example,, in the wording of gay and straight personal advertisements in newspapers, both heterosexual and homosexual men are more likely to request physically attractive partners than either heterosexual or homosexual, women are (Bailey et al., 1997; Deaux & Hanna, 1984)., The emphasis on beauty may not be quite as great, as the evidence reviewed thus far suggests. Figure 8.2, summarizes the results of a cross-cultural study conducted in 37 countries on the characteristics commonly, sought in a mate (Buss, 1985). As you can see, personal, qualities, such as kindness and intelligence, were ranked, higher than physical attractiveness by both genders., These results are somewhat reassuring, but we know, that verbal reports don’t always predict people’s actual, priorities and behavior., What makes someone attractive? Although there, are some differences of opinion about what makes a person attractive, people tend to agree on the key elements, of good looks. Researchers who study attractiveness, focus almost exclusively on facial features and physique., Both are important in perceived attractiveness, but an, unattractive body is seen as a greater liability than an, unattractive face (Alicke, Smith, & Klotz, 1986). Males,, whether gay or straight, place more emphasis on body, build., Even across different ethnic groups and countries,, there seems to be strong agreement on attractive facial, features (Cunningham et al., 1995; Langlois et al., 2000)., Women who have “baby-faced” features such as large, eyes, prominent cheekbones, a small nose, and full lips, get high ratings (Jones, 1995). In particular, the combination of these youthful features with “mature” features, (prominent cheekbones, narrow cheeks, wide smile), seems to be the winning ticket—picture Julia Roberts, and Jennifer Lopez (Cunningham, Druen, & Barbee,, 1997). Men who have a strong jaw and a broad forehead

Page 278 :
•, , Characteristics Commonly Sought in a Mate, Rank, , Characteristics preferred by men, , Characteristics preferred by women, , 1, , Kindness and understanding, , Kindness and understanding, , 2, , Intelligence, , Intelligence, , 3, , Physical attractiveness, , Exciting personality, , 4, , Exciting personality, , Good health, , 5, , Good health, , Adaptability, , 6, , Adaptability, , Physical attractiveness, , 7, , Creativity, , Creativity, , 8, , Desire for children, , Good earning capacity, , 9, , College graduate, , College graduate, , 10, , Good heredity, , Desire for children, , 11, , Good earning capacity, , Good heredity, , 12, , Good housekeeper, , Good housekeeper, , 13, , Religious orientation, , Religious orientation, , get high ratings on attractiveness (Mel Gibson and Denzel Washington come to mind) (Cunningham, Barbee,, & Pike, 1990). On the other hand, softer- and finerfeatured male faces are also rated attractive (Leonardo, DiCaprio is the perfect example) (Perrett et al., 1998)., When it comes to physique, males who have broad, shoulders, slim waists and legs, and small buttocks receive high attractiveness ratings (Singh, 1995). Tall men, are also considered attractive (Lynn & Shurgot, 1984)., Women of average weight with an “hourglass” figure, and medium-sized breasts are rated high in attractiveness (Franzoi & Herzog, 1987; Singh, 1993). African, American men and women prefer a larger body type, than European American men and women do (Jackson, & McGill, 1996; Rosenfeld et al., 1999). Nonetheless,, being considerably overweight is viewed very negatively, in the United States, despite the increasing incidence, of obesity in the country (Hebl & Mannix, 2003)., Currently in the United States, there is heightened, emphasis on thinness for girls and women. For example, one study reported that an overweight woman was, viewed as significantly less sexually attractive, warm,, and skilled than an average-weight woman (Regan,, 1996); however, perceptions of an overweight versus, an average-weight man didn’t differ. A study of white, college students found that women believed that their, male and female peers preferred a much thinner female, silhouette than was actually the case (and men exaggerated the extent to which others perceived large physiques, as most desirable for males) (Cohn & Adler, 1992). This, emphasis on thinness as the ideal female body shape, may underlie the high incidence of eating disorders, found among European American, Asian American,, and Hispanic adolescent girls (Halpern et al., 1999)., Eating disorders are less common among African Amer-, , FIG U R E 8.2, , Characteristics sought in a mate. Buss, (1989) surveyed individuals in three countries on the characteristics they sought in, a mate. Kindness/understanding and intelligence were ranked higher than physical, attractiveness by both males and females., Statistically significant gender differences in, rankings were found for a variety of characteristics, which are shown in italics. For, example, males ranked physical attractiveness higher than females did., From Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14. Copyright © 1989 by, Cambridge University Press. Reprinted with the permission, of Cambridge University Press., , ican females because the ideal physique is larger for, this group than that for European females (Polivy &, Herman, 2002). We explore the important issue of eating disorders in the Chapter 15 Application., Another response to “attractiveness pressure” is the, increased rate of cosmetic surgery, especially among, younger people. Between 2003 and 2004, the number, of cosmetic surgeries performed on Americans 18 and, younger increased 48 percent (Springen, 2004)! Most, such surgeries are nose jobs and breast augmentations., The popularity of television shows like Extreme Makeover and The Swan no doubt accounts for some of this, increase., Because our culture particularly values attractiveness in females, physical attractiveness appears to be a, more valued relationship quality for females than for, males (Feingold, 1990; Regan, 2003). This gender gap, was apparent in a study of the tactics heterosexual individuals used in pursuing romantic relationships. David, Buss (1988) asked 208 newlywed individuals to describe, the things they did when they first met their spouse, and, during the remainder of their courtship, to make themselves more appealing to their partner. Buss found that, men were more likely than women to emphasize their, material resources by doing such things as flashing lots, of money, buying nice gifts, showing off expensive possessions, and bragging about their importance at work, (see Figure 8.3 on the next page). In contrast, women, were more likely than men to work at enhancing their, appearance by dieting, wearing stylish clothes, trying, new hairstyles, and getting a tan. Although there were, relative differences between the genders in emphasis, on physical attractiveness, the data in Figure 8.3 show, that both genders relied on tactics intended to enhance, or maintain good looks., CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 241

Page 279 :
Tactics of Attraction, Mean frequency, Tactics used significantly, more by males, , Men, (N = 102), , Women, (N = 106), , Display resources, , 0.67, , 0.44, , Brag about resources, , 0.73, , 0.60, , Display sophistication, , 1.18, , 0.88, , Display strength, , 0.96, , 0.44, , Display athleticism, , 1.18, , 0.94, , Show off, , 0.70, , 0.47, , Wear makeup, , 0.02, , 1.63, , Keep clean and groomed, , 2.27, , 2.44, , Alter appearance—general, , 0.39, , 1.27, , Wear stylish clothes, , 1.22, , 2.00, , Act coy, , 0.54, , 0.73, , Wear jewelry, , 0.25, , 2.21, , Wear sexy clothes, , 0.68, , 0.91, , © Ephraim Ben-Shimon/Corbis, , Tactics used significantly, more by females, , Tactics for which no, significant gender, differences were found, Act provocative, , 0.77, , 0.90, , Flirt, , 2.13, , 2.09, , Keep hair groomed, , 2.20, , 2.31, , Increase social pressure, , 0.89, , 0.90, , Act nice, , 1.77, , 1.86, , Display humor, , 2.24, , 2.28, , Act promiscuous, , 0.30, , 0.21, , Act submissive, , 1.24, , 1.11, , Dissemble (feign agreement), , 1.26, , 1.09, , Touch, , 2.26, , 2.16, , •, , FIG U R E 8.3, , Similarities and differences between the genders in the tactics of attraction. Buss (1988) asked newlywed subjects to rate, how often they had used 23 tactics of attraction to make themselves more appealing to their partner. The tactics used by one, gender significantly more often than the other are listed in the, first two sections of the figure. Although there were significant, differences between the genders, there were also many similarities. The 11 tactics used most frequently by each gender (those, above the median) are boldfaced, showing considerable overlap, between males and females in the tactics they used most. (Note:, Higher means in the data reflect higher frequency of use, but the, numbers do not indicate frequency per day or week.), Adapted from Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics, of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628. Copyright ©, 1988 by the American Psychological Association. Adapted by permission of the author., , Matching up on looks. Thankfully, people can enjoy, rewarding social lives without being spectacularly goodlooking. In the process of dating and mating, people, apparently take into consideration their own level of, 242, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , According to the matching hypothesis, we tend to wind up with, someone similar to ourselves in attractiveness. However, other, factors such as personality, intelligence, and social status also, influence attraction., , attractiveness. The matching hypothesis proposes that, people of similar levels of physical attractiveness, gravitate toward each other. This hypothesis is supported by findings that both dating and married heterosexual couples tend to be similar in physical attractiveness (Feingold, 1988). There is some debate, however,, about whether people match up by their own choice, (Aron, 1988; Kalick & Hamilton, 1986). Some theorists, believe that individuals mostly pursue highly attractive partners and that their matching is the result of, social forces beyond their control, such as rejection by, more attractive others. Researchers have also found evidence for matching effects in friendships between men,, but not between women (Duck, 1994). The reasons for, this gender difference are not readily apparent., Resource exchange. Contradicting the matching, hypothesis, several studies have shown that, in heterosexual dating, males “trade” occupational status for physical attractiveness in females, and vice versa (Deaux &, Hanna, 1984; Feingold, 1992a; Green, Buchanan, &, Heuer, 1984). This finding also holds true in many other, cultures. As you already saw in the cross-cultural study

Page 280 :
summarized in Figure 8.2, men in most countries rate, physical attractiveness in a prospective mate as more, important than women do, whereas women rate “good, financial prospects” and “ambitious and industrious”, as more important characteristics than men do (Buss,, 1989). In reviewing the content of personal ads in newspapers and magazines, Wiederman (1993) reported, that women advertisers sought financial resources in, prospective partners 11 times as often as men did., Evolutionary social psychologists such as David, Buss (1988) believe that these findings on age, status,, and physical attractiveness reflect gender differences in, inherited reproductive strategies that have been sculpted, over thousands of generations by natural selection., Their thinking has been guided by parental investment, theory, which maintains that a species’ mating patterns, depend on what each sex has to invest—in the way of, time, energy, and survival risk—to produce and nurture, offspring. According to this model, members of the, gender that makes the smaller investment will compete with each other for mating opportunities with the, gender that makes the larger investment, and the gender with the larger investment will tend to be more discriminating in selecting its partners., Let’s look at how this analysis applies to humans., Like many mammalian species, human males are required to invest little in the production of offspring beyond the act of copulation, so their reproductive potential is maximized by mating with as many females as, possible. As well, males should prefer young and attractive females because these qualities are assumed to signal fertility, which should increase the chances of conception and passing genes on to the next generation., The situation for females is quite different. Females have, to invest nine months in pregnancy, and our female, ancestors typically had to devote at least several additional years to nourishing offspring through breast-, , •, , feeding. These realities place a ceiling on the number of, offspring women can produce, regardless of how many, males they mate with. Hence, females have little or no, incentive for mating with many males. Instead, females, can optimize their reproductive potential by being selective in mating. They should also prefer reliable partners with good incomes (Buss, 1994). This ensures that, a man will be committed to a long-term relationship, and will be able to support the woman and their child,, thus ensuring that her genes will be passed on., Thus, in humans, males are thought to compete, with other males for the relatively scarce and valuable “commodity” of reproductive opportunities. Parental investment theory predicts that in comparison to, women, men will show more interest in sexual activity,, more desire for variety in sexual partners, and more willingness to engage in uncommitted sex (see Figure 8.4)., In contrast, females are thought to be the conservative,, discriminating gender that is highly selective in choosing partners. This selectivity supposedly entails seeking partners who have more material resources that can, be invested in feeding and caring for offspring. Why?, Because in the world of our ancient ancestors, males’, greater strength and agility would have been crucial, assets in the never-ending struggle to find food and, shelter and defend one’s territory., Although evolutionary psychologists assert that, culture has little influence on gender differences in mate, selection strategies (Buss, 1998), evidence contradicts, this claim (Travis & Meginnis-Payne, 2001). Sociocultural models can also provide plausible explanations, for gender differences in attraction and mate selection,, including traditional gender-role socialization and men’s, greater economic power (Sprecher, Sullivan, & Hatfield, 1994). For instance, women’s preferences for a, physically attractive man appear to increase along with, women’s economic power (Gangestad, 1993). More-, , Biological reality, , Evolutionary significance, , Behavioral outcomes, , Males, , Reproduction involves, minimal investment of, time, energy, and risk, , Maximize reproductive, success by seeking more, sexual partners with high, reproductive potential, , More interest in uncommitted sex,, greater number of sex partners, over lifetime, look for youth and, attractiveness in partners, , Females, , Reproduction involves, substantial investment of, time, energy, and risk, , Maximize reproductive, success by seeking partners, willing to invest material, resources in your offspring, , Less interest in uncommitted sex,, smaller number of sex partners, over lifetime, look for income,, status, and ambition in partners, , F I G U R E 8.4, , Parental investment theory and mating preferences. Parental investment theory suggests that basic, differences between males and females in parental investment have great adaptive significance and lead, to gender differences in mating propensities and preferences, as outlined here., CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 243

Page 281 :
over, it is women in countries with limited educational, and career opportunities for females who prefer men, with high incomes (Eagly & Wood, 1999). Thus, both, biological and environmental factors influence gender, differences in mate selection strategies (Fitness, Fletcher,, & Overall, 2003; Wood & Eagly, 2002)., , Getting Acquainted, After several initial encounters, people typically begin, the dance of getting to know each other. Is there any way, to predict which budding relationships will flower and, which will die on the vine? We’ll examine three factors:, reciprocal liking, perceived similarity, and desirable, personality characteristics., Reciprocal Liking, , An old adage advises, “If you want to have a friend, be, a friend.” This suggestion captures the idea of the reciprocity principle in relationships. Reciprocal liking refers to liking those who show that they like you. Many, studies have demonstrated that if you believe another, person likes you, you will like him or her (Berscheid &, Walster, 1978; Kenny, 1994). Think about it. Assuming, 244, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Similarity, , Do “birds of a feather flock together,” or do “opposites, attract”? Research offers far more support for the first, , •, , FIG U R E 8.5, , Reciprocal liking. Research participants were, led to believe that their, research partner either, did or did not like them., The participants who, believed that their partners liked them liked, their partners more than, the participants who, believed that their partners did not like them., These results illustrate, how reciprocity and the, self-fulfilling prophecy, can influence attraction, to others. (Adapted from, Curtis & Miller, 1986), , 7, 6, Amount of liking, , © Paul Hawthorne/Getty Images, , Although most couples are similar in age and attractiveness,, sometimes men exchange occupational status for physical, attractiveness in women, and vice versa., , that others are sincere, you like it when they flatter you,, do favors for you, and use nonverbal behavior to signal, their interest in you (eye contact, leaning forward)., Moreover, you usually reciprocate such behavior., You can see the self-fulfilling prophecy at work, here. If you believe that someone likes you, you behave, in a friendly manner toward that person. Your behavior encourages him or her to respond positively, which, confirms your initial expectation. A study by Rebecca, Curtis and Kim Miller (1986) shows the self-fulfilling, prophecy in action. College students who were strangers, were divided into pairs for a 5-minute “get acquainted”, conversation. Afterward, one member of each pair was, led to believe that the other student either did or didn’t, like him or her. Then the pairs met again and talked, about current events for 10 minutes. Raters, blind to the, experimental condition of the participants, listened to, tape recordings of the 10-minute interactions and rated, the participants on a number of behaviors. As predicted,, the individuals who believed that they were liked were, rated as disclosing more about themselves, behaving, more warmly, disagreeing less, and having a more positive tone of voice and general attitude than those who, believed that they were disliked (see Figure 8.5)., The strategy of “playing hard to get” (nonreciprocity) seems at odds with the reciprocity principle. Is, there any evidence that it works? You should probably, avoid this tactic. People are usually turned off by others who reject them (Wright & Contrada, 1986). It also, seems that individuals prefer those who are moderately, selective in their liking for others. By contrast, people, who like everyone are seen as having no standards, while, those who like very few are perceived as arrogant., , 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, , Believe Believe, they are they are, liked, disliked

Page 282 :
adage than for the second (Berscheid & Reis, 1998). Despite the increasing diversity in the United States, similarity continues to play a key role in attraction (Macionis, 1997), and the similarity principle operates in, both friendships and romantic relationships regardless, of sexual orientation (Aubé & Koestner, 1995; Peplau,, Cochran, & Mays, 1997). Similarly, people who meet, others via the Internet often narrow down prospects in, advance by selecting individuals who are like them in key, respects (sexual orientation, age, religion, and so forth)., Heterosexual married and dating couples tend to, be similar in demographic characteristics (age, race, religion, socioeconomic status, and education), physical attractiveness, intelligence, attitudes, and personality, (Hendrick & Hendrick, 1992). (To date, there are not, enough data on the similarity of gay and lesbian couples to give a clear picture.) We’ve already explored similarity in physical attractiveness. Now, let’s consider attitudes and personality., It has been quite well established that similarity in, attitudes promotes liking (Byrne, 1971; Byrne, Clore, &, Smeaton, 1986). According to Donn Byrne’s two-stage, model, people first “sort” for dissimilarity, avoiding, those who appear to be different. Then, from among, the remaining group, individuals gravitate toward those, who are most similar (Byrne, Clore, & Smeaton, 1986)., Here’s a typical laboratory experiment that demonstrates, the impact of similarity on attraction. Subjects who, have previously provided information on their own attitudes are led to believe that they will be meeting a, stranger. They are given information about the stranger’s, views that has been manipulated to show various degrees of similarity to their own views. As attitude similarity increases, subjects’ ratings of the likability of the, stranger increase (see Figure 8.6). Once two people start, dating, a phenomenon termed attitude alignment enhances attitudinal similarity. That is, when dating part-, , F I G U R E 8.6, , Attitude similarity and, attraction. When asked, to rate the likability of, a hypothetical stranger,, subjects give progressively higher ratings, to people who they are, told share more attitudes, with them., Adapted from Gonzales, M. H.,, Davis, J. M., Loeny, G. L., Lukens,, C. K., & Junghans, C. H. (1983)., Interactional approach to interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44,, 1191–1197. Copyright © 1983 by, the American Psychological Association. Adapted by permission of the, author., , 14, 12, Rating of likability, , •, , 10, 8, 6, , WE B LI N K 8.1, , The Student Counseling Virtual Pamphlet Collection, The Student Counseling office at the University of Chicago, had a great idea: gather together links to the very best, online information from other counseling centers for the, problems and issues faced by students. This “best of the, best” resource includes helpful guides to love, friendship,, relationships, and almost any issue an adult in school, would face., , ners discover that they disagree on important values,, couples typically modify their attitudes so they are more, congruent (Davis & Rusbult, 2001)., People with similar personality traits are more likely, to be attracted to each other than are those with dissimilar or complementary traits (Berscheid & Reis, 1998)., For example, two people with “sunny” dispositions are, more likely to pair up than a happy and an unhappy, person are. This finding is true for both friends and romantic partners. Of course, sometimes opposites do attract. You probably know at least one couple with obvious dissimilarities—perhaps one tends to be quiet while, the other is more domineering. Although such combinations sometimes work (Dryer & Horowitz, 1997),, similarity is more often the rule, especially in the long, run. For example, married couples with similar personalities are happier than couples with less similar personalities (Caspi & Herbener, 1990)., What is the appeal of similarity? For one thing,, you assume that a similar person will probably like you, (Condon & Crano, 1988). Second, when others share, your beliefs, it validates them (Byrne & Clore, 1970)., Desirable Personality Characteristics, , As you might expect, personal qualities are more important than physical characteristics for a future spouse, or life partner, and the reverse is true for casual relationships. As you can see in Figure 8.7 (on the next, page), for a marriage partner, both male and female, college students highly ranked a good overall personality, honesty and trustworthiness, and kindness and, compassion (Regan & Berscheid, 1997). For a sexual, partner, both men and women ranked “attractive appearance” the highest. Other desirable personality, qualities in relationship partners include warmth,, friendliness, good sense of humor, and social assertiveness (Hatfield & Rapson, 1993; Regan, 2003)., , 4, , Established Relationships, , 2, 0, 0 50% 100%, Percentage of, similar attitudes, , Over time, some acquaintanceships evolve into established relationships. Through conversation and shared, activities, individuals mutually determine the desired, level of intimacy they want in a relationship. Not all, relationships need to be highly intimate to be satisfying., CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 245

Page 283 :
Women, , Men, , •, , Sexual partner, , Marriage partner, , Physically attractive, , Honest or trustworthy, , Healthy, , Sensitive/compassionate, , Attentive to my needs, , Overall personality, , Sense of humor, , Intelligent, , Overall personality, , Attentive to my needs, , Physically attractive, , Overall personality, , Healthy, , Honest or trustworthy, , Overall personality, , Physically attractive, , Attentive to my needs, , Intelligent, , Self-confident, , Healthy, , FIG U R E 8.7, , Characteristics men and women consider most important for a sexual partner, and a marriage partner. Both men and women emphasize good looks when judging a sexual partner. When judging a marriage partner, both stress desirable personal qualities, although men also consider physical attractiveness to be important, in a marriage partner., From Regan, P. C., & Berscheid, E. (1997). Gender differences in characteristics desired in a potential sexual and, marriage partner. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 9, 25–37., , For others, intimacy is an essential ingredient of relationship satisfaction. In either case, to continue, relationships need to be maintained., Maintenance of Ongoing Relationships, , Relationship maintenance involves the actions and, activities used to sustain the desired quality of a relationship. In Figure 8.8, you can see a list of commonly, used relationship maintenance behaviors. Often, these, behaviors occur spontaneously (calling on the phone, to check in, eating meals together); at other times, behaviors are more intentional and require more planning (traveling to visit family and friends) (Canary &, Stafford, 2001). People use most of these strategies in, their various relationships. Obviously, strategies vary, depending on the nature of a relationship (familial,, friendship, romantic) and its stage of development, (new, developing, mature). For example, married couples engage in more assurances and social networking, than dating partners do (Stafford & Canary, 1991). Both, spontaneous and routine maintenance activities are correlated with relationship satisfaction and commitment, (Dainton & Aylor, 2002). When the frequency of one, partner’s maintenance activities compares favorably, with the other’s expectations, relationship satisfaction, is higher (Dainton, 2000). Gay and lesbian couples, generally use the same maintenance behaviors as heterosexual couples (Haas & Stafford, 1998)., Another approach to relationship maintenance involves the process of “minding” relationships (Harvey &, Omarzu, 1997). Minding is an active process that continues throughout a relationship and involves such things, 246, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , as mutual self-disclosure and relationshipenhancing beliefs and attributions about one’s, partner. According to this model, developing, satisfying and intimate long-term relationships, is associated with a high level of minding, and, vice versa. To elaborate, a high degree of minding involves using good listening skills, having, detailed knowledge about your partner’s opinions, making generally positive attributions, for your partner’s behaviors, expressing feelings of trust and commitment, recognizing, your partner’s support and effort, and having, an optimistic view of the future of the relationship. By contrast, a low degree of minding is characterized by a lack of interest in, your partner’s self-disclosures, generally negative attributions for your partner’s behavior,, dwelling on your partner’s faults, and a pessimistic view of the future of the relationship., As you can see, this model has a strong cognitive flavor. Although Harvey and Omarzu, focus on committed romantic relationships,, they suggest that their model likely applies to, family and friendship relationships as well., , Relationship maintenance strategies, Strategy, , Behavioral Example, , Positivity, , Try to act nice and cheerful, , Openness, , Encourage him/her to disclose, thoughts and feelings to me, , Assurances, , Stress my commitment to him/her, , Social networking, , Show that I am willing to do things, with his/her friends and family, , Sharing tasks, , Help equally with tasks that need, to be done, , Joint activities, , Spend time hanging out, , Mediated, communication, , Use e-mail to keep in touch, , Avoidance, , Respect each other’s privacy and, need to be alone, , Antisocial behaviors, , Act rude to him/her, , Humor, , Call him/her by a funny nickname, , No flirting, , Do not encourage overly familiar, behavior (relevant in cross-gender, friendships), , •, , FIG U R E 8.8, , Relationship maintenance strategies. College students were, asked to describe how they maintained three different personal, relationships over a college term. Their responses were grouped, into 11 categories. You can see that, ironically, some people, behave negatively in an attempt to enhance relationships. Openness was the most commonly nominated strategy. (Adapted from, Canary & Stafford, 1994)

Page 284 :
To understand the role of commitment in relationships, we need to consider two additional factors. The, first is the comparison level for alternatives, or one’s, estimation of the available outcomes from alternative, relationships. In using this standard, individuals assess their current relationship outcomes in comparison, to the potential outcomes of other similar relationships, that are actually available to them. This principle helps, explain why many unsatisfying relationships are not, terminated until another love interest actually appears., The second factor that figures in relationship commitment is investments, or things that people contribute, to a relationship that they can’t get back if the relationship ends. Investments include past costs (time,, money) that they can never recover if the relationship, fails. Understandably, putting investments into a relationship strengthens one’s commitment to it., But what happens if individuals feel that they have, invested a lot in a relationship that starts to have problems? Because they’re unwilling to forfeit their investments, some people put even more into such a relationship. Others decide that they will probably have to forfeit, their investment sooner or later, so they choose not to, wait—especially if an attractive alternative comes into, the picture., Here’s how interdependence theory works: If both, members of a couple feel that they are getting a lot out, of the relationship (lots of strokes, high status) compared to its costs (a few arguments, occasionally giving, up preferred activities), they will probably perceive the, relationship as satisfactory and will keep it going. However, if either one begins to feel that the ratio of rewards, to costs is falling below his or her comparison level, dissatisfaction is likely to occur. The dissatisfied person, may attempt to alter the balance of costs and rewards, or try to ease out of the relationship. The likelihood of, ending the relationship depends on the number of important investments a person has in the relationship and, whether the person believes that an alternative relationship is available that could yield greater satisfaction., , Relationship Satisfaction, and Commitment, , How do you gauge your satisfaction in a relationship?, What determines whether you will stay in or get out of, a relationship? Interdependence or social exchange, theory postulates that interpersonal relationships are, governed by perceptions of the rewards and costs exchanged in interactions. Basically, this model predicts, that interactions between acquaintances, friends, and, lovers will continue as long as the participants feel that, the benefits they derive from the relationship are reasonable in comparison to the costs of being in the relationship. Harold Kelley and John Thibaut’s interdependence, theory (Kelley & Thibaut, 1978; Thibaut & Kelley, 1959), is based on B. F. Skinner’s principle of reinforcement,, which assumes that individuals try to maximize their rewards in life and minimize their costs (see Chapter 2)., Rewards include such things as emotional support,, status, and sexual gratification (in romantic relationships); costs are such things as the time and energy that, a relationship requires, emotional conflicts, and the inability to engage in other rewarding activities because, of relationship obligations. According to interdependence theory, people assess a relationship by its outcome—their subjective perception of the rewards of, the relationship minus its costs (see Figure 8.9)., Individuals gauge their satisfaction with a relationship by comparing the relationship outcomes (rewards, minus costs) to their subjective expectations. This personal standard of what constitutes an acceptable balance of rewards and costs in a relationship is called, the comparison level. It is based on the outcomes you, have experienced in previous relationships and the outcomes you have seen others experience in their relationships. Your comparison level may also be influenced by, your exposure to fictional relationships, such as those, you have read about or seen on television. Consistent, with the predictions of exchange theory, research shows, that relationship satisfaction is higher when rewards are, perceived to be high and costs, low., , •, Rewards, , Costs, , Outcome, , Outcome, , Comparison, level, , Satisfaction, , Satisfaction, , Comparison level, for alternatives, , Investments, , FIG U R E 8.9, , The key elements of social exchange theory, and their effects on a relationship. According, to social exchange theory, relationship outcome, is determined by the rewards minus the costs of, a relationship. Relationship satisfaction is based, on the outcome matched against comparison level, (expectations). Commitment to a relationship is, determined by one’s satisfaction minus one’s, comparison level for alternatives plus one’s investments in the relationship., , Commitment, , CHAPTER 8, , Adapted from Brehm, S. S., &, Kassin, S, M. (1993). Social, psychology. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin. Copyright © 1993 by, Houghton Mifflin Company., Adapted with permission., , Friendship and Love, , 247

Page 285 :
Research generally supports interdependence theory and its extensions (Le & Agnew, 2003; Rusbult,, Drigotas, & Verette, 1994). Social exchange principles, seem to operate in a similar fashion regardless of a, couple’s sexual orientation (Peplau, 1991). Moreover,, heterosexual and homosexual couples seem quite similar with regard to important aspects of relationships, (Peplau & Spaulding, 2003). For example, studies of, heterosexual males and females, gay males, and lesbians found that all groups report high satisfaction, with their relationships (Duffy & Rusbult, 1986; Kurdek & Schmitt, 1986a, 1986b), as well as moderately, high investments in their relationships, moderately poor, alternatives, and strong commitment (Duffy & Rusbult, 1986)., This theory of an “interpersonal marketplace” provides a useful model for analyzing many relationships,, particularly those in highly individualistic societies., The usefulness of interdependence theory appears more, limited for people in collectivist cultures or those with, interdependent self-views (Chapter 5)., Even in individualistic cultures, many people resist, the idea that close relationships operate according to, , an economic model. Much of this resistance probably, comes from discomfort with the idea that self-interest, plays such an important role in the maintenance of relationships. Resistance may also stem from doubts about, how well social exchange principles apply to close relationships. In fact, there is some empirical support for, this position. Margaret Clark and her colleagues (Clark, & Bennett, 1992) distinguish between exchange relationships (with strangers, acquaintances, co-workers), and communal relationships (with close friends, lovers,, family members). Research suggests that in exchange, relationships, the usual principles of social exchange, dominate. Social exchange principles also operate in, communal relationships, but seem to be applied differently. For example, in communal relationships, rewards are usually given freely, without any expectation, of prompt reciprocation (Clark & Mills, 1993). Also,, individuals pay more attention to the needs of a partner in a communal relationship than in an exchange, relationship. In other words, you use a need-based norm, with people who are close to you and help them without calculating whether and when they will reward you, in kind (Clark & Grote, 2003)., , Friendship, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Summarize the research on what makes a good friend., Describe some key gender differences in friendships., , It’s hard to overestimate the importance of friends. They, give help in times of need, advice in times of confusion,, consolation in times of failure, and praise in times of, achievement. The importance of friends was underscored by a finding we noted earlier: In identifying the, person to whom they felt closest, 36 percent of college, students named a friend (while 47 percent named a romantic partner, 14 percent named a family member,, and 3 percent said “other”)., Friends are important to adjustment. College students with strong friendships are more optimistic and, deal better with stressful life events (Brissette, Scheirer, &, Carver, 2002). Same-gender friendships between women, are linked to positive mental and physical health (Knickmeyer, Sexton, & Nishimura, 2002). But friends can, help or hinder adjustment, depending on relationship, quality. Intimate and stable friendships are associated, with less stress in adulthood and less troublesome behavior among teens, but the reverse is also true (Hartup, & Stevens, 1999). So the absence of “problematic qualities” in your friends may be as significant as the presence of their positive qualities. Also, developing friendships with people who are different from oneself—in, terms of ethnicity or sexual orientation, for example—, 248, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , can break down prejudice (Herek & Capitanio, 1996;, Levin, van Laar, & Sidanius, 2003)., , What Makes a Good Friend?, What does make a good friend? One approach to this, question comes from a cross-cultural study of students, in England, Italy, Japan, and Hong Kong (Argyle &, Henderson, 1984). The investigators wanted to see, whether they could find enough agreement on how, friends should conduct themselves to permit the formulation of some informal rules governing friendships., On the basis of the students’ responses, the authors, , WE B LI N K 8.2, , SUNY Buffalo Counseling Center: Relationships Page, The Counseling Center at SUNY–Buffalo is recognized for, its excellent guides to interpersonal relationships and to, improving communication among college students. The, online materials here focus on dozens of questions and, issues stemming from people relating intimately to each, other.

Page 286 :
The Rules of Friendship, Share news of success with a friend, Show emotional support, Volunteer help in time of need, Strive to make a friend happy when in each other’s company, Trust and confide in each other, Stand up for a friend in his or her absence, , •, , F I G U R E 8.10, , Vital behaviors in friendship. A cross-cultural inquiry into the, behaviors that are vital to friendship identified these six rules, of friendship. (Adapted from Argyle & Henderson, 1984), , were able to identify six informal rules. As Figure 8.10, shows, the common thread running through these rules, seems to be providing emotional and social support to, friends., We can also look at the common themes that underlie friendships of all ages to understand the nature, of friendship. Researchers have identified three such, themes (de Vries, 1996). The first involves the emotional, dimension of friendship (self-disclosure, expressing, affection and support, and so forth). A second theme, concerns the communal nature of friendship (partici-, , RE C O M M E N D E D, READING, , Friendshifts®: The Power, of Friendship and How It, Shapes Our Lives, by Jan Yager (Hannacroix Creek Books, 1999), The author of this useful self-help manual has coined, the word “friendshifts®” to make the point that friendships change over the life span. In this readable book,, sociologist Jan Yager traces the nature and role of, friendships for children, teens, and adults (in both personal life and the workplace). At all ages, friendships, play a vital role in mental health; thus the author urges, readers to look carefully at the balance of positives and, negatives in their various friendships. Drawing on psychological and sociological research as well as her own, interviews, Yager offers excellent advice on making,, keeping, and improving friendships. The book also includes a helpful resource section with websites and, a bibliography., Cover art by Jan Yager, Ph.D. from her original photograph. Copyright © 1999 by, Jan Yager, Ph.D. All rights reserved. Further reproduction use should be directed to, the publisher [email protected]., , pating in or supporting each other in mutually shared, activities). A third dimension involves sociability and, compatibility (friends are sources of fun and recreation). Thus, several lines of research indicate that the, most important element of friendship is emotional, support., , Gender Differences in Friendship, Men’s and women’s same-gender friendships have a, lot in common, but there are some interesting differences that appear rooted in traditional gender roles and, socialization., In the United States, women’s friendships are more, often emotionally based, whereas men’s tend to be activity based. Although some researchers have challenged, this characterization (Walker, 1994), the current belief, is that men’s friendships are typically based on shared, interests and doing things together, while women’s, friendships more often focus on talking—usually about, feelings and relationships (Fehr, 1996, 2004). Obviously, female friends do engage in joint activities, but, they often use these occasions to talk. And male friends, talk, but their conversations are usually focused on activities and nonpersonal matters such as sports (Fehr,, 1996, 2004)., We can also compare American men’s and women’s, friendships on preferred topics of conversation. Women, are far more likely than men to discuss personal issues:, problems, people, relationships, and feelings (Fehr,, 2004). Men, on the other hand, are much more likely, to talk about sports, work, vehicles, and computers, than personal concerns. E-mail communications also, reflect this gender difference (Colley & Todd, 2002)., Whose friendships are more intimate, men’s or, women’s? Currently, there is controversy over this question. One view is that men and women experience the, same level of intimacy in their friendships but take different pathways to intimacy (closeness through doing, versus closeness through self-disclosure, respectively), (Swain, 1989). A second perspective is that women, achieve intimacy through self-disclosure and men,, through both self-disclosure and joint activities (Helgeson, Shaver, & Dyer, 1987). A third, and the most, widely accepted, view is that women’s friendships are, closer and more satisfying—because they involve more, self-disclosure (Fehr, 2004; Reis, 1998)., In some other countries, men’s same-gender friendships are more intimate (Reis, 1998). What short-circuits, intimate connections between American men? Several, factors stand out (Kilmartin, 2000; Bank & Hansford,, 2000). First, men are socialized to be “strong and silent,”, which inhibits self-disclosure. Second, fear of homosexuality, which is stronger in males than females, is a, barrier to intimacy between male friends. Third, traditional gender-role expectations encourage men to see, CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 249

Page 287 :
each other as competitors. Why reveal weaknesses to, someone who might take advantage of you?, Keep in mind that the gender differences we’ve reported may not hold for friendships in other cultures., Several studies have found gender differences in friendships to be more pronounced in the United States than, , in India (Berman, Murphy-Berman, & Pachauri, 1988), and among Chinese students in Hong Kong (Wheeler,, Reis, & Bond, 1989). Thus, you should be cautious about, generalizing the findings on gender differences in friendship beyond the United States at this point., , Romantic Love, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, ■, , Summarize the research findings on the experience of, love in gay and straight couples., Discuss some gender differences regarding love., Define passion, intimacy, and commitment, and describe, Sternberg’s eight types of love., , Wander through a bookstore and you’ll see an overwhelming array of titles such as Men Who Can’t Love,, Women Who Love Too Much, and How to Survive the, Loss of a Love. Turn up your radio and you’ll hear the, refrains of “Crazy in Love,” “I Will Always Love You,”, and “Dangerously in Love.” Although there are other, forms of love, such as parental love and platonic love,, these books and songs are all about romantic love, a subject of consuming interest for almost everyone., Love is difficult to define, difficult to measure, and, frequently difficult to understand. Nonetheless, psychologists have conducted thousands of studies and developed a number of interesting theories on love and romantic relationships., , ■, , ■, ■, , Discuss adult attachment styles, including their correlates, and stability., Discuss the course of romantic love over time., Explain why relationships fail and what couples can do, to help relationships last., , describe their findings without any mention of homosexuals. Because many more people identify themselves, as heterosexual, heterosexism in research isn’t likely to, distort conclusions about heterosexuals. Unfortunately,, however, it renders homosexual relationships invisible. Consequently, psychologists don’t know as much, about sexual orientation as they would like to. However,, since the 1990s, researchers have been devoting much, more attention to this issue., We do know that homosexual romances and relationships are essentially the same as those of heterosexuals. Both groups experience romantic and passion-, , Sexual orientation refers to a person’s preference for, emotional and sexual relationships with individuals, of the same gender, the other gender, or either gender. Heterosexuals seek emotional-sexual relationships, with members of the other gender. Homosexuals seek, emotional-sexual relationships with members of the, same gender. Bisexuals seek emotional-sexual relationships with members of both genders. In recent years,, the terms gay and straight have become widely used to, refer to homosexuals and heterosexuals, respectively., Gay can refer to homosexuals of either gender, but most, homosexual women prefer to call themselves lesbians., Most studies of romantic love and relationships, suffer from heterosexism, or the assumption that all, individuals and relationships are heterosexual. For, instance, most questionnaires on romantic love and romantic relationships fail to ask subjects about their sexual orientation. Thus, when data are analyzed, there is, no way to know whether subjects are referring to sameor other-gender romantic partners. Assuming that their, subjects are all heterosexuals, researchers proceed to, 250, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , © 2004 AP/Wide World Photos, , Sexual Orientation and Love, , The experience of romantic love seems to be the same, regardless of a person’s sexual orientation.

Page 288 :
ate love and make commitments to relationships (Kurdek, 1994, 1998). Both heterosexual and homosexual, couples say they want their partners to have characteristics similar to theirs, hold similar values about relationships, report similar levels of relationship satisfaction, and perceive their relationships to be loving and, satisfying (Peplau & Spaulding, 2003). When relationship differences are found, they are much more likely to, be rooted in gender than in sexual orientation, as we’ll, see next., , WE B LI N K 8.3, , Love Page, James Park, an existentialist philosopher and advocate, of freedom and authenticity in relationships, offers a distinctive challenge to more traditional notions of romantic, love at this site. Park provides bibliographies on a host, of topics, such as jealousy, sexual scripts, and the decision, to have children., , Theories of Love, Gender Differences, Regarding Love, , Can the experience of love be broken down into certain, key components? How are romantic love relationships, similar to other types of close relationships? These are, the kinds of questions that two current theories of love, address., , INTIMACY, , The stereotype holds that women are more romantic, than men. Nonetheless, much of the research evidence, suggests just the opposite—that men are the more romantic gender (Dion & Dion, 1988). For example, men, Triangular Theory of Love, hold more romantic beliefs (“Love lasts forever” or, Robert Sternberg’s (1986, 1988) triangular theory of, “There is one perfect love in the world for everyone”), love posits that all love experiences are made up of three, (Peplau, Hill, & Rubin, 1993). In addition, men fall in, components: intimacy, passion, and commitment. Each, love more easily than women, whereas women fall out, of the components is represented as a point of a triangle,, of love more easily than men (Hill, Rubin, & Peplau,, from which the theory derives its name (see Figure 8.11)., 1976; Rubin, Peplau, & Hill, 1981). Also, women are, Intimacy refers to warmth, closeness, and sharing, more likely than men to say that they would marry, in a relationship. Signs of intimacy include giving and, someone they didn’t love (Peplau & Gordon, 1985)., Thus, as a whole the evidence suggests, that men are more romantic than women., However, there are several ways in which, Liking, women seem more romantic. For one thing,, (intimacy alone), women are more likely to report physical, symptoms associated with being in love—, for instance, feeling like they are “floating on, a cloud” (Peplau & Gordon, 1985). Second,, women are somewhat more likely to verbalize, Companionate love, Romantic love, and display tender emotions (Dindia & Allen,, (intimacy + commitment), (intimacy + passion), 1992)., Research also supports the view that, Consummate love, (intimacy +, women are more selective in choosing a partpassion +, ner than men are (Kenrick et al., 1990). Evocommitment), lutionary social psychologists would explain, CO, women’s tendency to be more “picky” in terms, MM, N, ITM, O, of the parental investment model we discussed, I, S, EN, S, PA, T, earlier in the chapter. The sociocultural explanation is based on the fact that heterosexual, Infatuation, Fatuous love, Empty love, women are still more economically dependent, (passion, alone), (passion, +, commitment), (commitment, alone), on their partners than vice versa. This means, that choosing a potential partner solely for, romantic reasons may be a luxury that men, F I G U R E 8. 11, (gay or straight) can more easily afford than, heterosexual women. Support for this perSternberg’s triangular theory of love. According to Robert Sternberg (1986), love, spective comes from a previously mentioned, includes three components: intimacy, passion, and commitment. These components, are portrayed here as points on a triangle. The possible combinations of these three, study showing that women who prefer men, components yield the seven types of relationships mapped out here. The absence, with high incomes are those in countries with, of all three components is called nonlove, which is not shown in the diagram., limited opportunities for females (Eagly &, From Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135. Copyright © 1986 by the, Wood, 1999)., American Psychological Association. Reprinted by permission of the author., , •, , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 251

Page 289 :
252, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , significantly higher on the passion scale than the Chinese. On the negative side, one study found little support for the idea that the various types of love can be, accounted for by different weightings of intimacy, passion, and commitment (Hendrick & Hendrick, 1989)., Although commitment is a key factor in romantic relationships, it is important in some friendships, as well., , In a groundbreaking theory of love,, Cindy Hazan and Phillip Shaver, (1987) asserted that romantic love, can be conceptualized as an attachment process, with similarities to, the bond between infants and their, caregivers. According to these theCindy Hazan, orists, adult romantic love and infant attachment share a number of, features: intense fascination with the, other person, distress at separation,, and efforts to stay close and spend, time together. Of course, there are, also differences: Infant-caregiver relationships are one-sided, whereas, caregiving in romantic relationships, works both ways. A second difference is that romantic relationships, Phillip Shaver, usually have a sexual component,, whereas infant-caregiver relationships do not., Hazan and Shaver’s ideas build on earlier work in, attachment theory by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Researchers who study attachment are keenly, interested in the nature and development of attachment styles, or typical ways of interacting in close relationships. Their interest is fueled by the belief that, attachment styles develop during the first year of life, and strongly influence individuals’ interpersonal interactions from then on., Infant attachment. Based on actual observations of, infants and their primary caregivers, earlier researchers identified three attachment styles (Ainsworth et al.,, 1978). Most infants develop a secure attachment style (see, Figure 8.12). However, other infants develop insecure, attachments. Some infants are very anxious when separated from their caretaker, a response characterized as, an anxious-ambivalent attachment style. A third group, of infants never connect very well with their caretaker, and are classified in the avoidant attachment style. How, do attachments in infancy develop? As you can see in, Figure 8.12, three parenting styles have been identified, as likely determinants of attachment quality. A warm/, responsive approach seems to promote secure attach-, , Photo by Bill Warren/Ithaca Journal, , Romantic Love as, Attachment, , Photo provided by Phillip Shaver, , Michael Marsland/Yale University, , receiving emotional support, valuing the loved one, wanting to promote the welfare of the loved one,, and sharing one’s self and one’s possessions with another. As we’ve already discussed, self-disclosure is, necessary to achieve and maintain, feelings of intimacy in a relationship, whether platonic or romantic., Robert Sternberg, Passion refers to the intense, feelings (both positive and negative) experienced in love relationships, including sexual desire. Passion is related to drives that lead to romance, physical attraction, and sexual consummation., Although sexual needs may be dominant in many close, relationships, other needs also figure in the experience, of passion, including the needs for nurturance, selfesteem, dominance, submission, and self-actualization., For example, self-esteem is threatened when one experiences jealousy. Passion obviously figures most prominently in romantic relationships., Commitment involves the decision and intent to, maintain a relationship in spite of the difficulties and, costs that may arise. According to Sternberg, commitment has both short-term and long-term aspects. The, short-term aspect concerns the conscious decision to, love someone. The long-term aspect reflects the determination to make a relationship endure. Although the, decision to love someone usually comes before commitment, that is not always the case (in arranged marriages, for instance)., Sternberg has described eight types of relationships, that can result from the presence or absence of each of, the three components of love (see Figure 8.11). One of, these relationship types, nonlove, is not pictured in the, diagram because it is defined as the absence of any of the, three components. Most casual interactions are of this, type. When all three components are present, consummate love is said to exist., Sternberg’s model has generated a great deal of interest and some research. In support of his theory, researchers have demonstrated that Sternberg’s three components characterize not only how people think about, love in general but also how they personally experience, love (Aron & Westbay, 1996). Also, measures of commitment and intimacy were found to be among the best, predictors of whether dating couples continued their, relationships (Hendrick, Hendrick, & Adler, 1988). A, cross-cultural study of Chinese and American heterosexual couples in their 20s used questionnaires to measure intimacy, passion, and commitment (Gao, 2001)., Scores on these three components of love increased as, relationships became more serious. Although there, were no significant differences between the two groups, on intimacy and commitment scores, Americans scored

Page 290 :
•, , F I G U R E 8.12, , Infant attachment and romantic relationships. According, to Hazan and Shaver (1987),, romantic relationships in adulthood are similar in form to, attachment patterns in infancy,, which are determined in part by, parental caregiving styles. The, theorized relations between, parental styles, attachment, patterns, and intimate relations, are outlined here. Hazan and, Shaver’s (1987) study sparked, a flurry of follow-up research,, which has largely supported the, basic premises of their groundbreaking theory, although the, links between infant experiences, and close relationships in adulthood appear to be somewhat, more complex than those portrayed here (Shaver & Hazan,, 1992). (Based on Hazan and, Shaver, 1986, 1987; Shaffer,, 1989), , Parent’s caregiving style, , Infant attachment, , Warm/responsive—, She/he was generally, warm and responsive;, she/he was good at, knowing when to be, supportive and when to, let me operate on my, own; our relationship was, always comfortable, and, I have no major reservations or complaints, about it., , Secure attachment—, An infant-caregiver bond, in which the child, welcomes contact with a, close companion and, uses this person as a, secure base from which, to explore the, environment., , Secure—I find it, relatively easy to get, close to others and am, comfortable depending, on them and having them, depend on me. I don't, often worry about, being abandoned or, about someone getting, too close to me., , Cold/rejecting—She/he, was fairly cold and, distant, or rejecting, not, very responsive; I wasn’t, her/his highest priority,, her/his concerns were, often elsewhere; it’s, possible that she/he, would just as soon not, have had me., , Avoidant attachment—, An insecure infantcaregiver bond, characterized by little, separation protest and a, tendency for the child to, avoid or ignore the, caregiver., , Avoidant—I am, somewhat uncomfortable, being close to others; I, find it difficult to trust, them, difficult to allow, myself to depend on, them. I am nervous, when anyone gets too, close, and often love, partners want me to be, more intimate than I feel, comfortable being., , Ambivalent/, inconsistent—, She/he was noticeably, inconsistent in her/his, reactions to me, some–, times warm and, sometimes not; she/he, has her/his own agenda,, which sometimes got in, the way of her/his, receptiveness and, responsiveness to my, needs; she/he definitely, loved me but didn't always, show it in the best way., , Anxious/ambivalent, attachment—An, insecure infant-caregiver, bond, characterized by, strong separation protest, and a tendency of the, child to resist contact, initiated by the, caregiver, particularly, after a separation., , Anxious/ambivalent—, I find that others are, reluctant to get as close, as I would like. I often, worry that my partner, doesn’t really love me or, won't want to stay with, me. I want to merge, completely with another, person, and this desire, sometimes scares people, away., , ments, while a cold/rejecting style is associated with, avoidant attachments. An ambivalent/inconsistent style, seems to result in anxious-ambivalent attachments., Adult attachment. What do these attachment styles, look like in adulthood? To answer this question, we’ll, summarize the findings of a number of studies (Mickelson, Kessler, & Shaver, 1997; Shaver & Hazan, 1993)., You can also see capsule summaries of adult attachment, styles in Figure 8.12., ■ Secure adults (55 percent). These people trust others, find it easy to get close to them, and are comfortable with mutual dependence. They rarely worry about, being abandoned by their partner. Secure adults have, the longest-lasting relationships and the fewest di-, , Adult attachment style, , vorces. They describe their parents as behaving warmly, toward them and toward each other., ■ Avoidant adults (25 percent). These individuals, both fear and feel uncomfortable about getting close, to others. They are reluctant to trust others and prefer, to maintain emotional distance from others. They have, the lowest incidence of positive relationship experiences, of the three groups. Avoidant adults describe their parents as less warm than secure adults do and see their, mothers as cold and rejecting., ■ Anxious-ambivalent or preoccupied adults (20 percent). These adults are obsessive and preoccupied with, their relationships. They want more relationship closeness than their partners do and suffer extreme feelings, of jealousy, based on fears of abandonment. Their relationships have the shortest duration of the three, , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 253

Page 291 :
groups. Ambivalent adults describe their relationship, with their parents as less warm than secure adults do, and feel that their parents had unhappy marriages., Cross-cultural studies in Australia and Israel have, confirmed that people are distributed across the three, styles with similar percentages in those countries (Feeney, & Noller, 1990; Mikulincer, Florian, & Tolmacz, 1990)., Also, males and females are distributed similarly across, the three styles, and the proportions of gay men and lesbians in the different attachment styles match those of, straight men and women (Ridge & Feeney, 1998)., Expanding on earlier work, Kim Bartholomew (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) developed a four-category, model of adult attachment styles. Her model stems, from Bowlby’s (1980) idea that individuals form abstract images about both the self and others, based on, interactions with the primary caregiver. According to, Bartholomew, people develop perceptions (positive or, negative) of their own self-worth as well as perceptions, (positive or negative) of others’ trustworthiness and, reliability. Depending on where people fall on these two, dimensions, Bartholomew classifies them into one of, four attachment styles: secure, preoccupied (anxiousambivalent), fearful, or dismissing (see Figure 8.13). The, main difference between the Bartholomew and the, Hazan/Shaver models is that Bartholomew’s delineates, two avoidant attachment styles. Individuals of both, types avoid close relationships to protect themselves, against disappointment; however, fearful avoidants have, , Image of others, Positive, Negative, , Image of self, , •, , Positive, , Negative, , Secure, Comfortable, with intimacy, and autonomy, , Preoccupied, Preoccupied with, relationship, , Dismissing, Dismissing of, intimacy, Counter-dependent, , Fearful, Fearful of intimacy, Socially avoidant, , FIG U R E 8.13, , Bartholomew’s model of adult attachment. Drawing on Bowlby’s, (1980) pioneering work on attachment, Bartholomew conceptualizes adult attachment as rooted in abstract images of oneself (as, worthy of love and support or not) and of others (as trustworthy, and available versus unreliable and rejecting). Adults’ self-views, and views of others are assessed with a structured interview., Based on their responses, people are categorized into one of four, attachment styles. (Adapted from Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991), , 254, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , WE B LI N K 8.4, , Phillip R. Shaver’s Homepage, Phillip Shaver of the University of California–Davis has, done pioneering research on adult attachment and its relationship to romantic relationships. His homepage provides, a link to his Adult Attachment Lab, where visitors can view, early and current work in the lab as well as links to other, relevant sites., , negative self-views, whereas dismissing avoidants have, positive self-views. While those in the former group, need others to bolster self-validation, those in the latter, group do not. The dismissing avoidant style emerged in, Bartholomew’s research but not in Hazan and Shaver’s, because of differences in the methodology used to classify subjects: Bartholomew uses a structured interview;, Hazan and Shaver used a self-report measure. Bartholomew’s four-category model has generally been supported by research (Brennan, Clark & Shaver, 1998;, Collins & Feeney, 2004)., Correlates of attachment styles. The idea of adult, attachment styles has triggered an avalanche of research., Among other findings, studies consistently show that, securely attached individuals have more committed, satisfying, interdependent, and well-adjusted relationships, compared to people with either anxious-ambivalent or, avoidant attachment styles (Feeney, 1999; Mikulincer &, Shaver, 2003). Studies have also found that an anxiousambivalent style is associated with not being in a relationship and with being in relationships of shorter duration, and that an avoidant style is associated with, shorter relationships (Shaver & Brennan, 1992)., Hoping to shed light on the connection between, attachment style and relationship health, researchers, have observed interactions between couples subjected, to stress (Feeney, 2004). The findings generally support, attachment theory predictions. That is, securely attached, individuals both seek out and provide support under, stress. By contrast, avoidant people withdraw from their, partners and may become angry either when they are, asked for support or don’t receive the support they want., Anxious individuals become fearful and sometimes exhibit hostility. Thus, attachment style may play a role, in whether relationship conflicts facilitate intimacy or, worsen distress (Pietromonaco, Greenwood, & Barrett,, 2004)., Individuals in the two insecure attachment styles, are more vulnerable to a number of problems and symptoms, including low self-esteem, low self-confidence,, self-consciousness, anger, resentment, anxiety, loneliness, and depression (Cooper et al., 2004; Mikulincer

Page 292 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Social Support and Stress, Immediately after the events of September 11, 2001,, anxious Americans sought to contact and be near their, family and friends. People at work called their family, members; parents went to schools to collect their children; college students went home. In the anxious moments and hours of that terrifying time, people wanted, to be with other people, especially those to whom they, felt close., Of course, other frightening life stresses exist besides fearing and dealing with terrorist attacks. Natural, disasters such as tornadoes and hurricanes as well as, life-threatening accidents and illnesses come to mind., Death, divorce, and romantic breakups are also difficult, to deal with. Regardless of the type of traumatizing, event, social support seems to serve as a protective, buffer, as we noted in Chapter 3 (Uchino, Cacioppo, &, Keicolt-Glaser, 1996; Wills & Fegan, 2001). For example,, the survivors of Hurricanes Hugo and Andrew who best, coped with the disasters were those who felt that they, had the most social support (Norris & Kaniasty, 1996)., Another example of the importance of social support, comes from a study of breast cancer patients (Spiegel, et al., 1989). Women with advanced breast cancer were, randomly assigned to a social support or control condition. Those in the social support condition met weekly, for 90 minutes with other patients and doctors to discuss their problems and fears; those in the control, group had no access to this support system. Those in, , & Shaver, 2003). Attachment patterns may exert influence beyond romantic relationships. For instance, correlations have been found between attachment styles, and friendships (Weimer, Kerns, & Oldenburg, 2004),, gender roles (Steiner-Pappalardo & Gurung, 2002), religious beliefs (Kirkpatrick, 1998), and job satisfaction, (Schirmer & Lopez, 2001)., Matching of attachment styles. Does the “likes attract” principle extend to attachment styles? Bolstering the argument for similarity, there is evidence that, people with a secure attachment style are more likely to, have securely attached partners (Collins & Read, 1990;, , the social support condition showed improved moods, and reduced fears, and, amazingly, they also lived an, average of 18 months longer than did those in the nosupport condition!, Social support also helps with everyday adjustment., Those who have a network of close relationships are happier and more satisfied with life than those who have, fewer social connections (Diener et al., 1999). One study, showed that those who have strong social support during, final exams had a stronger immune response than those, with weak social support (Jemmott & Magloire, 1988)., Also, those with close social ties have better physical, health and are less likely to die early (Cohen et al., 2002;, Uchino et al., 1996)., Why is social support beneficial in times of stress?, Although researchers are still working out definitive, answers to this question, a number of factors are likely, to come into play. At the cognitive level, sharing a, stressful event with others helps individuals interpret, the event as less monumental than if they had to face, it on their own. Emotional support in the form of sympathy and reassurance also figures in. And social support, may also reduce the physiological impact of stress., In these stressful times, individuals’ connections, to their families, friends, lovers, mates, and co-workers, form a life-sustaining web of interconnectedness. There, is much truth in the Beatles lyrics, “I get by with a little, help from my friends” (and other supportive people)., , Feeney, 1994). On the other side, avoidant and ambivalent individuals are often paired with each other, but not, with their mirror images (Collins & Read, 1990; Kirkpatrick & Davis, 1994). To date, it isn’t clear whether, these pairing patterns are present at the start of relationships or whether one or both individuals change their, styles over time. Longitudinal studies are needed to sort, this out. Approaching this issue in a different way, researchers have asked individuals about their preferred, attachment style in a hypothetical partner. Here, all attachment groups rate securely attached individuals the, highest (Chappell & Davis, 1998). For now, the evidence, for similarity in attachment styles is mixed., , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 255

Page 293 :
RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , 26–64 years) in short-term psychotherapy shifted from, an insecure to a secure attachment style (Travis et al.,, 2001). Thus, psychotherapy may be a helpful option, for those with attachment difficulties., , The Course of Romantic Love, , Pamela Regan, a social psychologist and respected, researcher on interpersonal relationships, has put together a highly readable primer on love, sex, and marriage. Although designed as a supplemental textbook,, the book’s informal writing style makes it an informative, read for anyone interested in relationships. The first, three sections address relevant theories and empirical, research on love, sex, and marriage. A fourth section, looks at individual differences in relationship orientation: gender, personality, and interpersonal beliefs (attachment style, rejection sensitivity, and romanticism)., The Mating Game includes a number of relevant scales, along with their scoring information. Unfortunately,, Regan has not provided norms by which to interpret, one’s scores, making the scales less useful than they, could be. Readers can obtain the norms by reading the, articles in which the scales were originally published,, and Regan has provided the citations for these articles., Cover copyright © 2003 by Sage Publications. Reproduced by permission of Sage, Publications, Inc., , Stability of attachment styles. A number of studies, have demonstrated that adult attachment styles parallel those in infancy (Shaver & Hazan, 1993). This pattern suggests that early bonding experiences do produce, relatively enduring relationship styles. However, to, conclude that an actual causal link exists between infant and adult attachment styles, we need longitudinal, evidence. A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies concluded that attachment styles are moderately stable over, the first 19 years of life (Fraley, 2002). Across adulthood, style stability appears to increase to some degree, (Fraley & Brumbaugh, 2004). Despite the relative stability of attachment styles, they are not set in stone. In, childhood, changes from secure to insecure attachment, are typically related to negative life events (divorce or, death of parents, parental substance abuse, maltreatment) (Waters et al., 2000; Weinfield, Sroufe, & Egeland, 2000). Experiences later in life may also lead to, style changes (Baldwin & Fehr, 1995; Lopez & Gormley, 2002). One study reported that about 30 percent, of individuals had changed their attachment style over, a period of four years (Kirkpatrick & Hazan, 1994). In, another, a significant number of individuals (aged, , 256, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Most people find being in love exhilarating and wish, the experience could last forever. Must passion fade? Regrettably, the answer to this question seems to be “yes.”, Consistent with this view, Sternberg’s (1986) theory, holds that passion peaks early in a relationship and, then declines in intensity. In contrast, both intimacy, and commitment increase as time progresses, although, they develop at different rates (see Figure 8.14). Research supports the idea that the intense attraction, and arousal one feels for a lover does tend to subside, over time (Sprecher & Regan, 1998; Lemieux & Hale,, 2002)., Why does passion fade? It seems that three factors, kick into high gear early, then fade in the stretch: fantasy,, novelty, and arousal (Brehm et al., 2002). At first, love is, “blind,” so individuals usually develop a fantasy picture, of their lover (often a projection of their own needs)., However, as time passes, the intrusion of reality undermines this idealized view. Also, the novelty of a new partner fades with increased interactions and knowledge., Finally, people can’t exist in a state of heightened physical arousal forever., Might the loss of passion be a function of age? After, all, people who stay in long relationships are also older., , Commitment, , Intimacy, , Level of intensity, , The Mating Game: A Primer, on Love, Sex, and Marriage, by Pamela Regan (Sage, Publications, 2003), , Passion, , Time, , •, , F I G U R E 8. 14, , The course of love over time. According to Sternberg (1986),, the three components of love typically progress differently over, time. He theorizes that passion peaks early in a relationship and, then declines. In contrast, intimacy and commitment are thought, to build gradually.

Page 294 :
Some evidence argues against the age explanation. For, example, people who change partners and remarry show, an increase in the frequency of sex (Call, Sprecher, &, Schwartz, 1995). So, while age probably plays some, role, it isn’t the sole explanation of this phenomenon., Does the decline of passion mean the demise of a, relationship? Not necessarily. Some relationships do dissolve when early passion fades. However, many others, evolve into different, but deeply satisfying, mixtures of, passionate-companionate love. And while passion does, fade over time, it’s important not to overemphasize or, oversimplify this fact (Hatfield, 1988; Hendrick & Hendrick, 2000). Long-term relationships (and sexual feelings, as well) seem to be a complex amalgam of both, passionate and companionate love. Significantly, both, types of love are related to relationship satisfaction and, commitment (Sprecher & Regan, 1998)., , What Causes Couples to Break Up?, Women’s, reports (%), , Men’s, reports (%), , Becoming bored with relationship, , 77, , 77, , Differences in interests, , 73, , 61, , Differences in backgrounds, , 44, , 47, , Differences in intelligence, , 20, , 10, , Factors, Interactive factors, , Conflicting sexual attitudes, , 48, , 43, , Conflicting marriage ideas, , 43, , 29, , 74, , 50, , Noninteractive factors, Woman’s desire to be independent, Man’s desire to be independent, , 47, , 61, , Woman’s interest in someone else, , 40, , 31, , Man’s interest in someone else, , 18, , 29, , Why Relationships End, , Living too far apart, , 28, , 41, , The question of why some relationships last while others, end is a popular issue in relationship research. Nonetheless, the matter is complex, so easy answers have not, been forthcoming (Berscheid & Reis, 1998)., If we were to follow seriously dating couples over, several years, what proportion of them would split up, over that period? If you guessed “about 50 percent,”, you’d be right. Consider the results of three longitudinal studies (all on heterosexual couples). One study, tracked college couples who were either dating or engaged. Over a four-year period, 58 percent of them broke, up (Sprecher, 1994). A second study of couples in, “steady or serious” dating relationships reported that, 51 percent had split at the end of 3 years (Kirkpatrick,, & Davis, 1994). Similarly, the Boston Couples Study, a, longitudinal study of dating couples in the Boston area,, reported that almost half (45 percent) of the relationships had dissolved at the end of two years (Hill, Rubin,, & Peplau, 1976). A 15-year follow-up to this study reported that 32 percent of the initial dating couples had, married and that 64 percent of them had not (Peplau,, Hill, & Rubin, 1993). Among the couples who had married at some time during the study, 68 percent were still, together at the time of the follow-up., To hone in on our key question as to why some relationships stand the test of time and some don’t, let’s, take a closer look at the Boston Couples Study. Here,, 200 couples (predominantly college students) were followed over two years. To participate in the study, couples had to be “going steady” and believe that they were, in love. If couples split, researchers asked them to give, their reasons (see Figure 8.15). The results of this and, other studies (Brehm, 1992; Buss, 1989; Sprecher, 1994), suggest that four prominent factors contribute to romantic breakups:, , Pressure from woman’s parents, , 18, , 13, , Pressure from man’s parents, , 10, , 9, , •, , F I G U R E 8. 15, , Factors contributing to breakups. Couples who broke up after, dating steadily were asked why by Hill, Rubin, and Peplau (1976)., The factors commonly cited are listed here. The researchers distinguished between interactive factors, which consisted of problems that emerged out of the partners’ ways of relating to each, other, and noninteractive factors., Adapted from Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976). Breakups before marriage: The, end of 103 affairs. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147–168. Basic Books Publishing Co., Inc., Adapted by permission of the author. All rights reserved., , 1. Premature commitment. Virtually all the reasons, for breakups involved things that could only be known, after some sharing of personal information over time., Hence, it seems that many couples make romantic commitments without taking the time to get to know each, other. These individuals may find out later that they, don’t really like each other or that they have little in common. For these reasons,“whirlwind courtships” are risky., Intimacy needs to be combined with commitment if, relationships are to survive., 2. Ineffective communication and conflict management skills. The vast majority of couples have disagreements. Not surprisingly, disagreements increase, as couples learn more about each other and become, more interdependent (Buss, 1989). Poor conflict management skills are a key factor in relationship distress, and can lead to romantic breakups (Sprecher, 1994)., They are also associated with a greater likelihood of, relationship aggression (see the Chapter 9 Application, on intimate violence). As we discussed in Chapter 7,, the solution to this problem is not to stifle all disagree-, , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 257

Page 295 :
© 1988 Lynn Johnston Productions, Inc. Distributed by Universal Press Syndicate, Inc. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved., , ments, because conflict can be helpful to relationships. The key is to manage conflict constructively., 3. Becoming bored with the relationship. Couples who break up rank, “boredom with the relationship” high, on the list of reasons for splitting. As, we have noted, novelty usually fades, as people get to know each other, and, boredom can set in. Individuals have, needs for both novelty and predictability in close relationships (Sprecher,, 1994). Balancing the two can be tricky, for couples., 4. Availability of a more attractive, relationship. Whether a deteriorating, relationship actually ends depends, in, great part, on the availability of a, more attractive alternative (Felmlee,, Sprecher, & Bassin, 1990; South &, Lloyd, 1995). We all know of individuals who remained in unsatisfying, relationships only until they met a, more appealing prospect., Helping Relationships Last, , How can couples increase the likelihood that their relationships will last?, Amazingly, researchers have only recently addressed this critical question., Still, there is enough research to support a few suggestions:, 1. Take plenty of time to get to, know the other person before you make, a long-term commitment. Research, based on Sternberg’s theory found, that the best predictors of whether dating couples’ relationships would continue were their levels of intimacy, and commitment (Hendrick et al., 1988). Regarding, intimacy, we have already noted that self-disclosures, that lead individuals to feel understood, cared for, and, validated are crucial (Reis & Patrick, 1996). Other advice comes from long-married couples who were asked, why they thought their relationship had lasted (Lauer, & Lauer, 1985). The most frequently cited responses of, 351 couples who had been married for 15 years or more, were (1) friendship (“I like my spouse as a person”);, (2) commitment to the relationship (“I want the relationship to succeed”); (3) similarity in values and relationship issues (“We agree on how and how often to, show affection”); and (4) positive feelings about each, other (“My spouse has grown more interesting”). Thus,, early attention to the intimacy foundations of a relationship and ongoing, mutual efforts to build a com-, , 258, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , mitment can foster more enduring love. Figure 8.16, offers some key questions for couples to discuss before, they decide to marry or partner (in the case of gay and, lesbian couples)., 2. Emphasize the positive qualities in your partner, and relationship. It is essential to communicate more, positive feelings than negative ones to your partner., Early in a relationship, people find this easy to do, but, it gets harder as relationships continue. Once the initial glow of the relationship wears off, a common attributional error comes into play. The actor-observer effect, is the tendency to attribute one’s own behavior to situational factors and the behavior of others to personal factors. This tendency can set up the destructive, habit of chronically blaming the other person for problems and not taking responsibility when one should., Ironically, married couples generally make more negative and fewer positive statements to their spouse than

Page 296 :
1. What are our separate professional goals in terms of positions or jobs desired? One year from now? Five years?, Fifteen years?, 2. How do we decide to spend our money? Is there an, amount ($50? $500? $5,000?) over which we need to, discuss a purchase before committing to it?, 3. Who is responsible for grocery shopping, cooking, and, other tasks connected with meals? Do we eat out? A lot?, A little?, 4. Am I comfortable giving and receiving love, sexually? In, sex, does my partner feel my love for him or her?, 5. Who will take care of our child if we both work? How, does each partner feel about day care?, , •, , F I G U R E 8.16, , Key questions for dating couples to discuss before deciding to, marry. To increase their chances for satisfying and long-lasting, marriages and partnerships, experts advise dating couples to get, to know each other well. Author Susan Piver (2000) has developed a list of 100 essential questions for couples to discuss, before they make long-term commitments. The questions cover, home, money, work, sex, health and food, family, children, community and friends, and spiritual life. Here is a sample of five, questions to consider., Piver, S. (2000). The hard questions: 100 essential questions to ask before you say “I do.”, New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam., , each other. But, too much predictability can translate, into loss of interest and, possibly, boredom. One way, “to keep the bloom on the rose” is to engage in novel, activities together (Aron et al., 2000; Baumeister &, Bratslavsky, 1999). For example, one study reported, that couples who participated in exciting activities together (versus just spending time together) showed increases in relationship satisfaction over a 10-week period (Reissman, Aron, & Bergen, 1993)., 4. Develop effective conflict management skills. Conflicts arise in all relationships, so it’s important to handle them well. For one thing, it’s helpful to distinguish, between minor annoyances and significant problems., You need to learn to see minor irritations in perspective, and recognize how little they matter. With big problems, however, it’s usually best to avoid the temptation, to sweep them under the rug in the hope that they’ll, disappear. Important issues rarely disappear on their, own, and if you postpone the inevitable discussion, the, “sweepings” will have accumulated, making it harder, to sort out the various issues. An interaction pattern, common to dissatisfied couples is “demand-withdraw”, (Roberts & Krokoff, 1990). Typically, this pattern involves the woman pressing the man to discuss a relationship problem and the man avoiding or withdrawing from the interaction. This pattern is associated, with the “closeness versus separateness dilemma,” in, which one partner wants more intimacy and closeness, and the other wants more privacy and independence, (Christensen & Heavey, 1990). For more specific suggestions on handling conflict, refer to our discussion, in Chapter 7., , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , © Ronnie Kaufman/Corbis, , to strangers, and we presume this situation holds for, those in other types of committed relationships as well, (Koren, Carlton, & Shaw, 1980; Miller, 1991). This tendency is more prevalent among distressed than among, nondistressed couples (Bradbury & Fincham, 1990;, Gottman, 1993). Unfortunately, when one partner engages in this behavior, the other usually responds in, kind, which can set in motion a pattern of reciprocal, negativity that makes things, worse. Hence, as the old, song advises, it helps to “accentuate the positive and, eliminate the negative.”, Similarly, married couples, who seek and grant forgiveness have better chances for, longer and more satisfying, relationships than those, who avoid each other or retaliate in kind for a partner’s negative behavior, (Fincham, 2003)., 3. Find ways to bring, novelty to long-term relationships. As romantic partners, learn more about each, other and develop feelings, of intimacy, they also beEngaging in novel activities together, like traveling to interesting destinations, contributes to long-term relationship satisfaction., come more predictable to, , 259

Page 297 :
Overcoming Loneliness, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , Describe various types of loneliness., Discuss the prevalence of loneliness., Explain how early experiences and current social trends, contribute to loneliness., , Answer the following “true” or “false.”, ___ 1. Adolescents and young adults are the loneliest, age group., ___ 2. Many people who are lonely are also shy., ___ 3. The seeds of loneliness are often sown early in, life., ___ 4. Effective social skills can be learned relatively, easily., All of the above are true, as you’ll learn shortly. But, first, we want to make a couple of points. For one thing,, being alone doesn’t necessarily trigger loneliness. In, these fast-paced times, solitude can provide needed, down time to recharge your batteries. Also, people need, time alone to deepen self-understanding, wrestle with, decisions, and contemplate important life issues. Second, people can feel lonely even when surrounded by, others (at a party or concert, for instance). Similarly,, , ■, , ■, , Describe how shyness, poor social skills, and self-defeating, attributions contribute to loneliness., Summarize the suggestions for conquering loneliness., , it’s possible to have a large social network but not feel, close to anyone in particular., , The Nature, of Loneliness, Loneliness occurs when a person has fewer interpersonal relationships than desired or when these relationships are not as satisfying as desired. Of course,, people vary in their needs for social connections. Thus,, if you’re not distressed by the quantity or quality of, your social and emotional ties, you wouldn’t be considered lonely., We can think about loneliness in several ways. One, approach is to look at the type of relationship deficit, involved (Weiss, 1973). Emotional loneliness stems from, the absence of an intimate attachment figure. For a, child, this figure is typically a parent; for an adult, it is, , © Michael Newman/PhotoEdit, , Contrary to stereotypes,, adolescents and young, adults are more likely to, feel lonely than people, from older age groups., , 260, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm

Page 298 :
usually a spouse or partner or an intimate friend. Social loneliness results from the lack of a friendship network (typically provided in school and work settings, and in community groups). For example, a married, couple who move to a new city will experience social, loneliness until they make new social connections; however, because they have each other, they should not experience emotional loneliness. On the other hand, a, recently divorced person will probably feel emotional, loneliness but should not experience social loneliness,, assuming that work and friendship networks remain, intact (which is not always the case)., Emotional loneliness seems to be tied to the absence of a romantic partner in both college students and, senior adults (Green et al., 2001). Social loneliness, however, seems to spring from different roots, depending, on age. In college students, it’s the quantity of friendship contacts that counts; among the older group, it’s, the quality of contacts. It’s also worth noting that social, support can’t compensate for emotional loneliness—, for example, the presence of friends and family cannot, substitute for a loved one who has died (Stroebe et al.,, 1996). Of course, this is not to say that social support is, unimportant. The point is that different types of loneliness require different responses; therefore, you need, to pinpoint the exact nature of your social deficits to, cope effectively with loneliness., A second way to look at loneliness is in terms of its, duration (Young, 1982). Transient loneliness involves, brief and sporadic feelings of loneliness, which many, people may experience even when their social lives are, reasonably adequate. Transitional loneliness occurs when, people who have had satisfying social relationships in, the past become lonely after experiencing a disruption, in their social network (the death of a loved one, say,, or divorce or moving to a new locale). Chronic loneliness is a condition that affects people who have been, unable to develop a satisfactory interpersonal network, over a period of years. We’ll focus on chronic loneliness for the most part., , many assume that the loneliest age group is the elderly,, this “distinction” actually belongs to adolescents and, young adults (Rubenstein & Shaver, 1982). Gay and, lesbian adolescents are particularly likely to be lonely, (Westefeld et al., 2001). Another vulnerable group is, beginning college students. One study reported that, 75 percent of those in this group experienced loneliness, in their first few weeks on campus (Cutrona, 1982). It, is likely that frequent changes of schools, jobs, and relationships during adolescence and young adulthood, all contribute to the high rates of loneliness for this age, group. A second unexpected finding is that loneliness, decreases with age, at least until the much later years, of adulthood when one’s friends begin to die (Rubenstein & Shaver, 1982)., In line with expectations, single, divorced, and widowed adults are lonelier than their married or cohabiting counterparts (deJong-Gierveld, 1986; Stroebe et, al., 1996), although some married people do feel lonely, (Stack, 1998). Also, individuals whose parents have been, divorced report feeling more lonely than those from, intact families (Rubenstein & Shaver, 1982). Moreover,, the earlier in their lives the divorce occurred, the stronger, , How many people are tormented by loneliness? Although we don’t have a precise answer to this question,, anecdotal evidence suggests that the number of people, plagued by loneliness is substantial. Telephone hotlines, for troubled people report that complaints of loneliness dominate their calls. No doubt some of the popularity of cell phone calls, instant messaging, and chat, rooms can be traced to loneliness., The prevalence of loneliness in specific age groups, actually contradicts stereotypes. For example, although, , © AP/Wide World Photos, , Prevalence, of Loneliness, , Thanks to automation and online technology people today are, able to take care of many of life’s necessities without interacting with other human beings. These reduced opportunities for, social interaction help to fuel increased loneliness., , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 261

Page 299 :
the feelings of loneliness experienced in adulthood. In, contrast, no differences in loneliness were noted between individuals who had lost a parent through death, and those from intact families., In keeping with gender differences in friendship, patterns, college women are more apt to be lonely if they, lack a close friend to confide in; college men experience more loneliness if they lack a group of friends to, interact with (Cutrona, 1982). Women are found to be, lonelier than men, but only on measures that use words, such as “lonely” or “loneliness” (Borys & Perlman, 1985)., Thus, it is likely that there is no actual gender difference, but rather a reluctance by men to admit to feeling lonely., , The Roots, of Loneliness, Any event that ruptures the social fabric of a person’s, life may lead to loneliness, so no one is immune. We’ll, consider the roles of early experiences and social trends., , Social Trends, , Some social commentators and psychologists are concerned about recent trends that seem to be undermining social connections in our culture (Kraut et al., 1998;, Putnam, 1996). Single working mothers and fathers, may be so pressed for time that they have little time to, cultivate adult relationships. Because of busy schedules, face-to-face interactions at home are reduced as, family members eat on the run, on their own, or in front, of the TV. And the fact that people watch television so, much tends to diminish meaningful family conversation. While technology makes life easier in some respects and does provide opportunities for meaningful, relationships, it has its down sides. For example, superficial social interactions become prevalent as people, order their meals and do their banking at drive-up windows, purchase their groceries via automated checkout stations, and so forth. Finally, people are spending, more time alone at computers in their offices and homes,, reducing opportunities for face-to-face interactions., , Early Experiences, , The seeds for chronic loneliness are likely sown early, in life. A key problem seems to be early negative social, behavior that leads to rejection by peers (Asher & Paquette, 2003). Children who are aggressive or withdrawn, are likely to suffer peer rejection even in preschool (Ray, et al., 1997). What prompts inappropriate social behavior in young children? One factor is insecure attachment, styles. Because of difficult early parent-infant interactions, children often develop social behaviors (aggression, aloofness, competitiveness, overdependence) that, “invite” rejection by adults and peers (Bartholomew,, 1990; Duggan & Brennan, 1994). You can see how a vicious cycle gets set up. A child’s inappropriate behavior prompts rejection by others, which in turn triggers, negative expectations about social interactions in the, child, along with more negative behavior, and so on., To help break this self-defeating cycle (and head off, the loneliness that can result), it is crucial to help children learn appropriate social skills early in life., Without intervention, insecurely attached children, can grow into insecurely attached adults. And insecure, attachment is correlated with loneliness in adulthood., Using the three-style model of attachment, anxiousambivalent adults score the highest on loneliness,, avoidant individuals score the next highest, and securely attached individuals score the lowest (Hazan &, Shaver, 1987; Larose & Bernier, 2001). The high scores, of the anxious-ambivalent group are in line with other, research showing that these individuals want more intense and close relationships than they typically find., Good social skills are related to the lower loneliness, scores of the “secures” (diTommaso et al., 2003)., , 262, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , Shyness, by Philip G. Zimbardo, (Addison Wesley, 1977, 1990), Zimbardo, a noted social psychologist, focuses his keen, insight on the frustrations of being shy. A lack of jargon and ample use of actual case histories make this, book highly readable. In Part I, Zimbardo explores the, roots of shyness. Here he discusses various types of, shyness and how shyness affects people, especially, their social and intimate relationships. He also examines the origins of shyness and how family and school, experiences can breed shyness. In Part II, Zimbardo, turns to the practical question of how to cope with, various types of shyness. Dealing with some forms of, shyness requires examining and changing one’s thinking about shyness and oneself. Other types require, changes in behavior, especially social skills. The book, includes numerous exercises and lots of sound advice, to help readers implement the changes they need to, make. For parents, teachers, and friends of shy individuals, Zimbardo includes a chapter on helping others, to overcome their shyness., Cover image reprinted by permission of Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., and Bart Goldman.

Page 300 :
Correlates, of Loneliness, For people who are chronically lonely, painful feelings, are a fact of life. Three factors that figure prominently, in chronic loneliness are shyness, poor social skills, and, a self-defeating attributional style. Of course, the link, between these factors and loneliness could go either, way. Feeling lonely might cause you to make negative, attributions about others, but making negative attributions can also lead to loneliness., , relatively inhibited and unassertive, speaking less than, nonlonely people. They also seem to disclose less about, themselves than those who are not lonely. This (often, unconscious) tendency has the effect of keeping people, at an emotional distance and limits interactions to a, relatively superficial level. These interactional problems are based, in part, on heightened fears of rejection (Jackson et al., 2002). It seems that people with, “rejection anxiety” believe that their signaled interest, is obvious to others when it is not (Vorauer et al.,, 2003). Thus, unaware that their signal was invisible,, , Shyness, , Shyness is commonly associated with loneliness (Jackson et al., 2002). Shyness refers to discomfort, inhibition, and excessive caution in interpersonal relations., Specifically, shy people tend to (1) be timid about expressing themselves, (2) be overly self-conscious about, how others are reacting to them, (3) embarrass easily,, and (4) experience physiological symptoms of their, anxiety, such as a racing pulse, blushing, or an upset, stomach. In pioneering research on shyness, Philip, Zimbardo (1977, 1990) and his associates report that, 60 percent of shy people indicated that their shyness, was situationally specific. That is, their shyness is triggered only in certain social contexts, such as asking, someone for help or interacting with a large group of, people (see Figure 8.17)., , “What Makes You Shy?”, Percentage of, shy students, Other people, , Poor Social Skills, , The Shyness Homepage, The Shyness Institute (Portola Valley, CA) offers a “gathering of network resources for people seeking information, and services for shyness.” The Institute is co-directed by, psychologists Lynne Henderson and Philip Zimbardo., , 70, , Opposite sex, , 64, , Authorities by virtue of their knowledge, , 55, , Authorities by virtue of their role, , 40, , Relatives, , 21, , Elderly people, , 12, , Friends, , 11, , Children, , 10, , Parents, , 8, , Situations, , Studies have also found that lonely people evaluate, others negatively (Duck, Pond, & Leatham, 1995; Wittenberg & Reis, 1986), although this is not always the, case (Christensen & Kashy, 1998). Either way, people, who suffer from chronic loneliness typically have casual, acquaintances rather than close friends, and they date, infrequently (Bell, 1991). They spend much of their, time in solitary activities such as listening to music or, reading (Rubenstein & Shaver, 1982)., Often, these individuals are adults who were unable to break out of self-defeating patterns of social behavior developed early in life. A common finding is that, lonely people show lower responsiveness to their conversational partners and are more self-focused (Rook,, 1998). Similarly, researchers report that lonely people are, , WE B LI N K 8.5, , Strangers, , •, , Where I am focus of attention—large group, (as when giving a speech), , 73, , Large groups, , 68, , Of lower status, , 56, , Social situations in general, , 55, , New situations in general, , 55, , Requiring assertiveness, , 54, , Where I am being evaluated, , 53, , Where I am focus of attention—small group, , 52, , Small social groups, , 48, , One-to-one different-sex interactions, , 48, , Of vulnerability (need help), , 48, , Small task-oriented groups, , 28, , One-to-one same-sex interactions, , 14, , F I G U R E 8. 17, , The situational determinants of shyness. Zimbardo (1977), asked subjects about the people and circumstances that made, them feel shy. The results of his survey showed that shyness, depends to a large degree on situational factors., From Zimbardo, P. (1977). Shyness: What is it, what to do about it. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley Copyright © 1977 by Philip Zimbardo, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Perseus Books, Publishers, a member of Perseus Books, L.L.C., , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 263

Page 301 :
those with rejection anxiety may perceive rejection, where none exists., Self-Defeating Attributional Style, , It’s easy to see how repeated rejections can foster negative expectations about social interactions. Thus, lonely, people are prone to irrational thinking about their social skills, the probability of their achieving intimacy,, the likelihood of being rejected, and so forth. Unfortunately, once people develop these negative ideas, they, often behave in ways to confirm their expectations, setting up a vicious cycle of behavior., Jeffrey Young (1982) points out that lonely people, engage in negative self-talk that prevents them from, pursuing intimacy in an active and positive manner. He, has identified some clusters of ideas that foster loneliness. Figure 8.18 gives examples of typical thoughts from, six of these clusters of cognitions and the overt behaviors that result. As you can see, several of the cognitions, in Figure 8.18 are stable, internal self-attributions. This, tendency to attribute loneliness to stable, internal causes, constitutes a self-defeating attributional style (Anderson et al., 1994). In other words, lonely people tell themselves that they’re lonely because they’re basically unlovable individuals. Not only is this a devastating belief, it, is also self-defeating because it offers no way to change, the situation. Happily, it is possible to reduce loneliness,, as you’ll see., , Conquering Loneliness, The personal consequences associated with chronic, loneliness can be painful and sometimes overwhelming: low self-esteem, hostility, depression, alcoholism,, psychosomatic illness, and, possibly, suicide (McWhirter,, , •, , FIG U R E 8.18, , Clusters of Cognitions Typical of Lonely People, , Patterns of thinking underlying loneliness. According, to Young (1982), negative, self-talk contributes to loneliness. Six clusters of irrational thoughts are illustrated here. Each cluster of, cognitions leads to certain, patterns of behavior (right), that promote loneliness., From a paper presented at the annual, convention of the American Psychological, Association, 9/2/79. An expanded version, of this paper appears in G. Emery, S. D., Hollan, & R. C. Bedrosian (Eds.). (1981)., New directions in cognitive therapy. New, York: Guilford Press and in L. A. Peplau &, D. Perlman (Eds.). (1982). Loneliness: A, sourcebook of current theory, research and, therapy. New York: Wiley. Copyright © 1982, by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and Jeffrey, Young., , 264, , PART 2, , 1990). Chronic loneliness is also a predictor of a number of diseases, including cardiovascular disease and, cancer (Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2003). Although there are, no simple solutions to loneliness, there are some effective ones. Let’s look at four useful strategies., One option is to use the Internet to overcome loneliness, although this approach can be a two-edged sword, (McKenna & Bargh, 2000). On the plus side, the Internet is an obvious boon to busy people, those with stigmatized social identities, and those who find physical, mobility difficult (the infirm and people with serious, medical conditions). Moreover, shy people can interact without the anxiety involved in face-to-face communication. On the other hand, if lonely people spend, a lot of time online, will they devote less time to faceto-face relationships? Will shy individuals develop the, self-confidence to pursue relationships offline? Internet, use in the general population is associated with generally positive effects (Bargh & McKenna, 2004). Among, lonely persons, Internet use is also associated with benefits such as reduced loneliness, improved perceived, social support, and formation of online friendships, (Shaw, & Gant, 2002; Morahan-Martin & Schumacher,, 2003). Still, one study found that lonely individuals, more often reported that Internet use caused disturbances in their daily functioning (Morahan-Martin &, Schumacher, 2003), raising concerns about Internet, addiction (Nalwa & Anand, 2003). Research on these, questions is in its infancy, so answers must await further research., A second suggestion is to avoid the temptation to, withdraw from social situations. A study that asked people what they did when they felt lonely found the top, responses to be “read” and “listen to music” (Rubenstein, & Shaver, 1982). If used occasionally, reading and lis-, , Clusters, , Cognitions, , Behaviors, , A, , 1. I’m undesirable., 2. I’m dull and boring., , Avoidance of friendship, , B, , 1. I can’t communicate with other people., 2. My thoughts and feelings are bottled up inside., , Low self-disclosure, , C, , 1. I’m not a good lover in bed., 2. I can’t relax, be spontaneous, and enjoy sex., , Avoidance of sexual, relationships, , D, , 1. I can’t seem to get what I want from this relationship., 2. I can’t say how I feel, or he/she might leave me., , Lack of assertiveness in, relationships, , E, , 1. I won’t risk being hurt again., 2. I’d screw up any relationship., , Avoidance of potentially, intimate relationships, , F, , 1. I don’t know how to act in this situation., 2. I’ll make a fool of myself., , Avoidance of other people, , The Interpersonal Realm

Page 302 :
Internal-external dimension, , tening to music can be constructive ways of, Stability dimension, dealing with loneliness. However, as longStable cause, Unstable cause, term strategies, they do nothing to help a, (permanent), (temporary), lonely person acquire new “real-world”, I’m lonely now, but won’t, I’m lonely because, friends. This situation may be a particular, Internal be for long. I need to get, I’m unlovable. I’ll never, problem for those with an avoidant attachcause, out and meet some new, be worth loving., ment style. The importance of staying active, people., socially cannot be overemphasized. Recall, that proximity is a powerful factor in the deThe people here are, My lover and I just split, cold and unfriendly., up. I guess some, velopment of close relationships. To make, External, It’s time to look for a, relationships work and, friends, you have to be around people., cause, new job., some don’t. Maybe I’ll be, A third strategy is to break out of the, luckier next time., habit of the self-defeating attributional style, we just discussed (“I’m lonely because I’m, unlovable”). Recall from Chapter 5 that, there are other attributions a lonely person, F I G U R E 8. 19, could make and that these alternative explaAttributions and loneliness. Lonely people often have a self-defeating attribunations point to solutions (see Figure 8.19)., tional style, in which they attribute their loneliness to stable, internal causes (see, If a person says, “My conversational skills are, upper right quadrant). Learning to make alternative attributions (see other quadweak” (unstable, internal cause), the solurants) can bring to light ways to deal with loneliness and facilitate active coping., tion would be: “I’ll try to find out how to imBased on Shaver, P., & Rubenstein, C. (1980). Childhood attachment experience and adult loneliness. In L. Wheeler, (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol.1, pp. 42–73). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications., prove them.” Or, if someone thinks, “It always takes time to meet people when you, move to a new location” (unstable, external cause), this, and shyness usually involves work on two fronts. First,, attribution suggests the solution of trying harder to, counselors help people improve social skills through, develop new relationships and giving them time to, social skills training. (This approach can be used with, work. The attribution “I’ve really searched, but I just, socially isolated children, as well.) In this program, incan’t find enough compatible people at my workplace”, dividuals learn and practice the skills involved in initi(stable, external cause) may lead to the decision, “It’s, ating and maintaining relationships. For example, they, time to look for a new job.” As you can see, the last, might watch videotapes of socially skilled models demthree attributions lead to active modes of coping, onstrating appropriate social behavior in a variety of, rather than the passivity fostered by a self-defeating, settings. They then practice these behaviors in the, attributional style., therapist’s office. Sometimes these practice sessions are, Finally, to thwart loneliness, you need to cultivate, taped so people can actually see how they are coming, your social skills. You’ll find a wealth of information on, across. Second, counselors can use cognitive therapy, this important topic in Chapter 7 (Interpersonal Com(see Chapter 16) to help lonely and shy individuals to, munication). Lonely people, especially, should focus, break the habit of automatic negative thoughts and, on reading others’ nonverbal signals, deepening the, self-defeating attributions. Over a series of sessions,, level of their self-disclosure, engaging in active listenindividuals learn to change their negative views of theming, improving their conversational skills, and developselves (“I’m boring”) and other people (“They’re cold, ing an assertive communication style., and unfriendly”). Both of these approaches have high, If you feel overwhelmed at the prospect of tacksuccess rates, and they can pave the way to more posiling loneliness on your own, consider paying a visit to, tive social interactions that are critical to adjustment., your college counseling center. Dealing with loneliness, , •, , CHAPTER 8, , Friendship and Love, , 265

Page 303 :
■, , KEY IDEAS, Perspectives on Close Relationships, , CHAPTER 8 REVIEW, , ■, , Close relationships are those that are important, interdependent, and long-lasting. They include friendships as well as work,, family, and romantic relationships. People in individualistic cultures believe that romantic love is a prerequisite for marriage,, whereas those in collectivist cultures are accustomed to arranged, marriages., ■ The Internet offers many new vehicles for meeting others, and developing relationships. The differences between Internet, and face-to-face communication have important implications, for established psychological theories and principles of relationship development., Initial Attraction and Relationship Development, ■, , People are initially drawn to others who are nearby, who are, seen often, and who are physically attractive. Although physical, attractiveness plays a key role in initial attraction, people also, seek other desirable characteristics, such as kindness and intelligence. People often match up on looks, but sometimes men, trade status for physical attractiveness in women, and vice versa., ■ As people get acquainted, they prefer others who like them, and those who have desirable personality characteristics. Similarity is a key factor in relationship development. Couples tend, to be similar in age, race, religion, education, attitudes, and even, some personality traits., ■ Once relationships are established, people engage in various, maintenance behaviors and actions to sustain them. Interdependence (social exchange) theory uses principles of reinforcement to predict relationship satisfaction and commitment. How, individuals apply social exchange principles depends on whether, they are in exchange or communal relationships., Friendship, ■, , The key ingredients of friendship are loyalty, emotional support, and letting friends be themselves. Women’s same-gender, friendships are usually characterized by self-disclosure and intimacy, whereas men’s same-gender friendships typically involve, doing things together., , Initially, romantic love is usually characterized by passion,, but strong passion appears to fade over time for a number of, reasons. In relationships that continue, passionate love evolves, into a less intense, more mature form of love., ■ The chief causes of relationship failure are the tendency to, make premature commitments, ineffective conflict management skills, boredom with the relationship, and the availability, of a more attractive relationship. To help relationships last, couples should take the time to know each other very well, emphasize the positive qualities in their partner and relationship, engage in new activities together, and develop effective conflict, management skills., Application: Overcoming Loneliness, ■, , Loneliness involves discontent with the extent and quality of, one’s interpersonal network. A surprisingly large number of people in our society are troubled by loneliness. The age groups, most affected by loneliness contradict stereotypes., ■ The origins of chronic loneliness can often be traced to early, negative behavior that triggers rejection by peers and teachers. Social trends may also promote loneliness. Loneliness is associated, with shyness, poor social skills, and self-defeating attributions., ■ The keys to overcoming loneliness include avoiding the, temptation to withdraw from social situations, avoiding selfdefeating attributions, and working on one’s social skills., , KEY TERMS, Actor-observer effect p. 258, Attachment styles p. 252, Close relationships p. 236, Commitment p. 252, Comparison level p. 247, Comparison level for, alternatives p. 247, Heterosexism p. 250, Intimacy p. 251, Investments p. 247, Loneliness p. 260, , Matching hypothesis p. 242, Mere exposure effect p. 240, Passion p. 242, Proximity p. 239, Reciprocal liking p. 244, Relationship maintenance, p. 246, Sexual orientation p. 250, Shyness p. 263, Social exchange theory, p. 247, , Romantic Love, ■, , Research indicates that the experience of romantic love is, the same for heterosexual and homosexual individuals. Contrary to stereotypes, men may be more romantic than women., In choosing a partner, women are more selective than men., ■ Sternberg’s triangular theory of love proposes that passion,, intimacy, and commitment combine into eight types of love., Hazan and Shaver theorize that love relationships follow the, form of attachments in infancy, falling into three categories: secure, avoidant, and anxious-ambivalent. Bartholomew has proposed an alternative, four-category model of adult attachment, styles. Although attachment styles show stability over time, it is, possible for them to change., , 266, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , KEY PEOPLE, David Buss pp. 243–244, Cindy Hazan and Philip, Shaver pp. 252–254, , Harold Kelley and John, Thibaut pp. 247–248, Robert Sternberg, pp. 251–252

Page 304 :
7. If a researcher fails to determine the sexual orientation, of her research participants and reports her findings, without any mention of homosexuals, her study suffers, from:, a. homosexism., b. social exchange., c. heterosexism., d. romantic bias., , The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 8.1: Social, Avoidance and Distress Scale. Personal Probe 8.1: How Do, You Relate to Friends? Personal Probe 8.2: Analyzing Your, Views of Social Connectedness., , ANSWERS, , Pages 249–250, Page 250, Page 251, Page 254, Page 264, , 6. Women’s same-gender friendships are based on ____;, men’s are based on ____., a. shopping together; hunting together, b. attending sports events; attending sports events, c. shared activities; intimacy and self-disclosure, d. intimacy and self-disclosure; shared activities, , Personal Explorations Workbook, , d, c, b, c, a, , 5. An individual’s personal standard of what constitutes, an acceptable balance of rewards and costs in a relationship is termed:, a. social exchange., b. comparison level., c. comparison level for alternatives., d. relationship satisfaction., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. The matching hypothesis suggests that people match, up on the basis of:, a. religion., b. personality., c. socioeconomic status., d. looks., , Book Companion Website, , CHAPTER 8, , Pages 236–237, Page 238, Page 240, Page 242, Page 247, , 3. The mere exposure effect refers to an increase in positive feelings due to:, a. seeing someone often., b. interacting with someone often., c. communicating via e-mail often., d. having similar attitudes., , 10. A self-defeating attributional style associated with, loneliness involves attributing loneliness to:, a. internal, stable factors., b. internal, unstable factors., c. external, stable factors., d. external, unstable factors., , Friendship and Love, , b, d, a, d, b, , 2. Which of the following is a relationship issue that, operates differently in online versus face-to-face, interactions?, a. Physical proximity, b. Physical attractiveness, c. Self-disclosure, d. All of the above, , 9. Adults who have positive views of themselves but negative views of others would be categorized in which of, the following attachment styles?, a. Secure, b. Preoccupied, c. Dismissive avoidant, d. Fearful avoidant, , 267, , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Arranged marriages are most common in:, a. individualistic cultures., b. collectivist cultures., c. unrequited cultures., d. both individualistic and collectivist cultures., , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 8. A sociocultural explanation for the finding that women, are more selective than men in choosing partners is, that women:, a. have better vision than men., b. have less economic power than men., c. are less superficial than men., d. have to compensate for being more romantic than, men.

Page 305 :
CHALLENGES TO THE TRADITIONAL, MODEL OF MARRIAGE, MOVING TOWARD MARRIAGE, The Motivation to Marry, Selecting a Mate, Predictors of Marital Success, MARITAL ADJUSTMENT ACROSS, THE FAMILY LIFE CYCLE, Between Families: The Unattached, Young Adult, Joining Together: The Newly Married, Couple, Family with Young Children, Family with Adolescent Children, Launching Children into the Adult World, The Family in Later Life, , 268, , VULNERABLE AREAS IN, MARITAL ADJUSTMENT, Gaps in Role Expectations, Work and Career Issues, Financial Difficulties, Inadequate Communication, DIVORCE, Increasing Rate of Divorce, Deciding on a Divorce, Adjusting to Divorce, Effects of Divorce on Children, Remarriage, , ALTERNATIVES TO MARRIAGE, Remaining Single, Cohabitation, Gay Relationships, APPLICATION: UNDERSTANDING, INTIMATE VIOLENCE, Date Rape, Partner Abuse, CHAPTER 9 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST

Page 306 :
CHAPTER, , Marriage, and Intimate, Relationships, , 9, , “My hands are shaky. I want to call her again but I know it is no good., She’ll only yell and scream. It makes me feel lousy. I have work to do but, I can’t do it. I can’t concentrate. I want to call people up, go see them,, but I’m afraid they’ll see that I’m shaky. I just want to talk. I can’t think, about anything besides this trouble with Nina. I think I want to cry.”—A, recently separated man quoted in Marital Separation (Weiss, 1975, p. 48), This man is describing his feelings a few days after he and his wife broke up., He is still hoping for a reconciliation. In the meantime, he feels overwhelmed, by anxiety, remorse, and depression. He feels very alone and is scared at the, prospect of remaining alone. His emotional distress is so great that he can’t, think straight or work effectively. His reaction to the loss of an intimate relationship is not all that unusual. Marital breakups are devastating for most, people—a reality that illustrates the enormous importance of intimate relationships in people’s lives., In this chapter we take a look at marriage and other intimate relationships. We discuss why people marry and how they progress toward the selection of a mate. To shed light on marital adjustment, we describe the life cycle, of the family, highlighting key vulnerable spots in marital relations. We also, address issues related to divorce, cohabitation, remaining single, and being, gay. Finally, in the Application we examine the tragic problem of violence in, intimate relationships. Let’s begin by discussing recent challenges to the traditional concept of marriage., , CHAPTER 9, , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 269

Page 307 :
Challenges to the Traditional, Model of Marriage, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , ■, , Discuss recent trends relating to the acceptance of singlehood and, cohabitation., Describe changing views on the permanence of marriage and gender, roles., Explain how increased childlessness and the decline of the nuclear, family have affected the institution of marriage., , Marriage is the legally and socially sanctioned union, of sexually intimate adults. Traditionally, the marital, relationship has included economic interdependence,, common residence, sexual fidelity, and shared responsibility for children. Although the institution of marriage remains popular, it sometimes seems to be under, assault from shifting social trends. This assault has, prompted many experts to ask whether marriage is in, serious trouble (Cherlin, 2004; Lewin, 2004). Although, it appears that the institution of marriage will weather, the storm, it’s worth looking at some of the social, trends that are shaking up the traditional model of, marriage:, 1. Increased acceptance of singlehood. An increasing proportion of the adult population under age 35 is, remaining single (Teachman, Polonko, & Scanzoni,, 1999). In part, this trend reflects longer postponement, of marriage than before. The median age at which people marry has been increasing gradually since the mid1960s, as Figure 9.1 shows. Thus, remaining single is, becoming a more acceptable lifestyle (DeFrain & Olson,, 1999). Furthermore, the negative stereotype of people, who remain single—which pictures them as lonely,, frustrated, and unchosen—is gradually evaporating., 2. Increased acceptance of cohabitation. Cohabitation is living together in a sexually intimate relationship without the legal bonds of marriage. Negative, attitudes toward couples living together have clearly, declined (Cherlin, 2004), although many people continue to disapprove of the practice (Thornton & YoungDeMarco, 2001). The prevalence of cohabitation has, increased dramatically in recent decades. Census data,, for instance, suggest that the number of couples living, together increased more than tenfold between 1970, and 2000. Moreover, cohabiting relationships increasingly include children (Smock, 2000). (Cohabitation is, discussed in further detail later in this chapter.), 3. Reduced premium on permanence. Most people, still view marriage as a permanent commitment, but, , 270, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , an increasing number of people regard divorce as justifiable if their marriage fails to foster their interests as, individuals (Bianchi & Casper, 2000). Accordingly, the, social stigma associated with divorce has lessened, and, divorce rates have risen. Some experts estimate that, roughly 50 percent of marriages ultimately end in separation or divorce (Amato, 2004a; see pp. 285–286 for, a more complete discussion of divorce rates)., 4. Transitions in gender roles. The women’s movement and economic pressures have led to substantial, changes in the gender-role expectations of many people entering marriage today (Brewster & Padavic, 2000;, Zuo & Tang, 2000). The traditional breadwinner and, homemaker roles for the husband and wife are being, discarded by many couples, as more and more married, , 27, Median age at first marriage, , ■, , 26, 25, Males, , 24, 23, 22, , Females, 21, 20, 19, 1950, , •, , 1960, , 1970, , Year, , 1980, , 1990, , 2000, , FIG U R E 9.1, , Median age at first marriage. The median age at which people, in the United States marry for the first time has been creeping, up for both males and females since the mid-1960s. This trend, indicates that more people are postponing marriage. (Data from, U.S. Bureau of the Census)

Page 308 :
50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 0, 1900, , •, , 1920, , 1940, , 1960, Year, , 1980, , 2000, Photo by NBC Studios/Getty Images, , Women over 16 in labor force (%), , 60, , F I G U R E 9.2, , Women in the workforce. The percentage of women in the, United States (over age 16) who work outside the home has, been rising steadily throughout the 20th century, although it, has leveled off in the last few years. (Data from U.S. Bureau of, Labor Statistics), , women enter the workforce (see Figure 9.2). Role expectations for husbands and wives are becoming more, varied, more flexible, and more ambiguous (Amato, et al., 2003). Many people regard this trend as a step in, the right direction. However, changing gender roles, create new potential for conflict between marital partners (McGraw & Walker, 2004)., 5. Increased voluntary childlessness. In the past two, decades, the percentage of women without children, has climbed in all age groups as an increasing number, of married couples have chosen not to have children or, to delay having children (Bulcroft & Teachman, 2004)., This trend is a result of new career opportunities for, women, the tendency to marry at a later age, and changing attitudes., 6. Decline of the traditional nuclear family. Thanks, to endless reruns of television shows like Leave It to, Beaver, Father Knows Best, Happy Days, The Brady Bunch,, and Family Ties, in the eyes of most American adults the, ideal family should consist of a husband and wife married for the first time, rearing two or more children,, with the man serving as the sole breadwinner (Coontz,, 2000). As McGraw and Walker (2004), put it, “Many, people today, both in academic settings and popular, culture, continue to idealize the image of the traditional, nuclear family—one consisting of a breadwinner father, and a homemaker mother . . . Because this ideology remains strong, a dearth of support exists for families, , CHAPTER 9, , Thanks in part to television portrayals of the family, such as, that seen on the popular Cosby Show, people cling to an idealized image of the traditional nuclear family, despite the fact, that only a small minority of American families match this, stereotype., , that do not conform to the image” (p. 177). In reality,, this image was never all that accurate, and today it is, estimated that only a small minority of American families match this ideal (Coontz, 2000). The increasing, prevalence of single-parent households, stepfamilies,, childless marriages, unwed parents, and working wives, have conspired to make the traditional nuclear family, a highly deceptive mirage that does not reflect the diversity of family structures in America., In summary, the norms that mold marital and intimate relationships have been restructured in fundamental ways in recent decades. Traditional values have, eroded as people have increasingly embraced more individualistic values (Bianchi & Casper, 2000; Popenoe,, 1993). Thus, the institution of marriage is in a period, of transition, creating new adjustment challenges for, modern couples. Support for the concept of monogamy, remains strong, but changes in the society are altering, the traditional model of marriage. The impact of these, changes can be seen throughout this chapter as we discuss various facets of married life., , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 271

Page 309 :
Moving Toward Marriage, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , Discuss several factors influencing the selection of a mate., Outline Murstein’s stage theory of mate selection., Summarize evidence on predictors of marital success., , “I’m ashamed of being single, I have to admit it. I have, grown to hate the word. The worst thing someone can say, is, ‘How come you’re still not married?’ It’s like saying,, ‘What’s wrong with you?’ I look at women who are frumpy, and physically undesirable and they’re monochromatic, and uninteresting and they don’t seem unselfish and giving and I wonder, ‘How did they become such an integral part of a man’s life that he wanted to marry them, and spend his life with them?’ I’m envious. They’re married and I date.”—A woman quoted in Tales from the, Front (Kavesh & Lavin, 1988, p. 91), This woman desperately wants to be married. The intensity of her motivation for marriage may be a bit unusual, but otherwise she is fairly typical. Like most, people, she has been socialized to believe that her life, isn’t complete until she finds a mate. Although alternatives to marriage are more viable than ever, experts, project that over 90 percent of Americans will marry at, least once. Some will do it several times! But why? What, motivates people to marry? And how do individuals, choose their partners? We’ll address these questions as, we discuss the factors that influence the movement toward marriage., , The Motivation to Marry, A great variety of motivational factors propel people, into marriage. Foremost among them is the desire to, participate in a socially sanctioned, mutually rewarding,, intimate relationship. Another key factor is the social, pressure exerted on people to marry. Getting married is, still the norm in our society. Your parents, relatives, and, friends expect you to marry eventually, and they often, make this expectation abundantly clear with their comments and inquiries., The popular view in our culture is that people marry, because they have fallen in love. Although partially accurate, this view is oversimplified. A multitude of motivational factors are involved in the decision to marry., Peter Stein (1975, 1976) interviewed single men and, women ages 22 to 45 who were judged to be neither unattractive nor socially inept. As you can see in Figure 9.3,, he learned that many forces push and pull people toward marriage or singlehood., , 272, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Selecting a Mate, Modern Western cultures are somewhat unusual in permitting free choice of one’s marital partner. Most societies rely on parental arrangements and severely restrict, the range of acceptable partners along religious and, class lines (Ingoldsby, 1995). Mate selection in American culture is a gradual process that begins with dating, and moves on to sometimes lengthy periods of courtship. In this section, we will look at the impact of endogamy, homogamy, and gender on marital choice. We’ll, also discuss Bernard Murstein’s S-V-R theory, which provides a good overview of the process of mate selection., Endogamy, , Endogamy is the tendency of people to marry within, their own social group. Research demonstrates that, people tend to marry others of the same race, religion,, ethnic background, and social class (Jepsen & Jepsen,, 2002; Kalmijn, 1998). This endogamy is promoted by, cultural norms and by the way similarity fosters interpersonal attraction (see Chapter 8). Although endogamy appears to be declining, this trend has been gradual. For example, interracial marriages have become, more common, but they only increased from 1.3 percent of marriages in 1980 to 2.4 percent in 1999 (Amato, et al., 2003)., Homogamy, , Homogamy is the tendency of people to marry others, who have similar personal characteristics. Among, other things, marital partners tend to be similar in age, and education (Jepsen & Jepsen, 2002), physical attractiveness (Feingold, 1988), attitudes and values (Kilby,, 1993), and even vulnerability to psychological disorders, (Matthews & Reus, 2001). Interestingly, homogamy is, associated with longer-lasting and more satisfying marital relations (Heaton, 2002)., Deviations from homogamy in age and education, do not tend to be symmetrical, as husbands are usually older and better educated than their wives (South,, 1991). The typical age gap is about three to four years, (Surra, 1990). Cultural norms that discourage women, from dating younger men may contribute to a “marriage squeeze” for women. Without the freedom to date, younger men, women are likely to find their pool of po-

Page 310 :
The Decision to Marry, Pushes toward marriage, , Pulls toward marriage, , Pushes toward singlehood, , Pulls toward singlehood, , Economic security, , Influence of parents, Desire for family, , Pressure from parents, , Example of peers, , Need to leave home, , Romanticization of marriage, , Interpersonal and personal, reasons, Fear of independence, Loneliness, Alternative did not seem, feasible, , Love, Physical attraction, Emotional attachment, , Restrictions, Suffocating one-to-one relationships, feeling trapped, Obstacles to self-development, Boredom, unhappiness, anger, Role playing and conformity, to expectations, , Career opportunities, , Influence from mass media, , Poor communication with mate, , Freedom to change and, experiment, , Security, social status, prestige, , Lack of friends, isolation,, loneliness, , Cultural expectations,, socialization, , Limitations on mobility and, available experience, , Regular sex, , Influence of and participation in, women’s movement, , Guilt over singlehood, , •, , Sexual frustration, , Variety of experiences, Self-sufficiency, Sexual availability, Exciting lifestyle, , Mobility, Sustaining friendships, Supportive groups, Men’s and women’s groups, Group living arrangements, Specialized groups, , F I G U R E 9.3, , The decision to marry. Stein (1975) interviewed single people ages 22 to 45 to determine the motivational factors that influence the decision to marry. Pushes toward marriage involve deficits supposedly, felt by single persons. Pushes toward singlehood involve deficits felt by married people. Pulls are positive factors associated with marriage or being single. The two lists on the left identify the factors, favoring marriage, while the two lists on the right identify those favoring singlehood. Not everyone, weighs all these factors, but this list illustrates the complexity of the decision to marry., Adapted from Stein, P. J. (1975). Singlehood: An alternative to marriage. The Family Coordinator, 24(4), 500. Copyright © 1975 by the National, Council on Family Relations. Reprinted by permission., , tential partners dwindling more rapidly than men of, similar age do., , lutionary theories, all organisms, including humans,, are motivated to enhance their chances of passing on, their genes to subsequent generations. Human females, , Research reveals that males and females exhibit both similarities and differences in what, they look for in a marital partner. Many characteristics, such as emotional stability, dependability, and a pleasant disposition, are, rated highly by both sexes (Buss et al., 2001)., However, a few crucial differences between, men’s and women’s priorities have been, found, and these differences appear to be, nearly universal across cultures. As we saw, in Chapter 8, women tend to place a higher, value than men on potential partners’ socioeconomic status, intelligence, ambition,, and financial prospects. In contrast, men consistently show more interest than women in, potential partners’ youthfulness and physical, attractiveness (Buss & Kenrick, 1998)., Most theorists explain these gender disparities in terms of evolutionary concepts, (Archer, 1996; Buss, 1996). According to evo-, , © Trujillo-Paumier/Stone/Getty Images, , Gender and Mate, Selection Preferences, , People tend to marry others who are similar in race, religion, social class, education, and other personal characteristics—a phenomenon called homogamy., , CHAPTER 9, , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 273

Page 311 :
supposedly accomplish this end not by seeking larger, or stronger partners, as in the animal kingdom, but by, seeking male partners who possess or are likely to acquire more material resources that can be invested in, children. Men, on the other hand, are assumed to maximize their reproductive outlook by seeking female, partners with good breeding potential. Thus, men are, thought to look for youth, attractiveness, good health,, and other characteristics presumed to be associated, with higher fertility. These evolutionary analyses of, gender differences in mating are speculative and there, are alternative explanations (see Chapter 8), but they, fit with the evidence quite well., , ple may marry after progressing through only the first, two stages, Murstein maintains that marriage is generally delayed until couples are comfortable with role enactments in stage 3., Murstein’s theory has been questioned on the, grounds that courtship relationships do not really evolve, through distinct stages. Critics argue that individuals in, romantic relationships acquire information about each, other’s stimulus characteristics, values, and roles continuously rather than in discrete stages (Leigh, Holman,, & Burr, 1984, 1987). Although there is some merit to, this criticism, S-V-R theory provides a useful overview, of the factors that influence whether romantic relationships progress toward marriage., , Stimulus-Value-Role Theory, , A number of theories have attempted to shed light on, the process of mate selection and the development of, premarital relationships. We’ll focus on one particularly prominent model, Bernard Murstein’s (1976, 1986), stimulus-value-role (S-V-R) theory. According to Murstein, couples generally proceed through three stages—, the stimulus, value, and role stages—as they move toward marriage., During the first stage, a person’s attraction to members of the other gender depends mainly on their stimulus value. At this point, the individual focuses on relatively superficial and easily identifiable characteristics, of the other person—especially the person’s physical, attractiveness, social status, occupational success, and, reputation. Murstein borrows from social exchange theory (see Chapter 8) and argues that progress to the next, stage depends on the pair’s having relatively similar, stimulus value, so as to produce an “even” exchange., The two persons may derive their stimulus value from, different characteristics—one from wealth, say, and, the other from beauty. However, progress to stage 2 is, thought to depend on the couple’s subjective perception that they possess similar stimulus value., If a couple makes it to the second stage, involving, value comparison, the significance of stimulus variables, may be reduced. Further progress now depends on compatibility in values. Typically, the pair will begin to explore each other’s attitudes about religion, politics, sex,, gender roles, leisure activities, and so forth. If fundamental incompatibilities are uncovered, the relationship may stall at stage 2, or it may come to an end. However, if the two persons discover similarity in values,, they are more likely to progress to stage 3., In the role stage, people begin to think about getting married. Hence, they start evaluating whether the, other person does a satisfactory job in the role of intimate companion. At this point, individuals focus on the, distribution of power in their relationship, the reliability of emotional support, and the quality of their sexual, liaison (if they have formed one). Although some peo-, , 274, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Predictors of Marital Success, Are there any factors that reliably predict marital success? A great deal of research has been devoted to this, question. This research has been plagued by one obvious problem: How do you measure “marital success”?, Some researchers have simply compared divorced and, intact couples in regard to premarital characteristics. The, problem with this strategy is that many intact couples, obviously do not have happy or successful marriages., Other researchers have used elaborate questionnaires, to measure couples’ marital satisfaction. Unfortunately,, these scales are plagued by a number of problems., Among other things, they appear to measure complacency and lack of conflict more than satisfaction (Fowers et al., 1994). Although measures of marital quality, are rather crude, some predictors of marital success have, been found. The relations are all statistically weak, but, they are intriguing nonetheless., Family background. The marital adjustment of partners is correlated with the marital satisfaction of their, parents. People whose parents were divorced are more, likely than others to experience divorce themselves, (Amato & DeBoer, 2001). For a number of reasons, marital instability appears to run in families., Age. The ages of the bride and groom are also related, to the likelihood of success. Couples who marry young, have higher divorce rates (Bramlett & Mosher, 2001), as, Figure 9.4 shows. Surprisingly, couples who marry late, also have a higher propensity to divorce. Because they, are selected from a smaller pool of potential mates, older, newlyweds are more likely to differ in age, religion, social status, and education (Bitter, 1986). Such differences, may make marriage more challenging regardless of age., Length of courtship. Longer periods of courtship, are associated with a greater probability of marital success (Cate & Lloyd, 1988). Longer courtships may allow

Page 312 :
F I G U R E 9.4, , Age at marriage and, probability of marital, disruption in the first, five years. Martin and, Bumpass (1989) estimated the likelihood of, marital disruption (either divorce or separation) within five years, for various groups. The, data summarized here, show that the probability of marital disruption, is substantially higher, among those who marry, young., , .30, Probability of marital disruption, , •, , dictors of marital success. That said, there are some traits, that show modest correlations with marital adjustment., For example, two negative predictors of marital success are perfectionism (Haring, Hewitt, & Flett, 2003), and insecurity (Crowell, Treboux, & Waters, 2002). In, terms of the Big Five personality traits, there is evidence, for a negative association between neuroticism and, marital adjustment, and some preliminary evidence, suggestive of a weak positive association between marital adjustment and both agreeableness and conscientiousness (Bouchard, Lussier, & Sabourin, 1999)., , .25, .20, .15, .10, , Premarital interaction. As you might expect, the degree to which couples get along well during their courtship is predictive of their marital adjustment. Premarital satisfaction is positively correlated with subsequent, marital satisfaction. The quality of premarital communication appears especially crucial. For example, the, more that prospective mates are negative, sarcastic, insulting and unsupportive during courtship, the greater, the likelihood of marital distress and divorce (Clements,, Stanley, & Markman, 2004)., , .05, 0, , 14–19 20–22 23–29 30+, Age at marriage, , couples to evaluate their compatibility more accurately., Alternatively, the correlation between courtship length, and marital success may exist because people who are, cautious about marriage have attitudes and values that, promote marital stability., , In summary, research shows some thoughtprovoking correlations between couples’ premarital, characteristics and marital adjustment. However, most, of the correlations are relatively small. Thus, there are no, proven, reliable premarital predictors of marital success., , Personality. Generally, studies have found that partners’ specific personality traits are not very strong pre-, , Marital Adjustment Across, the Family Life Cycle, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , Explain what the family life cycle is., Describe the factors couples weigh in deciding to have, children., Analyze the dynamics of the transition to parenthood., , ■, , ■, , “Jennifer has taken a lot of time away from us, the time, that we normally spend doing things together or talking., It seems like maybe on a weekend when we would normally like to sleep in, or just have lazy sex, Jennifer wakes, up and needs to be fed. . . . But I’m sure that will pass as, soon as Jennifer gets a little older. We’re just going through, a phase.”—A new mother quoted in American Couples, (Blumstein & Schwartz, 1983, p. 205), “We’re just going through a phase.” That statement, highlights an important point: There are predictable, patterns of development for families, just as there are, for individuals. These patterns make up the family life, cycle, an orderly sequence of developmental stages, , CHAPTER 9, , Identify common problems that surface as a family’s, children reach adolescence., Discuss the transitions that occur in the later stages of, the family life cycle., , that families tend to progress through. The institutions of marriage and family are inevitably intertwined., With the advent of marriage, two persons add a new, member to their existing families and create an entirely, new family. Typically, this new family forms the core of, one’s life as an adult., Sociologists have proposed a number of models to, describe family development. Our discussion is organized, around a six-stage model of family development outlined by Carter and McGoldrick (1988, 1999). Figure 9.5, (on the next page) provides an overview of their model., It spells out the developmental tasks during each stage of, the life cycle for families that eventually have children, and remain intact. Although Carter and McGoldrick have, , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 275

Page 313 :
The Family Life Cycle, , Family life cycle stage, , Emotional process, of transition: Key, developmental task, , 1. Between families:, The unattached young adult, , Accepting parent/offspring, separation, , a. Differentiation of self in relation to family of origin, b. Development of intimate peer relationships, c. Establishment of self in work, , 2. The joining of families through, marriage: The newly married couple, , Commitment to new system, , a. Formation of marital system, b. Realignment of relationships with extended families and friends, to include spouse, , 3. The family with young children, , Accepting new members into, the system, , a. Adjusting marital system to make space for child(ren), b. Taking on parenting roles, c. Realignment of relationships with extended family to include, parenting and grandparenting roles, , 4. The family with adolescents, , Increasing flexibility of, family boundaries to include, children’s independence, , a. Shifting of parent-child relationships to permit adolescent to, move in and out of system, b. Refocus on midlife marital and career issues, c. Beginning shift toward concerns for older generation, , 5. Launching children and moving on, , Accepting a multitude of, exits from and entries into, the family system, , a. Renegotiation of marital system as a dyad, b. Development of adult-to-adult relationships between grown, children and their parents, c. Realignment of relationships to include in-laws and grandchildren, d. Dealing with disabilities and death of parents (grandparents), , 6. The family in later life, , Accepting the shifting of, generational roles, , a. Maintaining own and/or couple functioning and interests in, face of physiological decline; exploration of new familial and, social role options, b. Support for a more central role for middle generation, c. Making room in the system for the wisdom and experience of, the elderly; supporting the older generation without overfunctioning for them, d. Dealing with loss of spouse, siblings, and other peers and, preparation for own death; life review and integrations, , •, , Additional changes in family status, required to proceed developmentally, , FIG U R E 9.5, , Stages of the family life cycle. The family life cycle can be divided into six stages, as shown here, (based on Carter & McGoldrick, 1988). The family’s key developmental task during each stage is identified in the second column. The third column lists additional developmental tasks at each stage., , described variations on this basic pattern that are associated with remaining childless or going through a, divorce, we will focus primarily on the basic pattern in, this section. Let’s look at some of the key challenges, that arise during each stage of the family life cycle., , Between Families: The, Unattached Young Adult, As young adults become independent of their parents,, they go through a transitional period during which they, are “between families” until they form a new family, through marriage. What is interesting about this stage, is that it is being prolonged by more and more people., The percentage of young adults who are postponing, marriage until their late twenties or early thirties has, risen dramatically (DeFrain & Olson, 1999). The extension of this stage is probably due to a number of factors, including the availability of new career options for, 276, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , women, increased educational requirements in the world, of work, an increased emphasis on personal autonomy,, and more positive attitudes about remaining single., , Joining Together: The, Newly Married Couple, The next phase begins when the unattached adult becomes attached. The newly married couple gradually, settle into their roles as husband and wife. This phase, can be quite troublesome, as the early years of marriage are often marred by numerous problems and disagreements (McGoldrick, 1999). In general, however,, this stage tends to be characterized by great happiness—, the proverbial “marital bliss.” Spouses’ satisfaction with, their relationship tends to be relatively high early in, marriage, before the arrival of the first child., This prechildren phase used to be rather short for, most newly married couples, as they quickly went about

Page 314 :
© Thinkstock/Getty Images, , the business of having their first child. Traditionally,, couples simply assumed that they would proceed to, have children. Remaining childless by choice used to, be virtually unthinkable for wives, as having a child, was viewed as the ultimate fulfillment of womanhood, (Ulrich & Weatherall, 2000). This value system meant, that women who remained childless often felt incomplete (Morell, 2000) or were viewed by others as selfish, (Letherby & Williams, 1999)., In recent decades, however, ambivalence about the, prospect of having children has clearly increased (T. W., Smith, 1999), and the percentage of childless couples, has roughly doubled since 1980 (Bulcroft & Teachman,, 2004). Thus, more and more couples find themselves, struggling to decide whether to have children. Often,, this decision occurs after numerous postponements,, when the couple finally acknowledge that “the right, time” is never going to arrive. Intentions about having, children are not as stable over time as one might expect., In one study that followed adult participants over a, span of six years, about one-quarter of the respondents, changed their plans (Heaton, Jacobson, & Holland,, 1999). These subjects were almost evenly split between, those who planned to remain childless but subsequently, decided they wanted to have children and those who, intended to have children but subsequently expressed, a preference for remaining child-free., Couples who choose to remain childless cite the, great costs incurred in raising children. In addition to, the financial burdens, they mention such costs as giving up educational or career opportunities, loss of time, for leisure activities and each other, loss of autonomy,, worry about the responsibility associated with childrearing, and concerns about overpopulation (Bulcroft, & Teachman, 2004; Connidis & McMullin, 1999). In, contrast, couples who decide to have children cite many, reasons for this choice, including the responsibility to, procreate, the joy of watching youngsters mature, the, sense of purpose that children create, and the satisfaction associated with emotional nurturance and the challenges of childrearing (Cowan & Cowan, 2000; Goetting, 1986). Clearly, parenthood is associated with both, benefits and costs (Nomaguchi & Milkie, 2003). However, most parents report no regret about their choice., The vast majority of parents rate parenthood as a very, positive and satisfying experience (Demo, 1992)., , Although children can be unparalleled sources of joy and satisfaction, the transition to parenthood can be extremely stressful,, especially for mothers., , by the birth process, is particularly prone to postpartum, distress, and about 10 percent of new moms experience, depression (Formichelli, 2001). The transition is more, difficult when a wife’s expectations regarding how much, the father will be involved in child care are not met (Fox, et al., 2000). A review of decades of research on parenthood and marital satisfaction found that (1) parents, exhibit lower marital satisfaction than comparable nonparents, (2) mothers of infants report the steepest decline in marital satisfaction, and (3) the more children, couples have, the lower their marital satisfaction tends, to be (Twenge, Campbell, & Foster, 2003)., Crisis during the transition to first parenthood is, far from universal, however (Cox et al., 1999). Couples, with high levels of affection and commitment prior to, the first child’s birth are likely to maintain a stable level, of satisfaction after the child’s birth (Shapiro, Gottman,, & Carrere, 2000). The key to making this transition less, stressful may be to have realistic expectations about, parental responsibilities (Belsky & Kelly, 1994). Studies find that stress tends to be greatest in new parents, who have overestimated the benefits and underestimated the costs of their new role. Reactions to parenthood may also depend on how a couple’s marriage is, going. Involvement in and satisfaction with parenting, tends to be higher when marital quality is higher (Gavin, et al., 2002; Rogers & White, 1998). Although children, bring their share of trials and tribulations to a marriage,, , Family with Young Children, Although most parents are happy with their decision to, have children, the arrival of the first child represents a, major transition, and the disruption of routines can be, emotionally draining (Bost et al., 2002; Carter, 1999)., The transition to parenthood tends to have more impact on mothers than fathers (Nomaguchi & Milkie,, 2003). The new mother, already physically exhausted, CHAPTER 9, , WE B LI N K 9.1, , American Academy of Child and Adolescent, Psychiatry (AACAP): Facts for Families, Many new parents may need help coping with emerging, problems in their children. The brochures here (in both, English and Spanish) cover a wide range of psychological, issues and psychiatric conditions., , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 277

Page 315 :
divorce rates are clearly higher for those who remain, childless (Shapiro et al., 2000)., , Family with Adolescent Children, Although the adolescent years have long been viewed, as a period of great stress and turmoil, research from, the past decade has led to the conclusion that adolescence is not as turbulent or difficult as once believed, (Steinberg & Levine, 1997). Ironically, though, studies, indicate that it is an especially stressful period for the, parents, who overwhelmingly rate adolescence as the, most difficult stage of parenting (Gecas & Seff, 1990)., As adolescent children seek to establish their own, identities, parental influence tends to decline while the, influence of peer groups tends to increase. Parents tend, to retain more influence than peers over important matters, such as educational goals and career plans, but, peers gradually gain more influence over less critical, matters, such as style of dress and recreational plans, (Gecas & Seff, 1990). Thus, conflicts between adolescent children and their parents tend to involve everyday matters such as chores and dress more than substantive issues such as sex and drugs (Barber, 1994)., Conflict is particularly likely to surface between adolescents (of both sexes) and their mothers. Adolescents, tend to exhibit better adjustment in families in which, they are encouraged to participate in decision making, but parents ultimately maintain control (Preto, 1999)., Parents apparently learn from their experience in dealing with an adolescent child, as they report less conflict with their second adolescent child than their first, (Whiteman, McHale, & Crouter, 2003)., In addition to worrying about their adolescent children, middle-aged couples often worry about the care, of their parents. Adults caught between these conflicting responsibilities have been called the sandwich generation. Thanks to increased longevity and decreased, family size, today’s average married couple has more, parents than children, and an increasing number of, adults provide care to their aging parents (Starrels et al.,, 1997). Females tend to assume most of the responsibility for elderly relatives, and it is estimated that in the, future women can expect to spend more years caring, for their aging parents than for their dependent children (Bromley & Blieszner, 1997). Many theorists are, , WE B LI N K 9.2, , The Whole Family Center, This lively site features reasonable advice and useful links, for the issues that come up in families, such as rearing children and coping with family crises. A team of psychologists,, social workers, educators, and marriage and family therapists, among others, serve as the experts at the center., , 278, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , concerned that these multigenerational caregiving responsibilities may prove burdensome. Supporting this, concern, one study found that the number of hours, spent caring for an aging parent was correlated with, wives’ psychological distress (Voydanoff & Donnelly,, 1999). Another study found that becoming a caregiver, for a parent was associated with declines in happiness,, autonomy, and personal growth among women (Marks,, Lambert, & Choi, 2002)., , Launching Children, into the Adult World, When children begin to reach their twenties, the family has to adapt to a multitude of exits and entries, as, children leave and return, sometimes with their own, spouses. This period, during which children normally, progress from dependence to independence, brings a, host of transitions. In many instances, conflict subsides, and parent-child relations become closer and more supportive (Aquilino, 1997)., One might argue that launching children into the, adult world tends to be a lengthier and more difficult, process today than it once was (Furstenberg, 2001). The, percentage of young adults who live with their parents, has climbed in recent decades. The rapidly rising cost, of a college education and the shrinking job market, have probably led many young adults to linger in their, parents’ homes. Moreover, crises such as separation,, divorce, job loss, and pregnancy out of wedlock force, many children who have ventured out on their own to, return to their parents. Young adults who return home, after living independently have been characterized as, the boomerang generation. Children from intact, twoparent homes are more likely to return than those with, stepparents (Goldscheider & Goldscheider, 1998). Interestingly, young adults have more negative attitudes about, returning home than their parents do (Veevers, Gee, &, Wister, 1996). The repercussions of these new trends are, the subject of current research. Preliminary data suggest, that living with one’s parents during adulthood has a, modest negative impact on parent-child relations (White, & Rogers, 1997). Conflicts are particularly likely when, returning children have been unsuccessful in moving, into autonomous adult roles (Treas & Lawton, 1999)., When parents do manage to get all their children, launched into the adult world, they find themselves, faced with an “empty nest.” This period was formerly, thought to be a difficult transition for many parents,, especially mothers who were familiar only with the, maternal role. In recent decades, however, more women, have experience with other roles outside the home and, look forward to their “liberation” from childrearing, responsibilities. Most parents adjust effectively to the, empty nest transition and are more likely to have problems if their children return to the once-empty nest

Page 316 :
CATHY © 1994 Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , (Blacker, 1999). Hence, researchers have found that the, empty nest is associated with improved mood and wellbeing for most women (Dennerstein, Dudley, & Guthrie,, 2002). Middle-aged parents who have launched their, children into the adult world report more enjoyment, of life and higher marital satisfaction than similaraged parents who still have children at home (White &, Edwards, 1990)., , The Family in Later Life, Marital satisfaction tends to climb in the postparental, period as couples find they have more time to devote, attention to each other (Brubaker, 1990). Whether this, , trend is the result of reduced parental responsibilities,, reduced work responsibilities, or other considerations, remains unclear (Lee, 1988). In any case, many couples take advantage of their newfound freedom, traveling or developing new leisure interests. For many people this can be a period of increased intimacy. However,, spouses do have to adapt to spending more time with, each other and often need to renegotiate role expectations (Walsh, 1999). Of course, age-related considerations that are independent of the relationship, such as, the increased likelihood of physical illness, can make, the later years stressful. In general, however, the trend, is for couples to report fairly high satisfaction until one, of the spouses dies., , Vulnerable Areas in Marital Adjustment, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, ■, , Discuss how gaps in role expectations may affect marital adjustment., Summarize how spouses’ work affects their marital satisfaction and, their children., Describe how financial issues are related to marital adjustment., Summarize evidence on the relationship between communication, quality and marital adjustment., , “When we first got married, the first six months of conflicts were all about getting him to take account of what I, had planned for him at home. . . . He would come waltzing in an hour and a half late for dinner, or cancel an, evening with friends, because he had to close a deal. . . ., We would argue and argue . . . not because I didn’t want, him to make a living . . . but because I thought he had to, be more considerate.”—A wife quoted in American Couples (Blumstein & Schwartz, 1983, p. 174), An unavoidable reality of marriage is that couples must, confront a legion of problems together. During courtship, couples tend to focus on pleasurable activities., But once couples are married, they deal with a variety, CHAPTER 9, , of problems, such as arriving at acceptable role compromises, paying bills, and raising a family. There is no, such thing as a problem-free marriage. Successful marriages depend on couples’ ability to handle their problems. In this section we will analyze the major kinds of, difficulties that are likely to emerge. We can’t offer simple solutions for these problems. However, in navigating your way through life, it helps to know where you’re, likely to encounter the most perilous reefs., , Gaps in Role Expectations, When a couple marry, they assume new roles—those, of husband and wife. Each role comes with certain exMarriage and Intimate Relationships, , 279

Page 317 :
SALLY FORTH Reprinted with special permission of King Features Syndicate., , 280, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , 40, Hours per week of housework, , pectations that the partners hold about how wives and, husbands should behave. These expectations may vary, greatly from one person to another. Gaps between partners in their role expectations appear to have a negative, effect on couples’ marital satisfaction (Lye & Biblarz,, 1993). Unfortunately, substantial differences in role, expectations seem particularly likely in this era of transition in gender roles., The traditional role expectations for husbands, and wives used to be fairly clear. A husband was supposed to act as the principal breadwinner, make the, important decisions, and take care of certain household chores, such as car or yard maintenance. A wife, was supposed to raise the children, cook, clean, and, follow the leadership of her husband. Spouses had different spheres of influence. The working world was the, domain of the husband, the home the domain of the, wife. In recent decades, however, the women’s movement and other forces of social change have led to new, expectations about marital roles. Thus, modern couples, need to negotiate and renegotiate role responsibilities, throughout the family life cycle (Zvonkovic et al., 1996)., Women may be especially vulnerable to ambivalence about shifting marital roles. More and more, women are aspiring to demanding careers. Yet research, shows that husbands’ careers continue to take priority, over their wives’ vocational ambitions (Haas, 1999). It, is wives who are expected to interrupt their career to, raise young children, stay home when children are sick,, and abandon their jobs when husbands’ careers require, relocation. Moreover, even when both spouses are employed, many husbands maintain traditional role expectations about housework, child care, and decision, making., Men’s contribution to housework has increased, noticeably since the 1960s, as you can see in Figure 9.6, (Bianchi et al., 2000). However, studies indicate that, wives are still doing the bulk of the household chores, in America, even when they work outside the home, (Coltrane, 2001). For example, the data show that wives, take responsibility for about 65 percent of total house-, , 35, 30, , 20, 15, , Married men, , 10, 5, 0, 1965, , •, , Married women, , 25, , 1975, , Year, , 1985, , 1995, , FIG U R E 9.6, , Housework trends since the 1960s. As these data show, the, housework gap between husbands and wives has narrowed since, the 1960s. Married men have more than doubled their housework,, but it is the large reduction in wives’ housework that has really, shrunk the housework gap. (Data from Bianchi et al., 2000), , work (not including child care), whereas husbands account for the remaining 35 percent (see Figure 9.7)., Moreover, wives still account for 78 percent of the essential “core housework” such as cooking, cleaning, and, laundry, while men continue to handle more discretionary, traditional “male chores,” such as yard or auto, maintenance (Bianchi et al., 2000)., Although married women perform almost twothirds of all housework, only about one-third of wives, characterize their division of labor as unfair, because, most women don’t expect a 50-50 split (Coltrane, 2001)., Although many couples accept these gender-driven expectations, the one-third of wives who perceive their, division of labor as unfair constitute a sizable population of women for whom housework is a source of discontent. Research shows that women are more likely to

Page 318 :
Household tasks, , Wives, Total 65%, , 35%, , Bills 41%, , 59%, , Repairs 27%, , 73%, , Outdoor 28%, , 72%, , Laundry 89%, , 11%, , Cleaning 79%, , 21%, , Dishes 82%, , 18%, , Meals 79%, , 21%, , 0, , •, , Husbands, , 10, , 40, 70, 20, 30, 50, 60, 80, Percentage of chores done by husbands and wives, , 90, , 100, , F I G U R E 9.7, , Who does the housework? This chart breaks down the proportion of housework done by husbands and, wives for specific tasks. The data show that wives continue to do a highly disproportionate share of, most household tasks, especially the “core housework” tasks (cooking, cleaning, laundry) that are hard, to ignore. Note also, that in spite of great changes in modern life, the division of labor in the household still largely meshes with traditional gender roles. (Data from Bianchi et al., 2000), , perceive their share of housework as unfair when they, have nontraditional attitudes about gender roles and, when they work outside the home (Coltrane, 2001)., As you might expect, wives who perceive their housework burden to be unfair tend to report lower levels of, marital satisfaction (Haas, 1999)., In light of this reality, it is imperative that couples, discuss role expectations in depth before marriage. If, they discover that their views are divergent, they need, to take the potential for problems seriously. Many people casually dismiss gender-role disagreements, thinking they can “straighten out” their partner later on. But, assumptions about marital roles, whether traditional or, not, may be deeply held and not easily changed., , Work and Career Issues, The possible interactions between one’s occupation and, one’s marriage are numerous and complex. Individuals’ job satisfaction and involvement can affect their, own marital satisfaction, their partner’s marital satisfaction, and their children’s development., Work and Marital Adjustment, , A host of studies have investigated the relationship between spouses’ job satisfaction and their marital adjustment. We could speculate that these two variables might, be either positively or negatively related. On the one, hand, if a spouse is highly committed to a satisfying career, he or she may have less time and energy to devote, , CHAPTER 9, , to marriage and family. On the other hand, the frustration and stress of an unsatisfying job might spill over, to contaminate one’s marriage., The research on this question suggests that both, scenarios are realistic possibilities. Both husbands and, wives struggle to balance the demands of work and, family, and both report that work commitments often, interfere with family responsibilities (Hochschild, 1997;, Milkie & Peltola, 1999). When pressures increase at, work, husbands and wives report more role conflicts, and often feel overwhelmed by their multiple commitments (Crouter et al., 1999). Furthermore, studies find, that spouses’ stress at work can have a substantial negative effect on their marital and family interactions, (Perry-Jenkins, Repetti, & Crouter, 2001). For example,, after highly stressful days at work, spouses tend to withdraw from family interactions (Crouter & Bumpus,, 2001). The stress associated with working night shifts, , WE B LI N K 9.3, , National Council on Family Relations (NCFR):, Family Tips, The National Council on Family Relations has developed a, subpage to reach out to families with practical advice from, a cadre of experts on all sorts of family issues. Information, is available on a host of topics, such as discussing terrorism with children, school violence, drugs, anger management, and so forth., , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 281

Page 319 :
RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , Reconcilable Differences, by Andrew Christensen and, Neil S. Jacobson (Guilford, Press, 2000), Innumerable books attempt to tell couples how to, make their relationships work. This entry in the market,, written by two experts in marital and family therapy,, appears to be superior to most of the others. Christensen, and Jacobson argue that no matter how much spouses, love each other, their differences will inevitably lead, to some conflict. They further assert that the key to, a healthy marriage is not to avoid conflict but to learn, to accept each other’s differences in an atmosphere, of empathy and understanding. The early chapters describe the typical sources of conflict in intimate relationships, how arguments unfold, and how conflicts, affect couples. Most of the remaining chapters outline, concrete steps that couples can take to improve their, communication, become more accepting of their differences, and learn to make changes to accommodate, each other. The writing sometimes gets a little abstract, for a “how to” book, but the wealth of interesting, reallife examples keeps the book moving along at a pleasant, pace. The authors’ advice is sound and sophisticated,, and the book is filled with engaging exercises for the, reader. In sum, this is a sensitive, practical guide for, couples who want to enhance their relationship., Cover image: Jacket design by Paul Gordon. Reproduced by permission of Guilford, Publications., , argued that in the long run multiple roles are beneficial to both men and women. Barnett and Hyde (2001), assert that negative effects of stress in one role can be, buffered by success and satisfaction in another role. They, also note that multiple roles can increase sources of social support and opportunities to experience success., Moreover, when both parents work outside the home,, income tends to be greater and the spouses often find, they have more in common., Parents’ Work and, Children’s Development, , Another issue of concern has been the potential impact, of parents’ employment on their children. Virtually all, of the research in this area has focused on the effects of, mothers’ employment outside the home. What does the, research on maternal employment show? Although, most Americans seem to believe that maternal employment is detrimental to children’s development, the vast, majority of empirical studies have found little evidence, that a mother’s working is harmful to her children, (Bianchi, 2000; Haas, 1999; Perry-Jenkins et al., 2001)., For instance, studies generally have not found a link, between mothers’ employment status and the quality, of infant-mother emotional attachment (Etaugh, 1993;, NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, 1997)., Some studies have found that maternal employment, in the first year after a child’s birth may have negative, effects on youngster’s cognitive skills during early and, middle childhood (Han, Waldfogel, & Brooks-Gunn,, 2001), but these effects are modest and inconsistent, across ethnic groups (Han et al., 2001; Harvey, 1999)., , Financial Difficulties, appears to be especially tough on spouses and families, (Presser, 2000)., Many studies have compared the marital adjustment of male-breadwinner versus dual-career couples. The interest in this comparison arises from traditional views that regard men’s lack of employment, but, women’s employment, as departures from the norm., Typically, these studies simply categorize women as, working or nonworking and evaluate couples’ marital, satisfaction. Most of these studies find little in the way, of consistent differences in the marital adjustment of, male-breadwinner versus dual-career couples (Haas,, 1999; Perry-Jenkins & Turner, 2004). Although dualcareer couples do face special problems in negotiating, career priorities, child-care arrangements, and other, practical matters, their marriage need not be negatively, affected., Although the difficulties involved in juggling work, and family roles can be challenging, some theorists have, , 282, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , How do couples’ financial resources affect marital adjustment and family functioning? Neither financial, stability nor wealth can ensure marital satisfaction., However, poverty can produce daunting challenges and, serious problems for married couples (Rank, 2004)., Without money, families live in constant dread of financial drains such as illness, layoffs, or broken appliances., Husbands tend to view themselves as poor providers, and become hostile and irritable. Their hostility can, undermine the warm, supportive exchanges that help, sustain relationships. This problem is sometimes aggravated by disappointed wives who criticize their husbands. Spontaneity in communication may be impaired, by an understandable reluctance to talk about financial concerns., Thus, it is not surprising that serious financial worries among couples are associated with increased hostility in husbands, increased depression in wives, and, lower marital happiness in both husbands and wives

Page 320 :
Perceived divorce causes, , Effective communication is crucial to the, success of a marriage. Marital conflict is associated with a host of negative outcomes, for partners and their family members, including increased depression, alcoholism,, physical health problems, domestic violence,, and divorce (Fincham, 2003). The damaging, role that poor communication can play in, marital relations was clearly demonstrated, in a study of couples getting a divorce (Cleek, & Pearson, 1985). In this study, communication difficulties were the most frequently, cited problem among both husbands and, wives (see Figure 9.8). Spouses’ strategies for, resolving conflicts may be particularly crucial to marital satisfaction (Crohan, 1992)., Many partners respond to conflict by withdrawing and refusing to communicate—a, pattern associated with deteriorating marital satisfaction over time (Heavey, Christensen, & Malamuth, 1995; Roberts, 2000)., A number of studies have compared, communication patterns in happy and unhappy marriages. This research indicates, , Males, Females, , Incompatibility, , Inadequate Communication, , Emotional Males, abuse Females, Financial Males, problems Females, Sexual Males, problems Females, Alcohol abuse Males, by spouse Females, Infidelity Males, by spouse Females, Physical Males, abuse Females, In–laws Males, Females, 0, , •, , 10, , 30, 40, 20, 50, 60, Percentage of males and females, indicating each cause, , 70, , FIG U R E 9.8, , Causes of divorce. When Cleek and Pearson (1985) asked divorcing couples about, their perceptions regarding the causes of their divorce, both men and women cited, communication difficulties more than any other cause., , CHAPTER 9, , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 283, , Photo by Sharon M. Fentiman, , (White & Rogers, 2001). Similarly, husbands’ job insethat unhappily married spouses (1) find it difficult to, curity is predictive of wives’ reports of marital conflict, convey positive messages, (2) misunderstand each other, and their thoughts of divorce (Fox & Chancey, 1998)., more often, (3) are less likely to recognize that they, Moreover, evidence consistently demonstrates that the, have been misunderstood, (4) use more frequent, and, risk of separation and divorce increases as husbands’, more intense, negative messages, and (5) often differ in, income declines (Ono, 1998; South & Lloyd, 1995). The, the amount of self-disclosure they prefer in the relationeffects of low income on children are even more distressship (Noller & Fitzpatrick, 1990; Noller & Gallois, 1988;, ing. Children brought up in poverty exhibit poorer physSher & Baucom, 1993). Above all else, unhappy couples, ical health, reduced mental health, lower academic pertend to get caught up in escalating cycles of conflict, formance, and increased delinquency in comparison, from which they cannot escape,, to other children (Seccombe, 2001)., whereas happy couples find ways, Even when financial resources are plentiful, money, to exit the cycles (Fincham, 2003)., can be a source of marital strain. Quarrels about how, The importance of marital, to spend money are common and potentially damaging, communication was underscored, at all income levels. Pittman and Lloyd (1988), for inin a widely cited study by John, stance, found that perceived financial stress (regardless, Gottman and his colleagues that, of a family’s actual income) was associated with deattempted to predict the likelicreased marital satisfaction. Another study examined, hood of divorce in a sample of 52, John Gottman, how happily married couples handled their money in, married couples (Buehlman, Gottcomparison to couples that eventually divorced (Schanman, & Katz, 1992). Each couple, inger & Buss, 1986). In comparison to the, divorced couples, the happy couples engaged in more joint decision making on finances. Thus, the best way to avoid troubleCommunication Males, problems Females, some battles over money is probably to, engage in extensive planning of expendiBasic Males, tures together., unhappiness Females

Page 321 :
CATHY © Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , RE C OMME ND E D, RE ADI NG, , Why Marriages Succeed, or Fail . . . and How You, Can Make Yours Last, by John Gottman (with Nan Silver), (Simon & Schuster, 1994), This book is about communication in intimate relationships—a subject that Gottman has studied intensively for, over 20 years. A psychology professor at the University of, Washington, Gottman is justifiably famous for his landmark, research on the prediction of divorce. He has demonstrated, that he can predict which couples will divorce with remarkable accuracy, based on careful examination of the couples’, communication patterns. According to Gottman, the marriages that last are not those that appear to be free of, conflict but those in which couples are able to resolve, the conflicts that inevitably arise in intimate relationships., Gottman categorizes couples into three types based on their, , 284, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , style of conflict resolution. In validating marriages, couples, compromise often and work out their disagreements calmly., In conflict-avoiding marriages, couples rarely confront their, disagreements openly. In volatile marriages, couples have, frequent and passionate disputes. For all three types, the, crucial consideration, according to Gottman, is the relative, balance of positive versus negative interactions., In this practical, readable analysis of marital communication, the author provides plenty of case histories, to make ideas come alive. The book also includes many, thought-provoking scales that readers can take to evaluate, their own communication styles and tendencies. For example, there are scales to measure stonewalling, defensiveness,, and the other communication tendencies Gottman characterizes as the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.” Why Marriages Succeed or Fail is an outstanding book loaded with, exercises, quizzes, and tips that should help readers improve, their marital communication. Gottman has written two other, highly practical books on marriage that are worth consulting: The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work (1999), and a more elaborate and detailed analysis titled The Relationship Cure (2001)., Book cover, Copyright © 1994 by Simon & Schuster, Inc. Reproduced by permission of the, publisher. All rights reserved.

Page 322 :
provided an oral history of their relationship and a 15minute sample of their interaction style, during which, they discussed two problem areas in their marriage., The investigators rated the spouses on a variety of factors that mostly reflected the subjects’ ways of relating, to each other. Based on these ratings, they were able to, predict which couples would divorce within three years, with 94 percent accuracy! Follow-up research has demonstrated that marital adjustment depends not on, whether there is conflict (conflict is virtually inevitable), but rather on how conflict is handled when it, occurs (Driver et al., 2003)., John Gottman, who is probably the world’s foremost authority on marital communication, asserts that, conflict and anger are normal in marital interactions, and that they are not, in and of themselves, predictive of, marital dissolution. Instead, Gottman (1994) identifies four other communication patterns, which he calls, the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” that are risk, factors for divorce: contempt, criticism, defensiveness,, and stonewalling. Contempt involves communicating, , insulting feelings that one’s spouse is inferior. Criticism, involves constantly expressing negative evaluations of, one’s partner. Defensiveness involves responding to contempt and criticism with obstructive communication, that escalates marital conflict. Stonewalling involves refusing to listen to one’s partner, especially the partner’s, complaints. Gottman eventually added a fifth troublesome communication pattern, belligerence, which involves provocative, combative challenges to partners’, power and authority (Gottman et al., 1998)., Given the importance of good communication,, many approaches to marital therapy emphasize the development of better communication skills in partners, (Gottman et al., 2002). However, poor marital communication is not simply a result of communication skills, (Burleson & Denton, 1997). In many instances, spouses, may have adequate or even excellent communication, ability but be unwilling to make communication a priority, to avoid unnecessary criticism, to share in decision making, and so forth., , Divorce, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Describe the evidence on changing divorce rates., Discuss how men and women tend to adjust to, divorce., , “In the ten years that we were married I went from twentyfour to thirty-four and they were a very significant ten, years. I started a career, started to succeed, bought my, first house, had a child, you know, very significant years., And then all of a sudden, every goddamn thing, I’m back, to zero. I have no house. I don’t have a child. I don’t have, a wife. I don’t have the same family. My economic position has been shattered. And nothing recoverable. All, these goals which I had struggled for, every goddamn one, of them, is gone.”—A recently divorced man quoted in, Marital Separation (Weiss, 1975, p. 75), The dissolution of a marriage tends to be a bone-jarring, event for most people, as this bitter quote illustrates., Any of the problems discussed in the previous section, might lead a couple to consider divorce. However, people appear to vary in their threshold for divorce, just as, they do in their threshold for marriage. Some couples, will tolerate a great deal of disappointment and bickering without seriously considering divorce. Other couples are ready to call their attorney as soon as it becomes, apparent that their expectations for marital bliss were, somewhat unrealistic. Typically, however, divorce is the, culmination of a gradual disintegration of the relationship brought about by an accumulation of interrelated, CHAPTER 9, , ■, , ■, , Analyze the evidence on the effects of divorce on, children., Summarize data on the frequency and success of, remarriage and its impact on children., , problems, which often date back to the beginning of, couples’ relationships (Huston, Niehuis, & Smith, 2001)., , Increasing Rate of Divorce, Although relatively accurate statistics are available on, divorce rates, it is still difficult to estimate the percentage of marriages that end in divorce. The usually cited, ratio of marriages in a year to divorces in the same year, is highly misleading. It is more informative to follow, people married in a particular year over a period of time,, but this type of research indicates a particular cohort’s, divorce rate 15–20 years after the marriages, so these, findings may not be accurate for people currently entering into marriage. In any case, it is clear that divorce, rates increased dramatically between the 1950s and, 1980s, but they appear to have stabilized and even declined slightly since the 1980s (Amato et al., 2003). When, divorce rates were at their peak, the most widely cited, estimates of future divorce risk were around 50 percent, (Bumpass, Raley, & Sweet, 1995). However, the modest, reductions in divorce rates in recent years appear to have, lowered the risk of divorce to 40–45 percent for today’s, couples (Bramlett & Mosher, 2001; Whitehead & Popenoe, 2001). The decline in divorce rates is encouraging,, Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 285

Page 323 :
Percent getting a divorce, , The high divorce rate has led to some novel ways of dealing, with its worrisome legal aspects. Attorney Robert Nordyke discovered that the drive-up window at his new office—a former, savings and loan branch in Salem, Oregon—was perfect for, serving legal papers on his clients’ spouses., , ity. The entry of more women into the workforce has, made many wives less financially dependent on the continuation of their marriage. New attitudes emphasizing, individual fulfillment seem to have counterbalanced, older attitudes that encouraged dissatisfied spouses to, suffer in silence. Reflecting all these trends, the legal barriers to divorce have also diminished., , Deciding on a Divorce, , 10, , Divorces are often postponed repeatedly, and they are, rarely executed without a great deal of agonizing forethought (Ahrons, 1999). Indecision is common, as, roughly two out of five divorce petitions are eventually, withdrawn (Donovan & Jackson, 1990). The decision to, divorce is usually the outcome of a long series of smaller, decisions that may take years to unfold, so divorce should, be viewed as a process rather than a discrete event (Morrison & Cherlin, 1995). Wives’ judgments about the, likelihood of their marriages ending in divorce tend to, be more accurate than husbands’ judgments (South,, Bose, & Trent, 2004). This finding may be related to, , 8, , 6, , 4, , 2, , 0, 0, , •, , © Matthew McVay/Corbis Saba, , but the chances of marital dissolution remain quite, high. Although most people realize that divorce rates, are high, they have a curious tendency to underestimate, the likelihood that they will personally experience a divorce. On the average, people peg their probability of, divorce at about 10–11 percent, which is far below the, actual probability for the population as a whole (Fowers, et al., 2001)., Divorce rates are higher among blacks than whites, or Hispanics, among lower-income couples, among, couples who do not have children, among people who, marry at a relatively young age, and among those whose, parents divorced (Faust & McKibben, 1999; Kurdek,, 1993). As Figure 9.9 shows, the vast majority of divorces, occur during the first decade of a marriage (Hiedemann, Suhomlinova, & O’Rand, 1998). What types of, marital problems are predictive of divorce? The most, frequently cited problems include infidelity, jealousy,, growing apart, foolish spending behavior, drinking and, drug problems, and communication difficulties (not, talking; being moody, critical, and easy to anger) (Amato, & Previti, 2003; Amato & Rogers, 1997)., A wide variety of social trends have probably contributed to increasing divorce rates (Amato et al., 2003;, Giddens, 2001; Sabatelli & Ripoll, 2004). The stigma attached to divorce has gradually eroded. Many religious, denominations are becoming more tolerant of divorce,, and marriage has thus lost some of its sacred quality., The declining fertility rate and the consequent smaller, families probably make divorce a more viable possibil-, , 5, , 10, 15, 20, 25, Years since marriage, , 30, , 35, WE B LI N K 9.4, , FIG U R E 9.9, , Divorce rate as a function of years married. This graph shows, the distribution of divorces in relation to how long couples have, been married. As you can see, the vast majority of divorces occur, in the early years, with divorce rates peaking between the fifth, and tenth years of marriage. (Data from National Center for Health, Statistics), 286, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Divorce Central, Divorce Central is one of a number of excellent sites that, provide information and advice on legal, emotional, and, financial issues for individuals contemplating or going, through a divorce. Annotated links to the other outstanding divorce-related sites can also be found here.

Page 324 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Should the Government Promote Marriage?, As noted in the main body of the chapter, research evidence suggests that marriage is good for one’s health, and happiness (Waite & Gallagher, 2000). And studies, show that children whose parents divorce exhibit an, increased risk for quite a variety of negative outcomes, (Amato, 2003). These findings suggest that both adults, and children are most likely to flourish in stable, loving, families, but social trends are clearly moving in just the, opposite direction. Marriage rates are down and divorce, rates are up, cohabitation rates are skyrocketing, and, more and more children are being born out of wedlock, (Bianchi & Casper, 2000). Concerns about these trends, have led some religious leaders and public officials to, argue that government entities ought to do more to promote a culture of marriage (Hackstaff, 1999; Popenoe,, 1999; Wagner, 1998). At first glance, this sounds like a, sensible, enlightened policy that everyone ought to be, able to agree on, but in reality this issue turns out to, be surprisingly complex and controversial., The pro-marriage movement has been gathering, momentum since the early 1990s. The advocates of this, movement argue that people today are overly focused on, their personal happiness and are unwilling to endure hardship and show loyalty when the going gets rough in a, marriage (Fowers, 2000). They also assert that the emergence of no-fault divorce laws since the 1970s has made, it too easy to get a divorce. Hence, the pro-marriage advocates campaign for policies that would make divorces, more difficult to obtain. For example, several states have, enacted covenant marriage laws. Couples who choose to, enter into a covenant marriage agree to complete premarital education programs and pledge to divorce only in, response to severe problems (such as spouse abuse or a, lengthy prison term), and only after seeking extensive marriage counseling (Hawkins et al., 2002). Other advocated, reforms have included waiting periods for divorces of up, to five years and more demanding legal proceedings for, divorces involving children. More proactive proposals have, included mandating high school education programs touting the value of marriage, providing government subsidies for marriage counseling, and requiring couples to, complete premarital relationship skills training (Amato,, 2004b). Some pro-marriage proponents have also suggested giving married couples preferential treatment (over, single, divorced, and cohabiting individuals) in regard to, government benefits, such as welfare payments and, housing subsidies (Murray, 2001)., , Critics of the pro-marriage movement raise a variety, of objections. First, they question the meaning of the research findings that serve as the rationale for this movement. Although they acknowledge that married people are, somewhat healthier and happier than nonmarried adults,, they point out that the data are correlational and that, there is no solid evidence that being married causes this, difference (Huston & Melz, 2004). They argue that causation probably runs the other way—that being healthy and, happy causes people to have better marital opportunities, and greater marital success. In a similar vein, they admit, that experiencing divorce can be harmful for children but, suggest that remaining in a home filled with bitter discord, can be just as harmful (Booth & Amato, 2001). Second,, the critics express concern that restricting access to divorce could leave some spouses and children stranded in, homes riddled with alcoholism, drug abuse, or domestic, violence (Gelles, 1996). Third, critics point out that making, divorces harder to get just may not be a realistic option, in today’s society (Coontz, 1997). Although a majority of, adults agree—in the abstract—that divorce laws should, be tougher, they do not want their own personal freedom, in this area to be impeded. Consistent with this finding,, only 3 percent of couples have chosen covenant marriage, in the state (Louisiana) that first offered this option, (Licata, 2002). If divorces are made harder to get, critics, argue that couples will simply revert back to the fraudulent practices of the past, when attorneys would coach, spouses on how to submit fabricated testimony of adultery, or mental cruelty to meet legal standards for a divorce., Fourth, critics note that premarital relationship skills, training and similar programs may have some genuine, value for couples, but no research has been conducted on, their efficacy in reducing the likelihood of divorce (Belluck,, 2000). Thus, they argue that it is premature to require, such training. Fifth, critics argue that if the government, wants to promote marital success, it should focus more on, making it easier to stay married, as opposed to harder to, get a divorce. In particular, they note that divorce rates, tend to be high in lower social classes where families could, be better strengthened by improving social services (such, as child care and job training). Finally, critics maintain, that the pro-marriage movement treats the traditional, nuclear family as the only legitimate family form and that, pro-marriage programs will unfairly discriminate against, single parents, divorced persons, cohabiting couples, and, gay and lesbian partners (Coltrane, 2001; Scanzoni, 2004).

Page 325 :
the fact that wives initiate two-thirds of divorce actions, (Hetherington, 2003)., It is difficult to generalize about the relative merits, of divorce as opposed to remaining in an unsatisfactory, marriage. Extensive research clearly shows that people, who are currently divorced suffer a higher incidence of, both physical and psychological maladies and are less, happy than those who are currently married (Amato,, 2001; Waite & Gallagher, 2000). Furthermore, the process of getting divorced usually is extremely stressful for, both spouses. We might guess that as divorce becomes, more commonplace, it should also become less traumatic, but available evidence does not support this supposition (Kitson, 1992). As painful as marital dissolution may be, remaining in an unhappy marriage is also, potentially detrimental. Research has shown that in, comparison to divorced individuals, unhappily married, people tend to show even poorer physical and emotional health (Wickrama et al., 1997)., , Kahn, 1999). The economic consequences of divorce, clearly are more severe for women than for men, but in, this era of two-income families, many men also experience a noticeable decline in their standard of living after, going through a divorce (McManus & DiPrete, 2001)., Although divorce appears to impose greater stress, on women than men, researchers do not find consistent, gender differences in postdivorce adjustment (Amato,, 2001). In the aggregate, the magnitude of the negative, effects of divorce on individuals’ psychological and physical well-being seems to be pretty similar for husbands, and wives. Among both men and women, high preoccupation with one’s ex-spouse is associated with poorer, adjustment to divorce (Masheter, 1997). Factors associated with favorable postdivorce adjustment include, having higher income, getting remarried, having more, positive attitudes about divorce, and being the partner, who initiated the divorce (Wang & Amato, 2000)., , Effects of Divorce on Children, Adjusting to Divorce, , © 1992 The New Yorker Collection 1992 Michael Maslin from cartoonbank.com., All rights reserved., , Objectively speaking, divorce appears to be more difficult and disruptive for women than for men (ClarkeStewart & Bailey, 1989). Women are more likely to assume the responsibility of raising the children, whereas, men tend to reduce their contact with their children., Within the first year after divorce, half of fathers basically lose contact with their kids (Carter & McGoldrick,, 1999). Another key consideration is that divorced women, are less likely than their ex-husbands to have adequate, income or a satisfying job (Smock, Manning, & Gupta,, 1999). For example, one well-designed study found that, custodial mothers experienced a 36 percent decrease, in their standard of living, whereas noncustodial fathers, experienced a 28 percent increase (Bianchi, Subaiya, &, , “That’s right, Phil. A separation will mean—among other, things—watching your own cholesterol.”, , 288, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , Roughly half of all divorces involve children. When couples have children, decisions about divorce must take, into account the potential impact on their offspring., Widely publicized research by Judith Wallerstein and colleagues has painted a rather bleak picture of how divorce, affects youngsters (Wallerstein & Kelly, 1980; Wallerstein, & Blakeslee, 1989; Wallerstein, Lewis, & Blakeslee, 2000)., This research has followed a sample of 60 divorced couples and their 131 children since 1971. At the 10-year, followup, almost half of the participants were characterized as “worried, underachieving, self-deprecating,, and sometimes angry young men and women” (Wallerstein & Blakeslee, 1989, p. 299). Even 25 years after their, parents’ divorce, a majority of subjects were viewed as, troubled adults who found it difficult to maintain stable, and satisfying intimate relationships. The enduring,, long-term effects of divorce reported by Wallerstein, were particularly disturbing and generated great interest from the media, resulting in an abundance of TV, interviews, magazine articles, and so forth., Although the lengthy follow-up in Wallerstein’s research is commendable, critics point out that her study, suffers from a variety of flaws (Amato, 2003; Cherlin,, 1999; Kelly & Emery, 2003). It was based on a small sample of children from a wealthy area in California that, clearly was not representative of the population at large., There was no comparison group and conclusions were, based on impressions from clinical interviews in which, it is easy for interviewers to see what they want to see., Coltrane and Adams (2003) also note that Wallerstein is, part of a conservative political-religious movement that, favors traditional family arrangements and reforms that, would make divorces more difficult to obtain. Hence, her, conclusions may be shaped in part by a political agenda.

Page 326 :
CHAPTER 9, , lation of interacting factors. As Furstenberg and Kiernan, (2001) put it, “Many researchers have become increasingly wary about public discussions of divorce that, treat it as an undifferentiated and uniform occurrence, resulting in similar outcomes for all children” (p. 446)., , Remarriage, Evidence that adequate courtship opportunities exist, for the divorced is provided by the statistics on remarriage: Roughly three-quarters of divorced people eventually remarry (Bramlett & Mosher, 2001). The mean, length of time between divorce and remarriage is a little less than 4 years (Coleman, Ganong, & Fine, 2001)., How successful are second marriages? The answer, depends on your standard of comparison. Divorce rates, are higher for second than for first marriages (Mason,, 1998). However, this statistic may simply indicate that, this group of people see divorce as a reasonable alternative to an unsatisfactory marriage. Nonetheless, studies, of marital adjustment suggest that second marriages, are slightly less successful than first marriages (Brown, & Booth, 1996). Of course, if you consider that in this, pool of people all the first marriages ran into serious, trouble, then the second marriages look rather good, by comparison., Another major issue related to remarriage is its effect on children. Adaptation to remarriage can be difficult for children. Evidence suggests that on the average,, interaction in stepfamilies appears to be somewhat less, cohesive and warm than interaction in first-marriage, families, and stepparent-stepchild relations tend to be, more negative and distant than parent-child relations, in first marriages (Pasley & Moorefield, 2004). Taken, as a whole, the evidence suggests that children in stepfamilies are a little less well adjusted than children in, first marriages and are roughly similar in adjustment, to children in single-parent homes (Coleman, Ganong,, , © Michelle D. Bridewell/PhotoEdit, , Courtesy, E. Mavis Hetherington, , Are Wallerstein’s findings consistent with other research? Yes and, no. The results of another longrunning study by E. Mavis Hetherington (1993, 1999, 2003), which, used a larger and more representative sample, a control group, and, conventional statistical comparisons, suggest that Wallerstein’s conE. Mavis, Hetherington, clusions are unduly pessimistic. According to Hetherington, divorce, can be traumatic for children, but a substantial majority adjust reasonably well after two to three years, and, only about 25 percent show serious psychological or, emotional problems in adulthood (versus 10 percent, in the control group). Another complicated issue in, assessing the effects of divorce is the choice of whom, should be used as a baseline for comparison. One can, argue that children of divorce should be compared to, children from intact homes characterized by persistent, marital discord, a group that also shows elevated rates, of many types of adjustment problems (Morrison &, Coiro, 1999; Papp, Cummings, & Schermerhorn, 2004)., Although Wallerstein’s conclusions appear overly, negative, they differ from the results of other research only, in degree (Amato, 2003). After a divorce, many children, exhibit depression, anxiety, nightmares, dependency,, aggression, withdrawal, distractibility, lowered academic, performance, reduced physical health, precocious sexual behavior and substance abuse (Hines, 1997; Kelly, & Emery, 2003; Knox, 2000). Although these problems, dissipate in most children after a few years, divorce can, have a lasting impact that extends into adulthood. Experiencing divorce during childhood is a risk factor for, many subsequent problems in one’s adult years, including maladjustment, marital instability, and reduced, occupational attainments (Amato, 1999). Children, have more adjustment problems when their parents, have a history of particularly bitter, acrimonious conflict (Amato, 2001)., So what can we conclude about the effects of divorce on children? Overall, the weight of evidence suggests that divorce tends to have harmful effects on many, children but can have beneficial effects for children if their, parents’ relationship is dominated by conflict (Booth &, Amato, 2001). However, the latter assertion is based on, the assumption that the parents’ divorce brings their, bickering to an end. Unfortunately, the conflicts between divorcing spouses often continue for many years, after they part ways (Hopper, 2001). For example, Goldberg (1985) describes a case history in which a man’s, ex-wife was still calling him 10 to 15 times a day to disturb and berate him three years after their divorce. It is, also reasonable to conclude that divorces have highly varied effects on children that depend on a complex constel-, , Although remarried couples tend to have more open communication, the evidence suggests that second marriages are slightly, less successful than first marriages, on the average., , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 289

Page 327 :
•, , Mean rating of children’s overall well–being, , & Fine, 2001). However, the differences between stepfamilies and other types of families in the adjustment, of their children tend to be modest. For example, Figure 9.10 highlights some representative results from, one large-scale study (Acock & Demo, 1994)., , FIG U R E 9.10, , Children’s adjustment in four types of families. Acock and, Demo (1994) assessed children’s adjustment in four types of family, structures: first marriages, divorced single-parent homes, stepfamilies, and families in which the mother never married. The, comparisons of 2457 families did turn up some statistically significant differences, as children’s overall well-being was highest, in intact first marriages. However, as you can see, the differences, were rather small, and the authors concluded that “family structure has a modest effect on children’s well-being.”, , 4.0, 3.5, 3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, First–, married, , Divorced, , Stepfamily Continuously, single, Type of family situation, , Alternatives to Marriage, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , 290, , PART 2, , 40, , 1960, , 20, , 0, , •, , 20–24, , Age, , 25–29, , 60, , 40, , 20, , 0, , 20–24, , Age, , 2000, , 60, , 80, , ’60, , 80, , 2000, , Men remaining single (%), , Remaining Single, The pressure to marry is substantial in our, society (Berliner, Jacob, & Schwartzberg,, 1999). People are socialized to believe that, they are not complete until they have found, their “other half ” and have entered into a, partnership for life. And reference is often, made to people’s “failure” to marry. In spite, of this pressure, an increasing proportion of, young adults are remaining single (Teachman, Tedrow, & Crowder, 2001), as Figure 9.11 shows., Does the increased number of single, adults mean that people are turning away, , 100, , 100, , 1960, , We noted at the beginning of the chapter, that the traditional model of marriage has, been undermined by a variety of social trends., More and more people are choosing alternatives to marriage. In this section we examine, some of these alternatives, including remaining single, cohabitation, and gay relationships., , Women remaining single (%), , ■, , 2000, , ■, , 1960, , ■, , Describe stereotypes of single life, and summarize evidence on the, adjustment of single people., Discuss the prevalence of cohabitation and whether it improves the, probability of marital success., Discuss the stability and dynamics of intimate relationships among, homosexual couples., Outline some misconceptions about gay couples., , 2000, , ■, , 25–29, , F I G U R E 9. 11, , The proportion of young people who remain single. This graph shows the percentage of single men and women, ages 20–24 or 25–29, in 2000 as compared to, 1960 (based on U.S. Census data). The proportion of people remaining single has, increased substantially for both sexes, in both age brackets. Single men continue, to outnumber single women in these age brackets., , The Interpersonal Realm

Page 328 :
CHAPTER 9, , cial support, financial well-being, and physical health, (Stack & Eshleman, 1998). Of course, the correlation, between being married and health/happiness may be, due in part to the effects of health and happiness on, marital status. That is, it is likely that healthier and happier people are better able to attract and retain marital, partners., , Cohabitation, As we noted earlier in the chapter, cohabitation refers, to living together in a sexually intimate relationship outside of marriage. Recent years have witnessed a tremendous increase in the number of cohabiting couples (see, Figure 9.12). Although cohabitation is still illegal in, seven states (Fields, 2001), over 4.6 million couples were, living together unmarried in the United States in 2000., However, the percentage of couples living together at, any one time does not accurately convey how widespread this phenomenon has become, because cohabiting unions tend to be short (Seltzer, 2004). It is more, instructive to study people getting married for the first, time and determine the percentage of them who cohabited prior to their marriage (either with their spouse-tobe or someone else). Studies indicate that this percentage has increased dramatically, from around 11 percent, in 1970 to over 50 percent in the mid-1990s (Bumpass, & Lu, 2000). Increasing rates of cohabitation are not, unique to the United States and are even higher in many, , 5.0, Unmarried cohabiting couples (in millions), , from the institution of marriage? Perhaps a little, but, for the most part, no. A variety of factors have contributed to the growth of the single population. Much, of this growth is a result of the increase in the median, age at which people marry and the increased rate of, divorce. The vast majority of single, never-married people do hope to marry eventually. In one study of nevermarried men and women (South, 1993), 87.4 percent, of the 926 respondents ages 19 to 25 agreed with the, statement “I would like to get married someday.”, Singlehood has been plagued by two disparate, stereotypes (DeFrain & Olson, 1999). On the one hand,, single people are sometimes portrayed as carefree swingers who are too busy enjoying the fruits of promiscuity to shoulder marital responsibilities. On the other, hand, they are seen as losers who have not succeeded in, snaring a mate, and they may be portrayed as socially, inept, maladjusted, frustrated, lonely, and bitter. These, stereotypes do a great injustice to the diversity that exists among those who are single., The “swinging single” stereotype appears to be a, media-manufactured illusion designed to lure singles’, spending power into nightclubs and bars. In reality, the, bar circuit is usually described as an experience in alienation and disappointment. In comparison to married, people, single people do have sex with more partners,, but they have sex less frequently than their married, counterparts (Michael et al., 1994)., As for the “maladjusted, bitter” stereotype, it is true, that single people exhibit poorer mental and physical, health than married people (Joung et al., 1997; Waite,, 1995), and they rate themselves as less happy than their, married counterparts (Stack & Eshleman, 1998; Waite,, 2000). However, the differences are modest, and the, happiness gap has shrunk, especially among women., Although popular stereotypes suggest that being single, is more difficult for women than for men, the empirical, data are mixed. The physical health benefits of being, married appear to be greater for men than for women, (Waite, 2000; Wu & Hart, 2002). But most studies find, that single women are more satisfied with their lives and, less distressed than comparable single men, and various, lines of evidence suggest that women get along without, men better than men get along without women (Davies,, 1995; Marker, 1996)., Why is being married associated with greater health, and happiness? The health benefits of marriage may result because spouses provide emotional and social support that buffers the negative effects of stress and because they discourage their partners’ unhealthy habits, (Joung et al., 1997; Murphy, Glaser, & Grundy, 1997)., Another consideration is that married people tend to, have a higher income (Hirschl, Altobelli, & Rank, 2003),, and affluence is associated with better health (Adler &, Snibbe, 2003). The greater happiness of married people, has been attributed to the advantages they enjoy in so-, , 4.0, , 3.0, , 2.0, , 1.0, , 0, 1960, , •, , 1970, , 1980, Year, , 1990, , 2000, , F I G U R E 9. 12, , Cohabitation in the United States. The number of unmarried, couples living together has been increasing rapidly since 1970, (based on U.S. Census data). This increase shows no signs of, leveling off., Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 291

Page 329 :
European countries (Kiernan, 2004). In some places,, cohabitation has become nearly as normative as marriage (Le Bourdais & Lapierre-Adamcyk, 2004)., Cohabitation tends to conjure up images of college, students or other well-educated young couples without, children, but these images are misleading. In reality, cohabitation rates have always been higher in the less-educated and lower-income segments of the population, (Bumpass & Lu, 2000). Moreover, many cohabitating, couples have children. About half of previously married, cohabitants and 35 percent of never-married cohabitants have children in their household (Smock, 2000)., Although many people see cohabitation as a threat, to the institution of marriage, many theorists see it as a, new stage in the courtship process—a sort of trial marriage. Consistent with this view, about three-quarters, of female cohabitants expect to marry their current partner (Lichter, Batson, & Brown, 2004). In spite of these, expectations, however, cohabitants report that they are, less satisfied with their relationships than married couples (Brown & Booth, 1996; Nock, 1995). Moreover, cohabitating relationships are notably less durable than, marital relationships (Seltzer, 2004). Conceiving a child, during cohabitation tends to increase couples’ chances, of staying together (Manning, 2004)., As a prelude to marriage, cohabitation should allow, people to experiment with marital-like responsibilities, and reduce the likelihood of entering marriage with unrealistic expectations. Living together may also permit, , people to identify incompatible mates more effectively, than a traditional courtship would. These considerations suggest that couples who cohabit before they, marry should go on to more successful marriages than, those who do not., Although this analysis sounds plausible, researchers have not found that premarital cohabitation increases the likelihood of subsequent marital success., In fact, studies have consistently found an association, between premarital cohabitation and increased marital, discord and divorce rates (Bumpass & Lu, 2000; Cohan, & Kleinbaum, 2002; Teachman, 2003). What accounts, for this finding? Many theorists argue that this nontraditional lifestyle has historically attracted a more liberal and less conventional segment of the population, with a weak commitment to the institution of marriage and relatively few qualms about getting divorced., This explanation has considerable empirical support, (Hall, 1996; Smock, 2000), but some support also exists for the alternative explanation—that the experience of cohabitation changes people’s attitudes, values,, or habits in ways that somehow increase their vulnerability to divorce (Kamp Dush, Cohan, & Amato, 2003;, Seltzer, 2001)., , Gay Relationships, Up until this point, we have, for purposes of simplicity,, focused our attention on heterosexuals, those who seek, , © Ron Chapple/Thinkstock/Alamy, , Despite the common stereotype, that homosexuals rarely form, long-term relationships, the fact, is that they are similar to heterosexual couples in their attitudes, and behaviors, and many enjoy, long-term commitments in, marriage-like arrangements., , 292, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm

Page 330 :
emotional-sexual relationships with memRespondents who reported having sex, bers of the other gender. However, we have, with same–gender partners, been ignoring a significant minority group:, homosexual men and women, who seek, Men, Past 5 years, emotional-sexual relationships with memWomen, bers of the same gender. (In everyday language, the term gay is used to refer to homoSince Men, puberty Women, sexuals of both genders, although many, homosexual women prefer the term lesbian, Respondents who reported being attracted, for themselves.), to person of the same gender, How large is this minority group? No, one knows for sure. Part of the problem is, Men, that this question is vastly more complex, Women, than it appears at first glance (LeVay, 1996)., 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, Sexual orientation is best represented as a, Percent, continuum (see Chapter 13), so where do, you draw the lines between heterosexuality,, bisexuality, and homosexuality? And how, F I G U R E 9. 13, do you handle the distinction between overt, behavior and desire? Where, for instance, do, How common is homosexuality? The answer to this question is both complex and, controversial. Michaels (1996) brought together data from large-scale surveys to, you put a person who is married and has, arrive at the estimates shown here. If you look at how many people have actually, never engaged in homosexual behavior but, had a same-sex partner in the last five years, the figures are relatively low, but if, who reports homosexual fantasies and acyou count those who have had a same-sex partner since puberty, the figures more, knowledges being strongly drawn to memthan double. Still another way to look at it is to ask people whether they are attracted, to people of the same sex (regardless of their actual behavior). This approach sugbers of the same sex? The other part of the, gests that about 8 percent of the population could be characterized as homosexual., problem is that many people have extremely, prejudicial attitudes about homosexuality,, which makes gays cautious and reluctant to give canheterosexuals’ marital relationships. As Garnets and, did information about their sexuality (Smith & Gates,, Kimmel (1991) point out, gay relationships “develop, 2001). Small wonder then that estimates of the portion, within a social context of societal disapproval with an, of the population that is homosexual vary widely, absence of social legitimization and support; families, (Gonsiorek & Weinrich, 1991). A frequently cited estiand other social institutions often stigmatize such remate is 10 percent, but recent surveys suggest that this, lationships and there are no prescribed roles and behavpercentage may be an overestimate. Michaels (1996), iors to structure such relationships” (p. 170)., has combined data from two of the better large-scale, Attitudes about gay relationships have become more, surveys to arrive at the estimates seen in Figure 9.13. As, favorable in recent years, but over half of Americans, you can see, the numbers are open to varying interprestill condemn homosexual relations as morally wrong, tations, but as a whole they suggest that about 5–8 per(Yang, 1997) and oppose gay marriage and gays’ right, cent of the population could reasonably be characterto adopt children (Herek, 2002). Gays continue to be, ized as homosexual., victims of employment and housing discrimination,, Devoting a separate section to gay couples may seem, not to mention verbal and physical abuse and hate, to imply that the dynamics of their close relationships, crimes (Herek, 2000; Herek, Cogan, & Gillis, 2002)., are different from those seen in heterosexual couples., With rare exceptions, gay couples cannot legally forActually, this assumption appears to be much less true, malize their unions by getting married, and in fact, durthan widely thought, even though gays’ close relationing the 1990s many states passed laws prohibiting sameships unfold in a radically different social context than, gender marriages. Gay couples are also denied many, economic benefits available to married couples. For, example, they can’t file joint tax returns, and gay individuals often can’t obtain employer-provided health inWE B LI N K 9.5, surance for their partner., , •, , Partners Task Force for Gay and Lesbian Couples, Reflecting the belief that “same-gender couples deserve, the same treatment as all other couples,” this web page’s, resources address a wide range of issues, including relationships, parenting, domestic partnership, ceremonial, marriage, and legal and civil rights matters., , CHAPTER 9, , Comparisons to, Heterosexual Couples, , Given the lack of moral, social, legal, and economic, supports for gay relationships, are gay unions less stable than marital unions? Researchers have not yet been, Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 293

Page 331 :
able to collect adequate data on this question, but the, limited data available suggest that gay couples’ relationships are somewhat briefer and more prone to, break-ups than heterosexual marriages (Kurdek, 1998;, Peplau, 1991). If that’s the case, it’s probably because, gay relationships face fewer barriers to dissolution—, that is, fewer practical problems that make breakups, difficult or costly (Kurdek, 1998; Peplau & Cochran,, 1990). Married couples considering divorce often face, a variety of such barriers—attorneys’ fees, concerns, about children, wrangling over joint investments, and, the disapproval of their families—that may motivate, them to salvage their deteriorating relationship. In contrast, gay couples do not have to wrestle with the legal, formalities of divorce, and they are less likely to have, children, joint investments, or family opposition to, worry about., Although gay relationships evolve in a different, social context than marital relationships, recent studies have documented striking commonalities between, heterosexual and homosexual couples. Both types of, couples report similar levels of love and commitment, in their relationships, similar levels of overall satisfaction with their relationships, and similar levels of sexual satisfaction (Bryant & Demian, 1994; Kurdek, 1998;, Peplau, 1991). Resemblance is also apparent when researchers study what gays and heterosexuals want out, of their relationships (Peplau, 1988; see Figure 9.14)., , •, , Homosexual and heterosexual couples are also similar, in terms of the factors that predict relationship satisfaction, the sources of conflict in their relationships, and, their patterns of conflict resolution (Kurdek, 2004)., Misconceptions About Gay Relationships, , Although research indicates a considerable continuity, between homosexual and heterosexual relationships,, basic misconceptions about the nature of gay relationships remain widespread. Let’s look at some of these inaccurate stereotypes., First, many people assume that most gay couples, adopt traditional masculine and feminine roles in their, relationships, with one partner behaving in a crossgendered manner. This appears to be true in only a small, minority of cases. In fact, on the whole, gay couples, appear to be more flexible about role expectations than, heterosexuals (Reimann, 1997). In comparison to married couples, gay couples display a more equitable balance of power in their relationships and are less likely to, adhere to traditional gender roles (Rosenbluth, 1997;, Solomon, Rothblum, & Balsam, 2004)., Second, popular stereotypes suggest that gays only, rarely get involved in long-term intimate relationships., In reality, most homosexual men, and nearly all homosexual women, prefer stable, long-term relationships,, and at any one time roughly 40–60 percent of gay males, and 45–80 percent of lesbians are involved in commit-, , FIG U R E 9.14, , Comparing priorities in intimate, relationships. Peplau (1981) asked, heterosexual men and women and, homosexual men and women to rate, the significance (9 = high importance), of various aspects of their intimate, relationships. As you can see, all four, groups returned fairly similar ratings., Peplau concludes that gays and heterosexuals largely want the same things, out of their relationships., From Peplau, L. A. (1981, March). What homosexuals, want. Psychology Today, 3, 28–38. Reprinted with permission from Psychology Today Magazine. Copyright © 1981, Sussex Publishers, Inc., , Heterosexual, men, , Heterosexual, women, , Homosexual, men, , Homosexual, women, , Being able to talk, about my most, intimate feelings, Having an, egalitarian relationship, Sharing as many, activities with my, partner as possible, Trying new sexual, activities or techniques, with my partner, Sexual fidelity in, the relationship, Laughing easily, with each other, Both of us having, similar political, attitudes, Working together on tasks, rather than dividing, tasks between us, 0, , 294, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , 1, , 2, , 3, 4, 5, 6, Rating of importance, , 7, , 8, , 9

Page 332 :
ted relationships (Kurdek, 2004). Lesbian relationships, are generally sexually exclusive. About half of committed male couples have “open” relationships, allowing, for the possibility of sexual activity (but not affection), with outsiders. While intimate relationships among gays, appear to be less stable than marriages among straights,, they may compare favorably with heterosexual cohabitation, which would be a more appropriate baseline, for comparison. Both gays and heterosexual cohabitants may face opposition to their relationship from, their families and from society in general, and neither, enjoys the legal and social sanctions of marriage., Third, lesbians and gay men tend to be thought of, as individuals rather than as members of families. This, thinking reflects a bias that homosexuality and family, just don’t mesh (Allen & Demo, 1995). In reality, gays, are very much involved in families as sons and daughters, as parents and stepparents, as aunts, uncles, and, grandparents (Johnson & Colluci, 1999). Although, exact data are not available, far more are parents than, most people realize. Many of these parental responsi-, , bilities are left over from previous marriages, as about, 20–30 percent of gays have been heterosexually married, (Kurdek, 2004). But an increasing number of homosexuals are opting to have children in the context of their, gay relationships (Falk, 1994; Gartrell et al., 1999)., What do we know about gays and lesbians as parents? The evidence suggests that gays are similar to, their heterosexual counterparts in their approaches to, parenting and that their children are similar to the children of heterosexual parents in terms of personal development and peer relations (Patterson, 2001). The, overall adjustment of children with gay parents appears, similar in quality to that of children of heterosexual parents (Chan et al., 1998; Golombok et al., 2003). Moreover, the vast majority of children of gay parents grow, up to identify themselves as heterosexual (Bailey & Dawood, 1998), and some studies suggest that they are no, more likely than others to become homosexual (Flaks, et al., 1995). In sum, children reared by gay and lesbian, parents do not appear to suffer any special ill effects and, do not seem noticeably different from other children., , Understanding Intimate Violence, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , ■, , Discuss the incidence and consequences of date rape., Explain the factors that contribute to date rape., Discuss the incidence of partner abuse and the characteristics of, batterers., Discuss why women stay in abusive relationships., , Answer the following statements “true” or “false.”, ___ 1. Most rapes are committed by strangers., ___ 2. Research indicates that aggressive pornography, does not contribute to sexual coercion., ___ 3. Most women in abusive relationships are attracted to violent men., ___ 4. Most men who have witnessed domestic violence, as children will batter their intimate partners., All of the above statements are false, as you will, see in this Application, which examines the darker side, of intimate relationships. Most of us assume that we will, be safe with those whom we love and trust. Unfortunately, some people are betrayed by individuals to whom, they feel closest. Intimate violence is aggression toward those who are in close relationship to the aggressor. Intimate violence takes many forms: psychological, physical, and sexual abuse. Tragically, this violence, sometimes ends in homicide. In this Application, we’ll, CHAPTER 9, , focus on two serious social problems: date rape and, partner abuse., , Date Rape, Date rape refers to forced and unwanted intercourse, in the context of dating. Date rape can occur on a first, date, with someone you’ve dated for a while, or with, someone to whom you’re engaged. Many people confuse, , WE B LI N K 9.6, , Office on Violence Against Women, This U.S. Department of Justice office was created in 1995, after federal legislation mandated national efforts to reduce domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. This, site provides a wide variety of legal and social scientific, resources in support of this mission., , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 295

Page 333 :
date rape with seduction. The latter occurs when a, woman is persuaded and agrees to have sex. Date rape, often occurs when seduction fails and the man goes on, to have sex with the woman without her consent. The, force used in date rape is typically verbal or physical, coercion, but sometimes it involves a weapon., Incidence and Consequences, , How common is date rape? It’s much more common, than widely realized. Research suggests that 13–30 percent of women are likely to be victimized by date rape or, attempted sexual coercion at some point in their lives, (Abbey et al., 2004; Koss & Cook, 1993; Spitzberg, 1999)., Most people naively assume that the vast majority of, rapes are committed by strangers who leap from bushes, or dark alleys to surprise their victims. In reality, research indicates that strangers are responsible for only, a small minority of rapes and that over half of all rapes, occur in the context of dating relationships (see Figure 9.15). Most rape victims are between the ages of 15, and 25., How are women affected by date rape? All rape is, traumatic, but it is particularly shattering for a woman, to be raped by someone she has trusted. In the aftermath, of date rape, women typically experience a variety of, emotional reactions, including fear, anger, anxiety, selfblame, and guilt (Kahn & Andrioli Mathie, 1999). Many, , Family, member,, Stranger, including, 11%, husband, 9%, Nonromantic, Steady date,, acquaintance,, including, including friend,, boyfriend, co–worker,, or lover, neighbor, 31%, 26%, Casual date, 22%, , •, , FIG U R E 9.15, , Rape victim–offender relationships. Based on a national survery of 3187 college women, Mary Koss and her colleagues (1988), identified a sample of 468 women who indicated that they had, been a victim of rape and who provided information on their, relationship to the offender. Contrary to the prevailing stereotype, only a small minority (11 percent) had been raped by a, stranger. As you can see, over half of rapes occur in the context, of dating relationships. (Data based on Koss et al., 1988), , 296, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , rape victims suffer from depression, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, and increased risk for suicide, (Foa, 1998; Slashinski, Coker, & Davis, 2003; Ullman,, 2004). Negative reactions can be exacerbated if the, woman’s family and friends are not supportive—particularly if family or friends blame the victim for the, attack. In addition to the trauma of the rape, women, also have to cope with the possibilities of pregnancy and, sexually transmitted disease (Golding, 1996). Moreover,, if the rape survivor presses charges against her attacker,, she may have to deal with extremely difficult legal proceedings, negative publicity, and social stigma., Contributing Factors, , To understand the phenomenon of date rape, it’s essential to know something about the factors that contribute, to it. It probably comes as no surprise to learn that alcohol contributes to about half of sexually aggressive incidents (Abbey et al., 2004). Alcohol impairs judgment, and reduces inhibitions, making men more willing to, use force. Drinking also undermines men’s ability to interpret ambiguous social cues, making them more likely, to overestimate their date’s interest in sex. The more, intoxicated perpetrators are, the more aggressive they, tend to be (Abbey et al., 2003). Alcohol also increases, women’s vulnerability to sexual coercion. Drinking can, cloud women’s assessments of their risk and their ability to mount firm resistance or find a way to escape the, situation., Increasingly, so-called “date rape drugs” are a cause, for concern (Dyer, 2000; Pope & Shouldice, 2001)., Rohypnol (“roofies”) and gamma hydroxybutyrate, (GHB) are two drugs used to subdue dates. Although, these drugs are colorless, odorless, and tasteless, their, effects are anything but benign, and they can even be, fatal. Victims typically pass out and have no recall of, what happened while they were under the influence, of the drug. To make it easier to spike a drink, predators typically look for individuals who are already, intoxicated., Research on the effects of aggressive pornography,, which depicts rape and other sexual violence against, women, suggests that such material elevates some men’s, tendency to behave aggressively toward women (Donnerstein & Malamuth, 1997). It appears that aggressive, pornography works indirectly by fostering callous attitudes toward women, making sexual coercion seem, less offensive, and desensitizing males to the horror of, sexual violence (Mullin & Linz, 1995). In particular, such, pornography helps perpetuate the myth that women, enjoy being raped and ravaged (Boeringer, 1994). That, said, given the widespread dissemination of aggressive, pornography, it is obvious that there are vast numbers, of men who are exposed to it without becoming rapists., It seems likely that aggressive pornography contributes

Page 334 :
© AP/Wide World Photos, , The rape allegations against basketball star Kobe Bryant focused a great deal of attention on the problem of date rape,, which is far more common than most people realize., , to sexual violence only in a minority of men who are already predisposed to behave in sexually aggressive ways, (Seto, Maric, & Barbaree, 2001)., Gender differences in sexual standards also contribute to date rape. Society still encourages a double, standard for males and females. Men are encouraged, to have sexual feelings, to act on them, and to “score,”, whereas women are socialized to be coy about their sexual desires. This double standard can promote sexual, aggression by men who come to view dating as a “battle, of the sexes” in which they are supposed to persist in, their pursuit of sexual conquests (Abbey et al., 2001;, Forbes, Adams-Curtis, & White, 2004)., Many date rapes are the result of miscommunication (Lim & Roloff, 1999). Social norms encourage game, playing as part of flirting, so dating partners may not, always say what they mean or mean what they say., Whereas the majority of women say “no” and mean it,, , CHAPTER 9, , some women may say “no” to sexual activity when they, actually mean “maybe” or “yes.” Studies surveying the, extent of token resistance among college women report that approximately 38 percent of them have acted, this way (Muehlenhard & McCoy, 1991; Shotland &, Hunter, 1995). Unfortunately, this behavior can backfire. For some men, it can cloud the issue of whether a, woman has consented to sex (Osman, 2003)., In terms of personal characteristics, males who, engage in sexual aggression tend to be relatively impulsive, low in empathy, hostile toward women, and, heavy drinkers (Abbey et al., 2001, 2004). They tend to, endorse traditional gender stereotypes about male, dominance and tend to have had more (consensual) sex, partners than their age-mates. They also tend to have, poor anger management skills (Lundeberg et al., 2004)., A variety of situational factors influence the likelihood of date rape. Sexual assault is more likely (1) the, more the man knows the woman, (2) the more isolated, the setting they are in, (3) the more they have had some, consensual sexual activity previously, and (4) the longer, the man has misperceived the woman’s sexual interest, (Abbey et al., 2001). These factors can contribute to a, man feeling that his date owes him sex because he has, been “led on.” He may then use his anger as an excuse to, force the woman to have sex., Reducing the Incidence of Date Rape, , What can women do to reduce the likelihood of being, victimized by date rape? Here are some suggestions:, (1) Recognize date rape for what it is: an act of sexual, aggression; (2) become familiar with the characteristics, of men who are likely to engage in date rape (see Figure 9.16 on the next page) and be cautious about dating men who exhibit these traits; (3) beware of excessive alcohol and drug use, which may undermine, self-control and self-determination in sexual interactions; (4) when dating someone new, agree to go only, to public places and always carry enough money for, transportation back home; (5) communicate feelings, and expectations about sex by engaging in appropriate, self-disclosure; and (6) be prepared to act aggressively if, assertive refusals fail to stop unwanted advances., , Partner Abuse, The O. J. Simpson trial dramatically heightened public, awareness of partner violence, particularly wife battering and homicide. People found it difficult to reconcile, the image of the smiling sports hero with the fact that, he was a convicted wife batterer with a history of terrorizing his former spouse. Physical abuse can include, kicking, biting, punching, choking, pushing, slapping,, hitting with an object, threatening with a weapon, using, , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 297

Page 335 :
Characteristics of Date Rapists, , Sexual entitlement, , Power and control, , Hostility and anger, , Touching women with no regard, for their wishes, , Interrupting people, especially, women, , Showing a quick temper, , Sexualizing relationships that, are appropriately not sexual, , Being a bad loser, , Blaming others when things, go wrong, , Exhibiting inappropriate, competitiveness, , Tending to transform other, emotions into anger, , Engaging in conversation that, is inappropriately intimate, Telling sexual jokes at inappropriate times or places, , Using intimidating body, language, , Acceptance of, interpersonal violence, Using threats in displays of, anger, Using violence in borderline, situations, Approving observed violence, Justifying violence, , Game playing, , Making inappropriate comments, about women’s bodies, sexuality,, and so on, , •, , FIG U R E 9.16, , Date rapists: Warning signs. According to Rozee, Bateman, and Gilmore (1991), four factors appear, to distinguish date rapists: feelings of sexual entitlement, a penchant for exerting power and control,, high hostility and anger, and acceptance of interpersonal violence. The presence of more than one of, these characteristics is an important warning sign. When sexual entitlement is coupled with any other, factor, special heed should be taken., , a weapon, and rape. Examples of psychological abuse, include humiliation, name calling, controlling what, the partner does and with whom the partner socializes, refusing to communicate, unreasonable withholding of money, and questioning of the partner’s sanity., We will focus primarily on physical abuse of partners,, or battering., Incidence and Consequences, , As with other taboo topics, obtaining accurate estimates of physical abuse is difficult. Research suggests, that about 25 percent of women and 7 percent of men, have been physically assaulted by an intimate partner, at some point in their lives (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000)., Wives attack their husbands more than most people realize (P. Pearson, 1998), but much of wives’ aggression, appears to be retaliation for abuse and women tend to, inflict less physical damage than men (Johnson, 2000)., Thus, women are the principal victims of severe, dangerous abuse. A woman is the victim in 85 percent of, nonfatal violent crimes committed by intimate partners, and in 75 percent of murders by spouses (Rennison &, Welchans, 2000). That said, women commit one-quarter, of spousal murders, so it is an oversimplification to assume that partner abuse involves only male aggression, against women. It is also inaccurate to assume that intimate violence is seen only in marital relationships., Partner abuse is also a significant problem for cohabiting heterosexual couples (DeMaris et al., 2003) and for, gay and lesbian couples (Greenwood et al., 2002; Renzetti, 1995)., , 298, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , The effects of battering reverberate beyond the obvious physical injuries. Victims of partner abuse tend to, suffer from severe anxiety, depression, feelings of helplessness and humiliation, stress-induced physical illness,, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, and increased vulnerability to suicide (Brewster, 2002; Campbell, 2002; Cohan et al., 2002). Children who witness, marital violence also experience ill effects, such as anxiety, depression, reduced self-esteem, and increased, delinquency (Johnson & Ferraro, 2001)., Characteristics of Batterers, , Men who batter women are a diverse group, so a single, profile has not emerged (Dixon & Browne, 2002). Some, risk factors associated with an elevated risk for domestic violence include unemployment, drinking and drug, problems, a tendency to anger easily, attitudes that condone aggression, and high stress (Stith et al., 2004). Males, who were beaten as children or who witnessed their, mothers being beaten are more likely to abuse their wives, than other men are, although most men who grow up, in these difficult circumstances do not become batterers, (Stith et al., 2000). Battering appears to be somewhat, more common in families of lower socioeconomic status, but no social class is immune (Roberts, 2002). In, many instances, the motivation for battering is to use, it as a tool to exert control over women (Johnson & Ferraro, 2001). Other relationship factors that are associated with domestic violence include having frequent, disagreements, exhibiting a heated style of dealing with, disagreements, and pairing a man holding traditional

Page 336 :
gender role attitudes with a woman who has nontraditional views of gender roles (DeMaris et al., 2003)., , Perceived Reasons for Returning, to Abusive Relationships, , Why Do Women Stay, in Abusive Relationships?, , Reasons, , Mean rating, , Women leave abusive partners more often than popular stereotypes suggest (Johnson & Ferraro, 2001), but, people are still perplexed by the fact that many women, remain in abusive relationships that seem horrible and, degrading. However, research shows that this phenomenon is not really that perplexing. A host of seemingly, compelling reasons explain why many women feel that, leaving is not a realistic option. Many fear economic, hardship and believe that they won’t be able to survive, financially without their husband (Choice & Lamke,, 1997). Many simply have no place to go and fear becoming homeless (Browne, 1993a). Many feel guilty and, ashamed about their failing relationship and don’t want, to face disapproval from family and friends, who are, likely to fall into the trap of blaming the victim (Barnett, & La Violette, 1993). Above all else, many fear that if, they try to leave, they may precipitate more brutal violence and even murder (DeMaris & Swinford, 1996)., Unfortunately, this fear is not an unrealistic one, in, that many men have shown remarkable persistence in, tracking down, stalking, threatening, beating, and killing their ex-partners. Despite the many difficulties of, leaving abusive relationships (see Figure 9.17), attention is still focused on why women stay rather than on, why men batter and on what interventions can prevent, women from being brutalized or killed when they do, leave (Koss et al., 1994). Treatment programs for men, who batter their wives can be helpful in decreasing further violence, but the effectiveness of these programs is, rather modest (Babcock, Green, & Robie, 2004; Roberts, 2002)., Although most of us would prefer not to think, about this darker side of relationships, intimate violence, is a reality we can ill-afford to ignore. It deeply touches, the lives of millions of individuals. We can only hope, that increased public awareness of intimate violence, will help reduce its incidence and its tragic effects., , Lack of financial resources, , 9.1, , Emotional dependency on the abuser, , 9.0, , Lack of housing resources, , 8.7, , Lack of job opportunities, , 7.7, , Denial of cycle of violence, , 7.6, , Lack of support or follow-through by the legal, system, , 7.6, , Give the abuser one more chance, , CHAPTER 9, , •, , 10.0, , Lack of child-care resources, , 7.1, , Lack of transportation, , 6.7, , Fear that the abuser will find her and do her, harm, , 6.7, , Lack of support from other family members, , 6.6, , Fear that the abuser will get custody of the, children, , 5.8, , Fear that the abuser will kidnap the children, , 5.8, , Children miss the absent parent, , 5.6, , Lack of professional counseling, , 5.1, , Fear that the abuser will harm the children, , 4.6, , F I G U R E 9. 17, , Perceived reasons for returning to abusive relationships., Shelters for battered wives generally report that the majority, of their clients return to their partners. In one study (Johnson,, Crowley, & Sigler, 1992), workers at ten shelters in Alabama were, asked to rate the reasons that women returned to abusive relationships. The most frequently cited reasons are listed here in, order of rated importance. As you can see, a diverse host of, factors appear to propel women back into abusive relationships., From Johnson, I. M., Crowley, J., & Sigler, R. T. (1992). Agency response to domestic violence: Services provided to battered women. In E. C. Viano (Ed.), Intimate violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp 191–202, Table on p. 199). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis. Copyright, © 1992 Hemisphere Publishing. Reprinted with permission of Taylor & Francis, Inc., , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , 299

Page 337 :
■, , KEY IDEAS, Challenges to the Traditional Model of Marriage, , CHAPTER 9 REVIEW, , ■, , The traditional model of marriage is being challenged by the, increasing acceptability of singlehood, the increasing popularity, of cohabitation, the reduced premium on permanence, changes, in gender roles, the increasing prevalence of voluntary childlessness, and the decline of the traditional nuclear family. Nonetheless, marriage remains quite popular., , Moving Toward Marriage, ■, , A multitude of factors influence an individual’s motivation, to marry. Mate selection is influenced by endogamy, homogamy,, and gender. Women place more emphasis on potential partners’, ambition and financial prospects, whereas men are more interested in a partner’s youthfulness and physical attractiveness., ■ According to Murstein, the process of mate selection goes, through three stages, which emphasize the stimulus value of the, potential partner, value compatibility, and adequacy of role enactments. There are some premarital predictors of marital success,, such as family background, age, length of courtship, and personality, but the relations are weak. The nature of a couple’s premarital interactions is a better predictor of marital adjustment., Marital Adjustment Across, the Family Life Cycle, ■, , The family life cycle is an orderly sequence of developmental stages that families tend to progress through. Newly married, couples tend to be very happy before the arrival of children., Today more couples are struggling with the decision about, whether to have children. The arrival of children is a major, transition that is handled best by parents who have realistic expectations about the difficulties inherent in raising a family., ■ As children reach adolescence, parents should expect more, conflict as their influence declines. They must learn to relate to, their children as adults and help launch them into the adult world., Most parents no longer struggle with the empty nest syndrome., Adult children returning home may be more of a problem., Vulnerable Areas in Marital Adjustment, , Wallerstein’s research suggests that divorce tends to have extremely negative effects on children. Hetherington’s research suggests that most children recover from divorce after a few years., The effects of divorce on children vary, but negative effects can, be long-lasting., ■ A substantial majority of divorced people remarry. These, second marriages have a somewhat lower probability of success, than first marriages., Alternatives to Marriage, ■, , An increasing proportion of the young population are remaining single, but this fact does not mean that people are turning away from marriage. Although singles generally have the same, adjustment problems as married couples, evidence suggests that, singles tend to be somewhat less happy and less healthy., ■ The prevalence of cohabitation has increased dramatically., Logically, one might expect cohabitation to facilitate marital success, but research has consistently found an association between, cohabitation and marital instability., ■ Gay relationships develop in a starkly different social context than marital relationships. Nonetheless, studies have found, that heterosexual and homosexual couples are similar in many, ways. Gay relationships are characterized by great diversity. It is, not true that gay couples usually assume traditional masculine, and feminine roles, nor is it true that gays rarely get involved in, long-term intimate relationships or family relations., Application: Understanding Intimate Violence, ■, , Over half of rapes are committed in the context of dating., Estimates suggest that the chances of a woman being victimized, by date rape at some time in her life range from 13 percent to, 30 percent. Rape is a traumatic experience that has many serious consequences. Alcohol and drug use, violent pornography,, and gender-based sexual standards all contribute to date rape., Miscommunication revolving around token resistance is particularly problematic., ■ Research suggests that about 25 percent of women and 7 percent of men have been victims of partner abuse. Women are the, principal victims of serious, dangerous abuse. Men who batter, their partners are diverse, but control is often the central issue., Women stay in abusive relationships for a variety of compelling,, practical reasons, including economic realities., , ■, , Gaps in expectations about marital roles may create marital, stress. Disparities in expectations about gender roles and the, distribution of housework may be especially common and problematic. Work concerns can clearly spill over to influence marital functioning, but the links between parents’ employment and, marital adjustment are complex., ■ Wealth does not ensure marital happiness, but a lack of money, can produce marital problems. Inadequate communication is, a commonly reported marital problem, which is predictive of, divorce., , KEY TERMS, Cohabitation p. 270, Date rape p. 295, Endogamy p. 272, Family life cycle p. 275, , Homogamy p. 272, Intimate violence p. 295, Marriage p. 270, , Divorce, ■, , Divorce rates have increased dramatically in recent decades,, but they appear to be stabilizing. Deciding on a divorce tends to, be a gradual process marred by indecision. Unpleasant as divorce, may be, the evidence suggests that toughing it out in an unhappy, marriage can often be worse., , 300, , PART 2, , The Interpersonal Realm, , KEY PEOPLE, John Gottman pp. 283–285, E. Mavis Hetherington, p. 289, , Bernard Murstein p. 274, Judith Wallerstein p. 288

Page 338 :
c. The median age at which people get married has, increased, d. An increase in the number of young people unwilling to undertake the financial burdens of marriage, and family, , PRACTICE TEST, , 2. Endogamy refers to:, a. the tendency to marry within one’s social group., b. the tendency to marry someone with similar, characteristics., c. the final marriage in serial monogamy., d. norms that promote marriage outside one’s social, unit., 3. Which of the following is associated with a greater, likelihood of marital success?, a. Having parents who divorced., b. Perfectionism., c. Longer courtships., d. Younger age at marriage., , 9. Research on cohabitation indicates that:, a. most cohabitants are just not interested in marriage., b. most cohabitants would eventually like to marry., c. cohabitation is declining., d. cohabitation experience improves the chances that, one’s marriage will be successful., 10. Which of the following has been supported by research, on intimate relationships among gay men and lesbians?, a. Gay couples adopt traditional male/female gender, roles., b. Gays rarely become involved in long-term, relationships., c. Gays have impoverished family relations., d. Gays want the same things out of intimate relationships that heterosexuals want., , Book Companion Website, Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , 4. The transition to parenthood tends to be easier when:, a. the newborn child was planned for., b. the parents have realistic expectations., c. the new parents are relatively young., d. the father is not heavily involved in child care., 5. Most research suggests that maternal employment is:, a. very harmful to children., b. moderately harmful to children., c. generally not harmful to children., d. extremely beneficial to young male children., , Personal Explorations Workbook, The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 9.1: Self-Report, Jealousy Scale. Personal Probe 9.1: How Do You Behave in, Intimate Relationships? Personal Probe 9.2: Thinking About, Your Attitudes About Marriage and Cohabitation., , 6. When financial resources are plentiful in a marriage,, arguments about money:, a. may still be a problem., b. don’t occur., c. are a big problem only if the wife earns more than, her husband., d. are unrelated to marital satisfaction., , Pages 270–271, Page 272, Pages 274–275, Page 277, Page 282, , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , a, d, c, b, d, , Page 283, Page 288, Page 291, Page 292, Pages 294–295, , CHAPTER 9, , Marriage and Intimate Relationships, , d, a, c, b, c, , 8. What is the most probable reason for the increase in, the proportion of young people who are single?, a. Loss of faith in the institution of marriage, b. Increased individualism and declining collectivism, , ANSWERS, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , 7. The evidence suggests that the negative effects of divorce, on former spouses’ psychological adjustment are:, a. exaggerated for both sexes., b. greater for men than women., c. greater for women than men., d. about the same for men and women., , 301, , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Which of the following is not one of the social trends, that are undermining the traditional model of marriage?, a. Increased acceptance of singlehood, b. Increased voluntary childlessness, c. Increased acceptance of cohabitation, d. Increased premium on permanence in marriage

Page 339 :
GENDER STEREOTYPES, GENDER SIMILARITIES AND, DIFFERENCES, Cognitive Abilities, Personality Traits and Social Behavior, Psychological Disorders, Putting Gender Differences in, Perspective, BIOLOGICAL ORIGINS OF GENDER, DIFFERENCES, Evolutionary Explanations, Brain Organization, Hormonal Influences, , 302, , ENVIRONMENTAL ORIGINS OF GENDER, DIFFERENCES, Processes in Gender-Role Socialization, Sources of Gender-Role Socialization, GENDER ROLES, Role Expectations for Males, Problems with the Male Role, Role Expectations for Females, Problems with the Female Role, Sexism: A Special Problem for Females, GENDER IN THE PAST AND IN THE, FUTURE, Why Are Gender Roles Changing?, Alternatives to Traditional Gender Roles, A Gender-Free Society?, , APPLICATION: BRIDGING THE GENDER, GAP IN COMMUNICATION, The Clash of Two “Cultures”, Instrumental and Expressive Styles, Common Mixed-Gender Communication, Problems, Toward a “Shared Language”, CHAPTER 10 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST

Page 340 :
CHAPTER, , Gender and, Behavior, , 10, , “In classes, I experienced myself as a person to be taken lightly. In one, seminar, I was never allowed to finish a sentence. There seemed to be a tacit, understanding that I never had anything to say.”—A woman quoted in The, Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women? (Hall & Sandler, 1982, p. 7), “I get a feeling, like I want to say ‘I love you’ or just put my arms around, my girlfriend. But then, for some reason, I just shut down and I don’t do, anything. It seems like I am going to give up too much by getting too close., Maybe she’ll want more than I have to give. This way I can cover myself., But I wind up feeling guilty about not showing her I care.”—A man quoted, in Man Alive: A Primer of Men’s Issues (Rabinowitz & Cochran, 1994, p. 55), The woman and man quoted here feel boxed in by gender roles. They’re, struggling with the limitations placed on their behavior because of their, gender. They aren’t unique or unusual—think about the times you have, changed your behavior to bring it in line with society’s concepts of masculinity and femininity., Before continuing, we need to clarify some terms., Some scholars prefer to use the term gender to refer to, Courtesy, Janet Shibley Hyde, , male-female differences that are learned and sex to designate biologically based differences between males and, females. However, as respected authority Janet Shibley, Hyde (2004) points out, making this sharp distinction, between sex and gender fails to recognize that biology, , Janet Shibley Hyde, , and culture interact. Following this reasoning, we’ll use, gender to mean the state of being male or female. (When we use the term, sex, we’re referring to sexual behavior.) It’s important to note that, as we, use the term, gender says nothing about the causes of behavior. In other, , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 303

Page 341 :
•, , FIG U R E 10.1, , Gender-Related Concepts, , Terminology related to, gender. The topic of gender, involves many closely related, ideas that are easily confused. The gender-related, concepts introduced in this, chapter are summarized here, for easy comparison., , Gender, , The state of being male or female, , Gender identity, , An individual’s perception of himself or herself as male or female, , Gender stereotypes, , Widely held and often inaccurate beliefs about males’ and females’ abilities,, personality traits, and social behavior, , Gender differences, , Actual disparities in behavior between males and females, based on research, observations, , Gender roles, , Culturally defined expectations about appropriate behavior for males and females, , Gender-role identity, , A person’s identification with the traits regarded as masculine or feminine, (one’s sense of being masculine or feminine), , Sexual orientation, , A person’s preference for sexual partners of the other gender (heterosexual),, the same gender (homosexual), or both genders (bisexual), , words, if we say that there are gender differences in, aggressive behavior, we are simply stating that males, and females differ in this area. This behavioral dispar, ity might be caused by biological factors, by environ, mental factors, or by both. Figure 10.1 sorts out a, number of gender-related terms that will be used in, our discussions., , In this chapter, we take up some intriguing and, controversial questions: Are there genuine behavioral, differences between males and females? If so, what are, their origins? Are traditional gender-role expectations, healthy or unhealthy? Why are gender roles in our society changing, and what does the future hold? In the Application, we explore gender and communication styles., , Gender Stereotypes, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Explain the nature of gender stereotypes and their connection with, instrumentality and expressiveness., Discuss four important points about gender stereotypes., , Obviously, males and females differ biologically—in, their genitals and other aspects of anatomy, and in their, physiological functioning. These readily apparent physical disparities between males and females lead people, to expect other differences as well. Recall from Chap-, , CATHY © Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , 304, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , ter 6 that stereotypes are widely held beliefs that people, possess certain characteristics simply because of their, membership in a particular group. Thus, gender stereotypes are widely shared beliefs about males’ and females’ abilities, personality traits, and social behavior.

Page 342 :
Elements of Traditional Gender, Stereotypes, , •, , Masculine, , Feminine, , Active, , Aware of others’ feelings, , Adventurous, , Considerate, , Aggressive, , Creative, , Ambitious, , Cries easily, , Competitive, , Devotes self to others, , Dominant, , Emotional, , Independent, , Enjoys art and music, , Leadership qualities, , Excitable in a crisis, , Likes math and science, , Expresses tender feelings, , Makes decisions easily, , Feelings hurt easily, , Mechanical aptitude, , Gentle, , Not easily influenced, , Home oriented, , Outspoken, , Kind, , Persistent, , Likes children, , Self-confident, , Neat, , Skilled in business, , Needs approval, , Stands up under pressure, , Tactful, , Takes a stand, , Understanding, , F I G U R E 10.2, , Traditional gender stereotypes. This is a partial list of the, characteristics that college students associate with a typical man, and a typical woman., Adapted from Ruble, T. L. (1983). Sex stereotypes: Issues of change in the 70s. Sex Roles, 9,, 397–402. Copyright © 1983 Plenum Publishing Co. Adapted by permission of Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers and the author., , Research finds a great deal of consensus on supposed behavioral differences between men and women (Bergen, & Williams, 1991). For example, a survey of gender, stereotypes in 25 countries revealed considerable similarity of views (Williams & Best, 1990; Williams, Satterwhite, & Best, 1999). Because of the widespread gains in, educational and occupational attainment by American, women since the 1970s, you might expect to find, changes in gender stereotypes from then to now. However, gender stereotypes in this country have remained, largely stable since the early 1970s, especially those for, men (Diekman & Eagly, 2000; Spence & Buckner, 2000)., Gender stereotypes are too numerous to summarize here. Instead, you can examine Figure 10.2, which, lists a number of characteristics people commonly link, with femininity and masculinity. This list is based on a, study in which subjects were asked to indicate the extent to which various traits are characteristic of each, gender (Ruble, 1983). The stereotyped attributes for, males generally reflect the quality of instrumentality,, an orientation toward action and accomplishment,, whereas the stereotypes for females reflect the qual-, , ity of expressiveness, an orientation toward emotion, and relationships (Eagly, Wood, & Diekman, 2000;, Parsons & Bales, 1955)., When it comes to stereotypes, there are some important points to keep in mind. First, despite the general agreement on a number of gender stereotypes,, variability also occurs (Williams & Best, 1990). The, characteristics in Figure 10.2 represent the prototypic, American male or female: white, middle-class, heterosexual, and Christian. But it is obvious that not everyone fits this set of characteristics. For example, the, stereotypes for African American males and females are, more similar on the dimensions of competence and expressiveness than those for white American males and, females (Kane, 2000). Also, the stereotypes of white and, Hispanic women are more positive than are those for, African American women (Niemann et al., 1994)., A second point about gender stereotypes is that, since the 1980s, the boundaries between male and female stereotypes have become less rigid (Deaux &, Lewis, 1983, 1984). Earlier, the male and female stereotypes were seen as separate and distinct categories (for, example, men are strong and women are weak). Now, it seems that people perceive gender stereotypes as two, overlapping categories., A third consideration is that the traditional male, stereotype is more complimentary than the conventional female stereotype. This fact is related to androcentrism, or the belief that the male is the norm, (Bem, 1993). In other words, our society is organized, in a way that favors “masculine” characteristics and behavior. Figure 10.3 provides some examples of how androcentrism can be manifested in the workplace., , Androcentrism in the Workplace, , •, , He’s good on details., , She’s picky., , He follows through., , She doesn’t know when to quit., , He’s assertive., , She’s pushy., , He stands firm., , She’s rigid., , He’s a man of the world., , She’s been around., , He’s not afraid to say, what he thinks., , She’s outspoken., , He’s close-mouthed., , She’s secretive., , He exercises authority., , She’s power-mad., , He climbed the ladder of, success., , She slept her way to the top., , He’s a stern taskmaster., , She’s difficult to work for., , F I G U R E 10. 3, , Male bias on the job. In the world of work, women who exhibit, traditional “masculine” characteristics are often perceived negatively. Thus, a man and a woman may display essentially the same, behavior but elicit very different reactions., CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 305

Page 343 :
Finally, keep in mind what you learned about, stereotypes in Chapter 6: They can bias your perceptions and expectations of others as well as your, interactions., , Let’s shift from gender stereotypes to what males, and females are actually like. Keep in mind that our, discussion focuses on modern Western societies; the, story may be different in other cultures., , Gender Similarities and Differences, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Summarize the research findings on gender, similarities and differences in verbal, mathematical,, and spatial abilities., Summarize the research on gender similarities and, differences in personality and social behavior., Summarize the research on gender and psychological, disorders., , Are men more aggressive than women? Do more, women than men suffer from depression? Hundreds, of studies have attempted to answer these and related, questions about gender and behavior. Moreover, new, evidence is pouring in constantly, and many researchers report conflicting findings. Thus, it is almost an, overwhelming task to keep up with trends in the field., Thankfully, a new statistical technique has come to the, rescue. Meta-analysis combines the statistical results, of many studies of the same question, yielding an estimate of the size and consistency of a variable’s effects. This approach allows a researcher to assess the, overall trends across all the previous studies of how, gender is related to, say, math abilities or conformity., Meta-analysis has been a great boon to researchers,, and quite a few meta-analyses on gender differences, have now been conducted., We’ll do our best to thread our way through the, available research. Here we examine three areas: cognitive abilities, personality traits and social behavior,, and psychological disorders., , Cognitive Abilities, Perhaps we should first point out that gender differences have not been found in overall intelligence. Of, course, this fact shouldn’t be surprising, because intelligence tests are intentionally designed to minimize, differences between the scores of males and females., But what about gender differences in specific cognitive, skills? Let’s start with verbal abilities., Verbal Abilities, , Verbal abilities include a number of distinct skills, such, as vocabulary, reading, writing, spelling, and grammar, abilities. Girls and women generally have the edge in, the verbal area, although the gender differences are, small (Halpern, 2000; Hyde & Kling, 2001; Hyde &, Linn, 1988). Among the findings worth noting are the, 306, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , ■, , ■, , Summarize the situation regarding overall behavioral, similarities and differences between males and, females., Give two explanations for why gender differences, appear larger than they actually are., , fact that girls usually start speaking a little earlier, have, larger vocabularies and better reading scores in grade, school, and are more verbally fluent (on tests of writing, for instance). Boys seem to fare better on verbal, analogies. However, they are three to four times more, likely to be stutterers (Skinner & Shelton, 1985) and five, to ten times more likely than girls to be dyslexic (Vandenberg, 1987). Again, the gender differences in verbal, abilities are small, but they generally favor females., Mathematical Abilities, , Researchers have also looked at gender differences in, mathematical abilities, including performing computations and solving word and story problems. Meta-analyses of mathematical abilities show small gender differences favoring males (Hedges & Nowell, 1995; Hyde,, Fennema, & Lamon, 1990; Nowell & Hedges, 1998). Interestingly, small gender differences favoring males appear for European Americans but not for African Americans, Hispanic Americans, or Asian Americans (Hyde,, 1994b). In Canada, gender differences in mathematical, abilities are minimal (Randhawa & Hunter, 2001)., Thus, the current view is that gender differences in, mathematical abilities in the general population are essentially nil. However, this rule has several exceptions., In mathematical problem solving, boys start to slightly, outperform girls when they reach high school. This difference is attributable in part to the fact that boys take, more high school math courses (Halpern, 2000). Still,, because problem-solving ability is essential for success, in scientific courses and careers (arenas currently underpopulated by women), this finding is a concern., Males also outperform females at the high end of the, mathematical ability distribution. For instance, when, gifted seventh- and eighth-graders take the math subtest of the SAT, boys outnumber girls 17 to 1 in the, group scoring over 700 (Benbow, 1988). To summarize,, when all students are compared, gender differences in, mathematical ability are small but favor males. In the

Page 344 :
area of problem solving, boys do a lot better, and many, more boys than girls are precocious in math., Spatial Abilities, , In the cognitive area, the most compelling evidence for, gender differences is in spatial abilities, which include, perceiving and mentally manipulating shapes and figures. Males typically outperform females in most spatial abilities, and gender differences favoring males are, consistently found in the ability to perform mental rotations of a figure in three dimensions—a skill important in occupations such as engineering, chemistry,, and the building trades (see Figure 10.4). This gender, gap in the ability to handle mental rotations is relatively large and has been found repeatedly (Halpern,, 2000, 2004; Voyer, Voyer, & Bryden, 1995). Experience, and training can improve mental rotation in both girls, and boys (Sanz de Acedo & Garcia Ganuza, 2003)., , WE B LI N K 10.1, , Women’s Studies Database, Established in 1992, this database at the University of, Maryland has been recognized as one of the premier Internet guides to issues related to women’s and gender studies., , that they are important ones (Halpern, 2000). We’ll examine the possible causes of these differences after we, examine gender comparisons in some other areas., , Personality Traits and, Social Behavior, Turning to personality and social behavior, let’s examine those factors for which gender differences are reasonably well documented., , Changes Over Time?, , Self-Esteem, , Have societal efforts to reduce sexism produced any, changes in these gender patterns in cognitive abilities, over the past 25 years? This is an important question,, because any finding of changes would support the view, that gender differences in cognitive abilities are largely, attributable to environmental factors, as opposed to, biological factors. There is evidence on both sides of, the question (Feingold, 1988; Hyde et al., 1990;, Halpern, 2000; Nowell & Hedges, 1998). To further, complicate the issue, changes have occurred in how, some mental abilities are measured—for instance, testing companies have eliminated items that show large, gender differences (Halpern, 2000, 2004). Unfortunately, to date, not enough evidence exists to provide a, definitive answer to the question., To summarize, males and females in the general, population seem to be basically similar regarding mental abilities; the exception is that males seem to excel in, the spatial ability of mental rotation. The differences, that do exist are relatively few—although some assert, , As we noted in Chapter 5, females typically score lower, than males on tests of self-esteem, but the difference in, scores is generally small. For example, a meta-analysis, of several hundred studies that included respondents, from 7 to 60 years of age found only a small difference, in self-esteem that favored males (Kling et al., 1999)., The researchers also found that this gender difference, increased somewhat during adolescence but returned, to the smaller, preadolescent difference at about age 19., The authors found no support for claims in the popular press that girls’ self-esteem drops dramatically during adolescence (Brody, 1997; Orenstein, 1994). A second meta-analysis also reported a small overall gender, difference favoring males (Major et al., 1999)., Socioeconomic status and ethnicity also mediate, gender differences in self-esteem (Major et al., 1999;, Twenge & Crocker, 2002). Relatively large gender differences in self-esteem are found for lower- and middleclass males and females but not for upper-class males, and females. Research consistently reports self-esteem, , a, , •, , b, , c, , d, , e, , F I G U R E 10.4, , Mental rotation test. If you mentally rotate the figure on the left, which of the five figures on the right, would match it? The answer is “d.” This problem illustrates how spatial rotation skills are measured. Researchers have uncovered some interesting gender differences in the ability to mentally rotate figures in space., Adapted from Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. N. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. Copyright © 1971, by American Association for the Advancement of Science. Adapted by permission of the publisher and author., , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 307

Page 345 :
differences between white men and women, but findings are mixed for other ethnic groups (Major et al.,, 1999; Twenge and Crocker, 2002)., Aggression, , ported four key differences that hold for both gays and, straights. First, men have more interest in sex than, women (they think about sex more often and prefer to, have sex more often, for example). Second, the connection between sex and intimacy is more important for, women than for men (women typically prefer sex in, the context of a relationship). Third, aggression is, more often linked to sexuality for men than for women, (men engage in coercive sex much more often). Finally,, women’s sexuality is more easily shaped by cultural, and situational factors (their sexual attitudes are easier, to change, for instance)., , Aggression involves behavior that is intended to hurt, someone, either physically or verbally (see Chapter 4)., Gender differences in aggression vary depending on the, form aggression takes. A recent summary of crosscultural meta-analyses reported that males consistently, engage in more physical aggression than females (Archer,, 2005). In the area of verbal aggression (insults, threats of, harm), the findings are inconsistent (Geen, 1998; HarConformity, ris, 1996). When it comes to relational aggression, such, Conformity involves yielding to real or imagined soas giving someone the “silent treatment” to get one’s, cial pressure. Traditional beliefs hold that females are, way, talking behind another’s back, or trying to get othmore conforming than males, who are viewed as more, ers to dislike someone, females are rated higher (Archer,, independent-minded. Nonetheless, research does not, 2005; Crick & Rose, 2000). Experts believe that the, support the idea that females conform more to peer, higher rates of relational aggression among girls and, standards unless they are in a group pressure situation, women result from the importance that females attach, where they must openly disagree with others (Becker,, to close relationships (Crick, Casas, & Nelson, 2002)., 1986; Eagly & Carli, 1981; Hyde & Frost, 1993). As we, This variable pattern of gender differences in agnoted earlier, race and gender often interact. For exgression has also been found in cross-cultural research., ample, African American females seem to be less easily, In a study of 8-, 11-, and 15-year-olds from Finland,, influenced and more assertive than either African, Israel, Italy, and Poland, researchers looked at gender, American males or white females (Adams, 1980, 1983)., differences in three types of aggression: physical, verThe traditional explanation for gender differences in, bal, and indirect aggression (Oesterman et al., 1998)., conformity is that women are more gullible than men,, (Indirect aggression overlaps to some degree with relabut there are alternative explanations as well: Women, tional aggression; it involves covert behaviors in which, typically hold lower status in groups than men, and, the target is not directly confronted—spreading ruthey may feel pressured to behave in line with female, mors, for instance.) Across nations, boys were equally, gender-role expectations (Eagly, 1987)., likely to use physical and verbal aggression and less, likely to use indirect aggression. Girls most often used, Emotional Expression, indirect aggression, followed by verbal aggression, then, Conventional wisdom holds that women are more, physical aggression., “emotional” than men. Does research support this beStill, there is no getting around the fact that men, commit a grossly disproportionate share of, violent crimes. Figure 10.5 shows the stark, gender differences in such crimes as assault,, Type of offense, Females, Males, 1.3, armed robbery, rape, and homicide., Forcible rape, , Sexual Attitudes and Behavior, , In the sexual domain, meta-analyses have, found men to have more permissive attitudes, than women about casual, premarital, and, extramarital sex (Hyde & Oliver, 2000; Oliver, & Hyde, 1993). Still, it’s important to note, that the analysis found many similarities between men and women—for example, both, men and women were somewhat negative toward sexual permissiveness. Researchers also, report that males are more sexually active and, more likely to engage in masturbation than, females are (Hyde & Oliver, 2000)., In a summary of gender differences in, sexuality, Letitia Anne Peplau (2003) re308, , PART 3, , 98.7, , Murder and, manslaughter, , 89.7 10.3, , Robbery, , 89.6 10.4, , Aggravated, assault, All violent, crimes, , 79.3 20.7, 89.6 10.4, 0, , •, , 25, 75, 50, Percentage of arrests by gender, , 100, , F I G U R E 10. 5, , Gender differences in violent crimes. Males are arrested for violent crimes far, more often than females, as these statistics show. These data support the findings, of laboratory studies indicating that males are more physically aggressive than, females. (Data from U.S. Department of Justice, 2003), , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 346 :
WE B LI N K 10.2, , lief ? If by being “emotional,” we mean outwardly displaying one’s emotions, the answer is yes. A number of, studies have found that women express more emotion, than men (Ashmore, 1990; Brody & Hall, 1993). Gender differences “favoring” women have been found on, such emotions as sadness, disgust, fear, surprise, happiness, and anger., Are women just more comfortable than men in, publicly expressing emotion, or do women actually experience more emotion? To answer this question, Ann, Kring and Albert Gordon (1998) had college students, view films selected to evoke sadness, happiness, and, fear. The researchers videotaped the participants’ facial expressions and asked the subjects to describe their, emotional experiences. As expected, they found gender differences in the facial expression of emotion (see, Figure 10.6); however, they failed to find any gender, differences in experienced emotions. Thus, gender differences in emotional functioning are limited to the, outward expression of feelings and stem from the different display rules parents teach their sons and, daughters (DeAngelis, 2001)., Communication, , Popular stereotypes have it that females are much more, talkative than males. In fact, the opposite seems to be, true: Men talk more than women (Gleason & Ely, 2002)., Men also tend to interrupt women more than women, interrupt men, although this difference is small (Eckert, & McConnell-Ginet, 2003). Yet when women have more, power in work or personal relationships, women interrupt more (Aries, 1998). Thus, this supposed gender difference is probably better seen as a status difference., Most studies have found that women speak more, tentatively (“I may be wrong, but”) than men (Carli &, Bukatko, 2000). One explanation attributes women’s, greater use of tentative and polite language to lower status; another, to gender-specific socialization (Athenstadt, Haas, & Schwab, 2004)., Researchers have also studied how the genders, compare in the realm of nonverbal communication. A, number of studies have shown women to be more sensitive to nonverbal cues (Hall, Carter, & Horgan, 2000)., In an interesting twist, one study reported that women, are better “readers” of happiness and that men are better “readers” of anger (Coats & Feldman, 1996). The, researchers speculated that these gender differences in, , Film type, , Voice of the Shuttle: Gender Studies, The VOS maintains one of the broadest databases of web, resources across many topics. The multiple links cited here, cover the spectrum of gender-related issues from women’s, and men’s studies to gay and lesbian identity resources., , Sad Men, Women, Happy, , Men, Women, , Fearful, , Men, Women, 0, , •, , 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, Frequency of expressed emotions, , 12, , F I G U R E 10. 6, , Gender differences in emotional expression. Researchers, calculated how often men and women showed facial expressions, of various emotions as they viewed films. Women were judged to, be more emotionally expressive than men on all three emotions, studied. Men and women did not differ significantly in their, reports of experienced emotion., Adapted from Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotions: Expression,, experience and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686–703. Copyright © 1998 by the American Psychological Association. Adapted by permission of the author., , encoding skills parallel the types of skills that members of each gender need in order to maintain their different social networks. Some claim that the gender difference in nonverbal sensitivity is actually a status, difference (LaFrance, 2001), but others disagree (Hall, & Friedman, 1999). For more on gender and communication, see this chapter’s Application., , Psychological Disorders, In terms of the overall incidence of mental disorders,, only minimal gender differences have been found. It, seems that about one out of every three people will develop a psychological disorder over the course of their, lives and that this statistic is roughly accurate for both, males and females (Regier & Kaelber, 1995)., When researchers assess the prevalence of specific, disorders, they do find some rather large gender differences (Regier et al., 1988; Nolen-Hoeksema & Keita,, 2003). Antisocial behavior, alcoholism, and other drugrelated disorders are far more prevalent among men, than among women. On the other hand, women are, about twice as likely as men to suffer from depression, and anxiety disorders (phobias, for example). Females, also show higher rates of eating disorders (see the, Chapter 15 Application). In addition, women attempt, suicide more often than men, but men complete suicides (actually kill themselves) more frequently than, women (Maris, Berman, & Silverman, 2001)., What accounts for these gender differences in, mental illnesses? One explanation is rooted in the obvious connection between the symptoms of “male”, and “female” disorders and traditional gender roles, CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 309

Page 347 :
Persons receiving each score, , (Rosenfield, 1999). That is, women’s disorders seem to, reflect a turning inward—negative, hostile, anxious, feelings and conflicts are directed against the self. In, men, these same feelings and conflicts are typically directed outward—against either other individuals or society. (Suicide is one obvious exception.), , Putting Gender Differences, in Perspective, , 310, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Low, , •, , Distribution, for females, , Distribution, for males, , Score on the trait, , High, , F I G U R E 10. 7, , The nature of group differences. Gender differences are group, differences that tell us little about individuals because of the, great overlap between the groups. For a given trait, one gender, may score higher on the average, but there is far more variation, within each gender than between the genders., , Although gender differences, in personality and behavior are, relatively few and modest, sometimes it seems otherwise. How, come? One explanation focuses on, gender-based differences in social, roles. Alice Eagly’s (1987) social, role theory asserts that minor, gender differences are exaggerAlice Eagly, ated by the different social roles, that males and females occupy., For example, because women are assigned the role of, caregiver, they learn to behave in nurturing ways., Moreover, people come to associate such role-related, behaviors with individuals of a given gender, not with, the roles they play. In other words, people come to see, nurturing as a female trait rather than a characteristic, that anyone in a nurturing role would demonstrate., This is one way that stereotypes develop and persist., Another explanation for discrepancies between beliefs and reality is that the differences actually reside in, the eye of the beholder, not the beholdee. Social constructionism asserts that individuals construct their, own reality based on societal expectations, conditioning, and self-socialization (Hyde, 1996; Maracek,, 2001). According to social constructionists, the tendency to look for gender differences as well as specific, beliefs about gender are rooted in the “gendered” messages and conditioning that permeate people’s socialization experiences. To better understand these issues,, we need to explore the role of biological and environmental factors as likely sources of gender differences., , Courtesy, Alice Eagly, , Although research has uncovered some genuine gender, differences in behavior, remember that these are group, differences. That is, they tell us nothing about individuals. Essentially, we are comparing the “average man”, with the “average woman.” Furthermore, the differences, between these groups are relatively small. Figure 10.7, shows how scores on a trait might be distributed for, men and women. Although the group averages are detectably different, you can see that there is great variability within each group (gender) and huge overlap, between the two group distributions. Thus, a gender, difference that shows up on the average does not by itself tell us anything about you or any other unique individual. This is why such differences should not be, used to restrict individual choices., A second essential point is that gender accounts, for a minute proportion of the differences between individuals. Using complicated statistical procedures, it, is possible to gauge the influence of gender on behavior. These tests show that gender accounts for a very, small amount of the variation among people. Thus,, factors other than gender (for example, the social context in which behavior occurs) are far more important, determinants of differences between individuals, (Yoder & Kahn, 2003)., Another point to keep in mind is that when gender differences are found, they do not mean that one, gender is better than the other (Halpern, 2004). When, certain qualities are deemed superior to others by a, particular society or group, the tendency is to perceive, the group that performs less well in these valued areas, as deficient, rather than as different. As Diane Halpern, (1997) humorously notes, “It is about as meaningful, to ask ‘Which is the smarter sex?’ . . . as it is to ask, ‘Which has the better genitals?’ ” (p. 1092). The problem is not with gender differences, but with how these, differences are evaluated by the larger society., To conclude, the behavioral differences between, males and females are relatively few in number and, small in size. Moreover, gender-relevant behavior often, appears and disappears as gender-role expectations become more or less salient (Deaux & LaFrance, 1998)., Ultimately, the similarities between women and men, greatly outweigh the differences., , Mean, score for, females, , Mean, score for, males

Page 348 :
Biological Origins of Gender Differences, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , Summarize evolutionary explanations for gender differences., Review the evidence linking gender differences in cognitive abilities to, brain organization., Review the evidence relating hormones to gender differences., , Are the gender differences that do exist biologically, built in, or are they acquired through learning? This is, the age-old issue of nature versus nurture. The “nature” theorists concentrate on how biological disparities between the genders contribute to differences in, behavior. “Nurture” theorists, on the other hand, emphasize the role of learning and environmental influences. Although we will discuss biological and environmental influences separately, keep in mind that the, distinctions between nature and nurture are less sharp, today than they once were. Many contemporary researchers and theorists in this area are interested in, how biological and environmental factors interact., We’ll look at three biologically based lines of inquiry, on this topic: evolutionary explanations, brain organization, and hormonal influences., , Evolutionary Explanations, Evolutionary psychologists suggest that gender differences in behavior reflect different natural selection pressures operating on the genders over the course of, human history (Archer, 1996). That is, natural selection, favors behaviors that maximize the chances of passing, on genes to the next generation (reproductive success)., To support their assertions, evolutionary psychologists look for gender differences that are consistent, across cultures (Kenrick & Trost, 1993). Is there consistency across cultures for the better-documented, gender differences? Despite some fascinating exceptions, gender differences in cognitive abilities, aggression, and sexual behavior are found in many cultures, (Beller & Gafni, 1996; Halpern, 2000). According to, evolutionary psychologists, these consistent differences have emerged because males and females have, been confronted with different adaptive demands. For, example, males supposedly are more sexually active, and permissive because they invest less than females in, the process of procreation and can maximize their reproductive success by seeking many sexual partners, (Buss & Kenrick, 1998)., The gender gap in aggression is also explained in, terms of reproductive fitness. Because females are more, selective about mating than males are, males have to engage in more competition for sexual partners than fe-, , males do. Greater aggressiveness is thought to be adaptive for males in this competition for sexual access because it should foster social dominance over other males, and facilitate the acquisition of the material resources, emphasized by females when they evaluate potential, partners (Kenrick & Trost, 1993). Evolutionary theorists, assert that gender differences in spatial abilities reflect, the division of labor in ancestral hunting-and-gathering, societies in which males typically handled the hunting, and females the gathering. Males’ superiority on most, spatial tasks has been attributed to the adaptive demands of hunting (Eals & Silverman, 1994)., Evolutionary analyses of gender differences are interesting, but controversial. While it is eminently plausible that evolutionary forces could have led to some, divergence between males and females in typical behavior, evolutionary hypotheses are highly speculative, and difficult to test empirically (Fausto-Sterling, 1992;, Halpern, 2000). For example, it is quite a leap to infer, that modern paper-and-pencil tests of spatial abilities, assess a talent that would have made high scorers superior hunters million of years ago. In addition, evolutionary theory can be used to claim that the status quo, in society is the inevitable outcome of evolutionary, forces. Thus, if males have dominant status over females, natural selection must have favored this, arrangement. The crux of the problem is that evolutionary analyses can be used to explain almost anything. For instance, if the situation regarding mental, rotation were reversed—if females scored higher than, males—evolutionary theorists might attribute females’, superiority to the adaptive demands of gathering food,, weaving baskets, and making clothes—and it would be, difficult to prove otherwise., , WE B LI N K 10.3, , Great Ideas in Personality: Evolutionary Psychology, and Sociobiology, Professor G. Scott Acton’s excellent site in personality, includes a major collection of resources supporting and, opposing evolutionary psychology and sociobiology—the, theory that human behavior is predominantly governed by, biological forces, particularly those arising from one’s genes., , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 311

Page 349 :
Some theorists propose that male and female brains, are organized differently, which might account for, gender differences in some cognitive abilities. As you, may know, the human brain is divided into two halves., The cerebral hemispheres are the right and left halves, of the cerebrum, which is the convoluted outer layer, of the brain. The largest and most complicated part of, the human brain, the cerebrum is responsible for most, complex mental activities., Some evidence suggests that the right and left, cerebral hemispheres are specialized to handle different cognitive tasks (Sperry, 1982; Springer & Deutsch,, 1998). For example, it appears that the left hemisphere, is more actively involved in verbal and mathematical, processing, while the right hemisphere is specialized to, handle visual-spatial and other nonverbal processing., This pattern is generally seen in both right-handed and, left-handed people, although it is less consistent among, those who are left-handed., After these findings on hemispheric specialization, surfaced, some theorists began to wonder whether a, connection might exist between this division of labor, in the brain and the then-observed gender differences, in verbal and spatial skills. Subsequently, researchers, began looking for disparities between male and female, brain organization., Some thought-provoking findings have been reported. For instance, males exhibit more cerebral specialization than females (Bryden, 1988; Hines, 1990)., In other words, males tend to depend more heavily, than females on the left hemisphere in verbal processing and on the right hemisphere in spatial processing., Gender differences have also been found in the size of, the corpus callosum, the band of fibers connecting the, two hemispheres of the brain (Steinmetz et al., 1995)., More specifically, some studies suggest that females, tend to have a larger corpus callosum. This greater size, might allow for better interhemispheric transfer of information, which in turn might underlie the more bilateral organization of female brains (Innocenti, 1994)., Thus, some theorists have argued that these differences, in brain organization are responsible for gender differences in verbal and spatial ability (Kimura & Hampson, 1993). Based on these findings, the popular press, has often touted the idea that there are “male brains”, and “female brains” that are fundamentally different, (Bleier, 1984)., This idea is intriguing, but psychologists have a, long way to go before they can attribute gender differences in verbal and spatial ability to right brain/left, brain specialization. First, studies have not consistently, found that males have more specialized brain organization than females (Fausto-Sterling, 1992), and the, finding of a larger corpus callosum in females does not, , 312, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Wadsworth Collection, , Brain Organization, , Studies have shown that the brain’s cerebral hemispheres,, shown here, are somewhat specialized in the kinds of cognitive, tasks they handle and that such specialization is more pronounced in males than in females. Whether this difference, bears any relation to gender differences in behavior is yet to be, determined., , always show up (Hines, 1990). Second, because a significant amount of brain development occurs over the, first five to ten years after birth, during which time, males and females are socialized differently, it is possible that different life experiences may accumulate to, produce slight differences in brain organization (Hood, et al., 1987). In other words, the biological factors that, supposedly cause gender differences in cognitive functioning may actually reflect the influence of environmental factors. Finally, it’s important to remember that, male and female brains are much more similar than, they are different. Thus, the notion that cerebral specialization is linked to gender differences in mental, abilities is still under debate., , Hormonal Influences, Biological explanations of gender differences have also, focused on the possible role of hormones. Hormones, are chemical substances released into the bloodstream by the endocrine glands. In this section we examine the effect of hormones on prenatal sexual differentiation and on sexual and aggressive behavior.

Page 350 :
Prenatal Gender Differentiation, , We know that hormones play a key role in gender differentiation during prenatal development. Biological, gender is determined by sex chromosomes: An XX, pairing produces a female, and an XY pairing produces, a male. However, both male and female embryos are, essentially the same until about 8 to 12 weeks after, conception. Around this time, male and female gonads (sex glands) begin to produce different hormonal, secretions. The high level of androgens (male hormones) in males and the low level of androgens in females lead to the differentiation of male and female, genital organs., The influence of prenatal hormones on gender differentiation becomes apparent when something interferes with normal prenatal hormonal secretions. About, a half dozen endocrine disorders can cause overproduction or underproduction of specific gonadal hormones during prenatal development. Scientists have, also studied children born to mothers given an androgen-like drug to prevent miscarriage. Two trends have, been noted in this research (Collaer & Hines, 1995)., First, females exposed prenatally to abnormally high, levels of androgens exhibit more male-typical behavior, than other females do. Second, males exposed prenatally to abnormally low levels of androgens exhibit, more female-typical behavior than other males. For example, girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia tend to, show “tomboyish” interests in vigorous outdoor activities and in “male” toys and have elevated scores on measures of aggressiveness and spatial ability., The findings suggest that prenatal hormones, shape gender differences in humans. But there are a, number of problems with this evidence (Basow, 1992;, Fausto-Sterling, 1992). First, there is much more and, much stronger evidence for females than for males., Second, it’s always dangerous to draw conclusions, , about the general population based on small samples, of people who have abnormal conditions. Third, most, of the endocrine disorders studied have multiple effects (besides altering hormone level) that make it difficult to isolate actual causes. Finally, most of the research is necessarily correlational, and it is always risky, to draw causal conclusions from correlational data., Sexual and Aggressive Behavior, , The hormone testosterone plays an important role in, sexual desire for both men and women (Bancroft,, 2002a). That is, when testosterone is reduced or eliminated, both men and women show decreases in sexual, drive. A handful of studies have also reported associations between levels of male and female hormones and, specific traits. So far, however, the results of these studies are equivocal and inconsistent (Fausto-Sterling,, 1992; Hines, 1982). For instance, testosterone has been, linked with higher levels of aggression (impulsive and, antisocial behavior) in humans, but the picture is complicated because aggressive behavior can produce increases in testosterone (Dabbs, 2000)., To summarize, hormones probably do play a role, in some aspects of sexual and aggressive behavior, although the nature of the connections is not well understood. Also, hormones have less influence on, human behavior than they do on animal behavior, because humans are more susceptible to environmental, influences. We still have much to learn about the complicated ways in which hormones interact with social, and psychological factors., The overall evidence suggests that biological factors, play a relatively minor role in gender differences, creating predispositions that are largely shaped by experience. In contrast, efforts to link gender differences to, disparities in the way males and females are reared have, proved more fruitful. We consider this perspective next., , Environmental Origins, of Gender Differences, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Define socialization and gender roles, and describe, Margaret Mead’s findings on the variability of gender, roles and their implications., Explain how reinforcement and punishment,, observational learning, and self-socialization operate, in gender-role socialization., , Socialization is the acquisition of the norms and roles, expected of people in a particular society. This process, includes all the efforts made by a society to ensure that, its members learn to behave in a manner that’s consid-, , ■, , ■, , Describe how parents and peers influence gender-role, socialization., Describe how schools and the media influence, gender-role socialization., , ered appropriate. Teaching children about gender roles, is an important aspect of the socialization process., Gender roles are cultural expectations about what is, appropriate behavior for each gender. For example, in, , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 313

Page 351 :
Processes in Gender-Role, Socialization, How do people acquire gender roles? Several key learning processes come into play, including reinforcement, and punishment, observational learning, and selfsocialization., Reinforcement and Punishment, , In part, gender roles are shaped by the power of rewards and punishment—the key processes in operant, conditioning (see Chapter 2). Parents, teachers, peers,, and others often reinforce (usually with tacit approval), “gender-appropriate” behavior (Bussey & Bandura,, 1999; Fagot & Hagan, 1991). For example, a young boy, who has hurt himself may be told that “big boys don’t, cry.” If he succeeds in inhibiting his crying, he may get, a pat on the back or a warm smile—both potent reinforcers. Over time, a consistent pattern of such reinforcement will strengthen the boy’s tendency to “act, like a man” and suppress emotional displays., Most parents take gender-appropriate behavior, for granted and don’t go out of their way to reward it., On the other hand, parents are much less tolerant of, gender-inappropriate behavior, especially in their sons, (Lytton & Romney, 1991; Sandnabba & Ahlberg, 1999)., For instance, a 10-year-old boy who enjoys playing, with dollhouses will probably elicit strong disapproval., , 314, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , © Stephen Marks/Taxi/Getty Images, , our culture women have been expected to rear children,, cook meals, clean house, and do laundry. On the other, hand, men have been expected to be the family breadwinner, do yardwork, and tinker with cars., Are gender roles in other cultures similar to those, seen in our society? Generally, yes—but not necessarily., Despite a fair amount of cross-cultural consistency in, gender roles, some dramatic variability occurs as well, (Gibbons, 2000). For instance, anthropologist Margaret, Mead (1950) conducted a now-classic study of three, tribes in New Guinea. In one tribe, both genders followed our masculine role expectations (the Mundugumor); in another, both genders approximated our feminine role (the Arapesh). In a third tribe, the male and, female roles were roughly the reverse of our own (the, Tchambuli). Such remarkable discrepancies between, cultures existing within 100 miles of one another, demonstrate that gender roles are not a matter of biological destiny. Instead, like other roles, gender roles are, acquired through socialization., As we noted earlier, Eagly’s social role theory suggests that gender differences occur because males and, females are guided by different role expectations. In, the next section, we’ll discuss how society teaches individuals about gender roles., , Parents typically reward “gender-appropriate” behavior in their, children., , Reactions usually involve ridicule or verbal reprimands rather than physical punishment., Observational Learning, , Younger children commonly imitate the behavior of a, parent or an older sibling. This imitation, or observational learning, occurs when a child’s behavior is influenced by observing others, who are called models., Parents serve as models for children, as do siblings,, teachers, relatives, and others who are important in, children’s lives. Note that models are not limited to real, people; television, movie, and cartoon characters can, also serve as models., According to social cognitive theory (see Chapter 2), young children are more likely to imitate people, who are nurturant, powerful, and similar to them, (Bussey & Bandura, 1984, 1999). Children imitate both, genders, but most children are prone to imitate samegender models. Thus, observational learning often, leads young girls to play with dolls, dollhouses, and toy, stoves. By contrast, young boys are more likely to tinker, with toy trucks, miniature gas stations, and tool kits., Interestingly, same-gender peers may be even more influential models than parents are (Maccoby, 2002)., Self-Socialization, , Children are not merely passive recipients of genderrole socialization. Rather, they play an active role in, this process, beginning early in life (Bem, 1993; Martin, Ruble, & Szkrybalo, 2002). Because society labels, people, characteristics, behavior, and activities by gender, children learn that gender is an important social, category. For example, they learn that females wear

Page 352 :
Ken Fisher/Stone/Getty Images, , © Laura Dwight/PhotoEdit, , Children learn behaviors appropriate to their gender roles very early, in life. According to social learning theory, girls tend to do the sorts, of things their mothers do, while boys tend to follow in their fathers’, footsteps., , dresses and males don’t. Around 2 to 3 years of age,, children begin to identify themselves as male or female, (Martin et al., 2002). In addition, they begin to organize, the various pieces of gender-relevant information into, gender schemas. Gender schemas are cognitive structures that guide the processing of gender-relevant information. Basically, gender schemas work like lenses, that cause people to view and organize the world in, terms of gender (Bem, 1993)., Self-socialization begins when children link the gender schema for their own gender to their self-concept., Once this connection is made, children are motivated to, selectively attend to activities and information that are, consistent with the schema for their own gender. For example, Jeremy knows that he is a boy and also has a “boy”, schema that he attaches to his own sense of boyhood., Too, his self-esteem is dependent on how well he lives up, to his boy schema. In this way, children get involved in, their own socialization. They are “gender detectives,”, working diligently to discover the rules that are supposed to govern their behavior (Martin & Ruble, 2004)., , Sources of Gender-Role, Socialization, Four major sources of gender-role messages are parents, peers, schools, and the media. Keep in mind that, gender-role socialization varies depending on one’s socioeconomic status and ethnicity. For example, black, families typically make fewer distinctions between girls, , and boys when compared to white families (Hill, 2002)., By contrast, gender roles are relatively rigidly defined in, Asian and Hispanic families (Chia et al., 1994; ComasDiaz, 1987). Also, gender roles are changing, so the generalizations that follow may say more about how you, were socialized than about how your children will be., Parents, , A great deal of gender-role socialization takes place in, the home. Nonetheless, a meta-analysis of 172 studies, of parental socialization practices suggests that parents, don’t treat girls and boys as differently as one might expect (Lytton & Romney, 1991). Still, there are some important distinctions. For one thing, there is a strong tendency for both mothers and fathers to emphasize and, encourage play activities that are “gender-appropriate.”, For example, studies show that parents encourage boys, and girls to play with different types of toys (Wood, Desmarais, & Gugula, 2002). As Figure 10.8 (on the next, page) shows, substantial gender differences are found in, toy preferences. Generally, boys have less leeway to play, with “feminine” toys than girls do with “masculine” toys., As children grow older, their leisure activities often vary, by gender: Jaime plays in Little League and Alexis gets, dancing lessons. Too, the picture books parents buy for, their children typically depict characters engaging in, gender stereotypic activities (Gooden & Gooden, 2001)., A second way parents emphasize gender is in the assignment of household chores (Lytton & Romney, 1991;, Cunningham, 2001). Tasks are doled out on the basis of, , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 315

Page 353 :
Boys, , Girls, , ”Masculine” toys, Vehicles, Sports, equipment, Spatial–temporal, toys (e.g,, construction sets), ”Feminine” toys, Dolls, Domestic, accessories, Dollhouses, 0, , •, , 10, 20, 30, 40, Children requesting toys (%), , FIG U R E 10.8, , Toy preferences and gender. This graph depicts the percentage, of boys and girls asking for various types of toys in letters to, Santa Claus (adapted from Richardson & Simpson, 1982). Boys, and girls differ substantially in their toy preferences, which, probably reflects the effects of gender-role socialization., , 50, , peers. Moreover, according to Eleanor Maccoby (1998, 2002), over time boys’ and girls’, groups develop different “subcultures” (shared, understandings and interests) that strongly, shape youngsters’ gender-role socialization, (Maccoby, 1998, 2002)., Play among same-gender peers takes different forms for boys and girls (Maccoby,, 1998, 2002). Boys play in larger groups and, roam farther away from home, whereas girls, prefer smaller groups and stay near the house., In addition, high status in boys’ groups tends, to be achieved by engaging in dominant behavior (telling others what to do and enforcing orders). In contrast, girls usually express, their wishes as suggestions rather than demands. Also, boys engage in rough-and-tumble play much more frequently than girls do., Because both boys and girls are critical of peers who violate traditional gender, norms, they perpetuate stereotypical behavior. Among children ages 3–11, boys are devalued more than girls for dressing like the, , Adapted from Richardson, J. G., & Simpson, C. H. (1982). Children, gender and social structure:, An analysis of the contents of letters to Santa Claus. Child Development, 53, 429–436. Copyright © 1982 by the Society for Research in Child Development, Inc. Adapted by permission., , © Michelle D. Bridwell/PhotoEdit, , gender stereotypes: Girls usually do laundry and dishes,, whereas boys mow the lawn and sweep the garage., Parents’ attitudes about gender roles have been, shown to influence the gender roles their children acquire (Fiese & Skillman, 2000). Importantly, gender, expectations vary by ethnicity and socioeconomic status. African American families seem to place less emphasis on traditional gender roles than white American families do (Hill, 2002). By contrast, Hispanic, families usually encourage traditional gender-role behavior, and Asian American families typically encourage subservience in their daughters (Tsai & Uemera,, 1988). Also, middle-class parents may allow their children to deviate more from traditional gender roles, than lower-class parents do (Reid & Paludi, 1993). Because social class cuts across ethnicity with regard to, gender-role attitudes, the findings in this area are complex (Flannagan & Perese, 1998)., Peers, , Peers form an important network for learning about, gender-role stereotypes, as well as gender-appropriate, and gender-inappropriate behavior. Between the ages, of 4 and 6, children tend to separate into same-gender, groups. From then to about age 12, boys and girls spend, much more time with same-gender than other-gender, 316, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Boys are under more pressure than girls to behave in genderappropriate ways. Little boys who show an interest in dolls are, likely to be chastised by both parents and peers.

Page 354 :
other gender, whereas girls are evaluated more negatively than boys for playing like the other gender, (loudly and roughly versus quietly and gently) (Blakemore, 2003)., , Hours per day, , 4, , Schools, , The school environment figures importantly in socializing gender roles (American Association of University, Women, 1994; Sadker & Sadker, 1994). Children’s gradeschool textbooks have often ignored or stereotyped girls, and women (AAUW Educational Foundation, 1992)., Traditionally, these books have portrayed males as, clever, heroic, and adventurous, whereas females have, been shown performing domestic chores. Although the, depiction of stereotypical gender roles has declined considerably since the 1970s, researchers still find significant differences in how males and females are portrayed,, even in supposedly nonsexist books (Diekman & Murnen, 2004). Many high school and college textbooks also, contain gender bias. The most common problems are, using generic masculine language (“policeman” versus, “police officer” and so forth) and portraying males and, females in stereotypic roles. You might review your textbooks for instances of gender bias., Gender bias in schools also shows up in teachers’, treatment of boys and girls. Preschool and grade-school, teachers often reward gender-appropriate behavior in, their pupils (Fagot et al., 1985). Teachers also tend to, pay greater attention to boys—helping them, praising, them, and scolding them more than females (Sadker &, Sadker, 1994). By contrast, girls tend to be less visible, in the classroom and to receive less encouragement for, academic achievement from teachers. Many teacher, education textbooks still give little attention to gender, equity (Zittleman & Sadker, 2002)., Gender bias also shows up in academic and career, counseling. Despite the fact that females obtain higher, grades than males (on the average) in all subjects from, elementary school through college (Halpern, 2004),, many counselors continue to encourage male students, to pursue high-status careers in medicine or engineering while guiding female students toward less prestigious careers (Read, 1991)., The Media, , Television is yet another source of gender-role socialization (Luecke-Aleksa et al., 1995). American youngsters spend a lot of time watching TV (see Figure 10.9)., Children between the ages of 3 and 11 watch an average of 2 to 4 hours of TV per day (Huston et al., 1990)., African American children and adolescents spend, more time in front of the tube than their white peers, (Roberts et al., 1999)., An analysis of male and female characters on, prime-time television programs showed that the number and variety of roles of female TV characters have, , 3, 2, 1, 0, , •, , 0, , 2, , 4, , 6, 8, 10, Age (years), , 12, , 14, , 16, , F I G U R E 10. 9, , Television viewing habits. As children grow up, they spend more, and more time watching TV until viewing time begins to decline, slightly around age 12. Research shows that children’s conceptions, of gender roles are influenced to a considerable degree by what, they watch on television., Adapted from Liebert, R. M., & Sprafkin, J. (1988). The early window: Effects of television on, children and youth. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Copyright © 1988 by Allyn & Bacon. Adapted by, permission., , increased over the past 30 years but that these shifts lag, behind the actual changes in women’s lives (Glascock,, 2001; Signorielli & Bacue, 1999). Compared to males,, females appear less often, are less likely to be employed, (especially in prestigious positions), are more likely to, be younger, and are more likely to appear in secondary, and comedy roles. In children’s cartoons, male characters appear more often, have more prominent roles, talk, more, and engage in more varied behaviors than female, characters (Thompson & Zerbinos, 1995)., Television commercials are even more genderstereotyped than TV programs (Furnham & Mak,, 1999). Women are frequently shown worrying about, trivial matters such as laundry and cleaning products,, whereas men appear as bold outdoorsmen or energetic, sports fans. In a study of gender stereotyping in TV, commercials on five continents, the authors reported, that, in all the countries studied, men appeared more, often than women in both on- and off-screen announcer roles (Furnham & Mak, 1999)., Most video games push a hypermasculine stereotype featuring search-and-destroy missions, fighter, pilot battles, and male sports (Lips, 2005). Of the few, video games directed at girls, the great majority of them, are highly stereotypic (shopping and Barbie games)., Also, music videos frequently portray women as sex objects and men as dominating and aggressive (SommersFlanagan, Sommers-Flanagan, & Davis, 1993), and, these portrayals appear to influence viewers’ attitudes, about sexual conduct (Hansen & Hansen, 1988)., A meta-analysis reported a link between the number and type of television programs children watch and, the acquisition of gender-stereotyped beliefs: Children, CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 317

Page 355 :
who watch a lot of television hold more stereotyped, beliefs about gender than children who watch less TV, (Herrett-Skjellum & Allen, 1996). Still, this research is, correlational, so it is quite likely that other factors—, such as parental values—come into play as well., Nonetheless, once gender stereotypes are learned, they, are difficult to change., Another manifestation of gender bias is television’s inordinate emphasis on women’s physical appearance (Lauzen & Dozier, 2002). Males on television may, or may not be good-looking, but the vast majority of, females are young, attractive, and sexy (Signorielli &, Bacue, 1999). Overweight female characters are much, more likely than male characters to receive negative, comments about their weight (Fouts & Burggraf, 1999;, , WE B LI N K 10.4, , Gender and Race in Media, The University of Iowa’s Communications Studies Program, offers a focused guide to the ways in which gender and, racial differences are expressed in various media, including an excellent set of materials dealing with gender and, advertising., , Fouts & Vaughan, 2002). As you’ll see in the Chapter, 15 Application, these cultural expectations have been, cited as a cause of the disproportionately high incidence of eating disorders in females., , Gender Roles, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , List five elements of the traditional male role, and, contrast it with the modern male role., Describe three common problems associated with the, traditional male role., List three major expectations of the female role., , Traditional gender roles are based on several unspoken, assumptions: that all members of the same gender have, basically the same traits, that the traits of one gender are, very different from the traits of the other gender, and, that masculine traits are more highly valued. In recent, decades, many social critics and theorists in psychology, and other fields have scrutinized gender roles, identifying the essential features and the ramifications of traditional roles. In this section, we review the research and, , © The New Yorker Collection 2001 Barbara Smaller from cartoonbank.com. All rights reserved., , 318, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , ■, , ■, , Describe three common problems associated with the, female role., Describe two ways in which women are victimized by, sexism., , theory in this area and note changes in gender roles over, the past 30 to 40 years. We begin with the male role., , Role Expectations for Males, A number of psychologists have sought to pinpoint the, essence of the traditional male role (Brannon, 1976;, Levant, 1996, 2003; Pleck, 1995). Many consider antifemininity to be the central theme that runs through, the male gender role. That is, “real men” shouldn’t act, in any way that might be perceived as feminine. For example, men should not publicly display vulnerable, emotions, should avoid feminine occupations, and, should not show obvious interest in relationships—especially homosexual ones. Five key attributes constitute, the traditional male role (Brannon, 1976; Jansz, 2000):, 1. Achievement. To prove their masculinity, men, need to beat out other men at work and at sports. Having a high-status job, driving an expensive car, and, making lots of money are aspects of this element., 2. Aggression. Men should be tough and fight for, what they believe is right. They should aggressively defend themselves and those they love against threats., 3. Autonomy. Men should be self-reliant and not, admit to being dependent on others., 4. Sexuality. Real men are heterosexual and are, highly motivated to pursue sexual activities and, conquests.

Page 356 :
5. Stoicism. Men should not share their pain or, express their “soft” feelings. They should be cool and, calm under pressure., , Gender-role expectations for males have remained, relatively stable for years. However, the male role may, be undergoing some changes. According to Joseph, Pleck (1995), who has written extensively on this issue,, in the traditional male role, masculinity is validated by, individual physical strength, aggressiveness, and emotional inexpressiveness. In the modern male role, masculinity is validated by economic achievement, organizational power, emotional control (even over anger),, and emotional sensitivity and self-expression, but only, with women., Thus, in modern societies, the traditional male role, coexists with some new expectations. Some theorists, use the plural “masculinities” to describe these variations in the male gender role (Smiler, 2004). This flux in, expectations means that males are experiencing role, inconsistencies and pressures to behave in ways that, conflict with traditional masculinity: to communicate, personal feelings, to nurture children and share in, housework, to integrate sexuality with love, and to curb, aggression (Levant, 1996, 2003). Some psychologists believe that these pressures have shaken traditional masculine norms sufficiently that many men are experiencing a masculinity crisis (Levant, 1996, 2003). That is,, they are feeling bewildered and confused, and their, pride in being a man has been diminished. The rise in, popularity of men’s groups and organizations such as, the Promise Keepers may reflect this confusion. The, good news is that boys and men are beginning to get, more attention from psychological theorists, researchers, and clinicians (see the Recommended Reading box)., , Problems with the Male Role, It is often assumed that only females suffer from the, constricting binds of traditional gender roles. Not so., Increasingly, the costs of the male role are a cause for, concern (Levant, 1996; Pleck, 1995)., , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , The Masculine Self, by Christopher T. Kilmartin, (McGraw-Hill, 2000), This small paperback, written for college courses on, gender, is highly readable. Kilmartin’s major purpose in, writing the book was to help readers “understand the, difference between being male and being a ‘generic, human being’” (p. xiv). The implication is that androcentrism may render invisible the uniqueness of the, male experience., Kilmartin, a psychologist, does an excellent job of, blending classic and contemporary research findings to, shed light on important questions. About half of the, book is devoted to a thorough and research-based discussion of current problem areas for men: emotions,, physical health, work, sexuality, violence, relationships,, and mental health. He also addresses the important, issues of race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and age. In, addition, he integrates male gender-role theory into, the major perspectives on personality—psychoanalytic,, social learning, humanistic, and biological. There is, also a chapter on cultural influences., The book closes with an enlightening discussion of, contemporary men’s movements, including the mythopoetic movement (Robert Bly and Sam Keen), profeminism, the men’s rights movement (Robert Farrell), and, Promise Keepers. Also included is an interesting discussion of men’s studies, an emerging area of scholarly work., Two other books, also written by psychologists,, focus on helping boys deal with gender-role pressures:, Real Boys: Rescuing Our Sons from the Myths of Boyhood,, by William Pollack (1998), and Raising Cain: Protecting, the Emotional Life of Boys, by Dan Kindlon and Michael, Thompson (1999). Although Pollack’s book could better, address relationships between boys and their fathers,, both books offer insightful first-person accounts of the, challenges boys face, especially from male peers and in, the school setting., Photo © Reichel Jean-Noel FPG/Getty Images., , Pressure to Succeed, , Most men are socialized to be highly competitive and, are taught that a man’s masculinity is measured by the, size of his paycheck and job status. As Christopher Kilmartin (2000) notes, “There is always another man who, has more money, higher status, a more attractive partner, or a bigger house. The traditional man . . . must constantly work harder and faster “ (p. 13). Small wonder,, then, that so many men pursue success with a fervor that, is sometimes dangerous to their health. The extent of, this danger is illustrated by men’s life expectancy, which, is about six years shorter than women’s (of course, factors besides gender roles contribute to this difference)., , The majority of men who have internalized the success ethic are unable to fully realize their dreams. This is, a particular problem for African American and Hispanic men, who experience more barriers to financial, success than European American men do (Biernat &, Kobrynowicz, 1997). How does this “failure” affect, men? Although many are able to adjust to it, many are, not. The latter group are likely to suffer from shame, and poor self-esteem (Kilmartin, 2000). Men’s emphasis, on success also makes it more likely that they will spend, long hours on the job. This pattern in turn decreases, CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 319

Page 357 :
the amount of time families can spend together and, increases the amount of time wives spend on housework and child care., Interestingly, younger men seem less inclined to, embrace the success ethic than older men. A significantly smaller proportion of men between the ages of, 18 and 37 are work focused (they want to spend more, time with their families) compared to men age 38 and, older (Families and Work Institute, 2004)., The Emotional Realm, , Most young boys are trained to believe that men, should be strong, tough, cool, and detached (Brody,, 2000; Jansz, 2000). Thus, they learn early to hide vulnerable emotions such as love, joy, and sadness because, they believe that such feelings are feminine and imply, weakness. Over time, some men become strangers to, their own emotional lives (Levant, 1996). It seems that, men with traditional views of masculinity are more, likely to suppress outward emotions and to fear emotions, supposedly because they may lead to a loss of, composure (Jakupcak et al., 2003)., The difficulty with “tender” emotions has serious, consequences. First, as we saw in Chapter 3, suppressed, emotions can contribute to stress-related disorders. And, worse, men are less likely than women to seek help from, health professionals (Addis & Mahalik, 2003). Second,, men’s emotional inexpressiveness can cause problems, in their relationships with partners and children. For example, children whose fathers are warm, loving, and accepting toward them have higher self-esteem and lower, rates of aggression and behavior problems, and the reverse is also true (Rohner & Veneziano, 2001). On a positive note, fathers are increasingly involving themselves, with their children. And 30 percent of fathers report that, they take equal or greater responsibility for their children than their working wives do (Bond et al., 2003)., One emotion males are allowed to express is anger., Sometimes this anger translates into physical aggression or violence. Men commit nearly 90 percent of violent crimes in the United States and almost all sexual, assaults (U.S. Department of Justice, 2003)., Sexual Problems, , Men often experience sexual problems that derive, partly from their gender-role socialization, which gives, them a “macho” sexual image to live up to. There are, few things that men fear more than a sexual encounter, in which they are unable to achieve an erection (Doyle,, 1989). Unfortunately, these very fears often cause the, dysfunction that men dread (see Chapter 13). The upshot is that men’s obsession with sexual performance, can produce anxiety that may interfere with their sexual responsiveness., Another problem is that many men learn to confuse feelings of intimacy and sex. In other words, if a, 320, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , man experiences strong feelings of connectedness, he, is likely to interpret them as sexual feelings. This confusion has a number of consequences (Kilmartin,, 2000). For one thing, sex may be the only way some, men can allow themselves to feel intimately connected, to another. Thus, men’s keen interest in sex may be driven, in part, by strong needs for emotional intimacy, that don’t get satisfied in other ways. The confusion of, intimacy and sex may underlie the tendency for men, (compared to women) to perceive eye contact, a compliment, an innocent smile, a friendly remark, or a, brush against the arm as a sexual invitation (Kowalski,, 1993). Finally, the sexualization of intimate feelings, causes inappropriate anxiety when men feel affection, for another man, thus promoting homophobia., Homophobia is the intense fear and intolerance, of homosexuality. Because homosexuality is still, largely unaccepted, fear of being labeled homosexual, keeps many people, who might otherwise be more flexible, adhering to traditional gender roles. This situation, is particularly true for males. One reason that homophobia is more prevalent among males is that the male, role is rooted in the fear of appearing feminine—and, feminine characteristics are mistakenly associated with, gay males (Maurer, 1999). Second, homophobia is much, more common in men than in women because males, feel more pressure to avoid any behavior characteristic, of the other gender (Herek, 2003). Although they will, tolerate “tomboyism” in girls, parents (especially fathers) are highly intolerant of any “sissy” behavior exhibited by their sons. This intense pressure against appearing feminine contributes not only to homophobia, among heterosexual males but also to negative attitudes, toward females (Friedman, 1989)., , Role Expectations for Females, In the past 30 years, the role expectations for American, women have undergone dramatic changes, especially, when compared to male role expectations. Prior to the, 1970s, a woman was expected to be a wife and a stay-athome mother. Today, there are three major expectations:, 1. The marriage mandate. Most women are socialized to feel incomplete until they find a mate. Women, attain adult status when they get married. In the context of marriage, women are expected to be responsible for cooking, cleaning, and other housework., 2. The motherhood mandate. The imperative of, the female role is to have children. This expectation, has been termed the “motherhood mandate” (Russo,, 1979). Preferably, a woman should have at least two, children, and at least one of them should be a son. The, prevailing ideology of today’s motherhood mandate, is that of “intensive mothering”—mothering should, be wholly child-centered, and mothers should be self-

Page 358 :
sacrificing rather than persons who also have needs, and interests (Arendell, 2000)., 3. Work outside the home. Most of today’s young, women, especially those who are college educated, expect to work outside the home, and they also want a, satisfying family life (Family and Work Institute, 2004;, Konrad, 2003). As you can see in Figure 10.10, the percentage of women in the labor force has been steadily, rising over the last 30 years., , Problems with the Female Role, Writers in the feminist movement generated some, compelling analyses of the problems associated with, the pre-1970s traditional role of wife and mother, , 80, , 60, , •, , Males, Females, , Males, Females, , 0, , Males, Females, , 20, , Males, Females, , 40, , Males, Females, , Participation rate (percent), , The marriage and motherhood mandates fuel, women’s focus on heterosexual success—learning how, to attract and interest males as prospective mates. The, resulting emphasis on dating and marriage can lead, some women away from a challenging career—they, worry about driving away a prospective mate who might, be threatened by a high-achieving woman (Arnold,, 1994). Because younger men are more supportive of, their wives’ working than older men, this conflict, should ease for younger women (Family and Work Institute, 2004). The prospect of dealing with young children can also reduce women’s career expectations., , 100, , 1970, , 1980, , 1990, Year, , 2000, , 2010, (projected), , F I G U R E 10. 10, , Increases in women’s workforce participation. The percentage, of women who work outside the home has increased steadily over, the past century, especially since 1970. In 2010, close to twothirds of women are projected to be in the labor force, about 10, percent fewer than men. (Data from U.S. Bureau of the Census,, 2000, 2003, 2004a), , DOONESBURY © 1975 G. B. Trudeau. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 321

Page 359 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Gender Stereotypes and “Appearance Pressure”, Currently in the United States, the ideal physique for, women is an hourglass shape with medium-sized breasts, packaged in a relatively thin body. For men, the ideal, physique includes broad shoulders, narrow hips, narrow, waist, and muscularity. Images of these gender ideals, pervade “women’s” and “men’s” magazines as well as, those that focus on fitness (Vartanian, Giant, & Passino,, 2001). Physically attractive men and women dominate, television programs and commercials. In an ironic use of, the term, “reality” television shows such as Extreme, Makeover and The Swan depict real men and women, undergoing extensive plastic surgery to improve their, lives. The media message for today’s women: thin is “in”;, for men: you need “six-pack abs” to be attractive., Weight is particularly important for women because, men generally prefer thinner women to those who are, heavier. For many years, this concern with thinness has, existed among white and Asian Americans, but it has, been a lesser concern among Hispanics and black Americans (Polivy & Herman, 2002). Unfortunately, some, recent evidence suggests that the thin female ideal may, be spreading to these two groups as well (Barnett, Keel,, & Conoscenti, 2001; Bay-Cheng et al., 2002, but also see, Schooler et al. 2004)., Today, males also seem to be experiencing “ appearance pressure.” Recent studies show that adolescent, boys, college men, and adult males all prefer to be more, muscular (Morrison, Morrison, & Hopkins, 2003; Olivardia, Pope, & Phillips, 2000). Pressure on males also, appears to be coming from women, who prefer a large, torso with narrow waist and hips (Maisey et al., 1999)., More men are dieting, working out, and seeking surgery, than has been true in the past (Olivardia et al., 2000)., Do televised images of body ideals have any impact, on viewers? Unfortunately, it seems that they do—, negative ones. For example, in one study, college men, and women were exposed to either sexist ads, nonsexist, ads, or no ads (Lavine, Sweeney, & Wager, 1999). (The, , (Friedan, 1964; Millett, 1970). Many criticized the assumption that women, unlike men, did not need an independent identity; it should be sufficient to be Jim, Smith’s wife and Jason and Robin’s mother. Increasingly, 322, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , sexist ads portrayed both men and women as sex objects, as part of a bogus marketing research study.) The results, showed that both the men and women who were exposed, to sexist ads had greater body dissatisfaction than students in the other two conditions. In a correlational, study, the amount of exposure to ideal body images of, women on television (based on viewing habits) was, measured. Women with a lot of exposure to these ideal, images were more likely to prefer a smaller waist and, hips and a medium-sized bust for themselves (Harrison,, 2003). Both women and men who viewed ideal body, images of women were more likely to approve of cosmetic surgery for women. Other research on women has, shown that internalized images of thinness have been, linked to disordered eating (Harrison & Cantor, 1997)., The current social pressures for females to be thin, and for males to be muscular cause both genders to have, distorted perceptions of their peers’ body ideals, thus, increasing the pressure to conform. For example, a study, of college students reported that the women believed, that their male and female peers preferred a much thinner female silhouette than was actually the case; the, men exaggerated the extent to which others perceived, large physiques as most desirable for males (Cohn &, Adler, 1992)., Also, social pressures to attain an ideal body shape, push many individuals into unhealthy eating behaviors., Experts say that eating disorders are at an all-time high, (Gleaves et al., 2000). And some males may turn to, dangerous anabolic steroids to build up their muscle, mass (Courtenay, 2000). Another response to “attractiveness pressure” is the increased rate of cosmetic surgeries., Between 2003 and 2004, a 48 percent increase occurred, in the number of cosmetic surgeries performed on Americans who were 18 and younger (Springen, 2004)., Thus, the pressure to live up to an unrealistic, and, sometimes unhealthy, ideal body shape is a significant adjustment challenge facing both males and females today., , over the past 40 years, girls and women have been encouraged to develop and use their talents, and work opportunities for women have greatly expanded. Still,, there are problems with the female role.

Page 360 :
Diminished Career Aspirations, , Despite recent efforts to increase women’s opportunities for achievement, young women continue to have, lower career aspirations than young men with comparable backgrounds and abilities (Wilgosh, 2001). Also,, they are more likely to underestimate their achievement than boys (who overestimate theirs) (Eccles,, 2001). This thinking is especially likely when estimating performance on “masculine” tasks such as science, and math versus “feminine” (social skills, language) or, gender-neutral tasks. This is a problem because science, and math are the foundations for many high-paying,, high-status careers. Higher intelligence and grades are, generally associated with higher career aspirations, but, this trend is less likely to hold true for girls than for, boys (Kelly & Cobb, 1991)., The discrepancy between women’s abilities and, their level of achievement has been termed the abilityachievement gap (Hyde, 1996). The roots of this gap, seem to lie in the conflict between achievement and, femininity that is built into the traditional female role., Many women worry that they will be seen as unfeminine if they boldly strive for success. Of course, this is, not a concern for all women. Still, gender discrimination remains a barrier for those who aim for prestigious careers., , out” of the workforce to focus on childbearing and, rearing their young children (Wallis, 2004). Given the, three-role reality of their lives, they trade off the, worker role and income for a slower pace and less, stress to rear young children, although they miss the, stimulation and recognition from their work. (But, keep in mind that these women have husbands who, can support the family.) Their strategy: “You can have, it all, just not all at the same time” (Wallis, 2004, p. 53)., Of course multiple roles, in themselves, are not inherently problematic. In fact, there is some evidence, that multiple roles can be beneficial for mental health,, as you’ll see in Chapter 12. Rather, the problem stems, from unequal sharing of role responsibilities. Greater, participation in household tasks and child care by husbands or others as well as family-friendly workplaces, and subsidized quality child-care programs would alleviate women’s stress in this area., Ambivalence About Sexuality, , Like men, women may have sexual problems that stem,, in part, from their gender-role socialization. For many, women, the problem is difficulty in enjoying sex. Why?, For one thing, many girls are still taught to suppress or, deny their sexual feelings (Hyde & DeLamater, 2003)., , Juggling Multiple Roles, , Another problem with the female role is that societal, institutions have not kept pace with the reality of, women’s lives. Women are able to successfully manage, marriage and a career. But when children enter the picture, the emotional and time demands on women increase dramatically (Hoffnung, 2004)., Today 60 percent of married women with children, under the age of 6 work outside the home (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2004). Yet the workplace (and, many husbands and fathers) still operate as if women, were stay-at-home moms and as if there were no, single-parent families. This gap between policies based, on outdated assumptions about women’s lives and reality means that women who “want it all” experience, burdens and conflicts that most men do not. That’s because most men typically have major day-to-day responsibilities in only one role: worker. But most, women have major day-to-day responsibilities in three, roles: spouse, parent, and worker., Although more men, and especially younger men,, are giving additional time to household chores and, child care, women still do most of this work (Family &, Work Institute, 2004). One way today’s college-educated, women deal with these conflicts is to postpone marriage and motherhood (and to have small families) to, pursue more education or to launch their careers, (Hoffnung, 2004). Once women in high-powered careers are established, some are temporarily “stopping, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , The Mismeasure of Woman, by Carol Tavris (Touchstone,, 1993), The title and thesis of this book refer to Protagoras’s, statement that “Man is the measure of all things.”, Tavris, a social psychologist, has written this book for, the nonprofessional audience and uses her natural wit, and humor to excellent advantage. She points out the, fallacy of using a male-centered standard for evaluating, “what is normal” for both men and women. Using research findings, she exposes numerous myths about, males and females that are the source of misunderstanding and frustration for many., Tavris is not interested in replacing a male-centered, view with a female-dominant view but rather in expanding our view of what it means to be human. She urges, people to move away from the tendency to think in “us, versus them” terms about gender issues. Instead, she, suggests that men and women need to work together, and rethink how they need to be to have the kind of, relationships and work that are life enhancing., Book cover, Copyright © 1992 by Simon & Schuster, Inc. Reproduction by permission of the publisher. All rights reserved., , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 323

Page 361 :
For another, they are told that a woman’s role in sex, is a passive one. In addition, girls are encouraged to, focus on romance rather than on gaining sexual experience. As a result, many women feel uncomfortable, (guilty, ashamed) with their sexual urges. The experience of menstruation (and its association with blood, and pain) and the fear of pregnancy add another dimension of negativity to sex. And females’ concerns about, sexual exploitation and rape also foster negative emotions. Thus, when it comes to sexuality, women are likely, to have ambivalent feelings instead of the largely positive feelings that men have (Tolman, 2002; Hyde, 2004)., , tims of gender-based discrimination. In this section,, we’ll discuss two specific problems: economic discrimination and aggression toward women., Economic Discrimination, , Women are victimized by two forms of economic discrimination: differential access to jobs and differential, treatment once on the job. Concerning job access, the, problem is that women still lack the same employment, opportunities as men. For example, in 2003, only 6, percent of mechanical engineers were women and only, 30 percent of physicians and 14 percent of Congresspersons were women (U.S. Bureau of the Census,, 2004a). Ethnic minority women were even less likely, than white women to work in these occupations. On, the other hand, women are overrepresented in “pinkcollar ghetto” occupations, such as secretary and, preschool and kindergarten teacher (see Figure 10.11)., The second aspect of economic discrimination is, differential treatment on the job. For example, women, typically earn lower salaries than men in the same jobs, (see Figure 10.12). And when women demonstrate, leadership qualities such as confidence, ambitiousness,, and assertiveness, they are evaluated less favorably than, , Sexism: A Special Problem, for Females, Intimately intertwined with the topic of gender roles is, the issue of sexism. Sexism is discrimination against, people on the basis of their gender. (Using our terminology, the term should be “genderism,” but we’ll stick, with standard terminology for the sake of clarity.) Sexism usually refers to discrimination by men against, women. However, sometimes women discriminate, against other women and sometimes men are the vic-, , •, , Occupations, , FIG U R E 10.11, , Women in the world of work., Career opportunities for women, have expanded dramatically in, the past 40 years. Nonetheless,, women remain underrepresented, in many traditionally masculine, occupations and overrepresented, in many traditionally feminine, occupations. (Data from U.S., Bureau of the Census, 2004a), , Carpenters, Flight engineers, Industrial truck and, tractor operators, Aerospace engineers, Police and sheriff’s, patrol officers, Clergy, Chief executive, officers, Lawyers, Computer, programmers, Physicians, and surgeons, Post–secondary, teachers, Accountants, and auditors, Psychologists, Human resources, managers, Waiters and waitresses, Registered nurses, Secretaries,, stenographers, typists, Prekindergarten and, kindergarten teachers, 0, , 324, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , 10, , 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, Percentage of workers who are female, , 90, , 100

Page 362 :
Accountants Males, and auditors Females, Males, Females, , Bus drivers, , College and Males, university teachers Females, Computer Males, programmers Females, Engineers, , Males, Females, , Lawyers, , Males, Females, , Sales persons, , Males, Females, , Registered nurses, , Males, Females, , Waiters and Males, waitresses Females, 0, , •, , 200, , 400, , 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 2002 median weekly earnings (dollars), , 1600, , 1800, , F I G U R E 10.12, , The gender gap in weekly wages. Women continue to earn less than men in all occupational categories,, as these 2002 data for selected occupations make clear. Many factors can contribute to this gender, gap in earned income, but economic discrimination is probably a major consideration. (Data from U.S., Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2003), , men because this behavior contradicts the female gender role (Eagly & Karau, 2002). There appears to be a, glass ceiling that prevents most women and ethnic minorities from advancing beyond middle-management, positions. For example, in 1996, only 4 of the top 1,000, corporations in America were headed by women, (Valian, 1998). Ironically, men employed in traditionally female fields are promoted more quickly than their, female counterparts, a phenomenon dubbed the glass, escalator (Williams, 1998)., , Sexual Harassment in the Schools, , Aggression Toward Females, , Forms of aggression toward girls and women include, rape, intimate violence, sexual harassment, sexual abuse,, incest, and violent pornography. We’ve discussed a, number of these problems elsewhere (in particular, consult the Application for Chapter 9), so we’ll focus on sexual harassment here. Sexual harassment has become recognized as a widespread problem that occurs not only, on the job but also at home (obscene telephone calls),, while walking outside (catcalls and whistles), and in, medical and psychotherapy settings. It also takes place, in schools and colleges. Figure 10.13 reports the results, , Percentage, reporting, , Type of harassment, Received suggestive gestures, looks,, comments, or jokes, , 89, , Touched, pinched, or grabbed, , 83, , Leaned over or cornered, , 47, , Received sexual notes or pictures, , 28, , Pressured to do something sexual, , 27, , Forced to do something sexual, , 10, , Other form of harassment, , 7, , Note: Percentages do not add to 100 because readers could indicate, more than one type of harassment., , •, , F I G U R E 10. 13, , Reported incidence of sexual harassment in the schools. This, figure depicts common forms of sexual harassment in grades 2, through 12 and the percentage of girls reporting them. (Adapted, from Stein, Marshall, & Tropp, 1993), Adapted from Stein, N., Marshall, N. L., & Tropp, L. R. (1993). Secrets in public: Sexual harassment in our schools, p. 4. Copyright © 1993 Center for Research on Women at Wellesley, College and the NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund., , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 325

Page 363 :
of a survey on the most common forms of sexual harassment in grades 2 through 12. Teachers and professors who pressure students for sexual favors in exchange, for grades have been singled out for strong criticism., Although there are costs associated with gender, roles for both males and females, sexism causes par-, , ticularly serious problems in the lives of girls and, women. In addition, when prejudice and discrimination prevent talented individuals from making contributions from which all could benefit, society as a, whole suffers., , Gender in the Past and in the Future, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Explain the basis for traditional gender roles and why they are, changing., Define gender-role identity and discuss two alternatives to traditional, gender roles., , In Western society, gender roles are in a state of transition. As we have noted, sweeping changes in the female, role have already occurred. It’s hard to imagine today,, but less than 100 years ago, women were not allowed, to vote or to manage their own finances. Only a few, decades ago, it was virtually unheard of for a woman, to initiate a date, manage a corporation, or run for, public office. In this section, we’ll discuss why gender, roles are changing and what the future might bring., , Many people are baffled as to why gender, roles are changing. They can’t understand, why age-old traditions are being flouted and, discarded. A number of theories attempt to, explain why gender roles are in transition., Basically, these theories look at the past to, explain the present and the future. A key, consideration is that gender roles have always, constituted a division of labor. In earlier societies, the division of labor according to gender was a natural outgrowth of some simple, realities. In most hunting-and-gathering, societies, as well as most herding societies,, an economic premium was put on physical strength. Men tend to be stronger than, women, so they were better equipped to, handle such jobs as hunting and farming. In, most societies they got those assignments,, whereas women were responsible for gathering, home maintenance, and childrearing, (Nielsen, 1990). Another consideration was, that women had to assume responsibility, for nursing young children. Thus, although, people might have worked out other ways of, , 326, , PART 3, , © Jim Zukerman/Corbis, , Why Are Gender Roles Changing?, , doing things (and some cultures did), there were some, basic reasons for dividing labor according to gender in, premodern societies., Traditional gender roles are a carryover from the, past. Once traditions are established, they have a way, of perpetuating themselves. Over the past century or, so in Western society, these divisions of labor have become increasingly antiquated. Therein lies the prime, reason for changes in gender roles. Traditional gender, roles no longer make economic sense. The widespread, use of machines to do work has rendered physical, strength relatively unimportant. Furthermore, as we, , A division of labor based on gender no longer makes economic sense in our, society. Relatively few jobs require great physical strength; the rest call for skills, possessed by both men and women., , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 364 :
Alternatives to Traditional, Gender Roles, Gender-role identity is a person’s identification with, the qualities regarded as masculine or feminine. Initially, gender-role identity was conceptualized as either, “masculine” or “feminine.” All males were expected to, develop masculine role identities and females, feminine gender-role identities. Individuals who did not, identify with the role expectations for their gender or, who identified with the characteristics for the other, gender were judged to be few in number and to have, psychological problems., In the 1970s, social scientists began to rethink their, ideas about gender-role identity. One assumption that, was called into question is that males should be “masculine” and females should be “feminine.” For one, thing, it appears that the number of people who don’t, conform to traditional gender-role norms is higher than, widely assumed, as is the amount of strain that some, people experience trying to conform to conventional, roles (Pleck, 1981, 1995). Research suggests that strong, identification with traditional gender-role expectations, is associated with a variety of negative outcomes. For, example, high femininity in females is correlated with, low self-esteem (Whitley, 1983) and increased psychological distress (Helgeson, 1994). High masculinity in, males has been linked to increased Type A behavior (see, Chapter 14), poor health care (Helgeson, 1994), greater, likelihood of committing physical and sexual aggression in relationships (Mosher, 1991), and vulnerability, to certain types of psychopathology (Evans & Dinning,, 1982). Furthermore, relationship satisfaction tends, to be lower in heterosexual couples with traditional, gender-role identities (Ickes, 1993). Thus, contrary to, earlier thinking, the evidence suggests that “masculine”, males and “feminine” females may be less well adjusted,, on the average, than those who are less traditional., , As people have become aware of the possible costs, of conventional gender roles, there has been much, debate about moving beyond them. A big question, has been: What should we move toward? To date, two, ideas have received the most attention: (1) androgyny, and (2) gender-role transcendence. Let’s examine these, options., Androgyny, , Like masculinity and femininity, androgyny is a type, of gender-role identity. Androgyny refers to the coexistence of both masculine and feminine personality, traits in a single person. In other words, an androgynous person is one who scores above average on measures of both masculinity and femininity., To help you fully appreciate the nature of androgyny, we need to briefly review other kinds of gender, identity (see Figure 10.14). Males who score high on, masculinity and low on femininity, and females who, score high on femininity and low on masculinity, are, said to be gender-typed. Males who score high on femininity but low on masculinity, and females who score, high on masculinity but low on femininity, are said to, be cross-gender-typed. Finally, males and females who, score low on both masculinity and femininity are characterized as gender-role undifferentiated., Keep in mind that we are referring to individuals’, descriptions of themselves in terms of personality, traits traditionally associated with each gender (dominance, nurturance, and so on). People sometimes confuse gender-role identity with sexual orientation, but, they are not the same. A person can be homosexual,, heterosexual, or bisexual (sexual orientation) and be, , High, , Masculinity score, High, Low, , move toward a service economy, physical strength will, become even less relevant., The future is likely to bring even more dramatic, shifts in gender roles. We can see the beginnings of, these changes now. For example, although women still, bear children, nursing responsibilities are now optional. Moreover, as women become more economically independent, they will have less need to get married solely for economic reasons. The possibility of, developing a fetus outside the uterus may seem farfetched now, but some experts predict that it is only a, matter of time. If so, both men and women could be, “mothers.” In light of these and other changes in modern society, it is safe to say that gender roles are likely, to remain in flux for some time to come., , •, , Femininity score, , Low, , Androgynous, males and females, , Masculine, gender–typed, (if male), or, cross–gender–typed, (if female), , Feminine, gender–typed, (if female), or, cross–gender-typed, (if male), , Undifferentiated, males and females, , F I G U R E 10. 14, , Possible gender-role identities. This diagram summarizes the, relations between subjects’ scores on measures of masculinity and, femininity and four possible gender identities., , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 327

Page 365 :
Courtesy, Sandra Bem, , androgynous, gender-typed, cross-gender-typed, or, gender-role undifferentiated (gender-role identity)., In groundbreaking research three, decades ago, Sandra Bem (1975) challenged the then-prevailing view that, males who scored high in masculinity and females who scored high, in femininity are better adjusted, than “masculine” women and “feminine” men. She argued that traditionally masculine men and femiSandra Bem, nine women feel compelled to adhere, to rigid and narrow gender roles that, unnecessarily restrict their behavior. In contrast, androgynous individuals ought to be able to function, more flexibly. She also advanced the idea that androgynous people are psychologically healthier than those, who are gender-typed., What about Bem’s ideas? First, androgynous people do seem more flexible than others. That is, they can, be nurturing (feminine) or independent (masculine),, depending on the situation (Bem, 1975). In contrast,, gender-typed males tend to have difficulty behaving, nurturantly, while gender-typed females often have, trouble with independence. Also, individuals whose, partners are either androgynous or feminine (but not, masculine or undifferentiated) report higher relationship satisfaction (Bradbury, Campbell, & Fincham,, 1995). This finding holds for cohabiting heterosexuals,, as well as for lesbian and gay couples (Kurdek &, Schmitt, 1986b). Thus, in these areas, androgyny seems, to be advantageous., Bem’s second assertion—that androgynous people are psychologically healthier than gender-typed individuals—requires a more complicated analysis. Since, 1976, over a hundred studies have been conducted to, try to answer this question. Some early studies did find, a positive correlation between androgyny and mental, health. Ultimately, however, the weight of the evidence, did not support Bem’s hypothesis that androgyny is, especially healthy. In fact, several comprehensive surveys of the research concluded that masculine traits (in, both males and females) were more strongly associated with psychological health than androgyny (Hyde, & Frost, 1993; ). These findings, as well as problems, with the concept of androgyny and its measurement,, have led Bem and other psychologists to take a different view of gender roles, as you’ll see next., , the other. Although it can be argued that androgyny is, less restrictive than traditional gender roles, it may also, lead people to feel that they have two potential sources, of inadequacy to contend with, as opposed to only one, (Bem, 1993)., More important, the idea that people should have, both masculine and feminine traits reinforces the assumption that gender is an integral part of human behavior (Bem, 1983). In other words, the androgyny, perspective presupposes that masculine and feminine, traits actually exist within people. Another way of putting it is that the current system sets up self-fulfilling, prophecies. That is, if people use gender-based labels, (“masculine” and “feminine”) to describe certain human characteristics and behavior, they are likely to associate these traits with one gender or the other. A final, criticism of androgyny is that it implies that the solution to gender bias is to change the individual rather, than to address the gender inequities in society and its, institutions (Matlin, 2004)., Many gender theorists maintain that masculinity, and femininity are really only arbitrary labels that we, have learned to impose on certain traits through societal conditioning. This assertion is the foundation for, the gender-role transcendence perspective (Bem, 1983,, 1993; Spence, 1983). The gender-role transcendence, perspective proposes that to be fully human, people, need to move beyond gender roles as a way of organizing their perceptions of themselves and others., This goal requires that instead of dividing human, characteristics into masculine and feminine categories, (and then combining them, as the androgyny perspective suggests), we should dispense with the artificially, constructed gender categories and labels altogether., How would this work? Instead of the labels “masculine” and “feminine,” we would use gender-neutral, terms such as “instrumental” and “expressive,” respectively, to describe personality traits and behaviors. This, “decoupling” of traits and gender could reduce the, self-fulfilling prophecy problem., The advocates of gender-role transcendence argue, that this practice would help us break our current, habits of “projecting gender into situations irrelevant, to genitalia” (Bem, 1985, p. 222) and hasten the advent, of a gender-free society. They believe that if gender, were to be eliminated (or even reduced) as a means of, , Gender-Role Transcendence, , WE B LI N K 10.5, , As psychologists thought more about androgyny, they, realized that the concept had some problems. For one, thing, androgyny requires people to develop both masculine and feminine characteristics, rather than one or, , Feminist Majority Foundation, This site brings together a massive set of resources dealing, with issues from a feminist perspective., , 328, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 366 :
categorizing traits, each individual’s unique capabilities and interests would assume greater importance,, and individuals would be more free to develop their, own unique potentials., Given that individuals today have had years of exposure to gender messages, moving toward genderrole transcendence would likely be a gradual process., According to James O’Neil and Jean Egan (1992), such, a gender-role journey moves from initial acceptance of, traditional gender roles (Stage 1) to a growing ambivalence about gender roles (Stage 2). From there, it, evolves to anger about sexism (Stage 3) and then to actions to reduce sexist restrictions (Stage 4). Finally, in, Stage 5, people integrate their gender-role beliefs,, which enables them to see themselves and the world in, less gender-stereotypic ways., , A Gender-Free Society?, Obviously, a gender-free society would require more, than individuals changing their gender-based attitudes, and behaviors. It would also be necessary to eliminate, all gender discrimination in societal institutions as, , well, and such changes would take many years. While, America is nowhere near being a gender-free society,, the past 40 years show evidence of both individual and, institutional changes in this direction., Although many social scientists find the concept, of a gender-free society appealing, some social critics, are concerned about the decline of traditional gender, roles. For instance, George Gilder (1992) maintains, that conventional gender roles provide a fundamental, underpinning for our economic and social order. Furthermore, he asserts that changes in gender roles will, damage intimate relationships between women and, men and have a devastating impact on family life., Gilder argues that women are needed in the home in, their traditional homemaker role to provide for the socialization of the next generation. Without this traditional socialization, he predicts that our moral fabric, will decay, leading to an increase in crime, violence,, and drug abuse. Given these starkly contrasting projections, it will be interesting to see what developments, unfold in the next few decades. Meanwhile, in the Application we’ll take a look at how gender affects communication styles., , Bridging the Gender Gap in Communication, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, ■, , Describe how the different socialization experiences of males and, females contribute to communication problems between men and, women., Describe expressive and instrumental styles of communication., Describe some common mixed-gender communication problems., , Answer the following questions “true” or “false.”, ___ 1. Men talk much more than women in mixedgender groups., ___ 2. Women are more likely to ask for help than, men., ___ 3. Women are more willing to initiate confrontations in relationships than men., ___ 4. Men talk more about nonpersonal issues with, their friends than women do., If you answered true to all of these statements, you, were correct. They are just some of the observed differences in communication styles between males and, females. While not characteristic of all men and, women or of all mixed-gender conversations, these, , style differences appear to be the source of many misunderstandings between males and females., When people experience frustrating communication situations in their personal or work relationships, they often attribute them to the other person’s, quirks or failings. Instead, it seems that some of these, frustrating experiences may result from gender differences in communication style. That is, many men, and women learn to speak different “languages” in social interactions but don’t realize it. In this Application, we explore the nature of these gender-based style, differences, how they develop, and how they can contribute to interpersonal conflicts. We also offer some, suggestions for dealing more effectively with these, style differences., , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 329

Page 367 :
According to sociolinguist Deborah, Tannen (1990), males and females, are typically socialized in different, “cultures.” That is, males are likely, to learn a language of “status and, independence,” while females learn, a language of “connection and intimacy” (p. 42). Tannen likens male/, female communications to other Deborah Tannen, “cross-cultural” communications—, full of opportunities for misunderstandings to develop., These differences in communication styles develop, in childhood and are fostered by traditional gender, stereotypes and the socializing influences of parents,, teachers, media, and childhood social interactions—, usually with same-gender peers. As we noted earlier,, boys typically play in larger groups, usually outdoors,, and farther away from home than girls (Feiring &, Lewis, 1987). Thus, boys are less under the scrutiny of, adults and are therefore more likely to engage in activities that encourage exploration and independence., Also, boys’ groups are often structured in terms of, high- and low-status roles. Boys achieve high status in, their groups by engaging in dominant behavior, (telling others what to do and enforcing compliance)., The games that boys play often result in winners and, losers, and boys frequently bid for dominance by interrupting each other, calling each other names, boasting to each other about their abilities, and refusing to, cooperate with each other (Maccoby, 1998, 2002; Maltz, & Borker, 1998)., In contrast, girls usually play in small groups or in, pairs, often indoors, and gain high status through popularity—the key to which is intimacy with peers. Many, of the games girls play do not have winners or losers., , © The New Yorker Collection 2002 Robert Weber from cartoon bank.com. All rights reserved., , 330, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Photo by Sara Barrett, courtesy of, Random House, , The Clash of Two “Cultures”, , And, while it is true that girls vary in abilities and, skills, to call attention to oneself as better than others, is frowned upon. Girls are likely to express their wishes, as suggestions rather than as demands or orders (Maccoby, 1998, 2002; Maltz & Borker, 1998). Dominance, tends to be gained by verbal persuasion rather than by, the direct bids for power characteristic of boys’ social, interactions (Charlesworth & Dzur, 1987)., These two cultures shape the functions of speech, in different ways. According to Eleanor Maccoby, (1990), among boys, “speech serves largely egoistic, functions and is used to establish and protect an individual’s turf. Among girls, conversation is a more socially binding process” (p. 516)., Tannen contends that these different styles carry, over into adult social interactions. Many males learn, to see the social world as hierarchical. To maintain independence and avoid failure they have to jockey for, high status. Hence, she says, men tend to approach, conversations as “negotiations in which people try to, achieve and maintain the upper hand if they can and, protect themselves from others’ attempts to put them, down and push them around” (p. 25). Females, on the, other hand, learn to see the social order as a community in which individuals are connected to others and, one where the task is to preserve these connections., Consequently, women tend to approach conversations, as “negotiations for closeness in which people try to, seek and give confirmation and support, and to reach, consensus. They try to protect themselves from others’, attempts to push them away” (p. 25). These different, views of the social order are the root of the often heard, complaint, “You just don’t understand”—the title of, Tannen’s book (see the Recommended Reading box)., The idea that there are two cultures founded on, gender-based communication styles has intuitive appeal because it confirms people’s stereotypes and reduces complex issues to simple explanations. But, there’s an important caveat here. As we have noted, status, power, and gender role differences can lurk behind, what seem to be gender differences. Researchers have, only recently tested Tannen’s ideas; to date, the findings are mixed (Basow & Rubenfeld, 2003; Edwards &, Hamilton, 2004; Michaud & Warner, 1997; MacGeorge, et al., 2004). Although some gender differences in, communication styles have been found, they are quite, small (MacGeorge et al., 2004). Also, there are individual differences in preferred styles: Some women use, the “male style” and some men use the “female style.”, As we have noted, the social context is a much stronger, influence on behavior than gender, which means that, many people use either style, depending on the situation. Therefore, we caution you not to reduce all communication problems between males and females to, gender-based style differences. It is simply not true, that men and women come from different planets.

Page 368 :
RE C O M M E N D E D, READING, , You Just Don’t Understand:, Women and Men in, Conversation, by Deborah Tannen (Morrow, 1990), This paperback, a one-time bestseller, addresses the, “communication gap” that Tannen believes exists between males and females. Tannen, a sociolinguist,, asserts that boys and girls learn different styles of, communication through same-gender social interactions in childhood. Because men and women often, approach social interactions from different (and sometimes conflict-producing) perspectives, other-gender, interactions can be problematic and frustrating. The, author describes a wide variety of such interactions and, provides numerous examples. In addition, she “translates” many conversations between men and women to, illustrate how the different styles operate. Thus, readers can see the difference between what they think, they are saying and how their messages may actually, be interpreted. Tannen believes that many frustrations, caused by gender differences in styles of communication could be alleviated if men and women learned to, understand one another’s perspectives., Cover image, Copyright © 1990 by Deborah Tannen. Reprinted by permission of, HarperCollins, Inc., design by Eric Fuentecilla., , Instrumental and, Expressive Styles, Because of the differences in their socialization experiences, men are more likely to use an “instrumental”, style of communication and women, an “expressive”, style (Block, 1973; Tannen, 1990). An instrumental, style focuses on reaching practical goals and finding, solutions to problems; an expressive style is characterized by being able to express tender emotions easily, and being sensitive to the feelings of others. This gender difference has been found across a number of cultures (D’Andrade, 1966). Of course, many individuals, use both styles, depending on the situation., In conflict situations, men’s instrumental style, means that husbands are more likely to stay calm and, problem oriented and to make more efforts to find compromise solutions to problems. However, an instrumental style can have a darker side. When the instrumental, behavior of calmness changes to coldness and unresponsiveness, it becomes negative. Research has shown, that this emotional unresponsiveness is characteristic of, many men and that it seems to figure importantly in, marital dissatisfaction (Larson & Pleck, 1998)., , Many studies indicate that women are more skilled, than men in nonverbal communication—a key component of the expressive style. For example, they are, better at reading and sending nonverbal messages, (Hall, 1998; Hall & Matsumoto, 2004). And women are, better listeners (Miller, Berg, & Archer, 1983). But, women engage in some “negative” expressive behaviors, as well (Brehm, 1992). For example, during relationship conflicts, women are more likely to (1) display, strong negative emotions (Noller, 1985, 1987); (2) use, psychologically coercive tactics, such as guilt manipulations, verbal attacks, and power plays (Barnes & Buss,, 1985); and (3) reject attempts at reconciliation (Barnes, & Buss, 1985)., , Common Mixed-Gender, Communication Problems, In this section, we briefly review some common mixedgender communication problems noted by Tannen. To, keep things simple, we use “she” and “he” to illustrate, various scenarios, but you should interpret these labels, loosely for the reasons we have mentioned., Mismatches, , People expect their friends and partners to support, and reassure them. When a mismatch occurs between, their expectations and reality, they become confused,, frustrated, and possibly hurt or angry. Consider a, woman who tells her partner about a recurring problem she is having at work—not because she wants help, with the problem but because she wants some sympathy. However, thinking that she is seeking a solution to, the problem, he gives her advice. Not receiving the, consolation she seeks, she believes he doesn’t care. He, is frustrated about her repeated complaining, because, he has offered her the same advice in the past. Although neither wants to frustrate the other, that’s exactly what happens because they are talking at crosspurposes. She wants him to commiserate with her, but, he thinks she wants him to help her solve a problem., Each assumes the other knows what each wants, and, neither does. These mismatches crop up quite frequently in intimate relationships., Talking About People Versus Things, , Women’s conversations frequently involve sharing the, details of their personal lives or talking about people., Talking about people isn’t necessarily destructive, although it can be if it turns into talking against people., As they did in childhood, women share secrets with, one another as a way of being close. Men are interested, in details, too, but those of a different kind: politics,, news, and sports. Women fear being left out by not, knowing what is going on in friends’ lives; men fear, CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 331

Page 369 :
CATHY © Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , being left out by not knowing what is going on in the, world (Tannen, 1990)., Tannen suggests that both women and men need, to extend their communication strategies by adding, aspects of the other style to their own. Thus, some men, may need to learn to be more comfortable talking, about their personal lives, whereas some women could, benefit by talking more about impersonal topics and, talking in a more assertive manner., Lecturing and Listening, , In many mixed-gender conversations, particularly those, in public settings, women often end up playing the listener to the man’s “lecture.” Are men self-centered bigmouths? Are women meek, passive creatures? Instead, of these interpretations, Tannen suggests that men and, women are playing different games that are rooted in, their childhood experiences. Men are playing “Do you, respect me?” and women, “Do you like me?”, As we noted, males use conversation to jockey for, status and challenge the authority of others—both, men and women. A woman who lacks experience defending herself against these challenges can easily misinterpret an assertive man’s style as an attack on her, credibility. Similarly, women have been taught to hand, off the conversational ball and expect that others will, , WE B LI N K 10.6, , Deborah Tannen’s Homepage, Georgetown University Professor Deborah Tannen has won, considerable recognition for her work on communication, differences between men and women in diverse settings, such as the home and office. Visitors to her “official”, homepage will find a complete bibliography of professional, and general interest publications by Tannen that explain, her sociolinguistic theories., , 332, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , do the same. While most women reciprocate, many, men don’t. When this happens, some women may feel, awkward drawing the focus of the conversation back, to themselves, because this style was frowned on during their childhood play with other girls., To improve this kind of mixed-gender communication problem, Tannen suggests that women who tire, of listening need to be more assertive and take some, control of the conversation. Also, some men might be, relieved to learn that they don’t always have to talk. As, we noted in Chapter 7, effective listening is a muchunderrated communication skill., The Woman’s Double-Bind, , According to Tannen, mixed-gender communication, situations often place women at a disadvantage because males’ instrumental style of communication, tends to be used as the norm against which both, women’s and men’s speech is evaluated (recall androcentrism). This fact means that a woman may be evaluated negatively regardless of which style (male or female) she adopts. The female style is devalued, but a, woman who embraces the instrumental style will often, evoke negative reactions. Women in positions of authority experience a special version of this doublebind. In Tannen’s words, “If they speak in ways expected of women, they are seen as inadequate leaders., If they speak in ways expected of leaders, they are seen, as inadequate women” (p. 244). Other research supports this view (Eagly & Karau, 2002)., , Toward a “Shared Language”, Tannen asserts that many frustrations in personal and, work relationships could be avoided if men and women, were more aware of gender differences in communication styles. Many people misperceive style differences, as the other’s personal failings. If individuals could see

Page 370 :
the style differences for what they are, they could eliminate a lot of negative feelings. As Tannen (1990) says,, “Nothing hurts more than being told your intentions, are bad when you know they are good, or being told, that you are doing something wrong when you know, , you’re just doing it your way” (pp. 297–298). People, need to understand that there are different ways of listening, talking, and having conversations, not just their, own way. For some hints on how to improve genderbased communication, see Figure 10.15., , Hints to Improve Communication, Hints for Men, , Hints for Women, , 1. Notice whether or not you have a tendency to interrupt women., If you do, work on breaking this habit. When you catch yourself, interrupting, say, “I’m sorry, I interrupted you. Go ahead with, what you were saying.”, , 1. When others interrupt you, politely but firmly redirect the conversation back to you. You can say, for example, “Excuse me. I, haven’t finished my point.”, , 2. Avoid responding to a woman’s questions in monosyllables, (“Yep,” “Nope,” “Uh-huh”). Give her more details about what, you did and explain why., , 3. A lower-pitched voice gets more attention and respect than a, higher-pitched one, which is associated with little girls. Keeping your abdominal muscles firm as you speak will help keep, your voice low., , 3. Learn the art of conversational give and take. Ask women questions about themselves. And listen carefully when they respond., 4. Don’t order women around. For example, don’t say, “Get me the, newspaper.” First, notice whether it might be an inconvenience, for her to do something for you. If it isn’t, say, “Would you, mind giving me the newspaper?” or “Would you please give me, the newspaper?” If she’s busy, get it yourself!, 5. Don’t be a space hog. Be more aware of the space you take up, when you sit with others (especially women). Watch that you, don’t make women feel crowded out., 6. Learn to open up about personal issues. Talk about your feelings, interests, hopes, and relationships. Talking about personal, things helps others know who you are (and probably helps you, clarify your self-perceptions, too)., 7. Learn to convey enthusiasm about things in addition to the, victories of your favorite sports teams., 8. Don’t be afraid to ask for help if you need it., , •, , 2. Look the person you’re talking with directly in the eye., , 4. Learn to be comfortable claiming more space (without becoming a space hog). If you want your presence to be noted, don’t, fold yourself up into an unobtrusive object., 5. Talk more about yourself and your accomplishments. This isn’t, offensive as long as others are doing the same and the circumstances are appropriate. If the conversation turns to photography and you know a lot about the topic, it’s perfectly OK to, share your expertise., 6. Make a point of being aware of current events so you’ll be, knowledgeable about what others are discussing and have an, opinion to contribute., 7. Resist the impulse to be overly apologetic. Although many, women say “I’m sorry” to convey sympathy or concern (not, apology), these words are likely to be interpreted as an apology. Because apologizing puts one in a lower-power position,, women who use apologetic words inappropriately put themselves at a disadvantage., , F I G U R E 10.15, , Hints to improve communication. To have productive personal and work relationships in today’s world, demands that people be knowledgeable about gender and communication styles. Men and women may, be able to benefit from the suggestions listed here. (Compiled by the authors based on insights from, Tannen, 1990), , CHAPTER 10, , Gender and Behavior, , 333

Page 371 :
■, , KEY IDEAS, , CHAPTER 10 REVIEW, , Gender Stereotypes, ■, , Many stereotypes have developed around behavioral differences between the genders, although the distinctions between, the male and female stereotypes are less rigid than they used to, be. Gender stereotypes may vary depending on ethnicity, and, they typically favor males., , Gender Similarities and Differences, ■, , There are no gender differences in general intelligence., When it comes to verbal abilities, gender differences are small,, and they generally favor females. Gender differences in mathematical abilities are typically small as well, and they favor males., Males perform much better than females on the spatial ability, of mental rotation., ■ Research shows that males typically are somewhat higher in, self-esteem and more physically aggressive than females. Females are higher in relational aggression. Males and females are, similar in the experience of emotions, but females are more, likely to outwardly display emotions. Males have more permissive attitudes about casual sex and are more sexually active than, females. Women seem to conform to group pressure a little, more than men. Women are more sensitive to nonverbal cues., The genders are similar in overall mental health, but they differ, in prevalence rates for specific psychological disorders., ■ The gender differences that do exist are quite small. Moreover, they are group differences that tell us little about individuals. Nonetheless, some people still believe that psychological, differences between the genders are substantial. Social role theory and social constructionism provide two explanations for, this phenomenon., , Role expectations for females include the marriage mandate,, the motherhood mandate, and working outside the home., Among the principal costs of the female role are diminished aspirations, juggling of multiple roles, and ambivalence about sexuality. In addition to these psychological problems, women also, face sexist hurdles in the economic domain and may be victims, of aggression., , Gender in the Past and in the Future, ■, , Gender roles have always represented a division of labor., They are changing today, and they seem likely to continue, changing because they no longer mesh with economic reality., Consequently, an important question is how to move beyond, traditional gender roles. The perspectives of androgyny and, gender-role transcendence provide two possible answers to this, question., , Application: Bridging the Gender Gap, in Communication, ■, , Because of different socialization experiences, many males, and females learn different communication styles. These differences in experience and style seem to underlie a number of, mixed-gender communication problems. Men and women, need to understand these style differences to reduce interpersonal conflicts and the frustrations they cause., ■ Men are more likely to use an instrumental style of communication, whereas women tend toward an expressive style. Common mixed-gender communication problems include mismatches in expectations, differences in the tendency to talk, about people versus things, falling into the lecture and listen, trap, and the double-bind that women are often placed in., , KEY TERMS, , Biological Origins of Gender Differences, ■, , Biological explanations of gender differences include those, based on evolution, brain organization, and hormones. Evolutionary psychologists explain gender differences on the basis of, their purported adaptive value in ancestral environments. These, analyses are speculative and difficult to test empirically., ■ Regarding brain organization, some studies suggest that, males exhibit more cerebral specialization than females. However, linking this finding to gender differences in cognitive abilities is questionable for a number of reasons., ■ Efforts to tie hormone levels to gender differences have also, been troubled by interpretive problems. Nonetheless, there, probably is some hormonal basis for gender differences in aggression and in some aspects of sexual behavior., , Aggression p. 308, Androcentrism p. 305, Androgyny p. 327, Cerebral hemispheres, p. 312, Conformity p. 308, Expressiveness p. 305, Gender p. 303, Gender-role identity p. 327, Gender-role transcendence, perspective p. 328, Gender roles p. 313, , Gender schemas p. 315, Gender stereotypes p. 304, Homophobia p. 320, Hormones p. 312, Instrumentality p. 305, Meta-analysis p. 306, Sexism p. 324, Social constructionism, p. 310, Social role theory p. 310, Socialization p. 313, , Environmental Origins of Gender Differences, ■, , The socialization of gender roles appears to take place, through the processes of reinforcement and punishment, observational learning, and self-socialization. These processes operate through many social institutions, but parents, peers,, schools, and the media are the primary sources of gender-role, socialization., , Gender Roles, ■, , Five key attributes of the traditional male role include, achievement, aggression, autonomy, sexuality, and stoicism. The, theme of antifemininity cuts across these dimensions. Problems, associated with the traditional male role include excessive pressure to succeed, difficulty dealing with emotions, and sexual, problems. Homophobia is a particular problem for men., , 334, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , KEY PEOPLE, Sandra Bem p. 328, Alice Eagly p. 310, Janet Shibley Hyde p. 303, , Joseph Pleck p. 319, Deborah Tannen, pp. 330–332

Page 372 :
7. Which of the following statements about peer socialization is true?, a. Peer groups appear to influence gender-role socialization more in boys than girls., b. Girls play in smaller groups and boys in larger, groups., c. High status in boys’ groups is achieved by making, suggestions to others., d. Peers have relatively little impact on gender-role, socialization., , The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 10.1: Personal, Attributes Questionnaire. Personal Probe 10.1: How Do You, Feel about Gender Roles? Personal Probe 10.2: Reflecting, on the Power of Gender Roles., , ANSWERS, , Page 316, Page 316, Pages 319–320, Pages 321–324, Page 331, , 6. Parents tend to respond more to ___________ behavior, especially in ___________ ., a. gender appropriate; boys, b. gender appropriate; girls, c. gender inappropriate; boys, d. gender inappropriate; girls, , Personal Explorations Workbook, , c, b, d, a, d, , 5. Four-year-old Rachel seems to pay particular attention, to what her mother and her older sister do, and she, often imitates them. What is taking place?, a. Self-socialization, b. Observational learning, c. Operant conditioning, d. Androcentric bias, , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. Of the three biologically based explanations for gender, differences, which has the strongest support?, a. Evolutionary theory, b. Brain organization, c. Hormones, d. Social constructionism, , Book Companion Website, , CHAPTER 10, , Page 306, Pages 306–308, Pages 307–309, Pages 311–313, Page 314, , 3. Which of the following statements about gender differences is false?, a. Males have higher self-esteem than females., b. Males are more physically aggressive than females., c. Females are more likely to yield to group pressure., d. Women talk more than men., , 10. According to Deborah Tannen, men tend to use, an ___________ communication style, and women, tend to use an ____________ communication style., a. expressive; expressive, b. expressive; instrumental, c. instrumental; instrumental, d. instrumental; expressive, , Gender and Behavior, , a, c, d, c, b, , 2. Among the following traits, the largest gender differences are found in:, a. verbal abilities., b. mathematical abilities., c. physical aggression., d. conformity., , 9. Which of the following is not a problem with the female role?, a. Poor nonverbal communication skills, b. Diminished aspirations, c. Juggling multiple roles, d. Ambivalence about sexuality, , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Taken as a whole, gender differences in verbal abilities, are:, a. small and favor females., b. large and favor females., c. nonexistent., d. small and favor males., , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 8. Which of the following is not a problem with the male, role?, a. Pressure to succeed, b. Emotional inexpressiveness, c. Sexual problems, d. Androgyny, , 335

Page 373 :
THE TRANSITION OF ADOLESCENCE, Physical Changes, Cognitive Changes, Personality Changes, Adolescent Suicide, THE EXPANSE OF ADULTHOOD, Early Adulthood (From About, Age 20 to 40), Middle Adulthood (From About, Age 40 to 65), Late Adulthood (After Age 65), , AGING: A GRADUAL PROCESS, Physical Changes, Cognitive Changes, Personality Changes, DEATH AND DYING, Attitudes About Death, The Process of Dying, Bereavement and Grieving, , APPLICATION: BECOMING AN EFFECTIVE, PARENT, Maternal Behavior and Infant-Mother, Attachment, Day Care and Attachment, Dimensions of Childrearing, Correlates of Parenting Styles, Rearing Adolescents, Toward Effective Parenting, Using Punishment Effectively, CHAPTER 11 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST, , 336

Page 374 :
CHAPTER, , Development in, Adolescence and, Adulthood, , 11, , “My mother always complains that I spend too much time on the telephone. She thinks that I’m just gossiping with my friends and feels that, my time would be better spent studying. She can’t seem to understand, that my friends and I help each other through some pretty rough situations. She thinks that way because she doesn’t believe that anything a, teenager does besides homework is important. My Mom tells me to learn, in school, but she doesn’t realize that I’m actually trying to learn to survive school. Attending school is like a tryout for life. I know that it sounds, silly to adults, but at times getting a date, being invited to a certain, party, or being chosen to work on the school’s newspaper can mean more, than getting an A on a test.”—”Tracy,” quoted in Teenagers Talk About, School (Landau, 1988, p. 31), Do Tracy’s—or her mother’s—complaints sound familiar? Have you ever been, frustrated by your parents’ or your child’s inability to understand your point, of view? Psychologists attribute these contrasting perspectives to differences in development. In the above scenario, Tracy and her mother are at, different levels of development in a number of areas: physical, cognitive,, personality, and social. Thus, they have different perspectives on themselves, and the world., Until the 1970s, it was widely assumed that psychological development, slowed to a crawl as people reached adulthood. Now, however, psychologists, realize that important developmental changes continue throughout adult, life. As a result, they are probing into these changes to identify crucial patterns and trends. In this chapter, we review the major changes that take, place during adolescence and adulthood. We also examine the topics of dying, and death. The Application offers some suggestions for effective parenting., , CHAPTER 11, , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 337

Page 375 :
The Transition of Adolescence, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Define and discuss pubescence and secondary sex, characteristics., Define and discuss puberty and primary sex, characteristics., Summarize the findings on early and late maturation, in boys and girls., , Adolescence is a transitional period between childhood, and adulthood. Its age boundaries are not exact, but in, our society adolescence begins at around age 13 and, ends at about age 22. In some ways, adolescents resemble the children they were, yet the many changes they, undergo during this stage ensure that they will be different from children in many respects. Similarly, we see, glimpses of the adults that adolescents will become, but, more often we observe that they don’t behave much like, adults. As adolescents mature, we see fewer resemblances to children and more similarities to adults., Although most societies have at least a brief period of adolescence, this phenomenon is not universal, across cultures (Schlegel & Barry, 1991). In some cultures, young people move almost directly from childhood to adulthood. A protracted period of adolescence, is seen primarily in industrialized nations. In these societies, rapid technological progress has made lengthy, education, and therefore prolonged economic dependence, the norm. Thus, in our own culture, middle, school, high school, and college students often have a, “marginal” status. They are capable of reproduction, and are physiologically mature, yet they have not, achieved the emotional and economic independence, from their parents that are the hallmarks of adulthood., Let’s begin our discussion of adolescent development with its most visible aspect: the physical changes, that transform the body of a child into that of an adult., , Physical Changes, Do you remember your middle school days when your, body grew so fast that your clothes just couldn’t “keep, up”? This phase of rapid growth in height and weight, is called the adolescent growth spurt—“spurt” because, of the relatively sudden increases in body height and, weight. Brought on by hormonal changes, it typically, starts at about age 11 in girls and about two years later, in boys (Malina, 1990). (Technically, this spurt should, be called the preadolescent growth spurt because it actually occurs prior to puberty, which is generally recognized as the beginning of adolescence.), Psychologists use the term pubescence to describe, the two-year span preceding puberty during which, , 338, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe the cognitive changes that occur during, adolescence., Explain Erikson’s psychosocial crisis of adolescence, and Marcia’s four identity statuses., Discuss whether adolescence is a period of emotional, turmoil and describe recent trends in adolescent suicide., , the changes leading to physical and sexual maturity, take place. Besides growing taller and heavier during, pubescence, children begin to take on the physical features that characterize adults of their respective genders. These bodily changes are termed secondary sex, characteristics—physical features that distinguish, one gender from the other but that are not essential, for reproduction. For example, boys go through a, voice change, develop facial hair, and experience, greater skeletal and muscle growth in the upper torso,, leading to broader shoulders and enhanced upperbody strength. Females experience breast growth and a, widening of the pelvic bones, plus increased fat deposits in this area, resulting in wider hips (Susman,, Dorn, & Schiefelbein, 2003). Figure 11.1 details these, physical changes in boys and girls., The physical changes we’ve been describing are, triggered by the pituitary gland. This “master gland” of, the endocrine system sends signals to the adrenal, glands (on top of the kidneys) and gonads (ovaries and, testes), which in turn secrete the hormones responsible for the changes in physical characteristics that differentiate males and females., Note that the capacity to reproduce is not attained, in pubescence. This ability develops during puberty, the, stage that marks the beginning of adolescence and, during which sexual functions reach maturity. During, puberty, the primary sex characteristics—the structures necessary for reproduction—develop fully. In the, male, these structures include the testes, penis, and related internal structures; in females, they include the, ovaries, vagina, uterus, and other internal reproductive, structures (see Figure 11.1)., , WE B LI N K 11.1, , Adolescent Health and Mental Health, Visitors at this website will find links to resources about, adolescence that cover many of the pressing health and, mental health issues important to this phase of development. The site is edited by Michael Fenichel, a prominent, psychologist in the use of the Internet to distribute quality professional information to the public.

Page 376 :
•, , Acne, Acne, Pituitary, , Underarm hair,, chest hair,, muscle, development, , Underarm hair,, Breast, development, Rounded, body contours, Pubic hair, , Pubic hair, Enlargement, of penis,, scrotum,, testes, Ejaculation, , Ovaries, , Testes, Androgen,, estrogen,, testosterone, , Androgen,, estrogen,, progesterone, , Enlargement, of uterus,, clitoris, labia, , Physical development during, pubescence and puberty., During pubescence, the, two years prior to puberty,, a growth spurt occurs and, secondary sex characteristics, develop. During puberty, the, primary sex characteristics, mature. These various physical changes are caused by, hormonal secretions., , Menstruation, , In females, the onset of puberty is typically sigbefore the onset of the growth spurt (Graber, Petersen,, naled by menarche—the first occurrence of menstru& Brooks-Gunn, 1996). Generational changes have ocation. American girls typically reach menarche becurred in the timing of puberty, at least for girls in, tween ages 12 and 13, with further sexual maturation, industrialized countries (Anderson, Dallal, & Must,, continuing until approximately age 16 (Susman et al.,, 2003). (To date, no valid method has been found for, 2003). Most girls are sterile for 12 to 18 months followestablishing the existence of a comparable trend among, ing menarche. (Pregnancy is a possibility for some girls, boys.) Today’s girls begin puberty earlier, and complete, at this age, so any girl who has begun to menstruate, it more rapidly, than their counterparts in earlier genshould assume that she can become pregnant.) Breast, erations. This trend apparently reflects improvements, development and the presence of pubic hair serve as, in nutrition and medical care (Brooks-Gunn, 1991). In, important social criteria of adolescence for girls., the United States and some other industrialized counIn males, there is no clear-cut marker of the onset, tries, this trend appears to have leveled off, probably, of sexual maturity, although the capacity to, ejaculate is used as an index of puberty (the, onset of sperm production not being a visible, event). Spermarche, or the first ejaculation,, usually occurs through masturbation, rather, than nocturnal emissions (Hyde, 1994a). (In, the latter, also called “wet dreams,” ejaculation occurs during sleep and is sometimes, accompanied by erotic dreams.) Experts, note that ejaculation may not be a valid, index of actual maturity, as early ejaculations may contain seminal fluid but not active sperm. The average age of spermarche, in American boys is estimated to be age 14,, with complete sexual maturation occurring, at about 18 (Susman et al., 2003)., As we have noted, puberty arrives about, two years later in boys than in girls. In fact,, the major reason that adult males are taller, than adult females is that males typically ex- As they mature, adolescents look increasingly like adults, although boys typically, perience two additional years of development lag two years behind girls in physical development., , CHAPTER 11, , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 339, , © David Young-Wolff/Stone/Getty Images, , Beard, Voice change, , FIG U R E 11.1

Page 377 :
© 1988 Lynn Johnston Productions, Inc./Distributed by Universal Press Syndicate. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved., , because of the high standard of living (Tanner, 1990)., Thus, the onset of sexual maturation may have a genetically predetermined age “floor.”, Puberty also brings important changes in other, body organs. For instance, the heart and lungs increase, considerably in size, and the heart rate drops. These, changes are more marked for boys than for girls and, are responsible, in part, for the superior performance, of males in certain physical activities relative to females., Before about age 12, boys and girls are similar in physical strength, speed, and endurance. After puberty, boys, have clear advantage in all three areas (Smoll & Schutz,, 1990). After sexual maturation has been attained, adolescents continue to mature physically until their secondary sex characteristics are fully developed and their, body has reached adult height and proportions. In girls,, such growth continues until about 17 years of age; in, boys, it goes on until about age 20., Variation in the onset of pubescence and puberty, is normal. Still, the timing of these physical changes, figures importantly in adjustment. More specifically,, research suggests that girls who mature early and boys, who mature late seem to feel particularly anxious and, self-conscious about their changing bodies (Graber et, al., 1997). The early-maturing girl is taller and heavier, than most of the girls and nearly all of the boys her age., The late-maturing boy is shorter and slighter than, most of the boys and nearly all of the girls his age. To, make matters worse, both groups have body types that, are at odds with the cultural ideals of extreme slenderness for females and muscular physique for males., Compared to other girls, those who mature early, fare more poorly in school, are less popular, have lower, self-confidence, and have earlier sexual experiences, and more unwanted pregnancies (Ge, Conger, & Elder,, 1996; Stattin & Magnusson, 1990). They are also more, likely to have tried alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana, , 340, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , (Lanza & Collins, 2002), to have more negative body, images (Striegel-Moore et al., 2001), and to be depressed (Rierdan & Koff, 1991). At age 24, earlymaturing women have had more self-reported psychological disorders and current psychosocial symptoms, compared to on-time maturers (Graber et al., 2004)., Late-maturing boys have been found to feel more inadequate, to feel more insecure, and to think less of, themselves than other boys do (Siegel, 1982). Still,, early-maturing boys who were perceived by others to, be well adjusted reported more emotional distress and, hostile feelings than their less-developed peers (Ge,, Conger, & Elder, 2001). At age 24, late-maturing males, had engaged in significantly more deviant behavior, and substance abuse than other men (Graber et al.,, 2004). Optimal adjustment for girls is associated with, puberty coming “on time,” whereas optimal adjustment for boys is most often related to early puberty., Girls’ and boys’ perceptions of the timing of their puberty and their feelings of attractiveness follow this, same pattern (see Figure 11.2)., , Cognitive Changes, Around the time of early adolescence, major changes, take place in thinking and problem solving (Eccles,, Wigfield, & Byrnes, 2003). Compared to those who are, younger, adolescents can think abstractly (not merely, concretely) and more efficiently. They also become, more self-aware and self-reflective and can view problems from several perspectives rather than only one., Thus, the thinking of adolescents is qualitatively different from that of younger children. Whereas children, go about solving problems on a trial-and-error basis,, most adolescents are capable of solving problems by, generating a number of possible hypotheses and systematically testing them.

Page 378 :
Optimum, , Quality of outcome, , Boys, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , The Hurried Child: Growing, Up Too Fast, Too Soon, by David Elkind, (Perseus Publishing, 2001), Girls, , Poor, Early, , Late, Teenagers’ perception, of their pubertal timing, , •, , F I G U R E 11.2, , Perceived timing of puberty and optimal adjustment. For girls,, feelings of attractiveness and a positive body image are associated with the perception that puberty arrives “on time”; for boys,, these feelings are associated with the perception that puberty, arrives early., Adapted from Tobin-Richards, M. H., Boxer, A. A., & Petersen, A. C. (1983). The psychological, significance of pubertal change: Sex differences in perceptions of self during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty: Biological and psychosocial, perspectives. New York: Plenum Publishing. Copyright © 1983 Plenum Publishing Co. Adapted, by permission of Springer Science and Business Media and the authors., , As would be expected, adolescents show increases, across several spheres of knowledge compared to children. For example, as individuals age, they know more, facts (declarative knowledge), have more skills (procedural knowledge), and have a greater understanding of, why one problem-solving approach works better than, another (conceptual knowledge) (Byrnes, 2001; Eccles, et al., 2003)., Adolescents are also more skilled than children in, deductive reasoning skills (Eccles et al., 2003). These, skills involve the ability to reach logical conclusions, when given certain information (including that which, is contrary to fact). Age-related increases have also, been found in mathematical, spatial, and scientific reasoning ability, as well as in some memory processes, (Byrnes, 2001; Eccles et al., 2003)., Another facet of cognitive functioning is decision, making, specifically risk taking. Numerous studies have, looked at age differences in the tendency to engage in, physically harmful risky behavior: smoking, drinking,, and unprotected sex (Byrnes, Miller, & Schafer, 1999)., Most research shows that older adolescents are more, likely than younger adolescents and children to engage, in such behavior (DiClemente, Hansen, & Ponton,, , CHAPTER 11, , In this eye-opening book, psychologist David Elkind, shows how recent changes in the structure of family, life have altered views of children and their needs. Earlier generations saw children as needing adult protection, and guidance, a view consistent with the “traditional”, family structure, in which at least one parent was available to the children at all times. Today, in many step-,, single-parent, and dual-earner families, such nurturing, is impossible for parents to provide. Many of these parents have alleviated their anxiety about parenthood by, adopting a new conception of children as “superkids”, who can take care of themselves., This new view of children as “miniature adults” is, mirrored in every facet of children’s culture: education,, television, movies, and music. Computer software for, infants, video games for children, and the Internet also, encourage the hurrying of intellectual and social development. Thus, society as a whole conspires with the, parents to “hurry” children to outgrow their need for, nurturance as quickly as possible., According to Elkind, pressuring children to grow up, fast can produce negative outcomes ranging from academic failure to psychosomatic illness to teenage suicide., Nevertheless, he maintains an attitude of optimism and, hope that, with awareness of the pressures today’s children face, parents can and will seek to alleviate their, children’s stress. Reading this book can help a concerned, parent to do just that., Cover Reprinted by permission of Perseus Books Publishers, a member of Perseus, Books, L.L.C. Photo © Photonica., , 1995; Eccles et al., 2003). Because “risky” adolescents, are as knowledgeable about the possible negative outcomes of their behavior as “nonrisky” adolescents, psychologists speculate that the causes of risk-taking behavior are not cognitively rooted (Eccles et al., 2003)., Instead, they probably involve other aspects of decision, making, such as self-regulation (see Chapter 5)., , Personality Changes, Adolescents are faced with a number of challenges in, the realm of personality. They must grapple with identity questions and deal with the stresses of moving, from childhood to adulthood., , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 341

Page 379 :
The Search for Identity, WE B LI N K 11.2, , Erik Erikson Tutorial Homepage, Margaret Anderson, who teaches at Cortland College in, New York, has developed a set of tutorials on major figures, of importance to educational psychology. Her Erik Erikson, tutorial includes a summary of his eight stages of development, biographical details, some controversies regarding, his theories, and links to other online sources., , Ted Streshinsky/Corbis, , As adulthood looms closer, adolescents turn their attention to their, place in the larger social order. Erik, Erikson (1968), an influential psychoanalytic theorist, used the term, identity to express this important, psychological connection between, self and society. Identity refers to, having a relatively clear and stable, Erik Erikson, sense of who one is in the larger, society. In Erikson’s theory, the, stage of adolescence is of pivotal importance; the challenge of this period is achieving identity. (Figure 11.3, depicts all eight of Erikson’s stages, although in this, chapter we will focus on only the last four.) Developing a sense of identity involves wrestling with such important issues as “Who am I?” “What do I stand for?”, and “What kind of work do I want to do?” Gender, ethnicity, and sexual orientation are also important aspects of identity development. Although much of the, process of identity formation is unconscious, a key, point is that individuals create their identity; they do, not just blindly accept the roles and beliefs designated, for them by parents and society., , According to Erikson, identity emerges out of an, “identity crisis,” or a period of personal questioning during which individuals reflect on and experiment with, various occupational possibilities and value choices (political, religious, sexual, and so forth). For most people,, an identity crisis is not a sudden or agonizing experience, but rather the gradual evolution of a sense of who one, is. An identity crisis usually ends with a commitment to, a specific career and personal value system. According to, James Marcia (1980), these two factors of crisis and commitment combine in various ways to produce four identity statuses (see Figure 11.4) instead of just the two outcomes shown in Figure 11.3. Note that these are not, stages that people pass through, but rather statuses that, , Erikson’s Stages of Psychosocial Development, Psychosocial, crisis, , Stage, , •, , Significant social, relationships, , Favorable, outcome, , 1. First year of life, , Trust versus mistrust, , Mother or mother substitute, , Trust and optimism, , 2. Second and third years, , Autonomy versus doubt, , Parents, , A sense of self-control and adequacy, , 3. Fourth through sixth years, , Initiative versus guilt, , Basic family, , Purpose and direction; ability to initiate, one’s own activities, , 4. Age 6 through puberty, , Industry versus inferiority, , Neighborhood, school, , Competence in intellectual, social, and, physical skills, , 5. Adolescence, , Identity versus diffusion, , Peer groups and outgroups;, models of leadership, , An integrated image of oneself as a, unique person, , 6. Early adulthood, , Intimacy versus isolation, , Partners in friendship and sex;, competition, cooperation, , An ability to form close and lasting, relationships, to make career, commitments, , 7. Middle adulthood, , Generativity versus, stagnation, , Divided labor and shared, household, , Concern for family, society, and future, generations, , 8. The aging years, , Integrity versus despair, , “Humankind,” “my kind”, , A sense of fulfillment and satisfaction, with one’s life; willingness to face death, , FIG U R E 11.3, , Overview of Erikson’s stages. Building on earlier work by Freud, Erik Erikson (1963) divided the, life span into eight stages. Each stage involves a psychosocial crisis (column 2) that is played out in, certain social relationships (column 3). If a crisis is handled effectively, a favorable outcome results, (column 4)., Adapted from Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton. Copyright © 1950, 1963 by W. W. Norton & Co. Inc., Copyright renewed 1978, 1991 by Erik H. Erikson. Used by permission of W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., , 342, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 380 :
Marcia’s Four Identity Statuses, , •, , Crisis present, , Crisis absent, , Commitment, present, , Identity achievement (successful, achievement of a sense of identity), , Identity foreclosure (unquestioning adoption, of parental or societal values), , Commitment, absent, , Identity moratorium (active struggling, for a sense of identity), , Identity diffusion (absence of struggle for identity,, with no obvious concern about this), , F I G U R E 11.4, , Marcia’s four identity statuses. According to James Marcia, the experience of an identity crisis and, the development of personal commitments can combine into four possible identity statuses, as shown, in this diagram., Adapted from Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–210). New York: Wiley., Copyright © 1980 by John Wiley & Sons. Inc. Adapted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., , characterize a person’s identity orientation at any particular time. Thus, a person may never experience some of, the statuses, including identity achievement., The status of identity foreclosure is a premature, commitment to visions, values, and roles prescribed by, one’s parents. Moratorium involves delaying commitment for a while to experiment with alternative ideologies. Identity achievement is arriving at a sense of self, and direction after some consideration of alternative, possibilities. Finally, identity diffusion is an inability to, make identity commitments. In both identity achievement and foreclosure, the identity crisis is resolved because a sense of commitment is present. Of course, in, foreclosure, the commitment is not an independently, developed one, as is desirable. Individuals in both the, moratorium and diffusion statuses have not resolved, the identity crisis. While those experiencing identity, diffusion have given up the search for identity, “moratoriums” are still pursuing it. As they move into their, 20s, adolescents typically shift from the foreclosure and, diffusion statuses to the moratorium or achievement, statuses (Kroger, 1997; Meeus, 1996)., Considerable research has been done on identity, statuses and their characteristics (Marcia, 1980, 1991)., Compared to those in other statuses, adolescents in, identity foreclosure are strongly connected to their, families, cognitively rigid, conventional, and conservative in their values. Those going through a moratorium, are conflicted between conforming and rebelling, have, ambivalent feelings toward their parents, and are perceived by others to be intense. The identity diffused, feel alienated from their parents, exhibit lower levels of, moral reasoning, and show less emotional intimacy, than those in the other statuses. Those who experience, identity achievement are more cognitively flexible,, function at higher levels of moral reasoning, and have, more emotionally intimate relationships., , CHAPTER 11, , Erikson and many other theorists believe that, identity achievement is a cornerstone of sound psychological health. Researchers find that long-term, foreclosed and diffused individuals are likely to experience adjustment problems (Berzonsky & Kuk, 2000)., Time of Turmoil?, , Is adolescence a period of emotional upheaval and turmoil? G. Stanley Hall (1904), the first psychologist to, study adolescence, thought so. In fact, he specifically, characterized adolescence as a period of “storm and, stress.” Hall attributed this turmoil to the conflicts between the physical changes of puberty and society’s demands for social and emotional maturity., Does research support Hall’s idea? To answer this, question, Jeffrey Arnett (1999) looked at the research, on three relevant issues. First, there is evidence that, parent-adolescent conflicts increase during (early) adolescence (Laursen, Coy, and Collins, 1998). Adolescents, also experience more volatile emotions and extremes of, mood than preadolescents or adults do (Larson &, Richards, 1994). Finally, adolescents engage in risk behaviors: delinquent and antisocial behavior, alcohol, and substance abuse, careless sexual practices, and, school failure (Perkins & Borden, 2003)., Increases in these areas are not found in more traditional (preindustrial) cultures (Suarez-Orozco &, Suarez-Orozco, 1995). Thus, Arnett argues that there is, support for a modified storm-and-stress view that takes, into account individual differences and cultural variations. Still, even for adolescents who do experience turmoil, it is important not to exaggerate the phenomenon. Based on her extensive studies of adolescents,, Anne Petersen (1987) has concluded, “The adolescent’s, journey toward adulthood is inherently marked by, change and upheaval, but need not be fraught with, chaos or deep pain” (p. 34)., , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 343

Page 381 :
As young people progress through adolescence,, the differences between the vast majority who can cope, with the transition to adulthood and the small minority who cannot become increasingly obvious. Those in, the latter group are prone to depression, suicidal behavior, drug and alcohol abuse, and chronic delinquency (Petersen, 1988; Takanishi, 1993). Of course,, most teens who have a run-in with the law are not, doomed to a life of crime, but repeated offenses are a, cause for concern. As well, juvenile delinquents who, have a childhood history of behavior problems are at, high risk for adult criminal activity (Farrington & Loeber, 2000). Early professional attention in such cases, can often forestall more serious trouble., , Adolescent Suicide, Adolescent suicide rates have risen alarmingly in recent, decades. Suicide among 15- to 24-year-olds increased, dramatically after 1960, while it rose only slightly in the, general population during this time. Despite these increases, only a small minority of adolescents commit, suicide (Meehan et al., 1992). Also, even with the steep, increase in the 15–24 age group, the incidence of suicide in this group is about the same as or lower than, that for any older age group., Actually, the suicide crisis among teenagers involves attempted suicide more than completed suicide., Experts estimate that when all age groups are lumped, together, suicide attempts outnumber actual suicidal, deaths by a ratio of about 8 to 1 (Cross & Hirschfeld,, 1986). However, the ratio of attempted to completed, suicides among adolescents is much higher than that, for any other age group—anywhere from 100:1 to 200:1, (Maris, Berman, & Silverman, 2000). Suicide attempts, , by adolescents tend to be desperate cries for attention,, help, and support. Gay and lesbian youth are much, more likely to attempt suicide than their heterosexual, peers. Experts estimate that 33 percent of homosexual, youth have attempted suicide, compared to 13 percent, of their heterosexual peers (Hershberger & D’Augelli,, 2000). These high rates are not a result of homosexuality per se but are linked to other factors associated with, psychological distress such as high stress, lack of social, support, and so forth (Goldfried, 2001)., Girls are more likely to attempt suicide, and boys, are more likely to complete suicide (Garland & Zigler,, 1993). That’s because girls use methods that are less, lethal (overdosing on sleeping pills, for instance),, whereas boys elect methods with a low likelihood of, survival (shooting or hanging). Another factor may be, lower tolerance for the perceived weakness implied in, suicide attempts by males (Canetto & Sakinofsky,, 1998). White adolescents have higher suicide rates than, African American and Hispanic youth. Sadly, American Indian adolescents have a suicide rate that is more, than twice the national average, a finding that is likely, rooted in extreme poverty and a sense of hopelessness, about the future (Strickland, 1997)., What drives an adolescent to such a dramatic, but, dangerous, gesture? The “typical” suicidal adolescent, has a long history of stress and personal problems extending back into childhood (de Wilde et al., 1992)., Unfortunately, for some teenagers these problems—, trouble at home, difficulties in school, problems with, girlfriends and boyfriends—escalate during adolescence. As their efforts to cope with these problems fail,, many teenagers rebel against parental authority, withdraw from social relationships, and make dramatic gestures such as running away from home. These actions, , © Nancy Richmond/The Image Works, , Most adolescents who attempt suicide, have a long history of stress and personal problems and are socially isolated., A perceived failure at school or a perceived social slight can be the “final, straw” that triggers a suicide attempt in, such teens., , 344, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 382 :
What to Do When You Fear Someone May Take Their Life, , •, , FIG U R E 11.5, , Preventing suicide. If someone tells you that he or she, is contemplating suicide, you, should treat this information, very seriously. Here are some, suggestions for dealing with, that difficult situation., , Determine whether the person is in imminent danger:, Ask the following questions in a nonjudgmental way:, 1. Do you have a plan?, 2. Do you know when you would do it (today, next week)?, 3. Do you have access to what you would use?, If you believe that the person is in imminent danger:, Call 911 or get the person to a hospital emergency room or to the campus or local police station. If, you are with the person, do not leave him or her alone., If you believe that the threat is not imminent:, , Based on American Foundation for Suicide, Prevention (n.d.). When you fear someone, may take their life. Retrieved January 10,, 2005 from http://www.afsp.org/about/, whattodo.htm, , 1. Do not discount the threat by telling the person that his or her problems are not that bad, or that, the person has everything to live for, or that he or she is silly to contemplate suicide., 2. Reassure the person that help is available, that depression is treatable, and that suicidal feelings, are temporary., 3. Let the person know that he or she is very important to you and how devastated you and others, would be if he or she followed through with suicide., 4. Emphasize that there are alternative ways to deal with problems other than suicide. Often people, fail to see other solutions to their problems., 5. Offer to go with the person to your campus counseling center, or to help him or her find a doctor or, mental health professional., 6. Understandably, you may be frightened and worried when you learn such information. Consider, going to the campus counseling center and asking for advice., , often lead to progressive social isolation. The experience of a humiliating event such as an arrest, a conflict, with or a rejection by a parent or romantic partner, or, a perceived failure at school or work can be the final, , thread in a tapestry of frustration and distress (Garland & Zigler, 1993; King, 1997). In Figure 11.5, we provide some suggestions for dealing with someone who, tells you that he or she is contemplating suicide., , The Expanse of Adulthood, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Summarize the key developmental transitions in early adulthood,, including Erikson’s views., Summarize the key developmental transitions in middle adulthood,, including Erikson’s views., Summarize the key developmental transitions in late adulthood,, including Erikson’s views., , As people progress through adulthood, they periodically ask themselves, “How am I doing for my age?” In, pondering this question, they are likely to be influenced by their social clocks (Helson, Mitchell, &, Moane, 1984). A social clock is a person’s notion of a, developmental schedule that specifies what he or she, should have accomplished by certain points in life., For example, if you feel that you should be married by, the time you’re 30, that belief creates a marker on your, social clock. Although social clocks are a product of, socialization, they do show individual variations., Social clocks can exert considerable influence over, decisions concerning education, career moves, marriage, parenting, and other life choices. Adhering to a, social clock based on prevalent age norms brings social approval and is thus a way to evaluate one’s own, CHAPTER 11, , development. Important life events that come too early, or too late according to one’s social clock produce, more stress than transitions that occur “on time”, (Chiriboga, 1987). It is easy to imagine how an early, marriage, delayed career promotion, or delayed retirement might be especially stressful. In particular, it, seems that lagging behind one’s personal schedule for, certain achievements results in psychological distress, (Antonucci & Akiyama, 1997). In short, most people, listen carefully to their social clocks ticking in the, background as they proceed through adulthood., In recent years, psychologists have recognized that, the time period in which a person is born can have significant effects on development (Stewart & Ostrove,, 1998). Events such as the Great Depression, World War, II, the Vietnam War, the women’s movement, and the, Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 345

Page 383 :
rise of the Internet can leave a lasting mark on the individuals who experience them. Complicating the picture, further, developmental patterns are becoming increasingly diverse. That is, the boundaries between young,, middle, and late adulthood are becoming blurred as, more people have children later than one is “supposed”, to, retire earlier than one is “supposed” to, and so forth., As we look at the major developmental transitions in, adult life, keep in mind that there are many divergent, pathways and timetables during these years., , Early Adulthood (From, About Age 20 to 40), , ers, truly commit to others, and give of oneself unselfishly. The person who can experience genuine intimacy is thought to be more likely to develop a mature, and successful long-term relationship. Failure to resolve, this psychosocial crisis favorably leads to difficulties in, relating to others in an authentic fashion. The resulting, sense of isolation can foster competitive interactions, with friends and troublesome intimate relationships., Jacob Orlofsky and his colleagues (1973) found, support for five intimacy statuses, based on the quality, of a person’s relationships with others:, 1. Intimate. Individuals in this status are capable, , of forming open and close relationships with both, male and female friends and are involved in a committed relationship., 2. Preintimate. Although people in this category, are capable of mature, reciprocal relationships, they, haven’t yet experienced a committed relationship because they are ambivalent about making commitments., 3. Stereotyped. Men and women in this status, have relationships that are superficial and not very, close. They often see others as objects to manipulate, rather than to share with., 4. Pseudointimate. These individuals are typically, involved in a relatively permanent relationship, but it, resembles the stereotyped relationship in quality., 5. Isolate. Isolates avoid social situations and appear to be loners whose social interactions consist of, casual conversations with a few acquaintances., According to Erikson, the ability to establish and, maintain intimate relationships depends on having, successfully weathered the identity crisis of adolescence. The rationale here is that without a clear sense, , © Arlene Collins/The Image Works, , Between the ages of about 20 and 30, adults must learn, a number of new and important roles. Take Jack, for, example: He graduated from college at age 22, then left, his family and moved to Atlanta to start work as a, management trainee. Over the next four years, he was, involved in several serious relationships (which later, broke up), and he changed jobs several times. At age, 26, Jack got engaged and married. At age 28, he and his, wife had their first child and he again changed jobs., Based on Jack’s scenario, you can see why the years, from 20 to 30 have been described as “demographically, dense,” referring to the fact that more role changes, occur during this period than any other (Rindfuss,, 1991). For some, early adulthood brings additional, stress because it is a time for sorting out sexual orientation. As we discuss in Chapter 13, gay males and lesbians take longer than heterosexuals to recognize their, sexual orientation (Garnets & Kimmel, 2003a)., To cope successfully with all these developmental, challenges, young adults must have developed certain, psychological and social competencies, including a set, of personal values to guide their life decisions, and enough self-control to reach their goals., In addition, they must have a sense of the, kind of work they want to do, the job skills, necessary for the position they want, and social skills by which to develop and maintain, relationships at work and with friends and, partners or mates. Also, most young adults, are still struggling to become fully independent of their parents., Erikson’s Theory:, Intimacy Versus Isolation, , In Erikson’s sixth stage, the psychosocial crisis centers on whether a person can develop, the capacity to share intimacy with others, (refer back to Figure 11.3). Erikson was not, concerned simply with the young adult’s, need to find a marriage partner. Rather, he, was concerned with more subtle issues, such, as whether one can learn to open up to oth346, , PART 3, , The positive outcome of Erikson’s sixth stage is intimacy or the capacity to relate, openly to others and to make emotional commitments. Isolation, the negative, outcome, is characterized by difficulties in forming relationships with others., , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 384 :
domains of sexuality and family roles are more salient, for women than they are for men., Going beyond Erikson’s theory, two specific developmental tasks of early adulthood are adjusting to fulltime work and adjusting to marriage and family life., , RE C O M M E N D E D, READING, , Adjusting to the World of Work, , How To Grow Up When, You’re Grown Up: Achieving, Balance in Adulthood, by Nancy O’Connor, (La Mariposa Press, 1994), According to the author, a clinical psychologist, people, are grown up when they can make responsible decisions, and can maintain a balance of body, emotions, intellect, and spirit. To achieve maturity and peace of mind,, these four aspects of the self need to be well developed and in balance with one another. O’Connor doesn’t, mean that people should strive for perfection—an obviously impossible goal—but that they should strive for, continual improvement and balance in these four areas., In most people, these four components are out of, balance through neglect, misuse, or overemphasis., O’Connor elaborates on what it means to be “grown, up” in each of the different parts and describes the, factors that can interfere with maturity. These factors, are often fears and needs, usually rooted in childhood, experiences, that surface in stressful situations and, crises. She also describes how the four parts work together and how to keep them in balance. Readers can, assess their level of development by using questionnaires and can develop the various self-aspects through, exercises., , of yourself before you enter into an intimate relationship, you risk becoming overly dependent on another, for your identity. Researchers typically find that college, males and females in the more advanced identity statuses (achievement and moratorium) are most likely to, be in the more advanced intimacy statuses (intimate, and preintimate) (Fitch & Adams, 1983). Similarly,, those experiencing identity foreclosure or diffusion, predominate in the less advanced intimacy statuses, (stereotyped, pseudointimate, and isolate). A similar, pattern has been found in adults up to 35 years of age, (Raskin, 1986; Tesch & Whitbourne, 1982)., Early research showed gender differences in the sequencing of Erikson’s stages 5 and 6, such that noncareer-oriented women seemed to resolve intimacy issues before they tackled identity issues (Dyk & Adams,, 1990; Whitbourne & Tesch, 1985). (Career-oriented, women showed the same pattern as men, passing, though stage 5 before stage 6.) In a review of research, on gender and identity, Jane Kroger (1997) found no, gender differences in the key aspects of identity, except, that men lagged behind women in attaining identity, achievement. Kroger also reported that the identity, CHAPTER 11, , Young adults are confronted with several major challenges in their work lives (Super, 1957, 1985, 1988). To, start, they need to complete their schooling and secure, their first job. At this point in career development,, many people are still only tentatively committed to, their chosen occupational area. If their first experiences are not rewarding, they may shift to another, area, where they continue to explore their work options. People in their twenties change jobs on the average of every two years (Peterson & Gonzales, 2005)., Ideally, people are able to find work that is gratifying and commit to an occupational area. Once individuals make a commitment to a particular kind of, work, their future job moves usually take place within, this area. During early adulthood, workers learn new, skills and develop work attitudes that affect their job, success. Effective mentors can play an important role, in this process., Once men begin working full-time, they tend to, stay in the workforce until they retire (a continuous, pattern). Women’s work lives often have a discontinuous pattern—typically because women have greater, child-care responsibilities. Thus, they may move in and, out of the workforce at different points in their lives, (Betz, 1993)., Adjusting to Marriage and Family Life, , Although an increasing proportion of the population, under 35 are remaining single (Teachman, Polonko, &, Scanzoni, 1999), most people marry or become involved in committed relationships during early adulthood. Today, the average age of first marriage for, women is about 25; for men, it is about 27 (U.S. Bureau, of the Census 2004a). As noted in Chapter 9, the, first few years of married life tend to be very happy. The, early years of committed gay and lesbian relationships, also follow this pattern (Peplau & Spalding, 2003)., Compared to earlier generations, more of today’s, married couples are choosing not to have children, , WE B LI N K 11.3, , Adult Development and Aging (APA Division 20), Psychological researchers interested in adulthood and, aging form a distinct division with the American Psychological Association—Division 20. The division’s homepage, contains a wide range of educational, instructional, and, clinical resources and references for this area of concern., , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 347

Page 385 :
(Bulcroft & Teachman, 2004), but the vast majority, plan to do so. The arrival of the first child represents a, major transition. Among other things, it triggers a shift, toward traditional roles for husband and wife (Cowan &, Cowan, 1997). This shift is significant because greater, discrepancies between the responsibilities of husband, and wife after childbirth are associated with more marital conflict as well as declines in marital satisfaction, and mental health, particularly for women (PerryJenkins, Repetti, & Crouter, 2001)., Even in dual-earner families, women typically bear, greater responsibilities in the realms of child care and, housework (Bond et al., 2003). Thus, mothers experience more work-family conflicts than fathers do. After, the first few years of married life, marital satisfaction, typically declines and continues at a lower level until, middle adulthood, when it rises again (Glenn, 1998)., Like heterosexual married couples, most gay and, lesbian couples are in dual-worker relationships. Unlike married couples, however, committed homosexual, couples are more likely to have a flexible division of, labor, where the workload is shared and tasks are completed based on personal preference (Peplau & Spaulding, 2003)., , More specific challenges of middle age include, confronting the aging process and making transitions, in work and family roles., Confronting the Aging Process, , Chief among the challenges of middle adulthood is, coming to terms with the aging process. Middle-aged, adults notice a number of physical transformations:, changes in vision that often require glasses or bifocals, for reading, the onset of wrinkles and sagging skin,, weight gain, tooth and gum problems, and more bodily aches and pains and general “creakiness” (Lachman,, 2004; Whitbourne, 2001). In addition, people are, forced to acknowledge their mortality as they witness, the deaths of parents, colleagues, and friends., After early adulthood, people perceive themselves, to be younger than they actually are (Montepare &, Lachman, 1989). In Figure 11.6, you can see that the, gap between actual and subjective age widens over, time, especially among women, suggesting that women, find it harder to accept growing older. This attitude no, doubt reflects the “double standard of aging”—the, perception that women’s attractiveness declines more, with age than men’s does (Zebrowitz & Montepare,, 2000). On a positive note, feeling younger than one’s, , Middle Adulthood (From, About Age 40 to 65), Compared to early adulthood, which requires learning, so many new roles, middle adulthood is an easier period., , ge, , 85, , 348, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Subjective age in years, , The challenge of middle adulthood is acquiring generativity, or a concern for the welfare of future generations (refer to Figure 11.3). Adults demonstrate generativity when they provide unselfish guidance to, younger people. The recipients of this guidance are, often their own children, but not necessarily. For example, a middle-aged college professor may gain great, satisfaction from working with students. Or a 50-yearold attorney might mentor a younger woman in her, law firm. Thus, generativity and its opposite, stagnation, do not hinge on a person’s having children. Stagnation is characterized by self-absorption and selfindulgent preoccupation with one’s own needs., A number of studies support Erikson’s views on, generativity and middle adulthood. For example, researchers have found that generativity increases between young adulthood and middle age (McAdams, de, St. Aubin, & Logan, 1993; Stewart, Ostrove, & Helson,, 2001). Studies also report that highly generative individuals are well adjusted (low levels of anxiety and depression) and high in life satisfaction (Ackerman,, Zuroff, & Moskowitz, 2000; Grossbaum & Bates, 2002)., , ua, , la, , 75, , n, , Ac, t, , Erikson’s Theory: Generativity, Versus Stagnation, , 65, , ive, , a, , t, ec, , 55, , me, , :, ge, , n, , e, om, bj, w, u, :, S ge, a, ve, cti, , 45, bje, , Su, , 35, 25, 15, 15, , •, , 25, , 35 45 55 65, Actual age in years, , 75, , 85, , F I G U R E 11. 6, , Discrepancies between actual and subjective age. After early, adulthood, people see themselves as younger than they really are., This gap between reality and perception increases with age,, especially among women. This graph also shows that adolescents, perceive themselves to be older than they really are, while the, age perceptions of young adults match reality fairly closely., Adapted from Montepare, J., & Lachman, M. E. (1989). You’re only as old as you feel: Selfperceptions of age, fears of aging, and life satisfaction. Psychology and Aging, 4, 73–78., Copyright © 1989 American Psychological Association. Adapted by permission of the author.

Page 386 :
Transitions in the Parenting Role, , As children grow up, parental influence tends to decline, and the early years of parenting—which once, seemed so difficult—are often recalled with fondness., When children reach adolescence and seek to establish, their own identities, gradual realignment occurs in, parent-child relationships. As a result, conflicts over, values are common, and power struggles frequently, ensue (Arnett, 1999). Parents overwhelmingly rate adolescence as the most difficult stage of childrearing, (Steinberg, 2001). Still, on balance, most parents have, little regret about their decision to have children and, rate parenthood as a positive experience (Demo, 1992)., Although “emptying of the nest” is widely believed, to be a traumatic event for parents, especially mothers,, only about 25 percent of mothers and fathers report, being very sad or unhappy when the last child leaves, home (Lewis & Lin, 1996). In fact, the “empty nest” is, associated with improved mood and well-being for, most women (Dennerstein, Dudley, & Guthrie, 2002)., An interesting phenomenon is that in recent decades,, the percentage of young adults who return home to, live with their parents has increased. Returning home, is due to a number of factors: inability to find a job,, marital separation, divorce, or job loss. To date, research indicates that young adults living with their, parents has a small negative impact on parent-child, relationships (White & Rogers, 1997)., The postparental period often provides couples, with more freedom and time to devote to each other,, to travel, and to new leisure interests. As offspring, strike out on their own, couples’ marital satisfaction, starts climbing to higher levels once again (Glenn,, 1998). It tends to remain fairly high until one of the, spouses (usually the husband) dies., A related challenge for most middle-aged adults is, learning the grandparent role. In addition, some individuals (typically women) may assume responsibility, for the care of aging parents and relatives (Putney &, Bengtson, 2001)., , clocks ticking. Others seem content with their work, achievements and begin to shift some of their attention and energy to family and leisure activities., Workers in the changing careers pattern make up a, more varied group. Whereas all are seeking to begin a, different type of work, their reasons for doing so are, quite varied. Some are looking for a new line of work, because they have been forced out of a job by cutbacks., Others are seeking new careers because they want new, challenges at this time in their lives. A third group is, composed of women who are entering or reentering, the workforce because family concerns now occupy, less of their time and energy., Is There a Midlife Crisis?, , Much has been made about whether most people go, through a midlife crisis—a turbulent period of doubts, and reappraisal of one’s life. Two influential studies of, adult development in the 1970s both concluded that a, midlife crisis is a normal transition experienced by a, majority of people. Daniel Levinson and his colleagues, (1978) found that most of their subjects (all men) went, through a midlife crisis around the ages of 40 to 45., This transition was marked by life reevaluation and, emotional turmoil. Roger Gould (1978) found that, , © Jutta Klee/Stone/Getty Images, , actual age is correlated with greater psychological adjustment and health (Lachman, 2004)., , Transitions in the Work Role, , Work plays a central role in the midlife years (Lachman, 2004). At midlife, workers seem to follow one of, two patterns (Papalia & Olds, 1995). Those in the stable career pattern are at the peak of their careers. They, have more responsibility, earn more money, and wield, more influence than their younger co-workers. As we, noted, many take the opportunity to mentor younger, workers, an expression of generativity. Some workers, in this group continue to work at a frantic pace, struggling to accomplish their goals as they hear their social, , CHAPTER 11, , Do most adults go through a midlife crisis in their 40s? The, research on this question is contradictory, but overall, the, evidence suggests that only a minority of people in their 40s, struggle with a midlife crisis., , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 349

Page 387 :
CATHY © Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , people tended to go through a midlife crisis between, the ages of 35 and 45. His subjects reported feeling, pressed by time. They heard their social clocks ticking, loudly as they struggled to achieve their life goals., Since the landmark studies of Levinson and Gould,, many other researchers have questioned whether the, midlife crisis is a normal developmental transition. A, host of studies have failed to detect an increase in emotional turbulence at midlife (Baruch, 1984; Eisler &, Ragsdale, 1992; Roberts & Newton, 1987). How can, we explain this discrepancy? Levinson and Gould both, depended primarily on interview and case study, methods to gather their data. However, when knitting, together impressionistic case studies, it is easy for investigators to see what they expect to see. Given that, the midlife crisis has long been a part of developmental folklore, Levinson and Gould may have interpreted, their case study data in this light (McCrae & Costa,, 1984). In any case, investigators relying on more objective measures of emotional stability have found, signs of midlife crises in only a tiny minority (2–5 percent) of subjects (Chiriboga, 1989; McCrae & Costa,, 1990). Typically, these are individuals whose circumstances in early adulthood (family pressures, poverty,, and so forth) severely limited their chances to achieve, life satisfaction (McAdams, 1988). To summarize,, midlife may bring a period of increased reflection as, people contemplate the remainder of their lives, but, it’s clear that the fabled midlife crisis is not typical, (Lemme, 1999)., Of course, this finding doesn’t mean that people, don’t make major changes in midlife. Nearly everyone, knows someone who has embarked on a new career or, committed relationship during middle age. Nonetheless, researchers find that such “turning points” are, more often caused by unexpected events (divorce, job, transfers, serious illness), which can occur at any time, in adulthood (Lachman & Bertrand, 2001; Wethington, Kessler, & Pixley, 2004). In fact, some evidence exists for a “quarter-life” crisis (mid-20s and early 30s), 350, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , involving the search for meaningful work and relationships (Lachman, 2004; Robbins & Wilner, 2001)., , Late Adulthood (After Age 65), Late adulthood also has its share of developmental transitions. These challenges include adjusting to retirement,, adapting to changes in one’s support network, coping, with health problems, and confronting death. Let’s begin, by discussing Erikson’s views of late adulthood., Erikson’s Theory: Integrity Versus Despair, , The challenge of Erikson’s last stage is to achieve ego, integrity (refer to Figure 11.3). People who achieve integrity are able to look back on their lives with a sense, of satisfaction and to find meaning and purpose there., The opposite, despair, is the tendency to dwell on the, mistakes of the past, bemoan paths not chosen, and, contemplate the approach of death with bitterness., Erikson asserts that it is better to face the future in a, spirit of acceptance than to wallow in regret and resentment. In a test of Erikson’s theory, researchers studied, male and female adults over a 20-year span (Whitbourne et al., 1992). Among other things, they found, that favorable resolutions of earlier stages lead to favorable resolutions of later stages. Another study of participants ages 17 to 82 reported that subjective well-being, was correlated with increasing age and psychological, maturity and that the factors of generativity and ego, integrity accounted for most of the relationship between age and well-being (Sheldon & Kasser, 2001a)., Key developmental challenges in late adulthood, include retirement and changes in support networks., Retirement, , As retirement looms near, people prepare to leave the, workplace. Over the years, the average age of retirement has been decreasing, and it is now 62. Still, this, number is misleading because it falsely implies that retirement is an abrupt event. In fact, retirement these

Page 388 :
American Geriatrics Society (AGS), This site contains a vast spectrum of resources—generated, by the AGS itself or from other agencies on the Internet—, regarding health and medical care, public policy, and many, other issues related to the concerns of older adults., , days is usually a gradual process during which people, cut back on their work hours over some years rather, than stopping work altogether (Mutchler et al., 1997)., Individuals approach retirement with highly variable attitudes. Chief concerns include having adequate, retirement income and being able to fill the hours previously devoted to paid work. Happily, many studies, have shown that retirement has no adverse effect on, overall health or life satisfaction (Bossé, Spiro, & Kressin, 1996). Retirement can pose a problem, however, for, those who are forced to leave work because of ill health,, mandatory retirement policies, or job elimination or, whose incomes are inadequate. Those most likely to be, so affected are blacks, Hispanics, and women (Flippen, & Tienda, 2000). Retirement can also be stressful if it, comes at the same time as other life changes, such as, widowhood. Although retirement may result in decreased income, it also provides more time for travel,, hobbies, and friends. Through volunteer work, retirees, can share their knowledge and skills and interact with, others in meaningful ways (Moen et al., 2000). Retirees, who make the best adjustment have an adequate income, good health, and an extended social network of, friends and family (Gall, Evans, & Howard, 1997)., Changes in Support Networks, , As we noted, relationship satisfaction starts rising later, in life and remains fairly high until one of the spouses, or partners dies. In addition, most older adults maintain their ties to their children and grandchildren. In, one large study of over 11,000 adults age 65 and over,, 63 percent of the participants reported that they saw, at least one of their children at least once a week, and, another 16 percent saw a child one to three times a, month. Only 20 percent indicated that they saw their, children once a month or less (Crimmins & Ingegneri,, 1990). Surprisingly, elderly parents who see their children regularly or who report positive interactions with, them don’t describe themselves as happier than those, who see their children less often or who have less positive relationships with their offspring (Markides &, Krause, 1985; Seccombe, 1987)., Older adults report that siblings become more important than they were earlier (White, 2001). Relationships with sisters (sister-sister or sister-brother) seem, to be especially important in old age (Cicirelli, 1996)., CHAPTER 11, , © Spencer Grant/PhotoEdit, , WE B LI N K 11.4, , A few studies have explored family relationships in, ethnic minority families. This research indicates that, Hispanics have extensive family relationships, with frequent visiting and exchanges not only with the immediate family but also with grandparents and cousins, (Keefe, 1984). There is also evidence that Italian American and African American siblings have closer relationships than siblings from nonethnic families, although the number of these intimate relationships, appears to be relatively small (Gold, 1990)., Friends seem to play a more significant role in life, satisfaction for older adults than family members do,, at least for most white Americans (Pruchno & Rosenbaum, 2003). Friendships provide companionship, as, well as opportunities for engaging in leisure activities, and sharing thoughts and feelings. Although the elderly have fewer friends than those who are younger,, they are happier with their current number of friends, than younger adults are (Lansford, Sherman & Antonucci, 1998). The elderly have fewer friends in part, because they have lost friends through death, but also, because they are more selective about their friends, (Carstensen, 1995). In contrast to younger adults,, older adults particularly prefer friends who help them, avoid stress and make them feel good. The gender differences in friendships we noted in Chapter 8 continue, throughout adulthood. Thus, older men may have a, larger network of friends than women do, but women’s, friendships are more intimate (Sherman, deVries, &, Lansford, 2000). Men rely heavily on their wives for, emotional support, whereas women derive support, from children and friends, along with their spouse, (Umberson, Wortman, & Kessler, 1992). This difference, in social support puts husbands at greater risk than, wives for health and adjustment problems when a, spouse dies (Lee, Willetts, & Seccombe, 1998)., For African American elders, ritual kin are an important component of social support networks. In, , For older adults, friendships provide companionship and opportunities for shared activities., Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 351

Page 389 :
these relationships, certain neighbors or peers acquire, the status of a close family member and render mutual, aid and support (Taylor et al., 1990). Also, for elderly, African Americans, participation in church activities, plays a central role in psychological adjustment (Bryant, & Rakowski, 1992)., , Other significant challenges for older adults include coping with health problems, dealing with the, deaths of friends and partners, and confronting one’s, own mortality. We’ll address these issues in the last two, sections of the chapter., , Aging: A Gradual Process, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Discuss age-related changes in appearance and their, psychological significance., Describe the sensory, neurological, and endocrine, changes that accompany aging., Discuss health changes as people age and two things, people can do to maintain health., , ■, , ■, , As an alternative to the ages-and-stages approach to, adult development, many psychologists take the approach of identifying the physical, cognitive, and personality changes that occur across the expanse of, adulthood. Whereas some of these age-related developments are quite obvious, others are very subtle. In, either case, the changes take place gradually., , nate reality is probably aggravated by the media’s obsession with youthful attractiveness. Older women suffer more than older men as a result of the decline in, physical attractiveness because of the “double standard, of aging.” That is, because much of a woman’s worth is, determined by her physical attractiveness to men, her, social status declines along with her attractiveness. In, contrast, older men don’t have to rely on their looks, for social status; instead, they can use their occupational achievements and money., , Physical Changes, , Sensory Changes, Courtesy, Susan Whitbourne, , The physical changes that occur in, adulthood affect appearance, the, nervous system, vision and hearing,, hormone functioning, and health., Unless we indicate otherwise, the, following summary of trends is, based on the work of Susan Krauss, Whitbourne (1996, 2001), a leading researcher in adult psychology, and aging., , Susan Krauss, Whitbourne, , Changes in Appearance, , Height is stable in adulthood, although it does tend to, decline by an inch or so after age 55, as the spinal column “settles.” Weight is more variable and tends to increase in most adults up through the mid-50s, when a, gradual decline typically begins. Although weight often, goes down late in life, the percentage of body weight, that is fat tends to increase throughout adulthood, to, the chagrin of many. The skin of the face and body, tends to wrinkle and sag. The appearance of the face, may change, as the nose and ears tend to become longer, and wider, and the jaw appears to shrink. Hair tends to, thin out and become gray in both genders, and many, males have to confront receding hairlines and baldness., The net impact of these changes is that many older, people view themselves as less attractive. This unfortu352, , PART 3, , Describe age-related changes in intelligence,, information processing, and memory., Summarize evidence on personality change and, stability in adulthood., , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , The most important changes in sensory reception, occur in hearing and vision. Hearing problems and visual impairments become common, with men exhibiting higher frequencies of both. Noticeable hearing, losses do not usually show up until people reach their, 50s. Whereas the vast majority of the elderly require, corrective treatment for visual losses, only about a, third of older adults suffer hearing losses that require, corrective treatment., The proportion of people with 20/20 vision declines steadily as age increases. From about age 30 to, the mid-60s, most people become increasingly farsighted. After the mid-60s, the trend is toward greater, nearsightedness. Depth perception begins to decline in, the mid-40s. As well, older people commonly have difficulty adapting to darkness, experience poor recovery, from glare, and have reduced peripheral vision. These, changes in vision may be responsible for accidents in, and outside the home, but they most seriously affect, driving ability (particularly at night). Drivers over age, 65 have a high proportion of car accidents (except, compared to males under 25), which are typically caused, by failing to obey traffic signs, not yielding the right of, way, and making improper turns, rather than speeding, (Kline et al., 1992).

Page 390 :
WE B LI N K 11.5, , SeniorNet, Research on Internet use has demonstrated an increasingly, significant presence by older adults online. Perhaps some, of that presence has been aided by this excellent site that, links seniors (age 50 and up) to technology and many agerelated resources, especially discussion groups and educational opportunities., , In addition, small sensory losses in touch, taste,, and smell have been detected, usually after age 50., These losses generally have little impact on day-to-day, functioning, although older people often complain, that their food is somewhat tasteless. In contrast, visual and hearing losses often make interpersonal interaction more awkward and difficult, promoting social withdrawal in some., Neurological Changes, , The nervous system is composed of neurons, individual cells that receive, integrate, and transmit information. The number of active neurons in the brain, declines steadily during adulthood. As neurons die, the, brain decreases in both weight and volume, especially, after age 50. Although this progressive neuronal loss, sounds alarming, it is a normal part of the aging, process. Its functional significance is the subject of, some debate, but it doesn’t appear to contribute to any, of the age-related dementias. Dementia is an abnormal condition marked by multiple cognitive deficits, that include memory impairment. Dementia can be, caused by a variety of disorders, such as Alzheimer’s, disease, Parkinson’s disease, and AIDS, to name just a, few. Because some of these diseases are more prevalent, in older adults, dementia is seen in about 15 percent of, people over age 65 (Elias, Elias, & Elias, 1990). However, it is important to emphasize that dementia and, “senility” are not part of the normal aging process. As, Cavanaugh (1993) notes, “The term senility has no, valid medical or psychological meaning, and its continued use simply perpetuates the myth that drastic, mental decline is a product of normal aging” (p. 85)., Alzheimer’s disease accounts for about 50–60 percent of all cases of dementia. Some 5–7 percent of adults, over age 65 have the disease; this number grows to, about 25 percent for those 85 and older (Gatz & Smyer,, 2001; Gurland et al., 1999). Although the precise causes, of Alzheimer’s disease are not yet known, it is associated with changes in brain chemistry (Davis et al.,, 1999) and structure (Knowles et al., 1999). It is a vicious affliction that can strike during middle age, (40–65) or later in life (after 65). The disease is one of, progressive deterioration, ending in death, and it takes, from 8 to 10 years, on average, to run its course., CHAPTER 11, , Although it will be many years before drugs and, vaccines are available to safely slow or stop the disease,, federally funded research programs around the country are making progress on the Alzheimer’s puzzle, (Siegler, Bosworth, & Poon, 2003). For example, older, adults who engage frequently in cognitively stimulating, activities may reduce their risk of Alzheimer’s disease, (Wilson & Bennett, 2003). One research project involves a group of elderly Catholic nuns in a Minnesota, convent (Nash, 1997). About 20 years ago, these women, agreed to serve as research subjects in a longitudinal, study of Alzheimer’s disease and, on death, to donate, their brains to this scientific project. Among other findings from the ongoing Nun Study is a strong association between a high frequency of small strokes and severe confusion and memory loss (Snowdon, 2001). It, also seems that folic acid may exert a protective effect, against Alzheimer’s disease. For more information on, the Nun Study, see the Recommended Reading box on, the next page and Web Link 11.6., The beginnings of Alzheimer’s disease are so subtle, that they are difficult to detect. Individuals often forget common words, may report reduced energy, and, may lose their temper. Early on, depression often appears (Espiritu et al., 2001). Later, obvious problems, begin to emerge, including difficulties in speaking,, comprehending, and performing complicated tasks., Individuals don’t seem to have trouble with familiar, activities. However, profound memory loss develops,, especially for recent events. For example, patients may, forget the time, date, current season of the year, and, where they are. They may also fail to recognize familiar people, something particularly devastating to family and friends. Sometimes, they experience hallucinations, delusions, and paranoid thoughts. Later, victims, become completely disoriented and lose control of, bladder and bowel functions. At this point, they are, unable to care for themselves at all. The disease is eventually fatal., Hormonal Changes, , Although age-related changes occur in hormonal, functioning, their significance is not well understood., , WE B LI N K 11.6, , The Nun Study, Maintained by the Chandler Medical Center at the University of Kentucky, this site serves as a portal for information about the ongoing Nun Study on aging and Alzheimer’s, disease described in the text. The homepage provides a, number of links, including frequently asked questions and, publications that detail the findings from the continuing, study., , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 353

Page 391 :
RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , Aging with Grace: What, the Nun Study Teaches, Us About Leading Longer,, Healthier, and More Meaningful Lives, by David Snowdon (Bantam, 2001), In this fascinating and inspiring book, the director of, the Nun Study details the long-term research project, that is tracking the effects of aging, with a special, focus on Alzheimer’s disease. David Snowdon, professor, of neurology and director of the Nun Study at the, Sanders-Brown Center on Aging at the University of, Kentucky Medical Center, and his colleagues initiated, the study in 1991, and it continues today., The participants in the study are 678 elderly nuns, of the School Sisters of Notre Dame order in Mankato,, Minnesota. In a remarkable humanitarian gesture, the, Catholic sisters agreed to share with Snowdon their, medical and personal histories and, on their deaths, to, donate their brains for research. As of December 2003,, approximately 150 of the nuns were still alive, ranging, in age from 87 to 100., Snowdon’s scientific account of the project is infused with affectionate biographies of the participants, and compassionate personal observations. Readers will, appreciate the book’s inspirational messages and practical information. For example, aging successfully is, positively correlated with maintaining an optimistic, outlook, keeping up an exercise program, and consuming antioxidants such as lycopene, which is found in, tomatoes and watermelon., Cover Used by permission of Bantam Books, a division of Random House, Inc. Cover, photo © Lee P. Thoma, Nun Study participant Sister Andrea Carron, a School Sister, of Notre Dame from St. Louis., , They do not appear to be the chief cause of declining, sexual activity during the later years. Rather, this decline reflects the acceptance of social norms that older, people don’t have sexual desires and that sexual activity in the elderly is “inappropriate.” For women, decreased sexual activity may simply reflect lack of opportunity, as the proportion of widows increases, dramatically with age. The vast majority of older, adults remain physically capable of engaging in rewarding sexual encounters, although arousal tends to, be somewhat slower and less intense., Among women, menopause is a key transition that, typically occurs in the early 50s. Menopause is the time, when menstruation ceases. It is tied to a decrease in, the production of estrogen. Episodes of moderate physical discomfort (“hot flashes” and “night sweats”) dur354, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , ing the transitional phase are fairly common but are, usually no more troublesome than menstruation itself., Vaginal dryness, which can make intercourse painful,, can be relieved by a water-based lubricant (K-Y Jelly,, for example). The decrease in estrogen is also tied to, loss of bone density, which makes women more susceptible than men to osteoporosis and bone fractures, (Masi & Bilezikian, 1997). Not so long ago, menopause, was almost universally associated with severe emotional, strain. However, it is now clear that women’s reactions, to menopause vary greatly, depending on their expectations (Matthews, 1992). Most women suffer little psychological distress (George, 2002). In fact, many feel, liberated from menstrual periods, childbearing, and, worrying about birth control (Walter, 2000)., Although the idea of a “male menopause,” has, generated much discussion in recent years, there really, is no equivalent experience among men (Jacobs, 2001)., Significant endocrine changes do occur in males in, their later years, but these changes are gradual and are, largely unrelated to physical or psychological distress., Although sperm production declines between the ages, of 25 and 60, older men are still capable of fathering, children (Morley, 2001)., Changes in Health Status, , The quality of health diminishes with increasing age., There are many reasons for this trend. Vital organ systems lose some of their functional capacity. Vulnerability to some diseases (such as heart disease) increases, with age. For other diseases (such as pneumonia), the, vulnerability may remain unchanged, but their effects, may be more serious. In any case, the proportion of people with a chronic health problem climbs steadily with, age. As you can see in Figure 11.7, common chronic, health problems among those over 65 are hypertension,, arthritis, heart disease, cancer, and diabetes., Factors such as lifestyle differences and access to, and affordability of health care obviously play an important role in maintaining good health. Among the, elderly, the affluent have better health than the poor,, and whites are healthier than African Americans, (Berkman & Gurland, 1998). The health of elderly Hispanics seems to fall between that of whites and African, Americans. Native Americans fare the worst., Most older people live independently—at least, until they reach 85. However, with “the graying of, America” because of the aging of the baby boomer, generation, the number of elderly individuals needing, assistance with activities of daily living is expected to, soar. Home health care and assisted living facilities are, cost-effective alternatives to nursing homes (Maddox,, 2001). They also have the important added advantage, of permitting individuals to function relatively independently. Although relatively few elderly Americans, live in nursing homes, these numbers do increase with

Page 392 :
those who engage in exercise and physical activity tend, to be healthier and live longer than those who do not, (Connell & Janevic, 2003). Regular exercise during, adulthood has been shown to protect against hypertension, heart disease, cancer, and osteoporosis. Because it, increases the strength and flexibility of joints and muscles, exercise also reduces the chance of injuries. Regular aerobic exercise also promotes lower stress levels,, more positive moods, and better cognitive functioning., People can also increase their chances of maintaining, their health by eating a healthy diet. You can learn more, about exercise and nutrition in Chapter 14., , Chronic condition, Hypertension, Arthritis, Heart disease, Any cancer, Diabetes, Stroke, Asthma, , Cognitive Changes, , Chronic, bronchitis, , It is commonly believed that intelligence drops during, middle age and that memory lapses become more frequent in the later years. Are these notions accurate?, Let’s review the evidence., , Emphysema, 0, , 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, Percentage of people over 65, with condition (2001–2002), , 60, , Intelligence, , •, , Researchers have long been interested in whether general intelligence, as measured by IQ tests, remains stable throughout the adult years. The current evidence, suggests that IQ is fairly stable throughout most of, adulthood, with most declines beginning after age 60, (Schaie, 1994). Still, there are large individual differences in IQ fluctuations. It’s important to note that, findings are typically based on average test scores,, which can be dragged down by a small group of people who experience declines. When Schaie (1990) calculated the percentage of people who maintained stable performance on various mental abilities (see Figure, 11.8), he found that about 80 percent showed no declines by age 60 and that about two-thirds were still, stable through age 81. Older individuals who maintain, , F I G U R E 11.7, , Chronic health problems in those over age 65. Although most, people over age 65 are in good health, they suffer from a number, of chronic conditions. Note: These data refer only to noninstitutionalized individuals. (Federal Interagency Forum on AgingRelated Statistics, 2004), , age (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2004b). Nursing home, use varies across ethnic groups, typically because of, the availability of family members to care for the frail, elderly. For instance, African American, Hispanic, and, Asian American families are more likely to care for the, elderly at home than white families are (Gabrel, 2000)., Although it’s a given that everyone ages, people can, improve their health regardless of age. For one thing,, , To age 60, , To age 67, , To age 74, , To age 81, , Percentage maintaining over 7 years, , 90, , •, , F I G U R E 11. 8, , Age and the stability of primary mental, abilities. In his longitudinal study of, cognitive performance begun in 1956,, Schaie (1983, 1994) has repeatedly assessed the five basic mental abilities shown, along the bottom of this chart. The data, graphed here show the percentage of subjects who maintained stable levels of performance on each ability through various ages, up to age 81. As you can see, even at the, oldest ages, the majority of subjects show, no significant decline on most abilities., , 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, , From Schaie, K. W. (1990). Intellectual development in adulthood. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the, psychology of aging (3rd ed). San Diego: Academic Press., Copyright © 1990, reproduced with permission of Elsevier., , 20, 10, 0, Verbal, meaning, , Spatial, orientation, , Inductive, reasoning, , Numbers, , CHAPTER 11, , Word, fluency, , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 355

Page 393 :
© Syracuse Newspaper, photo by Randi Anglin/The Image Works, , © AP/Wide World Photos, , Many people, such as scientist Jane Goodall (forefront in the left, photo) and former President Jimmy and First Lady Rosalyn Carter,, remain active and productive in their 70s, 80s, and even beyond., , higher levels of cognitive functioning have good physical health, above-average education and occupations,, plenty of intellectual and social stimulation, and are, satisfied with their life accomplishments in midlife or, early old age (Schaie, 1994)., Information Processing, and Problem Solving, , Although intelligence is more stable during adulthood, than widely believed, some significant cognitive changes, do take place. These changes are most apparent in specific aspects of information processing and problem, solving., There is ample evidence that the ability to narrow, one’s focus of attention diminishes somewhat with increasing age, as does the ability to handle simultaneous, multiple inputs (Hartley & McKenzie, 1991; Kausler,, 1994). These changes may be due to decreased efficiency in filtering out irrelevant stimuli. Most of the, studies have simply compared extreme age groups (very, young participants against very old participants). Thus,, it’s not clear at what age these changes tend to emerge., In the cognitive domain, age seems to take its toll, on speed first. Many studies indicate that speed in, learning, solving problems, retrieving memories, and, processing information tends to decline with age,, probably beginning in middle adulthood (Salthouse,, 2000, 2004). The general nature of this trend (across, differing tasks) suggests that it may be a result of agerelated changes in neurological functioning., Overall success on both practical and laboratory, problem-solving tasks appears to decrease as people, grow older (Sinnott, 1989). For the most part, problemsolving ability is unimpaired if older people are given, adequate time to compensate for their reduced speed, in information processing. Furthermore, many of the, age-related decrements in cognitive functioning can, 356, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , be partly compensated for by increases in older adults’, knowledge., It should be emphasized that many people remain, capable of great intellectual accomplishment in their, later years (Simonton, 1997). This fact was verified in, a study of scholarly, scientific, and artistic productivity, that examined lifelong patterns of work among 738, men who lived at least through the age of 79 (Dennis,, 1966). Figure 11.9 plots the percentage of professional, works completed by these men in their 20s, 30s, 40s,, 50s, 60s, and 70s. As you can see, in most professions, the 40s decade was the most productive. However, in, many areas productivity was remarkably stable, through the 60s and even the 70s. Other researchers, have focused on the quality, rather than the quantity,, of output. They typically find that “masterpieces”, occur at the same relative frequency among the works, of creators of all ages (Simonton, 1997)., Memory, , Many older people complain about problems with their, memory. And it does seem that the capacity of shortterm or working memory decreases as people age, (Dixon & Cohen, 2003). Also, as we noted, the speed of, processing information slows with age. This combination of less working memory capacity and slower processing seems to underlie older adults’ poorer performance on complex tasks that demand considerable, cognitive effort and resources. Older adults also experience frustrating declines in episodic memory (Dixon &

Page 394 :
•, Humanities, (e.g., history,, philosophy), , 20, , Sciences, (e.g, biology,, chemistry,, mathematics), , 15, , 10, , Arts, (e.g., music,, poetry, drama), , 5, , CHAPTER 11, , 70s, , 1, 0, , Old, , 2, , Young, , Cohen, 2003). For example, sometimes they may have, difficulties remembering individuals’ names or where, the car is parked. On tasks that don’t require much, mental effort (recognizing a familiar face, for example),, age-related declines are minimal., The memory losses associated with aging are, moderate and are not universal. However, individuals’, beliefs about their memory abilities can produce selffulfilling prophecies. In one study, individuals who believed that memory gets worse with age estimated, larger self-declines in memory compared to people, who believed that memory declines only a little with, age (Cavanaugh, Feldman, & Hertzog, 1998). Self-beliefs are also important because they are tied to the use, of compensatory strategies (for example, investing, extra time and effort in learning new skills) to offset, memory problems (Cavanaugh, 2000)., Cultural attitudes about aging have been shown to, affect memory in the elderly. In an interesting study,, researchers looked at memory performance in younger, people (20s) and older people (late 50s to 90s). The participants were selected from three cultural groups with, differing views of older people: hearing Americans, (who hold negative views about aging), deaf Americans, (who have generally positive views about aging), and, hearing Chinese (who hold positive views about aging)., As you can see in Figure 11.10, basically no differences, were seen in memory among the younger participants, from the three different cultures. In contrast, older, Chinese participants performed significantly better, than older hearing and deaf Americans. Thus, as we, noted in Chapter 6, stereotypes (in this case, about the, elderly) can produce self-fulfilling prophecies, for better and for worse., , 60s, , Old, , 50s, 40s, Age decade, , Based on data from Dennis, W. (1966)., Creative productivity between the ages, of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology, 2(1), 1–8. Copyright © 1966 the, Gerontological Society of America., Adapted by permission., , Young, , 30s, , Old, , 20s, , Young, , 0, , FIG U R E 11.9, , Age trends in professional, productivity. Dennis (1966), compiled the percentage of, professional works completed, in each decade of life by, 738 men who lived to at, least age 79. Productivity, peaked in the 40s decade,, but professional output, remained strong through the, 60s decade, and even lasted, through the 70s decade for, the humanities and sciences., , 25, , Performance on memory tasks, , Works completed in each decade, (percentage of all works), , 30, , –1, –2, –3, Chinese, American, American, (hearing), (deaf), Participants’ culture, , •, , F I G U R E 11. 10, , Cultural attitudes about aging and memory performance in, older persons. Levy and Langer (1994) found that the memory, performance of older mainland Chinese, whose culture has positive attitudes about aging, was significantly better than that, of older hearing and deaf Americans. Although the differences, were not statistically significant, older deaf Americans, whose, culture generally has positive views about aging, performed, better than older hearing Americans, whose culture has more, negative attitudes about aging. The memory performance of, young people from these three groups did not differ. (Data from, Levy & Langer, 1994), Adapted from Baron, R., & Byrne, D. (1997). Social psychology. Boston, MA:, Allyn & Bacon. Copyright © 1997 by Pearson Education. Adapted by permission, of the publisher., , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 357

Page 395 :
A popular misconception is that older people have, vivid recollections of events in the distant past while, being forgetful about recent events. In actuality, there, is no evidence that the elderly have more numerous,, or more vivid, early memories (Kausler, 1994; Rabbitt, & McGinnis, 1988). In fact, memories of events long, ago may be loose reconstructions that are less accurate, than people assume., , Personality Changes, Is a grouchy 20-year-old destined to be crotchety at 40, or 65? Or can the cranky young adult become a mellow, senior citizen? Psychologists have engaged in lively debate about whether personality remains stable in adulthood, and both sides have been able to cite supportive, research. On the one hand, a number of large-scale longitudinal studies using objective assessments of personality traits provide evidence for long-term stability, in personality. The general conclusion that emerges, from these longitudinal studies is that personality tends, to be quite stable over periods of 20 to 40 years (Costa, & McCrae, 1994, 1997). For example, Paul Costa and, Robert McCrae (1988) conducted a six-year longitudinal study of 983 men who were ages 21 to 76 at the time, of the first testing. Over this six-year period, the researchers looked at the stability of the traits in their, five-factor model of personality (see Chapter 2). The, stability of the participants’ self-ratings on these five, traits over six years was quite high. Costa and McCrae, also asked the spouses of the participants to rate the, subjects over the same six-year interval. They found, that the stability of the spousal ratings closely matched, , that of the participants’ self-ratings. Also, a recent, meta-analysis of 150 studies, involving almost 50,000, participants, concluded that personality in early adulthood was a good predictor of personality in late adulthood and that the stability of personality increases with, age up to about age 50 (Roberts & DelVecchio, 2000)., On the other hand, some studies suggest that substantial personality changes continue to occur throughout the life span (Haan, Millsap, & Hartka, 1986; Helson, & Moane, 1987; Whitbourne et al., 1992). For example,, in a study of women graduates of Mills College, few personality changes were found between the ages of 21 and, 27; however, between the ages of 27 and 43, the women, increased in dominance (including confidence) and, independence (Helson and Moane, 1987; Helson,, Mitchell, & Moane, 1984). According to Susan Krauss, Whitbourne and her colleagues (1992), “there is a growing body of evidence indicating the existence of adult, personality changes on a variety of . . . variables” (p. 268)., In sum, researchers assessing the stability of personality in adulthood have reached contradictory conclusions. How can they be reconciled? This appears to, be one of those debates in which researchers are eyeing, the same findings from different perspectives. Hence,, some conclude that the glass is half full, whereas others, conclude that it’s half empty. In his discussion of this, controversy, Lawrence Pervin (1994) concludes that, personality is characterized by both stability and, change. Thus, some personality traits (such as emotional stability, extraversion, and assertiveness) tend to, remain stable, while others (such as masculinity and, femininity) tend to change as people grow older (Helson & Stewart, 1994)., , Death and Dying, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Discuss cultural and individual attitudes about death, including death, anxiety., Describe Kübler-Ross’s five stages of dying and research findings about, the dying process., Describe cultural variations in mourning practices and discuss the, grieving process., Discuss different types of loss and what helps people cope with, bereavement., , Dealing with the deaths of close friends and loved ones, is an increasingly frequent adjustment problem as people move through adulthood. Moreover, the final challenge of life is to confront one’s own death., , Attitudes About Death, Because death is a taboo topic in modern Western society, the most common strategy for dealing with it is, 358, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , avoidance. There is abundant evidence of Americans’, inability to confront death comfortably. People often, use euphemisms such as “passed away” to avoid even, the word itself. To minimize exposure to the specter of, death, individuals sometimes unnecessarily quarantine the dying in hospitals and nursing homes. Professionals take custody of the body at death and manage, funeral arrangements for families. These are all manifestations of what Kastenbaum (2001) calls a death

Page 396 :
system—the collection of rituals and procedures, used by a culture to handle death. Death systems vary, from culture to culture. Ours happens to be rather, negative and evasive., Negativism and avoidance are not universal features of death systems. In Mexican culture, death is, discussed frequently and is even celebrated on a national feast day, the Day of the Dead (DeSpelder &, Strickland, 1983). Also, the Amish view death as a natural transition rather than a dreaded adversary (Bryer,, 1979). Thus, some cultures and subcultures display less, fear of death than others., Death anxiety is the fear and apprehension about, one’s own death. In Chapters 2 and 5, we noted that, terror management theory asserts that death anxiety, stems from the conflict between humans’ instinct for, self-preservation and their awareness of the inevitability of death. According to terror management theory,, cultures provide traditions and institutions to help, people deal with death anxiety. In support of the theory, adults who have a strong faith in a higher force or, being have low death anxiety (Cicirelli, 1999, 2002)., Having a well-formulated personal philosophy of death,, rather than having a particular religious affiliation, is, associated with low death anxiety. For instance, one, study found that both devout Christians and devout, atheists were less anxious about death than those with, ambivalent religious views (Moore, 1992). Also, individuals who haven’t accomplished all that they had, hoped are more likely to fear death, as are those who are, anxious and depressed (Neimeyer & Van Brunt, 1995)., Although death anxiety is uncommon in children,, it does appear in those who live in dangerous neighborhoods or war zones. Death anxiety is high in terminally ill children whose parents don’t tell them of, their impending death (O’Halloran & Altmaier, 1996)., Death anxiety typically declines from early to late, adulthood (Thorson & Powell, 2000). In fact, elderly, adults are more likely to fear the period of uncertainty, that comes before death than death itself. They worry, about where they will live, who will take care of them,, and how they will cope with the loss of control and independence they may experience before death., , WE B LI N K 11.7, , The End of Life: Exploring Death in America, Since late 1997, National Public Radio (NPR) has regularly, aired a range of programs relating to dying and death as, experienced in American culture. This companion website, at NPR offers not only printed and audio transcripts of, each program but many bibliographical and organizational, resources as well., , many such patients were enthusiastic about the discussions. They were frustrated by the “conspiracy of, silence” that surrounds death and were relieved to get, things out in the open., Eventually, Kübler-Ross interviewed over 200 terminally ill patients and developed a model of the, process of dying. According to her model, people, evolve through a series of five stages as they confront, their own death:, , Pioneering research on the experience of dying was conducted by, Elisabeth Kübler-Ross (1969, 1970), during the 1960s. At first, her project met with immense resistance., Fellow physicians at the hospital, where she worked were initially, unresponsive to her requests to interview dying patients. Gradually,, however, it became apparent that, , Although Kübler-Ross asserted that people do not, necessarily progress through these five stages in lockstep sequence, her use of the term “stages” implies otherwise. Thus, it is not surprising that her theory has been, criticized on this confusing point (Kastenbaum, 1999)., Systematic studies of dying patients have not always, observed the same five emotions or the same progression of emotions she described (Corr, 1993). Instead, of progressing though a common, five-stage process,, dying people seem to show “a jumble of conflicting or, , © Roos/Gamma Liaison-Getty Images, , The Process of Dying, , Stage 1: Denial. Denial, shock, and disbelief are the, first reactions to being informed of a serious, lifeterminating illness. According to Kübler-Ross, few patients maintain this stance to the end., Stage 2: Anger. After denial, the patient often becomes nasty, demanding, difficult, and hostile. Asking, and resolving the question “Why me?” can help the patient reduce resentment., Stage 3: Bargaining. In this stage the patient wants, more time and asks for favors to postpone death. The, bargaining may be carried out with the physician or,, more frequently, with God., Stage 4: Depression. Depression is a signal that the, acceptance process has really begun. Kübler-Ross has, referred to this stage as “preparatory grief ”—the sadness of anticipating an impending loss., Stage 5: Acceptance. The person who achieves acceptance has taken care of unfinished business. The, patient has relinquished the unattainable and is now, ready to die. He or she will want to be with close family members, usually a wife or husband and children;, dying children want to be with their parents. Although, patients desire the presence of someone warm, caring,, and accepting at this time, verbal communication may, be totally unnecessary., , Elisabeth KüblerRoss, , CHAPTER 11, , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 359

Page 397 :
alternating reactions running the gamut from denial, to acceptance, with tremendous variation affected by, age, sex, race, ethnic group, social setting, and personality” (Butler & Lewis, 1982, p. 370). Nonetheless,, Kübler-Ross greatly improved our understanding of, the process of dying and stimulated research that continues to add to our knowledge., , Bereavement and Grieving, When a friend, spouse, or relative dies, individuals, must cope with bereavement, or the painful loss of a, loved one through death. The death of someone close, typically brings forth the painful and complex emotions of grief. Mourning refers to the formal practices, of an individual and a community in response to a, death. Many cultural and religious rituals help survivors adjust to and cope with their loss., Cultural Variations, , Considerable variation exists among and within cultures as to how this major life event is acknowledged., In America and Western European countries, the bereaved are typically encouraged to break their emotional ties with the deceased relatively quickly and to, return to their regular routines. Nonetheless, research, has found support for “continued bonds” with the deceased among American widows and widowers (Bonanno & Kaltman, 1999). Based on interviews of men, and women during the first two months of bereavement, one study reported that 71 percent felt that their, deceased spouses were still with them at times and that, 61 percent felt that their deceased spouses were watching out for them (Shuchter & Zisook, 1993). Moreover,, 39 percent reported that they talked regularly with their deceased spouses. In Asian,, African, and Hispanic cultures, the bereaved, are encouraged to maintain emotional ties, to their dead loved ones (Bonanno, 1998)., Almost all Japanese homes have altars dedicated to family ancestors, and family members routinely talk to the deceased and offer, them food. Regardless of the particular, form that mourning takes, all such rituals, are designed to make death meaningful and, to help the bereaved cope with the pain and, disruption of death., , this view, John Bowlby (1980) characterizes grieving, as a four-stage process:, Stage 1: Numbness. In this initial phase, survivors, are typically dazed and confused. They may experience, physical reactions such as nausea or tightness in the, chest or throat. This phase may last several days or, in, cases when death has been unexpected, several weeks., Stage 2: Yearning. Here, survivors try to recover the, lost person. Individuals may report that they see the, deceased and may wander as if they are searching for, the loved one. They often feel frustration, anger, and, guilt. In addition, they may experience intense feelings, of sadness and may cry and sob uncontrollably. They, may also suffer loss of appetite and insomnia., Stage 3: Disorganization and despair. Searching for, the loved one ceases as the loss is accepted as real., However, accepting the loss brings feelings of helplessness, despair, and depression. Survivors often experience extreme fatigue and a need to sleep much more, than usual., Stage 4: Reorganization. Individuals are able to resume their normal routines at home and at work. Depression lifts, regular sleeping habits return, and energy, increases. Thoughts of the loved one may bring sadness, but these feelings are no longer overwhelming., Although Bowlby’s model is certainly plausible,, research suggests that most grief reactions do not follow this straightforward path (Wortman, Wolff, & Bonanno, 2004). Just as people react differently to the experience of dying, they also show variable responses to, bereavement. For instance, one study examined the, patterns of change in depression in a sample of older, adults prior to a spouse’s death and at 6 and 18 months, , The common view of bereavement asserts, that distress is an inevitable response to loss, and that failure to experience distress is a, sign that the individual has not grieved, “properly” (Bonanno & Kaltman, 1999). As, a result, the person is expected to suffer negative consequences later. In keeping with, 360, , PART 3, , © Spencer Grant/PhotoEdit, , The Grieving Process, , The grieving process is more variable among people than widely appreciated., , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 398 :
after spousal loss (Bonanno et al., 2002). By measuring, depression both before and after a spouse’s death, researchers could separate preloss depression from lossinduced depression. Participants’ grief reactions fell, into five patterns. Absent grief or the resilient pattern is, characterized by low levels of depression before and, after the spouse’s death. In chronic grief, depression exists before and after the spouse’s death. Common grief, is characterized by an increase in depression shortly, after the spouse’s death and a decrease in depression, over time. The depressed-improved pattern reflects a, decrease in depression after the spouse’s death. Chronic, depression describes those who are depressed both before and after spousal loss., When you examine Figure 11.11, you may be surprised to find that common grief is not the most frequent pattern. In fact, absent grief occurs much more, frequently—almost half of the participants follow this, pattern. As we noted earlier, many (including some, mental health professionals) believe that individuals, who fail to engage in “grief work” will suffer long-term, adjustment problems. However, this view is contradicted by many studies (Bonanno et al., 2002; Wortman, et al., 2004). In the current study, resilience was found to, be associated with preloss acceptance of death, whereas, , Type of grief reaction, , Absent, grief, Chronic, grief, Common, grief, Depressedimproved, Chronic, depression, 0, , •, , 30, 40, 10, 20, Percentage of spouses, showing reaction, , 50, , F I G U R E 11.11, , Five reactions to spousal loss. Researchers gathered data on, 205 older individuals prior to spousal loss and 6 months and 18, months following spousal loss. Ninety percent of the subjects, exhibited one of the five bereavement patterns shown in the, figure. Contrary to popular belief, “absent grief” or the “resilient, pattern” was the most frequently experienced reaction, while, “common grief ” occurred relatively infrequently. Traditional views, of grief hold that the “common grief ” reaction is the only healthy, response to loss, but numerous studies contradict that view., (Adapted from Bonanno et al., 2002), CHAPTER 11, , chronic grief was associated with preloss dependency, on the spouse. To counter the traditional “negative” view, of bereavement, some researchers are investigating how, positive emotions and laughter can ameliorate the stress, of grieving (Bonanno & Keltner, 1997)., Coping with Different Types of Loss, , The research we have been discussing looked only at, the experiences of widows and widowers. The researchers would probably have obtained quite different findings if the subjects had been parents who had lost a, child, the most difficult type of death adults must cope, with (Stillion, 1995). Coping with miscarriage and stillbirth can also be painful (Klass, 1996). One study compared the grief reactions of 255 middle-aged women, who had experienced the death of a spouse, a parent,, or a child in the two years preceding the study (Leahy,, 1993). As you might expect, mothers who had lost children had the highest levels of depression. And women, whose husbands had died were significantly more depressed than women who had lost a parent. Other studies of bereaved persons (including men) have also, found that they score higher on depression than the, nonbereaved (Wortmann & Silver, 1990). They also, score lower on life satisfaction and are at greater risk, for illness. Thus, the death of an intimate is an adjustment challenge for most people, even though individuals’ reactions to the experience may vary., A particularly difficult bereavement situation occurs when a child or an adolescent loses a parent to, death. In these cases, grieving typically involves frequent crying, angry outbursts, trouble concentrating, at school, and sleep problems. These symptoms may, last from several months to a year (Silverman & Worden, 1992). It is important for adults to take the time, to talk with grieving children. In particular, children, need to be assured that the parent did not leave out of, anger and that the remaining parent will not disappear, (Furman, 1984)., Although the numbers are small, some children, and adolescents have lost schoolmates and teachers in, schoolyard killings and may also have witnessed such, traumatic acts of violence. These individuals are likely, to suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder (see Chapter 3). Typical reactions to these disturbing and tragic, events include shock, prolonged grief, flashbacks, and, fear of returning to school (Nader, 1997)., Bereavement overload occurs when individuals experience several deaths at the same time or in close succession. As an example, the tens of thousands of individuals who lost all or most of their families and friends, during the December 26, 2004 earthquake and tsunami, disaster in Southeast Asia come quickly to mind. On a, less dramatic scale, other groups who are likely to suffer bereavement overload include members of the gay, community, who have lost lovers and friends to AIDS,, Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 361

Page 399 :
© Arko Datta/Reuters/Corbis, , The Southeast Asian tsunami, disaster was a rare and dramatic example of bereavement, overload, the devastating, experience of having to cope, with several or more deaths, at the same time., , and the elderly, who must deal with the loss of spouses,, friends, and siblings because of advancing years., To cope with loss, people need the sympathy and, support of family and friends as well as the passage of, time. Still, the presence of friends and family can’t substitute for a loved one who has died (Stroebe et al.,, 1996). Parents who have lost a child may find it helpful, to talk with others who have been through this experi-, , ence (Lieberman, 1993). Groups for bereaved children, and adolescents can be particularly helpful (Bacon,, 1996). Tragically, because of the immensity of the losses, in the Southeast Asian tsunami disaster, survivors will, take years to recover, and some may never do so., In the Application, we look at some ways parents, can facilitate their children’s development by providing optimal combinations of affection and discipline., , Becoming an Effective Parent, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe Ainsworth’s three attachment styles and, how caregivers can promote secure attachment in, their infants., Summarize the research on the effects of day care on, infants and children., Discuss Baumrind’s parenting styles and their effects, on children’s development., , Are the following statements “true” or “false?”, ___ 1. Infant-mother emotional attachments are, formed automatically., ___ 2. Placing infants and children in day care negatively affects their development., ___ 3. Extensive use of punishment is the key to effective discipline., 362, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , ■, , ■, ■, , Discuss issues related to the effective parenting of, adolescents., List five suggestions for more effective parenting., List five suggestions for the effective use of, punishment., , ___ 4. Parents shouldn’t have to explain their reasons, for punishing their children., All these statements are false. All represent popular, myths about childrearing that we address in this Application. Many parents are eager to learn all they can, about children’s development. They search to find new

Page 400 :
and better ways to ensure optimal social, emotional,, and cognitive development in their children. What, kinds of answers can psychology provide?, , Maternal Behavior and, Infant-Mother Attachment, During the first few months of life, infants rely on builtin behaviors such as crying, cooing, and smiling to initiate and maintain contact with adult caregivers. Before, long, infants start to recognize their most frequent caregiver (typically, the mother) and are more easily soothed, by that person. By the age of 8 months, most babies develop a strong emotional connection to a single familiar, caregiver (hereafter assumed to be the mother, to simplify our discussion). This emotional bond between infant and mother is termed infant attachment., Contrary to popular belief, infants’ attachment to, their mothers is not automatic. Indeed, as we noted in, Chapter 8, not all infants develop a secure attachment, to their mothers. Sometimes, mothers are insensitive, or inconsistent in responding to their infants’ needs, (Pederson & Moran, 1996). “Difficult” infants whose, mothers are unable to respond sensitively to them are, at risk for developing an insecure attachment style, (Vaughn & Bost, 1999). For instance, some babies are, prone to distress, spit up most of their food, make, bathing a major battle, refuse to go to sleep, and rarely, smile. It is easy to see that such behavior could undermine a mother’s responsiveness to an infant., After extensive study, Mary Ainsworth and her, colleagues (1978) concluded that infants could be classified into one of three attachment styles by about 8, months of age. These different styles develop out of, parent-infant interactions during the early months of, life. Babies with an avoidant attachment style tend to, ignore their mothers. Those with an anxious-ambivalent style seem to desire contact with the mother, yet, they actively resist her when she comes near., Fortunately, the majority of infants are securely attached and welcome contact with their mothers. A secure attachment to a caregiver during infancy is important because it provides a basis for successful social, relationships later in life. A meta-analysis of 63 studies, reported that those who were securely attached had, more positive peer relationships than those who were, insecurely attached (Schneider, Atkinson, & Tardif,, 2001). In Erik Erikson’s terms, the securely attached, baby has developed a sense of basic trust in the mother, and toward the world at large., Researchers are also studying a fourth—disorganized/disoriented—attachment style, in which infants, are both drawn to their caregivers and fear them because of past negative interactions (Main & Solomon,, 1990). This style appears to be common among neglected and abused children (Barnett, Ganiban, & CicCHAPTER 11, , chetti, 1999). A longitudinal study reported that this, attachment style is associated with dissociative disorders (see Chapter 15) in childhood and adolescence, (Carlson, 1998)., How can caregivers promote a secure attachment, in infants? Ainsworth and her associates reported that, the mothers of securely attached infants were perceptive about the baby’s needs, responded to those, needs relatively quickly and consistently, and enjoyed, physical contact with the baby. Other research has confirmed that these are among the key attributes of effective parenting of infants (DeWolff & van Ijzendoorn, 1997)., , Day Care and Attachment, The impact of day care on attachment is a hotly debated topic these days. The crucial question is whether, daily infant-mother separations might disrupt the attachment process. The issue is an important one, given, that 55 percent of mothers with an infant under the, age of 1 and 67 percent of mothers with a child under, the age of 5 work outside the home (U.S. Bureau of the, Census, 2004a). Research by Jay Belsky (1992) suggests, that babies under a year who receive nonmaternal care, for more than 20 hours per week have an increased risk, of developing insecure attachments to their mothers., Belsky’s findings have raised many eyebrows, but they, need to be put in perspective. First, the data reveal that, the proportion of day-care infants who exhibit insecure attachment is only slightly higher than the norm, in American society and even lower than the norm in, some other societies (Lamb, Sternberg, & Prodromidis,, 1992). Second, many studies have found no differences, in attachment between children reared in day care or, at home (Roggman et al., 1994), and some studies have, even found that day care can have beneficial effects on, youngsters’ intellectual and social development (Caldwell, 1993; Egeland & Hiester, 1995). Third, the effects, of day care depend on the quality of the care provided., Negative effects are minimal and may even be outweighed by positive effects in safe, clean, spacious,, well-equipped, adequately staffed facilities that provide lots of individual attention and carefully planned, activities (Fitzgerald et al., 2003). Nonetheless, infants, and young children who spend many hours in day care, with poorly trained child-care workers and large childcaregiver ratios are at risk for developing insecure attachment, especially if their mothers are insensitive, caregivers., , Dimensions of Childrearing, As children grow from infancy into toddlerhood, the role, of parenting broadens. How parents react to a child’s actions communicates their standards of appropriate and, Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 363

Page 401 :
364, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , WE B LI N K 11.8, , The ChildTrauma Academy, Founded by Bruce Perry, a psychiatrist, The ChildTrauma, Academy develops programs that seek to nurture, protect,, and enrich children. Its website is rich with information, on basic child development topics, such as attachment,, curiosity, and language development. However, its foremost strength is its collection of materials on how to help, children victimized by physical, psychological, or sexual, abuse or other types of severe trauma., , Courtesy, Diana Baumrind, , inappropriate behavior. Parents fulfill this role with, varying degrees of conscious awareness., As we mentioned in Chapter 5, two major dimensions underlie parenting behavior (Maccoby & Martin, 1983). The first, and most important, is parental, acceptance. Although most parents are at least moderately accepting of their children, some are indifferent, or even hostile and rejecting. Parental acceptance and, warmth appear to influence the degree to which children internalize the standards and expectations of, their parents (Eccles et al, 1997). Children whose parents hold them in high regard develop high self-esteem, and self-control (behave appropriately even if the parents are not present). In contrast, children whose parents are less accepting may develop lower self-esteem, and less self-control. Thus, they may behave when the, parents are around (out of fear of punishment) but, misbehave when on their own., The second dimension of parenting behavior is, parental control, or strictness of parental standards. For, example, a parent who is moderately controlling sets, high performance standards and expects increasingly, mature behavior. A parent who is uncontrolling expects, little of the child. The absence of control is associated, with maladjustment and high levels of aggression., Diana Baumrind (1967, 1971,, 1978) looked at specific parenting, styles as interactions between the, two dimensions of acceptance and, control. In addition, she wanted to, know the effects of these parenting, styles on children’s social and intellectual competence. In her initial study, Baumrind observed a, Diana Baumrind, sample of preschool children and, their parents and rated both groups, on a number of dimensions. Additional data were obtained through interviews with the parents. Baumrind, was able to identify four distinct parenting styles: authoritarian, permissive, authoritative, and neglectful., Authoritative parents (high acceptance, high control) set high goals for their children but are also accepting of their children and responsive to their needs., They also provide age-appropriate explanations that, emphasize the consequences of “good” and “bad” behavior. They encourage verbal give-and-take and allow, their children to question parental requests. Authoritative parents maintain firm control but take into account each child’s unique and changing needs. They, are willing to negotiate with their children, setting new, and less restrictive limits when appropriate, particularly as children mature., Authoritarian parents (low acceptance, high control) are highly demanding and controlling and use, physical punishment or the threat of it with their children. By virtue of their higher status, they issue com-, , mands that are to be obeyed without question (“Do it, because I said so”). These parents rigidly maintain, tight control even as their children mature. They also, tend to be somewhat emotionally distant and may be, rejecting., Permissive parents (high acceptance, low control), make few or no demands of their children. They allow, children free expression of impulses and set few limits, on appropriate behavior. Permissive parents are responsive and warmly accepting and indulge their children’s desires., Neglectful parents (low acceptance, low control), provide for the basic physical and emotional needs of, their children, but not much else. They convey the impression that they don’t really care for their children:, They are not particularly involved with or supportive, of their children (no help with homework, minimal, supervision, little time spent together)., , Correlates of Parenting Styles, Baumrind and others have found that parenting styles, are associated with different traits in children, as summarized in Figure 11.12. As you might expect, authoritative parenting is associated with the most positive, outcomes. Children whose parents use this style do the, best in school and tend to be self-reliant, friendly, and, cooperative. In contrast, the children of authoritarian, parents tend to do less well in school and to have lower, self-esteem and poorer social skills. Permissive parents, often have children whose grades are lower and who, are undisciplined, impulsive, and easily frustrated. Although Baumrind didn’t report on children of neglectful parents, other researchers have found them to have, low self-esteem and to be moody, impulsive, and aggressive (Maccoby & Martin, 1983). This style also predicts the most maladaptive outcomes of the four parenting styles (Baumrind, 1991; Patterson, DeBaryshe,, & Ramsey, 1989). Problems include low academic and, social competence, delinquency, and alcohol and substance abuse., Of course, these data are correlational and do not, establish that the parenting style is the cause of the chil-

Page 402 :
Parenting Styles and Children’s Traits, Parenting style, , Authoritative, , Authoritarian, , Permissive, , Children’s behavioral profile, , Energetic-friendly, , Conflicted-irritable, , Impulsive-aggressive, , Self-reliant, , Fearful, apprehensive, , Rebellious, , Self-controlled, , Moody, unhappy, , Low in self-reliance and self-control, , Cheerful and friendly, , Easily annoyed, , Impulsive, , Copes well with stress, , Passively hostile, , Aggressive, , Cooperative with adults, , Vulnerable to stress, , Domineering, , Curious, , Aimless, , Aimless, , Purposive, , Sulky, unfriendly, , Low in achievement, , Achievement-oriented, , •, , F I G U R E 11.12, , Baumrind’s findings on parenting styles and children’s traits. Diana Baumrind (1977) has studied, three styles of parenting and their relations to children’s social and intellectual competence. As you can, see, authoritative parenting is associated with the most desirable outcomes. (Summary adapted from, Schaffer, 1989), Based on Baumrind, D. (1977). Socialization determinants of personal agency. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child, Development, New Orleans, LA., , dren’s traits. The direction of influence goes both ways, (Cummings, Braungart-Rieker, & DuRocher-Schudlich,, 2003). For instance, parents may become increasingly, authoritarian in response to their child’s increasing resentment and irritability. Even so, Baumrind’s results, imply that authoritative parenting is most likely to foster social and cognitive competence in children., , Adolescents’ emerging cognitive abilities enable them to, question parental values and to formulate a personal, philosophy to guide their own behavior. Although this, process is necessary, it often drives intergenerational, conflicts. Parents seem to have a harder time dealing with, these conflicts than adolescents do (Steinberg, 2001)., One of the undercurrents in parent-adolescent relationships is that the balance of power between parent and child is shifting. Younger children accept their, parents’ power as a legitimate source of authority, especially if they have a warm relationship. The increasing autonomy of adolescents, however, requires a more, equal parent-child relationship. While this is a necessary step on the road to autonomous adulthood, negotiating such shifts in power can be difficult. Authoritative parents who are willing to respond to their, teenagers’ input are most likely to avoid such turmoil, (Steinberg, 2001). Authoritarian parents who are unwilling to relinquish their control promote hostility, and rebellion in adolescents. Permissive and neglectful, parents, who never exercised much control over their, children, may find themselves faced with adolescents, CHAPTER 11, , Photo Credit goes here, , Rearing Adolescents, , Research has uncovered some interesting correlations between, parents’ disciplinary style and their children’s personality traits., An authoritative parenting style seems to be associated with, the most desirable traits., Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 365

Page 403 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Promoting Resilience in Children, Peoples’ coping abilities are overwhelmed when they are, exposed to traumatic events such as the Oklahoma City, bombing, a space shuttle explosion, the 9/11 terrorist, attacks, a violent homicide or suicide, rape, or a natural, disaster. Other events that traumatize individuals include, exposure to acts of war, domestic or community violence,, and child abuse or neglect., Psychologists are particularly interested in how, children react to traumatic events to understand how to, protect them from long-term damage. Children’s reactions, to traumatic events are likely to vary depending on their, age (National Institute of Mental Health, 2001; Gallagher, & Chase, 2002). The responses of children under the age, of 6 tend to be muted unless their parents exhibit strong, distress that disturbs the children. If children between, the ages of 6 and 11 are troubled, parents may observe, regressive or disruptive behaviors, nightmares, irrational, fears, reluctance to go to school, and vague bodily complaints (stomachaches, headaches, and so forth). The, responses of youngsters in the 12–17 age bracket tend to, resemble the responses seen in adults, such as flashbacks,, emotional numbing, and avoidance of any reminders of, the traumatic event. Sleep disturbances and difficulties, at school are also common. Adolescents may increase, their use of alcohol or cigarettes., Following a traumatic experience, most children, return to their normal level of functioning after the, acute phase of distress passes (Cloitre, Morin, & Lanares,, 2004). Unfortunately, a few have difficulties getting back, on track. Children and adolescents who have experienced, at least one of the following risk factors are more likely, to have long-term difficulties coping with a traumatic, event (Cloitre, et al., 2004):, • Directly witnessed an event or have a family member who observed an event, • Survived the death of a parent or another important, person, • Had mental health problems before the event, • Experienced an earlier traumatic event, • Lacked a strong support network, • Had a parent whose levels of stress and fear are on, the increase, Although exposure to a traumatic event heightens, the risk for psychological problems, many children have, an amazing ability to overcome adversity. This ability, to bounce back from traumatic experiences is termed, , 366, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , resilience. Researchers have tracked the adjustment of, children who have (1) been exposed to war, (2) lived in, areas of high terrorist activity, (3) experienced traumatic, events such as the 9/11 attacks, (4) lived in American, slums, (5) lost loved ones through death, (6) witnessed, life-threatening natural disasters, and (7) lived with a, parent with a serious psychological disorder such as, schizophrenia (Gallagher & Chase, 2002; Cloitre, et al.,, 2004)., According to Richard Gallagher and Ayana Chase, (2002), “Many children who have experienced tragedy or, witnessed life-threatening events emerge with a positive, outlook on life, have a good capacity to form positive,, fulfilling relationships, achieve a high level of personal, success, and develop effective resources for dealing with, future negative events” (p. 2). Parents, teachers, and, others who work with children and adolescents can do a, lot to foster such positive outcomes in the face of traumatic events. The following advice, adapted from Gallagher & Chase (2002), may be helpful:, • Take steps to ensure children’s safety. Make sure that, settings where children gather are safe and secure. Secure, environments enable children to spend their time on, playing and learning., • Help children establish and maintain a close relationship with an adult. Children who experience the harshest, circumstances can do well if they have a relationship, with at least one very supportive adult. Nonparental, figures can fill this role if parents cannot., • Be sure that children and teens know ways to calm, themselves. Help children relax through play, talk, art, activities, music, or physical comforting. Teens should, be encouraged to engage in exercise, muscle relaxation,, or deep breathing to reduce stress, as opposed to unhealthy stress-reduction methods such as smoking,, drinking, and drugs., • Help children understand the real statistical probability of tragedy and disaster. Children need to understand, that traumatic events are very unlikely to happen to, them or to their family members. A realistic outlook will, help children remain alert to dangers, but free from, constant worries that they are in danger., • Watch for negative reactions and provide early assistance, or treatment, when necessary. Reactions to traumatic events may appear months after rather than immediately following the event. Chronic irritability, avoiding

Page 404 :
Promoting Resilience in Children (continued), anxiety-inducing situations, fatigue, and inability to, concentrate may signal problems, especially if these, symptoms interfere with daily functioning and last for, more than a week., • Keep children informed about related events. Children may overhear information about a traumatic, event and misinterpret it. Adults should provide ageappropriate facts about frightening situations. Repeated exposure to violent images and those related, to destruction and death is especially harmful to, children., • Help children establish a set of values to guide their, actions. Children who have values for relating to the, world show less depression and anxiety than others., , whose behavior is completely out of hand. Compared, to the other parenting styles, authoritative parenting is, also associated with greater resistance to unfavorable, peer pressure (Masten, 2001)., Researchers who have studied parenting styles in, adolescence have found essentially the same pattern of, outcomes we noted earlier, although the differences, among the four groups are not always dramatic (Baumrind, 1989; Steinberg, 2001). Authoritatively reared, , Prosocial values help them feel connected to a larger, social group and engage in positive behavior., • Help children develop a positive outlook for the, future. Traumatic events can shake children’s natural, optimism about the future. Parents can help children, recover their optimism by reminding them that negative, events are temporary. They can also help their kids develop self-efficacy (see Chapter 5) so that the children, believe they are able to cope with stressful situations, and can make contributions to better the world., • Take care of your own physical and mental health., Adults need to get rest and support so they can be a, calming influence on their children and be emotionally, available and supportive to them., , adolescents show the highest competence and adjustment, while neglectfully reared adolescents generally, show the lowest. Adolescents reared with authoritarian or permissive styles generally fall between the other, two groups. Figure 11.13 depicts the high school grades, and school misconduct of adolescents in these four, groups. These findings are consistent across a number, of ethnic groups, including African American, Hispanic, and Asian American (Steinberg, 2001)., , •, Parenting style, , Neglectful, Indulgent/, permissive, Authoritarian, Authoritative, 2.40, , 2.45, , 2.50, , 2.55 2.60 2.65 2.70 2.75 2.80, Grade point average, , 2.85, , 2.90, , Parenting style, , Neglectful, , FIG U R E 11.13, , Parenting styles, school performance, and school misconduct., Lamborn and colleagues (1991), classified the families of over, 4,000 14- to 18-year-olds into, four parenting styles, based on, adolescents’ ratings of their, parents. They then compared the, youths on a number of outcomes,, including high school grade point, average and frequency of school, misconduct. Adolescents from, authoritative families showed the, highest competence and adjustment (higher grades, less misconduct), while those from neglectful families showed the lowest., Data from Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of, competence and adjustment among adolescents, from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent,, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62,, 1049-1065. Copyright © 1991 by the Society, for Research in Child Development. Used with, permission of SRCD., , Indulgent/, permissive, Authoritarian, Authoritative, 2.00, , 2.05, , 2.10, , 2.15 2.20 2.25 2.30 2.35, Frequency of school misconduct, , CHAPTER 11, , 2.40, , 2.45, , 2.50, , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 367

Page 405 :
Are there some “basic rules” for effective parenting? We offer five key, principles here. Of course, it’s essential to tailor these suggestions, to the age and developmental level, of a specific child. For an additional perspective, see the Recommended Reading box on Laurence, Steinberg’s (2004) book on effective parenting., , Courtesy, Laurence Steinberg, , Toward Effective Parenting, , you?”). This role-playing approach fosters moral development and empathy in children., 5. Enforce rules consistently. Children need to have, a clear idea about what is expected of them and to, know that there will be consequences when they fail to, meet your standards. This practice also fosters selfcontrol in children., Parents often wonder how punishment can be, used more effectively in disciplinary efforts., , Laurence Steinberg, , 1. Set high, but reasonable standards. Children, , To use punishment effectively, parents should use it less, often. That’s because punishment often has unintended, negative side effects. A recent meta-analysis of, 88 studies on corporal punishment reported that it is, associated with stopping the punished behavior (Gershoff, 2002). Still, the bad news is that punishment is, also associated with host of problematic outcomes: reduced quality of parent-child relationships, poorer, mental health in childhood and adulthood, increased, delinquency and aggression in childhood, and increased aggression and criminal behavior in adulthood., Many professionals decry the use of punishment, for these reasons. Others assert that occasional, mild, spankings should not be conflated with harsher punishment (which was the case in Gershoff ’s meta-analysis)., Advocates of this position argue that infrequent, mild, spankings can reduce disobedience and fighting and, are not associated with negative outcomes (Baumrind,, Larzelere, & Cowan, 2002; Larzelere, 2000). As an al-, , © Jonathan Nourok/PhotoEdit, , should be expected to behave in a socially appropriate, manner for their age and to do as well as they can in, school and in other activities. Parents who don’t expect much from their children are teaching them not, to expect much from themselves., 2. Stay alert for “good” behavior and reward it., Most parents pay attention to children when they are, misbehaving and ignore them when they’re being good., This approach is backward! Develop the habit of praising good behavior so a child knows what you want., 3. Explain your reasons when you ask a child to do, something. Don’t assume that a child can read your, mind. Explaining the purpose of a request can transform what might appear to be an arbitrary request into, a reasonable one. It also encourages self-control in a, child., 4. Encourage children to take the perspective of others. Talk to children about the effects of their behavior, on others (“How would you feel if Keisha did that to, , Using Punishment Effectively, , Although physical punishment is frequently administered to suppress aggressive behavior, in, the long run it actually is associated with an increase in aggressive behavior., , 368, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 406 :
punishment effective while minimizing its side effects, (Berkowitz, 1993):, , RE C O M M E N D E D, READING, , The 10 Basic Principles, of Good Parenting, by Laurence Steinberg, (Simon & Schuster, 2004), Laurence Steinberg, a respected researcher in developmental psychology, has consolidated the voluminous, findings on child development and parenting into ten, basic principles of effective parenting. Parents can, begin applying these principles in infancy and use, them through adolescence. Steinberg asserts that these, principles can be universally applied—regardless of a, family’s income, race, or parental status (two-parent or, single-parent). His principles are designed to foster, competence, responsibility, security, and kindness in, children and to help adults be happier and more confident parents., Steinberg’s ten principles are: “What You Do Matters,” “You Cannot Be Too Loving,” “Be Involved in, Your Child’s Life,” “Adapt Your Parenting to Fit Your, Child,” “Establish Rules and Set Limits,” “Help Foster, Your Child’s Independence,” “Be Consistent,” “Avoid, Harsh Discipline,” “Explain Your Rules and Decisions,”, and “Treat Your Child with Respect.” For each principle,, Steinberg elaborates on the concept, explains how the, principle applies to children of different ages, and offers “dos and don’ts.”, Cover, copyright © 2004 by Simon & Schuster, Inc. Reprinted with the permission, of Simon & Schuster Adult Publishing Group, , ternative to punishment, most psychologists favor a, combination of negative reinforcement (“time out” or, the loss of privileges) of unwanted behavior and positive reinforcement (praise) of alternative, positive behavior (Kazdin & Benjet, 2003). The following guidelines summarize research evidence on how to make, , CHAPTER 11, , 1. Punishment should not damage the child’s selfesteem. To be effective, punishment should get across, the message that it is the behavior that is undesirable,, not the child. Unduly harsh physical punishment,, derogatory accusations, and other hurtful words erode, the child’s self-esteem., 2. Punishment should be swift. A delay in delivering punishment undermines its impact. A parent who, says, “Wait until your father (or mother) gets home . . .”, is making a fundamental mistake. (He or she is also, unfairly setting up the other parent as the “heavy.”), Quick punishment highlights the connection between, the prohibited behavior and its negative outcome., 3. Punishment should be consistent. If you want to, eliminate an undesirable behavior, you should punish, it every time it occurs. When parents are inconsistent, about punishing a particular behavior, they only create confusion in the child., 4. Punishment should be explained. When children are punished, the reason for their punishment, should be explained as fully as possible, given the constraints of their age. The more children that understand the reason they are punished, the more effective, the punishment tends to be. These explanations, characteristic of the authoritative style, also foster the development of self-control., 5. Point out alternative, positive ways for your child, to behave and reinforce these actions. One shortcoming, of punishment is that it only tells a child what not to do., A better strategy is to punish an undesirable response, and reward a positive alternative behavior. Children, usually engage in undesirable behavior for a reason., Suggest another response that serves the same purpose, and reward a child for doing it. For example, many troublesome behaviors exhibited by children are primarily, attention-seeking devices. Punishment of these responses will be more effective if you can provide a child, with more acceptable ways to gain attention., , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , 369

Page 407 :
KEY IDEAS, , of sound intellectual functioning in their later years. The adult, personality seems to be characterized by both stability and, change., Death and Dying, , CHAPTER 11 REVIEW, , The Transition of Adolescence, ■, , During pubescence, the adolescent growth spurt takes place, and secondary sex characteristics develop. During puberty,, which begins a few years later, the primary sex characteristics, mature. The onset of puberty marks the beginning of adolescence. Girls typically mature two years earlier than boys. Boys, who mature late and girls who mature early may find puberty, particularly stressful., ■ During adolescence, cognitive changes also occur, including, development of the ability to apply logic to hypothetical situations, increases in knowledge, and greater skills in deductive, reasoning. Despite greater cognitive sophistication, older adolescents are more likely to engage in physically harmful risky, behavior, suggesting that this behavior is governed by noncognitive factors., ■ In the realm of personality, adolescents must develop a clear, sense of identity. Some theorists assert that adolescence is a period of turmoil, and there is research support for a modified, storm-and-stress view that recognizes cultural and individual, differences. Attention should be paid to youths who display, symptoms of serious problems such as depression, suicidal behavior, drug and alcohol abuse, and chronic delinquency. Suicide among adolescents has greatly increased since 1960, but, very few young people actually take their lives., The Expanse of Adulthood, , ■, , Attitudes about death vary from one culture to another. Attitudes in this culture are characterized by negativism, avoidance, and fear. Kübler-Ross’s research on the process of dying, indicated that individuals progress through a sequence of five, stages. Later research has called into question the idea that people’s reactions to dying follow such a straightforward path., ■ A wide variation exists between and within cultures regarding how death is acknowledged. Research has revealed a variety, of patterns of grieving, calling into question traditional views, of the process of mourning. The loss of a child is the most difficult type of death adults must cope with. In coping with bereavement, people need the support of family and friends. Support groups can also be helpful., Application: Becoming an Effective Parent, ■, , Attachment between infants and their primary caregivers, develops early in life. According to Mary Ainsworth, infants develop one of three attachment styles with their caregivers: secure, anxious-ambivalent, and avoidant. Of Diana Baumrind’s, four parenting styles, authoritative parenting is associated with, the most positive outcomes in children., ■ Intergenerational conflicts typically increase during adolescence, and parents seem to find these conflicts more difficult to, deal with than adolescents do., ■ Effective parenting involves following five key principles, as, well as knowing how to use punishment effectively., , ■, , During early adulthood, individuals make more major role, changes than in any other developmental stage. In Erikson’s theory, the key psychosocial crisis for young adults is intimacy versus isolation. Specific developmental tasks of young adulthood, include leaving one’s family, entering the workplace and developing a career, finding a mate, having and rearing children, and, adjusting to family life., ■ In middle adulthood, the major psychosocial crisis is generativity versus stagnation, according to Erikson. Additional tasks, for this group include confronting the aging process and dealing with transitions in the parental role as children mature and, leave home. Midlife adults also experience changes in their work, roles. Typically, they follow either the stable career pattern or, the changing careers pattern. Few individuals seem to experience a midlife crisis., ■ The key psychosocial crisis for older adults, according to, Erikson, is integrity versus despair. Older adults must adjust to, retirement, adapt to changes in their social networks, cope with, health problems, and confront their own death., , KEY TERMS, Bereavement p. 360, Death anxiety p. 359, Death system pp. 358–359, Dementia p. 353, Identity p. 342, Infant attachment p. 363, Menarche p. 339, Menopause p. 354, Midlife crisis p. 349, Mourning p. 360, , Neurons p. 353, Primary sex characteristics, p. 338, Puberty p. 338, Pubescence p. 338, Secondary sex characteristics, p. 338, Social clock p. 345, Spermarche p. 339, , KEY PEOPLE, , Aging: a Gradual Process, ■, , Physical development during adulthood leads to many obvious changes in physical appearance and sensory acuity. After, age 30 there is a steady loss of active brain cells; however, this, loss does not appear to underlie reductions in cognitive functioning. Similarly, hormonal changes appear to be only modestly related to midlife distress or declining sexual activity. Unfortunately, health does tend to decline with increasing age for a, variety of reasons. Engaging in regular exercise and eating a nutritious diet can help maintain health., ■ Intelligence seems to remain fairly stable during most of, adulthood. Attentional capacity, speed of learning, and success, in problem solving all tend to decline slightly during old age., Memory processes also deteriorate but can be exacerbated by, self-fulfilling prophecies. However, most people remain capable, , 370, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Mary Ainsworth p. 363, Diana Baumrind, pp. 364–365, Erik Erikson p. 342, Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, pp. 359–360, , Laurence Steinberg, pp. 368–369, Susan Krauss Whitbourne, pp. 352–365

Page 408 :
2. Optimal adjustment is associated with puberty arriving, ____ for girls and ____ for boys., a. late; on time, b. early; on time, c. on time; early, d. late; early, 3. Compared to those who are younger, adolescents:, a. can think abstractly., b. have greater knowledge., c. show greater self-awareness., d. all of the above., , 9. Less anxiety about death is found among those who:, a. feel they haven’t accomplished all that they had, hoped., b. have a particular religious affiliation., c. have ambivalent religious views., d. have a well-formulated philosophy of death., 10. Baumrind’s authoritative parenting style is characterized by:, a. high acceptance and high control., b. low acceptance and high control., c. high acceptance and low control., d. low acceptance and low control., , Book Companion Website, , 4. Which of the following statements about storm and, stress in adolescence is false?, a. Conflicts with parents increase during adolescence., b. Adolescents experience more volatile emotions than, younger or older individuals do., c. Adolescents engage in more risk behaviors than, children do., d. Heightened emotional turmoil in adolescence is, found in all cultures., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , 5. The life stage that involves more role changes than any, other is:, a. adolescence., b. early adulthood., c. middle adulthood., d. later adulthood., , Personal Explorations Workbook, , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , c, a, c, d, a, , Page 348, Pages 350–351, Page 358, Page 359, Page 364, , CHAPTER 11, , ANSWERS, , Page 338, Page 340, Pages 340–341, Page 343, Page 346, , 7. Which of the following is a false statement about, retirement?, a. Retirement typically has a negative impact on overall health and life satisfaction., b. The best-adjusted retirees have an adequate income,, good health, and a social network., c. Most older adults maintain their ties to their children., d. Retirement is typically a gradual process of cutting, back on work hours over a period of years., , The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook, may enhance your self-understanding in relation to issues, raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 11.1: Death Anxiety, Scale. Personal Probe 11.1: How Do You Feel about Age, Roles? Personal Probe 11.2: How Flexible Is Development?, , Development in Adolescence and Adulthood, , b, c, d, d, b, , 6. According to Erikson, the psychosocial conflict of, middle adulthood is:, a. identity versus identity diffusion., b. intimacy versus isolation., c. generativity versus stagnation., d. integrity versus despair., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Primary sex characteristics develop during _____;, secondary sex characteristics develop during _____., a. menarche, menopause, b. puberty, pubescence, c. the sexual stage; the physical stage, d. adulthood; adolescence, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 8. With regard to whether personality changes with age, it, can be concluded that:, a. a pattern of change is most typical., b. a pattern of stability is most typical., c. some traits change over time and some traits remain stable., d. no pattern can be discerned., , 371

Page 409 :
CHOOSING A CAREER, Examining Personal Characteristics and, Family Influences, Researching Job Characteristics, Using Psychological Tests for Career, Decisions, Taking Important Considerations into, Account, MODELS OF CAREER CHOICE AND, DEVELOPMENT, Holland’s Trait Measurement and, Matching Model, Super’s Developmental Model, Women’s Career Development, , 372, , THE CHANGING WORLD OF WORK, Workplace Trends, Education and Earnings, The Changing Workforce, COPING WITH OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS, Job Stress, Sexual Harassment, Unemployment, , APPLICATION: GETTING AHEAD IN THE, JOB GAME, Putting Together a Résumé, Finding Companies You Want to Work For, Landing an Interview, Polishing Your Interview Technique, CHAPTER 12 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST, , BALANCING WORK AND OTHER, SPHERES OF LIFE, Workaholism, Work and Family Roles, Leisure and Recreation

Page 410 :
CHAPTER, , Careers and, Work, , 12, , When adults meet for the first time, their initial “How do you do?” is usually, followed by the more crucial question, “What do you do for a living?” The, answer may convey information not only about one’s occupation but also, about one’s social status, lifestyle, personality, interests, and aptitudes. In, other words, work plays a pivotal role in adult life. According to a recent, Gallup poll, 73 percent of Americans rated work as either “extremely” or, “very important” in their life (Moore, 2003). In Figure 12.1 on the next, page, you can see that how people view their jobs is strongly correlated, with their income., Because work is such a significant aspect of life, psychologists take a, great interest in it. Industrial/organizational (I/O) psychology is the study, of human behavior in the workplace. Among other issues, I/O psychologists study worker motivation and satisfaction, job performance, leadership,, personnel selection, and diversity in organizations. A recent concern is how, individuals balance work and family life (Borman, Klimoski, & Ilgen, 2003)., We begin this chapter by reviewing some important considerations in, choosing a career. Then we explore two models of career development and, discuss women’s career issues. Next, we examine how the workplace and, workforce are changing and look at some occupational hazards such as job, stress, sexual harassment, and unemployment. Finally, we address the important issue of balancing work, relationships, and leisure. In the Application, we offer some concrete suggestions for enhancing your chances of, landing a desirable job., , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 373

Page 411 :
Choosing a Career, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, ■, , Describe personal and family influences on job, choice., Cite several helpful sources of career information., List some aspects of potential occupations that are, important to know about., , One of your biggest decisions in life is choosing a career. The importance of this decision is enormous. It, may determine whether you are employed or unemployed, financially secure or insecure, happy or unhappy. Rapidly advancing technology and the increased training and education required to break into, most fields make it more important than ever to, choose thoughtfully. In theory, what’s involved in making a successful career choice is pretty straightforward., First, you need to have a clear grasp of your personal, characteristics. Second, you need realistic information, about potential careers. From there, it’s just a matter, of selecting an occupation that is a good match with, your personal characteristics. In reality, the process is a, lot more complicated. Let’s take a closer look., , ■, , ■, , Explain the role of occupational interest inventories, in career decisions., List five important considerations in choosing an, occupation., , ligence and occupational level generally holds well for, men, but an ability-achievement gap exists for women,, as we noted in Chapter 10., In many occupations, special talents are more important than general intelligence. Specific aptitudes that, might make a person well suited for certain occupations include creativity, artistic or musical talent, mechanical ability, clerical skill, mathematical ability, and, persuasive talents. A particularly crucial characteristic, is social skills, since the use of teams to accomplish, work tasks is increasingly important in a wide variety, of organizations (Kozlowski & Bell, 2003)., As people travel through life, they acquire a variety of interests. Are you intrigued by the business, , Percentage of respondents who . . ., get a sense of identity from job, work just to earn a living, , Examining Personal, Characteristics and, Family Influences, , 70, , People who have limited job skills and qualifications, have limited job options. Thus, they usually must take, whatever job is available rather than a job that is well, suited for them. Actually choosing a career is a luxury, usually afforded to the middle and upper classes. For, those who are able to select a career, personal qualities, and family influences come into play., , 60, , Percent, , 50, 40, 30, , Personal Characteristics, , Making career decisions can be scary. Individuals who, exhibit secure attachment and who have achieved a, solid sense of identity thus seem better able to take the, risks associated with making career choices (Blustein,, Prezioso, & Schultheiss, 1995)., What other personal characteristics affect career, choice? Although intelligence does not necessarily predict occupational success, it does predict the likelihood, of entering particular occupations. That’s because intelligence is related to academic success—the ticket required to enter certain fields. Professions such as law,, medicine, and engineering are open only to those who, can meet increasingly selective criteria as they advance, from high school to college to graduate education and, professional training. This relationship between intel-, , 374, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , 20, 10, 0, , •, , Less than, $30,000, , $30,000– $50,000–, $50,000, $75,000, Annual income, , $75,000+, , F I G U R E 12. 1, , How workers view their jobs. The way workers view their jobs is, strongly related to their income. Those who earn higher salaries, are more likely to obtain a sense of identity from their work;, whereas those who earn lower salaries typically see their jobs, merely as a way to make a living. (Data from Moore, 2001)

Page 412 :
world? the academic world? international affairs? the, outdoors? physical sciences? music? athletics? human, services? The list of potential interests is virtually infinite. Because interests underlie your motivation for, work and your job satisfaction, they should definitely, be considered in your career planning., Finally, it is important to choose an occupation that, is compatible with your personality (Swanson & D’Achiardi, 2005). In assessing your personality, pay special attention to your dominant abilities and interests., Family Influences, , © B. Busco/The Image Bank/Getty Images, , Individuals’ career choices are strongly influenced by, their family background (Whiston & Keller, 2004)., That is, the jobs that appeal to people tend to be like, those of their parents. For instance, people who grow, up in middle-class homes are likely to aspire to highpaying professions in law, medicine, or engineering., On the other hand, individuals from low-income families often lean toward blue-collar jobs in construction, work, office work, and food services., Family background influences career choice for, several reasons. For one thing, a key predictor of occupational status is the number of years of education an, individual has completed (Arbona, 2005). And, because parents and children often attain similar levels, of education, they are likely to have similar jobs. Second, career attainment is related to socioeconomic sta-, , tus. The factors that mediate this relationship are educational aspirations and attainment during the school, years (Schoon & Parsons, 2002). Thus, parents and, teachers can help boost their children’s career aspirations and opportunities by encouraging them to do, well in school. Although socioeconomic status seems, to have more influence on career aspirations than ethnicity (Rojewski, 2005), ethnic differences in aspirations are still found. For example, a cross-cultural and, multi-ethnic study reported that Chinese and Asian, American college students’ more often choose investigative occupations, and their career decisions are, more influenced by their parents than those of European American college students (Tang, 2002)., Finally, parenting practices come into play. As we, noted in Chapter 11’s Application on parenting, parenting styles are correlated with socioeconomic status., They also shape work-related values. Thus, most children from middle-class homes are encouraged to be, curious and independent, qualities that are essential to, success in many high-status occupations. By contrast,, most children from lower-status families are often, taught to conform and obey. As a result, they may have, less opportunity to develop the qualities demanded in, high-status jobs. As we noted in Chapter 10, parents’, gender-role expectations also influence their children’s, aspirations and sometimes interact with socioeconomic status and ethnicity., , Family background plays an important role in children’s later career choices., , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 375

Page 413 :
Researching Job Characteristics, The second step in selecting an occupation is seeking, out information about jobs. Over 20,000 occupations, are listed in the U.S. Department of Labor’s Dictionary, of Occupational Titles. The sheer number of jobs is overwhelming. Obviously, you have to narrow the scope of, your search before you can start gathering information., Sources of Career Information, , Once you have selected some jobs that might interest, you, the next question is, Where do you get information on them? A helpful place to start is the Occupational Outlook Handbook, available in most libraries, and on the World Wide Web (see Web Link 12.1). This, government document, published every two years by, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, is a comprehensive, guide to occupations. It includes job descriptions, education and training requirements, advancement possibilities, salaries, and employment outlooks for 250, occupations. In addition, it details numerous career, information resources, including those for the handicapped, veterans, women, and minorities. You can also, find tips on locating jobs and accepting salary offers in, this useful resource., If you want more detailed information on particular occupations, you can usually get it from government agencies, trade unions, and professional organizations. For example, if you’re interested in a career in, psychology, you can obtain a number of pamphlets or, books from the American Psychological Association, (APA). Also, the APA website provides links to other, sites describing more than 50 subfields in psychology,, many of which provide useful career information. Related professions (social work, school psychology, and, so on) also have Web pages. You will find the addresses, of these pages on Marky Lloyd’s Careers in Psychology, Web site (see Web Link 12.3)., After you’ve read the available literature about an, occupation, it’s helpful to talk to some individuals, working in that area. People in the field can provide, you with more down-to-earth information than you, can get by reading. Keep in mind, though, that the people you talk to may not be a representative sample of, , those who work in an occupation. Don’t make the mistake of rejecting a potentially satisfying career just because one person hates it., Essential Information About Occupations, , When you examine occupational literature and interview people, what kinds of information should you, seek? To some extent, the answer depends on your, unique interests, values, and needs. However, some, things are of concern to virtually anyone. Workers typically rate highest in importance good health insurance, retirement plans, limited job stress, and recognition for performing well (Saad, 1999). Some key issues, you need to know about include:, The nature of the work. What would your duties, and responsibilities be on a day-to-day basis?, Working conditions. Is the work environment, pleasant or unpleasant, low key or high pressure?, Job entry requirements. What education and training are required to break into this occupational area?, Potential earnings. What are entry-level salaries,, and how much can you hope to earn if you’re exceptionally successful? What does the average person, earn? What are the fringe benefits?, Potential status. What is the social status associated, with this occupation? Is it personally satisfactory for you?, Opportunities for advancement. How do you move, up in this field? Are there adequate opportunities for, promotion and advancement?, Intrinsic job satisfaction. Apart from money and, formal fringe benefits, what can you derive in the way, of personal satisfaction from this job? Will it allow you, to help people, to have fun, to be creative, or to shoulder responsibility?, Future outlook. What is the projected supply and, demand for this occupational area?, By the way, if you’re wondering whether your college education will be worth the effort in terms of dollars and cents, the answer is yes. As we’ll discuss shortly,, the jobs that you can obtain with a college degree typically yield higher pay than those that require less education(U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2004). The ex-, , WE B LI N K 12.1, , WE B LI N K 12.2, , Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) Online, Every two years the Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes, the OOH, now available via the Internet. This guide to, every occupation in the United States includes descriptions of the nature of each job and its working conditions,, educational requirements, future employment, and earnings prospects., , The Riley Guide: Employment Opportunities and Job, Resources on the Internet, This site, developed by the well-regarded career expert, Margaret F. Dikel, complements her excellent book, the, Guide to Internet Job Searching. Her website contains hundreds of annotated links regarding almost any topic related to employment and careers., , 376, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 414 :
perts also agree that the future belongs to those who, are better educated (U.S. Department of Labor, 2000)., , Using Psychological Tests, for Career Decisions, If you are undecided about an occupation, you might, consider taking some tests at your campus counseling, center. Occupational interest inventories measure, your interests as they relate to various jobs or careers. Three widely used tests of this type are the, Strong Interest Inventory (SII), the Self-Directed Search, (SDS), and the Campbell Interest and Skill Survey, (CISS) (Hansen, 2005)., Occupational interest inventories do not attempt, to predict whether you would be successful in various, occupations. Rather, they focus more on the likelihood, of job satisfaction than job success. When you take an, occupational interest inventory, you receive many, scores indicating how similar your interests are to the, typical interests of people in various occupations. For, example, a high score on the accountant scale of a test, means that your interests are similar to those of the average accountant. This correspondence in interests, does not ensure that you would enjoy a career in accounting, but it is a moderately good predictor of job, satisfaction (Hackett & Watkins, 1995)., Interest inventories like the SII can provide worthwhile food for thought about possible careers. The results may confirm your subjective guesses about your, interests and strengthen already-existing occupational, preferences. Additionally, the test results may inspire, you to investigate career possibilities that you had, never thought of before. Unexpected results may stimulate you to rethink your career plans., Although interest inventories can be helpful in, working through career decisions, several cautions are, worth noting. First, you may score high on some occupations that you’re sure you would hate. Given the, sheer number of occupational scales on the tests, this, can easily happen by chance. However, you shouldn’t, dismiss the remainder of the test results just because, you’re sure that a few specific scores are “wrong.” Second, don’t let the test make career decisions for you., Some students naïvely believe that they should pursue, whatever occupation yields their highest score. That is, not how the tests are meant to be used. They merely, provide information for you to consider. Ultimately,, you have to think things out for yourself., Third, you should be aware that most occupational, interest inventories have a lingering gender bias. Many, of these scales were originally developed 30 to 40 years, ago when outright discrimination or more subtle discouragement prevented women from entering many, traditionally “male” occupations. Critics assert that, , WE B LI N K 12.3, , Marky Lloyd’s Careers in Psychology Page, For those who think they might want a job or career in, psychology or allied fields, Professor Marky Lloyd, one of, this textbook’s authors, has put together a fine set of resources to help in both planning and making the choice., Many of the resources are helpful to any student seeking, career guidance and employment tips., , interest inventories have helped channel women into, gender-typed careers, such as nursing and teaching,, while guiding them away from more prestigious “male”, occupations, such as medicine and engineering. Undoubtedly, this was true in the past. Recently, progress, has been made toward reducing gender bias in occupational tests, although it has not been eliminated (Hansen, 2005). Research suggests that ethnic bias on interest tests is less of a concern than gender bias (Hansen,, 2005; Worthington, Flores, & Navarro, 2005). In interpreting interest inventory results, be wary of letting, gender stereotypes limit your career options. A good, career counselor can help you sort through the effects, of gender bias on your test results., , Taking Important Considerations, into Account, As you contemplate your career options, here are some, important points to keep in mind., 1. You have the potential for success in a variety of, occupations. Career counselors stress that people have, multiple potentials (Bolles, 2005). As we have noted,, you have over 20,000 occupations to choose from. Considering the huge variety in job opportunities, it’s foolish to believe that only one career would be right for, you. If you expect to find one job that fits you perfectly,, you may spend your entire lifetime searching for it., 2. Be cautious about choosing a career solely on the, basis of salary. Because of the tremendous emphasis on, material success in America, people are often tempted, to choose a career solely on the basis of income or status. Experts advise against this strategy (Lowman,, 1991). When people ignore personal characteristics in, choosing a career, they risk being mismatched. Such, job mismatching can result in boredom, frustration,, and unhappiness with one’s work, and these negative, feelings can spill over into other spheres of life., 3. There are limits on your career options. Entry into, a particular occupation is not simply a matter of choosing what you want to do. It’s a two-way street. You get, to make choices, but you also have to persuade schools, and employers to choose you. Your career options will, , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 377

Page 415 :
be limited to some extent by factors beyond your control, including fluctuations in the economy and the job, market., 4. Career choice is a developmental process that extends throughout life. Occupational choice involves not, a single decision but a series of decisions. Although, this process was once believed to extend only from prepuberty to one’s early 20s, it is now recognized that the, process continues throughout life. Some experts predict that the average person will have 12 to 15 jobs over, the course of his or her working life (Smith, 2000)., Moreover, labor analysts now project that individuals, will change their careers—not just their jobs—three to, four times during their working lives (Naisbitt &, Aburdene, 1991). Nonetheless, middle-aged people, may underestimate the options available to them and, , therefore miss opportunities to make constructive, changes. We want to emphasize that making occupational choices is not limited to youth., 5. Some career decisions are not easily undone. Although it’s never too late to strike out in new career directions, it is important to recognize that many decisions are not readily reversed. Once you invest time,, money, and effort in moving along a particular career, path, it may not be easy to change paths. And family responsibilities can make major career changes difficult., This potential problem highlights why it is important, to devote careful thought to your occupational choice., In the next section, we explore in greater detail, how personal characteristics are related to career, choice and career development., , Models of Career Choice, and Development, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , Summarize Holland’s hexagonal model of career choice., Summarize Super’s five-stage model of career development., Discuss women’s career development., , Psychologists have long been interested in understanding how individuals make career choices and how their, careers evolve over time. Theorists have developed several approaches to these issues. Here we examine two, influential models., , Holland’s Trait Measurement, and Matching Model, The most influential trait model of career choice is that, developed by John Holland (1985, 1996). According to, Holland, career choice is related to an individual’s personality characteristics, which are assumed to be relatively stable over time. In Holland’s system, people can, be classified into one of six personality types, called personal orientations. Similarly, occupations can be classified into six ideal work environments. For obvious reasons, this model is often called the hexagonal model., According to Holland, people flourish when their personality type is matched with a work environment that, is congruent with their abilities, interests, and selfbeliefs. A good match typically results in career satisfaction, achievement, and stability. Here are the six personal, orientations and their optimal work environments:, ■ Realistic people describe themselves as good at, mechanical tasks and weak in social skills. They prefer, jobs with tasks that are physical or mechanical and that, , 378, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , are clearly defined, such as farming, auto mechanics,, and engineering. They tend to avoid tasks that involve, social skills, abstract thinking, subjectivity, or verbal skill., ■ Investigative people enjoy abstract thinking and, logical analysis, preferring understanding to action., They like working with ideas rather than with things, or people. Investigative individuals can often be found, working in research laboratories or libraries., ■ Artistic people see themselves as imaginative and, independent. They tend to be impulsive and creative, and are socially aloof. These individuals dislike structured tasks, preferring instead to rely on their subjective impressions in dealing with the environment., They have a high need for emotional expression and, often seek careers in art, music, or drama., ■ Social people describe themselves as being understanding and wanting to help others. They prefer to interact with people, and they have the necessary social, skills to do so comfortably. They typically have greater, verbal ability than mathematical ability. Social types, are often found in the helping professions, such as, teaching, nursing, and social work., ■ Enterprising people perceive themselves as happy,, self-confident, sociable, and popular. They like to use, their social skills to lead or persuade others. They prefer sales or supervisory positions, in which they can, express these characteristics.

Page 416 :
Holland has developed several tests to measure the, six basic personal orientations. One of them, the SelfDirected Search (SDS), is a self-scoring test. Once individuals identify their personality type on the SDS,, they can match it with various relevant occupations., Studies have shown the SDS to be a useful career assessment tool (Spokane & Cruza-Guet, 2005)., Obviously, these six personal orientations are ideal, types, and no one person will fit perfectly into any one, type. In fact, most people are a combination of two or, three types (Holland, 1996). You can take a rough stab, at categorizing your own personal orientation by, studying Figure 12.2. Look at the matching work environments to get some ideas for possible career options., More research has been conducted on Holland’s, hexagonal model than any other theory in vocational, psychology, and much of this research is supportive, , (Spokane & Cruza-Guet, 2005). For instance, researchers report that Holland’s model describes relatively accurately the career preferences of college-bound male, and female white, black, Hispanic, Asian, and American Indian adolescents (Day & Rounds, 1998; Day,, Rounds, & Swaney, 1998). Also, people with good jobpersonality matches are more satisfied with their jobs, and are likely to remain in these jobs longer than those, who are less well matched (Holland, 1996)., In contrast to trait models such as Holland’s that, view occupational choice as a specific event, stage theories view occupational choice as a developmental, process. We look at that approach next., , Super’s, Developmental, Model, A highly influential developmental, model of career choice is one outlined by Donald Super (1957, 1985,, 1988). He views occupational development as a process that begins in, childhood, unfolds gradually across, , Columbia University Archives, Columbia, University, , ■ Conventional people are conforming, systematic,, and orderly. They typically have greater clerical and, mathematical ability than verbal ability. They prefer, working environments that are structured and predictable and may be well suited to occupations in the, business world., , Donald Super, , Holland’s Personal Orientations and Related Work Environments, , •, , Themes, , Personal orientations, , Work environments, , Realistic, , Values concrete and physical tasks. Perceives self as, having mechanical skills and lacking social skills., , Settings: concrete, physical tasks requiring mechanical, skills, persistence, and physical movement, Careers: machine operator, truck driver, draftsperson, barber, , Investigative, , Wants to solve intellectual, scientific, and mathematical, problems. Sees self as analytical, critical, curious,, introspective, and methodical., , Settings: research laboratory, diagnostic medical case, conference, work group of scientists, Careers: marine biologist, computer programmer, clinical, psychologist, architect, dentist, , Artistic, , Prefers unsystematic tasks or artistic projects: painting,, writing, or drama. Perceives self as imaginative, expressive,, and independent., , Settings: theater, concert hall, library, radio or TV studio, Careers: sculptor, actor, designer, musician, author, editor, , Social, , Prefers educational, helping, and religious careers. Enjoys, social involvement, church, music, reading, and dramatics., Is cooperative, friendly, helpful, insightful, persuasive, and, responsible., , Settings: school and college classrooms, psychiatrist’s, office, religious meetings, mental institutions,, recreational centers, Careers: counselor, nurse, teacher, social worker, judge,, minister, sociologist, , Enterprising, , Values political and economic achievements, supervision,, and leadership. Enjoys leadership control, verbal expression,, recognition, and power. Perceives self as extraverted, sociable,, happy, assertive, popular, and self-confident., , Settings: courtroom, political rally, car sales room, real, estate firm, advertising company, Careers: realtor, politician, attorney, salesperson, manager, , Conventional, , Prefers orderly, systematic, concrete tasks with verbal and, mathematical data. Sees self as conformist and having, clerical and numerical skills., , Settings: bank, post office, file room, business office,, Internal Revenue office, Careers: banker, accountant, timekeeper, financial counselor, typist, receptionist, , F I G U R E 12.2, , Overview of Holland’s theory of occupational choice. According to John Holland (1985), people can, be divided into six personality types (personal orientations) that prefer different work environments., Adapted from Holland, J. L. (1985). Making occupational choices: A theory of occupational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Adapted by permission of Prentice-Hall, Inc., , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 379

Page 417 :
most of the life span, and ends with retirement. Super, asserts that the person’s self-concept is the critical factor in this process. In other words, decisions about, work and career commitments reflect people’s attempts to express their changing views of themselves., To map these changes, Super breaks the occupational, life cycle into five major stages and a variety of substages (see Figure 12.3)., , expected to have narrowed a general career direction, into a specific one. Whether through studying about it, or through part-time work, young people try to get a, real taste of the projected occupation. During the later, part of this stage, individuals typically attempt to enter, the world of work on a full-time basis. Many people in, this phase are still only tentatively committed to their, chosen occupation. If their initial work experiences are, gratifying, their commitment will be strengthened., However, if their first experiences are not rewarding,, they may shift to another occupation, where they will, continue the exploration process., , Growth Stage, , The growth stage encompasses childhood, during, which youngsters fantasize about exotic jobs they, would enjoy. Generally, they imagine themselves as detectives, airplane pilots, and brain surgeons rather than, plumbers, grocers, and bookkeepers. Until near the, end of this period, children are largely oblivious to realistic considerations such as the abilities or education, required for specific jobs. Instead, they base their fantasies purely on their likes and dislikes., , Establishment Stage, , Vacillation in career commitment continues to be, common during the first part of the establishment, stage. For some, doubts begin to surface for the first, time as they reappraise the match between their personal attributes and their current position. Others, simply carry earlier doubts into this stage. If a person’s, career choice turns out to be gratifying, however, the, individual firmly commits to an occupation. With few, exceptions, future job moves will take place within this, occupational area. Having made a commitment, the, , Exploration Stage, , Pressures from parents, teachers, and peers to develop, a general career direction begin to intensify during, high school. By the end of high school, individuals are, , •, , FIG U R E 12.3, , Stages of Occupational Development, , Overview of Super’s theory, of occupational development. According to Donald, Super, people go through five, major stages (and a variety, of substages) of occupational, development over the life, span., Adapted from Zaccaria, J. (1970). Theories, of occupational choice and vocational, development. Boston: Houghton Mifflin., Copyright © 1970 by Time Share Corporation, New Hampshire., , 380, , PART 3, , Stage, Growth stage, , Approximate ages, 0–14, , Key events and transitions, A period of general physical and mental growth, , Prevocational substage, , 0–3, , No interest or concern with vocations, , Fantasy substage, , 4–10, , Fantasy is basis for vocational thinking, , Interest substage, , 11–12, , Vocational thought is based on individual’s likes, and dislikes, , Capacity substage, , 13–14, , Ability becomes the basis for vocational thought, , Exploration stage, , 15–24, , General exploration of work, , Tentative substage, , 15–17, , Needs, interests, capacities, values, and opportunities become bases for tentative occupational, decisions, , Transition substage, , 18–21, , Reality increasingly becomes basis for vocational, thought and action, , Trial substage, , 22–24, , First trial job is entered after the individual has, made an initial vocational commitment, , Establishment stage, , 25–44, , Individual seeks to enter a permanent occupation, , Trial substage, , 25–30, , Period of some occupational change due to, unsatisfactory choices, , Stabilization substage, , 31–44, , Period of stable work in a given occupational field, , Maintenance stage, , 45–65, , Continuation in one’s chosen occupation, , Decline stage, , 65+, , Adaptation to leaving workforce, , Deceleration substage, , 65–70, , Period of declining vocational activity, , Retirement substage, , 71+, , A cessation of vocational activity, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 418 :
person’s task is now to demonstrate the ability to function effectively in the chosen occupation. To succeed,, individuals must use previously acquired skills, learn, new skills as necessary, and display flexibility in adapting to organizational changes., Maintenance Stage, , As the years go by, opportunities for further career advancement and occupational mobility decline. Around, their mid-40s, many people cross into the maintenance, stage, during which they worry more about retaining, their achieved status than improving it. Rapidly changing technology may compel middle-aged employees to, enhance and update their skills as they face competition from younger, more recently educated workers., The primary goal in this stage, however, is simply to, protect the security, power, advantages, and perks that, one has attained. With decreased emphasis on career, advancement, many people shift energy and attention, away from work in favor of family or leisure activities., Decline Stage, , Deceleration involves a decline in work activity during, one’s later years as retirement looms near. People redirect their energy and attention toward planning for this, major transition. In his original formulation, which, was based on research in the 1950s, Super projected, that deceleration ought to begin at around age 65. Since, the 1970s, however, the entry of the large baby boom, cohort into the workforce has created an oversupply of, skilled labor and professional talent. This social change, has created pressures that promote early retirement., Because of these conditions, deceleration often begins, earlier than Super initially indicated., Retirement brings work activity to a halt. People approach this transition with highly varied attitudes. Many, individuals look forward to it eagerly. Others approach, it with apprehension, unsure about how they will occupy themselves and worried about their financial viability. Still others approach retirement with a combination of hopeful enthusiasm and anxious concern., Although anxiety about the unknown is understandable, many studies have shown that retirement typically, has no adverse effect on psychological distress (Ross &, Drentea, 1998). Although retirement may mean less income, it can also mean more time to spend with friends, and on hobbies, travel, and meaningful volunteer work., As a stage theorist, Super deserves credit for acknowledging that people follow different patterns in, their career development. He identified several patterns, for both men and women that do not coincide with the, conventional pattern we have described. In support of, Super’s model, it has been found that self-esteem and, career maturity are positively correlated (Crook, Healy,, , & O’Shay, 1984). On the other hand, a study of adolescents reported that identity status was a stronger predictor of career maturity than self-esteem (WallaceBroscious, Serafica, & Osipow, 1994). A more serious, problem with Super’s theory is that it assumes that people will remain in the same careers all of their working, lives. But today’s American workers are likely to have a, number of career changes, a reality that is incompatible, with the assumptions of long-term models like Super’s., The current thinking about career stages or cycles is that, they are shorter and recur periodically over the course, of a person’s career (Greenhaus, 2003). To be useful,, stage models must reflect today’s workplace realities., , Women’s Career Development, It is currently estimated that 60 percent of adult women, (versus 74 percent of men) are in the labor force (U.S., Bureau of the Census, 2004a). Moreover, the odds that, a woman will work outside the home during her adult, life are greater than 90 percent (U. S. Department of, Labor, 2003). Although women’s labor force participation is approaching that of men’s, important gender, differences remain when it comes to career choice and, development. For one thing, most women still subordinate their career goals to their husbands’ (Betz, 2005)., This is even the case with academically gifted women, (Arnold, 1995). If a married man wants or needs to, move to another job, his wife typically follows him and, takes the best job she can find in the new location., Hence, married women usually have less control over, their careers than married men do. Also, the high divorce rate (50 percent) means that many women will, have to provide for themselves and their children. One, study reported that after a divorce, the woman’s standard of living drops 27 percent (Weitzman, 1996)., Today’s women need to take these factors into account, as they consider their career options., Another gender difference concerns career paths., Men’s career paths are usually continuous, whereas, women’s tend to be discontinuous (Betz, 1993). In other, words, once men start working full-time, they usually, continue to work. Women are more likely to interrupt, their careers to concentrate on childrearing or family, crises (Hattery, 2001). Still, because women are having, fewer children and are returning to work sooner, the, amount of time they are out of the labor force is decreasing (Han & Moen, 1999). Some researchers report, that labor force discontinuity is a factor in women’s, lower salaries and status (Waldfogel, 1997), while others fail to find a “family penalty” (Schneer & Reitman,, 1993). Women who do not have children usually remain in the labor force and tend to have a pattern of, career advancement (Felmlee, 1995)., , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 381

Page 419 :
The Changing World of Work, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , ■, , List six work-related trends., Describe the relationship between education and, salary., Summarize important demographic changes that are, transforming the workforce., , Before you enter the working world, it’s important to, get your bearings. In this section we look at several important background issues: contemporary trends in, the workplace, the relationship between education and, earnings, and diversity in the workforce., , Workplace Trends, Work is an activity that produces something of value, for others. For some people, work is just a way to earn, a living; for others, work is a way of life. For both types, of workers, the nature of work is undergoing dramatic, changes. Because trends in the workplace can affect, your future job prospects, you need to be aware of six, important trends:, , ■, , ■, , Cite some problems that women and minorities face, in today’s workplace., Describe some challenges presented by workforce, diversity to organizations and workers., , work environment, the keys to job success are self-direction, self-management, up-to-date knowledge and, skills, flexibility, and mobility (Smith, 2000)., 3. Lifelong learning is a necessity. Experts predict, that today’s jobs are changing so rapidly that in many, cases, work skills will become obsolete over a 10- to, 15-year period (Lock, 2000). Thus, lifelong learning, and training will become essential for employees., Every year, nearly one-third of American workers take, courses to improve their job skills (American Council, on Education, 1997). In some cases, retraining occurs, on the job; in others, community colleges and technical institutes provide continuing education (Kasper,, 2002). Distance learning courses and programs are, also available, although you have to watch out for, bogus programs (Mariani, 2001). For suggestions on, how to evaluate the quality and accreditation claims of, distance education programs, see Web Link 12.4. Workers who know “how to learn” will be able to keep pace, with the rapidly changing workplace and will be highly, valued. Those who cannot will be left behind., 4. Independent workers are increasing. Corporations are downsizing and restructuring to cope with, the changing economy and to be competitive globally., In doing so, they are slashing thousands of permanent, , 1. Technology is changing the nature of work. Computers have dramatically transformed the workplace., From the worker’s point of view, these changes are having both negative and positive effects. On the negative, side, computers have been used to automate many jobs, that people perform, reducing the need for some workers. The digital workplace also demands that employees, have more education and skills than were previously, required. Workers also have to keep upgrading their, technology skills, which can be stressful. On, the positive side, computer technology makes, it possible for employees to work at home, and to communicate with others in distant, offices and while traveling. Another consideration is that computer-driven machines, require workers to design, manufacture, sell,, and service them., 2. New work attitudes are required. Yesterday’s workers could usually count on job, security. Thus, many could afford a somewhat passive attitude in shaping their careers. But today’s workers have job security, only as long as they can add value to a company. This situation means that workers, must take a more active role in shaping their, careers (Smith, 2000). In addition, they must, develop a variety of valuable skills, be productive workers, and skillfully market themThe growth of technology is significantly changing the nature of work, with both, positive and negative effects., selves to prospective employers. In the new, , 382, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , © Mark Richards/PhotoEdit, , ■

Page 420 :
WE B LI N K 12.4, , Distance Education, A Consumer’s Guide (WCET), This excellent online publicationhas been developed by, the Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications (WCET), a respected organization in higher education. The WCET Guide offers advice on how to evaluate the, quality of distance education programs (both those that, are and are not accredited) and provides other useful relevant information., , jobs and doling out the work to temporary employees, or to workers in other countries, a practice termed, “outsourcing.” By reducing the number of regular, workers, companies can dramatically cut their expenditures on payroll, health insurance, and pension, plans, as temporary employees don’t typically receive, such benefits. A leaner workforce also enables organizations to respond quickly to fast-changing markets., According to Daniel Pink (2001), one way to survive, in this new environment is to become a “free agent”, and hire out your skills to one or more organizations, on a contract basis (see Recommended Reading). To, characterize the “free agent” work pattern, Pink suggests the metaphor of the “LEGO career” instead of the, “career ladder.” Just as you can construct a variety of, structures by assembling LEGO blocks, “free agents”, assemble and reassemble the building blocks of their, work life (values, interests, aptitudes, and skills) in different combinations to match career opportunities, that emerge over time. Many professionals thrive on, contract work; they have freedom, flexibility, and high, incomes. But for those who are short on skills and entrepreneurial spirit, this work can be stressful and, risky. About a third of independent employees would, prefer to work for someone else than to work for themselves (Bond et al., 2003)., 5. The boundaries between work and home are, breaking down. Computer technology is one force, driving this change, because people can work at home, and stay in touch with the office via high-speed Internet, telephone, and fax machine. Working at home is, convenient—workers save time (no commuting) and, money (on gas, parking, clothes). Still, family members and friends may interrupt home-workers, necessitating setting rules to protect work time. And the advent of cell phones and pagers means that employees, can be contacted any time and any place, making some, workers feel as though they are on an “electronic, leash.” On the other side, the availability of onsite day, care in some large companies shows that a traditional, home function has moved to the office (Rousseau,, 1997). This development is largely a response to increases in the number of single-parent families and, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , Free Agent Nation: The, Future of Working for, Yourself, by Daniel H. Pink (Warner Books, 2001), In this provocative book, Daniel Pink describes the workplace of the future for an increasing number of workers., The recent mega-changes in the workplace brought, about by international competition and technological, innovations have dramatically altered work patterns., People no longer work for the same company all of, their working lives but rather change (and, sometimes,, lose) jobs regularly. To deal with these workplace, changes, to gain more control over their lives, and to, do work that is personally meaningful, many workers go, into business for themselves. Pink describes three types, of these free agents. Soloists (or freelancers or independent contractors) are the most common type; they, work for themselves, selling their services as they move, from project to project. Owners of microbusinesses (organizations with only two or three workers) are a second type of free agent. Temps (temporary workers) are, free agents by default as they would rather be working, for someone else. In his engaging writing style, Pink, details both the pros and cons of working as a free, agent. The book also includes an excellent resource, guide detailing the basics of self-employment (getting, started, finding health insurance, and so forth)., Cover image Copyright © 2001 Warner Books. Reprinted by permission of, Warner Books., , dual-earner households, in which both partners are, employed. Quality onsite day care is a big draw to, workers because it allows parents to interact with their, children during the day., 6. The highest job growth will occur in the professional and service occupations. The United States, like, many other industrialized nations, continues to shift, from a manufacturing, or “goods-producing,” economy, to a service-producing one (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2004). Whereas the bulk of yesterday’s jobs were, in manufacturing, construction, agriculture, and mining, the jobs of the next decade will be in the professional (and related technical) occupations and service, occupations. Among the professional occupations, jobs, in the computer and health care industries are expected, to expand dramatically. (In psychology, jobs in health,, counseling, and school psychology are expected to, show strong growth.) In the service occupations, strong, , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 383

Page 421 :
•, , FIG U R E 12.4, , “Best Bet” Occupations, 2002–2012, , High-growth, high-salary occupations., According to the U.S. Department of, Labor (2004), between 2002 and 2012, these 19 occupations will have the, largest number of job openings and will, provide high pay. (Adapted from Occupational Outlook Quarterly, Spring 2004), , Registered nurses, , Executive secretaries and administrative, assistants, , Postsecondary teachers, , First-line supervisors or managers, of office and administration support workers, , General and operations managers, Sales representatives, wholesale and, manufacturing, except technical and, scientific products, , Accountants and auditors, Carpenters, , Truck drivers, heavy and tractor-trailer, , Automotive service technicians and mechanics, , Elementary school teachers, , Police and sheriff’s patrol officers, , First-line supervisors or managers of, retail sales workers, , Licensed practical and licensed vocational, nurses, , Secondary school teachers, except, vocational education, , Electricians, , General maintenance and repair workers, , Computer systems analysts, , job growth should occur in education (at all levels), social services, and business services. Figure 12.4 depicts, those occupations expected to grow the most and pay, the most between now and 2012., , Management analysts, , ments of their positions (“Employers Bemoan,” 2004)., As new jobs develop, they will require more education, and higher skill levels. International competition and, technology are the two driving forces here (U.S. Depart-, , Education and Earnings, , 384, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , $90,000, 80,000, 70,000, Average annual income, , 60,000, 50,000, 40,000, 30,000, , 0, , •, , Women, Men, , Women, Men, , 10,000, , Women, Men, , 20,000, Women, Men, , Although many jobs exist for individuals without a college degree, these jobs usually offer the lowest pay and, benefits. In fact, all but 1 of the 50 highest-paying occupations require a college degree or higher (U.S. Bureau, of Labor Statistics, 2004). (By the way, the high-paying, job that doesn’t require a college degree is air traffic, controller.) In Figure 12.5, you can see that the more, you learn, the more you earn. This relationship holds, for both males and females, although, as you can see,, men are paid approximately $5,000 to $28,000 more, than women with the same educational credentials., On the other hand, a college diploma is no guarantee of a great job. In fact, many college graduates are, underemployed. Underemployment is settling for a, job that does not fully utilize one’s skills, abilities,, and training. About 18 percent of college graduates, take jobs that don’t usually require a college degree,, and experts predict that this situation is unlikely to, change in the near future (Lock, 2005a; Mittlehauser,, 1998). And while it’s true that the jobs you can obtain, with a college degree pay more than those requiring, less education, the higher-paying jobs go to college, graduates with college-level reading, writing, and quantitative skills. College graduates without these skills, more often end up in high-school-level jobs (Pryor &, Schaffer, 1997)., Current employers are not very happy with the academic skills of many of their employees. According to, a survey by the College Board’s National Commission, on Writing, a majority of U.S. employers say that about, a third of their workers do not meet the writing require-, , Less than, 9th grade, , High, Associate Bachelor’s, school, degree, degree, graduate, or more, Educational attainment, , F I G U R E 12. 5, , Education and income. This graph shows the average incomes, of year-round, full-time workers age 18 and over, by gender and, educational attainment. As you can see, the more education, people have, the higher their income tends to be. However, at all, levels women earn less than men with comparable education., (Data from U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2004a)

Page 422 :
ment of Labor, 2000). Thus, computer literacy is an essential complement to a good basic education., , The Changing Workforce, , © Michael Newman/PhotoEdit, , The labor force consists of all those who are employed as well as those who are currently unemployed but are looking for work. In this section, we, look at some of the changes affecting the workforce, and consider how women and other minorities fare in, the workplace., Demographic Changes, , The workforce is becoming increasingly diverse, with, regard to both gender and ethnicity. In 2003, 62 percent of married women worked, compared to 41 percent in 1970 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2004). This increase, holds even for women with very young children. For, instance, in 1975 only 33 percent of women with children under the age of 3 worked outside the home. By, 2003, this number had grown to 57 percent (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2004a). These changes have implications not only for work and family life but also for, men’s and women’s roles., The workforce is also becoming more ethnically, diversified (see Figure 12.6) (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2002). High school graduation rates for Asian, Americans about match those for European Americans, and college graduation rates for Asian Americans, exceed those of European Americans. By contrast, the, high school and college graduation rates of Hispanics, and African Americans lag behind those of European, Americans, although they have been improving in re-, , Today’s workforce is becoming increasingly diverse., , cent decades (Worthington et al., 2005). Consequently,, both groups are at a disadvantage when it comes to, competing for the better jobs., Although gay, lesbian, and bisexual workers have, been long-standing participants in the workplace, they, are often “closeted” for fear of discrimination. Unfortunately, most of these workers do not have the same, legal protections against employment discrimination, as their heterosexual counterparts (Badgett, 2003)., Thus, disclosing one’s sexual orientation may cause a, homophobic supervisor to fire, refuse to promote, or, reduce the income of a gay or lesbian employee. Predictably, factors associated with the decision to disclose, one’s sexual orientation at work include employer poli-, , •, , 90, 80, , Percentage of labor force, , 60, 50, , Increasing diversity in the work, force. Women and minority group, members are entering the workforce in, greater numbers than before. This, graph projects changes in the share of, the labor force by gender and by, ethnicity between 1990 and 2010., (Data from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2002), , 77.7, 69.2, , 70, 54.8, , 52.1, 45.2, , F I G U R E 12. 6, , 47.9, , 40, 30, 20, 10.8 12.0, , 10, , 13.3, 8.5, 3.0, , 0, , 1990 2010 1990 2010, Women, Men, GENDER, , 5.5, , 1990 2010 1990 2010 1990 2010 1990 2010, White, Black, Hispanic, Asian and, other, ETHNICITY, , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 385

Page 423 :
All employees, Women, , cies and perceived employer gay-supportiveness (Griffith & Hebl, 2002). We are unaware of reliable data on, the effects of sexual orientation disclosure and employment discrimination, , Executives, , WE B LI N K 12.5, , U.S. Department of Labor, With primary responsibility for many job- and work-related, matters in the U.S. government, the Labor Department, offers a site that can serve as a base to explore a variety, of topics, including wages and compensation, worker productivity, and the legal rights of workers (such as protection from sexual harassment)., , 386, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Minorities, , Today’s Workplace for, Women and Minorities, , Recent years have seen a dramatic upsurge in the number of females and ethnic minorities in the workplace., Is today’s workplace essentially the same for these, groups as it is for white males? In many respects, the, answer appears to be no. Although job discrimination, on the basis of race and gender has been illegal for, more than 25 years, women and minority group members continue to face obstacles to occupational success,, as evidenced by recent court decisions that found Morgan Stanley and Wal-Mart guilty of sex discrimination., Foremost among these obstacles is job segregation. Jobs, are simultaneously typed by gender and by race. For, example, skycaps are typically African American males., Most white women and people of color tend to be concentrated in female-dominated jobs where there is little opportunity for advancement or increase in salary., As we discussed in Chapter 10, workers in femaledominated fields typically earn less than employees in, male-dominated fields, even when the jobs require, similar levels of training, skill, and responsibility., Still, more women and ethnic minorities are entering higher-status occupations, even if at a low rate, (Jacobs, 1999). Unfortunately, they still face discrimination because they are frequently passed over for promotion in favor of white men (Maume, 1999). This, seems to be a problem especially at higher levels of, management. For example, the U.S. government’s 1995, Glass Ceiling Commission reported that 95 percent of, the senior-level managers of Fortune 1000 industries, and Fortune 500 companies are men and that 97 percent are white (Swoboda, 1995). There appears to be a, glass ceiling, or invisible barrier that prevents most, women and ethnic minorities from advancing to the, highest levels of occupations (see Figure 12.7). In fact,, the Commission termed this barrier a “concrete wall”, for women of color. Largely because of these reduced, opportunities for career advancement, almost twice as, many female corporate managers as males quit their, , All managers, , All employees, All managers, Executives, 0, , •, , 10, 20, 30, 40, Percentage at different levels, of Fortune 1000 corporations, , F I G U R E 12. 7, , The glass ceiling for women and minorities. A government, survey of Fortune 1000 corporations found that women and, minorities are underrepresented in management and executive, positions. (U.S. Department of Labor, 1992), , jobs (Stroh, Brett, & Reilly, 1996). At the other end of, the job spectrum, there seems to be a “sticky floor” that, causes women and minorities to get stuck in low-paying, occupations (Brannon, 2005)., When there is only one woman or minority person, in an office, that person becomes a token—or a symbol of all the members of that group. Tokens are more, distinctive than members of the dominant majority., And, as we discussed in Chapter 6, distinctiveness, makes a person’s actions subject to intense scrutiny,, stereotyping, and judgments. Thus, if a white male, makes a mistake, it is explained as an individual problem. When a token woman or minority person makes a, mistake, it is seen as evidence that all members of that, group are incompetent. Hence, tokens experience a, great deal of performance pressure, an added source of, job stress (Thomas, 2005). Interestingly, if tokens are, perceived as being “too successful,” they may be labeled, “workaholics” or may be accused of trying to “show up”, members of the dominant majority. These unfavorable, perceptions may be reflected in performance appraisals., The performance of successful white men is less likely, to be interpreted in these negative ways., Another way the world of work is different for, women, ethnic, and gay and lesbian minorities is that, they have less access to same-gender or same-group role, models and mentors (Murrell & James, 2001). Finally,, sexual harassment, a topic we’ll take up later, is much, more likely to be a problem for working women than, for working men. In sum, women and minority individuals must contend with discrimination on the job, in a number of forms.

Page 424 :
The Challenges of Change, , The increasingly diverse workforce presents challenges, to both organizations and workers. Important cultural, differences exist in managing time and people, in identification with work, and in making decisions (Thomas,, 2005). These differences can contribute to conflict. Another challenge is that some individuals feel that they, are personally paying the price of prejudice in the, workplace, and this perception causes resentment., Recognizing the problem, some corporations offer diversity training programs for their employees. Ironically, these programs can make the problem worse if, they take a blaming stance toward white males or if, they stir up workers’ feelings but provide no ongoing, support for dealing with them (Baker, 1996). Thus, it, is essential that such programs be carefully designed., The strong support of top management is also critical, to their success (Rynes & Rosen, 1995)., Many who advocate abandoning affirmative action programs argue that these programs promote “reverse discrimination” through the use of unfair hiring, and promotion practices. For some, this perception, may reflect a sense of privilege, an unquestioned assumption that white males should be guaranteed a, , place in society and that others should compete for the, remaining jobs (Jacques, 1997). Some also argue that, affirmative action undercuts the role of merit in employment decisions and sets up (supposedly) underprepared workers for failure (Sowell, 1994). Negative, feelings about affirmative action prompt some to automatically assume that all women and ethnic minority co-workers have been hired only because of their, gender or ethnicity (Thomas, 2005). Obviously, these, assumptions can be quite harmful to an employee’s, success. For instance, several studies have demonstrated that attaching an affirmative action label to an, employee results in negative attributions and perceptions of incompetence (Sagrestano, 2004). The good, news is that this potential negative effect can be eliminated when people know that decisions are based on, merit as well as on group membership., To minimize conflict and to maintain worker productivity and satisfaction, companies can provide welldesigned diversity programs and managers can educate themselves about the varied values and needs of, their workers. Similarly, both majority and minority, employees must be willing to learn to work comfortably with those who come from other backgrounds., , Coping with Occupational Hazards, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , List some important sources of job stress., Summarize the effects of job stress on physical and, mental health., Describe actions organizations are taking to reduce, job stress., , Work can bring people deep satisfaction, but it can also, be a source of frustration and conflict. In this section,, we explore three challenges to today’s workers: job, stress, sexual harassment, and unemployment., , Job Stress, You saw in Chapter 3 that stress can emerge from any, corner of your life. However, many theorists suspect, that the workplace is the primary source of stress in, modern society. Let’s examine job stress and what employers and workers can do about it., Sources of Stress on the Job, , Americans today are working harder and longer than, they were a decade ago, causing experts to cite overwork as a major source of job stress (McGuire, 1999)., Current estimates clock the average full-time workweek, at 48 hours; in law and finance, 60-hour weeks are common (Hodge, 2002). According to a United Nations re-, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe the prevalence and consequences of sexual, harassment., Cite some ways that organizations and individuals, can reduce sexual harassment., Describe some causes and effects of unemployment., , port, the average American worked 1,978 hours in 2000,, up from 1,942 hours in 1990 (International Labour Office, 2002). That’s an increase of nearly a full week over, the past decade. Compare this situation to that in, Canada, Japan, and Mexico, where the average worker, put in about 100 hours, or 2.5 weeks, less than American workers in 2000. Germans worked nearly 12.5, weeks less than Americans in 2000. Also, among affluent nations, only the United States does not require a, minimum number of sick days for workers (Heymann, et al., 2004)., In addition to long hours, common job stressors, include lack of privacy, high noise levels, unusual, hours (such as rotating shifts), the pressure of deadlines, lack of control over one’s work, inadequate resources to do a job, and perceived inequities at work, (Fairbrother & Warn, 2003). Fears of being “downsized” and concerns about health care benefits (losing, them or paying increasingly higher premiums) also, dog workers in today’s economy. Office politics and, CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 387

Page 425 :
© Bill Stormont/Corbis, , Firefighters obviously face a great deal of stress in their work,, but so do people in many other jobs. Work stress is a major, issue in a diverse array of occupations., , conflict with supervisors, subordinates, and co-workers, also make the list of job stressors. Workers who must, adapt to computers and automated offices experience, “technostress” (Brod, 1988). Firefighters and coal miners face frequent threats to their physical safety. Highpressure jobs such as air traffic controller and surgeon, demand virtually perfect performance, as errors can, have disastrous consequences. Ironically, “underwork”, (boring, repetitive tasks) can also be stressful., Women may experience certain workplace stressors, such as sex discrimination and sexual harassment, at higher rates than men (Davidson & Fielden,, 1999). African Americans and ethnic minorities must, cope with racism and other types of discrimination on, the job (Davidson & Fielden, 1999). Discrimination is, also a problem for gay and lesbian employees (Badgett,, 2003). Workers from lower socioeconomic groups typically work in more dangerous jobs than workers from, higher socioeconomic status do., Why are American workers so stressed out? According to Gwendolyn Keita and Joseph Hurrell, (1994), four factors are the culprits:, , 388, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , 1. More workers are employed in service industries., Workers in these jobs must interact with a variety of, individuals on a daily basis. While most customers are, civil and easy to deal with, some are decidedly difficult. Nonetheless, even obnoxious and troublesome, customers “are always right,” so workers have to swallow their frustration and anger, and this situation is, stressful., 2. The economy is unpredictable. In the age of restructuring, downsizing, takeovers, and bankruptcies,, even excellent workers aren’t assured of keeping their, jobs like workers in the past. Thus, the fear of job loss, may lurk in the back of workers’ minds., 3. Rapid changes in computer technology tax workers’ abilities to keep up. Computers have taken over, some jobs, forcing workers to develop new skills and, to do so quickly. In other jobs, the stress comes from, rapid and ongoing advances in technology that force, workers to keep pace with the changes., 4. The workplace is becoming more diverse. As, more women and minority group members enter the, workplace, individuals from all groups must learn to, interact with those who are unfamiliar. Developing, these skills takes time and may be stressful., , Taking a broader view, Robert Karasek contends that, the two key factors in occupational stress are the psychological demands made on a worker and a worker’s, amount of decision control (Karasek, 1979; Karasek &, Theorell, 1990). Psychological demands are measured, by asking employees questions such as “Is there excessive work?” and “Must you work fast (or hard)?” To, measure decision control, employees are asked such, questions as “Do you have a lot of say in your job?” and, “Do you have freedom to make decisions?” In Karasek’s, demand-control model, stress is greatest in jobs characterized by high psychological demands and low decision, control. Based on survey data obtained from workers,, he has tentatively mapped out where various jobs fall, on these two key dimensions of job stress, as shown in, Figure 12.8. The jobs thought to be most stressful are, those with heavy psychological demands and little control over decisions (see the lower right area of the figure). Considerable research has been conducted on the, demand-control model, most of which has been supportive (Sonnentag & Frese, 2003)., Effects of Job Stress, , As with other forms of stress, occupational stress is associated with a host of negative effects. In the work, arena itself, job stress has been linked to an increased, number of industrial accidents, increased absenteeism, (Allegro & Veerman, 1998), poor job performance, and, higher turnover rates (Buunk et al., 1998). Experts estimate that stress-related reductions in workers’ pro-

Page 426 :
Forester, Natural scientist, Dentist, Peddler, Skilled machinist, , High decision control, , Architect, , Real estate agent, Sales manager, Secondary school teacher, Manufacturing manager, Bank officer, Physician, Retail manager, Police, High psychological demand, , Auto repairman, Low psychological demand, Carpenter, , Firefighter, , Billing clerk, Waiter and waitress, , Night watchman, Janitor, , •, , Low decision control, , Truck driver, Cashier, , Telephone operator, , Cook, Freight handler, Garment stitcher, Mail worker, , & Goldberg, 1998). As we noted in Chapter 3,, prolonged stress can lead to burnout, characterized by exhaustion, cynicism, and poor job performance (Maslach, 2003)., Of course, the negative effects of occupational stress extend beyond the workplace. Foremost among these adverse effects are those on, employees’ physical health. Work stress has been, related to a variety of physical maladies, including heart disease, high blood pressure, ulcers,, arthritis, asthma, and cancer (Thomas, 2005)., In a test of Karasek’s model of work stress,, symptoms of heart disease were more prevalent, among Swedish men whose jobs were high in, psychological demands and low in decision control (Karasek et al., 1981; see Figure 12.9 on the, next page). Job stress can also have a negative, impact on workers’ psychological health. Occupational stress has been related to distress, anxiety, and depression (Sonnentag & Frese, 2003), as well as abuse of alcohol or drugs (Maslach &, Goldberg, 1998)., Dealing with Job Stress, , There are essentially three avenues of attack for, dealing with occupational stress (Ivancevich et, Karasek’s model of occupational stress as related to specific jobs. Robert, al., 1990). The first is to intervene at the individKarasek (1979) theorizes that occupational stress is greatest in jobs characterized by high psychological demands and low decision control. Based on survey, ual level by modifying workers’ ways of coping, data, this chart shows where various familiar jobs fall on these two dimensions., with job stress. The second is to intervene at the, According to Karasek’s model, the most stressful jobs are those shown in the, organizational level by redesigning the work enshaded area on the lower right., vironment itself. The third is to intervene at the, individual-organizational interface by improving, the fit between workers and their companies., ductivity may cost American industry hundreds of bilInterventions at the individual level are the most, lions per year (Karasek & Theorell, 1990)., widely used strategy for managing work stress in the, When job stress is temporary, as when important, United States (Sonnenberg & Frese, 2003). Many comdeadlines loom, workers usually suffer only minor and, panies have instituted programs designed to improve, brief effects of stress, such as sleeplessness or anxiety., their employees’ coping skills. These programs usually, Prolonged, high levels of stress are more problematic, as, focus on relaxation training, time management, cogthose who work in people-oriented jobs such as human, nitive approaches to reappraising stressful events, and, services, education, and health care can attest (Maslach, F I G U R E 12.8, , CATHY © Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 389

Page 427 :
•, , FIG U R E 12.9, , Job characteristics in Karasek’s model and, heart disease prevalence. Karasek et al., (1981) interviewed 1,621 Swedish men about, their work and assessed their cardiovascular, health. The vertical bars in this figure show the, percentage of the men with symptoms of heart, disease as a function of the characteristics of, their jobs. The highest incidence of heart, disease was found among men who had jobs, high in psychological demands and low in, decision control, just as Karasek’s model of, occupational stress predicts., Redrawn from Karasek, R. A., Baker, D., Marxer, F., Ahlbom, A., &, Theorell, T. (1981). Job decision latitude, job demand, and cardiovascular disease: A prospective study of Swedish men. American, Journal of Public Health, 71, 694–705. Reprinted by permission., , 20.0, , Percentage of male workers, with symptoms of heart disease, , 12.8, , High, , 0.0, , Decision, control, , 4.4, , 6.8, , 2.0 4.0 6.6, , SALLY FORTH. Reprinted with special permission of King Features Syndicate, , 390, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , 2.8, , 4.5, , 3.2, , Low, , other constructive coping strategies that we discussed, in Chapter 4. Also popular are workplace wellness programs that seek to improve employees’ physical health, (Nurminen et al., 2002). These programs usually focus, on exercise and fitness training, health screening, nutritional education, and reduction of health-impairing, habits, such as smoking and overeating., Interventions at the organizational level are intended, to make work environments less stressful. Some companies attempt to reduce occupational stress by reducing, noise levels, instituting rest periods, making surroundings more attractive, and giving workers different tools, or responsibilities. Decentralizing management and giving workers greater participation in decision making, may also help reduce occupational stress (Wilpert, 1995)., Interventions at the individual-organizational interface can take many forms. Now and for the foreseeable future, the biggest challenge is probably to accommodate the changing nature of the workforce, which, increasingly includes dual-earner couples and single, parents rather than married men who are the sole wage, , 10.4, , Psychological demand, , High, , earners in their families. What kinds of accommodations are companies making in response to the changing needs of their workers? In the important area of, child care, the workplace has not been particularly responsive, according to a national survey based on a representative sample of American workers that looked at, various aspects of work life in 1992 and 2002 (Bond et, al., 2003). Only 10 percent of employers offered childcare services to their employees both in 1992 and in, 2002. The survey also reported that only 18 percent of, employees in 2002 had access to job-based child-care, resource and referral services (24 percent had access to, elder-care resource and referral services)., The most notable increase in family-friendly employer policies during the 10-year period was in flexible working hours. In 2002, 43 percent of employees, were able to set their own starting and quitting times, within some range of hours, compared to 29 percent, in 1992. Among other things, flexible work times help, parents manage child care and other family responsibilities. Thus, it is not surprising that workers who

Page 428 :
have flexible work arrangements report higher job satisfaction than employees whose jobs are less flexible., We’ll return to the issue of family-friendly work benefits in our discussion of “Work and Family Roles.”, As we noted, workers from lower socioeconomic, groups typically experience more work stress than those, from higher-status groups. Ironically, these are the, workers who receive less attention through stress management and other programs (Ilgen, 1990). Researchers, also pay limited attention to gender, race, and socioeconomic status in their research on job stressors and intervention programs (Davidson & Fielden, 1999)., , Sexual Harassment, Sexual harassment burst into the American consciousness in the fall of 1991 during the televised confirmation hearings for the nomination of Clarence Thomas, as a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Although Justice, Thomas survived the confirmation process, many would, argue that his reputation was damaged by Anita Hill’s, public allegations of sexual harassment, and so was, Hill’s. Allegations of sexual harassment also caused serious problems for President Bill Clinton. These highly, publicized examples of sexual harassment charges have, served as a wake-up call to individuals and companies,, as both can be sued for harassment (regulations were, instituted in 1980). Although most workers recognize, that they need to take the problem of sexual harassment, seriously, many people remain relatively naïve about, what constitutes sexual harassment., Sexual harassment occurs when employees are, subjected to unwelcome sexually oriented behavior., According to law, there are two types of sexual harassment. The first is quid pro quo (from the Latin expression that translates as “something given or received in, exchange for something else”). In the context of sexual, harassment, quid pro quo involves making submission, to unwanted sexual advances a condition of hiring, advancement, or not being fired. In other words, the, worker’s survival on the job depends on agreeing to, engage in unwanted sex. The second type of harassment is hostile environment, or any type of unwelcome, sexual behavior that creates a hostile work environment that can inflict psychological harm and interfere, with job performance., Sexual harassment can take a variety of forms: unsolicited and unwelcome flirting, sexual advances, or, propositions; insulting comments about an employee’s, appearance, dress, or anatomy; unappreciated dirty, jokes and sexual gestures; intrusive or sexual questions, about an employee’s personal life; explicit descriptions, of the harasser’s own sexual experiences; abuse of familiarities such as “honey” and “dear”; unnecessary, and unwanted physical contact such as touching, hugging, pinching, or kissing; catcalls; exposure of geni-, , tals; physical or sexual assault; and rape. As experts, have pointed out, sexual harassment is an abuse of, power by a person in authority. To determine what, legally constitutes sexual harassment, the courts take, into account “whether the behavior is motivated by the, gender of the victim, whether it is unwelcome, whether, it is repetitive, and whether it could lead to negative, psychological or organizational outcomes” (Goldberg, & Zhang, 2004, p. 823). Same-gender sexual harassment also occurs and is tried according to the same, standards applied in cross-sex sexual harassment although little research has been done on the topic., Prevalence and Consequences, , Sexual harassment in the workplace is more widespread, than most people realize. A review of 18 studies suggested that approximately 42 percent of female workers, in the United States report having been sexually harassed (Gruber, 1990). A liberal estimate for male workers is 15 percent (Gutek, 1993). The typical female victim is young, divorced or separated, in a nonsenior, position, and in a masculine-stereotyped field (Davidson & Fielden, 1999). A survey of women in the military, reported that 76 percent had experienced sexual harassment in the previous year (Yoder, 2001). Women in, blue-collar jobs are also at high risk, but sexual harassment also occurs in the professions. For example, in a, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , Sexual Harassment on the, Job: What It Is and How, to Stop It, by William Petrocelli and Barbara Kate Repa, (Nolo Press, 1998), Employees and employers now recognize that they need, to know what constitutes sexual harassment and what, does not. In addition, those who believe that they are, being sexually harassed want to know how to stop it., As the title of this book indicates, it addresses both, issues. The authors clearly define the varieties of sexual, harassment and provide examples from the workplace, and from court cases to reinforce their points. Petrocelli, and Repa view the alternatives to ending sexual harassment as a series of escalating steps, and they helpfully, guide readers through their various options. For employers, there is a chapter on workplace policies and, programs to reduce occurrences of sexual harassment., Cover image reproduced by permission of Nolo Press. Copyright © 2002., http://www.nolo.com, , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 391

Page 429 :
survey of United Methodist clergywomen, 77 percent, reported that they had experienced sexual harassment—, with 41 percent of these incidents perpetrated by colleagues and other ministers (“Women Clerics,” 1990)., Experiencing sexual harassment can have negative, effects on psychological and physical health (Norton,, 2002). Problematic reactions include anger, reduced, self-esteem, depression, and anxiety. Victims may also, have difficulties in their personal relationships and in, sexual adjustment (loss of desire, for example). Increased alcohol consumption, smoking, and dependence on drugs are also reported (Davidson & Fielden,, 1999). Sexual harassment can also produce fallout on, the job: Women who are harassed may be less productive, less satisfied with their jobs, and less committed, to their work and employer., Stopping Sexual Harassment, , ers have developed a typology of possible responses to, this problem (see Figure 12.10) and have studied their, relative effectiveness (Bowes-Sperry & Tata, 1999;, Knapp et al., 1997). Ironically, the most frequently, used strategy—avoiding/denial—is also the least effective one. Confrontation and advocacy seeking are two, effective strategies but are infrequently used. In the, Recommended Reading box on page 391, we describe, a book that both employers and employees should find, helpful in ridding the workplace of sexual harassment., , Unemployment, People with little education and training have always, been vulnerable to unemployment. In today’s economic market, however, even those with a good education and excellent job skills are not immune to unemployment. What’s going on?, , •, , FIG U R E 12.10, , Effectiveness of responses to sexual harassment., Responses to sexual harassment can be classified into, four categories based on the focus of the response, (directed toward self or toward the harasser) and the, mode of the response (involving the self or others)., Unfortunately, the most frequent reactions turn out to, be the least helpful. Effective strategies are available,, but they are infrequently used., From Bowes-Sperry, L., & Tata, J. (1999). A multiperspective framework of, sexual harassment. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work, (pp. 263–280). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Copyright © 1999, by Sage Publications. Reprinted with permission of Sage Publications, Inc., , 392, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , FOCUS OF RESPONSE, , To predict the occurrence of sexual harassment, researchers have developed a two-factor model based on, Causes of Unemployment, the person (prospective harasser) and the social situaUnemployment today is caused primarily by the dration (Pryor, Giedd, & Williams, 1995). According to this, matic economic changes we have already discussed., model, individuals vary in their proclivity for sexual, First, the shift from a manufacturing to a service econharassment, and organizational norms regarding the, omy has significantly transformed the nature of work., acceptability of sexual harassment also vary. Research, On the positive side, this means that many new jobs are, suggests that sexual harassment is most likely to occur, being created; on the negative side, it means that workwhen individual proclivity is high and organizational, ers in high-paying manufacturing jobs are being laid off, norms are accepting. Thus, it follows that organizations, can reduce the incidence of sexual harassment by promoting norms that are intolerant of it., Acknowledging the prevalence and negative impact of sexual harassment, many orMODE OF RESPONSE, ganizations have taken steps to educate and, SELF-RESPONSE, SUPPORTED RESPONSE, protect their workers. Managers are publicly, Avoidance/Denial, Social Coping, speaking out against sexual harassment, supMost frequently used, yet, Not effective for ending, least effective for ending, harassment, but may assist, porting programs designed to increase emharassment., in coping with negative, ployees’ awareness of the problem, issuing, consequences resulting, • avoiding the harasser, from harassment., policies expressly forbidding harassment, and, • altering the job situation, • bringing along a friend, implementing formal grievance procedures, by transferring/quitting, SELF-FOCUS, when harasser will be, • ignoring the behavior, for handling allegations of harassment., present, • going along with the, • discussing the situation, Responses to sexual harassment may be, behavior, with sympathetic other, personal as well as organizational. Research• treating the behavior as, , INITIATOR, FOCUS, , a joke, • blaming self, Confrontation/Negotiation, Not frequently used, but, very effective for ending, harassment., • asking or telling the, harasser to stop, • threatening the harasser, • disciplining the harasser, (if in a position to do so), , • seeking medical and/or, emotional counseling, , Advocacy Seeking, Not frequently used, but, very effective for ending, harassment., • reporting the behavior to, a supervisor, other, internal official body, or, outside agency, • asking another person, (e.g., friend) to intervene, • seeking legal remedies, through the court system

Page 430 :
(robots are now assembling cars, for instance). A second, economic change is the globalization of the marketplace. For corporations, this means restructuring and, downsizing to increase efficiency and profits—at the expense of workers, including those in white-collar jobs., Thus, a major consequence of these economic upheavals, is displaced workers—individuals who are unemployed because their jobs have disappeared. Between, 1999 and 2001, about 4 million workers with three or, more years of experience were displaced as a result of, plant closings, slack or insufficient work, or positions, being eliminated (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2004a)., , Sources of on-the-job homicides, Relatives, 4%, Acquaintances, 7%, Customers, and clients, 8%, Co-workers, and former, co-workers, 15%, , 67%, Robberies, , Effects of Unemployment, , Losing one’s job is difficult at best and devastating at, worst. Not only can it cause economic distress, it can, also cause health problems and such psychological difficulties as loss of self-esteem, depression, and anxiety, (Bobek & Robbins, 2005). Also, the rate of attempted, and completed suicides increases with unemployment., The amount of distress experienced as the result of job, loss is not affected by gender (Kulik, 2000)., While losing a job at any age is highly stressful,, those who are laid off in middle age seem to find the, experience most difficult (Kulik, 2000). For one thing,, they typically have more financial responsibilities than, those in other age groups. Second, if other family, members aren’t able to provide health insurance, the, entire family’s health and welfare is jeopardized (Couch,, 1998). Third, older workers typically remain out of, work for a longer time than younger workers. Thus,, economic hardship can be a real possibility and can, threaten quality of life for the worker’s whole family., Finally, middle-aged workers have been on the job for, a number of years. Because they typically feel highly, involved in their work, being cut off from this important source of life satisfaction is painful (Broomhall &, Winefield, 1990). Of course, not all middle-aged workers are affected negatively by loss of work (Leana &, Feldman, 1992). Individuals who are in their 50s and, close to retirement and those who are motivated to try, their hand at something new seem the least affected., Sometimes the stress of job loss leads to violence. Occasionally, such violent episodes occur in the, workplace (Sygnatur & Toscano, 2000). As you can see, in Figure 12.11 the overriding cause of on-the-job, homicides is robberies (67 percent). Of the remaining, causes, the next highest is disputes between co-workers, (15 percent). These situations often involve a displaced, worker who lashes out in rage and desperation at a supervisor or co-workers. Employees who lose their jobs, because of downsizing—instead of poor job performance—are likely to believe they have been treated arbitrarily and unfairly—a situation associated with increased aggression (Baron, Neuman, & Geddes, 1999;, LeBlanc & Barling, 2004). Workplace murderers are, , •, , F I G U R E 12. 11, , Violence at work. Business-related disputes with work, colleagues, such as retaliation for being fired, account for a, relatively small portion of homicides at work, even though they, are the second leading cause of on-the-job homicides. Homicides, in the workplace are not the largest source of fatalities in the, workplace (accidents are); nonetheless, they occur often enough, to be a source of concern to workers. (Data from U.S. Bureau of, Labor Statistics, 1998), , typically middle-aged white males, loners at work,, owners of gun collections, and fascinated by exotic, weapons (Stuart, 1992). They are often angry and, paranoid and may signal their intentions by making violent threats. Incidents of workplace violence, and recent concerns about terrorism have prompted, some organizations to make an effort to identify potentially dangerous individuals (Auerbach & Gramling, 1998)., Job loss can also generate anger among people, who are dependent on the displaced workers. For example, a study of over 800 employed individuals and, their partners reported that job loss led partners to, withdraw social support from each other and to be increasingly critical, insulting, and angry (Vinokur,, Price, & Caplan, 1996)., Coping with Unemployment, , Support from friends and family is essential in coping, with unemployment. When a person is out of work for, an extended period of time or has little social support,, counseling may also be helpful. Some companies offer, programs for laid-off workers. These programs typically teach employees how to search for jobs, manage, stress, and cultivate social support. In the “Living in, Today’s World” box on page 394, we offer some specific suggestions for coping with unemployment., CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 393

Page 431 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Coping with Unemployment, Mental health experts view job loss as a devastating life, experience—similar to death, divorce, and serious illness, or disability. Foremost, people are hit with the frightening prospect of loss of income and must deal with the, stressful practicalities of how to live on less. Job loss, also deals a psychological blow because it strikes at a, key component of adult identity—having a job. If you’re, a victim of downsizing, you must deal with the anger and, resentment that stem from the unfairness of the situation., Understandably, job loss is associated with decreases in, self-confidence, feelings of failure and rejection, and, increases in anxiety and depression (Bobek & Robbins,, 2005). Unfortunately, job loss also increases the likelihood, of marital problems. Being aware of the psychological aspects of job loss can help you cope with the experience., Some experts suggest that individuals’ reactions to, job loss are similar to what they experience when they, confront their own death (Bobek & Robbins, 2005; Lock,, 2005b). Both of these experiences involve coming to, terms with loss (although the losses are obviously quite, different). In contemplating one’s death, Elisabeth, Kübler-Ross (1969) asserted that people experience a, variety of reactions. These include denial (“I can’t believe, this is happening to me.”), anger (“How could they do, this to me?”), bargaining (“Maybe if I offer to work, overtime for free, my boss will change her mind.”), depression (“How can I look my kids in the eye?”), and, acceptance (“I can learn from this painful experience and, will be able to provide for myself and my family again.”)., As we noted in Chapter 11, people don’t necessarily go, through these five reactions in lockstep sequence. Individuals often move in and out of these emotional states, as they strive to recover their psychological equilibrium., Interestingly, one author of a survival guide for the, unemployed advises those who have been “downsized” to, get angry—and then to move on (Laskoff, 2004)., For some practical suggestions for coping with job, loss, we draw on the advice of career experts Michael, Laskoff (2004) and Robert Lock (2005b)., Apply for unemployment benefits as soon as, possible. You may be able to collect benefits for 26, weeks (or longer in some cases). Contact the nearest, , 394, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , office of your state’s Employment Security Commission or, Department of Labor., Determine your income and expenses. Determine, precisely your sources of income (unemployment benefits, spouse or partner’s income, savings) and how much, you can count on per week/month. Itemize your weekly/, monthly expenses. Set up a realistic budget and stick to, it. Talk with your creditors if you need to., Lower your expenses and think of ways to bring, in extra income. Cut out unnecessary expenses for now., Minimize your credit card purchases and pay the bills off, every month to avoid building up huge debt and becoming a slave to high interest payments. For extra income,, consider selling a car, or having a garage sale, or putting, items up for auction on eBay. Use your skills as a temporary worker., Stay healthy. To save money on medical expenses,, eat well-balanced meals and get adequate sleep. Use, relaxation techniques to manage your stress (see Chapter, 4). Keep yourself in a positive frame of mind by recalling, past successes and imagining future ones., Reach out for support. Although it is difficult to, do, explain your situation to your family. You need their, support and they need to know how your unemployment, will affect them. If you are having relationship problems,, consult a counselor. Let your friends know that you are, looking for work; they may have job leads. Consider, attending a support group or consulting a career counselor. Attend religious services or make time for daily, meditation or spiritual reading., Get organized and get going. Start by setting aside, time and space to work on your job search. Then consider your situation. Can you find the same type of job or, do you need to think about other options? Do you need, to relocate? Do you need more education or retraining?, Visit the library and check out some of the excellent, career planning books (What Color Is Your Parachute?, for, example). Once you’re clear about your options, get busy., Expect to spend 15–25 hours a week on job-searching, activities. Spend some time every week on volunteer, activities in an area you would like to pursue.

Page 432 :
Balancing Work and Other, Spheres of Life, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , Summarize current perspectives on workaholism., Define work-family conflict, and discuss the benefits of multiple roles., List several types of leisure activities and summarize their benefits., , A major challenge for individuals today is balancing, work, family, and leisure activities in ways that are personally satisfying. We noted that dual-earner families are, becoming increasingly common and that the traditional, boundaries between family and paid work life are breaking down. These two developments are related. Historically, traditional gender roles assigned women’s work to, the home and men’s work outside the home. This division of labor created boundaries between family and, work life. With more women entering the workforce,, these boundaries have become blurred. The technologybased changes in the workplace are also eroding these, distinctions between family and work life. Here we examine three issues related to balancing various life roles., , Workaholism, Most people cherish their leisure activities and relationships with their families and friends. However,, workaholics devote nearly all their time and energy to, their jobs. They put in lots of overtime, take few vacations, regularly bring work home from the office, and, think about work most of the time. They are energetic,, intense, and ambitious. In addition to personal factors,, situational forces can also promote workaholism., Thus, workaholism is more common where the organizational climate supports imbalances between work, and personal life (Burke, 2001)., Although workaholism has received considerable, attention in the popular press, empirical research on, the topic is relatively limited (Harpaz & Snir, 2003). A, survey of 800 senior-level managers reported that, nearly one in four considered themselves to be workaholics (Joyner, 1999). Psychologists are divided on the, issue of whether workaholism is problematic. Should, workaholics be praised for their dedication and encouraged in their single-minded pursuit of fulfillment, through work? Or is workaholism a form of addiction,, a sign that an individual is driven by compulsions he or, she cannot control? In support of the former view is, evidence that some workaholics tend to be highly satisfied with their jobs and with their lives (Bonebright,, Clay, & Ankenmann, 2000). They work hard simply because work is the most meaningful activity they know., , Yet other evidence suggests that workaholics may have, poorer emotional and physical well-being than nonworkaholics (Bonebright et al., 2000; Burke, 2000)., How can these conflicting findings be reconciled?, It seems that there are two types of workaholics, (Buelens & Poelmans, 2004; Spence & Robbins, 1992)., One type, the enthusiastic workaholic, works for the, pure joy of it. Such people derive immense satisfaction, from work and generally perform well in highly demanding jobs. The other type, the nonenthusiastic, workaholic, feels driven to work but reports low job enjoyment. Moreover, these workaholics tend to report, lower life satisfaction and less purpose in life than enthusiastic workaholics. Thus, it is not surprising that, the nonenthusiastic group is more likely to develop, burnout (Porter, 1996)., Both types of workaholics experience an imbalance between work and personal time. Not surprisingly, this situation translates into a high degree of, work-family conflict for both groups (Bonebright et, al., 2000). Moreover, the families of both groups suffer, (Robinson, 1998). So, although enthusiastic workaholics really love their work, their devotion to their, jobs has a price, one often paid by their families., , Work and Family Roles, One of the biggest recent changes in the labor force has, been the emergence of dual-earner households, now, the dominant family form in the United States (U.S., Bureau of the Census, 2004a). Dual-earner couples are, struggling to discover better ways of balancing family, life and the demands of work. These changes in work, and family life have sparked the interest of researchers, in many disciplines, including psychology., An important fact of life for dual-earner couples, is that they juggle multiple roles: spouse or partner and, employee. TICKS (two-income couples with kids) add, a third role: parent. Thus, today’s working parents experience work-family conflict or the feeling of being, pulled in multiple directions by competing demands, from the job and the family. In heterosexual dualearner families, men are taking on more household, chores and child care, but most wives still have greater, , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 395

Page 433 :
responsibilities in these areas (Bond et al., 2003). In, gay and lesbian dual-earner households, responsibilities are more evenly divided (Kurdek, 1993b; Patterson, 2003). Single parents are especially likely to have, work-family conflicts., Given the tight economic conditions, employers, seem to be cutting back on family-friendly benefits, (Geller, 2003). Some believe that this situation is partly, to blame for the downward slide in the percentage of, mothers with infant children who are in the labor force, (Armour, 2004). In 1998, the participation rate for this, group had reached a high of 59 percent; by 2003, it had, fallen to 55 percent. According to Ellen Galinsky, president of the Families and Work Institute, “They’re not, fleeing work—they’re fleeing the demanding way of, work” (Armour, 2004). To gain more control over their, lives, some women are temporarily opting out of the, workforce; others are going into business for themselves., To be fair, some of the decline in women’s labor, force participation rates can probably also be attributed to generational shifts in the views of the optimal, balance of work and family roles. As you can see in Figure 12.12, more Gen-X employees with children endorse a family-centric view over a work-centric view, compared to a comparable group of Boomers (Families and Work Institute, 2004). Some suggest that these, generational differences are due, in part, to many GenXers seeing their hardworking parents lose their jobs, due to downsizing (Families and Work Institute, 2004)., Although today’s working parents may feel stressed,, researchers find that multiple roles are beneficial for, both men’s and women mental, physical, and relationship health (Barnett & Hyde, 2001). For women, the, benefits of multiple roles are attributed primarily to, , Generational Differences in Work and, Family Priorities, , Relative emphasis, on work and family, , •, , 2002 Ages, Gen-X, Boomers, (23–37), (38–57), , Family-centric, , 55%, , 46%, , Dual-centric, , 33%, , 35%, , Work-centric, , 13%, , 20%, , FIG U R E 12.12, , Generational differences in work and family priorities. Gen-X, parents are significantly more likely than Boomer parents to be, family-centric (place more emphasis on family than work),, whereas Boomer parents are significantly more likely than GenXers to be work-centric (place greater emphasis on work than, family). The fact that both groups have children under 18 living, at home suggests that this is a generational, rather than a life, cycle, difference., From Families and Work Institute (2004, October). Generation and gender in the workplace., New York: Author., , 396, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , The Time Bind: When, Work Becomes Home, and Home Becomes Work, by Arlie Russell Hochschild (Owl Books, 2001), Sociologist Hochschild addresses the difficulties of balancing work and family life. She makes the disturbing, claim that many adult workers are spending more time, at work than at home because they actually prefer it, that way. For the children of these parents, it means, spending more time in day care or afterschool activities., Hochschild’s unsettling thesis is based on a case, study of an anonymous Fortune 500 corporation, (“Americo”). In three summers of field research, she, interviewed employers and employees, attended business meetings, and shadowed working parents and their, children. She observed that although Americo offered a, number of “family friendly” programs (flextime, paternity leave), employees rarely made use of them. For, many workers, lack of participation was rooted in concerns about career advancement and fears about job, security in the age of downsizing. The shocker was that, many workers actually preferred office life to home life!, In other words, workers saw the office as a structured,, supportive refuge compared to the conflicts, hassles,, and pressures at home., To address the problem, the author urges parents to, start a “time movement” by organizing to reduce work, hours. Ironically, her data give little reason to believe, that working parents would want to join such a movement. Moreover, she fails to address the really significant implication of her findings—namely, that Americans, really need to reconsider what a satisfying adult life encompasses. Despite such weaknesses in her analysis, the, findings are provocative and well worth thinking about., Cover Copyright © 2001 by Henry Holt and Co. Reprinted by permission of Henry, Holt & Co., LLC., , the effects of the employee role. For men, family involvement is important, especially in the area of relationship health. According to Rosalind Barnett and, Janet Hyde (2001), a number of factors contribute to, the positive outcomes associated with multiple roles,, including added income, social support, opportunities, to experience success, and buffering. The latter refers, to the idea that successes and satisfactions in one role, provide a buffer against the negative effects of stress or, failure in another role. Of course, there are outside, limits to the number of roles and the amount of work, that people can take on before they sacrifice the benefits of multiple roles (Barnett & Hyde, 2001). Role, overload likely causes psychological distress.

Page 434 :
Leisure and Recreation, Most Americans are working 48-hour workweeks, and, many put in more paid work hours than that. Some, workers put in extra hours because their employers, mandate it. Others choose to work more hours to, maintain their standard of living, because real earning, power, especially for low-wage workers, has fallen behind what it was 25 years ago (Joyner, 2001). And, when workers arrive home, unpaid family work awaits, them. Given the pace of contemporary American life,, it’s no surprise that almost 60 percent of Americans, say that having leisure time is either “extremely important” or “very important” in their lives, according to a, Gallup poll (Moore, 2003)., American workers take an average of 16 days of, paid annual vacation (Mishel, Bernstein, & Schmitt,, 2001). The paid vacation time of American workers lags, far behind that of many European workers (see Figure, 12.13). Moreover, workers in most European Union, countries get four weeks of vacation time by law, (Roughton, 2001). A generous number of public holi-, , days pushes the average vacation time in the E.U. to, about seven weeks! Interestingly, those long European, vacations don’t seem to cut into worker productivity. In, contrast, Americans worked longer hours over the past, decade, but productivity slipped (Mishel et al., 2001)., Perhaps more leisure time would improve the situation., We define leisure as unpaid activities people choose, to engage in because the activities are personally, meaningful. How might we distinguish activities that, are meaningful from those that aren’t? Although people may lounge in front of the TV set for hours at a, time, most would also acknowledge that an important, difference exists between this use of time and, say, hiking around a nearby lake. While one activity merely, provides respite from a boring or exhausting day (which, you sometimes need), the other can be genuinely revitalizing. Being a couch potato will probably contribute, nothing to your state of mind and may even contribute, to your feeling apathetic and depressed. On the other, hand, participating in activities that are meaningful, and fulfilling can contribute to your feeling of wellbeing (Ragheb, 1993)., Types of Leisure Activities, , The types of leisure activities that people prefer are, quite diverse (see Figure 12.14 on the next page). Popular leisure pursuits include:, , Sweden, Spain, Denmark, Austria, Finland, France, Ireland, Portugal*, Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Switzerland, Germany, United, States**, 5, , 15, , 25, , 35, , Days, *Ranges from 21–30 days, **Average, not legally mandated, , •, , F I G U R E 12.13, , American and European vacation days. American workers average, 16 paid vacation days a year. Most European workers get considerably longer vacations. Moreover, these are benefits mandated by law., Adapted from Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., & Schmitt, J. (2001). The state of working America, 2000–2001. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Copyright © 2001 by Cornell University, Press. Adapted by permission of the publisher, Cornell University Press., , ■ Hobbies. Among the most popular hobbies are, photography; acting; music (playing and listening);, gardening; knitting; drawing; collecting stamps, autographs, and so forth; hiking; camping; fishing; and, birdwatching., ■ Reading. Although fewer individuals read now than, in the past, plenty of people still love to curl up with a, good book. Books allow readers to escape from daily, cares, solve mysteries, travel to real or imaginary places,, learn useful information, and find inspiration. Mysteries, romances, science fiction, historical novels, biographies, graphic novels, self-help books, magazines—the, variety of available reading material is truly astounding., ■ Surfing the Internet. A relatively new entry into, the world of leisure, the Internet offers an amazing, array of activities: e-mailing friends and relatives,, meeting new people, visiting chat rooms on topics of, interest, playing multiuser games, listening to music,, visiting world-class museums, and taking tours, through ancient historic sites are just a few options., ■ Travel. Many choose their destinations spontaneously, but others are more systematic in their travel, plans. For example, some individuals want to travel to, all the U.S. national parks or all the major Civil War, battlefields. Those who can afford it may travel to, other countries—to get a taste of real French cooking, or a firsthand look at what remains of ancient Egyptian civilization., , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 397

Page 435 :
•, , FIG U R E 12.14, , Movies, , Males, Females, , Exercise, program, , Males, Females, , Home, improvement/, repair, , Males, Females, , Amusement, park, , Males, Females, , Attending, sports, events, , Males, Females, , Playing, sports, , Males, Females, , Gardening, , Males, Females, , Charity, work, , Males, Females, , Participation in leisure activities. Americans enjoy, participating in quite a variety of leisure activities., The percentage of men and women engaging in, popular leisure pursuits is summarized here. (Data, from U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2004a), , 0, , ■ Games and puzzles. Some individuals enjoy playing bridge for relaxation; others like to play board, games such as Scrabble or chess. Computerized and, video games are highly popular, especially with children and adolescents. For some, the day isn’t complete, without the daily crossword puzzle. Others like to assemble jigsaw puzzles., ■ Sports. Many people like to play team sports such, as bowling or softball, enjoying the benefits of both, physical exercise and social interaction. Others enjoy, individual sports such as jogging, swimming, surfing,, ice skating, or skiing. Kayaking is a popular option that, can be done solo or with another., ■ Volunteer activities. Helping others appeals to individuals in almost all age groups. Moreover, you can, use your skills to help others in an incredibly diverse, array of settings: homeless shelters, hospitals, schools,, battered women’s shelters, boys’ and girls’ clubs, and, sports teams, for example., , Being aware of the broad range of leisure activities, heightens your chances of selecting those that are most, meaningful to you., Benefits of Leisure Activities, , The idea that a satisfying balance of work, relationships, and leisure activities will lead to a more reward398, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , 10, , 20, 30, 40, 50, Americans engaging in activity, at least once in past year (%), , 60, , 70, , ing and healthy life has intuitive appeal. Happily, research generally supports this notion. In one study of, adult males, both job satisfaction and leisure satisfaction were significant predictors of psychological health, (Pearson, 1998). College students who participate at, high levels in a variety of leisure activities report, higher rates of perceived physical, mental, and social, health than students who are less involved (Caldwell,, Smith & Weissinger, 1992). Among adults age 55 and, older, regular participation in a variety of leisure activities is positively correlated with psychological wellbeing and negatively related to depression (Dupuis &, Smale, 1995). Interestingly, this study found that one, leisure activity was negatively related to perceived wellbeing: viewing television. Getting up off the couch, is beneficial. Regular exercise can reduce the effects, of stress, improve your mood and self-esteem, and, help you shed unwanted pounds, as you’ll see in Chapter 14., To summarize, meaningful work, rewarding family interactions and friendships, and revitalizing leisure, pursuits are three components of a rewarding life., Maintaining a satisfying balance among these three, components is a major challenge in contemporary, times., In the Application, we describe how to conduct an, effective job search and offer a few interviewing tips.

Page 436 :
Getting Ahead in the Job Game, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Summarize the guidelines for putting together an, effective résumé., Discuss strategies for targeting companies you would, like to work for., Describe several strategies for landing a job, interview., , Answer the following statements “true” or “false.”, ___ 1. The most common and effective job search, method is answering classified ads., ___ 2. Your technical qualifications will determine the, success of your job search., ___ 3. Employment agencies are a good source of, leads to high-level professional jobs., ___ 4. Your résumé should be very thorough and include everything you have ever done., ___ 5. It’s a good idea to inject some humor into your, job interviews to help you and your interviewer, relax., Most career counselors would agree that all these statements are generally false. Although there is no one, “tried and true” method for obtaining desirable jobs,, experts do have guidelines that can increase your, chances of success. Their insights are summarized in, this Application. To ensure that you get the best job you, can, you’ll need to know more details than we can provide here. A good place to start is to read What Color Is, Your Parachute?, one of the best job search manuals, available (see the Recommended Reading box)., Above all else, it is important to conduct a job, search that is well organized, thorough, and systematic. Sending out a hastily written résumé to a few randomly selected companies is a waste of effort. An effective job search requires lots of time and careful, planning. People who are desperate for a job tend to, behave in ways that cause prospective employers to see, them as bad risks. Thus, it is crucial that you begin, your search well in advance of the time when you will, need a job. The best time to look for a job is when you, don’t need one. Then you can select an employer,, rather than seeking an employer who will select you., Of course, no amount of planning and effort can, guarantee favorable results in a job search. Luck is definitely a part of the picture. Success may hinge on being, in the right place, or meeting the right person at the, right time. Moreover, becoming a top candidate for a, position will depend on factors other than your techni-, , ■, , ■, , List some factors that can influence an interviewer’s, rating of a job candidate., List the dos and don’ts of interviewing for jobs., , cal competence. This is not to say that technical competence isn’t necessary; it is. But given the realities of, today’s job market, employers are often inundated with, applicants who have all of the required training and experience. The one who is ultimately selected may not, be the one with the best technical qualifications. Rather,, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , What Color Is Your, Parachute? A Practical, Manual for Job-Hunters, and Career-Changers, by Richard Nelson Bolles (Ten Speed Press, 2005), Richard Bolles is a clever, creative writer who has put, together a landmark book on the process of hunting for, a job. “Parachute” was first published in 1970 and has, become so successful that it’s updated yearly. If you, have time to read only one book about getting a job or, changing careers, this is the one to choose. (His discussion of transferable skills is must-reading.), Bolles’s writing is humorous and opinionated. However, his opinions have merit because he has done his, homework. The book is thoroughly researched and documented. The author destroys many of the myths about, what does and does not work in seeking jobs. He discusses a variety of practical topics, including where the, jobs are, what will get you hired, how to get in to see, the boss, whom to see, whom to avoid, and how to start, your own business. Readers will also appreciate helpful, hints on using the Internet for career information and, job searching. Bolles also has an interesting chapter on, integrating work and faith. The book contains a number, of useful appendixes, including exercises to help people, determine their ideal job and locating a career counselor, or coach., Reproduced by permission of the publisher., , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 399

Page 437 :
most hiring decisions are made on the basis of subjective impressions gleaned from résumés, telephone conversations, and face-to-face interviews. These impressions are based on perceptions of personality,, appearance, social skills, and body language. Knowing, this situation, you can practice certain strategies that, may increase the odds in your favor., No matter what type of job you’re looking for, successful searches have certain elements in common. First,, you must prepare a résumé. Next, you need to target specific companies or organizations you would like to work, for. Then, you must inform these companies of your interest in such a way as to get them interested in you., , Putting Together a Résumé, No matter what your job search strategy, an excellent, résumé is a critical ingredient. The purpose of a résumé is not to get you a job, but to get you an interview. To be effective, your résumé must show that you, have at least the minimum technical qualifications for, the position, know the standard conventions of the, work world, and are a person who is on the fast track, to success. Furthermore, it must achieve these goals, without being flashy or gimmicky. Especially, it must, contain no spelling or grammatical mistakes. Consider, these two “fatal flaws” that appeared on cover letters:, “I am a rabid typist” and “Thank you for your consideration. Hope to hear from you shorty”!, Your résumé should project the desired positive,, yet conservative, image if you follow these guidelines, (Lock, 2005a):, 1. Use white, ivory, or beige (never any other, color) paper high in rag content., 2. Make sure the résumé contains not a single typographical error., 3. Use the best professional printing service, available., 4. Keep it short. One side of an 8.5" X 11" sheet, of paper will suffice for most college students; do not, go over two pages., 5. Don’t write in full sentences, and avoid using, the word I. Instead, begin each statement with an “action” word that describes a specific achievement, such, as “Supervised a staff of fifteen” or “Handled all customer complaints.”, 6. Avoid giving any personal information that is, superfluous to the job. Such information is an unnecessary distraction and may give the reader cause to dislike you and therefore reject your application., , An effective résumé will generally contain the following information, laid out in an easy-to-read format, (Figure 12.15 shows an attractively prepared résumé):, , 400, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Heading. At the top of the page, give your name, address, and phone number. This is the only section of, the résumé that is not given a label. (You do not need, to label the document “Résumé.”), Objective. State precisely and concisely the kind of, position you are seeking, remembering to use action, words and to avoid the use of I. An example might be, “Challenging, creative position in the communication, field requiring extensive background in newspaper,, radio, and television.”, Education. List any degrees you’ve earned, giving, major field of study, date, and granting institution for, each. (List the highest degree you received first. If you, have a college degree, you don’t need to mention your, high school diploma.) If you have received any academic honors or awards, mention them in this section., Experience. This section should be organized, chronologically, beginning with your most recent job, and working backward. For each position, give the, dates of employment and describe your responsibilities and your accomplishments. Be specific, and make, sure your most recent position is the one with the, greatest achievements. Don’t bother listing trivial attainments. Readers find such material annoying, and it, just calls attention to the fact that you don’t have more, important items to list., Also, although it may be tempting, beware of padding your résumé with misrepresentations or outright, untruths. Although false information may help you get, an interview, a good interviewer can usually detect a, fraud. Also, background checking is relatively common, today (Kluger, 2002). Thus, the truth is likely to come, out—either before or during the interview—and then, the irreparable damage is done. If you are wondering, whether to include a questionable entry on your résumé, use the “sniff test” (Theisen, 2002). Could you, talk easily with an interviewer about what you claim, on your résumé without feeling nervous? If not, delete, the information., If you are currently a student or are a recent graduate, your schooling will provide the basis for both, , WE B LI N K 12.6, , JobWeb, The National Association of Colleges and Employers has assembled a comprehensive set of resources for both students, and career guidance professionals. The site includes information on job searching, employment listings, educational, updating, and college- and university-based resources.

Page 438 :
Finding Companies You, Want to Work For, , your experience and your qualifications. You can give, yourself a boost over the competition by taking parttime or summer jobs in the field in which you plan to, work. If this option isn’t feasible, do some volunteer, work in this area and list it under an “Honors and Activities” section on your résumé., , Initially, you need to determine what general type of, organization will best suit your needs. Do you want to, work in a school? a hospital? a small business? a large, corporation? a government agency? a human services, agency? If you want to select an appropriate work environment, you need an accurate picture of your personal qualities and knowledge of various occupations, and their characteristics. Job search manuals like Parachute can provide you with helpful exercises in selfexploration. To learn about the characteristics of different occupations, look them up in the Occupational, Outlook Handbook, visit your Career Services office, or, see a reference librarian., Once you’ve decided on a setting, you need to target specific companies. That’s easy—you simply look, , Technology is changing a number of aspects of the, job search process, including the preparation and, screening of résumés. Increasingly, companies are, likely to electronically scan résumés for key words that, match job specifications (Lock, 2005a). Thus, it’s helpful to know how to create an electronic résumé in addition to the traditional paper version. You can get information about doing so at your campus Career, Services office. Also, many organizations post formatting instructions on their websites for people who, want to submit electronic résumés., , •, , Example of an Attractively Formatted Résumé, TERESA M. MORGAN, Campus Address, 1252 River St., Apt. 808, East Lansing, MI 48823, (517)332-6086, , Permanent Address, 1111 W. Franklin, Jackson, MI 49203, (517)782-0819, , OBJECTIVE, , To pursue a career in interior design, or a related field, in which I, can utilize my design training. Willing to relocate after June 2005., , EDUCATION, Sept. 2003–, June 2005, , Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48825., Bachelor of Arts–Interior Design, with emphasis in Design, Communication and Human Shelter. Courses include Lighting,, Computers, Public Relations and History of Art., (F.I.D.E.R. accredited) 3.0 GPA (4.0 = A)., , July 2003–, Aug. 2003, , Michigan State University overseas study, England and France,, Decorative Arts and Architecture. 4.0 GPA (4.0 = A)., , Sept. 2001–, June 2003, , Jackson Community College, Jackson, MI 49201., Associate’s Degree. 3.5 GPA (4.0 = A)., , EMPLOYMENT, Dec. 2004–, June 2005, , Food Service and Maintenance, Owen Graduate Center, Michigan, State University., • Prepared and served food., • Managed upkeep of adjacent Van Hoosen Residence Hall., , Sept. 2003–, June 2004, , Food Service and Maintenance, McDonel Residence Hall,, Michigan State University., • Served food and cleaned facility., • Handled general building maintenance., , June 2002–, Dec. 2002, , Waitress, Charlie Wong’s Restaurant, Jackson, MI., • Served food, dealt with a variety of people on a personal level., • Additional responsibilities: cashier, hostess, bartender, and, employee trainer., , HONORS, AND, ACTIVITIES, , • Community College Transfer scholarship from MSU., • American Society of Interior Design Publicity Chairman;, Executive Board, MSU Chapter., • Sigma Chi Little Sisters., • Independent European travel, summer 2003., • Stage manager and performer in plays and musicals., , F I G U R E 12. 15, , Example of an attractively formatted, résumé. The physical appearance of a, résumé is very important. This example, shows what a well-prepared résumé should, look like. (Adapted from Lock, 2005b), , REFERENCES and PORTFOLIO available upon request., , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 401

Page 439 :
for companies that have advertised openings in your, field, right? Not necessarily. If you restrict yourself to, this approach, you may miss many valuable opportunities. Experts estimate that up to 80 percent of all vacancies, especially those above entry level, are never, advertised (Bolles, 2005)., How should you proceed? Certainly you should, check the classified section in newspapers to identify, the many positions that are advertised. If you are willing to relocate anywhere, a good source for business, and professional jobs is the National Business Employment Weekly. You should also consult any trade or professional newspapers, magazines, or journals in your, field. You can also search for job openings on the Internet (see several of the Web Links in this chapter)., But you should note that using Internet job boards is, one of the least effective ways of getting a job (Bolles,, 2005; Kleiman, 2003)., You could also go to an employment agency, but, keep in mind that these agencies generally handle only, entry-level, hourly wage jobs. In addition, they can, cost you thousands of dollars. If you’re interested in, professional jobs, you might consider contacting executive recruiters, widely known as “headhunters.” Executive recruiters work on commission for organizations, that have vacancies to fill. They earn their livelihood, by actively looking for people who have the qualifications being sought by the hiring organization. You can, locate headhunters nationwide by consulting The Directory of Executive Recruiters., What about that 80 percent of openings that are, not advertised? Actually, this statistic is somewhat misleading, because it includes a large number of vacancies that are filled by promotions within organizations., Nonetheless, many organizations do have openings, that are not accessible through traditional channels. If, you have targeted companies that haven’t advertised, any vacancies, you may want to initiate the contact, yourself. Richard Bolles, author of What Color Is Your, Parachute?, suggests the following strategy. First, identify a specific problem that the organization has, then, devise a strategy to solve it. Next, find out who has the, , WE B LI N K 12.7, , CareerJournal, Compiled by an editorial team from The Wall Street Journal,, CareerJournal contains both daily updates on employment, issues (particularly for executive, managerial, and professional positions) and a vast array of job-seeking and employment articles online. Students can find an extraordinary, wealth of tips and strategies on résumé and cover letter, preparation, effective interviewing, and similar practical, matters., , 402, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , power to hire and fire (either through library research, or a network of personal contacts). Finally, approach, this person directly to convince him or her of your, unique capability to help., , Landing an Interview, No one is going to hire you without first “checking out, the goods.” This inspection process typically involves, one or more formal interviews. How do you go about, getting yourself invited for an interview? If you are applying for an advertised vacancy, the traditional approach is to send a résumé with a cover letter to the hiring organization. If your letter and résumé stand out, from the crowd, you may be invited for an interview., One way to increase your chances is to persuade the, prospective employer that you are interested enough in, the company to have done some research on the organization. By taking the time to learn something about a, company, you should be in a better position to make a, convincing case about the ways in which your expertise, will be particularly useful to the organization., If you are approaching an organization in the absence of a known position opening, your strategy may, be somewhat different. You may still opt to send a résumé, along with a more detailed cover letter explaining why you have selected this particular company. Another option, suggested by Bolles (2005), is to, introduce yourself (by phone or in person) directly to, the person in charge of hiring and request an interview. You can increase your chances of success by using, your network of personal contacts to identify some acquaintance that you and the person in charge have in, common. Then, you can use this person’s name to facilitate your approach. After you have an interview,, you should follow up with a thank-you note and a résumé that will jog the prospective employer’s memory, about your training and talents., , Polishing Your Interview, Technique, The final, and most crucial, step in the process of securing a job is the face-to-face interview. If you’ve gotten this far, the employer already knows that you have, the necessary training and experience to do the job., Your challenge is to convince the employer that you’re, the kind of person who would fit well in the organization. Your interviewer will attempt to verify that you, have the intangible qualities that will make you a good, team player. Even more important, he or she will try to, identify any “red flag” behaviors, attitudes, or traits, that mark you as an unacceptable risk., Because interviews are so important, you would, think that interviewers’ ratings of job applicants are

Page 440 :
WE B LI N K 12.8, , Salary.com, This useful site allows you to determine median salaries, for numerous occupations at different experience levels, and in different geographical areas and compare them to, national averages. You can probably get all the information you need for free, but you can also pay (a lot) for a, customized salary report., , should be somewhat formal and reserved, and you, should avoid any attempts at humor—you never know, what might offend your interviewer. Above all, never, give more information than the interviewer requests,, especially negative information. If asked directly what, your weaknesses are—a common ploy—respond with, a “flaw” that is really a positive, as in “I tend to work, too hard at times.” Don’t interrupt or contradict your, interviewer. And don’t ever blame or criticize anyone,, especially previous employers, even if you feel that the, criticism is justified (Lock, 2005b)., Developing an effective interview technique requires practice. Many experts suggest that you never, turn down an interview, because you can always benefit from the practice even if you don’t want the job., Advance preparation is also crucial. Never go into an, interview cold. Find out all you can about the company before you go. Try to anticipate the questions that, will be asked and have some answers ready. In general,, you will not be asked simply to reiterate information, from your résumé. Remember, it is your personal, qualities that are being assessed at this point. A final, word of advice: If possible, avoid any discussion of, salary in an initial interview. The, appropriate time for salary negotiation is after a firm offer of employment has been extended. By, the way, you can scope out salary, information for many jobs by visiting Web Link 12.8. And you can, find additional tips on interviewing at some of the other Web Links, in this chapter., © Martin Leissl/Visum/The Image Works, , heavily based on job-relevant considerations. Unfortunately, research shows that this is not usually the case., For one thing, confirmation bias (Chapter 6) can operate in interview situations. That is, interviewers who, have formed expectations about a job candidate (based, on the résumé, letters of recommendation, and the like), often behave in ways that tend to confirm these expectations, whether positive or negative (Dipboye, 1992)., In addition, researchers find that more attractive, candidates are usually rated higher than less attractive, ones, as are those who dress in a manner consistent, with the dress norms in an organization (Forsythe,, Drake, & Cox, 1985). Also, visible tattoos or body, piercings can create a negative impression at a job interview (Mallory, 2001). And remember to go easy on, the aftershave lotion or perfume. A strong scent can be, a real turnoff. Researchers also find that job candidates, who are overweight are rated lower (especially if they, are women) than those of average weight (Pingitore et, al., 1994). Finally, it has been found that interviewees, who emit positive nonverbal cues—leaning forward,, smiling, and nodding—are rated higher than those, who do not (Riggio & Throckmorton, 1988). Thus, to, do your best in an interview, you should brush up on, your nonverbal communication skills (Chapter 7) and, your impression management tactics (Chapter 5). And, remember, because of primacy effects (Chapter 6), the, first few minutes of the interview are crucial., To create the right impression, you must come, across as confident, enthusiastic, and ambitious. By the, way, a firm (not wishy-washy or bone-crushing) handshake helps create a positive first impression, especially, for women (Chaplin et al., 2000). Your demeanor, , To be successful on a job interview, candidates need to dress appropriately and convey confidence, enthusiasm, and interest in the job., , CHAPTER 12, , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 403

Page 441 :
■, , KEY IDEAS, , CHAPTER 12 REVIEW, , Choosing a Career, ■, , Ideally, people look for jobs that are compatible with their, personal characteristics. Thus, individuals need to have a sense, of their own abilities, interests, and personality. Family background also influences career choices., ■ There are abundant resources for those who want to learn, about possible career options. In researching prospective careers, it is important to find out about the nature of the work,, working conditions, entry requirements, potential earnings, potential status, opportunities for advancement, intrinsic satisfactions, and the future outlook for jobs., ■ Individuals who have trouble making career decisions may, find it helpful to take an occupational interest inventory. People, have the potential for success in a variety of occupations, and, they need to keep this and other considerations in mind as they, make career decisions., Models of Career Choice and Development, ■, , John Holland’s hexagonal model of career development asserts that people select careers based on their own personality, characteristics. Holland’s well-supported theory includes six, personal orientations and matching work environments., ■ Super’s stage theory holds that self-concept development is, the basis for career choice. According to this model, there are, five stages in the occupational life cycle: growth, exploration,, establishment, maintenance, and decline. The assumption that, people will remain in the same career all of their working lives, is out of sync with current workplace realities., ■ Models of career development in women are still being developed. Women’s career paths are often less orderly and predictable than men’s because of the need to juggle multiple roles, and because many women interrupt their careers to devote time, to childrearing., The Changing World of Work, ■, , Work is an activity that produces something of value for, others. A number of contemporary trends are changing the, world of work. Generally, the more education individuals obtain, the higher their salaries will be., ■ Between now and the year 2012, more women and minorities will join the labor force. Although women and minorities, are participating in the workforce at all occupational levels, they, tend to be concentrated in the lower-paying and lower-status, positions. Furthermore, women and minorities face discrimination in a number of areas. Increasing diversity in the workforce presents challenges to both organizations and workers., , Because of dramatic changes in the economy, unemployment is a problem for both skilled and unskilled workers. Job, loss is highly stressful; middle-aged workers are most distressed, by the experience. Unemployed workers who believe that they, have been treated unfairly and arbitrarily often feel angry; a few, of these individuals may resort to violence in the workplace. In, coping with unemployment, social support is critical., , Balancing Work and Other Spheres of Life, ■, , A major challenge for workers today is balancing work, family, and leisure activities in ways that are personally satisfying., Workaholism may be based on positive or negative motives, but, it still creates work-family conflict for workaholics and their, families., ■ As dual-earner families have become the family norm, juggling multiple roles has emerged as a challenge, especially for, women. Nonetheless, multiple roles are generally beneficial to, mental, physical, and relationship health. Leisure plays an important role in psychological and physical health., Application: Getting Ahead in the Job Game, ■, , Career counselors agree about the essential elements of a, successful job search. The key factors include (1) determining, the type of organization that will best suit one’s needs, (2) constructing an effective résumé, (3) winning a job interview, and, (4) developing an effective interview technique., ■ Before interviewing with a company, it is wise to do some, research on the company to demonstrate your interest in the, organization. Nonverbal communication skills can be crucial in, job interviews. You should try to appear confident and enthusiastic. Try to avoid salary discussions in your initial interview., , KEY TERMS, Displaced workers p. 393, Dual-earner households, p. 383, Glass ceiling p. 386, Industrial/organizational, (I/O) psychology p. 373, Labor force p. 385, Leisure p. 397, , Occupational interest, inventories p. 377, Sexual harassment p. 391, Token p. 386, Underemployment p. 384, Work p. 382, Work-family conflict p. 395, , KEY PEOPLE, , Coping with Occupational Hazards, ■, , Major hazards related to work include job stress, sexual harassment, and unemployment. The negative effects of stress affect both employers and employees. Interventions to manage, stress in the workplace can be made at the individual level, the, organizational level, and the individual-organizational interface., ■ Victims of sexual harassment often develop physical and, psychological symptoms of stress that can lead to decreased, work motivation and productivity. Many organizations are educating their workers about this problem. Individuals can also, take steps to reduce sexual harassment, although the most popular strategies tend to be the least effective., , 404, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Richard Nelson Bolles, p. 399, John Holland pp. 378–379, , Robert Karasek pp. 388–390, Donald Super pp. 379–381

Page 442 :
7. Job stress has been found to lead to all but which of the, following negative effects?, a. Burnout, b. Bipolar disorder, c. High blood pressure, d. Anxiety, , The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 12.1: Assertive, Job-Hunting Survey. Personal Probe 12.1: What Do You, Know about the Career That Interests You? Personal Probe, 12.2: How Will Your Job or Career Fit with Your Life Needs?, , ANSWERS, , Page 386, Pages 387–391, Pages 391–392, Page 397, Pages 400–401, , 6. When there is only one woman or minority person in a, workplace setting, that person becomes a symbol of his, or her group and is referred to as a _________., a. token., b. scapegoat., c. sex object., d. protected species., , Personal Explorations Workbook, , a, b, a, a, c, , 5. Which of the following is not a work-related trend?, a. Technology is changing the nature of work., b. New work attitudes are required., c. Most new jobs will be in the manufacturing sector., d. Life-long learning is a necessity., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. Holland’s hexagonal theory of occupational choice, emphasizes:, a. the role of self-esteem in job choice., b. the unfolding of career interests over time., c. parental influences and job choice., d. matching personality traits and job environments., , Book Companion Website, , CHAPTER 12, , Page 375, Page 384, Page 377, Pages 378–379, Pages 382–384, , 3. Occupational interest inventories are designed to, predict:, a. how successful an individual is likely to be in a job., b. how long a person will stay in a career., c. how satisfied a person is likely to be in a job., d. all of the above., , 10. Which of the following is a good tip for preparing an, effective résumé?, a. Make your résumé as long as possible., b. Use complete sentences., c. Keep it short., d. Provide a lot of personal information., , b, a, c, d, c, , 2. Findings on education and earnings show that:, a. at all levels of education, men earn more than, women., b. at all levels of education, women earn more than, men., c. there are no gender differences in education and, earnings., d. there is no relationship between education and, earnings., , 9. Compared to European workers, American workers, receive:, a. much less paid vacation time., b. about the same amount of paid vacation time., c. much more paid vacation time, but less sick leave., d. much more paid vacation and more sick leave., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Individuals’ career choices are often:, a. much higher in status than those of their parents., b. similar to those of their parents., c. much lower in status than those of their parents., d. unrelated to their family background., , C a re e rs a n d Wo rk, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 8. According to law, the two types of sexual harassment, are:, a. quid pro quo and environmental., b. legal and illegal., c. caveat emptor and confrontational., d. industrial and organizational., , 405

Page 443 :
BECOMING A SEXUAL PERSON, Key Aspects of Sexual Identity, Physiological Influences, Psychosocial Influences, Gender Differences in Sexual, Socialization, Sexual Orientation, , SEXUAL EXPRESSION, Fantasy, Kissing and Touching, Self-Stimulation, Oral and Anal Sex, Intercourse, , CHAPTER 13 REVIEW, , INTERACTION IN SEXUAL, RELATIONSHIPS, Motives for Engaging in Sex, Communicating About Sex, , PATTERNS OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, Sex in the Age of AIDS, Early Sexual Experiences, Sex in Committed Relationships, Infidelity in Committed Relationships, , THE HUMAN SEXUAL RESPONSE, The Sexual Response Cycle, Gender Differences in Patterns of Orgasm, , PRACTICAL ISSUES IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY, Contraception, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, , 406, , APPLICATION: ENHANCING SEXUAL, RELATIONSHIPS, General Suggestions, Understanding Sexual Dysfunction, Coping with Specific Problems, , PRACTICE TEST

Page 444 :
CHAPTER, , Development, and Expression, of Sexuality, , 13, , Sex. For some people it’s a source of great intimacy and pleasure. For others, it is a source of anxiety and frustration. To some, it’s a sport; to others, an, oppressive duty. Whatever the case, sexuality plays a central role in people’s, lives. Americans sometimes seem obsessed with sex. People joke and gossip, about it constantly. Movies and TV shows, magazines, novels, and the Internet are saturated with sex. Advertisers use sex to sell everything from automobiles to toothpaste. People voraciously consume books to help them improve their sex lives. Yet many couples find it excruciatingly difficult to talk, to each other about sex, and misconceptions about sexuality abound., In this chapter we consider sexuality and adjustment. Specifically, we, look at the development of sexuality and the interpersonal dynamics of sexual relationships. Then we discuss sexual arousal and the varieties of sexual, expression. We also address the important topics of contraception and sexually transmitted diseases. In the Application, we offer some suggestions for, enhancing sexual relationships., Before beginning, we should note that sex research has some unique, problems. Given the difficulties in doing direct observation, sex researchers, depend mostly on interviews and questionnaires. And people who are willing to volunteer information are more liberal and more sexually experienced, than the general population (Wiederman, 2004). In addition, respondents, may shade the truth about their sex lives because of shame, embarrassment,, boasting, or wishful thinking. Researchers also have difficulty getting representative samples, so most studies of American sexuality are overrepresented, with white, middle-class volunteers. Thus, you need to evaluate the results, of sex research with more than the usual caution., , CHAPTER 13, , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 407

Page 445 :
Becoming a Sexual Person, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , ■, , List four key aspects of sexual identity., Discuss how hormones influence sexual, differentiation and sexual behavior., Discuss how families, peers, schools, and the media, shape sexual attitudes and behavior., Discuss gender differences in sexual socialization and, how they affect individuals., , People vary greatly in how they express their sexuality., While some eagerly reveal the intimate details of their, sex lives, others can’t even use sexual words without, embarrassment. Some people need to turn out the, lights before they can have sex; others would like to be, on camera with spotlights shining. To understand this, diversity, we need to examine developmental influences on human sexual behavior., , Key Aspects of Sexual Identity, Identity refers to a clear and stable sense of who one is, in the larger society (see Chapter 11). We’ll use the, term sexual identity to refer to the complex of personal qualities, self-perceptions, attitudes, values,, and preferences that guide one’s sexual behavior. In, other words, your sexual identity is your sense of yourself as a sexual person. It includes four key features:, sexual orientation, body image, sexual values and, ethics, and erotic preferences., 1. Sexual orientation. Sexual orientation is an individual’s preference for emotional and sexual relationships with individuals of one gender or the other., Heterosexuals seek emotional-sexual relationships, with members of the other gender. Homosexuals seek, emotional-sexual relationships with members of the, same gender. Bisexuals seek emotional-sexual relationships with members of both genders. In recent, years, the terms gay and straight have become widely, used to refer to homosexuals and heterosexuals, respectively. Male homosexuals are called gay, whereas, female homosexuals prefer to be called lesbians. As a, social issue, sexual orientation has only recently come, out of the closet. Because many people are ignorant, about this issue, we give it a closer look a little later in, this chapter., 2. Body image. Your body image is how you see, yourself physically. Your view of your physical self definitely affects how you feel about yourself in the sexual, domain. A positive body image is correlated with greater, sexual activity and higher sexual satisfaction (Hatfield, & Rapson, 1996). While ultra-thinness for women has, been a long-time media message, muscular body types, 408, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , ■, , ■, , Summarize the current thinking on the origins of, sexual orientation and attitudes toward, homosexuality., Discuss the identity development and adjustment of, lesbians and gay males., , for men are getting more promotion (Pope, Phillips, &, Olivardia, 2000). The increasing popularity of gym, memberships and the recent dramatic increases in, facelifts and breast enhancements testifies to the importance of body image (Springen, 2004)., 3. Sexual values and ethics. All cultures impose, constraints on how people are expected to behave sexually. People are taught that certain expressions of sexuality are “right” while others are “wrong.” The nature, of these sexual messages varies depending on gender,, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. For example, the double standard encourages sexual experimentation in males, but not females. Individuals are faced, with the daunting task of sorting through these oftenconflicting messages to develop their own sexual values and ethics., 4. Erotic preferences. Within the limits imposed by, sexual orientation and values, people still differ in, what they find enjoyable. Your erotic preferences encompass your attitudes about self-stimulation, oral, sex, intercourse, and other sexual activities. They develop through a complex interplay of physiological, and psychosocial influences—issues we take up next., , Physiological Influences, Among the various physiological factors involved in, sexual behavior, hormones have been of particular interest to researchers., Hormones and Sexual Differentiation, , During prenatal development, a number of biological, developments result in a fetus that is a male or a female. Hormones play an important role in this process,, which is termed sexual differentiation. Around the, third month of prenatal development, different hormonal secretions begin to be produced by male and, female gonads—the sex glands. In males, the testes, produce androgens, the principal class of male sex, hormones. Testosterone is the most important of the, androgens. In females, the ovaries produce estrogens,, the principal class of female sex hormones. Actually,, both classes of hormones are present in both genders,, but in different proportions. During prenatal develop-

Page 446 :
ment, the differentiation of the genitals depends primarily on the level of testosterone, produced—high in males, low in females., At puberty, hormones reassert their influence on sexual development. As you saw, in Chapter 11, adolescents attain reproductive capacity as hormonal changes trigger the, maturation of the primary sex characteristics, (sex organs). Hormonal shifts also regulate, the development of secondary sex characteristics (physical features that distinguish the, genders but are not directly involved in reproduction). In females, more estrogen leads, to breast development, widened hips, and, more rounded body contours. In males, more, androgen results in developing facial hair, a, deeper voice, and angular body contours., Hormones and Sexual Behavior, , © Tribune Media Services, Inc. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission., , Hormonal fluctuations clearly regulate sex, drive in many species of animals. Hormones, also play a role in human sexuality, but their influence, is much more modest. Androgen does seem related to, sexual motivation in both men and women, although, the effect is less strong in women (Apperloo et al.,, 2003; Freeman, Bloom, & McGuire, 2001). Also, high, levels of testosterone in female and male subjects correlate with higher rates of sexual activity (Morley &, Perry, 2003). Curiously, estrogen levels among women, do not correlate well with sexual interest., In summary, physiological factors have important, effects on sexual development. Their influence on sexual anatomy, however, is much greater than their influence on sexual activity., , Rodriguez, & Edwards, 2001). According to a 2003, Gallup Youth Survey, 63 percent of teenagers (ages 13, to 17) reported that their parents talked to them about, sex, while 36 percent said that their parents mostly left, this discussion up to the schools (Mazzuca, 2003). In, another national survey of adolescents and young, adults (ages 13 to 24), only 37 percent felt that they, learned “a lot” of information about relationships and, sexual health from their parents (see Figure 13.1)., Children definitely benefit from having positive and, , Main Sources of Sex Information, Among Youth, , Psychosocial Influences, The principal psychosocial influences on sexual identity, are essentially the same as the main sources of genderrole socialization discussed in Chapter 10. Sexual identity is shaped by families, peers, schools, and the media., Families, , Parents and the home environment are significant influences on sexual identity in the early years. Before, they reach school age, children usually engage in some, sex play and exploration, often under the guise of, “playing doctor.” They also display curiosity about sexual matters, asking questions such as “Where do babies come from?” Parents who punish innocent, exploratory sex play and who stutter and squirm when, kids ask sexual questions convey the idea that sex is, “dirty.” As a result, children may begin to feel guilty, about their sexual urges and curiosity., Most adolescents want both their parents to be, their primary source of sex information (Kreinin,, CHAPTER 13, , •, , Source, , Male, , Percentage, Female, , Total, , Friends, , 46, , 48, , 47, , Sex education classes, , 42, , 39, , 40, , Boyfriends, girlfriends,, partners, , 40, , 39, , 39, , Media (TV, movies,, magazines, the Internet), , 33, , 42, , 38, , Parents, , 34, , 40, , 37, , Doctors, other health care, providers, , 21, , 50, , 36, , Brothers and sisters, , 24, , 19, , 22, , F I G U R E 13. 1, , Main sources of sex information among youth. Adolescents, and young adults (ages 13 to 24) said they had learned “a lot”, from the following sources, according to a national survey., Adapted from Kaiser Family Foundation, Holt, T., Greene, L., & Davis, J. (2003). National, survey of adolescents and young adults: Sexual health knowledge, attitudes, and experience., Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (Question 2, p. 97)., , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 409

Page 447 :
who participate in such programs are less likely to have, sex, and when they do have sex, they are more likely to, use contraceptives., , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , Sex Matters for College, Students: FAQ’s in Human, Sexuality, by Sandra L. Caron (Prentice Hall, 2003), This small paperback is designed around frequently, asked questions the author gets in her college sexuality, classes. Sandra Caron covers a wide range of topics and, groups the many questions into sections based on traffic signs. For instance, the “Pass with Care” section, addresses issues for which caution is advised: birth, control, pregnancy testing, and abortion. The questions, under “Traffic Circle Ahead” focus on sexual decisions, and address gender roles, sexual orientation, and gender identity issues. “Do Not Enter” deals with questions, on sexual assault, sexual abuse, and sexual harassment., The author answers the FAQs as if she were responding, to questions in class. Her replies are informative, supportive, and free of jargon. The last two sections are, devoted to lists of relevant books and websites, organized by topic., Cover image Copyright © 2003 Reprinted by Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle, River, NJ., , open conversations about sex with their parents. For, example, adolescents who receive most of their sex education from a parent engage in sex later, less often,, and with fewer sexual partners than adolescents whose, parents avoid the subject (Jaccard, Dittus, & Gordon,, 2000; Meschke, Bartholomae, & Zentall, 2000). Moreover, they are more likely to use contraceptives if they, are sexually active (Whitaker et al., 1999)., Parents who make sex a taboo topic end up reducing their influence on their kids’ evolving sexual identity, as the children turn elsewhere for information., , Schools, , Surveys show that the vast majority of parents and, other adults support sex education programs in the, schools, despite the media attention given to isolated,, vocal protests (SIECUS, 2004). Also, most teenagers, want their schools to offer sex education (McKay &, Holoway, 1997). Because they fear protests by vocal, minorities, many schools offer sex education programs, that are nothing more than “an organ recital—what is, connected to what in the body with no discussion of, how or why two bodies might connect with each, other” (Zellman & Goodchilds, 1983, p. 53)., Researchers who surveyed a nationally representative sample of American public, middle, junior, and senior high schools reported that 90 percent of schools, offered some type of sex education (Kaiser Family, Foundation, 2004). Among the surveyed schools, 30, percent offer “abstinence only” programs (no information about contraceptive methods), 47 percent offer, “abstinence plus” programs (information about contraception and sexually transmitted diseases), and 20, percent offer comprehensive programs (information, on such topics as contraception, abortion, sexually, transmitted diseases, relationships, sexual orientation,, and responsible decision making)., What is the effectiveness of these various programs? Unfortunately, “abstinence only” programs do, not deter adolescents from engaging in sex, nor do, they change teens’ attitudes about their sexual intentions (Kirby, 2000; Thomas, 2000). In contrast, comprehensive programs result in a wide range of positive, outcomes: increased use of contraception, reduced, pregnancies, and reduced high-risk sexual behavior, (Kirby, 2000). Also, these programs do not promote, (and may delay) having early sex and do not increase, (and may decrease) the number of sexual partners., The Media, , Peers, , As you can see in Figure 13.1, friends are a leading, source of relationship and sexual health information., (Only health care providers are rated higher, and only, by females.) Unfortunately, peers can be a source of, highly misleading information and often champion, sexual ethics at odds with parents’ views., However, peers can also be a highly effective force, for sexually responsible behavior. Some programs, train selected high school seniors to educate younger, students to postpone sexual involvement until they are, mature enough to be sexually responsible (Howard &, McCabe, 1990). Among other things, students practice, effective responses to the “lines” teens encounter. Teens, 410, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Americans see thousands of sexual encounters a year, on television, videos, and DVDs. Among the top 20, teen television programs, 83 percent contain sexual, , WE B LI N K 13.1, , SIECUS (Sexuality Information and Educational Council, of the United States), This site is produced by one of the oldest organizations in, the United States devoted to educating the public about, matters of sexuality. It contains not only SIECUS-related, information but an excellent annotated set of web-based, links to a variety of topics related to sexuality.

Page 448 :
Among, all, programs, Among, prime-time, broadcast, shows, Among, top 20, teen, programs, 0, , •, , 20, 100, 40, 60, 80, Percentage of programs, with sexual content (2001–2002), , F I G U R E 13.2, , Sexual content in television programs. Sexual content pervades, television programs and is especially high in the top 20 teen, programs, according to this survey of programs that aired in, 2001–2002., , Turning to cyberspace, experts estimate that there, will be 1.2 billion Internet users worldwide by 2005, (Cooper, 2002). Newsgroups with sexually explicit images are extremely popular, especially among males., But parents are understandably alarmed about young, children having easy access to sexually explicit material. Among 10- to 17-year-olds, 25 percent have encountered unwanted pornography, and 20 percent, have been exposed to unwanted sexual solicitations, (Finkelhor, Mitchell, & Wolak, 2000). On the other, hand, the Internet provides easy and private access to, useful information on a host of sexual topics, including contraceptive methods and resources for gays and, lesbians. The “Living in Today’s World” sidebar expands on the issue of sex and the Internet., To conclude, sexual identities are shaped by a host, of intersecting influences. Given the multiplicity of, factors at work, people bring highly diverse expectations to their sexual relationships. As you’ll see, this, variability can complicate sexual interactions., , Gender Differences in Sexual, Socialization, , content (see Figure 13.2). Although it is still unusual, to see TV characters talking about the consequences of, unprotected sex or “using protection,” TV sex is slowly, getting “safer.” For example, in shows that talked about, or depicted sexual intercourse, 26 percent made some, reference to a safer sex issue, nearly double the rate, four years prior (14 percent) (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2003). Television portrayals of sexual relationships can influence young people’s emerging sexual, values. For example, one experiment reported that, teens who watched 15 hours of TV shows containing, casual sex had more permissive attitudes toward nonmarital sex than teens who saw 15 hours of TV depicting nonsexual relationships (Bryant & Rockwell,, 1994). On the other hand, television can promote responsible sexual behavior and tolerance of homosexuality (Keller & Brown, 2002; Silver, 2002)., Books and magazines are another source of information on sex. Some 20 percent of adolescents and, young adults reported that they had learned “a lot”, about relationships and sexual health from magazines, (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2003). Of course, some, publications provide accurate and useful information,, but many perpetuate myths about sex and miseducate, young readers. The lyrics of rock music also contain, extensive references to sexual behavior and norms of, sexual conduct. Some rap music has come under fire, because it portrays women as sex objects and advocates sexual violence against women. Approximately, two-thirds of music videos contain sexual imagery, (Pardun & McKee, 1995)., , Summarizing the research on gender differences in sexuality, Letitia, Anne Peplau (2003), a major researcher on gender and relationships, concludes that there are four, key differences, and that these hold, for both gays and straights. First,, men have more interest in sex than, women (they think about and want Letitia Anne Peplau, to have sex more often). Second,, the connection between sex and, intimacy is more important for women than for men, (women typically prefer sex in the context of a relationship). Third, aggression is more often linked to, sexuality for men than for women (men engage in coercive sex much more often). Finally, women’s sexuality is more easily shaped by cultural and situational, factors (their sexual attitudes are easier to change and, they are more likely to change their sexual orientation, over time)., Societal values obviously come into play here., American males are encouraged to experiment sexually, to initiate sexual activities, and to enjoy sex without emotional involvement (Townsend, 1995). They, also get the message to be conquest-oriented regarding, sex (“scoring”). Thus, men may emphasize “sex for, fun” in casual relationships and reserve “sex with love”, for committed relationships (Oliver & Hyde, 1993)., Girls are typically taught to view sex in the context of a loving relationship (Hatfield & Rapson, 1996)., They learn about romance and the importance of, physical attractiveness and catching a mate. It isn’t, , CHAPTER 13, , Courtesy, Letitia Anne Peplau, , From A Biennial Report of the Kaiser Family Foundation: Sex on TV 3, Executive Summary,, (#3324), The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. This information was reprinted with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation., , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 411

Page 449 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Sex and the Internet, The Internet is playing an increasingly important role in, sexuality. In fact, some experts say that “the influence of, the Internet on sexuality is likely to be so significant that, it will ultimately be recognized as the next ‘sexual revolution’” (Cooper et al., 2000). Researchers estimate that, between 20 percent and 33 percent of Internet users engage in some form of online sexual activity (Egan, 2000)., Online sexual activity involves the use of the Internet for any activity (text, audio, or graphics) that involves sexuality (Cooper et al, 2002). These activities are, quite diverse and include using the Internet for information or entertainment, as well as for purchasing sexual, materials, searching for sexual partners, and having, sexually explicit discussions., The first large-scale survey of adults who used the, Internet for sexual pursuits (Cooper et al., 1999) described the respondents:, • Males outnumbered females by about 6 to 1., • The average age was about 35., • Most (87 percent) identified themselves as heterosexual; 7 percent, as gay or lesbian; 7 percent, as bisexual., • Most (64 percent) were either married (47 percent) or in committed relationships (17 percent)., • Most (59 percent) were managers or professionals;, 27 percent were in sales or clerical work or in the trades;, 13 percent were students; 2 percent were unemployed., Cybersex, a subcategory of online sexual activity,, involves the use of computerized content for sexual, stimulation and gratification (Maheu & Subotnik, 2001)., People look at erotic pictures, engage in sexual chat,, exchange sexually explicit e-mail messages, and share, mutual sexual fantasies while masturbating. In a large online survey, 39 percent of the respondents said that they, had engaged in cybersex, although fewer than 3 percent, engaged in it “often” or “all the time” (Cooper et al.,, 2002). Interestingly, 60 percent of people in this survey, did not believe that cybersex violated a person’s marriage, vows. However, spouses of individuals who are involved, in Internet sexual affairs say that online affairs are as, emotionally painful as those offline (Schneider, 2003)., The large online survey also reported that 25 percent of respondents had had an in-person meeting for a, date or sexual experience with someone whom they had, met online (Cooper et al., 2002). (More women than men, reported engaging in this behavior, since women are, more likely to use the Internet to explore online sexual, relationships.) Because people who make these arrangements are more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior,, they expose themselves to potential sexual assault and, contracting STDs (McFarlane, Bull, & Reitmeijer, 2000)., , Actual cybersex addiction or Internet sex addiction is, a specific form of Internet addiction (see Chapter 4)., People with this problem engage in online sex so often, that it interferes with their personal and work life, they, are unable to refrain from the activity (except temporarily), and they deny its negative effects on their lives., Most professionals view cybersex addiction as a type of, compulsion (see Chapter 15). This behavior can have, serious consequences for addicted individuals and their, families (Cooper, 2002). Internet sex addicts may neglect, their spouses and children, sow feelings of betrayal in, their mates, and break up their marriages (Schneider,, 2003). They can also lose their jobs if they neglect their, work or are discovered engaging in cybersex at the office. (About 20 percent who engage in online sex use an, office computer for this activity, risky behavior in that, many organizations now monitor the online activities of, their employees.), Because Internet sexuality is a relatively new phenomenon, mental health professionals are still developing their views about it (Cooper et al., 1999). Some see, it as just another form of sexual expression. Others are, alarmed that Internet sex addiction is a growing problem. To date, research supports both of these perspectives (Cooper et al., 1999; 2002). Online sex does seem, to be a form of sexual expression for light users (less, than 1 hour per week) and moderate users (1 to 10 hours, per week). They typically use sexual material on the Internet for entertainment more than for sexual release—, akin to reading Playboy or viewing TV programs with lots, of “skin.” These individuals make up about 92 percent of, all Internet sex users. Unfortunately it is quite a different story for high users (11 to 80 hours per week), who, make up 8 percent of all those involved in online sexual, activity. These people report significantly more psychological distress and score higher on measures of compulsivity and sensation seeking (see Chapter 2 Application)., They are at high risk for developing psychological problems. Research needs to substantiate these findings and, to determine which activities increase risk for heavy users., The Internet can obviously have a positive influence, on sex. Among other things, it is an excellent source of, helpful information. And gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals can use it to locate virtual support communities., On the other hand, the anonymity, affordability, and, accessibility of the Internet lead some individuals to, become hooked on cybersex, resulting in serious negative, consequences (Cooper & Sportolari, 1997). We look to, researchers and mental health professionals for muchneeded insights into this emerging and significant area, of sexuality.

Page 450 :
Because of gender differences in sexual socialization, females, tend to begin seeing themselves as sexual persons at a later, age than males., , until women actually begin having sexual experiences, that they start to see themselves as sexual persons., Sexual socialization usually takes longer for females than for males because women usually have, more emotional baggage connected with sex than men, do. One factor is the fear of pregnancy. Concerns about, becoming pregnant inhibit a woman’s enthusiasm for, sex. Second, girls hear negative messages about sex and, men (“Men only want one thing”) from their mothers,, siblings, and female peers. They are also aware of rape, and incest. Third, women typically develop negative, associations about their genitals and sex that males don’t, experience: blood and pain associated with menstruation and fears of penetration. A fourth factor is sexual, guilt. Whereas social norms encourage males to be sexually active, these norms discourage such behavior in, females—sexually active women may be looked on as, “loose.” All these negative associations with sex are, combined with the positive rewards of dating and, emotional intimacy. Hence, it’s no surprise that many, women feel ambivalent about sex (Hyde, 2004). These, feelings can tilt in the negative direction if early sexual, partners are unskilled, impatient, or selfish., With differing views of sexuality and relationships,, males and females can be out of sync with each other—, particularly in adolescence and early adulthood. In, adulthood, women become more comfortable with, themselves as sexual persons, while males become more, comfortable with emotional intimacy and commitment., These gender differences mean that communication is, essential for mutually satisfying sexual relationships., Because both members of same-gender couples, have been socialized similarly, they are less likely than, straight couples to have compatibility problems. Like, heterosexual women, lesbians typically experience, emotional attraction to their partners before experiencing sexual feelings (Peplau & Spaulding, 2003). By, contrast, gay men (like heterosexual men) tend to, CHAPTER 13, , Sexual Orientation, Gay, straight, or in between? In this section, we’ll explore the intriguing and controversial topic of sexual, orientation., Key Considerations, , Most people view heterosexuality, and homosexuality as two distinct, categories: you’re either one or the, other. However, many individuals, who define themselves as heterosexuals have had homosexual experiences, and vice versa (Kinsey,, 1948, 1953; Laumann et al., 1994)., Thus, it is more accurate to view, Alfred Kinsey, heterosexuality and homosexuality, as end points on a continuum. Indeed, Alfred Kinsey devised a seven-point scale, shown, in Figure 13.3 on the next page, to characterize sexual, orientation., How are people distributed on this scale? No one, knows for sure, because it’s hard to get accurate data., Furthermore, there’s some debate about where to draw, the lines between heterosexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality on the Kinsey scale. A frequently cited estimate of the number of people who are predominantly homosexual is 10 percent; however, several, recent surveys have all reported lower estimates (ACFS, Investigators, 1992; Johnson et al., 1992; Laumann, et al., 1994). The overall evidence suggests that about, 5 percent–8 percent of the population could reasonably be characterized as homosexual (Michaels, 1996;, see Chapter 9)., Now let’s complicate things a little more. Using, Kinsey’s model, how would you characterize a person, who was married for 10 years, has children, got a divorce, and is now involved in a committed homosexual relationship? And what about a person who is married but who has homosexual fantasies and feels strongly, drawn to members of the same gender? Clearly, these, complex situations require more elaborate models., One such model portrays sexual orientation as a cluster of seven factors that can be rated along Kinsey’s, seven-point scale: sexual behavior; emotional preference; sexual fantasies; sexual attraction; social preference; lifestyle, social world, and community; and selfidentification (Klein, Sepekoff, & Wolff, 1986). In this, view, individuals’ ratings on the seven factors may or, may not be congruent, and ratings may change over, time to match shifts in people’s understanding of their, Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 413, , AP/Wide World Photos, , © Michael Newman/PhotoEdit, , place much more importance on physical appearance, and sexual compatibility in selecting partners (Blumstein & Schwartz, 1983) and to develop emotional relationships out of sexual ones (Harry, 1983).

Page 451 :
0, Exclusively, heterosexual, behavior, , 1, Incidental, homosexual, behavior, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , More than, incidental, homosexual, behavior, , Equal, amount of, heterosexual, and, homosexual, behavior, , More than, incidental, heterosexual, behavior, , Incidental, heterosexual, behavior, , Exclusively, homosexual, behavior, , Ambisexual behavior, , •, , FIG U R E 13.3, , Heterosexuality and homosexuality as end points on a continuum. Kinsey and other sex researchers, view heterosexuality and homosexuality as ends of a continuum rather than as all-or-none distinctions., Kinsey created this seven-point scale (from 0 to 6) for describing sexual orientation. He used the term, ambisexual to describe those falling in the middle of the scale, but bisexual is more widely used today., , sexual orientation. It’s obvious that sexual orientation, is a complex concept we need to know a lot more about., Origins, , Why do some people become straight and others, gay?, A number of environmental explanations have been, suggested as causes of homosexuality. Freud believed, that homosexuality originates from an unresolved, Oedipus complex (see Chapter 2). That is, instead of, coming to identify with the parent of the same gender,, the child continues to identify with the parent of the, other gender. Learning theorists assert that homosexuality results from early negative heterosexual encounters or early positive homosexual experiences. Sociologists propose that homosexuality develops because of, poor relationships with same-gender peers or because, being labeled a homosexual sets up a self-fulfilling, prophecy. Surprisingly, a comprehensive review of the, causes of sexual orientation found no compelling support for any of these explanations of homosexuality, (Bell, Weinberg, & Hammersmith, 1981)., Similarly, there is no evidence that parents’ sexual, orientation is linked to that of their children (Patterson, 2003). That is, heterosexual parents are as likely to, produce homosexual (or heterosexual) offspring as, homosexual parents are. Children who grow up in gay, or lesbian families are predominantly heterosexual., Researchers have found that extremely feminine, behavior in young boys and masculine behavior in, young girls is correlated with subsequent homosexuality (Bailey, 2003; Bem, 2000). Consistent with this finding, many gay men and some gay women report that, they can trace their homosexual leanings back to their, early childhood (Bailey, 2003). The evidence for this, connection in lesbians is less strong than it is in males,, supporting the emerging view that female sexuality is, more fluid than that of males (Baumeister, 2000; Peplau & Garnets, 2000)., 414, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , Some theorists speculate that biological factors are, involved in the development of homosexuality, because many gay men and some lesbians can trace their, homosexual leanings back to their childhood years, (Bell, Weinberg, & Hammersmith, 1981; Garnets &, Kimmel, 1991). Several lines of research suggest that, hormonal secretions during prenatal development, may shape sexual development, organize the brain in a, lasting manner, and influence subsequent sexual orientation (Berenbaum & Snyder, 1995; Ellis & Ebertz,, 1997). To date, however, the research is inconclusive,, so this theory must be viewed with caution. Other, researchers have explored the relationship between circulating hormone levels in adults and sexual orientation, but there is no convincing evidence of an association (Bailey, 2003; Banks & Gartrell, 1995)., Genetic factors are also of interest. In an important study, investigators identified gay and bisexual, men who had a twin brother or an adopted brother, (Bailey & Pillard, 1991). They found that 52 percent of, the subjects’ identical twins were gay, that 22 percent, of their fraternal twins were gay, and that 11 percent of, their adoptive brothers were gay. A companion study, of lesbian women with twin or adopted sisters reported a similar pattern of results (Bailey et al., 1993;, see Figure 13.4). More recent twin studies, with larger, and more representative samples, have provided further support for the conclusion that heredity influences sexual orientation, although these studies have, yielded smaller estimates of genetic influence (Bailey,, Dunne, & Martin, 2000; Kendler et al., 2000). Thus,, there may be genetic links to homosexuality., The bottom line is that it isn’t yet clear what determines sexual orientation. Moreover, it appears that, different paradigms are needed to explain male and female homosexuality (Peplau & Garnets, 2000). It is, likely that there are a variety of types of homosexuality—and heterosexuality—that will require a variety

Page 452 :
Genetic, Relationship relatedness, Identical, twin, , 100%, , Fraternal, twin, , 50%, , Adoptive, sibling, , 0%, , Percentage of relatives, with gay sexual orientation, Males, Females, Males, Females, Males, Females, 0, , •, , 10, , 20, , 30, , 40, , 50, , F I G U R E 13.4, , Genetics and sexual orientation. A concordance rate indicates the percentage of twin pairs or other pairs of relatives that exhibit the same, characteristic. If relatives who share more genetic relatedness show higher, concordance rates than relatives who share less genetic overlap, this, evidence suggests a genetic predisposition to the characteristic. Recent, studies of both gay men and lesbian women have found higher concordance rates among identical twins than fraternal twins, who, in turn,, exhibit more concordance than adoptive siblings. These findings are, consistent with the hypothesis that genetic factors influence sexual, orientation. If only genetic factors were responsible for sexual orientation, the identical twin concordance rates would be 100 percent;, because they are much lower, environmental factors must also play, a role. (Data from Bailey & Pillard, 1991; Bailey et. al., 1993), , page). Greater acceptance is due, in part, to, the increasing visibility of lesbians and gays, in society, including likable gay characters, (Will and Grace) and individuals (Queer Eye, for the Straight Guy) on television., Homophobia is the intense fear and intolerance of homosexuals. Because few, people with negative attitudes toward homosexuals have the psychopathology that, “phobia” implies, some psychologists believe, that sexual prejudice is a more appropriate, term (Herek, 2003). The lowest levels of sexual prejudice are associated with individuals, 60, who personally know someone who is gay, (Herek & Capitanio, 1996). Higher levels of, sexual prejudice are associated with being older,, male, less educated, and living in the South or Midwest and in rural areas (Herek & Capitanio, 1996)., Sexual prejudice is also correlated with such psychological factors as authoritarianism (see Chapter, 6) and conservative religious and political beliefs, (Altemeyer, 1996; Herek & Capitanio, 1996). Un-, , of explanations rather than a single account (Hyde &, DeLamater, 2003). This issue is exceedingly complex, and research is still in its infancy. The best we can say, is that the explanations must lie in some complex interaction of biological and environmental factors., , The legalization of same-gender marriage in parts of, the United States in 2004 set off a contentious public, debate. Fueling the controversy, constitutional amendments banning gay marriage were introduced in the, U.S. Congress and in many state legislatures. At the end, of 2004, 15 states had approved constitutional amendments barring gay marriage, and many others had legislative bans on marriage rights for gays (Sullivan,, 2004). Nonetheless, civil unions are legal in California,, Hawaii, and Vermont, and “domestic partnerships” are, legal in Maine and New Jersey (Larson, 2004)., Although the public discussion over gay marriage, is difficult, some believe that it has value (Garnets &, Kimmel, 2003a). First, it has allowed the gay community to educate straight citizens about the realities and, diversity of same-gender couples and their family relationships. Second, it has helped to raise the nation’s, awareness about the facets of discrimination against, gays. Although many Americans are opposed to gay, marriage, they are much more accepting of other issues, related to homosexuality (see Figure 13.5 on the next, CHAPTER 13, , © Justin Sullivan/Getty Images, , Attitudes Toward Homosexuality, , TV personality Rosie O’Donnell and partner Kelli Carpenter were, among many gay and lesbian couples who married when San, Francisco permited gay marriages in 2004. (As of April 2005, the, legal status of gay marriages in California was not yet resolved.), Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 415

Page 453 :
Attitudes Toward Homosexuals, Percent, endorsing, , 1. Homosexuals should have equal rights in, terms of job opportunities., , 89, , 2. Gay partners should have the same inheritance, rights as married couples., , 60, , 3. Gay partners should have the same health, insurance and other employee benefits as, married couples., , 60, , 4. Gay partners should have the same social, security benefits as married couples., , 55, , 5. Gay and lesbian partners should have the same, adoption rights as married couples., , 45, , 6. Which of the following do you support for, gay couples?, a. Marriage rights, , 28, , b. Civil unions, , 23, , c. No legal recognition, , 43, , d. Don’t know, , 6, , *Item 1 is based on a May 2–4, 2004 Gallup survey. Items 2–5 are based on, a February 5–6, 2004 Newsweek survey. Item 6 is based on a May 13–14,, 2004 Newsweek survey. All surveys are based on randomly selected national, samples., , •, , FIG U R E 13.5, , Attitudes toward homosexuals. Americans’ attitudes toward, gays are highly variable, depending on the specific issue. Women, generally have more accepting attitudes than men., , fortunately, negative attitudes sometimes translate into, hate crimes. Approximately 25 percent of gay men and, 20 percent of lesbians have been victims of hate, crimes, and this estimate is likely low (Herek, Gillis, &, Cogan, 1999)., , Developing one’s sexual identity is, complicated and difficult when it, must take place in a climate of sexual prejudice. In discussing that, process, we draw heavily on the work, of psychologists Linda Garnets and, Douglas Kimmel (1991, 2003b). For, gays, lesbians, and bisexuals, sexual, identity development involves acLinda Garnets, knowledging, recognizing, and labeling one’s sexual orientation; conceptualizing it in positive terms; and disclosing it to, others. Gay people of color may need to create a dual, identity that integrates their sexual orientation and, their culture; gay women of color may need to create a, triple identity., In deciding to disclose one’s, sexual orientation to others, people must balance the psychological, and social benefits against the costs, (being fired, losing friends, losing, custody of children, falling victim, to hate crimes). A pragmatic solution to this conflict is rational outness—being “as open as possible,, Douglas C. Kimmel, because it feels healthy to be honest, and as closed as necessary to, protect against discrimination” (Bradford & Ryan,, 1987, p. 77). People are more likely to disclose their sex-, , Photo Credit goes here, , Sexual Identity Development, , Photo Credit goes here, , Poll Question*, , Not all societies view homosexuality negatively. A, review of anthropological studies of 294 societies reported that 59 societies had a clear opinion of homosexuality; within this group, 69 percent approved of it, and 31 percent condemned it (Gregerson, 1982)., , © 2004 AP/Wide World Photos, , Popular television programs like Queer Eye for the, Straight Guy have contributed to the increased, acceptance of gays and lesbians., , 416, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 454 :
ual orientation to close heterosexual friends and siblings than to parents, co-workers, or employers., Coming to terms with one’s homosexuality in a, hostile environment is difficult. Some parents throw, their gay children out of the house, and some teachers, and peers harass and assault gay and lesbian youth. A, survey of 165 15- to 21-year-old gay and bisexual youth, reported that over half feared disclosing their sexual, orientation to their parents (D’Augelli & Hershberger,, 1993). This same study reported that, among parents, who knew about their children’s homosexuality, 12 percent of mothers were perceived by their children to be, rejecting and 8 percent to be intolerant but not rejecting; comparable figures for fathers were 18 percent and, 10 percent, respectively. At least half of gay and lesbian, teenagers reported that they had lost at least one friend, because of their sexual orientation (Ryan & Futterman,, 1997). High schools and colleges increasingly support, groups for gay, lesbian, and bisexual students. And the, Internet offers a wealth of resources for gay, lesbian, and, bisexual people (see Web Link 13.2). These developments should relieve some of the stress that homosexuals experience (see the Recommended Reading box)., Adjustment, , The mental health community initially classified homosexuality as a psychological disorder. The pioneering, research of Evelyn Hooker (1957) and others, however,, demonstrated that view to be a myth: Gays and straights, do not differ on overall measures of psychological adjustment (Bell & Weinberg, 1978; Rosen, 1974). As a result of research, changes in public attitudes, and political lobbying, homosexuality was deleted from the, official list of psychological disorders in 1973. Since, then, research continues to demonstrate comparable, psychological adjustment in gay and straight individuals, couples, and parents (Gonsiorek, 1991; Patterson &, Redding, 1996; Peplau & Spaulding, 2003). Similarly,, there is no evidence of psychopathology in nonclinical, samples of bisexual men and women (Fox, 1996)., Although there is no reliable evidence that homosexual orientation per se impairs psychological functioning, exposure to sexual prejudice and discrimination can cause acute distress (Meyer, 2003). Some recent, studies suggest that gay males and lesbians are at, , WE B LI N K 13.2, , American Psychological Association’s Public Affairs Site, APA’s Office of Public Affairs website offers information, and resources on important contemporary psychological, issues. The site provides answers to common questions, about sexual orientation and homosexuality as well as, links to additional web resources., , CHAPTER 13, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , Loving Someone Gay, by Don Clark (Celestial Arts,, 1997), Now in its 20th anniversary edition, this book speaks, both to those who are gay and to those who know, someone gay. The author, a clinical psychologist who is, gay, writes in a personal and informal style that draws, the reader in. He also easily weaves in real-life examples to illustrate his points. The first two sections address questions of special interest to homosexuals. For, example, Clark discusses the impact of invisibility and, oppression on one’s self-concept, as well as the rewards, of being gay. Other topics include coming out, meeting, other gay people, the emotional and sexual aspects of, relationships, and dealing with break-ups. The third, section, “Loving Someone Gay,” contains advice for, people who know someone gay: parents, wives, husbands, sons, daughters, other relatives, friends, and, neighbors. In “Professional Help,” the fourth section,, Clark provides suggestions for those who interact, often, unknowingly, with gays (teachers, librarians, physicians,, nurses, clergy, counselors, police, judges, legislators,, and researchers)., Another excellent book in this area is Positively Gay:, New Approaches to Gay and Lesbian Life edited by Betty, Berzon (Celestial Arts, 2001). In this book, experts, explore a variety of topics of interest to gay individuals: special issues in same-gender relationships, family, relationships, children, aging, religion, work, and people of color. For a book that deals specifically with gays, and their parents, try Coming Out to Parents: A Two-Way, Survival Guide for Lesbians and Gay Men and Their Parents by Mary Borhek (Pilgrim Press, 1993)., Cover image reprinted by permission of the publisher., , greater risk than their straight peers for anxiety, depression, substance dependence, and suicide attempts, (Cochran, 2001; DeAngelis, 2002)., According to the 2000 U.S. Census, 33 percent of, female same-gender couples and 22 percent of male, same-gender couples are rearing children. The children, of some couples are their own from previous heterosexual relationships or artificial insemination; other, children have been adopted. Studies to date indicate, that children of gay or lesbian parents are no different, than children of heterosexual parents in terms of selfesteem, gender roles, sexual orientation, peer group relationships, or social adjustment (Golombok et al.,, 2003; Patterson, 2003)., , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 417

Page 455 :
Interaction in Sexual Relationships, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , List some common sexual motives., Describe four common barriers in communicating about sex., , Sexual relationships stir up intense emotions. When, things are going well, you feel on top of the world;, when they’re not, you feel in the grip of despair. In this, section, we’ll briefly discuss the interpersonal dynamics of sexual relationships., , Motives for Engaging in Sex, What motivates individuals to engage in sexual encounters? As you might surmise, sexual motives are, quite diverse. Hill (1997) has described eight distinct, sexual motives: (1) feeling valued by one’s partner,, (2) showing value for one’s partner, (3) obtaining relief from stress, (4) providing nurturance to one’s partner, (5) enhancing feelings of personal power, (6) experiencing the power of one’s partner, (7) experiencing, pleasure, and (8) procreating. Individuals differ in the, strength of these motives (Hill & Preston, 1996). Obviously, motives for sexual encounters vary depending, on the circumstances., On a related issue—the relationship between sex, and love—men and women often have somewhat different views. Women are more likely than men to associate sex with love and to “romanticize” sexual desire, (Peplau, 2003). These gender differences transcend, sexual orientation, as they are observed in gays as well, as straights (Peplau, Fingerhut, & Beals 2004)., Some experts speculate that these differences stem, from gender-role socialization (Carroll, Volk, & Hyde,, 1985). Still other researchers believe that these gender, differences are a product of biological influences (Buss,, 1999). It is possible that both influences play a role., , 1. Fear of appearing ignorant. According to a Kinsey Institute/Roper poll, most Americans are woefully, ignorant about sex. That is, on an 18-item test of basic, sexual knowledge, 55 percent of adults responded incorrectly to at least half of the questions (Reinisch, 1990)., (You can test your own knowledge about some aspects, of sex by responding to the questions in Figure 13.6.), Because most people feel that they should be experts, about sex and know that they are not, they feel ashamed., To hide their ignorance, they avoid talking about sex., 2. Concern about partner’s response. Both men and, women say they want their partners to tell them what, they want sexually (see Figure 13.7). Ironically, neither, , How Knowledgeable About Sex Are You?, 1. Massage oil, petroleum jelly, and body lotions are good, lubricants to use with a condom or diaphragm., ____ True ____ False ____ Don’t know, 2. Adult male homosexuals have lower than normal levels of, male hormones., ____ True ____ False ____ Don’t know, 3. A teenage girl or woman can get pregnant during her, menstrual period., ____ True ____ False ____ Don’t know, 4. Most cases of sexually transmitted diseases occur in, people aged 26-50., ____ True ____ False ____ Don’t know, 5. In the United States, heterosexually-transmitted HIV, infections rarely occur., ____ True ____ False ____ Don’t know, Scoring: 1. False. (Oil-based creams, lotions, and jellies can, produce microscopic holes in rubber products within 60 seconds of their application.) 2. False. (Research does not support, this view.) 3. True. (While the chance of a woman’s becoming, pregnant during her menstrual period is lower than at other, times, pregnancy can occur if she has unprotected sex during, her period. Sperm can live for up to 8 days in a woman’s reproductive tract, and if the menstrual cycle is irregular, as it, is likely to be in adolescence, sperm may still be present in, the reproductive tract a week later to fertilize a new egg.), 4. False. (Most cases of sexually transmitted diseases occur in, the under-25 age group.) 5. False. (There is currently an upsurge in heterosexually-transmitted HIV infections in the U.S.), , Communicating About Sex, Because individuals differ in sexual motives, attitudes,, and appetites, disagreements about sex are commonplace (Laumann et al., 1994). Couples have to negotiate whether, how often, and when they will have sex., They also have to decide what kinds of erotic activities, will take place and what sexual behavior means to their, relationship. This negotiation process may not be explicit, but it’s there. Unresolved disparities can be an, ongoing source of frustration in a relationship. Still,, many people find it difficult to talk with their partner, about sex. Couples can encounter four common barriers to sexual communication:, , 418, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , •, , F I G U R E 13. 6, , How knowledgeable about sex are you? Check your basic sexual, knowledge by answering these five questions. Information about, each of the questions is discussed in this chapter.

Page 456 :
feels comfortable doing so (Hatfield & Rapson, 1996)., People usually hold back because they’re afraid of hurting the other’s feelings. Or they fear that their partner, won’t respect and love them if they are truthful. Research, shows that more extensive disclosure of sexual likes and, dislikes positively predicts sexual and relationship satisfaction in committed relationships (Sprecher & Cate,, 2004). Thus, if you keep your preferences to yourself,, you are likely to remain frustrated and unsatisfied., 3. Conflicting attitudes about sex. Many people,, particularly women, are burdened with the negative, sexual messages they learned as children. Also, most, individuals have contradictory beliefs about sex (“Sex, is ‘beautiful’ ” and “Sex is ‘dirty’ ”), and this dissonance, produces psychological conflicts. It may also cause individuals to feel uncomfortable with themselves as sexual persons and to have difficulty talking about sex., 4. Early negative sexual experiences. Some people, have had negative sexual experiences that inhibit their, enjoyment of sex. If these experiences are due to ignorant or inconsiderate sexual partners, subsequent positive sexual interactions will usually resolve the problem over time. If earlier sexual experiences have been, traumatic, as in the case of rape or incest, counseling, may be required to help the individual view sex positively and enjoy it., To communicate more easily and effectively about, sex, you may want to review Chapter 7. Most of the advice on how to improve verbal and nonverbal communication can be applied to sexual relationships. Assertive, communication and constructive conflict-resolution, strategies can keep sexual negotiations healthy. A basic, rule is to accentuate the positive (“I like it when you . . .”), rather than the negative (“I don’t like it when you . . .”)., , What Men and Women Want More of, During Sex, Dating couples, Men, , Women, , Wish their partners would:, Be more experimental, , Talk more lovingly, , Initiate sex more often, , Be more seductive, , Try more oral-genital sex, , Be warmer and more involved, , Give more instructions, , Give more instructions, , Be warmer and more involved, , Be more complimentary, , Married couples, Men, , Women, , Wish their partners would:, Be more seductive, , Talk more lovingly, , Initiate sex more, , Be more seductive, , Be more experimental, , Be more complimentary, , Be wilder and sexier, , Be more experimental, , Give more instructions, , Give more instructions, Be warmer and more involved, , •, , F I G U R E 13. 7, , What men and women want more of during sex. Dating and, married couples were asked which sexual activities they wanted, more of in their relationships. Men and women all agreed that, they wanted more instructions from their partners. They also, generally agreed that they wanted warmer, more involved sexual, relationships and more experimentation. In terms of gender, differences, men wanted their partners to take the initiative, and to be wilder and sexier; women wanted more emotional, reassurance., From Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1997). Love, sex, and intimacy: Their psychology, biology,, and history. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Copyright © 1997 by Pearson Education. Reprinted by, permission of the publisher., , The Human Sexual Response, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Describe the four phases of the human sexual response cycle., Discuss gender differences in patterns of orgasm and some reasons, for them., , When people engage in sexual activity, exactly how, does the body respond? Surprisingly, until William, Masters and Virginia Johnson conducted their groundbreaking research in the 1960s, little was known about, the physiology of the human sexual response. Masters, and Johnson used physiological recording devices to, monitor the bodily changes of volunteers engaging in, sex. Their observations and interviews with their sub-, , CHAPTER 13, , jects yielded a detailed description of the human sexual, response that won them widespread acclaim., Nonetheless, critics note that the model focuses entirely on genital changes during sex and ignores cognitive factors. Other models include these subjective factors. For example, the three-stage model of noted sex, therapist Helen Singer Kaplan (1979) begins with desire, followed by excitement and orgasm. Since people’s, , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 419

Page 457 :
thoughts and views about sex underlie many sexual, problems, a cognitive approach is helpful. Because of, the historical importance of Masters and Johnson’s, model, we describe it here. But you should be mindful, of cognitive factors as you read about it., , tion, swollen testes, and the movement of the scrotum, (the sac containing the testes) closer to the body. In females, vasocongestion leads to a swelling of the clitoris, and vaginal lips, vaginal lubrication, and enlargement, of the uterus. Most women also experience nipple, erection and a swelling of the breasts., , The Sexual Response Cycle, , Plateau Phase, , Masters and Johnson’s (1966, 1970) description of the, sexual response cycle is a general one, outlining typical, rather than inevitable patterns—people vary considerably. Figure 13.8 shows how the intensity of sexual, arousal changes as women and men progress through, the four phases of the sexual response cycle., , The name given to the “plateau” stage is misleading because physiological arousal does not level off. Instead,, it continues to build, but at a much slower pace. In, women, further vasocongestion produces a tightening, of the lower third of the vagina and a “ballooning” of, the upper two-thirds, which lifts the uterus and cervix, away from the end of the vagina. In men, the head of, the penis may swell, and the testicles typically enlarge, and move closer to the body. Many men secrete a bit, of pre-ejaculatory fluid from the tip of the penis that, may contain sperm., Distractions during the plateau phase can delay or, stop movement to the next stage. These include ill-, , Excitement Phase, , During the initial phase of excitement, the level of, arousal usually escalates rapidly. In both sexes, muscle, tension, respiration rate, heart rate, and blood pressure increase quickly. In males vasocongestion—engorgement of blood vessels—produces penile erec-, , PATTERNS FOR MALES, , Refractory period, Orgasm, , Intensity of arousal, , Plateau, , Excitement, , Resolution, A B, , A, , B, PATTERNS FOR FEMALES, , Orgasm, , Intensity of arousal, , Plateau, , Excitement, , Resolution, A B, , C, , A, , C, , Time, , •, , FIG U R E 13.8, , The human sexual response cycle. There are similarities and differences between men and women in, patterns of sexual arousal. Pattern A, which culminates in orgasm and resolution, is the most typical, sequence for both sexes. Pattern B, which involves sexual arousal without orgasm followed by a slow, resolution, is also seen in both genders, but it is more common among women. Pattern C, which involves multiple orgasms, is seen almost exclusively in women, as men go through a refractory period, before they are capable of another orgasm. (Based on Masters & Johnson, 1966), 420, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , B

Page 458 :
timed interruptions like a telephone or doorbell ringing, or a child’s knocking—or not!—on the bedroom, door. Equally distracting can be such things as physical discomfort, pain, guilt, frightening thoughts, feelings of insecurity or anger toward one’s partner, and, anxiety about not having an orgasm., , Reports of past year’s experience, , Orgasm Phase, , Orgasm occurs when sexual arousal reaches its peak, intensity and is discharged in a series of muscular, contractions that pulsate through the pelvic area., Heart rate, respiration rate, and blood pressure increase sharply during this exceedingly pleasant spasmodic response. The male orgasm is usually accompanied by ejaculation of seminal fluid. Some women, report that they ejaculate some kind of fluid at orgasm., How common this is and the source and nature of the, fluid are matters still under debate (Darling, Davidson, & Conway-Welch, 1990). The subjective experience of orgasm appears to be essentially the same for, men and women., Resolution Phase, , During the resolution phase, the physiological changes, produced by sexual arousal subside. If one has not had, an orgasm, the reduction in sexual tension may be relatively slow and sometimes unpleasant. After orgasm,, men generally experience a refractory period, a time, following male orgasm during which males are largely, unresponsive to further stimulation. The refractory, period varies from a few minutes to a few hours and, increases with age., , Gender Differences in, Patterns of Orgasm, As a whole, the sexual responses of women and men, parallel each other fairly closely. The similarities clearly, outweigh the differences. Nonetheless, there are some, interesting differences between the genders in their, patterns of experiencing orgasm. During intercourse,, women are less likely than men to reach orgasm (that is,, they are more likely to follow pattern B in Figure 13.8)., According to one survey of American sexual behavior, (Laumann et al., 1994), about 29 percent of women reported that they always reached orgasm in their primary, , WE B LI N K 13.3, , Kaiser Family Foundation, This foundation sponsors multiple programs and educational efforts in the United States and South Africa to, promote health generally, and its site provides a large set, of resources regarding human sexuality, one major focus of, its educational efforts., , CHAPTER 13, , Aways, had, orgasm, , Men, Women, , Extremely, physically, pleased, , Men, Women, , Extremely Men, emotionally Women, satisfied, 0, , •, , 10, , 20, , 30 40 50, Percentage, , 60, , 70, , 80, , F I G U R E 13. 9, , Sexual satisfaction with primary partner. A major survey of, American sexual behavior showed large gender differences in the, consistency of orgasm, a physical measure of sexual satisfaction., Men’s and women’s subjective evaluations of physical and emotional sexual satisfaction are much more similar. These data, indicate that not everyone who has an orgasm every time has a, blissful sex life and that factors other than orgasm contribute to, a satisfying sex life., From Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press., Copyright © 1994 by University of Chicago Press. Reprinted by permission., , sexual relationships, compared to 75 percent of men (see, Figure 13.9). Apparently, about 10 percent of American, women have never had an orgasm by any means (Spector & Carey, 1990)., In their laboratory, Masters and Johnson found, that the men they studied took about 4 minutes to reach, a climax with their partners. Women took about 10–20, minutes to reach orgasm with their partners, but they, reached orgasm in about 4 minutes when they masturbated. Clearly, then, women are capable of reaching orgasm more quickly than they typically do. Our point, here is not that men and women should race each other, to the finish line but that physiological factors are not, the likely cause of gender differences related to orgasm., How do we account for these disparities? First, although most women report that they enjoy intercourse,, it is not the optimal mode of stimulation for them. This, is because intercourse provides rather indirect stimulation to the clitoris, the most sexually sensitive genital, area in most women. Thus, more lengthy foreplay, including manual or oral stimulation of the clitoris, is, usually the key to enhancing women’s sexual pleasure., Many men mistakenly assume that women experience, the same degree of pleasurable sensations that they do, during sexual intercourse. But this is not the case, as, the upper two-thirds of the vagina has relatively few, nerve endings—a good thing, since the vagina serves, as the birth canal! Manual or oral stimulation of the, Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 421

Page 459 :
clitoris is more effective in producing female orgasm, than sexual intercourse alone (Bancroft, 2002b). Unfortunately, many couples are locked into the idea that, orgasms should be achieved only through intercourse., (Even the word foreplay suggests that any other form of, sexual stimulation is merely preparation for the “main, event.”) Also, most women associate sex with affection,, so they want to hear some tender words during a sexual encounter. Men who verbally express their love and, affection usually find their partners more responsive., Research suggests that lesbians have orgasms more, often and more easily in sexual interactions than heterosexual women do (Peplau et al., 2004). Kinsey, (1953) attributed this difference to female partners’, knowing more about women’s sexuality and how to, optimize women’s sexual satisfaction than male part-, , ners do. Also, female partners are more likely to emphasize the emotional aspects of lovemaking than male, partners (Peplau et al., 2004). Taken together, these, facts support a socialization-based explanation of gender differences in orgasmic consistency., Because women reach orgasm through intercourse, less consistently than men, they are more likely than, men to fake an orgasm. Surveys reveal that more than, half of all adult women (straight and lesbian) have faked, an orgasm (Elliott & Brantley, 1997). Men (straight and, gay) also fake them, but much less frequently. People, typically do so to make their partner feel better or to, bring sexual activity to an end when they’re tired. Frequent faking is not a good idea, because it can become a, vicious cycle and undermine communication about sex, (Crooks & Bauer, 2005)., , Sexual Expression, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Discuss fantasy as well as kissing and touching as, aspects of sexual expression., Discuss the prevalence of self-stimulation and, attitudes about it., , People experience and express sexuality in myriad, ways. Erogenous zones are areas of the body that are, sexually sensitive or responsive. The genitals and, breasts usually come to mind when people think of, erogenous zones, as these areas are particularly sensitive for most people. But it’s worth noting that many, individuals fail to appreciate the potential that lies in, other areas of the body. Virtually any area of the body, can function as an erogenous zone., Indeed, the ultimate erogenous zone may be the, mind. That is, an individual’s mental set is extremely, important to sexual arousal. Skillful genital stimulation by a partner may have absolutely no impact if a, person is not in the mood. Yet fantasy in the absence, of any other stimulation can produce great arousal. In, this section, we’ll consider the most common forms of, sexual expression., , Fantasy, Have you ever fantasized about having sex with someone other than your partner? If so, you’ve had one of, the most commonly reported fantasies (see Figure, 13.10). There’s no need to feel guilty about this; more, than 90 percent of men and women have fantasies during sexual activities with another person (Leitenberg, & Henning, 1995). As you might expect, women’s fan-, , 422, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , ■, , ■, , Discuss oral and anal sex as forms of sexual, expression., Discuss intercourse and the preferred sexual activities, of gay males and lesbians., , tasies tend to be more romantic, while men’s tend to, contain more explicit imagery. Most sex therapists, view sexual fantasies as harmless ways to enhance sexual excitement and achieve orgasm., As you can see in Figure 13.10, dominance and, submission fantasies are not uncommon. Still, just because you fantasize about a particular encounter, such, as forced sex, doesn’t mean that you really want to have, such an experience. Only one-tenth of 1 percent of, women say that they enjoy forced sex, and only onethird of 1 percent of men say that they enjoy forcing a, partner to have sex (Laumann et al., 1994)., , Kissing and Touching, Most two-person sexual activities begin with kissing., Kissing usually starts at the lips but may be extended, to almost any area of the partner’s body. Mutual caressing is also an integral element of sexual stimulation for most couples. Like kissing, this tactile stimulation may be applied to any area of the body. Manual, and oral stimulation of the other partner’s genitals are, related sexual practices., Men often underestimate the importance of kissing, and touching (including clitoral stimulation). It is not, surprising, therefore, that heterosexual women commonly complain that their partners are in too much of

Page 460 :
Fantasies During Intercourse, , Theme, , Subjects, reporting fantasy, (%), Males, , Females, , A former lover, , 42.9, , 41.0, , An imaginary lover, , 44.3, , 24.3, , Oral-genital sex, , 61.2, , 51.4, , Group sex, , 19.3, , 14.1, , Being forced or overpowered into a, sexual relationship, , 21.0, , 36.4, , Others observing you engage in, sexual intercourse, , 15.4, , 20.0, , Others finding you sexually irresistible, , 55.2, , 52.8, , Being rejected or sexually abused, , 10.5, , 13.2, , Forcing others to have sexual relations, with you, , 23.5, , 15.8, , Others giving in to you after, resisting you at first, , 36.8, , 24.3, , Observing others engaging in sex, , 17.9, , 13.2, , A member of the same sex, , 2.8, , 9.4, , Animals, , 0.9, , 3.7, , Note: For comparison, the responses of “frequently” and “sometimes” were, combined for both males and females to obtain these percentages. The number, of respondents answering for a specific fantasy ranged from 103 to 106 for males, and from 105 to 107 for females., , •, , F I G U R E 13.10, , Common sexual fantasies. The percentage of men and women, reporting various sexual fantasies during intercourse is shown, here. Sue (1979) concluded that people fantasize about experiences they wouldn’t seek out in real life., Adapted from Sue, D. (1979). The erotic fantasies of college students during coitus. Journal, of Sex Research, 15(4), 299–305. Copyright © 1979 for the Society for the Scientific Study of, Sexuality. Reprinted by permission., , a hurry (King, 2005). Partners who seek to learn about, each other’s preferences and who try to accommodate, each other are much more likely to have mutually satisfying sexual experiences than those who don’t., , Self-Stimulation, Masturbation, or the stimulation of one’s own genitals,, has traditionally been condemned as immoral because, it is nonreproductive. Disapproval and suppression of, masturbation were truly intense in the 19th and early, 20th centuries, when people believed that the practice, was harmful to physical and mental health. Because the, term masturbation has acquired negative connotations,, many modern experts prefer to use self-stimulation or, autoeroticism. Sometimes people, more often women,, use vibrators or other “sex toys” for self-stimulation., , CHAPTER 13, , Kinsey discovered over four decades ago that most, people masturbate with no ill effects. Sexologists now, recognize that self-stimulation is normal and healthy., In fact, sex therapists often prescribe masturbation to, treat both male and female sexual problems (see this, Chapter’s Application). Nonetheless, nearly half of, those who engage in the practice feel guilty about it, (Laumann et al., 1994)., Self-stimulation is common in our society: By, adulthood, nine out of ten males and eight out of ten, females report having masturbated at least once (Atwood & Gagnon, 1987). African American males masturbate less than Asian, white, and Hispanic men. Also,, masturbation is less common among those with less, education (Laumann et al., 1994)., Among married couples, 57 percent of husbands and 37 percent of wives report engaging in selfstimulation (Laumann et al., 1994). In fact, masturbation in marriage is often associated with a greater, degree of marital and sexual satisfaction (Leitenberg,, Detzer, & Srebnik, 1993). Still, couples usually don’t, talk about it, probably for fear that it will be viewed as, a sign of sexual discontent., , Oral and Anal Sex, Oral sex refers to oral stimulation of the genitals. Cunnilingus is oral stimulation of the female genitals; fellatio is oral stimulation of the penis. Partners may, stimulate each other simultaneously, or one partner, may stimulate the other without immediate reciprocation. Oral-genital sex may be one of several activities, in a sexual encounter, or it may be the main event. Oral, sex is a major source of orgasms for many heterosexual couples, and it plays a central role in homosexual, relationships. A positive aspect of oral sex is that it, does not result in pregnancy. (This fact partly accounts, for the finding that younger teens are more likely to, engage in oral sex than sexual intercourse [Willetts,, Sprecher, & Beck, 2004]. Among older teens, sexual intercourse is at least as common as oral sex.) However,, some sexually transmitted diseases (human immunodeficiency virus or HIV, for example) can be contracted through mouth-genital stimulation, especially, if there are small cracks in the mouth or if the mouth, is exposed to semen (Guest, 2004)., Negative attitudes persist about oral sex, particularly among African Americans, Hispanics, religious, conservatives, and those with less education (Laumann, et al., 1994). About 80 percent of men and 70 percent, of women (both gay and straight) report that they have, either given or received oral sex at least once (Laumann, et al., 1994). Oral sex is now a component in most couples’ sexual relationships., , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 423

Page 461 :
Anal intercourse involves insertion of the penis, into a partner’s anus and rectum. Legally, it is termed, sodomy (and is still considered illegal in some states)., About 25 percent of men and women report that they, have practiced anal sex at least once (Laumann et al.,, 1994). Anal intercourse is more popular among homosexual male couples than among heterosexual couples. However, even among gay men it ranks behind, oral sex and mutual masturbation in prevalence. Anal, sex is risky as rectal tissues are easily torn, facilitating, HIV transmission., , Intercourse, Vaginal intercourse, known more technically as coitus,, involves inserting the penis into the vagina and (typically) pelvic thrusting. It is the most widely endorsed, and widely practiced sexual act in our society. In the, recent American sex survey, 95 percent of heterosexual, respondents said that they had practiced vaginal sex, the last time they had sex (Laumann et al., 1994). Inserting the penis generally requires adequate vaginal, lubrication, or intercourse may be difficult and painful, for the woman. This is another good reason for couples to spend plenty of time on mutual kissing and, touching, since as we saw with Masters and Johnson’s, findings, sexual excitement causes vaginal lubrication, in women. In the absence of adequate lubrication,, , partners may choose to use artificial lubricants such as, Astroglide or K-Y Warming Liquid., Couples use a variety of positions in intercourse,, and may use more than one position in a single encounter. The man-above, or “missionary,” position is, the most common, but the woman-above, side-byside, and rear-entry positions are also popular. Each, position has its advantages and disadvantages. Although people are fascinated by the relative merits of, various positions, specific position may not be as important as the tempo, depth, and angle of movements, in intercourse. As with other aspects of sexual relations, the crucial consideration is that partners talk to, each other about their preferences., What kinds of sexual activities do homosexuals, prefer in the absence of coitus (which is, by definition,, a heterosexual act)? As is true with heterosexual couples, the preliminary activities of gay and lesbian couples include kissing, hugging, and petting. Gay men, also engage in fellatio, mutual masturbation, and anal, intercourse, in that order (Lever, 1994). Lesbians engage in cunnilingus, mutual masturbation, and tribadism, in which one partner lies on top of the other, and makes thrusting movements so that both receive, genital stimulation at the same time. Contrary to, stereotype, a dildo (an artificial penis) is rarely used by, lesbian couples (Jay & Young, 1979)., , Patterns of Sexual Behavior, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe how the fear of contracting AIDS has, influenced sexual attitudes and practices., Summarize attitudes toward and prevalence of early, sexual experiences., Summarize the findings on sex patterns in dating, couples and married couples., , In this section we consider whether fears of contracting acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), have influenced sexual attitudes and behaviors, then, see how age and type of relationship are related to sexual behavior, and consider the issue of infidelity., , Sex in the Age of AIDS, Over the past 30 years, American sexual attitudes and, behaviors have become more liberal. Although the, media have labeled these changes a “sexual revolution,”, it is probably more accurate to characterize them as an, evolution in attitudes and behavior. This trend toward, more permissive sexual behavior appears to have slowed, during the 1990s (Christopher & Sprecher, 2000)., 424, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , ■, , ■, , Compare and contrast sexual behavior in married, couples versus committed homosexual couples., Summarize the evidence on infidelity in committed, relationships., , While heralded by some, the liberal trends have, had several serious drawbacks. Two troublesome problems are teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted, diseases (Trussell, Brown, & Hogue, 2004). The spread, of HIV infection that leads to AIDS was, and remains,, a special concern. Has public awareness of AIDS put, the brakes on the liberalizing trends?, For both pregnancy rates and sexually transmitted, diseases, the news is mixed. Although the teenage birth, rate declined 26 percent between 1991 and 2001, the, rate remains one of the highest in the world (Trussell et, al, 2004; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2002). Regarding sexually transmitted diseases,, rates of genital infections among adolescents remain at, high levels. Twenty-five percent of all cases of sexually

Page 462 :
WE B LI N K 13.4, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , AIDS HIV AEGIS, This is the largest and probably most important web-based, resource dealing with the human immunodeficiency virus, (HIV) and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). A, simply extraordinary collection of information sources can, be found here., , Human Sexuality Today, by Bruce M. King (Pearson, Prentice Hall, 2005), , transmitted diseases occur among teenagers (and twothirds are among people under 25 years of age) (Trussell, et al., 2004). The good news is that most young people, are knowledgeable about HIV and AIDS. Also, between, 1991 and 2001, the percentage of high school students, who had ever had sexual intercourse decreased, the average number of sex partners decreased, and the incidence of condom use increased, as you can see in Figure 13.11. Unfortunately, these positive patterns do not, hold for all teens. Thus, in the age of AIDS, there is both, good and bad news about patterns of sexual behavior., , Early Sexual Experiences, By age 22, 90 percent of Americans have had sexual intercourse. With the average age for marriage being 27, for men and 25 for women, it is obvious that most people are not virgins when they enter committed relationships. Thus, the term premarital sex is losing relevance., Another problem with the term is that it doesn’t apply, to homosexuals, who aren’t permitted to marry under, , Today, almost all colleges offer courses on sexuality. But, if you can’t enroll in a sexuality course, you may want, to read one of the better textbooks. If so, Human Sexuality Today by Bruce King is an outstanding candidate., King’s text is accurate, thorough, up-to-date, well organized, and written in an engaging, highly readable manner. Numerous first-person accounts are also sprinkled, throughout the text. The author is sensitive to readers’, personal needs; he discusses the interpersonal aspects, of sex without getting bogged down in physiology., Moreover, the book is a paperback and thus more manageable than most heavy, hardcover texts on the topic., Other sexuality texts of similar quality include Our, Sexuality by Robert Crooks and Karla Baur (Wadsworth,, 2005), Understanding Human Sexuality by Janet Shibley, Hyde and John D. DeLameter (McGraw-Hill, 2003), and, Human Sexuality in a World of Diversity by Spencer, Rathus, Jeffrey Nevid, and Lois Fichner-Rathus (Pearson, Allyn and Bacon, 2005). Any of these books can provide you with an excellent introduction to the realities, of human sexual expression., Cover Image Copyright © 2005 Reprinted by Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle, River, NJ., , Sexual Risk Behavior in High School Students, Four or more, sexual partners, in lifetime (%), , Condom use, during last, sexual intercourse (%), , Survey year, , Ever had, intercourse (%), , 9, , 1991, 2001, , 39, 34, , 13, 10, , 53, 68, , 10, , 1991, 2001, , 48, 41, , 15, 13, , 46, 60, , 11, , 1991, 2001, , 62, 52, , 22, 15, , 49, 59, , 12, , 1991, 2001, , 67, 61, , 25, 22, , 41, 49, , Grade, , Note: Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number., , •, , F I G U R E 13.11, , Sexual risk behavior in high school students. In national surveys over a ten-year period, high, school students reported on their sexual behavior: whether they had ever had sexual intercourse,, the number of sex partners they had had, and whether they had used a condom during their last, intercourse. Between 1991 and 2001, sexual risk behavior declined: Fewer students had sex,, fewer had four or more sex partners, and more had used a condom during their last sexual encounter. Still, risky behavior increased as students progressed in school., From Centers for Disease Control. (2002). Trends in sexual risk behaviors among high school students—United States, 1991–2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 51(38), 856–859. (Figure based on data in table on p. 858), , CHAPTER 13, , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 425

Page 463 :
the law (except in Massachusetts as of 2004). Thus, we, have chosen to characterize youthful sexual encounters, as “early sexual experiences” instead of “premarital sex.”, Attitudes, , Compared to a generation ago, more people believe, that sex before marriage is acceptable, especially if the, two people are emotionally committed to each other., Nonetheless, a sexual double standard still exists. Both, men and women are less approving of sexual activity, for women than men, especially in the early stages of, relationships (Willetts et al., 2004)., , In Figure 13.11, you can see that 61 percent of high, school seniors have had sexual intercourse (Centers for, Disease Control, 2002a). This same survey reported that, African American teenagers are likely to engage in sex, earlier than their Hispanic or European American peers., Studies also find that African American teens from affluent families are less likely to engage in sex than their, less affluent counterparts are (Leadbeater & Way, 1995;, Murry, 1996). Thus these apparent ethnic differences, are probably actually differences in socioeconomic status. Early sexual activity is also correlated with parents’, lack of education, poor academic performance, and low, educational expectations (Davis & Lay-Yee, 1999; Lammers et al., 2000). Interestingly, adult homosexuals report rates of heterosexual premarital intercourse that are, nearly identical to those reported by heterosexuals, (Saghir & Robbins, 1973). These findings support the, view that adolescence is an important period for working out answers to questions about sexual orientation., “Hooking up,” a phenomenon that has arisen since, the late 1990s, involves two strangers or briefly acquainted people having a single sexual encounter. Unlike a one-night-stand, hookups don’t always involve intercourse (petting below the waist and oral sex are, common). According to one study, 78 percent of college, students have had at least one hookup (Paul, McManus,, & Hayes, 2000). And 46 percent of men and 33 percent, of women in this study had sexual intercourse when, they hooked up. Casual sex is risky: People don’t always, practice safer sex, and the risk of contracting sexually, transmitted diseases increases with multiple partners., , Sex in Committed Relationships, Sex is a key aspect of most committed, romantic relationships. In this section, we examine patterns of sexual activity in dating couples, married couples, and gay, couples., Sex Between Dating Partners, , At some point, couples confront the question of whether, or when they should have sex. Some worry that sex, 426, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , © Paul Wright/Masterfile, , Prevalence, , Sexual encounters with casual acquaintances are common in, today’s society. Nonetheless, casual sex can be risky for a, variety of reasons., , might adversely affect the relationship; others fear that, not having sex will cause trouble. Is there evidence to, support either view? As it turns out, sexual intimacy is a, positive predictor of relationship stability (Sprecher &, Cate, 2004). However, gender and sexual and relationship satisfaction are also part of this equation. For men,, sexual (but not relationship) satisfaction is significantly, correlated with relationship stability; for women, relationship (but not sexual) satisfaction is significantly associated with relationship stability (Sprecher, 2002)., Marital Sex, , Couples’ overall marital satisfaction is strongly related, to their satisfaction with their sexual relationship, (Sprecher & Cate, 2004). Of course, it is difficult to, know whether good sex promotes good marriages or, good marriages promote good sex. In all probability,, it’s a two-way street. Relationship satisfaction is also, correlated with satisfaction in other areas of a relationship (fairness in distribution of household labor, for, example) (Sprecher & Cate, 2004)., Married couples vary greatly in how often they, have sex (see Figure 13.12). On the average, couples in, their 20s and 30s engage in sex about two or three, times a week. The frequency of sex among married, couples tends to decrease as the years wear on (Sprecher, & Cate, 2004). Biological changes play some role in this, trend, but social factors seem more compelling. Most, couples attribute this decline to increasing fatigue, from work and childrearing and to growing familiarity, with their sexual routine.

Page 464 :
MEN, Not at all, 1%, , WOMEN, Not at all, 3%, , 4 or more A few times, times, a year, a week, 13%, 7%, , 2 to 3 times, a week, 36%, , •, , 4 or more, times, a week, 7%, , 2 to 3 times, a week, 32%, , A few times, a month, 43%, , A few times, a year, 12%, , A few times, a month, 47%, , F I G U R E 13.12, , Frequency of sex among married men and women. A well-sampled survey asked Americans, “How, often have you had sex in the past 12 months?” Married individuals’ responses to the question were, wide ranging. The most frequent response was “a few times per month” followed by “2 to 3 times, a week.”, From Michael, R. T., Gagnon, J. H., Laumann, E. O., & Kolata, G. (1994) Sex in America: A definitive survey. Boston: Little, Brown. Copyright © 1994, by CSG Enterprises, Inc. Edward O. Lauman, Robert T. Michael, and Gina Kolata. By permission of Little, Brown and Company, Inc., , As men and women age, sexual arousal tends to, build more slowly and orgasms tend to diminish in, frequency and intensity. Males’ refractory periods, lengthen, and females’ vaginal lubrication and elasticity decrease. Nevertheless, older people remain capable of rewarding sexual encounters (Burgess, 2004). A, national survey of couples reported that those in the, 75 and older age group had sex slightly less than once, a month (Call, Sprecher, & Schwartz, 1995)., Sex in Homosexual Relationships, , Regarding the relative frequency of sex among lesbian,, gay, and heterosexual couples, Peplau and her colleagues (2004) report three patterns. First, there is a, general decline in the frequency of sexual behavior over, time. Second, in the early stages of a relationship, gay, males engage in sex more frequently than the other couples. For example, among couples who had been together for 2 years or less, 67 percent of gay men reported, having sex three or more times a week, compared to, 45 percent of married couples and 33 percent of lesbian, couples (Blumstein & Schwartz, 1983). Third, lesbian, couples have sex less often than the other couples., Like heterosexual women, most lesbians believe, that sex and love are intertwined. In contrast (and like, straight males), gay men find casual sex more acceptable (Sanders, 2000). Comparative studies find comparable levels of sexual satisfaction in gay, lesbian, and, CHAPTER 13, , heterosexual couples (Peplau et al., 2004). And for, both lesbians and gay men, sexual satisfaction is correlated with overall relationship satisfaction., , Infidelity in Committed, Relationships, Sexual infidelity occurs when a person who is in a, committed relationship engages in erotic activity with, someone other than his or her partner. Among married couples, this behavior is also called “adultery” or, “extramarital sex.” Infidelity among couples in committed relationships (straight and gay) is termed “extradyadic sex.” The vast majority of people (90 percent) in our society believe that extramarital sex is, “always” or “almost always wrong” (Treas & Giesen,, 2000). Nonetheless, Americans are fascinated by infidelity, if the popularity of the TV series Desperate Housewives is any gauge!, Although it’s not common, extramarital sex can be, consensual. Two examples include “swinging” and “open, marriage.” Swinging typically involves married couples, exchanging partners for sex or both partners having sex, with a third person (Atwood & Seifer, 1997). In “open, marriage,” both partners agree that it is okay for each to, have sex with others (O’Neill & O’Neill, 1972). As we, noted, gay male couples are more likely to have “open, ‘marriages’” than are lesbian or married couples., Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 427

Page 465 :
What Constitutes Infidelity?, Answered “yes”, , © NBC photo by Paul Drinkwater/Getty Images, , Does this constitute, cheating in a marriage?, , The popularity of the TV series Desperate Housewives suggests, that Americans are fascinated by infidelity., , Precisely what kind of erotic activity qualifies as, “cheating” is debatable, especially between men and, women, as you can see in Figure 13.13. Are you unfaithful if you develop a deep emotional involvement, without sex? No doubt many people would say “yes.”, The Internet has added confusion to an already complex issue. For example, is it “cheating” if a person in a, committed relationship uses the Internet for sexual, arousal or masturbation? What about exchanging sexually explicit e-mail with someone you’ve never met, face to face? Therapists are seeing more couples for, problems related to Internet-initiated affairs (Cooper, & Griffin-Shelley, 2002)., Prevalence, , Despite the fact that most people disapprove of infidelity, a number of people get involved in it. Because, of the associated stigma and secrecy, accurate estimates, of infidelity are difficult to come by. Several recent surveys on sex reported that about 25 percent of married, men and about 10 percent of married women had engaged in an extramarital affair at least once (Laumann, et al., 1994; Wiederman, 1997)., , 428, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , •, , Married, men, , Married, women, , Kissing someone else, , 59%, , 75%, , Having a sexually explicit, conversation on the phone, , 64%, , 74%, , Having a sexually explicit, conversation on the Internet, , 62%, , 72%, , Holding hands with someone else, , 40%, , 49%, , Fantasizing about having sex, with someone else, , 39%, , 43%, , Casually flirting with someone else, , 32%, , 38%, , F I G U R E 13. 13, , What constitutes infidelity? A 1998 Time/CNN poll asked 397, married men and 431 married women whether various actions, constituted cheating in a marriage. Men’s responses were more, liberal than women’s, especially regarding “kissing someone else.”, From Handy, B. (1998, August 3). How we really feel about infidelity. Time, pp. 52–53., Copyright © 1998 by Time Inc. Reprinted by permission., , In straight cohabiting relationships, about a third, of men and women have engaged in extradyadic sex, (Blumstein & Schwartz, 1983). As we noted, sexual, openness is the norm in committed gay male relationships, and the rates of extradyadic sex for this group, are higher than for all other groups (Peplau et al.,, 2004). Committed lesbian relationships are much, more exclusive, in principle and in practice, than gay, male relationships (Peplau et al., 2004). Rates of lesbian extradyadic sex are also lower than those for married women., Motivations, , Why do people pursue extramarital sexual encounters?, Common reasons include dissatisfaction with a relationship, anger toward a partner, and boredom (Willetts et al., 2004). Sometimes people need to confirm, that they are still desirable, or they want to trigger the, end of an unsatisfying relationship. Then again, extramarital sexual activity can occur simply because two, people are attracted to each other. Erotic reactions to, people other than one’s partner do not cease when one, makes a permanent commitment. Most people suppress, these sexual desires because they disapprove of adultery., The gender differences in motivations for infidelity parallel gender differences in sexual socialization. Men tend to engage in extradyadic affairs to obtain sexual variety, while women usually seek an, emotional connection (Blumstein & Schwartz, 1983).

Page 466 :
Age is also a factor. People between the ages of 18 and, 30 are twice as likely to engage in sex outside a marriage or committed relationship than people over 50, (Treas & Giesen, 2000)., Impact, , The impact of extramarital sexual activity on marriages, has not been investigated extensively. Experts speculate, that approximately 20 percent of all divorces are caused, by infidelity (Reinisch, 1990). Still, it’s hard to know in, , these cases whether extramarital sex is a symptom of a, disintegrating relationship or its cause. Occasionally, extramarital affairs can have a positive effect on a marriage, if they motivate a couple to resolve relationship problems. Participants in extramarital affairs, whether or not, they are discovered, may experience loss of self-respect,, guilt, stress, and complications of sexually transmitted, diseases. Sexual fidelity is positively correlated with relationship satisfaction for lesbian and heterosexual couples, but not for gay male couples (Kurdek, 1991)., , Practical Issues in Sexual Activity, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe constraints on effective contraception and discuss the merits, of hormone-based contraceptives and condoms., Describe the various types of STDs, and discuss their prevalence and, means of transmission., List some suggestions for safer sexual practices., , Regardless of the context of sexual activity, two practical issues are often matters of concern: contraception, and sexually transmitted diseases. These topics are, more properly in the domain of medicine than of psychology, but birth control and sex-related infections, certainly do have their behavioral aspects., , Contraception, Most people want to control whether and when they, will conceive a child, so they need reliable contraception. Despite the availability of effective contraceptive, methods, however, many people fail to exercise much, control., Constraints on Effective Contraception, , Effective contraception requires that intimate couples, negotiate their way through a complex sequence of, steps. First, both people must define themselves as, sexually active. Second, both must have accurate, knowledge about fertility and conception. Third, their, chosen method of contraception must be readily accessible. Finally, both must have the motivation and, skill to use the method correctly and consistently. Failure to meet even one of these conditions can result in, an unintended pregnancy., Despite the threat of AIDS, only about two out of, three sexually active females age 15 to 19 use contraception—but not every time they have sex (Glei, 1999)., Why this risky behavior? First, many believe that if they, aren’t gay, aren’t intravenous drug users, and don’t have, frequent sex, they don’t need to take precautions, (Tucker & Cho, 1991). Second, those who feel guilty, , CHAPTER 13, , about planned sex rationalize their sexual behavior by, telling themselves that “we got carried away.”, A third factor is conflicting norms about gender, and sexual behavior. Men are socialized to be the initiators of sexual activity, but when it comes to birth control, they often rely on women to take charge. It is hard, for a woman to maintain an image of sexual naïveté, and also be responsible for contraception. Telling her, partner that she is “on the pill” or whipping out a condom conveys quite a different image. Unfortunately, a, woman’s decision to use a condom may be influenced, more by concerns about how her partner might perceive her than her perceived susceptibility to infections, and attitudes about condom use (Bryan, Aiken, & West,, 1999). Finally, alcohol is a factor. It doesn’t increase sexual desire, but it does typically impair judgment (MacDonald, Zanna, & Fong, 1996). In addition, many college students drink as a socially acceptable way to avoid, potentially embarrassing discussions about sex., Selecting a Contraceptive Method, , If a couple is motivated to control their fertility, how, should they go about selecting a technique? A rational, , WE B LI N K 13.5, , Sexual Health Network, The health professionals who staff this Connecticut-based, site have assembled a comprehensive set of resources related to all aspects of human sexual health. Especially, notable are materials discussing sexual functioning for, persons with physical injuries or disabilities., , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 429

Page 467 :
Contraceptive Methods, Ideal, failure, rate (%), , Actual, failure, rate (%), , Advantages, , Disadvantages, , Birth control pills, (combination), , 0.3, , 8, , Highly reliable; coitus-independent;, has some health benefits, , Side effects; daily use; continual, cost; health risks for some women;, no protection against STDs, , Minipill, (progestin only), , 0.3, , 8, , Thought to have low risk of side, effects; coitus-independent; has, some health benefits, , Breakthrough bleeding; daily use;, continual cost; health risks for some, women; no protection against STDs, , IUD, , 0.6, , 0.8, , No memory or motivation required, for use; very reliable; some, health benefits, , Cramping, bleeding, expulsion; risk, of pelvic inflammatory disease; no, protection against STDs, , Diaphragm with, spermicidal cream or jelly, , 6, , 16, , No major health risks; inexpensive, , Aesthetic objections; initial cost, , Condom (male), , 2, , 15, , Protects against STDs; simple to use;, male responsibility; no health risks;, no prescriptions required, , Unaesthetic to some; requires, interruption of sexual activity;, continual cost, , Sponge, , 9, , 16, , 24-hour protection; simple to use; no, taste or odor; inexpensive; effective, with several acts of intercourse, , Aesthetic objections; continual cost;, no protection against STDs, , Cervical cap with, spermicidal cream or jelly, , 9, , 16, , 48-hour protection; no major, health risks, , May be difficult to insert; may, irritate cervix; initial cost, , Spermicides, , 18, , 29, , No major health risks; no prescription, required, , Unaesthetic to some; must be, properly inserted; continual cost; no, protection against STDs, , Fertility awareness, (rhythm), , 1–9, , 25, , No cost; acceptable to Catholic, church, , Requires high motivation and, periods of abstinence; unreliable;, no protection against STDs, , 4, , 27, , No cost or health risks, , Reduces sexual pleasure; unreliable;, requires high motivation; no protection, against STDs, , Transdermal patch, , .03, , 8, , No memory or motivation, required to use; coitusindependent; very reliable; has, some health benefits, , Continual cost; skin irritation for some, women; no protection against STDs, , No contraception, , 85, , 85, , No immediate monetary cost, , High risk of pregnancy and STDs, , Method, , Withdrawal, , Note: STDs = Sexually transmitted diseases, , •, , FIG U R E 13.14, , A comparison of widely used contraceptive techniques. Couples can choose from a variety of contraceptive methods. This chart summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Note that, the typical failure rate is much higher than the ideal failure rate for all methods, because couples do, not use contraceptive techniques consistently and correctly. (Based on Hatcher et al., 2004; Crooks and, Baur, 2005), , choice requires accurate knowledge of the effectiveness, benefits, costs, and risks of the various methods., Figure 13.14 summarizes information on most of the, methods currently available. The ideal failure rate estimates the probability of conception when the technique is used correctly and consistently. The actual, failure rate is what occurs in the real world, when users’, negligence is factored in., Besides being informed about the various types of, contraceptive methods, couples must also put this information to use. Contraception is a joint responsibil430, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , ity. Hence, it’s essential for partners to discuss their, preferences, to decide what method(s) they are going, to use, and to act on their decision. Let’s look in more, detail at the two most widely used birth control methods in the Western world: hormone-based contraceptives and condoms., Hormone-based contraceptives contain synthetic, forms of estrogen and progesterone (or progesterone, only, in the minipill), which inhibit ovulation in women., Types of hormone-based contraceptives include “the, pill,” the transdermal patch (worn on the skin), and the

Page 468 :
vaginal ring (inserted once a month). Many couples, prefer these birth control options because contraceptive use is not tied to the sex act. Only the interuterine, device permits a similar degree of sexual spontaneity., Use of hormone-based contraceptives does not appear to increase a woman’s overall risk for cancer, (Trussell, 2004). In fact, the likelihood of certain forms, of cancer (such as uterine and ovarian cancer) is reduced in women who use low-dosage oral contraceptives. These methods do slightly increase the risk of certain cardiovascular disorders, such as heart disease and, stroke. Thus, alternative methods of contraception, should be considered by women who smoke, are over, age 35, or have any suspicion of cardiovascular disease., A condom is a sheath worn over the penis during, intercourse to collect ejaculated semen. The condom is, the only widely available contraceptive device for use, by males. A condom slightly reduces a man’s sensitivity, but many men see this dulling as a plus because it, can make sex last longer. Condoms can be purchased, in any drugstore without a prescription. If used correctly, the condom is highly effective in preventing, pregnancy (Warner, Hatcher, & Steiner, 2004). It must, be placed over the penis after erection but before any, contact with the vagina, and space must be left at the, tip to collect the ejaculate. The man should withdraw, before completely losing his erection and hold the rim, of the condom during withdrawal to prevent any, semen from spilling into the vagina., Condoms are made of polyurethane, latex rubber,, and animal membranes (“skin”). Polyurethane condoms are thinner than latex condoms; however, they, are more likely to break and to slip off than latex condoms. The FDA still requires that the box say that the, risks of pregnancy and infection are “unknown.” The, use of latex condoms definitely reduces the chances of, contracting or passing on various sexually transmitted, diseases. However, oil-based creams and lotions (petroleum jelly, massage oil, baby oil, and hand and body, lotions, for example) should never be used with latex, condoms (or diaphragms) (Warner et al., 2004). Within, 60 seconds, these products can make microscopic, holes in the rubber membrane that are large enough, to allow passage of HIV and organisms produced by, other sexually transmitted diseases. Water-based lubricants such as Astroglide or K-Y warming jelly don’t, cause this problem. Polyurethane condoms are impervious to oils. Skin condoms do not offer protection, against sexually transmitted diseases., In closing, we should mention emergency contraception. Women may seek emergency contraception in, cases of sexual assault, contraceptive failure, or unprotected sex. Progestin pills (Plan B), which are available, by prescription, can prevent a pregnancy if they are, taken within 72 hours after intercourse. The drug works, like birth control pills, by preventing ovulation or fertilCHAPTER 13, , ization and implantation of the fertilized egg into the, uterine wall (“Condoms—Extra Protection,” 2005). If, the fertilized egg is already implanted into the wall of, the uterus, progestin will not harm it. By contrast,, mifepristone (RU 486) is a drug that can induce a miscarriage in the first seven weeks of a pregnancy (Stewart, Ellertson, & Cates, 2004). Prescribed by a physician,, mifepristone is typically administered in the form of two, pills taken several days apart. Although no substitute for, regular birth control, the drug can be used after unprotected sex and is particularly helpful in cases of rape., , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, A sexually transmitted disease (STD) is a disease or, infection that is transmitted primarily through sexual contact. When people think of STDs, they typically, think of syphilis and gonorrhea, but these diseases are, only the tip of the iceberg. There are actually about 20, sexually transmitted diseases. Some of them—for instance, pubic lice—are minor nuisances that can readily be treated. Others, however, are severe afflictions, that are difficult to treat. For instance, if it isn’t detected early, syphilis can cause heart failure, blindness,, and brain damage, and AIDS is eventually fatal. (We’ll, discuss AIDS in detail in Chapter 14.), Prevalence and Transmission, , No one is immune to sexually transmitted diseases., Even monogamous partners can develop some STDs, (yeast infections, for instance). Health authorities estimate that about 15 million new cases occur in the, United States each year (Cates, 2004). The highest incidence of STDs occurs in the under-25 age group, (Cates, 2004). About one person in four contracts an, STD by age 21 (Feroli & Burstein, 2003)., The United States has seen a recent surge of HIV, infections stemming from heterosexual transmission, (Centers for Disease Control, 2003). AIDS is increasing more rapidly among women than among men, especially among women of color (Centers for Disease, Control, 2002b). Women whose sexual partners have, multiple sex partners or who inject drugs are especially, at risk. An increasing concern is that a woman’s partner may be secretly having sex with other men and, may deny that he is gay or bisexual (King, 2004). Infected women are more likely to be poor and less likely, to get treatment (Cowley & Murr, 2004). The rate of, HIV infections is also up among young gay and bisexual men, especially those of color (Gross, 2003)., Women suffer more severe long-term consequences, of STDs than men, including chronic pelvic pain, infertility, and cervical cancer (Cates, 2004). Because of, the transmission dynamics of sexual intercourse, they, are also more likely to acquire an STD from any single, sexual encounter. But women are less likely to seek, Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 431

Page 469 :
treatment because more of their STDs are asymptomatic or not perceived to be serious., The principal types of sexually transmitted diseases are listed in Figure 13.15, along with their symptoms and modes of transmission. Most of these infections are spread from one person to another through, intercourse, oral-genital contact, or anal-genital contact. Concerning the transmission of STDs, six points, are worth emphasizing:, 1. You should consider any activity that exposes, you to blood (including menstrual blood), semen, vaginal secretions, urine, feces, or saliva as high-risk behavior unless you and your partner are in a mutual, sexually exclusive relationship and neither of you is infected., 2. The more sexual partners you have, the higher, your chances of exposure to a sexually transmitted, infection., 3. Don’t assume that the labels people attach to, themselves (heterosexual or homosexual) accurately, describe their actual sexual behavior. According to the, director of the Kinsey Institute, “Studies of men from, the general population show that more than 30 percent have had at least one sexual experience with another male since puberty” (Reinisch, 1990)., 4. People can be carriers of sexually transmitted, diseases without knowing it. For instance, in its early, stages gonorrhea may cause no readily apparent symptoms in women, who may unknowingly transmit the, infection to their partners., 5. Even when people know they have a sexually, transmitted infection, they may fail to refrain from sex, or inform their partners. Guilt and embarrassment, cause many people to ignore symptoms of sexually, transmitted diseases and continue their normal sexual, activities. Close to half of the subjects in one study admitted that they had told dates that they had had fewer, sexual partners than was actually the case (Reinisch,, 1990). People are even more likely to lie about homosexual activity, sex with prostitutes, and drug use. So, don’t assume that sexual partners will warn you that, they may be contagious., 6. Engaging in anal intercourse (especially being, the receiving partner) puts one at high risk for AIDS., Rectal tissues are delicate and easily torn, thus letting the virus pass through the membrane. Oral-genital, sex may also transmit HIV, particularly if semen is, swallowed., Prevention, , Abstinence is obviously the best way to avoid acquiring sexually transmitted diseases. Of course, this is not, an appealing or realistic option for most people. Short, of abstinence, the best strategy is to engage in sexual, activity only in the context of a long-term relationship,, , 432, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , where you have an opportunity to know your partner, reasonably well. Casual sex greatly increases your risk, for STDs, including HIV. To decrease this risk, you, should use condoms with spermicides., Along with being judicious about sexual relations,, you need to talk openly about safer sexual practices, with your partner. But if you don’t carry the process, one step further and practice what you preach, you remain at risk. As we noted, many people engage in risky, sexual behavior—a practice they can ill afford while, we are still in the grip of the deadly AIDS epidemic., Unfortunately, the availability of new drug treatments for HIV seems to have increased risk taking, among drug users, gay men, and heterosexuals who, frequent STD clinics (Centers for Disease Control,, 2000). Although these new drugs are welcome news,, they cost over $10,000 per year—well out of the reach, of those without health insurance (Freedberg et al.,, 2001). And they require a patient to follow a strict and, complicated regimen of medication., We offer the following suggestions for safer sex, (Hyde & DeLamater, 2003; King, 2005):, ■ Don’t have sex with lots of people. You increase, your risk of contracting STDs., ■ Don’t have sex with someone who has had lots of, previous partners. People won’t always be honest, about their sexual history, so it’s important to know, whether you can trust a prospective partner’s word., ■ If you are not involved in a sexually exclusive relationship, always use latex condoms with spermicides., They have a good track record of preventing STDs and, offer effective protection against the AIDS virus. (And, never use oil-based lubricants with latex condoms; use, water-based lubricants instead.), ■ If there is any possibility that you or your partner, has an STD, abstain from sex, always use condoms, or, use other types of sexual expression such as hand-genital, stimulation. (Remember that mouth-genital sex may, transmit HIV, especially if semen enters the mouth.), ■ Wash your genitals with soap and warm water before and after sexual contact., ■ Urinate shortly after intercourse., ■ Because HIV is easily transmitted through anal, intercourse, it’s a good idea to avoid this type of sex., ■ Watch for sores, rashes, or discharge around the, vulva or penis, or elsewhere on your body, especially the, mouth. If you have cold sores, avoid kissing or oral sex., , If you have any reason to suspect that you have an, STD, find a good health clinic and get tested as soon as, possible. (It’s normal to be embarrassed or afraid of getting bad news, but don’t delay. Health professionals are, in the business of helping people, not judging them.) To, be really sure, get tested twice. If both tests are negative,

Page 470 :
Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), , •, , STD, , Transmission, , Symptoms, , Acquired immune, deficiency syndrome, (AIDS), , The AIDS virus is spread by coitus or anal intercourse. There is a chance the virus may also be, spread by oral-genital sex, particularly if semen, is swallowed. (AIDS can also be spread by nonsexual means: contaminated blood, contaminated, hypodermic needles, and transmission from an, infected woman to her baby during pregnancy or, childbirth.), , Most people infected with the virus show no immediate symptoms; antibodies usually develop in the blood 2-8 weeks after, infection. People with the virus may remain symptom-free for, 5 years or more. No cure for the disease has yet been found., Common symptoms include fevers, night sweats, weight loss,, chronic fatigue, swollen lymph nodes, diarrhea and/or bloody, stools, atypical bruising or bleeding, skin rashes, headache,, chronic cough, and a whitish coating on the tongue or throat., , Chlamydia infection, , The Chlamydia trichomatis bacterium is transmitted primarily through sexual contact. It may, also be spread by fingers from one body site to, another., , In men, chlamydial infection of the urethra may cause a discharge and burning during urination. Chlamydia-caused epidydimitis may produce a sense of heaviness in the affected, testicle(s), inflammation of the scrotal skin, and painful swelling, at the bottom of the testicle. In women, pelvic inflammatory, disease caused by chlamydia may disrupt menstrual periods,, elevate temperature, and cause abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, headache, infertility, and ectopic pregnancy., , Genital warts, , The virus is spread primarily through penilevaginal, oral-genital, oral-anal, or genital-anal, contact., , Warts are hard and yellow-gray on dry skin areas, soft pinkish, red and cauliflowerlike on moist areas., , Gonorrhea (“clap”), , The Neisseria gonorrhoeae bacterium (gonococcus), is spread through penile-vaginal, oral-genital,, or genital-anal contact., , Most common symptoms in men are a cloudy discharge from the, penis and burning sensations during urination. If the disease is, untreated, complications may include inflammation of the scrotal, skin and swelling at the base of the testicle. In women, some, green or yellowish discharge is produced, but the disease commonly remains undetected. At a later stage, pelvic inflammatory, disease may develop., , Herpes, , The genital herpes virus (HSV-2) appears to be, transmitted primarily by penile-vaginal, oralgenital, or genital-anal contact. The oral herpes, virus (HSV-1) is transmitted primarily by kissing,, or oral-genital contact., , Small red, painful bumps (papules) appear in the region of the, genitals (genital herpes) or mouth (oral herpes). The papules, become painful blisters that eventually rupture to form wet,, open sores., , Pubic lice (“crabs”), , Phthirus pubis, the pubic louse, is spread easily, through body contact or through shared clothing, or bedding., , Persistent itching. Lice are visible and may often be located in, pubic hair or other body hair., , Syphilis, , The Treponema pallidum bacterium (spirochete), is transmitted from open lesions during penilevaginal, oral-genital, oral-anal, or genital-anal, contact., , Primary stage: A painless chancre (sore) appears at the site, where the spirochetes entered the body. Secondary stage: The, chancre disappears and a generalized skin rash develops. Latent, stage: There may be no observable symptoms. Tertiary stage:, Heart failure, blindness, mental disturbance, and many other, symptoms may occur. Death may result., , Trichomoniasis, , The protozoan parasite Trichomonas vaginalis, is passed through genital sexual contact or less, frequently by towels, toilet seats, or bathtubs, used by an infected person., , In women, white or yellow vaginal discharge with an unpleasant, odor; vulva is sore and irritated. Men are usually asymptomatic., , Viral hepatitis, , The hepatitis B virus may be transmitted by blood,, semen, vaginal secretions, and saliva. Manual,, oral, or penile stimulation of the anus is strongly, associated with the spread of this virus. Hepatitis A seems to be spread primarily via the fecaloral route. Oral-anal sexual contact is a common, mode of sexual transmission for hepatitis A., , Vary from nonexistent to mild, flulike symptoms to an incapacitating illness characterized by high fever, vomiting, and severe, abdominal pain., , F I G U R E 13.15, , Overview of common sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). This chart summarizes the symptoms and, modes of transmission of 9 STDs. Note that intercourse is not required to transmit all STDs—many STDs, can be contracted through oral-genital contact or other forms of physical intimacy. (Adapted from, Hatcher et al., 2004; Crooks and Baur, 2005), , CHAPTER 13, , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 433

Page 471 :
you can stop worrying. If you have several sexual partners in a year, you should have regular STD checkups., You will have to ask for them, as most doctors and, health clinics won’t perform them otherwise., Remember that the symptoms of some STDs disappear as the infection progresses. If your test results, are positive, it’s essential to get the proper treatment, , right away. Notify your sexual partner(s) so they can, be tested immediately, too. And avoid sexual intercourse and oral sex until you and your partner are fully, treated and a physician or clinic says you are no longer, infectious., In the Application, we focus on enhancing sexual, satisfaction and treating common sexual problems., , Enhancing Sexual Relationships, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, ■, , ■, , List six general suggestions for enhancing sexual relationships., Discuss the nature, prevalence, and causes of common sexual, dysfunctions., Describe the strategies for coping with erectile difficulties, premature, ejaculation, orgasmic difficulties, and hypoactive sexual desire., , Answer the following statements “true” or “false.”, _____ 1. Sexual problems are unusual., _____ 2. Sexual problems belong to couples rather, than individuals., _____ 3. Sexual problems are highly resistant to, treatment., _____ 4. Sex therapists sometimes recommend masturbation as a treatment for certain types of, problems., The answers are (1) false, (2) true, (3) false, and, (4) true. If you missed several of these questions, you, are by no means unusual. Misconceptions about sexuality are the norm rather than the exception. Fortunately, there is plenty of useful information on how to, improve sexual relationships., For the sake of simplicity, our advice is directed to, heterosexual couples, but much of what we have to say, is also relevant to same-gender couples. For advice, aimed specifically at same-gender couples, we recommend Permanent Partners: Building Gay and Lesbian, Relationships That Last by Betty Berzon (2004)., , General Suggestions, Let’s begin with some general ideas about how to enhance sexual relationships, drawn from several excellent books on sexuality (Crooks & Baur, 2005; Hyde &, DeLamater, 2003; King, 2005). Even if you are satisfied, with your sex life, these suggestions may be useful as, “preventive medicine.”, 434, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , 1. Pursue adequate sex education. A surprising, number of people are ignorant about the realities of, sexual functioning. So the first step in promoting sexual satisfaction is to acquire accurate information, about sex. The shelves of most bookstores are bulging, with popular books on sex, but many of them are, loaded with inaccuracies. A good bet is to pick up a college textbook on human sexuality. The Recommended, Readings in this chapter describe books that we think, are excellent. Enrolling in a course on sexuality is also a, good idea. Most colleges offer such courses today., 2. Review your sexual values system. Many sexual, problems stem from a negative sexual values system, that associates sex with immorality. The guilt feelings, caused by such an orientation can interfere with sexual functioning. Thus, sex therapists often encourage, adults to examine the sources and implications of their, sexual values., 3. Communicate about sex. As children, people, often learn that they shouldn’t talk about sex. Many, people carry this edict into adulthood and have great, difficulty discussing sex, even with their partner. Good, communication is essential in a sexual relationship., Figure 13.16 lists common problems in sexual relations., Many of these problems—such as choosing an inconvenient time, too little erotic activity before intercourse,, and too little tenderness afterward—are traceable, largely to poor communication. Both men and women, say they want more instructions from their partner, (refer back to Figure 13.7). But your partner is not a, mindreader! You have to share your thoughts and feel-

Page 472 :
•, , Disagreement Women, about sexual, practices Men, “Turned off“, , F I G U R E 13. 16, , Common problems in sexual relations., The percentage of men and women reporting, various types of problems in their sexual, relationships is shown here, based on a, sample of 100 couples., , Women, Men, , Adapted from Frank, E., Anderson, C., & Rubenstein, D. (1978)., Frequency of sexual dysfunction in “normal” couples. New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 111–115. Copyright © 1978 by, the New England Journal of Medicine. Reprinted by permission., , Too little Women, foreplay before, Men, intercourse, Too little Women, tenderness, Men, after intercourse, Partner chooses Women, inconvenient, Men, time, Inability Women, to relax Men, Attraction to Women, person(s) other, Men, than mate, Lack of Women, interest Men, 0, , 10, , 40, 30, 20, Percentage of persons reporting, sexual problems, , ings. If you are unsure about your partner’s preferences,, ask. And provide candid (but diplomatic) feedback, when your partner asks for your reactions., 4. Avoid goal setting. Sexual encounters are not, tests or races. Sexual experiences are usually best when, people relax and enjoy themselves. People get overly, concerned about orgasms or about both partners, reaching orgasm simultaneously. A grim determination to climax typically makes it harder to do so. This, , 50, , mental set can lead to disruptive habits like spectatoring, or stepping outside the sexual act to judge one’s, performance. It’s better to adopt the philosophy that, getting there is at least half the fun., 5. Enjoy your sexual fantasies. As we noted earlier,, the mind is the ultimate erogenous zone. Although, Freudian theory originally saw sexual fantasy as an, unhealthy by-product of sexual frustration and immaturity, research shows that sexual fantasies are most, , © Marc Romanelli/The Image Bank/Getty Images, , Unresolved sexual problems can be a source of, tension and frustration in relationships. Physical,, psychological, and interpersonal factors can contribute to sexual difficulties., , CHAPTER 13, , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 435

Page 473 :
common among those who have the fewest sexual problems (Leitenberg & Henning, 1995; Renaud & Byers,, 2001). Men and women both report that their sexual, fantasies increase their excitement. So don’t be afraid to, use fantasy to enhance your sexual arousal., 6. Be selective about sex. Sexual encounters generally work out better when you have privacy and a relaxed atmosphere, when you are well rested, and when, you are enthusiastic. Of course, you can’t count on (or, insist on) having ideal situations all the time, but you, should be aware of the value of being selective. If your, heart just isn’t in it, it may be wise to wait. Partners, often differ about when, where, and how often they, should have sex. Such differences are normal and, should not be a source of resentment. Couples simply, need to work toward reasonable compromises—through, open communication., , Physical, psychological, and interpersonal factors, can contribute to sexual problems. Physical factors include chronic illness, disabilities, some medications, alcohol, and drugs. Individual psychological factors include, anxieties around fear of failure, negative attitudes about, sexuality learned during childhood, spectatoring, fears, of pregnancy and STDs, life stresses such as unemployment, and prior sexual abuse. Interpersonal factors include ineffective communication about sexual matters, and unresolved relationship issues that fuel anger and, resentment., People commonly assume that a sexual problem resides in just one partner (physical or individual psychological factors). While this is sometimes the case, most, sexual problems emerge out of partners’ unique ways of, relating to each other (interpersonal factors). Moreover,, even in those cases where a problem may lie more with, one partner than another, the couple needs to work together for an acceptable solution. In other words, sexual, problems belong to couples rather than to individuals., Now let’s examine the symptoms and causes of, four common sexual dysfunctions: erectile difficulties,, premature ejaculation, orgasmic difficulties, and low, sexual desire., Erectile difficulties occur when a man is persistently unable to achieve or maintain an erection ade-, , Understanding Sexual, Dysfunction, Many people struggle with sexual dysfunctions—impairments in sexual functioning that cause subjective distress. Figure 13.17 shows the prevalence of, some of the most common sexual problems (Laumann, et al., 1994)., , •, , FIG U R E 13.17, , Sexual dysfunction in normal couples., This graph shows the prevalence of various, sexual dysfunctions during a year in a probability sample of American men and women., The most common problems among men, are premature ejaculation and anxiety about, performance; in women, they are lack of, interest in sex and orgasmic difficulties., From Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., &, Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality:, Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of, Chicago Press. Copyright © 1994 by University of Chicago, Press. Reprinted by permission., , Experiencing Women, pain during sex Men, Sex not Women, pleasurable Men, Unable to Women, achieve orgasm Men, Lacking Women, interest in sex Men, Anxiety about Women, performance Men, Climaxing Women, too early Men, Men unable, to keep Men, an erection, Women, having trouble Women, lubricating, 0, , 436, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , 5, , 10, 15, 20, 25, Percentage of persons reporting, sexual dysfunctions, , 30, , 35

Page 474 :
WE B LI N K 13.6, , Sexual Disorders Information Sites on the Web, In writing a 1997 article for the Journal of Sex Education, and Therapy, David A. Gotlib and Peter Fagan at Johns, Hopkins University surveyed the web for the best online, resources about sexuality. This April 2001 revision of their, recommended links was prepared with the help of Cynthia, Osborne., , quate for intercourse. The traditional name for this, problem is impotence, but sex therapists have discarded, the term because of its demeaning connotation. A man, who has never had an erection sufficient for intercourse is said to have lifelong erectile difficulties. A man, who has had intercourse in the past but who is currently having problems achieving erections is said to, have acquired erectile difficulties. The latter problem is, more common and easier to overcome., Some 30 million American men are estimated to, suffer from erectile difficulties if a broad criterion (the, inability to get an erection adequate for satisfactory, sexual performance) is used (Levine, 2003). Erectile, difficulties affect about 1 in 20 men age 40 and over,, and about 1 in 4 over age 65., Physical factors can play a role in erectile dysfunction. For example, experts estimate that as many as 25, percent of all cases may be due to side effects of medication (Miller, 2000). A host of common diseases, (such as diabetes) can produce erectile problems as a, side effect (Althof, 2000). Many temporary conditions,, such as fatigue, worry about work, an argument with, your partner, a depressed mood, or too much alcohol, can cause such incidents. The most common psychological cause of erectile difficulties is anxiety about sexual performance. Anxiety may stem from doubts about, virility or conflict about the morality of sexual desires., Interpersonal factors can enter in if the partner turns, an incident into a major catastrophe. If the man allows, himself to get unduly concerned about his sexual response, the seeds of anxiety may be sown., Premature ejaculation occurs when sexual relations are impaired because a man consistently reaches, orgasm too quickly. What is “too quickly”? Obviously,, any time estimate is hopelessly arbitrary. The critical, consideration is the subjective feelings of the partners., If either partner feels that the ejaculation is persistently, too fast for sexual gratification, they have a problem., Approximately 29 percent of men repeatedly experience, premature ejaculation (Laumann et al, 1994)., What causes premature ejaculation? Some men, who have a lifelong history of quick ejaculation may, have a neurophysiological predisposition to this condition (Metz & Pryor, 2000). But psychological factors, , CHAPTER 13, , are the typical cause. Some men simply don’t exert, much effort to prolong intercourse. Most of these men, do not view their ejaculations as premature, even if, their partners do. Other causes can include stress, depression, or anger at one’s partner. Many therapists, believe that this problem is rooted in early sexual experiences in which a rapid climax was advantageous., Furtive sex in the backseat of a car, quick efforts at, masturbation, and experiences with prostitutes are situations in which men typically attempt to achieve orgasm quickly. A pattern of rapid ejaculation established by these formative experiences can become, entrenched., Orgasmic difficulties occur when people experience sexual arousal but have persistent problems in, achieving orgasm. When this problem occurs in men,, it is often called male orgasmic disorder. The traditional, name for this problem in women, frigidity, is no longer, used because of its derogatory implications. Since this, problem is much more common among women, we’ll, limit our discussion to them. A woman who has never, experienced an orgasm through any kind of stimulation is said to have generalized lifelong orgasmic difficulties. Women who experience orgasms in some situations or only rarely are said to have situational orgasmic, difficulties. This category includes women who experience orgasm only through noncoital techniques (oral,, manual, and self-stimulation). Although lifelong orgasmic difficulties would seem to be the more severe, problem, they are actually more responsive to treatment than situational orgasmic difficulties., Physical causes of orgasmic difficulties are rare, (medications can be a problem). One of the leading, psychological causes is a negative attitude toward sex., Women who have been taught that sex is dirty or sinful are likely to approach it with shame and guilt., These feelings can undermine arousal, inhibit sexual, expression, and impair orgasmic responsiveness. Arousal, may also be inhibited by fear of pregnancy or excessive, concern about achieving orgasm., Some women have orgasmic difficulties because, intercourse is too brief. Others fail to experience orgasms because their partners are unconcerned about, their needs and preferences. But many couples simply, need to explore sexual activities such as manual or oral, stimulation of the clitoris that are more effective in, producing female orgasm than sexual intercourse,, alone (Bancroft, 2002b)., Hypoactive sexual desire, or the lack of interest, in sexual activity, seems to be on the rise. Individuals, with this problem rarely initiate sex or tend to avoid, sexual activities with their partner (Aubin & Heiman,, 2004). It occurs in both men and women, but it is, more common among women (see Figure 13.17)., Many attribute the recent increases in this problem to, , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 437

Page 475 :
the fast pace of contemporary life and to couples’ heavy, workloads both at home and the office. In men, low, sexual desire is often related to embarrassment about, erectile dysfunction (McCarthy, Bodnar, & Handal,, 2004). In women, it is most often associated with relationship difficulties (Aubin & Heiman, 2004). Sometimes the problem arises when a person is trying to, sort out his or her sexual orientation., , are effective. If you’re in the market for a sex therapist,, be sure to get someone who is qualified to work in this, specialized field. One professional credential to look, for is that provided by the American Association of Sex, Educators, Counselors, and Therapists (AASECT)., Of course, sex therapy isn’t for everyone. It can be, expensive and time-consuming. In some areas, it is, difficult to find. However, many people can benefit, from ideas drawn from the professional practice of sex, therapy., , Coping with Specific Problems, , Erectile Difficulties, , © Bettmann/Corbis, , With the advent of modern sex, therapy, sexual problems no longer, have to be chronic sources of frustration and shame. Sex therapy involves the professional treatment, of sexual dysfunctions. Masters and, Johnson reported high success rates, for their treatments of specific problems, as Figure 13.18 shows. Some, William Masters, critics argue that the cure rates reand Virginia, Johnson, ported by Masters and Johnson are, overly optimistic in comparison, with those reported by other investigators (Zilbergeld, & Evans, 1980). Nonetheless, there is a consensus that, sexual dysfunctions can be overcome with encouraging regularity (McCarthy et al., 2004). The advent of, medications to treat sexual problems (Viagra) has resulted in an increased emphasis on medical and individual treatments over relationship interventions, (Aubin & Heiman, 2004). Nonetheless, couple-based, treatment approaches definitely have their place and, , Viagra, the much-touted pill for treating erectile disorders, is about 80 percent effective (Handy, 1998a)., Still, it is not without its drawbacks—some of them, life threatening. Cialis and Levitra are two similar pills, that enhance erections over a longer time period (24, to 36 hours) than Viagra. To work effectively, these pills, must be incorporated into the couple’s love-making, style (Rosen, 2000). The expectation that a pill alone, will solve sexual problems that stem from relationship, or psychological issues can set men up for additional, sexual dysfunction (McCarthy et al., 2004)., To overcome psychologically based erectile difficulties, the key is to decrease the man’s performance, anxiety. It is a good idea for a couple to discuss the, problem openly. The woman should be reassured that, the difficulty does not reflect lack of affection by her, partner. Obviously, it is crucial for her to be emotionally supportive rather than hostile and demanding., Masters and Johnson introduced a procedure, called sensate focus in the treatment of erectile difficul-, , Dysfunction, , Number, of cases, , Lifelong erectile, difficulties, , 65, , Acquired erectile, difficulties, , 674, , Premature ejaculation, , 543, , Orgasmic difficulties in women, (lifelong and situational), , 811, 0, , •, , 60, 20, 40, 80, 100, Percentage of cases treated successfully, , F I G U R E 13. 18, , Success rates reported by Masters and Johnson in their treatment of sexual dysfunctions., This figure shows the success rates for cases treated between 1959 and 1985. Treatment was, categorized as successful only if the change in sexual function was clear and enduring. The, minimum follow-up period was two years, and in many cases follow-up was five years later., Adapted from Masters, W. H., Johnson, V. E., & Kolodny, R. C. (1988). Human sexuality (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Copyright ©, 1988 by Pearson Education. Adapted by permission of the publisher., , 438, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s

Page 476 :
ties and other dysfunctions. Sensate focus is an exercise in which partners take turns pleasuring each, other while giving guided verbal feedback and in, which certain kinds of stimulation are temporarily, forbidden. One partner stimulates the other, who simply lies back and enjoys it while giving instructions and, feedback about what feels good. Initially, the partners, are not allowed to touch each other’s genitals or to attempt intercourse. This prohibition should free the, man from feelings of pressure to perform. Over a number of sessions, the couple gradually includes genital, stimulation in their sensate focus, but intercourse is still, banned. With the pressure to perform removed, many, men spontaneously get erections. Repeated arousals, should begin to restore the man’s confidence in his sexual response. As his confidence returns, the couple can, move on gradually to attempts at intercourse., Premature Ejaculation, , Men troubled by premature ejaculation range from, those who climax almost instantly to those who cannot, last the time that their partner requires. In the latter, case, simply slowing down the tempo of intercourse, may help. Sometimes the problem can be solved indirectly by discarding the traditional assumption that orgasms should come through intercourse. If the female, partner enjoys oral or manual stimulation, these techniques can be used to provide her with an orgasm either before or after intercourse. This strategy can reduce, the performance pressure for the male partner, and couples may find that intercourse starts to last longer., For the problem of instant ejaculation, two treatments are very effective: the stop-start method (Semans,, 1956) and the squeeze technique (Masters & Johnson,, 1970). With both, the woman brings the man to the, verge of orgasm through manual stimulation. Then, she, either stops stimulating him (stop-start technique) or, squeezes the end of his penis firmly for 3–5 seconds, (squeeze technique) until he calms down. She repeats, this procedure three or four times before bringing him, to orgasm. These exercises can help a man recognize, , CHAPTER 13, , preorgasmic sensations and teach him that he can delay, ejaculation. Medication may also help (Polonsky, 2000)., Orgasmic Difficulties, , Negative attitudes and embarrassment about sex are, often at the root of women’s orgasmic difficulties. Thus,, therapeutic discussions are usually geared toward helping nonorgasmic women to reduce their ambivalence, about sexual expression, become more clear about their, sexual needs, and become more assertive about them., Sex therapists often suggest that women who have, never had an orgasm try to have one by using a vibrator and then shifting to masturbation, as the latter more, closely approximates stimulation by a partner (Crooks, & Baur, 2005). Many women achieve orgasms in intercourse after an initial breakthrough with self-stimulation. To make this transition, it is essential that the, woman express her sexual wishes to her partner. Sensate focus is also an effective technique for treating orgasmic difficulties (Heiman & Meston, 1997)., When a woman’s orgasmic difficulties stem from, not feeling close to her partner, treatment usually focuses on couples’ relationship problems more than on, sexual functioning per se. Therapists also focus on, helping couples improve their communication skills., Hypoactive Sexual Desire, , Therapists consider reduced sexual desire the most, challenging sexual problem to treat (Aubin & Heiman,, 2004). This is because the problem usually has multiple causes, which can also be difficult to identify. If the, problem is a result of fatigue from overwork, couples, may be encouraged to allot more time to personal and, relationship needs. But hypoactive sexual desire can, also masquerade as effects of relationship issues. Treatment for this problem is usually more intensive than, that for more specific sexual disorders, and it is usually, multifaceted to deal with the multiple aspects of the, problem. Some medications can help with low sexual, desire, but drugs will not solve relationship problems., For these, couples therapy is needed., , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , 439

Page 477 :
■, , KEY IDEAS, , CHAPTER 13 REVIEW, , Becoming a Sexual Person, ■, , One’s sexual identity is made up of sexual orientation, body, image, sexual values and ethics, and erotic preferences. Physiological factors such as hormones influence sexual differentiation, maturation, and anatomy more than they do sexual activity. Psychosocial factors appear to have more impact on sexual, behavior. Sexual identity is shaped by families, peers, schools,, and the media. Because of differences in sexual socialization,, sexuality usually has different meanings for males and females., ■ Experts believe that sexual orientation is best viewed as a, continuum, with end points of heterosexuality and homosexuality. The determinants of sexual orientation are not yet known, but appear to be a complex interaction of biological and environmental factors. Attitudes toward homosexuals are negative,, but moving in a positive direction. Coming to terms with a homosexual orientation is a process. Recent evidence suggests that, homosexuals are at greater risk for depression and suicide attempts than are heterosexuals, a phenomenon linked to their, membership in a stigmatized group., Interaction in Sexual Relationships, ■, , People frequently enter into sexual interactions with differing motivations. Men tend to be motivated more by physical, gratification, whereas women are more likely to have emotional, motives. Variations among people in erotic preferences are also, shaped by their attitudes., ■ Disparities between partners in sexual interest and erotic, preferences lead to disagreements that require negotiation. Effective communication plays an important role in sexual and, relationship satisfaction., The Human Sexual Response, ■, , The physiology of the human sexual response was described, by Masters and Johnson. They analyzed the sexual response, cycle into four phases: excitement, plateau, orgasm, and resolution. For a more complete view of this process, individuals’ subjective experiences during sexual encounters also need to be factored in., ■ Women reach orgasm in intercourse less consistently than, men, usually because foreplay and intercourse are too brief and, because of gender differences in sexual socialization., Sexual Expression, ■, , Sexual fantasies are normal and are an important aspect of, sexual expression. Kissing and touching are important erotic activities, but their importance is often underestimated by heterosexual males. Despite the strongly negative attitudes about masturbation that are traditional in our society, this practice is quite, common, even among married people. Oral-genital sex has become a common element in most couples’ sexual repertoires., ■ Coitus is the most widely practiced sexual act in our society., Four coital positions are commonly used, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Sexual activities between gay males include mutual masturbation, fellatio, and, less often, anal intercourse. Lesbians engage in mutual masturbation, cunnilingus,, and tribadism., , The acceptability and prevalence of premarital sex have increased since the 1960s. Unprotected casual sex remains a problem among high school and college students., ■ Satisfaction with the sexual aspect of a relationship is correlated with overall relationship satisfaction in both gay and, straight couples. Younger married couples tend to have sex, about two or three times a week. This frequency declines with, age in both heterosexual and same-gender couples., ■ Most Americans strongly disapprove of extramarital sex. Infidelity is uncommon among married couples and lesbians and, more common among gay male couples. People become involved in extradyadic relationships for a variety of reasons., Practical Issues in Sexual Activity, ■, , Contraception and sexually transmitted diseases are two, practical issues that concern many couples. Many people who, do not want to conceive a child fail to use contraceptive procedures effectively, if at all. Contraceptive methods differ in effectiveness and have various advantages and disadvantages., ■ STDs are increasing in prevalence, especially among those, under 25. The danger of contracting STDs is higher among those, who have had more sexual partners. In the United States, the, rates of HIV infections stemming from heterosexual sex are on, the rise, particularly among women. HIV rates are also up among, young gay and bisexual men. Using condoms decreases the risk, of contracting STDs. Early treatment of STDs is important., Application: Enhancing Sexual Relationships, ■, , To enhance their sexual relationships, individuals need to, have adequate sex education and positive values about sex. They, also need to be able to communicate with their partners about, sex and avoid goal setting in sexual encounters. Enjoying sexual, fantasies and being selective about their sexual encounters are, also important., ■ Common sexual dysfunctions include erectile difficulties,, premature ejaculation, orgasmic difficulties, and hypoactive, sexual desire. Treatments for low sexual desire are less effective, than those for more specific sexual problems., , KEY TERMS, Anal intercourse p. 424, Androgens p. 408, Bisexuals p. 408, Coitus p. 424, Cunnilingus p. 423, Erectile difficulties, pp. 436–437, Erogenous zones p. 422, Estrogens p. 408, Fellatio p. 423, Gonads p. 408, Heterosexuals p. 408, Homophobia p. 415, Homosexuals p. 408, , Hypoactive sexual desire, p. 437, Orgasm p. 421, Orgasmic difficulties p. 437, Premature ejaculation, p. 437, Refractory period p. 421, Sensate focus p. 439, Sex therapy p. 438, Sexual dysfunctions p. 436, Sexual identity p. 408, Sexually transmitted disease, (STD) p. 431, Vasocongestion p. 420, , Patterns of Sexual Behavior, ■, , American sexual attitudes and behavior have become more, liberal over the past 30 years, although this trend appeared to, slow in the 1990s. Teen pregnancy rates have declined recently,, but they still remain high. STD rates are highest among young, people. The incidence of sexually risky behavior among teens, has declined in recent years., , 440, , PART 3, , D e v e l o p m e n t a l Tr a n s i t i o n s, , KEY PEOPLE, Linda Garnets and Douglas, Kimmel pp. 416–417, Alfred Kinsey pp. 413–414, , William Masters and Virginia, Johnson pp. 419–421, Letitia Anne Peplau p. 411

Page 478 :
CHAPTER 13, , Personal Explorations Workbook, The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 13.1: Sexuality, Scale. Personal Probe 13.1: How Did You Acquire Your Attitudes about Sex? Personal Probe 13.2: Reflecting on the, Place of Sexuality Throughout Your Life., , ANSWERS, , Page 426, Page 427, Page 431, Pages 431–432, Pages 434–436, , 6. Regarding overall marital satisfaction and sexual satisfaction, research indicates there is:, a. a strong relationship., b. a weak relationship., c. no relationship., d. a strong relationship, but only in the first year of, marriage., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , a, d, b, c, d, , 5. Which of the following characterizes teen sexual behavior in the “age of AIDS”?, a. Fewer teens are engaging in risky sexual behavior, now than 10 years ago., b. The teen pregnancy rate has increased since the, early 90s., c. About 75 percent of sexually active teens use condoms regularly., d. The teen pregnancy rate in America is among the, lowest in the world., , Book Companion Website, , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. Sexual fantasies:, a. are signs of abnormality., b. are quite normal., c. rarely include having sex with someone other than, one’s partner., d. are an excellent indication of what people want to, experience in reality., , 10. Which of the following is not one of the text’s suggestions for enhancing your sexual relationships?, a. Pursue adequate sex education., b. Review your sexual values system., c. Communicate about sex., d. Set clear goals for each sexual encounter., , Pages 411–412, Pages 413–414, Pages 420–421, Page 422, Pages 424–425, , 3. Which of the following describes the correct order of, the four phases of Masters and Johnson’s sexual response cycle?, a. Resolution, plateau, excitement, orgasm, b. Plateau, excitement, orgasm, resolution, c. Excitement, plateau, orgasm, resolution, d. Excitement, orgasm, plateau, resolution, , 9. Sexually transmitted diseases:, a. are all very serious., b. always cause symptoms right away., c. are most common among people under age 25., d. are most common among people between 26, and 40., , Development and Expression of Sexuality, , d, b, c, b, a, , 2. Which of the following statements about sexual orientation is true?, a. Heterosexuality and homosexuality are best viewed, as two distinct categories., b. Heterosexuality and homosexuality are best viewed, as end points on a continuum., c. Biological factors alone probably determine sexual, orientation., d. Environmental factors alone probably determine, sexual orientation., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Young men typically feel _____ about sex; young, women typically feel _____ about sex., a. positive; positive, b. positive; negative, c. ambivalent; ambivalent, d. positive; ambivalent, , 8. Which of the following statements about condom use, is false?, a. It’s okay to use oil-based lubricants with, polyurethane condoms., b. It’s okay to use oil-based lubricants with rubber, condoms., c. Skin condoms do not protect against STDs., d. It’s okay to use water-based lubricants with rubber, or polyurethane condoms., , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 7. About what percent of Americans strongly disapprove, of sexual infidelity?, a. 0 percent, c. 60 percent, b. 30 percent, d. 90 percent, , 441

Page 479 :
STRESS, PERSONALITY, AND ILLNESS, Personality, Emotions, and Heart Disease, Stress and Cancer, Stress and Other Diseases, Stress and Immune Functioning, Conclusions, HABITS, LIFESTYLES, AND HEALTH, Smoking, Drinking, Overeating, , Poor Nutrition, Lack of Exercise, Behavior and AIDS, REACTIONS TO ILLNESS, The Decision to Seek Treatment, The Sick Role, Communicating with Health Providers, Adherence to Medical Advice, , APPLICATION: UNDERSTANDING THE, EFFECTS OF DRUGS, Drug-Related Concepts, Narcotics, Sedatives, Stimulants, Hallucinogens, Marijuana, Ecstasy (MDMA), CHAPTER 14 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST, , 442

Page 480 :
CHAPTER, , Psychology and, Physical Health, , 14, , The patterns of illness found in a society tend to fluctuate over time. In our, society, some interesting trends have occurred during the last century or so., Before the 20th century, the principal threats to health were contagious diseases caused by specific infectious agents. Because such diseases can be, transmitted readily from one person to another, people used to live in fear, of epidemics. The leading causes of death were diseases such as the plague,, smallpox, typhoid fever, influenza, diphtheria, yellow fever, malaria, cholera,, tuberculosis, polio, and scarlet fever. Today, the incidence of these diseases, has declined to the point where none of them is among the leading killers, in the United States (see Figure 14.1 on the next page)., What neutralized these dreaded diseases? The general public tends to, attribute the conquest of contagious diseases to advances in medical treatment. Although progress in medicine certainly played a role, Grob (1983), marshals evidence that the significance of such progress has been overrated., Of greater significance, according to Grob, have been (1) improvements in, nutrition, (2) improvements in public hygiene and sanitation (water filtration, treatment of sewage, and so forth), and (3) evolutionary changes in, human immune resistance to the diseases. Whatever the causes, infectious, diseases are no longer the major threat to physical health in the industrialized nations of the world (although many remain quite prevalent in Third, World countries)., Unfortunately, the void left by contagious diseases has been filled all, too quickly by various chronic diseases—illnesses that develop gradually, over many years (refer to Figure 14.1). Psychosocial factors, such as lifestyle and stress, play a much larger role in the development of chronic diseases than they do in contagious diseases. Today, the three leading chronic, diseases (heart disease, cancer, and stroke) account for 63 percent of all, , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 443

Page 481 :
400, , Cancer, 22.9%, , Accidents 4.2%, , Death rates per 100,000 population, , Heart, disease, 29%, , 300, , 250, , All other, causes, 37.1%, , Cancer, , 200, , 150, Stroke, 100, Pneumonia and, influenza, , 50, , 0, 1900, , 1910, , 1920, , Measles, scarlet fever,, whooping cough, and diphtheria, , •, , Heart disease, , Stroke, 6.8%, , 350, , 1930, , 1940, , Typhoid, fever, , 1950, , 1960, , 1970, , 1980, , 1990, , 2000, , Tuberculosis, , FIG U R E 14.1, , Changing patterns of illness. Trends in the death rates for various diseases during the 20th century, reveal that contagious diseases (shown in blue) have declined as a threat to health. However, the death, rates for stress-related chronic diseases (shown in red) have remained quite high. The pie chart (inset),, which depicts the percentage of deaths caused by most of the leading killers today, shows the results of, these trends: Three chronic diseases (heart disease, cancer, and stroke) account for almost 60 percent, of all deaths., , deaths in the United States, and these mortality statistics reveal only the tip of the iceberg. Psychosocial factors contribute to many other, less serious illnesses,, such as headaches, backaches, skin disorders, asthma,, and ulcers., In light of these trends, it is not surprising that the, way we think about illness is changing. Traditionally,, illness has been thought of as a purely biological phenomenon produced by an infectious agent or some internal physical breakdown. However, the shifting patterns of disease and new findings relating stress to, physical illness have rocked the foundation of this biological model. In its place a new model has gradually, emerged (Suls & Rothman, 2004). The biopsychosocial model holds that physical illness is caused by a, complex interaction of biological, psychological, and, sociocultural factors. This new model does not suggest that biological factors are unimportant. Rather, it, , 444, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , simply asserts that biological factors operate in a psychosocial context that can also be highly influential., The growing recognition that psychological factors influence physical health led to the development, of a new specialty within psychology. Health psychology is concerned with how psychosocial factors relate to the promotion and maintenance of health and, with the causation, prevention, and treatment of illness. This specialty is relatively young, having emerged, in the late 1970s. In this chapter we focus on the, rapidly growing domain of health psychology. The, chapter’s first section analyzes the link between stress, and illness. The second section examines common, health-impairing habits, such as smoking and overeating. The third section discusses how people’s reactions, to illness can affect their health. The Application expands on one particular type of health-impairing, habit: the use of recreational drugs.

Page 482 :
Stress, Personality, and Illness, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe the Type A personality and evidence, regarding its most toxic element., Discuss possible explanations for the link between, hostility and heart disease., Summarize evidence relating emotional reactions and, depression to heart disease., , As we noted in Chapter 3, during the 1970s health researchers began to uncover new links between stress, and a variety of diseases previously believed to be, purely physiological in origin. In this section, we’ll, look at the evidence on the apparent link between, stress and physical illness and discuss how personality, factors contribute to this relationship. We begin with, heart disease, which is far and away the leading cause, of death in North America., , Personality, Emotions,, and Heart Disease, Heart disease accounts for nearly 40 percent of the, deaths in the United States every year. Coronary heart, disease results from a reduction in blood flow through, the coronary arteries, which supply the heart with, blood. This type of heart disease causes about 90 percent of heart-related deaths. Atherosclerosis is the, principal cause of coronary disease. Atherosclerosis is, a gradual narrowing of the coronary arteries, usually, caused by a buildup of fatty deposits and other debris, on the inner walls (see Figure 14.2). Atherosclerosis, , Cholesterol, fatty deposits,, and cellular debris, , (a), , •, , (b), , (c), , F I G U R E 14.2, , Atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis, a narrowing of the coronary, arteries, is the principal cause of coronary disease. (a) A normal, artery. (b) Fatty deposits, cholesterol, and cellular debris on the, walls of the artery have narrowed the path for blood flow. (c) Advanced atherosclerosis. In this situation, a blood clot might, suddenly block the flow of blood through the artery., , ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe the evidence linking stress and personality, to cancer., Summarize evidence linking stress to a variety of, diseases and immune functioning., Evaluate the strength of the relationship between, stress and illness., , progresses slowly over many years. Narrowed coronary, arteries may eventually lead to situations in which the, heart is temporarily deprived of adequate blood flow,, causing a condition known as myocardial ischemia., This ischemia may be accompanied by brief chest pain,, called angina. If a coronary artery is blocked completely (by a blood clot, for instance), the abrupt interruption of blood flow can produce a full-fledged heart, attack, or myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis is, more prevalent in men than women and tends to increase with age. Other established risk factors for coronary disease include smoking, diabetes, high cholesterol levels, and high blood pressure (Greenland et al.,, 2003; Khot et al., 2003). Smoking and diabetes are, somewhat stronger risk factors for women than for, men (Stoney, 2003). Contrary to public perception,, cardiovascular diseases kill women just as much as, men, but these diseases tend to emerge in women, about 10 years later in life than in men (Stoney, 2003)., Recently, attention has shifted to the possibility, that inflammation may contribute to atherosclerosis, and elevated coronary risk (Hackam & Anand, 2003)., Evidence is mounting that inflammation plays a key, role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, as well as the acute complications that trigger heart, attacks (Albert et al., 2002; Libby, Ridker, & Maseri,, 2002). Fortunately, researchers have found a marker—, levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the blood—that, may help physicians estimate individuals’ coronary, risk more accurately than was possible previously, (Ridker, 2001). Figure 14.3 (on the next page) shows, how combined levels of CRP and cholesterol appear to, be related to coronary risk. CRP levels are also predictive of the development of high blood pressure, which, suggests that hypertension may be part of an inflammatory syndrome (Sesso et al., 2003)., Hostility and Coronary Risk, , In the 1960s and 1970s a pair of cardiologists, Meyer, Friedman and Ray Rosenman (1974), were investigating the causes of coronary disease. Originally, they, were interested in the usual factors thought to produce, , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 445

Page 483 :
•, , FIG U R E 14.3, , The relationship of cholesterol and inflammation to coronary risk. Levels of C-reactive, protein (CRP) in the blood appear to be a, useful index of the inflammation that contributes to atherosclerosis (Ridker, 2001)., This graph shows how increasing CRP levels, and increasing cholesterol levels combine to, elevate cardiovascular risk (for a heart attack, or stroke). The relative risks shown are for, successive quintiles on each measure (each, quintile represents one-fifth of the sample,, ordered from those who scored lowest to, those who scored highest). The relative risks, are in relation to those who fall in the lowest, quintile on both measures., Adapted from Ridker, P. M. (2001). High sensitivity C-reactive, protein: Potential adjunct for global risk assessment in primary, prevention of cardiovascular disease. Circulation, 103, 1813–, 1818. Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association. Adapted by, permission of the publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and, the author., , 8.7, 7.2, , 5.1, , 4.2, , 5.0, 4.2, 4.2, , 3.5, , 3.5, , 2.0, 4, , 2.1, , 1.7, , 1.7, , 5, , 1.4, , 1.4, , 4, , 1.2, , 3, , Mental and Physical Health, , 2.2, , 2.5, 2.5, , 5, , 3.0, , 2.9, , 2.9, , a high risk of heart attack: smoking, obesity, physical, inactivity, and so forth. Although they found these factors to be important, they eventually recognized that a, piece of the puzzle was missing. Many people who, smoked constantly, got little exercise, and were severely, overweight still managed to avoid the ravages of heart, disease. Meanwhile, others who seemed to be in much, better shape with regard to these risk factors experienced the misfortune of a heart attack. What was their, explanation for these perplexing findings? Stress!, Specifically, they identified an apparent connection between coronary risk and a pattern of behavior they, called the Type A personality, which involves selfimposed stress and intense reactions to stress., Friedman and Rosenman divided people into two, basic types (Friedman, 1996; Rosenman, 1993). The, Type A personality includes three elements: (1) a, strong competitive orientation, (2) impatience and, time urgency, and (3) anger and hostility. In contrast,, the Type B personality is marked by relatively relaxed, patient, easygoing, amicable behavior. Type A’s, are ambitious, hard-driving perfectionists who are exceedingly time conscious. They routinely try to do several things at once. They fidget frantically over the, briefest delays. They tend to be highly competitive,, achievement-oriented workaholics who drive themselves with many deadlines. They are easily aggravated, and get angry quickly. Type B’s are less hurried, less, competitive, and less easily angered than Type A’s., Decades of research uncovered a tantalizingly modest correlation between Type A behavior and increased, PART 4, , 6.0, , 6.0, , Increasing, cholesterol level,, by quintile, , 446, , Relative risk, of heart attack, , 3, 1.0, , 2, 1, , 2, 1, , Increasing CRP level,, by quintile, , coronary risk. More often than not, studies found an, association between Type A personality and an elevated, incidence of heart disease, but the findings were not as, strong or as consistent as expected (Ragland & Brand,, 1988; Smith & Gallo, 2001). However, in recent years,, researchers have found a stronger link between personality and coronary risk by focusing on a specific component of the Type A personality: anger and hostility, (Rozanski, Blumenthal, & Kaplan, 1999). For example,, in one study of almost 13,000 men and women who had, no prior history of heart disease (Williams et al., 2000),, investigators found an elevated incidence of heart attacks among participants who exhibited an angry temperament. The participants, who were followed for a, median period of 4.5 years, were classified as being low, (37.1 percent), moderate (55.2 percent), or high (7.7, percent) in anger. Among participants with normal, blood pressure, the high-anger subjects experienced almost three times as many coronary events as the lowanger subjects (see Figure 14.4). In another study, CT, scans were used to look for signs of atherosclerosis in a, , WE B LI N K 14.1, , healthfinder, Through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the government has opened an ambitious online, gateway to consumer-oriented information about health in, all its aspects. Annotated descriptions are available for all, resources identified in no-cost searches of this database.

Page 484 :
3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, 0, , •, , © Anabella Bluesky/Photo Researchers, Inc., , Relative risk of coronary events, , 3.5, , Low, , Moderate, Anger level, , High, Research suggests that excessive anger and hostility are associated with an increased risk for various types of heart disease., , F I G U R E 14.4, , Anger and coronary risk. Working with a large sample of healthy, men and women who were followed for a median of 4.5 years,, Williams et al. (2000) found an association between trait anger and, the likelihood of a coronary event. Among subjects who manifested, normal blood pressure at the beginning of the study, a moderate, anger level was associated with a 36 percent increase in coronary, attacks, and a high level of anger nearly tripled participants’ risk, for coronary disease. (Based on data in Williams et al., 2000), , sample of 374 young men and women whose cynical, hostility had been assessed a decade earlier when they, were 18 to 30 years old (Irabarren et al., 2000). Participants with above-average hostility scores were twice as, likely to exhibit atherosclerosis as participants with, below-average hostility scores., , Many other studies have also found an association, between hostility and various aspects of cardiovascular disease (Eaker et al., 2004; Niaura et al, 2002), including CRP levels (Suarez, 2004). Thus, recent research trends suggest that hostility may be the crucial, toxic element in the Type A syndrome that accounts, for the correlation between Type A behavior and heart, disease. Why are anger and hostility associated with, coronary risk? Research has uncovered a number of, possible explanations (see Figure 14.5)., First, anger-prone individuals appear to exhibit, greater physiological reactivity than those who are, lower in hostility (Smith & Gallo, 1999; Suarez et al.,, , •, Greater physiological reactivity in, response to stress may cause wear and, tear in cardiovascular system., Exposure to self-imposed stress may, be high because hostility and anger, lead to interpersonal difficulties., Cynical hostility, and anger, Hostility may undermine social, support from others that might buffer, the effects of stress., , Increased, incidence, of coronary, heart disease, , FIG U R E 14.5, , Mechanisms that may link, hostility and anger to heart, disease. Explanations for the, apparent link between cynical, hostility and heart disease are, many and varied. Four widely, discussed possibilities are, summarized in the middle, column of this diagram., , Cynicism might lead to poor health, habits, such as lack of exercise,, excessive consumption of convenience, foods, or denial of symptoms., , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 447

Page 485 :
1998). The frequent ups and downs in heart rate and, blood pressure may create wear and tear in their cardiovascular systems., Second, hostile people probably create additional, stress for themselves (Felsten, 1996; Smith & Gallo,, 2001). For example, their quick anger may provoke, many arguments and conflicts with others. Consistent, with this line of thinking, Smith and colleagues (1988), found that subjects high in hostility reported more, hassles, more negative life events, more marital conflict, and more work-related stress than subjects who, were lower in hostility., Third, thanks to their antagonistic ways of relating to others, hostile individuals tend to have less social support than others (Brummett et al., 2001; Hart,, 1999). As we noted in Chapter 3, research suggests that, social support may be an important coping resource, that promotes health and buffers the effects of stress, (Wills & Fegan, 2001). Moreover, research indicates, that low social support may be an independent risk, factor for coronary disease (Rozanski, Blumenthal, &, Kaplan, 1999)., Fourth, perhaps because of their cynicism, people, high in anger and hostility seem to exhibit a higher, prevalence of poor health habits that may contribute, to the development of cardiovascular disease. For example, people high in hostility are more likely to, smoke, drink alcohol and coffee, and be overweight, than others (Everson et al., 1997; Siegler et al., 1992)., In sum, there are a variety of plausible explanations for the connection between hostility and heart, disease. With all these mechanisms at work, it’s not, surprising that anger is associated with increased coronary risk., Emotional Reactions and Heart Disease, , Although work on personality risk factors has dominated research on how psychological functioning contributes to heart disease, recent studies suggest that, emotional reactions may also be critical. One line of research has supported the hypothesis that transient mental stress and the resulting emotions that people experience can tax the heart. Based on anecdotal evidence,, cardiologists and laypersons have long voiced suspicions that strong emotional reactions might trigger, heart attacks in individuals with coronary disease, but, it has been difficult to document this connection., However, advances in cardiac monitoring have facilitated investigation of the issue. As suspected, laboratory experiments with cardiology patients have shown, that brief periods of mental stress can trigger acute, symptoms of heart disease, such as myocardial ischemia and angina (Gottdiener et al., 1994). Overall,, the evidence suggests that mental stress can elicit ischemia in about 30–70 percent of patients with stable, coronary disease (Kop, Gottdiener, & Krantz, 2001)., 448, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , Is It Worth Dying For?, by Robert S. Eliot &, Dennis L. Breo, (Bantam Books, 1984, 1991), Robert S. Eliot is a cardiologist whose work on “hot, reactors” has attracted attention. Eliot believes that, some people are particularly vulnerable to heart attacks, because they have an overly reactive cardiovascular response to stress. These people may or may not exhibit, Type A behavior or cynical hostility. Hot reacting involves a physiological tendency that is probably affected, by genetic inheritance. Those who are both a hot reactor, and an anger-prone Type A personality probably have a, very elevated risk of coronary problems. Eliot and Breo, explain all this and much more in their highly readable, book, which focuses on the connections between stress, and coronary risk. In addition to explaining how stress,, hot reacting, and Type A behavior influence the risk of, heart attack, they discuss the significance of healthimpairing habits such as physical inactivity, poor eating, and smoking. They construct a handy overview of, how a diverse array of factors govern cardiac vulnerability and then offer a great deal of useful advice on, how to minimize your susceptibility to a heart attack., Cover image copyright © 1984, 1989 Bantam Books. Reprinted by permission., , Moreover, research indicates that these patients have a, higher risk for heart attack than the cardiology patients who do not manifest ischemia in response to, mental stress (Krantz et al., 2000)., Researchers have also examined the importance of, emotional reactions by having patients keep a diary of, their emotions while their cardiac functioning is monitored continuously as they go about their business., For example, Gullette and colleagues (1997) found, that the likelihood of ischemia increased two- or threefold when people reported negative emotions, such as, tension, frustration, and sadness. In another study, 660, patients who experienced a nonfatal myocardial infarction were subsequently interviewed about events, that occurred in the 6 hours prior to the onset of their, heart attack (Moller et al., 1999). The interviews suggested that episodes of anger were a frequent trigger, for the participants’ heart attacks. Consistent with this, evidence, studies that have provided stress management training for coronary patients have shown, promising results in efforts to reduce the likelihood of, additional heart attacks (Claar & Blumenthal, 2003)., Taken together, these studies suggest that emotional

Page 486 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Coping with Traumatic Events, A principal theme of this chapter is that stress can affect, one’s physical health. In today’s world, a major new source, of stress is living with the ominous threat of further, terrorist attacks and the emotional fallout that results., Aware of these problems, a variety of health organizations have consulted their top experts and posted advice, on the Internet about how to cope with terrorism-related, anxiety and emotional reactions to traumatic events. The, advice on these sites is fairly similar, with a great deal of, overlap in content. The best overall list of suggested, coping strategies, found at the website of the National, Center for PTSD, is provided here. These strategies may, be helpful in dealing with this new form of stress:, • Spend time with other people. Coping with stressful events is easier when people support each other., • If it helps, talk about how you are feeling. Be, willing to listen to others who need to talk about how, they feel., • Get back to your everyday routines. Familiar, habits can be comforting., , reactions to stressful events may precipitate heart attacks in people with coronary disease and that learning to better manage one’s emotions may reduce one’s, coronary risk., Depression and Heart Disease, , Another line of research has recently implicated depression as a major risk factor for heart disease. Depressive disorders, which are characterized by persistent, feelings of sadness and despair, are a fairly common, form of psychological disorder (see Chapter 15). Over, the years, many studies have found elevated rates of, depression among patients suffering from heart disease, but most theorists have explained this correlation, by asserting that being diagnosed with heart disease, makes people depressed. However, studies conducted, in the last decade or so have suggested that the causal, relations may also flow in the opposite direction—that, the emotional dysfunction of depression may cause heart, disease (Thomas, Kalaria, & O’Brien, 2004). For example, Pratt and colleagues (1996) examined a large sample of people 13 years after they were screened for de-, , • Take time to grieve and cry if you need to. To feel, better in the long run, you need to let these feelings out, instead of pushing them away or hiding them., • Ask for support and help from your family,, friends, church, or other community resources. Join or, develop support groups., • Eat healthy food and take time to walk, stretch,, exercise, and relax, even if just for a few minutes at a, time., • Make sure you get enough rest and sleep. You, may need more sleep than usual when you are highly, stressed., • Do something that just feels good to you, such as, taking a warm bath, taking a walk, sitting in the sun, or, petting your cat or dog., • If you are trying to do too much, cut back by, putting off or giving up a few things that are not absolutely necessary., • If TV news reports get too distressing, turn them, off and distract yourself by doing something you enjoy., , pression. They found that participants who had been, depressed at the time of the original study were four, times more likely than others to experience a heart attack during the intervening 13 years. Because the participants’ depressive disorders preceded their heart attacks, one cannot argue that their heart disease caused, their depression. Overall, studies have found that depression roughly doubles one’s chances of developing, heart disease (Lett et al., 2004; Rudisch & Nemeroff,, 2003). Moreover, depression also appears to influence, how heart disease progresses, as it is associated with a, worse prognosis among cardiology patients (Glassman, et al., 2003). Although the new emphasis is on how depression contributes to heart disease, experts caution, that the relationship between the two conditions is, surely bidirectional and that heart disease also increases vulnerability to depression (Sayers, 2004)., , Stress and Cancer, If one single word can strike terror into most people’s, hearts, it is probably cancer. People generally view cancer, , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 449

Page 487 :
as the most sinister, tragic, loathsome, and unbearable, of diseases. In reality, cancer is actually a collection of, over 200 related diseases that vary in their characteristics and amenability to treatment (Nezu et al., 2003)., Cancer refers to malignant cell growth, which may, occur in many organ systems in the body. The core, problem in cancer is that cells begin to reproduce in a, rapid, disorganized fashion. As this reproduction, process lurches out of control, the teeming new cells, clump together to form tumors. If this wild growth, continues unabated, the spreading tumors cause tissue, damage and begin to interfere with normal functioning in the affected organ systems., It is widely believed by the general public that stress, and personality play major roles in the development of, cancer (McKenna et al., 1999). However, the research, linking psychological factors to the onset of cancer is, extremely weak. A few retrospective studies have found, evidence that high stress precedes the development of, cancer (Cohen, Kunkel, & Levenson, 1998), but many, others have failed to find any connection, and there is, no convincing evidence that stress contributes to the, causation of cancer (Newell, 1991; Petticrew, Fraser, &, Regan, 1999). That said, Delahanty and Baum (2001), note that researchers trying to link stress to cancer face, a daunting task. Most types of cancer develop slowly, over periods of many years before a tumor is detectable., For most patients it is impossible to know when their, cancer began to develop. If you can’t pinpoint the onset, of a disease, how can you link its onset to stressful, events? Should you look into stress that occurred two, years ago, or five years ago, or ten years ago? Thus, the, failure to find an association between stress and cancer, onset may not reflect the absence of such a link; it may, only mean that insurmountable difficulties exist in detecting the association., Investigators have also attempted to determine, whether there is a cancer-prone personality that might, reflect unsuccessful patterns of coping with stress., These studies have yielded some intriguing threads of, consistency, suggesting that lonely, depressed people, who depend on repressive, avoidant coping strategies, may have a slightly elevated risk for cancer (Eysenck,, 1988, 1993b; McKenna et al., 1999; Temoshok, 1987)., However, this research must be viewed with great caution, given the possibility that someone’s personality, may change after discovering that he or she has cancer., Although efforts to link psychological factors to, the onset of cancer have largely failed, more convincing evidence has shown that stress and personality influence the course of the disease. The onset of cancer, frequently sets off a chain reaction of stressful events, (Anderson, Golden-Kreutz, & DiLillo, 2001). Patients, typically have to grapple with fear of the unknown;, difficult and aversive treatment regimens; nausea, fatigue, and other treatment side effects; dislocations in, 450, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , WE B LI N K 14.2, , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), The CDC is the federal agency charged with monitoring and, responding to serious threats to the nation’s health as well, as taking steps to prevent illness. This site’s “Health Information from A to Z” offers the public in-depth medical, explanations of many health problems both common (flu,, allergies) and unusual (fetal alcohol syndrome, meningitis)., , intimate relationships; career disruptions; job discrimination; and financial worries. Such stressors may, often contribute to the progress of the disease, perhaps, by impairing certain aspects of immune system functioning (Andersen, Kiecolt-Glaser, & Glaser, 1994)., The impact of all this stress may depend in part on, one’s personality. Research suggests that mortality, rates are somewhat higher among patients who respond with depression, repressive coping, and other, negative emotions (Friedman, 1991). In contrast,, prospects appear to be better for patients who can, maintain their emotional stability and enthusiasm., , Stress and Other Diseases, The development of questionnaires to measure life, stress has allowed researchers to look for correlations, between stress and a variety of diseases. For example,, Zautra and Smith (2001) found an association between life stress and the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Another study found an association between stressful life events and the emergence of lower back pain, (Lampe et al., 1998). Other researchers have connected, stress to the occurrence of asthmatic reactions (Ritz et, al., 2000) and periodontal disease (Marcenes & Sheiham, 1992). Studies have also found an association between high stress and flareups of irritable bowel syndrome (Blanchard & Keefer, 2003) and peptic ulcers, (Levenstein, 2002)., These are just a handful of representative examples of research relating stress to physical diseases. Figure 14.6 provides a longer list of health problems that, have been linked to stress. Many of these stress-illness, connections are based on tentative or inconsistent, findings, but the sheer length and diversity of the list is, remarkable. Why should stress increase the risk for so, many kinds of illness? A partial answer may lie in immune functioning., , Stress and Immune Functioning, The apparent link between stress and many types of, illness probably reflects the fact that stress can undermine the body’s immune functioning. The immune, response is the body’s defensive reaction to invasion

Page 488 :
•, , Health Problem, , Representative evidence, , Common cold, , Mohren et al. (2001), , Ulcers, , Levenstein (2002), , Asthma, , Lehrer et al. (2002), , Migraine headaches, , Ramadan (2000), , Premenstrual distress, , Stanton et al. (2002), , Vaginal infections, , Williams & Deffenbacher, (1983), , Herpes virus, , Padgett & Sheridan (2000), , Skin disorders, , Arnold (2000), , Rheumatoid arthritis, , Keefe et al. (2002), , Chronic back pain, , Lampe et al. (1998), , Diabetes, , Landel-Graham, Yount, &, Rudnicki (2003), , Complications of pregnancy, , Dunkel-Schetter et al. (2001), , Hyperthyroidism, , Yang, Liu, & Zang (2000), , Hemophilia, , Buxton et al. (1981), , Stroke, , Harmsen et al. (1990), , Appendicitis, , Creed (1989), , Multiple sclerosis, , Grant et al. (1989), , Periodontal disease, , Marcenes & Sheiham (1992), , Hypertension, , O’Callahan, Andrews, & Krantz, (2003), , Cancer, , Holland & Lewis (1993), , Coronary heart disease, , Orth-Gomer et al. (2000), , AIDS, , Ironson et al. (2000), , Inflammatory bowel disease, , Searle & Bennett (2001), , Epileptic seizures, , Kelly & Schramke (2000), , F I G U R E 14.6, , Stress and health problems. The onset or progress of the health, problems listed here may be affected by stress. Although the, evidence is fragmentary in many instances, it’s alarming to see, the number and diversity of problems on this list., , by bacteria, viral agents, or other foreign substances., The human immune response works to protect the, body from many forms of disease. Immune reactions, are remarkably complex and multifaceted (Chiappelli, & Liu, 2000). Hence, there are a great many ways to, measure immune function in an organism, and these, multiple measures can sometimes produce conflicting,, confusing results in research., Nonetheless, a wealth of studies indicate that experimentally induced stress can impair immune functioning in animals (Moynihan & Ader, 1996). That is,, stressors such as crowding, shock, food restriction, and, restraint reduce various aspects of immune reactivity, in laboratory animals (Chiappelli & Hodgson, 2000)., , Studies by Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, and her colleagues have also related, stress to suppressed immune activity, in humans (Kiecolt-Glaser & Glaser,, 1995). In one study, medical students provided researchers with, blood samples so that their immune response could be assessed at, various points (Kiecolt-Glaser et al.,, Janice Kiecolt1984). The students provided the, Glaser, baseline sample a month before, final exams and contributed the “high-stress” sample, on the first day of their finals. The subjects also responded to the Social Readjustment Rating Scale, (SRRS; see Chapter 3) as a measure of recent stress. Reduced levels of immune activity were found during the, extremely stressful finals week. Reduced immune activity was also correlated with higher scores on the SRRS., Many other studies have also shown a link between, stress and suppressed immune response (Ader, 2001;, Segerstrom & Miller, 2004). For example, when quarantined volunteers were exposed to respiratory viruses, that cause the common cold, those under high stress, were more likely to be infected by the viruses (Cohen,, Tyrrell, & Smith, 1993). Other studies have found evidence of reduced immune activity among people who, scored relatively high on a stress scale measuring daily, hassles (Levy et al., 1989), among men who were recently divorced or separated (Kiecolt-Glaser et al.,, 1988), among husbands and wives grappling with a, high level of marital conflict (Kiecolt-Glaser et al.,, 1997), among people recently traumatized by a hurricane (Ironson et al., 1997), and among men who recently experienced the death of an intimate partner, (Kemeny et al., 1995). Unfortunately, evidence suggests, that susceptibility to immune suppression in the face, of stress increases as people grow older (Kiecolt-Glaser, & Glaser, 2001). To summarize, scientists have assembled impressive evidence that stress can temporarily, suppress human immune functioning, which can make, people more vulnerable to infectious disease agents., , Conclusions, A wealth of evidence suggests that stress influences, physical health. However, virtually all of the relevant research is correlational, so it cannot demonstrate conclusively that stress causes illness (Smith & Gallo, 2001;, Watson & Pennebaker, 1989). The association between, stress and illness could be due to a third variable. Perhaps some aspect of personality or some type of physiological predisposition makes people overly prone to interpret events as stressful and overly prone to interpret, unpleasant physical sensations as symptoms of illness, (see Figure 14.7 on the next page). For instance, in the, Chapter 3 Application we discussed how neuroticism, , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 451, , Courtesy, Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, , Health Problems That May Be Linked, to Stress

Page 489 :
might increase individuals’ sensitivity to both stress and, illness. Moreover, critics of this research note that many, of the studies used research designs that may have inflated the apparent link between stress and illness, (Schwarzer & Schulz, 2003; Turner & Wheaton, 1995)., In spite of methodological problems favoring inflated correlations, the research in this area consistently indicates that the strength of the relationship between stress and health is modest. The correlations, typically fall in the .20s and .30s (Cohen, Kessler, &, Gordon, 1995). Clearly, stress is not an irresistible force, that produces inevitable effects on health. Actually, this, fact should come as no surprise. As we saw in Chapter, 3, some people handle stress better than others. Furthermore, stress is only one actor on a crowded stage., A complex network of biopsychosocial factors influence health, including genetic endowment, exposure, to infectious agents and environmental toxins, nutrition, exercise, alcohol and drug use, smoking, use of, medical care, and cooperation with medical advice. In, the next section we look at some of these factors as we, examine health-impairing habits and lifestyles., , Aspects, of personality,, physiology,, memory, , High stress, , •, , High, incidence, of illness, , F I G U R E 14. 7, , The stress/illness correlation. Based on the evidence as a whole,, most health psychologists would probably accept the assertion, that stress often contributes to the causation of illness. However,, some critics argue that the stress-illness correlation could reflect, other causal processes. One or more aspects of personality, physiology, or memory might contribute to the correlation between, high stress and a high incidence of illness (see Chapter 3 for, additional discussion of this complex issue)., , Habits, Lifestyles, and Health, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Give some reasons for why people develop healthimpairing habits., Discuss the health effects of smoking and the, dynamics of giving up smoking., Summarize data on patterns of alcohol use and the, short-term risks of drinking., Describe the major long-term health risks and social, costs of drinking., Discuss the health risks and determinants of, obesity., Outline the key elements in effective weight loss, efforts., , Some people seem determined to dig an early grave for, themselves. They do precisely those things they have, been warned are particularly bad for their health. For, example, some people drink heavily even though they, know they’re corroding their liver. Others eat all the, wrong foods even though they know they’re increasing their risk for a heart attack. Unfortunately, healthimpairing habits contribute to far more deaths than, most people realize. In a recent analysis of the causes, of death in the United States, Mokdad and colleagues, (2004) estimate that unhealthy behaviors are responsible for about half of all deaths each year. The unhealthy, habits that account for the most premature mortality,, by far, are smoking and poor diet/physical inactivity, (see Figure 14.8). Other leading behavioral causes of, 452, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , ■, , ■, , ■, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Provide examples of links between nutrition and, health and discuss the basis for poor nutrition., List three general goals intended to foster sound, nutrition., Summarize evidence on the benefits and risks of, exercise., List four guidelines for embarking on an effective, exercise program., Describe AIDS and summarize evidence on the, transmission of the HIV virus., Identify some common misconceptions about AIDS, and discuss the prevention of AIDS., , death include alcohol consumption, unsafe driving,, sexually transmitted diseases, and illicit drug use., It may seem puzzling that people behave in selfdestructive ways. Why do they do it? Several factors are, involved. First, many health-impairing habits creep up, on people slowly. For instance, drug use may grow imperceptibly over years, or exercise habits may decline, ever so gradually. Second, many health-impairing, habits involve activities that are quite pleasant at the, time. Actions such as eating favorite foods, smoking, cigarettes, and getting “high” are potent reinforcing, events. Third, the risks associated with most healthimpairing habits are chronic diseases such as cancer, that usually take 10, 20, or 30 years to develop. It is, relatively easy to ignore risks that lie in the distant fu-

Page 490 :
Smoking, Poor diet/, inactivity, Alcohol, consumption, Motor vehicle, accidents, Firearms, Sexually, transmitted, diseases, Illicit, drug use, 0, , •, , 100, 200, 300, 400, Estimated annual deaths attributed to preventable behavior (thousands), , 500, , F I G U R E 14.8, , Mortality due to health-impairing behaviors. Synthesizing data from many sources, Mokdad and colleagues (2004) estimated the number of annual deaths in the United States attributable to various healthimpairing behaviors in an interesting article published in The Journal of the American Medical Association., As you can see, their calculations suggest that smoking and obesity are the leading causes of preventable, mortality. However, their mortality estimate for obesity has proven controversial and is the subject of, some debate (some experts argue that their estimate is too high). (Data from Mokdad et al., 2004), , ture. Fourth, it appears that people have a tendency to, underestimate the risks associated with their own healthimpairing habits while viewing the risks associated with, , others’ self-destructive behaviors much more accurately (Weinstein, 2003; Weinstein & Klein, 1996). In, other words, most people are aware of the dangers, , Cartoon by Borgman Reprinted with special permission from King Features Syndicate., , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 453

Page 491 :
associated with certain habits, but they often engage in, denial when it is time to apply this information to, themselves. Yet another problem is that people are exposed to so much conflicting information about what’s, healthy and what isn’t. It seems like every week a report, in the media claims that yesterday’s standard health advice has been contradicted by new research. This apparent inconsistency confuses people and undermines, their motivation to pursue healthy habits., In this section we discuss how health is affected by, smoking, drinking, overeating and obesity, poor nutrition, and lack of exercise. We also look at behavioral, factors that relate to AIDS. The health risks of recreational drug use are covered in the Application., , mated life expectancy 13–14 years shorter than that of, a similar nonsmoker (Schmitz & Delaune, 2005). The, overall risk is positively correlated with the number of, cigarettes smoked and their tar and nicotine content., Cigar smoking, which has increased dramatically in, recent years, elevates health risks almost as much as, cigarette smoking (Baker et al., 2000)., Why are mortality rates higher for smokers? Smoking increases the likelihood of developing a surprisingly, large range of diseases, as you can see in Figure 14.10, (Schmitz & Delaune, 2005; Woloshin, Schwartz, &, Welch, 2002). Lung cancer and heart disease kill the, largest number of smokers. However, smokers also have, an elevated risk for oral, bladder, and kidney cancer, as, well as cancers of the larynx, esophagus, and pancreas;, for atherosclerosis, hypertension, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases; and for bronchitis, emphysema,, and other pulmonary diseases. Most smokers know, about the risks associated with tobacco use, but they, tend to underestimate the actual risks as applied to, themselves (Ayanian & Cleary, 1999)., , Smoking, The percentage of people who smoke has declined noticeably since the mid-1960s (see Figure 14.9). Nonetheless, about 25.7 percent of adult men and 21 percent of, adult women in the United States continue to smoke, regularly. Unfortunately, these percentages are slightly, higher (28 percent for both sexes) among college students (Rigotti, Lee, & Wechsler, 2000). Moreover, smoking is even more common in many other societies., , Giving Up Smoking, , Studies show that if people can give up smoking, their, health risks decline reasonably quickly (Williams et al.,, 2002). Five years after people stop smoking, their, health risk is already noticeably lower than that for, people who continue to smoke. The health risks for, people who give up tobacco continue to decline until, they reach a normal level after about 15 years (see Figure 14.11). Evidence suggests that 70 percent of smokers would like to quit, but they are reluctant to give up, a major source of pleasure and they worry about craving cigarettes, gaining weight, becoming anxious and, , Health Effects, , Suspicions about the health risks associated with tobacco use were voiced in some quarters early in the, 20th century. However, the risks of smoking were not, widely appreciated until the mid-1960s. Since then, accumulating evidence has clearly shown that smokers, face a much greater risk of premature death than nonsmokers. For example, the average smoker has an esti-, , FIG U R E 14.9, , 55, , The prevalence of smoking in the United States., This graph shows how the percentage of U.S. adults, who smoke has declined steadily since the mid1960s. Although considerable progress has been, made, smoking still accounts for about 435,000, premature deaths each year. (Data from Centers for, Disease Control), , Percentage of adults (over 18) who smoke, , •, , 50, 45, 40, 35, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , Women, , 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, 0, 1965, , 454, , Men, , 1970, , 1975, , 1980, , 1985, , 1990, , 1995, , 2000

Page 492 :
•, , Stroke, Cataracts, Oral cancer, Cancer of larynx, , Esophageal cancer, , Lung cancer, (risks greatly, elevated), , Chronic obstructive, lung diseases, , Peptic, (stomach) ulcers, , Heart attacks, (smoking more than, doubles risks), , Pancreatic cancer, (30% linked, to smoking), , Circulatory diseases, , Reproductive, system, • In women:, cervical cancer, • In men:, impotence, , Unborn babies, at risk for premature, birth, stunted, development,, and infant death, if mother smokes, , Females,, 19+ cigarettes per day, , 3.5, , Mortality ratio, , 3.0, , Males,, 20+ cigarettes per day, , 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, Males,, 1–20 cigarettes, per day, , 1.0, 0.5, 0, , <1, , Health risks associated with smoking., This graphic provides an overview of the, various diseases that are more common, among smokers than nonsmokers. As you, can see, tobacco elevates one’s vulnerability to a remarkably diverse array of diseases, including the three leading causes of, death in the modern world—heart attack,, cancer, and stroke., , Bladder and, kidney cancers, , irritable, and feeling less able to cope with stress (Grunberg, Faraday, & Rahman, 2001)., There are nearly 40 million ex-smokers in the, United States. Collectively, they clearly demonstrate, that it is possible to give up smoking successfully. But, many didn’t succeed until their third, fourth, or fifth, attempt, and most would testify that quitting isn’t easy., , 4.0, , F I G U R E 14. 10, , Females,, 1–19 cigarettes per day, , Research shows that long-term success rates for efforts, to quit smoking are in the vicinity of only 25 percent, (Cohen et al., 1989). Light smokers are somewhat, more successful at quitting than heavy smokers. Discouragingly, people who enroll in formal smokingcessation programs are only slightly more successful than people who try to quit on their own (Swan,, Hudman, & Khroyan, 2003). In fact, it is estimated that, the vast majority of people who successfully give up, smoking quit on their own, without professional help, (Niaura & Abrams, 2002)., No single approach to quitting smoking is most, effective for everyone. However, if you attempt to give, up smoking on your own (without entering a formal, treatment program), the self-modification techniques, described in the Application for Chapter 4 can be invaluable. A good program should include careful monitoring of smoking habits, ample rewards for going, without cigarettes, and control of antecedents to avoid, situations that trigger smoking. It is also important to, set a specific target date for quitting, to have specific, plans for coping with temptation, and to arrange cooperation and encouragement from family and friends, , 1–2, 3–5 6–10 11–15 15+, Years of abstinence, WE B LI N K 14.3, , •, , F I G U R E 14.11, , Quitting smoking and mortality. Research suggests that various, types of health risks associated with smoking decline gradually, after people give up tobacco. The data shown here, from the, 1990 U.S. Surgeon General’s report on smoking, illustrate the, overall effects on mortality rates. (Data from U.S. Department of, Health and Human Services, 1990), , The QuitNet Community, The Boston University School of Public Health sponsors an, online community of individuals who seek to quit smoking, and tobacco use. A range of excellent resources, including, an online support “community” available 24 hours a day,, can help make this behavioral health change a reality., , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 455

Page 493 :
© Tribune Media Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted with permission., , (Fisher et al., 2004). Keep in mind, too, that people attempting to give up smoking often fail several times, before eventually succeeding. Evidence suggests that, the readiness to quit builds gradually as people cycle, through periods of abstinence and relapse (Herzog et, al., 1999; Prochaska, 1994). Hence, if your effort to quit, smoking ends in failure, don’t give up hope—try again, in a few weeks or a few months., In recent years attention has focused on the potential value of nicotine substitutes, which can be delivered, , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , The Stop Smoking, Workbook: The Definitive, Step-by-Step Guide to Healthy Quitting, by Lori Stevic-Rust & Anita Maximin (MJF Books,, 1996), The title says it all—this highly practical book is intended to help smokers through the challenging process, of giving up tobacco. Written by two health psychologists, the book begins with a review of facts and myths, about smoking, including a detailed review of the habit’s, physiological effects. Then the authors take the reader, through a series of self-assessments intended to help, them better understand when and why they smoke. The, authors go on to outline strategies for setting a quit, date and getting through the first few weeks. They also, discuss how to deal with the urge to smoke and how to, reduce the likelihood of relapse. The book is loaded, with exercises and questionnaires that really make it, something of a “workbook.” The information is scientifically sound and the coverage of smoking-related issues, is thorough., Cover reprinted by permission of New Harbinger, Oakland, CA. 800/748-6273., www.newharbinger.com, , 456, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , via gum, skin patches, nasal sprays, or inhalers. The rationale for nicotine substitutes is that insofar as nicotine is addictive, using a substitute might be helpful, during the period when the person is trying to give up, cigarettes. Do these substitutes work? They do help., Controlled studies have demonstrated that nicotine, substitutes increase long-term rates of quitting in comparison to placebos (Swan et al., 2003). However, the, increases are modest and the success rates are still discouragingly low. Nicotine substitutes are not a magic, bullet or a substitute for a firm determination to quit., The various methods of nicotine delivery seem to be, roughly equal in effectiveness, but combining a couple, methods of delivery appears to increase the chances of, quitting successfully (Schmitz & Delaune, 2005)., , Drinking, Alcohol rivals tobacco as one of the leading causes of, health problems in Americans. Alcohol encompasses a, variety of beverages containing ethyl alcohol, such as, beers, wines, and distilled spirits. The concentration of, alcohol in these drinks varies from about 4 percent in, most beers up to 40 percent in 80-proof liquor (or, more in higher-proof liquors). Survey data indicate, that about half of adults in the United States drink. As, Figure 14.12 shows, per capita consumption of alcohol, in the United States declined in the 1980s and 1990s,, but this decrease followed decades of steady growth,, and alcohol consumption remains relatively high, although certainly not the highest in the world., Drinking is particularly prevalent on college campuses. Researchers from the Harvard School of Public, Health (Wechsler et al., 2002) surveyed nearly 11,000, undergraduates at 119 schools and found that 81 percent of the students drank. Moreover, 49 percent of the, men and 41 percent of the women reported that they, engage in binge drinking with the intention of getting, drunk. Perhaps most telling, college students spend far, more money on alcohol ($5.5 billion annually) than, they do on their books.

Page 494 :
•, , Per capita consumption of alcohol (gallons of ethanol), , 2.8, 2.6, 2.4, 2.2, 2.0, 1.8, 1.6, 1.4, , Heavy, drinkers, Binge 5.6%, drinkers, 20.6%, Light and, moderate, drinkers, 20.4%, , Abstainers, 53.4%, , 1.2, 0, 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000, , Why Do People Drink?, , The effects of alcohol are influenced by the user’s experience, motivation, and mood, as well as by the presence of food in the stomach, the proof of the beverage,, and the rate of drinking. Thus, we see great variability, in how alcohol affects different people on different occasions. Nonetheless, the central effect is a “Who, cares?” brand of euphoria that temporarily boosts selfesteem as one’s problems melt away. Negative emotions such as tension, worry, anxiety, and depression, are dulled, and inhibitions may be loosened (Johnson, & Ait-Daoud, 2005). Thus, when first-year college stu-, , FIG U R E 14.12, , Drinking in America. Drinking, in the United States, as indexed, by per capita consumption of, ethanol in gallons, rose steadily, through most of the 20th century, although notable declines, occurred during the 1980s and, 1990s. The inset shows the, percentage of American adults, who are abstainers, light drinkers,, binge drinkers (people who have, consumed five or more drinks on, the same occasion at least once, in the past month), and heavy, drinkers (people who have consumed five or more drinks on the, same occasion at least five times, in the past month). The highest, rates of binge drinking and heavy, drinking are seen among young, adults. (Data from National, Institute on Alcohol Abuse and, Alcoholism and U.S. Department, of Health and Human Services), , dents are asked why they drink, they say it’s to relax, to, feel less tense in social situations, to keep friends company, and to forget their problems. Of course, many, other factors are also at work (Wood, Vinson, & Sher,, 2001). Families and peer groups often encourage alcohol use. Drinking is a widely endorsed and encouraged, social ritual in our culture. Its central role is readily, apparent if you think about all the alcohol consumed, at weddings, sports events, holiday parties, and so, forth. Moreover, the alcohol industry spends hundreds, of millions of dollars on advertising to convince us, that drinking is cool, sexy, sophisticated, and harmless., , © Paul A. Souders/Corbis, , Short-Term Risks and Problems, , Overindulging in alcohol is particularly widespread among college students., CHAPTER 14, , Alcohol has a variety of side effects, including some that can be very problematic. To, begin with, we have that infamous source, of regret, the “hangover,” which may include headaches, dizziness, nausea, and, vomiting. In the constellation of alcohol’s, risks, however, hangovers are downright, trivial. For instance, life-threatening overdoses are more common than most people, realize. Although it’s possible to overdose, with alcohol alone, a more common problem is overdosing on combinations of alcohol and sedative or narcotic drugs., In substantial amounts, alcohol has, a decidedly negative effect on intellectual, functioning and perceptual-motor coordination. The resulting combination of, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 457

Page 495 :
.05–.09%, Driving will be impaired, , BAC to .05%, Be careful driving, , FIG U R E 14.13, , Drinking and impaired, driving. The chart shown, here estimates how many, drinks it takes to impair, driving ability in people of, various weights. As you can, see, as few as three drinks in, a two-hour period can elevate, blood alcohol content (BAC), to a dangerous level., , Weight (lbs.), , •, , .10% and up, Do not drive, , 100, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, , 9, , 10, , 11, , 12, , 120, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, , 9, , 10, , 11, , 12, , 140, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, , 9, , 10, , 11, , 12, , 160, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, , 9, , 10, , 11, , 12, , 180, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, , 9, , 10, , 11, , 12, , 200, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, , 9, , 10, , 11, , 12, , 220, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, , 9, , 10, , 11, , 12, , 240, , 1, , 2, , 3, , 4, , 5, , 6, , 7, , 8, , 9, , 10, , 11, , 12, , Drinks (11/2 oz. liquor or 12 oz. beer) in two-hour period, , tainted judgment, slowed reaction time, and reduced, coordination can be deadly when people attempt to, drive after drinking. As Figure 14.13 shows, depending, on body weight, it may take only a few drinks for driving to be impaired. It’s estimated that alcohol contributes to 30 percent of all automobile fatalities in the, United States (Yi et al., 1999). Drunk driving is a major, social problem and the leading cause of death in young, adults. Alcohol is also implicated in many other types, of accidents. Victims test positive for alcohol in 38 percent of fire fatalities, 49 percent of drownings, and 63, percent of fatal falls (Smith, Branas, & Miller, 1999)., With their inhibitions released, some drinkers become argumentative and prone to aggression. In the, Harvard survey of undergraduates from 119 schools,, 29 percent of the students who did not engage in binge, drinking reported that they had been insulted or humiliated by a drunken student, 19 percent had experienced serious arguments, 9 percent had been pushed,, hit, or assaulted, and 19.5 percent had been the target, of unwanted sexual advances (Wechsler et al., 2002)., Worse yet, alcohol appears to contribute to about 90, percent of student rapes and 95 percent of violent, crime on campus. In society at large, alcohol is associated with a variety of violent crimes, including murder, assault, rape, child abuse, and spouse abuse (Wood, et al., 2001). Finally, alcohol can also contribute to, reckless sexual behavior, which may have ramifications, for one’s health. In the Harvard survey, 21 percent of, students who drank reported that they had unplanned, sex as a result of drinking, and 10 percent indicated, that their drinking had led to unprotected sex., Long-Term Health Effects, and Social Costs, , Alcohol’s long-term health risks are mostly (but not exclusively) associated with chronic, heavy consumption, of alcohol. Estimates of the number of people at risk, vary considerably. According to Schuckit (2000) ap458, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , proximately 5–10 percent of American men and, women engage in chronic alcohol abuse and another, 10 percent of men and 3–5 percent of women probably, suffer from alcohol dependence, or alcoholism. Alcohol, dependence (alcoholism) is a chronic, progressive disorder marked by a growing compulsion to drink and, impaired control over drinking that eventually interfere with health and social behavior. Whether alcoholism is best viewed as a disease or as a self-control, problem is the source of considerable debate, but experts have reached a reasonable consensus about the, warning signs of alcoholism. These signs include preoccupation with alcohol, drinking to relieve uncomfortable feelings, gulping drinks, clandestine drinking,, and the other indicators listed in Figure 14.14., Alcoholism and problem drinking are associated, with an elevated risk for a wide range of serious health, problems, which are summarized in Figure 14.15 (Mack,, Franklin, & Frances, 2003; Moak & Anton, 1999). Although there is some thought-provoking evidence that, moderate drinking may reduce one’s risk for coronary, disease (Chick, 1998; Mukamal et al., 2003), it is clear, that heavy drinking increases the risk for heart disease,, hypertension, and stroke. Excessive drinking is also, correlated with an elevated risk for various types of, cancer, including oral, stomach, pancreatic, colon, and, rectal cancer. Moreover, serious drinking problems can, lead to cirrhosis of the liver, malnutrition, pregnancy, , WE B LI N K 14.4, , National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Just two of the many scientific research sources from this, NIH agency include the entire collection of the bulletin, Alcohol Alert, issued since 1988 on specific topics related to, alcoholism (e.g., “Alcohol and Sleep” or “Youth Drinking”), and the ETOH Database, a searchable repository of more, than 100,000 records on alcoholism and alcohol abuse.

Page 496 :
We have focused on the personal risks of alcohol, abuse, but the enormous social costs of alcohol should, also be emphasized (Wood et al., 2001). Drinking, problems wreak havoc in millions of families. Children, of alcoholics grow up in dysfunctional environments, in which the risk of physical or sexual abuse is much, higher than normal (Mathew et al., 1993). In the world, of work, alcohol-related absenteeism and reduced efficiency on the job cost American industry billions of, dollars annually. It is hard to put a dollar value on the, diverse social costs of alcohol abuse, but experts estimate that alcohol costs the U.S. economy about $185, billion annually (Johnson & Ait-Daoud, 2005). Thus,, the social costs of alcohol are staggering., , Warning Signs of Problem Drinking or, Alcoholism, 1. Gulping drinks., 2. Drinking to modify uncomfortable feelings., 3. Personality or behavioral changes after drinking., 4. Getting drunk frequently., 5. Experiencing “blackouts”—not being able to remember, what happened while drinking., 6. Frequent accidents or illness as a result of drinking., 7. Priming—preparing yourself with alcohol before a social, gathering at which alcohol is going to be served., 8. Not wanting to talk about the negative consequences of, drinking (avoidance)., 9. Preoccupation with alcohol., , Overeating, , 10. Focusing social situations around alcohol., 11. Sneaking drinks or clandestine drinking., , •, , F I G U R E 14.14, , Detecting a drinking problem. Facing the reality that one has a, problem with alcohol is always difficult. This list of the chief, warning signs associated with problem drinking is intended to, help with this process., Adapted from Edlin, G., & Golanty, E. (1992). Health and wellness. Boston: Jones & Bartlett., Copyright © 1992 Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Inc. Reprinted with permission., , complications, brain damage, and neurological disorders. Finally, alcoholism can produce severe psychotic, states, characterized by delirium, disorientation, and, hallucinations., , Brain and central nervous system, • Damages and eventually destroys, brain cells, • Impairs memory, • Dulls senses, • Impairs physical coordination, • Affects judgment,, reasoning, and inhibitions, Immune system, • Lowers resistance to, disease, Liver, • Damages and eventually, destroys liver cells, • Causes medical conditions, including fatty liver,, alcohol hepatitis, and, cirrhosis, Stomach and intestines, • Causes bleeding and, inflammation, • May trigger cancer, , Obesity is a common health problem. The criteria for, obesity vary considerably. One simple, intermediate, criterion is to classify people as obese if their weight, exceeds their ideal body weight by 20 percent. If this, criterion is used, 31 percent of men and 35 percent of, women in the United States qualify as obese (Brownell, & Wadden, 2000). Many experts prefer to assess obesity in terms of body mass index (BMI)—weight (in, kilograms) divided by height (in meters) squared, (kg/m2). This increasingly used index of weight controls for variations in height. A BMI of 25.0–29.9 is, typically regarded as overweight, and a BMI over 30 is, considered obese (Bjorntorp, 2002). Although American culture seems to be obsessed with slimness, recent, , Gastrointestinal tract, • Causes inflammation, • May cause cancer, • Leads to pancreatitis, Heart, • May raise blood pressure, • Causes irregular heartbeat, • Causes heart disease and, stroke, , •, , FIG U R E 14.15, , Health risks associated with, drinking. This graphic provides, an overview of the various, diseases that are more common, among drinkers than abstainers. As you can see, alcohol, elevates one’s vulnerability to a, remarkably diverse array of, diseases., , Reproductive system, • In women, menstrual, cycles become irregular;, pregnant women have an, increased risk of bearing, children with birth defects, • In men, hormone levels may, be altered; impotence may, occur; testicles may atrophy, , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 459

Page 497 :
Determinants of Obesity, , A few decades ago it was widely believed that obesity is, a function of personality. Obesity was thought to occur, mostly in depressed, anxious, compulsive people who, overate to deal with their negative emotions or in lazy,, undisciplined individuals. However, research eventu-, , 460, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , 40, Hypertension, Patients with medical condition (%), , surveys show surprisingly sharp increases in the incidence of obesity (Corsica & Perri, 2003). If a BMI over, 25 is used as the cutoff, almost two-thirds of American, adults are struggling with weight problems (Sarwer, Foster, & Wadden, 2004). Moreover, they are not alone—, they have plenty of company from their children,, as weight problems among children and adolescents, have increased 15–22 percent in recent decades (West, et al., 2004)., Obesity is similar to smoking in that it exerts a relatively subtle impact on health that is easy for many people to ignore. Nevertheless, the long-range effects of, obesity can be quite dangerous. Obesity is a significant, health problem that elevates one’s mortality risk (Allison et al., 1999; Bender et al., 1999). Overweight people, are more vulnerable than others to heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, respiratory problems, gallbladder, disease, stroke, arthritis, muscle and joint pain, and back, problems (Manson, Skerrett, & Willet, 2002; Pi-Sunyer,, 2002). For example, Figure 14.16 shows how the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, coronary disease, and, musculoskeletal pain are elevated as BMI increases., Evolution-oriented researchers have a plausible explanation for the dramatic increase in the prevalence of, obesity (Pinel, Assanand, & Lehman, 2000). They point, out that over the course of history, most animals and, humans have lived in environments in which there was, fierce competition for limited, unreliable food resources, and starvation was a very real threat. Hence, warmblooded, foraging animals evolved a propensity to consume more food than immediately necessary when the, opportunity presented itself because food might not be, available later. Excess calories were stored in the body, to prepare for future food shortages. This approach to, eating remains adaptive for most species of animals that, continue to struggle with the ebb and flow of unpredictable food supplies. However, in today’s modern,, industrialized societies, the vast majority of humans, live in environments that provide an abundant, reliable supply of tasty, high-calorie food. In these environments, humans’ evolved tendency to overeat when, food is plentiful leads most people down a pathway of, chronic, excessive food consumption. According to this, line of thinking, most people in food-replete environments tend to overeat in relation to their physiological, needs, but because of variations in genetics, metabolism, and other factors only some become overweight., , 35, 30, 25, , Musculoskeletal, pain, , 20, , Coronary, heart disease, , 15, 10, , Diabetes, , 5, 0, 20–25, , •, , 25–30, 30–35, Body Mass Index (BMI), , Over 35, , F I G U R E 14. 16, , Weight and the prevalence of various diseases. This graph, shows how obesity, as indexed by BMI, is related to the prevalence of four common types of illness. The prevalence of diabetes,, heart disease, muscle pain, and hypertension all increase as BMI, goes up. Clearly, obesity is a significant health risk. (Data from, Brownell & Wadden, 2000), , ally showed that there is no such thing as an “obese, personality” (Rodin, Schank, & Striegel-Moore, 1989)., Instead, research showed that a complex network of, interacting factors determine whether people develop, weight problems., Heredity. Chief among the factors contributing to, obesity is genetic predisposition (Bouchard, 2002). In, one influential study, adults raised by foster parents, were compared with their biological and foster parents, in regard to body mass index (Stunkard et al., 1986)., The investigators found that the adoptees resembled, their biological parents much more than their adoptive parents. In a subsequent twin study, Stunkard and, associates (1990) found that identical twins reared, apart were far more similar in body mass index than, fraternal twins reared together (see Chapter 2 for a discussion of the logic underlying twin studies). Based on, a study of over 4000 twins, Allison and colleagues, (1994) estimate that genetic factors account for 61 percent of the variation in weight among men and 73 percent of the variation among women. These genetic, factors probably explain why some people can eat constantly without gaining weight whereas other people, grow chubby eating far less. Thus, it appears that some

Page 498 :
people inherit a genetic vulnerability to obesity (Cope,, Fernandez, & Allison, 2004)., Excessive eating and inadequate exercise. The, bottom line for overweight people is that their energy, intake from food consumption chronically exceeds, their energy expenditure from physical activities and, resting metabolic processes. In other words, they eat, too much in relation to their level of exercise (Wing &, Polley, 2001). In modern America, the tendency to, overeat and exercise too little is easy to understand, (Henderson & Brownell, 2004). Tasty, caloric, high-fat, foods are readily available nearly everywhere, not just, in restaurants and grocery stores, but in shopping, malls, airports, gas stations, schools, and workplaces., And when people eat out, they tend to eat larger meals, and consume more high-fat food than they would at, home (French, Harnack, & Jeffery, 2000). Unfortunately, the increased availability of highly caloric food, in America has been paralleled by declining physical, activity. Modern conveniences, such as cars and elevators, and changes in the world of work, such as the shift, to more desk jobs, have conspired to make American, lifestyles more sedentary then ever before., Set point. People who lose weight on a diet have a, rather strong (and depressing) tendency to gain back, all the weight they lose. The reverse is also true. People, who have to work to put weight on often have trouble, keeping it on. According to Richard Keesey (1995),, these observations suggest that your body may have a, set point, or a natural point of stability in body weight., Set-point theory proposes that the body monitors, fat-cell levels to keep them (and weight) fairly stable., When fat stores slip below a crucial set point, the body, supposedly begins to compensate for this change, (Keesey, 1993). This compensation apparently leads to, increased hunger and decreased metabolism., , Studies have raised some doubts about various details of set-point theory, leading some researchers to, propose an alternative called settling-point theory (Pinel, et al., 2000). Settling-point theory proposes that weight, tends to drift around the level at which the constellation of factors that determine food consumption and, energy expenditure achieve an equilibrium. According to this view, weight tends to remain stable as long, as there are no durable changes in any of the factors, that influence it. Settling-point theory casts a much, wider net than set-point theory, which attributes, weight stability to specific physiological processes. Another difference is that set-point theory asserts that an, obese person’s body will initiate processes that actively, defend an excessive weight, whereas settling-point theory suggests that if an obese person makes long-term, changes in eating or exercise that person’s settling point, will drift downward without active resistance. Thus,, settling-point theory is a little more encouraging to, those who hope to lose weight., Losing Weight, , Whether out of concern about their health or just oldfashioned vanity, an ever-increasing number of people, are trying to lose weight. At any given time, about 21, percent of men and 39 percent of women are dieting, (Hill, 2002). Although concerns have been raised that, dieting carries its own risks, the evidence clearly indicates that weight loss efforts involving moderate changes, in eating and exercise are more beneficial than harmful, to people’s health (Devlin, Yanovski, & Wilson, 2000)., Research has provided some good news for those who, need to lose weight. Studies have demonstrated that relatively modest weight reductions can significantly diminish many of the health risks associated with obesity., For example, a 10 percent weight loss is associated with, reduced medical risks (Jeffery et al., 2000). Thus, the, traditional objective of obesity treatment—reducing to, , CATHY copyright © Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 461

Page 499 :
RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , Weight Loss Through, Persistence: Making, Science Work for You, by Daniel S. Kirschenbaum (New Harbinger, 1994), If you want to lose weight, read this book. It is an excellent guide to weight reduction, written by a clinical, psychologist affiliated with Northwestern University, Medical School. The author knits together three of the, themes emphasized in this chapter: the utility of behavioral control of overeating, the importance of having, some rudimentary knowledge of nutrition, and the, value of exercise. Kirschenbaum reviews some myths, about the challenge of losing weight, then explains, how people move through a series of stages of change, along the way to successful persistence. A review of, healthy eating strategies and sound nutritional principles, is followed by a chapter on how to exercise effectively., Finally, Kirschenbaum outlines a plan for improved selfcontrol and wraps up his coverage with a chapter on, managing stress so that stress doesn’t disrupt weight, control efforts. A crucial, prevailing theme throughout, the book is that successful weight control is a lifetime, project. This book, which is enlivened by an ample supply of case studies and exercises, is well written, scientifically sound, and extremely practical., Cover image reprinted by permission of New Harbinger, Oakland, CA. 800/748-6273., www.newharbinger.com, , one’s ideal weight—has been replaced by more modest, and realistic goals (Sarwer et al., 2004)., While many factors may contribute to obesity,, there is only one way to lose weight. You must change, your ratio of energy intake (food consumption) to energy output (physical activities). To be quite specific,, to lose one pound you need to burn up 3500 more, calories than you consume. You have three options in, trying to change your ratio of energy input to energy, output: (1) You can sharply reduce your food consumption, (2) you can sharply increase your exercise, output, or (3) or you can simultaneously decrease your, food intake and step up your exercise output in more, moderate ways. Virtually all experts recommend the, third option. Brownell (1995) emphasizes that exercise, is an essential ingredient of an effective weight-loss, regimen. Exercise seems especially important for maintaining reduced weight, as it is the single best predictor, of long-term weight loss (Wing & Polley, 2001). Moreover, exercise can yield many other benefits, which we, will discuss momentarily., , 462, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , Self-modification techniques (see the Chapter 4, Application) can be helpful in achieving gradual, weight loss. Indeed, behavior modification procedures, represent the cornerstone of most reputable, professional weight-loss programs. Overall, the evidence on, weight-loss programs suggests that they are moderately successful in the short term (the first 6 months),, but in the long run the vast majority of people regain, most of the weight that they lose (Jeffery et al., 2000)., Diet medications can be a useful adjunct in weight loss, efforts that can contribute to success, but only if they, are part of a conventional program that alters eating, and exercise habits (Brownell & Wadden, 2000). Reliance on medication alone does not lead to durable, weight loss, and diet drugs carry risks of their own., , Poor Nutrition, Nutrition is a collection of processes (mainly food, consumption) through which an organism utilizes, the materials (nutrients) required for survival and, growth. The term also refers to the study of these, processes. Unfortunately, most of us don’t study nutrition very much. Moreover, the cunning mass marketing of nutritionally worthless foods makes maintaining sound nutritional habits more and more difficult., Nutrition and Health, , Evidence is accumulating that patterns of nutrition influence susceptibility to a variety of diseases and health, problems. For example, in a study of over 42,000 women,, investigators found an association between a measure, of overall diet quality and mortality. Women who reported poorer quality diets had elevated mortality, rates (Kant et al., 2000). What are the specific links between diet and health? In addition to the problems associated with obesity, which we have already discussed,, other possible connections between eating patterns, and health include the following:, 1. Heavy consumption of foods that elevate, serum cholesterol level (eggs, cheeses, butter, shellfish,, sausage, and the like) appears to increase the risk of, cardiovascular disease (Stamler et al., 2000; see Figure, 14.17). Eating habits are only one of several factors, that influence serum cholesterol level, but they do, make an important contribution., 2. Vulnerability to cardiovascular diseases may, also be influenced by other dietary factors. For example, low-fiber diets may increase the likelihood of coronary disease (Ludwig et al., 1999; Wolk et al., 1999) and, high intake of red and processed meats, sweets, potatoes, and refined grains is associated with increased, cardiovascular risk (Hu & Willett, 2002). Recent research indicates that the omega 3 fatty acids found in

Page 500 :
Relative risk of mortality due to coronary disease, , 14, , WE B LI N K 14.5, , Go Ask Alice!, One of the longest-standing and most popular sources of, frank information on the Net has been Alice! from Columbia University’s Health Education Program. Geared especially to the needs of undergraduate students, Alice!, visitors will find direct answers to questions about relationships, sexuality and sexual health, fitness and nutrition, alcohol and drug consumption, emotional health, and, general health., , 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, , 7. Although the research findings are mixed, there, is some evidence that vitamin E may reduce one’s risk, for coronary disease and some types of cancer (Friedrich, 2004)., , 2, 0, , Of course, nutritional habits interact with other, factors—genetics, exercise, environment, and so on—, to determine whether someone will develop a particular disease. Nonetheless, the examples just described, indicate that eating habits can influence physical health., , <160 160–199 200–239 240–279 >280, Serum cholesterol level at baseline, , •, , F I G U R E 14.17, , The link between cholesterol and coronary risk. In a review of, several major studies, Stamler et al. (2000) summarize crucial, evidence on the association between cholesterol levels and the, prevalence of cardiovascular disease. This graph is based on a, sample of over 11,000 men who were 18 to 39 at the beginning, of the study (1967–1973) when their serum cholesterol level was, measured. The data shown here depict participants’ relative risk for, coronary heart disease during the ensuing 25 years, as a function, of their initial cholesterol level. (Data from Stamler et al., 2000), , fish and fish oils offer protection against coronary disease (Din, Newby, & Flapan, 2004)., 3. High salt intake is thought to be a contributing, factor in the development of hypertension (Vollmer et, al., 2001), although there is still some debate about its, exact role., 4. High caffeine consumption may elevate one’s, risk for hypertension (James, 2004) and for coronary, disease (Happonen, Voutilainen, Salonen, 2004), although the negative effects of caffeine appear relatively, modest., 5. High-fat diets have been implicated as possible, contributors to some forms of cancer, especially prostate cancer (Rose, 1997), colon and rectal cancer (Shike,, 1999), and breast cancer (Wynder et al., 1997). Some, studies also suggest that high-fiber diets may reduce, one’s risk for colon and rectal cancer (Reddy, 1999),, but the evidence is not conclusive., 6. Vulnerability to osteoporosis, an abnormal loss, of bone mass observed most commonly in postmenopausal women, appears to be elevated by a lifelong pattern of inadequate calcium intake (Kalkwarf,, Khoury, Lanphear, 2003)., , The Basis for Poor Nutrition, , Nutritional deficiencies are more widespread in the, United States than most people realize. One study, found that 70 percent of men and 80 percent of, women consumed a diet deficient in at least one of 15, essential nutrients (Murphy et al., 1992). For the most, part, these deficiencies are not a result of low income, or an inability to afford appropriate foods. Instead,, most malnutrition in America is attributable to lack of, knowledge about nutrition and lack of effort to ensure, good nutrition (West et al., 2004)., In other words, our nutritional shortcomings are, the result of ignorance and poor motivation. Americans are remarkably naive about the basic principles of, nutrition. Schools tend to provide little education in, this area, and most people are not highly motivated to, make sure their food consumption is nutritionally, sound. Instead, people approach eating very casually,, guided not by nutritional needs but by convenience,, palatability, and clever advertising., For most people, then, the first steps toward improved nutrition involve changing attitudes and acquiring information. First and foremost, people need, to recognize the importance of nutrition and commit, themselves to making a real effort to regulate their eating patterns. Second, people should try to acquire a, basic education in nutritional principles., Nutritional Goals, , The most healthful approach to nutrition is to follow, well-moderated patterns of food consumption that ensure nutritional adequacy while limiting the intake of, , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 463

Page 501 :
•, , FIG U R E 14.18, , The food guide pyramid. The food pyramid, endorsed in 1992 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is intended to provide, a simple and easy guide to nutritionally, balanced eating. It identifies key categories, of food and makes recommendations about, how many daily servings one should have in, each category. As your text explains, it has, been subjected to criticism and currently is, under revision., , Fats (naturally occurring and added), Sugars (added), , Fats, oils,, and sweets, Use sparingly, , Milk, yogurt, Meat, poultry,, fish, eggs, dry, and cheese, 2–3 servings beans, and nuts, 2–3 servings, , Vegetable group, 3–5 servings, , Fruit group, 2–4 servings, , Breads, cereal, rice, and pasta group, 6–11 servings, , certain substances that can be counterproductive. Here, are some general guidelines for achieving these goals:, 1. Consume a balanced variety of foods. Food is, made up of a variety of components, six of which are, essential to your physical well-being. These six essential nutrients are proteins, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins, minerals, and fiber. Proteins, fats, and carbohydrates supply the body with its energy. Vitamins and, minerals help release that energy and serve other important functions as well. Fiber provides roughage that, facilitates digestion. Educational efforts to promote, adequate intake of all essential nutrients have generally suggested that people should be guided by the classic food pyramid published by the U. S. Department, of Agriculture (see Figure 14.18). Although the food, pyramid remains a useful benchmark, it has been subjected to considerable criticism, and hotly debated revisions are under way (Norton, 2004). The principal, problem with the food pyramid is its failure to distinguish between different types of fat, different forms of, carbohydrates, and different sources of protein (Willett & Stampfer, 2003). For example, the current thinking is that monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, are healthy, whereas saturated fats should be consumed sparingly. A revised food pyramid, which takes, distinctions such as these into consideration, is shown, in Figure 14.19., 2. Avoid excessive consumption of saturated fats,, cholesterol, refined-grain carbohydrates, sugar, and salt., 464, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , These commodities are all overrepresented in the typical American diet. It is particularly prudent to limit the, intake of saturated fats by eating less beef, pork, ham,, hot dogs, sausage, lunch meats, whole milk, and fried, foods. Consumption of many of these foods should, also be limited to reduce cholesterol intake, which influences vulnerability to heart disease. In particular,, beef, pork, lamb, sausage, cheese, butter, and eggs are, high in cholesterol. Refined-grain carbohydrates, such, as white bread, pasta, and white rice, are problematic, because they increase glucose levels in the blood too, quickly. Refined (processed) sugar is believed to be, grossly overconsumed. Hence, people should limit their, dependence on soft drinks, chocolate, candy, pastries,, and high-sugar cereals. Finally, many people should cut, down on their salt intake. Doing so may require more, than simply ignoring the salt shaker, as many prepackaged foods are loaded with salt., 3. Increase consumption of polyunsaturated fats,, whole-grain carbohydrates, natural sugars, and foods, with fiber. To substitute polyunsaturated fats for saturated ones, you can eat more fish, chicken, turkey, and, veal; trim meats of fat more thoroughly; use skim (nonfat) milk; and switch to vegetable oils that are high in, polyunsaturated fats. Healthy carbohydrates include, whole grain foods such as whole wheat bread, oatmeal,, and brown rice, which are digested more slowly than, refined-grain carbohydrates. Fruits and vegetables tend, to provide natural sugars and ample fiber. Healthy, sources of protein include fish, poultry, eggs, and nuts.

Page 502 :
•, Use, sparingly, White, rice,, white, Red, bread,, meat, potatoes,, and, pasta, and, butter, sweets, , Multiple vitamins, for most people, , Alcohol in moderation, (unless contraindicated), , F I G U R E 14. 19, , The healthy eating pyramid. This alternative food pyramid was developed by Walter, Willett and colleagues at the Harvard Medical School. It corrects a variety of flaws, that were apparent in the USDA food pyramid and incorporates recent scientific, findings on healthy versus unhealthy fats, and carbohydrates., Adapted from Willett, W. C. (2001). Eat, drink, and be healthy:, The Harvard Medical School guide to healthy eating. New York:, Free Press. Copyright © 2001 by the President and Fellows at, Harvard College. Adapted with permission of Simon & Schuster, Adult Publishing Group., , Dairy foods or calcium, supplement 1–2 times/day, Fish, poultry, and eggs 0–2 times/day, Nuts and legumes 1–3 times/day, Vegetables, (in abundance), Whole grain foods, (at most meals), , Fruits 2–3 times/day, Plant oils, including olive,, canola, soy, corn, sunflower,, peanut, and other vegetable oils, , Daily exercise and weight control, , Lack of Exercise, RE C O M M E N D E D, READING, , Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy:, The Harvard Medical School, Guide to Healthy Eating, by Walter C. Willett (Free Press, 2001), Harvard Medical School professor Walter Willett is a renowned nutrition researcher who has written a superb, book on healthy eating. Willett has been one of the, more vocal critics of the food pyramid released by the, U.S. Department of Agriculture in 1992. He asserts that, “It was built on shaky scientific ground back in 1992., Since then it has been steadily eroded by new research, from all parts of the globe” (pp. 15–16). Willett explains, that the food pyramid was the product of extensive, wrangling between scientists, bureaucrats, and special, interest lobbies, such as the meat, dairy, and sugar, industries. Given all the compromises that were struck,, it never was an optimal guide for healthy eating. Moreover, the food pyramid does not reflect many important,, recent scientific findings on nutrition. Willett reviews, these findings and their practical implications in an, easy-to-understand, readable style. He sifts through the, often contradictory evidence on nutrition and health, and makes sense of it all. He describes an alternative, healthy eating pyramid and then provides extensive, advice on how to eat in a sensible manner., Cover reprinted with permission of Simon & Schuster Adult Publishing Group., Copyright © 2001 by President and fellows at Harvard College., , A great deal of evidence suggests that there is a link between exercise and health. Research indicates that regular exercise is associated with increased longevity (Lee, & Skerrett, 2001). Moreover, you don’t have to be, a dedicated athlete to benefit from exercise. Even a, moderate level of reasonably regular physical activity is associated with lower mortality rates (Richardson et al., 2004; see Figure 14.20 on the next page). Unfortunately, physical fitness appears to be declining in, the United States. Only 25 percent of American adults, get an adequate amount of regular exercise (Dubbert, et al., 2004)., Benefits and Risks of Exercise, , Exercise is correlated with greater longevity because it, promotes a diverse array of specific benefits. First, an, appropriate exercise program can enhance cardiovascular fitness and thereby reduce one’s susceptibility to cardiovascular problems. Fitness is associated with reduced, risk for coronary disease, stroke, and hypertension, , WE B LI N K 14.6, , About.Com: Health and Fitness, About.Com is a commercial endeavor enlisting subject, experts to edit topic-specific directories with annotated, links and other information resources. More than 60 directories related to topics of health and fitness—including, alcoholism, substance abuse, and smoking cessation—are, now available at About.Com., , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 465

Page 503 :
Fitness category, Participants were, divided into five, categories based, on their fitness,, ranging from least, fit (group 1) to, most fit (group 5), , Low fitness:, Group 1, , Men, Women, , Medium fitness: Men, Groups 2 and 3 Women, High fitness: Men, Groups 4 and 5 Women, 0, , •, , 10, 20, 30, 50, 60, 40, 70, Age–adjusted death rate per 10,000 persons, , F I G U R E 14.20, , hysical fitness and mortality. Blair et al. (1989) studied death rates among men and women who, exhibited low, medium, or high fitness. Even medium fitness was associated with lower mortality rates, in both genders. The investigators note that one could achieve this level of fitness by taking a brisk, half-hour walk each day. (Data from Blair et al., 1989), , (Blair, Cheng, & Holder, 2001; Lee et al., 2001). Second, regular physical activity can contribute to the, avoidance of obesity (Corsica & Perri, 2003). Hence,, fitness may indirectly reduce one’s risk for a variety of, obesity-related health problems, including diabetes,, respiratory difficulties, arthritis, and back pain. Third,, some recent studies suggest that physical fitness is also, associated with a decreased risk for colon cancer and, for breast and reproductive cancer in women (Thune, & Furberg, 2001). The apparent link between exercise, and reduced cancer risk has been a pleasant surprise, for scientists, who are now scrambling to replicate the, findings and figure out the physiological mechanisms, underlying this association., Fourth, exercise may serve as a buffer that reduces, the potentially damaging effects of stress (Plante,, 1999b; Plante, Caputo, & Chizmar, 2000). This buffering effect may occur because people high in fitness, show less physiological reactivity to stress than those, who are less fit. Fifth, exercise may have a favorable impact on mental health, which in turn may have positive effects on physical health. Studies have found a, consistent association between regular exercise over a, period of at least eight weeks and reduced depression, (Phillips, Kiernan, & King, 2001), which is important, given the evidence that depression is correlated with, increased vulnerability to heart disease. Sixth, successful participation in an exercise program can produce, desirable personality changes that may promote physical wellness. Research suggests that fitness training can, lead to improvements in one’s mood, self-esteem, and, work efficiency, as well as reductions in tension and, anxiety (Dunn, Trivedi, & O’Neal, 2001; Hays, 1999;, Sonstroem, 1997)., 466, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , Devising an Exercise Program, , Putting together a good exercise program is difficult, for many people. Exercise is time-consuming, and if, you’re out of shape, your initial attempts may be, painful, aversive, and discouraging. People who do not, get enough exercise cite lack of time, lack of convenience, and lack of enjoyment as the reasons (Jakicic, & Gallagher, 2002). To circumvent these problems, it is, wise to heed the following advice (Greenberg, 2002;, Jakicic & Gallagher, 2002; Phillips et al., 2001):, 1. Look for an activity that you will find enjoyable., You have a great many physical activities to choose, from (see Figure 14.21). Shop around for one that you, find intrinsically enjoyable. Doing so will make it much, easier for you to follow through and exercise regularly., 2. Increase your participation gradually. Don’t try, to do too much too quickly. An overzealous approach, can lead to frustration, not to mention injury. An exercise regimen should build gradually. If you experience injuries, avoid the common tendency to ignore, them. Consult your physician to see whether continuing your exercise program is advisable., 3. Exercise regularly without overdoing it. Sporadic, exercise will not improve your fitness. A widely cited, rule of thumb is that you should plan on exercising for, a minimum of 30 minutes three to five times a week,, or you will gain little benefit from your efforts. At the, other extreme, don’t try to become fit overnight by, working out too vigorously. One recent study found, that people are more likely to stick to an exercise regimen consisting of more frequent workouts of moderate intensity than a regimen of less frequent but more, intense workouts (Perri et al., 2002).

Page 504 :
Swimming, , Swimming, , Skating, (ice or, roller), , Skiing—, Nordic, , Skiing—, Alpine, , Skiing—, Alpine, , Basketball, , Basketball, , Tennis, , Calisthenics, , Walking, , Golf, , Softball, , Bowling, , Cardiorespiratory, endurance (stamina), , 21, , 19, , 21, , 18, , 19, , 19, , 16, , 19, , 16, , 10, , 13, , 8, , 6, , 5, , Muscular endurance, , 20, , 18, , 20, , 17, , 18, , 19, , 18, , 17, , 16, , 13, , 14, , 8, , 8, , 5, , Muscular strength, , 17, , 16, , 14, , 15, , 15, , 15, , 15, , 15, , 14, , 16, , 11, , 9, , 7, , 5, , Flexibility, , 9, , 9, , 15, , 13, , 16, , 14, , 14, , 13, , 14, , 19, , 7, , 9, , 9, , 7, , Balance, , 17, , 18, , 12, , 20, , 17, , 16, , 21, , 16, , 16, , 15, , 8, , 8, , 7, , 6, , Weight control, , 21, , 20, , 15, , 17, , 19, , 17, , 15, , 19, , 16, , 12, , 13, , 6, , 7, , 5, , Muscle definition, , 14, , 15, , 14, , 14, , 11, , 12, , 14, , 13, , 13, , 18, , 11, , 6, , 5, , 5, , Skiing—, Nordic, , Calisthenics, , Tennis, , Handball/, Squash, , Handball/, Squash, , Physical fitness, , Skating, (ice or, roller), , Walking, , Bicycling, , Jogging, , Jogging, , Bicycling, , How Beneficial Is Your Favorite Sport?, , Golf Softball Bowling, , General well-being, , •, , Digestion, , 13, , 12, , 13, , 11, , 13, , 12, , 9, , 10, , 12, , 11, , 11, , 7, , 8, , 7, , Sleep, , 16, , 15, , 16, , 15, , 12, , 15, , 12, , 12, , 11, , 12, , 14, , 6, , 7, , 6, , Total, , 148, , 142, , 140, , 140, , 140, , 139, , 134, , 134, , 128, , 126, , 102, , 67, , 64, , 51, , F I G U R E 14.21, , A scorecard on the benefits of 14 sports and exercises. Here is a summary of how seven experts, rated the value of 14 sporting activities (the highest rating possible on any one item was 21). The, ratings were based on vigorous participation four times per week., Adapted from Conrad, C. C. (1976, May). How different sports rate in promoting physical fitness. Medical Times, pp. 45. Copyright 1976 by Romaine, Pierson Publishers. Reprinted by permission., , 4. Reinforce yourself for your participation. To offset the inconvenience or pain that may be associated, with exercise, it is a good idea to reinforce yourself for, your participation. The behavior modification procedures discussed in Chapter 4 can be helpful in devising a viable exercise program., , © Jim Cummings/Taxi/Getty Images, , Behavior and AIDS, , Regular exercise has many physical and psychological benefits that promote increased longevity., , At present, some of the most problematic links between, behavior and health may be those related to AIDS. AIDS, stands for acquired immune deficiency syndrome, a, disorder in which the immune system is gradually, weakened and eventually disabled by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Being infected with the, HIV virus is not equivalent to having AIDS. AIDS is the, final stage of the HIV infection process, typically manifested about 7–10 years after the original infection, (Carey & Vanable, 2003). With the onset of AIDS, one is, left virtually defenseless against a host of opportunistic, infectious agents. The symptoms of AIDS vary widely, depending on the specific constellation of diseases that, one develops (Cunningham & Selwyn, 2005). Unfortunately, the worldwide prevalence of this deadly disease, continues to increase at an alarming rate, especially in, certain regions of Africa (De Cock & Janssen, 2002)., Prior to 1996–1997, the average length of survival, for people after the onset of the AIDS syndrome was, , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 467

Page 505 :
about 18 to 24 months. Encouraging advances in the, treatment of AIDS with drug regimens referred to as, highly active antiretroviral therapy hold out promise, for substantially longer survival (Sande & Ronald,, 2004). But these drugs are being rushed into service, and their long-term efficacy is yet to be determined., Medical experts are concerned that the general public, has gotten the impression that these treatments have, transformed AIDS from a fatal disease to a manageable one, which is a premature conclusion. HIV strains, are evolving and many have developed resistance to, the currently available antiretroviral drugs (Trachtenberg & Sande, 2002). Moreover, many patients do not, respond well to the new drugs and many patients who, are responsive have difficulty sticking to the complicated drug administration regimens that often require, people to take 20–30 pills daily and that often have adverse side effects (Catz & Kelly, 2001; Sorenson, Haug,, & Batki, 2005). Another daunting problem is that these, expensive new drugs remain largely unavailable in developing nations, which have not seen progress in, treatment. In some African nations the impact of AIDS, has reduced life expectancy to levels not seen for hundreds of years. In Botswana, for instance, projections, suggest that life expectancy has declined from 66 to 33, years (Carey & Vanable, 2003)., Transmission, , As mentioned in Chapter 13, the HIV virus is transmitted through person-to-person contact involving, the exchange of bodily fluids, primarily semen and, blood. The two principal modes of transmission in the, United States have been sexual contact and the sharing, of needles by intravenous (IV) drug users. In the United, States, sexual transmission has occurred primarily, among gay and bisexual men, but heterosexual transmission has increased in recent years (Catania et al.,, 2001). In the world as a whole, infection through heterosexual relations has been more common from the, beginning. In heterosexual relations, male-to-female, transmission is estimated to be about eight times more, likely than female-to-male transmission (Ickovics,, Thayaparan, & Ethier, 2001). The HIV virus can be, found in the tears and saliva of infected individuals,, but the concentrations are low, and there is no evidence that the infection can be spread through casual, contact. Even most forms of noncasual contact, including kissing, hugging, and sharing food with infected individuals, appear safe (Kalichman, 1995)., Misconceptions, , Misconceptions about AIDS are widespread. Ironically,, the people who hold these misconceptions fall into two, polarized camps. On the one hand, a great many peo-, , 468, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , ple have unrealistic fears that AIDS can be readily, transmitted through casual contact with infected individuals. These people worry unnecessarily about contracting AIDS from a handshake, a sneeze, or an eating, utensil. They tend to be paranoid about interacting, with homosexuals, thus fueling discrimination against, gays. Some people also believe that it is dangerous to, donate blood when, in fact, blood donors are at no risk, whatsoever., On the other hand, many young heterosexuals, who are sexually active with a variety of partners foolishly downplay their risk for HIV, naively assuming, that they are safe as long as they avoid IV drug use and, sexual relations with gay or bisexual men. They greatly, underestimate the probability that their sexual partners may have previously used IV drugs or had unprotected sex with an infected individual. They don’t understand, for instance, that most bisexual men do not, disclose their bisexuality to their female partners, (Kalichman et al., 1998). Also, because AIDS is usually, accompanied by discernible symptoms, many young, people believe that prospective sexual partners who, carry the HIV virus will exhibit telltale signs of illness., However, as we have already noted, having AIDS and, being infected with HIV are not the same thing, and, HIV carriers often remain healthy and symptom-free, for many years after they are infected. In sum, many, myths about AIDS persist, despite extensive efforts to, educate the public about this complex and controversial disease. Figure 14.22 contains a short quiz to test, your knowledge of the facts about AIDS., Prevention, , The behavioral changes that minimize the risk of developing AIDS are fairly straightforward, although, making the changes is often much easier said than, done (Coates & Collins, 1998). In all groups, the more, sexual partners a person has, the higher the risk that, he or she will be exposed to the HIV virus. Thus, people can reduce their risk by having sexual contacts with, fewer partners and by using condoms to control the, exchange of semen. It is also important to curtail certain sexual practices (in particular, anal sex) that increase the probability of semen/blood mixing. The, 1980s and early 1990s saw considerable progress toward wider use of safe sex practices, but new cohorts, of young people appear to be much less concerned, about the risk of HIV infection than the generation, that witnessed the original emergence of AIDS (Catania et al., 2001). In particular, experts are concerned, that recent advances in treatment may lead to more casual attitudes about risky sexual practices, a development that would not bode well for public health efforts to slow the spread of AIDS (Crepaz, Hart, &, Marks, 2004).

Page 506 :
•, , AIDS Risk Knowledge Test, Answer the following “true” or “false.”, T, , F, , 1. The AIDS virus cannot be spread through kissing., , T, , F, , 2. A person can get the AIDS virus by sharing kitchens and bathrooms with, someone who has AIDS., , T, , F, , 3. Men can give the AIDS virus to women., , T, , F, , 4. The AIDS virus attacks the body’s ability to fight off diseases., , T, , F, , 5. You can get the AIDS virus by someone sneezing, like a cold or the flu., , T, , F, , 6. You can get AIDS by touching a person with AIDS., , T, , F, , 7. Women can give the AIDS virus to men., , T, , F, , 8. A person who got the AIDS virus from shooting up drugs cannot give the virus, to someone by having sex., , T, , F, , 9. A pregnant woman can give the AIDS virus to her unborn baby., , T, , F, , 10. Most types of birth control also protect against getting the AIDS virus., , T, , F, , 11. Condoms make intercourse completely safe., , T, , F, , 12. Oral sex is safe if partners “do not swallow.”, , T, , F, , 13. A person must have many different sexual partners to be at risk for AIDS., , T, , F, , 14. It is more important to take precautions against AIDS in large cities than in, small cities., , T, , F, , 15. A positive result on the AIDS virus antibody test often occurs for people who, do not even have the virus., , T, , F, , 16. Only receptive (passive) anal intercourse transmits the AIDS virus., , T, , F, , 17. Donating blood carries no AIDS risk for the donor., , T, , F, , 18. Most people who have the AIDS virus look quite ill., , F I G U R E 14. 22, , A quiz on knowledge of AIDS. Because misconceptions about AIDS, abound, it may be wise to take this, brief quiz to test your knowledge of, AIDS., Adapted from Kalichman, S. C. (1995). Understanding, AIDS: A guide for mental health professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Copyright, © 1995 by the American Psychological Association., Adapted with permission of the author., , Answers: 1. T 2. F 3. T 4. T 5. F 6. F 7. T 8. F 9. T 10. F 11. F 12. F 13. F 14. F 15. F, 16. F 17. T 18. F, , Reactions to Illness, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Summarize evidence on patterns of treatmentseeking behavior., Explain the appeal of the “sick role.”, , ■, , ■, , So far we have emphasized the psychosocial aspects of, maintaining health and minimizing the risk of illness., Health is also affected by how individuals respond to, physical symptoms and illnesses. Some people engage, in denial and ignore early-warning signs of developing, diseases. Others engage in active coping efforts to conquer their diseases. In this section, we discuss the decision to seek medical treatment, the sick role, communication with health providers, and compliance with, medical advice., , The Decision to Seek Treatment, Have you ever experienced nausea, diarrhea, stiffness,, headaches, cramps, chest pains, or sinus problems? Of, , Identify the factors that tend to undermine doctorpatient communication and how to improve it., Discuss the prevalence of nonadherence to medical, advice and its causes., , course you have; everyone experiences some of these, problems periodically. However, whether you view, these sensations as symptoms is a matter of individual, interpretation. When two persons experience the same, unpleasant sensations, one may shrug them off as a, nuisance, while the other may rush to a physician (Martin & Leventhal, 2004). Studies suggest that those who, are relatively high in anxiety and neuroticism tend to, report more symptoms of illness than others do (Feldman et al., 1999). Those who are extremely attentive to, bodily sensations and health concerns also report more, symptoms than the average person (Barsky, 1988)., Variations in the perception of symptoms help, explain why people vary so much in their readiness, to seek medical treatment (Cameron, Leventhal, &, , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 469

Page 507 :
The Sick Role, Although many people tend to delay medical consultations, some people are actually eager to seek medical, 470, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , care. Given this reality, it is not surprising that up to, 60 percent of patients’ visits to their primary care, physicians appear to have little medical basis (Ellington & Wiebe, 1999). Many of the people who are quick, to solicit medical assistance probably have learned that, there are potential benefits in adopting the “sick role”, (Hamilton, Deemer, & Janata, 2003; Lubkin, 1990). For, instance, the sick role absolves people from responsibility for their incapacity and can be used to exempt, them from many of their normal duties and obligations (Segall, 1997). Fewer demands are placed on sick, people, who can often be selective in deciding which, demands to ignore. Illness can provide a convenient,, face-saving excuse for one’s failures (Wolinksky, 1988)., Sick people may also find themselves receiving lots of, attention (affection, concern, sympathy) from friends, and relatives. This positive attention can be rewarding, and can encourage the maintenance of symptoms, (Walker, Claar, & Garber, 2002)., Thus, some people grow to like the sick role, although they may not be aware of it. Such people readily seek professional care, but they tend to behave in, subtle ways that prolong their illness (Kinsman, Dirks,, & Jones, 1982). For example, they may only pretend to, go along with medical advice, a common problem that, we discuss momentarily., , Communicating with, Health Providers, , Courtesy, Robin DiMatteo, , Leventhal, 1993). Generally, people are more likely to, seek medical care when their symptoms are unfamiliar,, appear to be serious, last longer than expected, or disrupt their work or social activities (Bernard & Krupat,, 1994; Martin et al., 2003). Another key consideration is, how friends and family react to the symptoms. Medical, consultation is much more likely when friends and, family view symptoms as serious and encourage the, person to seek medical care, although nagging a person, about seeking care can sometimes backfire (Martin et, al., 2003). Gender also influences decisions to seek, treatment, as women are much more likely than men, to utilize medical services (Bertakis et al., 2000)., The time that elapses between the first perception, of physical distress and the actual provision of health, care is not necessarily a period of passive waiting. The, process of seeking medical treatment can be divided into, three stages of active, complex problem-solving (Martin, et al., 2003). First, people have to decide that their physical sensations are symptoms—that they are indicative of, illness. Second, they have to decide that their apparent, illness warrants medical attention. Third, they have, to go to the trouble to make the actual arrangements for, medical care, which can be complicated and timeconsuming. The task of checking insurance coverage,, finding an appropriate doctor, negotiating an appointment, arranging to get off work or take care of children,, and so forth can be a huge series of hassles., Small wonder then, that the, biggest problem in regard to treatment seeking is the tendency of, many people to delay the pursuit of, needed professional consultation., Delays can be important, because, early diagnosis and quick intervention can facilitate more effective, treatment of many health probRobin DiMatteo, lems. Unfortunately, procrastination is the norm even when people, are faced with a medical emergency, such as a heart attack (Martin & Leventhal, 2004). Why do people dawdle, in the midst of a crisis? Robin DiMatteo (1991) mentions a number of reasons, noting that people delay because they often (1) misinterpret and downplay the significance of their symptoms, (2) fret about looking silly, if the problem turns out to be nothing, (3) worry about, “bothering” their physician, (4) are reluctant to disrupt, their plans (to go out to dinner, see a movie, and so, forth), and (5) waste time on trivial matters (such as taking a shower, gathering personal items, or packing, clothes) before going to a hospital emergency room., , When people seek help from physicians and other, health care providers, many factors can undermine effective communication. A large portion of medical patients leave their doctors’ offices not understanding, what they have been told and what they are supposed, to do (Johnson & Carlson, 2004). This situation is unfortunate, because good communication is a crucial, requirement for sound medical decisions, informed, choices about treatment, and appropriate followthrough by patients (Buckman, 2002; Gambone, Reiter, & DiMatteo, 1994)., There are many barriers to effective providerpatient communication (Beisecker, 1990; DiMatteo,, 1997). Economic realities dictate that medical visits be, generally quite brief, allowing little time for discus-, , WE B LI N K 14.7, , MedFriendly, Do you ever wonder what complicated medical terms really, mean? Have you tried to read a medical report from a doctor and found yourself not knowing what the doctor was, talking about? The MedFriendly site may be your answer in, its often humorous, but always clear and helpful definitions of many terms, concepts, and abbreviations used in, medicine and health care generally.

Page 508 :
Adherence to Medical Advice, , ing his medicine, the physician may abandon an accurate diagnosis in favor of an inaccurate one. The inaccurate diagnosis could lead to inappropriate treatments, that might be harmful to the patient., Why don’t people comply with the advice that, they’ve sought out from highly regarded health care professionals? Physicians tend to attribute noncompliance, to patients’ personal characteristics, but research indicates that personality traits and demographic factors are, surprisingly unrelated to adherence rates (DiMatteo,, 2004b). One factor that is related to adherence is patients’, social support. Adherence is improved when patients have, family members, friends, or coworkers who remind them, and help them to comply with treatment requirements, (DiMatteo, 2004a). Here are some other considerations, that influence the likelihood of adherence (DunbarJacob & Schlenk, 2001; Johnson & Carlson, 2004):, 1. Frequently, noncompliance is due to patients, simply forgetting instructions or failing to understand, the instructions as given. Highly trained professionals, often forget that what seems obvious and simple to, them may be obscure and complicated to many of, their patients., 2. Another key factor is how aversive or difficult the, treatments are. If the prescribed regimen is unpleasant, compliance will tend to decrease. For example, adherence is reduced when prescribed medications have, many severe side effects. And the more that following, instructions interferes with routine behavior, the less, likely it is that the patient will cooperate successfully., 3. If a patient has a negative attitude toward a, physician, the probability of noncompliance will increase., When patients are unhappy with their interactions, with the doctor, they’re more likely to ignore the medical advice provided., , Many patients fail to adhere to the instructions they receive from physicians and other health care professionals. The evidence suggests that noncompliance with, medical advice may occur 30 percent of the time when, short-term treatments are prescribed for acute conditions and 50 percent of the time when long-term treatments are needed for chronic illness (Johnson & Carlson, 2004). Nonadherence takes many forms. Patients, may fail to begin a treatment regimen, stop the regimen, early, reduce or increase the levels of treatment that were, prescribed, or be inconsistent and unreliable in following treatment procedures (Dunbar-Jacob & Schlenk,, 2001). Nonadherence is a major problem, that has been linked to increased sickness,, treatment failures, and higher mortality, (Christensen & Johnson, 2002; DiMatteo et, al., 2002). Moreover, nonadherence wastes, expensive medical visits and medications, and increases hospital admissions, leading to, enormous economic costs. Robin DiMatteo, (2004b) speculates that in the United States, alone, nonadherence may be a $300 billion a, year drain on the health care system., Our concern about adherence is not intended to suggest that you passively accept, all professional advice from medical personnel. However, when you have doubts about a, prescribed treatment, you should speak up., Passive resistance can backfire. For instance,, if a physician sees no improvement in a paCommunication between health care providers and patients tends to be far from, optimal for a variety of reasons., tient who falsely insists that he has been takCHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 471, , © A. Ramey/PhotoEdit, , sion. Illness and pain are subjective matters that may, be difficult to describe. Many providers use too much, medical jargon and overestimate their patients’ understanding of technical terms. Some providers are uncomfortable being questioned and discourage their patients’ information seeking. Patients who are upset and, worried about their illness may simply forget to report, some symptoms or to ask questions they meant to ask., Other patients are evasive about their real concerns because they fear a serious diagnosis. Many patients are, reluctant to challenge doctors’ authority and are too, passive in their interactions with providers., What can you do to improve your communication, with health care providers? The key is to not be a passive, consumer of medical services (Ferguson, 1993; Kane,, 1991). Arrive for an appointment on time, with your, questions and concerns prepared in advance. Try to be, accurate and candid in replying to your doctor’s questions. If you don’t understand something the doctor says,, don’t be embarrassed to ask for clarification. If you have, doubts about the suitability or feasibility of your doctor’s recommendations, don’t be afraid to voice them.

Page 509 :
In response to the noncompliance problem, researchers have investigated many methods of increasing patients’ adherence to medical advice. Interventions, have included simplifying instructions, providing more, rationale for instructions, reducing the complexity of, treatment regimens, helping patients with emotional, , distress that undermines adherence, and training patients in the use of behavior modification strategies. All, of these interventions can improve adherence, although, their effects tend to be modest (Christensen & Johnson, 2002; Roter et al., 1998)., , Understanding the Effects of Drugs, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , ■, , Explain the concepts of drug tolerance, physical, and psychological dependence, and overdose., Summarize the main effects and risks of, narcotics., Summarize the main effects and risks of, sedatives., , Answer the following “true” or “false.”, ___ 1. Smoking marijuana can make men impotent, and sterile., ___ 2. Overdoses caused by cocaine are relatively rare., ___ 3. It is well documented that LSD causes chromosome damage., ___ 4. Hallucinogens are addictive., ___ 5. Ecstasy is a relatively harmless drug., As you will learn in this Application, all of these statements are false. If you answered all of them accurately,, you may already be well informed about drugs. If not,, you should be. Intelligent decisions about drugs require an understanding of their effects and risks., This Application focuses on the use of drugs for, their pleasureable effects, commonly referred to as drug abuse or recreational drug, use. Drug abuse reaches into every corner, of our society and is a problematic healthimpairing habit. Although small declines, appear to have occurred in the overall abuse, of drugs in recent years, survey data show, that illicit drug use has mostly been increasing since the 1960s (Winick & Norman, 2005)., Like other controversial social problems, recreational drug use often inspires, more rhetoric than reason. For instance, a, former president of the American Medical, Association made headlines when he deRecreational drug users come from all ages and, all walks of life., 472, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Summarize the main effects and risks of stimulant, drugs., Summarize the main effects and risks of, hallucinogens., Summarize the main effects and risks of marijuana, and ecstasy (MDMA)., , clared that marijuana “makes a man of 35 sexually like, a man of 70.” In reality, the research findings do not, support this assertion. This influential physician later, retracted his statement, admitting that he had made it, simply to campaign against marijuana use (Leavitt,, 1995). Unfortunately, such scare tactics can backfire by, undermining the credibility of drug education efforts., Recreational drug use involves personal, moral, political, and legal issues that are not matters for science, to resolve. However, the more knowledgeable you are, about drugs, the more informed your decisions and, opinions about them will be. Accordingly, this Application is intended to provide you with nonjudgmental,, realistic coverage of issues related to recreational drug, use. We begin by reviewing key drug-related concepts., , © image 100/Alamy Images, , ■

Page 510 :
Then we examine the effects and risks of five types of, widely abused drugs: narcotics, sedatives, stimulants,, hallucinogens, and marijuana. We wrap up our coverage with a brief discussion of ecstasy (MDMA), which, has stirred up controversy in recent years., , the likelihood of either physical or psychological dependence. Although both forms of drug dependence, have a physiological basis (Di Chiara, 1999; Self, 1998),, important differences exist between the two syndromes. Physical dependence exists when a person, must continue to take a drug to avoid withdrawal illness (which occurs when drug use is terminated)., The symptoms of withdrawal illness (also called abstinence syndrome) vary depending on the drug. Withdrawal from heroin and barbiturates can produce, fever, chills, tremors, convulsions, seizures, vomiting,, cramps, diarrhea, and severe aches and pains. The, agony of withdrawal from these drugs virtually compels addicts to continue using them. Withdrawal from, stimulants leads to a different and somewhat milder, syndrome dominated by fatigue, apathy, irritability,, depression, and disorientation., Psychological dependence exists when a person, must continue to take a drug to satisfy intense mental and emotional craving for it. Psychological dependence is more subtle than physical dependence, as it is, not marked by a clear withdrawal reaction. However,, psychological dependence can create a powerful, overwhelming need for a drug. The two types of dependence often coexist—that is, many people manifest, , Drug-Related Concepts, The principal types of recreational drugs are described, in Figure 14.23. This table lists representative drugs in, each of the five categories and indicates how the drugs, are taken, their principal medical uses, their desired, effects, and their common side effects., Most drugs produce tolerance effects. Tolerance is, a progressive decrease in a person’s responsiveness to, a drug with continued use. Tolerance effects usually, lead people to consume larger and larger doses of a, drug to attain the effects they desire. Tolerance builds, more rapidly to some drugs than to others. The first, column in Figure 14.24 on the following page (which, lists the risks associated with drug abuse) indicates, whether various categories of drugs tend to produce, rapid or gradual tolerance., In evaluating the potential problems associated, with the use of specific drugs, a key consideration is, , Comparison of Major Categories of Abused Drugs, Methods of, administration, , Principal, medical uses, , Narcotics (opiates), Morphine, Heroin, , Injected, smoked, oral, , Sedatives, Barbiturates, (e.g., Seconal), Nonbarbiturates, (e.g., Quaalude), , Drugs, , •, , Desired effects, , Short-term side effects, , Pain relief, , Euphoria, relaxation,, anxiety reduction,, pain relief, , Lethargy, drowsiness, nausea, impaired, coordination, impaired mental functioning,, constipation, , Oral, injected, , Sleeping pill,, anticonvulsant, , Euphoria, relaxation,, anxiety reduction,, reduced inhibitions, , Lethargy, drowsiness, severely impaired, coordination, impaired mental functioning,, emotional swings, dejection, , Stimulants, Amphetamines, Cocaine, , Oral, sniffed, injected,, freebased, smoked, , Treatment of, hyperactivity, and narcolepsy;, local anesthetic, (cocaine only), , Elation, excitement,, increased alertness,, increased energy,, reduced fatigue, , Increased blood pressure and heart, rate, increased talkativeness, restlessness,, irritability, insomnia, reduced appetite,, increased sweating and urination, anxiety,, paranoia, increased aggressiveness, panic, , Hallucinogens, LSD, Mescaline, Psilocybin, , Oral, , Increased sensory, awareness, euphoria,, altered perceptions,, hallucinations, insightful, experiences, , Dilated pupils, nausea, emotional swings,, paranoia, jumbled thought processes,, impaired judgment, anxiety, panic reaction, , Cannabis, Marijuana, Hashish, THC, , Smoked, oral, , Mild euphoria, relaxation,, altered perceptions,, enhanced awareness, , Bloodshot eyes, dry mouth, reduced, memory, sluggish motor coordination,, sluggish mental functioning, anxiety, , Treatment of, glaucoma;, other uses, under study, , F I G U R E 14.23, , Major categories of abused drugs. This chart summarizes the methods of ingestion, chief medical, uses, and principal effects of five major types of recreational drugs. Alcohol is covered in the main body, of the chapter. (Based on Julien, 2001; Levinthal, 2002; Lowinson, et al., 2005), CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 473

Page 511 :
•, , FIG U R E 14.24, , Risks Associated with Major Categories of Abused Drugs, , Specific risks for various, categories of drugs. This, chart shows estimates of the, risk potential for tolerance,, dependence, and overdose, for the five major categories, of drugs discussed in this, Application., , Drugs, , Tolerance, , Risk of physical, dependence, , Risk of psychological, dependence, , Fatal overdose, potential, , Narcotics, (opiates), , Rapid, , High, , High, , High, , Sedatives, , Rapid, , High, , High, , High, , Stimulants, , Rapid, , Moderate, , High, , Moderate to high, , Hallucinogens, , Gradual, , None, , Very low, , Very low, , Cannabis, , Gradual, , None, , Low to moderate, , Very low, , both psychological and physical dependence on a specific drug. Both types of dependence are established, gradually with repeated use of a drug. However, specific drugs vary greatly in their potential for creating, dependence. The second and third columns in Figure, 14.24 provide estimates of the risk of each kind of dependence for the drugs covered in our discussion., An overdose is an excessive dose of a drug that can, seriously threaten one’s life. Any drug can be fatal if a, person takes enough of it, but some drugs carry more, risk of overdose than others. In Figure 14.24, column 4, estimates the risk of accidentally consuming a lethal, overdose of various drugs. Drugs that are central nervous system (CNS) depressants—narcotics and sedatives—carry the greatest risk of overdose. It’s important to understand that the effects of these drugs are, additive. Many overdoses involve lethal combinations of, CNS depressants. What happens when people overdose, on these drugs? Their respiratory system usually grinds, to a halt, producing coma, brain damage, and death, within a brief period. In contrast, fatal overdoses with, CNS stimulants (cocaine and amphetamines) usually, involve a heart attack, stroke, or cortical seizure., Now that our basic vocabulary is spelled out, we, can begin to examine the effects and risks of major, recreational drugs. Of course, we’ll be describing the, typical effects of each drug. Please bear in mind that, the effects of any drug depend on the user’s age, body, weight, physiology, personality, mood, expectations,, and previous experience with the drug. The dose and, potency of the drug, the method of administration,, and the setting in which the drug is taken also influence its effects (Leavitt, 1995). Our coverage is based, largely on comprehensive books by Levinthal (2002),, Julien (2001), and Lowinson and colleagues (2005),, but we cite additional sources when discussing specific, studies or controversial points., , Narcotics, Narcotics (or opiates) are drugs derived from opium, that are capable of relieving pain. In legal regulations,, 474, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , the term narcotic is used in a haphazard way to refer to, a variety of drugs besides opiates. The most widely, abused opiates are heroin, morphine, and a relatively, new painkiller called Oxycontin. However, less potent, opiates, such as codeine, Demerol, and Vicodin, are, also subject to misuse., Effects, , The most significant narcotics problem in modern,, Western society is the use of heroin. Most users inject, this drug intravenously with a hypodermic needle. The, main effect is an overwhelming sense of euphoria. This, euphoric effect has a “Who cares?” quality to it that, makes the heroin high an attractive escape from reality. Common side effects include nausea, lethargy,, drowsiness, constipation, and slowed respiration., Risks, , Narcotics carry a high risk for both psychological and, physical dependence (Knapp, Ciraulo, & Jaffe, 2005). It, is estimated that there are about 600,000 heroin addicts in the United States (Winick & Norman, 2005)., Although heroin withdrawal usually isn’t life threatening, it can be terribly unpleasant, so that “junkies” have, a desperate need to continue their drug use. Once dependence is entrenched, users tend to develop a drugcentered lifestyle that revolves around the need to procure more heroin. This lifestyle occurs because the, drug is expensive and available only through highly, undependable black market channels. Obviously, it is, difficult to lead a productive life if one’s existence is, dominated by a desperate need to “score” heroin. The, inordinate cost of the drug forces many junkies to resort to criminal activities to support their habit., Heroin is blamed for over 4,000 deaths annually in, the United States, so overdose is a very real danger. Opiates are additive with other CNS depressants, and most, narcotic overdoses occur in combination with the use, of sedatives or alcohol. Junkies also risk contracting infectious disease because they often share hypodermic, needles and tend to be sloppy about sterilizing them., The most common of these diseases used to be hepati-

Page 512 :
tis, but in recent years AIDS has been transmitted at an, alarming rate through the population of intravenous, drug users (Des Jarlais, Hagan, & Friedman, 2005)., , Sedatives, Sedatives are sleep-inducing drugs that tend to decrease central nervous system and behavioral activity., In street jargon, they are often called “downers.” Over the, years, the most widely abused sedatives have been the, barbiturates, which are compounds derived from barbituric acid. However, barbiturates have gradually become, medically obsolete and diminished in availability, so, sedative abusers have had to turn to drugs in the benzodiazepine family, such as Valium (Wesson et al., 2005)., Effects, , People abusing sedatives generally consume larger, doses than are prescribed for medical purposes. These, overly large doses have a euphoric effect similar to that, produced by drinking large amounts of alcohol (Wesson et al., 2005). Feelings of tension, anxiety, and depression are temporarily replaced by a relaxed, pleasant state of intoxication, in which inhibitions may be, loosened. Sedatives carry a truckload of dangerous side, effects. Motor coordination suffers badly, producing, slurred speech and a staggering walk, among other, things. Intellectual functioning also becomes sluggish,, and judgment is impaired. One’s emotional tone may, become unstable, with feelings of dejection often intruding on the intended euphoric mood., , South America. It is usually consumed as a crystalline, powder that is snorted through the nasal cavities, although it can be consumed orally or intravenously., “Crack” is a processed variant of cocaine, consisting of, little chips of cocaine that are usually smoked. Smoking crack tends to be more dangerous than snorting, cocaine powder because smoking leads to a more rapid, absorption of the drug into the bloodstream and more, concentrated delivery of cocaine to the brain. That, said, all the forms of cocaine and all the routes of administration can deliver highly toxic amounts of the, drug to the brain (Repetto & Gold, 2005)., Synthesized in a pharmaceutical laboratory, amphetamines are usually consumed orally. However,, speed is also sold as a crystalline powder (called “crank”, or “crystal meth”) that may be snorted or injected intravenously. A smokable form of methamphetamine,, called “ice,” is seen in some regions., Effects, , Amphetamines and cocaine have almost indistinguishable effects, except that cocaine produces a very brief, high (20–30 minutes unless more is taken), while a, speed high can last many hours (Gold, Miller, & Jonas,, 1992). Stimulants produce a euphoria very different, from that created by narcotics or sedatives. They produce a buoyant, elated, enthusiastic, energetic, “I can, conquer the world!” feeling accompanied by increased, alertness. Common side effects include increased blood, pressure, muscle tension, sweating, and restlessness., Some users experience unpleasant feelings of irritability, anxiety, and paranoia., , Risks, , Sedatives have the potential to produce both psychological and physical dependence. They are also among the, leading causes of overdoses in the United States because, of their additive interactions with other CNS depressants (especially alcohol) and because of the degree to, which they impair judgment. In their drug-induced, haze, sedative abusers are likely to take doses they, would ordinarily recognize as dangerous. Sedative, users also elevate their risk for accidental injuries because these drugs can have significant effects on motor, coordination. Many users trip down stairs, fall off bar, stools, get into automobile accidents, and so forth., , Stimulants, Stimulants are drugs that tend to increase central, nervous system and behavioral activity. They range, from mild, widely available forms, such as caffeine and, nicotine, to stronger, carefully regulated stimulants,, such as cocaine and amphetamines (“speed”). Here we, focus on the latter two drugs., Cocaine is an organic substance extracted from, the coca shrub, which grows most prominently in, , Risks, , Stimulants can cause physical dependence, but the physical distress caused by stimulant withdrawal is mild compared to that caused by narcotic or sedative withdrawal., Psychological dependence on stimulants is a more common problem. Cocaine can create an exceptionally powerful psychological dependence that compels the user to, pursue the drug with a fervor normally seen only when, physical dependence exists (Gold & Jacobs, 2005)., Both cocaine and amphetamines can suppress appetite and disrupt sleep. Thus, heavy use of stimulants, may lead to poor eating, poor sleeping, and ultimately,, a deterioration in physical health. Furthermore, stimulant use increases one’s risk for stroke, heart attack, and, other forms of cardiovascular disease, and crack smoking is associated with a host of respiratory problems, (Gourevitch & Arnsten, 2005; Weaver & Schnoll, 1999)., Heavy stimulant use occasionally leads to the, onset of a severe psychological disorder called amphetamine or cocaine psychosis (depending on the drug involved), which is dominated by intense paranoia (King, & Ellinwood, 2005). All of the risks associated with, stimulant use increase when more potent forms of the, , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 475

Page 513 :
drugs (crack and ice) are used. Overdoses on stimulants used to be relatively infrequent (Kalant & Kalant,, 1979). However, in recent years, cocaine overdoses have, increased sharply as more people experiment with, more dangerous modes of ingestion. In 2001, cocaine, was the leading cause of drug-related emergency room, visits (Gold & Jacobs, 2005)., , Hallucinogens, Hallucinogens are a diverse group of drugs that have, powerful effects on mental and emotional functioning,, marked most prominently by distortions in sensory, and perceptual experience. The principal hallucinogens, are LSD, mescaline, and psilocybin, which have similar, effects, although they vary in potency. Mescaline comes, from the peyote plant, psilocybin comes from a particular type of mushroom, and LSD is a synthetic drug., Effects, , Hallucinogens intensify and distort perception in ways, that are difficult to describe, and they temporarily impair intellectual functioning as thought processes become meteoric and jumbled. These drugs can produce, awesome feelings of euphoria that sometimes include, an almost mystical sense of “oneness” with the human, race. This is why they have been used in religious ceremonies in various cultures. Unfortunately, at the other, end of the emotional spectrum, they can also produce, nightmarish feelings of anxiety, fear, and paranoia,, commonly called a “bad trip.”, Risks, , There is no potential for physical dependence on hallucinogens, and no deaths attributable to overdose are, known to have occurred. Psychological dependence, has been reported but appears to be rare. Research reports that LSD increases chromosome breakage were, based on poor methodology (Dishotsky et al., 1971)., However, like most drugs, hallucinogens may be harmful to a fetus if taken by a pregnant woman., Although the dangers of hallucinogens have probably been exaggerated in the popular press, there are, some significant risks (Pechnick & Ungerleider, 2005)., Emotion is highly volatile with these drugs, so users, can never be sure that they won’t experience acute, panic from a terrifying bad trip. Generally, this disorientation subsides within a few hours, leaving no permanent emotional scars. However, in such a severe, state of disorientation, accidents and suicide are possible. Flashbacks are vivid hallucinogenic experiences occurring months after the original drug ingestion. They, do not appear to be a common problem, but repetitious flashbacks have proved troublesome for some individuals. In a small minority of users, hallucinogens, may contribute to the emergence of a variety of psy476, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , chological disorders (psychoses, depressive reactions,, paranoid states) that may be partially attributable to, the drug (Pechnick & Ungerleider, 2005)., , Marijuana, Cannabis is the hemp plant from which marijuana,, hashish, and THC are derived. Marijuana is a mixture, of dried leaves, flowers, stems, and seeds taken from, the plant, while hashish comes from the plant’s resin., THC, the active chemical ingredient in cannabis, can, be synthesized for research purposes (for example, to, give to animals)., Effects, , When smoked, cannabis has an almost immediate impact that may last several hours. The effects of the drug, vary greatly, depending on the user’s expectations and, experience with it, the drug’s potency, and the amount, smoked. The drug has subtle effects on emotion, perception, and cognition (Grinspoon, Bakalar, & Russo,, 2005). Emotionally, the drug tends to create a mild, relaxed state of euphoria. Perceptually, it enhances the, impact of incoming stimulation, thus making music, sound better, food taste better, and so on. Cannabis, tends to produce a slight impairment in cognitive, functioning (especially short-term memory) and perceptual-motor coordination while the user is high., However, there are huge variations among users., Risks, , Overdose and physical dependence are not problems, with marijuana, but as with any other drug that produces pleasant feelings, it has the potential to produce, psychological dependence (Grinspoon, Bakalar, & Russo,, 2005). There is no solid evidence that cannabis causes, psychological disorders. However, marijuana can cause, transient problems with anxiety and depression in some, people. Studies also suggest that cannabis may have a, more negative effect on driving than has been widely believed (Ramaekers, Robbe, & O’Hanlon, 2000). Like tobacco smoke, marijuana smoke carries carcinogens and, impurities into the lungs, thus increasing one’s chances, for respiratory and pulmonary diseases, and probably, lung cancer (Stephens, 1999). However, the evidence on, other widely publicized risks remains controversial., Here is a brief overview of the evidence on some of, these controversies:, ■ Does marijuana reduce the user’s immune response?, Research with animals suggests that cannabis may, suppress the body’s natural immune response slightly., However, infectious diseases do not appear to be more, common among marijuana smokers than among nonsmokers. Hence, marijuana’s effect on immune functioning apparently is too small to have any practical importance (Hall, Solowij, & Lemon, 1994; Hollister, 1988).

Page 514 :
Ecstasy (MDMA), The newest drug controversy in Western society centers on MDMA, better known as “ecstasy.” MDMA was, originally formulated in 1912 but was not widely used, in the United States until the 1990s, when it became, popular in the context of “raves” and dance clubs, (Millman & Beeder, 1994). This compound is related, to both amphetamines and hallucinogens, especially, mescaline. It produces a high that typically lasts a few, hours or more. Users report that they feel warm,, friendly, euphoric, sensual, insightful, and empathetic,, yet alert and energetic. Problematic side effects include, increased blood pressure, muscle tension, sweating,, blurred vision, insomnia, and transient anxiety., Empirical research on ecstasy is still in its infancy,, so assertions about its risks and dangers must be tentative and provisional. Data on adverse effects are also, complicated by the fact that the vast majority of, MDMA users ingest it in conjunction with many other, drugs (Hammersley et al., 1999; Pedersen & Skrondal,, 1999). Yet another complicating factor is that MDMA, often contains potentially harmful impurities, contaminants, and toxic by-products introduced during its, illicit manufacture (Grob & Poland, 2005)., MDMA does not appear to be especially addictive,, but psychological dependence can clearly become a, , 84, Overall score on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, , ■ Does marijuana lead to impotence and sterility in, men? Cannabis appears to produce a small, reversible, decline in sperm count among male smokers and may, have temporary effects on hormone levels (Bloodworth, 1987). Citing these findings, the popular media, have frequently implied that marijuana therefore, makes men sterile and impotent. However, the evidence suggests that marijuana has little lasting impact, on male smokers’ fertility or sexual functioning (Grinspoon & Bakalar, 1997)., ■ Does marijuana have long-term negative effects on, cognitive functioning? It has long been known that marijuana has a negative impact on attention and memory, while users are high, but until recently studies had, failed to find any permanent cognitive deficits attributable to cannabis use. However, a spate of recent studies, using more elaborate and precise assessments of cognitive functioning have found an association between, chronic, heavy marijuana use and measureable impairments in attention and memory (see Figure 14.25) that, show up when users are not high (Ehrenreich et al.,, 1999; Solowij et al., 2002). That said, the cognitive, deficits that have been observed are modest and certainly not disabling, and one study found that the, deficits vanished after a month of marijuana abstinence, (Pope, Gruber, & Yurgelun-Todd, 2001; Pope et al.,, 2001). More research is needed, but the recent studies, in this area provide some cause for concern., , 82, 80, 78, 74, 72, 70, 68, 66, 64, 0, , •, , Controls, , Short–term Long–term, users, users, History of marijuana use, , F I G U R E 14. 25, , Chronic cannabis use and cognitive performance. Solowij and, associates (2002) administered a battery of neuropsychological, tests to 51 long-term cannabis users, who had smoked marijuana, regularly for an average of 24 years; 51 short-term cannabis, users, who had smoked marijuana regularly for an average of 10, years; and 33 control subjects who had little or no history of, cannabis use. The cannabis users were required to abstain from, smoking marijuana for a minimum of 12 hours prior to their, testing. The study found evidence suggestive of subtle cognitive, impairments among the long-term cannabis users on many of the, tests. The graph shown here depicts the results observed for, overall performance on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test,, which measures several aspects of memory functioning., , problem for some people. MDMA has been implicated, in cases of stroke and heart attack, seizures, heat stroke,, and liver damage, but its exact contribution is hard to, gauge given all the other drugs that MDMA users typically consume (Burgess, O’Donohoe, & Gill, 2000;, Grob & Poland, 2005). Chronic, heavy use of ecstasy, appears to be associated with sleep disorders, depression, and elevated anxiety and hostility (Morgan,, 2000). Moreover, studies of former MDMA users suggest that ecstasy may have subtle, long-term effects on, cognitive functioning (Parrott, 2000). Quite a few studies have found memory deficits in former users (Bhattachary & Powell, 2001; Zakzanis & Young, 2001)., Other studies have found decreased performance on, laboratory tasks requiring attention and learning, (Gouzoulis-Mayfrank et al., 2000). Thus, although, more research is needed, there are many reasons to be, concerned about the possible effects of ecstasy., , CHAPTER 14, , Psychology and Physical Health, , 477

Page 515 :
KEY IDEAS, , CHAPTER 14 REVIEW, , Stress, Personality, and Illness, ■, , The biopsychosocial model holds that physical health is influenced by a complex network of biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors. Stress is one of the psychological factors that, can affect physical health. In particular, cynical hostility has been, implicated as a contributing cause of coronary heart disease. A, number of mechanisms may contribute to this connection., ■ Emotional reactions may also influence susceptibility to, heart disease. Recent research has suggested that transient mental stress and the negative emotions that result may tax the, heart. Yet another line of research has identified the emotional, dysfunction of depression as a risk factor for heart disease., ■ The connection between psychological factors and the onset, of cancer is not well documented, but stress and personality, may influence the course of the disease. Researchers have found, associations between stress and the onset of a variety of other, diseases. Stress may play a role in a variety of diseases because it, can temporarily suppress immune functioning. While there’s, little doubt that stress can contribute to the development of, physical illness, the link between stress and illness is modest., Habits, Lifestyles, and Health, ■, , People commonly engage in health-impairing habits and, lifestyles. These habits creep up slowly, and their risks are easy, to ignore because the dangers often lie in the distant future., ■ Smokers have much higher mortality rates than nonsmokers because they are more vulnerable to a variety of diseases., Giving up smoking can reduce one’s health risks, but it is difficult and relapse rates are high., ■ Drinking rivals smoking as a source of health problems. In, the short term, drinking can impair driving, cause various types, of accidents, and increase the likelihood of aggressive interactions or reckless sexual behavior. In the long term, chronic, excessive alcohol consumption increases one’s risk for numerous, health problems, including cirrhosis of the liver, heart disease,, hypertension, stroke, and cancer., ■ Obesity elevates one’s risk for many health problems. Body, weight is influenced by genetic endowment, eating and exercise, habits, and perhaps set point or setting point. Weight loss is best, accomplished by decreasing caloric consumption while increasing exercise., ■ Poor nutritional habits have been linked to many health, problems, including cardiovascular diseases and some types of, cancer, although some of the links are tentative. One’s health, can best be served by following balanced food consumption, patterns while limiting the intake of saturated fats, cholesterol,, refined carbohydrates, sugar, and salt., ■ Lack of exercise is associated with elevated mortality rates., Regular exercise can reduce one’s risk for cardiovascular disease, cancer, and obesity-related diseases; buffer the effects of, stress; and lead to desirable personality changes., ■ Although misconceptions abound, HIV is transmitted almost exclusively by sexual contact and the sharing of needles by, IV drug users. One’s risk for HIV infection can be reduced by, avoiding IV drug use, having fewer sexual partners, using condoms, and curtailing certain sexual practices., , other extreme, a minority of people learn to like the sick role because it earns them attention and allows them to avoid stress., ■ Good communication is crucial to effective health services,, but many factors undermine communication between patients, and health providers, such as short visits, overuse of medical, jargon, and patients’ reluctance to ask questions., ■ Noncompliance with medical advice is a major problem,, which appears to occur 30–50 percent of the time. The likelihood of nonadherence is greater when instructions are difficult, to understand, when recommendations are difficult to follow,, and when patients are unhappy with their doctor., Application: Understanding the Effects of Drugs, ■, , Recreational drugs vary in their potential for tolerance effects,, psychological dependence, physical dependence, and overdose., The risks associated with narcotics use include both types of dependence, overdose, and the acquisition of infectious diseases., ■ Sedatives can also produce both types of dependence, are, subject to overdoses, and elevate the user’s risk for accidental, injuries. Stimulant use can lead to psychological dependence,, overdose, psychosis, and a deterioration in physical health. Cocaine overdoses have increased greatly in recent years., ■ Hallucinogens can in some cases contribute to accidents,, suicides, and psychological disorders, and they can cause flashbacks. The risks of marijuana use include psychological dependence, impaired driving, transient problems with anxiety and, depression, and respiratory and pulmonary diseases. Recent, studies suggest that marijuana may have some long-term negative effects on cognitive processes., ■ More research is needed, but it appears that the use of ecstasy (MDMA) may contribute to a variety of acute and chronic, physical maladies. MDMA may also have subtle, negative effects, on cognitive functioning., , KEY TERMS, Acquired immune deficiency, syndrome (AIDS) p. 467, Alcohol dependence p. 458, Alcoholism p. 458, Atherosclerosis p. 445, Biopsychosocial model, p. 444, Body mass index (BMI), p. 459, Cancer p. 450, Cannabis p. 476, Coronary heart disease, p. 445, Hallucinogens p. 476, Health psychology p. 444, , Immune response, pp. 450–451, Narcotics p. 474, Nutrition p. 462, Overdose p. 474, Physical dependence p. 473, Psychological dependence, p. 473, Sedatives p. 475, Set-point theory p. 461, Settling-point theory p. 461, Stimulants p. 475, Tolerance p. 473, Type A personality p. 446, Type B personality p. 446, , KEY PEOPLE, , Reactions to Illness, ■, , Variations in seeking treatment are influenced by the severity, duration, and disruptiveness of one’s symptoms and by the, reactions of friends and family. The biggest problem is the tendency of many people to delay needed medical treatment. At the, , 478, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , Robin DiMatteo p. 470, Meyer Friedman and Ray, Rosenman pp. 445–446, , Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, , p. 451

Page 516 :
c. not having enough doctors to cover peoples’ needs., d. the tendency of people in higher socioeconomic, categories to exaggerate their symptoms., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. The greatest threats to health in our society today are:, a. environmental toxins., b. accidents., c. chronic diseases., d. contagious diseases caused by specific infectious, agents., 2. Which of the following is not associated with elevated, coronary risk?, a. Cynical hostility, b. Strong emotional reactions to transient mental, stress, c. Obsessive-compulsive disorder, d. Depression, , PRACTICE TEST, , 8. In which of the following cases are people most likely, to follow the instructions they receive from health care, professionals?, a. When the instructions are complex and punctuated, with impressive medical jargon, b. When they do not fully understand the instructions, but still feel the need to do something, c. When they like and understand the health care, professional, d. All of the above, 9. Which of the following risks is not typically associated, with narcotics use?, a. Overdose, c. Physical dependence, b. Infectious disease, d. Flashbacks, 10. The use of sedatives may result in personal injury, because they:, a. cause motor coordination to deteriorate., b. produce a strong physical dependence., c. suppress pain warnings of physical harm., d. trigger hallucinations such as flying., , 3. Why do people tend to act in self-destructive ways?, a. Because many health-impairing habits creep up on, them, b. Because many health-impairing habits involve, activities that are quite pleasant at the time, c. Because the risks tend to lie in the distant future, d. All of the above, 4. Some short-term risks of alcohol consumption include, all but which of the following?, a. Hangovers and life-threatening overdoses in combination with other drugs, b. Poor perceptual coordination and driving drunk, c. Increased aggressiveness and argumentativeness, d. Transient anxiety from endorphin-induced flashbacks, 5. Twin studies and other behavioral genetics research, suggest that:, a. genetic factors have little impact on people’s weight., b. heredity has scant influence on BMI but does influence weight., c. heredity accounts for 60 percent or more of the, variation in weight., d. heredity is responsible for severe, morbid obesity, but has little influence over the weight of normal, people., , Book Companion Website, Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , Personal Explorations Workbook, The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 14.1: Chronic, Self-Destructiveness Scale. Personal Probe 14.1: How Do, Your Health Habits Rate? Personal Probe 14.2: Examining, Specific Health Habits., , 6. Which of the following has not been found to be a, mode of transmission for AIDS?, a. Sexual contact among homosexual men, b. The sharing of needles by intravenous drug users, c. Sexual contact among heterosexuals, d. Sharing food, , ANSWERS, , Pages 443–444, Pages 445–448, Pages 452–454, Pages 457–458, Pages 460–461, , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , d, a, c, d, a, , Page 468, Pages 469–470, Pages 471–472, Pages 474–475, Page 475, , Psychology and Physical Health, , c, c, d, d, c, , CHAPTER 14, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , 7. Regarding the seeking of medical treatment, the biggest, problem is:, a. the tendency of many people to delay treatment., b. the tendency of many people to rush too quickly for, medical care for minor problems., , 479

Page 517 :
ABNORMAL BEHAVIOR: MYTHS AND, REALITIES, The Medical Model Applied to Abnormal, Behavior, Criteria of Abnormal Behavior, Psychodiagnosis: The Classification of, Disorders, The Prevalence of Psychological, Disorders, ANXIETY DISORDERS, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Phobic Disorder, Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Etiology of Anxiety Disorders, , SOMATOFORM DISORDERS, Somatization Disorder, Conversion Disorder, Hypochondriasis, Etiology of Somatoform Disorders, DISSOCIATIVE DISORDERS, Dissociative Amnesia and Fugue, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Etiology of Dissociative Disorders, MOOD DISORDERS, Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Etiology of Mood Disorders, SCHIZOPHRENIC DISORDERS, General Symptoms, Subtypes, , 480, , Course and Outcome, Etiology of Schizophrenia, PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS AND THE, LAW, Insanity, Involuntary Commitment, APPLICATION: UNDERSTANDING EATING, DISORDERS, Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, History and Prevalence, Etiology of Eating Disorders, Course and Outcome, CHAPTER 15 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST

Page 518 :
CHAPTER, , Psychological, Disorders, , 15, , “The government of the United States was overthrown more than a year, ago! I’m the president of the United States of America and Bob Dylan is, vice president!” So said Ed, the author of a prominent book on journalism, who was speaking to a college journalism class, as a guest lecturer., Ed also informed the class that he had killed both John and Robert, Kennedy, as well as Charles de Gaulle, the former president of France. He, went on to tell the class that all rock music songs were written about him,, that he was the greatest karate expert in the universe, and that he had, been fighting “space wars” for 2000 years. The students in the class were, mystified by Ed’s bizarre, disjointed “lecture,” but they assumed that he, was putting on a show that would eventually lead to a sensible conclusion. However, their perplexed but expectant calm was shattered when Ed, pulled a hatchet from the props he had brought with him and hurled the, hatchet at the class! Fortunately, he didn’t hit anyone, as the hatchet, sailed over the students’ heads. At that point, the professor for the class, realized that Ed’s irrational behavior was not a pretense. The professor, evacuated the class quickly while Ed continued to rant and rave about his, presidential administration, space wars, vampires, his romances with female rock stars, and his personal harem of 38 “chicks.” (Adapted from, Pearce, 1974), Clearly, Ed’s behavior was abnormal. Even he recognized that when he agreed, later to be admitted to a mental hospital, signing himself in as the “President of the United States of America.” What causes such abnormal behavior? Does Ed have a mental illness, or does he just behave strangely? What, is the basis for judging behavior as normal versus abnormal? How common, are such disorders? These are just a few of the questions we address in this, chapter as we discuss psychological disorders and their complex causes., CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 481

Page 519 :
Abnormal Behavior: Myths and Realities, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , Describe and evaluate the medical model of, abnormal behavior., Explain the most commonly used criteria of, abnormality., , Misconceptions about abnormal behavior are common. We therefore need to clear up some preliminary, issues before we describe the various types of psychological disorders. In this section, we discuss (1) the, medical model of abnormal behavior, (2) the criteria of, abnormal behavior, (3) the classification of psychological disorders, and (4) the prevalence of such disorders., , The Medical Model Applied to, Abnormal Behavior, In Ed’s case, there’s no question that his behavior was, abnormal. But does it make sense to view his unusual, and irrational behavior as an illness? This is a controversial question. The medical model proposes that it is, useful to think of abnormal behavior as a disease., This point of view is the basis for many of the terms, used to refer to abnormal behavior, including mental, illness, psychological disorder, and psychopathology, (pathology refers to manifestations of disease). The, medical model gradually became the dominant way of, thinking about abnormal behavior during the 19th and, 20th centuries, and its influence remains strong today., The medical model clearly represented progress, over earlier models of abnormal behavior. Prior to the, 18th century, most conceptions of abnormal behavior, were based on superstition. People who behaved, strangely were thought to be possessed by demons, to, be witches in league with the devil, or to be victims of, God’s punishment. Their disorders were “treated” with, chants, rituals, exorcisms, and such. If the people’s behavior was seen as threatening, they were candidates, for chains, dungeons, torture, and death (see Figure, 15.1)., The rise of the medical model brought improvements in the treatment of those who exhibited abnormal behavior. As victims of an illness, they were viewed, with more sympathy and less hatred and fear. Although living conditions in early asylums were often, deplorable, gradual progress was made toward more, humane care of the mentally ill. It took time, but ineffectual approaches to treatment eventually gave way to, scientific investigation of the causes and cures of psychological disorders., However, in recent decades, some critics have suggested that the medical model may have outlived its, , 482, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , ■, , ■, , Discuss the history of the DSM system, and describe, the five axes of DSM-IV., Summarize data on the prevalence of various, psychological disorders., , usefulness (Kiesler, 1999). A particularly vocal critic has been Thomas, Szasz (1974, 1993). He asserts that, “strictly speaking, disease or illness, can affect only the body; hence, there can be no mental illness. . . ., Minds can be ‘sick’ only in the, sense that jokes are ‘sick’ or economies are ‘sick’” (1974, p. 267). He, Thomas Szasz, further argues that abnormal behavior usually involves a deviation, from social norms rather than an illness. He contends, that such deviations are “problems in living” rather, than medical problems. According to Szasz, the medical model’s disease analogy converts moral and social, questions about what is acceptable behavior into medical questions., , •, , F I G U R E 15. 1, , Historical conceptions of mental illness. Throughout most of, history, psychological disorders were thought to be caused by, demonic possession, and the mentally ill were candidates for, chains and torture., , Courtesy, Thomas Szasz, , ■

Page 520 :
Although the criticism of Szasz has some merit,, we’ll take the position that the disease analogy continues to be useful, although you should keep in mind, that it is only an analogy. Medical concepts such as diagnosis, etiology, and prognosis have proven valuable in, the treatment and study of abnormality. Diagnosis involves distinguishing one illness from another. Etiology refers to the apparent causation and developmental history of an illness. A prognosis is a forecast, about the probable course of an illness. These medically based concepts have widely shared meanings that, permit clinicians, researchers, and the public to communicate more effectively in their discussions of abnormal behavior., , If your next-door neighbor scrubs his front porch, twice every day and spends virtually all his time cleaning and recleaning his house, is he normal? If your sister-in-law goes to one physician after another seeking, treatment for ailments that appear imaginary, is she, psychologically healthy? How are we to judge what’s, normal and what’s abnormal? More important, who’s, to do the judging?, These are complex questions. In a sense, all people, make judgments about normality in that they all express opinions about others’ (and perhaps their own), mental health. Of course, formal diagnoses of psychological disorders are made by mental health professionals. In making these diagnoses, clinicians rely on a variety of criteria, the foremost of which are the following:, 1. Deviance. As Szasz has pointed out, people are, often said to have a disorder because their behavior deviates from what their society considers acceptable., What constitutes normality varies somewhat from one, culture to another, but all cultures have such norms., When people ignore these standards and expectations,, they may be labeled mentally ill. For example, transvestic fetishism is a sexual disorder in which a man, achieves sexual arousal by dressing in women’s clothing. This behavior is regarded as disordered because a, man who wears a dress, brassiere, and nylons is deviating from our culture’s norms. This example illustrates, the arbitrary nature of cultural standards regarding, normality, as the same overt behavior (cross-gender, dressing) is acceptable for women yet deviant for men., 2. Maladaptive behavior. In many cases, people are, judged to have a psychological disorder because their, everyday adaptive behavior is impaired. This is the key, criterion in the diagnosis of substance use (drug) disorders. In and of itself, alcohol and drug use is not terribly unusual or deviant. However, when the use of cocaine, for instance, begins to interfere with a person’s, , © 2003 AP/Wide World Photos, , Criteria of Abnormal Behavior, , This man clearly exhibits a certain type of deviance, but does, that mean that he has a psychological disorder? The criteria of, mental illness are more subjective and complicated than most, people realize, and to some extent, judgments of mental health, represent value judgments., , social or occupational functioning, a substance use disorder exists. In such cases, it is the maladaptive quality, of the behavior that makes it disordered., 3. Personal distress. Frequently, the diagnosis of a, psychological disorder is based on an individual’s report of great personal distress. This is usually the criterion met by people who are troubled by depression or, anxiety disorders. Depressed people, for instance, may, or may not exhibit deviant or maladaptive behavior., Such people are usually labeled as having a disorder, when they describe their subjective pain and suffering, to friends, relatives, and mental health professionals., Although two or three criteria may apply in a particular case, people are often viewed as disordered, when only one criterion is met. As you may have already noticed, diagnoses of psychological disorders involve value judgments about what represents normal, or abnormal behavior (Widiger & Sankis, 2000). The, criteria of mental illness are not nearly as value-free as, the criteria of physical illness. In evaluating physical, , CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 483

Page 521 :
WE B LI N K 15.1, , RE C O M M E N D ED, READING, , The Burden of Sympathy:, How Families Cope with, Mental Illness, by David A. Karp (Oxford University Press, 2001), Although psychological disorders are quite common,, they remain shrouded in mystery. Mental illness is not a, topic that people want to talk about, and little advice, is available for the families of people suffering from, psychological disorders. Nevertheless, millions of people are troubled by severe disorders such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, so millions of families must, struggle with these trying and difficult afflictions. This, book thus fills an important need. Based on extensive, interviews, Karp, a sociologist, discusses the devastating effects that mental illness can have on patients’, families and how to deal with these effects. This is not, a “how to” manual, but it includes many useful insights, about the mental health system and a good deal of, concrete, realistic advice. Other worthwhile books intended for families of psychiatric patients include How, to Cope with Mental Illness in Your Family: A Self-Care, Guide for Offspring and Parents (Marsh & Dickens, 1997), and When Someone You Love Has a Mental Illness: A, Handbook for Family, Friends, and Caregivers (Woolis,, 1992)., Copyright © 2000 Oxford University Press, Inc. Used by permission of Oxford University Press, Inc. Photo by Michael Wilson/Superstock., , diseases, people can usually agree that a weak heart or, a malfunctioning kidney is pathological, regardless of, their personal values. However, judgments about mental illness reflect prevailing cultural values, social, trends, and political forces, as well as scientific knowledge (Kutchins & Kirk, 1997; Mechanic, 1999)., Antonyms such as normal versus abnormal and, mental health versus mental illness imply that people, , •, , can be divided neatly into two distinct groups: those, who are normal and those who are not. In reality, it is, often difficult to draw a line that clearly separates normality from abnormality. On occasion, everyone experiences personal distress. Everybody acts in deviant, ways once in a while. And everyone displays some maladaptive behavior. People are judged to have psychological disorders only when their behavior becomes extremely deviant, maladaptive, or distressing. Thus,, normality and abnormality exist on a continuum. It’s, a matter of degree, not an either-or proposition (see, Figure 15.2)., For the most part, people with, psychological disorders do not behave in bizarre ways that are very, different from the behavior of normal people. At first glance, people, with psychological disorders are, usually indistinguishable from those, without disorders. A study by David, Rosenhan (1973) showed that even, David Rosenhan, mental health professionals may, have difficulty distinguishing normality from abnormality. To study diagnostic accuracy, Rosenhan arranged for a number of normal, people to seek admission to mental hospitals. These, “pseudopatients” arrived at the hospitals complaining, of one false symptom—hearing voices. Except for this, single symptom, they acted as they normally would, and gave accurate information when interviewed, about their personal histories. All the pseudopatients, , FIG U R E 15.2, , Normality and abnormality as a continuum. No, sharp boundary divides normal and abnormal, behavior. Behavior is normal or abnormal in, degree, depending on the extent to which it is, deviant, personally distressing, or maladaptive., , Deviance, , Normal, , Personal, distress, Maladaptive, behavior, , 484, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , Abnormal, , Courtesy, David Rosenhan, , Psych Central, The work of John Grohol, Psych Central is arguably the, premier site on the web to explore all aspects of mental, health, including psychological disorders and treatment,, professional issues, and information for mental health care, consumers. This site offers nearly 2000 annotated listings, to information sources.

Page 522 :
were admitted, and the average length of their hospitalization was 19 days!, Why is it so hard to distinguish normality from, abnormality? The pseudopatients’ observations about, life on the psychiatric wards offer a clue. They noted, that the real patients acted normal most of the time, and only infrequently acted in a deviant manner. As, you might imagine, Rosenhan’s study evoked quite a, controversy about our diagnostic system for mental, illness. Let’s take a look at how this diagnostic system, has evolved., , (Psychosocial and Environmental Problems), the clinician makes notations regarding the types of stress experienced by the individual in the past year. On Axis V, (Global Assessment of Functioning), estimates are, made of the individual’s current level of adaptive functioning (in social and occupational behavior, viewed, as a whole), and of the individual’s highest level of, functioning in the past year. Most theorists agree that, the multiaxial system is a step in the right direction because it recognizes the importance of information besides a traditional diagnostic label., , Psychodiagnosis: The, Classification of Disorders, , The Prevalence of Psychological, Disorders, , Obviously, we cannot lump all psychological disorders, together without giving up all hope of understanding, them better. A sound taxonomy of mental disorders, can facilitate empirical research and enhance communication among scientists and clinicians (First, 2003)., Hence, a great deal of effort has been invested in devising an elaborate system for classifying psychological, disorders., Guidelines for psychodiagnosis were extremely, vague and informal prior to 1952, when the American, Psychiatric Association unveiled its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Nathan & Langenbucher, 2003). This classification scheme described, about 100 disorders. Revisions intended to improve, the system were incorporated into the second edition, (DSM-II) published in 1968, but the diagnostic guidelines were still pretty sketchy. However, the third edition (DSM-III), published in 1980, represented a, major advance, as the diagnostic criteria were made, much more explicit, concrete, and detailed to facilitate, more consistent diagnoses across clinicians (Blacker &, Tsuang, 1999). The current, fourth edition (DSM-IV),, which was released in 1994, made use of intervening, research to refine the critieria introduced in DSM-III., Each revision of the DSM system has expanded the list, of disorders covered. The current version describes, about three times as many types of psychological disorders as DSM-I (Houts, 2002)., The publication of DSM-III in 1980 introduced a, new multiaxial system of classification, which asks for, judgments about individuals on five separate dimensions, or “axes.” Figure 15.3 on the next page provides, an overview of the entire system and the five axes. The, diagnoses of disorders are made on Axes I and II. Clinicians record most types of disorders on Axis I. They, use Axis II to list long-running personality disorders, or mental retardation. People may receive diagnoses, on both Axes I and II., The remaining axes are used to record supplemental information. A patient’s physical disorders are listed, on Axis III (General Medical Conditions). On Axis IV, , How common are psychological disorders? What percentage of the population is afflicted with mental illness? Is it 10 percent? Perhaps 25 percent? Could the, figure range as high as 40 percent or 50 percent?, Such estimates fall in the domain of epidemiology—the study of the distribution of mental or, physical disorders in a population. In epidemiology,, prevalence refers to the percentage of a population, that exhibits a disorder during a specified time period. In the case of mental disorders, the most interesting data are the estimates of lifetime prevalence, the, percentage of people having a specific disorder at any, time in their lives., Studies published in the 1980s and early 1990s, found psychological disorders in roughly one-third of, the population (Regier & Kaelber, 1995; Robins, Locke,, & Regier, 1991). Subsequent research, which has focused on a somewhat younger sample (age 18–54 instead of over age 18), suggests that about 44 percent of, the adult population will struggle with some sort of, psychological disorder (Kessler & Zhao, 1999; Regier, & Burke, 2000). Obviously, all these figures are estimates that depend to some extent on the sampling and, assessment techniques used (Wakefield, 1999). Some, of the increase in the prevalence of mental illness is, more apparent than real, as it is partly attributable to, more effective tabulation of certain disorders. However, research also suggests that there has been a genuine increase in the prevalence of mental disorders, , WE B LI N K 15.2, , NAMI: The National Alliance for the Mentally Ill, Professional and lay evaluators have consistently found, NAMI among the most helpful and informative organizations dealing with the entire spectrum of mental disorders,, including schizophrenia and depression. The NAMI site, offers a particularly rich array of information on specific, mental disorders and on how patients and their families, can find support., , CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 485

Page 523 :
Axis I, Clinical Syndromes, , Axis II, Personality Disorders, , 1. Disorders usually first diagnosed in infancy, childhood,, or adolescence, This category includes disorders that arise before adolescence, such as attention deficit disorders, autism, mental, retardation, enuresis, and stuttering., , These disorders are patterns of personality traits that are, longstanding, maladaptive, and inflexible and involve impaired functioning or subjective distress. Examples include, borderline, schizoid, and antisocial personality disorders., , 2. Organic mental disorders, These disorders are temporary or permanent dysfunctions, of brain tissue caused by diseases or chemicals. Examples are delirium, dementia, and amnesia., 3. Substance-related disorders, This category refers to the maladaptive use of drugs and, alcohol. Mere consumption and recreational use of such, substances are not disorders. This category requires a, maladaptive pattern of use, as with alcohol abuse and, cocaine dependence., 4. Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, The schizophrenias are characterized by psychotic symptoms (for example, grossly disorganized behavior, delusions, and hallucinations) and by over 6 months of, behavioral deterioration. This category also includes, delusional disorder and schizoaffective disorder., 5. Mood disorders, The cardinal feature is emotional disturbance. Patients, may, or may not, have psychotic symptoms. These disorders include major depression, bipolar disorder,, dysthymic disorder, and cyclothymic disorder., 6. Anxiety disorders, These disorders are characterized by physiological signs, of anxiety (for example, palpitations) and subjective, feelings of tension, apprehension, or fear. Anxiety may, be acute and focused (panic disorder) or continual and, diffuse (generalized anxiety disorder)., 7. Somatoform disorders, These disorders are dominated by somatic symptoms that, resemble physical illnesses. These symptoms cannot be, accounted for by organic damage. There must also be, strong evidence that these symptoms are produced by, psychological factors or conflicts. This category includes, somatization, conversion disorder, and hypochondriasis., 8. Dissociative disorders, These disorders all feature a sudden, temporary alteration or dysfunction of memory, consciousness, identity,, and behavior, as in dissociative amnesia and multiple, personality., 9. Sexual and gender-identity disorders, There are three basic types of disorders in this category:, gender identity disorders (discomfort with identity as, male or female), paraphilias (preference for unusual acts, to achieve sexual arousal), and sexual dysfunctions (impairments in sexual functioning)., , •, , Axis III, General Medical Conditions, Physical disorders or conditions are recorded on this axis., Examples include diabetes, arthritis, and hemophilia., , Axis IV, Psychosocial and Environmental, Problems, Axis IV is for reporting psychosocial and environmental, problems that may affect the diagnosis, treatment, and, prognosis of mental disorders (Axes I and II). A psychosocial, or environmental problem may be a negative life event, an, environmental difficulty or deficiency, a familial or other, interpersonal stress, an inadequacy of social support or personal resources, or another problem that describes the context in which a person’s difficulties have developed., , Axis V, Global Assessment of, Functioning (GAF) Scale, Code, , Symptoms, , 100, , Superior functioning in a wide range of activities, , 90, , Absent or minimal symptoms, good functioning in, all areas, , 80, , Symptoms transient and expectable reactions to, psychosocial stressors, , 70, , Some mild symptoms or some difficulty in social,, occupational, or school functioning, but generally, functioning pretty well, , 60, , Moderate symptoms or difficulty in social, occupational, or school functioning, , 50, , Serious symptoms or impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning, , 40, , Some impairment in reality testing or communication or major impairment in family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood, , 30, , Behavior considerably influenced by delusions or, hallucinations, serious impairment in communication or judgment, or inability to function in almost, all areas, , 20, , Some danger of hurting self or others, occasional, failure to maintain minimal personal hygiene, or, gross impairment in communication, , 10, , Persistent danger of severely hurting self or others, , FIG U R E 15.3, , Overview of the DSM diagnostic system. Published by the, American Psychiatric Association, the Diagnostic and Statistical, Manual of Mental Disorders is the formal classification system, used in the diagnosis of psychological disorders. It is a multiaxial, system, which means that information is recorded on the five, axes described here., Adapted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th, ed. Text revision. Copyright © 2000 American Psychiatric Association., , 486, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , 1

Page 524 :
Any disorder, Substance use, disorders (including, alcoholism), Anxiety disorders, Mood disorders, Schizophrenic, disorders, 0, , •, , 15, 5, 10, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, Portion of population meeting criteria for disorder (%), , 45, , F I G U R E 15.4, , Lifetime prevalence of psychological disorders. The estimated percentage of people who have, at, any time in their life, suffered from one of four types of psychological disorders or from a disorder of, any kind (top bar) is shown here. Prevalence estimates vary somewhat from one study to the next,, depending on the exact methods used in sampling and assessment. The estimates shown here are based, on pooling data from Waves 1 and 2 of the Epidemiological Catchment Area studies and the National, Comorbidity Study, as summarized by Regier and Burke (2000) and Dew, Bromet, and Switzer (2000)., These studies, which collectively evaluated over 28,000 subjects, provide the best data to date on the, prevalence of mental illness in the United States., , among more recent age cohorts (Smith & Weissman,, 1992). In any event, as Figure 15.4 shows, the most, common classes of disorders are (1) substance (alcohol and drugs) use disorders, (2) anxiety disorders,, and (3) mood disorders., We are now ready to start examining the specific, types of psychological disorders. Obviously, we cannot, cover all of the diverse disorders listed in DSM-IV., However, we will introduce most of the major cate-, , gories of disorders to give you an overview of the many, forms abnormal behavior takes. In discussing each set, of disorders, we begin with brief descriptions of the, specific syndromes or subtypes that fall in the category., Then we focus on the etiology of the disorders in that, category. Although many paths can lead to specific disorders, some are more common than others. We highlight some of the common paths in order to enhance, your understanding of the roots of abnormal behavior., , Anxiety Disorders, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , ■, , List and describe four types of anxiety disorders., Discuss the contribution of biological factors and conditioning to the, etiology of anxiety disorders., Explain the contribution of cognitive factors and stress to the etiology, of anxiety disorders., , Everyone experiences anxiety from time to time. It is a, natural and common reaction to many of life’s difficulties. For some people, however, anxiety becomes a, chronic problem. These people experience high levels, of anxiety with disturbing regularity. Anxiety disorders are a class of disorders marked by feelings of excessive apprehension and anxiety. There are four, principal types of anxiety disorders: generalized anxiety disorder, phobic disorder, obsessive-compulsive, , disorder, and panic disorder. They are not mutually, exclusive, as many people who develop one anxiety, syndrome often suffer from another at some point in, their lives (Hunt & Andrews, 1995)., , Generalized Anxiety Disorder, The generalized anxiety disorder is marked by a, chronic, high level of anxiety that is not tied to any, CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 487

Page 525 :
specific threat. People with this disorder worry constantly about yesterday’s mistakes and tomorrow’s, problems. They worry excessively about minor matters related to family, finances, work, and personal illness (Sanderson & Barlow, 1990). In particular, they, worry about how much they worry (Barlow et al.,, 2003). Their anxiety is frequently accompanied by, physical symptoms, such as muscle tension, diarrhea,, dizziness, faintness, sweating, and heart palpitations., Generalized anxiety disorder tends to have a gradual, onset and is seen more frequently in females than, males (Brown, 1999)., , Phobic Disorder, In a phobic disorder, an individual’s troublesome anxiety has a specific focus. A phobic disorder is marked, by a persistent and irrational fear of an object or situation that presents no realistic danger. Although, mild phobias are extremely common, people are said, to have a phobic disorder only when their fears seriously interfere with their everyday behavior. Phobic, reactions tend to be accompanied by physical symptoms of anxiety, such as trembling and palpitations, (Rapee & Barlow, 2001). The following case provides, an example of a phobic disorder:, Hilda is 32 years of age and has a rather unusual fear., She is terrified of snow. She cannot go outside in the, snow. She cannot even stand to see snow or hear about it, on the weather report. Her phobia severely constricts her, day-to-day behavior. Probing in therapy revealed that, , •, , FIG U R E 15.5, , Common phobias. Frequently reported phobias, are listed here, along, with their typical age of, onset and information on, gender differences in, phobias., From Marks, I. M. (1969). Fears and, phobias. San Diego: Academic Press., Copyright 1969 by Isaac Marks., Reprinted by permission., , 488, , PART 4, , her phobia was caused by a traumatic experience at age, 11. Playing at a ski lodge, she was buried briefly by a, small avalanche of snow. She had no recollection of this, experience until it was recovered in therapy. (Adapted, from Laughlin, 1967, p. 227), As Hilda’s unusual snow phobia illustrates, people, can develop phobic responses to virtually anything., Nonetheless, certain types of phobias are relatively, common, as the data in Figure 15.5 show. Particularly, common are acrophobia (fear of heights), claustrophobia (fear of small, enclosed places), brontophobia, (fear of storms), hydrophobia (fear of water), and various animal and insect phobias (Eaton, Dryman, &, Weissman, 1991). People troubled by phobias typically, realize that their fears are irrational, but they still are, unable to calm themselves when they encounter a phobic object., , Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia, A panic disorder is characterized by recurrent attacks, of overwhelming anxiety that usually occur suddenly, and unexpectedly. These paralyzing attacks are accompanied by physical symptoms of anxiety. After a number of anxiety attacks, victims often become apprehensive, wondering when their next panic attack will occur., Their concern about exhibiting panic in public may escalate to the point where they are afraid to leave home., This creates a condition called agoraphobia., Agoraphobia is a fear of going out to public places, (its literal meaning is “fear of the marketplace or open, , Common Phobias, Percent, of all phobias, , Gender, difference, , Typical age, of onset, , Agoraphobia, (fear of places of assembly, crowds, open spaces), , 10%–50%, , Large majority, are women, , Early, adulthood, , Social phobia, (fear of being observed doing something humiliating), , 10%, , Majority, are women, , Adolescence, , 5%–15%, , Vast majority, are women, , Childhood, , Inanimate objects, Dirt (mysophobia), Storms (brontophobia), Heights (acrophobia), Darkness (nyctophobia), Closed spaces (claustrophobia), , 20%, , None, , Any age, , Illness-injury (nosophobia), Death (thanatophobia), Cancer (cancerophobia), Venereal disease (venerophobia), , 15%–25%, , None, , Middle age, , Specific phobias, Animals, Cats (ailurophobia), Insects (insectophobia), Birds (avisophobia), Snakes (ophidiophobia), , Mental and Physical Health, , Dogs (cynophobia), Spiders (arachnophobia), Horses (equinophobia), Rodents (rodentophobia)

Page 526 :
from a point as far out into the center of the road as possible. Do not ever walk on the grass at all, also do not step, into the gutter at all. Walk to the bungalow keeping as, near to the center of the sidewalk as possible.” (Adapted, from Barlett & Steele, 1979, pp. 227–237), , © 1990 by Sidney Harris, , places”). Because of this fear, some people become prisoners confined to their homes, although many can, venture out if accompanied by a trusted companion, (Hollander & Simeon, 2003). As its name suggests, agoraphobia has traditionally been viewed as a phobic disorder. However, more recent evidence suggests that, agoraphobia is mainly a complication of panic disorder. About two-thirds of people who suffer from panic, disorder are female (Horwath & Weissman, 2000). The, onset of panic disorder typically occurs during late, adolescence or early adulthood (Pine, 2000)., , Obsessions often center on fear of contamination,, inflicting harm on others, suicide, or sexual acts. Compulsions usually involve stereotyped rituals that temporarily relieve anxiety. Common examples include, constant handwashing; repetitive cleaning of things that, are already clean; endless rechecking of locks, faucets,, and such; and excessive arranging, counting, and hoarding of things (Pato, Eisen, & Phillips, 2003). Specific, types of obsessions tend to be associated with specific, types of compulsions. For example, obsessions about, contamination tend to be paired with cleaning compulsions, and obsessions about symmetry tend to be paired, with ordering and arranging compulsions (Leckman et, al., 1997). Although many of us can be compulsive at, times, full-fledged obsessive-compulsive disorders occur, in roughly 2.5 percent of the population (Turner et al.,, 2001). The prevalence of obsessive-compulsive disorder, , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, , The famous industrialist Howard Hughes was obsessed, with the possibility of being contaminated by germs. This, led him to devise extraordinary rituals to minimize the, possibility of such contamination. He would spend hours, methodically cleaning a single telephone. He once wrote, a three-page memo instructing assistants on exactly how, to open cans of fruit for him. The following is just a small, portion of the instructions that Hughes provided for a, driver who delivered films to his bungalow. “Get out of, the car on the traffic side. Do not at any time be on the, side of the car between the car and the curb. . . . Carry, only one can of film at a time. Step over the gutter opposite the place where the sidewalk dead-ends into the curb, , © Jeffrey MacMillan/U.S. News & World Report, , Obsessions are thoughts that repeatedly intrude on, one’s consciousness in a distressing way. Compulsions, are actions that one feels forced to carry out. Thus, an, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is marked by, persistent, uncontrollable intrusions of unwanted, thoughts (obsessions) and urges to engage in senseless rituals (compulsions). To illustrate, let’s examine, the bizarre behavior of a man once reputed to be the, wealthiest person in the world:, , Repetitive handwashing is an example of a common compulsive, behavior., , CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 489

Page 527 :
seems to be increasing, but this trend may simply reflect, changes in clinicians’ and researchers’ diagnostic tendencies (Stein et al., 1997a). Most cases of OCD emerge, before the age of 35 (Otto et al., 1999)., , Etiology of Anxiety Disorders, Like most psychological disorders, anxiety disorders, develop out of complicated interactions among a variety of factors. Conditioning and learning appear especially important, but biological factors may also contribute to anxiety disorders., Biological Factors, , Recent studies suggest that there may be a weak to moderate genetic predisposition to anxiety disorders, depending on the specific type of disorder (Fyer, 2000;, Hettema, Neale, & Kendler, 2001). These findings are, consistent with the idea that inherited differences in, temperament might make some people more vulnerable than others to anxiety disorders. Kagan and his colleagues (1992) have found that about 15–20 percent of, infants display an inhibited temperament, characterized, by shyness, timidity, and wariness, which appears to, have a strong genetic basis. Research suggests that this, temperament is a risk factor for the development of, anxiety disorders (Rosenbaum, Lakin, & Roback, 1992)., One influential theory holds that anxiety sensitivity may make people vulnerable to anxiety disorders, (Reiss, 1991; Weems et al., 2002). According to this notion, some people are very sensitive to internal physiological symptoms of anxiety and are prone to overreact with fear when they experience these symptoms., Anxiety sensitivity may fuel an inflationary spiral in, which anxiety breeds more anxiety, which eventually, spins out of control in the form of an anxiety disorder., , 1, , Recent evidence suggests that a link may exist between anxiety disorders and neurochemical activity in, the brain. Neurotransmitters are chemicals that carry, signals from one neuron to another. Therapeutic drugs, (such as Valium) that reduce excessive anxiety appear to, alter activity at synapses for a neurotransmitter called, GABA. This finding and other lines of evidence suggest, that disturbances in the neural circuits using GABA, may play a role in some types of anxiety disorders (Skolnick, 2003). Abnormalities in other neural circuits using, the transmitter serotonin have been implicated in panic, and obsessive-compulsive disorders (Sullivan & Coplan,, 2000). Thus, scientists are beginning to unravel the neurochemical bases for anxiety disorders., Conditioning and Learning, , Many anxiety responses may be acquired through classical conditioning and maintained through operant conditioning (see Chapter 2). According to Mowrer (1947),, an originally neutral stimulus (the snow in Hilda’s, case, for instance) may be paired with a frightening, event (the avalanche) so that it becomes a conditioned, stimulus eliciting anxiety (see Figure 15.6). Once a fear, is acquired through classical conditioning, the person, may start avoiding the anxiety-producing stimulus., The avoidance response is negatively reinforced because it is followed by a reduction in anxiety. This, process involves operant conditioning (also shown in, Figure 15.6). Thus, separate conditioning processes, may create and then sustain specific anxiety responses, (Levis, 1989). Consistent with this view, studies find, that a substantial portion of people suffering from, phobias can identify a traumatic conditioning experience that probably contributed to their anxiety disorder (Antony & McCabe, 2003; King, Eleonora, & Ollendick, 1998)., , 2, , Classical conditioning:, Acquisition of phobic fear, , Operant conditioning:, Maintenance of phobic fear, (negative reinforcement), , CS, Snow, , UCS, Buried in, avalanche, , •, , CR, Fear, UCR, , Avoid, snow, , Reduction, of fear, , Response, , Reinforcer, , F I G U R E 15.6, , Conditioning as an explanation for phobias. (1) Many phobias appear to be acquired through classical conditioning when a neutral stimulus is paired with an anxiety-arousing stimulus. (2) Once acquired, a phobia may be maintained through operant conditioning, because avoidance of the phobic, stimulus leads to a reduction in anxiety, resulting in negative reinforcement., 490, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health

Page 528 :
The tendency to develop phobias of certain types, ner (Eysenck et al., 1991). For instance, one such senof objects and situations may be explained by Martin, tence was “The doctor examined little Emma’s growth,”, Seligman’s (1971) concept of preparedness. Like many, which could mean that the doctor checked her height or, theorists, Seligman believes that classical conditioning, the growth of a tumor. As Figure 15.7 shows, the anxcreates most phobic responses. However, he suggests, ious subjects interpreted the sentences in a threatening, that people are biologically prepared by their evolutionway more often than the nonanxious subjects did. Thus,, ary history to acquire some fears much more easily than, the cognitive view holds that some people are prone to, others. His theory would explain why people develop, anxiety disorders because they see threat in every corner, phobias of ancient sources of threat (such as snakes, of their lives (Williams et al., 1997)., and spiders) much more readily than modern sources, Stress, of threat (such as electrical outlets or hot irons). Some, Finally, studies have supported the long-held suspicion, laboratory studies have yielded evidence consistent, that anxiety disorders are stress related. For instance,, with the idea that we are wired by evolution to readily, Faravelli and Pallanti (1989) found that patients with, develop certain conditioned fears, but the evidence is, panic disorder had experienced a dramatic increase in, inconsistent (Ohman & Mineka, 2003; Rapee & Barstress in the month prior to the onset of their disorder., low, 2001)., In another study, Brown et al. (1998) found an associThere are a number of problems with conditioning, ation between stress and the development of social, models of phobias (Rachman, 1990). For instance, many, phobia. Thus, there is reason to believe that high stress, people with phobias cannot recall or identify a trauoften helps precipitate the onset of anxiety disorders., matic conditioning experience that led to their phobia., Conversely, many people endure extremely, traumatic experiences that should create a, phobia but do not. To provide better explanations for these complexities, conditioning, 60, F I G U R E 15. 7, models of anxiety disorders are currently, 55, being revised to include a larger role for cogCognitive factors in anxiety disor50, ders. Eysenck and his colleagues, nitive factors (de Jong & Merckelbach, 2000)., Cognitive Factors, , Cognitive theorists maintain that certain, styles of thinking make some people particularly vulnerable to anxiety disorders. According to these theorists, some people are prone, to suffer from problems with anxiety because, they tend to (a) misinterpret harmless situations as threatening, (b) focus excessive attention on perceived threats, and (c) selectively, recall information that seems threatening, (Beck, 1997; McNally, 1994, 1996). In one intriguing test of the cognitive view, anxious, and nonanxious subjects were asked to read, 32 sentences that could be interpreted in either a threatening or a nonthreatening man-, , (1991) compared how subjects with, anxiety problems and nonanxious, subjects tended to interpret sentences that could be viewed as, threatening or nonthreatening., Consistent with cognitive models of, anxiety disorders, anxious subjects, were more likely to interpret the, sentences in a threatening light., , Threatening interpretations, endorsed (%), , •, , 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, 0, , Anxious Nonanxious, subjects subjects, , Somatoform Disorders, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Describe three types of somatoform disorders., Summarize what is known about the causes of somatoform disorders., , Chances are, you have met people who always seem to, be complaining about aches, pains, and physical maladies of doubtful authenticity. When physical illness, appears largely psychological in origin, people are said, , to suffer from somatoform disorders. Somatoform disorders are physical ailments that cannot be fully explained by organic conditions and are largely due to, psychological factors. Although their symptoms are, CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 491

Page 529 :
more imaginary than real, victims of somatoform disorders are not simply faking illness. Deliberate feigning of illness for personal gain is another matter altogether, called malingering., People with somatoform disorders typically seek, treatment from physicians practicing neurology, internal medicine, or family medicine, instead of from psychologists or psychiatrists. Making accurate diagnoses, of somatoform disorders can be difficult, because the, causes of physical ailments are sometimes hard to, identify. In some cases, a problem is misdiagnosed as a, somatoform disorder when a genuine organic cause, for a person’s physical symptoms goes undetected despite medical examinations and tests (Yutzy, 2003)., Let’s look at three specific types of somatoform, disorders: somatization disorder, conversion disorder,, and hypochondriasis. Diagnostic difficulties make it, hard to obtain sound data on the prevalence of somatoform disorders (Bouman, Eifert, & Lejuez, 1999)., , Somatization Disorder, Individuals with somatization disorders are often said, to “cling to ill health.” A somatization disorder is, marked by a history of diverse physical complaints, that appear to be psychological in origin. Somatization disorder occurs mostly in women (Guggenheim,, 2000) and often coexists with depression or anxiety, disorders (Gureje et al., 1997). Victims report an endless succession of minor physical ailments that seem to, wax and wane in response to the stress in their lives, (Servan-Schreiber, Kolb, & Tabas, 1999). They usually, have a long and complicated history of medical treatment from many doctors. The distinguishing feature, of this disorder is the diversity of victims’ physical, complaints. Over the years, they report a mixed bag of, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, neurological, and genitourinary symptoms. The unlikely nature, of such a mixture of symptoms occurring together, often alerts a physician to the possible psychological, basis for the patient’s problems., , Conversion Disorder, Conversion disorder is characterized by a significant, loss of physical function with no apparent organic, basis, usually in a single organ system. Common, symptoms include partial or complete loss of vision,, partial or complete loss of hearing, partial paralysis,, severe laryngitis or mutism, seizures, vomiting, and, loss of feeling or function in limbs, such as that seen in, the following case:, Mildred was a rancher’s daughter who lost the use of both, of her legs during adolescence. Mildred was at home, alone one afternoon when a male relative attempted to, 492, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , WE B LI N K 15.3, , National Institute of Mental Health: For the Public, A wealth of information on psychological disorders is, available at this subpage of the U.S. National Institute of, Mental Health’s massive website. Visitors will find detailed, online booklets on generalized anxiety disorder, obsessivecompulsive disorder, panic disorder, depression, bipolar, disorder, and so forth. Brief fact sheets, dense technical, reports, and many other resources are also available., , assault her. She screamed for help, and her legs gave way, as she slipped to the floor. She was found on the floor a, few minutes later when her mother returned home. She, could not get up, so she was carried to her bed. Her legs, buckled when she made subsequent attempts to walk on, her own. Due to her illness, she was waited on hand and, foot by her family and friends. Neighbors brought her, homemade things to eat or to wear. She became the center of attention in the household. (Adapted from, Cameron, 1963, pp. 312–313), People with conversion disorder are usually troubled by more severe ailments than people with somatization disorder. In some cases of conversion disorder,, there are telltale clues about the psychological origins of, the illness because the patient’s symptoms are not consistent with medical knowledge about their apparent disease. For instance, the loss of feeling in one hand that is, seen in “glove anesthesia” is inconsistent with the known, facts of neurological organization (see Figure 15.8)., , Hypochondriasis, Hypochondriacs constantly monitor their physical condition, looking for signs of illness. Any tiny alteration, from their physical norm leads them to conclude that, , •, , F I G U R E 15. 8, , Glove anesthesia. In, conversion disorders, the, physical complaints are, sometimes inconsistent, with the known facts of, physiology. Such is the, case in glove anesthesia,, in which the patient complains of losing feeling in, a hand. Given the patterns, of nerve distribution in the, arm shown in (a), a loss of, feeling in the hand exclusively as shown in (b) is a, physical impossibility,, indicating that the patient’s problem is psychological in origin., , (a), , (b)

Page 530 :
disorders are largely a function of personality and, learning., Personality Factors, , Reprinted by permission of Edgar Argo., , they have contracted a disease. Hypochondriasis (more, widely known as hypochondria) is characterized by, excessive preoccupation with health concerns and incessant worry about developing physical illnesses. The, following case illustrates the nature of hypochondria:, Jeff is a middle-aged man who works as a clerk in a drug, store. He spends long hours describing his health problems, to anyone who will listen. Jeff is an avid reader of popular, magazine articles on medicine. He can tell you all about, the latest medical discoveries. He takes all sorts of pills and, vitamins to ward off possible illnesses. He’s the first to try, every new product on the market. Jeff is constantly afflicted by new symptoms of illness. His most recent problems were poor digestion and a heartbeat that he thought, was irregular. He frequently goes to physicians who can, find nothing wrong with him physically. They tell him, that he is healthy. He thinks they use “backward techniques.” He suspects that his illness is too rare to be diagnosed successfully. (Adapted from Suinn, 1984, p. 236), When hypochondriacs are assured by their physician that they do not have any real illness, they often, are skeptical and disbelieving (Starcevic, 2001). As in, Jeff ’s case, they frequently assume that the physician, must be incompetent, and they go shopping for another doctor. Hypochondriacs don’t subjectively suffer, from physical distress as much as they overinterpret, every conceivable sign of illness. Hypochondria frequently appears alongside other psychological disorders, especially anxiety disorders and depression (Iezzi,, Duckworth, & Adams, 2001). For example, Howard, Hughes’s obsessive-compulsive disorder was coupled, with profound hypochondria., , Etiology of Somatoform Disorders, Inherited aspects of physiological functioning, such as, a highly reactive autonomic nervous system, may predispose some people to somatoform disorders (Weiner,, 1992). However, available evidence suggests that these, , People with certain types of personality traits seem to, be particularly prone to develop somatoform disorders. The prime candidates appear to be people with, histrionic personality characteristics (Nemiah, 1985;, Slavney, 1990). The histrionic personality tends to be, self-centered, suggestible, excitable, highly emotional,, and overly dramatic. Such people thrive on the attention that they get when they become ill. The personality trait of neuroticism also seems to elevate individuals’ susceptibility to somatoform disorders (Kirmayer,, Robbins, & Paris, 1994)., Cognitive Factors, , In recent years, theorists have devoted increased attention to how cognitive peculiarities might contribute to, somatoform disorders. For example, Barsky (2001) asserts that some people focus excessive attention on, their internal physiological processes and amplify normal bodily sensations into symptoms of distress,, which lead them to pursue unnecessary medical treatment. Recent evidence suggests that people with somatoform disorders tend to draw catastrophic conclusions about minor bodily complaints (Salkovskis &, Warwick, 2001). They also seem to apply a faulty standard of good health, equating health with a complete, absence of symptoms and discomfort, which is unrealistic (Barsky et al., 1993)., The Sick Role, , As we discussed in Chapter 14, some people grow fond, of the role associated with being sick (Pilowsky, 1993)., Their complaints of physical symptoms may be reinforced by indirect benefits derived from their illness, (Schwartz, Slater, & Birchler, 1994). One payoff is that, becoming ill is a superb way to avoid having to confront life’s challenges. Many people with somatoform, disorders are avoiding facing up to marital problems,, career frustrations, family responsibilities, and the like., After all, when you’re sick, others cannot place great, demands on you. Another benefit is that physical problems can provide a convenient excuse when people fail,, or worry about failing, in endeavors that are critical to, their self-esteem (Organista & Miranda, 1991)., Attention from others is another payoff that may, reinforce complaints of physical illness. When people, become ill, they command the attention of family,, friends, co-workers, neighbors, and doctors. The sympathy that illness often brings may strengthen the person’s tendency to feel ill. This clearly occurred in Mildred’s case of conversion disorder. Her illness paid, handsome dividends in terms of attention, consolation, and kindhearted assistance from others., CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 493

Page 531 :
Dissociative Disorders, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, , Describe three types of dissociative disorders., Summarize what is known about the causes of dissociative disorders., , Dissociative disorders are among the more unusual of, psychological syndromes. Dissociative disorders are a, class of disorders in which people lose contact with, portions of their consciousness or memory, resulting in disruptions in their sense of identity. Here we, describe three dissociative syndromes—dissociative, amnesia, dissociative fugue, and dissociative identity, disorder—all of which are relatively uncommon., , Dissociative Amnesia and Fugue, Dissociative amnesia and fugue are overlapping disorders characterized by serious memory deficits. Dissociative amnesia is a sudden loss of memory for important personal information that is too extensive to, be due to normal forgetting. Memory losses may, occur for a single traumatic event (such as an automobile accident or home fire) or for an extended period, of time surrounding the event. Cases of amnesia have, been observed after people have experienced disasters,, accidents, combat stress, physical abuse, and rape, or, after they have witnessed the violent death of a parent,, among other things (Arrigo & Pezdek, 1997; Loewenstein, 1996). In dissociative fugue, people lose their, memory for their sense of personal identity. Having, forgotten their name, their family, where they live, and, where they work, these people typically wander away, from their home area. In spite of this wholesale forgetting, they remember matters unrelated to their identity, such as how to drive a car and how to do math., , Dissociative Identity Disorder, Dissociative identity disorder (DID) involves the coexistence in one person of two or more largely complete, and usually very different, personalities. The, name for this disorder used to be multiple personality, disorder, which still enjoys informal usage. In dissociative identity disorder, the divergences in behavior, go far beyond those that people normally display in, adapting to different roles in life. People with “multiple personalities” feel that they have more than one, identity. Each personality has his or her own name,, memories, traits, and physical mannerisms. Although, rare, this “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” syndrome is frequently portrayed in novels, movies, and television, , 494, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , shows. In popular media portrayals, the syndrome is, often mistakenly called schizophrenia. As you will see, later, schizophrenic disorders are entirely different and, do not involve “split personality.”, In dissociative identity disorder, the various personalities are often unaware of each other (Eich et al.,, 1997). In other words, the experiences of a specific personality are only recalled by that personality and not, the others. The alternate personalities commonly display traits that are quite foreign to the original personality. For instance, a shy, inhibited person might develop a flamboyant, extraverted alternate personality., Transitions between identities often occur suddenly., The disparities between identities can be bizarre, as, personalities may assert that they are different in age,, race, gender, and sexual orientation (Kluft, 1996). Dissociative identity disorder rarely occurs in isolation., Most DID patients also have a history of anxiety,, mood, or personality disorders (Ross, 1999)., Starting in the 1970s, a dramatic increase was seen, in the diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder (Kihlstrom, 2001). Some theorists believe that this disorder, used to be underdiagnosed—that is, it often went undetected (Maldonado & Spiegel, 2003; Saxe et al.,, 1993). However, other theorists argue that a handful, of clinicians have begun overdiagnosing the condition, and that some clinicians even contribute to the emergence of DID (McHugh, 1995; Powell & Gee, 1999)., Consistent with this view, a survey of all the psychiatrists in Switzerland found that 90 percent of them had, never seen a case of dissociative identity disorder,, whereas three of the psychiatrists had each seen more, than 20 patients with dissociative identity disorder, (Modestin, 1992). The data from this study suggest, that 6 psychiatrists (out of 655 surveyed) accounted, , WE B LI N K 15.4, , International Society for the Study of Dissociation, Dissociative disorders, including dissociative identity disorder, are the focus of this organization of research and, clinical professionals. In addition to a selective bibliography and a set of treatment guidelines, the site provides an, impressive set of links to other professional groups, involved in studying and treating dissociation.

Page 532 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , Risk Factors for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the, Aftermath of Trauma, The threat of terrorism in contemporary life raises concerns, about its psychological fallout. Epidemiologists are still, trying to determine exactly how many people developed, posttraumatic stress disorder and other psychological, disorders in the wake of the terrorist attacks that took, place on September 11, 2001 (DeRoma et al., 2003; Lating, et al., 2004; Piotrkowski & Brannen, 2002). As you may, recall from Chapter 3, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), involves enduring psychological disturbance attributed, to the experience of a major traumatic event. Although, PTSD is fairly common in the wake of major disasters, the, vast majority of people who experience such events do, not develop PTSD (Ozer & Weiss, 2004). Hence, a current, focus of research is to ask why—what factors make, certain people more vulnerable than others to PTSD? Two, recent reviews of hundreds of studies on predictors of, PTSD suggest that the major risk factors are as follows, (Brewin, Andrews, & Valentine, 2000; Ozer et al., 2003)., Severity of exposure to the traumatic event. As, one would expect, the probability of PTSD is an increasing function of the intensity of one’s exposure to the, traumatic event. For example, studies have found that, the closer people were to an explosion, fire, flood, or, combat zone, the higher the risk of PTSD. And the more, people perceived that their life was in danger, the, greater the likelihood of PTSD., Pretrauma adjustment. Research consistently, shows susceptibility to PTSD is influenced by the quality, , for two-thirds of the dissociative identity disorder diagnoses in Switzerland., , Etiology of Dissociative Disorders, Psychogenic amnesia and fugue are usually attributed, to excessive stress. However, relatively little is known, about why this extreme reaction to stress occurs in a, tiny minority of people but not in the vast majority, who are subjected to similar stress. Some theorists, speculate that certain personality traits—fantasyproneness and a tendency to become intensely ab-, , of one’s pretrauma adjustment. The likelihood of PTSD is, much higher among people who are already struggling, with psychological problems and among people who have, a history of previous exposures to trauma, including, abuse during their childhood., Gender. Research suggests that women are more, vulnerable to PTSD than men. This gender disparity is, seen when men and women are exposed to the same, traumatic stressor. For example, female survivors of the, 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City (which killed 168 people) were twice as likely, as male survivors to develop PTSD. The reasons for this, gender gap are not readily apparent., Posttrauma social support. A surprisingly strong, predictor of whether people develop PTSD is the quality, of their social support after their exposure to the traumatic event. Strong social support from family and, friends reduces the likelihood of PTSD., Intensity of one’s reaction at the time of the, traumatic event. Individuals who have especially intense emotional reactions during or immediately after, the traumatic event show increased susceptibility to, PTSD. Vulnerability seems to be greatest among people, whose reactions are so intense that they report dissociative experiences (a sense that things are not real, that, time is stretching out, that one is watching oneself in, a movie)., , sorbed in personal experiences—may make some people more susceptible to dissociative disorders, but adequate evidence is lacking on this line of thought, (Kihlstrom, Glisky, & Angiulo, 1994)., The causes of dissociative identity disorder are, particularly obscure. Some skeptical theorists, such as, Nicholas Spanos (1994, 1996) and Lilienfeld and colleagues (1999), believe that people with multiple personalities are engaging in intentional role playing to, use mental illness as a face-saving excuse for their personal failings. Spanos also argues that a small minority, of therapists help create multiple personalities in their, , CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 495

Page 533 :
patients by subtly encouraging the emergence of alternate personalities. According to Spanos, dissociative, identity disorder is a creation of modern North American culture, much as demonic possession was a creation, of early Christianity. To bolster his argument, he discusses how DID patients’ symptom presentations seem, to have been influenced by popular media. For example, the typical patient with dissociative identity disorder used to report having two or three personalities, but, since the publication of Sybil (Schreiber, 1973) and, other books describing patients with many personalities, the average number of alternate personalities has, climbed to about 15. In a similar vein, a dramatic upsurge occurred in the number of dissociative patients, reporting that they were victims of ritual satanic abuse, during childhood after the publication of Michelle Remembers (Smith & Pazder, 1980), a book about a DID, patient who purportedly was tortured by a satanic cult., In spite of these concerns, many clinicians are convinced that DID is an authentic disorder (Gleaves, May,, , & Cardena, 2001). They argue that there is no incentive, for either patients or therapists to manufacture cases of, multiple personalities, which are often greeted with, skepticism and outright hostility. They maintain that, most cases of DID are rooted in severe emotional, trauma that occurred during childhood (Draijer &, Langeland, 1999). A substantial majority of people with, DID report a history of disturbed home life, beatings, and rejection from parents, and sexual abuse (Lewis et, al., 1997; Scroppo et al., 1998). However, this link is not, unique to DID, as a history of child abuse elevates the, likelihood of many disorders, especially among females, (MacMillan et al., 2001). In the final analysis, however,, very little is known about the causes of dissociative, identity disorder, which remains a controversial diagnosis. In one survey of American psychiatrists, only, one-quarter of the respondents indicated that they felt, there was solid evidence for the scientific validity of the, DID diagnosis (Pope et al., 1999)., , Mood Disorders, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , © Katy Winn/Corbis, , What might Abraham Lincoln, Leo Tolstoy, Marilyn, Monroe, Vincent Van Gogh, Ernest Hemingway, Winston Churchill, Virginia Woolf, Janis Joplin, Irving, Berlin, Kurt Cobain, Francis Ford Coppola, Carrie, Fisher, Ted Turner, Sting, Mike Wallace, Larry Flynt,, Jane Pauley, and Ben Stiller have in common? Yes, they, , ■, , ■, , Discuss how cognitive processes may contribute to, mood disorders., Explain how interpersonal behavior and stress may, contribute to mood disorders., , all achieved great prominence, albeit in different ways, at different times. But, more pertinent to our interest,, they all suffered from severe mood disorders. Although, mood disorders can be terribly debilitating, people, with mood disorders may still achieve greatness, because such disorders tend to be episodic. In other words,, , Mood disorders are common and have afflicted many successful, well-known people, such as Jane, Pauley, Ben Stiller and Sting., 496, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , © 2004 AP/Wide World Photos, , ■, , Describe the two major mood disorders and discuss, their prevalence., Explain how genetic and neurochemical factors may, be related to the development of mood disorders., , © Graeme Robertson/Getty Images, , ■

Page 534 :
•, , Unipolar mood disorder, , Episodic patterns in mood disorders., Episodes of emotional disturbance come, and go unpredictably in mood disorders., People with unipolar disorders suffer, from bouts of depression only, while, people with bipolar disorders experience, both manic and depressive episodes. The, time between episodes of disturbance, varies greatly., , Manic, Mood state, , F I G U R E 15. 9, , Normal, Depressed, Time (years), Bipolar mood disorder, , Mood state, , Manic, Normal, Depressed, Time (years), , emotional disorders often come and go. Thus, episodes, of disturbance are interspersed among periods of normality. These episodes of disturbance can vary greatly, in length, but they typically last 3 to 12 months (Akiskal,, 2000)., Of course, we all have our ups and downs in terms, of mood. Life would be dull indeed if emotional tone, were constant. Everyone experiences depression occasionally and has other days that bring an emotional, high. Such emotional fluctuations are natural, but, some people are prone to extreme distortions of, mood. Mood disorders are a class of disorders, marked by emotional disturbances that may spill, over to disrupt physical, perceptual, social, and, thought processes., Mood disorders include two basic types: unipolar, and bipolar (see Figure 15.9). People with unipolar disorders experience emotional extremes at just one end, of the mood continuum—depression. People with, bipolar disorders experience emotional extremes at, both ends of the mood continuum, going through periods of both depression and mania (excitement and, elation). The mood swings in bipolar disorders can be, patterned in many ways., , havior for more than a few weeks, there is reason for, concern., In major depressive disorder people show persistent feelings of sadness and despair and a loss of interest in previous sources of pleasure. Figure 15.10 on, the next page summarizes the most common symptoms, of depressive disorders and compares them to the, symptoms of mania. Negative emotions form the heart, of the depressive syndrome, but many other symptoms, may also appear. Depressed people often give up activities that they used to find enjoyable. For example, a depressed person might quit going bowling or give up a, favorite hobby like photography. Reduced appetite and, insomnia are common. People with depression often, lack energy. They tend to move sluggishly and talk, slowly. Anxiety, irritability, and brooding are frequently, observed. Self-esteem tends to sink as the depressed, person begins to feel worthless. Depression plunges, people into feelings of hopelessness, dejection, and, boundless guilt. The severity of abnormal depression, varies considerably. The onset of unipolar disorder can, occur at any point in the life span, but a substantial, majority of cases emerge before age 40 (Hammen,, 2003). Depression does occur in children, as well as, , Major Depressive Disorder, The line between normal and abnormal depression, can be difficult to draw (Kendler & Gardner, 1998). Ultimately, a subjective judgment is required. Crucial, considerations in this judgment include the duration, of the depression and its disruptive effects. When a depression significantly impairs everyday adaptive be-, , WE B LI N K 15.5, , Dr. Ivan’s Depression Central, Some might suggest that psychiatrist Ivan Goldberg’s site, would be better titled “Everything You Ever Wanted to Know, About Depression . . .” He offers visitors a great depth of, resources regarding depression and mood disorders., , CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 497

Page 535 :
FIG U R E 15.10, , Comparison of Manic and Depressive Symptoms, , Common symptoms in manic, and depressive episodes., The emotional, cognitive, and, motor symptoms exhibited in, manic and depressive illnesses, are largely the opposite of, each other., From Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R., (1987). Abnormal psychology: The problem, of maladaptive behavior (5th ed., p. 283)., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. ©, 1987 Prentice-Hall. Reprinted by permission of Prentice-Hall, Inc., , Characteristics, , Manic episode, , Depressive episode, , Emotional, , Elated, euphoric, very sociable,, impatient at any hindrance, , Gloomy, hopeless, socially withdrawn,, irritable, , Cognitive, , Characterized by racing thoughts,, flight of ideas, desire for action,, and impulsive behavior; talkative,, self-confident; experiencing, delusions of grandeur, , Characterized by slowness of thought, processes, obsessive worrying, inability, to make decisions, negative selfimage, self-blame, and delusions of, guilt and disease, , Motor, , Hyperactive, tireless, requiring less, sleep than usual, showing increased, sex drive and fluctuating appetite, , Less active, tired, experiencing difficulty in sleeping, showing decreased, sex drive and decreased appetite, , adolescents and adults (Gruenberg & Goldstein, 2003)., The median duration of depressive episodes is 5, months (Solomon et al., 1997). The vast majority, (75–95 percent) of people who suffer from depression, experience more than one episode over the course of, their lifetime (Dubovsky, Davies, Dubovsky, 2003). The, median number of depressive episodes is four., How common are depressive disorders? Very common. A recent, large-scale study of a nationally representative sample of over 9000 adults found that the, lifetime prevalence of depressive disorder was 16.2, percent (Kessler et al., 2003). That estimate suggests, that over 30 million people in the United States have, suffered from depression! That said, estimates of the, prevalence of depression vary quite a bit from one, study to another because of the previously mentioned, difficulty in drawing a line between normal dejection, and abnormal depression. Hence, researchers using, different procedures and cutoff points obtain different, estimates. Nonetheless, evidence suggests that the, prevalence of depression is increasing, as it is higher in, more recent age cohorts (Rehm, Wagner, & Ivens-Tyndal, 2001). In particular, age cohorts born since World, War II appear to have an elevated risk for depression, (Kessler, 2002). The factors underlying this rise in depression are not readily apparent, and researchers are, scrambling to collect data that might shed light on this, unanticipated trend., Researchers also find that the, prevalence of depression is about, twice as high in women as it is in, men (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2002). The, many possible explanations for this, gender gap are the subject of considerable debate. The gap does not, appear to be attributable to differences in genetic makeup or other bioSusan Nolenlogical factors (Kessler et al., 2003)., Hoeksema, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema (2001) argues that women experience more depression than, 498, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , men because they are far more likely to be victims of, sexual abuse and somewhat more likely to endure, poverty, harassment, and role constraints. In other, words, she attributes the higher prevalence of depression among women to their experience of greater, stress and adversity. Nolen-Hoeksema also believes, that women have a greater tendency than men to ruminate about setbacks and problems. Evidence suggests that this tendency to dwell on one’s difficulties, elevates vulnerability to depression, as we will discuss, momentarily., , Bipolar Disorder, , Courtesy, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, , •, , Bipolar disorder (formerly known as manic-depressive disorder) is marked by the experience of both depressed and manic periods. The symptoms seen in, manic periods generally are the opposite of those seen, in depression (see Figure 15.10 for a comparison). In a, manic episode, a person’s mood becomes elevated to, the point of euphoria. Self-esteem skyrockets as the, person bubbles over with optimism, energy, and extravagant plans. People become hyperactive and may, go for days without sleep. They talk rapidly and shift, topics wildly as their minds race at breakneck speed., Judgment is often impaired. Some people in manic periods gamble impulsively, spend money frantically, or, become sexually reckless. Like depressive disorders,, bipolar disorders vary considerably in severity., You may be thinking that the euphoria in manic, episodes sounds appealing. If so, you are not entirely, wrong. In their milder forms, manic states can seem, attractive. The increases in energy, self-esteem, and optimism can be deceptively seductive. Because of the increase in energy, many bipolar patients report temporary surges of productivity and creativity (Goodwin &, Jamison, 1990)., Although manic episodes may have some positive, aspects, bipolar disorder ultimately proves to be troublesome for most victims. Manic periods often have a

Page 536 :
paradoxical negative undertow of uneasiness and irritability (Dilsaver et al., 1999). Moreover, mild manic, episodes usually escalate to higher levels that become, scary and disturbing. Impaired judgment leads many, victims to do things that they greatly regret later, as illustrated in the following case:, Robert, a dentist, awoke one morning with the idea that, he was the most gifted dental surgeon in his tri-state, area. He decided that he should try to provide services to, as many people as possible, so that more people could, benefit from his talents. Thus, he decided to remodel his, two-chair dental office, installing 20 booths so that he, could simultaneously attend to 20 patients. That same, day he drew up plans for this arrangement, telephoned a, number of remodelers, and invited bids for the work., Later that day, impatient to get going on his remodeling,, he rolled up his sleeves, got himself a sledgehammer, and, began to knock down the walls in his office. Annoyed, when that didn’t go so well, he smashed his dental tools,, washbasins, and X-ray equipment. Later, Robert’s wife, became concerned about his behavior and summoned, two of her adult daughters for assistance. The daughters, responded quickly, arriving at the family home with their, husbands. In the ensuing discussion, Robert—after bragging about his sexual prowess—made advances toward, his daughters. He had to be subdued by their husbands., (Adapted from Kleinmuntz, 1980, p. 309), Although not rare, bipolar disorder is much less, common than unipolar depression. Bipolar disorder, affects about 1–2.5 percent of the population (Dubovsky et al., 2003). Unlike depressive disorder, bipolar, disorder is seen equally often in men and women, (Bauer, 2003). As Figure 15.11 shows, the onset of, bipolar disorders is age related, with the peak of vul-, , nerability occurring between the ages of 20 and 29, (Goodwin & Jamison, 1990)., , Etiology of Mood Disorders, We know quite a bit about the etiology of mood disorders, although the puzzle hasn’t been assembled completely. There appear to be a number of routes into, these disorders, involving intricate interactions between psychological and biological factors., Genetic Vulnerability, , The evidence strongly suggests that genetic factors influence the likelihood of developing major depression, or a bipolar mood disorder (Kalidindi & McGuffin,, 2003; Sullivan, Neale, & Kendler, 2000). In studies that, assess the impact of heredity on psychological disorders, investigators look at concordance rates. A concordance rate indicates the percentage of twin pairs or, other pairs of relatives that exhibit the same disorder. If relatives who share more genetic similarity show, higher concordance rates than relatives who share less, genetic overlap, this finding supports the genetic hypothesis. Twin studies, which compare identical and, fraternal twins (see Chapter 2), suggest that genetic, factors are involved in mood disorders (Knowles,, Kaufmann, & Rieder, 1999). Concordance rates average around 65–72 percent for identical twins but only, 14–19 percent for fraternal twins, who share less genetic similarity. Thus, evidence suggests that heredity, can create a predisposition to mood disorders. Environmental factors probably determine whether this predisposition is converted into an actual disorder. Research suggests that genetic vulnerability may play, a larger role in women’s depression than in men’s, (Bierut et al., 1999). The influence of genetic factors, , •, , 420, , Age of onset for bipolar mood disorder. The, onset of bipolar disorder typically occurs in, adolescence or early adulthood. The data, graphed here, which were combined from ten, studies, show the distribution of age of onset, for 1304 bipolar patients. As you can see,, bipolar disorder emerges most frequently during, the 20s decade., , 360, Number of patients, , F I G U R E 15. 11, , 300, 240, , From Goodwin, F. K., & Jamison, K. R. (1990). Manic-depressive, illness. New York: Oxford University Press. Copyright © 1990 Oxford, University Press, Inc. Used by permission of Oxford University, Press, Inc., , 180, 120, 60, 0, Under, 10, , 10–19 20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–69 70 and, over, Age of onset, , CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 499

Page 537 :
also appears to be stronger for bipolar disorder than, for depression (Knowles et al., 1999)., Neurochemical Factors, , Heredity may influence susceptibility to mood disorders by creating a predisposition toward certain types, of neurochemical activity in the brain. Correlations, have been found between mood disorders and the levels of two neurotransmitters in the brain—norepinephrine and serotonin—although other neurotransmitter disturbances may also contribute (Sher & Mann,, 2003; Thase, Jindal, & Howland, 2002). The details remain elusive, but it seems clear that a neurochemical, basis exists for at least some mood disorders. A variety, of drug therapies are fairly effective in the treatment of, severe mood disorders. Most of these drugs are known, to affect the availability (in the brain) of the neurotransmitters that have been related to mood disorders, (Garlow, Musselman, & Nemeroff, 1999). Because this, effect is unlikely to be a coincidence, it bolsters the, plausibility of the idea that neurochemical changes, produce mood disturbances., If alterations in neurotransmitter activity are the, basis for many mood disorders, what causes the alterations in neurotransmitter activity? These changes, probably depend on the individual’s reactions to environmental events. Thus, a number of psychological, factors have been implicated in the etiology of mood, disorders. Here we focus on three such factors: patterns of thinking, interpersonal style, and stress., Cognitive Factors, , A variety of theories emphasize how cognitive factors, contribute to depressive disorders (Abramson et al.,, 2002). We will discuss Aaron Beck’s (1976, 1987) influential cognitive theory of depression in Chapter 16,, where his approach to therapy is described. In this section, we examine Martin Seligman’s learned helplessness, model of depression (see Chapter 4) and its most recent, descendant, hopelessness theory. Based largely on animal research, Seligman (1974) proposed that depression is caused by learned helplessness—passive “giving, up” behavior produced by exposure to unavoidable, aversive events (such as uncontrollable shock in the laboratory). He originally considered learned helplessness, to be a product of conditioning but eventually revised, his theory, giving it a cognitive slant. The reformulated, theory of learned helplessness postulated that the roots, of depression lie in how people explain the setbacks and, other negative events that they experience (Abramson,, Seligman, & Teasdale, 1978). According to Seligman, (1990), people who exhibit a pessimistic explanatory, style are especially vulnerable to depression (see Chapter 5). These people tend to attribute their setbacks to, their personal flaws instead of situational factors, and, , 500, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , they tend to draw global, far-reaching conclusions about, their personal inadequacies based on these setbacks., Hopelessness theory builds on these insights by, postulating a sense of hopelessness as the “final pathway” leading to depression and by incorporating additional factors that may interact with explanatory style, to foster this sense of hopelessness (Abramson, Alloy,, & Metalsky, 1995). According to hopelessness theory, a, pessimistic explanatory style is just one of several or, more factors—along with high stress, low self-esteem,, and so forth—that may contribute to hopelessness,, and thus depression. Although hopelessness theory, casts a wider net than the learned helplessness model,, it continues to emphasize the importance of people’s, cognitive reactions to the events in their lives., In accord with this line of thinking, Susan NolenHoeksema (1991, 2000) has found that people who ruminate about their problems and setbacks have elevated rates of depression and tend to remain depressed, longer than those who do not ruminate. People who, tend to ruminate repetitively focus their attention on, their depressing feelings, thinking constantly about, how sad, lethargic, and unmotivated they are. According to Nolen-Hoeksema (1995), excessive rumination, tends to extend and amplify episodes of depression., She believes that women are more likely to ruminate, than men and that this disparity may be a major reason why depression is more prevalent in women., In sum, cognitive models of depression maintain, that negative thinking is what leads to depression in, many people. The principal problem with cognitive, theories is their difficulty in separating cause from effect (Rehm, Wagner, & Ivens-Tyndal, 2001). Does negative thinking cause depression? Or does depression, cause negative thinking (see Figure 15.12)? A clear, demonstration of a causal link between negative thinking and depression is not possible because it would require manipulating people’s explanatory style (which, is not easy to change) in sufficient degree to produce, full-fledged depressive disorders (which would not be, ethical). However, recent research has provided impressive evidence consistent with a causal link between, negative thinking and vulnerability to depression. Lauren Alloy and her colleagues (1999) assessed the explanatory style of a sample of first-year college students who were not depressed at the outset of the, study. The students were characterized as being at high, risk or low risk for depression based on whether they, exhibited a negative cognitive style. The follow-up data, over the ensuing 2.5 years on students who had no, prior history of depression showed dramatic differences between the two groups in vulnerability to depression. During this relatively brief period, a major, depressive disorder emerged in 17 percent of the highrisk students in comparison to only 1 percent of the

Page 538 :
High risk, , •, , Participants developing depression, over next 2.5 years (%), , Neurochemical, changes, , Negative, thinking,, attributions, , Low risk, , 50, , Depression, , F I G U R E 15.12, , Interpreting the correlation between negative thinking and, depression. Cognitive theories of depression assert that consistent patterns of negative thinking cause depression. Although, these theories are highly plausible, depression could cause negative thoughts, or both could be caused by a third factor, such as, neurochemical changes in the brain., , low-risk students. These high-risk subjects also displayed a much greater incidence of minor depressive, episodes (39 percent versus 6 percent). These findings, and other data from the study (see Figure 15.13) suggest that negative thinking makes people more vulnerable to depression., , 40, , 30, , 20, , 10, , 0, Major depression, , •, , Minor depression, , F I G U R E 15. 13, , Negative thinking and prediction of depression. Alloy and, colleagues (1999) measured the explanatory style of first-year, college students and characterized them as being high risk or low, risk for depression. This graph shows the percentage of these, students who experienced major or minor episodes of depression, over the next 2.5 years. As you can see, the high risk students,, who exhibited a negative thinking style, proved to be much more, vulnerable to depression. (Data from Alloy et al., 1999), , Interpersonal Roots, , Some theorists suggest that inadequate social skills put, people on the road to depressive disorders (Coyne,, 1999; Lewinsohn & Gotlib, 1995). According to this, notion, depression-prone people lack the social finesse, needed to acquire many important kinds of reinforcers, such as good friends, top jobs, and desirable, spouses. This paucity of reinforcers could understandably lead to negative emotions and depression (see Figure 15.14). Consistent with this theory, researchers, , have found correlations between poor social skills and, depression (Ingram, Scott, & Siegle, 1999)., Another interpersonal consideration is that depressed people tend to be depressing (Joiner & Katz,, 1999). Individuals suffering from depression are often, irritable and pessimistic. They complain a lot, and they, aren’t very enjoyable companions. As a consequence,, depressed people inadvertently court rejection from, those around them (Joiner & Metalsky, 1995). In turn,, , •, , Acquire fewer, reinforcers, such as good, friends, top jobs, , Poor social, skills, , Court rejection, because of irritability,, pessimism, , Increased, vulnerability, to depression, , F I G U R E 15. 14, , Interpersonal factors in depression. Interpersonal theories about the etiology of depression, emphasize how inadequate social skills may, contribute to the development of the disorder., , Gravitate to people, who confirm negative, self–image, , CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 501

Page 539 :
rejection and lack of social support may aggravate and, deepen a person’s depression (Potthoff, Holahan, &, Joiner, 1995). To compound these problems, evidence, indicates that depressed people may gravitate to partners who view them unfavorably and hence reinforce, their negative views of themselves (Joiner, 2002)., Precipitating Stress, , Mood disorders sometimes appear mysteriously “out of, the blue” in people who are leading benign, nonstressful, lives. For this reason, experts used to believe that mood, disorders are relatively uninfluenced by stress. However,, recent advances in the measurement of personal stress, have altered this picture. The evidence available today, suggests a moderately strong link between stress and the, , onset of mood disorders (Kendler, Kuhn, & Prescott,, 2004; Kessler, 1997). Stress also appears to affect how, people with mood disorders respond to treatment and, whether they experience a relapse of their disorder, (Monroe & Hadjiyannakis, 2002)., Of course, many people endure great stress without getting depressed. The impact of stress varies in, part because different people have different degrees of, vulnerability to mood disorders (Lewinsohn, Joiner, &, Rohde, 2001). Variations in vulnerability appear to depend primarily on biological makeup. Similar interactions between stress and vulnerability probably influence the development of many kinds of disorders,, including those that are next on our agenda: the schizophrenic disorders., , Schizophrenic Disorders, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, ■, , ■, , Describe the prevalence and general symptoms of, schizophrenia., Describe four schizophrenic subtypes., Distinguish between positive and negative symptoms, in schizophrenia., Identify factors related to the prognosis for, schizophrenic patients., , Literally, schizophrenia means “split mind.” However,, when Eugen Bleuler coined the term in 1911, he was referring to the fragmenting of thought processes seen in, the disorder—not to a “split personality.” Unfortunately, writers in the popular media often assume that, the split-mind notion refers to the syndrome in which a, person manifests two or more personalities. As you have, already learned, this syndrome is actually called dissociative identity disorder. Schizophrenia is a much more, common, and altogether different, type of disorder., Schizophrenic disorders are a class of disorders, marked by disturbances in thought that spill over to, affect perceptual, social, and emotional processes., How common is schizophrenia? Prevalence estimates, suggest that about 1 percent of the population may, suffer from schizophrenic disorders (Jablensky, 1999)., That may not sound like much, but it means that in, the United States alone there may be several million, people troubled by schizophrenic disturbances. Moreover, schizophrenia is an extremely costly disorder for, society, because it is a severe, debilitating illness that, tends to have an early onset and often requires lengthy, hospital care (Buchanan & Carpenter, 2000)., , General Symptoms, Although there are a number of distinct schizophrenic, syndromes, they share some general characteristics, 502, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , ■, , ■, , ■, , Summarize how genetic vulnerability and, neurochemical factors may contribute to the etiology, of schizophrenia., Discuss the evidence relating schizophrenia to, structural abnormalities in the brain and, neurodevelopmental insults to the brain., Summarize how expressed emotion and stress may, contribute to schizophrenia., , that we need to examine before looking at the subtypes. Many of these characteristics are apparent in the, following case history (adapted from Sheehan, 1982)., Sylvia was first diagnosed as schizophrenic at age, 15. She has been in and out of many types of psychiatric facilities since then. She has never been able to, hold a job for any length of time. During severe flareups of her disorder, her personal hygiene deteriorates., She rarely washes, wears clothes that neither fit nor, match, smears makeup on heavily but randomly, and, slops food all over herself. Sylvia occasionally hears, voices talking to her. Sylvia tends to be argumentative,, aggressive, and emotionally volatile. Over the years,, she has been involved in innumerable fights with fellow patients, psychiatric staff members, and strangers., Her thoughts can be highly irrational, as is apparent, from the following quotation:, “Mick Jagger wants to marry me. If I have Mick Jagger, I, don’t have to covet Geraldo Rivera. Mick Jagger is St., Nicholas and the Maharishi is Santa Claus. I want to, form a gospel rock group called the Thorn Oil, but Geraldo wants me to be the music critic on Eyewitness News,, so what can I do? Got to listen to my boyfriend. Teddy, Kennedy cured me of my ugliness. I’m pregnant with the, son of God. I’m going to marry David Berkowitz and get, it over with. Creedmoor is the headquarters of the American Nazi Party. They’re eating the patients here. Archie

Page 540 :
Bunker wants me to play his niece on his TV show. I work, for Epic Records. I’m Joan of Arc. I’m Florence Nightingale. The door between the ward and the porch is the dividing line between New York and California. Divorce, isn’t a piece of paper, it’s a feeling. Forget about Zip Codes., I need shock treatment.” (Sheehan, 1982, pp.104–105), Sylvia’s case clearly shows that schizophrenic, thinking can be bizarre and that schizophrenia is a, brutally serious, psychologically disfiguring disorder., Although no single symptom is inevitably present, the, following symptoms are commonly seen in schizophrenia (Cancro & Lehmann, 2000; Ho, Black, & Andreasen, 2003)., Irrational thought. Disturbed, irrational thought, processes are the central feature of schizophrenic disorders. Various kinds of delusions are common. Delusions are false beliefs that are maintained even, though they clearly are out of touch with reality. For, example, one patient’s delusion that he is a tiger (with, a deformed body) persisted for 15 years (Kulick, Pope,, & Keck, 1990). More typically, affected persons believe, that their private thoughts are being broadcast to other, people, that thoughts are being injected into their, mind against their will, or that their thoughts are being, controlled by some external force (Maher, 2001). In, delusions of grandeur, people maintain that they are extremely famous or important. Sylvia expressed an endless array of grandiose delusions, such as thinking that, Mick Jagger wanted to marry her, that she dictated the, hobbit stories to Tolkien, and that she was going to win, the Nobel Prize for medicine. In addition to delusions,, the schizophrenic person’s train of thought deteriorates. Thinking becomes chaotic rather than logical, and linear. There is a “loosening of associations” as the, schizophrenic shifts topics in disjointed ways. The, quotation from Sylvia illustrates this symptom dramatically. The entire passage involves a wild “flight of, ideas,” but at one point (beginning with the sentence, “Creedmoor is the headquarters . . .”) she rattles off ten, consecutive sentences that have no apparent connection to the preceding sentence., Deterioration of adaptive behavior. Schizophrenia, involves a noticeable deterioration in the quality of, one’s routine functioning in work, social relations, and, personal care. Friends will often make remarks such as, “Hal just isn’t himself anymore.” This deterioration is, readily apparent in Sylvia’s inability to get along with, others or function in the work world. It’s also apparent in her neglect of personal hygiene., Distorted perception. A variety of perceptual distortions may occur in schizophrenia, with the most, common being auditory hallucinations. Hallucina-, , tions are sensory perceptions that occur in the absence of a real external stimulus or that represent, gross distortions of perceptual input. Schizophrenics, frequently report that they hear voices of nonexistent, or absent people talking to them. Sylvia, for instance,, heard messages from former Beatle Paul McCartney., These voices often provide an insulting running commentary on the person’s behavior (“You’re an idiot for, shaking his hand”). The voices may be argumentative, (“You don’t need a bath”), and they may issue commands (“Prepare your home for visitors from outer, space”)., Disturbed emotion. Normal emotional tone can be, disrupted in schizophrenia in a variety of ways. Although it may not be an accurate indicator of their underlying emotional experience (Kring, 1999), some, victims show little emotional responsiveness, a symptom referred to as “blunted or flat affect.” Others show, inappropriate emotional responses that don’t jell with, the situation or with what they are saying. People with, schizophrenia may also become emotionally volatile., This pattern was displayed by Sylvia, who often overreacted emotionally in erratic, unpredictable ways., , Subtypes, Four subtypes of schizophrenic disorders are recognized, including a category for people who don’t fit, neatly into any of the first three categories (Ho et al.,, 2003)., Paranoid Type, , As its name implies, paranoid schizophrenia is dominated by delusions of persecution, along with delusions of grandeur. In this common form of schizophrenia, people come to believe that they have many, enemies who want to harass and oppress them. They, may become suspicious of friends and relatives, or they, may attribute the persecution to mysterious, unknown, persons. They are convinced that they are being, watched and manipulated in malicious ways. To make, sense of this persecution, they often develop delusions, of grandeur. They believe that they must be enormously important people, often seeing themselves as, great inventors or as great religious or political leaders., For example, in the case described at the beginning of, the chapter, Ed’s belief that he was president of the, United States was a delusion of grandeur., Catatonic Type, , Catatonic schizophrenia is marked by striking motor, disturbances, ranging from muscular rigidity to random motor activity. Some catatonics go into an extreme form of withdrawal known as a catatonic stupor. They may remain virtually motionless and seem, CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 503

Page 541 :
Disorganized Type, , In disorganized schizophrenia, a particularly severe, deterioration of adaptive behavior is seen. Prominent symptoms include emotional indifference, frequent incoherence, and virtually complete social withdrawal. Aimless babbling and giggling are common., Delusions often center on bodily functions (“My brain, is melting out my ears”)., Undifferentiated Type, , People who are clearly schizophrenic but who cannot be placed into any of the three previous categories, are said to have undifferentiated schizophrenia,, which is marked by idiosyncratic mixtures of schizophrenic symptoms. The undifferentiated subtype is, fairly common., Positive Versus Negative Symptoms, , Many theorists have raised doubts about the value of dividing schizophrenic disorders into these four subtypes, (Sanislow & Carson, 2001). Critics note that the catatonic subtype is disappearing and that undifferentiated, cases aren’t a subtype so much as a hodgepodge of “leftovers.” Critics also point out that the classic schizophrenic subtypes do not differ meaningfully in etiology,, prognosis, or response to treatment. The absence of, such differences casts doubt on the value of the current, classification scheme., Because of such problems, Nancy Andreasen (1990), and others (Carpenter, 1992; McGlashan & Fenton,, 1992) have proposed an alternative approach to subtyping. This new scheme divides schizophrenic disor-, , •, , FIG U R E 15.15, , PART 4, , Course and Outcome, Schizophrenic disorders usually emerge during adolescence or early adulthood and only infrequently after, , Positive and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia, , Examples of positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia., Some theorists believe that, schizophrenic disorders should, be classified into just two types,, depending on whether patients, exhibit mostly positive symptoms, (behavioral excesses) or negative, symptoms (behavioral deficits)., The percentages shown here,, based on a sample of 111 schizophrenic patients studied by, Andreasen (1987), provide an, indication of how common each, specific symptom is., , 504, , ders into just two categories based, on the predominance of negative, versus positive symptoms (see Figure 15.15). Negative symptoms involve behavioral deficits, such as flattened emotions, social withdrawal,, apathy, impaired attention, and poverty of speech. Positive symptoms, involve behavioral excesses or pecuNancy Andreasen, liarities, such as hallucinations, delusions, bizarre behavior, and wild, flights of ideas., Theorists advocating this scheme hoped to find, consistent differences between the two subtypes in etiology, prognosis, and response to treatment, and some, progress along these lines has been made. For example,, a predominance of positive symptoms is associated, with better adjustment prior to the onset of schizophrenia and greater responsiveness to treatment (Cuesta,, Peralta, & DeLeon, 1994; Fenton & McGlashan, 1994)., However, the assumption that patients can be placed, into discrete categories based on this scheme now seems, untenable. Most patients exhibit both types of symptoms and vary only in the degree to which positive or, negative symptoms dominate (Black & Andreasen,, 1994). Moreover, there is some debate about which, symptoms should be classified as positive and which as, negative, and some theorists have proposed a third category of symptoms reflecting disorganization of behavior (Toomey et al., 1997). Although it seems fair to say, that the distinction between positive and negative, symptoms is enhancing our understanding of schizophrenia, it has not yielded a classification scheme that, can replace the traditional subtypes of schizophrenia., , Negative symptoms, , Percent, of patients, , Positive symptoms, , Percent, of patients, , Few friendship relationships, , 96, , Delusions of persecution, , 81, , Few recreational interests, , 95, , Auditory hallucinations, , 75, , Lack of persistence at work or school, , 95, , Delusions of being controlled, , 46, , Impaired grooming or hygiene, , 87, , Derailment of thought, , 45, , Paucity of expressive gestures, , 81, , Delusions of grandeur, , 39, , Social inattentiveness, , 78, , Bizarre social, sexual behavior, , 33, , Emotional nonresponsiveness, , 64, , Delusions of thought insertion, , 31, , Inappropriate emotion, , 63, , Aggressive, agitated behavior, , 27, , Poverty of speech, , 53, , Incoherent thought, , 23, , Mental and Physical Health, , Courtesy, Nancy Andreasen, , oblivious to the environment around them for long, periods of time. Others go into a state of catatonic excitement. They become hyperactive and incoherent., Some alternate between these dramatic extremes. The, catatonic subtype is not particularly common, and its, prevalence seems to be declining.

Page 542 :
WE B LI N K 15.6, , Doctor’s Guide to the Internet: Schizophrenia, Produced by a communications and medical education consulting company, the free Doctor’s Guide site is updated, frequently to provide a current overview of the state of, research on schizophrenic disorders. A more detailed set of, resources for physicians parallels this site, which is, intended primarily for patients and their families., , age 45 (Howard et al., 1993). The emergence of schizophrenia may be either sudden or gradual. Once it, clearly emerges, the course of schizophrenia is variable, but patients tend to fall into three broad groups., Some patients, presumably those with milder disorders, are treated successfully and enjoy a full recovery., Other patients experience a partial recovery so that, they can return to independent living for a time. However, they experience regular relapses and are in and, out of treatment facilities for much of the remainder, of their lives. Finally, a third group of patients endure, chronic illness that sometimes results in permanent, hospitalization. Estimates of the percentage of patients, falling in each category vary. Overall, it appears that, about 15–20 percent of schizophrenic patients enjoy a, full recovery, although some long-term studies have, yielded higher estimates (Modestin et al., 2003; Robinson et al., 2004)., A number of factors are related to the likelihood, of recovery from schizophrenic disorders (Cancro &, Lehmann, 2000; Liberman et al., 2002). A patient has a, relatively favorable prognosis when (1) the onset of the, disorder has been sudden rather than gradual, (2) the, onset has occurred at a later age, (3) the patient’s social and work adjustment were relatively good prior to, the onset of the disorder, (4) the proportion of negative symptoms is relatively low, (5) the patient’s cognitive functioning is relatively preserved, (6) the patient, shows good adherence to treatment interventions, and, (7) the patient has a relatively healthy, supportive family situation to return to. Many of these predictors are, concerned with the etiology of schizophrenic illness,, which is the matter we turn to next., , Etiology of Schizophrenia, Most of us can identify, at least to some extent, with, people who suffer from mood disorders, somatoform, disorders, and anxiety disorders. You can probably, imagine events that might leave you struggling with, depression, grappling with anxiety, or worrying about, your physical health. But what could possibly have led, Ed to believe that he had been fighting space wars and, vampires? What could account for Sylvia thinking that, she was Joan of Arc, or that she had dictated the hob-, , bit novels to Tolkien? As mystifying as these delusions, may seem, you’ll see that the etiology of schizophrenic, disorders is not all that different from the etiology of, other disorders., Genetic Vulnerability, , Evidence is plentiful that hereditary factors play a role, in the development of schizophrenic disorders (Tsuang,, Glatt, & Faraone, 2003). For instance, in twin studies,, concordance rates average around 48 percent for identical twins, in comparison to about 17 percent for fraternal twins (Gottesman, 1991, 2001). Studies also indicate that a child born to two schizophrenic parents, has about a 46 percent probability of developing a, schizophrenic disorder (as compared to the probability of about 1 percent for the population as a whole)., These and other findings that demonstrate the genetic, roots of schizophrenia are summarized in Figure 15.16, on the next page. Overall, the picture is similar to that, seen for mood disorders. Several converging lines of, evidence indicate that people inherit a genetically, transmitted vulnerability to schizophrenia (Schneider, & Deldin, 2001). Although genetic factors may account, for more than two-thirds of the variability in susceptibility to schizophrenia, genetic mapping studies have, made little progress in identifying the genes responsible (Levinson et al., 1998; Owen & O’Donovan, 2003)., Neurochemical Factors, , Like mood disorders, schizophrenic disorders appear, to be accompanied by changes in the activity of one or, more neurotransmitters in the brain. Excess dopamine, activity has been implicated as a likely cause of schizophrenia (Abi-Dargham et al., 1998). This hypothesis, makes sense because most of the drugs that are useful, in the treatment of schizophrenia are known to, dampen dopamine activity in the brain (Tamminga &, Carlsson, 2003). However, the evidence linking schizophrenia to high dopamine levels is riddled with inconsistencies, complexities, and interpretive problems, (Egan & Hyde, 2000). Researchers are currently exploring how interactions between the dopamine, serotonin,, and other neurotransmitter systems may contribute to, schizophrenia (Patel, Pinals, & Breier, 2003). Thus, investigators are gradually making progress in their, search for the neurochemical bases of schizophrenia., Structural Abnormalities in the Brain, , For decades, studies have suggested that individuals, with schizophrenia exhibit a variety of deficits in attention, perception, and information processing (Bellack,, Gearon, & Blanchard, 2000). Impairments in working, (short-term) memory are especially prominent (Silver, et al., 2003). These cognitive deficits suggest that schizophrenic disorders may be caused by neurological defects. Until recent decades, however, this theory was, CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 505

Page 543 :
based more on speculation than on, actual research. However, advances, Concordance rate (%), Genetic, in brain-imaging technology have, Relationship, (lifetime risk), relatedness, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, yielded mountains of intriguing data, since the mid-1980s. The most reli100%, Identical twin, able finding is that CT scans and, MRI scans suggest an association, 50%, Offspring of two, between enlarged brain ventricles, with each, schizophrenic, (the hollow, fluid-filled cavities in the, parent, patients, brain depicted in Figure 15.17) and, schizophrenic disturbance (Egan, 50%, Fraternal twin, & Hyde, 2000). Enlarged ventricles, Offspring of one, are assumed to reflect either the, 50%, schizophrenic, degeneration or failure to develop, patient, of nearby brain tissue. The significance of enlarged ventricles is hotly, 50%, Sibling, debated, however. Structural deterioration in the brain could be a conNephew or niece, 25%, tributing cause or a consequence of, schizophrenia., Unrelated person, Brain-imaging studies have also, in the general, 0%, population, uncovered structural and metabolic abnormalities in the frontal, lobes of individuals with schizophrenia. Although the research reF I G U R E 1 5. 16, sults are not entirely consistent,, schizophrenia appears to be associGenetic vulnerability to schizophrenic disorders. Relatives of schizophrenic patients have, ated with smaller size and reduced, an elevated risk for schizophrenia. This risk is greater among closer relatives. Although environment also plays a role in the etiology of schizophrenia, the concordance rates shown here, metabolic activity in areas of the, suggest that there must be a genetic vulnerability to the disorder. These concordance estiprefrontal cortex (Fowles, 2003)., mates are based on pooled data from 40 studies conducted between 1920 and 1987., Scientists are also intrigued by the, fact that a major dopamine pathway runs through the area in the, early insults to the brain? Thus far, research has foprefrontal cortex where metabolic abnormalities have, cused on viral infections or malnutrition during prenatal, been found. A connection may exist between the abdevelopment and obstetrical complications during the, normal dopamine activity implicated in schizophrenia, birth process., and the dysfunctional metabolic activity seen in this, The evidence on viral infections has been building, area of the prefrontal cortex (Conklin & Iacono, 2002)., since Sarnoff Mednick and his colleagues (1988) disAlthough the research on the prefrontal cortex is incovered an elevated incidence of schizophrenia among, triguing, Ho, Black, and Andreasen (2003) caution that, individuals who were in their second trimester of prethe neural correlates of schizophrenia are complex and, natal development during a 1957 influenza epidemic, that the disease is not likely to be caused by “a single, in Finland. Several subsequent studies in other locaabnormality in a single region of the brain” (p. 408)., tions have also found a link between exposure to influenza during pregnancy and increased prevalence of, The Neurodevelopmental Hypothesis, schizophrenia (Brown et al., 2004). Another study,, In recent years, several new lines of evidence have led, which investigated the possible impact of prenatal, to the emergence of the neurodevelopmental hypothesis, malnutrition, found an elevated incidence of schizoof schizophrenia, which posits that schizophrenia is, phrenia in a cohort of people who were prenatally excaused in part by various disruptions in the normal, posed to a severe famine in 1944–45 because of a Nazi, maturational processes of the brain before or at birth, blockade of food deliveries in the Netherlands during, (Brown, 1999). According to this hypothesis, insults to, World War II (Susser et al., 1996). A follow-up study, the brain during sensitive phases of prenatal developof some schizophrenic patients exposed to this famine, ment or during birth can cause subtle neuorological, found increased brain abnormalities among the padamage that elevates individuals’ vulnerability to, tients, as the neurodevelopmental hypothesis would, schizophrenia years later in adolescence and early adultpredict (Hulshoff et al., 2000). Other research has, hood (see Figure 15.18). What are the sources of these, , •, , 506, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health

Page 544 :
Right ventricle, Left, ventricle, , R EC O M M EN D ED, R EA D IN G, , Third, ventricle, , Surviving Schizophrenia:, A Manual for Families,, Consumers, and Providers, by E. Fuller Torrey (Harper, 1988, 1995), , Fourth, ventricle, , •, , F I G U R E 15.17, , Schizophrenia and the ventricles of the brain. Cerebrospinal, fluid (CSF) circulates around the brain and spinal cord. The hollow, cavities in the brain filled with CSF are called ventricles. The four, ventricles in the human brain are depicted here. Studies with, modern brain-imaging techniques suggest that an association, exists between enlarged ventricles in the brain and the occurrence, of schizophrenic disturbance., , shown that schizophrenic patients are more likely than, control subjects to have a history of obstetrical complications (Geddes & Lawrie, 1995; Rosso et al., 2000)., Finally, research suggests that minor physical anomalies (slight anatomical defects of the head, hands, feet,, and face) that would be consistent with prenatal neurological damage are more common among people, with schizophrenia than in other people (McNeil, Cantor-Graae, & Ismail, 2000; Schiffman et al., 2002). Collectively, these diverse studies argue for a relationship, between early neurological trauma and a predispostion to schizophrenia (Mednick et al., 1998)., , E. Fuller Torrey, a prominent psychiatrist who specializes in the study and treatment of schizophrenia, has, written a practical book intended for the lay public., Torrey points out that many myths surrounding schizophrenia have added to the anguish of families who have, been victimized by this illness. He explains that schizophrenia is not caused by childhood trauma, domineering, mothers, or passive fathers. He discusses how genetic, vulnerability, flawed brain chemistry, and other factors, contribute to the development of schizophrenic disorders. Torrey discusses the treatment of schizophrenia, at great length. He also explains the various ways in, which the disease can evolve. Some of the best material is found in chapters on what the patient needs and, what the family needs., Throughout the book, Torrey writes with clarity, eloquence, and conviction. He is not reluctant to express, strong opinions. For instance, in an appendix he lists, the ten worst readings on schizophrenia (along with, the ten best), and his evaluations are brutal. He characterizes one book as “absurd drivel” and dismisses, another by saying, “If a prize were to be given to the, book which has produced the most confusion about, schizophrenia over the past twenty years, this book, would win going away.” Scientists and academicians are, usually reluctant to express such strong opinions, so, Torrey’s candor is remarkably refreshing. Another excellent, down-to-earth book on schizophrenic disorders is, Understanding Schizophrenia: A Guide to the New Research on Causes and Treatment by Richard S. E. Keefe, and Philip D. Harvey (The Free Press, 1994)., Cover image reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., , •, , Prenatal, viral infection, Prenatal, malnutrition, Obstetrical, complications, , Disruption, of normal, maturational, processes, before or, at birth, , Subtle, neurological, damage, , Increased, vulnerability to, schizophrenia, , Other brain, insults, Minor physical, anomalies, , CHAPTER 15, , F I G U R E 15. 18, , The neurodevelopmental hypothesis of, schizophrenia. Research suggests that, insults to the brain sustained during, prenatal development or at birth may, disrupt crucial maturational processes in, the brain, resulting in subtle neurological damage that gradually becomes, apparent as youngsters develop. This, neurological damage is believed to, increase both vulnerability to schizophrenia and the incidence of minor, physical anomalies., , Psychological Disorders, , 507

Page 545 :
Expressed Emotion, , Studies of expressed emotion have primarily focused on, how this element of family dynamics influences the, course of schizophrenic illness after the onset of the disorder (Leff & Vaughn, 1985). Expressed emotion (EE) reflects the degree to which a relative of a schizophrenic, patient displays highly critical or emotionally overinvolved attitudes toward the patient. Audiotaped interviews are used to assess relatives’ expressed emotion. The, interviews are carefully evaluated for critical comments,, resentment toward the patient, and excessive emotional, involvement (overprotective, overconcerned attitudes)., Studies show that a family’s expressed emotion is, a good predictor of the course of a schizophrenic patient’s illness (Hooley & Candela, 1999; Kavanaugh,, 1992). After release from a hospital, schizophrenic, patients who return to a family high in expressed emotion show relapse rates three or four times those of patients who return to a family low in expressed emotion. Part of the problem for patients returning to, , homes high in expressed emotion is that their families, are probably sources of more stress than of social support (Cutting & Docherty, 2000). However, Rosenfarb, et al. (1995) caution against placing all the blame on, the families high in expressed emotion. They found, that patients returning to high-EE homes exhibited, more odd and disruptive behavior than patients returning to low-EE homes. Thus, the more critical, negative attitudes experienced by patients in high-EE, homes may be caused in part by their own behavior., Precipitating Stress, , Many theories of schizophrenia assume that stress plays, a role in triggering schizophrenic disorders (Walker,, Baum, & Diforio, 1998). According to this notion, various biological and psychological factors influence individuals’ vulnerability to schizophrenia. High stress may, then serve to precipitate a schizophrenic disorder in, someone who is vulnerable (McGlashan & Hoffman,, 2000)., , Psychological Disorders and the Law, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Explain the reasoning underlying the insanity defense, and discuss, how often it is used., Discuss the legal grounds for involuntary commitment., , Societies use the law to enforce their norms of conformity. Given this function, the law has something to say, about many issues related to abnormal behavior. In, this section we briefly examine the legal issues of insanity and involuntary commitment., , Insanity, Insanity is not a diagnosis; it’s purely a legal concept., Insanity is a legal status indicating that a person cannot be held responsible for his or her actions because, of mental illness. Why is this an issue in the courtroom? Because criminal acts must be intentional. The, law reasons that people who are “out of their mind”, may not be able to appreciate the significance of what, they’re doing. The insanity defense is used in criminal, trials by defendants who admit that they committed, the crime but claim that they lacked intent., No simple relationship exists between specific diagnoses of mental disorders and court findings of insanity. Most people with diagnosed psychological disorders would not qualify as insane. The people most, likely to qualify are those troubled by severe schizophrenic disturbances. The courts apply several rules in, making judgments about a defendant’s sanity, depend-, , 508, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , ing on the jurisdiction. According to the most widely, used rule, called the M’naghten rule, insanity exists, when a mental disorder makes a person unable to distinguish right from wrong. As you can imagine, evaluating, insanity as defined in the M’naghten rule can be difficult for judges and jurors, not to mention the psychologists and psychiatrists who are called into court as expert witnesses. Although highly publicized and, controversial, the insanity defense is actually used less, frequently and less successfully than widely believed, (Phillips, Wolf, & Coons, 1988). One study found that, the general public estimates that the insanity defense, is used in 37 percent of felony cases, when in fact it is, used in less than 1 percent (Silver, Cirincione, & Steadman, 1994). Another study of over 60,000 indictments, in Baltimore found that only 190 defendants (0.31 percent) pleaded insanity, and of these, only 8 were successful (Janofsky et al., 1996)., , Involuntary Commitment, The issue of insanity surfaces only in criminal proceedings. Far more people are affected by civil proceedings, relating to involuntary commitment. In involuntary, commitment people are hospitalized in psychiatric fa-

Page 546 :
cilities against their will. What are the grounds for, such a dramatic action? They vary some from state to, state. Generally, people are subject to involuntary commitment when mental health professionals and legal, authorities believe that a mental disorder makes them, (1) dangerous to themselves (usually suicidal), (2) dangerous to others (potentially violent), or (3) in need of, treatment (applied in cases of severe disorientation). In, emergency situations psychologists and psychiatrists, can authorize temporary commitment, usually for 24 to, 72 hours. Orders for long-term involuntary commitment are usually set up for renewable six-month periods and can be issued by a court only after a formal, hearing. Mental health professionals provide extensive, input in these hearings, but the courts make the final, decisions (Simon, 2003)., , Most involuntary commitments occur because, people appear to be dangerous to themselves or others., The difficulty, however, is in predicting dangerousness., Studies suggest that clinicians’ short-term predictions, about which patients are likely to become violent are, only moderately accurate and that their long-term predictions of violent behavior are largely inaccurate, (Simon, 2003; Stone, 1999). This inaccuracy in predicting dangerousness is unfortunate, because involuntary, commitment involves the detention of people for what, they might do in the future. Such detention goes against, the grain of the American legal principle that people, are innocent until proven guilty. The inherent difficulty, in predicting dangerousness makes involuntary commitment a complex and controversial issue., , Understanding Eating Disorders, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, , ■, , Describe the symptoms and medical complications of, anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa., Discuss the history, prevalence, and gender, distribution of eating disorders., , Answer the following “true” or “false.”, ___ 1. Although they have attracted attention only in, recent years, eating disorders have a long history and have always been fairly common., ___ 2. Eating disorders are universal problems found, in virtually all cultures., ___ 3. People with anorexia nervosa are much more, likely to recognize their eating behavior as pathological than people suffering from bulimia, nervosa., ___ 4. The prevalence of eating disorders is twice as, high in women as it is in men., ___ 5. The binge-and-purge syndrome seen in bulimia, nervosa is not common in anorexia nervosa., ___ 6. Normal dieting is not a risk factor for eating, disorders., All six of these statements are false, as you will see in, this Application. The psychological disorders that we, discussed in the main body of the chapter have largely, been recognized for centuries and generally are found, in one form or another in all cultures and societies., , ■, , ■, , Explain how genetic factors, personality, and culture, may contribute to eating disorders., Explain how family dynamics and disturbed thinking, may contribute to eating disorders., , Eating disorders, however, present a sharp contrast to, this picture: They have only been recognized in recent, decades, and initially they were largely confined to affluent, Westernized cultures (Russell, 1995; Szmukler, & Patton, 1995). In spite of these fascinating differences, eating disorders have much in common with, traditional forms of pathology., Eating disorders are severe disturbances in eating, behavior characterized by preoccupation with weight, and unhealthy efforts to control weight. The vast majority of cases consist of two sometimes overlapping, , WE B LI N K 15.7, , The Alliance for Eating Disorders Awareness, This site offers a great deal of information on eating disorders. Visitors can find statistics, suggested readings, information on symptoms and treatments, self-tests, success, stories from people who have overcome their eating disorders, and links to other worthwhile websites., , CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 509

Page 547 :
syndromes: anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Although most people don’t seem to take eating disorders, as seriously as other types of psychological disorders,, you will see that they can be dangerous and debilitating, (Striegel-Moore & Smolak, 2001)., , Anorexia Nervosa, Anorexia nervosa involves intense fear of gaining, weight, disturbed body image, refusal to maintain, normal weight, and dangerous measures to lose, weight. Two subtypes have been distinguished (Herzog & Delinsky, 2001). In restricting type anorexia nervosa, people drastically reduce their intake of food,, sometimes literally starving themselves. In binge-eating/, purging type anorexia nervosa, victims attempt to lose, weight by forcing themselves to vomit after meals, by, misusing laxatives and diuretics, and by engaging in, excessive exercise., Both types entail a disturbed body image. No matter how frail and emaciated the victims become, they, insist that they are too fat. Their morbid fear of obesity means that they are never satisfied with their, weight. If they gain a pound or two, they panic. The, only thing that makes them happy is to lose more, weight. The common result is a relentless decline in, body weight—in fact, patients entering treatment for, anorexia nervosa are typically 25–30 percent below, their normal weight (Hsu, 1990). Because of their disturbed body image, people suffering from anorexia, generally do not appreciate the maladaptive quality of, their behavior and rarely seek treatment on their own., They are typically coaxed or coerced into treatment by, friends or family members who are alarmed by their, appearance., Anorexia nervosa eventually leads to a cascade of, medical problems, including amenorrhea (a loss of, menstrual cycles in women), gastrointestinal problems, low blood pressure, osteoporosis (a loss of bone, density), and metabolic disturbances that can lead to, cardiac arrest or circulatory collapse (Herzog & Becker,, 1999; Pomeroy & Mitchell, 2002). Anorexia is a debilitating illness that leads to death in 5–10 percent of patients (Steinhausen, 2002)., , Bulimia Nervosa, Bulimia nervosa involves habitually engaging in outof-control overeating followed by unhealthy compensatory efforts, such as self-induced vomiting, fasting,, abuse of laxatives and diuretics, and excessive exercise., The eating binges are usually carried out in secret and, are followed by intense guilt and concern about gaining, weight. These feelings motivate ill-advised strategies to, , 510, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , undo the effects of the overeating. However, vomiting, prevents the absorption of only about half of recently, consumed food, and laxatives and diuretics have negligible impact on caloric intake, so people suffering from, bulimia nervosa typically maintain a reasonably normal, weight (Beumont, 2002; Kaye et al., 1993)., Medical problems associated with bulimia nervosa, include cardiac arrythmias, dental problems, metabolic deficiencies and gastrointestinal problems (Halmi,, 2002, 2003). Bulimia often coexists with other psychological disturbances, including depression, anxiety disorders, and substance abuse (P. Cooper, 1995; Wilson,, 1993)., Obviously, bulimia nervosa shares many features, with anorexia nervosa, such as a morbid fear of becoming obese, preoccupation with food, and rigid,, maladaptive approaches to controlling weight that are, grounded in naive all-or-none thinking. However, the, syndromes also differ in crucial ways. First and foremost, bulimia is a less life-threatening condition. Second, although their weight and appearance usually is, more “normal” than that seen in anorexia, people with, bulimia are much more likely to recognize that their, eating behavior is pathological and are more prone to, cooperate with treatment (Striegel-Moore, Silberstein,, & Rodin, 1993)., , History and Prevalence, Historians have been able to track down descriptions, of anorexia nervosa that date back centuries, so the, disorder is not entirely new, but anorexia nervosa did, not become a common affliction until the middle of, the 20th century (Russell, 1995). Although binging and, purging have a long history in some cultures, they were, not part of a pathological effort to control weight, and, bulimia nervosa appears to be an entirely new syndrome that emerged gradually in the middle of the, 20th century and was first recognized in the 1970s, (Parry-Jones & Parry-Jones, 1995; Russell, 1997)., Both disorders are a product of modern, affluent, Western culture, where food is generally plentiful and, the desirability of being thin is widely endorsed. Until, recently, these problems were not seen outside of Western cultures (Hoek, 2002). However, in recent years,, advances in communication have exported Western, culture to farflung corners of the globe, and eating disorders have started showing up in many non-Western, societies, especially affluent Asian countries (Lee &, Katzman, 2002)., A huge gender gap exists in the likelihood of developing eating disorders. About 90–95 percent of individuals with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa are female (Hoek, 2002). This staggering discrepancy appears

Page 548 :
to be a result of cultural pressures rather than biological, factors (Smolak & Murnen, 2001). Western standards of, attractiveness emphasize being slender more for females, than for males, and women generally experience heavier pressure to be physically attractive than men do, (Sobal, 1995). The prevalence of eating disorders is also, elevated in certain groups that place an undue emphasis, on thinness, such as fashion models, dancers, actresses,, and athletes. Eating disorders mostly afflict young, women. The typical age of onset for anorexia is 14–18,, and for bulimia it is 15–21 (see Figure 15.19)., How common are eating disorders in Western societies? The prevalence of these disorders has increased, dramatically in recent decades, although this escalation may be leveling off (Steiger & Seguin, 1999). Studies of young women suggest that about 1.0–1.5 percent, develop anorexia nervosa (Walters & Kendler, 1995),, and about 2–3 percent develop bulimia nervosa (Romano & Quinn, 2001). Although these figures may, seem small, they mean that millions of young women, are wrestling with serious eating problems., , Etiology of Eating Disorders, Like other types of psychological disorders, eating disorders are caused by multiple determinants that work, interactively. Figure 15.20 on the next page provides, an overview of the factors that contribute to the emergence of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa., , 45, 40, 35, , Cases (%), , 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, +, 45, , 4, –4, , 9, 40, , –3, , 4, 35, , –3, , 9, 30, , –2, , 4, 25, , –2, , 9, 20, , –1, 15, , 10, , –1, , 4, , 0, Age of onset, , •, , F I G U R E 15. 19, , Age of onset for anorexia nervosa. Eating disorders emerge, primarily during adolescence, as these data for anorexia nervosa, show. This graph shows how age of onset was distributed in a, sample of 166 female patients from Minnesota. As you can see,, over half experienced the onset of their illness before the age, of 20, with vulnerability clearly peaking between the ages of, 15 and 19. (Data from Lucas, et al., 1991), , Genetic Vulnerability, , The scientific evidence is not nearly as strong or complete for eating disorders as it is for many other types, of psychopathology (such as anxiety, mood, and schizophrenic disorders), but some people may inherit a genetic vulnerability to these problems. Studies show, that relatives of patients with eating disorders have elevated rates of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, (Bulik, 2004). And studies of female twins report, higher concordance rates for identical twins than fraternal twins, suggesting that a genetic predisposition, may be at work (Steiger, Bruce, & Israël, 2003)., Personality Factors, , Strober (1995) has suggested that genetic factors may, exert their influence indirectly by fostering certain personality traits that make people more vulnerable to, eating disorders. Although there are innumerable exceptions, victims of anorexia nervosa tend to be obsessive, rigid, neurotic, and emotionally restrained,, whereas victims of bulimia nervosa tend to be impulsive, overly sensitive, and low in self-esteem (Wonderlich, 2002). Recent research also suggests that perfectionism is a risk factor for anorexia (Halmi et al.,, , 2000). Most of these personality traits are influenced, by genetics, making Strober’s hypothesis plausible., Nonetheless, personality-based explanations of eating, disorders remain speculative., Cultural Values, , The contribution of cultural values to the increased, prevalence of eating disorders can hardly be overestimated (Anderson-Fye & Becker, 2004; Stice, 2001). In, Western society, young women are socialized to believe, that they must be attractive, and to be attractive, they, must be as thin as the actresses and fashion models, that dominate the media (Levine & Harrison, 2004)., As Figure 15.21 on page 513 shows, the increased premium on being thin is reflected in statistics on Miss, America contestants and Playboy centerfolds, whose, average weight declined gradually between 1959 and, 1988 (Garner et al., 1980; Wiseman et al., 1992)., Thanks to this cultural milieu, many young women are, dissatisfied with their weight because the societal ideals, promoted by the media are unattainable for most of, them (Thompson & Stice, 2001). Unfortunately, in a, small portion of these women, the pressure to be thin,, , CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 511

Page 549 :
Psychological, influences, • Intense fear of, gaining weight, • Distorted, thinking and, body image, , Social influences, • Cultural pressures, to be thin, • Maladaptive, family, dynamics, , Biological influences, • Genetic predisposition, • Perhaps mediated by, heritable personality traits, , ”Normal” dieting, , BULIMIA, , ANOREXIA, , Binge, , or, , Continued, restriction, , Purge, , •, , Binge eating, , Purge, , Reduced anxiety, , Reduced anxiety, , Excessive weight loss, , Retain weight, , FIG U R E 15.20, , The etiology of eating disorders. The causes of eating disorders are complex and multifaceted. Psychological, biological, and social factors often lead people into “normal” dieting, which sometimes, spins out of control. Maladaptive weight control efforts temporarily relieve individuals’ pathological fear, of gaining weight, but this reduced anxiety has a tremendous cost, as anorexia nervosa and bulimia, nervosa are dangerous illnesses., Graphic adapted from Barlow. D. H., & Durand, V. M. (1999). Abnormal psychology: An integrative approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Copyright ©, 1999 Wadsworth Publishing. Reprinted by permission., , in combination with genetic vulnerability, family, pathology, and other factors, leads to unhealthy efforts, to control weight., The Role of the Family, , Many theorists emphasize how family dynamics can, contribute to the development of anorexia nervosa, and bulimia nervosa in young women (HaworthHoeppner, 2000). Some theorists suggest that parents, who are overly involved in their children’s lives turn, the normal adolescent push for independence into an, unhealthy struggle (Minuchin, Rosman, & Baker, 1978)., Needing to assert their autonomy, some adolescent, , 512, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , girls seek extreme control over their bodies, leading to, pathological patterns of eating (Bruch, 1978). Other, theorists argue that parents of adolescents with eating, disorders tend to define their children’s needs for them, instead of allowing them to define their own needs,, thus making the youngsters insensitive to their internal needs (Bruch, 1973; Steiner et al., 1991). In contrast, Pike and Rodin (1991) maintain that some, mothers contribute to eating disorders simply by endorsing society’s message that “you can never be too, thin” and by modeling unhealthy dieting behaviors of, their own. Although the hypotheses about the role of, family dynamics in eating pathology are speculative, it

Page 550 :
92, 91, , Percentage of expected weight, , 90, 89, 88, , Playboy, , 87, Miss America, , 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 1959, , •, , 1961, , 1963, , 1965, , 1967, , 1969, , 1971, , 1973 1975, Year, , 1977, , 1979, , 1981, , 1983, , 1985, , 1987, , 1989, , F I G U R E 15.21, , Weight trends among Playboy centerfolds and Miss America contestants. This graph charts how the, average weight of Playboy centerfolds and Miss America contestants changed over the course of 30, years (from 1959 to 1989). To control for age and height, each woman’s weight was compared to the, average weight for a woman of that age and height and expressed as a percentage of the expected, weight. Given the small samples, the figures are a little erratic, but overall, the data show a clear downward trend. (Data from Garner et al., 1980; Wiseman et al., 1992), Graphic adapted from Barlow. D. H., & Durand, V. M. (1999). Abnormal psychology: An integrative approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Copyright ©, 1999 Wadsworth Publishing. Reprinted by permission., , does appear that families can contribute to eating disorders in a variety of ways., Cognitive Factors, , Many theorists emphasize the role of disturbed thinking in the etiology of eating disorders (Williamson et, al., 2001). For example, anorexic patients’ typical belief, that they are fat when they are really wasting away is a, dramatic illustration of how thinking goes awry. Patients with eating disorders display rigid, all-or-none, thinking and many maladaptive beliefs, such as “I must, be thin to be accepted,” “If I am not in complete control, I will lose all control,” and “If I gain one pound, I’ll, go on to gain enormous weight.” Additional research is, needed to determine whether distorted thinking is a, cause or merely a symptom of eating disorders., , Course and Outcome, Virtually all of the psychotherapies that we will discuss, in the next chapter—such as insight therapy, group, therapy, behavior therapy, and drug therapy—have, been used in the treatment of eating disorders (Halmi,, 2000). How successful are these therapeutic interventions? The picture is mixed. About 40–50 percent of patients experience a full recovery, while treatment is, largely a failure for about 20–25 percent of patients, (Steinhausen, 2002). The remaining patients fall somewhere in between, experiencing modest improvement, along with continued struggles. The prognosis is somewhat better for bulimia nervosa than for anorexia; bulimia has a recovery rate of about 70 percent (Sullivan,, 2002)., , CHAPTER 15, , Psychological Disorders, , 513

Page 551 :
KEY IDEAS, , CHAPTER 15 REVIEW, , Abnormal Behavior: Myths and Realities, ■, , The medical model assumes that it is useful to view abnormal behavior as a disease. There are serious problems with the, medical model, but the disease analogy is useful if you keep in, mind that it is only an analogy. Three criteria are used in deciding whether people suffer from psychological disorders: deviance, personal distress, and maladaptive behavior. Often, it is, difficult to draw a clear line between normality and abnormality., ■ DSM-IV is the official psychodiagnostic classification system in the United States. This system asks for information about, patients on five axes. Psychological disorders are more common, than widely believed, with a lifetime prevalence of roughly 44, percent., Anxiety Disorders, ■, , The anxiety disorders include generalized anxiety disorder,, phobic disorder, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). These disorders have been linked to genetic predisposition, temperament, anxiety sensitivity, and neurochemical abnormalities in the brain., ■ Many anxiety responses, especially phobias, may be caused, by classical conditioning and maintained by operant conditioning. Cognitive theorists maintain that some people are vulnerable to anxiety disorders because they see threat everywhere., Stress may also contribute to the onset of these disorders., , ophrenia to disruptions of normal maturational processes, in the brain before or at birth. Patients who return to homes, high in expressed emotion tend to have elevated relapse rates., Precipitating stress may also contribute to the emergence of, schizophrenia., Psychological Disorders and the Law, ■, , Insanity is a legal concept applied to people who cannot be, held responsible for their actions because of mental illness., When people appear to be dangerous to themselves or others,, courts may rule that they are subject to involuntary commitment in a hospital., , Application: Understanding Eating Disorders, ■, , The principal eating disorders are anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Both reflect a morbid fear of gaining weight., Anorexia and bulimia are both associated with other psychopathology, and both lead to a cascade of medical problems., Eating disorders appear to be a product of modern, affluent,, Westernized culture., ■ Females account for 90–95 percent of eating disorders. The, typical age of onset is roughly 15 to 20. There appears to be a, genetic vulnerability to eating disorders, which may be mediated by heritable personality traits. Cultural pressures on young, women to be thin clearly help foster eating disorders. Some theorists emphasize how family dynamics and disturbed thinking, can contribute to the development of eating disorders., , KEY TERMS, , Somatoform Disorders, ■, , Somatoform disorders include somatization disorder, conversion disorder, and hypochondriasis. These disorders often, emerge in people with highly suggestible, histrionic personalities, who think irrationally about their health. Somatoform disorders may be learned avoidance strategies reinforced by attention and sympathy., , Dissociative Disorders, ■, , Dissociative disorders include dissociative amnesia, dissociative fugue, and dissociative identity disorder (DID). These, disorders appear to be uncommon, although there is some controversy about the prevalence of DID. Stress and childhood, trauma may contribute to DID, but overall, the causes of dissociative disorders are not well understood., , Mood Disorders, ■, , The principal mood disorders are major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. People vary in their genetic vulnerability, to mood disorders, which are accompanied by changes in neurochemical activity in the brain., ■ Cognitive models posit that a pessimistic explanatory style,, rumination, and other types of negative thinking contribute to, depression. Depression is often rooted in interpersonal inadequacies, as people who lack social finesse often have difficulty, acquiring life’s reinforcers. Mood disorders are sometimes stress, related., Schizophrenic Disorders, ■, , Schizophrenic disorders are characterized by deterioration, of adaptive behavior, irrational thought, distorted perception,, and disturbed mood. Schizophrenic disorders are classified as, paranoid, catatonic, disorganized, or undifferentiated. The distinction between positive and negative symptoms has proven, useful, but it has not yielded an effective new classification, scheme., ■ Research has linked schizophrenia to genetic vulnerability,, changes in neurotransmitter activity, and enlarged ventricles in, the brain. The neurodevelopmental hypothesis attributes schiz-, , 514, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , Agoraphobia p. 488, Anorexia nervosa p. 510, Anxiety disorders p. 487, Bipolar disorder p. 498, Bulimia nervosa p. 510, Catatonic schizophrenia, p. 503, Concordance rate p. 499, Conversion disorder p. 492, Delusions p. 503, Diagnosis p. 483, Disorganized schizophrenia, p. 504, Dissociative amnesia p. 494, Dissociative disorders, p. 494, Dissociative fugue p. 494, Dissociative identity disorder, (DID) p. 494, Eating disorders p. 509, Epidemiology p. 485, Etiology p. 483, Generalized anxiety disorder, pp. 487–488, Hallucinations p. 503, Hypochondriasis p. 493, Insanity p. 508, , Involuntary commitment, pp. 508–509, Major depressive disorder, p. 497, Manic-depressive disorder, p. 498, Medical model p. 482, Mood disorders p. 497, Multiple-personality disorder, p. 494, Neurotransmitters p. 490, Obsessive-compulsive, disorder (OCD) p. 489, Panic disorder p. 488, Paranoid schizophrenia, p. 503, Phobic disorder p. 488, Prevalence p. 465, Prognosis p. 483, Schizophrenic disorders, p. 502, Somatization disorder, p. 492, Somatoform disorders, p. 491, Undifferentiated, schizophrenia p. 504, , KEY PEOPLE, Nancy Andreasen p. 504, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, pp. 498, 500, , David Rosenhan, pp. 484–485, Martin Seligman p. 500, Thomas Szasz p. 482

Page 552 :
2. Although Sue always feels high levels of dread, worry,, and anxiety, she still meets her daily responsibilities., Sue’s behavior:, a. should not be considered abnormal, since her adaptive functioning is not impaired., b. should not be considered abnormal, since everyone, sometimes experiences worry and anxiety., c. can still be considered abnormal, since she feels, great personal distress., d. both a and b., 3. Recent epidemiological studies have found that the, most common types of psychological disorders are:, a. mood disorders and anxiety disorders., b. anxiety disorders and schizophrenic disorders., c. substance-use disorders and anxiety disorders., d. substance-use disorders and somatoform disorders., , 9. Kyle, who works as a projectionist at the local theater, is, convinced that everyone is out to get him. He is sure, that his phone is tapped by ruthless enemies. He thinks, that most of the people in the theater each night are, there to spy on him. Worse yet, he is sure people follow, him home from work every night. Kyle is probably, suffering from:, a. paranoid schizophrenia., b. catatonic schizophrenia., c. bipolar disorder., d. dissociative fugue., 10. About ______ percent of patients with eating disorders, are female., a. 40, c. 75, b. 50–60, d. 90–95, , Book Companion Website, , 4. People who repeatedly perform senseless rituals to, overcome their anxiety are said to have a(n):, a. generalized anxiety disorder., b. manic disorder., c. obsessive-compulsive disorder., d. phobic disorder., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , 5. If a person has a paralyzed arm for which no organic, basis can be found, she probably has:, a. a conversion disorder., b. paralytic hypochondriasis., c. a dissociative disorder., d. a schizophrenic disorder., , Personal Explorations Workbook, , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , c, a, c, a, d, , Pages 498–499, Page 499, Page 504, Page 503, Pages 510–511, , CHAPTER 15, , Page 483, Page 483, Pages 485, 487, Pages 489–490, Page 492, , 7. A concordance rate indicates:, a. the percentage of twin pairs or other relatives that, exhibit the same disorder., b. the percentage of people with a given disorder that, are currently receiving treatment., , ANSWERS, , Psychological Disorders, , a, c, c, c, a, , 6. After several months during which he was always, gloomy and dejected, Mario has suddenly perked up., He feels elated and energetic and works around the, clock on a writing project. He has also started to bet, heavily on sporting events over the Internet, which he, never did previously. Mario’s behavior is consistent, with:, a. schizophrenia., b. obsessive-compulsive disorder., c. bipolar disorder., d. dissociative identity disorder., , The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 15.1: Manifest, Anxiety Scale. Personal Probe 15.1: What Are Your Attitudes on Mental Illness? Personal Probe 15.2: Do You Think, That We Are All Candidates for a Disorder?, , 515, , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Sergio has just entered treatment for bipolar disorder, and he is informed that most patients respond to drug, treatment within a month. This information represents:, a. a prognosis., c. a histology., b. an etiology., d. a concordance., , 8. Which of the following would be a negative symptom, of schizophrenia?, a. Auditory hallucinations, b. Delusions of persecution, c. Having virtually no friendships, d. Delusions of grandeur, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , c. the prevalence of a given disorder in the general, population., d. the rate of cure for a given disorder.

Page 553 :
THE ELEMENTS OF THE TREATMENT, PROCESS, Treatments: How Many Types Are There?, Clients: Who Seeks Therapy?, Therapists: Who Provides Professional, Treatment?, , BEHAVIOR THERAPIES, General Principles, Systematic Desensitization, Aversion Therapy, Social Skills Training, Evaluating Behavior Therapies, , INSIGHT THERAPIES, Psychoanalysis, Client-Centered Therapy, Cognitive Therapy, Group Therapy, Evaluating Insight Therapies, Therapy and the Recovered Memories, Controversy, , BIOMEDICAL THERAPIES, Treatment with Drugs, Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), , 516, , CURRENT TRENDS AND ISSUES IN, TREATMENT, Grappling with the Constraints of, Managed Care, Blending Approaches to Treatment, Increasing Multicultural Sensitivity in, Treatment, , APPLICATION: LOOKING FOR A, THERAPIST, When Should You Seek Professional, Treatment?, Where Do You Find Therapeutic Services?, Is the Therapist’s Profession Important?, Is the Therapist’s Gender Important?, Is Therapy Always Expensive?, Is the Therapist’s Theoretical Approach, Important?, What If There Isn’t Any Progress?, What Is Therapy Like?, CHAPTER 16 REVIEW, PRACTICE TEST

Page 554 :
CHAPTER, , 16, , Psychotherapy, , What do you picture when you hear the term psychotherapy? If you’re like, most people, you probably envision a troubled patient lying on a couch in a, therapist’s office, with the therapist asking penetrating questions and providing sage advice. Typically, people believe that psychotherapy is only for, those who are “sick” and that therapists have special powers that allow, them to “see through” their clients. It is also widely believed that therapy, requires years of deep probing into a client’s innermost secrets. Many people further assume that therapists routinely tell their patients how to lead, their lives. Like most stereotypes, this picture of psychotherapy is a mixture, of fact and fiction, as you’ll see in the upcoming pages., In this chapter, we take a down-to-earth look at the process of psychotherapy, using the term in its broadest sense to refer to all the diverse, approaches to the treatment of psychological problems. We start by discussing some general questions about the provision of treatment. Who seeks, therapy? What kinds of professionals provide treatment? How many types of, therapy are there? After considering these general issues, we examine some, of the more widely used approaches to treating psychological maladies, analyzing their goals, techniques, and effectiveness. The Application at the end, of the chapter focuses on practical issues involved in finding a therapist, in, case you ever have to advise someone about seeking help., , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 517

Page 555 :
The Elements of the Treatment Process, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , Identify the three major categories of therapy., Discuss why people do or do not seek psychotherapy., Describe the various types of mental health professionals involved in, the provision of therapy., , Today people have a bewildering array of psychotherapy approaches to choose from. In fact, the immense, diversity of therapeutic treatments makes defining the, concept of psychotherapy difficult. After organizing a, landmark conference that brought together many of the, world’s leading authorities on psychotherapy, Jeffrey, Zeig (1987) commented, “I do not believe there is any, capsule definition of psychotherapy on which the 26, presenters could agree” (p. xix). In lieu of a definition,, we can identify a few basic elements that the various approaches to treatment have in common. All psychotherapies involve a helping relationship (the treatment), between a professional with special training (the therapist) and another person in need of help (the client). As, we look at each of these three elements, you’ll see the, diverse nature of modern psychotherapy., , Treatments: How Many Types Are, There?, In their efforts to help people, mental health professionals use many methods of treatment, including discussion, emotional support, persuasion, conditioning procedures, relaxation training, role playing, drug, therapy, biofeedback, and group therapy. Some therapists also use a variety of less conventional procedures,, such as rebirthing, poetry therapy, and primal therapy., No one knows exactly how many approaches to treatment there are. One expert (Kazdin, 1994) estimates, that there may be over 400 distinct types of psychotherapy! Fortunately, we can impose some order on, this chaos. As varied as therapists’ procedures are, approaches to treatment can be classified into three, major categories:, 1. Insight therapies. Insight therapy is “talk therapy” in the tradition of Freud’s psychoanalysis. This is, probably the approach to treatment that you envision, when you think of psychotherapy. In insight therapies,, clients engage in complex verbal interactions with, their therapists. The goal in these discussions is to pursue increased insight regarding the nature of the client’s difficulties and to sort through possible solutions., Insight therapy can be conducted with an individual, or with a group., , 518, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , 2. Behavior therapies. Behavior therapies are based, on the principles of learning and conditioning, which, were introduced in Chapter 2. Instead of emphasizing, personal insights, behavior therapists make direct efforts to alter problematic responses (phobic behaviors,, for instance) and maladaptive habits (drug use, for instance). Behavior therapists work on changing clients’, overt behaviors. They use different procedures for different kinds of problems., 3. Biomedical therapies. Biomedical approaches, to therapy involve interventions into a person’s physiological functioning. The most widely used procedures, are drug therapy and electroconvulsive therapy. As the, name biomedical therapies suggests, these treatments, have traditionally been provided only by physicians, with a medical degree (usually psychiatrists). This situation may change, however, as psychologists have, begun to campaign for prescription privileges (Gutierrez & Silk, 1998; Sammons et al., 2000). They have, made some progress toward this goal, even though, many psychologists have argued against pursuing the, right to prescribe medication (Albee, 1998; Dobson &, Dozois, 2001)., , In this chapter we examine approaches to therapy, that fall into each of these three categories. Although, different methods are used in each, the three major, classes of treatment are not entirely incompatible. For, example, a client being seen in insight therapy may, also be given medication., , Clients: Who Seeks Therapy?, In the therapeutic triad (therapists, treatments, clients), the greatest diversity is seen among the clients., According to the 1999 U.S. Surgeon General’s report, on mental health (U.S. Department of Health and, Human Services, 1999), about 15 percent of the U.S., population uses mental health services in a given year., These people bring to therapy the full range of human, problems: anxiety, depression, unsatisfactory interpersonal relations, troublesome habits, poor self-control,, low self-esteem, marital conflicts, self-doubt, a sense of, emptiness, and feelings of personal stagnation. The, two most common presenting problems are excessive

Page 556 :
Demographic, variable, 0, , Medical, insurance, Marital, status, , Rate of use of any outpatient mental health service, (numbers of service users annually per 100 persons), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, , 9, , Uninsured, Insured, Divorced/separated, Married, Single, , Education, , >16 years, 12–16 years, <12 years, , Age, , >65, 50–65, 35–49, 18–34, <18, , Gender, , Females, Males, , •, , F I G U R E 16.1, , Therapy utilization rates. Olfson and Pincus (1996) gathered data on the use of nonhospital, outpatient mental health services in the United States in relation to various demographic variables. As you can see, people are more likely to enter therapy if they have medical insurance, than if they do not. In regard to marital status, utilization rates are particularly high among, those who are divorced or separated. The use of therapy is greater among those who have more, education and, in terms of age, utilization peaks in the 35–49 age bracket. Finally, females are, more likely to pursue therapy than males. (Data from Olfson & Pincus, 1996), , anxiety and depression (Narrow et al., 1993). Interestingly, people often hold off for many years before finally seeking treatment for their psychological problems (Kessler, Olfson, & Berglund, 1998)., A client in treatment does not necessarily have an, identifiable psychological disorder. Some people seek, professional help for everyday problems (career decisions, for instance) or vague feelings of discontent, (Strupp, 1996). One surprising finding in the Surgeon, General’s report was that almost half of the people, who use mental health services in a given year do not, have a specific disorder., People vary considerably in their willingness to, seek psychotherapy. As you can see in Figure 16.1,, women are more likely than men to receive therapy., Treatment is also more likely when people have medical insurance and when they have more education, (Olfson & Pincus, 1996). Unfortunately, it appears that, , many people who need therapy don’t receive it (Kessler et, al., 1999). As Figure 16.2 on the next page shows, only a, portion of the people who need treatment receive it., People who could benefit from therapy do not seek it, for a variety of reasons. Lack of health insurance and, cost concerns appear to be major barriers to obtaining, needed care for many people (Druss & Rosenheck,, 1998). According to the Surgeon General’s report, the, biggest roadblock is the “stigma surrounding the receipt of mental health treatment.” Unfortunately, many, people equate seeking therapy with admitting personal, weakness., , Therapists: Who Provides, Professional Treatment?, Friends and relatives may provide excellent advice, about personal problems, but their assistance does not, , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 519

Page 557 :
Percent of, population (28%), with disorder, (in one year), , Percent of, population (15%), receiving, mental health, services, (in one year), , Other mental, health, specialists, 28.3%, , Psychologists, 35.5%, , Psychiatrists, 26.9%, General medical, professionals, 9.3%, , •, Diagnosis, and, no treatment, (20%), , •, , Diagnosis, and, treatment, (8%), , Treatment, and, no diagnosis, (7%), , FIG U R E 16.2, , Psychological disorders and professional treatment. Not everyone who has a psychological disorder receives professional treatment, and not everyone who seeks treatment has a clear disorder., This graph, from the 1999 Surgeon General’s report on mental, health, shows that 15 percent of the adult population receives, mental health treatment each year. Almost half of these people, (7 percent) did not receive a psychiatric diagnosis, although, some of them probably have milder disorders that are not assessed in epidemiological research. This graph also shows that, over two-thirds of the people who do have disorders do not, receive professional treatment. (Data from Mental Health: A, Report from the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and, Human Services, 1999), , qualify as therapy. Psychotherapy refers to professional, treatment by someone with special training. However,, a common source of confusion about psychotherapy, is the variety of “helping professions” available to offer, assistance. Psychology and psychiatry are the principal, professions involved in psychotherapy, providing the, lion’s share of mental health care (see Figure 16.3)., However, therapy is also provided by social workers,, psychiatric nurses, and counselors, as outlined in Figure 16.4., Psychologists, , Two types of psychologists may provide therapy, although the distinction between them is more theoretical, , 520, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , F I G U R E 16. 3, , Who people see for therapy. Based on a national survery, Olfson, and Pincus (1994) estimated that in 1987 Americans made 79.5, million outpatient psychotherapy visits. Information on the, therapist’s profession was missing for 11 percent of these visits., The pie chart shows how the remaining visits were distributed, among psychologists, psychiatrists, other mental health professionals (social workers, counselors, and such), and general medical professionals (typically physicians specializing in family, practice, internal medicine, or pediatrics). As you can see, psychologists and psychiatrists account for about 62 percent of, outpatient treatment. (Data from Olfson & Pincus, 1994), , than real. Clinical psychologists and counseling psychologists specialize in the diagnosis and treatment of, psychological disorders and everyday behavioral, problems. In theory, the training of clinical psychologists emphasizes treatment of full-fledged disorders,, whereas the training of counseling psychologists is, slanted toward treatment of everyday adjustment problems in normal people. In practice, however, there is, great overlap between clinical and counseling psychologists in training, in skills, and in the clientele they serve., Both types of psychologists must earn a doctoral, degree (Ph.D., Psy.D., or Ed.D.). A doctorate in psy-, , WE B LI N K 16.1, , Online Dictionary of Mental Health, This thematically arranged “dictionary” comprises diverse, links involving many forms of psychotherapy, the treatment of psychological disorders, and general issues of, mental health. It is sponsored by the Centre for, Psychotherapeutic Studies at the University of Sheffield’s, Medical School in the UK.

Page 558 :
Types of Therapists, , •, , Years beyond, bachelor’s degree, , Typical roles, and activities, , Ph.D., Psy.D., Ed.D., , 5–7, , Diagnosis, psychological testing, insight, and behavior therapy, , Psychiatrist, , M.D., , 8, , Diagnosis; insight, behavior, and, biomedical therapy, , Social worker, , M.S.W., , 2, , Insight and behavior therapy, family, therapy, helping patients return to the, community, , Psychiatric nurse, , B.S., B.A., M.A., , 0–2, , Inpatient care, insight and behavior, therapy, , Counselor, , M.A., M.S., , 2, , Insight and behavior therapy, working, primarily with everyday adjustment and, marital and career issues, , Title, , Degree, , Clinical or, counseling, psychologist, , F I G U R E 16.4, , The principal mental health professions. Psychotherapists come from a variety of professional, backgrounds. This chart provides an overview of various types of therapists’ education and typical, professional activities., , chology requires five to seven years of training beyond, a bachelor’s degree. The process of gaining admission, to a Ph.D. program in clinical psychology is highly, competitive (about as competitive as for medical, school). Psychologists receive most of their training on, university campuses, although they also serve a oneto two-year internship in a clinical setting, such as a, hospital., In providing therapy, psychologists use either insight or behavioral approaches. In comparison to psychiatrists, they are more likely to use behavioral techniques and less likely to use psychoanalytic methods., Clinical and counseling psychologists do psychological testing as well as psychotherapy, and many also, conduct research., Psychiatrists, , Psychiatrists are physicians who specialize in the treatment of psychological disorders. Many psychiatrists, also treat everyday behavioral problems. However, in, comparison to psychologists, psychiatrists devote more, time to relatively severe disorders (schizophrenia, mood, disorders) and less time to everyday marital, family, job,, and school problems. Psychiatrists have an M.D. degree., Their graduate training requires four years of course, work in medical school and a four-year apprenticeship, in a residency at an approved hospital. Their psychotherapy training occurs during their residency, since the, required course work in medical school is essentially the, , same for all students, whether they are going into, surgery, pediatrics, or psychiatry., In their provision of therapy, psychiatrists increasingly emphasize drug therapies (Olfson, Marcus, & Pincus, 1999), which the other, nonmedical helping professions cannot provide. In comparison to psychologists,, psychiatrists are more likely to use psychoanalysis and, less likely to use group therapies or behavior therapies., Other Mental Health Professionals, , Several other mental health professions provide psychotherapy services. In hospitals and other institutions, psychiatric social workers and psychiatric nurses, often work as part of a treatment team with a psychologist or psychiatrist. Psychiatric nurses, who may have, a bachelor’s or master’s degree in their field, play a, large role in hospital inpatient treatment. Psychiatric, social workers generally have a master’s degree and, typically work with patients and their families to ease, the patient’s integration back into the community. Although social workers have traditionally worked in, hospitals and social service agencies, many are licensed, as independent, private practitioners who provide a, wide range of therapeutic services., Many kinds of counselors also provide therapeutic, services. Counselors are usually found working in, schools, colleges, and human service agencies (youth, centers, geriatric centers, family planning centers, and, so forth). Counselors typically have a master’s degree., , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 521

Page 559 :
They often specialize in particular types of problems,, such as vocational counseling, marital counseling, rehabilitation counseling, and drug counseling., Although clear differences exist among the helping professions in education and training, their roles, in the treatment process overlap considerably. In this, chapter, we refer to psychologists or psychiatrists as, needed, but otherwise we use the terms clinician, ther-, , apist, and mental health professional to refer to psychotherapists of all kinds, regardless of their professional degree., Now that we have discussed the basic elements in, psychotherapy, we can examine specific approaches to, treatment in terms of their goals, procedures, and effectiveness. We begin with a few representative insight, therapies., , Insight Therapies, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, ■, , Explain the logic of psychoanalysis and describe the, techniques used to probe the unconscious., Discuss interpretation, resistance, and transference, in psychoanalysis., Explain the logic of client-centered therapy., Describe therapeutic climate and process in clientcentered therapy., , ■, , ■, ■, ■, ■, , Many schools of thought exist as to how to do insight, therapy. Therapists with different theoretical orientations use different methods to pursue different kinds of, insights. What these varied approaches have in common is that insight therapies involve verbal interactions intended to enhance clients’ self-knowledge and, thus promote healthful changes in personality and, behavior. Although there may be hundreds of insight, therapies, the leading eight or ten approaches appear to, account for the lion’s share of treatment. In this section, we delve into psychoanalysis, client-centered therapy, and cognitive therapy. We also discuss how insight, therapy can be done with groups as well as individuals., , Freud’s thinking about the roots of mental disorders., Freud treated mostly anxiety-dominated disturbances,, such as phobic, panic, obsessive-compulsive, and conversion disorders, which were then called neuroses. He, believed that neurotic problems are caused by unconscious conflicts left over from early childhood. As explained in Chapter 2, he thought that these inner conflicts involve battles among the id, ego, and superego,, usually over sexual and aggressive impulses. Freud theorized that people depend on defense mechanisms to, avoid confronting these conflicts, which remain hidden in the depths of the unconscious. However, he, noted that defensive maneuvers often lead to self-defeating behavior. Furthermore, he asserted that defenses tend to be only partially successful in alleviating, anxiety, guilt, and other distressing emotions. With, this model in mind, let’s take a look at the therapeutic, procedures used in psychoanalysis., , 522, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , National Library of Medicine, , Psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud worked as a psychotherapist for almost 50 years in Vienna. Through a painstaking process of trial and error, he developed, innovative techniques for the treatment of psychological disorders, and distress. His system of psychoanalysis came to dominate psychiatry for many decades. Although the, Sigmund Freud, dominance of psychoanalysis has, eroded in recent decades, a diverse, array of psychoanalytic approaches to therapy continue, to evolve and to remain influential today (McWilliams, & Weinberger, 2003; Ursano & Silberman, 2003)., Psychoanalysis is an insight therapy that emphasizes the recovery of unconscious conflicts, motives,, and defenses through techniques such as free association, dream analysis, and transference. To appreciate the logic of psychoanalysis, we have to look at, , Discuss the logic, goals, and techniques of cognitive, therapy., Describe how group therapy is generally conducted., Identify some advantages of group therapy., Summarize evidence on the efficacy of insight therapies., Summarize both sides of the recovered memories, controversy., , Probing the Unconscious, , Given Freud’s assumptions, we can see that the logic, of psychoanalysis is very simple. The analyst attempts, to probe the murky depths of the unconscious to discover the unresolved conflicts causing the client’s neurotic behavior. In a sense, the analyst functions as a, psychological detective. In this effort to explore the unconscious, he or she relies on two techniques: free association and dream analysis., In free association, clients spontaneously express, their thoughts and feelings exactly as they occur, with, as little censorship as possible. Clients lie on a couch, so they will be better able to let their minds drift freely., In free associating, clients expound on anything that, comes to mind, regardless of how trivial, silly, or embarrassing it might be. Gradually, most clients begin to

Page 560 :
© Bruce Ayres/Stone/Getty Images, , In psychoanalysis, the therapist encourages the client to reveal, thoughts, feelings, dreams, and memories that can then be, interpreted in relation to the client’s current problems., , let everything pour out without conscious censorship., The analyst studies these free associations for clues, about what is going on in the unconscious., In dream analysis, the therapist interprets the, symbolic meaning of the client’s dreams. For Freud,, dreams were the “royal road to the unconscious,” the, most direct means of access to patients’ innermost, conflicts, wishes, and impulses. Clients are encouraged, and trained to remember their dreams, which they describe in therapy. The therapist then analyzes the symbolism in these dreams to interpret their meaning., To better illustrate these matters, let’s look at an actual case treated through psychoanalysis (adapted from, Greenson, 1967, pp. 40–41). Mr. N was troubled by an, unsatisfactory marriage. He claimed to love his wife,, but he preferred sexual relations with prostitutes. Mr., N reported that his parents also endured lifelong marital difficulties. His childhood conflicts about their relationship appeared to be related to his problems. Both, dream analysis and free association can be seen in the, following description of a session in Mr. N’s treatment:, Mr. N reports a fragment of a dream. All that he can remember is that he is waiting for a red traffic light to, change when he feels that someone has bumped into him, from behind. . . . The associations led to Mr. N’s love of, cars, especially sports cars. He loved the sensation, in particular, of whizzing by those fat, old, expensive cars. . . ., His father always hinted that he had been a great athlete, but he never substantiated it. . . . Mr. N doubted, whether his father could really perform. His father would, flirt with a waitress in a cafe or make sexual remarks, about women passing by, but he seemed to be showing, off. If he were really sexual, he wouldn’t resort to that., , As is characteristic of free association, Mr. N’s, train of thought meanders about with little direction., Nonetheless, clues about his unconscious conflicts are, apparent. What did Mr. N’s therapist extract from this, session? The therapist saw sexual overtones in the, dream fragment, where Mr. N was bumped from behind. The therapist also inferred that Mr. N had a competitive orientation toward his father, based on the free, association about whizzing by fat, old, expensive cars., As you can see, analysts must interpret their clients’, dreams and free associations. This is a critical process, throughout psychoanalysis., Interpretation, , Interpretation involves the therapist’s attempts to explain the inner significance of the client’s thoughts,, feelings, memories, and behaviors. Contrary to popular belief, analysts do not interpret everything, and, they generally don’t try to dazzle clients with startling, revelations. Instead, analysts move forward inch by, inch, offering interpretations that should be just out of, the client’s own reach. Mr. N’s therapist eventually offered the following interpretations to his client:, I said to Mr. N near the end of the hour that I felt he was, struggling with his feelings about his father’s sexual life., He seemed to be saying that his father was sexually not a, very potent man. . . . He also recalls that he once found a, packet of condoms under his father’s pillow when he was, an adolescent and he thought “My father must be going, to prostitutes.” I then intervened and pointed out that, the condoms under his father’s pillow seemed to indicate, more obviously that his father used the condoms with his, mother, who slept in the same bed. However, Mr. N, wanted to believe his wish-fulfilling fantasy: mother, doesn’t want sex with father and father is not very potent. The patient was silent and the hour ended., As you may already have guessed, the therapist has, concluded that Mr. N’s difficulties are rooted in an, Oedipal complex (see Chapter 2). Mr. N has unresolved sexual feelings toward his mother and hostile, feelings about his father. These unconscious conflicts,, which are rooted in his childhood, are distorting his, intimate relations as an adult., , WE B LI N K 16.2, , The American Psychoanalytic Association, The site for this professional organization provides a great, deal of useful information about psychoanalytic approaches, to treatment. The resources include news releases, background information on psychoanalysis, an engine for literature searches, and a bookstore., , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 523

Page 561 :
How would you expect Mr. N to respond to his therapist’s suggestion that he was in competition with his, father for the sexual attention of his mother? Obviously, most clients would have great difficulty accepting such an interpretation. Freud fully expected clients, to display some resistance to therapeutic efforts. Resistance involves largely unconscious defensive maneuvers intended to hinder the progress of therapy. Why, do clients try to resist the helping process? Because, they don’t want to face up to the painful, disturbing, conflicts that they have buried in their unconscious., Although they have sought help, they are reluctant to, confront their real problems., Resistance may take many forms. Patients may, show up late for their sessions, merely pretend to engage in free association, or express hostility toward the, therapist. For instance, Mr. N’s therapist noted that, after the session just described, “The next day he began, by telling me that he was furious with me.” Analysts, use a variety of strategies to deal with their clients’ resistance. Often, a key consideration is the handling of, transference, which we consider next., Transference, , Transference occurs when clients start relating to, their therapists in ways that mimic critical relationships in their lives. Thus, a client might start relating, to a therapist as if the therapist were an overprotective, mother, rejecting brother, or passive spouse. In a sense,, the client transfers conflicting feelings about important people onto the therapist. For instance, in his, treatment, Mr. N transferred some of the competitive, hostility he felt toward his father onto his analyst., Psychoanalysts often encourage transference such, that clients begin to reenact relations with crucial people in the context of therapy. These reenactments can, help bring repressed feelings and conflicts to the surface, allowing the client to work through them. The, therapist’s handling of transference is complicated and, difficult because transference may arouse confusing,, highly charged emotions in the client., Undergoing psychoanalysis is not easy. It can be a, slow, painful process of self-examination that routinely, requires three to five years of hard work. Ultimately, if, resistance and transference can be handled effectively,, the therapist’s interpretations should lead the client to, profound insights. For instance, Mr. N eventually admitted, “The old boy is probably right, it does tickle me, to imagine that my mother preferred me and I could, beat out my father. Later, I wondered whether this had, something to do with my own screwed-up sex life with, my wife.” According to Freud, once clients recognize, the unconscious sources of their conflicts, they can resolve these conflicts and discard their neurotic defenses., , 524, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , Although still available, classical psychoanalysis as, done by Freud is not widely practiced anymore (Kay &, Kay, 2003). Freud’s psychoanalytic method was geared, to a particular kind of clientele that he was seeing in, Vienna many years ago. As his followers fanned out, across Europe and America, many found that it was, necessary to adapt psychoanalysis to different cultures,, changing times, and new kinds of patients. Thus, many, variations on Freud’s original approach to psychoanalysis have developed over the years. These descendants of psychoanalysis are collectively known as psychodynamic approaches to therapy., , Client-Centered Therapy, You may have heard of people going, into therapy to “find themselves” or, to “get in touch with their real feelings.” These now-popular phrases, emerged out of the human potential movement, which was stimulated in part by the work of Carl, Rogers (1951, 1986). Taking a huCarl Rogers, manistic perspective, Rogers devised, client-centered therapy (also known, as person-centered therapy) in the, 1940s and 1950s., Client-centered therapy is an insight therapy that, emphasizes providing a supportive emotional climate for clients, who play a major role in determining the pace and direction of their therapy. You may, wonder why the troubled, untrained client is put in, charge of the pace and direction of the therapy. Rogers, (1961) provides a compelling justification:, It is the client who knows what hurts, what directions to, go, what problems are crucial, what experiences have, been deeply buried. It began to occur to me that unless I, had a need to demonstrate my own cleverness and learning, I would do better to rely upon the client for the direction of movement in the process. (pp. 11–12), Rogers’s theory about the principal causes of neurotic anxieties is quite different from the Freudian explanation. As discussed in Chapter 2, Rogers maintained, that most personal distress is due to inconsistency, or, “incongruence,” between a person’s self-concept and, reality (see Figure 16.5). According to his theory, incongruence makes people prone to feel threatened by, realistic feedback about themselves from others. For example, if you inaccurately viewed yourself as a hardworking, dependable person, you would feel threatened, by contradictory feedback from friends or co-workers., According to Rogers, anxiety about such feedback often, leads to reliance on defense mechanisms, distortions of, , Courtesy, Carl Rogers Memorial Library, , Resistance

Page 562 :
Believe affection, from others is, conditional, , Need to distort, shortcomings to feel, worthy of affection, , Relatively, incongruent, self-concept, , Recurrent, anxiety, , Defensive behavior, protects inaccurate, self-concept, , •, , F I G U R E 16.5, , Rogers’s view of the roots of disorders. Carl Rogers’s theory posits that anxiety and self-defeating, behavior are rooted in an incongruent self-concept that makes one prone to recurrent anxiety, which, triggers defensive behavior, which fuels more incongruence., , reality, and stifled personal growth. Excessive incongruence is thought to be rooted in clients’ overdependence, on others for approval and acceptance., Given Rogers’s theory, client-centered therapists, seek insights that are quite different from the repressed, conflicts that psychoanalysts try to track down. Clientcentered therapists help clients to realize that they do, not have to worry constantly about pleasing others and, winning acceptance. They encourage clients to respect, their own feelings and values. They help people restructure their self-concept to correspond better to reality. Ultimately, they try to foster self-acceptance and, personal growth., , A therapist can disapprove of a particular behavior, while continuing to value the client as a human being., 3. Empathy. Finally, the therapist must provide, accurate empathy for the client. This means that the, therapist must understand the client’s world from the, client’s point of view. Furthermore, the therapist must, be articulate enough to communicate this understanding to the client., Rogers firmly believed that a supportive emotional, climate was the major force promoting healthy changes, in therapy. However, some client-centered therapists, have begun to place more emphasis on therapeutic, process (Rice & Greenberg, 1992)., , Therapeutic Climate, , In client-centered therapy, the process of therapy is not, as important as the emotional climate in which the, therapy takes place. According to Rogers, it is critical, for the therapist to provide a warm, supportive, accepting climate in which clients can confront their shortcomings without feeling threatened. The lack of threat, should reduce clients’ defensive tendencies and thus, help them to open up. To create this atmosphere of, emotional support, Rogers believed that client-centered, therapists must provide three conditions:, 1. Genuineness. The therapist must be genuine, with the client, communicating in an honest and spontaneous manner. The therapist should not be phony or, defensive., 2. Unconditional positive regard. The therapist, must also show complete, nonjudgmental acceptance, of the client as a person. The therapist should provide, warmth and caring for the client with no strings attached. This mandate does not mean that the therapist, has to approve of everything that the client says or does., , Therapeutic Process, , In client-centered therapy, the client and therapist, work together almost as equals. The therapist provides, relatively little guidance and keeps interpretation and, advice to a minimum. So, just what does the clientcentered therapist do, besides creating a supportive climate? Primarily, the therapist provides feedback to, help clients sort out their feelings. The therapist’s key, task is clarification. Client-centered therapists try to, function like a human mirror, reflecting statements, back to their clients, but with enhanced clarity. They, help clients become more aware of their true feelings, by highlighting themes that may be obscure in the, clients’ rambling discourse., By working with clients to clarify their feelings,, client-centered therapists hope to gradually build toward more far-reaching insights. In particular, they try, to help clients become more aware of and comfortable about their genuine selves. Obviously, these are, ambitious goals. Client-centered therapy resembles, psychoanalysis in that both seek to achieve a major, , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 525

Page 563 :
reconstruction of a client’s personality. More limited, and specific goals are found in cognitive therapy,, which we consider next., , (3) make unduly pessimistic projections about the future, and (4) draw negative conclusions about their, worth as persons based on insignificant events. For instance, imagine that you earned a poor score on a, minor quiz in a class. If you made the four kinds of errors in thinking just described, you might blame the, score on your woeful stupidity, dismiss comments from, a classmate that it was an unfair test, hysterically predict that you will surely flunk the course, and conclude, that you are not genuine college material., , In Chapter 3 we saw that people’s, cognitive interpretations of events, make all the difference in the world, in how well they handle stress. In, Chapter 15 we learned that cognitive factors play a key role in the development of depressive disorders., Citing the importance of findings, such as these, two former psychoAaron Beck, analysts—Aaron Beck (1976, 1987), and Albert Ellis (1973, 1989)—independently devised cognitive-oriented therapies that, became highly influential (Arnkoff & Glass, 1992)., Since we covered the main ideas underlying Ellis’s rational-emotive behavior therapy in our discussion of, coping strategies in Chapter 4, we focus on Beck’s system of cognitive therapy here. Cognitive therapy is a, treatment that emphasizes recognizing and changing, negative thoughts and maladaptive beliefs., In recent years cognitive therapy has been applied, fruitfully to a wide range of disorders (Beck, 1991; Rush, & Beck, 2000), but it was originally devised as a treatment for depression. According to Beck, depression is, caused by “errors” in thinking (see Figure 16.6). He asserts that depression-prone people tend to (1) blame, their setbacks on personal inadequacies without considering circumstantial explanations, (2) focus selectively on negative events while ignoring positive ones,, , •, , FIG U R E 16.6, , Adapted from Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive, therapy and the emotional disorders. New, York: International Universities Press. Copyright © 1976 by International Universities, Press, Inc. Adapted by permission of the, publisher., , PART 4, , Goals and Techniques, , The goal of cognitive therapy is to change the way, clients think. To begin, clients are taught to detect their, automatic negative thoughts. These are self-defeating, statements that people are prone to make when analyzing problems. Examples might include “I’m just not, smart enough,” “No one really likes me,” and “It’s all, my fault.” Clients are then trained to subject these automatic thoughts to reality testing. The therapist helps, them see how unrealistically negative the thoughts are., The therapist’s goal is not to promote unwarranted optimism but rather to help the client use more, reasonable standards of evaluation. For example, a, cognitive therapist might point out that a client’s failure to get a desired promotion at work may be attributable to many factors and that this setback doesn’t, mean that the client is incompetent. Gradually, the, therapist digs deeper, looking for the unrealistic assumptions that underlie clients’ constant negative, thinking. These, too, have to be changed., Unlike client-centered therapists, cognitive therapists are actively involved in determining the pace and, direction of treatment. They usually talk extensively in, , Cognitive Errors That Promote Depression, , Beck’s cognitive theory of, depression. According to Aaron, Beck (1976, 1987), depression, is caused by certain patterns of, negative thinking. This chart, lists some of the particularly, damaging cognitive errors that, can foster depression., , 526, , Courtesy, Aaron T. Beck, , Cognitive Therapy, , Cognitive error, , Description, , Overgeneralizing, , If it is true in one case, it applies to any case that is even slightly, similar., , Selective abstraction, , The only events that matter are failures, deprivation, and so on., I should measure myself by errors, weaknesses, etc., , Excessive responsibility, (assuming personal causality), , I am responsible for all bad things, failures, and so on., , Assuming temporal causality, (predicting without sufficient, evidence), , If it has been true in the past, then it is always going to be true., , Self-references, , I am the center of everyone’s attention, especially when it comes, to bad performances or personal attributes., , “Catastrophizing”, , Always think of the worst. It is most likely to happen to you., , Dichotomous thinking, , Everything is either one extreme or another (black or white; good, or bad)., , Mental and Physical Health

Page 564 :
WE B LI N K 16.3, , The Beck Institute of Cognitive Therapy and Research, This site offers a diverse array of materials relating to, Aaron Beck’s cognitive therapy. Resources found here include newsletters, a referral system, a bookstore, recommended readings for clients, and questions and answers, about cognitive therapy., , the therapy sessions. They may argue openly with, clients as they try to persuade them to alter their patterns of thinking., Kinship with Behavior Therapy, , Cognitive therapy overlaps considerably with behavioral approaches to treatment, which we will discuss, shortly. Specifically, cognitive therapists often use, “homework assignments” that focus on changing, clients’ overt behaviors (Wright, Beck, & Thase, 2003)., Clients may be instructed to engage in overt responses, on their own, outside of the clinician’s office. For example, one shy, insecure young man in cognitive therapy was told to go to a singles bar and engage three different women in conversations for up to five minutes, each (Rush, 1984). He was instructed to record his, thoughts before and after each of the conversations., This assignment elicited various maladaptive patterns, of thought that gave the young man and his therapist, plenty to talk about in subsequent sessions. As this example illustrates, cognitive therapy is a creative blend, of “talk therapy” and behavior therapy., Cognitive therapy was originally designed as a, treatment for individuals. However, it has been adapted, for use with groups (Rose, 1999). Since most types of, insight therapy can be conducted on either an individual or a group basis (Kaplan & Sadock, 1993), let’s take, a look at the dynamics of group therapy., , Group Therapy, Although it dates back to the early part of the 20th century, group therapy came of age during World War II, and its aftermath in the 1950s (Rosenbaum, Lakin, &, Roback, 1992). During this period, the expanding demand for therapeutic services forced clinicians to use, group techniques (Scheidlinger, 1993). Group therapy, is the simultaneous treatment of several or more clients in a group. Most major insight therapies have, been adapted for use with groups. In fact, the ideas underlying Rogers’s client-centered therapy spawned the, much-publicized encounter group movement. Although group therapy can be conducted in a variety of, , ways, we can provide a general overview of the process, as it usually unfolds (see Alonso, Alonso, & Piper, 2003;, Stone, 2003; Vinogradov, Cox, & Yalom, 2003)., Participants’ Roles, , A therapy group typically consists of about five to ten, participants. The therapist usually screens the participants, excluding anyone who seems likely to be disruptive. Some theorists maintain that judicious selection, of participants is crucial to effective group treatment, (Salvendy, 1993). There is some debate about whether, it is best to have a homogeneous group (people who, are similar in age, gender, and presenting problem)., Practical necessities usually dictate that groups be at, least somewhat diversified., In group treatment, the therapist’s responsibilities, include selecting participants, setting goals for the, group, initiating and maintaining the therapeutic, process, and protecting clients from harm (Weiner,, 1993). The therapist often plays a relatively subtle role, in group therapy, staying in the background and focusing mainly on promoting group cohesiveness. The, therapist always retains a special status, but the therapist and clients are on much more equal footing in, group therapy than in individual therapy. The leader, in group therapy expresses emotions, shares feelings,, and copes with challenges from group members. In, other words, group therapists participate in the group’s, exchanges and “bare their own souls” to some extent., In group therapy, participants essentially function, as therapists for one another. Group members describe, their problems, trade viewpoints, share experiences,, and discuss coping strategies. Most important, they, provide acceptance and emotional support for each, other. In this supportive atmosphere, group members, work at peeling away the social masks that cover their, insecurities. Once their problems are exposed, members work at correcting them. As members come to, value one another’s opinions, they work hard to display healthy changes to win the group’s approval., Advantages of the Group Experience, , Group therapies obviously save time and money,, which can be critical in understaffed mental hospitals, and other institutional settings. Therapists in private, practice usually charge less for group than individual, therapy, making therapy affordable for more people., However, group therapy is not just a less costly substitute for individual therapy. For many types of patients, and problems, group therapy can be just as effective as, individual treatment (Piper, 1993). Moreover, group, therapy has unique strengths of its own. Irwin Yalom, (1995), who has studied group therapy extensively, has, described some of these advantages:, , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 527

Page 565 :
© Michael Newman/PhotoEdit, , Group therapies have proven, particularly helpful when members share similar problems,, such as alcoholism, overeating,, or depression., , 1. In group therapy, participants often come to realize that their misery is not unique. Clients often enter, therapy feeling sorry for themselves. They think that, they alone have a burdensome cross to bear. In the, group situation, they quickly see that they are not, unique. They are reassured to learn that many other, people have similar or even worse problems., 2. Group therapy provides an opportunity for participants to work on their social skills in a safe environment. Many personal problems essentially involve difficulties in relating effectively to people. Group therapy, can provide a workshop for improving interpersonal, skills that cannot be matched by individual therapy., 3. Certain kinds of problems are especially well, suited to group treatment. Specific types of problems, and clients respond especially well to the social support that group therapy can provide. Peer self-help, groups illustrate this advantage. In peer self-help groups,, people who have a problem in common get together, regularly to help one another out. The original peer, self-help group was Alcoholics Anonymous. Today,, similar groups are made up of former psychiatric patients, single parents, drug addicts, and so forth., , Whether treatment is conducted on a group or an, individual basis, clients usually invest considerable, time, effort, and money in insight therapies. Are they, worth the investment?, , Evaluating Insight Therapies, Evaluating the effectiveness of any approach to treatment is a complex challenge (Howard, Krasner, &, 528, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , Saunders, 2000; Nathan, Stuart, & Dolan, 2000). This, is especially true for insight therapies. If you were to, undergo insight therapy, how would you judge its effectiveness? By how you felt? By looking at your behavior? By asking your therapist? By consulting your, friends and family? What would you be looking for?, Various schools of thought pursue entirely different, goals. And clients’ ratings of their progress are likely to, be slanted toward a favorable evaluation because they, want to justify their effort, their heartache, their expense, and their time. Another problem that crops up, in studies of the relative efficacy of different treatments, is the allegiance effect—researchers comparing different therapies tend to obtain results that favor the, therapeutic approach they champion (Luborsky,, Singer, & Luborsky, 1999). Allegiance effects are probably due in part to the normal human tendency to see, what one wants to see when making subjective evaluations. In any event, allegiance effects further complicate the daunting task of assessing the effectiveness of, various insight therapies. In sum, evaluations of thera-, , WE B LI N K 16.4, , The Effectiveness of Psychotherapy: The Consumer, Reports Study, In 1995, Consumer Reports concluded that, indeed, psychotherapy is effective in the treatment of psychological, problems and disorders. Martin Seligman, an important, psychotherapy researcher, reviews the study’s methods and, compares its approach to other ways of judging psychotherapy’s effects.

Page 566 :
RE C O M M E N D E D, READING, , The Psychotherapy Maze, by Otto and Miriam, Ehrenberg (Aronson, 1994), This book is billed as a “consumer’s guide to the ins, and outs of therapy.” The Ehrenbergs provide a frank,, down-to-earth discussion of practical issues relating to, psychotherapy. Most books on therapy are devoted to, explaining various theoretical approaches to therapy., The Ehrenbergs go far beyond that in this book. They, tackle such practical issues as how to select a therapist, how to help make therapy work for you, and how, to judge whether therapy is doing you any good. They, also discuss mundane but important details such as, fees, insurance, missed sessions, and emergency phone, calls. The Ehrenbergs’ goal is to make therapy less intimidating and mysterious. They succeed handsomely in, this endeavor., Cover image reprinted by permission of the publisher., , peutic outcomes tend to be subjective, with little consensus about the best way to assess clients’ progress, (Lambert & Hill, 1994)., In spite of these difficulties, hundreds of therapy, outcome studies have been conducted over the past 50, years. These studies have examined a broad range of, specific clinical problems and have used diverse methods to assess therapeutic outcomes, including scores, on psychological tests and ratings by family members,, as well as therapists’ and clients’ ratings. Collectively,, these studies consistently indicate that insight therapy, is superior to no treatment or to placebo treatment, and that the effects of therapy are reasonably durable, (Barlow, 1996b; Kopta et al., 1999; Lambert & Bergin,, 1994). In one widely discussed study that focused on, patients’ self-reports, the vast majority of the respondents subjectively felt that they had derived considerable benefit from their therapy (Seligman, 1995)., Although there is considerable evidence that insight therapy tends to produce positive effects for a sizable majority of clients, there is vigorous debate about, the mechanisms of action underlying these positive, effects. The advocates of various therapies tend to attribute the benefits of therapy to the particular methods and procedures employed by each specific approach to therapy (Chambless & Hollon, 1998). In, essence, they argue that different therapies achieve, similar benefits through different processes. An alternative view espoused by many theorists is that the di-, , verse approaches to therapy share certain common, factors and that it is these common factors that account for much of the improvement experienced by, clients (Frank & Frank, 1991). Evidence supporting the, common factors view has mounted in recent years, (Ahn & Wampold, 2001; Lambert & Barley, 2001)., What are the common denominators that lie at the, core of diverse approaches to therapy? Although the, models proposed to answer to this question vary considerably, there is some consensus. The most widely, cited common factors include (1) the development of, a therapeutic alliance with a professional helper,, (2) the provision of emotional support and empathic, understanding by the therapist, (3) the cultivation of, hope and positive expectations in the client, (4) the, provision of a rationale for the client’s problems and a, plausible method for ameliorating them, and (5) the, opportunity to express feelings, confront problems,, gain new insights, and learn new patterns of behavior, (Grencavage & Norcross, 1990; Weinberger, 1995)., How important are these common factors in therapy?, Some theorists argue that common factors account for, virtually all of the progress that clients make in therapy (Wampold, 2001). It seems more likely that the, benefits of therapy represent the combined effects of, common factors and specific procedures (Beutler &, Harwood, 2002). Either way, it is clear that common, factors play a significant role in insight therapy., , Therapy and the Recovered, Memories Controversy, While debate about the efficacy of insight therapy has, simmered for four decades, the 1990s brought an entirely new controversy to rock the psychotherapy profession like never before. The subject of this emotionally charged debate is the spate of reports of people, recovering repressed memories of sexual abuse and, other childhood trauma through therapy—often using, methods that some critics characterize as questionable., You’ve no doubt read or seen media stories about people—including some celebrities—who have recovered, long-lost recollections of sexual abuse, typically with, the help of their therapists. For example, in 1991 TV, star Roseanne suddenly recalled years of abuse by her, parents, and a former Miss America remembered having been sexually assaulted by her father (Wielawski,, 1991). These recovered memories have led to a rash of, lawsuits in which adult plaintiffs have sued their parents, teachers, neighbors, pastors, and so forth for alleged child abuse 20 or 30 years earlier (even the Archbishop of Chicago was sued, although the suit was soon, dropped). For the most part, these parents, teachers,, and neighbors have denied the allegations. Many of, them have seemed genuinely baffled by the accusations,, which have torn some previously happy families apart, CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 529

Page 567 :
530, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , none has occurred, (2) unsophisticated about the extent, to which memories can be distorted, and (3) naive about, how much their expectations and beliefs can influence, their patients’ efforts to achieve self-understanding., Psychologists who doubt the authenticity of repressed memories support their analysis by pointing to, discredited cases of recovered memories (Brown, Goldstein, & Bjorklund, 2000). For example, with the help, of a church counselor, one woman recovered memories, of how her minister father repeatedly raped her, got her, pregnant, and then aborted the pregnancy with a coathanger. However, subsequent evidence revealed that the, woman was still a virgin and that her father had had a, vasectomy years before (Loftus, 1997; Testa, 1996). The, skeptics also point to published case histories that, clearly involved suggestive questioning and to cases in, which patients have recanted recovered memories of, sexual abuse (see Figure 16.7) after realizing that these, memories were implanted by their therapists (Goldstein & Farmer, 1993; Loftus, 1994). Those who question recovered memories also point to several lines of, carefully controlled laboratory research that demonstrate that it is not all that difficult to create “memories” of events that never happened (Hyman & Kleinnecht, 1999; Lindsay et al., 2004; Roediger & McDermott,, 1995, 2000). For example, studies have shown that subtle suggestions made to hypnotized subjects can be con-, , AP/Wide World Photos, , (Loftus & Ketcham, 1994; Wylie, 1998). In an effort to, make sense of the charges, many accused parents have, argued that their children’s recollections are false memories created inadvertently by well-intentioned therapists through the power of suggestion., The crux of the debate is that child abuse usually, takes place behind closed doors, and in the absence of, corroborative evidence, there isn’t any way to reliably, distinguish genuine recovered memories from those, that are false. A handful of recovered memories have, been substantiated by independent witnesses or belated admissions of guilt from the accused (Bull, 1999;, Reisner, 1998; Schooler, 1999). But in the vast majority, of cases, the allegations of abuse have been vehemently, denied, and independent corroboration has not been, available. Recovered recollections of sexual abuse have, become so common, a support group has been formed, for accused people who feel that they have been victimized by “false memory syndrome.”, Psychologists are sharply divided on the issue of, recovered memories, leaving the public understandably confused. Many psychologists, especially therapists in clinical practice, accept most recovered memories at face value (Banyard & Williams, 1999; Briere &, Conte, 1993; Gleaves & Smith, 2004; Herman, 1994;, Whitfield, 1995). They assert that it is common for patients to bury traumatic incidents in their unconscious, (Del Monte, 2000; Wilsnack et al., 2002). Citing evidence that sexual abuse in childhood is far more widespread than most people realize (MacMillan et al.,, 1997), they argue that most repressed memories of, abuse are probably genuine. They attribute the recent, upsurge in reports of recovered memories to therapists’ and clients’ increased sensitivity to an issue that, people used to be reluctant to discuss., In contrast, many other psychologists, especially, memory researchers, have expressed skepticism about, the recent flood of recovered memories (Kihlstrom,, 2004; Lindsay & Poole, 1995; Loftus, 1993, 1998; Lynn &, Nash, 1994; McNally, 2004). These psychologists do not, argue that people are lying about their repressed memories. Rather, they maintain that some suggestible, confused people struggling to understand profound personal problems have been convinced by persuasive, therapists that their emotional problems must be the result of abuse that occurred years ago. Critics blame a, small minority of therapists who presumably have good, intentions but operate under the dubious assumption, that virtually all psychological problems are attributable, to childhood sexual abuse (Lindsay & Read, 1994;, Spanos, 1994). Using hypnosis, dream interpretation,, and leading questions, they supposedly prod and probe, patients until they inadvertently create the memories of, abuse that they are searching for. Consistent with this, view, Yapko (1994) reviewed evidence that some therapists are (1) overly prone to see signs of abuse where, , Tom Rutherford (shown here with his wife, Joyce) received a $1, million settlement in a suit against a church therapist and a, Springfield, Missouri, church in a false memory case. Under the, church counselor’s guidance, the Rutherfords’ daughter, Beth,, had “recalled” childhood memories of having been raped repeatedly by her minister father, gotten pregnant, and undergone a painful coat-hanger abortion. Her father lost his job and, was ostracized. After he later revealed he’d had a vasectomy, when Beth was age 4, and a physical exam revealed that at age, 23 she was still a virgin, the memories were shown to be false.

Page 568 :
•, , A Case History of Recovered Memories Recanted, Suffering from a prolonged bout of depression and desperate for help, Melody Gavigan, 39, a, computer specialist from Long Beach, California, checked herself into a local psychiatric hospital., As Gavigan recalls the experience, her problems were just beginning. During five weeks of treatment there, a family and marriage counselor repeatedly suggested that her depression stemmed, from incest during her childhood. While at first Gavigan had no recollection of any abuse, the, therapist kept prodding. “I was so distressed and needed help so desperately, I latched on to, what he was offering me,” she says. “I accepted his answers.”, When asked for details, she wrote page after page of what she believed were emerging repressed memories. She told about running into the yard after being raped in the bathroom. She, incorporated into another lurid rape scene an actual girlhood incident, in which she had dislocated a shoulder. She went on to recall being molested by her father when she was only a year, old—as her diapers were being changed—and sodomized by him at five. Following what she says, was the therapist’s advice, Gavigan confronted her father with her accusations, severed her relationship with him, moved away, and formed an incest survivors’ group., But she remained uneasy. Signing up for a college psychology course, she examined her, newfound memories more carefully and concluded that they were false. Now Gavigan has begged, her father’s forgiveness and filed a lawsuit against the psychiatric hospital for the pain that she, and her family suffered., , verted into “memories” of things they never saw (Sheehan, Green, & Truesdale, 1992)., Of course, psychologists who believe in recovered, memories have mounted rebuttals to these arguments., For example, Kluft (1999) argues that a recantation of, a recovered memory of abuse does not prove that the, memory was false. Gleaves (1994) points out that indi-, , F I G U R E 16. 7, , A case of recovered memories, recanted. Recovered memories of, sexual abuse are viewed with, skepticism in some quarters. One, reason is that some people who, have recovered previously, repressed recollections of childhood abuse have subsequently, realized that their “memories”, were the product of suggestion. A, number of case histories, such as, the one summarized here (from, Jaroff, 1993), have demonstrated, that therapists who relentlessly, search for memories of abuse in, their patients sometimes create, the memories they are seeking., From Jaroff, L. (1999, November 29). Lies of the, mind. Time, pp. 52-59. Copyright © 1993 Time, Inc. Reprinted by permission., , viduals with a history of sexual abuse often vacillate between denying and accepting that the abuse occurred., Harvey (1999) argues that laboratory demonstrations, showing how easy it is to create false memories have involved trivial memory distortions that are a far cry from, the vivid, emotionally wrenching recollections of sexual abuse that have generated the recovered memories, , DOONESBURY © 1994 G. B. Trudeau. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 531

Page 569 :
controversy. Olio (1994) concludes, “The possibility of, implanting entire multiple scenarios of horror that differ markedly from the individual’s experience, such as, memories of childhood abuse in an individual who, does not have a trauma history, remains an unsubstantiated hypothesis” (p. 442). Moreover, even if one accepts the assertion that therapists can create false memories of abuse in their patients, some critics have noted, that there is virtually no direct evidence on how often, this occurs and no empirical basis for the claim that, there has been an epidemic of such cases (Berliner &, Briere, 1999; Calof, 1998; Leavitt, 2001)., So, what can we conclude about the recovered memories controversy? It seems pretty clear that therapists, can unknowingly create false memories in their patients, , and that a significant portion of recovered memories of, abuse are the product of suggestion. But it also seems, likely that some cases of recovered memories are authentic (Brown, Scheflin, Whitfield, 1999). At this point, we, don’t have adequate data to estimate what proportion, of recovered memories of abuse fall in each category, (Brown, Scheflin, & Hammond, 1998; Gow, 1999). Thus,, the matter needs to be addressed with great caution. On, the one hand, people should be extremely careful about, accepting recovered memories of abuse in the absence of, convincing corroboration. On the other hand, recovered, memories of abuse cannot be summarily dismissed, and, it would be tragic if the repressed memories controversy, made people overly skeptical about the all-too-real problem of childhood sexual abuse., , Behavior Therapies, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , Summarize the general approach and principles of, behavior therapies., Describe the three steps in systematic desensitization, and the logic underlying the treatment., , Behavior therapy is different from insight therapy in, that behavior therapists make no attempt to help clients achieve grand insights about themselves. Why, not? Because behavior therapists believe that such insights aren’t necessary in order to produce constructive change. Consider a client troubled by compulsive, gambling. The behavior therapist doesn’t care whether, this behavior is rooted in unconscious conflicts or, parental rejection. What the client needs is to get rid of, the maladaptive behavior. Consequently, the therapist, simply designs a program to eliminate the compulsive, gambling. Actually, behavior therapists may work with, clients to attain some limited insights about how en-, , ■, , ■, , Describe the use of aversion therapy and social skills, training., Summarize evidence on the efficacy of behavior, therapies., , vironmental factors evoke troublesome behaviors, (Franks & Barbrack, 1983). This information can be, helpful in designing a behavioral therapy program., The crux of the difference between insight therapy and behavior therapy lies in how each views symptoms. Insight therapists treat pathological symptoms, as signs of an underlying problem. In contrast, behavior therapists think that the symptoms are the problem. Thus, behavior therapies involve the application, of the principles of learning to direct efforts to change, clients’ maladaptive behaviors., Behaviorism has been an influential school of, thought in psychology since the 1920s. But behaviorists, devoted little attention to clinical issues until the 1950s,, when behavior therapy emerged out of three independent lines of research fostered by B. F. Skinner (1953), and his colleagues in the United States, Hans Eysenck, (1959) and his colleagues in Britain, and Joseph Wolpe, (1958) and his colleagues in South Africa (Glass &, Arnkoff, 1992). Since then, there has been an explosion, of interest in behavioral approaches to psychotherapy., , General Principles, Behavior therapies are based on certain assumptions, (Agras & Berkowitz, 1999). First, it is assumed that, behavior is a product of learning. No matter how selfdefeating or pathological a client’s behavior might be,, , © 1999 by Sidney Harris, , 532, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health

Page 570 :
the behaviorist believes that it is the result of past, conditioning. Second, it is assumed that what has been, learned can be unlearned. The same learning principles, that explain how the maladaptive behavior was acquired can be used to get rid of it. Thus, behavior therapists attempt to change clients’ behavior by applying, the principles of classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and observational learning., Behavior therapies are close cousins of the selfmodification procedures described in the Chapter 4 Application. Both use the same principles of learning to, alter behavior directly. In discussing self-modification,, we examined some relatively simple procedures that, people can apply to themselves to improve everyday selfcontrol. In our discussion of behavior therapy, we examine more complex procedures used by mental health, professionals in the treatment of more severe problems., Like self-modification, behavior therapy requires, that clients’ vague complaints (“My life is filled with, frustration”) be translated into specific, concrete behavioral goals (“I need to increase my use of assertive, responses in dealing with colleagues”). Once the troublesome behaviors have been targeted, the therapist, designs a program to alter these behaviors. The nature, of the therapeutic program depends on the types of, problems identified. Specific procedures are designed, for specific types of problems, as you’ll see in our discussion of systematic desensitization., , CS, Bridge, , UCS, Lightning, strikes, , •, , CR, Fear, UCR, , F I G U R E 16. 8, , The logic underlying systematic desensitization. Behaviorists, argue that many phobic responses are acquired through classical, conditioning, as in the example diagrammed here. Systematic, desensitization targets the conditioned associations between, phobic stimuli and fear responses., , Courtesy, Joseph Wolpe, , Systematic Desensitization, Devised by Joseph Wolpe (1958,, 1987), systematic desensitization, revolutionized psychotherapy by, giving therapists their first useful, alternative to traditional “talk therapy” (Fishman & Franks, 1992). Systematic desensitization is a behavior therapy used to reduce clients’, anxiety responses through counJoseph Wolpe, terconditioning. The treatment assumes that most anxiety responses, are acquired through classical conditioning (as we discussed in Chapter 15). According to this model, a harmless stimulus (for instance, a bridge) may be paired with, a frightening event (lightning striking it), so it becomes, a conditioned stimulus eliciting anxiety. The goal of systematic desensitization is to weaken the association between the conditioned stimulus (the bridge) and the, conditioned response of anxiety (see Figure 16.8). Systematic desensitization involves three steps., First, the therapist helps the client build an anxiety, hierarchy. The hierarchy is a list of anxiety-arousing, stimuli centering on the specific source of anxiety, such, as flying, academic tests, or snakes. The client ranks, , Desensitization is intended, to weaken and replace, this association, , the stimuli from the least anxiety arousing to the most, anxiety arousing. This ordered list of related, anxietyprovoking stimuli constitutes the anxiety hierarchy. An, example of an anxiety hierarchy for one woman’s fear, of heights is shown in Figure 16.9 on the next page., The second step involves training the client in deep, muscle relaxation. This second phase may begin during early sessions while the therapist and client are still, constructing the anxiety hierarchy. Different therapists, use different relaxation training procedures. Whatever, procedures are used, the client must learn to engage in, deep and thorough relaxation on command from the, therapist., In the third step, the client tries to work through the, hierarchy, learning to remain relaxed while imagining, each stimulus. Starting with the least anxiety-arousing, stimulus, the client imagines the situation as vividly as, possible while relaxing. If the client experiences strong, anxiety, he or she drops the imaginary scene and concentrates on relaxation. The client keeps repeating this, process until he or she can imagine a scene with little, or no anxiety. Once a particular scene is conquered,, the client moves on to the next stimulus situation in, the anxiety hierarchy. Gradually, over a number of, therapy sessions, the client progresses through the hierarchy, unlearning troublesome anxiety responses., As clients conquer imagined phobic stimuli, they, may be encouraged to confront the real stimuli. Although desensitization to imagined stimuli can be effective by itself, contemporary behavior therapists usually follow it up with direct exposures to the real, anxiety-arousing stimuli (Emmelkamp & Scholing,, 1990). Indeed, behavioral interventions emphasizing direct exposures to anxiety-arousing situations, have become behavior therapists’ treatment of choice, for phobic and other anxiety disorders (Goldfried,, , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 533

Page 571 :
10 I’m standing on a stepladder in the kitchen to change, a light bulb., , elicits relaxation instead of anxiety. This is counterconditioning—an attempt to reverse the process of classical conditioning by associating the crucial stimulus, with a new conditioned response. Although Wolpe’s, explanation of how systematic desensitization works, has been questioned, the technique’s effectiveness in, eliminating specific anxieties has been well documented (Spiegler & Guevremont, 1998)., , 15 I’m walking on a ridge. The edge is hidden by shrubs, and treetops., , Aversion Therapy, , An Anxiety Hierarchy for Systematic, Desensitization, Degree of fear, 5 I’m standing on the balcony of the top floor of an, apartment tower., , 20 I’m sitting on the slope of a mountain, looking out, over the horizon., 25 I’m crossing a bridge 6 feet above a creek. The bridge, consists of an 18-inch-wide board with a handrail on, one side., 30 I’m riding a ski lift 8 feet above the ground., 35 I’m crossing a shallow, wide creek on an 18-inch-wide, board, 3 feet above water level., 40 I’m climbing a ladder outside the house to reach a, second-story window., 45 I’m pulling myself up a 30-degree wet, slippery slope, on a steel cable., 50 I’m scrambling up a rock, 8 feet high., 55 I’m walking 10 feet on a resilient, 18-inch-wide board,, which spans an 8-foot-deep gulch., 60 I’m walking on a wide plateau, 2 feet from the edge, of a cliff., 65 I’m skiing an intermediate hill. The snow is packed., 70 I’m walking over a railway trestle., 75 I’m walking on the side of an embankment. The path, slopes to the outside., 80 I’m riding a chair lift 15 feet above the ground., 85 I’m walking up a long, steep slope., 90 I’m walking up (or down) a 15-degree slope on a, 3-foot-wide trail. On one side of the trail the terrain, drops down sharply; on the other side is a steep upward slope., 95 I’m walking on a 3-foot-wide ridge. The slopes on both, sides are long and more than 25 degrees steep., , Aversion therapy is far and away the most controversial of the behavior therapies. It’s not something that, you would sign up for unless you were pretty desperate. Psychologists usually suggest it only as a treatment, of last resort, after other interventions have failed., What’s so terrible about aversion therapy? The client, has to endure decidedly unpleasant stimuli, such as, shocks or drug-induced nausea., Aversion therapy is a behavior therapy in which, an aversive stimulus is paired with a stimulus that, elicits an undesirable response. For example, alcoholics have had drug-induced nausea paired with their, favorite drinks during therapy sessions (Landabaso et, al., 1999). By pairing an emetic drug (one that causes, vomiting) with alcohol, the therapist hopes to create a, conditioned aversion to alcohol (see Figure 16.10)., Aversion therapy takes advantage of the automatic, nature of responses produced through classical conditioning. Admittedly, alcoholics treated with aversion, therapy know that they won’t be given an emetic outside of their therapy sessions. However, their reflex response to the stimulus of alcohol may be changed so, that they respond to it with nausea and distaste. Obviously, this response should make it much easier to resist the urge to drink., Troublesome behaviors treated successfully with, aversion therapy include drug abuse, sexual deviance,, , 100 I’m walking on a 3-foot-wide ridge. The trail slopes on, one side. The drop on either side of the trail is more, than 25 degrees., , CS, Alcohol, , •, , FIG U R E 16.9, , Example of an anxiety hierarchy. Systematic desensitization, requires the construction of an anxiety hierarchy like the one, shown here, which was developed for a woman with a fear of, heights who had a penchant for hiking in the mountains., , Greenberg, & Marmar, 1990). Usually, these real-life, confrontations prove harmless, and individuals’ anxiety responses decline., According to Wolpe (1958, 1990), the principle at, work in systematic desensitization is simple. Anxiety, and relaxation are incompatible responses. The trick is, to recondition people so that the conditioned stimulus, 534, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , UCS, Emetic drug, , •, , CR, Nausea, UCR, , F I G U R E 16. 10, , Aversion therapy. Aversion therapy uses classical conditioning, to create an aversion to a stimulus that has elicited problematic, behavior. For example, in the treatment of drinking problems,, alcohol may be paired with a nausea-inducing drug to create a, conditioned aversion to alcohol.

Page 572 :
LIVING IN TODAY‘S WORLD, , How Do Clinicians Treat Posttraumatic Stress Disorder?, As discussed in Chapters 3 and 15, posttraumatic stress, disorder (PTSD) involves enduring psychological disturbance following the experience of a major traumatic, event. Given the apparent association between terrorist, attacks and PTSD (see Chapter 15), interest has increased, in clinical treatments for PTSD. Unfortunately, the research on the etiology and symptoms of PTSD has outstripped the research on its treatment, which remains in, its infancy. This situation probably reflects the fact that, PTSD wasn’t widely recognized as an independent disorder until the 1980s. Nonetheless, PTSD has proven treatable (Livanou, 2001). As is the case with most other, disorders, there is no consensus on a single, ideal approach to treating PTSD and the probability of successful, treatment depends on the severity of a particular person’s disorder., Recovery from PTSD tends to be a gradual process,, and clients need to be realistic about their goals. Once, individuals have been severely traumatized, they are, likely to always have some emotional pain lurking beneath the surface. However, therapy for PTSD can lead to, fewer and less intense emotional reactions and to enhanced coping skills that help clients manage their, emotions more effectively (Ruzek, 2001). According to, the National Center for PTSD, treatment generally includes the following four components:, • Educating trauma survivors and their families, about how persons get PTSD, how PTSD affects survivors, and their loved ones, and other problems that commonly, come along with PTSD symptoms., , gambling, shoplifting, stuttering, cigarette smoking,, and overeating (Sandler, 1975; Smith, Frawley, & Polissar, 1997; Wolpe, 1990). Typically, aversion therapy is, only one element in a larger treatment program. Of, course, this procedure should only be used with willing clients when other options have failed (Rimm &, Cunningham, 1985)., , Social Skills Training, Many psychological problems grow out of interpersonal difficulties. Behavior therapists point out that humans are not born with social finesse. People acquire, , • Exposing survivors to the event via imagery that, allows them to reexperience it in a safe, controlled environment, while also carefully examining their reactions, and beliefs in relation to that event., • Examining and resolving strong feelings, such as, anger, shame, or guilt, that are common among survivors, of trauma., • Teaching the survivor to cope with posttraumatic, memories, reminders, reactions, and feelings without, becoming overwhelmed or emotionally numb., Given these elements in the treatment process, a, variety of specific approaches to treatment are used, (M. J. Friedman, 1996). Cognitive therapy with a strong, behavioral slant is often employed. The cognitive part of, this approach focuses on changing clients’ thoughts that, trigger emotional reactions, while the behavioral component usually involves some form of guided exposure to, the trauma-arousing event, similar to systematic desensitization. Brief psychodynamic therapy is also used with, PTSD patients. Psychodynamic therapists usually help, clients confront their traumatic memories and intense, emotions. Group therapy is another common approach., Trauma survivors seem to benefit from the peer-to-peer, sharing that takes place in group treatment. Drug therapies, are frequently used as an adjunct to other approaches., Antianxiety and antidepressant medications can reduce, many of the symptoms associated with PTSD. Among the, various approaches to treating PTSD, cognitive-behavioral, approaches have the greatest empirical support for their, efficacy (Hembree & Foa, 2000)., , their social skills through learning. Unfortunately, some, people have not learned how to be friendly, how to, make conversation, how to express anger appropriately,, and so forth. Social ineptitude can contribute to anxiety, feelings of inferiority, and various kinds of disorders. In light of these findings, therapists are increasingly using social skills training in efforts to improve, clients’ social abilities. This approach to therapy has, yielded promising results in the treatment of social anxiety (Shear & Beidel, 1998), autism (Gonzalez-Lopez &, Kamps, 1997), and schizophrenia (Wallace, 1998)., Social skills training is a behavior therapy designed to improve interpersonal skills that emphasizes, CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 535

Page 573 :
shaping, modeling, and behavioral rehearsal. This, type of behavior therapy can be conducted with individual clients or in groups. Social skills training depends on the principles of operant conditioning and, observational learning. The therapist makes use of, modeling by encouraging clients to watch socially, skilled friends and colleagues, so that the clients can, acquire responses (eye contact, active listening, and so, on) through observation., In behavioral rehearsal, the client tries to practice, social techniques in structured role-playing exercises., The therapist provides corrective feedback and uses approval to reinforce progress. Eventually, clients try their, newly acquired skills in real-world interactions. Usually,, they are given specific homework assignments. Shaping, is used in that clients are gradually asked to handle more, complicated and delicate social situations. For example,, a nonassertive client may begin by working on making, requests of friends. Only much later will the client be, asked to tackle standing up to his or her boss., , Evaluating Behavior Therapies, Behavior therapists have historically placed more emphasis than insight therapists on the importance of, , measuring therapeutic outcomes. As a result, there is, ample research on the effectiveness of behavior therapy (Jacob & Pelham, 2000). How does the effectiveness of behavior therapy compare to that of insight, therapy? In direct comparisons, the differences between the therapies are usually small. However, these, modest differences tend to favor behavioral approaches, for certain types of disorders (Lambert & Bergin,, 1992). Of course, behavior therapies are not well suited, to the treatment of some types of problems (vague, feelings of discontent, for instance). Furthermore, it’s, misleading to make global statements about the effectiveness of behavior therapies, because they include, many different procedures designed for different purposes. For example, the value of systematic desensitization for phobias has no bearing on the value of aversion therapy for sexual deviance., For our purposes, it is sufficient to note that there is, favorable evidence on the efficacy of most of the widely, used behavioral interventions. Behavior therapies can, make significant contributions to the treatment of anxiety problems, phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorders,, sexual dysfunction, schizophrenia, drug-related problems, eating disorders, hyperactivity, autism, and mental retardation (Berkowitz, 2003; Emmelkamp, 1994)., , Biomedical Therapies, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, , ■, , ■, , Describe the principal drug therapies used in the treatment of, psychological disorders and summarize evidence regarding their, efficacy., Discuss some of the problems associated with drug therapies and their, overall value., Describe ECT and discuss its efficacy and risks., , In the 1950s, a French surgeon was looking for a drug, that would reduce patients’ autonomic response to, surgical stress. The surgeon noticed that chlorpromazine produced a mild sedation. Based on this observation, Delay and Deniker (1952) decided to give, chlorpromazine to hospitalized schizophrenic patients, to see whether it would have a calming effect on them., Their experiment was a dramatic success. Chlorpromazine became the first effective antipsychotic drug—, and a revolution in psychiatry was begun. Hundreds, of thousands of severely disturbed patients—patients, who had appeared doomed to lead the remainder of, their lives in mental hospitals—were gradually sent, home thanks to the therapeutic effects of antipsychotic, drugs (see Figure 16.11). Today, biomedical therapies,, such as drug treatment, lie at the core of psychiatric, practice., Biomedical therapies are physiological interventions intended to reduce symptoms associated with, 536, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , psychological disorders. These therapies assume that, psychological disorders are caused, at least in part, by, biological malfunctions. As we discussed in the previous chapter, this assumption clearly has merit for, many disorders, especially the more severe ones. We, will discuss two biomedical approaches to psychotherapy: drug therapy and electroconvulsive therapy., , Treatment with Drugs, Psychopharmacotherapy is the treatment of mental, disorders with medication. We will refer to this kind, of treatment more simply as drug therapy. Therapeutic, drugs for psychological problems fall into four major, groups: antianxiety drugs, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressant drugs, and mood stabilizers. Of these drugs,, the antidepressant drugs have surpassed the antianxiety agents as the most widely prescribed psychiatric, drugs (Pincus et al., 1998).

Page 574 :
•, , Resident patients (thousands), , 600, , The declining inpatient population, in mental hospitals. The number of, inpatients in public mental hospitals, has declined dramatically since the, late 1950s. In part, this drop has, been due to “deinstitutionalization”—a philosophy that emphasizes, outpatient care whenever possible., However, above all else, this decline, was made possible by the development of effective antipsychotic, medications., , 500, 400, 300, 200, 100, 0, 1920, , F I G U R E 16. 1 1, , 1930, , 1940, , 1950, , 1960, , 1970, , Antianxiety Drugs, , Most of us know someone who pops pills to relieve, anxiety. The drugs involved in this common coping, strategy are antianxiety drugs, which relieve tension,, apprehension, and nervousness. The most popular of, these drugs are Valium and Xanax, which are the trade, names (the proprietary names that pharmaceutical, companies use in marketing drugs) for diazepam and, alprazolam, respectively., Valium, Xanax, and other drugs in the benzodiazepine family are often called tranquilizers. These, drugs are routinely prescribed for people with anxiety, disorders. They are also given to millions of people, who simply suffer from chronic nervous tension. In, the mid-1970s, pharmacists in the United States were, filling nearly 100 million prescriptions each year for, Valium and similar antianxiety drugs. Many critics, characterized this level of use as excessive (Lickey &, Gordon, 1991)., Antianxiety drugs exert their effects almost immediately. They can be fairly effective in alleviating feelings of anxiety (Ballenger, 2000). However, their effects, are measured in hours, so their impact is relatively, short-lived. Common side effects of antianxiety drugs, include drowsiness, depression, nausea, and confusion., These drugs also have some potential for abuse, dependency, and overdose problems (Ballenger, 2000)., Another drawback is that patients who have been on, antianxiety drugs for a while often experience withdrawal symptoms when their drug treatment is, stopped (Danton & Antonuccio, 1997). Although, some psychiatrists argue that the problems associated, with the benzodiazepine drugs have been exaggerated,, physicians have reduced their prescription of these, drugs since the 1970s (Silberman, 1998)., A newer antianxiety drug called Buspar (buspirone), which does not belong to the benzodiazepine, family, appears useful in the treatment of generalized, , 1980, , 1990, , 2000, , anxiety disorder (Brawman-Mintzer, Lydiard, & Ballenger, 2000). Unlike Valium, Buspar is slow acting, exerting its effects in one to three weeks, but with fewer, sedative side effects., Antipsychotic Drugs, , Antipsychotic drugs are used primarily in the treatment of schizophrenia. They are also given to people, with severe mood disorders who become delusional., The trade names (and generic names) of some prominent drugs in this category are Thorazine (chlorpromazine), Mellaril (thioridazine), and Haldol (haloperidol). Antipsychotic drugs are used to gradually reduce, psychotic symptoms, including hyperactivity, mental, confusion, hallucinations, and delusions., Studies suggest that antipsychotics reduce psychotic symptoms in about 70 percent of patients, albeit, in varied degrees (Marder, 2000). When antipsychotic, drugs are effective, they work their magic gradually,, as shown in Figure 16.12 on the next page. Patients, usually begin to respond within two days to a week., Further improvement may occur for several months., Many schizophrenic patients are placed on antipsychotics indefinitely because these drugs can reduce the, likelihood of a relapse into an active schizophrenic, episode (Marder & van Kammen, 2000)., Antipsychotic drugs undeniably make a major, contribution to the treatment of severe mental disorders, but they are not without problems. They have, many unpleasant side effects (Cohen, 1997). Drowsiness, constipation, and cotton mouth are common. Patients may also experience tremors, muscular rigidity,, and impaired coordination. After being released from, a hospital, many schizophrenic patients, supposedly, placed on antipsychotics indefinitely, discontinue their, drug regimen because of the disagreeable side effects., Unfortunately, a relapse eventually occurs in most patients after they stop taking antipsychotic medication, CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 537

Page 575 :
Mean severity of illness scores, , Severe, illness, , 6.00, , Marked, illness, , 5.00, , Moderate, illness, , 4.00, , Mild, illness, , 3.00, , Placebo, Chlorpromazine, Fluphenazine, , Thioridazine, , Moreover, the atypical antipsychotics produce fewer unpleasant side effects and carry, less risk for tardive dyskinesia (Correll,, Leucht, & Kane, 2004; Lieberman et al.,, 2003). Of course, like all powerful drugs,, they are not without their risks, as they appear to increase patients’ vulnerability to diabetes and cardiovascular problems (Meltzer, et al., 2002)., Antidepressant Drugs, , As their name suggests, antidepressant, drugs gradually elevate mood and help, Borderline 2.00, bring people out of a depression. Prior to, 1987, there were two principal classes of, antidepressants: tricyclics (such as Elavil), 1.00, Normal, and MAO inhibitors (such as Nardil). These, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Time (weeks), two sets of drugs affect neurochemical activity in different ways and tend to work, with different patients. Overall, they are, FIG U R E 16.12, beneficial for about two-thirds of depressed, patients (Gitlin, 2002), although only about, The time course of antipsychotic drug effects. Antipsychotic drugs reduce psyone-third of treated patients experience a, chotic symptoms gradually, over a span of weeks, as graphed here. In contrast,, complete resolution of their symptoms (Shulpatients given placebo pills show little improvement., From Cole, J. O., Goldberg, S. C., & Davis, J. M. (1966). Drugs in the treatment of psychosis. In P. Solomon (Ed.),, man, 2001). The tricylics have fewer probPsychiatric drugs. New York: Grune & Stratton. From data in the NIMH-PSC Collaborative Study I. Reprinted by permislems with side effects and complications, sion of J. M. Davis., than the MAO inhibitors (Rush, 2000). Like, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants exert, (Gitlin et al., 2001). In addition to minor side effects,, their effects gradually over a period of weeks., antipsychotics may cause a severe and lasting problem, Today, psychiatrists are more likely to prescribe a, called tardive dyskinesia, which is seen in about 20 pernewer class of antidepressants, called selective serotonin, cent of patients who receive long-term treatment with, reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which slow the reuptake, traditional antipsychotics (Miyamoto et al., 2003). Tarprocess at serotonin synapses. The drugs in this class,, dive dyskinesia is a neurological disorder marked by, which include Prozac (fluoxetine), Paxil (paroxetine),, chronic tremors and involuntary spastic movements., and Zoloft (sertraline), yield therapeutic gains similar, Once this debilitating syndrome emerges, there is no, to the tricyclics in the treatment of depression (Boland, cure, although spontaneous remission sometimes oc& Keller, 2003) while producing fewer unpleasant or, curs after the discontinuation of antipsychotic meddangerous side effects (Marangell et al., 2003). SSRIs, ication (Pi & Simpson, 2000)., have also proven valuable in the treatment of obsesPsychiatrists are currently enthusiastic about a, sive-compulsive disorders, panic disorders, and other, new class of antipsychotic agents called atypical antianxiety disorders (Rivas-Vazquez, 2001). However,, psychotic drugs (such as clozapine, olanzapine, and queProzac and the other SSRIs are not “miracle drugs,” as, tiapine). These drugs are roughly as effective as tradisuggested by some popular magazines. Like all drugs, tional antipsychotics (Fleischhacker, 2002) and can, for psychological disorders, the SSRIs have side effects,, help some patients who do not respond to convensuch as weight gain, sleep problems, and sexual dystional antipsychotic medications (Volavka et al., 2002)., functions, that must be carefully weighed against their, benefits (Baldessarini, 2001; Ferguson, 2001)., A major concern in recent years has been evidence, from a number of studies that SSRIs may increase the, WE B LI N K 16.5, risk for suicide (Healy & Whitaker, 2003; Holden,, 2004). The challenge of collecting definitive data on, Psychopharmacology Tips by Dr. Bob, this issue is much more daunting than one might, University of Chicago physician and pharmacology specialist Robert Hsiang provides both broad and specific referguess, in part because suicide rates are already elevated, ences about the interface of drugs and the human mind,, among people who exhibit the disorders for which, including a searchable archive of professional information, SSRIs are prescribed (Rihmer, 2003; Wessely & Kerand tips about the field., win, 2004). Some researchers have collected data that, , •, , 538, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health

Page 576 :
proate, which has become about as widely used as, lithium in the treatment of bipolar disorders (Blanco, et al., 2002). Valproate appears to be roughly as effective, as lithium in efforts to treat current manic episodes, and to prevent future affective disturbances (Moseman, et al., 2003). The advantage provided by valproate is, that it is better tolerated by patients., Evaluating Drug Therapies, , © The New Yorker Collection 2001 Barbara Smaller from cartoonbank.com. All rights reserved., , suggest that suicide rates have declined slightly because, of widespread prescription of SSRIs (Olfson et al.,, 2003) and others have found no association between, SSRIs and suicide (Lapiere, 2003; Tardiff, Marzuk, &, Leon, 2002). At present, the data are too fragmentary, and inconsistent to permit a firm, confident conclusion. That said, the issue should be taken seriously, and, patients on SSRIs should be carefully monitored by, their physicians and families (Culpepper et al., 2004)., Elevated suicide risk appears to mainly be a problem, among a small minority of children and adolescents in, the first month after starting antidepressants, especially the first nine days (Jick, Kaye, & Jick, 2004)., Mood Stabilizers, , Mood stabilizers are drugs used to control mood, swings in patients with bipolar mood disorders. For, many years, lithium was the only effective drug in this, category. Lithium has proven valuable in preventing, future episodes of both mania and depression in patients with bipolar illness (Geddes et al., 2004), and it, can also be used in efforts to bring patients with bipolar illness out of current manic or depressive episodes., However, antipsychotics and antidepressants are more, frequently used for these purposes. On the negative, side of the ledger, lithium does have some dangerous, side effects if its use isn’t managed skillfully (Jefferson, & Greist, 2000). Lithium levels in the patient’s blood, must be monitored carefully, because high concentrations can be toxic and even fatal. Kidney and thyroid, gland complications are the other major problems associated with lithium therapy., In recent years a number of alternatives to lithium, have been developed. The most popular of these newer, mood stabilizers is an anticonvulsant agent called val-, , Drug therapies can produce clear therapeutic gains for, many kinds of patients. What’s especially impressive is, that they can be effective in severe disorders that otherwise defy therapeutic endeavors. Nonetheless, drug therapies are controversial. Critics of drug therapy have, raised a number of issues (Cohen & McCubbin, 1990;, Greenberg & Fisher, 1997; Healy, 2004; Whitaker, 2002)., First, some critics argue that drug therapies often produce superficial curative effects. For example, Valium, does not really solve problems with anxiety—it merely, provides temporary relief from an unpleasant symptom., Moreover, this temporary relief may lull patients into, complacency about their problem and prevent them, from working toward a more lasting solution. Second,, critics charge that many drugs are overprescribed and, many patients overmedicated. According to these critics,, many physicians habitually hand out prescriptions without giving adequate consideration to more complicated, and difficult interventions. Critics also argue that there is, a tendency in some institutions to overmedicate patients, to minimize disruptive behavior. Third, some critics, charge that the side effects of therapeutic drugs are worse, than the illnesses the drugs are supposed to cure. Citing, problems such as tardive dyskinesia, lithium toxicity, and, addiction to antianxiety agents, these critics argue that, the risks of therapeutic drugs aren’t worth the benefits., Critics maintain that the negative effects of psychiatric drugs are not fully appreciated because the pharmaceutical industry has managed to gain undue influence over the research enterprise as it relates to drug, testing (Angell, 2000, 2004; Healy, 2004). Today, most, researchers who investigate the benefits and risks of, medications and write treatment guidelines have lucrative financial arrangements with the pharmaceutical industry (Bodenheimer, 2000; Choudhry, Stelfox, & Detsky, 2002). Their studies are funded by drug companies, and they often receive substantial consulting fees. Unfortunately, these financial ties appear to undermine the, objectivity required in scientific research, as studies, funded by pharmaceutical and other biomedical companies are far less likely to report unfavorable results, than nonprofit-funded studies (Bekelman, Li, & Gross,, 2003; Rennie & Luft, 2000). Industry-financed drug trials also tend to be much too brief to detect the longterm risks associated with new drugs (O’Brien, 1996),, and when unfavorable results emerge, the data are often, withheld from publication (Antonuccio, Danton, &, CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 539

Page 577 :
McClanahan, 2003). Also, research designs are often, slanted in a multitude of ways so as to exaggerate the, positive effects and minimize the negative effects of, the drugs under scrutiny (Carpenter, 2002; Moncrieff,, 2001; Rennie, 1999). The conflicts of interest that appear to be pervasive in contemporary drug research, raise grave concerns that require attention from researchers, universities, and federal agencies., Obviously, drug therapies have stirred up some debate. However, this controversy pales in comparison to, the furious debates inspired by electroconvulsive, (shock) therapy (ECT). ECT is so controversial that the, residents of Berkeley, California, voted to outlaw ECT, in their city. However, in subsequent lawsuits the courts, ruled that scientific questions cannot be settled through, a vote, and they overturned the law. What makes ECT, so controversial? You’ll see in the next section., , Electroconvulsive, Therapy (ECT), In the 1930s, a Hungarian psychiatrist named Ladislas, Meduna speculated that epilepsy and schizophrenia, could not coexist in the same body. On the basis of this, observation, which turned out to be inaccurate,, Meduna theorized that it might be useful to induce, epileptic-like seizures in schizophrenic patients. Initially, a drug was used to trigger these seizures. However, by 1938, a pair of Italian psychiatrists (Cerletti &, , Bini, 1938) demonstrated that it was safer to elicit the, seizures with electric shock. Thus, modern electroconvulsive therapy was born., Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a biomedical, treatment in which electric shock is used to produce, a cortical seizure accompanied by convulsions. In, ECT, electrodes are attached to the skull over one or, both temporal lobes of the brain (see the photo above)., A light anesthesia is induced, and the patient is given a, variety of drugs to minimize the likelihood of complications, such as spinal fractures. An electric current is, then applied for about a second. The current should, trigger a brief (5–20 seconds) convulsive seizure, during which the patient usually loses consciousness. Patients normally awaken in an hour or two. People typically receive between 6 and 12 treatments over a period, of about a month (Glass, 2001)., The clinical use of ECT peaked in the 1940s and, 1950s, before effective drug therapies were widely, available. ECT has long been controversial, and its use, did decline in the 1960s and 1970s. Nonetheless, there, has been a resurgence in the use of ECT, and it is not a, rare form of therapy. Although only about 8 percent of, psychiatrists administer ECT (Hermann et al., 1998),, estimates suggest that about 100,000 people receive, ECT treatments each year in the United States (Hermann et al., 1995). Some critics argue that ECT is, overused because it is a lucrative procedure that boosts, psychiatrists’ income while consuming relatively little, , © James Wilson/Woodfin Camp & Associates, all rights reserved, , This patient is being prepared for, electroconvulsive therapy. The, mouthpiece keeps the patient from, biting her tongue during the electrically induced seizures., , 540, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health

Page 578 :
of their time in comparison to insight therapy (Frank,, 1990). Conversely, some advocates argue that ECT is, underutilized because the public harbors many misconceptions about its risks and side effects (Farah,, 1997). Although ECT was once considered appropriate for a wide range of disorders, in recent decades it, has primarily been recommended for the treatment of, depression., Controversy about ECT is also fueled by patients’, reports that the treatment is painful, dehumanizing,, and terrifying. Substantial improvements in the administration of ECT have made it less disagreeable, than it once was (Bernstein et al., 1998). Nonetheless,, some patients continue to report that they find the, treatment extremely aversive (Johnstone, 1999)., Effectiveness of ECT, , The evidence on the therapeutic efficacy of ECT is open, to varied interpretations. Proponents of ECT maintain, that it is a remarkably effective treatment for major depression (Prudic & Sackeim, 1999; Rudorfer, Henry, &, Sackeim, 2003). Moreover, they note that many patients, who do not benefit from antidepressant medication, improve in response to ECT (Isenberg & Zorumski,, 2000). However, opponents of ECT argue that the available studies are flawed and inconclusive and that ECT, is probably no more effective than a placebo (Breggin,, 1991; Friedberg, 1983). Overall, enough favorable evidence seems to exist to justify conservative use of ECT, in treating severe mood disorders in patients who have, not responded to medication (Carney & Geddes, 2003;, , Metzger, 1999). Unfortunately, relapse rates after ECT, are distressingly high. Over 50 percent of patients relapse within 6 to 12 months, although relapse rates can, be reduced by giving ECT patients antidepressant drugs, (Sackeim et al., 2001)., The debate about whether ECT works does not, make ECT unique among approaches to the treatment, of psychological disorders. Controversies exist regarding the effectiveness of most therapies. However, this, controversy is especially problematic because ECT carries some risks., Risks Associated with ECT, , Even ECT proponents acknowledge that memory, losses, impaired attention, and other cognitive deficits, are common short-term side effects of electroconvulsive therapy (Isenberg & Zorumski, 2000; Lisanby et, al., 2000). However, ECT proponents assert that these, deficits are mild and usually disappear within a month, or two (Glass, 2001). An American Psychiatric Association (2001) task force concluded that there is no objective evidence that ECT causes structural damage in, the brain or that it has any lasting negative effects on, the ability to learn and remember information. In contrast, ECT critics maintain that ECT-induced cognitive deficits are often significant and sometimes permanent (Breggin, 1991; Frank, 1990; Rose et al., 2003),, although their evidence seems to be largely anecdotal., Given the concerns about the risks of ECT and the, doubts about its efficacy, it appears that the use of ECT, will remain controversial for some time to come., , Current Trends and Issues in Treatment, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, ■, ■, ■, , Discuss how managed care has affected the provision of therapy., Discuss the merits of blending approaches to therapy., Explain why therapy is underutilized by ethnic minorities., , The controversy about ECT is only one of many contentious issues and shifting trends in the world of mental health care. In this section, we discuss the impact of, managed care on psychotherapy, the continuing trend, toward blending various approaches to therapy, and efforts to respond more effectively to increasing cultural, diversity in Western societies., , Grappling with the Constraints of, Managed Care, The 1990s brought a dramatic shift in how people in, the United States pay for their health care. Alarmed by, , skyrocketing health care costs, huge numbers of employers and individuals moved from traditional fee-forservice arrangements to managed care health plans, (Kiesler, 2000). In the fee-for-service system, hospitals,, physicians, psychologists, and other providers charged, fees for whatever health care services were needed, and, most of these fees were reimbursed by private insurance or the government (through Medicaid, Medicare,, and other programs). In managed care systems people, enroll in prepaid plans with small co-payments for services, typically run by health maintenance organizations (HMOs), which agree to provide ongoing health, care for a specific sum of money. Managed care usually, , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 541

Page 579 :
involves a tradeoff: Consumers pay lower prices for, their care, but they give up much of their freedom to, choose their providers and to obtain whatever treatments they believe necessary. If an HMO’s treatment, expenses become excessive, it won’t turn a profit, so, HMOs have powerful financial incentives to hold treatment costs down., The HMOs originally promised individuals and, employers that they would be able to hold costs down, without having a negative impact on the quality of care,, by negotiating lower fees from providers, reducing inefficiency, and cracking down on medically unnecessary services. However, critics charge that managed care, systems have squeezed all the savings they can out of, the “fat” that existed in the old system and that they, have responded to continued inflation in their costs by, rationing care and limiting access to medically necessary services (Duckworth & Borus, 1999; Giles &, Marafiote, 1998; Sanchez & Turner, 2003)., The possibility that managed care is having a negative effect on the quality of care is a source of concern, throughout the health care professions, but the issue is, especially sensitive in the domain of mental health care, (Bursztajn & Brodsky, 2002; Campbell, 2000). Critics, maintain that mental health care has suffered particularly severe cuts in services because the question of, what is “medically necessary” can be more subjective, than in other treatment specialties (such as internal, medicine or ophthalmology) and because patients, who are denied psychotherapy services are relatively, unlikely to complain (Duckworth & Borus, 1999). For, example, a business executive who is trying to hide his, depression or cocaine addiction from his employer will, be reluctant to complain to his employer if therapeutic, services are denied., According to critics, the restriction of mental, health services sometimes involves outright denial of, treatment, but it often takes more subtle forms, such, as underdiagnosing conditions, failing to make needed, referrals to mental health specialists, and arbitrarily, limiting the length of treatment (Bursztajn & Brodsky,, 2002; Miller, 1996). Long-term therapy is becoming a, thing of the past unless patients can pay for it out of, pocket, and the goal of treatment has been reduced to, reestablishing a reasonable level of functioning (Zatzick, 1999). Many managed care systems hold down, costs by erecting barriers to access, such as requiring, referrals from primary care physicians who don’t have, appointments available for weeks or months or authorizing only a few sessions of therapy at a time (Sanchez, & Turner, 2003). Another cost-cutting strategy is the, rerouting of patients from highly trained providers,, such as psychiatrists and doctoral-level psychologists,, to less-well-trained providers, such as masters-level, counselors, who may not be adequately prepared to, handle serious psychological disorders (Seligman &, 542, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , Levant, 1998). Cost containment is also achieved by, requiring physicians to prescribe older antidepressant, and antipsychotic drugs instead of the newer and, much more expensive SSRIs and atypical antipsychotics (Docherty, 1999)., The extensive utilization review procedures required by managed care have also raised concerns, about providers’ autonomy and clients’ confidentiality, (Plante, 1999a). Clinicians who have to “sell” their, treatment plans to managed care bureaucrats who may, know little about mental health care feel that they have, lost control over their professional practice. They also, worry that the need to divulge the details of clients’, problems to justify treatment may breach the confidentiality of the therapist-client relationship., Unfortunately, there are no simple solutions to, these problems on the horizon. Restraining the burgeoning cost of health care without compromising the, quality of care, consumers’ freedom of choice, and, providers’ autonomy is an enormously complex and, daunting challenge. At this juncture, it is difficult to predict what the future holds. However, it is clear that economic realities have ushered in an era of transition for, the treatment of psychological disorders and problems., , Blending Approaches to, Treatment, In this chapter we have reviewed many approaches to, treatment, which are summarized and compared in, Figure 16.13. However, there is no rule that a client, must be treated with just one approach. Often, a clinician will use several techniques in working with a client., For example, a depressed person might receive cognitive therapy (an insight therapy), social skills training, (a behavior therapy), and antidepressant medication (a, biomedical therapy). Multiple approaches are particularly likely when a treatment team provides therapy., Studies suggest that combining approaches to treatment has merit (Glass, 2004; Klerman et al., 1994)., The value of multiple approaches may explain, why a significant trend seems to have crept into the, field of psychotherapy: a movement away from strong, loyalty to individual schools of thought and a corresponding move toward integrating various approaches, to therapy (Castonguay et al., 2003; Smith, 1999). Most, clinicians used to depend exclusively on one system of, therapy while rejecting the utility of all others. This era, of fragmentation may be drawing to a close. In recent, surveys of psychologists’ theoretical orientations, researchers have been surprised to find that the greatest, proportion of respondents described themselves as, eclectic in approach (Garfield & Bergin, 1994). Eclecticism in the practice of therapy involves drawing ideas, from two or more systems of therapy, instead of committing to just one system.

Page 580 :
Major Approaches to Psychotherapy, Type of, psychotherapy, , Primary, founders, , Psychoanalysis, , Origin of disorder, , Therapeutic goals, , Therapeutic techniques, , Freud, , Unconscious conflicts resulting, from fixations in earlier, development, , Insights regarding unconscious, conflicts and motives; personality, reconstruction, , Free association, dream, analysis, interpretation,, catharsis, transference, , Client-centered, therapy, , Rogers, , Incongruence between selfconcept and actual experience;, dependence on acceptance, from others, , Congruence between self-concept, and experience; acceptance of, genuine self; self-determination,, personal growth, , Genuineness, empathy,, unconditional positive regard,, clarification, reflecting back, to client, , Cognitive, therapy, , Beck, Ellis, , Irrational assumptions and, negative, self-defeating thinking, about events related to self, , Detection of negative thinking;, substitution of more realistic, thinking, , Thought stopping, recording, automatic thoughts, refuting, negative thinking, reattribution,, homework assignments, , Behavior, therapies, , Wolpe, Skinner, Eysenck, , Maladaptive patterns of behavior, acquired through learning, , Elimination of symptomatic,, maladaptive behaviors;, acquisition of more adaptive, responses, , Classical and operant, conditioning, reinforcement,, punishment, extinction,, shaping, aversive conditioning,, systematic desensitization,, social skills training, , Physiological malfunction,, primarily abnormal, neurotransmitter activity, , Elimination of symptoms;, prevention of relapse, , Antipsychotic, antianxiety,, antidepressant, and mood, stabilizer drugs; electroconvulsive, therapy (ECT), , Biomedical, therapies, , •, , F I G U R E 16.13, , Comparison of psychotherapy approaches. This chart compares behavior therapies, biomedical therapies, and three leading approaches to insight therapy., , Increasing Multicultural Sensitivity, in Treatment, Research on how cultural factors influence the process, and outcome of psychotherapy has burgeoned in recent years, motivated in part by the need to improve, mental health services for ethnic minority groups in, American society (Lee & Ramirez, 2000). The data are, ambiguous for a couple of ethnic groups, but studies, suggest that American minority groups generally underutilize therapeutic services (Mays & Albee, 1992;, Vega et al., 1999; Wells et al., 2001). Why? A variety of, barriers appear to contribute to this problem, including the following (Sue, Zane, & Young, 1994; Takeuchi,, Uehara, & Maramba, 1999; U.S. Department of Health, and Human Services, 1999):, , © Rhoda Sidney/PhotoEdit, , 1. Cultural barriers. In times of psychological distress, some cultural groups are reluctant to turn to formal, professional sources of assistance. Given their socialization, they prefer to rely on informal assistance, from family members, the clergy, respected elders,, , Cultural barriers have emerged in the psychotherapy process. A, number of minority groups in the United States shy away from using, professional services in this field. Those who do try it also tend to, quickly terminate treatment more often than white Americans., CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 543

Page 581 :
herbalists, acupuncturists, and so forth, who share, their cultural heritage. Many members of minority, groups have a history of frustrating interactions with, American bureaucracies and are distrustful of large,, intimidating, foreign institutions, such as hospitals, and community mental health centers (Pierce, 1992)., 2. Language barriers. Effective communication is, crucial to the provision of psychotherapy, yet most hospitals and mental health agencies are not adequately, staffed with therapists who speak the languages used, by minority groups in their service areas. The resulting, communication problems make it awkward and difficult for many minority group members to explain their, problems and obtain the type of help they need., 3. Institutional barriers. Stanley Sue and Nolan, Zane (1987) argue that the “single most important explanation for the problems in service delivery involves, the inability of therapists to provide culturally responsive forms of treatment” (p. 37). The vast majority of therapists have been trained almost exclusively, in the treatment of middle-class white Americans and, are not familiar with the cultural backgrounds and, unique characteristics of various ethnic groups. This, culture gap often leads to misunderstandings and illadvised treatment strategies (Hughes, 1993). Unfortunately, there is a grievous shortage of ethnic therapists, , to meet the needs of various ethnic groups (Mays &, Albee, 1992)., What can be done to improve mental health services for American minority groups? Researchers in this, area have offered a variety of suggestions (Homma-True, et al., 1993; Hong, Garcia, & Soriano, 2000; Pedersen,, 1994; Sue & Zane, 1987; Yamamoto et al., 1993). Discussions of possible solutions usually begin with the, need to recruit and train more ethnic minority therapists. Studies show that ethnic minorities are more likely, to go to mental health facilities that are staffed by a, higher proportion of people who share their ethnic, background (Snowden & Hu, 1996; Sue et al., 1994)., Furthermore, clients’ satisfaction with therapy tends to, be greater when they are treated by therapists from their, own culture. Therapists can also be given special training to work more effectively with people from different, cultural backgrounds. For example, Wade and Bernstein, (1991) found that a cultural sensitivity training program for white therapists working with an African, American clientele resulted in improved client satisfaction. Finally, most authorities urge further investigation, of how traditional approaches to therapy can be modified and tailored to be more compatible with specific, cultural groups’ attitudes, values, norms, and traditions., , Looking for a Therapist, LEARNING OBJECTIVES, , ■, ■, , Discuss when and where to seek therapy., Evaluate the potential importance of a therapist’s, gender and professional background., , Answer the following “true” or “false.”, ___ 1. Psychotherapy is an art as well as a science., ___ 2. The type of professional degree that a therapist, holds is relatively unimportant., ___ 3. Psychotherapy can be harmful or damaging to, a client., ___ 4. Psychotherapy does not have to be expensive., ___ 5. It is a good idea to shop around when choosing a therapist., All of these statements are true. Do any of them surprise you? If so, you’re in good company. Many people, , 544, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , ■, , ■, , Summarize the evidence on whether therapists’, theoretical approaches influence their effectiveness., Discuss what one should expect from therapy., , know relatively little about the practicalities of selecting a therapist., The task of finding an appropriate therapist is no, less complex than shopping for any other major service. Should you see a psychologist or a psychiatrist?, Should you opt for individual therapy or group therapy? Should you see a client-centered therapist or a behavior therapist? The unfortunate part of this decision, process is that people seeking psychotherapy often feel, overwhelmed by personal problems. The last thing, they need is to be confronted by yet another complex, problem.

Page 582 :
© Tom McCarthy/SKA, , Finding the right therapist is no easy task. You, need to take into account the therapist’s training, and orientation, fees charged, and personality., An initial visit should give you a good idea of, what a particular therapist is like., , Nonetheless, the importance of finding a good, therapist cannot be overestimated. Therapy can sometimes have harmful rather than helpful effects. We have, already discussed how drug therapies and ECT can, sometimes be damaging, but problems are not limited, to these interventions. Talking about your problems, with a therapist may sound pretty harmless, but studies indicate that insight therapies can also backfire, (Lambert & Bergin, 1994; McGlashan et al., 1990). Although a great many talented therapists are available,, psychotherapy, like any other profession, has incompetent practitioners as well. Therefore, you should, shop for a skilled therapist, just as you would for a, good attorney or a good mechanic., In this Application, we present some information, that should be helpful if you ever have to look for a therapist for yourself or for a friend or family member, (based on Amada, 1985; Bruckner-Gordon, Gangi, &, Wallman, 1988; Ehrenberg & Ehrenberg, 1994; Pittman,, 1994)., , When Should You Seek, Professional Treatment?, There is no simple answer to the question of when to, seek treatment. Obviously, people consider the possibility of professional treatment when they are psychologically distressed. However, they have other options, besides psychotherapy. There is much to be said for, seeking advice from family, friends, the clergy, and so, forth. Insights about personal problems do not belong, exclusively to people with professional degrees., So, when should you turn to professionals for, help? You should begin to think seriously about therapy when (1) you have no one to lean on, (2) the peo-, , ple you lean on indicate that they’re getting tired of it,, (3) you feel helpless and overwhelmed, or (4) your life, is seriously disrupted by your problems. Of course, you, do not have to be falling apart to justify therapy. You, may want to seek professional advice simply because, you want to get more out of life., , Where Do You Find Therapeutic, Services?, Psychotherapy can be found in a variety of settings., Contrary to general belief, most therapists are not in, private practice. Many work in institutional settings, such as community mental health centers, hospitals,, and human service agencies. The principal sources of, therapeutic services are described in Figure 16.14 on, the next page. The exact configuration of therapeutic, services available will vary from one community to another. To find out what your community has to offer, it, is a good idea to consult your friends, your local phone, book, or your local community mental health center., , Is the Therapist’s Profession, Important?, Psychotherapists may be trained in psychology, psychiatry, social work, counseling, psychiatric nursing,, or marriage and family therapy. Researchers have not, found any reliable associations between therapists’, professional background and therapeutic efficacy, (Beutler, Machado, & Neufeldt, 1994), probably because many talented therapists can be found in all of, these professions. Thus, the kind of degree that a therapist holds doesn’t need to be a crucial consideration, in your selection process. It is true that in most states, , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 545

Page 583 :
FRANK & ERNEST reprinted by permission of Newspaper Enterprise Association, Inc., , only a physician can prescribe drugs for disorders that, warrant drug therapy. However, some critics argue that, many psychiatrists are too quick to use drugs to solve, problems (Breggin, 1991). In any case, other types of, therapists can refer you to a psychiatrist if they think, that drug therapy would be helpful. If you have a, health insurance policy that covers psychotherapy, you, may want to check to see whether it carries any restrictions about the therapist’s profession., , Is the Therapist’s Gender, Important?, If you feel that the therapist’s gender is important, then, for you it is. The therapeutic relationship must be characterized by trust and rapport. Feeling uncomfortable, , with a therapist of one gender or the other could inhibit, the therapeutic process. Hence, you should feel free to, look for a male or female therapist if you prefer to do so., This point is probably most relevant to female clients, whose troubles may be related to the extensive sexism in, our society (A. G. Kaplan, 1985). It is entirely reasonable, for women to seek a therapist with a feminist perspective if that would make them feel more comfortable., You should also be aware that sexual exploitation, is an occasional problem in the context of therapy., Studies indicate that a small minority of therapists take, advantage of their clients sexually (Pope, KeithSpiegel, & Tabachnick, 1986). These incidents almost, always involve a male therapist making advances to a, female client. The available evidence indicates that, these sexual liaisons are usually harmful to clients, , Principal Sources of Therapeutic Services, , •, , Source, , Comments, , Private practitioners, , Self-employed therapists are listed in the Yellow Pages under their professional, category, such as psychologists or psychiatrists. Private practitioners tend to, be relatively expensive, but they also tend to be highly experienced therapists., , Community mental, health centers, , Community mental health centers have salaried psychologists, psychiatrists,, and social workers on staff. The centers provide a variety of services and often, have staff available on weekends and at night to deal with emergencies., , Hospitals, , Several kinds of hospitals provide therapeutic services. There are both public, and private mental hospitals that specialize in the care of people with psychological disorders. Many general hospitals have a psychiatric ward, and those, that do not will usually have psychiatrists and psychologists on staff and on, call. Although hospitals tend to concentrate on inpatient treatment, many, provide outpatient therapy as well., , Human service, agencies, , Various social service agencies employ therapists to provide short-term, counseling. Depending on your community, you may find agencies that deal, with family problems, juvenile problems, drug problems, and so forth., , Schools and, workplaces, , Most high schools and colleges have counseling centers where students can get, help with personal problems. Similarly, some large businesses offer in-house, counseling to their employees., , F I G U R E 16.14, , Sources of therapeutic services. Therapists work in a variety of organizational settings. Foremost, among them are the five described here., 546, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health

Page 584 :
(Williams, 1992). There are absolutely no situations in, which therapist-client sexual relations are an ethical, therapeutic practice. If a therapist makes sexual advances, the client should terminate treatment., , Is Therapy Always Expensive?, Psychotherapy does not have to be prohibitively expensive. Private practitioners tend to be the most expensive, charging between $25 and $140 per (50minute) hour. These fees may seem high, but they are, in line with those of similar professionals, such as dentists and attorneys. Community mental health centers, and social service agencies are usually supported by, tax dollars. Hence, they can charge lower fees than, most therapists in private practice. Many of these organizations use a sliding scale, so that clients are, charged according to how much they can afford to pay., Thus, most communities have inexpensive opportunities for psychotherapy. Moreover, many health insurance plans provide at least partial reimbursement for, the cost of treatment., , Is the Therapist’s Theoretical, Approach Important?, Logically, you might expect that the diverse approaches, to therapy vary in effectiveness. For the most part, that, , is not what researchers find, however. After reviewing, the evidence, Jerome Frank (1961) and Lester Luborsky, and his colleagues (1975) both quote the dodo bird, who has just judged a race in Alice in Wonderland:, “Everybody has won, and all must have prizes.” Improvement rates for various theoretical orientations, usually come out pretty close in most studies (Lambert, & Bergin, 1994; Luborsky et al., 2002; Wampold, 2001)., In their landmark review of outcome studies, Smith, and Glass (1977) estimated the effectiveness of many, major approaches to therapy. As Figure 16.15 shows,, the estimates cluster together closely., However, these findings are a little misleading, as, they have been averaged across many types of patients, and many types of problems. Most experts seem to, think that for certain types of problems, some approaches, to therapy are more effective than others (Beutler, 2002;, Crits-Christoph, 1997; Norcross, 1995). For example,, Martin Seligman (1995) asserts that panic disorders, respond best to cognitive therapy, that specific phobias, are most amenable to treatment with systematic desensitization, and that obsessive-compulsive disorders, are best treated with behavior therapy or medication., Thus, for a specific type of problem, a therapist’s theoretical approach may make a difference., It is also important to point out that the finding, that various approaches to therapy are roughly equal in, overall efficacy does not mean that all therapists are cre-, , Type of therapy, Psychodynamic, Client–centered, Rational–emotive, Systematic, desensitization, Behavior modification, (operant), Eclectic, 0, , •, , 10, , 20, , 30, , 40 50 60 70, Percentile rank, , 80, , 90, , 100, , F I G U R E 16.15, , Efficacy of different approaches to therapy. Smith and Glass (1977) reviewed nearly 400, studies in which clients who were treated with a specific type of therapy were compared with, a control group made up of people with similar problems who went untreated. The bars indicate the percentile rank (on outcome measures) attained by the average client treated with, each type of therapy when compared to control subjects. The higher the percentile, the more, effective the therapy was. As you can see, the different approaches were fairly close in their, apparent effectiveness., Adapted from Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome series. American Psychologist, 32, 752–760., Copyright © 1977 by the American Psychological Association. Adapted by permission of the author., , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 547

Page 585 :
INSIDE WOODY ALLEN by Stuart Hample. Reprinted by permission. © King Features Syndicate, Inc., 1977. World rights reserved., , has to creatively fashion a treatment program that will, help that individual., , What If There Isn’t Any Progress?, If you feel that your therapy isn’t going anywhere,, you should probably discuss these feelings with your, therapist. Don’t be surprised, however, if the therapist, suggests that it may be your own fault. Freud’s concept, of resistance has some validity. Some clients do have, difficulty facing up to their problems. Thus, if your, therapy isn’t progressing, you may need to consider, whether your resistance may be slowing progress. This, self-examination isn’t easy, as you are not an unbiased, , Tom Stewart/Corbis, , ated equal. Some therapists unquestionably are more, effective than others. However, these variations in effectiveness appear to depend on individual therapists’, personal skills rather than on their theoretical orientation (Beutler et al., 1994). Good, bad, and mediocre, therapists are found within each school of thought., The key point is that effective therapy requires skill, and creativity. Arnold Lazarus (1989), who devised an, approach to treatment called multimodal therapy, emphasizes that therapists “straddle the fence between, science and art.” Therapy is scientific in that interventions are based on extensive theory and empirical research (Forsyth & Strong, 1986). Ultimately, though,, each client is a unique human being, and the therapist, , Therapy is both a science and an art. It is scientific in that practitioners are guided in their work, by a huge body of empirical research. It is an art in that therapists often have to be creative in, adapting their treatment procedures to individual patients and their idiosyncrasies., , 548, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health

Page 586 :
Signs of Resistance in Therapy, , RE C O M M E N D E D, READING, , If you’re dissatisfied with your progress in therapy, resistance may be the problem when:, 1. You have nothing specific or concrete to complain about., 2. Your attitude about therapy changes suddenly just as you, reach the truly sensitive issues., , A Consumer’s Guide to, Psychotherapy, by Larry E. Beutler, Bruce, Bongar, and Joel N. Shurkin, (Oxford University Press, 2001), This book is a serious, sophisticated work that may be, more thoroughly grounded in scientific research than, any of its competitors. The character of the book is, consistent with the fact that Larry Beutler is one of the, leading researchers on the efficacy of psychotherapy., That is not to say that this is a research treatise. It is a, pragmatic, readable discussion of everyday issues, such, as what to look for in choosing a therapist, what questions to ask when you have doubts about your therapy,, what role you play in the success of your treatment,, how to recognize and deal with unprofessional or unethical behavior on the part of a therapist, and how to, recognize when therapy is not working. The greatest, strength of the book is its analysis of what research, says about the effectiveness of specific therapies for, particular problems. The authors carefully summarize, the findings on what works best with what problems., Cover image used by permission of Oxford University Press, Inc., , observer. Some common signs of resistance identified, by Ehrenberg and Ehrenberg (1994) are listed in Figure 16.16., Given the very real possibility that poor progress, may be due to resistance, you should not be too quick, to leave therapy when dissatisfied. However, it is possible that your therapist isn’t sufficiently skilled or that, the two of you are incompatible. Thus, after careful, , 3. You’ve had the same problem with other therapists in the, past., 4. Your conflicts with the therapist resemble those that you, have with other people., 5. You start hiding things from your therapist., , •, , F I G U R E 16. 16, , Signs of resistance. Resistance in therapy may be subtle, but, Ehrenberg and Ehrenberg (1994) have identified some telltale, signs to look for., , and deliberate consideration, you should feel free to, terminate your therapy., , What Is Therapy Like?, It is important to have realistic expectations about, therapy, or you may be unnecessarily disappointed., Some people expect miracles. They expect to turn their, life around quickly with little effort. Others expect, their therapist to run their lives for them. These are, unrealistic expectations., Therapy is usually a slow process. Your problems, are not likely to melt away quickly. Moreover, therapy, is hard work, and your therapist is only a facilitator., Ultimately, you have to confront the challenge of, changing your behavior, your feelings, or your personality. This process may not be pleasant. You may have, to face up to some painful truths about yourself. As, Ehrenberg and Ehrenberg (1994) point out, psychotherapy takes time, effort, and courage., , CHAPTER 16, , Psychotherapy, , 549

Page 587 :
■, , KEY IDEAS, , CHAPTER 16 REVIEW, , The Elements of the Treatment Process, ■, , Psychotherapy involves three elements: treatments, clients,, and therapists. Approaches to treatment are diverse, but they, can be grouped into three categories: insight therapies, behavior therapies, and biomedical therapies. People vary considerably in their willingness to seek psychotherapy, and many people who need therapy do not receive it., ■ Therapists come from a variety of professional backgrounds., Clinical and counseling psychologists, psychiatrists, social, workers, psychiatric nurses, and counselors are the principal, providers of therapeutic services., Insight Therapies, ■, , Insight therapies involve verbal interactions intended to enhance self-knowledge. In psychoanalysis, free association and, dream analysis are used to explore the unconscious. When an, analyst’s probing hits sensitive areas, resistance can be expected., The transference relationship may be used to overcome this resistance. Classical psychoanalysis is not widely practiced anymore, but Freud’s legacy lives on in a rich diversity of modern, psychodynamic therapies., ■ The client-centered therapist tries to provide a supportive, climate in which clients can restructure their self-concepts. The, process of therapy emphasizes clarification of the client’s feelings and self-acceptance. Cognitive therapy concentrates on, changing the way clients think about events in their lives. Most, theoretical approaches to insight therapy have been adapted for, use with groups. Group therapy has unique advantages in comparison to individual therapy., ■ The weight of the evidence suggests that insight therapies, can be effective. The benefits of insight therapies may be due in, part to common factors. Repressed memories of childhood sexual abuse recovered through therapy are a new source of controversy in the mental health field. Although many recovered, memories of abuse may be the product of suggestion, some, probably are authentic., Behavior Therapies, ■, , Behavior therapies use the principles of learning in direct, efforts to change specific aspects of behavior. Systematic desensitization is a treatment for phobias. It involves the construction of an anxiety hierarchy, relaxation training, and step-bystep movement through the hierarchy., ■ In aversion therapy, a stimulus associated with an unwanted, response is paired with an unpleasant stimulus in an effort to, eliminate the maladaptive response. Social skills training can, improve clients’ interpersonal skills through shaping, modeling, and behavioral rehearsal. Ample evidence shows that behavior therapies are effective., , Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is used to trigger a cortical, seizure that is believed to have therapeutic value for depression., There is contradictory evidence and heated debate about the effectiveness of ECT and about possible risks associated with its, use., , Current Trends and Issues in Treatment, ■, , Many clinicians and their clients believe that managed care, has restricted access to mental health care and undermined its, quality. Managed care has also raised concerns about providers’, autonomy and clients’ confidentiality., ■ Combinations of insight, behavioral, and biomedical therapies are often used fruitfully in the treatment of psychological, disorders. Many modern therapists are eclectic, using ideas and, techniques gleaned from a number of theoretical approaches., ■ Because of cultural, language, and access barriers, therapeutic, services are underutilized by ethnic minorities in America. However, the crux of the problem is the failure of institutions to provide culturally sensitive forms of treatment for ethnic minorities., Application: Looking for a Therapist, ■, , Therapeutic services are available in many settings, and such, services do not have to be expensive. Excellent and mediocre, therapists can be found in all of the mental health professions,, using the full range of therapeutic approaches. Thus, therapists’, personal skills are more important than their professional degree or their theoretical orientation., ■ In selecting a therapist, it is reasonable to insist on a therapist of one gender or the other. If progress is slow, your own resistance may be the problem. Therapy requires time, hard work,, and the courage to confront your problems., , KEY TERMS, Allegiance effect p. 528, Antianxiety drugs p. 537, Antidepressant drugs p. 538, Antipsychotic drugs p. 537, Aversion therapy p. 534, Behavior therapies p. 532, Biomedical therapies p. 536, Client-centered therapy, p. 524, Clinical psychologists, p. 520, Cognitive therapy p. 526, Counseling psychologists, p. 520, Dream analysis p. 523, Electroconvulsive therapy, (ECT) p. 540, , Free association p. 522, Group therapy p. 527, Insight therapies p. 522, Interpretation p. 523, Mood stabilizers p. 539, Psychiatrists p. 521, Psychoanalysis p. 522, Psychopharmacotherapy, p. 536, Resistance p. 524, Social skills training, pp. 535–536, Systematic desensitization, p. 533, Tardive dyskinesia p. 535, Transference p. 524, , Biomedical Therapies, ■, , Biomedical therapies involve physiological interventions for, psychological problems. Two examples of biomedical treatments are drug therapy and electroconvulsive therapy. A great, variety of disorders are treated with drugs. The principal types, of therapeutic drugs are antianxiety drugs, antipsychotic drugs,, antidepressant drugs, and mood stabilizers., ■ Drug therapies can be effective, but they have their pitfalls., Many drugs produce problematic side effects, and some are, overprescribed. Critics are also concerned that the pharmaceutical industry has gained too much influence over drug testing, research., , 550, , PART 4, , Mental and Physical Health, , KEY PEOPLE, Aaron Beck pp. 526–527, Sigmund Freud pp. 522–524, , Carl Rogers pp. 524–525, Joseph Wolpe pp. 533–534

Page 588 :
7. A stimulus that elicits an undesirable response is paired, with a noxious stimulus in:, a. systematic desensitization., b. cognitive therapy., c. aversion therapy., d. psychoanalysis., , The following exercises in your Personal Explorations Workbook may enhance your self-understanding in relation to, issues raised in this chapter. Questionnaire 16.1: Attitudes, Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help. Personal, Probe 16.1: What Are Your Feelings about Therapy? Personal Probe 16.2: Thinking About Therapy., , ANSWERS, , Pages 532–533, Pages 534–535, Pages 538–539, Pages 539–540, Pages 547–548, , 6. According to behavior therapists, pathological behaviors:, a. are signs of an underlying emotional or cognitive, problem., b. should be viewed as the expression of an unconscious sexual or aggressive conflict., c. can be modified directly through the application of, established principles of conditioning., d. both a and b., , Personal Explorations Workbook, , c, c, c, d, c, , 5. With regard to studies of the efficacy of various treatments, the allegiance effect refers to:, a. a recovery that occurs without formal treatment., b. the tendency to obtain results that favor one’s own, approach to treatment., c. the failure to obtain results that favor one’s own, approach to treatment., d. the finding that treatment benefits are due to common factors., , Visit the Book Companion Website at http://psychology., wadsworth.com/weiten_lloyd8e, where you will find tutorial quizzes, flashcards, and weblinks for every chapter,, a final exam, and more! You can also link to the Thomson, Wadsworth Psychology Resource Center (accessible directly at http://psychology.wadsworth.com) for a range, of psychology-related resources., , 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., , 4. Client-centered therapy emphasizes:, a. interpretation., c. clarification., b. probing the unconscious., d. all of the above., , Book Companion Website, , CHAPTER 16, , Page 522, Pages 522–523, Page 524, Pages 524–525, Page 528, , 3. Because Suzanne has an unconscious sexual attraction, to her father, she behaves seductively toward her therapist. Suzanne’s behavior is most likely a form of:, a. resistance., c. misinterpretation., b. transference., d. spontaneous remission., , 10. A therapist’s theoretical approach is not nearly as important as his or her:, a. age., b. appearance., c. personal characteristics and skills., d. type of professional training., , Psychotherapy, , d, b, b, c, b, , 2. Miriam is seeing a therapist who encourages her to let, her mind ramble and say whatever comes up, regardless of how trivial or irrelevant it may seem. The therapist explains that she is interested in probing the, depths of Miriam’s unconscious mind. This therapist, appears to practice _____________ and the technique, in use is _____________., a. psychoanalysis; transference, b. psychoanalysis; free association, c. cognitive therapy; free association, d. client-centered therapy; clarification, , 9. Drug therapies have been criticized on the grounds, that:, a. they are ineffective in most patients., b. they temporarily relieve symptoms without addressing the real problem., c. many drugs are overprescribed and many patients, are overmedicated., d. both b and c., , PRACTICE TEST, , 1. Which of the following approaches to psychotherapy, is based on the theories of Sigmund Freud and his, followers?, a. Behavior therapies, b. Client-centered therapy, c. Biomedical therapies, d. Psychoanalytic therapy, , 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., , PRACTICE TEST, , 8. Bryce’s psychiatrist has prescribed both Prozac and, lithium for him. Bryce’s diagnosis is probably:, a. schizophrenia., b. obsessive-compulsive disorder., c. bipolar disorder., d. dissociative disorder., , 551

Page 589 :
This page intentionally left blank

Page 590 :
Glossary, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, (AIDS) A disorder in which the immune, system is gradually weakened and eventually, disabled by the human immunodeficiency, virus (HIV)., actor-observer effect The tendency to attribute one’s own behavior to situational factors and others’ behavior to personal factors., acute stressors Threatening events that have, a relatively short duration and a clear end, point., adjustment The psychological processes, through which people manage or cope with, the demands and challenges of everyday life., aggression Any behavior intended to hurt, someone, either physically or verbally., agoraphobia A fear of going out to public, places., alcohol dependence See alcoholism, alcoholism A chronic, progressive disorder, marked by a growing compulsion to drink, and impaired control over drinking that, eventually interfere with health and social, behavior., allegiance effect The idea that researchers, comparing different therapies tend to obtain, results that favor the therapeutic approach, they champion., ambient stress Chronic environmental conditions that, although not urgent, are negatively valued and place adaptive demands on, people., anal intercourse The insertion of the penis, into a partner’s anus and rectum., androcentrism The belief that the male is, the norm., androgens The principal class of male sex, hormones., androgyny The coexistence of both masculine and feminine personality traits in an, individual., anorexia nervosa An eating disorder characterized by intense fear of gaining weight,, disturbed body image, refusal to maintain, normal weight, and dangerous methods to, lose weight., antecedents In behavior modification,, events that typically precede a target, response., antianxiety drugs Drugs that relieve tension, apprehension, and nervousness., antidepressant drugs Drugs that gradually, elevate mood and help to bring people out, of a depression., antipsychotic drugs Drugs used to gradually reduce psychotic symptoms, including, hyperactivity, mental confusion, hallucinations, and delusions., anxiety disorders A class of psychological, disorders marked by feelings of excessive, apprehension and anxiety., , approach-approach conflict A conflict in, which a choice must be made between two, attractive goals., approach-avoidance conflict A conflict in, which a choice must be made about whether, to pursue a single goal that has both attractive and unattractive aspects., archetypes Emotionally charged images and, thought forms that have universal meaning., assertiveness Acting in one’s own best interest by expressing one’s feelings and thoughts, honestly and directly., atherosclerosis A disease characterized by, gradual narrowing of the coronary arteries., attachment styles Typical ways of interacting in close relationships., attitudes Beliefs and feelings about people,, objects, and ideas., attributions Inferences that people draw, about the causes of events, others’ behavior,, and their own behavior., autonomic nervous system (ANS) That, portion of the peripheral nervous system, made up of the nerves that connect to the, heart, blood vessels, smooth muscles, and, glands., aversion therapy A behavior therapy in, which an aversive stimulus is paired with a, stimulus that elicits an undesirable response., avoidance-avoidance conflict A conflict in, which a choice must be made between two, unattractive goals., basking in reflected glory The tendency to, enhance one’s image by publicly announcing one’s association with those who are, successful., behavior Any overt (observable) response or, activity by an organism., behavior modification A systematic approach, to changing behavior through the application, of the principles of conditioning., behavior therapies The application of the, principles of learning to direct efforts to, change clients’ maladaptive behaviors., behavioral contract A written agreement, outlining a promise to adhere to the contingencies of a behavior modification program., behaviorism A theoretical orientation based, on the premise that scientific psychology, should study observable behavior., bereavement The painful loss of a loved one, through death., biomedical therapies Physiological interventions intended to reduce symptoms associated with psychological disorders., biopsychosocial model The idea that physical illness is caused by a complex interaction, of biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors., , bipolar disorders Psychological disorders, marked by the experience of both depressed, and manic periods., bisexuals People who seek emotional-sexual, relationships with members of both genders., body mass index (BMI) Weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in meters) squared, (kg/m2)., brainstorming Generating as many ideas as, possible while withholding criticism and, evaluation., bulimia nervosa An eating disorder characterized by habitual out-of-control overeating followed by unhealthy compensatory, efforts, such as self-induced vomiting, fasting, abuse of laxatives and diuretics, and, excessive exercise., burnout Physical, mental, and emotional, exhaustion that is attributable to workrelated stress., bystander effect The social phenomenon in, which individuals are less likely to provide, needed help when others are present than, when they are alone., cancer Malignant cell growth, which may, occur in many organ systems in the body., cannabis The hemp plant from which marijuana, hashish, and THC are derived., case study An in-depth investigation of an, individual subject., catastrophic thinking Unrealistic appraisals, of stress that exaggerate the magnitude of, one’s problems., catatonic schizophrenia A type of schizophrenia marked by striking motor disturbances, ranging from muscular rigidity to, random motor activity., catharsis The release of emotional tension., cerebral hemispheres The right and left, halves of the cerebrum, which is the convoluted outer layer of the brain., channel The medium through which a message reaches the receiver., chronic stressors Threatening events that, have a relatively long duration and no readily apparent time limit., classical conditioning A type of learning in, which a neutral stimulus acquires the capacity to evoke a response that was originally, evoked by another stimulus., client-centered therapy An insight therapy, that emphasizes providing a supportive, emotional climate for clients, who play a, major role in determining the pace and direction of their therapy., clinical psychologists Psychologists who, specialize in the diagnosis and treatment of, psychological disorders and everyday behavioral problems., , Glossary, , 553

Page 591 :
clinical psychology The branch of psychology, concerned with the diagnosis and treatment, of psychological problems and disorders., close relationships Relatively long-lasting, relationships in which frequent interactions, occur in a variety of settings and in which, the impact of the interactions is strong., cognitive therapy An insight therapy that, emphasizes recognizing and changing negative thoughts and maladaptive beliefs., cohabitation Living together in a sexually, intimate relationship without the legal, bonds of marriage., coitus The insertion of the penis into the, vagina and (typically) pelvic thrusting., collective unconscious According to Jung, a, storehouse of latent memory traces inherited from people’s ancestral past that is, shared with the entire human race., collectivism Putting group goals ahead of, personal goals and defining one’s identity in, terms of the groups to which one belongs., commitment The decision and intent to, maintain a relationship in spite of the difficulties and costs that may arise., communication apprehension The anxiety, caused by having to talk with others., comparison level One’s standard of what, constitutes an acceptable balance of rewards, and costs in a relationship., comparison level for alternatives One’s, estimation of the available outcomes from, alternative relationships., compensation A defense mechanism characterized by efforts to overcome imagined or, real inferiorities by developing one’s abilities., compliance Yielding to social pressure in, one’s public behavior, even though one’s, private beliefs have not changed., concordance rate A statistic indicating the, percentage of twin pairs or other pairs of, relatives that exhibit the same disorder., conditioned response (CR) A learned reaction to a conditioned stimulus that occurs, because of previous conditioning., conditioned stimulus (CS) A previously, neutral stimulus that has, through conditioning, acquired the capacity to evoke a, conditioned response., confirmation bias The tendency to behave, toward others in ways that confirm your, expectations about them., conflict The struggle that occurs when two, or more incompatible motivations or behavioral impulses compete for expression., conformity Yielding to real or imagined, social pressure., conscious According to Freud, whatever one, is aware of at a particular point in time., constructive coping Efforts to deal with, stressful events that are judged to be relatively healthful., context The environment in which communication takes place., , 554, , Glossary, , control group Subjects in an experiment, who do not receive the special treatment, given to the experimental group., conversion disorder Psychological disorder, characterized by a significant loss of physical, function or by other physical symptoms, (with no apparent organic basis), usually in, a single organ system., coping Active efforts to master, reduce, or, tolerate the demands created by stress., coronary heart disease A chronic disease, characterized by a reduction in blood flow, from the coronary arteries, which supply the, heart with blood., correlation The extent to which two variables are related to each other., correlation coefficient A numerical index of, the degree of relationship that exists between, two variables., counseling psychologists Psychologists who, specialize in the treatment of everyday behavioral problems., cunnilingus The oral stimulation of the, female genitals., date rape Forced and unwanted intercourse, with someone in the context of dating., death anxiety Fear and apprehension about, one’s own death., death system The collection of rituals and, procedures used by a culture to handle death., defense mechanisms Largely unconscious, reactions that protect a person from unpleasant emotions such as anxiety and guilt., defensive attribution The tendency to, blame victims for their misfortune, so that, one feels less likely to be victimized in a similar way., delusions False beliefs that are maintained, even though they clearly are out of touch, with reality., dementia An abnormal condition marked, by multiple cognitive defects that include, memory impairment., dependent variable In an experiment, the, variable that is thought to be affected by, manipulations of the independent variable., diagnosis Distinguishing one illness from, another., discrimination Behaving differently, usually, unfairly, toward members of a group., disorganized schizophrenia A type of schizophrenia characterized by a particularly, severe deterioration of adaptive behavior., displaced workers Individuals who are unemployed because their jobs have disappeared., displacement Diverting emotional feelings, (usually anger) from their original source to, a substitute target., display rules Norms that govern the appropriate display of emotions., dissociative amnesia A sudden loss of memory for important personal information that is, too extensive to be due to normal forgetting., , dissociative disorders A class of psychological disorders characterized by loss of contact, with portions of one’s consciousness or, memory, resulting in disruptions in one’s, sense of identity., dissociative fugue A loss of memory for, one’s entire past life, along with one’s sense, of personal identity., dissociative identity disorder Dissociative, disorder involving the coexistence in one, person of two or more largely complete, and, usually very different, personalities. Also, called multiple-personality disorder., door-in-the-face technique Making a very, large request that is likely to be turned down, to increase the chance that people will agree, to a smaller request later., downward social comparison The defensive, tendency to compare oneself with someone, whose troubles are more serious than one’s, own., dream analysis A psychotherapeutic technique in which the therapist interprets the, symbolic meaning of the client’s dreams., dual-earner households Households in, which both partners are employed., eating disorders Severe disturbances in eating behavior characterized by preoccupation, with weight and unhealthy efforts to control, weight., ego According to Freud, the decision-making, component of personality that operates according to the reality principle., elaboration likelihood model The idea that, an individual’s thoughts about a persuasive, message (rather than the message itself) determine whether attitude change will occur., electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) A biomedical treatment in which electric shock is used, to produce a cortical seizure accompanied, by convulsions., emotional intelligence The ability to monitor, assess, express, or regulate one’s emotions; the capacity to identify, interpret, and, understand others’ emotions; and the ability, to use this information to guide one’s thinking and actions., emotions Powerful, largely uncontrollable, feelings, accompanied by physiological, changes., empathy Adopting another’s frame of reference to understand his or her point of view., empiricism The premise that knowledge, should be acquired through observation., endocrine system Glands that secrete chemicals called hormones into the bloodstream., endogamy The tendency of people to marry, within their own social group., epidemiology The study of the distribution of, mental or physical disorders in a population., erectile difficulties The male sexual dysfunction characterized by the persistent inability to achieve or maintain an erection, adequate for intercourse.

Page 592 :
erogenous zones Areas of the body that are, sexually sensitive or responsive., estrogens The principal class of female sex, hormones., etiology The apparent causation and developmental history of an illness., evolutionary psychology A field of psychology that examines behavioral processes in, terms of their adaptive value for members of, a species over the course of many generations., experiment A research method in which the, investigator manipulates an (independent), variable under carefully controlled conditions and observes whether there are changes, in a second (dependent) variable as a result., experimental group The subjects in an experiment who receive some special treatment in regard to the independent variable., explanatory style The tendency to use similar causal attributions for a wide variety of, events in one’s life., expressiveness A style of communication, characterized by the ability to express tender, emotions easily and to be sensitive to the, feelings of others., external attributions Ascribing the causes, of behavior to situational demands and environmental constraints., extinction The gradual weakening and disappearance of a conditioned response tendency., family life cycle An orderly sequence of developmental stages that families tend to, progress through., fellatio The oral stimulation of the penis., fight-or-flight response A physiological, reaction to threat that mobilizes an organism for attacking (fight) or fleeing (flight) an, enemy., fixation In Freud’s theory, a failure to move, forward from one stage to another as, expected., foot-in-the-door technique Getting people, to agree to a small request to increase the, chances that they will agree to a larger request later., free association A psychotherapeutic technique in which clients spontaneously express, their thoughts and feelings exactly as they, occur, with as little censorship as possible., frustration The feelings that occur in any, situation in which the pursuit of some goal, is thwarted., fundamental attribution error The tendency to explain others’ behavior as a result, of personal rather than situational factors., games Manipulative interactions progressing toward a predictable outcome, in which, people conceal their real motivations., gender The state of being male or female., gender identity The ability to correctly classify oneself as male or female., , gender-role identity A person’s identification with the traits regarded as masculine or, feminine., gender-role transcendence perspective The, idea that to be fully human, people need to, move beyond gender roles as a way of organizing the world and of perceiving themselves and others., gender roles Cultural expectations about, what is appropriate behavior for each gender., gender schemas Cognitive structures that, guide the processing of gender-relevant, information., gender stereotypes Widely shared beliefs, about males’ and females’ abilities, personality traits, and social behavior., general adaptation syndrome A model of, the body’s stress response, consisting of three, stages: alarm, resistance, and exhaustion., generalized anxiety disorder A psychological disorder marked by a chronic high level, of anxiety that is not tied to any specific, threat., glass ceiling An invisible barrier that prevents most women and ethnic minorities, from advancing to the highest levels of an, occupation., gonads The sex glands., group therapy The simultaneous treatment, of several or more clients in a group., hallucinations Sensory perceptions that, occur in the absence of a real external stimulus or that represent gross distortions of, perceptual input., hallucinogens A diverse group of drugs that, have powerful effects on mental and emotional functioning, marked most prominently, by distortions in sensory and perceptual, experience., hardiness A personality syndrome marked, by commitment, challenge, and control that, is purportedly associated with strong stress, resistance., health psychology The subfield of psychology, concerned with the relation of psychosocial, factors to the promotion and maintenance, of health, and with the causation, prevention,, and treatment of illness., hedonic adaptation The phenomenon that, occurs when the mental scale that people, use to judge the pleasantness and unpleasantness of their experiences shifts so that, their neutral point, or baseline for comparison, is changed., heritability ratio An estimate of the proportion of trait variability in a population, that is determined by variations in genetic, inheritance., heterosexism The assumption that all individuals and relationships are heterosexual., heterosexuals People whose sexual desires, and erotic behaviors are directed toward the, other gender., hierarchy of needs A systematic arrangement of needs, according to priority, in, , which basic needs must be met before less, basic needs are aroused., homogamy The tendency of people to, marry others who have similar personal, characteristics., homophobia The intense fear and intolerance of homosexuality., homosexuals People who seek emotionalsexual relationships with members of the, same gender., hormones Chemical substances released, into the bloodstream by the endocrine, glands., humanism A theoretical orientation that, emphasizes the unique qualities of humans,, especially their free will and their potential, for personal growth., hypoactive sexual desire Lack of interest in, sexual activity., hypochondriasis (hypochondria) Excessive, preoccupation with health concerns and, incessant worry about developing physical, illnesses., id In Freud’s theory, the primitive, instinctive component of personality that operates, according to the pleasure principle., identification Bolstering self-esteem by, forming an imaginary or real alliance with, some person or group., identity A relatively clear and stable sense of, who one is and what one stands for., immune response The body’s defensive, reaction to invasion by bacteria, viral agents,, or other foreign substances., impression management Usually conscious, efforts to influence the way others think of, one., incongruence The disparity between one’s, self-concept and one’s actual experience., independent variable In an experiment, a, condition or event that an experimenter, varies in order to see its impact on another, variable., individualism Putting personal goals ahead, of group goals and defining one’s identity in, terms of personal attributes rather than, group memberships., industrial/organizational (I/O) psychology, The study of human behavior in the, workplace., infant attachment The strong emotional, bond that infants usually develop with their, caregivers during the first year of their lives., informational influence Pressure to conform, that operates when people look to others for, how to behave in ambiguous situations., ingratiation Efforts to make oneself likable, to others., insanity A legal status indicating that a person cannot be held responsible for his or her, actions because of mental illness., insight therapies A group of psychotherapies, in which verbal interactions are intended to, enhance clients’ self-knowledge and thus, , Glossary, , 555

Page 593 :
promote healthful changes in personality, and behavior., instrumentality A style of communication, that focuses on reaching practical goals and, finding solutions to problems., interference Forgetting information because, of competition from other learned material., internal attributions Ascribing the causes of, behavior to personal dispositions, traits,, abilities, and feelings rather than to external, events., Internet addiction Spending an inordinate, amount of time on the Internet and inability, to control online use., interpersonal communication An interactional process whereby one person sends a, message to another., interpersonal conflict Disagreement among, two or more people., interpretation A therapist’s attempts to, explain the inner significance of the client’s, thoughts, feelings, memories, and behaviors., intimacy Warmth, closeness, and sharing in, a relationship., intimate violence Aggression toward those, who are in close relationships to the aggressor., investments Things that people contribute, to a relationship that they can’t get back if, the relationship ends., involuntary commitment Hospitalizing, people in psychiatric facilities against their, will., kinesics The study of communication, through body movements., labor force All people who are employed as, well as those who are currently unemployed, but are looking for work., learned helplessness Passive behavior produced by exposure to unavoidable aversive, events., leisure Unpaid activities one chooses to, engage in because they are personally, meaningful., life changes Any noticeable alterations in, one’s living circumstances that require, readjustment., loneliness The emotional state that occurs, when a person has fewer interpersonal relationships than desired or when these relationships are not as satisfying as desired., lowball technique Getting people to commit themselves to an attractive proposition, before its hidden costs are revealed., major depressive disorder Psychological, disorder characterized by persistent feelings, of sadness and despair and a loss of interest, in previous sources of pleasure., manic-depressive disorder See bipolar, disorder., marriage The legally and socially sanctioned, union of sexually intimate adults., , 556, , Glossary, , matching hypothesis The idea that people, of similar levels of physical attractiveness, gravitate toward each other., medical model The idea that it is useful to, think of abnormal behavior as a disease., meditation A family of mental exercises in, which a conscious attempt is made to focus, attention in a nonanalytical way., menarche The first occurrence of menstruation., menopause The cessation of menstruation., mere exposure effect An increase in positive, feelings toward a novel stimulus (such as a, person) based on frequent exposure to it., message The information or meaning that is, transmitted from one person to another., meta-analysis A statistical technique that, evaluates the results of many studies on the, same question., midlife crisis A turbulent period of doubts, and reappraisals of one’s life., mnemonic devices Strategies for enhancing, memory., mood disorders A class of disorders marked, by emotional disturbances that may spill, over to disrupt physical, perceptual, social,, and thought processes., mood stabilizers Drugs used to control, mood swings in patients with bipolar mood, disorders., mourning Formal practices of an individual, and a community in response to a death., multiple-personality disorder See dissociative identity disorder, narcissism The tendency to regard oneself, as grandiosely self-important., narcotics (opiates) Drugs derived from, opium that are capable of relieving pain., naturalistic observation An approach to, research in which the researcher engages in, careful observation of behavior without, intervening directly with the subjects., need for self-actualization The need to fulfill one’s potential; the highest need in, Maslow’s motivational hierarchy., negative reinforcement The strengthening of, a response because it is followed by the removal of a (presumably) unpleasant stimulus., neurons Individual cells that receive, integrate, and transmit information., neuroticism A broad personality trait associated with chronic anxiety, insecurity, and, self-consciousness., neurotransmitters Chemicals that carry, signals from one neuron to another., noise Any stimulus that interferes with accurately expressing or understanding a message., nonverbal communication The transmission of meaning from one person to another, through means or symbols other than words., normative influence Pressure to conform, that operates when people conform to, social norms for fear of negative social, consequences., , nutrition A collection of processes (mainly, food consumption) through which an organism uses the materials (nutrients) required for survival and growth., obedience A form of compliance that occurs, when people follow direct commands, usually from someone in a position of authority., observational learning Learning that occurs, when an organism’s responding is influenced, by observing others, who are called models., obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) A, psychological disorder marked by persistent, uncontrollable intrusions of unwanted, thoughts (obsessions) and by urges to engage in senseless rituals (compulsions)., occupational interest inventories Tests that, measure one’s interests as they relate to various jobs or careers., Oedipal complex According to Freud, a, child’s erotically tinged desires for the othersex parent, accompanied by feelings of hostility toward the same-sex parent., operant conditioning A form of learning in, which voluntary responses come to be controlled by their consequences., optimism A general tendency to expect, good outcomes., orgasm The release that occurs when sexual, arousal reaches its peak intensity and is discharged in a series of muscular contractions, that pulsate through the pelvic area., orgasmic difficulties Sexual disorders characterized by an ability to experience sexual, arousal but persistent problems in achieving, orgasm., overcompensation Making up for frustration in one area by seeking overgratification, in another area., overdose An excessive dose of a drug that, can seriously threaten one’s life., panic disorder Recurrent attacks of overwhelming anxiety that usually occur suddenly and unexpectedly., paralanguage All vocal cues other than the, content of the verbal message itself., paranoid schizophrenia A type of schizophrenia dominated by delusions of persecution, along with delusions of grandeur., passion The intense feelings (both positive, and negative) experienced in love relationships, including sexual desire., person perception The process of forming, impressions of others., personal space A zone of space surrounding, a person that is felt to “belong” to that person., personality An individual’s unique constellation of consistent behavioral traits., personality trait A durable disposition to, behave in a particular way in a variety of, situations., persuasion The communication of arguments and information intended to change, another person’s attitudes.

Page 594 :
phobic disorders Anxiety disorders marked, by a persistent and irrational fear of an object, or situation that presents no realistic danger., physical dependence The need to continue, to take a drug to avoid withdrawal illness., polygraph A device that records fluctuations, in physiological arousal as a person answers, questions., positive reinforcement The strengthening, of a response because it is followed by the, arrival of a (presumably) pleasant stimulus., possible selves One’s conceptions about the, kind of person one might become in the, future., posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Disturbed behavior that emerges sometime, after a major stressful event is over., preconscious According to Freud, material, just beneath the surface of awareness that, can be easily retrieved., prejudice A negative attitude toward members of a group., premature ejaculation Impaired sexual, relations because a man consistently reaches, orgasm too quickly., pressure Expectations or demands that one, behave in a certain way., prevalence The percentage of a population, that exhibits a disorder during a specified, time period., primacy effect The fact that initial information tends to carry more weight than subsequent information., primary appraisal An initial evaluation of, whether an event is (1) irrelevant to one,, (2) relevant, but not threatening, or, (3) stressful., primary sex characteristics The structures, necessary for reproduction., procrastination The tendency to delay tackling tasks until the last minute., prognosis A forecast about the probable, course of an illness., projection Attributing one’s own thoughts,, feelings, or motives to another person., projective tests Personality tests that ask, subjects to respond to vague, ambiguous, stimuli in ways that may reveal the subjects’, needs, feelings, and personality traits., proxemics The study of people’s use of interpersonal space., proximity Geographic, residential, and, other forms of spatial closeness., psychiatrists Physicians who specialize in, the treatment of psychological disorders., psychoanalysis An insight therapy that emphasizes the recovery of unconscious conflicts, motives, and defenses through, techniques such as free association, dream, analysis, and transference., psychodynamic theories All the diverse, theories descended from the work of Sigmund Freud that focus on unconscious, mental forces., , psychological dependence The need to continue to take a drug to satisfy intense mental, and emotional craving for it., psychological test A standardized measure, of a sample of a person’s behavior., psychology The science that studies behavior, and the physiological and mental processes, that underlie it and the profession that applies the accumulated knowledge of this, science to practical problems., psychopharmacotherapy The treatment of, mental disorders with medication., psychosexual stages In Freud’s theory, developmental periods with a characteristic, sexual focus that leave their mark on adult, personality., psychosomatic diseases Genuine physical, ailments caused in part by psychological, factors, especially emotional distress., puberty The stage during which sexual, functions reach maturity and that marks the, beginning of adolescence., pubescence The two-year span preceding, puberty during which the changes leading to, physical and sexual maturity take place., punishment The weakening (decrease in, frequency) of a response because it is followed by the arrival of a (presumably) unpleasant stimulus., rational-emotive therapy An approach to, therapy that focuses on altering clients’ patterns of irrational thinking to reduce maladaptive emotions and behavior., rationalization Creating false but plausible, excuses to justify unacceptable behavior., reaction formation Behaving in a way that, is exactly the opposite of one’s true feelings., receiver The person to whom a message is, targeted., reciprocal liking Liking those who show, they like you., reciprocity principle The rule that one, should pay back in kind what one receives, from others., reference group A set of people against, whom one compares oneself., refractory period A time after orgasm during which males are unable to experience, another orgasm., regression A reversion to immature patterns, of behavior., relationship maintenance The actions and, activities used to sustain the desired quality, of a relationship., reliability The measurement consistency of, a test., repression Keeping distressing thoughts and, feelings buried in the unconscious., resistance Largely unconscious defensive, maneuvers intended to hinder the progress, of therapy., , schizophrenic disorders A class of disorders, marked by disturbances in thought that spill, over to affect perceptual, social, and emotional processes., secondary appraisal An evaluation of one’s, coping resources and options for dealing, with stress., secondary sex characteristics The physical, features that distinguish one gender from the, other but are not essential for reproduction., sedatives Sleep-inducing drugs that tend to, decrease central nervous system and behavioral activity., self-actualization See need for selfactualization., self-attributions Inferences that people, draw about the causes of their own behavior., self-concept A collection of beliefs about, one’s basic nature, unique qualities, and, typical behavior., self-defeating behaviors Seemingly intentional acts that thwart a person’s self-interest., self-disclosure The voluntary act of verbally, communicating private information about, oneself to another person., self-discrepancy The mismatching of selfperceptions., self-efficacy One’s belief about one’s ability, to perform behaviors that should lead to, expected outcomes., self-enhancement The tendency to maintain, positive views of oneself., self-esteem One’s overall assessment of one’s, worth as a person; the evaluative component, of the self-concept., self-fulfilling prophecy The process, whereby expectations about a person cause, the person to behave in ways that confirm, the expectations., self-handicapping The tendency to sabotage, one’s performance to provide an excuse for, possible failure., self-monitoring The degree to which people, attend to and control the impressions they, make on others., self-regulation Directing and controlling, one’s behavior., self-report inventories Personality scales, that ask individuals to answer a series of, questions about their characteristic behavior., self-serving bias The tendency to attribute, one’s successes to personal factors and one’s, failures to situational factors., self-verification theory The idea that people, prefer to receive feedback from others that is, consistent with their own self-views., sensate focus A sex-therapy exercise in, which partners take turns pleasuring each, other with guided verbal feedback while, certain kinds of stimulation are temporarily, forbidden., set-point theory The idea that there is a, natural point of stability in body weight,, thought to involve the monitoring of fat cell, levels., , Glossary, , 557

Page 595 :
settling-point theory The idea that weight, tends to drift around the level at which the, constellation of factors that determine food, consumption and energy expenditure, achieve an equilibrium., sex therapy The professional treatment of, sexual dysfunctions., sexism Discrimination against people on the, basis of their sex., sexual dysfunctions Impairments in sexual, functioning that cause subjective distress., sexual harassment The subjection of individuals to unwelcome sexually oriented behavior., sexual identity The complex of personal, qualities, self-perceptions, attitudes, values,, and preferences that guide one’s sexual, behavior., sexual orientation A person’s preference for, emotional and sexual relationships with, individuals of the same gender, the other, gender, or either gender., sexually transmitted disease (STD) An illness that is transmitted primarily through, sexual contact., shaping Modifying behavior by reinforcing, closer and closer approximations of a desired response., shyness Discomfort, inhibition, and excessive caution in interpersonal relations., social clock A person’s notion of a developmental schedule that specifies what the person should have accomplished by certain, points in life., social comparison theory The idea that, people need to compare themselves with, others in order to gain insight into their own, behavior., social constructionism The assertion that, individuals construct their own reality based, on societal expectations, conditioning, and, selfsocialization., social exchange theory The idea that interpersonal relationships are governed by perceptions of the rewards and costs exchanged, in interactions., social role theory The assertion that minor, gender differences are exaggerated by the, different social roles that males and females, occupy., social skills training A behavior therapy, designed to improve interpersonal skills that, emphasizes shaping, modeling, and behavioral rehearsal., , 558, , Glossary, , social support Aid and succor provided by, members of one’s social networks., socialization The process by which individuals acquire the norms and roles expected of, people in a particular society., somatization disorder A psychological disorder marked by a history of diverse physical, complaints that appear to be psychological, in origin., somatoform disorders A class of psychological disorders involving physical ailments, that have no authentic organic basis but are, due solely to psychological factors., source The person who initiates, or sends, a, message., spermarche An adolescent male’s first, ejaculation., SQ3R A study system designed to promote, effective reading that includes five steps:, survey, question, read, recite, and review., standardization The uniform procedures, used to administer and score a test., stereotypes Widely held beliefs that people, have certain characteristics simply because, of their membership in a particular group., stimulants Drugs that tend to increase central nervous system and behavioral activity., stress Any circumstances that threaten or, are perceived to threaten one’s well-being, and thereby tax one’s coping abilities., subjective well-being Individuals’ personal, assessments of their overall happiness or life, satisfaction., superego According to Freud, the moral, component of personality that incorporates, social standards about what represents right, and wrong., superordinate goals Requiring two groups, to work together to achieve a mutual goal., surveys Structured questionnaires designed, to solicit information about specific aspects, of subjects’ behavior., systematic desensitization A behavior therapy used to reduce clients’ anxiety responses, through counterconditioning., tardive dyskinesia A neurological disorder, marked by chronic tremors and involuntary, spastic movements., test norms Statistics that provide information, about where a score on a psychological test, ranks in relation to other scores on that test., , token A symbol of all the members of a, group., token economy A system for doling out, symbolic reinforcers that are exchanged later, for a variety of genuine reinforcers., tolerance A progressive decrease in responsiveness to a drug with continued use., transference A phenomenon that occurs, when clients start relating to their therapist, in ways that mimic critical relationships in, their lives., Type A personality A personality style, marked by a competitive orientation, impatience and urgency, and anger and hostility., Type B personality A personality style, marked by relatively relaxed, patient, easygoing, amicable behavior., unconditioned response (UCR) An unlearned reaction to an unconditioned, stimulus that occurs without previous, conditioning., unconditioned stimulus (UCS) A stimulus, that evokes an unconditioned response, without previous conditioning., unconscious According to Freud, thoughts,, memories, and desires that are well below, the surface of conscious awareness but that, nonetheless exert great influence on our, behavior., underemployment Settling for a job that, does not make full use of one’s skills, abilities, and training., undifferentiated schizophrenia A type of, schizophrenia marked by idiosyncratic mixtures of schizophrenic symptoms., validity The ability of a test to measure what, it was designed to measure., variables See dependent variable; independent variable., vasocongestion Engorgement of blood, vessels., work An activity that produces something of, value for others., work-family conflict The feeling of being, pulled in multiple directions by competing, demands from job and family.

Page 596 :
References, AAUW Educational Foundation (1992). How, schools shortchange girls. Washington, DC: AAUW., Abbey, A., Clinton-Sherrod, A. M., McAuslan, P.,, Zawacki, T., & Buck, P. O. (2003). The relationship, between the quantity of alcohol consumed and the, severity of sexual assaults committed by college, men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(7),, 813–833., Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., Zawacki, T. , Clinton,, A. M., & Buck, P. O. (2001). Attitudinal, experimental, and situational predictors of sexual assault, perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,, 16(8), 784–807., Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P. O., Clinton, A. M.,, & McAuslan, P. (2001). Alcohol and sexual assault., Alcohol Research and Health, 25(1), 43–51., Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P. O., Clinton, A. M.,, & McAuslan, P. (2004). Sexual assault and alcohol, consumption: What do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still, needed? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(3),, 271–303., Abel, M. H. (1998). Interaction of humor and, gender in moderating relationships between stress, and outcomes. Journal of Psychology, 132, 267–276., Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping, strategies. Humor: International Journal of Humor, Research, 15(4), 365–381., Aber, J. L., Brown, J. L., & Jones, S. M. (2003)., Developmental trajectories toward violence in, middle childhood: Course, demographic differences, and response to school-based intervention., Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 324–348., Abi-Dargham, A., Gil, R., Krystal, J., Baldwin,, R. M., Seibyl, J. P., Bowers, M., van Dyck, C. H.,, Charney, D. S., Innis, R. B., & Laruelle, M. (1998)., Increased striatal dopamine transmission in schizophrenia: Confirmation in a second cohort. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 761–767., Aboud, F. E., & Mendelson, M. J. (1996). Determinants of friendship selection and quality: Developmental perspectives. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F., Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company, they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence, (pp. 87–112). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., Abramson, L. Y., Alloy, L. B., Hankin, B. L., Haeffel,, G. J., MacCoon, D. G., & Gibb, B. E. (2002). Cognitive vulnerability-stress models of depression in, a self-regulatory and psychobiological context. In, I. H. Gotlib & C. L. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook of, depression. New York: Guilford., Abramson, L. Y., Alloy, L. B., & Metalsky, J. I. (1995)., Hopelessness depression. In J. N. Buchanan &, M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Explanatory style (pp., 113–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale,, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans:, Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal, Psychology, 87, 49–74., Ackerman, S., Zuroff, D. C., & Moskowitz, D. S., (2000). Generativity in midlife and young adults:, Links to agency, communion, and subjective wellbeing. International Journal of Aging and Human, Development, 50(1), 17–41., Acock, A. C., & Demo, D. H. (1994). Family diversity and well-being. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., ACSF investigators (1992, December). AIDS and, sexual behaviour in France. Nature, 360, 407–409., Adams, G., Anderson, S. L., & Adonu, J. K. (2004)., The cultural grounding of closeness and intimacy., In D. J. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of, closeness and intimacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Adams, H. E., Wright, L. W., Jr., & Lohr, B. A., (1996). Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105,, 440–445., , Adams, K. A. (1980). Who has the final word? Sex,, race, and dominance behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 1–8., Adams, K. A. (1983). Aspects of social context as, determinants of black women’s resistance to challenges. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 69–78., Adcock, C. J. (1965). Thematic Apperception Test., In O. K. Buros (Ed.), Sixth Mental Measurements, Yearbook. Highland Park, NY: Gryphon Press., Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5-14., Ader, R. (2001). Psychoneuroimmunology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(3),, 94–98., Adler, A. (1917). Study of organ inferiority and its, psychical compensation. New York: Nervous and, Mental Diseases Publishing., Adler, A. (1927). Practice and theory of individual, psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World., Adler, N. E., & Snibbe, A. C. (2003). The role of, psychological processes in explaining the gradient, between socioeconomic status and health. Current, Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 119–123., Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson,, D. J., & Sanford, B. W. (1950). The authoritarian, personality. New York: Harper & Row., Agras, W. S., & Berkowitz, R. I. (1999). Behavior, therapies. In R. E. Hales, S. C. Yudofsky, & J. A., Talbott (Eds.), American Psychiatric Press textbook, of psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press., Ahn, H., & Wampold, B. E. (2001). Where oh where, are the specific ingredients? A meta–analysis of, component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 251–257., Ahrons, C. R. (1999). Divorce: An unscheduled, family transition. In B. Carter & M. McGoldrick, (Eds.), The expanded family life cycle: Individual,, family, and social perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 381–398)., Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., &, Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ:, Erlbaum., Akgun, S., & Ciarrochi, J. (2003). Learned resourcefulness moderates the relationship between academic stress and academic performance. Educational, Psychology, 23(3), 287-294., Akimoto, S. A., & Sanbonmatsu, D. M. (1999)., Differences in self-effacing behavior between, European and Japanese Americans: Effect on, competence evaluations. Journal of Cross-Cultural, Psychology, 30, 159–177., Akiskal, H. S. (2000). Mood disorders: Clinical, features. In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.),, Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of, psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1338–1376)., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Albee, G. W. (1998). Fifty years of clinical psychology: Selling our soul to the devil. Applied and, Preventive Psychology, 7(3), 189–194., Albert, C. M., Ma, J., Rifai, N., Stampfer, M. J., &, Ridker, P. M. (2002). Prospective study of C-reactive protein, homocysteine, and plasma lipid levels, as predictors of sudden cardiac death. Circulation,, 105, 2595–2599., Alberti, R. E., & Emmons, M. L. (2001). Your perfect right. San Luis Obispo, CA: Impact Publishers., Alexander, C. N., Davies, J. L., Dixon, C. A., Dillbeck, M. C., Druker, S. M., Oetzel, R. M.,, Muehlman, J. M., & Orme-Johnson, D. W. (1990)., Growth of higher states of consciousness: The, Vedic psychology of human development. In C. N., Alexander & E. J. Langer (Eds.), Higher stages of, human development: Perspectives on adult growth., New York: Oxford University Press., , Alexander, C. N., Robinson, P., Orme-Johnson,, D. W., Schneider, R. H., et al. (1994). The effects of, transcendental meditation compared with other, methods of relaxation and meditation in reducing, risk factors, morbidity, and mortality. Homeostasis, in Health & Disease, 35, 243–263., Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as, determined by the desirability and controllability, of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 49(6), 1621–1630., Alicke, M. D., Smith, R. H., & Klotz, J. L. (1986)., Judgments of personal attractiveness: The role of, faces and bodies. Personality and Social Psychology, Bulletin, 12, 381–389., Allegro, J. T., & Veerman, T. J. (1998). Sickness, absence. In P. J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry, & C. J. de, Wolff (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational, psychology. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press., Allen, K., Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2002)., Cardiovascular reactivity in the presence of pets,, friends, and spouses: The truth about cats and, dogs. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64(5), 727–739., Allen, K. R., & Demo, D. H. (1995). The families of, lesbians and gay men: A new frontier in family, research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57,, 111–127., Allison, D. B., Fontaine, K. R., Manson, J. E.,, Stevens, J., & VanItallie, T. B. (1999). Annual, deaths attributable to obesity in the United States., Journal of the American Medical Association,, 282(16), 1530–1538., Allison, D. B., Heshka, S., Neale, M. C., Lykken,, D. T., & Heymsfield, S. B. (1994). A genetic analysis of relative weight among 4,020 twin pairs, with, an emphasis on sex effects. Health Psychology, 13,, 362–365., Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1988). Depressive, realism: Four theoretical perspectives. In L. B., Alloy (Ed.), Cognitive processes in depression. New, York: Guilford Press., Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Whitehouse, W. G.,, Hogan, M. E., Tashman, N. A., Steinberg, D. L.,, Rose, D. T., & Donovan, P. (1999). Depressogenic, cognitive styles: Predictive validity, information, processing and personality characteristics, and, developmental origins. Behavioral Research and, Therapy, 37, 503–531., Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological, interpretation. New York: Holt., Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston., Alonso, A., Alonso, S., & Piper, W. (2003). Group, psychotherapy. In G. Stricker, & T. A. Widiger, (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 8. Clinical, psychology. New York: Wiley., Altemeyer, B. (1988a). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., Altemeyer, B. (1988b). The good soldier, marching, in step: A psychological explanation of state terror., Sciences, March/April, 30–38., Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian, personality.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92., Altman, I., Vinsel, A., & Brown, B. A. (1981)., Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An, application to social penetration and privacy regulation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14). New York:, Academic Press., Amada, G. (1985). A guide to psychotherapy. Lanham, MD: Madison Books., Amato, P. R. (1996). Explaining the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Journal of Marriage, and the Family, 58, 628–640., , References, , 559

Page 597 :
Amato, P. R. (1999). Children of divorced parents as, young adults. In E. M. Hetheringon (Ed.), Coping, with divorce, single parenting, and remarriage: A risk, and resiliency perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Amato, P. R. (2001). The consequences of divorce, for adults and children. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.),, Understanding families into the new millennium: A, decade in review (pp. 488–506). Minneapolis, MN:, National Council on Family Relations., Amato, P. R. (2003). Reconciling divergent perspectives: Judith Wallerstein, quantitative family, research, and children of divorce. Family Relations:, Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies,, 52(4), 332–339., Amato, P. R. (2004a). Divorce in social and historical context: Changing scientific perspectives on, children and marital dissolution. In M. Coleman, & L. H. Ganong (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary, families: Considering the past, contemplating the, future. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Amato, P. R. (2004b). Tension between institutional and individual views of marriage. Journal of, Marriage and Family, 66, 959–965., Amato, P. R., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). The transmission of marital instability across generations:, Relationship skills or commitment to marriage?, Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1038–1051., Amato, P. R., Johnson, D. R., Booth, A., & Rogers,, S. J. (2003). Continuity and change in marital, quality between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1–22., Amato, P. R., & Previti, D. (2003). People’s reasons, for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course,, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24(5),, 602–626., Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal, study of marital problems and subsequent divorce., Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 612–624., Ambady, N., LaPlante, D., Nguyen, T., Rosenthal,, R., Chaumeton, N., & Levinson W. (2002). Surgeon’s tone of voice: A clue to malpractice history., Surgery, 132, 5–9., American Association of University Women., (1994). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America., Washington, DC: Author., American Council on Education. (1997). Many, college graduates participate in training courses to, improve their job skills. Higher Education and, National Affairs, 46(19), 3., American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author., American Psychiatric Association Task Force on, Electroconvulsive Therapy. (2001). The practice of, electroconvulsive therapy: Recommendations for, treatment (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American, Psychiatric Association., Ames, S. C., Jones, G. N., Howe, J. T., & Brantley,, P. J. (2001). A prospective study of the impact of, stress on quality of life: An investigation of lowincome individuals with hypertension. Annals of, Behavioral Medicine, 23(2), 112–119., Andersen, B. L., Golden-Kreutz, D. M., & DiLillo,, V. (2001). Cancer. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, &, J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology, (pp. 709–726). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Andersen, B. L., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R., (1994). A biobehavioral model of cancer stress and, disease course. American Psychologist, 49, 389–404., Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring,, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of, personality and physical attractiveness in social, groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116–132., Anderson, C. A., Berkowitz, L., Donnerstein, E.,, Huesmann, L. R., Johnson, J. D., Linz, D., Malamuth, N. M., & Wartella, E. (2003). The influence, of media violence on youth. Psychological Science, in the Public Interest, 4(3), 81–110., Anderson, C. A., & Huesmann, L. R. (2003)., Human aggression: A social-cognitive view. In, M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook, , 560, , References, , of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, Publications., Anderson, C. A., Miller, R. S., Riger, A. L., Dill,, J. C., & Sedikides, C. (1994). Behavioral and characterological attributional styles as predictors of, depression and loneliness: Review, refinement, and, test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 66, 549–558., Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its, implications. New York: Freeman., Anderson, K. J. (1990). Arousal and the invertedU hypothesis: A critique of Neiss’s “reconceptualizing arousal.” Psychological Bulletin, 107, 96–100., Anderson, K. J., & Leaper, C. (1998). Meta-analyses of gender effects on conversational interruption: Who, what, when, where, and how. Sex Roles,, 39(3/4), 225–252., Anderson, P. A. (1999). Nonverbal communication:, Forms and functions. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield., Anderson, S. E., Dallal, G. E., & Must, A. (2003)., Relative weight and race influence average age at, menarche: Results from two nationally representative surveys of U.S. girls studied 25 years apart., Pediatrics, 111, 844–850., Anderson, V. L., Levinson, E. M., Barker, W., &, Kiewra, K. R. (1999). The effects of meditation on, teacher-perceived occupational stress, state and, trait anxiety and burnout. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 3–25., Anderson-Fye, E. P., & Becker, A. E. (2004). Sociocultural aspects of eating disorders. In J. K. Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders and obesity., New York: Wiley., Andreasen, N. C. (1987). The diagnosis of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 9–22., Andreasen, N. C. (1990). Positive and negative, symptoms: Historical and conceptual aspects. In, N. C. Andreasen (Ed.), Modern problems of pharmacopsychiatry: Positive and negative symptoms, and syndromes. Basel: Karger., Andresen, J. (2000). Meditation meets behavioural, medicine: The story of experimental research on, meditation. Journal of Consciousness Studies,, 7(11–12), 17–73., Angell, M. (2000). Is academic medicine for sale?, New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 1516–1518., Angell, M. (2004). The truth about the drug companies: How they decieve us and what to do about it., New York: Random House., Ankey, C. D. (1992). Sex differences in relative, brain size: The mismeasure of woman, too? Intelligence, 16, 329–336., Antonucci, T., & Akiyama, H. (1997). Concern, with others at midlife: Care, comfort, or compromise? In M. E. Lachman & J. B. James (Eds.), Multiple paths of midlife development (pp. 145–169)., Chicago: University of Chicago Press., Antonuccio, D. O., Danton, W. G., & McClanahan, T. M. (2003). Psychology in the presciption, era: Building a firewall between marketing and, science. American Psychologist, 58(12), 1028–1043., Antony, M. M., & McCabe, R. E. (2003). Anxiety, disorders: Social and specific phobias. In A. Tasman, J. Kay, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry., New York: Wiley., Apperloo, M. J. A., Van Der Stege, J. G., Hoek, A.,, & Weijmar Schultz, W. C. M. (2003). In the mood, for sex: The value of androgens. Journal of Sex and, Marital Therapy, 29(2), 87–102., Aquilino, W. S. (1997). From adolescent to young, adult: A prospective study of parent-child relations, during the transition to adulthood. Journal of, Marriage and the Family, 59, 670–686., Arbona, C. (2005). Promoting the career development and academic achievement of at-risk youth:, College access programs. In S. D. Brown & R. W., Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling:, Putting theory and research to work. New York:, Wiley., Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51,, 909–917., , Archer, J. (2005). Are women or men the more, aggressive sex? In S. Fein, G. R. Goethals, & M. J., Sandstrom (Eds.), Gender and aggression: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Arendell, T. (2000). Conceiving and investigating, motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of, Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1192–1207., Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness., London: Metheun., Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz, (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic, psychology (pp. 353–373). New York: Sage., Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness, (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge., Argyle, M., & Henderson, M. (1984). The rules of, friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 211–237., Ariely, D., & Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by, precommitment. Psychological Science, 13(3),, 219–224., Aries, E. (1998). Gender differences in interaction:, A reexamination. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia, (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations, of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 65–81). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Armbruster, B. B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Armour, S. (2004, May 4). Some moms quit as, offices scrap family-friendliness. USA Today, pp., 1A–2A., Arndt, J., Goldenberg, J. L., Greenberg, J.,, Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (2000). Death can, be hazardous to your health: Adaptive and ironic, consequences of defenses against the terror of death., In P. R. Duberstein & J. M. Masling (Eds.), Psychodynamic perspectives on sickness and health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Arnett, J. J. (1999). Adolescent storm and stress,, reconsidered. American Psychologist, 54(5),, 317–326., Arnkoff, D. B., & Glass, C. R. (1992). Cognitive, therapy and psychotherapy. In D. K. Freedheim, (Ed.), History of psycho-therapy: A century of, change. Washington, DC: American Psychological, Association., Arnold, K. D. (1995). Lives of promise: What becomes of high school valedictorians. San Francisco:, Jossey-Bass., Arnold, L. M. (2000). Psychocutaneous disorders., In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and, Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th, ed., pp. 1818–1827). Philadelphia: Lippincott/, Williams & Wilkins., Aron, A. (1988). The matching hypothesis reconsidered again: Comment on Kalick and Hamilton., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54,, 441–446., Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., McKenna,, C., & Heyman, R. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and, experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273–284., Aron, A., & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the, prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 70, 535–551., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing, sensitivity and its relation to introversion and, emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 73(2), 345–368., Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). Cooperation in the, classroom: The jigsaw method. New York: Longman., Arrigo, J. M., & Pezdek, K. (1997). Lessons from, the study of psychogenic amnesia. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 148–152., Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressures., Scientific American, 193(5), 31–35.

Page 598 :
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and, conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (9,, Whole No. 416)., Asher, S., & Paquette, J. A. (2003). Loneliness and, peer relations in childhood. Current Directions in, Psychological Science, 12(3), 75–78., Ashmore, R. D. (1990). Sex, gender, and the individual. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality (pp. 486–526). New York: Guilford Press., Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M. , Szarota, P.,, de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B., (2004). A six-factor structure of personalitydescriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical, studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366., Aspinwall, L. G., Richter, L., & Hoffman R. R., III., (2001). Understanding how optimism works: An, examination of optimists’ adaptive moderation of, belief and behavior. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 217–238). Washington,, DC: American Psychological Association., Aspinwall, L. G., & Staudinger, U. M. (2003). A, psychology of human strengths: Some central, issues of an emerging field. In L. G. Aspinwall &, U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human, strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology. Washington, DC:, American Psychological Association., Athenstaedt, U., Haas, E., & Schwab, S. (2004)., Gender role self-concept and gender-typed communication behavior in mixed-sex and same-sex, dyads. Sex Roles, 50(1/2), 37–52., Atwood, J., & Seifer, M. (1997). Extramarital affairs and constructed meanings: A social constructionist therapeutic approach. American Journal of, Family Therapy, 25, 55–75., Atwood, J. D., & Gagnon, J. H. (1987). Masturbatory behavior in college youth. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 13(2), 35–42., Aubé, J., & Koestner, R. (1995). Gender characteristics and relationship adjustment: Another look at, similarity-complementarity hypotheses. Journal of, Personality, 63, 879–904., Aubin, S., & Heiman, J. R. (2004). Sexual dysfunction from a relationship perspective. In J. H. Harvey , A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook, of sexuality in close relationships. Mahwah, NJ:, Lawrence Erlbaum., Auerbach, S. M., & Gramling, S. E. (1998). Stress, management psychological foundations. Upper, Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall., Ayanian, J. Z., & Cleary, P. D. (1999). Perceived, risks of heart disease and cancer among cigarette, smokers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281(11), 1019–1021., Ayres, J. J. B. (1998). Fear conditioning and avoidance. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Learning and behavior therapy . Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon., Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004)., Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic, review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical, Psychology Review, 23(8), 1023–1053., Bacon, J. B. (1996). Support groups for bereaved, children. In C. A. Corr & D. M. Corr (Eds.), Handbook of childhood death and bereavement. New, York: Springer-Verlag., Badgett, M. V. L. (2003). Employment and sexual, orientation: Disclosure and discrimination in the, workplace. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel, (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay,, and bisexual experiences (2nd ed,). New York:, Columbia University Press., Bagley, C. (1995). Child sexual abuse and mental, health in adolescents and adults. Aldershot, UK:, Ashgate., Bailey, J. M. (2003). Biological perspectives on, sexual orientation. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian,, gay, and bisexual experiences (2nd ed.). New York:, Columbia University Press., , Bailey, J. M., & Dawood, K. (1998). Behavior genetics, sexual orientation, and the family. In C. J., Patterson & A. R. D’Augelli (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities in families: Psychological, perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press., Bailey, J. M., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G., (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on, sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 78(3), 524–536., Bailey, J. M., Kim, P. Y., Hills, A. , & Linsenmeier,, J. A. W. (1997). Butch, femme, or straight acting?, Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5),, 960–973., Bailey, J. M., & Pillard, R. C. (1991). A genetic, study of male sexual orientation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 1089–1096., Bailey, J. M., Pillard, R. C., Neale, M. C., & Agyei,, Y. (1993). Heritable factors influence sexual orientation in women. Archives of General Psychiatry,, 50, 217–223., Bailey, J. M., Willerman, L., & Parks, C. (1991). A, test of maternal stress theory of human male homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20,, 277–294., Bailey, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (1995). Childhood, sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation: A conceptual analysis and quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 31, 43–55., Baker, F., Ainsworth, S. R., Dye, J. T., Crammer,, C., Thun, M. J., Hoffmann, D., Repace, J. L., Henningfield, J. E., Slade, J., Pinney, J., Shanks, T.,, Burns, D. M., Connolly, G. N., & Shopland, D. R., (2000). Health risks associated with cigar smoking. Journal of the American Medical Association,, 284, 735–740., Baker, O. (1996). Managing diversity: Implications, for white managers. In B. P. Bowser & R. G. Hunt, (Eds.), Impacts of racism on white Americans. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., Baldessarini, R. J. (2001). Drugs and the treatment of psychiatric disorders: Depression and the, anxiety disorders. In J. G. Hardman & L. E. Limbird, (Eds.), Goodman & Gilman’s The pharmacological, basis of therapeutics. New York: McGraw-Hill., Baldwin, M., & Fehr, B. (1995). On the instability, of attachment style ratings. Personal Relationships,, 2, 247–261., Ballenger, J. C. (2000). Benzodiazepine receptor, agonists and antagonists. In B. J. Sadock & V. A., Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive, textbook of psychiatry. Philadelphia:, Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Bancroft, J. (2002a). Biological factors in human, sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research, 39(1),, 15–21., Bancroft, J. (2002b). The medicalization of female, sexual dysfunction: The need for caution. Archives, of Sexual Behavior, 31(5), 451–455., Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning, analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall., Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall., Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought, and action: A social-cognitive theory. Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall., Bandura, A. (1990a). Perceived self-efficacy in the, exercise of personal agency. Journal of Applied, Sport Psychology, 2, 128–163., Bandura, A. (1990b). Self-regulation of motivation through goal systems. In R. A. Dienstbier, (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol., 38). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press., Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in, cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148., Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of, control. New York: W. H. Freeman., Bandura, A. (1999a). A sociocognitive analysis of, substance abuse: An agentic perspective. Psychological Science, 10(3), 214–217., , Bandura, A. (1999b). Social cognitive theory of, personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.),, Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd, ed., pp. 154–196). New York: Guilford Press., Bandura, A. (2000). Social cognitive theory: An, agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology,, 52, 1–26., Bank, B. J., & Hansford, S. L. (2000). Gender and, friendship: Why are men’s best same-sex friendships less intimate and supportive? Personal Relationships, 7(1), 63–78., Banks, A., & Gartrell, N. K. (1995). Hormones and, sexual orientation: A questionable link. Journal of, Homosexuality, 28, 247–268., Banse, R., & Scherer, K. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 614636., Banyard, V. L., & Williams, L. M. (1999). Memories for child sexual abuse and mental health functioning: Findings on a sample of women and, implications for future research. In L. M. Williams, & V. L. Banyard (Eds.), Trauma & memory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Barber, B. K. (1994). Cultural, family, and personal contexts of parent-adolescent conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 375–386., Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday, life. In R. S. Wyer Jr.(Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The, case against the controllability of automatic, stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.),, Dual process theories in social psychology. New, York: Guilford., Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The, Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–590., Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons,, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation, and expression of the “true self ” on the Internet., Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48., Barlett, D. L., & Steele, J. B. (1979). Empire: The, life, legend and madness of Howard Hughes. New, York: Norton., Barlow, D. H. (1996a). Health care policy, psychotherapy research, and the future of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 50, 1050–1058., Barlow, D. H. (1996b). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: Science and policy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 3(3), 236–240., Barlow, D. H., & Durand, V. M. (1999). Abnormal, psychology: An Investigative approach. Belmont,, CA: Wadsworth., Barlow, D. H., Pincus, D. B., Heinrichs, N., &, Choate, M. L. (2003). Anxiety disorders. In, G. Stricker & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Handbook of, psychology: Vol. 8. Clinical psychology. New York:, Wiley., Barnes, M. L., & Buss, D. M. (1985). Sex differences in the interpersonal behavior of married, couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 654–661., Barnes, V. A., Treiber, F., & Davis, H. (2001). The, impact of Transcendental Meditation on cardiovascular function at rest and during acute stress in, adolescents with high norspeed in old age. Current, Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 163–169., Barnett, D., Ganiban, J., & Cicchetti, D. (1999)., Maltreatment, negative expressivity, and the development of Type D attachments from 12 to 24, months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64(3, Serial No. 258)., Barnett, H. L., Keel, P. K., & Conoscenti, L. M., (2001). Body type preferences in Asian and Caucasian college students. Sex Roles, 45 (11–12),, 867–878., Barnett, O. W., & LaViolette, A. D. (1993). It could, happen to anyone: Why battered women stay. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men,, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56(10), 781–796., , References, , 561

Page 599 :
Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1997). Social psychology., Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Baron, R. A., Neuman, J. H., & Geddes, D. (1999)., Social and personal determinants of workplace, aggression: Evidence for the impact of perceived, injustice and the Type A behavior pattern. Aggressive Behavior, 25(4), 261–296., Baron, R. S. (2000). Arousal, capacity, and intense, indoctrination. Personality and Social Psychology, Review, 4(3), 238–254., Barrick, C. B. (1999). Sad, glad, or mad hearts?, Epidemiological evidence for a causal relationship, between mood disorders and coronary artery, disease. Journal of Affective Disorders, 53(2),, 193–201., Barsky, A. J. (1988). The paradox of health. New, England Journal of Medicine, 318, 414–418., Barsky, A. J. (2001). Somatosensory amplification, and hypochondriasis. In V. Starcevic & D. R. Lipsitt (Eds.), Hypochondriasis: Modern perspectives, on an ancient malady. New York: Oxford University Press., Barsky, A. J., Coeytaux, R. R., Sarnie, M. K., &, Cleary, P. D. (1993). Hypochondriacal patients’, beliefs about good health. American Journal of, Psychiatry, 150, 1085–1090., Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy:, An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and, Personal Relationships, 7, 47–178., Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a, four-category model. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 61, 226–244., Bartlett, M. S., Hager, J. C., Ekman, P., &, Sejnowski, T. J. (1999). Measuring facial expressions by computer image analysis. Psychophysiology, 36, 253–263., Baruch, G. K. (1984). The psychological wellbeing of women in the middle years. In G. K., Baruch & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), Women in, midlife. New York: Plenum., Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender stereotypes and roles, (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole., Basow, S. A., & Rubenfeld, K. (2003). “Troubles, Talk”: Effects of gender and gender-typing. Sex, Roles, 48(3/4), 183–187., Bauer, M. S. (2003). Mood disorders: Bipolar, (manic-depressive) disorders. In A. Tasman, J. Kay,, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New York:, Wiley., Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure:, Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 610–620., Baumeister, R. F. (1989). The optimal margin of, illusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,, 8, 176–189., Baumeister, R. F. (1995). Disputing the effects of, championship pressures and home audiences., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68,, 644–648., Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Esteem threat, selfregulatory breakdown, and emotional distress, as factors in self-defeating behavior. Review of, General Psychology, 1, 145–174., Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert,, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of, social psychology. Boston: Mcgraw-Hill., Baumeister, R. F. (1999). The nature and structure, of the self: An overview. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.),, The self in social psychology (pp. 1–20). Ann Arbor,, MI: Edwards Bros., Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in, erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially, flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin,, 126(3), 347–374., Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality and Social, Psychology Review, 3(1), 49–67., Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., &, Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self, , 562, , References, , a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., & Campbell, W., K. (2000). Self-esteem, narcissism, and aggression:, Does violence result from low self-esteem or from, threatened egotism? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(1), 26–29., Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., &, Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause, better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in, the Public Interest, 4(1), 1–44., Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need, to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as, a fundamental human motivation. Psychological, Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529., Baumeister, R. F., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M., (2000). Ego depletion: A resource model of volition, self regulation, and controlled processing., Social Cognition, 18(2), 130–150., Baumeister, R. F., & Scher, S. J. (1988). Self-defeating, behavior patterns among normal individuals:, Review and analysis of common self-destructive, tendencies. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 3–22., Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M., (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence, and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem., Psychological Review, 103, 5–33., Baumeister, R. F., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). What, do men want? Gender differences and two spheres, of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson, (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 38–44., Baumeister, R. F., & Steinhilber, A. (1984). Paradoxical effects of supportive audiences on performance under pressure: The home field, disadvantage in sports championships. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 85–93., Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2003). The, social self. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and, social psychology. New York: Wiley., Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Self regulation and the executive function of the self. In, M.R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of Self, and Identity. New York: Guilford., Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on the ethics, of reading Milgram’s “Behavioral study of obedience.” American Psychologist, 19, 421–423., Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 43–88., Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental, authority. Developmental Psychology Monographs,, 4 (1, Part 2)., Baumrind, D. (1978). Parental disciplinary patterns and social competence in children. Youth and, Society, 9, 239–276., Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting, style on adolescent competence and sustance, abuse. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56–95., Baumrind, D., Larzelere, R. E., & Cowan, P. A., (2002). Ordinary physical punishment: Is it harmful? Comment on Gershoff (2002). Psychological, Bulletin, 128(4), 580–589., Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2002)., Listener responses as a collaborative process: The, role of gaze. Journal of Communication, 52(3),, 566–580., Baxter, L. A. (1988). A dialectical perspective on, communication strategies in relationship development. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal, relationships. New York: Wiley., Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Zucker, A. N., Stewart, A. J., &, Pomerleau, C. S. (2002). Linking femininity,, weight concern, and mental health among Latina,, black, and white women. Psychology of Women, Quarterly, 26(1), 36–45., Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press., , Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive therapy. In J. K. Zeig, (Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy. New York:, Brunner/Mazel., Beck, A. T. (1991). Cognitive therapy: A 30–year, retrospective. American Psychologist, 46, 368–375., Beck, A. T. (1997). Cognitive therapy: Reflections., In J. K. Zeig (Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy:, The third conference . New York: Brunner/Mazel., Becker, B. J. (1986). Influence again: Another look, at gender differences in social influence. In J. S., Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore:, Johns Hopkins University Press., Beer, J. M., Arnold, R. D., & Loehlin, J. C. (1998)., Genetic and environmental influences on MMPI, factor scale: Joint model fitting to twin and adoption data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 818–827., Behar, R. (1991, May 6). The thriving cult of greed, and power. Time, pp. 50–77., Beisecker, A. E. (1990). Patient power in doctorpatient communication: What do we know?, Health Communication, 2, 105–122., Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope, and impact of financial conflicts of interests in, biomedical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 454–465., Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. S. (1978). Homosexualities: A study of diversity among men and women., New York: Simon & Schuster., Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith,, K. S. (1981). Sexual preference—Its development in, men and women. Bloomington: Indiana University, Press., Bell, R. A. (1991). Gender, friendship network, density, and loneliness. Journal of Social Behavior, and Personality,6, 45–56., Bellack, A. S., Gearon, J. S., & Blanchard, J. J., (2000). Schizophrenia: Psychopathology. In, M. Hersen & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), Psychopathology, in adulthood. Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Beller, M., & Gafni, N. (1996). The 1991 international assessment of educational progress in mathematics and sciences: The gender differences, perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88,, 365–377., Belluck, P. (2000, April 21). States declare war on, divorce rates before any I do’s. New York Times,, p. A1., Belmore, S. M. (1987). Determinants of attention, during impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 480–489., Belsky, J. (1992). Consequences of child care for, children’s development: A deconstructionist view., In A. Booth (Ed.), Child care in the 1990s. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Belsky, J., & Kelly, J. (1994). The transition to parenthood. New York: Dell., Bem, D. J. (2000). Exotic becomes erotic: Interpreting the biological correlates of sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29(6), 531–548., Bem, S. L. (1975, September). Androgyny vs. the, tight little lives of fluffy women and chesty men., Psychology Today, pp. 58–62., Bem, S. L. (1983). Gender schema theory and its, implications for child development: Raising, gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic, society. Signs, 8, 598–616., Bem, S. L. (1985). Androgyny and gender schema, theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In, T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on, motivation 1984: Psychology and gender (Vol. 32)., Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press., Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New, Haven, CT: Yale University Press., Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented, preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible, causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169–232.

Page 600 :
Bender, R., Jockel, K. H., Trautner, C., Spraul, M.,, & Berger, M. (1999). Effect of age on excess mortality in obesity. Journal of the American Medical, Association, 281, 1498–1504., Bendis, D. (1997, May). A dose of moral adrenaline from Dr. Laura. The Christian Century,, 476–478., Benet, V., & Waller, N. G. (1995). The big seven, factor model of personality description: Evidence, for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,, 701–718., Benjamin, L. T., Jr., Cavell, T. A., & Shallenberger,, W. R., III. (1984). Staying with initial answers on, objective tests: Is it a myth? Teaching of Psychology,, 11, 133–141., Benson, H. (1975). The relaxation response (1st, ed.). New York: Morrow., Benson, H. (1984). Beyond the relaxation response., Times Books., Benson, H., & Klipper, M. Z. (1988). The relaxation response (2nd ed.). New York: Avon., Berenbaum, S. A., & Snyder, E. (1995). Early hormonal influences on childhood sex-typed activity, and playmate preferences: Implications for the, development of sexual orientation. Developmental, Psychology, 31, 31–42., Bergen, D. J., & Williams, J. E. (1991). Sex stereotypes in the United States revisited: 1972–1988., Sex Roles, 24, 413–423., Berkman, C. S., & Gurland, B. J. (1998). The relationship between ethnoracial group and functional level in older persons. Ethnicity and Health,, 3(3), 175–188., Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 59–73., Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. New York: McGraw-Hill., Berkowitz, L. (1999). Evil is more than banal:, Situationism and the concept of evil. Personality, and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 246–253., Berkowitz, R. I. (2003). Behavior therapies. In R., E. Hales & S. C. Yudofsky (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing., Berliner, K., Jacob, D., & Schwartzberg, N. (1999)., The single adult and the family life cycle. In, B. Carter & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), The expanded, family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 362–372). Boston: Allyn &, Bacon., Berliner, L., & Briere, J. (1999). Trauma, memory,, and clinical practice. In L. M. Williams & V. L., Banyard (Eds.), Trauma & memory. Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage., Berman, J. J., Murphy-Berman, V., & Pachauri, A., (1988). Sex differences in friendship patterns in, India and in the United States. Basic and Applied, Social Psychology, 9, 61–71., Bernard, L. C., & Krupat, E. (1994). Health psychology: Biopsychosocial factors in health and illness. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace., Berne, E. (1964). Games people play. New York:, Grove Press., Berne, P. H., & Savary, L. M. (1993). Building selfesteem in children. New York: Continuum., Bernstein, H. J., Beale, M. D., Burns, C., & Kellner, C. H. (1998). Patient attitudes about ECT after, treatment. Psychiatric Annuals, 28, 524–527., Berrington, A., & Diamond, I. (1999). Marital, dissolution among the 1958 British birth cohort:, The role of cohabitation. Population Studies, 53,, 19–38., Berry, D. S., Pennebaker, J. W., Mueller, J. S., &, Hiller, W. S. (1997). Linguistic bases of social, perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(5), 526–537., Berry, J. W., & Ataca, B. (2000). Cultural factors. In, G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 1, pp., 604–610). San Diego: Academic Press., , Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and, close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, &, G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). Boston: McGraw-Hill., Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989)., The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the, closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792–807., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1978). Interpersonal, attraction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley., Bertakis, K. D., Azari, R., Helms, J. L., Callahan,, E. J., & Robbins, J. A. (2000). Gender differences in, the utilization of health care services. Journal of, Family Practice, 49(2), 147–152., Berzon, B. (2004). Permanent partners: Building, gay and lesbian relationships that last. New York:, The Penguin Group., Berzonsky, M. D., & Kuk, L. S. (2000). Identity, status, identity processing style, and the transition, to university. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(1),, 81–98., Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender, differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119,, 422–447., Betz, N. E. (1993). Women’s career development., In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology, of women: A handbook of issues and theories. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press., Betz, N. E. (2005). Women’s career development., In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research, to work. New York: Wiley., Betz, N. E., & Klein, K. L. (1996). Relationships, among measures of career self-efficacy, generalized, self-efficacy, and global self-esteem. Journal of, Career Assessment, 4(3), 285–298., Beumont, P. J. V. (2002). Clinical presentation of, anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In C. G., Fairburn & K. D. Brownell (Eds.), Eating disorders, and obesity: A comprehensive handbook. New York:, Guilford., Beutler, L. E. (2000). David and Goliath: When, empirical and clinical standards of practice meet., American Psychologist, 55(9), 997–1007., Beutler, L. E. (2002). The dodo bird is extinct., Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 9(1), 30–34., Beutler, L. E., Bongar, B., & Shurkin, J. N. (1998)., Am I crazy, or is it my shrink? New York: Oxford, University Press., Beutler, L. E., Bongar, B., & Shurkin, J. N. (2001)., A consumers guide to psychotherapy. New York:, Oxford University Press., Beutler, L. E., & Harwood, T. M. (2002). What is, and can be attributed to the therapeutic relationship? Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy,, 32(1), 25–33., Beutler, L. E., Machado, P. P. P., & Neufeldt, S. A., (1994). Therapist variables. In A. E. Bergin & S. L., Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and, behavior change (4th ed.). New York: Wiley., Bhattachary, S., & Powell, J. H. (2001). Recreational use of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or “ecstasy”: Evidence for, cognitive impairment. Psychological Medicine,, 31(4), 647–658., Bianchi, S. (2000). Maternal employment and, time with children: Dramatic change or surprising, continuity? Demography, 37, 401–414., Bianchi, S., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework?, Trends in the gender division of household labor., Social Forces, 79(1), 191–228., Bianchi, S. M., & Casper, L. M. (2000). American, families. Population Bulletin (Vol. 55, Chap. 4)., Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau., Bianchi, S. M., Subaiya, L., & Kahn, J. R. (1999)., The gender gap in the economic well-being of, nonresident fathers and custodial mothers. Demography, 36, 195–203., , Bierly, M. M. (1985). Prejudice toward contemporary outgroups as a generalized attitude. Journal of, Applied Social Psychology, 15, 189–199., Biernat, M., & Billings, L. S. (2001). Standards,, expectancies and social comparison. In A. Tesser &, N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social, psychology: Intraindividual processes. Malden, MA:, Blackwell., Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Genderand race-based standards of competence: Lower, minimum standards but higher ability standards, for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 72(3), 544–557., Bierut, L. J., Heath, A. C., Bucholz, K. K., Dinwiddie, S. H., Madden, P. A. F., Statham, D. J., Dunne,, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (1999). Major depressive, disorder in a community-based twin sample., Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 557–563., Bishop, S. R. (2002). What do we really know, about mindfulness-based stress reduction? Psychosomatic Medicine, 64(1), 71–83., Bitter, R. G. (1986). Late marriage and marital, instability: The effects of heterogeneity and inflexibility. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48,, 631–640., Björntorp, P. (2002). Definition and classification, of obesity. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell, (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook. New York: Guilford., Black, D. W., & Andreasen, N. C. (1994). Schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, and delusional (paranoid) disorder. In R. E. Hales, S. C., Yudofsky, & J. A. Talbott (Eds.), The American, Psychiatric Press textbook of psychiatry (2nd ed.)., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press., Blacker, D., & Tsuang, M. T. (1999). Classification, and DSM-IV. In A. M. Nicholi (Ed.), The Harvard, guide to psychiatry (pp. 65–83). Cambridge, MA:, Harvard University Press., Blacker, L. (1999). The launching phase of the life, cycle. In B. Carter & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), The, expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and, social perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 287–306). Boston:, Allyn & Bacon., Blair, S. N., Cheng, Y., & Holder, J. S. (2001). Is, physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? Medicine and, Science in Sports and Exercise, 33, S379–S399., Blakemore, J. E. O. (2003). Children’s beliefs about, violating gender norms: Boys shouldn’t look like, girls, and girls shouldn’t act like boys. Sex Roles,, 48(9/10), 411–419., Blanchard, E. B., & Keefer, L. (2003). Irritable, bowel syndrome. In A. M. Nezu, C. M. Nezu, &, P. A. Geller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 9., Health psychology. New York: Wiley., Blanco, C., Laje, G., Olfson, M., Marcus, S. C., &, Pincus, H. A. (2002). Trends in the treatment of, bipolar disorder by outpatient psychiatrists. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1005–1010., Blass, T. (1999). The Milgram paradigm after 35, years: Some things we now know about obedience, to authority. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,, 29(5), 955–978., Blazer, D. G. (2000). Mood disorders: Epidemiology. In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan, and Sadock’s Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, (7th ed., Vol. 1). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams, & Wilkins., Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of, biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon Press., Block, J. H. (1973). Conceptions of sex role: Some, cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives., American Psychologist, 28, 512–526., Bloodworth, R. C. (1987). Major problems associated with marijuana abuse. Psychiatric Medicine, 3,, 173–184., Bloomfield, H. (2000). Making peace with your, past: The six essential steps to enjoying a great future. New York: HarperCollins., , References, , 563

Page 601 :
Bloomfield, H. H., & Kory, R. B. (1976). Happiness: The TM program, psychiatry, and enlightenment. New York: Simon & Schuster., Blumenthal, J. A., Jiang, W., Babyak, M. A.,, Krantz, D. S., Frid, D. J., Coleman, R. E., Waugh,, R., Hanson, M., Applebaum, M., O’Connor, C., &, Morris, J. J. (1997). Stress management and exercise training in cardiac patients with myocardial, ischemia: Effects on prognosis and evaluation of, mechanisms. Archives of Internal Medicine, 157,, 2213–2223., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American, couples: Money, work, sex. New York: Morrow., Blustein, D. L., Prezioso, M. S., & Schultheiss,, D. P. (1995). Current status and future directions., The Counseling Psychologist, 23, 416–432., Bobek, B. L., & Robbins, S. B. (2005). Counseling, for career transition: Career pathing, job loss, and, reentry. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career, development and counseling: Putting theory and, research to work. New York: Wiley., Boden, J. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Repressive coping: Distraction using pleasant thoughts, and memories. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 73(1), 45–62., Bodenhausen, G. V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in, social decision making and memory: Testing, process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726–737., Bodenhausen. G. V., Macrae, C. N., & Hugenberg,, K. (2003). Social cognition. In T. Millon, & M. J., Lerner (Eds.) Handbook of psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and social psychology. New York: Wiley., Bodenheimer, T. (2000). Uneasy alliance: Clinical, investigators and the pharmaceutical industry., New England Journal of Medicine, 342,1539–1544., Boen, F., Vanbeselaere, N., & Feys, J. (2002). Behavioral consequenes of fluctuating group success:, An Internet study of soccer-team fans. Journal of, Social Psychology, 142(6), 769–781., Boeringer, S. B. (1994). Pornography and sexual, aggression: Associations of violent and nonviolent, depictions with rape and rape proclivity. Deviant, Behavior, 15(3), 289–304., Boland, R. J., & Keller, M. B. (2003). Antidepressants. In A. Tasman, J. Kay, & J. A. Lieberman, (Eds.), Psychiatry. New York: Wiley., Bolger, N. (1990). Coping as a personality process:, A prospective study. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 59, 525–537., Bolles, R. N. (2005). What color is your parachute?, A practical manual for job-hunters and careerchangers. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press., Bonanno, G. A. (1998). The concept of “working, through” loss: A critical evaluation of the cultural,, historical, and empirical evidence. In A. Maercker,, M. Schuetzwohl, & Z. Solomon (Eds.), Posttraumatic stress disorder: Vulnerability and resilience in, the life-span (pp. 221–247). Göttingen, Germany:, Hogrefe and Huber., Bonanno, G. A., & Kaltman, S. (1999). Toward an, integrative perspective on bereavement. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 760–776., Bonanno, G. A., & Keltner, D. (1997). Facial expressions of emotion and the course of bereavement. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106,, 126–137., Bonanno, G. A., Wortman, C. B., Lehman, D. R.,, Tweed, R. G., Haring, M., Sonnega, J., Carr, D., &, Nesse, R. M. (2002). Resilience to loss and chronic, grief: A prospective study from preloss to 18months postloss. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 83(5), 1150–1164., Bond, J. T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Prottas,, D. (2003). The 2002 national study of the changing, workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute., Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s, (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological, Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137., Bonebright, C. A., Clay, D. L., & Ankenmann,, R. D. (2000). The relationship of workaholism with, , 564, , References, , work-life conflict, life satisfaction, and purpose in, life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 469–477., Booth, A., & Amato, P. R. (1994). Parental gender, role nontraditionalism and offspring outcomes., Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 865–877., Booth, A., & Amato, P. R. (2001). Parental predivorce relations and offspring postdivorce wellbeing. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 197–212., Borman, W. C., Klimoski, R. J., & Ilgen, D. R., (2003). Stability and change in industrial and, organizational psychology. In W. C. Borman, D. R., Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Wiley., Borys, S., & Perlman, D. (1985). Gender differences in loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 63–74., Bossé, R., Spiro, A., & Kressin, N. R. (1996). The, psychology of retirement. In R. T. Woods (Ed.),, Handbook of the clinical psychology of aging., Chicester, UK: Wiley., Bost, K. K., Cox, M. J., Burchinal, M. R., & Payne,, C. (2002). Structural and supporting changes in, couples’ family and friendships networks across, the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage, and the Family, 64, 517–31., Bouchard, C. (2002). Genetic influences on body, weight. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell (Eds.),, Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive, handbook (pp. 16–21). New York: Guilford., Bouchard, G., Lussier, Y., & Sabourin, S. (1999)., Personality and marital adjustment: Utility of the, five-factor model of personality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 651–660., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Lykken, D. T., McGue, M.,, Segal, N. L., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Sources of, human psychological differences: The Minnesota, study of twins reared apart. Science, 250, 223–228., Boudreaux, E., Carmack, C. L., Scarinci, I. C., &, Brantley, P. J. (1998). Predicting smoking stage of, change among a sample of low socioeconomic, status, primary care outpatients: Replication and, extension using decisional balance and self-efficacy, theories. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5(2), 148–165., Bouman, T. K., Eifert, G. H., & Lejeuz, C. W., (1999). Somatoform disorders. In T. Millon, P. H., Blaney, & R. D. Davis (Eds.), Oxford textbook of, psychopathology (pp. 444–465). New York: Oxford, University Press., Bower, G. H. (1970). Organizational factors in, memory. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 18–46., Bower, G. H., & Clark, M. C. (1969). Narrative, stories as mediators of serial learning. Psychonomic, Science, 14, 181–182., Bower, S. A., & Bower, G. H. (1991). Asserting, yourself: A practical guide for positive change (2nd, ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley., Bower, S. A., & Bower, G. H. (2004). Asserting, yourself: A practical guide for positive change (updated ed.). Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press/Perseus., Bowers, J. W., Metts, S. M., & Duncanson, W. T., (1985). Emotion and interpersonal communication. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication. Newbury, Park, CA: Sage., Bowes-Sperry, L., & Tata, J. (1999). A multiperspective framework of sexual harassment. In G. N., Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Bowins, B. (2004). Psychological defense mechanisms: A new perspective. American Journal of, Psychoanalysis, 64(1), 1–26., Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss:, Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books., Bozett, F. W. (1987). Children of gay fathers. In, F. W. Bozett (Ed.), Gay and lesbian parents. New, York: Praeger., Bradbury, T. N., Campbell, S. M., & Fincham, F., D. (1995). Longitudinal and behavioral analysis of, masculinity and femininity in marriage. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 328–341., , Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33., Bradford, J., & Ryan, C. (1987). National lesbian, health care survey: Mental health implications., Washington, DC: National Lesbian and Gay, Health Foundation., Bramlett, M. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2001). First, marriage dissolution, divorce, and remarriage:, United States. Advance data from vital and health, statistics, No. 323. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics., Brannon, L. (2005). Gender: Psychological perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint of manhood, and what it’s done, for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The, forty-nine percent majority. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley., Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., &, Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19,, 381–388., Brawman-Mintzer, O., Lydiard, R. B., &, Ballenger, J. C. (2000). Buspirone. In B. J. Sadock, & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp., 2329–2333). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams &, Wilkins., Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press., Brehm, S. S. (1992). Intimate relationships (2nd, ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill., Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological, reactance. New York: Academic Press., Brehm, S. S., & Kassin, S. M. (1993). Social psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin., Brehm, S. S., Kassin, S. M., & Fein, S. (2002). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin., Brehm, S. S., Miller, R. S., Perlman, D., & Campbell, S. (2002). Intimate relationships (3rd ed.)., Boston: McGraw-Hill., Brende, J. O. (2000). Stress effects of floods. In, G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 2, pp., 153–157). San Diego: Academic Press., Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R., (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson &, W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close, relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford, Press., Brett, J. M. (1980). The effect of job transfer on, employees and their families. In C. L. Cooper &, R. Payne (Eds.), Current concerns in occupational, stress. New York: Wiley., Brettle, R. P., & Leen, L. S. (1991). The natural, history of HIV and AIDS in women. AIDS, 5,, 1283–1292., Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice:, Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social, Issues, 55(3), 429–444., Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Inter-group, relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey, (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.,, Vol. 2, pp. 554–594). New York: McGraw-Hill., Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., & Valentine, J. D., (2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,, 68(5), 748–766., Brewster, K. L., & Padavic, I. (2000). Change in, gender-ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of, intracohort change and population turn-over., Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(2),, 477–487., Brewster, M. P. (2002). Domestic violence, theories, research, and practice implications. In A. R., Roberts (Ed.), Handbook of domestic violence intervention strategies: Policies, programs, and legal, remedies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Page 602 :
Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R., (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is, happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 36(8), 917–927., Bridges, K. R., & Roig, M. (1997). Academic procrastination and irrational thinking: A re-examination, with context controlled. Personality & Individual, Differences, 22, 941–944., Briere, J., & Conte, J. R. (1993). Self-reported, amnesia for abuse in adults molested as children., Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 21–31., Brissette, I., Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2002)., The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological adjustment during a life transition. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 82(1), 102–111., Brod, C. (1988). Technostress: Human cost of the, computer revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley., Brody, J. E. (1997, November 4). Girls and puberty: The crisis years. The New York Times, p. C9., Brody, L. R. (2000). The socialization of gender, differences in emotional expression: Display rules,, infant temperament, and differentiation. In A. H., Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 24–47). Cambridge, UK:, Cambridge University Press., Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 447–460). New York:, Guilford Press., Brody, N., & Crowley, M. J. (1995). Environmental, (and genetic) influences on personality and intelligence. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.),, International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York: Plenum Press., Broidy, L. M., Nagin, D. S., Tremblay, R. E., Bates,, J. E., Brame, B., Dodge, K. A., Fergusson, D., Horwood, J. L., Loeber, R., Laird, R., Lynam, D. R.,, Moffitt, T. E., Pettit, G. S., & Vitaro, F. (2003)., Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive, behaviors and adolescent delinquency: A six-site,, cross-national study. Developmental Psychology,, 39(2), 222–245., Bromage, B. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Quantitative and qualitative effects of repetition on learning from technical text. Journal of Educational, Psychology, 78, 271–278., Bromley, M., & Blieszner, R. (1997). Planning for, long-term care: Filial behavior and relationship, quality of adult children with independent parents. Family Relations, 155–162., Brooks-Gunn, J. (1991). Maturational timing, variations in adolescent girls, antecedents of. In, R. M. Lerner, A. C. Petersen, & J. Brooks-Gunn, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of adolescence. New York:, Garland., Broomhall, H. S., & Winefield, A. H. (1990). A, comparison of the affective well-being of young, and middle-aged unemployed men matched for, length of employment. British Journal of Medical, Psychology, 63, 43–52., Brown, A. S. (1999). New perspectives on the, neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia., Psychiatric Annals, 29(3), 128–130., Brown, A. S., Begg, M. D., Gravenstein, S., Schaefer, C. A., Wyatt, R. J., Bresnahan, M., Babulas,, V. P., & Susser, E. S. (2004). Serologic evidence of, prenatal influenza in the etiology of schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(8), 774–780., Brown, D., Scheflin, A. W., & Hammond, D. C., (1998). Memory, trauma treatment, and the law., New York: W. W. Norton., Brown, D., Scheflin, A. W., & Whitfield, C. L., (1999). Recovered memories: The current weight, of the evidence in science and in the courts. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 27, 5–156., Brown, E. (1994). Affairs: The hidden meanings, have major impact on therapeutic approach. Behavior Today, 3–4., Brown, E. J., Juster, H. R., Heimberg, R. G., &, Winning, C. D. (1998). Stressful life events and, personality styles: Relation to impairment and, , treatment outcome in patients with social phobia., Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 12(3), 233–251., Brown, J. D., & McGill, K. L. (1989). The cost of, good fortune: When positive life events produce, negative health consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1103–1110., Brown, R., Maras, P., Masser, B., Vivian J., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Life on the ocean wave: Testing, some intergroup hypotheses in a naturalistic setting. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations,, 4(2), 81–97., Brown, R. D., Goldstein, E., & Bjorklund, D. F., (2000). The history and zeitgeist of the, repressed–false memory debate: Scientific and, sociological perspectives on suggestibility and, childhood memory. In D. F. Bjorklund (Ed.),, False-memory creation in children and adults (pp., 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Brown, S., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 668–678., Brown, S. L., Nesse, R. M., Vinokur, A. D., &, Smith, D. M. (2003). Providing social support may, be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a, prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14(4), 320–327., Brown, T. A. (2001). Generalized anxiety disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. In T. Millon,, P. H. Blaney, & R. D. Davis (Eds.), Oxford textbook, of psychopathology (pp. 114–143). New York: Oxford University Press., Browne, A. (1993a). Family violence and homelessness: The relevance of trauma histories in the, lives of homeless women. American Journal of, Orthopsychiatry, 63, 370–384., Browne, A. (1993b). Violence against women by, male partners: Prevalence, outcomes, and policy, implications. American Psychologist, 48, 1077–1087., Brownell, K. D. (1989, June). When and how to, diet. Psychology Today, pp. 40–46., Brownell, K. D. (1995). Exercise in the treatment, of obesity. In K. D. Brownell & C. G. Fairburn, (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook. New York: Guilford Press., Brownell, K. D., & Wadden, T. A. (2000). Obesity., In B. J. Sadock, & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and, Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th, ed., pp. 1787–1796). Philadelphia: Lippincott/, Williams & Wilkins., Brubaker, T. (1990). Families in later life: A burgeoning research area. Journal of Marriage and the, Family, 52, 959–982., Bruch, H. (1973). Eating disorders: Obesity, anorexia, nervosa and the person within. New York: Basic, Books., Bruch, H. (1978). The golden cage: The enigma of, anorexia nervosa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., Bruckner-Gordon, F., Gangi, B. K., & Wallman,, G. U. (1988). Making therapy work: Your guide to, choosing, using, and ending therapy. New York:, HarperCollins., Brummett, B. H., Barefoot, J. C., Siegler, I. C.,, Clapp-Channing, N. E., Lytle, B. L., Bosworth,, H. B., Williams, R. B., & Mark, D. B. (2001). Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery disease who are at elevated risk for, mortality. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(2), 267–272., Bryan, A. D., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1999)., The impact of males proposing condom use on, perceptions of an initial sexual encounter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3),, 275–286., Bryant, J., & Rockwell, S. C. (1994). Effects of, massive exposure to sexually oriented prime-time, television programming on adolescents’ moral, judgment. In D. Zillman, J. Bryant, & A. C. Houston (Eds.), Media, children, and the family: Social,, scientific, psychodynamic, and clinical perspectives., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Bryant, S., & Rakowski, W. (1992). Predictors of, mortality among elderly African-Americans. Research on Aging, 14, 50–67., , Bryant, S. S., & Demian. (1994). Relationship, characteristics of American gay and lesbian couples: Findings from a national survey. Journal of, Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 1, 101–117., Bryden, M. P. (1988). An overview of the dichotic, listening procedure and its relation to cerebral, organization. In K. Hugdahl (Ed.), Handbook of, dichotic listening. Chichester, England: Wiley., Bryer, K. B. (1979). The Amish way of death: A, study of family support systems. American Psychologist, 34, 255–261., Buchanan, R. W., & Carpenter, W. T. (2000)., Schizophrenia: Introduction and overview. In B. J., Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s, comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed., Vol., 1). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Buck, E. B., Newton, B. J., & Muramatsu, Y., (1984). Independence and obedience in the U.S., and Japan. International Journal of Intercultural, Relations, 8, 279–300., Buckingham, J. T., & Alicke, M. D. (2002). The, influence of individual versus aggregate social, comparison and the presence of others on, self–evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 83(5), 1117–1130., Buckman, R. (2002). Communications and emotions: Skills and effort are key. British Medical, Journal, 325, 672., Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F., (1992). How a couple views their past predicts, their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5,, 295–318., Buelens, M., & Poelmans, S. A. Y. (2004). Enriching, the Spence and Robbins’ typology of workaholism:, Demographic, motivational and organizational, correlates. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(5), 440–458., Bulcroft, R., & Teachman, J. (2004). Ambiguous, constructions: Development of a childless or, child-free life course. In M. Coleman, & L. H., Ganong (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary families: Considering the past, contemplating the future., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Bulik, C. M. (2004). Genetic and biological risk, factors. In J. K. Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of, eating disorders and obesity. New York: Wiley., Bull, D. L. (1999). A verified case of recovered, memories of sexual abuse. American Journal of, Psychotherapy, 53, 221–224., Bullock, W. A., & Gilliland, K. (1993). Eysenck’s, arousal theory of introversion-extraversion: A, converging measures investigation. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 113–123., Bumpass, L. L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in, cohabitation and implications for children’s family, contexts in the United States. Population Studies,, 54, 29–41., Bumpass, L. L., Raley, R. K., & Sweet, J. (1995)., The changing character of stepfamilies: Implications of cohabitation and nonmarital childbearing. Demography, 32, 425–436., Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A., & Martin, T. C., (1990). Changing patterns of remarriage. Journal, of Marriage and the Family, 52, 747–756., Burger, J. M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and, review. Personality and Social Psychology Review,, 3(4), 303–325., Burger, J. M. (2000). Personality (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Burger, J. M., & Caldwell, D. F. (2003). The effects, of monetary incentives and labelling on the footin-the-door effect: Evidence for a self-perception, process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3),, 235–241., Burger, J. M., & Cornelius, T. (2003). Raising the, price of agreement: Public commitment and the, lowball compliance procedure. Journal of Applied, Social Psychology, 33(5), 923–934., Burger, J. M., & Guadagno, R. E. (2003). Selfconcept clarity and the foot-in-the-door proce-, , References, , 565

Page 603 :
dure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(1),, 79–86., Burgess, C., O’Donohoe, A., & Gill, M. (2000)., Agony and ecstasy: A review of MDMA effects and, toxicity. European Psychiatry, 15(5), 287–294., Burgess, E. O. (2004). Sexuality in midlife and, later life couples. In J. H. Harvey & S. Sprecher, (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. L., Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,, CA: Sage., Burhans, K. K., & Dweck, C. S. (1995). Helplessness in early childhood: The role of contingent, worth. Child Development, 66, 1719–1738., Burke, R. J. (2000). Workaholism in organizations:, Psychological and physical well-being. Stress Medicine, 16(1), 11–16., Burke, R. J. (2001). Workaholism in organizations:, The role of organizational values. Personnel Review, 30(6), 637–645., Burleson, B. R., & Denton, W. H. (1997). The, relationship between communication skill and, marital satisfaction: Some moderating effects., Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 884–902., Bursztajn, H. J., & Brodsky, A. (2002). Managed, healthcare complications, liability risk, and clinical, remedies. Primary Psychiatry, 9(4), 37–41., Buscaglia, L. (1982). Living, loving and learning., Thorofare, NJ: Charles B. Slack., Bushman, B. J. (2002). Does venting anger feed or, extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6),, 724–731., Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998)., Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and, direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or, self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219–229., Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Does, self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of, Research in Personality, 36(6), 543–545., Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., & Stack, A. D., (1999). Catharsis, aggression, and persuasive influence: Self-fulfilling or self-defeating prophecies?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76,, 367–376., Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection. American Scientist, 73, 47–51., Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54,, 616–628., Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate, preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37, cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14., Buss, D. M. (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 459–491., Buss, D. M. (1994). Mate preferences in 37 cultures. In W. J. Lonner & R. S. Malpass (Eds.), Psychology and culture. Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A, new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30., Buss, D. M. (1996). The evolutionary psychology, of human social strategies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W., Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of, basic principles.New York: Guilford Press., Buss, D. M. (1997). Evolutionary foundation of, personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs, (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology. San, Diego: Academic Press., Buss, D. M. (1998). The psychology of human, mate selection: Exploring the complexity of the, strategic repertoire. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs, (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas,, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Buss, D. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (1998). Evolutionary, social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, &, , 566, , References, , G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 982–1026). New York: McGraw-Hill., Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A.,, & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate, preferences: The cultural evolution of values., Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491–503., Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1984). Influence of, gender constancy and social power on sex-linked, modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1292–1302., Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive, theory of gender development and differentiation., Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713., Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wlhelm, F. H., Smith,, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The, social consequences of expressive suppression., Emotion, 3(1), 48–67., Butler, J. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The trouble with friendly faces: Skilled performance with a, supportive audience. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 75(5), 1213–1230., Butler, R., & Lewis, M. (1982). Aging and mental, health (3rd ed.). St. Louis: Mosby., Buunk, B. P., de Jonge, J., Ybema, J. F., & de Wolff,, C. J. (1998). Psychosocial aspects of occupational, stress. In P. J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry, & C. J. de, Wolff (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational, psychology. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press., Buxton, M. N., Arkel, Y., Lagos, J., Deposito, F.,, Lowenthal, H., & Simring, S. (1981). Stress and, platelet aggregation in hemophiliac children and, their family members. Research Communications, in Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavior, 6, 21–48., Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New, York: Academic Press., Byrne, D., & Clore, G. L. (1970). A reinforcement, model of evaluative responses. Personality: An, International Journal, 1(2), 103–128., Byrne, D., Clore, G. L., & Smeaton, G. (1986). The, attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes affect, anything? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1167–1170., Byrnes, J. P. (2001). Cognitive development and, learning in instructional contexts (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon., Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999)., Gender differences in risk-taking: A meta-analysis., Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383., Caldwell, B. M. (1993). Impact of day care on the, child. Pediatrics, 91, 225–228., Caldwell, L. L., Smith, E. A., & Weissinger, E., (1992). The relationship of leisure activities and, perceived health of college students. Society and, Leisure, 15, 545–556., Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2001). Posttraumatic growth: The positive lessons of loss. In R. A., Neimeyer (Ed.), Meaning reconstruction and the, experience of loss (pp. 157–172). Washington, DC:, American Psychological Association., Call, V., Sprecher, S., & Schwartz, P. (1995). The, incidence and frequency of marital sex in a national sample. Journal of Marriage and the Family,, 57, 639–650., Calof, D. (1998). Facing the truth about false, memory. In R. A. Baker (Ed.), Child sexual abuse, and false memory syndrome. Amherst, NY:, Prometheus Books., Camara, W. J., & Schneider, D. L. (1994). Integrity, tests: Facts and unresolved issues. American Psychologist, 49(2), 112–119., Cameron, L., Leventhal, E. A., & Leventhal, H., (1993). Symptom representations and affect as, determinants of care seeking in a communitydwelling, adult sample population. Health Psychology, 12, 171–179., Cameron, N. (1963). Personality development and, psychopathology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin., Campbell, E. Q., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1959). Racial, and moral crisis: The role of Little Rock ministers., American Journal of Sociology, 64, 509–516., , Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of, intimate partner violence. Lancet, 359, 1331–1336., Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of, the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 59, 538–549., Campbell, J. D., & Lavallee, L. F. (1993). Who am, I? The role of self-concept confusion in understanding the behavior of people with low selfesteem. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The, puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum., Campbell, J. D., Assanand, S., & DiPaula, A., (2000). Structural features of the self-concept and, adjustment. In A. Tesser, R. B. Felson, & J. M. Suls, (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 67–87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Campbell, L. F., & Smith, T. P. (2003). Integrating, self-help books into psychotherapy. Journal of, Clinical Psychology, 59(2), 177–186., Campbell, R. J. (2000). Managed care. In B. J., Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s, comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed., Vol., 2). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Selfthreat magnifies the self-serving bias: A metaanalytic integration. Review of General Psychology,, 3(1), 23–43., Campbell, W. K., Sedikides, C., Reeder, G. D., &, Elliot A. J. (2000). Among friends? An examination of friendship and the self-serving bias. British, Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 229–239., Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1994). Maintaining, relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relationship maintenance (pp., 3–22). San Diego: Academic Press., Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (2001). Equity in the, preservation of personal relationships. In J. H., Harvey & A. E. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Cancro, R., & Lehmann, H. E. (2000). Schizophrenia: Clinical features. In B. J. Sadock, & V. A. Sadock, (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook, of psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1169–1198). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Canetto, S. S., & Sakinofsky, I. (1998). The gender, paradox in suicide. Suicide and Life-Threatening, Behavior, 28, 1–23., Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body., New York: Norton., Cantor, N. (1990). Social psychology and sociobiology: What can we leave to evolution? Motivation, and Emotion, 14, 245–254., Carducci, B. J. (1999). The pocket guide to making, successful small talk. New Albany, IN: Pocket Guide, Publications., Carey, M. P., & Vanable, P. A. (2003). AIDS/HIV. In, A. M. Nezu, C. M. Nezu, & P. A. Geller (Eds.),, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 9. Health psychology., New York: Wiley., Carli, L. J. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 59, 941–951., Carli, L. L., & Bukatko, D. (2000). Gender, communication, and social influence: A developmental, perspective. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.),, The developmental social psychology of gender., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Carlson, E. A. (1998). A prospective longitudinal, study of attachment disorganization/disorientation. Child Development, 69, 1107–1128., Carlson, R. (1997). Don’t sweat the small stuff . . ., and it’s all small stuff: Simple ways to keep the, little things from taking over your life. New York:, Hyperion., Carney, S., & Geddes, J. (2003). Electroconvulsive, therapy. British Medical Journal, 326, 1343–1344., Carpenter, W. T. (1992). The negative symptom, challenge. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49,, 236–237.

Page 604 :
Carpenter, W. T. (2002). From clinical trial to, prescription. Archives of General Psychology, 59,, 282–285., Carr, V. J. (2000). Stress effects of earthquakes. In, G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 2, pp., 1–3). San Diego: Academic Press., Carrington, P. (1987). Managing meditation in, clinical practice. In M. A. West (Ed.), The psychology of meditation. Oxford: Clarendon Press., Carrington, P. (1993). Modern forms of meditation. In P. M. Lehrer & R. L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Principles and practice of stress management (2nd ed.)., New York: Guilford Press., Carroll, J. L., Volk, K. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1985)., Differences between males and females in motives, for engaging in sexual intercourse. Archives of, Sexual Behavior, 14, 131–139., Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a life-span, theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5), 151–156., Carter, B. (1999). Becoming parents: The family, with young children. In B. Carter & M., McGoldrick (Eds.), The expanded family life cycle:, Individual, family, and social perspectives (3rd ed.,, pp. 249–273). Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (1999). Overview:, The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family,, and social perspectives. In B. Carter & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), The expanded family life cycle:, Individual, family, and social perspectives (3rd ed.,, pp. 1–26). Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Carter, E. A., & McGoldrick, M. (1988). Overview:, The changing family life cycle—A framework for, family therapy. In E. A. Carter & M. McGoldrick, (Eds.), The changing family life cycle: A framework, for family therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Gardner, Press., Carter, M. J. (1999). Moving beyond the Surgeon, General’s report: An HPERD challenge? Journal of, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 70(2)., Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1994). Situational, coping and coping dispositions in a stressful transaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 66, 184–195., Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Optimism., In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of, what works (pp. 182–204). New York: Oxford, University Press., Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Optimism., In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of, positive psychology. New York: Oxford University, Press., Carver, C. S., Pozo, C., Harris, S. D., Noriega, V.,, Scheier, M. F., Robinson, D. S., Ketcham, A. S.,, Moffat, F. L., Jr., & Clark, K. C. (1993). How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A, study of women with early-stage breast cancer., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65,, 375–390., Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K., (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically, based approach. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 56, 267–283., Caspi, A., & Herbener, E. S. (1990). Continuity, and change: Assortative marriage and the consistency of personality in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 250–258., Cassel, R. N. (2000). Third force psychology and, person-centered theory: From ego-status to egoideal. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior,, 37(3), 44–48., Castonguay, L. G., Reid Jr., J. J., Halperin, G. S., &, Goldfried, M. R. (2003). Psychotherapy integration. In G. Stricker, & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 8. Clinical psychology. New, York: Wiley., Catania, J. A., Binson, D., Dolcini, M. M.,, Moskowitz, J. T., & van der Straten, A. (2001). In, A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.),, Handbook of health psychology. Mahwah, NJ:, Erlbaum., , Cate, R. M., & Lloyd, S. A. (1988). Courtship. In, S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships., New York: Wiley., Cate, R. M., & Lloyd, S. A. (1992). Courtship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., Cates, Jr. W. (2004). Reproductive tract infections., In R. A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, F. H. Stewart, A. L., Nelson, W. Cates Jr., F. Guest, & D. Kowal (Eds.),, Contraceptive technology. New York: Ardent Media., Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematic, theoretical and factual study. New York: McGraw-Hill., Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scientific analysis of personality. Chicago: Aldine., Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M., (1970). Handbook of the Sixteen Personality Factor, Questionnaire (16PF). Champaign, IL: Institute for, Personality and Ability Testing., Catz, S. L., & Kelly, J. A. (2001). Living with HIV, disease. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer, (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 841–850)., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Cavanaugh, J. C. (1993). Adult development and, aging (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole., Cavanaugh, J. C. (2000). Metamemory from a, social-cognitive perspective. In D. Park &, N. Schwarz (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer., Philadelphia: Psychology Press., Cavanaugh, J. C., Feldman, J. M., & Hertzog, C., (1998). Meta-memory as social cognition: A, reconceptualization of what memory questionnaires assess. Review of General Psychology, 2,, 48–65., Caverly, D. C., Orlando, V. P., & Mullen, J. L., (2000). Textbook study reading. In R. F. Flippo &, D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading, and study strategy research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Cegala, D. J., & Sillars, A. L. (1989). Further examination of nonverbal manifestations of interaction, involvement. Communication Reports, 2, 39–47., Center for Communication and Social Policy., (1998). National Television Violence Study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., Centers for Disease Control. (2000). Adoption of, protective behavior among persons with recent, HIV infection and diagnosis—Alabama, New, Jersey, and Tennessee, 1997–1998. Morbidity and, Mortality Weekly Report, 49, 512–515., Centers for Disease Control. (2002a). HIV/AIDS, among U.S. women: Minority and young women at, continuing risk. Fact Sheet of the U.S. Centers for, Disease Control and Prevention, National Center, for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention. Atlanta: Centers, for Disease Control., Centers for Disease Control. (2002b). Trends in, sexual risk behavior among high school, students—United States, 1991–2001. Morbidity, and Mortality Weekly, 51(38), 856–859., Centers for Disease Control. (2003). Advancing, HIV prevention: New strategies for a changing, epidemic—United States, 2003. Morbidity and, Mortality Weekly Report, 52, 329–332., Cerletti, U., & Bini, L. (1938). Un nuevo metodo, di shockterapie “L’elettro-shock.” Boll. Acad. Med., Roma, 64, 136–138., Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator’s physical, attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1387–1397., Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining, empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 7–18., Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions:, Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of, Psychology, 52, 685–716., Chan, R. W., Brooks, R. C., Raboy, B., & Patterson,, C. J. (1998). Division of labor among lesbian and, heterosexual parents: Associations with children’s, adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 12,, 402–419., Chang, E. C. (1996). Cultural differences in optimism, pessimism, and coping: Predictors of subse-, , quent adjustment in Asian American and Caucasian, American college students. Journal of Counseling, Psychology, 43, 113–123., Chang, E. C., & Sanna, L. J. (2003). Experience of, life hassles and psychological adjustment among, adolescents: Does it make a difference if one is, optimistic or pessimistic? Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 857–879., Chang, R. Y., & Kelly, P. K. (1993). Step-by-step, problem solving: A practical guide to ensure problems get (and stay) solved. Irvine, CA: Richard, Chang Associates., Chaplin, W. F., Phillips, J. B., Brown, J. D., Clanton, N. R., & Stein, J. L. (2000). Handshaking,, gender, personality, and first impressions. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1),, 110–117., Chappell, K. D., & Davis, K. E. (1998). Attachment, partner choice, and perception of romantic, partners: An experimental test of the attachmentsecurity hypothesis. Personal Relationships, 5(3),, 327–342., Charlesworth, W. R., & Dzur, C. (1987). Gender, comparisons of preschoolers’ behavior and resource utilization in group problem-solving. Child, Development, 58, 191–200., Chartrand, T., Pinckert, S., & Burger, J. M. (1999)., When manipulation backfires: The effects of time, delay and requester on the foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(1),, 211–221., Chemers, M. M., Hu, L., & Garcia, B. F. (2001)., Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of, Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55–64., Cheng, C. (2001). Assessing coping flexibility in, real-life and laboratory settings: A multimethod, approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 814–833., Cherlin, A. J. (1999). Going to extremes: Family, structure, children’s well-being, and social science., Demography, 36, 421–428., Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of, American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861., Chia, R. C., Moore, J. L., Lam, K. N., Chuang, C. J.,, & Cheng, B. S. (1994). Cultural differences in, gender role attitudes between Chinese and American students. Sex Roles, 31, 23–29., Chiappelli, F., & Hodgson, D. (2000). Immune, suppression. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress, (Vol. 2, pp. 531–535). San Diego: Academic Press., Chiappelli, F., & Liu, Q. N. (2000). Immunity. In, G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (pp. 541–546)., San Diego: Academic Press., Chick, J. (1998). Alcohol, health, and the heart:, Implications for clinicians. Alcohol and Alcoholism,, 33(6), 576–591., Chiriboga, D. A. (1987). Personality in later life. In, P. Silverman (Ed.), The elderly as modern pioneers., Bloomington: Indiana University Press., Chiriboga, D. A. (1989). Mental health at the midpoint: Crisis, challenge, or relief? In S. Hunter &, M. Sundel (Eds.), Mid-life myths: Issues, findings,, and practical implications. Thousand Oaks, CA:, Sage., Choi, I., Dalal, R., Kim-Prieto, C., & Park, H., (2003). Culture and judgment of causal relevance., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1),, 46-59., Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999)., Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and, universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 47–63., Choice, P., & Lamke, L. K. (1997). A conceptual, approach to understanding abused women’s, stay/leave decisions. Journal of Family Issues, 18,, 290–314., Chopra, D. (1993). Ageless body, timeless mind., New York: Crown., Choudhry, N. K., Stelfox, H. T., & Detsky, A. S., (2002). Relationships between authors of clinical, , References, , 567

Page 605 :
practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the American Medical Association,, 287(5), 612–617., Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender, and social structure in the demand/withdraw, pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81., Christensen, A., & Jacobson, N. S. (2000). Reconcilable differences. New York: Guilford Press., Christensen, A. J., & Johnson, J. A. (2002). Patient, adherence with medical treatment regimens: An, interactive approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(3), 94–97., Christensen, P., & Kashy, D. (1998). Perceptions of, and by lonely people in initial social interaction., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(3),, 322–329., Christoph, R. T., Schoenfeld, G. A., & Tansky, J. W., (1998). Overcoming barriers to training utilizing, technology: The influence of self-efficacy factors on, multimedia-based training receptiveness. Human, Resource Development Quarterly, 9(1), 25–38., Christophe, V., & Rime, B. (1997). Exposure to the, social sharing of emotion: Emotional impact,, listener responses and secondary social sharing., European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 37–54., Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality, in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A, decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family,, 62, 999–1017., Church, A. T. (1994). Relating to Tellegen and fivefactor models of personality structure. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 898–909., Church, A. T., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory, and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen’s three- and four-dimensional models. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93–114., Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social, Influence: Compliance and comformity. Annual, Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621., Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker,, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking, in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34,, 366–375., Ciarrochi, J., Dean, F. P., & Anderson, S. (2002)., Emotional intelligence moderates the relationship, between stress and mental health. Personality &, Individual Differences, 32, 197–209., Cicirelli, V. G. (1996). Sibling relationships in, middle and old age. In G. H. Brody (Ed.), Sibling, relationships: Their causes and consequences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex., Cicirelli, V. G. (1999). Personality and demographic factors in older adults’ fear of death., Gerontologist, 39(5), 569–579., Cicirelli, V. G. (2002). Older adults’ views on death., New York: Springer., Claar, R. L., & Blumenthal, J. A. (2003). The value of, stress-management interventions in life-threatening, medical conditions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 133–137., Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Beck, J. S. (1994)., Symptom differences in major depression, dysthymia, panic disorder, and generalized anxiety, disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151,, 205–209., Clark, M. S., & Bennett, M. E. (1992). Research on, relationships: Implications for mental health. In, D. N. Ruble, R. R. Costanzo, & M. E. Oliveri (Eds.),, The social psychology of mental health. New York:, Guilford Press., Clark, M. S., & Grote, N. K. (2003). Close relationships. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.) Handbook, of psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and social psychology. New York: Wiley., Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The difference, between communal and exchange relationships:, What it is and is not. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684–691., , 568, , References, , Clark, R., Anderson, N. B., Clark, V. R., &, Williams, D. R. (1999). Racism as a stressor for, African Americans. American Psychologist, 54(10),, 805–816., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., & Bailey, B. L. (1989). Adjusting to divorce: Why do men have it easier?, Journal of Divorce, 13, 75–94., Cleek, M. G., & Pearson, T. A. (1985). Perceived, causes of divorce: An analysis of interrelationships., Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 179–183., Clement, U. (1990). Surveys of heterosexual behavior. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1, 45–74., Clements, M. L., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J., (2004). Before they said “I do”: Discriminating, among marital outcomes over 13 years. Journal of, Marriage and Family, 66, 613–626., Cloitre, M., Morin, N. A., & Linares, O. (2004,, January-February). Children’s resilience in the face, of trauma. The New York University Child Study, Letter., Clow, A. (2001). The physiology of stress. In, F. Jones & J. Bright (Eds.), Stress: Myth, theory and, research. Harlow, England: Pearson Education., Coates, T. J., & Collins, C. (1998). Preventing HIV, infection. Scientific American, 279(1), 96–97., Coats, E. J., & Feldman, R. S. (1996). Gender differences in nonverbal correlates of social status., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(10),, 1014–1022., Cochran, S. D. (2001). Emerging issues in research, on lesbians’ and gay men’s mental health: Does, sexual orientation really matter? American Psychologist, 56, 931–947., Cohan, C. L., & Kleinbaum, S. (2002). Toward a, greater understanding of the cohabitation effect:, Premarital cohabitation and marital communication. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 180–192., Cohen, C. E. (1981). Person categories and social, perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 441–452., Cohen, D. (1997). A critique of the use of neuroleptic drugs in psychiatry. In S. Fisher & R. P., Greenberg (Eds.), From placebo to panacea: Putting, psychiatric drugs to the test. New York: Wiley., Cohen, D., & McCubbin, M. (1990). The political, economy of tardive dyskinesia: Asymmetries in, power and responsibility. The Journal of Mind and, Behavior, 11, 465–488., Cohen, D. B. (1999). Stranger in the nest: Do parents really shape their child’s personality, intelligence, or character? New York: Wiley., Cohen, F. (1979). Personality, stress and the development of physical illness. In G. C. Stone, F. Cohen,, N. E. Adler, & associates (Eds.), Health psychology—A handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., Cohen, F., Solomon, S., Maxfield, M. , Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2004). Fatal attraction:, The effects of mortality salience on evaluations, of charismatic, task-oriented, and relationshiporiented leaders. Psychological Science, 15, 846–851., Cohen, M. J. M., Kunkel, E. S., & Levenson, J. L., (1998). Associations between psychosocial stress, and malignancy. In J. R. Hubbard & E. A. Workman (Eds.), Handbook of stress medicine: An organ, system approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press., Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Turner, R., Alper, C. M., &, Skoner, D. P. (2003). Sociability and susceptibility, to the common cold. Psychological Science, 14(5),, 389–395., Cohen, S., Evans, G. W., Krantz, D. S., & Stokols,, D. (1980). Physiological, motivational, and cognitive effects of aircraft noise on children: Moving, from the laboratory to the field. American Psychologist, 35, 231–243., Cohen, S., Hamrick, N., Rodriguez, M. S., Feldman, P. J., Rabin, B. S., & Manuck, S. B. (2002)., Reactivity and vulnerability to stress-associated, risk for upper respiratory illness. Psychosomatic, Illness, 64, 302–310., Cohen, S., Kessler, R. C., & Gordon, L. U. (1995)., Strategies for measuring stress in studies of psy-, , chiatric and physical disorders. In S. Cohen, R. C., Kessler, & L. U. Gordon (Eds.), Measuring stress: A, guide for health and social scientists (pp. 3–28)., New York: Oxford University Press., Cohen, S., Lichtenstein, E., Prochaska, J. O.,, Rossi, J. S., Gritz, E. R., Carr, C. R., Orleans,, C. T., Schoenbach, V. J., Biener, L., Abrams, D.,, DiClemente, C., Curry, S., Marlatt, G. A., Cummings, K. M., Emont, S. L., Giovino, A., & OssipKlein, D. (1989). Debunking myths about, self-quitting: Evidence from 10 prospective studies, of persons who attempt to quit smoking by themselves. American Psychologist, 44, 1355–1365., Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D. A., & Smith, A. P. (1993)., Negative life events, perceived stress, negative, affect, and susceptibility to the common cold., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64,, 131–140., Cohn, E., Cohn, S., & Bradley, J. (1995). Notetaking, working memory, and learning principles of, economics. Journal of Economics Education, 26,, 291–307., Cohn, L. D., & Adler, N. E. (1992). Female and, male perceptions of ideal body shapes: Distorted, views among Caucasian college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(1), 69–79., Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1997). Aggression and, antisocial behavior. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg, (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3). New, York: Wiley., Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S.,, Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., & Smith, P. H., (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 260–268., Colder, C. R. (2001). Life stress, physiological and, subjective indexes of negative emotionality and, coping reasons for drinking: Is there evidence for a, self-medication model of alcohol use? Psychology, of Addictive Behaviors, 15(3), 237–245., Cole, J. O., Goldberg, S. C., & Davis, J. M. (1966)., Drugs in the treatment of psychosis. In P. Solomon, (Ed.), Psychiatric drugs. New York: Grune & Stratton., Cole, S. W., Kemeny, M. E., Taylor, S. E., & Visscher, B. R. (1996). Elevated physical health risk, among gay men who conceal their homosexual, identity. Health Psychology, 15, 243–251., Coleman, M., Ganong, L., & Fine, M. (2001)., Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of, progress. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Understanding, families into the new millennium: A decade in review (pp. 507–526). Minneapolis: National Council on Family Relations., Collaer, M. L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones, during early development? Psychological Bulletin,, 118, 55–107., Colley, A., & Todd, Z. (2002). Gender-linked differences in the style and content of e-mails to, friends. Journal of Language and Social Psychology,, 21(4), 380–392., Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2004). An attachment theory perspective on closeness and intimacy. In D. J. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook, of closeness and intimacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure, and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological, Bulletin, 116, 457–475., Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in, dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 58, 644–663., Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The, impact of upward social comparison on selfevaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51–69., Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000)., Contemporary research in parenting: The case for, nature and nurture. American Psychologist, 55,, 218–232., Coltrane, S. (2001). Marketing the marriage “solution”: Misplaced simplicity in the politics of fatherhood. Sociological Perspectives, 44(4), 387–418.

Page 606 :
Coltrane, S., & Adams, M. (2003). The social construction of the divorce “problem”: Morality, child, victims, and the politics of gender. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family, Studies, 52(4), 363–372., Colvin, C. R., & Block, J. (1994). Do positive illusions foster mental health? An examination of the, Taylor and Brown formulation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 3–20., Colvin, C. R., Block, J., & Funder, D. C. (1995)., Overly positive self-evaluations and personality:, Negative implications for mental health. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1152–1162., Comas-Diaz, L. (1987). Feminist therapy with, mainland Puerto Rican women. Psychology of, Women Quarterly, 11, 461–474., Comas-Diaz, L. (1991). Feminism and diversity in, psychology: The case of women of color. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 597–609., Condoms—extra protection. (2005, February)., Consumer Reports, pp. 34–38., Condon, J. W., & Crano, W. D. (1988). Inferred, evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 789–797., Conklin, H. M., & Iacono, W. G. (2002). Schizophrenia: A neurodevelopmental perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 33–37., Connell, C. M., & Janevic, M. R. (2003). Health, and human development. In R. M. Lerner, M. A., Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of, psychology: Vol. 6. Developmental psychology. New, York: Wiley., Connidis, I. A., & McMullin, J. A. (1999). Permanent childlessness: Perceived advantages and disadvantages among older persons. Canadian, Journal on Aging, 18, 447–465., Contrada, R. J., Ashmore, R. D., Gary, M. L.,, Coups, E., Egeth, J. D., Sewell, A., Ewell, K., Goyal,, T. M., & Chasse, V. (2000). Ethnicity-related, sources of stress and their effects on well-being., Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(4),, 136–139., Coontz, S. (1997, November 17). Divorcing reality., The Nation, pp. 21–24., Coontz, S. (2000). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic, Books., Cooper, A. (2002). Sex and the Internet. Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge., Cooper A., Boies, S., Maheu, M., & Greenfield, D., (2000). Sexuality and the Internet: The next sexual, revolution. In L. T. Szuchman & F. Muscarella, (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on human sexuality. New York: Wiley., Cooper, A., & Griffin-Shelley, E. (2002). A quick, tour of online sexuality: Part 1. Annals of the, American Psychotherapy Association, 5(6), 11–13., Cooper, A., Morahan-Martin, J., Mathy, R. M., &, Maheu, M. (2002). Toward an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual, activities. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28,, 105–129., Cooper, A., Scherer, C. R., Boies, S. C., & Gordon,, B. L. (1999). Sexuality on the Internet: From sexual exploration to pathological expression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30(2),, 154–164., Cooper, A., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance in, cyberspace: Understanding online attraction., Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 7–14., Cooper, C. L., & Dewe, P. (2004). Stress: A brief, history. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing., Cooper, L., & Bright. J. (2001). Individual differences in reactions to stress. In F. Jones & J. Bright, (Eds.), Stress: Myth, theory and research. Harlow,, England: Pearson Education., Cooper, M. L., Albino, A. W., Orcutt, H. K., &, Williams, N. (2004). Attachment styles and intrapersonal adjustment: A longitudinal study from, adolescence into young adulthood. In W. S. Rholes, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory,, , research, and clinical implications. New York:, Guilford., Cooper, P. J. (1995). Eating disorders and their, relationship to mood and anxiety disorders. In, K. D. Brownell & C. G. Fairburn (Eds.), Eating, disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook., New York: Guilford Press., Cope, M. B., Fernández, J. R., & Allilson, D. B., (2004). Genetic and biological risk factors. In J. K., Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders and, obesity. New York: Wiley., Corr, C. A. (1993). Coping with dying: Lessons, that we should and should not learn from the, work of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross. Death Studies,, 17(1), 69–83., Correll, C. U., Leucht, S., & Kane, J. M. (2004)., Lower risk for tardive dyskinesia associated with, second-generation antipsychotics: A systematic, review of 1-year studies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 414–425., Corsica, J. A., & Perri, M. G. (2003). Obesity. In, A. M. Nezu, C. M. Nezu, & P. A. Geller (Eds.),, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 9. Health psychology., New York: Wiley., Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). NEO, Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological, Assessment Resources., Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of, self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 54, 853–863., Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised, NEO Personality Inventory: NEO PI and NEO FiveFactor Inventory (Professional Manual). Odessa,, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources., Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1994). Set like, plaster? Evidence for the stability of adult personality. In T. F. Heatherton & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.),, Can personality change? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1997). Longitudinal stability of adult personality. In R. Hogan,, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 269–290). San Diego: Academic Press., Couch, K. A. (1998). Late-life job displacement., The Gerontologist, 38, 7–17., Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Behavioral factors associated with disease, injury, and death among men:, Evidence and implications for prevention. Journal, of Men’s Studies, 9(1), 81–142., Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (1997). Working with, couples during stressful transitions. In S. Dreman, (Ed.), The family on the threshold of the 21st century (pp. 17–47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (2000). When partners become parents. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Cowley, J., & Murr, A. (2004, December 6). The, new face of AIDS. Newsweek, pp. 76–78., Cox, M. J., Paley, B., Burchinal, M., & Payne, C. C., (1999). Marital perceptions and interactions, across the transition to parenthood. Journal of, Marriage and the Family, 61, 611–625., Coyne, J. C. (1999). Thinking interactionally about, depression: A radical restatement. In T. E. Joiner &, J. C. Coyne (Eds.), Interpersonal processes in depression (pp. 369–392). Washington, DC: American, Psychological Association., Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of, processing and the retention of words in episodic, memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 104, 268–294., Cramer, P. (2000). Defense mechanisms in psychology today: Further processes for adaptation., American Psychologist, 55(6), 637–646., Cramer, P. (2002). Defense mechanisms, behavior,, and affect in young adulthood. Journal of Personality, 70(1), 103–126., Creed, F. (1989). Appendectomy. In G. W. Brown, & T. O. Harris (Eds.), Life events and illness. New, York: Guilford Press., , Crepaz, N., Hart, T. A., & Marks, G. (2004). Highly, active antiretroviral therapy and sexual risk behavior. Journal of the American Medical Association,, 292(2), 224–236., Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Nelson, D. A. (2002)., Toward a more comprehensive understanding of, peer maltreatment: Studies of relational victimization. Current Directions in Psychological Science,, 11(3), 98–101., Crick, N. R., & Rose, A. J. (2000). Toward a genderbalanced approach to the study of social-emotional, development: A look at relational aggression. In, R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for, social policy (pp. 153–168). San Diego: Academic, Press., Crimmins, E. M., & Ingegneri, D. G. (1990). Interaction and living arrangements of older parents, and their children. Research on Aging, 12, 3–35., Critelli, J. W., & Ee, J. S. (1996). Stress and physical, illness: Development of an integrative model. In, T. W. Miller (Ed.), Theory and assessment of stressful life events. Madison, CT: International Universities Press., Crits-Christoph, P. (1997). Limitations of the, dodo bird verdict and the role of clinical trials in, psychotherapy research: Comment on Wampold,, et al. (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122, 216–220., Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective selfesteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 58, 60–67., Crocker, J., & McGraw, K. M. (1984). What’s good, for the goose is not good for the gander: Solo, status as an obstacle to occupational achievement, for males and females. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 357–370., Crockett, L. J. (1990). Sex role and sex typing in, adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, A. C. Petersen, &, J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), The encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 2). New York: Garland., Crohan, S. E. (1992). Marital happiness and, spousal consensus on beliefs about marital conflict: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Social, and Personal Relationships, 9, 89–102., Crook, R. H., Healy, C. C., & O’Shay, D. W. (1984)., The linkage of work achievement to self-esteem,, career maturity, and college achievement. Journal, of Vocational Behavior, 25, 70–79., Crooks, R., & Baur, K. (2005). Our sexuality. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Cross, C. K., & Hirschfeld, R. M. A. (1986). Epidemiology of disorders in adulthood: Suicide. In, G. L. Klerman, M. M. Weissman, P. S. Appelbaum,, & L. H. Roth (Eds.), Psychiatry: Vol. 5. Social, epidemiologic, and legal psychiatry. New York: Basic, Books., Cross, P. (1977). Not can but will college teaching, be improved? New Directions for Higher Education,, 17, 1–15., Cross, S., & Markus, H. (1991). Possible selves, across the life span. Human Development, 34(4),, 230–255., Cross, S. E., & Gore, J. S. (2003). Cultural models, of the self. In M.R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.),, Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford., Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the, self: Self-construal and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5–37., Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (1999). The cultural, constitution of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P., John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and, research (2nd ed., pp. 378–396). New York: Guilford Press., Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000)., The relational-interdependent self-construal and, relationships. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 78(4), 791–808., Crouter, A. C., & Bumpus, M. F. (2001). Linking, parents’ work stress to children’s and adolescents’, psychological adjustment. Current Directions in, Psychological Science, 10(5), 156–159., Crouter, A. C., Bumpus, M. F., Maguire, M. C., &, McHale, S. M. (1999). Linking parents’ work pres-, , References, , 569

Page 607 :
sure and adolescents’ well-being: Insights into, dynamics in dual-earner families. Developmental, Psychology, 35, 1453–1461., Crovitz, H. F. (1971). The capacity of memory loci, in artificial memory. Psychonomic Science, 24,, 187–188., Crowell, J. A., Treboux, D., & Waters, E. (2002)., Stability of attachment representations: The transition to marriage. Developmental Psychology, 38,, 467–479., Crowley, A. E., & Hoyer, W. D. (1994). An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 20,, 561–574., Crowley, B. J., Hayslip, B. Jr., & Hobdy, J. (2003)., Psychological hardiness and adjustment to life, events in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development,, 10(4), 237–248., Cudney, M. R., & Hardy, R. E. (1991). Self-defeating, behaviors. New York: Harper., Cuesta, M. J., Peralta, B., & DeLeon, J. (1994)., Schizophrenic syndromes associated with treatment response. Progress in Neurology, Psychopharmacology, and Biological Psychiatry, 18, 87–99., Culpepper, L., Davidson, J. R. T., Dietrich, A. J.,, Goodman, W. K., Kroenke, K., & Schwenk, T. L., (2004). Suicidality as a possible effect of antidepressant treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry,, 65(6), 742–749., Cummings, E. M., Braungart-Rieker, J. M., & du, Rocher-Schudlich, T. (2003). Emotion and personality development in childhood. In R. M., Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.),, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 6. Developmental, psychology. New York: Wiley., Cunningham, C. O., & Selwyn, P. A. (2005). HIVrelated medical complications and treatment. In, J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G., Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive, textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams &, Wilkins., Cunningham, M. (2001). The influence of parental attitudes and behaviors on children’s attitudes, toward gender and household labor in early adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(1),, 111–122., Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L., (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of, male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 61–72., Cunningham, M. R., Druen, P. B., & Barbee, A. P., (1997). Angels, mentors, and friends: Trade-offs, among evolutionary, social, and individual variables in physical appearance. In J. A. Simpson &, D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary Social Psychology, (pp. 109–140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P.,, Druen, P. B., & Wu, C., (1995). “Their ideas of, beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279., Curtis, R. C., & Miller, K. (1986). Believing another likes or dislikes you: Behaviors making the, beliefs come true. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 51, 284–290., Cutrona, C. E. (1982). Transition to college: Loneliness and the process of social adjustment. In L. A., Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy. New, York: Wiley., Cutting, L. P., & Docherty, N. M. (2000). Schizophrenia outpatients’ perceptions of their parents:, Is expressed emotion a factor? Journal of Abnormal, Psychology, 109(2), 266–272., Dabbs, J. M., with Dabbs, M. G. (2000). Heroes,, rogues, and lovers: Testosterone and behavior. New, York: McGraw-Hill., Dainton, M. (2000). Maintenance behaviors, expectations for maintenance, and satisfaction: Linking comparison levels to relational maintenance, , 570, , References, , strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(6), 827–842., Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2002). Routine and, strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns,, variations associated with relational length, and, the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69(1), 52–66., Dallman, M. F., Bhatnagar, S., & Viau, V. (2000)., Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. In G. Fink, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 2, pp. 468–476)., San Diego: Academic Press., D’Amico, M. L. (1998). Internet has become a, necessity, U.S. poll shows. CNNinteractive [Internet, Magazine],1., D’Andrade, R. G. (1966). Sex differences and, cultural institutions. In E. Maccoby (Ed.), The, development of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press., Danieli, Y., Engdahl, B., & Schlenger, W. E. (2004)., The psychological aftermath of terrorism. In F. M., Moghaddam & A. J. Marsella (Eds.), Understanding terrorism: Psychological roots, consequences, and, interventions. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association., Danton, W. G., & Antonuccio, D. O. (1997). A, focused empirical analysis of treatments for panic, and anxiety. In S. Fisher & R.P. Greenberg (Eds.),, From placebo to panacea: Putting psychiatric drugs, to the test. New York: Wiley., Dantzer, R., & Mormede, P. (1995). Psychoneuroimmunology of stress. In B. E. Leonard & K. Miller, (Eds.), Stress, the immune system and psychiatry., New York: Wiley., Darley, J. M., & Gilbert, D. T. (1985). Social psychological aspects of environmental psychology. In, G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of, social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2). New York: Random House., Darling, C. A., Davidson, J. K., & Conway-Welch,, C. (1990). Female ejaculation: Perceived origins,, the Grafenberg spot/area, and sexual responsiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 29–47., Darling, C. A., Davidson, J. K., & Cox, R. P., (1991). Female sexual response and the timing of, partner orgasm. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17, 3–21., Das, E. H. H. J., de Wit, J. B. F., & Stroebe, W., (2003). Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action, recommendations: Evidence for a positive bias in, the processing of persuasive messages. Personality, and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 650–664., D’Augelli, A. R., & Hershberger, S. L. (1993)., Lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth in community, settings: Personal challenges and mental health, problems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 421–448., Davidson, J. K., & Moore, N. B. (1994). Masturbation and premarital sexual intercourse among, college women: Making choices for sexual fulfillment. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 20,, 178–199., Davidson, M. J., & Fielden, S. (1999). Stress and, the working woman. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 413–426). Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage., Davies, L. (1995). A closer look at gender and, distress among the never married. Women and, Health, 23, 13–30., Davis, J. A., & Smith, T. (1991). General social, surveys, 1972–1991. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research., Davis, J. L., & Rusbult, C. E. (2001). Attitude, alignment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 65–84., Davis, K. L., Mohs, R. C., Marin, D., Purohit, D. P.,, Perl, D. P., Lantz, M., Austin, G., & Haroutunian,, V. (1999). Cholinergic markers in elderly patients, with early signs of Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of, the American Medical Association, 281, 1401–1406., Davis, M. H., Morris, M. M., & Kraus, L. A., (1998). Relationship-specific and global perceptions of social support: Associations with well-, , being and attachment. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 74, 468–481., Davis, P., & Lay-Yee, R. (1999). Early sex and its, behavioral consequences in New Zealand. Journal, of Sex Research, 36, 135–144., Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model, of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human, Behavior, 17(2), 187–195., Dawod, N. (1995). Stressors encountered by junior, high school students and their relation to grade, point average, sex and grade. Dirasat, 22A(Supplement), 3671–3706., Day, S. X., & Rounds, J. (1998). Universality of, vocational interest structure among racial and, ethnic minorities. American Psychologist, 53(7),, 728–736., Day, S. X., Rounds, J., & Swaney, K. (1998). The, structure of vocational interests for diverse racialethnic groups. Psychological Science, 9(1), 40–44., DeAngelis, T. (2001, December). Are men emotional mummies? Monitor on Psychology, pp., 40–41., DeAngelis, T. (2002). New data on lesbian, gay,, and bisexual mental health. Monitor on Psychology,, 33(2), 46–47., Deaux, K., & Hanna, R. (1984). Courtship in the, personals column: The influence of gender and, sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 11, 363–375., Deaux, K., & La France, M. (1998). Gender. In, D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The, handbook of social psychology. Boston: McGrawHill., Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1983). Components of, gender stereotypes. Psychological Documents, 13,, Ms. No. 2583., Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of, gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among, components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004., De Beni, R., Mo, A., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Learning from texts or lectures: Loci mnemonics can, interfere with reading but not with listening. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 401–415., DeCarvalho, R. J. (1991). The founders of humanistic psychology. New York: Praeger., De Cock, K. M., & Janssen, R. S. (2002). An unequal epidemic in an unequal world. Journal of the, American Medical Association, 288(2), 236–238., DeFrain, J., & Olson, D. H. (1999). Contemporary, family patterns and relationships. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.),, Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 309–326)., New York: Plenum Press., Deikman, A. J. (1990). The wrong way home: Uncovering the patterns of cult behavior in American, society. Boston: Beacon Press., de Jong, P. J., & Merckelbach, H. (2000). Phobiarelevant illusory correlations: The role of phobic, responsivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109,, 597–601., deJong-Gierveld, J. (1986). Loneliness and the, degree of intimacy in interpersonal relationships., In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field, of personal relationships (pp. 241–249). Hillsdale,, NJ: Erlbaum., Delahanty, D. L., & Baum, A. (2001). Stress and, breast cancer. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E., Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp., 747–756). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Delay, J., & Deniker, P. (1952). Trente-huit cas de, psychoses traitees par la cure prolongee et continue, de 4560 RP. Paris: Masson et Cie., DelMonte, M. M. (2000). Retrieved memories of, childhood sexual abuse. British Journal of Medical, Psychology, 73, 1–13., DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S., (1988). The impact of daily stress on health and, mood: Psychological and social resources as mediators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 54, 486–495., DeMaris, A., Benson, M. L., Fox, G. L., Hill, T., &, Van Wyk, J. (2003). Distal and proximal factors in

Page 608 :
domestic violence: A test of an integrated model., Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 652–667., DeMaris, A., & Swinford, S. (1996). Female victims of spousal violence: Factors influencing their, level of fearfulness. Family Relations, 45(1),, 98–106., Demo, D. H. (1992). Parent-child relations: Assessing recent changes. Journal of Marriage and the, Family, 54, 104–117., Dempsey, C. (1994). Health and social issues of, gay, lesbian, and bisexual adolescents. Families in, Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 160–167., Dempster, F. N. (1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In, E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory. San, Diego: Academic Press., Denisoff, E., & Endler, N. S. (2000). Life experiences, coping, and weight preoccupation in young, adult women. Canadian Journal of Behavioural, Science, 32(2), 97–103., Dennerstein, L., Dudley, E., & Guthrie, J. (2002)., Empty nest or revolving door? A prospective study, of women’s quality of life in midlife during the, phase of children leaving and re-entering the, home. Psychological Medicine, 32(3), 545–550., Dennis, W. (1966). Creative productivity between, the ages of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology,, 21, 1–8., DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and, self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111,, 203–243., DePaulo, B. M. (1994). Spotting lies: Can humans, learn to do better? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3(3), 83–86., DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay,, J. J., & Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). The accuracyconfidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review,, 1(4), 346–357., DePaulo, B. M., & Friedman, H. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, &, G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). Boston: McGraw-Hill., DePaulo, B. M., LeMay, C. S., & Epstein, J. A., (1991). Effects of importance of success and expectations for success on effectiveness at deceiving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17,, 14–24., DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003)., Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1),, 74–118., DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985)., Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker, (Ed.), The self and social life. New York: McGrawHill., Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., Wong, P. T. P., &, Hunter, S. (1985). Gender effects in an initial, encounter: A case where men exceed women in, disclosure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 25–44., Derogatis, L. R. (1982). Self-report measures of, stress. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects. New, York: Free Press., Derogatis, L. R., & Coons, H. L. (1993). Self-report, measures of stress. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz, (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical, aspects (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press., DeRoma, V., Saylor, C., Swickert, R. , Sinsi, C.,, Marable, T. B., & Vickery, P. (2003). College students’ PTSD symptoms, coping, and perceived, benefits following media exposure to 9/11. Journal, of College Student Psychotherapy, 18(1), 49–64., Des Jarlais, D. C., Hagan, H., & Friedman, S. R., (2005). Epidemiology and emerging public heath, perspectives. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A, comprehensive textbook. Philadelphia:, Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., , DeSpelder, L. A., & Strickland, A. L. (1983). The, last dance: Encountering death and dying. Palo Alto,, CA: Mayfield., Dessler, W. A. (2000). Indigenous societies. In, G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 1, pp., 558–564). San Diego: Academic Press., Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of, normative and informational social influences, upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal, and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636., Deveny, K. (2003, June 30). We’re not in the, mood. Newsweek, pp. 41–46., Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice:, Their automatic and controlled components., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,, 5–18., Devlin, M. J., Yanovski, S. Z., & Wilson, G. T., (2000). Obesity: What mental health professionals, need to know. American Journal of Psychiatry,, 157(6), 854–866., de Vries, B. (1996). The understanding of friendship: An adult life course perspective. In C. Magai, & S. H. McFadden (Eds), Handbook of emotion,, adult development, and aging. San Diego, CA:, Academic Press., Dew, M. A., Bromet, E. J., & Switzer, G. E. (2000)., Epidemiology. In M. Hersen & A. S. Bellack (Eds.),, Psychopathology in adulthood. Boston: Allyn &, Bacon., de Wilde, E. J., Kienhorst, I. C. W. M., Diekstra,, R. F. W., & Wolters, W. H. G. (1992). The relationship between adolescent suicidal behavior and life, events in childhood and adolescence. American, Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 45–51., DeWolff, M. S., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1997)., Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on, parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child, Development, 68, 571–591., Di Chiara, G. (1999). Drug addiction as, dopamine-dependent associative learning disorder. European Journal of Pharmacology, 375, 13–30., DiClemente, C. C., Fairhurst, S. K., & Piotrowski,, N. A. (1995). Self-efficacy and addictive behaviors., In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and, adjustment: Theory, research and application. New, York: Plenum Press., DiClemente, R. J., Hansen, W. B., & Ponton, L. E., (1995). Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior. New York: Plenum Press., Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes, as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the, past, present, and future. Personality and Social, Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188., Diekman, A. B., & Murnen, S. K. (2004). Learning, to be little women and little men: The inequitable, gender equality of nonsexist children’s literature., Sex Roles, 50(5/6), 373–385., Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 542–575., Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are, happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185., Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S., (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital, status and subjective well-being across cultures., Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 419–436., Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and, subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener,, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations, of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York:, Sage., Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M., (1993). The relationship between income and, subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social, Indicators Research, 28, 195–223., Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very, happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 80–83., Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond, money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31., Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. , & Smith, H. L., (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of, progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302., , Diener, E., Wolsic, B., & Fujita, F. (1995). Physical, attractiveness and subjective well-being. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 120–129., Dilsaver, S. C., Chen, Y. R., Shoaib, A. M., &, Swann, A. C. (1999). Phenomenology of mania:, Evidence for distinct depressed, dysphoric, and, euphoric presentations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 426–430., DiMatteo, M. R. (1991). The psychology of health,, illness, and medical care: An individual perspective., Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole., DiMatteo, M. R. (1997). Health behaviors and care, decisions: An overview of professional-patient, communication. In D. S. Gochman (Ed.), Handbook of health behavior research II: Provider determinants. New York: Plenum Press., DiMatteo, M. R. (2004a). Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: A metaanalysis. Health Psychology, 23(2), 207–218., DiMatteo, M. R. (2004b). Variations in patients’, adherence to medical recommendations: A quantitative review of 50 years of research. Medical Care,, 42(3), 200–209., DiMatteo, M. R., Giordani, P. J., Lepper, H. S., &, Croghan, T. W. (2002). Patient adherence and, medial treatment outcomes: A meta-analysis., Medical Care, 40(9), 794–811., Dimsdale, J. E. (1988). A perspective on Type A, behavior and coronary disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 318, 110–112., Din, J. N., Newby, D. E., & Flapan, A. D. (2004)., Omega 3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease—, fishing for a natural treatment. British Medical, Journal, 328, 30–35., Dinan, T. G. (2001). Stress, depression and cardiovascular disease. Stress and Health: Journal of the, International Society for the Investigation of Stress,, 17(2), 65–66., Dindia, K. (2000). Sex differences in self-disclosure,, reciprocity of self-disclosure, and self-disclosure, and liking: Three meta-analyses reviewed. In, S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private, disclosures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in, self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological, Bulletin, 112, 106–124., Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic, and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the, cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of, Social Issues, 49, 53–69., Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972)., What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290., Dion, K. L. (2003). Prejudice, racism and discrimination. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and social, psychology. New York: Wiley., Dion, K. L., & Dion, K. K. (1988). Romantic love:, Individual and cultural perspectives. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press., Dipboye, R. L. (1992). Selection interviews: Process, perspectives. Cincinnati: South-Western., Dishotsky, N. I., Loughman, W. D., Mogar, R. E.,, & Lipscomb, W. R. (1971). LSD and genetic damage: Is LSD chromosome damaging, carcinogenic,, mutagenic, or teratogenic? Science, 172, 431–440., DiTommaso, E., Brannen-McNulty, C., Ross, L., &, Burgess, M. (2003). Attachment styles, social skills, and loneliness in young adults. Personality and, Individual Differences, 35(2), 303–312., Dixon, L., & Browne, K. (2003). The heterogeneity, of spouse abuse: A review. Aggression and Violent, Behavior, 8(1), 107–130., Dixon, R. A., & Cohen, A. (2003). Cognitive development in adulthood. In R. M. Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of psychology:, Vol. 6. Developmental psychology. New York: Wiley., Dobson, K. S., & Dozois, D. J. A. (2001). Professional psychology and the prescription debate:, Still not ready to go to the altar. Canadian Psychology, 42(2), 131–135., , References, , 571

Page 609 :
Docherty, J. P. (1999). Cost of treating mental, illness from a managed care perspective. Journal of, Clinical Psychiatry, 60, 49–53., Dohrenwend, B. P., Raphael, K. G., Schwartz, S.,, Stueve, A., & Skodol, A. (1993). The structured, event probe and narrative rating method for measuring stressful life events. In L. Goldberger & S., Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and, clinical aspects (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press., Dolgin, K. L. (2001). Men’s friendships: Mismeasured, demeaned, and misunderstood? In T. F., Cohen (Ed.), Men and masculinity. New York:, Wadsworth., Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer,, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press., Domar, A. D., & Dreher, H. (2000). Self-nurture:, Learning to care for yourself as effectively as you care, for everyone else. New York: Viking., Donahue, E. M., Robins, R. W., Roberts, B. W., &, John, O. P. (1993). The divided self: Concurrent, and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 64, 834–846., Donnerstein, E., & Malamuth, N. (1997). Pornography: Its consequences on the observer. In L. B., Schlesinger & E. Revitch (Eds.), Sexual dynamics of, anti-social behavior (2nd ed., pp. 30–49). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas., Donovan, P. (1997). Confronting a hidden epidemic: The Institute of Medicine’s report on sexually transmitted diseases. Family Planning, Perspectives, 29, 87–89., Donovan, R. L., & Jackson, B. L. (1990). Deciding, to divorce: A process guided by social exchange,, attachment and cognitive dissonance theories., Journal of Divorce, 13, 23–35., Dougall, A. L., & Baum, A. (2000). Three Mile, Island, stress effects of. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 3, pp. 595–597). San Diego: Academic Press., Dougall, A. L., & Baum, A. (2001). Stress, health,, and illness. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E., Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp., 321–338). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Dougherty, T. W., Turban, D. B., & Callender, J. C., (1994). Confirming first impressions in the employment interview: A field study of interview, behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5),, 659–665., Douglass, M. E., & Douglass, D. N. (1993). Manage your time, your work, yourself. New York:, American Management Association., Dovidio, J. F., Ellyson, S. L., Keating, C. F., Heltman, K., & Brown, C. E. (1988). The relationship, of social power to visual display of dominance, between men and women. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 54, 233–242., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Affirmative, action, unintentional racial biases, and intergroup, relations. Journal of Social Issues, 52, 51–75., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1999). Reducing, prejudice: Combating intergroup biases. Current, Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 101–105., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Esses, V. M., &, Brewer, M. B. (2003). Social conflict, harmony,, and integration. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and, social psychology. New York: Wiley., Doyle, J. A. (1989). The male experience. Dubuque,, IA: William C. Brown., Draijer, N., & Langeland, W. (1999). Childhood, trauma and perceived parental dysfunction in the, etiology of dissociative symptoms in psychiatric, inpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156,, 379–385., Drigotas, S. M., Rusbult, C. E., Wieselquist, J., &, Whitton, S. W. (1999). Close partner as sculptor of, the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the, Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 77(2), 293–323., , 572, , References, , Driskell, J. E., Willis, R. P., & Copper, C. (1992)., Effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of, Applied Psychology, 77, 615–622., Driver, J., Tabares, A., Shapiro, A. , Nahm, E. Y., &, Gottman, J. M. (2003 ). Interactional patterns in, marital success and failure: Gottman laboratory, studies. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes:, Growing diversity and complexity. New York: Guilford., Druss, B. G., & Rosenheck, R. A. (1998). Mental, disorders and access to medical care in the United, States. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155,, 1775–1777., Dryer, D. C., & Horowitz, L. M. (1997). When do, opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity, versus similarity. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 72(3), 592–603., Dubbert, P. M., King, A. C., Marcus, B. H., & Sallis, J. F. (2004). Promotion of physical activity, through the life span. In J. M. Raczynski & L. C., Leviton (Eds.), Handbook of clinical health psychology: Vol. 2. Disorders of behavior and health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Dubovsky, S. L., Davies, R., & Dubovsky, A. N., (2003). Mood disorders. In R. E. Hales, & S. C., Yudofsky (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing., Duck, S. (1994). Meaningful relationships: Talking,, sense, and relating. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Duck, S., Pond, K., & Leatham, G. (1995). Loneliness and the evaluation of relational events. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11,, 253–276., Duckworth, K., & Borus, J. F. (1999). Populationbased psychiatry in the public sector and managed, care. In A. M. Nicholi, Jr. (Ed.), The Harvard guide, to psychiatry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Press., Duffy, S. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1986). Satisfaction, and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual, relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 1–23., DuFrene, D. D., & Lehman, C. M. (2002). Persuasive appeal for clean language. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(1), 48–56., Duggan, E. S., & Brennan, K. A. (1994). Social, avoidance and its relation to Bartholomew’s adult, attachment typology. Journal of Social and Personal, Relationships, 11, 147–153., Dunbar-Jacob, J., & Schlenk, E. (2001). Patient, adherence to treatment regimen. In A. Baum, T. A., Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health, psychology (pp. 571–580). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Gurung, R. A. R., Lobel, M.,, & Wadhwa, P. D. (2001). Stress processes in pregnancy and birth: Psychological, biological, and, sociocultural influences. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 495–518). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Dunn, A. L., Trivedi, M. H., & O’Neal, H. A., (2001). Physical activity dose-response effects on, outomes of depression and anxiety. Medicine and, Science in Sports and Exercise, 33, S587–S597., Dunning, D., & Sherman, D. A. (1997). Stereotypes and tacit inference. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 73(3), 459–471., Dupuis, S. L., & Smale, B. J. A. (1995). An examination of the relationship between psychological, well-being and depression and leisure activity, participation among older adults. Society and, Leisure, 18, 67–92., Dweck, C. S., Higgins, E. T., & Grant-Pillow, H., (2003). Self-systems give unique meaning to self, variables. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.),, Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford., Dwoskin, H., & Levenson, L. (2002). Happiness is, free: And it’s easier than you think! Sedona, AZ:, Sedona Press., Dyer, J. (2000). Evolving abuse of GHB in California: Bodybuilding drug to date-rape drug. Journal, of Toxicology, 38, 184., Dyer, W. W. (1976). Your erroneous zones. New, York: Crowell., , Dyk, P. H., & Adams, G. R. (1990). Identity and, intimacy: An initial investigation of three theoretical models using cross-lag panel correlations., Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 91–110., Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior:, A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., &, Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good,, but . . . : A meta-analytic review of research on the, physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychology Bulletin, 110, 107–128., Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A, meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1–20., Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity, theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598., Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of, sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist,, 54(6), 408–423., Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000)., Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M., Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Eaker, E. D., Sullivan, L. M., Kelly-Hayes, M.,, D’Agostino, R. B., & Benjamin, E. J. (2004). Anger, and hostility predict the development of atrial, fibrillation in men in the Framingham Offspring, Study. Circulation, 109(10), 1267–1271., Eals, M., & Silverman, I. (1994). The huntergatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in, recall of object arrays. Ethology and Sociobiology,, 15, 95–115., Easterbrook, G. (2003). The progress paradox: How, life gets better while people feel worse. New York:, Random House., Easterlin, B. L., & Cardena, E. (1999). Cognitive, and emotional differences between short- and, long-term Vipassana meditators. Imagination,, Cognition and Personality, 18(1), 68–81., Eaton, W. W., Dryman, A., & Weissman, M. M., (1991). Panic and phobia. In L. N. Robins & D. A., Regier (Eds.), Psychiatric disorders in America: The, epidemiologic catchment area study. New York: Free, Press., Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. (H. A. Ruger &, E. R. Bussemius, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885), Eccles, J. S. (2001). Achievement. In J. Worrell, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender. San, Diego: Academic Press., Eccles, J. S., Early, D., Frasier, K., Belansky, E., &, McCarthy, K. (1997). The relation of connection,, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents’ functioning. Journal of Adolescent Research,, 12, 263–286., Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Byrnes, J. (2003)., Cognitive development in adolescence. In R. M., Lerner, M.A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.),, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 6. Developmental, psychology. New York: Wiley., Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge, University Press., Edlin, G., & Golanty, E. (1992). Health and wellness: A holistic approach. Boston: Jones and, Bartlett., Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 5–24., Edwards, R., & Hamilton, M. A. (2004). You need, to understand my gender role: An empirical test of, Tannen’s model of gender and communication., Sex Roles, 50(7/8), 491–504.

Page 610 :
Egan, M. F., & Hyde, T. M. (2000). Schizophrenia:, Neurobiology. In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock, (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook, of psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1129–1146)., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Egan, T. (2000, October 23). Technology sent Wall, Street into market for pornography. New York, Times, pp. 1–20., Egeland, B., & Hiester, M. (1995). The long-term, consequences of infant day-care and mother-infant, attachment. Child Development, 66, 474–485., Ehrenberg, O., & Ehrenberg, M. (1994). The psychotherapy maze: A consumer’s guide to getting in, and out of therapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson., Ehrenreich, H., Rinn, T., Kunert, H. J., Moeller,, M. R., Poser, W., Schilling, L., Gigerenzer, G., &, Hoehe, M. R. (1999). Specific attentional dysfunction in adults following early start of cannabis use., Psychopharmacology, 142, 295–301., Eich, E., Macaulay, D., Loewenstein, R. J., & Dihle,, P. H. (1997). Memory, amnesia, and dissociative, identity disorder. Psychological Science, 8, 417–422., Eisler, R. M., & Ragsdale, K. (1992). Masculine, gender role and midlife transition in men. In V. B., Van Hasselt & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of, social development: A lifespan perspective. New, York: Plenum., Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole, (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1971., Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press., Ekman, P. (1975, September). The universal smile:, Face muscles talk every language. Psychology, Today, pp. 35–39., Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals, in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken, critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 268–287., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting, deception from the body or face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 288–298., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1984). Unmasking the, face. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press., Ekman, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can, catch a liar? American Psychologist, 44(9), 913–920., Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999)., A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10(3),, 263–266., Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the, universality and cultural specificity of emotion, recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 203–235., Elias, M. F., Elias, J. W., & Elias, P. K. (1990). Biological and health influences on behavior. In J. E., Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the, psychology of aging. San Diego: Academic Press., Eliot, R. S., & Breo, D. L. (1989). Is it worth dying, for? New York: Bantam Books., Ellington, L., & Wiebe, D. J. (1999). Neuroticism,, symptom presentation, and medical decision, making. Health Psychology, 18(6), 634–643., Elliot, L., & Brantley, C. (1997). Sex on campus., New York: Random House., Ellis, A. (1973). Humanistic psychotherapy: The, rational-emotive approach. New York: Julian Press., Ellis, A. (1977). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Seacaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart., Ellis, A. (1985). How to live with and without, anger. New York: Citadel Press., Ellis, A. (1987). The evolution of rational-emotive, therapy (RET) and cognitive behavior therapy, (CBT). In J. K. Zeig (Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel., Ellis, A. (1989). Rational-emotive therapy. In R. J., Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current Psychotherapies. Itasca, IL: Peacock., Ellis, A. (1993). The advantages and disadvantages, of self-help therapy materials. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 335–339., Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotheropy. Seacaucus, NJ: Birch Lane Press., , Ellis, A. (1995). Thinking processes involved in irrational beliefs and their disturbed consequences., Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 9, 105–116., Ellis, A. (1996). How I learned to help clients feel, better and get better. Psychotherapy, 33, 149–151., Ellis, A. (1999). How to make yourself happy and, remarkably less disturbable. Atascadero, CA: Impact Publishers., Ellis, A. (2001a). Feeling better, getting better, staying better: Profound self-help therapy for your emotions. Atascadero, CA: Impact Publishers., Ellis, A. (2001b). Overcoming destructive beliefs,, feelings, and behaviors: New directions for Rational, Emotive Behavior Therapy. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books., Ellis, A. (2003). Ask Albert Ellis: Straight answers, and sound advice from America’s best-known psychologist. Atascadero, CA: Impact Publishers., Ellis, L., & Ebertz, L. (1997). The ascendency of, biology: At long last! In L. Ellis & L. Ebertz (Eds.),, Sexual orientation: Toward biological understanding. Westport, CT: Praeger., Elms, A., & Milgram, S. (1966). Personality characteristics associated with obedience and defiance, toward authoritative command. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 282–289., Emanuel, H. M. (1987). Put time on your side. In, A. D. Timpe (Ed.), The management of time. New, York: Facts On File., Emavardhana, T., & Tori, C. D. (1997). Changes in, self-concept, ego defense mechanisms, and religiosity following seven-day Vipassana meditation, retreats. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,, 36, 194–206., Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (1994). Behavior therapy, with adults. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.),, Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, (4th ed.). New York: Wiley., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Scholing, A. (1990)., Behavioral treatment for simple and social phobias. In R. Noyes, Jr., M. Roth, & G. D. Burrows, (Eds.), Handbook of anxiety: The treatment of, anxiety (Vol. 4). Amsterdam: Elsevier., Employers bemoan workers’ writing skills. (2004,, September 15). The Statesboro Herald, p. 9., Epstein, R. (2001). Physiologist Laura. Psychology, Today, 34 (4), 5., Epstein, S. P. (1990). Cognitive-experiential selftheory. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford, Press., Epstein, S. P., & Katz, L. (1992). Coping ability,, stress, productive load, and symptoms. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 813–825., Epstein, S. P., & Meier, P. (1989). Constructive, thinking: A broad coping variable with specific, components. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 57, 332–350., Erdelyi, M. H. (2001). Defense processes can be, conscious or unconscious. American Psychologist,, 56(9), 761–762., Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New, York: Norton., Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis., New York: Norton., Ernst, C., & Angst, J. (1983). Birth order: Its influence on personality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,, 10(1), 55., Espiritu, D. A. V., Rashid, H., Mast, B. T., Fitzgerald, J., Steinberg, J., & Lichtenberg, P. A. (2001)., Depression, cognitive impairment and function in, Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16(11), 1098–1103., Esterling, B. A., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Bodnar, J. D.,, & Glaser, R. (1994). Chronic stress, social support,, and persistent alterations in the natural killer cell, response to cytokines in older adults. Health Psychology, 13, 291–298., Esterson, A. (1993). Seductive mirage: An exploration of the work of Sigmund Freud. Chicago:, Open Court., , Etaugh, C. (1993). Maternal employment: Effects, on children. In J. Frankel (Ed.), The employed, mother and the family context. New York: Springer., Evans, G. W. (2001). Environmental stress and, health. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer, (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 365–386)., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Evans, G. W., Hygge, S., & Bullinger, M. (1995)., Chronic noise and psychological stress. Psychological Science, 6, 333–338., Evans, G. W., Lepore, S. J., & Schroeder, A. (1996)., The role of interior design elements in human, responses to crowding. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 70, 41–46., Evans, G. W., & Stecker, R. (2004). Motivational, consequences of environmental stress. Journal of, Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 143–165., Evans, R. G., & Dinning, W. D. (1982). MMPI, correlates of the Bem Sex Role Inventory and, Extended Personal Attributes Questionnaire in a, male psychiatric sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 811–815., Everly, G. S., Jr., & Mitchell, J. T. (2001). America, under attack: The “10 commandments” of responding to mass terrorist attacks. International, Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 3, 133–135., Everson, S. A., Kauhanen, J., Kaplan, G. A., Goldberg, D. E., Julkunen, J., Tuomilehto, J., & Salonen, J. T. (1997). Hostility and increased risk of, mortality and acute myocardial infarction: The, mediating role of behavioral risk factors. American, Journal of Epidemiology, 146(2), 142–152., Ewart, C. K., & Suchday, S. (2002). Discovering, how urban poverty and violence affect health:, Development and validation of a neighborhood, stress index. Health Psychology, 21(3), 254–262., Eysenck, H. J. (1959). Learning theory and behaviour therapy. Journal of Mental Science, 195, 61–75., Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas., Eysenck, H. J. (1982). Personality, genetics and, behavior: Selected papers. New York: Praeger., Eysenck, H. J. (1988, December). Health’s character. Psychology Today, pp. 28–35., Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of, personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of, personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press., Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality:, 16, 5, or 3?—Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm., Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773–790., Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are, not basic. Personality and Individual Differences,, 13, 667–673., Eysenck, H. J. (1993a). Forty years on: The outcome problem in psychotherapy revisited. In T. R., Giles (Ed.), Handbook of effective psychotherapy., New York: Plenum., Eysenck, H. J. (1993b). Prediction of cancer and, coronary heart disease: Mortality by means of a, personality inventory: Results of a 15-year followup study. Psychological Reports, 72, 499–516., Eysenck, M. W., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A., &, Mathews, A. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety., Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 144–150., Fagot, B. I., & Hagan, R. (1991). Observations of, parent reactions to sex-stereotyped behaviors: Age, and sex effects. Child Development, 62, 617–628., Fagot, B. I., Hagan, R., Leinbach, M. D., & Kronsberg, S. (1985). Differential reactions to assertive, and communicative acts of toddler boys and girls., Child Development, 56, 1499–1505., Fairbank, J. A. (1998). Health status, somatization,, and severity of posttraumatic stress disorder in, Vietnam combat veterans with posttraumatic, stress disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155,, 1565–1569., Fairbank, J. A., Ebert, L., & Caddell, J. M. (2001)., Posttraumatic stress disorder. In P. B. Sunker &, H. E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of, , References, , 573

Page 611 :
psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 183–210). New York:, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers., Fairbrother, K., & Warn, J. (2003). Workplace, dimensions, stress, and job satisfaction. Journal of, Managerial Psychology, 18(1), 8–21., Falk, P. (1994). The gap between psychological, assumptions and empirical research in lesbianmother child custody cases. In A. E. Gottfried &, A. W. Gottfried (Eds.), Redefining families: Implications for children’s development. New York: Plenum., Falsetti, S. A., & Ballenger, J. C. (1998). Stress and, anxiety disorders. In J. R. Hubbard & E. A. Workman (Eds.), Handbook of stress medicine: An organ, system approach. New York: CRC Press., Families and Work Institute. (2004). Generation, and gender in the workplace. New York: Families, and Work Institute., Fancher, R. E. (1979). Pioneers of psychology. New, York: Norton., Farah, A. (1997). An overview of ECT. Primary, Psychiatry, 4, 58–62., Faravelli, C., & Pallanti, S. (1989). Recent life, events and panic disorders. American Journal of, Psychiatry, 146, 622–626., Farina, A., Burns, G. L., Austad, C., Bugglin, C., &, Fischer, E. H. (1986). The role of physical attractiveness in the readjustment of discharged psychiatric patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95,, 139–143., Farnsworth, L. (2002, August 25). Why courtesy, counts. Parade Magazine, pp. 8–9., Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (2000). Epidemiology of juvenile violence. Juvenile Violence, 9,, 733–748., Fassler, D. (2001). Talking to children about war, and terrorism: 20 tips for parents. Retrieved November 20, 2001 from American Psychiatric Association Web site: http://www.psych.org/disaster/, 20tipsparents11801.cfm., Faust, K. A., & McKibben, J. N. (1999). Marital, dissolution: Divorce, separation, annulment, and, widowhood. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, &, G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and, the family (pp. 475–502). New York: Plenum Press., Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men (2nd ed.)., New York: Basic Books., Federal Bureau of Investigation (1995). Uniform, crime reports: Crime in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related, Statistics. (2004). Older Americans 2004: Key indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: Government, Printing Office., Feeney, J. A. (1994). Attachment style, communication patterns, and satisfaction across the life, cycle of marriage. Personal Relationships,1,, 333–348., Feeney, J. A. (1999). Adult attachment, emotional, control, and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 6(2), 169–185., Feeney, J. A. (2004). Adult attachment and relationship functioning under stressful conditions:, Understanding partners’ responses to conflict and, challenge. In W. S. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.),, Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical, implications. New York: Guilford., Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1990). Attachment style, as a predictor of adult romantic relationships., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58,, 281–291., Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage., Fehr, B. (2000). The life cycle of friendship. In, C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 71–82). Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage., Fehr, B. (2004). Intimacy expectations in same-sex, friendships: A prototype interaction-pattern, model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 86(2), 265–284., , 574, , References, , Fein, S. (1996). Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,, 1164–1184., Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in, romantic partners and same-sex friends: A metaanalysis and theoretical critique. Psychological, Bulletin, 104, 226–235., Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects, of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction:, A comparison across five research paradigms., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59,, 981–993., Feingold, A. (1992a). Gender differences in mate, selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125–139., Feingold, A. (1992b). Good-looking people are, not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111,, 304–341., Feiring, C., & Lewis, M. (1987). The child’s social, network: Sex differences from three to six years., Sex Roles, 17, 621–636., Feldman, P. J., Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner,, D. P., & Gwaltney, J. M., Jr. (1999). The impact of, personality on the reporting of unfounded symptoms and illness. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 77(2), 370–378., Feldman-Barrett, L., & Swim, J. K. (1998). Appraisals of prejudice and discrimination. In J. K., Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s, perspective (pp. 11–36). New York: Academic Press., Felker, B., & Hubbard, J. R. (1998). Influence of, mental stress on the endocrine system. In J. R., Hubbard & E. A. Workman (Eds.), Handbook of, stress medicine: An organ system approach. New, York: CRC Press., Felmlee, D. H. (1995). Causes and consequences of, women’s employment discontinuity, 1967–1973., Work and Occupation, 22, 167–187., Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The, dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard, model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 513–30., Felson, R. B. (1989). Parents and the reflected, appraisal process: A longitudinal analysis. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 965–971., Felson, R. B. (1992). Coming to see ourselves:, Social sources of self-appraisals. Advances in Group, Processes, 9, 185–205., Felsten, G. (1996). Hostility, stress, and symptoms, of depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(4), 461–467., Fenton, W. S., & McGlashan, T. H. (1994). Antecedents, symptom progression, and long-term, outcome of the deficit syndrome in schizophrenia., American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 351–356., Fenwick, P. (1987). Meditation and the EEG. In, M. A. West (Ed.), The psychology of meditation., Oxford: Clarendon Press., Ferguson, J. M. (2001). SSRI antidepressant medications: Adverse effects and tolerability. Primary, Care Companion Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 3,, 22–27., Ferguson, T. (1993). Working with your doctor. In, D. Goleman & J. Gurin (Eds.), Mind-body medicine: How to use your mind for better health., Yonkers, NY: Consumer Reports Books., Feroli, K., & Burstein, G. (2003). Adolescent sexually transmitted diseases. American Journal of, Maternal/Child Nursing, 28, 113–118., Ferrari, J. R. (1992). Psychometric validation of, two adult measures of procrastination: Arousal, and avoidance measures. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 14, 97–100., Ferrari, J. R. (2001). Getting things done on time:, Conquering procrastination. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.),, Coping with stress: Effective people and processes., New York: Oxford University Press., Ferrari, J. R., Johnson, J. L., & McCown, W. G., (1995). Procrastination and task avoidance: Theory, research and treatment. New York: Plenum Press., Ferriss, A. L. (2002). Religion and the quality of, life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 199–215., , Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison, processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140., Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950)., Social pressures in informal groups: A study of, human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford, University Press., Fields, R. (2001, August 20). Seven states still classify cohabitation as illegal. Los Angeles Times, p. 3., Fiese, B. H., & Skillman, G. (2000). Gender differences in family stories: Moderating influence of, parent gender role and child gender. Sex Roles,, 43(5–6), 267–283., Fincham, F. D. (2003). Marital conflict: Correlates,, structure, and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 23–27., Fine, R. (1990). The history of psychoanalysis. New, York: Continuum., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K., & Wolak, J. (2000)., Online victimization: A report on the nation’s youth., Washington, DC: National Center for Missing and, Exploited Children., Finkenauer, C., & Hazam, H. (2000). Disclosure, and secrecy in marriage: Do both contribute to, marital satisfaction? Journal of Social and Personal, Relationships, 17(2), 245–263., First, M. B. (2003). Psychiatric classification. In A., Tasman, J. Kay, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New York: Wiley., Fisher, E. B., Brownson, R. C., Heath, A. C., Luke,, D. A., & Sumner II, W. (2004). Cigarette smoking., In J. M. Raczynski & L. C. Leviton (Eds.), Handbook of clinical health psychology: Vol. 2. Disorders, of behavior and health. Washington, DC: American, Psychological Association., Fisher, S., & Greenberg, R. P. (1996). Freud scientifically reappraised: Testing the theories and therapy. New York: Wiley., Fishman, D. B., & Franks, C. M. (1992). Evolution, and differentiation within behavior therapy: A, theoretical epistemological review. In D. K. Freedheim (Ed.), History of psychotherapy: A century of, change. Washington, DC: American Psychological, Association., Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social, perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44,, 155–194., Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and, discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, &, G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill., Fiske, S. T. (2002). What we know now about bias, and intergroup conflict, the problem of the century. Current Directions in Psychological Science,, 11(4), 123–128., Fiske, S. T., & Ruscher, J. B. (1993). Negative interdependence and prejudice: Whence the affect? In, D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect,, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in, group perception. New York: Academic., Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition., New York: McGraw-Hill., Fitch, S. A., & Adams, G. R. (1983). Ego identity, and intimacy status: Replication and extension., Developmental Psychology, 19, 839–845., Fitness, J., Fletcher, G., & Overall, N. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and intimate relationships., In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, Publications., Fitzgerald, H. E., Mann, T., Cabrera, N., & Wong,, M. M. (2003). Diversity in caregiving contexts. In, R. M. Lerner, M.A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry, (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 6. Developmental psychology. New York: Wiley., Flaks, D. K., Ficher, I., Masterpasqua, M., &, Joseph, G. (1995). Lesbians choosing motherhood:, A comparative study of lesbians and heterosexual, parents and their children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 105–114., Flannagan, D., & Perese, S. (1998). Emotional, references in mother-daughter and mother-son

Page 612 :
dyads’ conversations about school. Sex Roles,, 39(5–6), 353–367., Flannery, R. B., Jr. (1999). Psychological trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder: A review. International Journal of Mental Health, 1(2), 135–140., Flavin, C., & Dunn, S. (1999). Reinventing the, energy system. In L. R. Brown, C. Flavin, H. French,, J. Abramovitz, S. Dunn, G. Gardner, A. Mattoon,, A. P. McGinn, M. O’Meara, M. Renner, D. Roodman, P. Sampat, L. Starke, & J. Tuxill (Eds.), State, of the world 1999 (pp. 22–40). New York: Norton., Fleeson, W., Malanos, A. B., & Achille, N. M., (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the, relationship between extraversion and positive, affect: Is acting extraverted as “good” as being, extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1409–1422., Flegal, K. M., Carroll, M. D., Ogden, C. L., &, Johnson, C. L. (2002). Prevalence and trends in, obesity among U.S. adults, 1999–2000. Journal of, the American Medical Association, 288, 1723–1727., Fleischhacker, W. W. (2002). Second-generation, antipsychotics. Psychopharmacology, 162(1),, 90–91., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Thomas, G. (2000). Behavior, and on-line cognition in marital interaction. Personal Relationships, 7(1), 111–130., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Ward, C. (1988). Attribution, theory and processes: A cross-cultural perspective., In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to, social psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Martin, T. R. (1995)., Dimensions of perfectionism and procrastination., In J. R. Ferrari, J. L. Johnson, & W. G. McCown, (Eds.), Procrastination and task avoidance: Theory,, research, and treatment. New York: Plenum Press., Flippen, C., & Tienda, M. (2000). Pathways to, retirement: Patterns of labor force participation, and labor market exit among pre-retirement population by race, Hispanic orgin, and sex . Journals, of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and, Social Sciences, 55B(1), S14–S27., Floyd, M. (2003). Bibliotherapy as an adjunct to, psychotherapy for depression in older adults., Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(2), 187–195., Foa, E. B. (1998). Rape and posttraumatic stress, disorder. In E. A. Blechman & K. D. Brownell, (Eds.), Behavioral medicine and women: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 742–746). New York: Guilford Press., Foa, E. B., Hembree, E. A., Riggs, D., Rauch, S., &, Franklin, M. (2001). Common reactions to trauma., Retrieved November 21, 2001 from U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs National Cen-ter for, PTSD Web site: http:www.ncptsd.org/facts/, disasters/fs_foa_handout.html., Folkman, S. (1997). Positive psychological states, and coping with severe stress. Social Science and, Medicine, 45, 1207–1221., Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000). Positive, affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55(6), 647–654., Folkman, S., Moskowitz, J. T., Ozer, E. M., & Park,, C. L. (1997). Positive meaningful events and coping in the context of HIV/AIDS. In B. H. Gottlieb, (Ed.), Coping with chronic stress (pp. 293–314)., New York: Plenum., Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., & White, K. B., (2004). First- and second-generation measures of, sexism, rape, myths and related beliefs, and hostility toward women: Their interrelationships and, associations with college students’ experience with, dating aggression and sexual coercion. Violence, Against Women, 10(3), 236–261., Formicelli, L. (2001, March/April). Baby blues., Psychology Today, p. 24., Forrest, J. A., & Feldman, R. S. (2000). Detecting, deception and judge’s involvement: Lower task, involvement leads to better lie detection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(1), 118–125., Forsyth, D. R., & Strong, S. R. (1986). The scientific study of counseling and psychotherapy: A, , unificationist view. American Psychologist, 41,, 113–119., Forsythe, S., Drake, M. F., & Cox, C. E. (1985)., Influence of applicant’s dress on interviewer’s, selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology,, 70, 374–378., Fouts, G., & Burggraf, K. (1999). Television situation comedies: Female body images and verbal, reinforcements. Sex Roles, 40(5/6), 473–481., Fouts, G., & Vaughan, K. (2002). Television situation comedies: Male weight, negative references,, and audience reactions. Sex Roles, 46(11/12),, 439–442., Fowers, B. J. (2000). Beyond the myth of marital, happiness: How embracing the virtues of loyalty,, generosity, justice, and courage can strengthen your, relationship. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., Fowers, B. J., Applegate, B., Olson, D. H., &, Pomerantz, B. (1994). Marital conventionalization, as a measure of marital satisfaction: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 8,, 98–103., Fowers, B. J., Lyons, E., Montel, K. H., & Shaked,, N. (2001). Positive illusions about marriage, among married and single individuals. Journal of, Family Psychology, 15(1), 95–109., Fowles, D. C. (2003). Schizophrenia spectrum, disorders. In G. Stricker & T. A. Widiger (Eds.),, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 8. Clinical psychology., New York: Wiley., Fox, G. L., Bruce, C., & Combs-Orme, T. (2000)., Parenting expectations and concerns of fathers, and mothers of newborn infants. Family Relations,, 49(2), 123–131., Fox, G. L., & Chancey, D. (1998). Sources of economic distress: Individual and family outcomes., Journal of Family Issues, 19, 725–749., Fox, R. (1996). Bisexuality in perspective: A review, of theory and research. In B. Firestein (Ed.), Bisexuality: The psychology and politics of an invisible, minority. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Fraley, R. C. (2002). Attachment stability from, infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic, modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 123–151., Fraley, R. C., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2004). A dynamical systems approach to conceptualizing and, studying stability and change in attachment security. In W. S. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult, attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications. New York: The Guilford., Frank, E., Anderson, C., & Rubinstein, D. (1978)., Frequency of sexual dysfunction in “normal”, couples. New England Journal of Medicine, 299,, 111–115., Frank, J. D. (1961). Persuasion and healing. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press., Frank, J. D., & Frank, J. B. (1991). Persuasion and, healing: A comparison study of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press., Frank, L. R. (1990). Electroshock: Death, brain, damage, memory loss, and brainwashing. The, Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11, 489–512., Frank, M. G., & Ekman, P. (1997). The ability to, detect deceit generalizes different types of highstake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1429–1439., Frank, R. H. (1999). Luxury fever: Why money fails, to satisfy in an era of excess. New York: Free Press., Frankel, F. H. (1993). Adult reconstruction of, childhood events in the multiple personality literature. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150,, 954–958., Franks, C. M., & Barbrack, C. R. (1983). Behavior, therapy with adults: An integrative perspective. In, M. Hersen, A. E. Kazdin, & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), The, clinical psychology handbook. New York: Pergamon., Franzoi, S. L., & Herzog, M. E. (1987). Judging, personal attractiveness: What body aspects do we, use? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13,, 19–33., , Frazier, P. A., Byer, A. L., Fischer, A. R., Wright,, D. M., & DeBord, K. A. (1996). Adult attachment, style and partner choice: Correlational and experimental findings. Personal Relationships, 3, 117–136., Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, &, N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of, hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Sage., Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive, emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2,, 300–319., Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive, emotions in positive psychology: The broadenand-build theory of positive emotions. American, Psychologist, 56, 218–226., Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., &, Larkin, G. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience, and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the, United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365–376., Freedberg, K., Losina, E., Weinstein, M., Paltiel,, A., Cohen, C., Seage, G., Craven, D., Zhang, H.,, Kimmel, A., & Goldie, S. (2001). The cost effectiveness of combination antiretroviral therapy for, HIV disease. New England Journal of Medicine,, 824–831., Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 4, 195–202., Freeman, E., Bloom, D., & McGuire, E. (2001). A, brief history of testosterone. Journal of Urology,, 165, 371–373., Freese, J., Powell, B., & Steelman, L. C. (1999)., Rebel without a cause or effect: Birth order and, social attitudes. American Sociological Review, 64,, 207–231., French, S. A., Harnack, L., & Jeffrey, R. W. (2000)., Fast food restaurant use among women in the, Pound of Prevention study: Dietary, behavioral, and demographic correlates. International Journal, of Obesity, 24, 1353–1359., Freud, S. (1901/1960). The psychopathology of, everyday life (Standard ed., Vol. 6.) London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1901), Freud, S. (1920/1924). A general introduction to, psychoanalysis. New York: Boni and Liveright., (Original work published 1920), Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id (Standard ed.,, Vol. 19.) London: Hogarth., Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of, Economic Literature, 40, 402–435., Fried, S. B., & Schultis, G. A. (1995). The best selfhelp and self-awareness books: A topic-by-topic, guide to quality information. Chicago: American, Library Association., Friedan, B. (1964). The feminine mystique. New, York: Dell., Friedberg, J. M. (1983). Shock treatment II: Resistance in the 1970s. In R. F. Morgan (Ed.), The, iatrogenics handbook: A critical look at research and, practice in the helping professions. Fair Oaks, CA:, Morgan Foundation Publishers., Friedman, H. S. (1991). The self-healing personality: Why some people achieve health and others, succumb to illness. New York: Holt., Friedman, J. (1989). The impact of homophobia, on male sexual development. Siecus Report, 17,, 8–9., Friedman, M. (1996). Type A behavior: Its diagnosis and treatment. New York: Plenum Press., Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. F. (1974). Type A, behavior and your heart. New York: Knopf., Friedman, M. J. (1996). PTSD diagnosis and treatment for mental health clinicians. Community, Mental Health Journal, 32(2), 173–189., Friedrich, M. J. (2004). To “E” or not to “E,” vitamin E’s role in health and disease is the question., Journal of the American Medical Association,, 292(6), 671–673., , References, , 575

Page 613 :
Fromm, E. (1963). Escape from freedom. New York:, Holt., Fromm, E. (1981). Sane society. New York: Fawcett., Fullerton, H. N., Jr. (1997). Labor force 2006:, Slowing down and changing composition., Monthly Labor Review, 120, 23–38., Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review, of Psychology, 52, 197–221., Furman, E. (1984). Children’s patterns in mourning the death of a loved one. In H. Wass & C. A., Corr (Eds.), Childhood and death. Washington,, DC: Hemisphere., Furnham, A., & Cheng, H. (2000). Perceived, parental behavior, self-esteem and happiness., Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology,, 35(10), 463–470., Furnham, A., & Mak, T. (1999). Sex-role stereotyping in television commercials: A review and, comparison of fourteen studies done on five continents over 25 years. Sex Roles, 41, 413–437., Furnham, A., & Procter, E. (1989). Belief in a just, world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 365–384., Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2001). The sociology of, adolescence and youth in the 1990s: A critical, commentary. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Understanding families into the new millennium: A decade in, review (pp. 115–129). Minneapolis, MN: National, Council on Family Relations., Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. & Kiernan, K. E. (2001)., Delayed parental divorce: How much do children, benefit? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63,, 446–457., Fyer, A. J. (2000). Anxiety disorders: Genetics. In, B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and, Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th, ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1457–1463). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Gabrel, C. S. (2000). Advance data from Vital and, Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control, and Prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department, of Health and Human Services., Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there, “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The, implications of gender differences in collective, versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 77(3), 642–655., Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism:, Theory and research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press., Gall, T. L., Evans, D. R., & Howard, J. (1997). The, retirement adjustment process: Changes in the, well-being of male retirees across time. Journal of, Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52, 110–117., Gallagher, R., & Chase, A. (2002). Building resilience in children in the face of fear and tragedy., Retrieved January 11, 2005 From the New York, University Child Study Center Website:, Http://www.Aboutourkids.Org/Aboutour/, Articles/Crisis_Resilience.html., Gambone, J. C., Reiter, R. C., & DiMatteo, M. R., (1994). The PREPARED provider: A guide for improved patient communication. Beaverton, OR:, Mosybl Great Performance., Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Sexual selection and, physical attractiveness: Implications for mating, dynamics. Human Nature, 4, 205–235., Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Selfmonitoring appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 530–555., Gantt, W. H. (1975, April 25). Unpublished lecture, Ohio State University. Cited in D. Hothersall, (1984), History of psychology. New York: Random, House., Gao, G. (2001). Intimacy, passion and commitment in Chinese and U.S. American romantic, relationships. International Journal of Intercultural, Relations, 25(3), 329–342., , 576, , References, , Garb, H. N., Florio, C. M., & Grove, W. M. (1998)., The validity of the Rorschach and the Minnesota, Multiphasic Personality Inventory: Results from, meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 9, 402–404., Garfield, S. L., & Bergin, A. E. (1994). Introduction and historical overview. In A. E. Bergin & S. L., Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and, behavior change (4th ed.). New York: Wiley., Garfinkel, P. E. (1995). Classification and diagnosis of eating disorders. In K. D. Brownell & C. G., Fairburn (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A, comprehensive handbook. New York: Guilford, Press., Garland, A. F., & Zigler, E. (1993). Adolescent, suicide prevention: Current research and social, policy implications. American Psychologist, 48,, 169–182., Garlow, S. J., Musselman, D. L., & Nemeroff, C. B., (1999). The neurochemistry of mood disorders:, Clinical studies. In D. S. Charney, E. J. Nestler, &, B. S. Bunney (Eds.), Neurobiology of mental illness, (pp. 348–364). New York: Oxford University Press., Garner, D. M., Garfinkel, P. E., Schwartz, D., &, Thompson, M. (1980). Cultural expectations of, thinness in women. Psychological Reports, 47,, 483–491., Garnets, L., & Kimmel, D. (1991). Lesbian and, gay male dimensions in the psychological study, of human diversity. In J. D. Goodchilds (Ed.),, Psychological perspectives on human diversity in, America. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Garnets, L. D., & Kimmel, D. C. (2003a). Identity, development and stigma management. In L. D., Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological, perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences. New York: Columbia University Press., Garnets, L. D., & Kimmel, D. C. (2003b). Lesbian,, gay male, and bisexual dimensions in the psychological study of human diversity. In L. D. Garnets, & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives, on lesbian, gay and bisexual experiences. New York:, Columbia University Press., Garnets, L. D., & Kimmel, D. C. (2003c). Mental, health. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.),, Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences. New York: Columbia University, Press., Gartrell, N., Banks, A., Hamilton, J., Reed, N.,, Bishop, H., & Rodas, C. (1999). The national lesbian family study: Interviews with mothers of, toddlers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69,, 362–369., Gatz, M., & Smyer, M. A. (2001). Mental health, and aging at the outset of the twenty-first century., In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of, the psychology of aging. San Diego, CA: Academic, Press., Gavin, L. E., Black, M. M., Minor, S., Abel, Y., &, Bentley, M. E. (2002). Young, disadvantaged fathers’ involvement with their infants: An ecological perspective. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31,, 266–276., Ge X., G., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. Jr. (2001)., The relation between puberty and psychological, distress in adolescent boys. Journal of Research on, Adolescence, 11(1), 49–70., Ge, X., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. Jr. (1996)., Coming of age too early: Pubertal influences on, girls’ vulnerability to psychological distress. Child, Development, 67, 3386–3400., Gecas, V., & Schwalbe, M. L. (1986). Parental behavior and adolescent self-esteem. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 37–46., Gecas, V., & Seff, M. A. (1990). Families and adolescents: A review of the 1980s. Journal of Marriage, and the Family, 52, 941–958., Geddes, J. R., Burgess, S., Hawton, K., Jamison,, K., & Goodwin, G. M. (2004). Long-term lithium, therapy for bipolar disorder: Systematic review, and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials., American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 217–222., , Geddes, J. R., & Lawrie, S. M. (1995). Obstetrical, complications and schizophrenia: A meta-analysis., British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 786–793., Geen, R. G. (1997). Psychophysiological approaches, to personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs, (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp., 387–408). San Diego, CA: Academic Press., Geen, R. G. (1998). Aggression and antisocial, behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey, (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.,, Vol. 2, pp. 317–356). Boston: McGraw-Hill., Geller, A. (2003, October 23). Employers looking, for places to trim worker flexibility programs., Statesboro Herald., Gelles, R. J. (1996). The book of David: How preserving families can cost children’s lives. New York:, Basic Books., Gelles, R. J. (1997). Intimate violence in families, (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Genuis, S., & Genuis, S. (1995). Adolescent sexual, involvement: Time for primary prevention. The, Lancet, 345, 240–241., George, S. A. (2002). The menopause experience:, A woman’s perspective. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 31, 71–85., Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli,, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of, the cultivation process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann, (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17–40)., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by, parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review., Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 539–579., Ghosh, T. B., & Victor, B. S. (1994). Suicide. In, R. E. Hales, S. C. Yudofsky, & J. A. Talbott (Eds.),, The American Psychiatric Press textbook of psychiatry (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press., Gibbons, J. L. (2000). Gender development in, cross-cultural perspective. In T. Eckes & H. M., Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Gibson, B., & Sachau, D. (2000). Sandbagging as a, self-presentational strategy: Claiming to be less, than you are. Personality and Social Psychology, Bulletin, 26, 56-70., Giddens, A. (2001). The global revolution in family and personal life. In A. S. Skolnick, & J. H., Skolnick (Eds.), Families in Transition. Boston:, Allyn & Bacon., Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38., Gilder, G. F. (1992). Men and marriage. New York:, Pelican., Giles, T. R., & Marafiote, R. A. (1998). Managed, care and the practitioner: A call for unity. Clinical, Psychology: Science & Practice, 5, 41–50., Gilham, J. E., Shatté, A. J., Reivich, K. J., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and, explanatory style. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism, & pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and, practice (pp. 53–76). Washington, DC: American, Psychological Association., Gilovich, T., & Savitsky, K. (1999). The spotlight, effect and the illusion of transparency: Egocentric, assessments of how we are seen by others. Psychological Science, 8(6), 165–168., Gitlin, M. (2002). Pharmacological treatment of, depression. In I. H. Gotlib & C. L. Hammen, (Eds.), Handbook of depression. New York: Guilford., Gitlin, M., Nuechterlein, K., Subotnik, K. L.,, Ventura, J., Mintz, J., Fogelson, D. L., Bartzokis,, G., & Aravagiri, M. (2001). Clinical outcome following neuroleptic discontinuation in patients, with remitted recent-onset schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1835–1842., Glascock, J. (2001). Gender roles on prime-time, network television: Demograhics and behaviors., Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,, 45(4), 656–669.

Page 614 :
Glass, C. R., & Arnkoff, D. B. (1992). Behavior, therapy. In D. K. Freedheim (Ed.), History of psychotherapy: A century of change. Washington, DC:, American Psychological Association., Glass, R. M. (2001). Electroconvulsive therapy., Journal of the American Medical Association,, 285(10), 1346–1348., Glass, R. M. (2004). Treatment of adolescents with, major depression: Contributions of a major trial., Journal of the American Medical Association,, 292(7), 861–863., Glassman, A., Shapiro, P. A., Ford, D. E., Culpepper, L., Finkel, M. S., Swenson, J. R., Bigger, J. T.,, Rollman, B. L., & Wise, T. N. (2003). Cardiovascular health and depression. Journal of Psychiatric, Practice, 9(6), 409–421., Glazer, M. P., & Glazer, P. M. (1990). The whistleblowers: Exposing corruption in government and, industry. New York: Basic Books., Gleason, J. B., & Ely, R. (2002). Gender differences, in language development. In A. McGillicuddyDeLisi & R. DeLisi (Eds.), Biology, society, and, behavior: The development of sex differences in, cognition. Advances in applied developmental psychology, 21. Westport, CT: Ablex., Gleaves, D. H. (1994). On “the reality of repressed, memories.” American Psychologist, 49, 440–441., Gleaves, D. H., May, M. C., & Cardena, E. (2001)., An examination of the diagnostic validity of dissociative identity disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 577–608., Gleaves, D. H., Miller, K. J., Williams, T. J., &, Summers, S. A. (2000). Eating disorders: An, overview. In K. J. Miller & J. S. Mizes (Eds.), Comparative treatments for eating disorders. New York:, Springer., Gleaves D. H., & Smith. S. M. (2004). False and, recovered memories in the laboratory and clinic:, A review of experimental and clinical evidence., Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(1),, 2–28., Glei, D. A. (1999). Measuring contraceptive use, patterns among teenage and adult women. Family, Planning Perspectives, 31(2), 73–80., Glenberg, A. M. (1992). Disturbed practice effects., In L. R. Squire (Ed.), Encyclopedia of learning and, memory. New York: Macmillan., Glenn, N. D. (1998). The course of marital success, and failure in five American 10-year marriage, cohorts. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60,, 569–576., Goeders, N. E. (2004). Stress, motivation, and, drug addiction. Current Directions in Psychological, Science, 13(1), 33–35., Goetting, A. (1986). Parental satisfaction: A review, of research. Journal of Family Issues, 7, 83–109., Gold, D. T. (1990). Late-life sibling relationships:, Does race affect typological distribution? The, Gerontologist, 30, 741–748., Gold, M. S., & Jacobs, W. S. (2005). Cocaine and, crack: Clinical aspects. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz,, R. B. Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.), Substance, abuse: A comprehensive textbook. Philadelphia:, Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Gold, M. S., Miller, N. S., & Jonas, J. M. (1992)., Cocaine (and crack): Neurobiology. In J. H., Lowinson, P. Ruiz, & R. B. Millman (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook (2nd ed.)., Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins., Goldberg, C., & Zhang, L. (2004). Simple and, joint effects of gender and self-esteem on, responses to same-sex sexual harrassment. Sex, Roles, 50(11/12), 823–833., Goldberg, M. (1985). Remarriage: Repetition, versus new beginnings. In D. C. Goldberg (Ed.),, Contemporary marriage: Special issues in couples, therapy. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press., Goldberger, L. (1993). Sensory deprivation and, overload. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.),, Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects, (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press., , Goldenberg, J. L., Pyszczynski, T., McCoy, S. K.,, Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1999). Death, sex,, love and neuroticism: Why is sex such a problem?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6),, 1173–1187., Goldfried, M. R. (2001). Integrating gay, lesbian,, and bisexual issues into mainstream psychology., American Psychologist, 56(11), 977–988., Goldfried, M. R., Greenberg, L. S., & Marmar, C., (1990). Individual psychotherapy: Process and, outcome. Annual Review of Psychology, 41,, 659–688., Golding, J. M. (1996). Sexual assault history and, women’s reproductive and sexual health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 101–121., Goldscheider, F. K., & Goldscheider, C. (1998)., The effects of childhood family structure on leaving and returning home. Journal of Marriage and, the Family, 60, 745–756., Goldstein, E., & Farmer, K. (Eds.). (1993). True, stories of false memories. Boca Raton, FL: Sirs, Publishing., Goldstein, J. R. (1999). The leveling of divorce in, the United States. Demography, 36, 409–414., Golombok, S., Perry, B., Burnston, A., Murray, C.,, Money-Somers, J., Stevens, M., & Golding, J., (2003). Children with lesbian parents: A community study. Developmental Psychology, 39, 20–33., Gonsiorek, J. (1991). The empirical basis for the, demise of the illness model of homosexuality. In, J. Gonsiorek & J. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality:, Research implications for public policy. Newbury, Park, CA: Sage., Gonsiorek, J. C., & Weinrich, J. D. (1991). The, definition and scope of sexual orientation. In J. C., Gonsiorek & J. D. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality:, Research implications for public policy. Newbury, Park, CA: Sage., Gonzales, M. H., & Meyers, S. A. (1993). “Your, mother would like me”: Self-presentation in the, personals ads of heterosexual and homosexual, men and women. Personality and Social Psychology, Bulletin, 19, 131–142., Gonzalez-Lopez, A., & Kamps, D. M. (1997)., Social skills training to increase social interactions, between children with autism and their typical, peers. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental, Disabilities, 12, 2–14., Goodall, K. (1972, November). Field report:, Shapers at work. Psychology Today, pp. 53–63,, 132–138., Gooden, A. M., & Gooden, M. A. (2001). Gender, representation in notable children’s picture books:, 1995–1999. Sex Roles, 45(1/2), 89–101., Goodrick, G. K., Pendleton, V. R., Kimball, K. T.,, Poston, W. S., Carlos, R., Rebecca, S., & Foreyt,, J. P. (1999). Binge eating severity, self-concept,, dieting self-efficacy and social support during, treatment of binge eating disorder. International, Journal of Eating Disorders, 26(3), 295–300., Goodwin, F. K., & Jamison, K. R. (1990). Manicdepressive illness. New York: Oxford University, Press., Gordon, R. A. (1996). Impact of ingratiation on, judgments and evaluations: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 54–70., Gottdiener, J. S., Krantz, D. S., & Howell, R. H.,, Hecht, G. M., Klein, J., Falconer, J. J., & Rozanski,, A. (1994). Induction of silent myocardial ischemia, with mental stress testing: Relationship to the, triggers of ischemia during daily life activities and, to ischemic functional severity. Journal of the, American College of Cardiology, 24, 1645–1651., Gottesman, I. I. (1991). Schizophrenia genesis: The, origins of madness. New York: Freeman., Gottesman, I. I. (2001). Psychopathology through, a life span–genetic prism. American Psychologist,, 56, 867–878., Gottman, J. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital, interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of, , couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 6–15., Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson,, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5–22., Gottman, J. M. (with DeClaire, J.). (2001). The, relationship cure: A five-step guide for building, better connections with family, friends, and lovers., New York: Crown., Gottman, J. M., Ryan, K. D., Carrére, S., & Erley,, A. M. (2002). Toward a scientifically based marital, therapy. In H. Liddle & D. Santisteban (Eds.), Family psychology: Science-based interventions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Gottman, J. M. (with Silver, N.). (1994). Why, marriages succeed or fail . . . And how you can make, yours last. New York: Simon & Schuster., Gottman, J. M. (with Silver, N.). (1999). The seven, principles for making marriage work. New York:, Three Rivers Press., Gould, R. L. (1978). Transformations: Growth and, change in adult life. New York: Simon & Schuster., Gourevitch, M. N., & Arnsten, J. H. (2005). Medical complications of drug use. In J. H. Lowinson,, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.),, Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E., Daumann, J., Tuchtenhagen, F., Pelz, S., Becker, S., Kunert, H.-J., Fimm,, B., & Sass, H. (2000). Impaired cognitive performance in drug-free users of recreational ecstasy, (MDMA). Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and, Psychiatry, 68(6), 719–725., Gow, K. M. (1999). Recovered memories of abuse:, Real, fabricated, or both? Australian Journal of, Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 27(2), 81–97., Graber, J. A., Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., &, Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997). Is psychopathology associated with the timing of pubertal development?, Journal of the American Academy of Child and, Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1768–1776., Graber, J. A., Petersen, A. C., & Brooks-Gunn, J., (1996). Pubertal processes: Methods, measures,, and models. In J. A. Graber, J. Brooks-Gunn, & A., C. Petersen (Eds.), Transitions through adolescence, (pp. 23–53). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Graber, J. A., Seeley, J. R., Brooks-Gunn, J., &, Lewinsohn, P. M. (2004). Is pubertal timing associated with psychopathology in young adulthood?, Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(6), 718–726., Graig, E. (1993). Stress as a consequence of the, urban physical environment. In L. Goldberger &, S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical, and clinical aspects (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press., Grant, I., McDonald, W. I., Patterson, T., & Trimble, M. R. (1989). Multiple sclerosis. In G. W., Brown & T. O. Harris (Eds.), Life events and illness., New York: Guilford Press., Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are, from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your, relationship. New York: HarperCollins., Gray-Little, B., & Hafdahl, A. R. (2000). Factors, influencing racial comparisons of self-esteem: A, quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 126,, 26–54., Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. H. (1997)., Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In, R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds), Handbook, of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic, Press., Green, L. R., Richardson, D. S., Lago, T., & SchattenJones, E. C. (2001). Network correlates of social, and emotional loneliness in young and older, adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,, 27(3), 281–288., Green, S. K., Buchanan, D. R., & Heuer, S. K., (1984). Winners, losers, and choosers: A field, investigation of dating initiation. Personality and, Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 502–511., , References, , 577

Page 615 :
Greenberg, J. S. (2002). Comprehensive stress management: Health and human performance. New, York: McGraw-Hill., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T., (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem, and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments, and conceptual refinements. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 61–139., Greenberg, R. P., & Fisher, S. (1997). Moodmending medicines: Probing drug, psychotherapy, and placebo solutions. In S. Fisher & R. P. Greenberg (Eds.), From placebo to panacea: Putting psychiatric drugs to the test. New York: Wiley., Greene, R. L. (1992). Human memory: Paradigms, and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Greenfield, D. N. (1999). Psychological characteristics of compulsive Internet use: A preliminary, analysis. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2(5),, 403–412., Greenhaus, J. H. (2003). Career dynamics. In, W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.),, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and, organizational psychology. New York: Wiley., Greenland, P., Knoll, M. D., Stamler, J., Neaton,, J. D., Dyer, A. R., Garside, D. B., & Wilson, P. W., (2003). Major risk factors as antecedents of fatal, and nonfatal coronary heart disease events. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290,, 891–897., Greenson, R. R. (1967). The technique and practice, of psychoanalysis (Vol. 1). New York: International, Universities Press., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit, social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27., Greenwood, G. L., Relf, M. V., Huang, B., Pollack,, L. M., Canchola, J. A., & Catania, J. A. (2002)., Battering victimization among a probability-based, sample of men who have sex with men. American, Journal of Public Health, 92(12), 1964–1969., Gregersen, E. (1982). Sexual practices. New York:, Franklin Watts., Gregory, R. J., Schwer Canning, S., Lee, T. W., &, Wise, J. C. (2004). Cognitive bibliotherapy for, depression: A meta-analysis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(3), 275–280., Grencavage, L. M., & Norcross, J. C. (1990)., Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic factors? Professional Psychology: Research, and Practice, 21, 372–378., Griffith, K. H., & Hebl, M. R. (2002). The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: “Coming, out” at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6),, 1191–1199., Griffiths, M. (1999). Internet addiction: Fact or, fiction? Psychologist, 12(5), 246–250., Grinspoon, L., & Bakalar, J. B. (1997). Marihuana., In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. H. Millman, & J. G., Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive, textbook (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins., Grinspoon, L., Bakalar, J. B., & Russo, E. (2005)., Marihuana: Clinical aspects. In J. H. Lowinson,, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.),, Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Groat, H. T., Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A.,, Pugh, M. D., & Swinford, S. P. (1997). Attitudes, toward childbearing among young parents. Journal, of Marriage and the Family, 59, 568–581., Grob, C. S., & Poland, R. E. (1997). MDMA. In, J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G., Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive, textbook (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins., Grob, C. S., & Poland, R. E. (2005). MDMA. In, J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G., Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive, textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams &, Wilkins., Grob, G. N. (1983). Disease and environment in, American history. In D. Mechanic (Ed.), Handbook, of health, health care, and the health professions., New York: Free Press., , 578, , References, , Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent, styles associated with children’s self-regulation and, competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143–154., Gross, J. J. (2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in, Psychological Science, 10, 214–219., Gross, M. (2003). The second wave will drown us., American Journal of Public Health, 93(6), 872–881., Grossbaum, M. F., & Bates, G. W. (2002). Correlates of psychological well-being at midlife: The, role of generativity, agency and communion, and, narrative themes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(2), 120–127., Gruber, J. E. (1990). Methodological problems and, policy implication in sexual harassment research., Population Research and Policy Review, 9, 235–254., Gruenberg, A. M., & Goldstein, R. D. (2003)., Mood disorders: Depression. In A. Tasman, J. Kay,, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New York:, Wiley., Grunberg, N. E., Faraday, M. M., & Rahman,, M. A. (2001). The psychobiology of nicotine selfadministration. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E., Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp., 249–262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Guest, F. (2004). HIV/AIDS and reproductive, health. In R. A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, F. H. Stewart,, A. L. Nelson, W. Cates Jr., F. Guest, & D. Kowal, (Eds.), Contraceptive technology. New York: Ardent, Media., Guggenheim, F. G. (2000). Somatoform disorders., In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and, Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th, ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1504–1532). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Gullette, E. C. D., Blumenthal, J. A., Babyak, M.,, Jiang, W., Waugh, R. A., Frid, D. J., O’Connor, C., M., Morris, J. J., & Krantz, D. S. (1997). Effects of, mental stress on myocardial ischema during daily, life. Journal of the American Medical Association,, 277, 1521–1526., Gupta, G. R. (1992). Love, arranged marriage, and, the Indian social structure. In J. J. Macionis & N. V., Benokraitis (Eds.), Seeing ourselves: Classic, contemporary and cross-cultural reading in sociology., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall., Gupta, U., & Singh, P. (1982). Exploratory study of, love and liking type of marriages. Indian Journal of, Applied Psychology, 19, 92–97., Gureje, O., Simon, G. E., Ustun, T. B., & Goldberg,, D. P. (1997). Somatization in cross-cultural perspective: A world health organization study in, primary care. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154,, 989–995., Gurland, B. J., Wilder, D. E., Lantigua, R., Stern,, Y., Chen, J., Killeffer, E. H., & Mayeux, R. (1999)., Rates of dementia in three ethnoracial groups., International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14,, 481–493., Gutek, B. A. (1989). Relocation, family, and the, bottom line: Results from the Division 35 survey., Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 5–7., Gutek, B. A. (1993). Responses to sexual harassment. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender, issues in contemporary society. Newbury Park, CA:, Sage., Gutierrez, P. M., & Silk, K. R. (1998). Prescription, privileges for psychologists: A review of the psychological literature. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29(3), 213–222., Haan, N., Millsap, R., & Hartka, E. (1986). As time, goes by: Change and stability in personality over, 50 years. Psychology of Aging, 1, 220–232., Haas, A., & Haas, K. (1993). Understanding sexuality. St. Louis: Times Mirror/Mosby., Haas, L. (1999). Families and work. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson Handbook, of marriage and the family (pp. 571–612). New, York: Plenum Press., , Hackam, D. G., & Anand, S. S. (2003). Emerging, risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease: A, critical review of the evidence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(7), 932–940., Hackett, G., & Watkins, C.E., Jr. (1995). Research, in career assessment: Abilities, interests, decision, making, and career development. In W. B. Walsh,, & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational, psychology (2nd ed., pp. 181–216). Mahwah, NJ:, Erlbaum., Hackstaff, K. B. (1999). Marriage in a culture of, divorce. Philadelphia: Temple University Press., Hafen, B. Q., & Hoeger, W. W. K. (1998). Wellness:, Guidelines for a healthy lifestyle. Englewood, CO:, Morton Publishing., Hafer, C. L. (2000). Do innocent victims threaten, the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 79(2), 165–173., Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of, income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 746–771., Hall, D. R. (1996). Marriage as a pure relationship:, Exploring the link between premarital cohabitation and divorce in Canada. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 27, 1–12., Hall, E. T. (1966) The hidden dimension. Garden, City, NY: Doubleday., Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence. New York: Appleton., Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press., Hall, J. A. (1990). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style (2nd ed.)., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press., Hall, J. A. (1998). How big are nonverbal sex differences? The case of smiling and sensitivity to, nonverbal cues. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.),, Sex differences and similarities in communication:, Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex, and gender in interaction (pp. 155–177). Mahwah,, NJ: Erlbaum., Hall, J. A., Carter, J. D., & Horgan, T. G. (2000)., Gender differences in the nonverbal communication of emotion. In A. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and, emotion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University, Press., Hall, J. A., & Friedman, G. B. (1999). Status, gender, and nonverbal behavior: A study of structured, interactions between employees of a company., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(9),, 1082–1091., Hall, J. A., & Matsumoto, D. (2004). Gender differences in judgments of multiple emotions from, facial expressions. Emotion, 4(2), 201–206., Hall, J. A., & Veccia, E. M. (1990). More “touching”, observations: New insights on men, women, and, interpersonal touch. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 59, 1155–1162., Hall, J. A., & Veccia, E. M. (1991). Touch asymmetry between the sexes. In C. L. Ridgeway (Ed.),, Gender, interaction, and inequality. New York:, Springer-Verlag., Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom, climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC:, Association of American Colleges., Hall, S. A. (2002). Teaching and doing gender in, African American families. Sex Roles, 47(11–12),, 493–506., Hall, W., Solowij, N., & Lemon, J. (1994). The, health and psychological consequences of cannabis, use. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government, Publishing Service., Halmi, K. A. (1999). Eating disorders: Anorexia, nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and obesity. In R. E., Hales, S. C. Yudofsky, & J. A. Talbott (Eds.), American Psychiatric Press Textbook of Psychiatry (pp., 983–1002). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric, Press., Halmi, K. A. (2000). Eating disorders. In B. J., Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s

Page 616 :
comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed.,, Vol. 1, pp. 1663–1676). Philadelphia: Lippincott/, Williams & Wilkins., Halmi, K. A. (2002). Physiology of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In C. G. Fairburn &, K. D. Brownell (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity:, A comprehensive handbook. New York: Guilford., Halmi, K. A. (2003). Eating disorders: Anorexia, nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and obesity. In R. E., Hales & S. C. Yudofsky (Eds.), Textbook of clinical, psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric, Publishing., Halmi, K. A., Sunday, S. R., Strober, M., Kaplan,, A., Woodside, D. B., Fichter, M., Treasure, J.,, Berrettini, W. H., & Kaye, W. H. (2000). Perfectionism in anorexia nervosa: Variation by clinical, subtype, obsessionality, and pathological eating, behavior. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157,, 1799–1805., Halpern, C. T., Udry, J. R., Campbell, B., &, Suchindran, C. (1999). Effects of body fat on, weight concerns, dating, and sexual activity: A, longitudinal analysis of black and white adolescent, girls. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 721–736., Halpern, D. F. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 52, 1091–1102., Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive, abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Halpern, D. F. (2004). A cognitive-process taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4),, 135–139., Halverson, A. M., Hallahan, M., Hart, A. J., &, Rosenthal, R. (1997). Reducing the biasing effects, of judges’ nonverbal behavior with simplified jury, instruction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,, 82(4), 590–598., Hamilton, A. (1999). You’ve got mail! Time, 83., Hamilton, J. C., Deemer, H. N., & Janata, J. W., (2003). Feeling sad but looking good: Sick role, features that lead to favorable interpersonal judgments. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology,, 22(3), 253–274., Hammen, C. (2003). Mood disorders. In G., Stricker & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 8. Clinical psychology. New York:, Wiley., Hammersley, R., Ditton, J., Smith, I., & Short, E., (1999). Patterns of ecstasy use by drug users., British Journal of Criminology, 39(4), 625–647., Han, S., & Moen, P. (1999). Work and family over, time: A life course approach. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 562,, 98–110., Han, W., Waldfogel, J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2001)., The effects of early maternal employment on later, cognitive and behavioral outcomes. Journal of, Marriage and the Family, 63, 336–354., Hancock, D. R. (2001). Effects of test anxiety and, evaluative threat on students’ achievement and, motivation. Journal of Educational Research, 94(5),, 284–290., Handy, B. (1998a, May 4). The Viagra craze. Time,, 50–57., Handy, B. (1998b, August 31). How we really feel, about fidelity. Time, 52–54., Hankin, B. L. (2002). Gender differences in depression from childhood through adulthood: A, review of course, causes and treatment. Primary, Psychiatry, 9(10), 32–36., Hanna, S. L. (2003). Person to person: Positive, relationships don’t just happen. Upper Saddle River,, NJ: Prentice Hall., Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). How rock, music videos can change what is seen when boy, meets girl: Priming stereotypic appraisal of social, interactions. Sex Roles, 19, 287–316., Hansen, J. C. (2005). Assessment of interests. In S., D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development, and counseling: Putting theory and research to work., New York: Wiley., , Happonen, P., Voutilainen, S., & Salonen, J. T., (2004). Coffee drinking is dose dependently related to the risk of acute coronary events in middle-aged men. Journal of Nutrition, 134(9),, 2381–2386., Haring, M., Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (2003)., Perfectionism, coping, and quality of intimate, relationships. Journal of Marriage & Family, 65(1),, 143–158., Harmsen, P., Rosengren, A., Tsipogianni, A., &, Wilhelmsen, L. (1990). Risk factors for stroke in, middle-aged men in Goteborg, Sweden. Stroke, 21,, 23–29., Harpaz, I., & Snir, R. (2003). Workaholism: Its, definition and nature. Human Relations, 56(3),, 291–319., Harrigan, J. A., Lucic, K. S., Kay, D., McLaney, A.,, & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Effect of expresser role, and type of self-touching on observers’ perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 21, 585–609., Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458–189., Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why, children turn out the way they do. New York: Free, Press., Harris, J. R. (2000). Context-specific learning,, personality, and birth order. Current Directions in, Psychological Science, 9(5), 174–177., Harris, M. B. (1996). Aggressive experiences and, aggressiveness: Relationship to ethnicity, gender,, and age. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,, 26(10), 843–870., Harris, M. J., & Perkins, R. (1995). Effects of distraction on interpersonal expectancy effects: A, social interaction test of the cognitive busyness, hypothesis. Social Cognition, 13, 163–182., Harris, T. (1967). I’m OK—You’re OK. New York:, HarperCollins., Harrison, J. A., & Wells, R. B. (1991). Bystander, effects on male helping behavior: Social comparison and diffusion of responsibility. Representative, Research in Social Psychology, 19(1), 53–63., Harrison, K. (2003). Television viewers’ ideal body, proportions: The case of the curvaceously thin, woman. Sex Roles, 48(5/6), 255–264., Harrison, K., & Cantor, J. (1997). The relationship, between media consumption and eating disorders., Journal of Communication, 47(1), 40–67., Harry, J. (1983). Gay male and lesbian relationships. In E. D. Macklin & R. H. Rubin (Eds.), Contemporary families and alternative lifestyles:, Handbook on research and theory. Newbury Park,, CA: Sage., Hart, K. E. (1999). Cynical hostility and deficiencies in functional support: The moderating role of, gender in psychosocial vulnerability to disease., Personality and Individual Differences, 27(1),, 69–83., Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of, child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and, personality development. New York: Wiley., Harter, S. (2003). The development of selfrepresentations during childhood and adolescence. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.),, Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford., Hartley, A. A., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (1991). Attentional and perceptual contributions to the, identification of extrafoveal stimuli: Adult age, comparisons. Journal of Gerontology, 46,, P202–P206., Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1999). Friendships, and adaptation across the life span. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(3), 76–79., Harvey, E. (1999). Short-term and long-term, effects of parental employment on children of the, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Developmental Psychology, 35, 445–459., Harvey, J. H., & Omarzu, J. (1997). Minding the, close relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(3), 224–240., , Harvey, M. H. (1999). Memory research and clinical practice: A critique of three paradigms and a, framework for psychotherapy with trauma survivors. In L. M. Williams, & V. L. Banyard (Eds.),, Trauma & memory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Hass, D. M., & Stafford, L. (1998). An initial examination of maintenance behaviors in gay and, lesbian relationships. Journal of Social and Personal, Relationships, 15(6), 846–855., Hatala, M. N., & Prehodka, J. (1996). A content, analysis of gay male and lesbian personal advertisements. Psychological Reports, 78, 371–374., Hatcher, R. A., Trussell, J., Stewart, F. H., Nelson,, A. L., Cates, W. Jr., Guest, F., & Kowal, D. (2004)., Contraceptive Technology. New York: Ardent, Media., Hatfield, E. (1988). Passionate and companionate, love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The, psychology of love. New Haven, CT: Yale University, Press., Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Love, sex, and, intimacy: Their psychology, biology, and history., New York: HarperCollins., Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1996). Love and sex:, Cross-cultural perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Hattery, A. (2001). Women, work, and family:, Balancing and weaving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Hawkins, A. J., Nock, S. L., Wilson, J. C., Sanchez,, L., & Wright, J. D. (2002). Attitudes about covenant, marriage and divorce: Policy implications from a, three state comparison. Family Relations, 51, 166–75., Hawkley, L. C., & Cicioppo, J. T. (2003). Loneliness and pathways to disease. Brain, Behavior and, Immunity, 17(1), S98–S105., Haworth-Hoeppner, S. (2000). The critical shapes, of body image: The role of culture and family in, the production of eating disorders. Journal of, Marriage and the Family, 62, 212–227., Haycock, L. A., McCarthy, P., & Skay, C. L. (1998)., Procrastination in college students: The role of, self-efficacy and anxiety. Journal of Counseling &, Development, 76, 317–324., Hays, K. F. (1999). Working it out: Using exercise in, psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1986). Parental caregiving, style questionnaire. Unpublished questionnaire., Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love, conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524., Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1990). Love and work:, An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 270–280., Healy, D. (2004). Let them eat Prozac: The, unhealthy relationship between the pharmaceutical, industry and depression. New York: NYU Press., Healy, D., & Whitaker, C. (2003). Antidepressants, and suicide: Risk-benefit conundrums. Journal of, Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 28(5), 340–347., Heaton, T. B. (2002). Factors contributing to increasing marital stability in the United States., Journal of Family Issues, 23, 392–409., Heaton, T. B., Jacobson, C. K. & Holland, K., (1999). Persistence and change in decisions to, remain childless. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 531–539., Heavey, C. L., Christensen, A., & Malamuth,, N. M. (1995). The longitudinal impact of demand, and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of, Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 797–801., Hebl, M. R., & Mannix, L. M. (2003). The weight, of obesity in evaluating others: A mere proximity, effect. Personality and Social Psychology, 29(1),, 28–38., Hecker, D. E. (2001). Employment outlook:, 2000–10. Monthly Labor Review, 124(11), 57–84., Heckert, D. A., Nowak, T. C., & Snyder, K. A., (1998). The impact of husbands’ and wives’ relative earnings on marital disruption. Journal of, Marriage and the Family, 60, 690–703., , References, , 579

Page 617 :
Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences, in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of, high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45., Heejung, K., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or, uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural, analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785., Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal, relations. New York: Wiley., Heilman, M. E., McCullough, W. F., & Gilbert, D., (1996). The other side of affirmative action: Reactions of nonbeneficiaries to sex-based preferential, selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81,, 346–357., Heiman, J. R., & Meston, C. M. (1997). Empirically validated treatment for sexual dysfunction., Annual Review of Sex Research, 8, 148–194., Heine, S. J., & Renshaw, K. (2002). Interjudge, agreement, self-enhancement, and liking: Crosscultural divergences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 578–587., Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata,, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, H. (2001)., Divergent consequences of success and failure in, Japan and North America: An investigation of selfimproving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81,, 599–615., Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and, communion to well-being: Evidence and potential, explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428., Helgeson, V. S., Shaver, O., & Dyer, M. (1987)., Prototypes of intimacy and distance in same-sex, and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Social, and Personal Relationships, 4, 195–233., Hellström, A., & Tekle, J. (1994). Person perception through facial photographs: Effects of glasses,, hair, and beard on judgments of occupation and, personal qualities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(6), 693–705., Helson, R., Mitchell, V., & Moane, G. (1984)., Personality and patterns of adherence and nonadherence to the social clock. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 46, 1079–1096., Helson, R., & Moane, G. (1987). Personality, change in women from college to midlife. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 176–186., Helson, R., & Stewart, A. (1994). Personality, change in adulthood. In T. F. Heatherton & J. L., Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Helweg-Larsen, M., & Shepperd, J. A. (2001). Do, moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal, or target risk estimates? A review of the literature., Personality & Social Psychology Review, 5(1),, 74–95., Hembree, E. A., & Foa, E. (2000). Posttraumatic, stress disorder: Psychological factors and, psychosocial interventions. Journal of Clinical, Psychiatry, 61(7), 33–39., Hemenover, S. H. (2003). The good, the bad, and, the healthy: Impacts of emotional disclosure of, trauma on resilient self-concept and psychological, distress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,, 29(10), 1236–1244., Henderson, K. E., & Brownell, K. D. (2004). The, toxic environment and obesity: Contribution and, cure. In J. K. Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating, disorders and obesity. New York: Wiley., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1989). Research, on love: Does it measure up? Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 56, 784–794., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1992). Liking,, loving, and relating (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA:, Brooks/Cole., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (2000). Romantic, love. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close, relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 203–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L., (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction,, and staying together. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 54, 980–988., , 580, , References, , Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex and, nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:, Prentice-Hall., Henley, N. M. (1986). Body politics: Power, sex, and, nonverbal communication (2nd ed.). New York:, Simon & Schuster., Henley, N. M., & Freeman, J. (1995). The sexual, politics of interpersonal behavior. In J. Freeman, (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (5th ed.,, pp. 79–91). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield., Hennessy, D. A., & Wiesenthal, D. L. (1999). Traffic congestion, driver stress, and driver aggression., Aggressive Behavior, 25(6), 409–423., Henshaw, S. K. (1997). Teenage abortion and, pregnancy statistics by state. Family Planning, Perspectives, 29, 115–122., Heppner, P. P., & Lee, D. (2002). Problem-solving, appraisal and psychological adjustment. In C. R., Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive, psychology. New York: Oxford University Press., Herbert, T. B., & Cohen, S. (1993). Stress and, immunity in humans: A meta-analytic review., Psychosomatic Medicine, 5, 364–379., Herek, G. M. (1996). Heterosexism and homophobia. In R. P. Cabaj & T. S. Stein (Eds.), Textbook of, homosexuality and mental health (pp. 101–114)., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press., Herek, G. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual, prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22., Herek, G. M. (2002). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion, Quarterly, 66(2), 40–66., Herek, G. M. (2003). The psychology of sexual, prejudice. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.),, Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences. New York: Columbia University, Press., Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. (1996). “Some of my, best friends”: Intergroup contact concealable, stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay, men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412–424., Herek, G. M., Cogan, J. C., & Gillis, J. R. (2002)., Victim experiences in hate crimes based on sexual, orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2),, 319–339., Herek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., & Cogan, J. C. (1999)., Psychological sequelae of hate-crime victimization, among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Journal of, Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 945–951., Herman, J. L. (1994). Presuming to know the, truth. Nieman Reports, 48, 43–45., Hermann, R. C., Dorwart, R. A., Hoover, C. W., &, Brody, J. (1995). Variation in ECT use in the, United States. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152,, 869–875., Hermann, R. C., Ettner, S. L., Dorwart, R. A.,, Hoover, C. W., & Yeung, E. (1998). Characteristics, of psychiatrists who perform ECT. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 889–894., Herrett-Skjellum, J., & Allen, M. (1996). Television programming and sex stereotyping: A metaanalysis. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication, Yearbook 1995. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Hershsberger, S. L., & D’Augelli, A. R. (2000)., Issues in counseling lesbian, gay, and bisexual, adolescents. In R. M. Perez, K. A. DeBord, & K. J., Bieschke (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients, (pp. 225–247). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Herzog, D. B., & Becker, A. E. (1999). Eating disorders. In A. M. Nicholi (Ed.), The Harvard guide to, psychiatry (pp. 400–683). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., Herzog, D. B., & Delinski, S. S. (2001). Classification of eating disorders. In R. H. Striegel-Moore, & L. Smolak (Eds.), Eating disorders (pp. 31–50)., Washington, DC: American Psychological, Association., , Herzog, T. A., Abrams, D. B., Emmons, K. M.,, Linnan, L. A., & Shadel, W. G. (1999). Do, processes of change predict smoking stage movements? A prospective analysis of the transtheoretical model. Health Psychology, 18(4), 369–375., Heszen-Niejodek, I. (1997). Coping style and its, role in coping with stressful encounters. European, Psychologist, 2, 342–351., Hetherington, E. M. (1993). An overview of the, Virginia longitudinal study of divorce and remarriage with a focus on early adolescence. Journal of, Family Psychology, 7, 1–18., Hetherington, E. M. (1999). Should we stay together for the sake of the children? In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Coping with divorce, single, parenting, and remarriage: A risk and resiliency, perspective (pp. 93–116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Hetherington, E. M. (2003). Intimate pathways:, Changing patterns in close personal relationships, across time. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary, Journal of Applied Family Studies, 52(4), 318–331., Hetherington, E. M., Reiss, D., & Plomin, R., (1994). Separate social worlds of siblings: The impact of nonshared environment on development., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Hettema, J. M., Neale, M. C., & Kendler, K. S., (2001). A review and meta-analysis of the genetic, epidemiology of anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1568–1578., Hewstone, M. (1990). The ultimate attribution, error? A review of the literature on intergroup, causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311–335., Heymann, J., Earle, A., Simmons, S., Breslow, S.,, & Kuehnhoff, A. (2004). The work, family, and, equity index: Where does the United States stand, globally? Boston: Harvard School of Public Health., Hiedemann, B., Suhomlinova, O., & O’Rand,, A. M. (1998). Economic independence, economic, status, and empty nest in midlife marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60,, 219–231., Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory, relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3),, 319–340., Higgins, E. T. (1999). When do self-descrepancies, have specific relations to emotions? The secondgeneration question of Tangney, Niedenthal,, Covert, and Barlow (1998). Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1313–1317., Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997)., Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength, of regulatory focus as a moderator. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 515–525., Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Psychology in America: A, historical survey. San Diego: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich., Hill, A. J. (2002). Prevalence and demographics of, dieting. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell (Eds.),, Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive, handbook. New York: Guilford., Hill, C. A. (1997). The distinctiveness of sexual, motives in relation to sexual desire and desirable, partner attributes. Journal of Sex Research, 34,, 139–153., Hill, C. A., & Preston, L. K. (1996). Individual, differences in the experience of sexual motivation:, Theory and measurement of dispositional sexual, motives. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 27–45., Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976)., Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs., Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147–168., Hilton, J. L., & Darley, J. M. (1985). Constructing, other persons: A limit on the effect. Journal of, Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 1–18., Hines, A. M. (1997). Divorce-related transitions,, adolescent development, and the role of the parent-child relationship: A review of the literature., Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 375–388., Hines, M. (1982). Prenatal gonadal hormones and, sex differences in human behavior. Psychological, Bulletin, 92, 56–80.

Page 618 :
Hines, M. (1990). Gonadal hormones and human, cognitive development. In J. Balthazart (Ed.),, Hormones, brain and behavior in vertebrates: 1., Sexual differentiation, neuroanatomical aspects,, neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Basel: Karger., Hiroto, D. S., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 311–327., Hirschl, T. A., Altobelli, J., & Rank, M. R. (2003)., Does marriage increase the odds of affluence?, Exploring the life course probabilities. Journal of, Marriage and Family, 65, 927–938., Ho, B., Black, D. W., & Andreasen, N. C. (2003)., Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. In, R. E. Hales & S. C. Yudofsky (Eds.), Textbook of, clinical psychiatry. Washington, DC: American, Psychiatric Publishing., Hobfoll, S. E., & Vaux, A. (1993). Social support:, Resources and context. In L. Goldberger &, S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical, and clinical aspects (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press., Hobson, C. J., & Delunas, L. (2001). National, norms and life-event frequencies for the revised, Social Readjustment Rating Scale. International, Journal of Stress Management, 8(4), 299–314., Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When, work becomes home and home becomes work. New, York: Holt., Hochschild, A. R. (2001). The time bind. New, York: Owl Books., Hodge, B. (2002, March). PCs and the healthy, office. Smart Computing, pp. 64–67., Hoek, H. W. (2002). Distribution of eating disorders. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell (Eds.),, Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive, handbook. New York: Guilford., Hoek, H. W., Bartelds, A. I. M., Bosveld, J. J. F.,, van der Graaf, Y., Limpens, V. E. L., Maiwald, M.,, & Spaaij, C. J. K. (1995). Impact of urbanization, on detection rates of eating disorders. American, Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1272–1278., Hoffman, E. (1994). The drive for self: Alfred Adler, and the founding of individual psychology. Reading,, MA: Addison-Wesley., Hoffnung, M. (2004). Wanting it all: Career, marriage, and motherhood during college-educated, women’s 20s. Sex Roles, 50(9/10), 711–723., Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national, cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In, J. Deregowski, S. Dzuirawiec, & R. Annis (Eds.),, Explications in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse:, Swets and Zeitlinger., Hogan, J., & Ones, D. S. (1997). Conscientiousness, and integrity at work. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, &, S. Briggs (Eds), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego: Academic Press., Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1985). Life stress, and health: Personality, coping, and family support in stress resistance. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 49, 739–747., Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1990). Life stressors, resistance factors, and improved psychological functioning: An extension of the stress, resistance paradigm. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 58, 909–917., Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1994). Life stressors, and mental health: Advances in conceptualizing, stress resistance. In W. R. Avison & I. H. Gotlib, (Eds.), Stress and mental health: Contemporary, issues and prospects for the future. New York:, Plenum., Holden, C. (2004). FDA weighs suicide risk in, children on antidepressants. Science, 303, 745., Holen, A. (2000). Posttraumatic stress disorder,, delayed. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress, (Vol. 3, pp. 179–180). San Diego: Academic Press., Holland, J. C., & Lewis, S. (1993). Emotions and, cancer: What do we really know? In D. Goleman &, J. Gurin (Eds.), Mind/body medicine: How to use, , your mind for better health. Yonkers, NY: Consumer Reports Books., Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A, theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall., Holland, J. L. (1996). Exploring careers with a, typology: What we have learned and some new, directions. American Psychologist, 51, 397–406., Hollander, E., & Simeon, D. (2003). Anxiety disorders. In R. E. Hales & S. C. Yudofsky (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry. Washington, DC:, American Psychiatric Publishing., Hollister, L. E. (1988). Marijuana and immunity., Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 20, 3–7., Hollister, L. E. (1998). Health aspects of cannabis:, Revisited. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 1(1), 71–80., Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The Social, Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218., Homma-True, R., Greene, B., Lopez, S. R., &, Trimble, J. E. (1993). Ethnocultural diversity in, clinical psychology. The Clinical Psychologist,, 46(2), 50–63., Hong, G. K., Garcia, M., & Soriano, M. (2000)., Responding to the challenge: Preparing mental, health professionals for the new millennium. In, I. Cuellar & F. A. Paniagua (Eds.), Handbook of, multicultural mental health: Assessment and treatment of diverse populations. San Diego: Academic, Press., Hood, K. E., Draper, P., Crockett, L. J., & Petersen,, A. C. (1987). The ontogeny and phylogeny of sexual differences in development: A biopsychosocial, synthesis. In B. Carter (Ed.), Current conceptions of, sex roles and sex typing: Theory and research. New, York: Praeger., Hooker, E. (1957). The adjustment of the male, overt homosexual. Journal of Projective Techniques,, 21, 18–31., Hooley, J. M., & Candela, S. F. (1999). Interpersonal functioning in schizophrenia. In T. Millon,, P. H. Blaney, & R. D. Davis (Eds.), Oxford textbook, of psychopathology (pp. 311–338). New York: Oxford University Press., Hopper, J. (2001). The symbolic origins of conflict, in divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63,, 430–445., Horwath, E., & Weissman, M. M. (2000). Anxiety, disorders: Epidemiology. In B. J. Sadock & V. A., Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp., 1441–1449). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams &, Wilkins., Houts, A. C. (2002). Discovery, invention, and the, expansion of the modern Diagnostic and Statistical, Manuals of Mental Disorders. In L. E. Beutler &, M. L. Malik (Eds.), Rethinking the DSM. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Howard, G. S. (2000). Adapting human lifestyles, for the 21st century. American Psychologist, 55(5),, 509–515., Howard, K. I., Krasner, R. F., & Saunders, S. M., (2000). Evaluation of psychotherapy. In B. J. Sadock, & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp., 2217–2224). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams &, Wilkins., Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich,, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress., American Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064., Howard, M., & McCabe, J. B. (1990). Helping, teenagers postpone sexual involvement. Family, Planning Perspectives, 22, 21–26., Howard, R., Castle, D., Wessely, S., & Murray, R., (1993). A comparative study of 470 cases of earlyonset and late-onset schizophrenia. British Journal, of Psychiatry, 163, 352–357., Hsu, L. K. G. (1990). Eating disorders. New York:, Guilford Press., , Hu, F. B., & Willett, W. C. (2002). Optimal diets, for prevention of coronary heart disease. Journal of, the American Medical Association, 288(20),, 2569–2578., Hubbard, J. A., & Coie, J. D. (1994). Emotional, correlates of social competence in children’s peer, relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quaterly, 40, 1–20., Hubbard, J. R., & Workman, E. A. (1998). Handbook of stress medicine: An organ system approach., New York: CRC Press., Hubbard, L. R. (1989). Scientology: The fundamentals of thought. Los Angeles: Bridge., Huesmann, L. R., & Moise J. (1998). The stability, and continuity of aggression from early childhood, to young adulthood. In D.J. Flannery & C.R. Huff, (Eds.), Youth violence: Prevention, intervention, and, social policy. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press., Hughes, C. C. (1993). Culture in clinical psychiatry. In A. C. Gaw (Ed.), Culture, ethnicity, and, mental illness (pp. 3–41). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press., Hughes, D. (2001 May). Falling “in like” online., USA Weekend, p. 9., Hull, J. G., & Young, R. D. (1983). Self-consciousness,, self-esteem, and success-failure as determinants of, alcohol consumption in male social drinkers. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1097–1109., Hull, J. G., Young, R. D. & Jouriles, E. (1986)., Applications of the self-awareness model of alcohol consumption: Predicting patterns of use and, abuse. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 51, 790–796., Hulshoff, H. E., Hoek, H. W., Susser, E., Brown,, A. S., Dingemans, A., Schnack, H. G., van Haren,, N. E. M., Ramos, L. M. P., Gispen-de Wied, C. C.,, & Kahn, R. S. (2000). Prenatal exposure to famine, and brain morphology in schizophrenia. American, Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1170–1172., Hunsley, J., Lee, C. M., & Wood, J. M. (2003)., Controversial and questionable assessment techniques. In S. O. Lilienfeld, S. J. Lynn, & J. M. Lohr, (Eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology. New York: Guilford., Hunt, C., & Andrews, G. (1995). Comorbidity in, the anxiety disorders: The use of a life-chart approach. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 29(6),, 467–480., Hunt, M. (1974). Sexual behavior in the 1970s., Chicago: Playboy Press., Huston, A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1998). Mass media, and children’s development. In W. Damon (Series, Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4). New, York: Wiley., Huston, A. C., Donnerstein, E., Fairchild, H.,, Feshbach, N. D., Katz, P. A., Murray, J. P., Rubinstein, E. A., Wilcox, B. L., & Zuckerman, D., (1992). Big world, small screen: The role of television in American society. Lincoln: University of, Nebraska Press., Huston, A. C., Wright, J. C., Rice, M. L., Kerkman,, D., & St. Peters, M. (1990). Development of television viewing patterns in early childhood: A longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology,, 26, 409–420., Huston, T. L., & Melz, H. (2004). The case for, (promoting). Journal of Marriage and Family, 66,, 943–958., Huston, T. L., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. E. (2001)., The early marital roots of conjugal distress and, divorce. Current Directions in Psychological Science,, 10(4), 116–119., Hyde, J. S. (1994a). Understanding human sexuality, (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill., Hyde, J. S. (1994b). Can meta-analysis make feminist transformations in psychology? Psychology of, Women Quarterly, 18, 451–462., Hyde, J. S. (1996). Where are the gender differences? Where are the gender similarities? In D.M., Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives. New, York: Oxford University Press., , References, , 581

Page 619 :
Hyde, J. S. (2004). Half the human experience: The, psychology of women. Boston: Houghton Mifflin., Hyde, J. S., & DeLamater, J. D. (2003). Understanding human sexuality. New York: McGraw-Hill., Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990)., Gender differences in mathematics performance:, A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107,, 139–155., Hyde, J. S., & Frost, L. A. (1993). Meta-analysis in, the psychology of women. In F. L. Denmark & M., A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook, of issue and theories. Westport, CT: Greenwood, Press., Hyde, J. S., & Kling, K. C. (2001). Women, motivation, and achievement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 364–378., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69., Hyde, J. S., & Oliver, M. B. (2000). Gender differences in sexuality: Results from meta-analysis. In, C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society,, and feminism. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Hygge, S., Evans, G. W., & Bullinger, M. (2002). A, prospective study of some effects of aircraft noise, on cognitive performance in school children., Psychological Science, 13(5), 469–474., Hyman, I. E., & Kleinknecht, E. E. (1999). False, childhood memories: Research, theory, and applications. In L. M. Williams & V. L. Banyard (Eds.),, Trauma & memory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Iaccino, J. F. (1996). A further examination of the, bizarre imagery mnemonic: Its effectiveness with, mixed context and delayed testing. Perceptual &, Motor Skills, 83, 881–882., Iacono, W. G., & Lykken, D. T. (1997). The validity, of the lie detector: Two surveys of scientific opinion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 426–433., Iacono, W. G., & Patrick, C. J. (1999). Polygraph, (“lie detector”) testing: The state of the art. In, A. K. Hess & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), The handbook of, forensic psychology. New York: Wiley., Ickes, W. (1993). Traditional gender roles: Do they, make and then break our relationships? Journal of, Social Issues, 3, 71–85., Ickes, W. J., Patterson, M. L., Rajecki, D. W., &, Tanford, S. (1982). Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to preinteraction expectancies. Social, Cognition, 1, 160–190., Ickovics, J. R., Thayaparan, B., & Ethier, K. A., (2001). Women and AIDS: A contextual analysis., In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.),, Handbook of health psychology (pp. 817–840)., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Iezzi, T., Duckworth, M. P., & Adams, H. E., (2001). Somatoform and factitious disorders. In, P. B. Sutker & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive, handbook of psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 211–258)., New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers., Ilgen, D. R. (1990). Health issues at work: Opportunities for industrial/organization psychology., American Psychologist, 45, 252–261., Infante, J. R., Torres-Avisbal, M., Pinel, P., Vallejo., J. A., Peran, F., Gonzalez, F., Contreras, P.,, Pacheco, C., Roldan, A., & Latre, J. M. (2001)., Catecholamine levels in practitioners of the transcendental meditation technique. Physiology &, Behavior, 72(1-2), 141–146., Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced, industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press., Ingoldsby, B. B. (1995). Mate selection and marriage. In B. B. Ingoldsby & S. Smith (Eds.), Families, in multicultural perspective (pp. 143–160). New, York: Guilford Press., Ingram, R. E., Scott, W., & Siegle, G. (1999). Depression: Social and cognitive aspects. In T. Millon, P. H. Blaney, & R. D. Davis (Eds.), Oxford, , 582, , References, , textbook of psychopathology (pp. 203–226). New, York: Oxford University Press., Innocenti, G. M. (1994). Some new trends in the, study of the corpus callosum. Behavioral and Brain, Research, 64, 1–8., Insko, C. A., Smith, R. H., Alicke, M. D., Wade, J.,, & Taylor, S. (1985). Conformity and group size:, The concern with being right and the concern, with being liked. Personality and Social Psychology, Bulletin, 11, 41–50., International Labour Office. (2002). Key indicators of the labour market, 2001–2002. Geneva:, United Nations International Labour Office., Iribarren, C., Sidney, S., Bild, D. E., Liu, K.,, Markovitz, J. H., Roseman, J. M., & Matthews, K., (2000). Association of hostility with coronary, artery calcification in young adults: The CARDIA, study. Journal of the American Medical Association,, 283(19), 2546–2551., Ironson, G., Wynings, C., Sschneiderman, N.,, Baum, A., Rodriguez, M., Greenwood, D., Benight, C., Antoni, M., LaPerriere, A., Huang, H. S.,, Klimas, N., & Fletcher, M. A. (1997). Post-traumatic stress symptoms, intrusive thoughts, loss,, and immune function after Hurricane Andrew., Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 128–141., Isenberg, K. E., & Zorumski, C. F. (2000). Electroconvulsive therapy. In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock, (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 2503–2515)., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Ivancevich, J. M., Matteson, M. T., Freedman,, S. M., & Phillips, J. S. (1990). Worksite stress management interventions. American Psychologist, 45,, 252–261., Iwao, S. (1993). The Japanese woman: Traditional, image and changing reality. New York: Free Press., Izard, C., Fine, S., Schultz, D., Mostow, A., Ackerman, B., & Youngstrom, E. (2001). Emotion, knowledge as a predictor of social behavior and, academic competence in children at risk. Psychological Science, 12(1), 18–23., Jablensky, A. (1999). The 100-year epidemiology, of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 28,, 111–125., Jaccard, J., Dittus, P., & Gordon, V. (2000). Parentteen communication about premarital sex. Journal, of Adolescent Research, 15, 187–208., Jackicic, J., & Gallagher, K. I. (2002). Physical, activity considerations for management of body, weight. In D. H. Bessesen, & R. Kushner (Eds.),, Evaluation & Management of Obesity. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus., Jackson, L. A., & McGill, O. D. (1996). Body type, preferences and body characteristics associated, with attractive and unattractive bodies by African, Americans and Anglo Americans. Sex Roles,, 35(5–6), 295–307., Jackson, T., Fritch, A., Nagasaka, T., & Gunderson, J. (2002). Towards explaining the association, between shyness and loneliness: A path analysis, with American college students. Social Behavior, and Personality, 30(3), 263–270., Jacob, R. G., & Pelham, W. H. (2000). Behavior, therapy. In B. J. Sadock, & V. A. Sadock (Eds.),, Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of, psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 2080–2127)., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Jacobs, C., & Wolf, E. (1995). School sexuality, education and adolescent risk-taking behavior., Journal of School Health, 65, 91–95., Jacobs, H. S. (2001). Idea of male menopause is, not useful. Medical Crossfire, 3, 52–55., Jacobs, J. A. (1999). The sex segregation of occupations. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender, and work (pp. 125–144). Thousand Oaks, CA:, Sage., Jacobson, E. (1938). Progressive relaxation., Chicago: University of Chicago Press., Jacques, R. (1997). The unbearable whiteness of, being: Reflections of a pale, stale male. In P. Prasad,, , A. Mills, M. Elmes, & A. Prasad (Eds.), Managing, the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive, mental health. New York: Basic Books., Jakupcak, M., Salters, K., Gratz, K. L., & Roemer,, L. (2003). Masculinity and emotionality: An investigation of men’s primary and secondary emotional responding. Sex Roles, 49(3/4), 111–120., James, D., & Drakich, J. (1993). Understanding, gender differences in amount of talk: A critical, review of research. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and, conversational interaction (pp. 281–312). New, York: Oxford University Press., James, J. E. (2004). Critical review of dietary caffeine and blood pressure: A relationship that, should be taken more seriously. Psychosomatic, Medicine, 66(1), 63–71., Janis, I. L. (1958). Psychological stress. New York:, Wiley., Janis, I. L. (1993). Decision making under stress., In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of, stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed.)., New York: Free Press., Jankowiak, W. R., & Fischer, E. F. (1992). A crosscultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology,, 31, 149–155., Janofsky, J. S., Dunn, M. H., Roskes, E. J., Briskin,, J. K., & Rudolph, M. S. L. (1996). Insanity defense, pleas in Baltimore city: An analysis of outcome., American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 1464–1468., Jansz, J. (2000). Masculine identity and restrictive, emotionality. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and, emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp., 166–186). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University, Press., Jaroff, L. (1993, November 29). Lies of the mind., Time, pp. 52–59., Jaskiewicz, J. A., & McAnarney, E. R. (1994). Pregnancy during adolescence. Pediatrics in Review, 15,, 32–38., Jay, K., & Young, A. (1979). The gay report. New, York: Summit Books., Jefferson, J. W., & Greist, J. H. (2000). Lithium. In, B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and, Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th, ed., Vol. 1, pp. 2377–2389). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Jeffery, R. W. (2001). Public health strategies for, obesity treatment and prevention. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25(3), 252–259., Jeffery, R. W., Epstein, L. H., Wilson, G. T.,, Drewnowski, A., Stunkard, A. J., Wing, R. R., &, Hill, D. R. (2000). Long-term maintenance of, weight loss: Current status. Health Psychology,, 19(1), 5–16., Jemmott, J. B., III, & Magloire, K. (1988). Academic stress, social support, and secretory Immunoglobin A. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 55, 803–810., Jepsen, L. K., & Jepsen, C. A. (2002). An empirical, analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and, opposite-sex couples. Demography, 39, 435–453., Jex, S. M., Bliese, P. D., Buzzell, S., & Primeau, J., (2001). The impact of self-efficacy on stressorstrain relations: Coping style as an explanatory, mechanism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86,, 401–409., Jick, H., Kaye, J. A., & Jick, S. S. (2004). Antidepressants and the risk of suicidal behaviors. Journal of, the American Medical Association, 292(3), 338–343., John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five, trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John, (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford, Press., Johnson, A. M., Wadsworth, J., Wellings, K.,, Bradshaw, S., & Field, J. (1992). Sexual lifestyles, and HIV risk. Nature, 360, 410–412., Johnson, B. A., & Ait-Dauod, N. (2005). Alcohol:, Clinical aspects. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B.

Page 620 :
Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse:, A comprehensive textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1999). Joining, together. Group theory and group skills (7th ed.)., Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Johnson, I. M., Crowley, J., & Sigler, R. T. (1992)., Agency response to domestic violence: Services, provided to battered women. In E. C. Viano (Ed.),, Intimate violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives., Washington, DC: Hemisphere., Johnson, M. P. (2000). Conflict and control: Images of symmetry and asymmetry in domestic, violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, & M., Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict. Hillsdale, NJ:, Erlbaum., Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2001). Research, on domestic violence in the 1990’s: Making distinctions. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Understanding, families into the new millennium: A decade in review (pp. 167–182). Minneapolis, MN: National, Council on Family Relations., Johnson, S. B., & Carlson, D. N. (2004). Medical, regimen adherence: Concepts, assessment, and, interventions. In J. M. Raczynski, & L. C. Leviton, (Eds.), Handbook of clinical health psychology: Vol., 2. Disorders of behavior and health. Washington,, DC: American Psychological Association., Johnson, T. W., & Colucci, P. (1999). Lesbians, gay, men, and the family life cycle. In B. Carter &, M. McGoldrick (Eds.), The expanded family life, cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives, (3rd ed., pp. 346–361). Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Johnstone, L. (1999). Adverse psychological effects, of ECT. Journal of Mental Health, 8, 69–85., Joiner, T. E. (2002). Depression in its interpersonal, context. In I. H. Gotlib & C. L. Hammen (Eds.),, Handbook of depression. New York: Guilford., Joiner, T. E., & Katz, J. (1999). Contagion of depressive symptoms and mood: Meta-analytic review and explanations from cognitive, behavioral,, and interpersonal viewpoints. Clinical Psychology:, Science and Practice, 6, 149–164., Joiner, T. E., Jr., & Metalsky, G. I. (1995). A, prospective test of an integrative interpersonal, theory of depression: A naturalistic study of college students. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 69, 778–788., Jones, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neotony: Cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology, 36,, 723–748., Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New, York: Freeman., Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in, experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York:, Academic Press., Jones, F., & Kinman, G. (2001). Approaches to, studying stress. In F. Jones & J. Bright (Eds.),, Stress: Myth, theory and research . Harlow, England: Pearson Education., Jones, M. (1993, July 5). Getting away from the, “R” word. Publishers Weekly, pp. 42–45., Jones, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1970). Persuasiveness, of one- and two-sided communications as a function of awareness there are two sides. Journal of, Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 47–56., Jorgensen, R. S., Johnson, B. T., Kolodziej, M. E.,, & Schreer, G. E. (1996). Elevated blood pressure, and personality: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 293–320., Joung, I. M. A., Stronks, K., Van De Mheen, H.,, Van Poppel, F. W. A., Van Der Meer, J. B. W., &, Mackenbach, J. P. (1997). The contribution of, intermediary factors to marital status differences, in self-reported health. Journal of Marriage and the, Family, 59, 476–490., Jourard, S. M., & Landsman, T. (1980). Healthy, personality: An approach from the viewpoint of, humanistic psychology. New York: Macmillan., , Joyner, T. (1999, November 14). All-work is American way: Atlanta poll finds 21 percent work 50plus hours a week. The Atlanta, Journal-Constitution, pp. R1, R5., Joyner, T. (2001, May 27). Why can’t we enjoy a, vacation? Americans getting tired, and it shows at, work. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, pp. D1,, D3., Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor, model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 751–765., Julien, R. M. (2001). A primer of drug action. New, York: Freeman., Jung, C. G. (1921). Psychological types. In Collected Works (Vol. 6). Princeton, NJ: Princeton, University Press., Jung, C. G. (1933). Modern man in search of a soul., New York: Harcourt, Brace & World., Kagan, J. (1998). Biology and the child. In W., Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol., 3): Social, emotional, and personality development., New York: Wiley., Kagan, J., Snidman, N., & Arcus, D. M. (1992)., Initial reactions to unfamiliarity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 171–174., Kahn, A. S., & Andreoli Mathie, V. (1999). Sexuality, society, and feminism: Psychological perspectives on women. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White, (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism: Psychological perspectives on women. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In, D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.),, Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology, (pp. 3–25). New York: Sage., Kaiser, C. R., Vick, B. S., & Major, B. (2004). A, prospective investigation of the relationship between just-world beliefs and the desire for revenge, after September 11, 2001. Psychological Science,, 15(7), 503–506., Kaiser Family Foundation. (2004). Sex education, in America: Principals’ survey. Menlo Park, CA:, Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation., Kaiser Family Foundation, Holt, T., Greene, L., &, Davis, J. (2003). National Survey of adolescents and, young adults: Sexual health knowledge, attitudes,, and experiences. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser, Family Foundation., Kalant, H., & Kalant, O. J. (1979). Death in amphetamine users: Causes and rates. In D. E. Smith, (Ed.), Amphetamine use, misuse and abuse. Boston:, G. K. Hall., Kalichman, S. C. (1995). Understanding AIDS: A, guide for mental health professionals. Washington,, DC: American Psychological Association., Kalichman, S. C., Roffman, R. A., Picciano, J. F., &, Bolan, M. (1998). Risk for HIV infection among, bisexual men seeking HIV-prevention services and, risks posed to their female partners. Health Psychology, 17(4), 320–327., Kalick, S. M., & Hamilton, T. E., III. (1986). The, matching hypothesis reexamined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 673–682., Kalidindi, S., & McGuffin, P. (2003). The genetics, of affective disorders: Present and future. In R., Plomin, J. C. Defries, I. W. Craig, & P. McGuffin, (Eds.), Behavioral genetics in the postgenomic era., Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and, homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–421., Kalwarf, H. J., Khoury, J. C., & Lanphear, B. P., (2003). Milk intake during childhood and adolescence, adult bone density, and osteoporotic fractures in US women. American Journal of Clinical, Nutrition, 77, 257–265., Kamp Dush, C. M., Cohan, C. L., & Amato, P. R., (2003). The relationship between cohabitation and, marital quality and stability: Change across co-, , horts? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65,, 539–549., Kanagawa, C., Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R., (2001). “Who am I?” The cultural psychology of, the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 90–103., Kandell, J. J. (1998). Internet addiction on campus: The vulnerability of college students., CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1(1), 11–17., Kane, E. W. (2000). Racial and ethnic variations in, gender-related attitudes. Annual review of sociology, 26, 419–439., Kane, J. (1991). Be sick well: A healthy approach to, chronic illness. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger., Kane, T. D., Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Blair, V., (1996). Self-efficacy, personal goals, and wrestlers’, self-regulation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 36–48., Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., &, Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes, of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts, versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral, Medicine, 4, 1–39., Kanner, A. D., & Soule, R. G. (2004). Globalization, corporate culture, and freedom. In T. Kasser, & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and consumer, culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic, world. Washington, DC: American Psychological, Association., Kant, A. K., Schatzkin, A., Graubard, B. I., &, Schairer, C. (2000). A prospective study of diet, quality and mortality in women. Journal of the, American Medical Association, 283, 2109–02115., Kaplan, A. G. (1985). Female or male therapists, for women patients: New formulations. Psychiatry,, 48, 111–121., Kaplan, H. I. (1989). History of psychosomatic, medicine. In H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.),, Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry/V (Vol. 2), (5th ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins., Kaplan, H. I., & Sadock, B. J. (Eds.). (1993). Comprehensive group psychotherapy. Baltimore:, Williams & Wilkins., Kaplan, H. S. (1979). Disorders of sexual desire., New York: Simon & Schuster., Karasek, R. A., Jr. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for, job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24,, 285–308., Karasek, R. A., Jr., Baker, D., Marxer, F., Ahlbom,, A., & Theorell, T. (1981). Job decision latitude, job, demands, and cardiovascular disease: A prospective study of Swedish men. American Journal of, Public Health, 71, 694–705., Karasek, R. A., Jr., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy, work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of, working life. New York: Basic Books., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2000). Attributions in marriage: State or trait? A growth curve, analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 295–309., Karp, D. A. (2001). The burden of sympathy: How, families cope with mental illness. New York: Oxford, University Press., Kasper, H. T. (2002). The changing role of community college. Occupational Outlook Quarterly,, 14–21., Kassel, J. D., Stroud, L. R., & Paronis, C. A. (2003)., Smoking, stress, and negative affect: Correlation,, causation, and context across stages of smoking., Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), 270–304., Kasser, T. (2002). The high prices of materialism., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Materialistic values: Their causes, and consequences. In T. Kasser & A. D. Kanner, (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle, for a good life in a materialistic world. Washington,, DC: American Psychological Association., Kastenbaum, R. (1999). Dying and bereavement., In J. C. Cavanaugh & S. K. Whitbourne (Eds.),, , References, , 583

Page 621 :
Gerontology: An interdisciplinary perspective . New, York: Oxford University Press., Kastenbaum, R. J. (2001). Death, society, and, human experience (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn &, Bacon., Kausler, D. H. (1994). Learning and memory in, normal aging. San Diego: Academic Press., Kavanagh, D. J. (1992). Recent developments in, expressed emotion in schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 601–620., Kavesh, L., & Lavin, C. (1988). Tales from the front., New York: Doubleday., Kay, J., & Kay, R. L. (2003). Individual psychoanalytic psychotherapy. In A. Tasman, J. Kay, & J. A., Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New York: Wiley., Kaye, W. H., Weltzin, T. E., Hsu, L. K. G.,, McConaha, C. W., & Bolton, B. (1993). Amount of, calories retained after binge eating and vomiting., American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 969–971., Kazdin, A. E. (1982). History of behavior modification. In A. S. Bellack, M. Hersen, & A. E. Kazdin, (Eds.), International handbook of behavior modification and behavior therapy. New York: Plenum., Kazdin, A. E. (1994). Methodology, design, and, evaluation in psychotherapy research. In A. E., Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed.). New, York: Wiley., Kazdin, A. E. (2001). Behavior modification in, applied settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Kazdin, A. E., & Benjet, C. (2003). Spanking children: Evidence and issues. Current Directions in, Psychological Science, 99–103., Keefe, F. J., Smith, S. J., Buffington, A. L. H., Gibson, J., Studts, J. L., & Caldwell, D. S. (2002). Recent advances and future directions in the, biopsychosocial assessment and treatment of, arthritis. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 70(3), 640–655., Keefe, S. E. (1984). Real and ideal extended familism among Mexican Americans and Anglo Americans: On the meaning of “close” family ties., Human Organization, 43, 65–70., Keesey, R. E. (1993). Physiological regulation of, body energy: Implications for obesity. In A. J., Stunkard & T. A. Wadden (Eds.), Obesity: Theory, and therapy. New York: Raven Press., Keesey, R. E. (1995). A set-point model of body, weight regulation. In K. D. Brownell & C. G. Fairburn (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook. New York: Guilford Press., Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental, demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, University Press., Keinan, G. (1987). Decision making under stress:, Scanning of alternatives under controllable and, uncontrollable threats. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 52, 639–644., Keita, G. P., & Hurrell, J. J., Jr. (1994). Job stress in, a changing workforce. Washington, DC: American, Psychological Association., Keller, S. N., & Brown, J. D. Media interventions to, promote responsible sexual behavior. The Journal, of Sex Research, 39(1), 67–72., Kelley, H. H. (1950). The warm-cold dimension in, first impressions of persons. Journal of Personality,, 18, 431–439., Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social, psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15). Lincoln: University, of Nebraska Press., Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New, York: Wiley-Interscience., Kellogg, J. S., Hopko, D. R., & Ashcraft, M. H., (1999). The effects of time pressure on arithmetic, performance. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13(6),, 591–600., Kelly, J. B., & Emery, R. E. (2003). Children’s adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience, perspectives. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary, Journal of Applied Family Studies, 52(4), 352–362., , 584, , References, , Kelly, K. M., & Schramke, C. J. (2000). Epilepsy. In, G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (pp. 66–70)., San Diego: Academic Press., Kelly, K. R., & Cobb, S. J. (1991). A profile of the, career development characteristics of young gifted, adolescents: Examining gender and multicultural, differences. Roeper Review, 13, 202–206., Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of, obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority, and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University, Press., Kemeny, M. E. (2003). The psychobiology of, stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science,, 12(4), 124–129., Kemeny, M. E., Weiner, H., Duran, R., Taylor,, S. E., Visscher, B., & Fahey, J. L. (1995). Immune, system changes after the death of a partner in, HIV-positive gay men. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57,, 547–554., Kendler, K. S. (2000). Schizophrenia: Genetics. In, B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and, Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th, ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1147–1158). Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Kendler, K. S., & Gardner, C. O., Jr. (1998)., Boundaries of major depression: An evaluation of, DSM-IV criteria. American Journal of Psychiatry,, 155, 172–177., Kendler, K. S., Kuhn, J., & Prescott, C. A. (2004)., The interrelationship of neuroticism, sex, and, stressful life events in the prediction of episodes of, major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry,, 161, 631–636., Kendler, K. S., Thornton, L. M., Gilman, S. E., &, Kessler, R. C. (2000). Sexual orientation in a U.S., national sample of twin and nontwin sibling pairs., American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(11),, 1843–1846., Kenny, D. A. (1994). Using the social relations, model to understand relationships. In R. Erber &, R. Gilmour (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for, personal relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost,, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of, human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97–116., Kenrick, D. T., & Trost, M. R. (1993). The evolutionary perspective. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg, (Eds.), The psychology of gender. New York: Guilford Press., Keogh, E., Bond, F. W., French, C. C., Richards, A.,, & Davis, R. E. (2004). Test anxiety, susceptibility to, distraction and examination performance. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal,, 17(3), 241–252., Kernis, M. H. (2003a). Optimal self-esteem and, authenticity: Separating fantasy from reality. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 83–89., Kernis, M. H. (2003b). Toward a conceptualization, of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry,, 14(1), 1–26., Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2003). Stability, and variability in self-concept and self-esteem. In, M. R. Leary and J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of, self and identity. New York: Guilford., Kessler, R. C. (1997). The effects of stressful life, events on depression. Annual Review of Psychology,, 48, 191–214., Kessler, R. C. (2002). Epidemiology of depression., In I. H. Gotlib & C. L. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook, of depression. New York: Guilford., Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R.,, Koretz, D., Merikangas, K. R., Rush, A. J., Walters,, E. E., & Wang, P. S. (2003). The epidemiology of, major depressive disorder: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication (NCS-R)., The Journal of the American Medical Association,, 289(23), 3095–3105., Kessler, R. C., Olfson, M., & Berglund, P. A., (1998). Patterns and predictors of treatment contact after first onset of psychiatric disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 62–69., , Kessler, R. C., & Zhao, S. (1999). The prevalence of, mental illness. In A. V. Horvitz & T. L. Scheid, (Eds.), A handbook for the study of mental health:, Social contexts, theories, and systems. New York:, Cambridge University Press., Kessler, R. C., Zhao, S., Katz, S. J., Kouzis, A. C.,, Frank, R. G., Edlund, M., & Leaf, P. (1999). Pastyear use of outpatient services for psychiatric, problems in the National Comorbidity Survey., American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 115–123., Keyes, R. (1991). Timelock: How life got so hectic, and what you can do about it. New York: HarperCollins., Khot, U. N., Khot, M. B., Bajzer, C. T., Sapp, S. K.,, Ohman, E. M., Brener, S. J., Ellis, S. G., Lincoff,, M. A., & Topol, E. J. (2003). Prevalence of conventional risk factors in patients with coronary heart, disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 898–904., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R. (1995). Measurement of immune response. In S. Cohen, R. C., Kessler, & L. U. Gordon (Eds.), Measuring stress: A, guide for health and social scientists. New York:, Oxford University Press., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R. (2001). Stress, and immunity: Age enhances the risks. Current, Directions in Psychological Science, 10(1), 18–21., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Garner, W., Speicher, C.,, Penn, G. M., Holliday, J., & Glaser, R. (1984)., Psychosocial modifiers of immunocompetence in, medical students. Psychosomatic Medicine, 46,, 7–14., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Glaser, R., Cacioppo, J. T.,, MacCallum, R. C., Snydersmith, M., Kim, C., &, Malarkey, W. B. (1997). Marital conflict in older, adults: Endocrinological and immunological correlates. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 339–349., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Kennedy, S., Malkoff, S.,, Fisher, L., Speicher, C. E., & Glaser, R. (1988)., Marital discord and immunity in males. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50, 213–229., Kierein, N. M., & Gold, M. A. (2000). Pygmalion, in work organizations: A meta-analysis. Journal of, Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 913–928., Kiernan, K. (2004). Redrawing the boundaries of, marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66,, 980–987., Kiesler, C. A. (2000). The next wave of change for, psychology and mental health services in the, health care revolution. American Psychologist,, 55(5), 481–487., Kiesler, D. J. (1999). Beyond the disease model of, mental disorders. New York: Praeger., Kihlstrom, J. F. (1998). Exhumed memory. In S. J., Lynn & K. M. McConkey (Eds.), Truth in memory., New York: Guilford Press., Kihlstrom, J. F. (2001). Dissociative disorders. In, P. B. Sutker & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive, handbook of psychopathology (3rd ed., pp., 259–276). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, Publishers., Kihlstrom, J. F. (2004). An unbalanced balancing, act: Blocked, recovered, and false memories in the, laboratory and clinic. Clinical Psychology: Science, & Practice, 11(1), 34–41., Kihlstrom, J. F., Glisky, M. L., & Angiulo, M. J., (1994). Dissociative tendencies and dissociative, disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103,, 117–124., Kilby, R. W. (1993). The study of human values., Lanham, MD: University Press of America., Kilmartin, C. (2000). The masculine self (2nd ed.)., Boston: McGraw-Hill., Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or, uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural, analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785–800., Kimura, D., & Hampson, E. (1993). Neural and, hormonal mechanisms mediating sex differences, in cognition. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Biological approaches to the study of human intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Page 622 :
Kindlon, D., & Thompson, M. (with Barker, T.)., (1999). Raising Cain: Protecting the emotional life, of boys. New York: Ballantine., King, B. M. (2005). Human sexuality today. Upper, Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall., King, C. A. (1997). Suicidal behavior in adolescence. In R. W. Maris, M. M. Silverman, & S. S., Canetto (Eds.), Review of suicidology (pp. 61–95)., New York: Guilford Press., King, G. R., & Ellinwood Jr., E. H. (2005). Amphetamines and other stimulants. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.),, Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., King, J. L. (2004). On the down low: A journey into, the lives of “straight” black men who sleep with men., New York: Broadway Books., King, L. A., & Emmons, R. A. (1990). Conflict over, emotional expression: Psychological and physical, correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 864–877., King, L. A., & Emmons, R. A. (1991). Psychological, physical, and interpersonal correlates of emotional expressiveness, conflict and control., European Journal of Personality, 5, 131–150., King, L. A., King, D. W., Fairbank, J. A., Keane,, T. M., & Adams, G. A. (1998). Resilience-recovery, factors in post-traumatic stress disorder among, female and male Vietnam veterans: Hardiness,, postwar social support, and additional stressful life, events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 74, 420–434., King, N. J., Eleonora, G., & Ollendick, T. H., (1998). Etiology of childhood phobias: Current, status of Rachman’s three pathways theory. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 297–309., Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E., (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male., Philadelphia: Saunders., Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., &, Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the, human female. Philadelphia: Saunders., Kinsman, R. A., Dirks, J. F., & Jones, N. F. (1982)., Psychomaintenance of chronic physical illness:, Clinical assessment of personal styles affecting, medical management. In T. Millon, C. Green, &, R. Meagher (Eds.), Handbook of clinical health, psychology. New York: Plenum., Kirby, D. (2000). Making condoms available in, schools. Western Journal of Medicine, 172,, 149–151., Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1998). God as a substitute, attachment figure: A longitudinal study of adult, attachment style and religious change in college, students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 961–973., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A, longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 66, 502–512., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Hazan, C. (1994). Attachment styles and close relationships: A four-year, prospective study. Personal Relationships, 1,, 123–142., Kirmayer, L. J., Robbins, J. M., & Paris, J. (1994)., Somatoform disorders: Personality and the social, matrix of somatic distress. Journal of Abnormal, Psychology, 103, 125–136., Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons,, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22,, 336–353., Kitson, G. C. (1992). Portrait of divorce: Adjustment to marital breakdown. New York: Guilford, Press., Klag, S., & Bradley, G. (2004). The role of hardiness in stress and illness: An exploration of the, effect of negative affectivity and gender. British, Journal of Health Psychology, 9(2), 137–161., Klass, D. (1996). The deceased child in the psychic, and social worlds of bereaved parents during the, , resolution of grief. In D. Klass, P. R. Silverman, &, S. L. Nickman (Eds.), Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief (pp. 199–215). Washington,, DC: Taylor and Francis., Klassen, M. (1987). How to get the most out of, your time. In A. D. Timpe (Ed.), The management, of time. New York: Facts on File., Kleiman, C. (2003, September 7). Web job boards, fall short. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, p. R3., Klein, D. N., & Rubovits, D. R. (1987). The reliability of subjects’ reports of life events inventories:, A longitudinal study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 501–512., Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., & Wolf, T. J. (1985). Sexual, orientation: A multivariable dynamic process., Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 35–49., Klein, K. J., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When, it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(6), 720–730., Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1988)., Current trends toward convergence of the behavioristic, functional, and cognitive perspectives in, experimental psychology. The Psychological Record,, 38, 369–392., Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A, research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100,, 78–100., Kleinke, C. L., Meeker, F. B., & Staneski, R. A., (1986). Preference for opening lines: Comparing, ratings by men and women. Sex Roles, 15,, 585–600., Kleinmuntz, B. (1980). Essentials of abnormal, psychology. San Francisco: Harper & Row., Klerman, G. L., Weissman, M. M., Markowitz, J., C., Glick, I., Wilner, P. J., Mason. B., & Shear, M., K. (1994). Medication and psychotherapy. In A. E., Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed.). New, York: Wiley., Kline, D. W., Kline, T. J. B., Fozard, J. L., Kosnik,, W., Schieber, F., & Sekuler, R. (1992). Vision,, aging, and driving: The problems of older drivers., Journal of Gerontology, 42, P27–P34., Kline, P. (1995). A critical review of the measurement of personality and intelligence. In D. H., Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York:, Plenum Press., Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell,, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A, meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(4),, 470–500., Klonoff, E. A., & Landrine, H. (1999). Crossvalidation of the schedule of racist events. Journal, of Black Psychology, 25(2), 231–254., Kluft, R. P. (1996). Dissociative identity disorder., In L. K. Michelson & W. J. Ray (Eds.), Handbook of, dissociation: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical, perspectives. New York: Plenum., Kluft, R. P. (1999). True lies, false truths, and naturalistic raw data: Applying clinical research findings to the false memory debate. In L. M. Williams, & V. L. Banyard (Eds.), Trauma & memory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Kluger, J. (2002 June 10). Pumping up your past., Time, p. 45., Kluwer, E. S., Heesink, J. A. M., & Van de Vliert, E., (1996). Marital conflict about the division of, household labor and paid work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 958–969., Knapp, C. M., Ciraulo, D. A., & Jaffe, J. (2005)., Opiates: Clinical aspects. In J. H. Lowinson, P., Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Knapp, D. E., Faley, R. H., Ekeberg, W. C., &, Dubois, C. L. Z. (1997). Determinants of target, responses to sexual harassment: A conceptual, framework. Academy of Management Review,, 22(3), 687–729., , Knaus, W. (2000). Procrastination, blame, and, change. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,, 15, 153–166., Knickmeyer, N., Sexton, K., & Nishimura, N., (2002). The impact of same-sex friendships on the, well-being of women: A review of the literature., Women and Therapy, 25(1), 37–59., Knowles, J. A., Kaufmann, C. A., & Rieder, R. O., (1999). Genetics. In R. E. Hales, S. C. Yudofsky, &, J. A. Talbott (Eds.), American Psychiatric Press, textbook of psychiatry (pp. 35–82). Washington,, DC: American Psychiatric Press., Knowles, R. B., Wyart, C., Buldyrev, S. V., Cruz,, L., Urbanc, B., Hasselmo, M. E., Stanley, H. E., &, Hyman, B. T. (1999). Plaque-induced neurite, abnormalities: Implications of disruption of neuronal networks in Alzheimer’s disease. Proceedings, of the National Academy of Sciences, 96,, 5274–5279., Knox, D. (2000). The divorced dad’s survival book:, How to stay connected to your kids. New York:, Perseus., Kobasa, S. C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality, and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1–11., Kobasa, S. C. (1984, September). How much stress, can you survive? American Health, pp. 64–77., Konrad, A. M. (2003). Family demands and job, attribute preferences: A 4-year longitudinal study, of women and men. Sex Roles, 49(1–2), 35–46., Koopman, C., Classen, C., & Spiegel, D. (1994)., Predictors of posttraumatic stress symptoms, among survivors of the Oakland/Berkeley, Calif.,, firestorm. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151,, 888–894., Kop, W. J., Gottdiener, J. S., & Krantz, D. S. (2001)., Stress and silent ischemia. In A. Baum, T. A., Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health, psychology (pp. 669–682). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Kopta, S. M., Lueger, R. J., Saunders, S. M., &, Howard, K. I. (1999). Individual psychotherapy, outcome and process research: Challenges leading, to greater turmoil or a positive transition? Annual, Review of Psychology, 50, 441–469., Koren, D., Arnon, I., & Klein, E. (1999). Acute, stress response and posttraumatic stress disorder, in traffic accident victims: A one-year prospective,, follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry,, 156(3), 367–373., Koren, P., Carlton, K., & Shaw, D. (1980). Marital, conflict: Relations among behaviors, outcomes,, and distress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical, Psychology, 48, 460–468., Koss, M. P., & Cook, S. I. (1993). Facing the facts:, Date and acquaintance rape are significant problems for women. In R. J. Gelles, & D. R. Losede, (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp., 104–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N., (1988). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a, national sample of higher education students., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55,, 162–170., Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe, haven: Male violence against women at home, at, work, and in the community. Washington, DC:, American Psychological Association., Kowalski, R. M. (1993). Inferring sexual interest, from behavioral cues: Effects of gender and sexually relevant attitudes. Sex Roles, 29, 13–36., Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work, groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and, organizational psychology. New York: Wiley., Kramer, H. (1994). Liberating the adult within., New York: Simon & Schuster., Krantz, D. S., Sheps, D. S., Carney, R. M., & Natelson, B. H. (2000). Effects of mental stress in patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of, , References, , 585

Page 623 :
the American Medical Association, 283(14),, 1800–1802., Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler,, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces, social involvement and psychological well-being?, American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031., Kreinin, T., Rodriquez, M., & Edwards, M. (December 2000/January 2001). Adolescents would, prefer parents as primary sexuality educators., Siecus Report Supplement, 1., Kring, A. M. (1999). Emotion in schizophrenia:, Old mystery, new understanding. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 160–163., Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and, physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 686–703., Kroger, J. (1997). Gender and identity: The intersection of structure, content, and context. Sex, Roles , 36(11/12), 747–770., Krueger, W. C. F. (1929). The effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 71–78., Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New, York: Macmillan., Kübler-Ross, E. (1970). The dying patient’s point, of view. In O. G. Brim, Jr., H. E. Freeman, S. Levine,, & N. A. Scotch (Eds.), The dying patient. New, York: Sage., Kulick, A. R., Pope, H. G., & Keck, P. E. (1990)., Lycanthropy and self-identification. Journal of, Nervous and Mental Disease, 178, 134–137., Kulik, L. (2000). Jobless men and women: A comparative analysis of job search intensity, attitudes, toward unemployment and related responses., Journal of Occupational and Behavioral Psychology,, 73(4), 487–500., Kurdek, L. A. (1991). Sexuality in homosexual, and heterosexual couples. In K. McKinney &, S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships., Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum., Kurdek, L. A. (1993a). Predicting marital dissolution: A five-year prospective longitudinal study of, newlywed couples. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 64(2), 221–242., Kurdek, L. A. (1993b). The allocation of household, labor in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual married, couples. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 127–139., Kurdek, L. A. (1994). The nature and correlates of, relationship quality in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual cohabiting couples. In B. Greene & G. M., Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Kurdek, L. A. (1998). Relationship outcomes and, their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting, and lesbian, cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and the, Family, 30, 553–568., Kurdek, L. A. (2004). Gay men and lesbians: The, family context. In M. Coleman & L. H. Ganong, (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary families: Considering the past, contemplating the future. Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage., Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. (1986a). Early development of relationship quality in heterosexual, married, heterosexual cohabiting, gay, and lesbian, couples. Developmental Psychology, 22, 305–309., Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. (1986b). Interaction, of sex role self-concept with relationship quality, and relationship beliefs in married, heterosexual, cohabiting, gay, and lesbian couples. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 365–370., Kutchins, H., & Kirk, S. A. (1997). Making us, crazy: DSM—The psychiatric Bible and the creation, of mental disorders. New York: Free Press., Lachman, M. E. (2004). Development in midlife., Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 305–331., Lachman, M. E., & Bertrand, R. M. (2001). Personality and the self in midlife. In M. E. Lachman, , 586, , References, , (Ed.), Handbook of midlife development. New York:, Wiley., LaFrance, M. (2001). Gender and social interaction. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender. New York: Wiley., La Greca, A. M. (2000). Posttraumatic stress disorder in children. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of, stress (Vol. 3, pp. 181–185). San Diego: Academic, Press., Laitinen, J., Ek, E., & Sovio, U. (2002). Stressrelated eating and drinking behavior and body, mass index and predictors of this behavior. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted, to Practice & Theory, 34, 29–39, Lakein, A. (1996). How to get control of your time, and your life. New York: New American Library., Lam, L. T., & Kirby, S. L. (2002). Is emotional, intelligence an advantage? An exploration of the, impact of emotional and general intelligence on, individual performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 133–143., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Prodromidis, M., (1992). Nonmaternal care and the security of, infant-mother attachment: A reanalysis of the, data. Infant Behavior and Development, 15, 71–83., Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research, summary on the therapeutic relationship and, psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory,, Research, Practice, Training, 38, 357–361., Lambert, M. J., & Bergin, A. E. (1992). Achievements and limitations of psychotherapy research., In D. K. Freedheim (Ed.), History of psychotherapy:, A century of change. Washington, DC: American, Psychological Association., Lambert, M. J., & Bergin, A. E. (1994). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergin & S. L., Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and, behavior change (4th ed.). New York: Wiley., Lambert, M. J., & Hill, C. E. (1994). Assessing, psychotherapy outcomes and processes. In A. E., Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed.). New, York: Wiley., Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., &, Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence, and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful, families. Child Development, 62, 1049–1065., Lammers, C., Ireland, M., Resnick, M., & Blum,, R. (2000). Influences on adolescents’ decisions to, postpone onset of sexual intercourse: A survival, analysis of virginity among youths ages 13 to 18, years. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 42–48., Lampe, A., Soellner, W., Krismer, M., Rumpold,, G., Kantner-Rumplmair, W., Ogon, M., & Rathner, G. (1998). The impact of stressful life events, on exacerbation of chronic low-back pain. Journal, of Psychosomatic Research, 44(5), 555–563., Landabaso, M. A., Iraurgi, I., Sanz, J., Calle, R.,, Ruiz de Apodaka, J., Jimenez-Lerma, J. M., &, Gutierrez-Fraile, M. (1999). Naltrexone in the, treatment of alcoholism. Two-year follow up results. European Journal of Psychiatry, 13, 97–105., Landau, E. (1988). Teenagers talk about school., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Julian Messner., Landel-Graham, J., Yount, S. E., & Rudnicki, S. R., (2003). Diabetes mellitus. In A. M. Nezu, C. M., Nezu, & P. A. Geller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 9. Health psychology. New York: Wiley., Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. New York: Addison-Wesley., Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2),, 311–328., Langer, E., Bashner, R., & Chanowitz, B. (1985)., Decreasing prejudice by increasing discrimination., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49,, 113–120., Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J.,, Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and, theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3),, 390–423., , Lansford, J. E., Sherman, A. M., & Antonucci,, T. C. (1998). Satisfaction with social networks: An, examination of socioemotional selectivity theory, across cohorts. Psychology and Aging, 13(4),, 544–552., Lanyon, R. I., & Goodstein, L. D. (1997). Personality assessment. New York: Wiley., Lanza, S. T., & Collins, L. M. (2002). Pubertal, timing and the onset of substance use in females, during early adolescence. Prevention Science, 3(1),, 69–82., Lapierre, Y. D. (2003). Suicidality with selective, serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Valid claim? Journal, of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 28(5), 340–347., LaPoire, B. A., Burgoon, J. K., & Parrott, R., (1992). Status and privacy restoring communication in the workplace. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 4, 419–436., Larose, S., & Bernier, A. (2001). Social support, processes: Mediators of attachment state of mind, and adjustment in late adolescence. Attachment, and Human Development, 3(1), 96–120., Larson, K. (2004, July 11). N. J. begins recognizing, same-sex marriages. Statesboro Herald, p. 8A., Larson, R., & Pleck, J. (1998). Hidden feelings:, Emotionality in boys and men. In Gender and, motivation (Vol. 45, pp. 25–74). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press., Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1994). Divergent, realities: The emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and, adolescents. New York: Basic Books., Larzelere, R. E. (2000). Child outcomes of, nonabusive and customary physical punishment, by parents: An updated literature review. Clinical, Child and Family Psychology Review, 3(4),, 199–221., Laskoff, M. B. (2004). Landing on the right side of, your ass: A survival guide for the recently unemployed. New York: Three Rivers Press., Latané, B., & Nida, S. A. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological, Bulletin, 89, 308–324., Lating, J. M., Sherman, M. F., Everly, G. S., Lowry,, J. L., & Peragine, T. F. (2004). PTSD reactions and, functioning of American Airlines flight attendants, in the wake of September 11. Journal of Nervous &, Mental Disease, 192(6), 435–441., Lauer, J., & Lauer, R. (1985, June). Marriages made, to last. Psychology Today, pp. 22–26., Laughlin, H. (1967). The neuroses. Washington,, DC: Butterworth., Laughlin, H. (1979). The ego and its defenses. New, York: Aronson., Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., &, Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of, sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States., Chicago: University of Chicago Press., Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco,, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process:, The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in, interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251., Laursen, B., Coy, K. C., & Collins, W. A. (1998)., Reconsidering changes in parent-child conflict, across adolescence: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 69, 817–832., Lauzen, M. M., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). You look, mahvelous: An examination of gender and appearance comments in the 1999–2000 prime-time, season. Sex Roles, 46(11/12), 429–437., Lavine, H., Sweeney, D., & Wagner, S. H. (1999)., Depicting women as sex objects in television advertising: Effects on body dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8),, 1049–1058., Lay, C. H. (1992). Trait procrastination and the, perception of person-task characteristics. Journal, of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 483–494., Lay, C. H. (1995). Trait procrastination, agitation,, dejection, and self-discrepancy. In J. R. Ferrari, J. L., Johnson, & W. G. McCown (Eds.), Procrastination

Page 624 :
and task avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment. New York: Plenum., Lay, C. H., Edwards, J. M., Parker, J. D. A., &, Endler, N. S. (1989). An assessment of appraisal, anxiety, coping, and procrastination during an, examination period. European Journal of Personality, 3, 195–208., Lazarus, A. A. (1989). Multimodal therapy. In R. J., Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current psychotherapies. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock., Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation., New York: Oxford., Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Why we should think of, stress as a subset of emotion. In L. Goldberger &, S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical, and clinical aspects (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press., Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer., Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and, its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the, investment model. Personal Relationships, 10(1),, 37–57., Leadbeater, B., & Way, N. (1995). Urban adolescent, girls: Resisting stereotypes. New York: University, Press., Leahy, J. M. (1993). A comparison of depression in, women bereaved of a spouse, a child, or a parent., Omega, 26, 207–217., Leana, C. R., & Feldman, D. C. (1991). Gender, differences in responses to unemployment. Journal, of Vocational Behavior, 38, 65–77., Leary, M. R. (2004). The function of self-esteem in, terror management theory and sociometer theory:, Comment on Pyszczynski et al. (2004). Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 478–482., Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental, social psychology (Vol. 32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press., Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., &, Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3),, 519–530., Leary, M. R., Tchividjian, L. R., & Kraxberger,, B. E. (1994). Self-presentation can be hazardous to, your health: Impression management and health, risk. Health Psychology, 13, 461–470., Leavitt, F. (1995). Drugs and behavior (3rd ed.)., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Leavitt, F. (2001). Iatrogenic recovered memories:, Examining the empirical evidence. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19(2), 21–32., LeBlanc, M. M., & Barling, J. (2004). Workplace, aggression. Current Directions in Psychological, Science, 13(1), 9–12., LeBoeuf, M. (1980, February). Managing time, means managing yourself. Business Horizons, pp., 41–46., Le Bourdais, C. E., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, E., (2004). Changes in conjugal life in Canada: Is, cohabitation progressively replacing marriage?, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 929–942., Leckman, J. F., Grice, D. E., Boardman, J., Zhang,, H., Vitale, A., Bondi, C., Alsobrook, J., Peterson,, B. S., Cohen, D. J., Rasmussen, S. A., Goodman,, W. K., McDougle, C. J., & Pauls, D. L. (1997)., Symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder., American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 911–917., Ledray, L. E. (1994). Recovering from rape (2nd, ed.). New York: Henry Holt., Lee, G. R. (1988). Marital satisfaction in later life:, The effects of nonmarital roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 775–783., Lee, G. R., Willetts, M. C., & Seccombe, K. (1998)., Widowhood and depression. Research on Aging,, 20, 611–630., Lee, I.-M., Rexrode, K. M., Cook, N. R., Manson,, J. E., & Buring, J. E. (2001). Physical activity and, coronary heart disease in women: Is “no pain, no, , gain” passé? Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 1447–1454., Lee, I.-M., & Skerrett, P. J. (2001). Physical activity, and all-cause mortality. What is the dose-response, relation? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33, S459–S471., Lee, R. M., & Ramirez, M. (2000).The history,, current status, and future of multicultural psychotherapy. In I. Cuellar & F. A. Paniagua (Eds.),, Handbook of multicultural mental health: Assessment and treatment of diverse populations. San, Diego: Academic Press., Lee, S., & Katzman, M. A. (2002). Cross-cultural, perspectives on eating disorders. In C. G. Fairburn, & K. D. Brownell (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook. New York: Guilford., Lee, Y. T., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1997). Are Americans more optimistic than the Chinese? Personality, and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 32–40., Lefcourt, H. M. (2001). The humor solution. In, C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping with stress: Effective, people and processes (pp. 68–92). New York: Oxford University Press., Lefcourt, H. M., Davidson, K., Shepherd, R.,, Phillips, M., Prkachin, K., & Mills, D. (1995)., Perspective-taking humor: Accounting for stress, moderation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 373–391., Leff, J., & Vaughn, C. (1985). Expressed emotion in, families. New York: Guilford Press., Lehrer, P. M., & Woolfolk, R. L. (1984). Are stress, reduction techniques interchangeable, or do they, have specific effects? A review of the comparative, empirical literature. In R. L. Woolfolk & P. M., Lehrer (Eds.), Principles and practice of stress management. New York: Guilford Press., Lehrer, P. M., & Woolfolk, R. L. (1993). Specific, effects of stress management techniques. In P. M., Lehrer & R. L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Principles and, practice of stress management (2nd ed.). New York:, Guilford Press., Lehrer, P., Feldman, J., Giardino, N., Song, H., &, Schmaling, K. (2002). Psychological aspects of, asthma. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 70(3), 691–711., Leigh, G. K., Holman, T. B., & Burr, W. R. (1984)., An empirical test of sequence in Murstein’s SVR, Theory of mate selection. Family Relations, 33, 225–231., Leigh, G. K., Holman, T. B., & Burr, W. R. (1987)., Some confusions and exclusions of the SVR theory of dyadic pairing: A response to Murstein., Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 933–937., Leitenberg, H., Detzer, M. J., & Srebnik, D. (1993)., Gender differences in masturbation and the relation of masturbation experience in preadolescence, and/or early adolescence to sexual behavior and, sexual adjustment in young adulthood. Archives of, Sexual Behavior, 22, 87–98., Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual, fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–496., Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2001). Burnout and, health. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer, (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp., 415–426). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Lemack, G. E., Uzzo, R. G., & Poppas, D. P. (1998)., Effects of stress on male reproductive function. In, J. R. Hubbard & E. A. Workman (Eds.), Handbook, of stress medicine: An organ system approach. New, York: CRC Press., Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional, analysis of intimacy, passion, and commitment:, Testing the assumption of the triangular theory of, love. Psychological Reports, 90 (3, Pt. 1),, 1009–1014., Lemme, B. H. (1999). Development in adulthood., Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Leo, J. (1987, January 12). Exploring the traits of, twins. Time, p. 63., Lerman, H. (1986). A mote in Freud’s eye: From, psychoanalysis to the psychology of women. New, York: Springer., , Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A, fundamental decision. New York: Plenum., Lerner, M. J. (1998). The two forms of belief in a, just world: Some thoughts on why and how people, care about justice. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner, (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a, just world: Critical issues in social justice. New York:, Plenum Press., Lesage, A. D., Boyer, R., Grunberg, F., Vanier, C.,, Morissette, R., Menard-Buteau, C., & Loyer, M., (1994). Suicide and mental disorders: A casecontrol study of young men. American Journal of, Psychiatry, 151, 1063–1068., Letherby, G., & Williams, C. (1999). Non-motherhood: Ambivalent autobiographies. Feminist Studies, 25, 719–728., Lett, H. S., Blumenthal, J. A., Babyak, M. A., Sherwood, A., Strauman, T., Robins, C., & Newman,, M. F. (2004). Depression as a risk factor for coronary artery disease: Evidence, mechanisms, and, treatment. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(3),, 305–315., Levant, R. F. (1996). The new psychology of men., Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27,, 259–265., Levant, R. F. (2003, Fall). Why study boys and, men? Nova Southeastern University Center for, Psychological Studies Newsletter, pp. 12–13., Levant, R. F., Barbanel, L., & DeLeon, P. H., (2004). Psychology’s response to terrorism. In, F. M. Moghaddam & A. J. Marsella (Eds.), Understanding terrorism: Psychological roots, consequences,, and interventions. Washington, DC: American, Psychological Association., LeVay, S. (1996). Queer science: The use and abuse, of research into homosexuality. Cambridge, MA:, The MIT Press., Levenson, J. L., McDaniel, J. S., Moran, M. G., &, Stoudemire, A. (1999). Psychological factors affecting medical conditions. In R. E. Hales, S. C., Yudofsky, & J. A. Talbott (Eds.), Textbook of psychiatry (3rd ed., pp. 635–662). Washington, DC:, American Psychiatric Press, Inc., Levenstein, S. (2002). Psychosocial factors in peptic ulcer and inflammatory bowel disease. Journal, of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 70(3), 739–750., Lever, J. (1994, August 24). Sexual revelations. The, Advocate, 17–24., Levin, S., van Laar, C., & Sidanius, J. (2003). The, effects of ingroup and outgroup friendship on, ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study., Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6(1),, 76–92., Levine, M. P., & Harrison, K. (2004). Media’s role, in the perpetuation and prevention of negative, body image and disordered eating. In J. K., Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders and, obesity. New York: Wiley., Levine, R. V., Martinez, T. S., Brase, G., & Sorenson, K. (1994). Helping in 36 U.S. cities. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 67(1), 69–82., Levine, R. V., Sato, S., Hashimoto, T., & Verma, J., (1995). Love and marriage in eleven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(5), 554–571., Levine, S. B. (2003). Erectile dysfunction: Why, drug therapy isn’t always enough. Cleveland Clinic, Journal of Medicine, 70(3), 241–246., Levinson, D. F., Mahtani, M. M., Nancarrow, D. J.,, Brown, D. M., Kruglyak, L., Kirby, A., Hayward,, N. K., Crowe, R. R., Andreasen, N. C., Black,, D. W., Silverman, J. M., Endicott, J., Sharpe, L.,, Mohs, R. C., Siever, L. J., Walters, M. K., lennon,, D. P., Jones, H. L., Nurs, B., Nertney, D. A., Daly,, M. J., Gladis, M., & Mowry, B. J. (1998). Genome, scan of schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 741–750., Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. M., Klein, E. G., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of a, man’s life. New York: Knopf., Levinthal, C. E. (2002). Drugs, behavior, and modern society . Boston: Allyn & Bacon., , References, , 587

Page 625 :
Levis, D. J. (1989). The case for a return to a twofactor theory of avoidance: The failure of non-fear, interpretations. In S. B. Klein & R. R. Bowrer, (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian, conditioning and the status of traditional learning, theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Levy, B., & Langer, E. (1994). Aging free from, negative stereotypes: Successful memory in China, and among the American deaf. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 989–997., Levy, S. M., Herberman, R. B., Simons, A., Whiteside, T., Lee, J., McDonald, R., & Beadle, M., (1989). Persistently low natural killer cell activity, in normal adults: Immunological, hormonal and, mood correlates. Natural Immune Cell Growth, Regulation, 8, 173–186., Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998)., Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role, of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421–1436., Lewin, E. (2004). Does marriage have a future?, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1000–1006., Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality., New York: McGraw-Hill., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Gotlib, I. H. (1995). Behavioral theory and treatment of depression. In E. E., Beckham & W. R. Leber (Eds.), Handbook of depression (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press., Lewinsohn, P. M., Joiner, T. E. Jr., & Rohde, P., (2001). Evaluation of cognitive diathesis-stress, models in predicting major depressive disorder in, adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,, 110(2), 203–215., Lewis, B. P., & Linder, D. E. (1997). Thinking, about choking? Attentional processes and paradoxical performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 937–944., Lewis, D. O., Yeager, C. A., Swica, Y., Pincus, J. H.,, & Lewis, M. (1997). Objective documentation of, child abuse and dissociation in 12 murderers with, dissociative identity disorder. American Journal of, Psychiatry, 154, 1703–1710., Lewis, R. A., & Lin, L.-W. (1996). Adults and their, midlife parents. In N. Vanzetti & S. Duck (Eds.), A, lifetime of relationships (pp. 364–382). Pacific, Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole., Ley, P. (1997). Compliance among patients. In A., Baum, S. Newman, J. Weiman, R. West, & C. McManus (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psychology,, health, and medicine (pp. 281–284). Cambridge,, UK: Cambridge University Press., Libby, P., Ridker, P. M., & Maseri, A. (2002). Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation, 105,, 1135–1143., Liberman, R. P., Kopelowicz, A., Ventura, J., &, Gutkind, D. (2002). Operational criteria and factors related to recovery from schizophrenia. International Review of Psychiatry, 14(4), 256–272., Licata, N. (2002). Should premarital counseling be, mandatory as a requisite to obtaining a marriage, license? Family Court Review, 40, 518–532., Lichter, D. T., Batson, C. D., & Brown, J. B. (2004)., Welfare reform and marriage promotion: The, marital expectations and desires of single and, cohabiting mothers. Social Service Review, 78(1),, 2–25., Lickey, M. E., & Gordon, B. (1991). Medicine and, mental illness: The use of drugs in psychiatry. New, York: Freeman., Lieberman, J. A., Tollefson, G., Tohen, M., Green,, A. I., Gur, R. E., Kahn, R., McEvoy, J., Perkins, D.,, Sharma, T., Zipursky, R., Wei, H., Hamer, R. M., &, HGDH Study Group. (2003). Comparative efficacy and safety of atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in first-episode psychosis: A, randomized double-blind trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol. American Journal of Psychiatry,, 160, 1396–1404., Lieberman, M. A. (1993). Bereavement self-help, groups: A review of conceptual and methodological issues. In M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, & R. O., Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement. New, York: Cambridge University Press., , 588, , References, , Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., &, Trope, Y. (2004). Reflection and reflexion: A social, cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional, inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34). San Diego, CA:, Academic Press., Liebert, R. M., & Liebert, L. L. (1998). Liebert &, Spiegler’s personality strategies and issues. Pacific, Grove: Brooks/Cole., Liebert, R. M., & Sprafkin, J. N. (1988). The early, window: Effects of television on children and youth., New York: Pergamon., Lilenfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Kirsch, I., Chaves, J. F.,, Sarbin, T. R., Ganaway, G. K., & Powell, R. A., (1999). Dissociative identity disorder and the, sociocognitive model: Recalling the lessons of the, past. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 507–523., Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N., (2000). The scientific status of projective tests., Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(2),, 27–66., Lim, G. Y., & Roloff, M. E. (1999). Attributing, sexual consent. Journal of Applied Communication, Research, 27(1), 1–23., Linden, W. (1993). The autogenic training method, of J. H. Schultz. In P. M. Lehrer & R. L. Woolfolk, (Eds.), Principles and practice of stress management, (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press., Lindgren, H. C. (1969). The psychology of college, success: A dynamic approach. New York: Wiley., Lindsay D. S., Hagen, L., Read, J. D., Wade, K. A.,, & Garry, M. (2004). True photographs and false, memories. Psychological Science, 15(3), 149–154., Lindsay, D. S., & Poole, D. A. (1995). Remembering, childhood sexual abuse in therapy: Psychotherapists’ self-reported beliefs, practices, and experiences. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 23, 461–476., Lindsay, D. S., & Read, J. D. (1994). Psychotherapy, and memories of childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8,, 281–338., Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996)., The importance of distinguishing the belief in a, just world for self versus for others: Implications, for psychological well-being. Personality and Social, Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677., Lippa, R. A. (1994). Introduction to social psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole., Lips, H. M. (2005). Sex and gender. New York:, McGraw-Hill., Lisanby, S. H., Maddox, J. H., Prudic, J.,, Devanand, D. P., & Sackeim, H. A. (2000). The, effects of electroconvulsive therapy on memory of, autobiographical and public events. General Psychiatry, 57, 581–590., Livanou, M. (2001). Psychological treatments for, post-traumatic stress disorder: An overview. International Review of Psychiatry, 13(3), 181–188., Lock, R. D. (2000). Taking charge of your career, direction: Career planning guide, book 1. Belmont,, CA: Wadsworth., Lock, R. D. (2005a). Taking charge of your career, direction: Career planning guide, Book 1. Belmont,, CA: Wadsworth., Lock, R. D. (2005b). Job Search: Career Planning, Guide, Book 2. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and environment in, personality development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., Loewenstein, R. J. (1996). Dissociative amnesia, and dissociative fugue. In L. K. Michelson & W. J., Ray (Eds.), Handbook of dissociation: Theoretical,, empirical, and clinical perspectives. New York:, Plenum Press., Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist, 48, 518–537., Loftus, E. F. (1994). The repressed memory controversy. American Psychologist, 49, 443–445., Loftus, E. F. (1997). Creating false memories., Scientific American, 71–75., Loftus, E. F. (1998). Remembering dangerously. In, R. A. Baker (Ed.), Child sexual abuse and false, , memory syndrome. Amherst, NY: Prometheus, Books., Loftus, E. F., & Ketcham, K. (1994). The myth of, repressed memory: False memories and allegations, of sexual abuse. New York: St. Martin’s Press., Longman, D. G., & Atkinson, R. H. (2002). College, learning and study skills. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Lopes, P. N., Brackett, M. A., Nezlek, J. B., Schutz,, A., Sellin, I., & Salovey, P. (2004). Emotional intelligence and social interaction. Personality and, Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1018–1034., Lopez, F. G., & Gormley, B. (2002). Stability and, change in adult attachment style over the first-year, college transition: Relations to self-confidence,, coping, and distress patterns. Journal of Counseling, Psychology, 49(3), 355., Lowinson, J. H., Ruiz, P., Millman, R. B., & Langrod, J. G. (2005). Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams &, Wilkins., Lowman, R. L. (1991). The clinical practice of career assessment: Interests, abilities, and personality., Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Lubkin, I. M. (1990). Illness roles. In I. M. Lubkin, (Ed.), Chronic illness: Impact and interventions, (2nd ed.). Boston: Jones and Bartlett., Luborsky, L., Diguer, L., Seligman, D. A., Rosenthal, R., Krause, E. D., Johnson, S., Halperin, G.,, Bishop, M., Berman, J. S., & Schweizer, E. (1999)., The researcher’s own therapy allegiance: A “wild, card” in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 6(1), 95–106., Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Diguer, L., Andrusyna,, T. P., Berman, J. S., Levitt, J. T., Seligman, D. A., &, Krause, E. D. (2002). The dodo bird verdict is alive, and well—mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science &, Practice, 9, 2–12., Luborsky, L., Singer, B., & Luborsky, L. (1975)., Comparative studies of psychotherapies: Is it true, that everyone has won and all must have prizes?, Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 995–1008., Lucas, A. R., Beard, C. M., O’Fallon, W. M., &, Kurland, L. T. (1991). 50-year trends in the incidence of anorexia nervosa in Rochester, Minn.: A, population-based study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 917–922., Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener,, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and set point, model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539., Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener,, E. (2004). Unemployment alters the set point for, life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15(1), 8–13., Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628., Ludwig, D. S., Pereira, M. A., Kroenke, C. H.,, Hilner, J. E., Van Horn, L., Slattery, M. L., & Jacobs, D. R. Jr. (1999). Dietary fiber, weight gain,, and cardiovascular disease risk factors in young, adults. Journal of the American Medical Association,, 282(16), 1539–1546., Luecke-Aleska, D., Anderson, D. R., Collins, P. A.,, & Schmitt, K. L. (1995). Gender constancy and, television viewing. Developmental Psychology, 31,, 773–780., Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective, self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social, identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,, 18, 302–318., Lulofs, R. S. (1994). Conflict: From theory to action., Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbuck Publishers., Lulofs, R. S., & Cahn, D. D. (2000). Conflict: From, theory to action (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Lundberg, U. (2000). Catecholamines. In G. Fink, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 1, pp. 408–413)., San Diego: Academic Press., Lundeburg, K., Stith, S. M., Penn, C. E., & Ward,, D. B. (2004). A comparison of nonviolent, psychologically violent, and physically violent male col-

Page 626 :
lege daters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,, 19(10), 1191–1200., Lutz, C. J., & Ross, S. R. (2003). Elaboration versus, fragmentation: Distinguishing between selfcomplexity and self-concept differentiation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(5), 537–559., Lye, D. N., & Biblarz, T. J. (1993). The effects of, attitudes toward family life and gender roles on, marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 14,, 157–188., Lye, D., & Waldron, I. (1997). Attitudes toward, cohabitation, family, and gender roles: Relationships to values and political ideology. Sociological, Perspectives, 40, 199–225., Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses, and abuses of the lie detector. New York: Plenum, Press., Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Tellegen, A., &, Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1992). Emergenesis: Genetic, traits that may not run in families. American Psychologist, 47(12), 1565–1577., Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a, stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7,, 186–189., Lynn, D. J., & Vaillant, G. E. (1998). Anonymity,, neutrality, and confidentiality in the actual methods of Sigmund Freud: A review of 43 cases,, 1907–1939. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155,, 163–171., Lynn, M., & Mynier, K. (1993). Effects of server, posture on restaurant tipping. Journal of Applied, Social Psychology, 23, 678–685., Lynn, M., & Shurgot, B. A. (1984). Responses to, lonely hearts advertisements: Effects of reported, physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10,, 349–357., Lynn, S. J., & Nash, M. (1994). Truth in memory:, Ramifications for psychotherapy and hypnotherapy. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 36,, 194–208., Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’, differential socialization of boys and girls: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296., Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A, developmental account. American Psychologist, 45,, 513–520., Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up, apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, Press., Maccoby, E. E. (2000). Parenting and its effects on, children: On reading and misreading behavior, genetics. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 1–27., Maccoby, E. E. (2002). Gender and group, processes: A developmental perspective. Current, Direction in Psychological Science, 11(2), 54–58., Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child, interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & E. M., Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social, development. New York: Wiley., MacDonald, G., Saltzman, J. L., & Leary, M. R., (2003). Social approval and trait self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 23–40., MacDonald, T. K., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T., (1996). Why common sense goes out the window:, Effects of alcohol on intentions to use condoms., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8),, 763–775., MacGeorge, E. L., Graves, A. R., Feng, B., Gillihan,, S. J., & Burleson, B. R. (2004). The myth of gender, cultures: Similarities outweigh differences in men’s, and women’s provision of and responses to supportive communication. Sex Roles, 50(3/4),, 143–175., Macionis, J. J. (1997). Sociology (6th ed.). Upper, Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall., Mack, A. H., Franklin Jr., J. E., & Frances, R. J., (2003). Substance use disorders. In R. E. Hales &, , S. C. Yudofsky (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing., MacKenzie, R. A. (1997). The time trap. New York:, AMACOM., Mackie, D. M., Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G., (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 58, 812–822., MacMillan, H. L., Fleming, J. E., Streiner, D. L.,, Lin, E., Boyle, M. H., Jamieson, E., Duku, E. K.,, Walsh, C. A., Wong, M. Y. Y., & Beardslee, W. R., (2001). Childhood abuse and lifetime, psychopathology in a community sample. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1878–1883., MacMillian, H. L., Fleming, J. E., Trocme, N.,, Boyle, M. H., Wong, M., Racine, Y. A., Beardslee,, W. R., & Offord, D. R. (1997). Prevalence of child, physical and sexual abuse in the community: Results from the Ontario health supplement. Journal, of the American Medical Association, 278, 131–135., Macmillan, M. (1991). Freud evaluated: The completed arc. Amsterdam: North-Holland., Maddi, S. R. (1989). Personality theories: A comparative analysis. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press., Maddi, S. R. (1999). Comments on trends in hardiness: Research and theorizing. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 51(2),, 67–71., Maddi, S. R. (2002). The story of hardiness:, Twenty years of theorizing, research, and practice., Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 54(3), 175–185., Maddi, S. R., & Hightower, M. (1999). Hardiness, and optimism as expressed in coping patterns., Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 51(2), 95–105., Maddox, G. L. (2001). Housing and living, arrangements. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George, (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences., San Diego: Academic Press., Maddux, J. E., & Gosselin, J. T. (2003). Self-efficacy., In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of, self and identity. New York: Guilford., Maher, B. A. (2001). Delusions. In P. B. Sutker &, H. E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of, psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 309–370). New York:, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers., Maheu, M., & Subotnik, R. (2001). Infidelity and, the Internet: Virtual relationships and real betrayal., New York: Sourcebooks., Mahoney, M. J. (1979). Self-change: Strategies for, solving personal problems. New York: Norton., Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for, identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented, during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M. T., Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings, (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory,, research, and intervention. Chicago: University of, Chicago Press., Maisey, D. S., Vale, E. L. E., Cornelissen, P. L., &, Tovee, M. J. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. Lancet, 353, 1500., Major, B., Barr, L., Zubeck, J., & Babey, S. H., (1999). Gender and self-esteem: A meta-analysis., In W. B. Swann, Jr., J. H. Langlois, & L. A. Gilbert, (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society:, The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp., 223–254). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Major, B., Schmidlin, A. M., & Williams, L., (1990). Gender patterns in social touch: The impact of setting and age. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 58, 634–643., Maldonado, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2003). Dissociative disorders. In R. E. Hales & S. C. Yudofsky, (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry. Washington,, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing., Malefo, V. (2000). Psycho-social factors and academic performance among African women students at a predominantly white university in South, Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 30(4),, 40–45., , Malina, R. M. (1990). Physical growth and performance during the transitional years (9–16). In, G. R. Adams & T. P. Gullota (Eds.), From childhood, to adolescence: A transitional period? Newbury Park,, CA: Sage., Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). Which behaviors, do people explain? A basic actor-observer asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 72, 288–304., Mallen, M. J., Day, S. X., & Green, M. A. (2003)., Online versus face-to-face conversations: An examination of relational and discourse variable., Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training,, 40(1–2), 155–163., Mallory, M. (2001, June 24). Make style work. The, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, p. R1., Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (1983). A cultural, approach to male-female miscommunication. In, J. A. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity., New York: Cambridge University Press., Mandler, G. (1993). Thought, memory, and learning: Effects of emotional stress. In L. Goldberger &, S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical, and clinical aspects (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press., Manian, N., Strauman, T. J., & Denney, N. (1998)., Temperament, recalled parenting styles, and selfregulation: Testing the developmental postulates, of self-discrepancy theory. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1321–1332., Mann, J., Tarantola, D. J. M., & Netter, T. W., (1992). A global report: AIDS in the world. New, York: Oxford University Press., Manning, W. D. (2004). Children and the stability, of cohabiting couples. Journal of Mariage and, Family, 66, 674–689., Manson, J. E., Skerrett, P. J., & Willett, W. C., (2002). Epidemiology of health risks associated, with obesity. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell, (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 422–428). New York: Guilford., Marangell, L. B., Silver, J. M., Goff, D. C., & Yudofsky, S. C. (2003). Psychopharmacology and electroconvulsive therapy. In R. E. Hales, & S. C., Yudofsky (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing., Marcenes, W. G., & Sheiham, A. (1992). The relationship between work stress and oral health status. Social Science and Medicine, 35, 1511., Marchand, J. F., & Hock, E. (2000). Avoidance and, attacking conflict-resolution strategies among, married couples: Relations to depressive symptoms and marital satisfaction. Family Relations,, 49(2), 201–206., Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In, J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley., Marcia, J. E. (1991). Identity and self-development., In R. M. Lerner, A. C. Petersen, & J. Brooks-Gunn, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 1). New, York: Garland., Marcus-Newhall, A., Pedersen, W. C., Carlson,, M., & Miller, N. (2000). Displaced aggression is, alive and well: A meta-analytic review. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 670–689., Marder, S. R. (2000). Schizophrenia: Somatic, treatment. In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.),, Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of, psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1199–1209)., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Marder, S. R., & van Kammen, D. P. (2000)., Dopamine receptor antagonists (typical antipsychotics). In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.),, Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of, psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 2356–2376)., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Maracek, J. (2001). Disorderly constructs: Feminist frameworks for clinical psychology. In R. K., Unger (Ed.), Handbook of women and gender. New, York: Wiley., Mariani, M. (2001, Summer). Distance learning in, post-secondary education. Occupational Outlook, Quarterly, pp. 2–10., , References, , 589

Page 627 :
Maris, R. W., Berman, A. L., & Silverman, M. M., (2000). Comprehensive textbook of suicidology. New, York: Guilford., Marker, N. F. (1996). Flying solo at midlife: Gender, marital status, and psychological well-being., Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 917–932., Markey, P. M. (2000). Bystander intervention in, computer-mediated communication. Computers, in Human Behavior, 16(2), 183–188., Markides, K. S., & Krause, N. (1985). Intergenerational solidarity and psychological well-being among, older Mexican Americans: A three-generations, study. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 390–392., Marks, I. M. (1969). Fears and phobias. New York:, Academic Press., Marks, N. F., Lambert, J. D., & Choi, H. (2002)., Transitions to caregiving, gender, and psychological well-being: A prospective U. S. national study., Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 657–667., Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and, the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and, motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253., Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves., American Psychologist, 41, 954–969., Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic selfconcept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337., Marsella, A. J. (2004). Reflections on international, terrorism: Issues, concepts, and directions. In F. M., Moghaddam & A. J. Marsella (Eds.), Understanding terrorism: Psychological roots, consequences, and, interventions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. (2003). Big-fish-littlepond effect on academic self-concept: A crosscultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of, academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364–376., Marsh, H. W., & Parker, J. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a, relatively large fish in a small pond even if you, don’t learn to swim well? Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 47, 213–231., Marsh, P. (Ed). (1988). Eye to eye: How people, interact. Topsfield, MA: Salem House., Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. (2004). Children’s, search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on, gender development. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 13(2), 67–70., Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002)., Cognitive theories of early gender development., Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 903–933., Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Social-influence, prcoesses of control and change: Comformity, obedience to authority, and innovation. In M. A. Hogg, & J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social, psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications., Martin, R., & Leventhal, H. (2004). Symptom, perception and health care–seeking behavior. In, J. M. Raczynski & L. C. Leviton (Eds.), Handbook, of clinical health psychology: Vol. 2. Disorders of, behavior and health. Washington, DC: American, Psychological Association., Martin, R., Rothrock, N., Leventhal, H., & Leventhal, E. (2003). Common sense models of illness:, Implications for symptom perception and healthrelated behaviors. In J. Suls & K. A. Wallston, (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health, and illness. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing., Martin, R. A. (1996). The situational humor response questionnaire (SHRQ) and coping humor, scale (CHS): A decade of research findings., Humor: International Journal of Humor Research,, 9, 251–272., Martin, R. A. (2001). Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research, findings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 504–519., Martin, R. A. (2002). Is laughter the best medicine? Humor, laughter, and physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(6),, 216–220., , 590, , References, , Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of, humor as a moderator of the relation between, stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 45, 1313–1324., Martin, T. C., & Bumpass, L. L. (1989). Recent, trends in marital disruption. Demography, 26,, 37–51., Martin-Krumm, C. P., Sarrazin, P. G., Peterson,, C., & Famose, J. (2003). Explanatory style and, resilience after sports failure. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(7), 1685–1695., Masheter, C. (1997). Healthy and unhealthy, friendship and hostility between ex-spouses. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 463–475., Masi, L., & Bilezikian, J. P. (1997). Osteoporosis:, New hope for the future. International Journal of, Fertility and Women’s Medicine, 42, 245–254., Maslach, C. (2003). Job burnout: New directions, in research and intervention. Current Directions in, Psychological Science, 12(5), 189–192., Maslach, C., & Goldberg, J. (1998). Prevention of, burnout: New perspectives. Applied and Preventive, Psychology, 7, 63–74., Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth, about burnout. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2000). Burnout. In, G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 1, pp., 358–362). San Diego: Academic Press., Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being., New York: Van Nostrand., Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality., New York: Harper & Row., Mason, M. A. (1998). The modern American stepfamily: Problems and possibilities. In M. A., Mason, A. Skolnick, & S. D. Sugarman (Eds.), All, our families: New policies for a new century. New, York: Oxford University Press., Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience, processes in development. American Psychologist,, 56(3), 227–238., Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human, sexual response. Boston: Little, Brown., Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1970). Human, sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little, Brown., Masters, W. H., Johnson, V. E., & Kolodny, R. C., (1988). Human sexuality. Glenview, IL: Scott,, Foresman., Mathew, R., Wilson, W., Blazer, D., & George, L., (1993). Psychiatric disorders in adult children of, alcoholics: Data from the epidemiologic catchment area project. American Journal of Psychiatry,, 150, 793–796., Mathews, C. A., & Reus, V. I. (2001). Assortative, mating in the affective disorders: A systematic, review and meta-analysis. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 42(4), 257–262., Matlin, M. W. (2000). The psychology of women, (4th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace., Matlin, M. W. (2004). The psychology of women, (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Matsumoto, D. (1994). People: Psychology from a, cultural perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole., Matthews, K. A. (1992). Myths and realities of, menopause. Psychosomatic Medicine, 54, 1–9., Maume, D. J., Jr. (1999). Glass ceilings and glass, escalators: Occupational segregation and race and, sex differences in managerial promotions. Work, and Occupations, 26(4), 483–509., Maurer, L. (1999). Transgressing sex and gender:, Deconstruction zone ahead? SIECUS Report, 27,, 14–21., Mayer, J. D., Perkins, D. M., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2001). Emotional intelligence and giftedness. Roeper Review, 23, 131–137., Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2002)., Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, (MSCEIT): User’s manual. Toronto, Canada:, Multi-Health Systems., Mays, V. M., & Albee, G. W. (1992). Psychotherapy, and ethnic minorities. In D. K. Freedheim (Ed.),, , History of psychotherapy: A century of change (pp., 552–570). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Mazzuca, J. (2003, March 25). Open dialogue:, Parents talk to teens about sex. Retrieved January, 25, 2005 from http://www.Gallup.Com/Poll/, Content/?Ci=8047., McAdams, D. P. (1988). Power, intimacy, and the, life story. New York: Guilford Press., McAdams, D. P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R., (1993). Generativity in young, midlife, and older, adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230., McAllister, W. R., & McAllister, D. E. (1995)., Two-factor fear theory: Implications from understanding anxiety-based clinical phenomena. In, W. O’Donohue & L. Krasner (Eds.), Theories of, behavior therapy: Exploring behavior change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., McCarthy, B. W., Bodnar, L. E., & Handal, M., (2004). Integrating sex therapy and couple therapy. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher, (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., McCarty, R., & Pacak, K. (2000). Alarm phase and, general adaptation syndrome. In G. Fink (Ed.),, Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 1, pp. 126–130). San, Diego: Academic Press., McCrae, R. R. (1984). Situational determinants of, coping responses: Loss, threat and challenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46,, 919–928., McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of, experimental openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120,, 323–337., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1984). Emerging, lives, enduring dispositions: Personality in adulthood. Boston: Little, Brown., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation, of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1990). Personality, in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American, Psychologist, 52, 509–516., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A fivefactor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P., John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and, research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York: The, Guilford Press., McCullough, M. E. (2001). Forgiving. In C. R., Snyder (Ed.), Coping with stress: Effective people, and processes (pp. 93–113). New York: Oxford, University Press., McCullough, M. E., Bellah, C. G., Kilpatrick, S. D.,, & Johnson, J. L. (2001). Vengefulness: Relationships with forgiveness, rumination, well-being,, and the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology, Bulletin, 27(5), 601–610., McCullough, M. E., & Witvliet, C. V. (2002). The, psychology of forgiveness. In C. R. Synder & S. J., Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. New, York: Oxford University Press., McDaniel, M. A., Waddill, P. J., & Shakesby, P. S., (1996). Study strategies, interest, and learning from, text: The application of material appropriate processing. In D. J. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog,, P. Hertel, & M. K. Johnson (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research: Theory in context (Vol. 1)., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., McDougle, L. G. (1987). Time management: Making every minute count. In A. D. Timpe (Ed.), The, management of time. New York: Facts on File., McEwen, B. S. (2000). Stress, definitions and concepts of. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress, (Vol. 3, pp. 508–509). San Diego: Academic Press., McEwen, B. S., & Lasley, E. N. (2002). The end of, stress as we know it. Washington, DC: Joseph, Henry Press., McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., & Abalakina-Paap,, M. A. (1992). Authoritarianism in the former

Page 628 :
Soviet Union. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 63(6), 1004–1010., McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S., & Djintcharadze,, N. (1996). Russian authoritarianism two years, after communism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(2), 210–217., McFarlane, M., Bull, S. S., & Rietmeijer, C. A., (2000). The Internet as a newly emerging risk, environment for sexually transmitted diseases., Journal of the American Medical Association, 284,, 443–446., McGee-Cooper, A., & Trammell, D. (1994). Time, management for unmanageable people. New York:, Bantam Books., McGlashan, T. H., & Fenton, W. S. (1992). The, positive-negative distinction in schizophrenia:, Review of natural history validators. Archives of, General Psychiatry, 49, 63–72., McGlashan, T. H., & Hoffman, R. E. (2000). Schizophrenia: Psychodynamic to neurodynamic theories. In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan, and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1159–1168). Philadelphia:, Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., McGlashan, T. H., Mohr, D. C., Beutler, L. E.,, Engle, D., Shoham-Salomon, V., Bergan, J., Kaszniak, A. W., & Yost, E. B. (1990). Identification of, patients at risk for nonresponse and negative outcome in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and, Clinical Psychology, 58, 622–628., McGoldrick, M. (1999). Becoming a couple. In, B. Carter & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), The expanded, family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 231–248). Boston: Allyn &, Bacon., McGraw, L. A., & Walker, A. J. (2004). The more, things change, the more they stay the same. In, M. Coleman & L. H. Ganong (Eds.), Handbook of, contemporary families: Considering the past, contemplating the future. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., McGraw, P. C. (1999). Life strategies: Doing what, works, doing what matters. New York: Hyperion, Press., McGregor, H. A., Lieberman, J. D., Greenberg, J.,, Solomon, S., Arndt, J., Simon, L., & Pyszczynski,, T. (1998). Terror management and aggression:, Evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldview-threatening others. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3),, 590–605., McGuigan, F. J. (1993). Progressive relaxation:, Origins, principles, and clinical applications. In, P. M. Lehrer & R. L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Principles and, practice of stress management (2nd ed.). New York:, Guilford Press., McGuire, P. A. (1999, May). Worker stress, health, reaching critical point. APA Monitor, 30(5), 1, 27., McHugh, P. R. (1995). Dissociative identity disorder as a socially constructed artifact. Journal of, Practical Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, 1,, 158–166., McKay, A., & Holoway, P. (1997). Sexual health, education: A study of adolescents’ opinions, selfperceived needs, and current and preferred sources, of information. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6, 29–38., McKay, M., Davis, M., & Fanning, P. (1995). Messages: The communication skills book. Oakland, CA:, New Harbinger., McKay, M., & Fanning, P. (2000). Self-esteem (3rd, ed.). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger., McKeever, V. M., & Huff, M. E. (2003). A diathesisstress model of posttraumatic stress disorder:, Ecological, biological and residual stress pathways., Review of General Psychology, 7(3), 237–250., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9, from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet, for personality and social psychology. Personality, and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 57–75., McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A., & Gleason, M., (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet:, What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues,, 58, 9–31., , McKenna, M. C., Zevon, M. A., Corn, B., &, Rounds, J. (1999). Psychosocial factors and the, development of breast cancer: A meta-analysis., Health Psychology, 18(5), 520–531., McLean, D. E., & Link, B. G. (1994). Unraveling, complexity: Strategies to refine concepts, measures, and research designs in the study of life, events and mental health. In W. R. Avison & I. H., Gotlib (Eds.), Stress and mental health: Contemporary issues and prospects for the future. New York:, Plenum Press., McManus, P. A., & DiPrete, T. (2001). Losers and, winners: Financial consequences of separation and, divorce for men. American Sociological Review, 66,, 246–268., McNally, R. J. (1994). Cognitive bias in panic disorder. Current Directions in Psychological Science,, 3, 129–132., McNally, R. J. (1996). Panic disorder: A critical, analysis. New York: Guilford Press., McNally, R. J. (2004). Is traumatic amnesia nothing but psychiatric folklore? Cognitive Behaviour, Therapy, 33(2), 97–101., McNeil, T. F., Cantor-Graae, E., & Ismail, B., (2000). Obstetrics complications and congenital, malformation in schizophrenia. Brain Research, Reviews, 31, 166–178., McWhirter, B. T. (1990). Loneliness: A review of, current literature, with implications for counseling, and research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 68, 417–422., McWilliams, N., & Weinberger, J. (2003). Psychodynamic psychotherapy. In G. Stricker & T. A., Widiger (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 8., Clinical psychology. New York: Wiley., Mead, M. (1950). Sex and temperament in three, primitive societies. New York: Mentor Books., Mechanic, D. (1999). Mental health and mental, illness. In A. V. Horvitz & T. L. Scheid (Eds.), A, handbook for the study of mental health: Social, contexts, theories, and systems. New York: Cambridge University Press., Mednick, S. A., Machon, R. A., Huttunen, M. O., &, Bonett, D. (1988). Adult schizophrenia following, prenatal exposure to an influenza epidemic., Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 189–192., Mednick, S. A., Watson, J. B., Huttunen, M., Cannon, T. D., Katila, H., Machon, R., Mednick, B.,, Hollister, M., Parnas, J., Schulsinger, F.,, Sajaniemi, N., Voldsgaard, P., Pyhala, R.,, Gutkind, D., & Wang, X. (1998). A two-hit working model of the etiology of schizophrenia. In, M. F. Lenzenweger & R. H. Dworkin (Eds.), Origins and development of schizophrenia: Advances in, experimental psychopathology. Washington DC:, American Psychological Association., Medora, N. P., Larson, J. H., Hortacsu, N., & Dave,, P. (2002). Perceived attitudes towards romanticism: A cross-cultural study of American, AsianIndian, and Turkish young adults. Journal of, Comparative Family Studies, 33(2), 155–178., Meehan, P. J., Lamb, J. A., Saltzman, L. E., &, O’Carroll, P. W. (1992). Attempted suicide among, young adults: Progress toward a meaningful estimate of prevalence. American Journal of Psychiatry,, 149, 41–44., Meeks, B. S., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C., (1998). Communication, love and relationship, satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), 755–773., Meeus, W. (1996). Studies on identity development in adolescence: An overview of research and, some new data. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,, 25(5), 569–598., Meichenbaum, D. (1993). Stress inoculation training: A 20-year update. In P. M. Lehrer & R. L., Woolfolk (Eds.), Principles and practice of stress, management (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press., Mellers, B. A., Richards, V., & Birnbaum, M. H., (1992). Distributional theories of impression, formation. Organizational Behavior and Human, Decision Processes, 51, 313–343., , Meltzer, H. Y., Davidson, M., Glassman, A. H., &, Vieweg, V. R. (2002). Assessing cardiovascular, risks versus clinical benefits of atypical antipsychotic drug treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 63(9), 25–29., Merton, R. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy., Antioch Review, 8, 193–210., Meschke, L., Bartholomae, S., & Zentall, S., (2000). Adolsecent sexuality and parent-adolescent processes: Promoting healthy teen choices., Family Relations, 49, 143–154., Metz, M. E., & Pryor, J. L. (2000). Premature ejaculation: A psychological approach for assessment, and management. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 293–320., Metzger, E. D. (1999). Electroconvulsive therapy., In A. M. Nicholi (Ed.), The Harvard guide to psychiatry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., Meyer, I. H. (2003). Minority stress and mental, health in gay men. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian,, gay, and bisexual experiences. New York: Columbia, University Press., Michael, R. T., Gagnon, J. H., Laumann, E. O., &, Kolata, G. (1994). Sex in America. Boston: Little,, Brown., Michaels, S. (1996). The prevalence of homosexuality in the United States. In R. P. Cabaj & T. S., Stein (Eds.), Textbook of homosexuality and mental, health (pp. 43–64). Washington, DC: American, Psychiatric Press., Michaud, S. L., & Warner, R. M. (1997). Gender, differences in self-reported response to troubles, talk. Sex Roles, 37(7–8), 527–540., Mickelson, K. D., Kessler, R. C., & Shaver, P. R., (1997). Adult attachment in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 73, 1092–1106., Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Tolmacz, R. (1990)., Attachment styles and fear of personal death: A, case study of affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 273–280., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation,, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In, Mark P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental, Social Psychology (Vol. 35). San Diego: Academic, Press., Milgram, N., Marshevsky, S., & Sadeh, C. (1995)., Correlates of academic procrastination: Discomfort, task aversiveness, and task capability. Journal, of Psychology, 129, 145–155., Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,, 67, 371–378., Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New, York: Harper & Row., Milkie, M. A., & Peltola, P. (1999). Playing all the, roles: Gender and the work-family balancing act., Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 476–490., Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases, in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?, Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225., Miller, G. P. (1978). Life choices: How to make the, critical decisions—about your education, career,, marriage, family, life style. New York: Thomas Y., Crowell., Miller, I. J. (1996). Managed care is harmful to, outpatient mental health services: A call for accountability. Professional Psychology: Research and, Practice, 27, 349–363., Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development, of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961–978., Miller, L. C., Berg, J. H., & Archer, R. L. (1983)., Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate selfdisclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–1244., Miller, M. L., & Thayer, J. F. (1988). On the nature, of self-monitoring: Relationships with adjustment, and identity. Personality and Social Psychology, Bulletin, 14, 544–553., , References, , 591

Page 629 :
Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the, behavior disorders (Vol. 1). New York: Ronald., Miller, N. E. (1959). Liberalization of basic S-R, concepts: Extension to conflict behavior, motivation, and social learning. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science. (Vol. 2). New York:, McGraw-Hill., Miller, R. S. (1991). On decorum in close relationships: Why aren’t we polite to those we love? Contemporary Social Psychology, 15, 63–65., Miller, T. (2000). Diagnostic evaluation of erectile, dysfunction. American Family Physician, 61,, 95–104., Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. Garden City, NY:, Doubleday., Millman, R. B., & Beeder, A. B. (1994). The new, psychedelic culture: LSD, ecstasy, “rave” parties, and the Grateful Dead. Psychiatric Annals, 24(3),, 148–150., Mino, I., Profit, W. E., & Pierce, C. M. (2000)., Minorities and stress. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 1, pp. 771–776). San Diego: Academic Press., Minuchin, S., Rosman, B. L., & Baker, L. (1978)., Psychosomatic families: Anorexia nervosa in context., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social, learning conceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283., Mischel, W. (1990). Personality dispositions revisited and revised: A view after three decades. In, L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory, and research. New York: Guilford Press., Mischel, W., & Mischel, H. N. (1976). A cognitive, social learning approach to morality and selfregulation. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development, and behavior: Theory, research and social issues., New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston., Mischel, W., & Morf, C. C. (2003). The self as a, psycho-social dynamic processing system: A metaperspective on a century of the self in psychology., In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of, self and identity. New York: Guilford., Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Peake, P. K. (1988). The, nature of adolescent competencies predicted by, preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 687–696., Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., & Schmitt, J. (2001). The, state of working America 2000–2001. Ithaca, NY:, Cornell University Press., Mitchell, V. F. (1987). Rx for improving staff effectiveness. In A. D. Timpe (Ed.), The management of, time. New York: Facts on File., Mittlehauser, M. (1998). The outlook for college, graduates, 1996–2006: Prepare yourself. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 42(2), 2–9., Miyamoto, S., Lieberman, J. A., Fleischhacker,, W. W., Aoba, A., & Marder, S. R. (2003). Antipsychotic drugs. In A. Tasman, J. Kay, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New York: Wiley., Miyamoto, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2002). Cultural, variation in correspondence bias: The critical role, of attitude diagnosticity of socially constrained, behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1239–1248., Moak, D. H., & Anton, R. F. (1999). Alcohol. In, B. S. McCrady & E. E. Epstein (Eds.), Addictions:, A comprehensive guidebook (pp. 75–94). New York:, Oxford University Press., Modestin, J. (1992). Multiple personality disorder, in Switzerland. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149,, 88–92., Modestin, J., Huber, A., Satirli, E. , Malti, T., &, Hell, D. (2003). Long-term course of schizophrenic, illness: Bleuler’s study reconsidered. American, Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 2202–2208., Moen, P., Fields, V., Quick, H. E., & Hofmeister,, H. (2000). A life course approach to retirement, and social integration. In K. Pillemer & P. Moen, (Eds.), Social integration in the second half of life., Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press., , 592, , References, , Mohren, D. C. L., Swaen, G. M. H., Borm, P. J. A.,, Bast, A., & Galama, J. M. D. (2001). Psychological, job demands as a a risk factor for common cold in, a Dutch working population. Journal of, Psychomatic Research, 50(1), 21–27., Mokdad, A. H., Marks, J. S., Stroup, D. F., & Gerberding, J. L. (2004). Actual causes of death in the, United States, 2000. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 1238–1245., Möller, J., Hallqvist, J., Diderichsen, F., Theorell,, T., Reuterwall, C., & Ahlbom, A. (1999). Do, episodes of anger trigger myocardial infarction? A, case-crossover analysis in the Stockholm heart, epidemiology program (SHEEP). Psychosomatic, Medicine, 61, 842–849., Moncrieff, J. (2001). Are antidepressants overrated? A review of methodological problems in, antidepressant trials. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 189, 288–295., Monroe, S. M., & Hadjiyannakis, K. (2002). The, social environment and depression: Focusing on, severe life stress. In I. H. Gotlib & C. L. Hammen, (Eds.), Handbook of depression. New York: Guilford., Monroe, S. M., & Kelley, J. M. (1995). Measurement of stress appraisal. In S. Cohen, R. C. Kessler,, & L. U. Gordon (Eds.), Measuring stress: A guide, for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford, University Press., Monroe, S. M., & McQuaid, J. R. (1994). Measuring life stress and assessing its impact on mental, health. In W. R. Avison & I. H. Gotlib (Eds.), Stress, and mental health: Contemporary issues and, prospects for the future. New York: Plenum., Montepare, J. M., & Lachman, M. (1989). “You’re, only as old as you feel”: Self-perceptions of age,, fears of aging, and life satisfaction from adolescence to old age. Psychology and Aging, 4(1),, 73–78., Moore, D. W. (2001, August 31). Most American, workers satisfied with their job: One-third would, be happier in another job. [On-line]. The Gallup, Organization. Available: www.gallup.com/poll/, releases/pr010831.asp. Retrieved 1/19/2002., Moore, D. W. (2003, January 3). Family, health, most important aspects of life. Retrieved January 20,, 2005, from http://www.Gallup.Com/Poll/Content/, ?Ci=7504., Moore, D. W. (2004, May 20). Modest rebound in, public acceptance of homosexuals. Retrieved January 31, 2005 from http://www.Gallup.Com/Poll/, Content/?Ci=11755., Moore, M. K. (1992). An empirical investigation of, the relationship between religiosity and death, concern. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53,, 527., Moore, N. B., & Davidson, J. K. (1997). Guilt, about first intercourse: An antecedent of sexual, dissatisfaction among college women. Journal of, Sex and Marital Therapy, 23, 29–46., Moos, R. H., & Billings, A. G. (1982). Conceptualizing and measuring coping resources and, processes. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.),, Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects., New York: Free Press., Moos, R. H., & Schaefer, J. A. (1993). Coping resources and processes: Current concepts and measures. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.),, Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects, (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press., Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2000)., Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet, use among college students. Computers in Human, Behavior, 16(1), 13–29., Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003)., Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 659–671., Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening:, Affective cues and the influence of instructions., Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11,, 56–60., Morell, C. (2000). Saying no: Women’s experiences, with reproductive refusal. Feminism & Psychology,, 10, 313–322., , Moretti, M. M., & Higgins, E. T. (1990). Relating, self-discrepancy to self-esteem: The contribution, of discrepancy beyond actual-self ratings. Journal, of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 108–123., Morgan, H. J., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1994). Victims’ responses to traumatic life events: An unjust, world or an uncaring world? Social Justice Research,, 7, 47–68., Morgan, M. J. (2000). Ecstasy (MDMA): A review, of its possible persistent psychological effects., Psychopharmacology, 152(3), 230–248., Morgenstern, J. (2000). Time management from, the inside out. New York: Holt., Morley, J. E. (2001). Male menopause is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Medical Crossfire,, 3(1), 46–47, 51., Morley, J. E., & Perry H. M. (2003). Androgens, and women at the menopause and beyond. The, Journal of Gerontology, 58(5), 409–416., Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and, cause: American and Chinese attributions for, social and physical events. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 67, 949–971., Morrison, D. R., & Cherlin, A. J. (1995). The divorce process and young children’s well-being: A, prospective analysis. Journal of Marriage and the, Family, 57, 800–812., Morrison, D. R., & Coiro, M. J. (1999). Parental, conflict and marital disruption: Do children benefit when high-conflict marriages are dissolved?, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 626–637., Morrison, T. G., Morrison, M. A., & Hopkins, C., (2003). Striving for bodily perfection? An exploration of the drive for masculinity in Canadian, men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4(2),, 111–120., Morse, S., & Gergen, K. J. (1970). Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 148–156., Moseman, S. E., Freeman, M. P., Misiaszek, J., &, Gelenberg, A. J. (2003). Mood stabilizers. In, A. Tasman, J. Kay, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New York: Wiley., Mosher, D. L. (1991). Macho men, machismo, and, sexuality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 2,, 199–248., Mowrer, O. H. (1947). On the dual nature of, learning: A reinterpretaton of “conditioning” and, “problem-solving.” Harvard Educational Review,, 17, 102–150., Moynihan, J. A., & Ader, R. (1996). Psychoneuroimmunology: Animal models of disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 58, 546–558., Muehlenhard, C. L., & McCoy, M. L. (1991). Double standard/double bind: The sexual double standard and women’s communication about sex., Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 447–461., Mukamal, K. J., Conigrave, K. M., Mittleman,, M. A., Camargo, C. A., Stampfer, M. J., Willet,, W. C., & Rimm, E. B. (2003). Roles of drinking, pattern and type of alcohol consumed in coronary, heart disease in men. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(2), 109–118., Mullin, C. R., & Linz, D. (1995). Desensitization, and resensitization to violence against women:, Effects of exposure to sexually violent films on, judgments of domestic violence victims. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 449–459., Munck, A. (2000). Corticosteroids and stress. In, G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 1, pp., 570–577). San Diego: Academic Press., Muris, P. (2002). Relationships between self-efficacy, and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression, in a normal adolescent sample. Personality and, Individual Differences, 32, 337–348., Murphy, M., Glaser, K., & Grundy, E. (1997)., Marital status and long-term illness in Great, Britain. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59,, 156–164.

Page 630 :
Murphy, S. P., Rose, D., Hudes, M., & Viteri, F. E., (1992). Demographic and economic factors associated with dietary quality for adults in the, 1987–88 nationwide food consumption theory., Journal of the American Diet Association, 92,, 1352–1357., Murray, C. (2001). Family formation. Washington,, DC: American Enterprise Institute., Murrell, A. J., Dietz-Uhler, B. L., Dovidio, J. F.,, Gaertner, S. L., & Drout, E. (1994). Aversive, racism and resistance to affirmative action: Perceptions of justice are not necessarily color blind., Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(1–2),, 71–86., Murrell, A. J., & James, E. H. (2001). Gender and, diversity in organizations: Past, present, and future, directions. Sex Roles, 45(5/6), 243–257., Murry, V. M. (1996). An ecological analysis of, coital timing among middle-class African American adolescent females. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11(2), 261–279., Murstein, B. I. (1976). Who will marry whom?, Theories and research in marital choice. New York:, Springer., Murstein, B. I. (1986). Paths to marriage. Newbury, Park, CA: Sage., Mutchler, J. E., Burr, J. A., Pienta, A. M., & Massagli, M. P. (1997). Pathways to labor force exit:, Work transitions and work instability. Journal of, Gerontology, 52, 4–12., Myers, D. G. (1980). Inflated self: Human illusions, and the biblical call to hope. New York: Seabury, Press., Myers, D. G. (1992). The pursuit of happiness: Who, is happy—and why. New York: Morrow., Myers, D. G. (1999). Close relationships and, quality of life. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, &, N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of, hedonic psychology (pp. 374–391). New York: Sage., Myers, D. G. (2000). The American paradox: Spiritual hunger in an age of plenty. New Haven, CT:, Yale University Press., Myers, D. G. (2001, December). Do we fear the, right things? American Psychological Society Observer, 14(10), 3., Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy?, Psychological Science, 6, 10–19., Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1997). The pursuit of, happiness. Scientific American, Special Issue 7,, 40–43., Nabi, R. L., & Sullivan, J. L. (2001). Does television, viewing relate to engagement in protective action, against crime? A cultivation analysis from a theory, of reasoned action perpective. Communication, Research, 28(6), 802–825., Nader, K. O. (1997). Treating traumatic grief in, systems. In C. R. Figley, B. E. Bride, & N. Mazza, (Eds.), Death and trauma: The traumatology of, grieving (pp. 159–192). Washington, DC: Taylor, and Francis., Naisbitt, J., & Aburdene, P. (1991). Megatrends, 2000. New York: Morrow., Nalwa, K., & Anand, A. P. (2003). Internet addiction in students: A cause of concern. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 6(6), 653–656., Narrow, W. E., Regier, D. A., Rae, D. S., Manderscheid, R. W., & Locke, B. Z. (1993). Use of services by persons with mental and addictive, disorders: Findings from the National Institute of, Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area, Program. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50,, 95–107., Nash, M. (1997). Gift of love. Time, 80–82., Nathan, P. E., & Langenbucher, J. (2003). Diagnosis and classification. In G. Stricker & T. A. Widiger, (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 8. Clinical, psychology. New York: Wiley., Nathan, P. E., Stuart, S. P., & Dolan, S. L. (2000)., Research on psychotherapy efficacy and effectiveness: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Psychological, Bulletin, 126(6), 964–981., , Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation, and children’s aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124–143., National Institute of Mental Health. (2001)., Helping children and adolescents cope with violence, and disasters. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of, Mental Health., Naveh-Benjamin, M., Lavi, H., McKeachie, W. J.,, & Lin, Y. (1997). Individual differences in students’, retention of knowledge and conceptual structures, learned in university and high school courses: The, case of test anxiety. Applied Cognitive Psychology,, 11, 507–526., Naylor, T. H., Willimon, W. H., & Naylor, M. R., (1994). The search for meaning. Nashville: Abingdon Press., Neese, R. M., & Young, E. A. (2000). Evolutionary, origins and functions of the stress response. In, G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 2, pp., 79–83). San Diego: Academic Press., Neimeyer, R. A., & Van Brunt, D. (1995). Death, anxiety. In H. Wass & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.),, Dying: Facing the facts (3rd ed.). Washington, DC:, Taylor & Francis., Neiss, R. (1988). Reconceptualizing arousal: Psychobiological states in motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 345–366., Neiss, R. (1990). Ending arousal’s reign of error: A, reply to Anderson. Psychological Bulletin, 107,, 101–105., Nemeth, C., & Chiles, C. (1988). Modelling courage:, The role of dissent in fostering independence., European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 275–280., Nemiah, J. C. (1985). Somatoform disorders. In, H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive, textbook of psychiatry/IV. Baltimore: Williams &, Wilkins., Newberg, A., Alavi, A., Baime, M., Pourdehnad,, M., Santanna, J., & D’Aquili. E. (2001). The measurement of regional cerebral blood flow tions on, nocturnal dream content. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 75, 242–255., Newcomb, M. D. (1990). Social support and personal characteristics: A developmental and interactional perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical, Psychology, 9, 54–68., Newell, G. R. (1991, May). Stress and cancer. Primary Care and Cancer, 29–30., Newman, L. S., Duff, K. J., & Baumeister, R. F., (1997). A new look at defensive projection:, Thought suppression, accessibility, and biased, person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 980–1001., Newman, M., & Berkowitz, B. (1976). How to be, awake and alive. Westminster, MD: Ballantine., Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., Felgoise, S. H., & Zwick,, M. L. (2003). Psychosocial oncology. In A. M., Nezu, C. M. Nezu, & P. A. Geller (Eds.), Handbook, of psychology: Vol. 9. Health psychology. New York:, Wiley., Niaura, R., & Abrams, D. B. (2002). Smoking, cessation: Progress, priorities, and prospectus., Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 70(3),, 494–509., Niaura, R., Todaro, J. F., Stroud, L., Spiro, A.,, Ward, K. D., & Weiss, S. (2002). Hostility, the, metabolic syndrome, and incident coronary heart, disease. Health Psychology, 21(16), 588–593., NICHD Early Child Care Research Network., (1997). The effects of infant child care on infantmother attachment security: Results of the, NICHD Study of Early Child Care. Child Development, 68, 860–879., Nickerson, C., Schwarz, N., Diener, E., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Zeroing in on the dark side of the, American dream: A closer look at the negative, consequences of the goal for financial success., Psychological Science , 14(6), 531–536., Nie N. H., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford, CA: Stanford, Institutional Qualitative Study Society., , Nielsen, J. M. (1990). Sex and gender in society:, Perspective on stratification (2nd ed.). Prospect, Heights, IL: Waveland., Niemann, Y. F., Jennings, L., Rozelle, R. M., Baxter,, J. C., & Sullivan, E. (1994). Use of free responses, and cluster analysis to determine stereotypes of, eight groups. Personality and Social Psychology, Bulletin, 20, 379–390., Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A., (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic, versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review,, 108(2), 291–310., Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and, cohabitating relationships. Journal of Family Issues,, 13, 53–76., Noel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R., (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and, public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127–137., Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive, episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100,, 569–582., Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1995). Gender differences in, coping with depression across the lifespan. Depression, 3, 81–90., Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/, depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(3), 504–511., Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2001). Gender differences in, depression. Current Directions in Psychological, Science, 10,173–176., Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2002). Gender differences in, depression. In I. H. Gotlib & C. L. Hammen (Eds.),, Handbook of depression. New York: Guilford., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Keita, G. P. (2003)., Women and depression: An introduction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 89–90., Noller, P. (1985). Negative communications in, marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 289–301., Noller, P. (1987). Nonverbal communication in, marriage. In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and, deterioration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., Noller, P., Feeney, J. A., Bonnell, D., & Callan, V., (1994). A longitudinal study of conflict in early, marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 233–252., Noller, P., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Marital, communication in the eighties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 832–843., Noller, P., & Gallois, C. (1988). Understanding and, misunderstanding in marriage: Sex and marital, adjustment differences in structured and free, interaction. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.),, Perspectives on marital interaction. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters., Nomaguchi, K. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2003). Costs, and rewards of children: The effects of becoming a, parent on adults’ lives. Journal of Marriage and, Family, 65, 356–374., Norcross, J. C. (1995). Dispelling the dodo bird, verdict and the exclusivity myth in psychotherapy., Psychotherapy, 32, 500–504., Norcross, J. C., Santrock, J. W., Campbell, L. F.,, Smith, T. P., Sommer, R., & Zuckerman, E. L., (2003). Authoritative guide to self-help resources in, mental health. New York: Guilford., Norris, F. H., & Kaniasty, K. (1996). Received and, perceived social support in times of stress: A test, of the social support deterioration deterrence, model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 71(3), 498–511., Norton, P. G. W. (2004, February 1). Low-fat foods, helped fuel obesity epidemic. Family Practice, News, p. 22., Norton, S. (2002). Women exposed: Sexual harrassment and female vulnerability. In L. Diamant, & J. Lee (Eds.), The psychology of sex, gender, and, jobs. Westport, CT: Praeger., , References, , 593

Page 631 :
Nowell, A., & Hedges, L. V. (1998). Trends in gender differences in academic achievement from, 1960–1994: An analysis of differences in mean,, variance, and extreme scores. Sex Roles, 39(1/2),, 21–43., Nurminen, E., Malmivaara, A., Ilmarinen, J.,, Ylöstalo, P., Mutanen, P., Ahonen, G., & Aro, T., (2002). Effectiveness of a worksite exercise program with respect to perceived work ability and, sick leaves among women with physical work., Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and, Health, 28(2), 85–93., Nurnberger, J. I., & Zimmerman, J. (1970). Applied analysis of human behavior: An alternative, to conventional motivational inferences and unconscious determination in therapeutic programming. Behavior Therapy, 1, 59–69., Oakes, P. (2001). The root of all evil in intergroup, relations? Unearthing the categorization process., In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell, handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes., London: Blackwell., O’Brien, B. (1996). Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Medical Care, 34, 99–108., O’Callahan, M., Andrews, A. M., & Krantz, D. S., (2003). Coronary heart disease and hypertension., In A. M. Nezu, C. M. Nezu, & P. A. Geller (Eds.),, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 9. Health psychology., New York: Wiley., O’Connor, N. (1994). How to grow up when you’re, grown up: Achieving balance in adulthood. Tucson,, AZ: La Mariposa Press., O’Donnell, A., & Dansereau, D. F. (1993). Learning from lectures: Effects of cooperative review., Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 116–125., O’Donohue, W., & Crouch, J. L. (1996). Marital, therapy and gender-linked factors in communication. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 22,, 87–101., Oesterman, K., Bjoerkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., J., Kaukiainen, A., Landau, S. F., Fraczek, A., &, Caprara, G. V. (1998). Cross-cultural evidence of, female indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior,, 24(1), 1–80., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Goal, setting and goal striving. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz., (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology:, Intraindividual processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell., O’Halloran, C. M., & Altmaier, E. M. (1996)., Awareness of death among children: Does a lifethreatening illness alter the process of discovery?, Journal of Counseling and Development, 74,, 259–262., Ohman, A., & Mineka, S. (2003). The malicious, serpent: Snakes as a prototypical stimulus for an, evolved module of fear. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 5–9., O’Keefe, D. J., & Hale, S. L. (2001). An odds-ratio, based meta-analysis of research on the door-inthe-face influence strategy. Communication Reports, 14(1), 31–38., Olfson, M., Marcus, S. C., & Pincus, H. A. (1999)., Trends in office-based psychiatric practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 451–457., Olfson, M., & Pincus, H. A. (1996). Outpatient, mental health care in nonhospital settings: Distribution of patients across provider groups. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 1353–1356., Olfson, M., Shaffer, D., Marcus, S. C., & Greenberg,, T. (2003). Relationship between antidepressant, medication treatment and suicide in adolescents., Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(10), 978–982., Olio, K. (1994). Truth in memory. American Psychologist, 49, 442–443., Olivardia, R., Pope, H. G., & Phillips, K. A. (2000)., The Adonis complex: The secret crisis of male body, obsession. New York: Free Press., Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological, Bulletin, 114, 29–51., , 594, , References, , O’Neil, J. M., & Egan, J. (1992). Men’s and women’s, gender role journeys: A metaphor for healing, transition, and transformation. In B. Wainrib (Ed.),, Gender issues across the life cycle (pp. 107–123)., New York: Springer., O’Neill, N., & O’Neill, G. (1972). Open marriage., New York: Evans., Ono, H. (1998). Husbands’ and wives’ resources, and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and, the Family, 60, 674–689., Orenstein, P. (1994). School girls: Young women,, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York:, Doubleday., Organista, P. B., & Miranda, J. (1991). Psychosomatic symptoms in medical outpatients: An investigation of self-handicapping theory. Health, Psychology, 10, 427–431., Orlofsky, J. L., Marcia, J. E., & Lesser, I. M. (1973)., Ego identity status and the intimacy versus isolation crisis of young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 211–219., Orth-Gomer, K., Wamala, S. P., Horsten, M.,, Schenck-Gustafsson, K., Schneiderman, N., &, Mittleman, M. A. (2000). Marital stress worsens, prognosis in women with coronary heart disease:, The Stockholm female coronary risk study. Journal, of the American Medical Association, 284(23),, 3008–3014., Oskamp, S. (2000). A sustainable future for humanity? How psychology can help. American Psychologist, 55(5), 496–508., Osman, S. L. (2003). Predicting men’s rape perceptions based on the belief that “no” really means, “yes.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(4),, 683–692., Otto, M. W., Pollack, M. H., Jenike, M. A., &, Rosenbaum, J. F. (1999). Anxiety disorders and, their treatment. In A. M. Nicholi (Ed.), The Harvard guide to psychiatry (3rd ed., pp. 220–239)., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., Ouellette, S. C. (1993). Inquiries into hardiness. In, L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of, stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed.)., New York: Free Press., Ouellette, S. C., & DiPlacido, J. (2001). Personality’s role in the protection and enhancement of, health: Where the research has been, where it is, stuck, how it might move . In A. Baum, T. A., Revenson, & J. E. Singer Handbook of health psychology (pp. 175–194). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Owen, M. J., & O’Donovan, M. C. (2003). Schizophrenia and genetics. In R. Plomin, J. C. Defries, I., W. Craig & P. McGuffin (Eds.), Behavioral genetics, in the postgenomic era. Washington, DC: American, Psychological Association., Ozer, D. J., & Reise, S. P. (1994). Personality assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 357–388., Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L., & Weiss, D. S., (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder, and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 52–73., Ozer, E. J., & Weiss, D. S. (2004). Who develops, posttraumatic stress disorder? Current Directions, in Psychological Science, 13, 169–172., Ozer, E. M., & Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms, governing empowerment effects: A self-efficacy, analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 472–486., Padgett, D. A., & Sheridan, J. F. (2000). Herpesviruses. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (pp., 357–363). San Diego: Academic Press., Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual, coding approach. New York: Oxford University, Press., Papalia, D. E., & Olds, C. W. (1995). Human Development (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill., Papp, L. M., Cummings, E. M., & Schermerhorn,, A. C. (2004). Pathways among marital distress,, parental symptomatology, and child adjustment., Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 368–384., , Pardun, C. J., & McKee, K. B. (1995). Strange, bedfellows: Images of religion and sexuality on, MTV. Youth and Society, 26, 438–449., Park, C. L., & Fenster, J. R. (2004). Stress-related, growth: Predictors of occurrence and correlates, with psychological adjustment. Journal of Social, and Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 195–215., Park, C. W., & Young, S. M. (1986). Consumer, response to television commercials: The impact of, involvement and background music on brand, attitude formation. Journal of Marketing Research,, 23 11–24., Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends, in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46,, 80–97., Parrott, A. C. (2000). Human research on MDMA, (3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine) neurotoxicity: Cognitive and behavioural indices of, change. Neuropsychobiology, 42(1), 17–24., Parry-Jones, B., & Parry-Jones, W. L. (1995)., History of bulimia and bulimia nervosa. In K. D., Brownell & C. G. Fairburn (Eds.), Eating disorders, and obesity: A comprehensive handbook. New York:, Guilford Press., Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1995). Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free, Press., Pasley, K., & Moorefield, B. S. (2004). Stepfamilies: Changes and challenges. In M. Coleman, &, L. H. Ganong (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary, families: Considering the past, contemplating the, future. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Patel, J. K., Pinals, D. A., & Breier, A. (2003)., Schizophrenia and other psychoses. In A. Tasman,, J. Kay, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New, York: Wiley., Pato, M. T., Eisen, J. L., & Phillips, K. A. (2003)., Obsessive-compulsive disorder. In A. Tasman,, J. Kay, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New, York: Wiley., Patterson, C. J. (2001). Family relationships of, lesbians and gay men. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.),, Understanding families into the new millennium: A, decade in review (pp. 271–288). Minneapolis:, National Council on Family Relations., Patterson, C. J. (2003). Children of lesbian and gay, parents. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.),, Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences. New York: Columbia University, Press., Patterson, C. J., & Redding, R. E. (1996). Lesbian, and gay families with children: Implications of, social science research for policy. Journal of Social, Issues, 52(3), 29–50., Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D., & Ramsey, E., (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial, behavior. American Psychologist, 44(2), 329–335., Patterson, M. L. (1988). Functions of nonverbal, behavior in close relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.),, Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions. New York: Wiley., Paul, A. M. (2001). Self-help: Shattering the myths., Psychology Today, 34(2), 60., Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000)., “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual, experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 76–88., Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control, of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. S., Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and, social psychological attitudes. San Diego: Academic, Press., Paulhus, D. L., Fridhandler, B., & Hayes, S., (1997). Psychological defense: Contemporary, theory and research. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, &, S. Briggs (Eds), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego: Academic Press., Paulhus, D. L., Trapnell, P. D., & Chen, D. (1999)., Birth order effects on personality and achievement, within families. Psychological Science, 10, 482–488., Paunonen, S. (1998). Hierarchical organization of, personality and prediction of behavior. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 538–556.

Page 632 :
Pavlov, I. P. (1906). The scientific investigation of, psychical faculties or processes in the higher animals. Science, 24, 613–619., Payne, D. G., & Wenger, M. J. (1996). Practice, effects in memory: Data, theory, and unanswered, questions. In D. J. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel, & M. K. Johnson (Eds.), Basic and, applied memory research: Practical applications, (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Pearce, L. (1974). Duck! It’s the new journalism., New Times, 2, 40–41., Pearson, P. (1998). When she was bad: Violent, women and the myth of innocence. New York:, Viking., Pearson, Q. M. (1998). Job satisfaction, leisure, satisfaction, and psychological health. Career Development Quarterly, 46(4), 416–426., Pechacek, T. F., & Babb, S. (2004). Commentary:, How acute and reversible are the cardiovascular, risks of secondhand smoke? British Medical Journal, 328, 980–983., Pechnick, R. N., & Ungerleider, J. T. (1997). Hallucinogens. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A, comprehensive textbook (3rd ed.). Baltimore:, Williams & Wilkins., Pechnick, R. N., & Ungerleider, T. J. (2005). Hallucinogens. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A, comprehensive textbook. Philadelphia:, Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Pedersen, P. (1994). A culture-centered approach, to counseling. In W. J. Lonner & R. Malpass (Eds.),, Psychology and culture (pp. 291–295). Boston:, Allyn & Bacon., Pedersen, W., & Skrondal, A. (1999). Ecstasy and, new patterns of drug use: A normal population, study. Addiction, 94(11), 1695–1706., Pederson, D. R., & Moran, G. (1996). Expressions, of the attachment relationship outside of the, strange situation. Child Development, 67, 915–927., Peirce, R. S., Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper,, M. L. (1996). Financial stress, social support, and, alcohol involvement: A longitudinal test of the, buffering hypothesis in a general population survey. Health Psychology, 15, 38–47., Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Opening up: The healing, power of expressing emotions. New York: Guilford., Pennebaker, J. W., Colder, M., & Sharp, L. K., (1990). Accelerating the coping process. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 528–537., Peplau, L. A. (1988). Research on homosexual, couples: An overview. In J. P. De Cecco (Ed.), Gay, relationships. New York: Harrington Park Press., Peplau, L. A. (1991). Lesbian and gay relationships. In J. C. Gonsiorek & J. D. Weinrich (Eds.),, Homosexuality: Research implications for public, policy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do, men and women differ? Current Directions in, Psychological Science, 12(2), 37–40., Peplau, L. A., & Cochran, S. D. (1990). A relational, perspective on homosexuality. In D. P. McWhirter,, S. A. Sanders, & J. M. Reinisch (Eds.), Homosexuality/heterosexuality: Concepts of sexual orientation., New York: Oxford University Press., Peplau, L. A., Cochran, S. D., & Mays, V. M., (1997). A national survey of the intimate relationships of African-American lesbians and gay men:, A look at commitment, satisfaction, sexual behavior, and HIV disease. In B. Greene (Ed.), Ethnic, and cultural diversity among lesbians and gay men., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Peplau, L. A., Fingerhut, A., & Beals, K. P. (2004)., Sexuality in the relationships of lesbians and gay, men. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher, (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., Peplau, L. A., & Garnets, L. D. (2000). A new paradigm for understanding women’s sexuality and, sexual orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 56(2),, 329–350., , Peplau, L. A., & Gordon, S. L. (1985). Women and, men in love: Gender differences in close heterosexual relationships. In V. E. O’Leary, R. K. Unger, &, B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social, psychology (pp. 257–291). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Peplau, L. A., Hill, C. T., & Rubin, Z. (1993). Sex, role attitudes in dating and marriage: A 15-year, follow-up of the Boston couples study. Journal of, Social Issues, 49, 31–52., Peplau, L. A., & Spalding, L. R. (2000). The close, relationships of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals., In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close, relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 111–123). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Peplau, L. A., & Spalding, L. R. (2003). The close, relationships of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals., In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences. New York: Columbia University Press., Peretti, P. O., & Abplanalp, R. R., Jr. (2004)., Chemistry in the college dating process: Structure, and function. Social Behavior and Personality,, 32(2), 147–154., Perkins, D. F., & Borden, L. M. (2003). Positive, behaviors, problem behaviors, and resiliency in, adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, M.A. Easterbrooks, &, J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 6., Developmental psychology. New York: Wiley., Perloff, R. M. (1993). The dynamics of persuasion., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Perreault, S., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1),, 92–103., Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland,, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual, dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394,, 884–887., Perri, M. G., Anton, S. D., Durning, P. E., Ketterson, T. U., Sydeman, S. J., Berlant, N. E., Kanasky, Jr., W. F., Newton Jr., R. L., Llimacher, M. C., &, Martin, A. D. (2002). Adherence to exercise prescriptions: Effects of prescribing moderate versus, higher levels of intensity and frequency. Health, Psychology, 21(5), 452–458., Perry-Jenkins, M., & Turner, E. (2004). Jobs, marriage, and parenting: Working it out in dual-earner, families. In M. Coleman, & L. H. Ganong (Eds.),, Handbook of contemporary families: Considering, the past, contemplating the future. Thousand Oaks,, CA: Sage., Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R. L., & Crouter, A. C., (2001). Work and family in the 1990s. In R. M., Milardo (Ed.), Understanding families into the new, millennium: A decade in review (pp. 200–217)., Minneapolis, MN: National Council on Family, Relations., Person, E. S. (1990). The influence of values in, psychoanalysis: The case of female psychology. In, C. Zanardi (Ed.), Essential papers in psychoanalysis, (pp. 305–325). New York: New York University, Press., Pervin, L. A. (1994). Personality stability, personality change, and the question of process. In T. F., Heatherton & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Petersen, A. C. (1987, September). Those gangly, years. Psychology Today, pp. 28–34., Petersen, A. C. (1988). Adolescent development., Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 583–607., Peterson, B. E., & Lane, M. D. (2001). Implications, of authoritarianism for young adulthood: Longitudinal analysis of college experiences and future, goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,, 27(6), 678–690., Peterson, C., & Bossio, L. M. (2001). Optimism, and physical well-being. In E. C. Chang (Ed.),, Optimism and pessimism: Implications for theory,, research, and practice (pp. 127–146). Washington,, DC: American Psychological Association., , Peterson, C., Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P., (1993). Learned helplessness: A theory for the age of, personal control. New York: Oxford Univer-sity, Press., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological, Association/New York: Oxford University Press., Peterson, C., Seligman, M. E. P., & Vaillant, G. E., (1988). Pessimistic explanatory style is a risk factor, for physical illness: A thirty-five-year longitudinal, study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 55, 23–27., Peterson, C., Seligman, M. E. P., Yurko, K. H.,, Martin, L. R., & Friedman, H. S. (1998). Catastrophizing and untimely death. Psychological Science,, 9, 127–130., Peterson, N., & González, R. (2005). The role of, work in people’s lives: Applied career counseling and, vocational psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Petras, R., & Petras, K. (1993). The 776 stupidest, things ever said. New York: Doubleday., Petrocelli, W., & Repa, B. K. (1998). Sexual harassment on the job: What it is and how to stop it (3rd, ed.). Berkeley, CA: Nolo Press., Petticrew, M., Fraser, J. M., & Regan, M. F. (1999)., Adverse life-events and risk of breast cancer: A, meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology,, 4, 1–17., Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle, and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75., Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice: Recent metaanalytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing, prejudice and discrimination. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 19). Orlando, FL: Academic Press., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement, and persuasion: Tradition versus integration., Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367–374., Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude, change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In, D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The, handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp., 323–390). New York: McGraw-Hill., Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. A., Priester, J. R., & Feinstein, A. H. (2001). Individual versus group interest violation: Surprise as a determinant of, argument scrutiny and persuasion. Social Cognition, 19(4), 418–442., Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R., & Wegener, D. T. (1994)., Cognitive processes in attitude change. In R. S., Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R., (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual, Review of Psychology, 48, 609–647., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & White, P. (1998)., Flexible correction processes in persuasion. Social, Cognition, 16, 93–113., Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Tormala, Z. L., (2003). Persuasion and attitude change. In T. Millon, & M.J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology:, Vol. 5. Personality and social psychology. New York:, Wiley., Phelps, S., & Austin, N. (1997). The assertive, woman. San Luis Obispo, CA: Impact., Phelps, S., & Austin, N. (2002). The assertive, woman. San Luis Obispo, CA: Impact Publishers., Phillips, M. R., Wolf, A. S., & Coons, D. J. (1988)., Psychiatry and the criminal justice system: Testing, the myths. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145,, 605–610., Phillips, W. T., Kiernan, M., & King, A. C. (2001)., The effects of physical activity on physical and, psychological health. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson,, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology, (pp. 627–660). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., , References, , 595

Page 633 :
Pi, E. H., & Simpson, G. M. (2001). Medicationinduced movement disorders. In B. J. Sadock & V., A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 2)., Philadelphia: Lippincott/ Williams & Wilkins., Pierce, C. M. (1992). Contemporary psychiatry:, Racial perspectives on the past and future. In, A. Kales, C. M. Pierce, & M. Greenblatt (Eds.), The, mosaic of contemporary psychiatry in perspective., New York: Springer-Verlag., Pietromonaco, P. R., Greenwood, D., & Barrett,, L. F. (2004). Conflict in adult close relationships:, An attachment perspective. In W. S. Rholes & J. A., Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research,, and clinical implications. New York: Guilford., Pike, A., Manke, B., Reiss, D., & Plomin, R. (2000)., A genetic analysis of differential experiences of, adolescent siblings across three years. Social Development, 9, 96–114., Pike, K. M., & Rodin, J. (1991). Mothers, daughters, and disordered eating. Journal of Abnormal, Psychology, 100, 198–294., Pillow, D. R., Zautra, A. J., & Sandler, I. (1996)., Major life events and minor stressors: Identifying, mediational links in the stress process. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 381–394., Pilowsky, I. (1993). Aspects of abnormal illness, behaviour. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 60,, 62–74., Pincus, H. A., Tanielian, T. L., Marcus, S. C., Olfson, M., Zarin, D. A., Thompson, J., & Zito, J. M., (1998). Prescribing trends in psychotropic medications: Primary care, psychiatry, and other medical specialties. Journal of the American Medical, Association, 279, 526–531., Pine, D. S. (2000). Anxiety disorders: Clinical, features. In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.),, Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of, psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1476–1489)., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Pinel, J. P. J., Assanand, S., & Lehman, D. R., (2000). Hunger, eating, and ill health. American, Psychologist, 55, 1105–1116., Pines, A. M. (1993). Burnout. In L. Goldberger &, S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical, and clinical aspects (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press., Pingitore, R., Dugoni, B. L., Tindale, R. S., &, Spring, B. (1994). Bias against overweight job, applicants in a simulated employment interview., Journal of Applied and Social Psychology, 79,, 909–917., Pink, D. H. (2001). Free agent nation: The future of, working for yourself. New York: Warner Business, Books., Piotrkowski, C. S., & Brannen, S. J. (2002). Exposure, threat appraisal, and lost confidence as predictors of PTSD symptoms following September, 11, 2001. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,, 72(4), 476–485., Piper, W. E. (1993). Group psychotherapy, research. In H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.),, Comprehensive group psychotherapy. Baltimore:, Williams & Wilkins., Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the, selves of adolescent girls. New York: Ballantine., Pi-Sunyer, F. X. (2002). Medical complications of, obesity in adults. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D., Brownell (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A, comprehensive handbook (pp. 467–472). New York:, Guilford., Pittman, F., III. (1994, January/February). A, buyer’s guide to psychotherapy. Psychology Today,, pp. 50–53, 74–81., Pittman, J. F., & Lloyd, S. A. (1988). Quality of, family life, social support, and stress. Journal of, Marriage and the Family, 50, 53–67., Piver, S. (2000). The hard questions: 100 questions, to ask before you say “I do.” New York: Jeremy P., Tarcher/Putnam., , 596, , References, , Plante, T. G., Caputo, D., & Chizmar, L. (2000)., Perceived fitness and responses to laboratory induced stress. International Journal of Stress Management, 7(1), 61–73., Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack, (Eds.), A new psychology of men. New York: Basic, Books., Plomin, R. (1994). Nature, nurture, and development. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of, human intelligence (pp. 754–764). New York:, Macmillan., Plomin, R., & Caspi, A. (1999). Behavioral genetics and personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John, (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 251–276). New York: Guilford, Press., Plous, S. L., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004, September, 10). How social science can reduce terrorism. The, Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B9–B10., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (2002). Causes of eating, disorder. Annual Review of Psychology, 53,, 187–213., Pollack, W. (1998). Real boys: Rescuing our sons, from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random, House., Polonsky, D. (2000). Premature ejaculation. In, S. Leiblum & R. Rosen (Eds.), Principles and practice of sex therapy. New York: Guilford., Pomeroy, C., & Mitchell, J. E. (2002). Medical, complications of anorexia nervosa and bulimia, nervosa. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell, (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook. New York: Guilford., Pope, E., & Shouldice, M. (2001). Drugs and sexual assault: A review. Trauma Violence and Abuse,, 2(1), 51–55., Pope, H., Phillips, K., & Olivardia, R. (2000). The, Adonis complex: The secret crisis of male body obsession. New York: Free Press., Pope, H. G., Gruber, A. J., Hudson, J. I., Huestis,, M. A., & Yurgelun- Todd, D. (2001). Neuropsychological performance in long-term cannabis users., Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 909–915., Pope, H. G., Gruber, A. J., & Yurgelun-Todd, D., (2001). Residual neuropsychologic effects of, cannabis. Current Psychiatry Report, 3, 507–512., Pope, H. G., Oliva, P. S., Hudson, J. I., Bodkin, J. A.,, & Gruber, A. J. (1999). Attitudes toward DSM-IV, dissociative disorders diagnoses among boardcertified American psychiatrists. American Journal, of Psychiatry, 156(2), 321–323., Pope, K. S., Keith-Spiegel, P., & Tabachnick, B. G., (1986). Sexual attraction to clients. American, Psychologist, 41, 147–158., Popenoe, D. (1993). American family decline,, 1960–1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of, Marriage and the Family, 55, 527–555., Popenoe, D. (1999). Life without father: Compelling, new evidence that fatherhood and marriage are, indispensable for the good of children and society., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., Porter, G. (1996). Organizational impact of, workaholism: Suggestions for researching the, negative outcomes of excessive work. Journal of, Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 70–84., Potthoff, J. G., Holahan, C. J., & Joiner, T. E., Jr., (1995). Reassurance-seeking, stress generation,, and depressive symptoms: An integrative model., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68,, 664–670., Powell, J. L., & Drucker, A. D. (1997). The role of, peer conformity in the decision to ride with an, intoxicated driver. Journal of Alcohol and Drug, Education, 43(1), 1–7., Powell, R. A., & Gee, T. L. (1999). The effects of, hypnosis on dissociative identity disorder: A reexamination of the evidence. Canadian Journal of, Psychiatry, 44, 914–916., , Pratkanis, A. R., & Aronson, E. (2000). Age of, propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. New York: Freeman., Pratt, L. A., Ford, D. E., Crum, R. M., Armenian,, H. K., Gallo, J. J., & Eaton, W. W. (1996). Depression, psychotropic medication, and risk of myocardial infarction: Prospective data from the, Baltimore ECA follow-up. Archives of Internal, Medicine, 94, 3123–3129., Presser, H. B. (2000). Nonstandard work schedules, and marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the, Family, 62, 93–110., Pressman, S. (1993). Outrageous betrayal: The real, story of Werner Erhard, EST and the Forum. New, York: St. Martin’s Press., Preto, N. G. (1999). Transformation of the family system during adolescence. In B. Carter &, M. McGoldrick (Eds.), The expanded family life, cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives, (3rd ed., pp. 274–286). Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Prochaska, J. O. (1994). Strong and weak principles for progressing from precontemplation to, action on the basis of twelve problem behaviors., Health Psychology, 13(1), 47–51., Pruchno, R., & Rosenbaum, J. (2003). Social relationships in adulthood and old age. In R. M., Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.),, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 6. Developmental, psychology. New York: Wiley., Prudic, J., & Sackeim, H. A. (1999). Electroconvulsive therapy and suicide risk. Journal of Clinical, Psychiatry, 60, 104–110., Pryor, F. L., & Schaffer, D. (1997, July). Wages and, the university educated: A paradox resolved., Monthly Labor Review, 3–14., Pryor, J. B., Giedd, J. L., & Williams, K. B. (1995)., A social psychological model for predicting sexual, harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 69–84., Putnam, R. D. (1996). The strange disappearance, of civic America. The American Prospect, 24,, 34–46., Putney, N. M., & Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Families,, intergenerational relationships, and kinkeeping in, midlife. In M. E. Lachman (Ed.), Handbook of, midlife development. New York: Wiley., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Goldenberg, J. L., (2003). Freedom versus fear: On the defense,, growth, and expansion of the self. In M. R. Leary, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S., (1999). A dual-process model of defense against, conscious and unconscious death-related, thoughts: An extension of terror management, theory. Psychological Review, 106(4), 835–845., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S.,, Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people, need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical, review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 435–468., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J., (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, DC: American Psychological, Association., Quinn, K. A., Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V., (2003). Stereotyping and impression formation:, How categorical thinking shapes person perception. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage, handbook of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA:, Sage Publications., Rabbitt, P., & McGinnis, L. (1988). Do clever old, people have earlier and richer first memories?, Psychology and Aging, 3 338–341., Rabinowitz, F. E., & Cochran, S. V. (1994). Man, alive: A primer of men’s issues. Pacific Grove, CA:, Brooks/Cole., Rabkin, J. G. (1993). Stress and psychiatric disorders. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd, ed.). New York: Free Press.

Page 634 :
Rachman, S. J. (1990). Fear and courage. New York:, Freeman., Rachman, S. J. (1992). Behavior therapy. In L. R., Squire (Ed.), Encyclopedia of learning and memory., New York: Macmillan., Ragheb, M. G. (1993). Leisure and perceived wellness: A field investigation. Leisure Sciences, 12,, 13–24., Ragland, D. R., & Brand, R. J. (1988). Type A behavior and mortality from coronary heart disease., The New England Journal of Medicine, 318, 65–69., Rahe, R. H., & Arthur, R. H. (1978). Life change, and illness studies. Journal of Human Stress, 4,, 3–15., Rahe, R. H., Veach, T. L., Tolles, R. L., & Murakami,, K. (2000). The stress and coping inventory: An, educational and research instrument. Stress Medicine, 16, 199–208., Rahim, M. A., & Magner, N. R. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its, invariance across groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 122–132., Ramadan, N. M. (2000). Migraine. In G. Fink, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (pp. 757–770). San, Diego: Academic Press., Ramaekers, J. G., Robbe, H. W. J., & O’Hanlon,, J. F. (2000). Marijuana, alcohol and actual driving, performance. Human Psychopharmacology Clinical, & Experimental, 15(7), 551–558., Randhawa, B. S., & Hunter, D. M. (2001). Validity, of performance assessment in mathematics for, early adolescents. Canadian Journal of Behavioral, Science, 33, 14–24., Rank, M. R. (2004). The disturbing paradox of, poverty in American families: What we have, learned over the past four decades. In M. Coleman, & L. H. Ganong (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary, families: Considering the past, contemplating the, future. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage., Rapee, R. M., & Barlow, D. H. (2001). Generalized, anxiety disorders, panic disorders, and phobias. In, P. B. Sutker & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive, handbook of psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 131–154)., New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers., Raphael, B., & Dobson, M. (2000). Effects of public disasters. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress, (Vol. 1, pp. 699–705). San Diego: Academic Press., Raskin, P. M. (1986). The relationship between, identity and intimacy in early adulthood. Journal, of Genetic Psychology, 147, 167–181., Rasmussen, C., Knapp, T. J., & Garner, L. (2000)., Driving-induced stress in urban college students., Perceptual & Motor Skills, 90(2), 437–443., Ray, G. E., Cohen, R., Secrist, M. E., & Duncan,, M. K. (1997). Relating aggressive and victimization, behaviors to children’s sociometric status and, friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(1), 95–108., Read, C. R. (1991). Achievement and career, choices: Comparisons of males and females., Roeper Review, 13 188–193., Reddy, B. S. (1999). Role of dietary fiber in colon, cancer: An overview. American Journal of Medicine, 106(1A), 16S–19S., Reed, G. M., Kemeny, M. E., Taylor, S. E., & Visscher, B. R. (1999). Negative HIV-specific expectancies and AIDS-related bereavement as predictors, of symptom onset in asymptomatic HIV-positive, gay men. Health Psychology, 18, 354–363., Regan, P. C. (1996). Sexual outcasts: The perceived, impact of body weight and gender on sexuality., Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26,, 1803–1815., Regan, P. C. (2003). The mating game: A primer on, love, sex, and marriage. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, Publications., Regan, P. C., & Berscheid, E. (1997). Gender differences in characteristics desired in potential, sexual and marriage partners. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 9(1), 25–37., , Reggin, P. R. (1991). Toxic psychiatry. New York:, St. Martin’s Press., Regier, D. A., Boyd, J. H., Burke, J. D., Rea, D. S.,, Myers, J. K., Kramer, M., Robins, L. N., George,, L. K., Karno, M., & Locke, B. Z. (1988). One-month, prevalance of mental disorders in the United, States. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 977–986., Regier, D. A., & Burke, J. D. (2000). Epidemiology., In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and, Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Regier, D. A., & Kaelber, C. T. (1995). The epidemiologic catchment area (ECA) program:, Studying the prevalence and incidence of psychopathology. In M. T. Tsuang, M. Tohen, & G. E., P. Zahner (Eds.), Textbook in psychiatric epidemiology. New York: Wiley., Rehm, L. P., Wagner, A., & Ivens-Tyndal, Co., (2001). Mood disorders: Unipolar and bipolar. In, P. B. Sutker & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive, handbook of psychopathology (3rd ed., pp., 277–308). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum., Reibel, D. K., Greeson, J. M., Brainard, G. C., &, Rosenzweig, S. (2001). Mindfulness-based stress, reduction and health-related quality of life in a, heterogeneous patient population. General Hospital Psychiatry, 23(4), 183–192., Reid, P. T., & Paludi, M. A. (1993). Developmental, psychology of women: Conception to adolescence., In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology, of women: A handbook of issues and theories. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press., Reifman, A., Klein, J. G., & Murphy, S. T. (1989)., Self-monitoring and age. Psychology and Aging,4,, 245–246., Reimann, R. (1997). Does biology matter?: Lesbian couples’ transition to parenthood and their, division of labor. Qualitative Sociology, 20(2),, 153–185., Reinisch, J. M. (1990). The Kinsey Institute new, report on sex: What you must know to be sexually, literate. New York: St. Martin’s., Reis, H. T. (1998). Gender differences in intimacy, and related behaviors: Context and processes. In, D. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex and gender in, communication: Similarities and differences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Reis, H. T., & Patrick. B. C. (1996). Attachment, and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology:, Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford., Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an, interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships. New York: Wiley., Reis, H. T., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social, interaction with the Rochester Interaction Record., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24,, 269–318., Reis, T. J., Gerrard, M., & Gibbons, F. X. (1993)., Social comparison and the pill: Reactions to upward and downward comparison of contraceptive, behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 13–21., Reisner, A. D. (1998). Repressed memories: True, and false. In R. A. Baker (Ed.), Child sexual abuse, and false memory syndrome. Amherst, NY:, Prometheus Books., Reiss, I. L. (1986). Journey into sexuality: An exploratory voyage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall., Reiss, S. (1991). Expectancy model of fear, anxiety, and panic. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 141–154., Reissman, C., Aron, A., & Bergen, M. R. (1993)., Shared activities and marital satisfaction: Causal, direction and self-expansion versus boredom., Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10,, 243–254., Remland, M. S., Jones, T. S., & Brinkman, H., (1995). Interpersonal distance, body orientation,, and touch: Effects of culture, gender, and age., Journal of Social Psychology, 135(3), 281–297., Renaud, C. A., & Byers, E. S. (2001). Positive and, negative sexual cognitions: Subjective experience, , and relationships to sexual adjustment. Journal of, Sex Research, 38(3), 252–262., Rennie, D. (1999). Fair conduct and fair reporting, of clinical trials. Journal of the American Medical, Association, 282, 1766–1768., Rennie, D., & Luft, H. S. (2000). Making them, transparent, making them credible. Journal of the, American Medical Association, 283, 2516–2521., Rennison, C. M., & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate, partner violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau, of Justice Statistics., Renzetti, C. (1995). Violence in gay and lesbian, relationships. In R. J. Gelles (Ed.), Vision 2010:, Families and violence, abuse and neglect. Minneapolis: National Council on Family Relations., Repetti, R. L., & Wood, J. (1997). Effects of daily, stress at work on mothers’ interactions with, preschoolers. Journal of Family Psychology, 11,, 90–108., Repetto, M., & Gold, M. S. (2005). Cocaine and, crack: Neurobiology. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz,, R. B. Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.), Substance, abuse: A comprehensive textbook. Philadelphia:, Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Rhodewalt, F., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Tschanz, B.,, Feick, D. L., & Waller, A. (1995). Self-handicapping and interpersonal trade-offs: The effects of, claimed self-handicaps on observers’ performance, evaluations and feedback. Personality and Social, Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1042–1050, Rice, L. N., & Greenberg, L. S. (1992). Humanistic, approaches to psychotherapy. In D. K. Freedheim, (Ed.), History of psychotherapy: A century of, change. Washington, DC: American Psychological, Association., Richardson, C. R., Kriska, A. M., Lantz, P. M., &, Hayword, R. A. (2004). Physical activity and mortality across cardiovascular disease risk groups., Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,, 36(11), 1923–1929., Richardson, J. G., & Simpson, C. H. (1982). Children, gender and social structure: An analysis of, the contents of letters to Santa Claus. Child Development, 53 429–436., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1995). Communication: Apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Ridge, S. R., & Feeney, J. A. (1998). Relationship, history and relationship attitudes in gay males and, lesbians: Attachment style and gender differences., Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry,, 32(6), 848–859., Ridker, P. M. (2001). High-sensitivity C-reactive, protein: Potential adjunct for global risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular, disease. Circulation, 103, 1813–1818., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Strelau, J. (1997)., Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A study of twins reared together using the, self- and peer report NEO-FFI scales. Journal of, Personality, 65, 449–476., Rierdan, J., & Koff, E. (1991). Depressive symptomatology among very early maturing girls. Journal, of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 415–425., Rifkin, J. (1989). Time wars: The primary conflict, in human history. New York: Simon & Schuster., Riggio, R. E., & Throckmorton, B. (1988). The, relative effect of verbal and nonverbal behavior,, appearance, and social skills on valuations made, in hiring interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 331–348., Rigotti, N. A., Lee, J. E., & Wechsler, H. (2000)., U.S. college students’ use of tobacco products:, Results of a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 699–705., Rihmer, Z. (2003). Do SSRI’s increase the risk of, suicide among depressives even if they are only, taking placebo? Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics,, 72(6), 357–358., Rimal R. N. (2001). Longitudinal influences of, knowledge and self-efficacy on exercise behavior:, , References, , 597

Page 635 :
Tests of a mutual reinforcement model. Journal of, Health Psychology, 6, 31–46., Rimm, D. C., & Cunningham, H. M. (1985). Behavior therapies. In S. J. Lynn & J. P. Garske (Eds.),, Contemporary psychotherapies: Models and methods. Columbus, OH: Merrill., Rindfuss, R. R. (1991). The young adult years:, Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28, 493–512., Riso, L. P., du Toit, P. L., Blandino, J. A., Penna, S.,, Dacey, S., Duin, J. S., Pacoe, E. M., Grant, M. M., &, Ulmer, C. S. (2003). Cognitive aspects of chronic, depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,, 112(1), 72–80., Ritz, T., Steptoe, A., DeWilde, S., & Costa, M., (2000). Emotions and stress increase respiratory, resistance in asthma. Psychosomatic Medicine,, 62(3), 401–412., Rivas-Vazquez, R. A. (2001). Antidepressants as, first-line agents in the current pharmacotherapy of, anxiety disorders. Professional Psychology: Research, & Practice, 32(1), 101–104., Road rage plagues drivers. (1997, November/, December). AAA Going Places, 41–42., Robbins, A., & Wilner, A. (2001). Quarterlife crisis:, The unique challenges of life in your twenties. New, York: Putnam., Roberts, A. R. (2002). Myths, facts, and realities, regarding battered women and their children: An, overview. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.), Handbook of, domestic violence intervention strategies: Policies,, programs, and legal remedies. New York: Oxford, University Press., Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio. W. F. (2000). The, rank-order consistency of personality traits from, childhood to old age: A quantitative review of the, longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126,, 3–25., Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., Rideout, V. J., &, Vrodie, M. (1999). Kids and media @ the new, millennium. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family, Foundation., Roberts, L. J. (2000). Fire and ice in marital communication: Hostile and distancing behaviors as, predictors of marital distress. Journal of Marriage, and the Family, 62, 693–707., Roberts, L. J., & Krokoff, L. J. (1990). A time series, analysis of withdrawal, hostility, and displeasure in, satisfied and dissatisfied marriages. Journal of, Marriage and the Family, 52, 95–105., Roberts, P., & Newton, P. M. (1987). Levinsonian, studies of women’s adult development. Psychology, and Aging, 2, 154–163., Robins, L. N., Locke, B. Z., & Regier, D. A. (1991)., An overview of psychiatric disorders in America., In L. N. Robins & D. A. Regier (Eds.), Psychiatric, disorders in America: The epidemiologic catchment, area study. New York: Free Press., Robins, R. W., Norem, J. K., & Cheek, J. M. (1999)., Naturalizing the self. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. Johns, (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 443–477). New York : Guilford, Press., Robinson, B. E. (1998). The workaholic family: A, clinical perspective. American Journal of Family, Therapy, 26(1), 65–75., Robinson, D. G., Woerner, M. G., McMeniman,, M., Mendelowitz, A., & Bilder, R. M. (2004)., Symptomatic and functional recovery from a first, episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 473–479., Robinson, F. P. (1970). Effective study (4th ed.)., New York: HarperCollins., Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life:, The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, Press., Rodin, J., Schank, D., & Striegel-Moore, R. H., (1989). Psychological features of obesity. Medical, Clinics of North America, 73 47–66., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995)., Creating false memories: Remembering words not, , 598, , References, , presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21,, 803–814., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (2000)., Tricks of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 123–127., Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its, current practice, implications, and theory. Boston:, Houghton Mifflin., Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A, therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston:, Houghton Mifflin., Rogers, C. R. (1977). Carl Rogers on personal, power. New York: Delacorte., Rogers, C. R. (1980). A way of being. Boston:, Houghton Mifflin., Rogers, C. R. (1986). Client-centered therapy. In, I. L. Kutash & A. Wolf (Eds.), Psychotherapist’s, casebook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., Rogers, M. P., Fricchione, G., & Reich, P. (1999)., Psychosomatic medicine and consultation-liaison, psychiatry. In A. M. Nicholi (Ed.), The Harvard, guide to psychiatry (3rd ed., pp. 362–389). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., Rogers, R. W., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1997). Protection motivation theory. In D. Gochman (Ed.),, Handbook of health behavior research (Vol. 1, pp., 113–132). New York: Plenum., Rogers, S. J., & White, L. K. (1998). Satisfaction, with parenting: The role of marital happiness,, family structure, and parents’ gender. Journal of, Marriage and the Family, 60, 293–308., Roggman, L. A., Langlois, J. H., Hubbs-Tait, L., &, Rieser-Danner, L. A. (1994). Infant day-care, attachment, and the “file drawer problem.” Child, Development, 65, 1429–1443., Rohner, R. P., & Veneziano, R. A. (2001). The, importance of father love: History and contemporary evidence. Review of General Psychology, 5(4),, 382–405., Rojewski, J. W. (2005). Occupational aspirations:, Constructs, meanings, and application. In S. D., Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development, and counseling: Putting theory and research to work., New York: Wiley., Romano, S. J., & Quinn, L. (2001). Evaluation and, treatment of bulimia nervosa. Primary Psychiatry,, 8(2), 57–62., Rook, K. S. (1998). Investigating the positive and, negative sides of personal relationships: Through a, lens darkly? In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach, (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., Rose, D., Wykes, T., Leese, M., Bindman, J., &, Fleischmann, P. (2003). Patient’s perspectives on, electroconvulsive therapy: Systematic review., British Medical Journal, 326, 1363–1365., Rose, D. P. (1997). Dietary fatty acids and cancer., American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 66(4),, 998S–1003S., Rose, S. D. (1999). Group therapy: A cognitivebehavioral approach. In J. R. Price & D. R. Hescheles (Eds.), A guide to starting psychotherapy, groups. San Diego, CA: Academic Press., Rosen, D. H. (1974). Lesbianism: A study of female, homosexuality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas., Rosen, G. M. (1987). Self-help treatment books, and the commercialization of psychotherapy., American Psychologist, 42, 46–51., Rosen, R. (2000). Medical and psychological interventions for erectile dysfunction. In S. Leiblum &, R. Rosen (Eds.), Principles and practice of sex therapy. New York: Guilford., Rosen, R. D. (1977). Psychobabble. New York:, Atheneum., Rosenbaum, M., Lakin, M., & Roback, H. B., (1992). Psychotherapy in groups. In D. K. Freedheim (Ed.), History of psychotherapy: A century of, change. Washington, DC: American Psychological, Association., , Rosenberg, E. L., & Ekman, P. (1994). Coherence, between expressive systems in emotion. Cognition, and Emotion, 8, 201–229., Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S.,, Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for, terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or, uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 57(4), 681–690., Rosenbluth, S. C. (1997). Is sexual orientation a, matter of choice? Psychology of Women Quarterly,, 21, 595–610., Rosenfarb, I. S., Goldstein, M. J., Mintz, J., &, Nuechterlein, K. H. (1995). Expressed emotion, and subclinical psychopathology observable, within the transactions between schizophrenic, patients and their family members. Journal of, Abnormal Psychology, 104, 259–267., Rosenfeld, L. B., Stewart, S. C., Stinnett, H. J., &, Jackson, L. A. (1999). Preferences for body type, and body characteristics associated with attractive, and unattractive bodies: Jackson and McGill revisited. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89(2), 459–470., Rosenfield, S. (1999). Splitting the difference:, Gender, the self and mental health. In C. S. Aneshensel & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health. New York: Kluwer Academic., Rosenhan, D. L. (1973). On being sane in insane, places. Science, 179, 250–258., Rosenman, R. H. (1993). Relationships of the Type, A behavior pattern with coronary heart disease. In, L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of, stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed.)., New York: Free Press., Rosenthal, R. (1985). From unconscious experimenter bias to teacher expectancy effects. In J. B., Dusek, V. C. Hall, & W. J. Meyer (Eds.), Teacher, expectancies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Rosenthal, R. (2003). Covert communication in, laboratories, classrooms, and the truly real world., Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5),, 151–154., Ross, C. A. (1999). Dissociative disorders. In, T. Millon, P. H. Blaney, & R. D. Davis (Eds.), Oxford textbook of psychopathology (pp. 466–484)., New York: Oxford University Press., Ross, C. E., & Drentea, P. (1998). Consequences of, retirement activities for distress and the sense of, personal control. Journal of Health and Social, Behavior, 39(4), 317–334., Ross, C. E., & Van Willigen, M. (1997). Education, and the subjective quality of life. Journal of Health, & Social Behavior, 38, 275–297., Ross, L. D. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and, his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution, process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press., Ross, M., & Conway, M. (1986). Remembering, one’s own past: The construction of personal, histories. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins, (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition:, Foundations of social behavior. New York: Guilford, Press., Ross, M., McFarland, C., & Fletcher, G. J. O., (1981). The effect of attitude on the recall of personal histories. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 10, 627–634., Rosso, I. M., Cannon, T. D., Huttunen, T., Huttunen, M. O., Lönnqvist, J., & Gasperoni, T. L., (2000). Obstetric risk factors for early-onset schizophrenia in a Finnish birth cohort. American, Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 801–807., Roter, D. L., Hall, J. A., Merisca, R., Nordstrom,, B., Cretin, D., & Svarstad, B. (1998). Effectiveness, of interventions to promote patient compliance., Medical Care, 36, 1138–1161., Rotter, J. B. (1982). The development and application of social learning theory. New York: Praeger., Roughton, B. (2001, May 27). In Europe, workers, time off adds up. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution,, pp. D1–D2.

Page 636 :
Rousseau, D. M. (1997). Organizational behavior, in the new organizational era. In J. T. Spence, J. M., Darley, & D. J. Foss (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 515–533). Palo Alto, CA: Annual, Reviews, Inc., Rowe, D. (1994). The limits of family influence:, Genes, experience, and behavior. New York: Guilford., Rowe, D. C. (1997). Genetics, temperament, and, personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs, (Eds), Handbook of personality psychology. San, Diego: Academic Press., Rowe, D. C. (1999). Heredity. In V. J. Derlega, B. A., Winstead, & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Personality: Contemporary theory and research (2nd ed., pp., 66–100). Chicago: Nelson-Hall., Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., & Kaplan, J., (1999). Impact of psychological factors on the, pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. Circulation, 99(16),, 2192–2197., Rozee, P. D., Bateman, P., & Gilmore, T. (1991)., The personal perspective of acquaintance rape, prevention: A three-tier approach. In A. Parrot &, L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden, crime. New York: Wiley., Rubenstein, C. M., & Shaver, P. (1982). The experience of loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman, (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory,, research and therapy. New York: Wiley., Rubin, Z., Peplau, L. A., & Hill, C. T. (1981). Loving and leaving: Sex differences in romantic attachments. Sex Roles, 7, 821–835., Ruble, T. L. (1983). Sex stereotypes: Issues of, change in the 1970s. Sex Roles, 9, 397–402., Rudisch, B., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2003). Epidemiology of comorbid coronary artery disease and, depression. Biological Psychiatry, 54(3), 227–240., Rudorfer, M. V., Henry, M. E., & Sackeim, H. A., (2003). Electroconvulsive therapy. In A. Tasman,, J. Kay, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New, York: Wiley., Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., & Verette, J., (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena. In D. J. Canary, & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational, maintenance. San Diego: Academic Press., Rush, A. J. (1984). Cognitive therapy. In T. B., Karasu (Ed.), The psychiatric therapies. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association., Rush, A. J. (2000). Mood disorders: Treatment of, depression. In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.),, Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of, psychiatry (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1377–1384)., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams and Wilkins., Rush, A. J., & Beck, A. T. (2000). Cognitive therapy. In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan, and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, (7th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 2167–2177). Philadelphia:, Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Russell, G. F. M. (1995). Anorexia nervosa through, time. In G. Szmukler, C. Dare, & J. Treasure (Eds.),, Handbook of eating disorders: Theory, treatment,, and research. New York: Wiley., Russell, G. F. M. (1997). The history of bulimia, nervosa. In D. M. Garner & P. E. Garfinkel (Eds.),, Handbook of treatment for eating disorders (2nd, ed.). New York: Guilford Press., Russo, N. F. (1979). Overview: Sex roles, fertility,, and the motherhood mandate. Psychology of, Women Quarterly, 4, 7–15., Ruzek, J. (2001). Coping with PTSD and recommended lifestyle changes for PTSD patients. Retrieved November 28, 2001 from U.S. Department, of Veterans Affairs National Center for PTSD, Website: http://www.ncptsd.org/facts/treatment/, fs_coping.html., Ryan, C., & Futterman, D. (1997). Lesbian and gay, youth: Care and counseling. Adolescent Medicine,, 8, 221., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness, and human potentials: A review of research on, , hedonic and eudaimonic well–being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166., Rynes, S., & Rosen, B. (1995). A field study of, factors affecting the adoption and perceived success of diversity training. Personnel Psychology,, 48(2), 247–270., Saad, L. (1996, December). Americans growing, more tolerant of gays. The Gallup Poll Monthly,, 12–14., Saad, L. (1999, September 3). American workers, generally satisfied, but indicate their jobs leave much, to be desired. Princeton, NJ: Gallup News Service., Sabatelli, R. M., & Ripoll, K. (2004). Variations in, marriage over time: An ecological/exchange perspective. In M. Coleman & L. H. Ganong (Eds.),, Handbook of contemporary families: Considering, the past, contemplating the future. Thousand Oaks,, CA: Sage., Sackeim, H. A., Haskett, R. F., Mulsant, B. H.,, Thase, M. E., Mann, J. J., Pettinati, H. M., Greenberg, R. M., Crowe, R. R., Cooper, T. B., & Prudic, J., (2001). Continuation pharmacotherapy in the, prevention of relapse following electroconvulsive, therapy: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of, the American Medical Association, 285(10),, 1299–1307., Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls. New York:, Scribners., Saghir, M. T., & Robins, E. R. (1973). Male and, female homosexuality: A comprehensive investigation. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins., Sagrestano, L. M. (2004). Health implications of, workplace diversity. In M. S. Stockdale & F. J., Crosby (Eds.), The psychology and management of, workplace diversity. UK: Blackwell., Salkovskis, P. M., & Warwick, H. M. C. (2001)., Meaning, misinterpretations, and medicine: A, cognitive-behavioral approach to understanding, health anxiety and hypochondriasis. In V. Starcevic, & D. R. Lipsitt (Eds.), Hypochondriasis: Modern, perspectives on an ancient malady. New York: Oxford University Press., Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9,, 185–211., Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., & Caruso, D. (2002). The, positive psychology of emotional intelligence. In, C. R. Synder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of, positive psychology. New York: Oxford University, Press., Salovey, P., Rothman, A. J., Detweiler, J. B., &, Steward, W. T. (2000). Emotional states and physical health. American Psychologist, 55(1), 110–121., Salthouse, T. A. (2000). Steps toward the explanation of adult age differences in cognition. In, T. Perfect & E. Maylor (Eds.), Theoretical debate in, cognitive aging. Oxford, UK: Oxford University, Press., Salthouse, T. A. (2004). What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 140–144., Salvendy, J. T. (1993). Selection and preparation of, patients and organization of the group. In H. I., Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive group, psychotherapy. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins., Samet, J. M. (1992). The health benefits of smoking cessation. Medical Clinics of North America, 76,, 399–414., Sammons, M. T., Gorny, S. W., Zinner, E. S., &, Allen, R. P. (2000). Prescriptive authority for psychologists: A consensus of support. Professsional, Psychology: Research and Practice, 31(6), 604–609., Samovar, L. A., & Porter, R. E. (2004). Communication between cultures. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & Stefani, L. A., (1998). Communication between cultures (2nd ed.)., Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Sanchez, L. M., & Turner, S. M. (2003). Practicing, psychology in the era of managed care: Implica-, , tions for practice and training. American Psychologist, 58(2), 116–129., Sande, M. A., & Ronald, A. (2004). Treatment of, HIV/AIDS: Do the dilemmas only increase? Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(2),, 224–236., Sanders, G. (2000). Men together: Working with, gay couples in contemporary times. In P. Papp, (Ed.), Couples on the fault line. New York: Guilford, Press., Sanderson, W. C., & Barlow, D. H. (1990). A description of patients diagnosed with DSM-III-R, generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Nervous, and Mental Disease, 178, 588–591., Sandler, J. (1975). Aversion methods. In F. H., Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Helping people, change: A textbook of methods. New York: Pergamon., Sandnabba, N. K., & Ahlberg, C. (1999). Parents’, attitudes and expectations about children’s crossgender behavior. Sex Roles, 40(3–4), 249–263., Sanislow, C. A., & Carson, R. C. (2001). Schizophrenia: A critical examination. In P. B. Sutker &, H. E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of, psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 403–444). New York:, Kluwer Academic/Plenum., Santrock, J. W., Minnett, A. M., & Campbell, B. D., (1994). The authoritative guide to self-help books., New York: Guilford Press., Sanz de Acedo, M. L., & Garcia Ganuza, J. M., (2003). Improvement of mental rotation in girls, and boys. Sex Roles, 49(5–6), 277–286., Sarason, I. G., Johnson, J. H., & Siegel, J. M., (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the Life Experiences Survey. Journal, of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932–946., Sarason, I. G., Pierce, G. R., & Sarason, B. R., (1994). General and specific perceptions of social, support. In W. R. Avison & I. H. Gotlib (Eds.),, Stress and mental health: Contemporary issues and, prospects for the future. New York: Plenum., Sarwer, D. B., Foster, G. D., & Wadden, T. A., (2004). Treatment of obesity I: Adult obesity. In, J. K. Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders, and obesity. New York: Wiley., Saxe, G. N., van der Kolk, B. A., Berkowitz, R.,, Chinman, G., Hall, K., Lieberg, G., & Schwartz, J., (1993). Dissociative disorders in psychiatric inpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150,, 1037–1042., Saxe, L., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1999). Admissibility, of polygraph tests: The application of scientific, standards post-Daubert. Psychology, Public Policy,, and Law, 5(1), 203–223., Sayers, S. L. (2004). Depression and heart disease:, The interrelationship between these two common, disorders is complex and requires careful diagnostic and treatment methods. Psychiatric Annals,, 34(4), 282–288., Scanzoni, J. (2004). Household diversity: The, starting point for healthy families in the new century. In M. Coleman & L. H. Ganong (Eds.),, Handbook of contemporary families: Considering, the past, contemplating the future. Thousand Oaks,, CA: Sage., Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press., Schaefer, J., & Moos, R. (1992). Life crises and, personal growth. In B. Carpenter (Ed.), Personal, coping: Theory, research, and application. Westport,, CT: Praeger., Schaffer, D. R. (1989). Developmental psychology:, Childhood and adolescence. Pacific Grove, CA:, Brooks/Cole., Schaie, K. W. (1990). Intellectual development in, adulthood. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),, Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed.). San, Diego: Academic Press., Schaie, K. W. (1994). The course of adult development. American Psychologist, 49(4), 304–313., Schaninger, C. M., & Buss, W. C. (1986). A longitudinal comparison of consumption and finance, , References, , 599

Page 637 :
handling between happily married and divorced, couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48,, 129–136., Scheidlinger, S. (1993). History of group psychotherapy. In H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.),, Comprehensive group psychotherapy. Baltimore:, Williams & Wilkins., Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism,, coping, and health: Assessment and implications, of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247., Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W., (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and psychological, well-being. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and, pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and, practice (pp. 189–216). Washington, DC: American, Psychological Association., Scheier, M. F., Matthews, K. A., Owens, J. F.,, Magovern, G. J., Sr., Lefebvre, R. C., Abbott, R. A.,, & Carver, C. S. (1989). Dispositional optimism, and recovery from coronary artery bypass surgery:, The beneficial effects on physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 57, 1024–1040., Schiffman, J., Ekstrom, M., LaBrie, J.,, Schulsinger, F., Sorenson, H., & Mednick, S., (2002). Minor physical anomalies and schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A prospective investigation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 238–243., Schilit, W. K. (1987). Thinking about managing, your time. In A. D. Timpe (Ed.), The management, of time. New York: Facts On File., Schimel, J., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski,, T., Solomon, S., Waxmonsky, J., & Arndt, J., (1999). Stereotypes and terror management: Evidence that mortality salience enhances stereotypic, thinking and preferences. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 77(5), 905–926., Schirmer, L. L., & Lopez, F. G. (2001). Probing the, social support and work strain relationship among, adult workers: Contributions of adult attachment, orientations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(1),, 17–33., Schlegel, A., & Barry, H., III. (1991). Adolescence:, An anthropological inquiry. New York: Free Press., Schlenger, W. E., Kulka, R. A., Fairbank, J. A.,, Hough, R. L., et al. (1992). The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder in the Vietnam generation: A multimethod, multisource assessment of, psychiatric disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5,, 333–363., Schlenker, B. R. (2003). Self-presentation. In M.R., Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and, identity. New York: Guilford., Schlenker, B. R., & Pontari, B. A. (2000). The strategic control of information: Impression management and self-presentation in daily life. In A. Tesser,, R. B. Felson, & J. M. Suls (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 199–232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Schmitz, J. M., & DeLaune, K. A. (2005). Nicotine., In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G., Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive, textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams &, Wilkins., Schneer, J. A., & Reitman, F. (1993). Effects of, alternative family structures on managerial career, paths. Academy of Management Journal, 36,, 830–843., Schneider, B. H., Atkinson, L., & Tardif, C. (2001)., Child-parent attachment and children’s peer relations: A quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 37(1), 86–100., Schneider, F., & Deldin, P. J. (2001). Genetics and, schizophrenia. In P. B. Sutker & H. E. Adams, (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 371–402). New York: Kluwer, Academic/Plenum., Schneider, J. P. (2003). The impact of compulsive, cybersex behaviors on the family. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18(3), 329–354., Schofield, P. E., Pattison, P. E., Hill, D. J., & Borland, R. (2001). The influence of group identifi-, , 600, , References, , cation on the adoption of peer group smoking, norms. Psychology and Health, 16(1), 1–16., Schooler, D., Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., &, Caruthers, A. (2004). Who’s that girl: Television’s, role in the body image development of young, white and black women. Psychology of Women, Quarterly, 28, 38–47., Schooler, J. W. (1999). Seeking the core: The issues, and evidence surrounding recovered accounts of, sexual trauma. In L. M. Williams & V. L. Banyard, (Eds.), Trauma & memory. Thousand Oaks, CA:, Sage., Schoon, I., & Parsons, S. (2002). Teenage aspirations, for future careers and occupational outcomes., Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(2), 262–288., Schor, J. (1991). The overworked American. New, York: Basic Books., Schreiber, F. R. (1973). Sybil. New York: Warner., Schroeder, D. H., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1984). Influence of life events stress on physical illness: Substantive effects or methodological flaws? Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 853–863., Schuckit, M. A. (2000). Alcohol-related disorders., In B. J. Sadock & V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and, Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th, ed., pp. 953–970). Philadelphia: Lippincott/, Williams & Wilkins., Schultz, J. H., & Luthe, W. (1969). Autogenic therapy: Vol. 1. Autogenic methods. New York: Grune &, Stratton., Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and, writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and, self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly:, Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19(2), 159–172., Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why, more is less. New York: Ecco., Schwartz, J. E., Neale, J., Marco, C., Shiffman, S., S., & Stone, A. A. (1999). Does trait coping exist? A, momentary assessment approach to the evaluation, of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 360–369., Schwartz, L., Slater, M. A., & Birchler, G. R., (1994). Interpersonal stress and pain behaviors in, patients with chronic pain. Journal of Consulting, and Clinical Psychology, 62, 861–864., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their, methodological implications. In D. Kahneman,, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The, foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84)., New York: Russell Sage Foundation., Schwarzer, R., & Schulz, U. (2003). Stressful life, events. In A. M. Nezu, C. M. Nezu, & P. A. Geller, (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 9. Health, psychology. New York: Wiley., Scroppo, J. C., Drob, S. L., Weinberger, J. L., &, Eagle, P. (1998). Identifying dissociative identity, disorder: A self-report and projective study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 272–284., Scully, J. A., Tosi, H., & Banning, K. (2000). Life, event checklists: Revisiting the social readjustment, rating scale after 30 years. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 864–876., Searle, A., & Bennett, P. (2001). Psychological, factors and inflammatory bowel disease: A review, of a decade of literature. Psychology, Health and, Medicine, 6(2), 121–135., Seccombe, K. (1987). Children: Their impact on, the elderly in declining health. Research on Aging,, 9, 312–326., Seccombe, K. (2001). Families in poverty in the, 1990s: Trends, causes, consequences, and lessons, learned. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Understanding, families into the new millennium: A decade in review (pp. 313–332). Minneapolis: National Council on Family Relations., Sedikides, C. (1993). Assessment, enhancement,, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation, process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 65(2), 317–338., , Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003)., Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 60–79., Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation:, To thine own self be good, to thine own self be, sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own, self be better. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in, experimental social psychology (Vol. 29). New York:, Academic Press., Segal, M. W. (1974). Alphabet and attraction: An, unobtrusive measure of the effect of propinquity, in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 30, 654–657., Segall, A. (1997). Sick role concepts and health, behavior. In D. S. Gochman (Ed.), Handbook of, health behavior research I: Personal and social determinants. New York : Plenum Press., Segerstrom, S. C., & Miller, G. E. (2004). Psychological stress and the human immune system: A, meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 601–630., Segerstrom, S. C., Taylor, S. E., Kemeny, M. E., &, Fahey, J. L. (1998). Optimism is associated with, mood, coping and immune change in response to, stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 74, 1646–1655., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, E. (1993). Memory for positive versus negative life events: Theories for the, differences between happy and unhappy persons., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64,, 654–664., Self, D. W. (1998). Neural substrates of drug craving and relapse in drug addiction. Annals of Medicine, 30, 379–389., Seligman, M. E. P. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–321., Seligman, M. E. P. (1974). Depression and learned, helplessness. In R. J. Friedman & M. M. Katz, (Eds.), The psychology of depression: Contemporary, theory and research. New York: Wiley., Seligman, M. E. P. (1990). Learned optimism: How, to change your mind and your life. New York:, Pocket Books., Seligman, M. E. P. (1991). Learned optimism. New, York: Alfred A. Knopf., Seligman, M. E. P. (1992). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. New York: Freeman., Seligman, M. E. P. (1994). What you can change, and what you can’t. New York: Knopf., Seligman, M. E. P. (1995). The effectiveness of, psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 50,, 965–974., Seligman, M. E. P. (2003). The past and future of, positive psychology. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt, (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life, well-lived. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M., (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction., American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14., Seligman, M. E. P., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2000)., Learned helplessness. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 2, pp. 599–602). San Diego: Academic Press., Seligman, M. E. P., & Levant, R. F. (1998). Managed care policies rely on inadequate science., Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29,, 211–212., Seligman, M. E. P., Schulman, P., DeRubeis, R. J.,, & Hollon, S. D. (1999). The prevention of depression and anxiety. Prevention and Treatment,, http://journals.apa.org/prevention/volume2/pre00, 20008a.html, Seltzer, J. A. (2001). Families formed outside of, marriage. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Understanding, families into the new millennium: A decade in review (pp. 466–487). Minneapolis: National Council on Family Relations., Seltzer, J. A. (2004). Cohabitation and family, change. In M. Coleman & L. H. Ganong (Eds.),, Handbook of contemporary families: Considering

Page 638 :
the past, contemplating the future. Thousand Oaks,, CA: Sage., Selye, H. (1936). A syndrome produced by diverse, nocuous agents. Nature, 138, 32., Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. New York:, McGraw-Hill., Selye, H. (1974). Stress without distress. New York:, Lippincott., Selye, H. (1982). History and present status of the, stress concept. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz, (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical, aspects. New York: Free Press., Semans, J. H. (1956). Premature ejaculation: A, new approach. Journal of Southern Medicine, 79,, 353–361., Senecal, C., Lavoie, K., & Koestner, R. (1997)., Trait and situational factors in procrastination: An, interactional model. Journal of Social Behavior and, Personality, 12, 889–903., Servan-Schreiber, D., Kolb, R., & Tabas, G. (1999)., The somatizing patient. Primary Care, 26(2),, 225–242., Sesso, H. D., Buring, J. E., Rifai, N., Blake, G. J.,, Gaziano, J. M., & Ridker, P. M. (2003). C-reactive, protein and the risk of developing hypertension., Journal of the American Medical Association,, 290(22), 2945–2951., Seta, J. J., Seta, C. E., & McElroy, T. (2002). Strategies, for reducing the stress of negative life experiences:, An averaging/summation analysis. Personality and, Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1574–1585., Seto, M. C., Maric, A., & Barbaree, H. E. (2002)., The role of pornography in the etiology of sexual, aggression. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8(3), 4–42., Shaffer, D. R. (1989). Developmental psychology:, Childhood and adolescence. Pacific Grove, CA:, Brooks/Cole., Shalev, A. Y. (2001). Posttraumatic stress disorder., Primary Psychiatry, 8(10), 41–46., Shapiro, A. F., Gottman, J. M., & Carrère. (2000)., The baby and marriage: Identifying factors that, buffer against decline in marital satisfaction after, the first baby arrives. Journal of Family Psychology,, 14(1), 59–70., Shapiro, D. H., Jr. (1984). Overview: Clinical and, physiological comparison of meditation with, other self-control strategies. In D. H. Shapiro, Jr. &, R. N. Walsh (Eds.), Meditation: Classic and contemporary perspectives. New York: Aldine., Shapiro, D. H., Jr. (1987). Implications of psychotherapy research for the study of meditation., In M. A. West (Ed.), The psychology of meditation., Oxford: Clarendon Press., Shapiro, S. L., Schwartz, G. E. R., & Santerre, C., (2002). Meditation and positive psychology. In, C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of, positive psychology. New York: Oxford University, Press., Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C., (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46,, 407–411., Shaver, P. R., & Brennan, K. A. (1992). Attachment, styles and the “Big Five” personality traits: Their, connections with each other and with romantic, relationship outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 536–545., Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1992). Adult romantic, attachment: Theory and evidence. In D. Perlman, & W. Jones (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 4). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis., Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1993). Adult attachment: Theory and research. In W. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships, (Vol. 4). London: Jessica Kingsley., Shaver, P. R., Wu, S., & Schwartz, J. C. (1991)., Cross-cultural similarities and differences in emotion and its representation: A prototype approach., In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and, social psychology (Vol. 13). Newbury Park, CA:, Sage., , Shaw, L. H., & Gant, L. M. (2002). In defense of, the Internet: The relationship between Internet, communication and depression, loneliness, selfesteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology, 5(2), 157–171., Shear, M. K., & Beidel, D. C. (1998). Psychotherapy in the overall management strategy for social, anxiety disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59,, 39–46., Sheehan, P. W., Green, V., & Truesdale, P. (1992)., Influence of rapport on hypnotically induced, pseudomemory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,, 101, 690–700., Sheehan, S. (1982). Is there no place on earth for, me? Boston: Houghton Mifflin., Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2001a). Getting, older, getting better? Personal strivings and psychological maturity across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 491–501., Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2001b). Goals, congruence, and positive well-being: New empirical, support for humanistic theories. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(1), 30–50., Shephard, R. J. (1986). Passive smoking: Attitudes,, health, and performance. In T. Ney & A. Gale, (Eds.), Smoking and human behavior. Chichester:, Wiley., Shepperd, J. A., & McNulty, J. K. (2002). The affective consequences of expected and unexpected, outcomes. Psychological Science, 13, 85–88., Sher, L. (2003). Daily hassles, cortisol, and depression. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 37(3), 383–384., Sher, L., & Mann, J. J. (2003). Psychiatric pathophysiology: Mood disorders. In A. Tasman, J. Kay,, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New York:, Wiley., Sher, T. G., & Baucom, D. H. (1993). Marital communication: Differences among maritally distressed,, depressed, and nondistressed-nondepressed couples., Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 148–153., Sherer, M., Maddox, J. E., Mercandante, B.,, Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W., (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and, validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671., Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms., New York: Harper., Sherif, M., Harvey, L. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R.,, & Sherif, C. W. (1988). The robbers cave experiment: Intergroup conflict and cooperation. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press., Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale, University Press., Sherman, A. M., de Vries, B., & Lansford, J. E., (2000). Friendship in childhood and adulthood:, Lessons across the life span. International Journal, of Aging and Human Development, 51(1), 31–51., Shike, M. (1999). Diet and lifestyle in the prevention of colorectal cancer: An overview. American, Journal of Medicine, 106(1A), 11S–15S, 50S–51S., Shiono, P. H., Klebanoff, M. A., Nugent, R. P.,, Cotch, M. F., Wilkins, D. G., Rollins, D. E., Carey,, J. C., & Behrman, R. E. (1995). The impact of, cocaine and marijuana use on low birth weight, and preterm birth: A multicenter study. American, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 172, 19–27., Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1990)., Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory, competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26, 978–986., Shors, T. J. (2004). Learning during stressful times., Learning and Memory, 11(2), 137–144., Shotland, R. L., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Women’s, “token resistant” and compliant sexual behaviors, are related to uncertain sexual intentions and rape., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21,, 226–236., Shuchter, S. R., & Zisook, S. (1993). The course of, normal grief. In M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, & R. O., , Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement: Theory,, research, and intervention (pp. 23–43). Cambridge,, England: Cambridge University Press., Shulman, R. B. (2001). Response versus remission, in the treatment of depression: Understanding, residual symptoms. Primary Psychiatry, 8(5),, 28–30, 34., Shuval, J. T. (1993). Migration and stress. In, L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of, stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed.)., New York: Free Press., Siebert, A. (1995). Student success: How to succeed, in college and still have time for your friends. Fort, Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace., SIECUS. (2004, Fall). SIECUS Fact Sheet: Public, support for comprehensive sexuality education., Retrieved January 25, 2005 from http://63.73., 227.69/Pubs/Fact/Fact0017.html., Siegel, O. (1982). Personality development in, adolescence. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of, developmental psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:, Prentice-Hall., Siegler, I. C., Bosworth, H. B., & Poon, L. W., (2003). Disease, health and aging. In R. M. Lerner,, M.A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.), Handbook of, psychology: Vol. 6. Developmental psychology. New, York: Wiley., Siegler, I. C., & Brummett, B. H. (2000). Associations among NEO personality assessments and, well-being at mid-life: Facet-level analyses. Psychology & Aging, 15, 710–714., Siegler, I. C., Peterson, B. L., Barefoot, J. C., &, Williams, R. B. (1992). Hostility during late adolescence predicts coronary risk factors at mid-life., American Journal of Epidemiology, 136(2),, 146–154., Siegman, A. W., Townsend, S. T., Civelek, A. C., &, Blumenthal, R. S. (2000). Antagonistic behavior,, dominance, hostility, and coronary heart disease., Psychosomatic Medicine, 62(2), 248–257., Signorielli, N., & Bacue, A. (1999). Recognition, and respect: A content analysis of prime-time, television characters. Sex Roles, 40(7/8), 527–544., Silberman, E. K. (1998). Psychiatrists’ and, internists’ beliefs. Primary Psychiatry, 5, 65–71., Silke, A. (2003). Terrorists, victims, and society:, Psychological perspectives on terrrorism and its, consequences. New York: Wiley., Silver, E., Cirincion, C., & Steadman, H. J. (1994)., Demythologizing inaccurate perceptions of the, insanity defense. Law & Human Behavior, 18(1),, 63–70., Silver, H., Feldman, P., Bilker, W., & Gur, R. C., (2003). Working memory deficit as a core neuropsychological dysfunction in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1809–1816., Silver, M. (2002, June 10). What they’re seeing., U.S. News & World Report, p. 41., Silverman, P. R., & Worden, J. M. (1992). Children’s reactions in the early months after the death, of a parent. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,, 62, 93–104., Simon, R. I. (2003). The law and psychiatry. In R., E. Hales & S. C. Yudofsky (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing., Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A, predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104(1),, 66–89., Sinclair, R. C., Mark, M. M., & Clore, G. L. (1994)., Mood-related persuasion depends on (mis)attributions. Social Cognition, 12, 309–326., Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female, physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65,, 293–307., Singh, D. (1995). Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: Role of, waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1089–1101., , References, , 601

Page 639 :
Sinnott, J. D. (1989). A model for solution of illstructured problems: Implications for everyday, and abstract problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott, (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and application. New York: Praeger., Sirois, F. M., Melia-Gordon, M. L., & Pychyl, T. A., (2003). “I’ll look after my health, later”: An investigation of procrastination and health. Personality, and Individual Differences, 35(5), 1167–1184., Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior., New York: Macmillan., Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New, York: Knopf., Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as the science of behavior? American Psychologist, 42, 780–786., Skinner, B. F. (1990). Can psychology be a science, of mind? American Psychologist, 45, 1206–1210., Skinner, P. H., & Shelton, R. L. (1985). Speech,, language, and hearing: Normal processes and disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley., Skolnick, P. (2003). Psychiatric pathophysiology:, Anxiety disorders. In A. Tasman, J. Kay, & J. A., Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New York: Wiley., Slashinki, M. J., Coker, A. L., & Davis, K. E., (2003). Physical aggression, forced sex, and stalking victimization by a dating partner: An analysis, of the National Violence Against Women Survey., Violence & Victims, 18(6), 595–617., Slaski, M., & Cartwright, S. (2003). Emotional, intelligence training and its implications for stress,, health and performance. Stress and Health: Journal, of the International Society for the Investigation of, Stress, 19(4), 233–239., Slavney, P. R. (1990). Perspectives on hysteria. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press., Sloan, D. M., & Marx, B. P. (2004). A closer examination of the structured written disclosure procedure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,, 72(2), 165–175., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982)., Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk., In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.),, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases., Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press., Smiler, A. P. (2004). Thirty years after the discovery of gender: Psychological concepts and measures of masculinity. Sex Roles, 50(1–2), 15–26., Smith, A., Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1999). Do selffulfilling prophecies accumulate, dissipate, or, remain stable over time? Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 77, 548–565., Smith, A. K. (2000, November 6). Charting your, own course. U.S. News & World Report, 56–60, 62,, 64–65., Smith, A. L., & Weissman, M. M. (1992). Epidemiology. In E. S. Paykel (Ed.), Handbook of affective, disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford., Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal, components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233–269., Smith, D. A. (1999). The end of theoretical orientations? Applied & Preventative Psychology, 8,, 269–280., Smith, D. M., & Gates, G. J. (2001) Gay and lesbian, families in the United States: Same-sex unmarried, partner households: Preliminary analysis of 2000, U.S. census data, a human rights campaign report, [Web Page]. URL www.hrc.org., Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (1995). Social psychology. New York: Worth., Smith, G. S., Branas, C. C., & Miller, T. R. (1999)., Fatal nontraffic injuries involving alcohol: A metaanalysis. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 33(6),, 659–668., Smith, J. C. (1975). Meditation and psychotherapy: A review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 32, 553–564., Smith, J. W., Frawley, P. J., & Polissar, N. L. (1997)., Six- and twelve-month abstinence rates in inpatient alcoholics treated with either faradic aversion, , 602, , References, , or chemical aversion compared with matched, inpatients from a treatment registry. Journal of, Addictive Diseases, 16, 5–24., Smith, M., & Pazder, L. (1980). Michelle remembers. New York: Pocket Books., Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis, of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752–760., Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1994). Social psychology across cultures. Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1999). Social psychology across cultures. Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Smith, R. E. (1989). Effects of coping skills training on generalized self-efficacy and locus of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 56, 228–233., Smith, T. W. (1999). The emerging 21st century, American family. University of Chicago: National, Opinion Research Center., Smith, T. W., & Gallo, L. C. (1999). Hostility and, cardiovascular reactivity during marital interaction. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 436–445., Smith, T. W., & Gallo, L. C. (2001). Personality, traits as risk factors for physical illness. In A. Baum,, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of, health psychology (pp. 139–174). Mahwah, NJ:, Erlbaum., Smith, T. W., Pope, M. K., Sanders, J. D., Allred,, K. D., & O’Keefe, J. L. (1988). Cynical hostility at, home and work: Psychosocial vulnerability across, domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 22,, 525–548., Smith, W. P., Compton, W. C., & West, W. B., (1995). Meditation as an adjunct to a happiness, enhancement program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 269–273., Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United, States: An appraisal of research themes, findings,, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26,, 1–20., Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Gupta, S. (1999)., The effect of marriage and divorce on women’s, economic well-being. American Sociological Review, 64, 794–812., Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2001). Gender and, eating problems. In R. H. Striegel-Moore &, L. Smolak (Eds.), Eating disorders: Innovative directions in research and practice (pp. 91–10). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Smoll, F. L., & Schutz, R. W. (1990). Quantifying, gender differences in physical performance: A, developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 26, 360–369., Smyth, J., Litcher, L., Hurewitz, A., & Stone, A., (2001). Relaxation training and cortisol secretion, in adult asthmatics. Journal of Health Psychology,, 6(2), 217–227., Smyth, J. M. (1998). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating, variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174–184., Smyth, J. M., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1999). Sharing, one’s story: Translating emotional experiences into, words as a coping tool. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 70–89). New, York: Oxford Univer-sity Press., Smyth, J. M., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2001). What are, the health effects of disclosure? In A. Baum, T. A., Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health, psychology (pp. 339–348). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Snodgrass, S. E. (1985). Women’s intuition: The, effect of subordinate role on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 49, 146–155., Snodgrass, S. E. (1992). Further effects of role, versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 154–158., Snodgrass, S. E., Hecht, M. A., & Ploutz-Snyder,, R. (1998). Interpersonal sensitivity: Expressivity or, perceptivity? Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 74(1), 238–249., , Snowden, L. R., & Hu, T. W. (1996). Outpatient, service use in minority-serving mental health, programs. Administration and Policy in Mental, Health, 24, 149–159., Snowdon, D. (2001). Aging with grace: What the, nun study teaches us about leading longer, healthier,, and more meaningful lives. New York: Bantam, Books., Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In, L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social, psychology (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press., Snyder, M. (1986). Public appearances/Private, realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New, York: Freeman., Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (1978). Hypothesistesting processes in social interaction. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(11),, 1202–1212., Sobal, J. (1995). Social influences on body weight., In K. D. Brownell & C. G. Fairburn (Eds.), Eating, disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook., New York: Guilford Press., Solberg, E. C., Diener, E., & Robinson, M. (2004)., Why are materialists less satisfied? In T. Kasser &, A. D. Kanner (Eds.). Psychology and consumer, culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic, world. Washington, DC: American Psychological, Association., Solberg, E. C., Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Lucas, R. E., &, Oishi, S. (2002). Wanting, having, and satisfaction:, Examining the role of desire discrepancies in satisfaction with income. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 83(3), 725–734., Solomon, D. A., Keller, M. B., Leon, A. C., Mueller,, T. I., Shea, M. T., Warshaw, M., Maser, J. D.,, Coryell, W., & Endicott, J. (1997). Recovery from, major depression: A 10-year prospective follow-up, across multiple episodes. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 1001–1006., Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F., (2004). Pioneers in partnership: Lesbian and gay, male couples in civil unions compared with those, not in civil unions and married heterosexual siblings. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(2), 275–286., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T., (1991). A terror management theory of social, behavior: The psychological functions of selfesteem and cultural worldviews. In M. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 24). Orlando, FL: Academic Press., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J. L., & Pyszczynski, T. A., (2004). Lethal consumption: Death-denying materialism. In T. Kasser & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a, good life in a materialistic world. Washington, DC:, American Psychological Association., Solowij, N., Stephens, R. S., Roffman, R. A.,, Babor, T., Kadden, R., Miller, M., Christiansen., K., McRee, B., & Vendetti, J. (2002). Cognitive, functioning of long-term heavy cannabis users, seeking treatment. Journal of the American Medical, Association, 287, 1123–1131., Sommers-Flanagan, R., Sommers-Flanagan, J., &, Davis, B. (1993). What’s happening on music, television? A gender-role content analysis. Sex, Roles, 28, 745–753., Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2003). Stress in organizations. In W. C. Borman , D. R. Ilgen, & R. J., Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 12., Industrial and organizational psychology. New, York: Wiley., Sonstroem, R. J. (1997). Physical activity and selfesteem. In W. P. Morgan (Ed.), Physical activity, and mental health. Washington, DC: Taylor &, Francis., Sorensen, J. L., Haug, N. A., & Batki, S. L. (2005)., Psychosocial issues of HIV/AIDS among drug, users in treatment. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B., Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse:, A comprehensive textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins.

Page 640 :
Sotiriou, P. E. (2002). Integrating college study, skills: Reasoning in reading, listening, and writing., Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., South, S. J. (1991). Sociodemographic differentials, in mate selection preferences. Journal of Marriage, and the Family, 53 928–940., South, S. J. (1993). Racial and ethnic differences in, the desire to marry. Journal of Marriage and the, Family, 55, 357–370., South, S. J., Bose, S., & Trent, K. (2004). Anticipating divorce: Spousal agreement, predictive accuracy, and effects on labor supply and fertility., Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 40(3–4), 1–22., South, S. J., & Lloyd, K. M. (1995). Spousal alternatives and marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 60, 21–35., Sowell, T. (1994). Race and culture: A world view., New York: Basic Books., Spanos, N. P. (1994). Multiple identity enactments, and multiple personality disorder: A sociocognitive perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 116,, 143–165., Spanos, N. P. (1996). Multiple identities and false, memories. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Spector, I., & Carey, M. (1990). Incidence and, prevalence of the sexual dysfunctions: A critical, review of the empirical literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 389–408., Spence, J. T. (1983). Comment on Lubinski, Tellegen, and Butcher’s “Masculinity, femininity, and, androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 44, 440–446., Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and, sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24,, 44–62., Spence, J. T., & Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholism:, Definition, measurement, and preliminary results., Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 160–178., Sperry, R. W. (1982). Some effects of disconnecting the cerebral hemispheres. Science, 217,, 1223–1226, 1250., Spiegel, D., Bloom, J. R., Kraemer, H. C., & Gottheil, E. (1989). Psychological support for cancer, patients. Lancet, 2, 1447., Spiegler, M. D., & Guevremont, D. C. (1998)., Contemporary behavior therapy. Pacific Grove, CA:, Brooks/Cole., Spitzberg, B. H. (1999). An analysis of empirical, estimates of sexual aggression victimization and, perpetration. Violence and Victims, 14(3),, 241–260., Spokane, A. R., & Cruza-Guet, M. C. (2005). Holland’s theory of vocational personalities in work, environments. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.),, Career development and counseling: Putting theory, and research to work. New York: Wiley., Sprecher, S. (1994). Two sides to the breakup of, dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 1,, 199–222., Sprecher, S. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction,, love, commitment, and stability. The Journal of Sex, Research, 39(3), 190–196., Sprecher, S., & Cate, R. M. (2004). Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In J. H. Harvey,, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of, sexuality and close relationships. Mahwah, NJ:, Lawrence Erlbaum., Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The, importance of perceived communication for romantic and friendship attraction experienced, during a get-acquainted date. Personality and, Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(4), 391–400., Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (1998). Passionate and, companionate love in courting and young married, couples. Sociological Inquiry, 68(2), 163–185., Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994)., Mate selection preferences: Gender differences, , examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074–1080., Springen, K. (2004, November 1). Under the knife., Newsweek, pp. 59–60., Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1998). Left brain,, right brain. New York: Freeman., Stack, S. (1998). Marriage, family and loneliness: A, cross-national study. Sociological Perspectives, 41,, 415–432., Stack, S., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status, and happiness: A 17-nation study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 527–536., Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance, strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and, Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242., Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy, and work-related performance: A meta-analysis., Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261., Stamler, J., Daviglus, M. L., Garside, D. B., Dyer,, A. R., Greenland, P., & Neaton, J. D. (2000). Relationship of baseline serum cholesterol levels in 3, large cohorts of younger men to long-term coronary, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality and, to longevity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 311–318., Stanford, E. P., Happersett, C. J., Morton, D. J.,, Molgaard, C. A., & Peddecord, K. M. (1991). Early, retirement and functional impairment from a, multi-ethnic perspective. Research on Aging, 13,, 5–38., Stanton, A. L., Lobel, M., Sears, S. , & DeLuca,, R. S. (2002). Psychosocial aspects of selected issues, in women’s reproductive health: Current status, and future directions. Journal of Consulting &, Clinical Psychology, 70(3), 751–770., Starcevic, V. (2001). Clinical features and diagnosis of hypochondriasis. In V. Starcevic & D. R., Lipsitt (Eds.), Hypochondriasis: Modern perspectives on an ancient malady. New York: Oxford, University Press., Starker, S. (1990). Self-help books: Ubiquitous, agents of health care. Medical Psychotherapy: An, International Journal, 3 187–194., Starker, S. (1992). Characteristics of self-help, book readers among VA medical outpatients., Medical Psychotherapy: An International Journal, 5,, 89–93., Starrels, M. E., Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Dowler,, D. W., & Neal, M. B. (1997). The stress of caring, for a parent: Effects of the elder’s impairment on, an employed adult child. Journal of Marriage and, the Family, 59, 860–872., Statt, D. A. (1994). Psychology and the world of, work. New York: New York University Press., Stattin, H., & Magnusson, D. (1990). Pubertal, maturation in female development. Hillsdale, NJ:, Erlbaum., Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How, stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629., Steiger, H., Bruce, K. R., & Israël, M. (2003). Eating disorders. In G. Stricker & T. A. Widiger (Eds.),, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 8. Clinical psychology., New York: Wiley., Steiger, H., & Seguin, J. R. (1999). Eating disorders:, Anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In T. Millon,, P. H. Blaney, & R. D. Davis (Eds.), Oxford textbook, of psychopathology (pp. 365–389). New York: Oxford University Press., Stein, M. B., Forde, D. R., Anderson, G., & Walker,, J. R. (1997a). Obsessive-compulsive disorder in, the community: An epidemiologic survey with, clinical reappraisal. American Journal of Psychiatry,, 154, 1120–1126., Stein, M. B., Walker, J. R., Hazen, A. L., & Forde,, D. R. (1997b). Full and partial posttraumatic stress, disorder: Findings from a community survey., American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1114–1119., Stein, N., Marshall, N. L., & Tropp, L. R. (1993)., Secrets in public: Sexual harassment in our schools., Wellesley, MA: Center for Research on Women at, , Wellesley College and the NOW Legal Defense and, Education Fund., Stein, P. J. (1975). Singlehood: An alternative to, marriage. Family Coordinator, 24, 489–503., Stein, P. J. (1976). Single. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:, Prentice-Hall., Stein, R. J., O’Byrne, K. K., Suminski, R. R., &, Haddock, C. K. (1999). Etiology and treatment of, obesity in adults and children: Implications for the, addiction model. Drugs and Society, 15(1–2),, 103–121., Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parentadolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect., Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(1), 1–19., Steinberg, L. (2004). The ten basic principles of, good parenting. New York: Simon & Schuster., Steinberg, L., & Levine, A. (1997). You and your, adolescent: A parents’ guide for ages 10 to 20. New, York: Harper Perennial., Steiner, H., Smith, C., Rosenkranz, R. T., & Litt, I., (1991). The early care and feeding of anorexics., Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 21,, 163–167., Steiner-Pappalardo, N. L., & Gurung, R. A. R., (2002). The femininity effect: Relationship quality,, sex, gender, attachment, and significant-other, concepts. Personal Relationships, 9(3), 313–325., Steinhausen, H. (2002). The outcome of anorexia, nervosa in the 20th century. American Journal of, Psychiatry, 159, 1284–1293., Steinmetz, H., Staiger, J. F., Schluag, G., Huang, Y.,, & Jancke, L. (1995). Corpus callosum and brain, volume in women and men. Neuroreport, 3,, 1002–1004., Stephens, R. S. (1999). Cannabis and hallucinogens. In B. S. McCrady, & E. E. Epstein (Eds.),, Addictions: A comprehensive guidebook. New York:, Oxford University Press., Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love., Psychological Review, 93 119–135., Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangulating love. In R. J., Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of, love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press., Stevens, G., Owens, D., & Schaefer, E. C. (1990)., Education and attractiveness in marriage choices., Social Psychology Quarterly, 53 62–70., Stewart, A. J., & Ostrove, J. M. (1998). Women’s, personality in middle age: Gender, history, and, midcourse corrections. American Psychologist, 53,, 1185–1194., Stewart, A., Ostrove, J. M., & Helson, R. (2001)., Middle aging in women: Patterns of personality, change from the 30’s to the 50’s. Journal of Adult, Development, 8(1), 23–37., Stewart, F. H., Ellertson, C., & Cates, W. Jr. (2004)., Abortion. In R. A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, F. H. Stewart, A. L. Nelson, W. Cates Jr., F. Guest, & D. Kowal, (Eds.), Contraceptive technology (18th rev. ed.)., New York: Ardent Media., Stice, E. (2001). Risk factors for eating pathology:, Recent advances and future directions. In R. H., Striegel-Moore & L. Smolak (Eds.), Eating disorders: Innovative directions in research and practice, (pp. 51–74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Stillion, J. M. (1995). Death in the lives of adults:, Responding to the tolling of the bell. in H. Wass &, R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Dying: Facing the facts. New, York: Taylor & Francis., Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., Middleton, K. A.,, Busch, A. L., Lundeberg, K., & Carlton, R. P., (2000). The intergenerational transmission of, spouse abuse: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage, and the Family, 62, 640–654., Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B.,, & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse, perpetration and victimization risk factors: A, meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65–98., Stoffer, G. R., Davis, K. E., & Brown, J. B., Jr., (1977). The consequences of changing initial answers on objective tests: A stable effect and a stable, , References, , 603

Page 641 :
misconception. Journal of Educational Research,, 70, 272–277., Stone, A. A. (1999). Psychiatry and the law. In, A. M. Nicholi (Ed.), The Harvard guide to psychiatry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., Stone, L. (1977). The family, sex and marriage in, England 1500–1800. New York: Harper & Row., Stone, W. N. (2003). Group psychotherapy. In, A. Tasman, J. Kay, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry. New York: Wiley., Stoney, C. M. (2003). Gender and cardiovascular, disease: A psychobiological and integrative approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science,, 12(4), 129–133., Stoolmiller, M. (1999). Implications of the restricted range of family environments for estimates of heritability and nonshared environment, in behavior-genetic adoption studies. Psychological, Bulletin, 125, 392–409., Strauman, T. J., Vookles, J., Berenstein, V., Chaiken,, S., & Higgins, E. T. (1991). Self-discrepancies and, vulnerability to body dissatisfaction and disordered, eating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 61, 946–956., Strickland, C. J. (1997). Suicide among American, Indian, Alaskan Native, and Canadian Aboriginal, youth: Advancing the research agenda. International Journal of Mental Health, 25, 11–32., Striegel-Moore, R. H., McMahon, R. P., Biro, F., M., Schreiber, G., Crawford, P. B., & Voorhees, C., (2001). Exploring the relationship between timing, of menarche and eating disorder symptoms in, black and white adolescent girls. International, Journal of Eating Disorders, 30(4), 421–433., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Silberstein, L. R., & Rodin,, J. (1993). The social self in bulimia nervosa: Public, self-consciousness, social anxiety, and perceived, fraudulence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102,, 297–303., Striegel-Moore, R. H., & Smolak, L. (2001). Introduction. In R. H. Striegel-Moore & L. Smolak, (Eds.), Eating disorders: Innovative directions in, research and practice (pp. 3–8). Washington, DC:, American Psychological Association., Strober, M. (1995). Family-genetic perspectives on, anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In K. D., Brownell & C. G. Fairburn (Eds.), Eating disorders, and obesity: A comprehensive handbook. New York:, Guilford Press., Stroebe, W., Stroebe, M., Abakoumkin, G., &, Schut, H. (1996). The role of loneliness and social, support in adjustment to loss: A test of attachment, versus stress theory. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 70(6), 1241–1249., Stroh, L. K., Brett, J. M., & Reilly, A. H. (1996)., Family structure, glass ceiling, and traditional, explanations for the differential rate of turnover of, female and male managers. Journal of Vocational, Behavior, 49, 99–118., Strupp, H. H. (1996). The tripartite model and the, Consumer Reports study. American Psychologist, 51,, 1017–1024., Stuart, P. (1992). Murder on the job. Personnel, Journal, 71, 72–84., Stunkard, A. J., Harris, J. R., Pederson, N. L., &, McClearn, G. E. (1990). The body-mass index of, twins who have been reared apart. New England, Journal of Medicine, 322, 1483–1487., Stunkard, A. J., Sorensen, T., Hanis, C., Teasdale,, T. W., Chakraborty, R., Schull, W. J., & Schulsinger, F. (1986). An adoption study of human, obesity. New England Journal of Medicine, 314,, 193–198., Suarez, E. C. (2004). C-reactive protein is associated with psychological risk factors of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy adults., Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(5), 684–691., Suarez, E. C., Kuhn, C. M., Schanberg, S. M.,, Williams, R. B., Jr., & Zimmermann, E. A. (1998)., Neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and emotional, responses of hostile men: The role of interpersonal, challenge. Psychosomatic Medicine, 60(1), 78–88., , 604, , References, , Suarez-Orozco, C., & Suarez-Orozco, M. M., (1995). Transformation: Immigration, family life,, and achievement motivation among Latino adolescents. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press., Sue, D. (1979). Erotic fantasies of college students, during coitus. Journal of Sex Research, 15, 299–305., Sue, S., & Zane, N. (1987). The role of culture and, cultural techniques in psychotherapy: A critique, and reformulation. American Psychologist, 42,, 37–45., Sue, S., Zane, N., & Young, K. (1994). Research on, psychotherapy with culturally diverse populations., In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of, psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed., pp., 783–817). New York: John Wiley., Suinn, R. M. (1984). Fundamentals of abnormal, psychology. Chicago: Nelson-Hall., Sullivan, A. (2004, July 26). If at first you don’t, succeed . . . Time, p. 78., Sullivan, G. M., & Coplan, J. D. (2000). Anxiety, disorders: Biochemical aspects. In B. J. Sadock &, V. A. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan and Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, (7th ed., Vol. 1)., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., Sullivan, P. F. (2002). Course and outcome of, anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In C. G., Fairburn & K. D. Brownell (Eds.), Eating disorders, and obesity: A comprehensive handbook. New York:, Guilford., Sullivan, P. F., Neale, M. C., & Kendler, K. S., (2000). Genetic epidemiology of major depression: Review and meta-analysis. American Journal, of Psychiatry, 157, 1552–1562., Sulloway, F. J. (1991). Reassessing Freud’s case, histories: The social construction of psychoanalysis. ISIS, 82, 245–275., Sulloway, F. J. (1995). Birth order and evolutionary psychology: A meta-analytic overview. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 75–80., Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order,, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York:, Pantheon Books., Suls, J., & Rothman, A. (2004). Evolution of the, biopsychosocial model: Prospects and challenges, for health psychology. Health Psychology, 23(2),, 119–125., Super, D. E. (1957). The psychology of careers. New, York: HarperCollins., Super, D. E. (1985). Career and life development., In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and, development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., Super, D. E. (1988). Vocational adjustment: Implementing a self-concept. The Career Development, Quarterly, 36, 351–357., Surra, C. A. (1990). Research and theory on mate, selection and premarital relationships in the, 1980s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52,, 844–865., Susman, E. J., Dorn, L. D., & Schiefelbein, V. L., (2003). Puberty, sexuality, and health. In R. M., Lerner, M.A. Easterbrooks, & J. Mistry (Eds.),, Handbook of psychology: Vol. 6. Developmental, psychology. New York: Wiley., Susser, E., Neugebauer, R., Hoek, H. W., Brown,, A. S., Lin, S., Labovitz, D., & Gorman, J. M., (1996). Schizophrenia after prenatal famine: Further evidence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53,, 25–31., Sutherland, V. J. (2000). Understimulation/boredom. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol., 3, pp. 634–636). San Diego: Academic Press., Swain, S. (1989). Covert intimacy: Closeness in, men’s friendships. In B. J. Risman & P. Schwartz, (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships (pp., 71–86). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Swan, G. E., Hudmon, K. S., & Khroyan, T. V., (2003). Tobacco dependence. In A. M. Nezu, C. M., Nezu , & P. A. Geller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 9. Health psychology. New York: Wiley., Swann, W. B., Rentfrow, P. J., & Guinn, J. S., (2003). Self-verification: The search for coherence., , In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of, self and identity. New York: Guilford., Swann, W. B., Stein-Seroussi, A., & Giesler, R. B., (1992). Why people self-verify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 392–401., Swann, W. B., Jr., & Ely, R. J. (1984). A battle of, wills: Self-verification versus behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 46, 1287–1302., Swann, W. B., Jr., Stein-Seroussi, A., & McNulty,, S. E. (1992). Outcasts in a white-lie society: The, enigmatic worlds of people with negative selfconceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 618–624., Swanson, J. L., & D’Achiardi, C. (2005). Beyond, interests, needs/values, and abilities: Assessing, other important career constructs over the life, span. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career, development and counseling: Putting theory and, research to work. New York: Wiley., Swap, W. C. (1977). Interpersonal attraction and, repeated exposure to rewarders and punishers., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3,, 248–251., Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter,, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned, and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 68, 199–214., Swoboda, F. (1995, November 25). Law, education, failing to break glass ceiling. Washington Post,, C1, C2., Sygnatur, E. F., & Toscano, G. A. (2000, Spring)., Work-related homicides: The facts. Compensation, and Working Conditions, 3–8., Szasz, T. S. (1974). The myth of mental illness. New, York: HarperCollins., Szasz, T. S. (1993). A lexicon of lunacy: Metaphoric, malady, moral responsibility, and psychiatry. New, Brunswick, NJ: Transaction., Szmukler, G. I., & Patton, G. (1995). Sociocultural, models of eating disorders. In G. Szmukler, C. Dare,, & J. Treasure (Eds.), Handbook of eating disorders:, Theory, treatment and research. New York: Wiley., Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup, relations. London: Cambridge University Press., Takanishi, R. (1993). The opportunities of adolescence—Research, interventions, and policy. American Psychologist, 48, 85–87., Takeuchi, D. T., Uehara, E., & Maramba, G., (1999). Cultural diversity and mental health treatment. In A. V. Horwitz & T. L. Scheid (Eds.), A, handbook for the study of mental health. New York:, Cambridge University Press., Tamminga, C. A. (1999). Principles of the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. In D. S. Charney,, E. J. Nestler & B. S. Bunney (Eds.), Neurobiology of, mental illness (pp. 272–290). New York: Oxford, University Press., Tamminga, C. A., & Carlsson, A. (2003). Psychiatric pathophysiology: Schizophrenia. In A. Tasman, J. Kay, & J. A. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry., New York: Wiley., Tang, M. (2002). A comparison of Asian American, Caucasian American, and Chinese college, students: An initial report. Journal of Multicultural, Counseling and Development, 30(2), 124–134., Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand:, Women and men in conversation. New York:, Ballantine., Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture: Moving, from debate to dialogue. New York: Random, House., Tanner, J. M. (1990). Fetus into man: Physical, growth from conception to maturity. Cambridge,, MA: Harvard University Press., Tardiff, K., Marzuk, P. M., & Leon, A. C. (2002)., Role of anitdepressants in murder and suicide., American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1248–1249., Tavris, C. (1982). Anger: The misunderstood emotion. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Page 642 :
Tavris, C. (1989). Anger: The misunderstood emotion (2nd ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster., Tavris, C., & Sadd, S. (1977). The Redbook report, on female sexuality. New York: Delacorte., Taylor, D. A., & Altman, I. (1987). Communication in interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller, (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in, communication research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage., Taylor, E. (2001). Positive psychology and humanistic psychology: A reply to Seligman. Journal of, Humanistic Psychology, 41(1), 13–29., Taylor, R. J., Chatters, L. M., Tucker, M. B., &, Lewis, E. (1990). Developments in research on, black families: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 993–1014., Taylor, S. E. (1981a). A categorization approach to, stereotyping. In D. H. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive, processes in stereotyping and intergroup relations, (pp. 418–429). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Taylor, S. E. (1981b). The interface of cognitive, and social psychology. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp., 189–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and, well-being: A social psychological perspective on, mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103,, 193–210., Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact, from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27., Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A., (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight., Psychological Review, 107(3), 411–429., Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sherman, D. K., Sage,, R. M., & McDowell, N. K. (2003). Are self-enhancing cognitions associated with healthy or, unhealthy biological profiles? Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 85(4), 605–615., Teachman, J. (2003). Premarital sex, premarital, cohabitation, and the risk of subsequent marital, dissolution among women. Journal of Marriage, and Family, 65, 444–445., Teachman, J. D., Polonko, K. A., & Scanzoni, J., (1999). Demography and families. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.),, Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 39–76)., New York: Plenum., Teachman, J. D., Tedrow, L. M., & Crowder, K. D., (2001). The changing demography of America’s, families. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Understanding, families into the new millennium: A decade in review (pp. 453–465). Minneapolis: National Council on Family Relations., Tedeschi, R. G., Park, C. L., & Calhoun, L. G., (1998). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual issues., In R. G. Tedeschi, C. L. Park, & L. G. Calhoun, (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the, aftermath of crisis (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., Jr.,, Wilcox, K. J., Segal, N. L., & Rich, S. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 54, 1031–1039., Temoshok, L. (1987). Personality, coping style,, emotion and cancer: Towards an integrative, model. Cancer Surveys, 6, 545–567., Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (1999). Finding benefits, in adversity. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The, psychology of what works (pp. 279–304). New York:, Oxford University Press., Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (2002). Benefit-finding, and benefit-reminding. In C. R. Synder & S. J., Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. New, York: Oxford University Press., Tesch, S. A., & Whitbourne, S. K. (1982). Intimacy, and identity status in young adults. Journal of, Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1041–1051., , Tesser, A. (2001). Self-esteem. In A. Tesser & N., Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes. Malden, MA:, Blackwell., Testa, K. (1996). Church to pay $1 million in falsememory case. San Jose Mercury News, 8A., Thase, M. E., Jindal, R., & Howland, R. H. (2002)., Biological aspects of depression. In I. H. Gotlib &, C. L. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook of depression., New York: Guilford., Theisen, T. (2002, March 17). Too many are lying, to get the job. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, p. R5., Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social, psychology of groups. New York: Wiley., Thomas, A. J., Kalaria, R. N., & O’Brien, J. T., (2004). Depression and vascular disease: What is, the relationship? Journal of Affective Disorders,, 79(1–3), 81–95., Thomas, K. M. (2005). Diversity dynamics in the, workplace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Thomas, M. (2000). Abstinence-based programs, for prevention of adolescent pregnancies. Journal, of Adolescents Health, 26, 5–17., Thompson, J. K., & Stice, E. (2001). Thin-ideal, internalization: Mounting evidence for a new risk, factor for body-image disturbance and eating, pathology. Current Directions in Psychological, Science, 10(5), 181–183., Thompson, T. L., & Zerbinos, E. (1995). Gender, roles in animated cartoons: Has the picture, changed in 20 years? Sex Roles, 32, 651–673., Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1979). The, use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of, knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 83–106., Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four, decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues, in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s., Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009–1037., Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (2000). Death anxiety in younger and older adults. In A. Tomer (Ed.),, Death attitudes and the older adult: Theories, concepts, and applications. Philadelphia: BrunnerRoutledge., Thune, I., & Furberg, A. (2001). Physical activity, and cancer risk: Dose-response and cancer, all sites, and site specific. Medicine and Science in Sports, and Exercise, 33(6), S530–S550., Tice, D. M. (1991). Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions, differ by trait self-esteem. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 5, 711–725., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress,, and health: The cost and benefits of dawdling., Psychological Science, 8, 454–458., Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F., (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it!, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1),, 53–67., Tice, D. M., Butler, J. L., Muraven M. B., & Stillwell A. M. (1995). When modesty prevails: Differential favorability of self-presentation to friends, and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 69, 1120–1138., Tice, D. M., & Wallace, H. M. (2003). The reflected, self: Creating yourself as (you think) others see, you. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford., Tigner, R. B. (1999). Putting memory research to, good use: Hints from cognitive psychology. College, Teaching, 47(4), 149–151., Ting-Toomey, S. (2000). Managing intercultural, conflicts effectively. In L. A. Samovar & R. E., Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communications: A, reader (9th ed., pp. 388–399). Belmont, CA:, Wadsworth., Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and, consequences of male-to-female and female-tomale intimate partner violence as measured by the, National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence, Against Women, 6, 142–161., , Tobin-Richards, M. H., Boxer, A. M., & Petersen,, A. C. (1983). The psychological significance of, pubertal change: Sex differences in perceptions of, self during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn &, A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty: Biological, and psychosocial perspectives. New York: Plenum., Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House., Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Bantam Books., Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage, girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, University Press., Toomey, R., Kremen, W. S., Simpson, J. C., Samson, J. A., Seidman, L. J., Lyons, M. J., Faraone,, S. V., & Tsuang, M. T. (1997). Revisiting the factor, structure for positive and negative symptoms:, Evidence from a large heterogeneous group of, psychiatric patients. American Journal of Psychology, 154, 371–377., Torrey, E. F. (1992). Freudian fraud: The malignant, effect of Freud’s theory on American thought and, culture. New York: Harper Perennial., Torrey, E. F., Bowler, A. E., Taylor, E. H., & Gottesman, I. I. (1994). Schizophrenia and manic-depressive disorder. New York: Basic Books., Townsend, J. (1995). Sex without emotional involvement: An evolutionary interpretation of sex, differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24,, 173–182., Trachtenberg, J. D., & Sande, M. A. (2002)., Emerging resistance to nonnucleoside reverse, transcriptase inhibitors: A warning and a challenge. Journal of the American Medical Association,, 288(2), 239–241., Travis, C. B., & Meginnis-Payne, K. L. (2001)., Beauty politics and patriarchy: The impact on, women’s lives. In J. Worrell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of, women and gender. San Diego: Academic Press., Travis, F. (2001). Autonomic and EEG patterns, distinguish transcending from other experiences, during Transcendental Meditation practice. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 42, 1–9., Travis, L. A., Bliwise, N. G., Binder, J. L., & HorneMoyer, H. L. (2001). Changes in clients’ attachment style over the course of time-limited, dynamic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory,, Research, Practice, Training, 38(2), 149–159., Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity, among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal, of Marriage and the Family, 62, 48–60., Treas, J., & Lawton, L. (1999). Family relations in, adulthood. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, &, G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and, the family (pp. 425–438). New York: Plenum Press., Triandis, H. C. (1989). Self and social behavior in, differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review,, 96, 269–289., Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior., New York: McGraw-Hill., Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism, and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6),, 907–924., Trope, Y. (1983). Self-assessment in achievement, behavior. In J. Suls & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 93–121). Hillsdale,, NJ: Erlbaum., Trope, Y. (1986). Self-enhancement and selfassessment in achievement behavior. In R. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation, and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 350–378). New York:, Guilford Press., Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (2003). Attribution and, person perception. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper, (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social psychology., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications., Trussell, J. (2004). Contraceptive efficacy. In R. A., Hatcher, J. Trussell, F. H. Stewart, A. L. Nelson,, W. Cates Jr., F. Guest, & D. Kowal Contraceptive, technology. New York: Ardent Media., Trussell, J., Brown, S., & Hogue, C. (2004). Adolescent sexual behavior, pregnancy, and childbear-, , References, , 605

Page 643 :
ing. In R. A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, F. H. Stewart, A. L., Nelson, W. Cates Jr., F. Guest, & D. Kowal (Eds.),, Contraceptive technology. New York: Ardent Media., Trzesniewski, K. H., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins,, R. W. (2003). Stability of self-esteem across the life, span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 84(1), 205–220., Tsai, M., & Uemera, A. (1988). Asian Americans:, The struggles, the conflicts, and the successes. In, P. Bronstein & K. Quina (Eds.), Teaching a psychology of people. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Tsuang, M. T., Glatt, S. J., & Faraone, S. V. (2003)., Genetics and genomics in schizophrenia. Primary, Psychiatry, 10(3), 37–40, 50., Tucker, V., & Cho, C. (1991). AIDS and adolescents. Postgraduate Medicine, 89, 49–53., Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce, back from negative emotional experiences. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333., Turkheimer, E., & Waldron, M. (2000). Nonshared, environment: A theoretical, methodological, and, quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 126,, 78–108., Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group:, A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Basil, Blackwell., Turner, J. R., & Wheaton, B. (1995). Checklist, measurement of stressful life events. In S. Cohen,, R. C. Kessler, & L. U. Gordon (Eds.), Measuring, stress: A guide for health and social scientists. New, York: Oxford University Press., Turner, S. M., Beidel, D. C., Stanley, M. A., &, Heiser, N. (2001). Obsessive-compulsive disorder., In P. B. Sutker & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (3rd ed., pp. 155–182)., New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum., Twenge, J. M. (2000). The age of anxiety? Birth, cohort change in anxiety and neuroticism,, 1952–1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1007–1021., Twenge, J. M., & Campbell W. K. (2003). Isn’t it, fun to get the respect that we’re going to deserve?, Narcissism, social rejection, and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology, 29(2), 261–272., Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A., (2003). Parenthood and marital satisfaction: A, meta-analytic review. Journal of Marriage and, Family, 65, 574–83., Twenge, J. M., & Crocker, J. (2002). Race and selfesteem: Meta-analyses comparing whites, blacks,, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians and, comment on Gray-Little and Hafdahl (2000)., Psychological Bulletin, 128(3), 371–408., , Ursano, R. J., & Silberman, E. K. (2003). Psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and supportive psychotherapy. In R. E. Hales & S. C., Yudofsky (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing., U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1998). Occupational outlook handbook: 1998–1999. Washington,, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2003). Highlight, of women’s earnings in 2002. Retrieved December 12, 2004 from http://www.bls.gov/cps/, cpswom2002.pdf., U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2004). Occupational outlook handbook: 2004–2005. Washington,, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2000). Statistical, abstract of the United States: 2000. Washington,, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2003). Statistical, abstract of the United States: 2003. Washington,, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2004a). Statistical, abstract of the United States: 2004–2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2004b). America’s, families and living arrangements: 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., U. S. Department of Health and Human Services., (1990). The health benefits of smoking cessation: A, report of the surgeon general. Washington, DC: U.S., Government Printing Office., U. S. Department of Health and Human Services., (1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon, General. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., U. S. Department of Health and Human Services., (2002, June 10). Preventing teenage pregnancy., Retrieved January 30, 2005 From http://www.Hhs, .Gov/News/Press/2002pres/Teenpreg.html., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services., (2003). Profile of older Americans: 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., U.S. Department of Justice. (2003). Crime in the, United States— 2003: Uniform crime reports., Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., U. S. Department of Labor. (1992). Pipelines of, progress: An update on the glass ceiling initiative., Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., U. S. Department of Labor. (2000, Summer)., Futurework: Trends and challenges for work in the, 21st century. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, pp., 31–36., U. S. Department of Labor. (2003). Facts on, women workers. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office., , Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., (1996). The relationship between social support, and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications, for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488–531., Uleman, J. S., Hon, A., Roman, R. J. , & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). Online evidence for spontaneous trait inferences at encoding. Personality and, Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 377–394., Ullman, S. E. (2004). Sexual assualt victimization, and suicidal behavior in women: A review of the, literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(4),, 331–351., Ulrich, M., & Weatherall, A. (2000). Motherhood, and infertility: Viewing motherhood through the, lens of infertility. Feminism & Psychology, 10,, 323–336., Umberson, D., Wortman, C. B., & Kessler, R. C., (1992). Widowhood and depression: Explaining, long-term gender differences in vulnerability., Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 10–24., Ursano, R. J., Fullerton, C. S., Vance, K., & Kao,, T. C. (1999). Posttraumatic stress disorder and, identification in disaster workers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 353–359., , Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Adaptive mental mechanisms: Their role in a positive psychology. American Psychologist, 55(1), 89–98., Valent, P. (2000). Disaster syndrome. In G. Fink, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 1, pp. 706–708)., San Diego: Academic Press., Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow?: The advancement, of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., Valleroy, L. A., MacKellar, D. A., Karon, J. M.,, Rosen, D. H., McFarland, W., Shehan, D. A., Stoyanoff, S. R., LaLota, M., Celentano, D. D., Koblin,, B. A., Thiede, H., Katz, M. H., Torian, L. V., &, Janssen, R. S. (2000). HIV prevalence and associated risks in young men who have sex with men., Journal of the American Medical Association, 284,, 198–204., Vandenberg, S. G. (1987). Sex differences in mental, retardation and their implications for sex differences in ability. In J. M. Reinisch, L. A. Rosenblum,, & S. A. Sanders (Eds.), Masculinity/Femininity:, Basic perspectives. New York: Ox-ford University, Press., Vartanian, L. R., Giant, C. L., & Passino, R. M., (2001). “Ally McBeal vs. Arnold Schwarzenegger”:, , 606, , References, , Comparing mass media, interpersonal feedback, and gender as predictors of satisfaction with body, thinness and masculinity. Social Behavior and, Personality, 29(7), 711–723., Vaughn, B. E., & Bost, K. K. (1999). Attachment, and temperament: Redundant, independent, or, interacting influences on interpersonal adaptation, and personality development? In J. Cassidy & P. R., Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory,, research, and clinical applications. New York:, Guilford., Vazire, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2004). e-Perceptions:, Personality impressions based on personal websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 87(1), 123–132., Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Risbo., Veevers, J. E., Gee, E. M., & Wister, A. V. (1996)., Homeleaving age norms: Conflict or consensus?, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 43(4), 277–295., Vega, W. A., Kolody, B., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., &, Catalano, R. (1999). Gaps in service utilization by, Mexican Americans with mental health problems., American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 928–934., Verderber, K. S., & Verderber, R. F. (2001). Interact: Interpersonal communication, concepts, skills,, and contexts (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Verderber, R. F., & Verderber, K. S. (2004). InterAct: Interpersonal communication concepts, skills,, and contexts. New York: Oxford University Press., Verderber, R. F., & Verderber, K. S. (2005). Communicate. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Vernberg, E. M., La Greca, A. M., Silverman,, W. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (1996). Prediction of, posttraumatic stress symptoms in children after, Hurricane Andrew. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 237–248., Vgontzas, A. N., Bixler, E. O., & Kales, A. K., (2000). Sleep, sleep disorders, and stress. In, G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 3,, p. 449–457). San Diego: Academic Press., Vinogradov, S., Cox, P. D., & Yalom, I. D. (2003)., Group therapy. In R. E. Hales & S. C. Yudofsky, (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry. Washington,, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing., Vinokur, A. D., Price, R. H., & Caplan, R. D., (1996). Hard times and hurtful partners: How, financial strain affects depression and relationship, satisfaction of unemployed persons and their, spouses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 166–179., Vittengl, J. R., & Holt, C. S. (2000). Getting acquainted: The relationship of self-disclosure and, social attraction to positive affect. Journal of Social, and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 53–56., Volavka, J., Czobor, P., Sheitman, B.,, Lindenmayer, J. P., Citrome, L., McEvoy, J. P.,, Cooper, T. B. , Chakos, M., & Lieberman, J. A., (2002). Clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone,, haloperidol in the treatment of patients with, chronic schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 255–262., Vollmer, W. M., Sacks, F. M., Ard, J., Appel, L. J.,, Bray, G. A., Simons-Morton, D. G., & et al. (2001)., Effects of diet and sodium intake on blood pressure: Subgroup analysis of the DASH-sodium trial., Annals of Internal Medicine, 18, 1019–1028., Von Baeyer, C. L., Sherk, D. L., & Zanna, M. P., (1981). Impression management in the job interview: When the female applicant meets the male, (chauvinist) interviewer. Personality and Social, Psychology Bulletin, 7, 45–51., Vorauer, J. D., Cameron, J. J., Holmes, J. G., &, Pearce, D. G. (2003). Invisible overtures: Fears of, rejection and the signal amplification bias. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 793–812., Voydanoff, P., & Donnelly, B. W. (1999). Multiple, roles and psychological distress: The intersection, of the paid worker, spouse, and parent roles with, the role of the adult child. Journal of Marriage and, the Family, 61, 725–738.

Page 644 :
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A, meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270., Vrugt, A., & Luyerink, M. (2000). The contribution of bodily posture to gender stereotypical, impressions. Social Behavior and Personality, 28(1),, 91–103., Wachtel, P. L. (1989). The poverty of affluence: A, psychological portrait of the American way of life., Philadelphia: New Society., Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (1990). Learning to think, critically: A handbook to accompany psychology., New York: HarperCollins., Wade, P., & Bernstein, B. (1991). Culture sensitivity training and counselor’s race: Effects on black, female clients’ perceptions and attrition. Journal of, Counseling Psychology, 38, 9–15., Wagner, D. M. (1998, Feb 1). Divorce reform: New, directions. Current, pp. 7–10., Waite, L. (2000). Trends in men’s and women’s, well-being in marriage. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The, ties that bind. New York: Aldine de Gruyter., Waite, L., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for, marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday., Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483–507., Wakefield, J. C. (1999). The measurement of mental disorder. In A. V. Horvitz & T. L. Scheid (Eds.),, A handbook for the study of mental health: Social, contexts, theories, and systems. New York: Cambridge University Press., Waldfogel, J. (1997). The effect of children on, women’s wages. American Sociological Review,, 62(2), 209–217., Waldrop, D., Lightsey, O. R., Ethington, C. A.,, Woemmel, C. A., & Coke, A. L. (2001). Self-efficacy,, optimism, health competence, and recovery from, orthopedic surgery. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 233–238., Walker, E. F., Baum, K. M., & Diforio, D. (1998)., Developmental changes in behavioral expression, and vulnerability for schizophrenia. In M. F., Lenzenweger & R. H. Dworkin (Eds.), Origins and, development of schizophrenia: Advances in experimental psychopathology. Washington DC: American Psychological Association., Walker, K. (1994). Men, women, and friendship:, What they say, what they do. Gender & Society, 8,, 246–265., Walker, L. (1984) The battered woman. New York:, Springer Publishing., Walker, L. S., Claar, R. L., & Garber, J. (2002)., Social consequences of children’s pain: When do, they encourage symptoms of maintenance? Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27(8), 689–698., Wallace, C. J. (1998). Social skills training in psychiatric rehabilitation: Recent findings. International Review of Psychiatry, 10, 9–10., Wallace-Broscious, A., Serafica, F. C., & Osipow,, S. H. (1994). Adolescent career development: Relationships to self-concept and identity status. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 127–149., Wallerstein, J. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1989). Second, chances: Men, women, and children a decade after, divorce. Boston: Houghton Mifflin., Wallerstein, J. S., & Kelly, J. B. (1980). Surviving, the breakup: How children and parents cope with, divorce. New York: Basic Books., Wallerstein, J. S., Lewis, J. M., & Blakeslee, S., (2000). The unexpected legacy of divorce: A 25-year, landmark study. New York: Hyperion., Wallis, C. (2003, December 15). Does kindergarten, need cops? Time, pp. 52–53., Wallis, C. (2004, March 22). The case for staying, home. Time, pp. 51–59., Walsh, F. (1999). Families in later life: Challenges, and opportunities. In B. Carter & M. McGoldrick, (Eds.), The expanded family life cycle: Individual,, , family, and social perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 307–326)., Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Walster, E., Aronson, E., Abrahams, D., &, Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508–516., Walter, C. A. (2000). The psychosocial meaning of, menopause: Women’s experiences. Journal of, Women and Aging, 12(3–4), 117–131., Walters, E. E., & Kendler, K. S. (1995). Anorexia, nervosa and anorexic-like syndromes in a population-based female twin sample. American Journal, of Psychiatry, 152, 64–71., Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy, debate. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Wang, H., & Amato, P. R. (2000). Predictors of, divorce adjustment: Stressors, resources, and definitions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62,, 655–668., Warner, L., Hatcher, R. A., & Steiner, M. J. (2004)., Male condoms. In R. A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, F. H., Stewart, A. L. Nelson, W. Cates Jr., F. Guest, &, D. Kowal (Eds.), Contraceptive technology (18th, rev. ed.). New York: Ardent Media., Warr, P. (1999). Well-being and the workplace. In, D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.),, Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology, (pp. 392–412). New York: Sage., Waters, E., Merrick, S., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., &, Albersheim, L. (2000). Attachment security in, infancy and early adulthood: A twenty-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 71(3), 684–689., Watkins, C. E., Campbell, V. L., Nieberding, R., &, Hallmark, R. (1995). Contemporary practice of, psychological assessment by clinical psychologists., Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26,, 54–60., Watson, D. C. (2001). Procrastination and the fivefactor model: A facet-level analysis. Personality and, Individual Differences, 30(1), 149–158., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion, and its positive emotional core. In R. Hogan,, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego: Academic Press., Watson, D., David, J. P., & Suls, J. (1999). Personality, affectivity, and coping. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.),, Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 119–140)., New York: Oxford University Press., Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health, complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the, central role of negative affectivity. Psychological, Review, 96, 234–254., Watson, D., Suls, J., & Haig, J. (2002). Global selfesteem in relation to structural models of personality and affectivity. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 83, 185–197., Watson, D. L., & Tharp, R. G. (2002). Self-directed, behavior: Self-modification for personal adjustment., Belmont, CA: Wadsworth., Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist, views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177., Weaver, M. F., & Schnoll, S. H. (1999). Stimulants:, Amphetamines and cocaine. In B. S. McCrady &, E. E. Epstein (Eds.), Addictions: A comprehensive, guidebook. New York: Oxford University Press., Webster, D. M. (1993). Motivated augmentation, and reduction of the overattribution bias. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 261–271., Webster, D. M., Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W., (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling, tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,, 32, 181–195., Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Kuo, M., Seibring, M.,, Nelson, T. F., & Lee, H. (2002). Trends in college, binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts. Journal of American College Health,, 50(5), 203–217., Weems, C. F., Hayward, C., Killen, J., & Taylor,, C. B. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of anxiety sensitivity in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal, Psychology, 111, 471–477., , Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (1997). TechnoStress:, Coping with technology @ home @ work @ play., New York: Wiley., Weimer, B. L., Kerns, K. A., & Oldenburg, C. M., (2004). Adolescents’ interactions with a best, friend: Associations with attachment style. Journal, of Experimental Child Psychology, 88(1), 102–120., Weinberg, C. (1979). Self creation. New York:, Avon., Weinberger, D. A. (1990). The construct validity of, the repressive coping style. In J. L. Singer (Ed.),, Repression and dissociation. Chicago: University of, Chicago Press., Weinberger, D. A., & Davidson, M. A. (1994)., Styles of inhibiting emotional expression: Distinguishing repressive coping from impression management. Journal of Personality, 62, 589–611., Weinberger, J. (1995). Common factors aren’t so, common: The common factors dilemma. Clinical, Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 45–69,, 1915–1933., Weiner, B. (1986). An attribution theory of emotion, and motivation. New York: Springer-Verlag., Weiner, B. (1994). Integrating social and personal, theories of achievement striving. Review of Educational Research, 64, 557–573., Weiner, B. (Ed). (1974). Achievement motivation, and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General, Learning Press., Weiner, H. (1992). Perturbing the organism: The, biology of stressful experience. Chicago: University, of Chicago Press., Weiner, M. F. (1993). Role of the leader in group, psychotherapy. In H. I. Kaplan & B.J. Sadock, (Eds.), Comprehensive group psychotherapy. Baltimore: Williams &Wilkins., Weinfield, N., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2000)., Attachment from early infancy to early adulthood, in a high-risk sample: Continuity, discontinuity,, and their correlates. Child Development, 71(3),, 695–702., Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism, about future life events. Journal of Personality and, Social Psychology, 39, 806–820., Weinstein, N. D. (2003). Exploring the links between risk perceptions and preventive health behavior. In J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social, psychological foundations of health and illness., Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing., Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (1996). Unrealistic optimism: Present and future. Journal of Social, and Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 1–8., Weisaeth, L. (1993). Disasters: Psychological and, psychiatric aspects. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz, (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical, aspects (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press., Weiss, R. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of, emotional and social isolation. Cambridge, MA:, MIT Press., Weiss, R. S. (1975). Marital separation. New York:, Basic Books., Weisz, J. R., Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C., (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. American Psychologist, 39, 955–969., Weiten, W. (1988). Pressure as a form of stress and, its relationship to psychological symptomatology., Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6,, 127–139., Weiten, W. (1998). Pressure, major life events, and, psychological symptoms. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 51–68., Weiten, W., Guadagno, R. E., & Beck, C. A. (1996)., Students’ perceptions of textbook pedagogical, aids. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 105–107., Weitzman, L. (1996). The economic consequences, of divorce are still unequal: Comment on Peterson. American Sociological Review, 61, 537–538., Wells, K., Klap, R., Koike, A., & Sherbourne, C., (2001). Ethnic disparities in unmet need for alcoholism, drug abuse, and mental health care. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 2027–2032., , References, , 607

Page 645 :
Wessely, S., & Kerwin, R. (2004). Suicide risk and, the SSRI’s. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(3), 379–381., Wesson, D. R., Smith, D. E., Ling, W., & Seymour,, R. B. (2005). Sedatives–hypnotics. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. G. Langrod (Eds.),, Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook ., Philadelphia: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins., West, D. S., Harvey-Berino, J., & Raczynski, J. M., (2004). Behavioral aspects of obesity, dietary intake,, and chronic disease. In J. M. Raczynski & L. C., Leviton (Eds.), Handbook of clinical health psychology: Vol. 2. Disorders of behavior and health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association., Westefeld, J. S., Maples, M. R., Buford, B., & Taylor, S. (2001). Gay, lesbian, and bisexual college, students: The relationship between sexual orientation and depression, loneliness and suicide. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 15(3), 71–82., Westen, D. (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science. Psychological, Bulletin, 124(3), 333–371., Westen, D., & Gabbard, G. O. (1999). Psychoanalytic approaches to personality. In L. A. Pervin &, O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory, and research (2nd ed., pp. 57–101). New York:, Guilford Press., Wethington, E. (2000). Life events scale. In G. Fink, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (Vol. 1, pp. 618–622)., San Diego: Academic Press., Wethington, E., Kessler, R., & Pixley, J. (2004)., Turning points in adulthood. In O. G. Brim, C. D., Ryff, & R. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we: A, national study of well-being in midlife. Chicago:, University of Chicago Press., Wheaton, B. (1994). Sampling the stress universe., In W. R. Avison & I. H. Gotlib (Eds.), Stress and, mental health: Contemporary issues and prospects, for the future. New York: Plenum Press., Wheeler, L., & Kim, Y. (1997). What is beautiful is, culturally good: The physical attractiveness stereotype has different content in collectivistic cultures., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(8),, 795–800., Wheeler, L., Reis, H. T., & Bond, M. H. (1989)., Collectivism-individualism in everyday social life:, The middle kingdom and the melting pot. Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 79–86., When you fear someone (n.d.). Retrieved January 10, 2005 from http://www.afsp.org/about/, whattodo.htm., Whiston, S. C., & Keller, B. K. (2004). The influences of the family of origin on career development: A review and analysis. Counseling, Psychologist, 32(4), 493–568., Whitaker, D., Miller, K., May, D., & Levin, M., (1999). Teenage partners’ communication about, sexual risk and condom use: The importance of, parent-teenagers discussions. Family Planning, Perspectives, 31, 117–121., Whitaker, R. (2002). Mad in America: Bad science,, bad medicine, and the enduring mistreatment of the, mentally ill. New York: Perseus Publishing., Whitbourne, S. K. (1996). The aging individual:, Physical and psychological perspectives. New York:, Springer., Whitbourne, S. K. (2001). The physical aging, process in midlife: Interactions with psychological, and sociocultural factors. In M. E. Lachman (Ed.),, Handbook of midlife development. New York:, Wiley., Whitbourne, S. K., & Tesch, S. A. (1985). A comparison of identity and intimacy statuses in college, students and alumni. Developmental Psychology,, 21, 1039–1044., Whitbourne, S. K., Zuschlag, M. K., Elliot, L. B., &, Waterman, A. S. (1992). Psychosocial development in adulthood: A 22-year sequential study., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63,, 260–271., , 608, , References, , White, L. (2001). Sibling relationships over the life, course: A panel analysis. Journal of Marriage and, the Family, 63(2), 555–568., White, L. K., & Edwards, J. N. (1990). Emptying, the nest and parental well-being: An analysis of, national panel data. American Sociological Review,, 55(2), 235–242., White, L. K., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). Strong support, but uneasy relationships: Coresident and adult, children’s relationships with their parents. Journal, of Marriage and the Family, 59, 62–76., White, L. K., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). Strong support, but uneasy relationships: Coresidence and adult, children’s relationships with their parents. Journal, of Marriage and the Family, 59(1), 62–76., White, L. K., & Rogers, S. J. (2001). Economic, circumstances and family outcomes: A review of, the 1990s. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Understanding, families into the new millennium: A decade in review (pp. 254–270). Minneapolis: National Council on Family Relations., Whitehead, B. D., & Popenoe, D. (2001). The state, of our unions: The social health of marriage in, America, 2001. Piscataway, NJ: The National Marriage Project., Whiteman, S. D., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C., (2003). What parents learn from experience: The, first child as a first draft? Journal of Marriage and, Family, 65, 608–621., Whitfield, C. L. (1995). Memory and abuse: Remembering and healing the effects of trauma. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications., Whitley, B. E. (1983). Sex role orientation and, self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44,, 765–778., Whitley, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1),, 126–134., Wickrama, K. A. S., Lorenz, F. O., Conger, R. D., &, Elder, G. H. (1997). Marital quality and physical, illness: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of, Marriage and Family, 59, 143–155., Widiger, T. A. (2001). Official classification systems. In W. J. Livesley (Ed.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment. New, York: Guilford., Widiger, T. A., & Sankis, L. M. (2000). Adult psychopathology: Issues and controversies. Annual, Review of Psychology, 51, 377–404., Wiederman, M. W. (1993). Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal, advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14,, 331–352., Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Extramarital sex:, Prevalence and correlates in a national survey., Journal of Sex Research, 34, 167–174., Wiederman, M. W. (2004). Methodological issues, in studying sexuality in close relationships. In J. H., Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships. Mahwah,, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., Wielawski, I. (1991, October 3). Unlocking the, secrets of memory. Los Angeles Times, p. 1., Wiggins, J. S., & Trapnell, P. D. (1997). Personality, structure: The return of the big five. In R. Hogan,, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego: Academic Press., Wilgosh, L. (2001). Enhancing gifts and talents of, women and girls. High Ability Studies, 12(1),, 45–59., Willets, M. C., Sprecher, S., & Beck, F. D. (2004)., Overview of sexual practices and attitudes within, relationship contexts. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, &, S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in, close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum., Willett, W. C. (2001). Eat, drink, and be healthy:, The Harvard Medical School guide to healthy eating. New York: Free Press., , Willett, W. C., & Stampfer, W. J. (2003). Rebuilding the food pyramid. Scientific American, 288(1),, 64–71., Williams, C. G., Gagne, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci,, E. L. (2002). Facilitating autonomous motivation, for smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 21,, 40–50., Williams, C. L. (1998). The glass escalator: Hidden, advantages for men in the female professions. In, M. S. Kimmel & M. A. Messner (Eds.), Men’s lives, (pp. 285–299). Boston: Allyn & Bacon., Williams, J. B. W. (1999). Psychiatric Classification. In R. E. Hales, S. C. Yudofsky, & J. A. Talbott, (Eds.), American Psychiatric Press textbook of psychiatry (pp. 227–252). Washington, DC: American, Psychiatry Press., Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex, stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Newbury Park,, CA: Sage., Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex, stereotypes: A multination study (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications., Williams, J. E., Paton, C. C., Siegler, I. C., Eigenbrodt, M. L., Neito, F. J., & Tyroler, H. A. (2000)., Anger proneness predicts coronary heart disease, risk. Circulation, 101, 2034–2039., Williams, J. E., Satterwhite, R. C., & Best, D. L., (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited:, The five-factor model. Sex Roles, 40, 513–526., Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., &, Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and, emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK:, Wiley., Williams, K. B., Radefeld, P. S., Binning, J. F., &, Sudak, J. R. (1993). When job candidates are, “hard-” versus “easy-to-get”: Effects of candidate, availability on employment decisions. Journal of, Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 169–198., Williams, K. E., & Bond, M. J. (2002). The roles of, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies and social, support in the self-care behaviors of diabetics., Psychology, Health & Medicine, 7(2), 127–141., Williams, M. H. (1992). Exploitation and inference: Mapping the damage from therapist-patient, sexual involvement. American Psychologist, 47,, 412–421., Williams, N. A., & Deffenbacher, J. L. (1983). Life, stress and chronic yeast infections. Journal of, Human Stress, 9, 26–31., Williams, R. B. (2001). Hostility (and other psychosocial risk factors): Effects on health and the, potential for successful behavioral approaches to, prevention and treatment. In A. Baum, T. A., Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health, psychology (pp. 661–668). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Williams, R. B., & Williams, V. P. (1993). Anger, kills: Seventeen strategies for controlling the hostility, that can harm your health. New York: Times, Books/Random House., Williams, R. B., & Williams, V. P. (2001). Managing hostile thoughts, feelings, and actions: The, lifeskills approach. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping, with stress: Effective people and processes (pp., 137–153). New York: Oxford University Press., Williams, S. L. (1995). Self-efficacy, anxiety, and, phobic disorders. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy,, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and, application. New York: Plenum Press., Williamson, D. A., Zucker, N. L., Martin, C. K., &, Smeets, M. A. M. (2001). Etiology and management of eating disorders. In P. B. Sutker & H. E., Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 641–670). New York:, Kluwer Academic/Plenum., Wills, T. A., & Fegan, M. (2001). Social networks, and social support. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, &, J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology, (pp. 209-234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Wills, T. A., & Sandy, J. M. (2001). Comparing, favorably: A cognitive approach to coping through, comparison with other persons. In C. R. Snyder

Page 646 :
(Ed.), Coping with stress: Effective people and, processes (pp. 154–177). New York: Oxford University Press., Wilpert, B. (1995). Organizational behavior. Annual review of psychology, 46, 59–90, Wilsnack, S. C., Wonderlich, S. A., Kristjanson,, A. F., Vogeltanz-Holm, N. D., & Wilsnack, R. W., (2002). Self-reports of forgetting and remembering, childhood sexual abuse in a nationally representative sample of U.S. women. Child Abuse and Neglect, 26(2), 139–147., Wilson, G. T. (1993). Binge eating and addictive, disorders. In C. G. Fairburn, & G. T. Wilson (Eds.),, Binge eating: Nature, assessment, and treatment., New York: Guilford Press., Wilson, R. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2003). Cognitive, activity and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3),, 87–91., Wing, R. R., & Polley, B. A. (2001). Obesity. In, A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.),, Handbook of health psychology (pp. 263–279)., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Wingert, P., & Kantrowitz, B. (2000, March 20)., Two kids and two moms. Newsweek, pp. 50–53., Winick, C., & Norman, R. L. (2005). Epidemiology. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, &, J. G. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott/, Williams & Wilkins., Winter, D. D. N. (2004). Shopping for sustainability: Psychological solutions to overconsumption., In T. Kasser & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and, consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a, materialistic world. Washington, DC: American, Psychological Association., Winzelberg, A. J., & Luskin, F. M. (1999). The, effect of a meditation training in stress levels in, secondary school teachers. Stress Medicine, 15,, 69–77., Wiseman, C. V., Gray, J. J., Mosimann, J. E., &, Ahrens, A. H. (1992). Cultural expectations of, thinness in women: An update. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 11, 85–89., Witmer, D. F., & Katzman, S. L. (1997). Online, smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of, graphic accents? Journal of Computer-Mediated, Communication, 2(4), np., Wittenberg, M. T., & Reis, H. T. (1986). Loneliness, social skills, and social perception. Personality, and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 121–130., Witvliet, C., Ludwig, T. E., & Vander Laan, K. L., (2001). Granting forgiveness or harboring, grudges: Implications for emotion, physiology,, and health. Psychological Science, 121(2), 117–123., Wolinsky, F. D. (1988). Sick role legitimation. In, D. S. Gochman (Ed.), Health behavior: Emerging, research perspectives. New York: Plenum Press., Wolk, A., Manson, J. E., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz,, G. A., Hu, F. B., Speizer, F. E., Hennekens, C. H., &, Willett, W. C. (1999). Long-term intake of dietary, fiber and decreased risk of coronary heart disease, among women. Journal of the American Medical, Association, 281(21), 1998–2004., Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M., & Welch, H. G., (2002). Risk charts: Putting cancer in context., Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94,, 799–804., Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press., Wolpe, J. (1987). The promotion of scientific, therapy: A long voyage. In J. K. Zeig (Ed.), The, evolution of psychotherapy. New York:, Brunner/Mazel., Wolpe, J. (1990). The practice of behavior therapy., Elmsford, NY: Pergamon., Women clerics find sexual harassment. (1990,, December 1). Washington Post, C12., Wonderlich, S. A. (2002). Personality and eating, disorders. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell, , (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook. New York: Guilford., Wood, E., Desmarais, S., & Gugula, S. (2002). The, impact of parenting experience on gender stereotyped toy play of children. Sex Roles, 47(1–2),, 39–49., Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes., Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231–248., Wood, J. V., & Wilson, A. E. (2003). How important is social comparison? In M. R. Leary , & J. P., Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity. New, York: Guilford., Wood, M. D., Vinson, D. C., & Sher, K. J. (2001)., Alcohol use and misuse. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 280–320). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Wood, N., & Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail party, phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an irrelevant auditory, channel? Journal of Experimental Psychology:, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 255–260., Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and, social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51,, 539–570., Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural, analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 699–727., Wood, W., & Kallgren, C. A. (1988). Communicator attributes and persuasion: Recipients’ access, to attitude-relevant information in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 172–182., Wood, W., & Quinn, J. M. (2003). Forewarned and, forearmed? Two meta-analytic syntheses of forewarnings of influence appeals. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 119–138., Woodard, E. H., & Gridina. (2000). Media in the, home 2000: The fifth annual survey of parents and, children (Survey Series No. 7). Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of, Pennsylvania., Woolis, R. (1992). When someone you love has a, mental illness: A handbook for family, friends, and, caregivers. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam., Worthen, J. B. (1997). Resiliency of bizarreness, effects under varying conditions of verbal and, imaginal elaboration and list composition. Journal, of Mental Imagery, 21, 167–194., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Scherer, M. (2004). Forgiveness is an emotion-focused coping strategy, that can reduce health risks and promote health, resilience: Theory, review, and hypotheses. Psychology and Health, 19(3), 385–405., Worthington, R. L., Flores, L. Y., & Navarro, R. L., (2005). Career development in context: Research, with people of color. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent, (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting, theory and research to work. New York: Wiley., Wortman, C. B., & Silver, R. C. (1990). Successful, mastery of bereavement and widowhood: A lifecourse perspective. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes, (Eds.), Successful aging. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press., Wortman, C. B., Wolff, K., & Bonanno, G. A., (2004). Loss of an intimate partner through death., In D. J. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of, closeness and intimacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., Wright, J. H., Beck, A. T., & Thase, M. E. (2003)., Cognitive therapy. In R. E. Hales & S. C. Yudofsky, (Eds.), Textbook of clinical psychiatry. Washington,, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing., Wright, R. A., & Contrada, R. J. (1986). Dating, selectivity and interpersonal attraction: Toward a, better understanding of the “elusive phenomenon.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,, 3, 131–148., Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (2003). The social, psychology of cultural diversity: Social stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In M. A. Hogg, , & J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social, psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications., Wu, Z., & Hart, R. (2002). The effects of marital, and nonmarital union transition on health. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 430–432., Wylie, M. S. (1998). The shadow of a doubt. In, R. A. Baker (Ed.), Child sexual abuse and false memory syndrome. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books., Wynder, E. L., Cohen, L. A., Muscat, J. E., Winters,, B., Dwyer, J. T., & Blackburn, G. (1997). Breast, cancer: Weighing the evidence for a promoting, role of dietary fat. Journal of the National Cancer, Institute, 89(11), 766–775., Xiaohe, X., & Whyte, M. K. (1990). Love matches, and arranged marriages: A Chinese replication., Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 709–722., Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of, group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Basic, Books., Yamamoto, J., Silva, J. A., Justice, L. R., Chang,, C. Y., & Leong, G. B. (1993). Cross-cultural psychotherapy. In A. C. Gaw (Ed.), Culture, ethnicity,, and mental illness (pp. 101–124). Washington, DC:, American Psychological Press., Yang, A. S. (1997). The polls—Trends: Attitudes, toward homosexuality. Public Opinion Quarterly,, 61, 477–507., Yang, H., Liu, T., & Zang, D. (2000). A study of, stressful life events before the onset of hypothyroidism. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 14(3),, 201–202., Yapko, M. D. (1994). Suggestions of abuse: True and, false memories of childhood sexual trauma. New, York: Simon & Schuster., Yi, H., Stinson, F. S., Williams, G. D., & Dufour,, M. C. (1999). Surveillance report #53: Trends in, alcohol-related fatal traffic crashes, United States,, 1977–1998. Rockville, MD: National Institute on, Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism., Yoder, J. D. (2001). Military women. In J. Worrel, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender. San, Diego: Academic Press., Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (2003). Making gender, comparisons more meaningful: A call for more, attention to social context. Psychology of Women, Quarterly, 27, 281–290., Young, J. E. (1982). Loneliness, depression and, cognitive therapy: Theory and application. In L. A., Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New, York: Wiley., Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the net: How to, recognize the signs of Internet addiction—and a, winning strategy for recovery. New York: Wiley., Young, K. S., Pistner, M., O’Mara, J., & Buchanan,, J. (1999). Cyber disorders: The mental health, concern for the new millennium. CyberPsychology, and Behavior, 2(5), 475–479., Young, K. S., & Rogers, R. C. (1998). The relationship between depression and Internet addiction., CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1(1), 25–28., Younkin, S. L., & Betz, N. E. (1996). Psychological, hardiness: A reconceptualization and measurement. In T. W. Miller (Ed.), Theory and assessment, of stressful life events. Madison, CT: International, Universities Press., Yutzy, S. H. (2003). Somatoform disorders. In R. E., Hales & S. C. Yudofsky (Eds.), Textbook of clinical, psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric, Publishing., Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere, exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27., Zakzanis, K. K., & Young, D. A. (2001). Memory, impairment in abstinent MDMA (“Ecstasy”), users: A longitudinal investigation. Neurology, 56,, 966–969., , References, , 609

Page 647 :
Zammichieli, M. E., Gilroy, F. D., & Sherman, M. F., (1988). Relation between sex-role orientation and, marital satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 747–754., Zatzick, D. F. (1999). Managed care and psychiatry. In R. E. Hales, S. C. Yudofsky, & J. A. Talbott, (Eds.), American Psychiatric Press textbook of psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric, Press., Zautra, A. J., & Smith, B. W. (2001). Depression, and reactivity to stress in older women with, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(4), 687–696., Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2000). “Too, young, too old”: Stigmatizing adolescents and, elders. In T. F. Heatheron et al. (Eds.), The social, psychology of stigma. New York: Guilford., Zechmeister, E. B., & Nyberg, S. E. (1982). Human, memory: An introduction to research and theory., Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole., Zeig, J. K. (1987). Introduction: The evolution of, psychotherapy—Fundamental issues. In J. K. Zeig, , 610, , References, , (Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy. New York:, Brunner/Mazel., Zellman, G. L., & Goodchilds, J. D. (1983). Becoming sexual in adolescence. In E. R. Allgeier &, N. B. McCormick (Eds.), Changing boundaries., Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield., Zemishlany, Z., Aizenberg, D., & Weizman, A., (2001). Subjective effects of MDMA (“Ecstasy”), on human sexual function. European Psychiatry,, 16(2), 127–130., Zilbergeld, B., & Evans, M. (1980, August). The, inadequacy of Masters and Johnson. Psychology, Today, pp. 28–34, 37–43., Zimbardo, P. G. (1977). Shyness: What it is, what to, do about it. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley., Zimbardo, P. G. (1990). Shyness. Reading, MA:, Addison-Wesley., Zimbardo, P. G. (1992). Cults in everyday life:, Dependency and power. Contemporary Psychology,, 37, 1187–1189., Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-, , efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge, University Press., Zittleman, K., & Sadker, D. (2002). Gender bias in, teacher education texts: New (and old) lessons., Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 168–180., Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond, the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Zuckerman, M. (1995). Good and bad humors:, Biochemical bases of personality and its disorders., Psychological Science, 6, 325–332., Zuckerman, M., Kieffer, S. C., & Knee, C. R., (1998). Consequences of self-handicapping: Effects of coping, academic performance, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology, 74(6), 1619–1628., Zuo, J., & Tang, S. (2000). Breadwinner status and, gender ideologies of men and women regarding, family roles. Sociological Perspectives, 43(1), 29–43., Zvonkovic, A. N., Greaves, K. M., Schmiege, C. J.,, & Hall, L. D. (1996). The marital construction of, gender through work and family decisions: A, qualitative analysis. Journal of Marriage and the, Family, 58, 1, 91–100.

Page 648 :
Credits, This page constitutes an extension of the, copyright page. We have made every effort, to trace the ownership of all copyrighted, material and to secure permission from, copyright holders. In the event of any, question arising as to the use of any material, we will be pleased to make the necessary corrections in future printings., Thanks are due to the following authors,, publishers, and agents for permission to, use the material indicated., Photo Credits, Chapter 1, 3: © AP/Wide World Photos 4: © Randy, Faris/Corbis 5: bottom right, © Blake, Little/Corbis Sygma 5: bottom left, ©, Christopher J. Morris/Corbis 7: © David, Young-Wolff/Photo Edit 18: © David, Young-Wolff/Photo Edit 22: © Stuart, Hughes/Corbis 23: top left, © Charles, Gupton/Corbis 23: bottom right, ©, Rolf Bruderer/Masterfile 26: © EsbinAnderson/The Image Works, Chapter 2, 35: National Library of Medicine 36: ©, Peter Aprahamian/Corbis 41: right, ©, Bettmann/Corbis 41: top, © Michael, Newman/Photo Edit 42: © Bettmann/, Corbis 45: © Bettmann/Corbis 47: Courtesy of B. F. Skinner 48: © J. Clarke/Taxi/, Getty Images 49: Courtesy, Albert Bandura 51: Carl Rogers Memorial Library, 53: Courtesy, Abraham Maslow 56: center,, Courtesy, Hans Eysenck, photo by Mark, Gerson 56: top, © Michael Nichols/Magnum Photos 62: right, © Andy Sacks/Stone/, Getty Images 62: left, © Cheryl Maeder/, Corbis 67: © Laura Dwight/Photo Edit, , Chapter 5, 140: center, Stanford University News, Service, photo by L. A. Cicero 143: ©, Spencer Grant/Photo Edit 144: top,, Brooks/Cole Collection 144: bottom,, Brooks/Cole Collection 145: © David, Young-Wolff/Photo Edit 147: Courtesy,, Roy Baumeister 151: © Robert W. Ginn/, Photo Edit 156: © GDT/Stone/Getty, Images 159: top, Courtesy, Albert Bandura, 159: bottom, © Mary Kate Denny/Photo, Edit 161: © Marc Vaughn/Masterfile 162:, © 2004 AP/Wide World Photos 164:, Courtesy, Mark Synder 166: right, © Evan, Agostini/Getty Images 166: left, © Pascal, Le Segretain/Getty Images, Chapter 6, 172: © RNT Productions/Corbis 173:, Courtesy, Susan Fiske 178: © Andrew, Holbrooke/The Image Works 187: right,, AFP/AFP/Getty Images 187: left, © 2004, AP/Wide World Photos 188: center right,, Courtesy, John T. Cacioppo 188: top,, Courtesy, Richard E. Petty 189: © Scott, Olson/Getty Images 192: top left, © Soctt, Barbour/Getty Images 192: right, © 1981, Eric Kroll, courtesy of Alexandra Milgram, 193: inset, Photos copyright 1965 by Stanley Milgram. From the film Obedience,, distributed by The Pennsylvania State, University. Obedience, distributed by The, Pennsylvania State University. Reprinted, by permission of Alexandra Milgram 195:, Courtesy, Robert Cialdini 197: bottom, ©, Tony Freeman/Photo Edit, , Corbis 260: © Michael Newman/Photo, Edit 261: © AP/Wide World Photos, Chapter 9, 271: Photo by NBC Studios/Getty Images, 273: © Trujillo-Paumier/Stone/Getty Images 277: © Thinkstock/Getty Images 283:, center right, Photo by Sharon M. Fentiman, 286: © Matthew McVay/Corbis Saba 289:, top, Courtesy, E. Mavis Hetherington, 289: right, © Michelle D. Bridewell/Photo, Edit 292: © Ron Chapple/Thinkstock/, Alamy 297: © AP/Wide World Photos, Chapter 10, 303: Courtesy, Janet Shibley Hyde 310:, top right, Courtesy, Alice Eagly 312:, Wadsworth Collection 314: © Ken, Fisher/Stone/Getty Images 315: left, ©, Laura Dwight/Photo Edit 315: right, ©, Stephen Marks/Taxi/Getty Images 316:, © Michelle D. Bridwell/Photo Edit 319:, Photo © Reichel Jean-Noel- FPG /Getty, Images. 326: © Jim Zukerman/Corbis 328:, Courtesy, Sandra Bem 330: bottom, Photo, by Sara Barrett, courtesy of Random, House, Chapter 11, 339: © David Young Wolff/Stone/Getty, Images 342: © Ted Streshinsky/Corbis, 344: © Nancy Richmond/The Image, Works 346: © Arlene Collins/The Image, Works 349: © Jutta Klee/Stone/Getty Images 351: © Spencer Grant/Photo Edit, 352: Courtesy, Susan Whitbourne 356:, right, © AP/Wide World Photos 356: left,, © Syracuse Newspaper, photo by Randi, Anglin/The Image Works 359: © Roos/, Gamma Liaison-Getty Images 360: ©, Spencer Grant/Photo Edit 362: © Arko, Datta/Reuters/Corbis 364: Courtesy,, Diana Baumrind 365: © David YoungWolff/Photo Edit 368: top, Courtesy, Laurence Steinberg 368: bottom, © Jonathan, Nourok/Photo Edit, , Chapter 3, 72: Courtesy, Richard Lazarus 74: left,, © AP/Wide World Photos 74: right, ©, Richard Lord/PhotoEdit 76: Courtesy,, Neal Miller 80: left, © Allen Birnbach/, Masterfile 80: right, © Kelvin Murray/, Stone/Getty Images 84: Courtesy, Susan, Folkman 86: right, © Bettmann/Corbis, 92: © Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters/Corbis, 95: right, Courtesy, Suzanne C. Ouelette, 95: top, © Ghislain & Marie David de, Lossy/The Image Bank/Getty Images 97:, Courtesy, Eleanor Holmes Williams, , Chapter 7, 204: © Martin Parr/Magnum Photos 206:, © 2004 AP/Wide World Photos 208: top,, Photos from Unmasking the Face, © 1975, by Paul Ekman, photographs courtesy, of Paul Ekman 208: bottom, © 2004, AP/Wide World Photos 209: right, © Tony, Freeman/Photo Edit 209: left, © Walter, Hodges/Corbis 210: © Bob Daemmrich/, The Image Works 212: Courtesy, Bella, DePaulo 213: © Bob Daemmrich/The, Image Works 217: © Mary Kate Denny/, PhotoEdit 218: © Dana Hursey/Masterfile, 219: © Michael Newman/Photo Edit 222:, © Eric K.K. Yu/Corbis 225: top right,, Photo by Sara Barrett, courtesy of Random House 225: bottom right, © Jose Luis, Pelaez/Corbis, , Chapter 12, 375: © B. Busco/The Image Bank/Getty, Images 379: top, Columbia University, Archives-Columbiana Library 382: ©, Mark Richards/Photo Edit 385: © Michael, Newman/PhotoEdit 388: © Bill Stormont/, Corbis 403: © Martin Leissl/Visum/The, Image Works, , Chapter 4, 107: Courtesy, Dr. Martin Seligman 108:, © Paul Thomas/The Image Bank/Getty, Images 109: top right, © Rachel Epstein/, The Images Works 113: Courtesy, Shelley, Taylor 115: Courtesy, Albert Ellis Institute, 122: © Bruce Ayres/Stone/Getty Images, 127: left, © Bill Ling/Taxi/Getty Images, 127: right, © Stephanie Maze/Corbis 128:, © Acey Harper/Time Life Pictures/Getty, Images, , Chapter 8, 236: left, © Earl & Nazima Kowalt/Corbis, 236: right, © Michael Newman/Photo, Edit 238: © Mary Kate Denny/Photo Edit, 242: © Ephraim Ben-Shimon/Corbis 244:, © Paul Hawthorne/Getty Images 250: ©, 2004 AP/Wide World Photos 252: top left,, Michael Marsland/Yale University 252:, top right, Photo by Bill Warren/Ithaca, Journal 252: center right, Photo provided, by Philip Shaver 259: © Ronnie Kaufman/, , Chapter 13, 411: Courtesy, Letitia Anne Peplau 413:, right, © AP/Wide World Photos 413: top,, © Michael Newman/Photo Edit 415: ©, Justin Sullivan/Getty Images 416: center, right, Courtesy, Douglas C Kimmel 416:, top right, Courtesy, Linda Doris Garnets, 416: bottom, © 2004 AP/Wide World, Photos 426: © Paul Wright/Masterfile 428:, © NBC photo by Paul Drinkwater/Getty, Images 435: © Marc Romanelli/The Image, Credits, , 611

Page 649 :
Bank/Getty Images 438: © Bettmann/, Corbis, Chapter 14, 447: © Annabella Bluesky/Photo Researchers, Inc. 451: Courtesy, Janice KiecottGlaser 457: © Paul A. Souders/Corbis, 467: © Jim Cummings/Taxi/Getty Images, 470: Courtesy, Robin DiMatteo 471: ©, A. Ramey/PhotoEdit 472: © image100/, Alamy Images, Chapter 15, 482: top, Courtesy, Thomas Szasz 483: ©, 2003 AP/Wide World Photos 484: center,, Courtesy, David Rosenhan 489: top right,, © Jeffrey MacMillan/U.S. News & World, Report 496: right, © 2004 AP/Wide World, Photos 496: center, © Graeme Robertson/, Getty Images 496: left, © Katy Winn/Corbis, 498: Courtesy, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, 504: Courtesy, Nancy Andreasen, Chapter 16, 522: National Library of Medicine 523:, © Bruce Ayres/Stone/Getty Images 524:, Courtesy, Carl Rogers Memorial Library, 526: center, Courtesy, Aaron T. Beck 528:, © Michael Newman/Photo Edit 530: ©, AP/Wide World Photos 533: Courtesy,, Joseph Wolpe 540: © James Wilson/, Woodfin Camp & Associates, all rights, reserved 543: © Rhoda Sidney/PhotoEdit, 545: Tom McCarthey/SKA 547: © Tom, Stewart/Corbis, Text Credits, Chapter 1, 6: top right, Cartoon: Copyright © 2000., Used by permission. tomtomorrow@ix., netcom.com 7: DOONESBURY© 1978, G. B. Trudeau. Reprinted with permission, of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All, rights reserved. 8: Entire hardcover Book, cover of The Paradox of Choice: Why More, is Less, by Barry Schwartz. Copyright ©, 2004 by Barry Schwartz. Reprinted by, permission of HarperCollins Publishers,, Inc. 9: CALVIN AND HOBBES © 1993, Watterson. Reprinted with permission of, UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All, rights reserved. 10: Cover of What You, Can Change & What You Can’t by Martin, E. P. Seligman. Copyright © 1994 Alfred, A. Knopf, Inc. Reprinted by permission., 11: Figure 1.1: From Wade, Carol; Tavris,, Carole, Learning to Think Critically, 2nd, Edition. Copyright © 1989. Reprinted by, permission of Pearson Education, Inc.,, Upper Saddle River, N. J.. Used by permission. 21: Cover: The Pursuit of Happiness, by David G. Myers. Copyright © 1992 by, the David G. and Carol P. Myers Charitable Foundation. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. 22:, Figure 1.10: Adapted from D. G. Myers,, “Close Relationships and Quality of Life,”, 1999, Figure 19.1. In Well-Being: The, Handbook of Hedonic Psychology by, , 612, , Credits, , Daniel Kahneman, Edward Diener and, Norbert Schwarz, (Eds.) 1999. Copyright, © 1999 Russell Sage Foundation, 112 East, 64th Street, New York, NY 10021. Reprinted, with permission. 28: DOONESBURY©, G. B. Trudeau. Reprinted with permission, of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All, rights reserved. 29: Figure 1.14: Adapted, from G. H. Bower and M. C. Clark, “Narrative Stories as Mediators of Serial Learning,” Psychonomic Science, 14, 181–182., Copyright © 1969 by the Psychonomic, Society. Adapted by permission of the, Psychonomic Society and the author. 29:, Figure 1.14: Adapted from G. H. Bower,, “Analysis of a Mnemonic Device,” 1970,, American Scientist (September-October),, 58, 496–499. Copyright © 1970 by American Scientist. Reprinted by permission of, the publisher and the author., Chapter 2, 37: 38: top left, Cartoon © 1999 by Sidney, Harris 50: Figure 2.13: Reproduced with, permission of authors and publisher from, Sherer, M., Maddox, J. E., Mercandante,, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., and, Rogers, R. W., “The Self-efficacy Scale:, Construction and Validation.” Psychological Reports, 1982, 51, 663–671. © Psychological Reports 1982. 52: Cover: Three, Psychologists: Perspectives from Freud,, Skinner, and Rogers, by Robert D. Nye, ©, 2000, Wadsworth Group 55: PEANUTS, reprinted by permission of United Feature, Syndicate, Inc. 57: Figure 2.18: From H. J., Eysenck, The Biological Basis of Personality (1st Edition), p. 36, 1967. Courtesy of, Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Springfield,, IL. 58: Figure 2.19: Based on R. Plomin, and A. Caspi, “Behavioral Genetics and, Personality,” 1999 . In L. A. Pervin, & O. P., John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality:, Theory and Research. The Guilford Press., 66: Figure 2.23: Reprinted by permission, of Daniel S. Kirschenbaum from page 101, of Adjustment and Competence: Concepts and Applications, by A. F. Grasha &, D. S. Kirschenbaum, © 1986. West Publishing Company. 67: Figure 2.24: From, R. B. Cattell, “Personality pinned down,”, in Psychology Today, July 1973, 40–46., Reprinted with permission from Psychology Today Magazine. Copyright © 1973, (Sussex Publishers, Inc.)., Chapter 3, 73: Figure 3.2: Adapted from G. W. Evans,, S. Hygge, and M. Bullinger, “Chronic, Noise and Psychological Stress” Psychological Science, Vol. 6, p. 333–338, figure, 3.2. Copyright © 1995 Blackwell Publishers. Adapted by permission. 75: top right,, Cover: The End of Stress As We Know It, by Bruce McEwen, Elizabeth Norton, Lasley, Elizabeth Lasley. cover © 2002, Joseph Henry Press. Repinted by permission National Academies Press. 77: top,, BLONDIE © 2001. Reprinted with special, permission of King Features Syndicate., , 79: Figure 3.5: Reprinted from Journal of, Psychosomatic Research, 11 by T. H., Holmes and R. H. Rahe in “The Social, Readjustment Rating Scale,” 213–218,, Copyright © 1967, with permission from, Elsevier . 86: Cartoon: DILBERT reprinted, by permission of United Features Syndicate, Inc. 93: Cover: Why Zebras Don’t, Get Ulcers: An Updated Guide to StressRelated Diseases, and Coping, by Robert, M. Sapolsky; cover © 1998 Scientific, American Library. Reprinted by permission W. H. Freeman and Company Publishers. 96: CALVIN AND HOBBES ©, Watterson. Reprinted with permission of, Universal Press Syndicate. All rights reserved. 96: Figure 3.17: Adapted from, M.F. Scheier and C. S. Carver, “Optimism,, Coping, and Health: Assessment and, Implications of Generalized Outcome, Expectancies,” Health Psychology, 4,, 219–247. Copyright © 1985 Lawrence, Erlbaum & Associates. Adapted by permission and author. 99: Figure 3.19: From, I. G. Sarason, J. H. Johnson, and J. M., Siegel, “Assessing the Impact of Life, Changes,” 1978, Journal of Consulting, and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932–946., Copyright © 1978 by the American Psychological Association. Reprinted by permission of the author. 100: Figure 3.20:, From I. G. Sarason, J. H. Johnson, and, J. M. Siegel, “Assessing the Impact of Life, Changes,” 1978, Journal of Consulting, and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932–946., Copyright © 1978 by the American Psychological Association. Reprinted by permission of the author., Chapter 4, 106: Figure 4.1: From C. S. Carver, M. F., Scheier, and J. K. Weintraub, “Assessing, Coping Strategies: A Theoretically Based, Approach,” 1989, Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283., Copyright © 1989 America Psychological, Association. Reprinted by permission of, the author. 108: Cover: Anger: The Misunderstood Emotion, by Carol Tavris., Book cover, Copyright © 1989 by Simon, & Schuster, Inc. Reproduction by permission of the publisher. All rights reserved., 109: bottom, CATHY © Cathy Guisewite, Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved. 110: Figure 4.2: From K. S. Young,, Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the, Signs of Internet Addiction—and a Winning Strategy for Recovery, copyright, ©1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reprinted, with permission of John Wiley & Sons,, Inc. 111: Figure 4.3: Adapted from R. C., Carson, J. N. Butcher & C. C. Coleman,, Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life, (8/e), pp. 64–65. Copyright © 1988 by, Scott, Foresman and Company. Adapted, by permission. 112: CALVIN AND, HOBBES © Watterson. Reprinted with, permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved. 114: Car-

Page 650 :
toon: Sally Forth Copyright © 1984 News, Group Chicago, reprinted by permission, of North America Syndicate. 116: Cover:, How to Stubbornly Refuse to Make Yourself Miserable About Anything—Yes, Anything! by Albert Ellis. Copyright © 1988, Carol Publishing Group. Reprinted by, permission. 117: Figure 4.6: Adapted from, R. A. Martin and H. M. Lefcourt, “Sense, of Humor as a Moderator of the Relation, Between Stressors and Moods,” 1983,, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (6), 1313–1324. Copyright © 1983, by the American Psychological Association. Adapted by permission of the author. 121: Figure 4.8: From M LeBoeuf,, “Managing Time Means Managing Yourself,” Questionnaire, p. 45. Reprinted from, Business Horizons Magazine, February, 1980. Copyright by the Foundation for, the School of Business at Indiana University. Used with permission. 124: Cover:, Time Management From the Inside Out, by Julie Morgenstern; cover, © 2000 by, Henry Holt and Co. Reprinted by permission of Henry Holt & Co., LLC. 126:, Cover: Emotional Intelligence: Why It, Can Matter More Than IQ by Daniel, Goleman, Copyright © 1995, Bantam, Books. Reprinted by permission of Bantam Books. 127: Figure 4.12: Excerpt from, “Sharing One’s Story,” [J. M. Smyth and, J. W. Pennebaker,] pg.84 from Coping:, The Psychology of What Works, edited by, C. R. Snyder, copyright © 1999 by Oxford, University Press. Inc.. Used by permission, of Oxford University Press, Inc. 129: Figure 4.13: Adapted from illustration on, p. 86 by Lorelle Marie Raboni in Scientific, American, 226, 85–90, February 1972), “The Psychology of Meditation,” by R. K., Wallace & H. Bensen. Copyright © 1972, by Scientific American, Inc. All rights reserved. Adapted by permission of the, artist. 130: Figure 4.14: (from) Page, 114–115 from The Relaxation Response, by Herbert Benson, M.D. with Miriam Z., Klipper. Copyright © 1975 by William, Morrow & Company, Inc. Reprinted by, permission of HarperCollins Publishers,, Inc. 133: Figure 4.17: From D. L. Watson, & R. L. Tharp, Self-Directed Behavior:, Self-Modification for Personal Adjustment, Fourth Edition, , p. 213–214. Copyright © 1972, 1977, 1981, 1985, 1993 by, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company., Chapter 5, 142: Figure 5.3: From J. G. Hull and R. D., Young, “Self-Consciousness, Self-Esteem,, and Success-Failure as Determinants of, Alcohol Consumption in Male Social, Drinkers,” 1983, Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 44 (6), 1097–1109., Copyright © 1983 American Psychological Association. Reprinted by permission, of the author. 146: Figure 5.5: Adapted, from H. R. Markus and Shinobu Kitayama, “Culture and the Self: Implications, for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation”,, , 1991, Psychological Review, 98 (2), 224–253. Copyright © 1991 American, Psychological Association. Reprinted by, permission of the author. 148: Figure 5.7:, Adapted from Sharon S. Brehm and Saul, M. Kassin, Social Psychology, 2nd Edition., Copyright © 1993 Houghton-Mifflin, Company. Adapted by permission. 153:, Figure 5.10: From B. Weiner, I. Frieze,, A. Kukla, L. Reed, & R. M. Rosenbaum,”, Perceiving the Causes of Success and Failure.” In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanuouse, H. H., Kelly, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner, (Eds.), Perceiving Causes of Behavior, 1972,, General Learning Press. Reprinted by permission of the author. 157: PEANUTS, reprinted by permission of United Feature, Syndicate, Inc. 161: Entire Book cover from, Self-Defeating Behaviors, by Milton R., Cudney and Robert E. Hardy. Copyright, © 1975 by Lifegiving Enterprises, Inc., Copyright © 1991 by Milton R. Cudney, and Robert E. Hardy. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., 166: Cover: Self-Esteem, by Matthew, McKay and Patrick Fanning. Copyright, © 2000 New Harbinger Publications., Reprinted by permission. 167: FRANK &, ERNEST reprinted by permission of, Newspaper Enterprise Association, Inc., Chapter 6, 173: Figure 6.1: Adapted from Sharon S., Brehm and Saul M. Kassin, Social Psychology, Second Edition. Copyright ©, 1993 by Houghton Mifflin Company., Adapted with permission 174: Cartoon:, DILBERT Reprinted by permission of, United Feature Syndicate, Inc. 175: Figure, 6.2: Adapted from E. R. Smith and D. M., Mackie, Social Psychology, p. 103. Copyright © 1995 Worth Publishing. Reprinted, by permission. 177: Figure 6.3: Data from, 1999, September 15: Americans Agree, That Being Attractive is a Plus in American Society. Taken from 2001, June 10,, from http://gallup.com/poll/releases/, pr990915. 182: Figure 6.7: Statements, from J. K. Swim, K. J. Aikin, W. S. Hall, &, B. A. Hunter, “Sexism and Racism: OldFashioned and Modern Prejudices,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 68 (2), 199–214. Copyright © 1995 American Psychological Association. Reprinted, by permission of the author. 184: Figure, 6.8: Adapted from Sharon S. Brehm and, Saul M. Kassin, Social Psychology, Second, Edition. Copyright © 1993 by Houghton, Mifflin Company. Adapted with permission. 186: Cover: Age of Propaganda: The, Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion, by, Anthony R. Pratkanis and Elliot Aronson., Copyright © 2001. Reprinted by permission of Henry Holt & Co., LLC. 189: Cover, of Robert B. Cialdini, Influence: Science, and Practice. Published by Allyn and, Bacon, Boston, MA. Copyright © 2001 by, Pearson Education. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. 190: Figure 6.11:, Adapted from illustration by Sarah Love, , on p. 35, Scientific American, November, 1955, from “Opinion and Social Pressure,”, by Solomon Asch. Copyright © 1955, by Scientific American, Inc. All rights reserved. 191: Figure 6.12: Adapted from, illustration by Sarah Love on p. 32, Scientific American, November 1955, from, “Opinion and Social Pressure,” by Solomon Asch. Copyright © 1955 by Scientific, American, Inc. All rights reserved. 197:, CALVIN AND HOBBES © Watterson., Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL, PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., Chapter 7, 203: Cover: Multicultural Manners: New, Rules of Etiquette for a Changing Society,, by Norine Dresser. Copyright © 1996 by, John Wiley & Sons. The material is used, by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 211: Figure 7.6: “Where friends touch, each other,” page 89, [adapted] from Eye, to Eye: How People Interact, by Peter, Marsh. Copyright © 1988 by Andromeda, Oxford Ltd. Reprinted by permission of, HarperCollins, Publishers, Inc. and Andromeda Oxford Ltd. 214: Cover: Messages: The Communication Skills Book,, by Matthew McKay, Martha Davis, and, Patrick Fanning. Copyright © 2000 New, Harbinger Publications. Cover design by, Shelby Design & Associates. Reprinted by, permission. 216: Cartoon DAVE © 1993, Dave Miller. Reprinted with permission of, the artist. All rights reserved. 225: “Cover”,, copyright © 1997 by Random House, Inc., of The Argument Culture by Deborah, Tannen. Used by permission of Random, House, Inc. 226: Figure 7.12: From “Road, Rage Plagues Drivers,” 1997, AAA Going, Places, November-December, 1997,, 41–42. Copyright © 1997 by American, Automobile Association. 228: Cartoon by, Marlette: KUDZU © Tribune Media Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted, with permission. 228, 229: Excerpts from, Asserting Yourself: A Practical Guide for, Positive Change by Sharon Anthony, Bower and Gordon H. Bower, pp 8,9,11., Copyright © 1991 by Sharon Anthony, Bower and Gordon H. Bower. Reprinted, by permission of Perseus Books Publishers, a member of Perseus Books, L.L.C., 229: Cover: Asserting Yourself: A Practical, Guide for Positive Change by Sharon Anthony Bower and Gordon H. Bower., Copyright © 1991 by Sharon Anthony, Bower and Gordon H. Bower. Reprinted, by permission of Perseus Books Publishers, a member of Perseus Books, L.L.C., 230: Figure 7.13: From Asserting Yourself:, A Practical Guide for Positive Change by, Sharon Anthony Bower and Gordon H., Bower. Da Capo Press. Copyright © 1991, by Sharon Anthony Bower and Gordon, H. Bower. Reprinted by permission of, Perseus Books Publishers, a member of, Perseus Books, L.L.C. 231: Figure 7.13:, From Asserting Yourself: A Practical, Guide for Positive Change by Sharon, Credits, , 613

Page 651 :
Anthony Bower and Gordon H. Bower., Da Capo Press. Copyright © 1991 by, Sharon Anthony Bower and Gordon H., Bower. Reprinted by permission of, Perseus Books Publishers, a member of, Perseus Books, L.L.C., Chapter 8, 237: Figure 8.1: Adapted from R. Levine,, S. Sato, T. Hashimoto, J. Verma, “ Love, and Marriage in Eleven Cultures”, 1995,, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(5), 561, 564. Copyright © 1995 by Sage, Publications, Inc. Adapted by permission, of Sage Publications. 239: CATHY © 1993, by Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved. 241: Figure 8.2:, From D. M. Buss, “Sex Differences in, Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary, Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures,” 1989,, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14., Copyright © 1989 by Cambridge University Press. Reprinted with the permission, of Cambridge University Press. 242: Figure 8.3: Adapted from D. M. Buss, “The, Evolution of Human Intrasexual Competition: Tactics of Mate Attraction,”, 1988,, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628. Copyright © 1988 by, the American Psychological Association., Adapted by permission of the author. 245:, Figure 8.6: Adapted from M. H. Gonzales,, J. M. Davis, G. L. Loeny, C. K. Lukens, &, C. H. Junghans, “Interactional Approach, to Interpersonal Attraction,” 1983, Journal, of Personality and Social Psychology, 44,, 1191–1197. Copyright © 1983 by the, American Psychological Association., Adapted by permission of the author., 246: Figure 8.7: Based on Regan, P.C. &, Berscheid, E. “Gender differences in characteristics desired in a potential sexual, marriage partner,” 1997, Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 9, Table 1,, p.32. Haworth Press, Inc. 247: Figure 8.9:, From Sharon S. Brehm and Saul M. Kassin,, Social Psychology, Second Edition. Copyright © 1993 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Reprinted with permission. 248:, Cover art by Jan Yager, Ph.D. from her, original photograph Copyright © 1999, by Jan Yager, Ph.D. All rights reserved., Non-exclusive permission granted to, Wadsworth for reproduction of the book, jacket of Friendshifts® published by Hannacroix Creek Books, Inc. in Psychology, Applied to Modern Life, 8th edition. Book, jacket and original photograph copyright, © 1999 by Jan Yager, Ph.D. All rights reserved. (Any requests for further reproduction or printing of this cover art, should be directed to the publisher:, [email protected]. 251: Figure 8.11:, From R. J. Sternberg, “A Triangular Theory of Love,” 1986, Psychological Review,, 93, 119–135. Copyright © 1986 by the, American Psychological Association., Reprinted by permission of the author., , 614, , Credits, , 256: Cover: The Mating Game: a Primer, on Love, Sex, and Marriage, by Pamela C., Regan, 2003. Copyright © 2003 by Sage, Publications. Reproduced by permission, of Sage Publications, Inc. 257: Figure 8.15:, Adapted from C. T. Hill, Z. Rubin, & L. A., Peplau, “Breakups Before Marriage: The, End of 103 Affairs,” 1976, Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147–168. Basic Books Publishing Co., Inc. Adapted by permission of, the author. All rights reserved. 258: For, Better or For Worse® cartoon © Lynn, Johnston Productions, Inc./Distributed by, Universal Press Syndicate. Reprinted with, permission. All rights reserved. 262:, Cover: P. Zimbardo, Shyness, © 1977, Philip Zimbardo Inc. Cover illustration ©, 1989 by Bart Goldman. Reprinted by permission of Addison-Wesley Publishing, Company, Inc. and Bart Goldman. 263:, Figure 8.17: From Shyness: What Is It, What, To Do About It, by Philip Zimbardo., Copyright © 1977 by Philip Zimbardo,, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Perseus, Books Publishers, a member of Perseus, Books, L.L.C. 264: Figure 8.18: From a, paper presented at the annual convention, of the American Psychological Association, 9/2/79. An expanded version of this, paper apperars in New Directions in Cognitive Therapy, edited by Emery, Hollan,, and Bedrosian, Guilford Press, 1981 and, in Lonliness: A Sourcebook of Current, Theory, Research and Therapy, by L. A., Peplau and D. Perlman (Eds.). Copyright, © 1982 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and, Jeffrey Young. 265: Figure 8.19 based on, P. Shaver, & C. Rubenstein, 1980, “Childhood attachment experience ans adult, loneliness.” In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review, of personality and social psychology,, Vol. 1, pp. 42–73. Thousand Oaks, CA:, Sage Publications., Chapter 9, 273: Figure 9.3: Adapted from Peter J., Stein, “Singlehood: An Alternative to Marriage,” The Family Coordinator, 24(4),, 500. Copyrighted © 1975 by the National, Council on Family Relations, 3989 Central Ave. N. E., Suite 550, Minneapolis,, MN 55421. Reprinted by permission., 279: CATHY © 1994 Cathy Guisewite., Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved. 280: Cartoon: SALLY FORTH, Reprinted with special permission of King, Features Syndicate. 282: Cover: Reconcilable Differences, by Andrew Christiansen, and Neil S. Jacobson, 2000, The Guilford, Press, jacket design by Paul Gordon. Reproduced by permission of Guilford Publications. 284: CATHY © Cathy Guisewite., Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL, PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved., 284: Cover: Why Marriages Succeed or, Fail . . . and How You Can Make Yours, Last, by John Gottman Ph.D. with Nan, Silver. Book cover, Copyright © 1994 by, , Simon & Schuster, Inc. Reproduced by, permission of the publisher. All rights, reserved. 288: Cartoon © 1992 The New, Yorker Collection 1992 Michael Maslin, from cartoonbank.com. All rights reserved. 294: Figure 9.14: From L. A. Peplau,, “What Homosexuals Want,” March 1981,, Psychology Today, 3, 28–38. Reprinted, with permission from Psychology Today, Magazine. Copyright © 1981 (Sussex Publishers, Inc.). 299: Figure 9.17: From I. M., Johnson, J. Crowley, and R. T. Sigler,, “Agency Response to Domestic Violence:, Services Provided to Battered Women,”, 1992. In E. C. Viano (Ed.), Intimate Violence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives,, pp 191–202 (Table on p. 199). Copyright, © 1992 Hemisphere Publishing. Reprinted, with permission of Taylor & Francis, Inc., Chapter 10, 304: CATHY © Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved. 305: Figure 10.2: Adapted from, T. L. Ruble, “Sex Stereotypes: Issues of, Change in the 70s,” 1983, Sex Roles, 9,, 397–402. Copyright © 1983 Plenum Publishing Co. Adapted by permission of, Springer Science and Business Media and, the author. 307: Figure 10.4: Adapted, from R. N. Shepard and J. N. Metzler,, “Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensionl, Objects,” Science, 171, 701–703. Copyright © 1971 by American Association for, the Advancement of Science. Adapted by, permission of the publisher and author., 309: Figure 10.6: Adapted from A. M., Kring and A. H. Gordon, “Sex Differences, in Emotions: Expression, Experience and, Physiology,” 1998, Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 74 (3), 686–703., Copyright © 1998 by American Psychological Association. Adapted by permission of the author. 316: Figure 10.8:, Adapted from J. G. Richardson & C. H., Simpson, “Children, Gender and Social, Structure: An Analysis of the Contents of, Letters to Santa Claus,” 1982, Child Development, 53, 429–436. Copyright © 1982, by the Society for Research in Child Development, Inc. Adapted by permission., 317: Figure 10.9: Adapted from Robert M., Liebert & Joyce Sprafkin, The Early Window: Effects of Television on Children, and Youth, 3/e. Published by Allyn and, Bacon, Boston, Ma. Copyright © 1988 by, Pearson Education. Adapted by permission of the publisher. 318: Cartoon © The, New Yorker Collection 2001 Barbara, Smaller from cartoonbank.com. All rights, reserved. 321: DOONSBURY © 1975 G. B., Trudeau. Reprinted with permission of, UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All, rights reserved. 323: The Mismeasure of, Woman, by Carol Tavris. Book cover,, Copyright © 1992 by Simon & Schuster,, Inc. Reproduction by permission of the, publisher. All rights reserved. 325: Figure

Page 652 :
10.13: Adapted from N. Stein, N. L. Marshall, and L. R. Tropp, Secrets in public:, Sexual harassment in our schools, p. 4., Copyright © 1993 Center for Research on, Women at Wellesley College and the, NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund., Adapted by permission. 330: Cartoon ©, The New Yorker Collection 2002 Robert, Weber 2002 from cartoonbank.com. All, rights reserved. 331: Cover: You Just Don’t, Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, by Deborah Tannen. Copyright ©, 1990 by Deborah Tannen. Reprinted by, permission of HarperCollins, Inc. cover, design by Eric Fuentecilla. 332: CATHY ©, Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE., All rights reserved. 333: Figure 10.15:, Based on insights from You Just Don’t, Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, by Deborah. Tannen, 1990. New, York: William Morrow & Company, Inc., Chapter 11, 340: FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE cartoon © 1988 Lynn Johnston Productions,, Inc./Distributed by Universal Press Syndicate. Reprinted with permission. All rights, reserved. 341: Cover: The Hurried Child:, Growing Up Too Fast by David Elkind,, 2001. Reprinted by permission of Perseus, Books Publishers, a member of Perseus, Books, L..L.C. Photo © Photonica. 341:, Figure 11.2: Adapted M. H. Tobin-Richards,, A. M. Boxer, and A. C. Petersen from “The, Psychological Significance of Pubetal, Change: Sex Differences in Perceptions, of Self During Early Adolescence.” In, J. Brooks-Gunn and A. C. Petersen (Eds.),, Girls at Puberty: Biological and Psychosocial Perspectives, p. 137. Copyright © 1983, Plenum Publishing Inc. Adapted by permission of Springer Science and Business, Media and the author. 342: Figure 11.3:, Figure [adapted] of Erikson’s “Stages of, Personality Development”, from Childhood and Society by Erik H. Erikson., Copyright 1950 © 1963 by W. W. Norton, & Co. Inc., renewed © 1978, 1991 by Erik, H. Erikson. Used by permission of W. W., Norton & Company, Inc. 343: Figure 11.4:, Adapted from J. E. Marcia, “Identity in, Adolescence,” 1980. In J. Adelson (Ed.),, Handbook of Adolescent Psychology,, pp. 159–210. Copyright © 1980 by John, Wiley & Sons, Inc. Adapted by permission, of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 345: Figure, 11.5: Based on American Foundation for, Suicide Prevention: When You Fear Someone May Take Their Life 9n.d.) Retrieved, January 10, 2005 from http://www.afsp., org/about/whattodo.htm 347: Cover:, How to Grow Up When You’ve Grown, Up: Achieving Balance in Adulthood, by, Nancy O’Connor , 1994, La Mariposa, Press. Reprinted by permission of the, publisher and author. 348: Figure 11.6:, Adapted from J. Montepare and M. Lachman, “You’re Only as Old as You Feel:, , Self-Perceptions of Age, Fears of Aging,, and Life Satisfaction,” Psychology and, Aging, 4, 73–78. Copyright © 1989 American Psychological Association. Adapted by, permission of the author. 350: CATHY ©, Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE., All rights reserved. 354: Jacket Cover of, Aging With Grace by Dr. David Snowdon., Used by permission of Bantam Books, a, division of Random House, Inc. Cover, photo © Lee P. Thomas: Nun Study participant Sister Andrea Carron, a School, Sister of Notre Dame from St. Louis. 355:, Figure 11.8: Reprinted from “Intellectural, Development in Adulthood,” by K. W., Schaie in Handbook of the Psychology of, Aging, Third Edition, edited by J.E. Birren, and K. W. Schaie, copyright © 1990, reproduced with permission of the Elsevier., 357: Figure 11.10: Data from B. Levy and, E. Langer, “Aging Free From Negative, Stereotypes: Successful Memory in China, and Among the American Deaf,” 1994,, Journal of Social Psychology, 66, 989–997., American Psychological Association. Graph, adapted from R. Baron and D. Byrne,, Social Psychology, 8/e, p. 994, Table 2., Published by Allyn and Bacon, Boston,, MA. Copyright © 1997 by Pearson Education. Adapted by permission of the publisher. 357: Figure 11.9: Based on data, from W. Dennis, “Creative Productivity, Between the Ages of 20 and 80 Years,”, 1966. Journal of Gerontology, 2(1), 1–8., Copyright © 1966 the Gerontological Society of America. Adapted by permission, 365: Figure 11.12: Based on data from, “Socialization Determinants of Personal, Agency,” a paper presented at the biennial, meeting of the Society for Research in, Child Development, New Orleans, 1977., 367: Figure 11.13: Data from S. D. Lamborn, N. S. Mounts, L. Steinberg, & S. M., Dornbusch, “Patterns of Competence and, Adjustment Among Adolescents from, Authoritative, Authoritarian, Indulgent,, and Neglectful Families,” 1991, Child Development, 62, p 1060. Copyright © 1991, by the Society for Research in Child Development, Inc. Used with permission of, SRCD. 369: Cover Reprinted with the permission of Simon & Schuster Adult Publishing Group, from The 10 Principles of, Good Parenting, by Laurence Steinberg., Cover, Copyright © 2004 by Simon &, Schuster, Inc. All rights reserved., Chapter 12, 379: Figure 12.2: From John L. Holland,, Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of, Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (2nd ed.). © 1985, pp. 19–23,, 36–40. Adapted by permission of Prenctice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 380:, Figure 12.3: Adapted from J. Zaccaria,, Theories of Occupational Choice and, Vocational Development, pp. 51–52., Houghton Mifflin. Copyright © 1970 by, , Time Share Corporation, New Hampshire., 383: Cover: Free Agent Nation: The Future, of Working for Yourself, by Daniel H. Pink,, 2001. Copyright © 2001 Warner Books., Reprinted by permission of Warner Books., 389: CATHY © 2001 Cathy Guisewite., Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All rights reserved. 389: Figure 12.8: Adapted from, F. J. Landy, Psychology of Work Behavior, (4th ed.), p. 638. Copyright © 1989 by, Wadsworth, Inc. Reprinted by permission, of Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. 390:, Cartoon: Reprinted with special permission of King Features Syndicate. 390: Figure 12.9: Redrawn from R. A. Karasek,, D. Baker, F. Marxer, A. Ahlbom, T. Theorell,, “Job Decision Latitude, Job Demands, and, Cardiovascular Disease: A Prospective, Study of Swedish Men,” 1981, American, Journal of Public Health, 71, 694–705., Reprinted by permission. 391: Cover of, Sexual Harassment on the Job: What It Is, and How to Stop It, by Barbara Kate Repa, and William Petrocelli , 2002. Reprinted, with permission from the publisher, Nolo., Copyright © 2002.http://www.nolo.com, 392: Figure 12.10: From L. Bowes-Sperry, and J. Tata, “A Multi-Perspective Framework of Sexual Harassment,” in G. N., Powell (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and, Work, pp. 263–280. © 1999 by Sage Publications. Reprinted with permission of, Sage Publications, Inc. 396: Cover: The, Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home, and Home Becomes Work, by Arlie Russell, Hochschild, 2001, Owl Books. Copyright, © 2001 by Henry Holt and Co. Reprinted, by permission of Henry Holt & Co., LLC., 397: Figure 12.14: Adapted from L. Mishel,, J. Bernstein, & J. Schmitt, The State of, Working America—2000–2001, p. 401., Copyright © 2001 by Cornell University, Press. Adapted by permission of the publisher, Cornell University Press. 399: Cover:, Reprinted with permission from What, Color is Your Parachute? A Practical Manual for Job-Hunters and Career-Changers,, 2005 edition by Richard Nelson Bolles., Copyright © 2005 by Richard Nelson, Bolles.. Ten Speed Press P.O. Box 7123, Berkeley, CA, 94707. Available from, your local bookseller or by calling 800, 841–2665, or visiting www.tenspeed., com. Visit Richard Nelson Bolles at, www.jobhuntersbible.com., Chapter 13, 409: Cartoon by Wasserman: © Tribune, Media Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved., Reprinted with permission. 409: Figure, 13.1: Adapted from T. Holt, L. Greene, &, J. Davis, “National survey of adolescents, and young adults: Sexual health knowledge, attitudes, and experience,” 2003,, Kaiser Family Foundation, Question 2,, p. 97. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation., 410: Cover: Caron, Sandra L., SEX MATTERS FOR COLLEGE STUDENTS: SEX, , Credits, , 615

Page 653 :
FAQ’s IN HUMAN SEXUALITY, 1st Edition, © 2003. Adapted by permission of, Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle, River, NJ. 411: Figure 13.2: A Biennial, Report of the Kaiser Family Foundation:, Sex on TV 3, Executive Summary”,, (#3324), The Henry J. Kaiser Family, Foundation, 2003. This information was, reprinted with permission the Henry J., Kaiser Family Foundation. The Kaiser, Family Foundation, based in Menlo Park,, California, is a nonprofit, independent, national health care philanthropy and is, not associated with Kaiser Permanente or, Kaiser Industries. 416: Figure 13.5: Used, with permission from Newsweek. 417:, Cover reprinted with permission from, Loving Someone Gay, 1997 edition, by, Don Clark. Copyright © 1997 by Don, Clark, Celestrial Arts, P.O. Box 7123,, Berkeley, CA 94707. 94707. Available from, your local bookseller or by calling 800, 841-2665, or visiting www.tenspeed.com, 419: Figure 13.7: From Elaine Hatfield, and Richard L. Rapson, Love, Sex and, Intimacy: Their Psychology, Biology and, History, Table 3.10, p. 92. Published by, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA. Copyright, © 1997 by Pearson Education. Reprinted, by permission of the publisher. 421: Figure 13.9: From E. O. Laumann, J. H., Gagnon, R. T. Michael, and S. Michaels,, The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States, 1994., Copyright © 1994 University of Chicago, Press. Reprinted by permission. 423: Figure 13.10: From David Sue, “The Erotic, Fantasies of College Students During, Coitus,” 1979, The Journal of Sex Research, 15, p.303. Copyright © 1979 Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality., Reprinted by permission. 425: Cover:, King, Bruce M., HUMAN SEXUALITY, TODAY 5th Edition, Copyright © 2005., Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. 427:, Figure 13.12: From Sex in America by John, Gagnon. Copyright © 1994 by CSG Enterprises, Inc., Edward O. Lauman, Robert T., Michael, and Gina Kolata. By permission, of Little, Brown and Company, Inc. and, Brockman, Inc. 428: Figure 13.13: From, B. Handy, “How We Really Feel About Infidelity,” Time, August 3, 1998, pp. 52–53., Copyright © 1998 Time Inc. Reprinted by, permission. 435: Figure 13.16: Adapted, from E. Frank, C. Anderson, & D. Rubenstein, “Frequency of Sexual Dysfunction in, ‘Normal’ Couples,”1978, The New England, Journal of Medicine, 299, 1111–1115., Copyright © 1978 by the New England, Journal of Medicine. Reprinted by permission. 436: Figure 13.17: From E. O., Laumann, J. H. Gagnon, R. T. Michael,, and S. Michaels, The Social Organization, of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United, States, p. 369. Copyright © 1994 University of Chicago Press. Reprinted by permission. 438: Figure 13.18: Adapted from, , 616, , Credits, , William H. Masters, Virginia E. Johnson,, and Robert C. Kolodny, Human Sexuality,, 3rd Edition © 1988 , p. 527. Published by, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA. Copyright, © 1998 by Pearson Education. Adapted by, permission of the publisher., Chapter 14, 446: Figure 14.3: Adapted from Ridker,, P. M. (2002). “High Sensitivity C-reactive, Protein: Potential Adjunct for Global Risk, Assessment in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease,” Circulation, 103,, 1813–1818. Copyright © 2002 American, Heart Association. Adapted by permission, of the publisher Lippincott Williams &, Willams and the author. 448: Cover: Is It, Worth Dying For? by Robert S. Eliot and, Dennis L. Breo. Copyright © 1984, 1989,, 1991 Bantam Books. Reprinted by permission. 453: bottom, Cartoon by Borgman Reprinted with special permission, from King Features Syndicate. 455: Figure, 14.10: Adapted from B. Q. Hafen and, W. W.K. Hoeger, Wellness: Guidelines for, a Healthy Lifestyle, 1998. Copyright ©, 1998 by Morton Publishing Company., 456: Cartoon by Roger Bollen: © Tribune, Media Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved., Reprinted with permission. 456: Cover:, The Stop Smoking Workbook: the Definitive Step-by-Step Guide to Healthy by, Lori Stevic-Rust and Anita Maximin., Copyright © 1996 Anita Maximim, Psy.D.,, and Lori-Stevic-Rus, Ph.D. Reprinted by, permission New Harbinger, Oakland, CA., 800/748-6273 www.newharbinger.com, 459: Figure 14.14: From G. Edlin and, E. Golanty, Health and Wellness, Third, Edition, , p. 294. Copyright © 1992, Jones, & Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA., WWW.jbpub.com. Reprinted with permission. 459: Figure 14.15: Adapted from, B. Q. Hafen and W. W.K. Hoeger, Wellness: Guidelines for a Healthy Lifestyle,, 1998. Copyright © 1998 by Morton Publishing Company. 461: CATHY copyright, © Cathy Guisewite. Reprinted with permission of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE., All rights reserved. 462: Cover: Weight, Loss Through Persistence: Making Science, Work For You, by Daniel S. Kirschanbaum., New Harbinger Publications. Copyright ©, 1994 by Daniel S. Kirschenbaum. Reprinted, by permission New Harbinger, Oakland,, CA. 800/748-6273 www.newharbinger., com 465: Cover reprinted with permission of Simon & Schuster Adult Publishing, Group: Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy: The, Harvard Medical School Guide to Healthy, Eating, by Walter C. Weillett, M.D. Copyright © 2001 by President and Fellows, at Harvard College. 465: Figure 14.19:, Adapted with permission of Simon &, Schuster Adult Publishing Group: Eat,, Drink, and Be Healthy: The Harvard, Medical School Guide to Healthy Eating,, by Walter C. Weillett, M.D. Copyright, 2001 by President and Fellows at Harvard, , College. 467: Figure 14.21: Adapted from, C. C. Conrad, “How Different Sports Rate, in Promoting Physical Fitness,” Medical, Times, May 1976, 4–5. Copyright © 1976, by Romaine Pierson Publishers. Reprinted, by permission. 469: Figure 14.22: Adapted, from S. C. Kalichman, Understanding, AIDS: A Guide for Mental Health Professionals, 1995, Appendix C, pp. 391–392., Copyright © 1995 by the American Psychological Association. Adapted with permission of the author., Chapter 15, 484: Cover: The Burden of Sympathy:, How Families Cope With Mental Illness,, by David Allen Karp, copyright © 2000, Oxford University Press, Inc. Used by permission of Oxford University Press, Inc., Photo by Michael Wilson/Superstock., 486: Figure 15.3: Adapted with permission, from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition,, Text Revision Copyright © 2000 American Psychiatric Association. 488: Figure, 15.5: From I. M. Marks, Fears & Phobias,, 1969, Academic Press. Copyright © 1969, by Isaac Marks. Reprinted by permission., 489: Cartoon: © 1990 by Sidney Harris, 491: Figure 15.7: From M. W. Eysenck,, K. Mogg, J. May, A. Richards, and A. Mathews, “Bias in Interpretation of Ambiguous, Sentences Related to Threat in Anxiety,”, 1991, Journal of Abnormal Psychology,, 100, 144–150. Copyright © 1991 by the, American Psychological Association., Reprinted by permission of the author., 493: Cartoon © Egar Argo. Reprinted by, permission. 498: Figure 15.10: From I. G., Sarason and B. R. Sarason, Abnormal Psychology: The Problem of Maladaptive Behavior (5th Ed.), © 1987, p. 283. Reprinted, by permission of Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 499: Figure 15.11: From, Figure 6-1 (p. 132) , “Age of Onset for, Bipolar Mood Disorder,” from ManicDepressive Illness, by Frederick K. Goodwin and Kay R. Jamison, copyright © 1990, by Oxford University Press, Inc. Used by, permission of Oxford University Press,, Inc. 506: Figure 15.16: Adapted from I.I., Gottesman, Schizophrenia Genesis: The, Origins of Madness, 1991. Copyright ©, 1991 by W. H. Freeman. 507: Cover: Surviving Schizophrenia: A Family Manual, by, E. Fuller Torrey. Copyright © 1988, 1995, Harper & Row. Reprinted by permission, of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. 511:, Figure 15.19: Adapted from A. R. Lucas,, C. M. Beard, W. M. O’Fallon, & L. T. Kurland, “50-Year Trends in the Incidence of, Anorexia Nervosa in Rochester, Minn:, A Population-Based Study,” American, Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 917–922, 1991., American Psychiatric Association. 512:, Figure 15.20: Graphic adapted from Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach,, by D. H. Barlow and V. M. Durand, 1999., Copyright © 1999 Wadsworth Publishing.

Page 654 :
Chapter 16, 519: Figure 16.1: Data from M. Oflson, and H. A. Pincus, “Outpatient Mental, Health Care in Nonhospital Settings: Distribution of Patients Across Provider, Groups,” 1996, American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 1353–1356 526: Figure 16.6:, Adapted from A. T. Beck, Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders, 1976,, International Universities Press. Copyright © 1976 by International Universities, Press, Inc. Adapted by permission of the, publisher. 529: Cover: The Psychotherapy, Maze, by O. Ehrenberg and M. Ehrenberg., Copyright © 1986 Aronson. Reprinted by, permission. 531: DOONESBURY © 1994, G. B. Trudeau. Reprinted with permission, , of UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE. All, rights reserved. 531: Figure 16.7: From, “Lies of the Mind” Time , 11/29/93. Copyright © 1993 Time Inc. Reprinted by permission. 532: Cartoon: © 1999 by Sidney, Harris 538: Figure 16.12: From data in, NIMH-PSC Collaborative Study I and, reported in “Drugs in the Treament of, Psychosis,” by J.O. Cole, S. C. Goldberg,, and J. M. Davis, 1966. In P. Solomon (Ed.), Psychiatric Drugs, Grune & Stratton. Additional data added from J. M. Davis,, 1985. By permission of the author. 539:, Cartoon © The New Yorker Collection, 2001 Barbara Smaller from cartoonbank., com. All rights reserved. 546: Cartoon:, FRANK & ERNEST reprinted by permis-, , sion of Newspaper Enterprise Association,, Inc. 548: Cartoon: Inside Woody Allen by, Stuart Hample. Reprinted by permission., © King Features Syndicate, Inc., 1977., World rights reserved. 548: Figure 16.15:, Adapted from M. L. Smith & G. V. Glass,, “Meta Analysis of Psychotherapy Outcome Series,” 1977, American Psychologist, 32 (September), 752–760. Copyright, © 1977 by the American Psychological, Association. Adapted by permission of the, author. 549: Cover: A Consumer’s Guide, to Psychotherapy, by Larry E. Beutler,, Bruce Bongar & Joel Shurkin. copyright ©, 2001 by Larry E. Beutler, Bruce Bongar &, Joel Shurkin. Used by permission of Oxford University Press, Inc., , Credits, , 617

Page 655 :
This page intentionally left blank

Page 656 :
Name Index, A, , Abalakina-Paap, M. A., 182, Abbey, A., 296, 297, Abel, M. H., 117, Aber, J. L., 226, Abi-Dargham, A., 505, Aboud, F. E., 240, Abplanalp, R. R., Jr., 240, Abrams, D. B., 455, Abramson, L. Y., 108, 500, Aburdene, P., 378, Achille, N. M., 22, Ackerman, S., 348, Acock, A. C., 290, Acton, G. S., 55., 311, Adams, G., 237, Adams, G. R., 347, Adams, H. E., 493, Adams, K. A., 308, Adams, M., 288, Adams-Curtis, L. E., 297, Adcock, c. J., 67, Addis, M. E., M. E., 320, Ader, R., 451, Adler, A., 41, 42–43, Adler, L. 252, Adler, N. E., 241., 291, 322, Adonu, J. K., 236, Adorno, R., 182, Affleck, G., 93, 118, Ageyev, V. S., 182, Agnew, C. R., 248, Agras, W. S., 532, Ahlberg, C., 314, Ahn, H., 529, Ahrons, C. R., 286, Aiken, L. S., 429, Ainsworth, M. D. S., 252, 363, Ait-Daoud, N., 457, 459, Akgun, S., 92, Akimoto, S. A., 156, Akishkal, H. S., 497, Akiyama, H., 345, Albee, G. W., 518, 543, 544, Albert, C. M., 445, Alberti, R. E., 224, 227, 228, 231, Alexander, C. N., 128, 129, Alicke, M. D., 155., 240, Allegro, J. T., 388, Allen, K., 95, Allen, K. R., 295, Allen, M., 251, 318, Allison, D. B., 460, 461, Alloy, L. B., 500, 501, Allport, G., 34, Alonso, A., 527, Alonso, S., 527, Altemeyer, B., 182, 415, Altman, I., 215, 217, Altnaier, E. M., 359, Altobelli, J., 291, Amada, G., 545, Amato, P. R., 270, 271, 272, 274, 285, 286,, 287, 288, 289, 292, Ambady, N., 175, 208, Ames, S. C., 98, Anand, A. P., 264, , Anand, S. S., 445, Anderson, B. L., 450, Anderson, C., 3, 435, Anderson, C. A., 226, Anderson, J. R., 28, Anderson, K. J., 84, Anderson, P. A., 210, Anderson, S., 126, Anderson, S. E., 339, Anderson, S. L., 236, Anderson, V. L., 129, Anderson-Fye, E. P., 511, Andreasen, N. C., 503, 504, 506, Andresen, J., 128, Andrews, A. M., 451, Andrews, B., 495, Andrews, G., 487, Andrioli, M., 296, Angell, M., 539, Angiulo, M. J., 495, Angleitner, A., 57, Angst, J., 42, Ankenmann, R. D., 395, Anton, R. F., 458, Antonucci, T. C., 345, 351, Antonuccio, D. O., 537, 539, Antony, M. M., 490, Apperloo, M. J. A., 409, Aqilino, W. S., 278, Arbona, C., 375, Archer, J., 273, 308, 311, Archer, R. L., 331, Arendell, T., 321, Argyle, M., 20, 21, 22, 248, 249, Ariely, D., 122, Aries, E., 309, Armbruster, B. B., 26, Armour, S., 396, Arndt, J., 60, Arnett, J. J., 343, 349, Arnkoff, D. B., 527, 532, Arnold, K., 321, Arnold, K. D., 381, Arnold, L. M., 451, Arnold, R. D., 58, Arnon, L., 91, Arnsten, J. H., 475, Aron, A., 242, 252, 259, Aronson, E., 185, 186, Arrigo, J. M, 494, Arthur, R. H., 78, Asch, S. E., 180, 190–191, Ashcraft, M. H., 89, Asher, S., 262, Ashmore, R. D., 309, Ashton, M. C., 35, Aspinwall, L. G., 93, 97, Assanand, S., 140, 460, Asuncion, A. G., 187, Ataca, B., 74, Athenstadt, U., 309, Atkinson, L., 363, Atkinson, R. H., 27, Atwood, J. H., 423, 427, Aubé, J., 245, Aubin, S., 437, 438, 439, Auerbach, S. M., 393, , Ayanian, J. Z., 454, Aylor, B., 246, Ayres, J. J. B., 46, B, , Babcock, J. C., 299, Back, K., 239, Bacon, J. B., 362, Bacue, A., 317, 318, Bader, K. O., 361, Badgett, M. V. L., 385, 388, Bailey, B. L., 288, Bailey, J. M., 240, 295, 414, 415, Bailey, M., 414, Bakalar, J. B., 476, 477, Baker, F., 454, Baker, L., 512, Baker, O., 387, Baldessarini, R. J., 538, Baldwin, D., 91, Baldwin, M., 256, Bales, R. F., 305, Ballenger, J. C., 92, 537, Balsam, K. F., 294, Banaji, M. R., 177, Bancroft, J., 313, 422, 437, Bandura, A., 49–50, 158–159, 314, Bank, B. J., 249, Banks, A., 414, Banning, K., 79, Banse, R., 211, Banyard, V. L., 530, Barbanel, L., 3, Barbaree, H. E., 297, Barbee, A. P., 240, 241, Barber, B. K., 278, Barbrack, C. R., 532, Bargh, J. A., 152, 177, 204, 216, 237, 238, 264, Barlett, D. L., 489, Barley, D. E., 529, Barling, J., 393, Barlow, D. H., 488, 491, 529, Barnes, M. L., 331, Barnes, V. A., 129, Barnett, D., 363, Barnett, H. L., 322, Barnett, O. W., 299, Barnett, R. C., 282, 396, Baron, R. A., 393, Baron, R. S., 5, Barrett, L. F., 216, Barrett, S., 8, Barry, H., III, 338, Barsky, A. J., 469, 493, Bartholomae, S., 410, Bartholomew, K., 254, 262, Bartlett, M. S., 212, Baruch, G. K., 350, Bashner, R., 184, Basow, S. A., 313, 330, Bassin, E., 258, Bates, G. W., 348, Batki, S. L., 468, Batson, C. D., 292, Baucom, D. H., 283, Bauer, M. S., 499, Baum, A., 73, 75, 92, 450, , Name Index, , 619

Page 657 :
Baum, K. M., 508, Baumeister, R. F., 89, 109, 113, 122, 145, 146,, 147–148, 149, 150, 157, 158, 160, 162, 163,, 165, 235, 259, 414, Baumrind, D., 149, 194, 364, 365, 367, 368, Baur, K., 422, 425, 434, 439, Bavelas, J. B., 209, Baxter, L. A., 217, Bay-Cheng, L. Y., 322, Beals, K. P., 418, Beck, A., 111, 491, 500, 526–527, Beck, F. D., 423, Becker, A. E., 510, 511, Becker, B. J., 308, Beeder, A. B., 477, Beer, J. M., 58, Behar, R., 5, Beidel, D. C., 535, Beisecker, A. E., 470, Bekelman, J. E., 539, Bell, A. P., 414, 417, Bell, B. S., 374, Bell, R. A., 263, Bellack, A. S., 505, Beller, M., 311, Belluck, P., 287, Belmore, S. M., 180, Belsky, J., 277, 363, Bem, D. J., 196, 414, Bem, S. L., 305, 314, 315, 328, Benbow, C. P., 306, Bender, R., 460, Bendis, D., 5, Benet, V., 35, Bengston, V. L., 349, Benjamin, L. T., Jr., 17, Benjet, C., 369, Bennett, D. A., 353, Bennett, M. E., 248, Bennett, P., 451, Ben-Shakhar, G., 212, Benson, H., 129–130, Berenbaum, S. A., 414, Berg, J. H., 331, Bergen, D. L., 305, Bergen, M. R., 259, Bergin, A. E., 529, 536, 542, 545, 547, Berglund, P. A., 519, Berkman, C. S., 354, Berkowitz, B., 6, Berkowitz, L., 108, 194, 369, Berkowitz, R. I., 532, 536, Berliner, K., 290, Berliner, L., 532, Berman, A. L., 309, 344, Berman, J. J., 250, Bernard, L. C., 470, Berne, E., 221, Berne, P. H., 144, Bernier, A., 262, Bernstein, B., 544, Bernstein, H. J., 541, Bernstein, J., 397, Berry, D. S., 172, Berry, J. W., 74, Berscheid, E., 176, 236, 240, 244, 245, 257, Bertakis, K. D., 470, Bertrand, R. M., 350, Berzon, B., 417, 434, Berzonsky, M. D., 343, Best, D. L., 176, 305, , 620, , Name Index, , Betz, N. E., 96, 347, 381, Beumont, P. J. V., 510, Beutler, L. E., 529, 545, 547, 548, 549, Bhatnagar, S., 87, Bhattachary, S., 477, Bianchi, S. M., 270, 271, 280, 281, 282, 287,, 288, Biblarz, T. J., 280, Biernat, M., 154, 319, Bilezikian, J. P., 354, Billings, A. G., 109, 114, Billings, L. S., 154, Bini, L., 540, Birchler, G. R., 493, Birnbaum, M. H., 180, Bishop, S. R., 129, Bitter, R. G., 274, Bixler, E. O., 92, Bjorklund, D. F., 530, Bjorntorp, P., 459, Black, D. W., 503, 504, 506, Blackburn, T. C., 178, Blacker, D., 485, Blacker, L., 279, Blair, S. N., 466, Blakemore, J. E. O., 317, Blakeslee, S., 288, Blanchard, E. B., 450, Blanchard, J. J., 505, Blanco, C., 539, Blascovich, J., 95, Blass, T., 194, Bleier, R., 312, Bleuler, E., 502, Blieszner, R., 278, Block, J., 113, Block, J. H., 331, Bloodworth, R. C., 477, Bloom, D., 409, Bloomfield, H., 6, 128, Blumenthal, J. A., 446, 448, Blumstein, D., 427, 428, Blumstein, P., 275, 279, 413, Blustein, D. L., 374, Bly, R., 319, Bobek, B. L., 393, 394, Boden, J. M., 149, Bodenhausen, G. V., 177, 180, 183, Bodenheimer, T., 539, Bodnar, L. E., 438, Boen, F., 157, Boeree, C. G., 51, Boeringer, S. B., 296, Boland, R. J., 538, Bolger, N., 112, Bolles, R. N., 377, 399, 402, Bonanno, G. A., 360, 361, Bond, J. T., 320, 348, 383, 390, 396, Bond, M. H., 156, 217, 250, Bond, M. J., 50, Bond, R., 190, 194, Bonebright, C. A., 395, Bongar, B., 549, Bono, J. E., 35, Booth, A., 287, 289, 292, Bordon, L. M., 343, Borker, R. A., 330, Borman, W. C., 373, Borus, J. F., 542, Borys, S., 262, Bose, S., 286, , Bossé, R., 351, Bossio, L. M., 97, Bost, K. K., 277, 363, Bosworth, H. B., 353, Bouchard, G., 275, Bouchard, T. J., 57, Boudreaux, E., 50, Bouman, T. K., 492, Bourhis, R., 184, Bower, G. H., 28, 29, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, Bower, S. A., 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, Bowers, J. W., 216, Bowes-Sperry, L., 392, Bowins, B., 112, Bowlby, J., 254, 360, Boxer, A. A., 341, Bradbury, T. N., 259, 328, Bradford, J., 416, Bradley, G., 96, Bradley, J., 26, Bramlett, M. D., 274, 285, 289, Branas, C. C., 458, Brand, R. J., 446, Brannen, S. J., 495, Brannon, L., 386, Brannon, R., 318, Branscombe, N. R., 184, Brantley, C., 422, Bratskavsky, E., 109, 259, Braungart-Rieker, J. M., 365, Brawman-Mintzer, O., 537, Breggin, P., 541, Brehm, J. W., 187, 197, Brehm, S. S., 148, 173, 178, 197, 247, 256,, 257, 331, Breier, A., 505, Brende, J. O., 72, Brennan, K. A., 254, 262, Breo, D. L., 448, Brett, J. M., 80, 386, Brewer, M. B., 176, 184, 185, Brewester, M. P., 298, Brewin, C. R., 495, Brewster, K. L., 270, Brickman, P., 22, Bridges, K. R., 122, Bridges, M. W., 96, Briere, J., 530, 532, Bright, J., 73, Brinkman, A., 207, Brissette, I., 248, Brod, C., 388, Brodsky, A., 542, Brody, J. E., 307, Brody, L. R., 309, 320, Brody, N., 59, Broidy, L. M., 226, Bromage, B. K., 27, Bromet, E. J., 487, Bromley, M., 278, Brooks-Gunn, J., 282, 339, Broomhall, H. S., 393, Brown, A. S., 488, 506, Brown, B. A., 217, Brown, D., 532, Brown, E. J., 491, Brown, J., 113, Brown, J. B., 292, Brown, J. B., Jr., 16, Brown, J. D., 80, 143, 155, 411, Brown, J. L., 226

Page 658 :
Brown, R., 183, Brown, R. D., 530, Brown, R. J., 176, 185, Brown, S., 289, 292, 424, Brown, S. L., 95, Browne, A., 299, Browne, K., 298, Brownell, K. D., 459, 460, 461, 462, Brubaker, T., 279, Bruce, K. R., 511, Bruch, H., 512, Bruckner-Gordon, F., 545, Brumbaugh, C. C., 256, Brummett, B. H., 35, 448, Bryan, A. D., 429, Bryant, J., 411, Bryant, S., 352, Bryant, S. S., 294, Bryden, M. P., 307, 312, Bryer, K. B., 359, Buchanan, D. R., 242, Buchanan, R. W., 502, Buck, E. B., 194, Buckingham, J. T., 155, Buckman, R., 470, Buckner, C. E., 305, Buehlman, K. T., 283, Buelens, M., 395, Bukatko, D., 309, Bulcroft, R., 271, 277, 348, Bulik, C. M., 511, Bull, D. L., 530, Bull, S. S., 412, Bullinger, M., 73, Bumpass, L. L., 275, 285, 291, 292, Bumpus, M. F., 281, Burger, J. M., 55, 196, Burgess, C., 477, Burgess, E. O., 427, Burggraf, K., 318, Burgoon, J. K., 210, 211, Burhans, K. K., 144, Burke, J. D., 485, 487, Burke, P. J., 35, 395, Burleson, B. R., 285, Burr, W. R., 274, Burstein, G., 431, Bursztajn, H. J., 542, Buscaglia, L., 6, Bushman, B. J., 109, 149, Buss, D. M., 58–59, 240, 241, 242, 243, 257,, 273, 311, 331, 418, Buss, W. C., 283, Bussey, K., 49, 314, Butcher, J. N., 111, Butler, E. A., 126, Butler, J. L., 89, Butler, R., 360, Buunk, B. P., 388, Buxton, M. N., 451, Byers, E. S., 436, Byrne, D., 245, Byrnes, J., 340, 341, C, , Cacioppo, J. T., 95, 188, 255, 264, Caddell, M., 91, Caldwell, B. M., 363, Caldwell, D. F., 196, Caldwell, L. L., 398, Calhoun, L. G., 93, , Call, B., 257, Call, V., 427, Callander, J. C., 174, Calof, D., 532, Camara, W. J., 212, Cameron, L., 469, Cameron, N., 492, Campbell, E. Q., 191, Campbell, J. C., 298, Campbell, J. D., 140, 146, Campbell, L. F., 7, Campbell, R. J., 542, Campbell, S. M., 328, Campbell, W. K., 148, 149, 156, 277, Canary, D. J., 246, Cancro, R., 503, 505, Candela, S. F., 508, Canetto, S. S., 344, Cannon, W., 85, Cantor, J., 322, Cantor-Graae, E., 507, Capitanio, J., 248, 415, Caplan, R. D., 393, Caputo, D., 466, Cardena, E., 129, 496, Carducci, B., 215, Carey, M., 421, 467, 468, Carli, L. L., 308, 309, Carlson, D. N., 470, 471, Carlson, E. A., 363, Carlsson, A., 505, Carlton, K., 259, Carney, S., 541, Caron, S. L., 410, Carpenter, W. T., 502, 504, 540, Carr, V. J., 73, Carrere, 277, Carrington, P., 129, Carroll, J. L., 418, Carson, R. C., 111, 504, Carstensen, L. L., 351, Carter, B., 275, 276, 277, Carter, E. A., 288, Carter, J. D., 208, 309, Cartwright, S., 125, Caruso, D. R., 125, Carver, C. S., 96, 97, 106, 108, 248, Casas, J. F., 308, Casper, L. M., 270, 271, 287, Caspi, A., 58, 245, Cassel, R. N., 51, Castronguay, L. G., 542, Catania, J. A., 468, Cate, R. M., 274, 419, 426, Cates, W., Jr., 431, Cattell, R. B., 34, 65, 67, Catz, S. L., 468, Cavanaugh, J. C., 353, 357, Cavell, T. A., 17, Caverly, D. C., 25, 26, Cegala, D. J., 209, Cerletti, U., 540, Chaiken, S., 187, Chambless, D. L., 529, Chan, R. W., 295, Chancey, D., 283, Chang, E. C., 72, 97, Chang, R. Y., 118, Chanowitz, B., 184, Chaplin, W. F., 403, Chappell, K. D., 255, , Charlesworth, W. R., 330, Chartrand, T., 196, Chase, A., 366, Chemers, M. M., 50, Chen, D., 43, Cheng, C., 106, Cheng, H., 149, Cheng, Y., 466, Cherlin, A. J., 270, 286, 288, Chia, R. C., 315, Chiappelli, F., 88, 451, Chick, J., 458, Chiles, C., 190, Chiriboga, D. A., 345, 350, Chizmar, L., 466, Cho, C., 429, Choi, H., 278, Choi, I., 178, Choi, L., 177, Choice, P., 299, Chopra, D., 6, Chouldhry, N. K., 539, Christensen, A., 259, 282, 283, Christensen, A. J., 471, 472, Christensen, P., 263, Christoph, R. T., 50, Christophe, B., 216, Christopher, F. S., 18, 424, Church, A. T., 35, Cialdini, R. B., 157, 189, 191, 195, 196, 197, Ciarrochi, J., 92, 126, Cicchetti, D., 363, Cicirelli, V. G., 351, 359, Ciraulo, D. A., 474, Cirincione, C., 508, Claar, R. L., 448, 470, Clark, C. L., 254, Clark, D., 417, Clark, L. A., 34, Clark, M. C., 28, 29, Clark, M. S., 222, 248, Clark, R., 75, Clarke-Stewart, K. A., 288, Classen, C., 91, Clay, D. L., 395, Cleary, P. D., 454, Cleek, M. G., 283, Clements, M. L., 275, Cloitre, M., 366, Clore, G. L., 188, 245, Clow, A., 87, Coate, D., 22, Coates, L., 209, Coates, T. J., 468, Coats, E. J., 309, Cobb, S. J., 323, Cochran, S. B., 303, Cochran, S. D., 245, 294, 417, Cogan, J. C., 293, 416, Cohan, C. L., 292, 298, Cohen, A., 356, 357, Cohen, C. E., 174, Cohen, D. B., 58, Cohen, D., 537, 539, Cohen, F., 60, 97, Cohen, L. D., 241, Cohen, M. J. M., 450, Cohen, S., 73, 95, 255, 451, 452, 455, Cohn, E., 26, Cohn, L. D., 322, Cohn, S., 26, , Name Index, , 621

Page 659 :
Coie, J. D., 213, Coiro, M. J., 289, Coker, A. L., 296, Colder, C. R., 109, Colder, M., 127, Cole, S. W., 126, Coleman, J. C., 111, Coleman, M., 289, Collaer, M. L., 313, Colley, A., 249, Collins, C., 468, Collins, L. M., 340, Collins, N. L., 215, 254, 255, Collins, R. L., 155, Collins, W. A., 343, Colluci, P., 295, Coltrane, S., 280, 281, 287, 288, Colvin, C. R., 113, Comas-Diaz, L., 315, Compton, W. C., 129, Condon, J. W., 245, Conger, R. D., 340, Conklin, H. M., 506, Connell, C. M., 355, Connidis, I. A., 277, Conoscenti, L. M., 322, Conrad, C. C., 467, Conte, J. R., 530, Contrada, R. J., 244, 75, Conway, M., 154, Conway-Welch, C., 421, Cook, S. I., 296, Coons, D. J., 508, Coons, H. L., 79, Coontz, S., 271, 287, Cooper, A., 17, 18, 411, 412, 428, Cooper, C. L., 72, 73, 86, Cooper, M. L., 254, Cooper, P. J., 92, 510, Cope, M. B., 461, Coplan, J. D., 490, Copper, C., 27, Corhan, S. E., 283, Cornelius, T., 196, Cornoldi, C., 29, Corr, C. A., 359, Correll, C. U., 538, Corsica, J. A., 460, 466, Costa, P. T., Jr., 34, 35, 66, 97, 350, 358, Couch, K. A., 393, Courtenay, W. H., 322, Cowan, C. P., 277, 348, Cowan, N., 152, Cowan, P. A., 277, 348, 368, Cowley, J., 431, Cox, M. J., 277, Cox, P. D., 527, Coy, K. C., 343, Coyne, J. C., 501, Craik, F. I. M., 28, Cramer, P., 111, 113, Crano, W. D., 245, Creed, F., 451, Crepaz, N., 468, Crick, N. R., 308, Crimmins, E. M., 351, Critelli, J. W., 92, 98, Crits-Christoph, P., 547, Crocker, J., 151, 176, 184, 307, 308, Crooks, R. H., 381, 422, 425, 434, 439, Cross, C. K., 344, , 622, , Name Index, , Cross, P., 155, Cross, S. E., 141, 145, 146, 155, Crouter, A. C., 278, 281, 348, Crovitz, H. F., 29, Crowder, K. D., 290, Crowell, J. A., 275, Crowley, A. E., 187, Crowley, B. J., 95, Crowley, J., 299, Crowley, M. J., 59, Cruza-Guet, M. C., 379, Csikszentmihalyi, M., 93, Cudney, M. R., 161, Cuesta, M. J., 504, Culpepper, L., 539, Cummings, E. M., 289, 365, Cunningham, C. O., 467, Cunningham, H. M., 535, Cunningham, M. R., 240, 241, 315, Curtis, R. C., 244, Cutrona, C. E., 261, 262, Cutting, L. P., 508, D, , Dabbs, J. M., 313, D’Achiardi, C., 375, Dainton, M., 246, Dalbert, C., 178, Dallal, G. E., 339, Dallman, M. F., 87, D’Amico, M. L., 238, D’Andrade, R. G., 331, Danieli, Y., 3, 82, Dansereau, D. F., 26, Danton, W. G., 537, 539, Dantzer, R., 88, Darley, J. M., 176, 207, Darling, C. A., 421, Das, E. H. H., 187, D’Augelli, A. R., 344, 417, David, J. P., 73, 98, Davidson, J. K., 421, Davidson, M. J., 388, 391, 392, Davies, L., 291, Davies, R., 498, Davis, B., 317, Davis, H., 129, Davis, J. L., 245, Davis, K., 173, Davis, K. E., 255, 257, 296, Davis, K. F., 16, Davis, K. L., 353, Davis, M., 210, 214, Davis, M. N., 95, Davis, P., 426, Davis, R. A., 110, Dawood, K., 295, Day, S. X., 238, 379, Dean, F. P., 126, DeAngelis, T., 309, 417, Deaux, K., 240, 242, 305, 310, DeBaryshe, B. D., 364, De Beni, R., 29, DeBoer, D. D., 274, DeCarvalho, R. J., 51, Deci, E. L., 20, De Cock, K. M., 467, Deemer, H. N., 470, Deffenbacher, J. L., 451, DeFrain, J., 276, 291, Deikman, A. J., 5, , de Jong, P. J., 491, DeJong-Gierveld, J., 261, Del Monte, M. M., 530, Delahanty, D. L., 450, DeLamater, J. D., 323, 415, 432, 434, 425, Delaune, K. A., 454, 456, Delay, J., 536, Deldin, P. G., 505, DeLeon, J., 504, DeLeon, P. H., 3, DeLillo, V., 450, Delinsky, S. S., 510, Delongis, A., 72, Delunas, L., 79, 98, DelVecchio, W. F., 358, DeMaris, A., 298, 299, Demian, 294, Demo, D. H., 277, 290, 295, 349, Dempster, F. N., 27, Deniker, P., 536, Denisoff, E., 98, Dennerstein, L., 279, 349, Denney, N., 142, Dennis, W., 356, 357, Denton, W. H., 285, DePaulo, B. M., 206, 211, 212, Derlega, V. J., 217, Derogotis, L. R., 79, 97, DeRoma, V., 495, Des Jarlais, D. C., 475, Desmarais, S., 315, DeSpelder, L. A., 359, Dessler, W. A., 74, de St. Aubin, E., 348, Detsky, A. S., 539, Detzer, M. J., 423, Deutsch, G., 312, Deutsch, M., 191, Devine, P. G., 177, 184, Devlin, M. J., 461, de Vries, B., 249, 351, Dew, M. A., 487, Dewe, P., 72, 86, De Wilde, E. J., 344, DeWit, J. B. F., 187, DeWolff, M. S., 363, DiClemente, C. C., 159, DiClemente, R. J., 341, Diekman, A. B., 305, 317, Diener, C., 19, 20, Diener, E., 2, 3, 19, 20, 21, 22, 73, 255, Diforio, D., 508, Dikel, M. F., 376, Dilsaver, S. C., 499, DiMatteo, R. M., 470, 471, Din, J. N., 463, Dindia, K., 217, 251, Dinning, W. D., 327, Dion, K. K., 176, 237, 251, 182, 237, 251, DiPaula, A., 140, Dipboye, R. L., 403, DiPlacido, J., 96, DiPrete, T., 288, Dirks, J. F., 470, Dishotsky, N. L., 476, DiTommaso, E., 262, Dittus, P., 410, Dixon, L., 298, Dixon, R. A., 356, Djintccharadze, N., 182, Dobson, K. S., 518

Page 660 :
Dobson, M., 72, Docherty, J. P., 542, Docherty, N. M., 508, Dohrenwend, B. P., 98, Dolan, S. L., 528, Dolgin, K. L., 217, Dollard, J., 108, Domar, A. D., 6, Donahue, E. M., 162, Donnellan, M. B., 147, Donnelly, B. W., 278, Donnerstein, E., 296, Donovan, R. L., 286, Dorn, L. D., 338, Dougall, A. L., 73, 75, 92, Dougherty, T. W., 174, Douglass, D. N., 123, Douglass, M. E., 123, Dovidio, J. F., 75, 181, 183, 209, Doyle, J. A., 320, Dozier, D. M., 318, Dozois, D. J. A., 518, Draijer, N., 496, Drake, M. F., 403, Dreher, H., 6, Drentea, P., 381, Dresser, N., 203, Drigotas, S. M., 145, 248, Driskell, J. E., 27, Driver, J., 285, Drucker, A. D., 194, Druen, P. B., 240, Druss, B. G., 519, Dryer, D. C., 245, Dryman, A., 488, Dubbert, P. M., 465, Dubovsky, A. N., 498, Dubovsky, S. L., 498, 499, Du Chiara, G., 473, Duck, S., 240, 242, 263, Duckworth, K., 542, Duckworth, M. P., 493, Dudley, E., 279, 349, Duffy, S. M., 248, DuFrene, D. D., 225, Duggan, E. S., 262, Dunbar-Jacobs, J., 471, Duncanson, W. T., 216, Dunkel-Schetter, C., 451, Dunn, A. L., 466, Dunn, S., 4, Dunne, M. P., 414, Dunning, D., 177, Dupuis, S. L., 398, DuRocher-Schudlich, T., 365, Dweck, C. S., 142, 144, 183, Dwoskin, H., 6, Dyer, J., 296, Dyer, M., 249, Dyer, W. W., 6, Dyk, P. H., 347, Dzur, C., 330, E, , Eagly, A. H., 176, 244, 251, 305, 308, 310, 325,, 332, Eaker, E. D., 447, Eals, M., 311, Easterbrook, G., 2, Easterlin, B. L., 129, Eaton, W. W., 488, , Ebbinghaus, H., 27, Eber, H. W., 65, Ebert, L., 91, Ebertz, L., 414, Eccles, J. S., 175, 323, 340, 341, 364, Eckert, S., 309, Edwards, J. N., 279, Edwards, K., 188, Edwards, M., 409, Edwards, R., 330, Ee, J. S., 92, 98, Egan, J., 329, Egan, M. F., 505, 506, Egan, T., 412, Egeland, B., 256, 363, Ehreinreich, H., 477, Ehrenberg, M., 529, 545, 549, Ehrenberg, O., 529, 545, 549, Eich, E., 494, Eifert, G. H., 492, Eisen, J. L., 489, Eisenberg, N. H., 35, Eisler, R. M., 350, Ek, E., 109, Ekman, P., 172, 206, 207, 208, 211, 212, Elder, G. H., Jr., 340, Eleonara, G., 490, Elfenbein, H. A., 207, Elias, J. W., 353, Elias, M. F., 353, Elias, P. K., 353, Eliot, R. S., 448, Elkind, D., 341, Ellertson, C., 431, Ellington, L., 470, Ellinwood, E. H., Jr., 475, Elliott, L., 422, Ellis, A., 8, 111, 115–117, 165, 526, Ellis, L., 414, Elms, A., 193, Ely, R., 176, 309, Emavardhana, T., 129, Emery, R. E., 288, 289, Emmanuel, H. M., 122, Emmelkamp, P. M. G., 533, 536, Emmons, M. L., 224, 227, 228, 231, Emmons, R., 76, Endler, N. S., 98, Engdhal, B., 3, 82, Epstein, J. A., 206, Epstein, R., 6, Epstein, S. P., 74, 113, Erbring, L., 238, Erdelyi, M. H., 112, Erikson, E. H., 342, 346–347, 350, 363, Ernst, C., 42, Eshleman, J. R., 291, Espiritu, D. A. V., 353, Esterling, B. A., 88, Esterson, A., 43, Etaugh, C., 282, Ethier, K. A., 468, Evans, D. R., 351, Evans, G. W., 73, 107, Evans, M., 438, Evans, R. G., 327, Everly, G. S., Jr., 120, Everson., S. A., 448, Ewart, C. K., 74, Eysenck, H. J., 35, 56–57, 63, 450, 532, Eysenck, M. W., 491, , F, , Fabrigar, L. R., 186, Fagot, B. L., 314, 317, Fairbank, J. A., 91, Fairbrother, K., 387, Fairhurst, S. L., 159, Falk, P., 295, Falsetti, S. A., 92, Fancher, R. E., 45, Fanning, P., 165, 166, 210, 214, Faraday, M. M., 455, Farah, A., 541, Faraone, S. V., 505, Faravelli, C. P., 491, Farina, A., 17, 18, Farmer, K., 530, Farnsworth, L., 203, Farrell, R., 319, Farrington, D. P., 344, Faust, K. A., 286, Fausto-Sterling, A., 311, 312, 313, Feeney, J. A., 254, 255, Fegan, M., 119, 255, 448, 95, Fehr, B., 240, 249, 256, Fein, S., 177, 178, Feingold, A., 176, 240, 241, 242, 272, 307, Feiring, C., 330, Feldman, D. C., 393, Feldman, J. M., 357, Feldman, P. J., 469, Feldman, R. S., 172, 309, Felker, B., 87, Felmlee, D. H., 258, 381, Felson, R. B., 144, 149, Felsten, G., 448, Fennema, E., 306, Fenster, J. R., 93, Fenton, W. S., 504, Fenwick, P., 129, Ferguson, T., 471, 538, Fernandez, J. R., 461, Feroli, K., 431, Ferrari, J. R., 122, 122, Ferraro, J. K., 298, 299, Ferriss, A. L, 21, Festinger, L., 143, 239, Feys, J., 157, Fichner-Rathus, L., 425, Fielden, S., 388, 391, 392, Fields, R., 291, Fiese, B. H., 316, Fincham, F. D., 259, 283, 328, Fine, M., 289, 290, Fine, R., 43, Fingerhut, A., 418, Finkelhor, D., 411, Finkenauer, C., 217, First, M., B., 485, Fischer, E. F., 236, Fischhoff, B., 120, Fisher, E. B., 456, Fisher, S., 43, 539, Fishman, D. B., 533, Fiske, S. T., 173, 174, 175, 176, 179, 180, 183,, 184, Fitch, S. A., 347, Fitness, J., 244, Fitzgerald, H. E., 363, Fitzpatrick, M. A., 283, Fitzsimons, G. M., 238, Flaks, D. K., 295, , Name Index, , 623

Page 661 :
Flannagan, D., 316, Flannery, R. B., Jr., 82, 91, Flapan, A. D., 463, Flavin, C., 4, Fleeson, W., 22, Fleischhacker, W. W., 538, Fletcher, G. J. O., 155, 156, 174, 244, Flett, G. L., 122, 275, Flippen, C., 351, Flores, L. Y., 377, Florio, C. M., 67, Floyd, K., 238, Floyd, M., 7, Foa, E. B., 82, 296, 535, Folkman, S., 72, 73, 83–84, 87, 93, Fong, G. T., 429, Forbes, G. B., 297, Formicelli, L., 277, Forrest, J. A., 172, Forsyth, D. R., 548, Forsythe, S., 403, Foster, C. A., 277, Foster, G. D., 460, Fouts, G., 318, Fowers, B. J., 274, 286, 287, Fowles, D. C., 506, Fox, G. L., 277, 283, Fox, R., 417, Fraley, R. C., 256, Frances, R. J., 458, Frank, E., 435, Frank, J., 547, Frank, J. B., 529, Frank, J. D., 529, Frank, L. R., 541, Frank, M. G., 211, Frank, R. H., 2, Frank. N. G., 172, Franklin, J. E., Jr., 458, Franks, C. M., 532, 533, Franzoi, S. L., 241, Fraser, J. M., 450, Fraser, S. C., 195, Frawley, P. J., 535, Frederick, S., 23, Frederickson, B. L., 83, 84, 117, Freedberg, K., 432, Freedman, J. L., 195, Freeman, E., 409, Freeman, J., 210, Freese, J., 43, French, S. A., 461, Frese, M., 388, 389, Freud, S., 35–41, 63, 518, 522–524, Frey, B. S., 20, Fricchione, G., 92, Fried, S. B., 7, Friedan, B., 322, Friedberg, J. M., 541, Friedman, G. B., 213, 309, Friedman, H., 212, Friedman, H. S., 450, Friedman, J., 320, Friedman, M., 445–446, Friedman, M. J., 535, Friedman, R., 141, 142, Friedman, S. R., 475, Friedrich, M. J., 463, Friesen, W. V., 207, 208, 212, Frihandler, B., 39, Frist, L. A., 308, , 624, , Name Index, , Fromm, E., 4, Frost, L. A., 328, Fujita, F., 20, Funder, D. C., 59, 113, Furberg, A., 466, Furman, E., 361, Furnham, A., 149, 179, 317, Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., 278, 289, Futterman, D., 417, Fyer, A. J., 490, G, , Gabbard, G. O., 43, Gabrel, C. S., 355, Gabriel, S., 146, Gaertner, L., 155, Gaertner, S. L., 75, 181, Gafni, N., 311, Gagnon, J. H., 423, Galinsky, E., 396, Gall, T. L., 351, Gallagher, M., 287, 288, Gallagher, R., 366, Gallagher, S., 141, Gallaher, K. I., 466, Gallo, L. C., 446, 447, 448, 451, Gallois, C., 283, Gambone, J. C., 470, Gangestad, S. W., 164, 208, 243, Gangi, B. K., 545, Ganiban, J., 363, Ganong, L., 289, Gant, L. M., 264, Gantt, W. H., 45, Gao, G., 252, Garb, H. N., 67, Garber, J., 470, Garcia, B. E., 50, Garcia, M., 544, Garcia Ganuza, J. M., 307, Gardner, C. O., Jr., 497, Gardner, D. M., 511, Gardner, W. L., 146, Garfield, S. L., 542, Garland, A. F., 344, 345, Garlow, S. J., 500, Garner, D. M., 513, Garner, L., 76, Garnets, L. D., 239, 293, 346, 414, 415, 416, Gartrell, N., 295, 414, Gates, G. J., 293, Gatz, M., 353, Gaunt, R., 172, 174, Gavin, L. E., 277, Ge, X., 340, Gearon, J. S., 505, Gecas, V., 278, Geddes, D., 393, Geddes, J. R., 507, 539, 541, Gee, E. M., 278, Gee, T. L., 494, Geen, R. G., 308, Geisler, R. B., 155, Geller, A., 396, Gelles, R. J., 287, George, S. A., 354, Gerard, H. B., 191, Gergen, K. T., 143, Gerrard, M., 155, Gershoff, E. T., 368, Giant, C. L., 322, , Gibbons, F. X., 155, Gibbons, J. L., 314, Gibson, B., 157, Giddens, A., 286, Giedd, J. L., 392, Giesen, D., 427, 429, Gilbert, D. T., 177, 207, Gilder, G., 329, Giles, T. R., 542, Gill, M., 477, Gillham, J. E., 97, Gillis, J. R., 293, 416, Gilovich, T., 162, Gitlin, M., 538, Glascock, J., 317, Glaser, K., 291, Glaser, R., 450, 451, Glass, C. R., 527, 532, Glass, G. V., 547, 548, Glass, R. M., 540., 541, Glassman, A., 449, Glatt, S. J., 505, Glazer, M. P., 194, Glazer, P. M., 194, Gleason, J. B., 309, Gleason, M., 238, Gleaves, D. H., 322, 496, 530, 531, Glei, D. A., 429, Glenberg, A. M., 27, Glenn, N. D., 348, 349, Glisky, M. L., 495, Godbey, G., 2, Goeders, N. E., 92, 109, Goeting, A., 277, Gold, D. T., 351, Gold, M. A., 175, Gold, M. S., 475, 476, Goldberg, C., 391, Goldberg, I., 497, Goldberg, J., 389, Goldberg, M., 289, Goldberger, L., 93, Goldenberg, J. L., 60, 150, Golden-Kreutz, D. M., 450, Goldfried, M. C., 344, Goldfried, M. R., 533, Golding, J. M., 296, Goldman, B. M., 147, Goldscheider, C., 278, Goldscheider, F. K., 278, Goldstein, E., 530, Goldstein, N. J., 191, Goldstein, R. D., 498, Goleman, D., 126, Gollwitzer, P. M., 154, Golombok, S., 295, 417, Gonsiorek, J. C., 293, 417, Gonzales, M. H., 245, Gonzales, R., 347, Gonzalez-Lopez, A., 535, Goodall, K., 131, Goodchilds, J. D., 410, Gooden, A. M., 315, Gooden, M. A., 315, Goodrick, G. K., 159, Goodstein, L. D., 67, Goodwin, F. K., 498, 499, Gordon, A. H., 309, Gordon, B., 537, Gordon, L. U., 452, Gordon, R. A., 163

Page 662 :
Gordon, S. L., 251, Gordon, V., 410, Gore, J. S., 145, 146, Gormley, B., 256, Gosling, S. D., 180, Gosselin, J. T., 159, Gotlib, D. A., 437, Gotlib, I. H., 501, Gottdiener, J. S., 448, Gottesman, I. I., 505, 506, Gottman, J. M., 259, 277, 283, 284, 285, Gould, R., 349–350, Gourevitch, M. N., 475, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E., 477, Gow, K. M., 532, Graber, J. A., 339, 340, Graig, E., 76, Gramling, S. E., 393, Grant, I., 451, Grant-Pillow, H., 142, Gray, J., 6, Gray-Little, B., 151, Graziano, W. G., 35, Green, A., 238, Green, C. E., 299, Green, L. R., 261, Green, M. A., 238, Green, S. K., 242, Greenberg, J., 150, 179, Greenberg, J. L., 59–60, 61, 62, Greenberg, J. S., 466, Greenberg, L. S., 525, 534, Greenberg, R. P., 43, 539, Greene, R. L., 27, Greenfield, D. N., 110, Greenhaus, J. H., 381, Greenland, P., 445, Greenson, R. R., 523, Greenwald, A. G., 177, Greenwood, D., 254, 298, Gregerson, E. 416, Gregory, R. J., 7, Grencavage, L. M., 529, Griest, J. H., 539, Griffin-Shelley, E., 428, Griffith, K. H., 386, Griffiths, M., 110, Grinspoon, L., 476, 477, Grob, C. S., 477, Grob, G. N., 443, Grohol, J., 484, Gross, C. P., 539, Gross, J. J., 126, 431, Grossbaum, M. F., 348, Grote, N. K., 222, 248, Grove, W. M., 67, Gruber, A. J., 477, Gruber, J. E., 391, Gruenberg, A. M., 498, Grunberg, N. E., 455, Grundy, E., 291, Guadagno, R. E., 196, Guest, F., 423, Guevremont, D. C., 534, Guggenheim, F. G., 492, Gugula, S., 315, Guinn, I. S., 155, Gullette, E. C. D., 448, Gupta, G. R., 236, Gupta, S., 288, Gupta, U., 237, , Gureje, O., 492, Gurland, B. J., 353, 354, Gurung, R. A. R., 255, Gutek, B. A., 391, Guthrie, J., 279, 349, Gutierrez, P. M., 518, H, , Haan, N., 358, Haas, D. M., 246, Haas, E., 309, Haas, L., 280, 281, 282, Hackam, D. G., 445, Hackett, G., 377, Hackstaff, K. B., 287, Hadjiyannakis, K., 502, Hafdahl, A. R., 151, Hafer, C. L., 178, Hagan, H., 475, Hagan, R., 314, Hagerty, M. R., 22, Haig, J., 35, Hale, J. L., 256, Hale, S. L., 197, Hall, D. R., 292, Hall, E. T., 207, Hall, G. S., 343, Hall, J. A., 207, 208, 210, 213, 309, 331, Hall, R. M., 303, Hall, W., 476, Halmi, K, A., 510, 511, 513, Halpern, C. T., 241, Halpern, D. F., 306, 307, 310, 311, Halverson, A. M., 175, Hamilton, A., 238, Hamilton, J. C., 470, Hamilton, M. A., 330, Hamilton, T. E., III, 242, Hamilton, V. L., 194, Hammen, C., 497, Hammersley, R., 477, Hammersmith, K. S., 414, Hammond, D. C., 532, Hampson, E., 312, Hamsen, P., 451, Han, S., 381, Han, W., 282, Hancock, D. R., 84, Handal, M., 438, Handy, B., 428, 438, Hanna, R., 240, 242, Hanna, S. L., 218, Hansen, C. H., 317, Hansen, J. C., 377, Hansen, R. D., 317, Hansen, W. B., 341, Hansford, S. L., 249, Happonen, P., 463, Hardy, R. E., 161, Haring, M., 275, Harnack, L., 461, Harpaz, I., 395, Harrigan, J. A., 210, Harris, J. R., 43, 58, Harris, M. B., 308, Harris, M. J., 175, Harris, T., 6, Harrison, J. A., 192, Harrison, K., 322, 511, Harry, J., 413, Hart, K. E., 448, , Hart, R., 291, Hart, T. A., 468, Harter, S., 144, 149, 150, Hartka, E., 358, Hartley, A. A., 356, Hartup, W. W., 248, Harvey, J. H., 246, Harvey, M. H., 282, 531, Harvey, P. D., 507, Harwood, T. M., 529, Hatala, M. N., 240, Hatcher, R. A., 430, 431, 433, Hatfield, E., 236, 243, 245, 257, 408, 411, 419, Hattery, A., 381, Hau, K., 151, Haug, N. A., 468, Hawkins, A. J., 287, Hawkley, L. C., 264, Haworth-Hoeppner, S., 512, Haycock, L. A., 122, Hayes, A., 426, Hayes, S., 39, Hayes-Roth, B., 28, Hays, K. F., 466, Hayskip, B., Jr., 95, Hazam, H., 217, Hazan, C., 252–256, 262, Healy, C. C., 381, Healy, D., 538, 539, Heaton, T. B., 272, 277, Heavey, C. L., 259, 283, Hebi, M. R., 241, 386, Hecht, M. A., 213, Hedges, L. V., 306, 307, Heider, F., 152, Heiman, J. R., 437, 438, 439, Heine, S. J., 156, Helgeson, V. S., 249, 327, Hellstrom, A., 172, Helson, R., 345, 348, 358, Helweg-Larsen, M., 155, Hembree, E. A., 535, Hemenover, S. H., 127, Henderson, K. E., 461, Henderson, L., 263, Henderson, M., 248, 249, Hendrick, C., 204, 245, 252, 257, Hendrick, S. S., 204, 245, 252, 257, 258, Henley, N. M., 207, 209., 210, 213, Hennessy, D. A., 76, Henning, K., 422, 436, Henry, M. E., 541, Heppner, P. P., 118, Herbener, E. S., 245, Herek, G. M., 248, 293, 320, 415, 416, Herman, C. P., 241, 322, Herman, J. L., 530, Hermann, R. C., 540, Herrett-Skjellum, J., 318, Hershberger, S. L., 344, 417, Hertzog, C., 357, Herzog, D. B., 510, Herzog, M. E., 241, Herzog, T. A., 456, Heszen-Niejodek, I., 106, Hetherington, E. M., 58, 288, 289, Hettema, J. M., 490, Heuer, S. K., 242, Hewitt, P. L., 122, 275, Hewstone, M., 183, 191, Heymann, J., 387, , Name Index, , 625

Page 663 :
Hiedelmann, B., 286, Hiester, M., 363, Higgins, E. T., 141, 142, Hightower, M., 95, Hilgard, E. R., 63, Hill, A. J., 315, 316, 461, Hill, C. A., 418, Hill, C. E., 529, Hill, C. T., 251, 257, Hilton, J. L., 176, Hines, A. M., 289, Hines, M., 312, 313, Hiroto, D. S., 107, Hirschfeld, R. M. A., 344, Hirschl, T. A., 291, Ho, B., 503, 506, Hobdy, J., 95, Hobfoll, S. E., 95, Hobson, C. J., 79, 98, Hochschild, A. R., 281, 396, Hodge, B., 387, Hodges, S. D., 213, Hodgson, D., 88, 451, Hoek, J. W., 510, Hoffman, E., 42, Hoffman, R. E., 92, 508, Hoffman, R. R., III, 97, Hoffnung, M., 323, Hofstede, G., 145, Hogan, J., 35, Hogue., C. 424, Holahan, C. J., 94, 112, 502, Holden, C., 538, Holder, J. S., 466, Holen, A., 91, Holland, J. C., 451, Holland, J. L., 378–379, Holland, K., 277, Hollander, E., 489, Hollister, L. E., 476, Hollon, S. D., 529, Holman, T. B., 274, Holmes, T. H., 78–79, 95, 97, Holoway, P., 410, Holt, C. S., 215, Homma-True, R., 544, Hong, G. K., 544, Hood, K. E., 312, Hooker, E., 417, Hooley, J. M., 508, Hopkins, C., 322, Hopko, D. R., 89, Hopper, J., 289, Horgan, T. G., 208, 309, Horowitz, L. M., 245, 254, Horwath, E., 489, Houts, A. C., 485, Howard, G. S., 4, Howard, J., 351, Howard, K. I., 528, Howard, M., 410, Howard, R., 505, Howland, R. H., 500, Hoyer, W. D., 187, Hsiang, R., 538, Hsu, L. K. G., 510, Hu, F. B., 462, Hu, L., 50, Hu, T. W., 544, Hubbard, J. A., 213, Hubbard, J. R., 87, 92, , 626, , Name Index, , Hubner, J. J., 147, Hudman, K. S., 455, Huesmann, L. R., 226, Huff, M. E., 91, Hugenberg, K., 177, Hughes, C. C., 544, Hull, J. G., 142, Hulshoff, H. E., 506, Hunsley, J., 67, Hunt, C., 487, Hunt, M., 18, Hunter, B. A., 297, Hunter, D. M., 306, Hurrell, J., 388, Huston, A. C., 226, 227, 317, Huston, T. L., 285, 287, Hyde, J. S., 282, 303, 306, 307, 308, 310, 323,, 324, 328, 339, 396, 411, 413, 415, 418, 425,, 432, 434, Hyde, T. M., 505, 506, Hygge, S., 73, Hyman, I. E., 530, I, , Iaccino, J. F., 29, Iacono, W. G., 212, 506, Iawao, S., 236, Ickes, W., 183, 327, Ickovics, J. R., 468, Iezzi, T., 493, Ilgen, D. R., 373, 391, Infante, J. R., 129, Ingegneri, D. G., 351, Inglehart, R., 20, Ingoldsby, B. B., 272, Ingram, R. E., 7, 501, Innocenti, G. M., 312, Insko, C. A., 191, Irabarren, C., 447, Ironson, G., 451, Isaacowitz, D. M., 108, Isenberg, K. E., 541, Ismail, B., 507, Israël, M., 511, Ivancevich, J. M., 389, Ivens-Tyndal, C., 92, 498, 500, Izard, C., 213, J, , Jablensky, A., 502, Jaccard, J., 410, Jackson, B. L., 286, Jackson, L. A., 241, Jackson, T., 263, Jacob, D., 290, Jacob, R. G., 536, Jacobs, H. S., 354, Jacobs, J. A., 386, Jacobs, W. S., 475, 476, Jacobson, C. K., 277, Jacobson, E., 129, Jacobson, N. S., 282, Jacques, R., 387, Jaffe, J., 474, Jahoda, M., 113, Jakicici, J., 466, Jakupcak, M., 320, James, E. H., 386, James, J. E., 463, Jamison, K. R., 498, 499, Janata, J. W., 470, Janevic, M. R., 355, , Janis, I. L., 73, 84, Jankowiak, W. R., 236, Janoff-Bulman, R., 22, 141, Janofsky, J. S., 508, Janssen, R. S., 467, Jansz, J., 318, 320, Jaroff, L., 531, Jay, K., 424, Jefferson, J. W., 539, Jeffrey, R. W., 461, 462, Jemmott, J. B., III, 94, 255, Jepsen, C. A., 272C, Jepsen, L. K., 272, Jex, S. M., 50, Jick, H., 539, Jick, S. S., 539, Jindal, K., 500, John, O. P., 35, Johnson, A. M., 413, Johnson, B. A., 457, 459, Johnson, D. W., 224, Johnson, F. P, 224, Johnson, I. M., 299, Johnson, J. A., 471, 472, Johnson, J. H., 99, 100, Johnson, J. L., 122, Johnson, M. P., 298, 299, Johnson, S. B., 470, 471, Johnson, T., 209, Johnson, T. W., 295, Johnson, V. E., 419, 420–421, 438, 439, Johnstone, L., 541, Joiner, T. E., 501, 502, Jonas, J. M., 475, Jones, D., 240, Jones, E. E., 152, 163, 173, 174, Jones, F., 79, Jones, N. F., 470, Jones, R. A., 187, Jones, S. M., 226, Jones, T. S., 207, Jorgensen, R. S., 126, Joung, I. M. A., 291, Jourard, S. M., 113, Jouriles, E., 142, Joyner, T., 395, 397, Judge, T. A., 35, Julien, R. M., 473, 474, Jung, C. G., 41–42, Jussim, L., 175, K, , Kaelber, C. T., 309, 485, Kagan, J., 490, Kahn, A. S., 310, Kahn, J. R., 288, Kahneman, D., 23, Kaiser, C. R., 179, Kalant, H., 476, Kalant, O. J., 476, Kales, A. K., 92, Kalichman, S. C., 468, 469, Kalick, S. M., 242, Kalidindi, S., 499, Kalkwarf, H. J., 463, Kallgren, C. A., 186, Kalmijn, M., 272, Kaltman, S., 360, Kamp Dush, C. M., 292, Kamps, D. M., 535, Kanagawa, C., 155

Page 664 :
Kandell, J. J., 110, Kane, E. W., 305, Kane, J. M., 538, Kane, T. O., 50, Kaniasty, K., 255, Kanner, A. D., 2, 72, Kant, A. K., 462, Kaplan, A. G., 546, Kaplan, H. I., 92, 527, Kaplan, H. S., 419, Kaplan, J., 446, 448, Karasek, R. A., Jr., 388, 389, 390, Karau, S. J., 325, 332, Karp, D. A., 484, Kashy, D., 263, Kasper, H. T., 382, Kassel, J. D., 109, Kasser, T., 2, 4, 350, Kassin, S. M., 148, 173, 178, 247, Kastenbaum, R. J., 358, 359, Katz, J., 501, Katz, L., 74, Katz, L. F., 283, Katz, L. G., 148, Katzman, M. A., 510, Katzman, S. L., 211, Kaufman, C. A., 499, Kausler, D. H., 356, 358, Kavanaugh, D. J., 508, Kavesh, L., 272, Kay, J., 524, Kay, R. L., 524, Kaye, J. A., 539, Kaye, W. H., 510, Kazdin, A. E., 131, 369, 518, Keck, P. E., 503, Keefe, F. J., 451, Keefe, R. S. E., 507, Keefe, S. E., 351, Keefer, L., 450, Keel, P. K., 322, Keen, S., 319, Keesey, R. E., 461, Kegan, R., 4, Keinan, G., 89, Keita, G., 309, 388, Keith-Spiegel, P., 546, Keller, B. K., 375, Keller, M. B., 538, Keller, S. N., 411, Kelley, H. H., 152, 173, 247, Kellogg, J. S., 89, Kelly, H. H., 180, Kelly, J., 277, Kelly, J. A., 468, Kelly, J. B., 288, 289, Kelly, J. M., 72, Kelly, K. M., 451, Kelly, K. R., 323, Kelly, P. K., 118, Kelman, H. C., 194, Keltner, D., 361, Kemeny, M. E., 87, 451, Kendler, K. S., 414, 490, 497, 499, 502,, 511, Kenny, D. A., 244, Kenrick, D. T., 251, 273, 311, Keough, E., 84, Kernis, M. H., 147, Kerns, K. A., 255, Kerwin, R., 538, , Kessler, R. C., 253, 350, 351, 452, 485, 498,, 519, Ketcham, K., 530, Khot, U. N., 445, Khoury, J. C., 463, Khroyan, T. V., 455, Kiecolt-Glazer, J. K., 95, 255, 450, 451, Kieffer, S. C., 157, Kierein, N. M., 175, Kiernan, K. E., 289, 292, Kiernan, M., 466, Kiesler, C. A., 482, 541, Kihlstrom, J. F., 494, 495, 530, Kilby, R. W., 272, Kilmartin, C., 208, 217, 249, 319, 320, Kim, H., 188, 194, Kim, Y., 177, Kimmel, D., 239, 293, 346, 414, 415, 416, Kimura, D., 312, Kindlon, D., 319, King, A. C., 466, King, B. M., 423, 425, 432, King, C. A., 345, King, G. R., 475, King, J. L., 431, King, L., 76, King, L. A., 95, 96, King, N. J., 490, Kinman, G., 79, Kinsey, A. C., 413, 414, 422, Kinsman, R. A., 470, Kirby, D., 410, Kirby, S. L., 126, Kirk, S. A., 484, Kirkpatrick, L. A., 255, 256, 257, Kirmayer, L. J., 493, Kirschenbaum, D. S., 462, Kitayama, S., 146, 177, Kitson, G. C., 288, Klag, S., 96, Klass, D., 361, Klassen, M., 124, Kleiman, C., 402, Klein, D. N., 98, Klein, E., 91, Klein, F., 413, Klein, J. G., 164, Klein, K. J., 213, Klein, W. M., 453, Kleinbaum, S., 292, Kleinginna, A. M., 63, Kleinginna, P. R., 63, Kleinke, C. L., 209, 215, Kleinnecht, E. E., 530, Klerman, G. L., 542, Klimoski, R. J., 373, Kline, D. W., 353, Kline, P., 66, Kling, K. C., 151, 306, 307, Klipper, M. Z., 129, 130, Klonoff, E. A., 75, Klotz, J. L., 240, Kluft, R. P., 494, 531, Kluger, J., 400, Knapp, C. M., 474, Knapp, T. J., 76, Knaus, W., 122, Knee, C. R., 157, Knickmeyer, N., 248, Knobe, J., 174, Knowles, J. A., 499, 500, , Knowles, R. B., 353, Knox, D., 289, Kobasa, S. C., 95, Kobrynowicz, D., 319, Koestner, R., 122, 245, Koff, E., 340, Kolb, R., 492, Kolodny, R. C., 438, Konrad, A. M., 321, Koopman, C., 91, Kop, W. J., 448, Kopta, S. M., 529, Koren, D., 91, Koren, P., 259, Kory, R. B., 128, Koss, M. P., 296, 299, Kowalski, R. M., 320, Kozlowski, S. W. J., 374, Krantz, D. S., 448, 451, Krasner, R. F., 528, Kraus, L. A., 95, Krause, N., 351, Kraut, R., 262, Kraxberger, B. E., 164, Kreinin, T., 409, Kressin, M. R., 351, Kring, A. M., 309, 503, Kroger, J., 343, 347, Krokoff, L. J., 259, Krueger, W. C. F., 27, Kruglanski, A. W., 180, Krupat, E., 470, Kübler-Ross, E., 359–360, 394, Kuhn, J., 502, Kuk, L. S., 343, Kulick, A. R., 503, Kulik, L., 393, Kunkel, E. S., 450, Kurdek, L. A., 204, 248, 251, 286, 294, 295,, 328, 396, 429, Kutchins, H., 484, L, , Lachman, M. E., 348, 349, 350, LaFrance, M., 309, 310, La Greca, A. M., 91, Laitinen, J., 109, Lakein, A., 24, 121, 123, 124, Lakin, M., 490, 527, Lam, L. T., 126, Lamb, M. E., 363, Lambert, J. D., 278, Lambert, M. J., 529, 536, 545, 547, Lamborn, S. D., 367, Lamke, L. K., 299, Lammers, C., 426, Lamon, S. J., 306, Lampe, A., 450, 451, Lanares, O., 366, Landabaso, M. A., 534, Landau, E., 337, Landrine, H., 75, Landsman, T., 113, Lane, M. D., 182, Langeland, W., 496, Langenbucher, J., 485, Langer, E., 152, 155, 184, 357, Langlois, J. H., 176, 240, Lanphear, B. P., 463, Lansford, J. E., 351, Lanyon, R. I., 67, , Name Index, , 627

Page 665 :
Lanza, S. T., 340, Lapiere, Y. D., 539, Lapierre-Adamcyk, E., 292, LaPore, B. A., 210, Larose, S., 262, Larson, K., 415, Larson, R., 331, 343, Larzelere, R. E., 368, Laskoff, M. B., 394, Lasley, E. N., 75, Lassiter, G. D., 211, 212, Latané, B., 192, Lating, J. M., 495, Lauer, J., 258, Lauer, R., 258, Laughlin, H., 111, 488, Laumann, E. O., 413, 418, 421, 422, 423, 424,, 428, 436, 437, Laurenceau, J. P., 216, Laursen, B., 343, Lauzen, M. M., 318, Lavalle, L. F., 146, Lavin, C., 272, Lavine, H., 322, La Violette, A. D., 299, Lavoie, K., 122, Lawrie, S. M., 507, Lawton, L., 278, Lay, C. H., 122, Lay-Yee, R., 426, Lazarus, A., 548, Lazarus, R. S., 72, 73, 82, 83, 87, Le, B., 248, Leadbeater, B., 426, Leahy, J. M., 361, Leana, C. R., 393, Leary, M. R., 148, 150, 164, 235, Leatham, G., 263, Leavitt, F., 472, 474, 532, LeBlanc, M. M., 393, Le Boeuf, M., 121, Le Bourdais, C. E., 292, Leckman, J. F., 489, Lee, C. M., 67, Lee, D., 118, Lee, G. R., 279, 351, Lee, I.-M., 465, 466, Lee, J. E., 454, Lee, R. M., 543, Lee, S., 510, Lee, Y. T., 156, Lefcourt, H. M., 117, Leff, J., 508, Lehman, C. M., 225, Lehman, D., 460, Lehmann, H. E., 503, 505, Lehrer, P., 451, Lehrer, R. M., 129, Leigh, G. K., 274, Leitenberg, H., 422, 423, 436, Leiter, M. P., 90, Lejuez, C. W., 492, Lemack, G. E., 92, LeMay, C. S., 206, Lemieux, R., 256, Lemme, B. H., 350, Lemon, J., 476, Leo, J., 56, Leon, A. C., 539, LePore, S. J., 73, Lerman, H., 43, , 628, , Name Index, , Lerner, M. J., 178, Letherby, G., 277, Lett, H. S., 449, Leucht, S., 538, Levant, R. F., 3, 318, 319, 320, 542, Le Vay, S., 293, Levenson, J. L., 92, 450, Levenson, L., 6, Levenstein, S., 450, 451, Leventhal, E. A., 469, Leventhal, H., 469, 470, Lever, J., 424, Levin, S., 248, Levine, A., 278, Levine, M. P., 511, Levine, R. V., 192, 237, Levine, S. B., 437, Levinson, D., 349, Levinson, D. F., 505, Levinthal, C. E., 473, 474, Levis, D. J., 490, Levy, B., 357, Levy, S. M., 451, Levy, S. R., 183, Lewin, E., 270, Lewin, K., 76, Lewinsohn, P. M., 501, 502, Lewis, B. P., 89, Lewis, D. O., 496, Lewis, J. M., 288, Lewis, L. L., 305, Lewis, M., 330, 360, Lewis, R. A., 349, Lewis, S., 451, Li, Y., 539, Libby, P., 445, Licata, N., 287, Lichtenstein, S., 120, Lichter, D. T., 292, Lickey, M. E., 537, Lieberman, J. A., 538, Lieberman, M. A., 362, Lieberman, M. D., 177, Liebert, L. L., 50, Liebert, R. M., 50, 317, Lilenfeld, S. O., 67, 495, Lim, G. Y., 297, Lin, L. W., 349, Linden, W., 129, Linder, D. E., 89, Lindgren, H. C., 27, Lindsay, D. S., 530, Link, B. G., 98, Linn, C., 306, Linz, D., 296, Lipkus, I. M., 178, Lips, H. M., 317, Lisanby, S. H., 541, Liu, Q. N., 451, Liu, T., 451, Livanou, M., 535, Liverman, R. P., 505, Lloyd, K. M., 258, 283, Lloyd, M., 376, 377, Lloyd, S. A., 274, Lock, A., 143, Lock, R. D., 382, 384, 394, 400, 401, 403, Locke, B. Z., 485, Loeber, R., 344, Loehlin, J. C., 57, 58, Loewenstein, G., 23, , Loewenstein, R. J., 494, Loftus, E. F., 530, Logan, R., 348, Longman, D. G., 27, Lopes, P. N., 126, Lopez, F. G., 255, 256, Lowinson, J. H., 473, 474, Lowman, R. L., 377, Lu, H. H., 291, 292, Lubkin, I. M., 470, Luborsky, L., 528, 547, Lucas, R. E., 21, 22, 23, Ludwig, D. S, 462, Ludwig, T. E., 128, Luecke-Aleksa, D., 317, Luft, H. S., 539, Luhtanen, R., 184, Lulofs, R. S., 221, 223, Lundberg, U., 88, Lundeberg, K., 297, Luskin, F. M., 129, Lussier, Y., 275, Luthans, F., 50, 159, Luthe, W., 129, Lutz, C. J., 162, Luyerink, M., 210, Lydiard, R. B., 537, Lye, D. N., 280, Lykken, D. T., 22, 56, 212, Lynn, D. J., 43, Lynn, M., 209, 241, Lynn, S. J., 530, Lytton, H., 314, 315, M, , Maccoby, E. E., 58, 149, 314, 316, 330, 364, MacDonald, G., 150, MacDonald, T. K., 429, MacGeorge, E. L., 330, Machado, P. P. P., 545, Macionis, J. J., 245, Mack, A. H., 458, Mackenzie, R. A., 120, 122, 123, Mackie, D. M., 175, 187, MacMillan, H. L., 496, 530, Macmillan, M., 43, Macrae, C. N., 177, Maddi, S. R., 50, 95, Maddox, G. I., 354, Maddux, J. E., 159, Madson, L., 146, Magloire, K., 94, 255, Magner, N. R., 223, Magnusson, D., 340, Mahalik, J. R., 320, Maher, B. A., 503, Maheu, M., 412, Mahoney, M. J., 118, Maier, S. F., 154, Main, M., 363, Maisey, D. S., 322, Major, B., 179, 210, Major, P., 307, 308, Mak, T., 317, Malamuth, N., 296, Malanos, A. B., 22, Maldonado, J. R., 494, Malefo, V., 98, Malina, R. M., 338, Malle, B. F., 174, Mallen, M. J., 238

Page 666 :
Mallory, M., 403, Malone, P. S., 177, Maltz, D. N., 330, Mandler, G., 84, Manian, N., 142, Manktelow, J., 119, Mann, J. J., 500, Manning, W. D., 288, 292, Mannix, L. M., 241, Manson, J. E., 460, Maragiote, R. A., 542, Maramba, G., 543, Marangell, L. B., 538, Marcenes, W. G., 450, 451, Marcia, J. E., 342-343, Marcus, S. C., 521, Marcus-Newhall, A., 109, Marder, S. R., 537, Marecek, J., 310, Mariani, M., 382, Maric, A., 297, Maris, R. W., 309, 344, Mark, M. M., 188, Marker, N. F., 291, Markey, P. M., 192, Markides, K. S., 351, Markman, H. J., 275, Marks, G., 468, Marks, I. M., 488, Marks, N. F., 278, Markus, H., 140, 141, 145, 146, 155, 188,, 194, Marmar, C., 534, Marsella, A. J., 3, Marsh, H. W., 151, Marsh, P., 211, Marshall, N. L., 325, Marshevsky, S., 122, Martin, C. L., 314, 315, Martin, J. A., 149, 364, Martin, N. G., 414, Martin, R., 191, 469, 470, Martin, R. A., 117, Martin, T. C., 275, Martin, T. R., 122, Martin-Krumm, C. P., 153, Marx, B. P., 216, Marzuk, P. M., 539, Maseri, A., 445, Masheter, C., 288, Masi, L., 354, Maslach, C., 90, 389, Maslow, A., 51, 53–54, Mason, M. A., 289, Masten, A. S., 367, Masters, W. H., 419, 420–421, 438, 439, Mathew, R., 459, Matlin, M. W., 328, Matsumoto, D., 194, 213, 331, Matthews, C. A., 272, Matthews, K. A., 354, Maume, D. J., Jr., 386, Maurer, L., 320, Maximin, A., 456, May, M. C., 496, Mayer, J. D., 125, 126, Mayer, R. E., 27, Mays, V. M., 245, 543, 544, Mazzuca, J., 409, McAdams, D. P., 348, 350, McAllister, D. E., 46, , McAllister, W. R., 46, McCabe, J. B., 410, McCabe, R. E., 490, McCarthy, P., 122, McCarthy, R. W., 438, McCarty, R., 87, McClanahan, T. M., 540, McConnell-Ginet, S., 309, McCoullugh, M. E., 128, McCown, W. G., 122, McCoy, M. L., 297, McCrae, R. R., 34, 35, 66, 106, 117, 350, 358, McCroskey, J. C., 219, 220, McCubbin, M., 539, McDaniel, M. A., 28, McDermott, K. B., 530, McDougle, L. G., 121, McElroy, T., 72, McEwen, B. S., 72, 75, McFarland, C., 155, McFarland, S. G., 182, McFarlane, M., 412, McGee-Cooper, A., 124, McGill, K. L., 80, McGill, O. D., 241, McGinnis, L., 358, McGlashan, T. H., 92, 504, 508, 545, McGoldrick, M., 275, 276, 288, McGraw, K. M., 176, McGraw, L. A., 271, McGraw, P. C., 6, McGregor, H. A., 60, McGuffin, P., 499, McGuigan, F. J., 129, McGuire, E., 409, McGuire, P. A., 387, McHale, S. M., 278, McHugh, P. R., 494, McKay, A., 410, McKay, M., 165, 166, 210, 214, 215, 218, McKee, L. B., 411, McKeever, V. M., 91, McKenna, K. Y. A., 204, 216, 237, 238, 264, McKenna, M. C., 450, McKenzie, C. R. M., 356, McKibbeh, J. N., 286, McLean, D. E., 80, 98, McManus, B., 426, McManus, P. A., 288, McMullin, J. A., 277, McNally, R. J., 491, 530, McNeil, T. F., 507, McNulty, J. K., 23, McQuaid, J. R., 79, 98, 101, McWhirter, B. T., 264, McWilliams, N., 522, Mead, M., 314, Mechanic, D., 484, Mednick, S. A., 506, 507, Medora, N. P., 237, Meduna, L., 540, Meehan, P. J., 344, Meeker, L. B., 215, Meeks, B. S., 204, 216, Meertens, R. W., 181, Meeus, W., 343, Meginnis-Payne, K. L., 243, Meichenbaum, D., 93, Meier, P., 113, Melia-Gordon, M. L., 122, Mellers, B. A., 180, , Meltzer, H, Y., 538, Melz, H., 287, Mendelson, M. J., 240, Mendes, W. B., 95, Merckelbach, H P., 491, Merton, R., 175, Meschke, L., 410, Messina, C. M., 214, Messina, J. J., 214, Meston, C. M., 439, Metalsky, G. I. , 500, 501, Metts, S. M., 216, Metz, M. E., 437, Metzger, E. D., 541, Meyer, I. H., 417, Michael, R. T., 291, 427, Michaels, S., 293, 413, Michaud, S. L., 330, Mickelson, K. D., 253, Mikulincer, M., 254, Milgram, N., 122, Milgram, S., 192–194, Milkie, M. A., 277, 281, Miller, D. C., 341, Miller, D. T., 156, Miller, G. E., 451, 88, Miller, G. P., 118, Miller, I. J., 542, Miller, J. G., 178, Miller, L., 244, Miller, L. C., 215, 331, Miller, M. L., 164, Miller, N. E., 76, 77, 78, Miller, N. S., 475, Miller, R. S., 259, Miller, T., 437, Miller, T. R., 458, Millett, K., 322, Millman, R. B., 477, Mills, J., 248, Millsap, R., 358, Mineka, S P., 491, Mino, I., 74, Minuchin, S., 512, Miranda, J., 493, Mischel, H. N., 49, Mischel, W., 49, 50, 140, 158, Mishel, L., 397, Mitchell, J. E., 510, Mitchell, J. T., 120, Mitchell, K., 411, Mitchell, V., 121., 345, 358, Mittlehauser, M., 384, Miyamato, Y., 177, Miyamoto, S., 538, Mo, A., 29, Moak, D. H., 458, Moane, G., 345, 358, Modestin, J., 494, 505, Moen, P., 351, 381, Mohren, D. C. L., 451, Moise, J., 226, Mokdad, A. H., 452, 453, Moller, J., 448, Moncrieff, J., 540, Monn, N. A., 366, Monroe, S. M., 72, 79, 98, 101, 502, Montepare, J. M., 348, Moore, D. W., 373, 374, 397, Moore, M. K., 359, Moorefield, B. S., 289, , Name Index, , 629

Page 667 :
Moos, R. H., 89, 94, 109, 112, 114, Morahan-Martin, J., 110, 264, Moran, G., 363, Moray, N., 152, Morell, C., 277, Moretti, M. M., 141, Morgan, H. J., 141, Morgan, M. J., 477, Morgenstern, J., 123, 124, Morley, J. E., 354, 409, Mormede, P., 88, Morris, M. M., 95, Morris, M. W., 178, Morrison, D. R., 286, 289, Morrison, M. A., 322, Morrison, T. G., 322, Morse, S., 143, Moseman, S. E., 539, Mosher, D. L., 327, Mosher, W. D., 274, 285, 289, Moskowitz, D. S., 348, Moskowitz, J., 83–84, 93, Mowrer, O. H., 490, Moynihan, J. A., 451, Muehlenhard, C. L., 297, Mukamal, K. J., 458, Mullen, J. L., 25, 26, Mullin, C. R., 296, Munck, A., 88, Muramatsu, V., 194, Muraven, M., 158, Muris, P., 50, Murnen, S. K., 317, 510, Murphy, M., 291, Murphy, S. P., 463, Murphy, S. T., 164, Murphy-Berman, V., 250, Murr, A., 431, Murray, C., 287, Murrell, A. H., 386, Murrell, A. J., 182, Murry, V. M., 426, Murstein, B., 274, Musselman, D. L., 500, Must, A., 339, Mutchler, J. E., 351, Myers, D. G., 2, 19, 20, 21, 22, 120, 143, Mynier, K., 209, N, , Nabi, R. L., 226, Naisbitt, J., 378, Nalwa, K., 264, Narrow, W. E., 519, Nash, M., 353, 530, Nathan, P. E., 485, 528, Nathanson, A. I., 226, Navarro, R. L., 377, Naveh-Benjamin, M., 84, Naylor, M. R., 4, Naylor, T. H., 4, Neale, M. C., 490, 499, Necomb, M. D., 119, Neese, R. M., 86, Neimeyer, R. A., 359, Neiss, R., 85, Nelson, D. A., 308, Nemeroff, C. B., 449, 500, Nemeth, C., 190, Nemiah, J. C., 493, Neufeldt, S. A., 545, , 630, , Name Index, , Neuman, J. H., 393, Nevid,, J., 425, Newberg, A., 129, Newby, D. E., 463, Newell, G. R., 450, Newman, M., 6, Newport, F., 177, Newton, B. J., 194, Newton, P. M., 350, Nezu, A. M., 450, Niaura, R., 447, 455, Nickerson, C., 20, Nida, S. A., 192, Nie, N. H., 238, Niehuis, S., 285, Nielsen, J. M., 326, Niemann, Y. F., 305, Nisbett, R. E., 177, 178, Nishimura, N., 248, Nock, S. L., 292, Nolen-Hoeksema, S., 309, 498, 500, Noller, P., 222., 254, 283, 331, Nomaguchi, K. M., 277, Norcross, J. C., 7, 529, 547, Norenzayan, A., 177, Norman, R. L., 472, 474, Norns, F. H., 255, Norton, P. G. W., 464, Norton, S., 392, Nowell, A., 306, 307, Nurius, P., 141, Nurminen, E., 390, Nurnberger, J. L., 134, Nyberg, S. E., 27, Nye, R. D., 52, O, , Oakes, P., 176, O’Brien, B., 539, O’Callahan, M., 451, O’Conner, N., 347, O’Donnell, A., 26, O’Donohoe, A., 477, O’Donovan, M. C., 505, Oesterman, K., 308, Oettingen, G., 154, O’Halloran, C. M., 359, O’Hanlon, J. F., 476, Ohman, A P., 491, O’Keefe, D. J., 197, Oldenburg, C. M., 255, Olds, C. W., 349, Olfson, M., 519, 520, 521, 539, Olio, K., 532, Olivardia, R., 322., 408, Oliver, M. B., 308, Ollendick, T. H., 490, Olsman, S. L., 297, Olson, D. H., 276, 291, Olver, M. B., 411, Omarzu, J., 246, Omoto, A. M., 236, O’Neil, J., 329, O’Neill, G., 427, O’Neill, N., 427, Ones, D. S., 35, Ono, H., 283, O’Rand, A. M., 286, Orenstein, P., 151, 307, Organista, P. B., 493, Orlando, V. P., 25, 26, , Orlofsky, J., 346, Orth-Gomer, K., 451, O’Shay, D. W., 381, Osipow, S. H., 381, Oskamp, S., 4, Ostrove, J. M., 345, 348, O’Sullivan, M., 208, 211, Otto, M. W., 490, Oulette, S., 95, 96, Overall, N., 244, Owen, M. J., 505, Owens, D., 240, Ozer, D. J., 35, Ozer, E. J., 90, 91, 495, Ozer, E. M., 159, P, , Pacak, K., 87, Pachauri, A., 250, Padavic, I., 270, Padgett, D. A., 451, Paivio, A., 29, Pallanti, S P., 491, Paludi, M. A., 316, Papalia, D. E., 349, Papp, L. M., 289, Paquette, J. A., 262, Pardun, C. J., 411, Paris, J., 493, Park, C. L., 93, Park, C. W., 188, Park, J., 251, Parker, J. W., 151, Parks, M. R., 238, Paronis, C. A., 109, Parrott, A. C., 477, Parrott, R., 210, Parry-Jones, B., 510, Parry-Jones, W. L., 510, Parsons, S., 375, Parsons, T., 305, Pasley, K., 289, Passino, R. M., 322, Patel, J. K., 505, Patnoe, S., 185, Pato, M. T., 489, Patrick, B. C., 217, 258, Patrick, C. J., 212, Patterson, C. J., 295, 396, 414, 417, Patterson, G. R., 364, Patterson, M. L., 209, Patton, G., 509, Paul, A. M., 6, 8, Paul, E. L., 426, Paulhus, D. L., 39, 43, 66, Pavlov, I., 45, 50, Payne, D. G., 27, Pazder, L., 496, Peake, P. K., 158, Pearce, L., 481, Pearson, P., 298, 398, Pearson, T. A., 283, Pechnick, R. N., 476, Pedersen, P., 544, Pederson, D. R., 363, Pederson, W., 477, Peirce, R. S., 95, Pelham, W. H., 536, Peltola, P., 281, Peng, K., 178, Pennebaker, J. W., 126–127, 216, 451

Page 668 :
Peplau, L. A., 239, 245, 248, 251, 257, 294,, 308, 347, 348, 411, 413, 414, 417, 418, 422,, 427, 428, Peralta, B., 504, Perese, S., 316, Peretti, P. O., 240, Perkins, D. F., 343, Perkins, R., 175, Perloff, R. M., 187, Perreault, S., 184, Perrett, D. L., 241, Perri, M. G., 460, 466, Perry, B., 364, Perry, H. M., 409, Perry-Jenkins, M., 281, 282, 348, Person, E. S., 43, Pervin, L., 358, Petersen, A. C., 339, 341, 343, 344, Peterson, B. E., 182, Peterson, C., 93, 96–97, 154, Peterson, N., 347, Petras, K., 203, Petras, R., 203, Petrocelli, W., 391, Petticrew, M., 450, Pettigrew, T. F., 181, 185, 191, Petty, R. E., 186, 187, 188, 189, Pezedek, K., 494, Phillips, K. A., 322, 408, 489, Phillips, M. R., 508, Phillips, W. T., 466, Pi, E. H., 538, Pierce, C. M., 74, 544, Pierce, G. R., 95, Pietromonaco, P. R., 216, 254, Pike, A., 58, Pike, C. L., 241, Pike, K. M., 512, Pillard, R. C., 414, 415, Pillow, D. R., 72, Pilowsky, I., 493, Pinals, D. A., 505, Pinckert, S., 196, Pincus, H. A., 519, 520, 521, 536, Pine, D. S., 489, Pinel, J. P. J., 460, 461, Pines, A. M., 90, Pingitore, R., 403, Pink, D. H., 383, Piotrkowski, C. S., 495, Piotrowski, N. A., 159, Piper, W., 527, Pipher, M., 151, Pi-Sunyer, F. X., 460, Pittman, F., III, 545, Pittman, J. F., 283, Piver, S., 259, Pixley, J., 350, Plante, G. G., 466, Pleck, J. H., 318, 319, 327, 331, Plomin, R., 57, 58, Plous, S. L., 173, 179, Ploutz-Snyder, R., 213, Poelmans, S. A. Y., 395, Poland, R. E., 477, Polissar, N. L., 535, Polivy, J., 241, 322, Pollack, W., 319, Polley, B. A., 461, 462, Polonko, K. A., 347, Polonsky, D., 439, , Pomeroy, C., 510, Pond, K., 263, Pontari, B. A., 154, Ponton, L. E., 341, Poole, D. A., 530, Poon, L. W., 353, Pope, E., 296, Pope, H. G., 322, 477, 496, 503, Pope, H., 408, Pope, K. S., 546, Popenoe, D., 271, 285, 287, Poppas, D. P., 92, Porter, G., 395, Porter, R. E., 206, 209, 210, 223, 227, Potthoff, J. G., 502, Powell, B., 43, Powell, F. C., 359, Powell, J. A., 194, Powell, J. H., 477, Powell, R. A., 494, Pratkanis, A. R., 185, 186, Pratt, L. A., 449, Prehodka, J., 240, Prentice-Dunn, S., 187, Prescott, C. A., 502, Presser, H. B., 282, Pressman, S., 5, Preston, L. K., 418, Preto, N. G., 278, Previti, D., 286, Prezioso, M. S., 374, Price, R. H., 393, Priester, J. R., 189, Prochaska, J. O., 456, Procter, E., 179, Prodromidis, M., 363, Profit, W. E., 74, Pruchno, R., 351, Prudic, J., 541, Pryor, F. L., 384, Pryor, J. B., 392, Pryor, J. L., 437, Putnam, R. D., 262, Putney, N. M., 349, Pychyl, T. A., 122, Pyszczynski, T. A., 59–60, 61, 62, 150, 179, Q, , Quinn, J. M., 188, Quinn, K. A., 177, Quinn, L., 511, R, , Rabbitt, P., 358, Rabinowitz, F. E., 303, Rabkin, J. G., 97, Rachman, S. J., 131, 491, Radel, J., 219, Ragheb, M. G., 397, Ragland, D. R., 446, Ragsdale, K., 350, Rahe, R. H., 78–79, 95, 97, 98, Rahim, M. A., 223, Rahman, M. A., 455, Rakowski, W., 352, Raley, R. K., 285, Ramaden, N. M., 451, Ramaekers, J. G., 476, Ramirez, M., 543, Ramsey, E., 364, Randhawa, B. S., 306, , Rank, M. R., 282, 291, Rapee, R. M., 488, 491, Raphael, B., 72, Rapson, R. L., 236, 245, 246, 408, 411, 419, Raskin, P. M., 347, Rasmussen, C., 76, Rathus, S., 425, Ray, G. E., 262, Read, C. R., 317, Read, J. D., 530, Read, S. J., 255, Redding, R. E., 417, Reddy, B. S., 463, Reed, G. M., 113, Regan, M. F., 450, Regan, P. C., 241, 245, 246, 256, 257, Regier, D. A., 309, 485, 487, Rehm, L. P., 92, Reibel, D. K., 129, Reich, P., 92, Reid, P. T., 316, Reifman, A., 164, Reilly, A. H., 386, Reimann, R., 294, Reinisch, J. M., 418, 429, 432, Reis, H. T., 216, 217, 240, 245, 249, 250, 257,, 258, 263, Reis, T. J., 155, Reise, S. P., 35, Reisner, A. D., 530, Reiss, D., 58, Reiss, S., 490, Reissman, C., 259, Reiter, R. C., 470, Reitman, F., 381, Reitmeijer, C. A., 412, Remland, M. S., 207, Renaud, C. A., 436, Rennie, D., 539, 540, Rennison, C. M., 298, Renshaw, K., 156, Rentfrow, P. J., 155, Renzetti, C., 298, Repa, B. K., 391, Repetti, R. L., 281, 348, Repetto, M., 475, Rhem, L. P., 498, 500, Rhodes, K., 195, Rhodewalt, F., 157, Rice, L. N., 525, Richards, M. H., 343, Richards, V., 180, Richardson, C. R., 465, Richardson, J. G., 316, Richmond, V. P., 219, 220, Richter, L., 97, 180, Ridge, S. R., 254, Ridker, P. M., 445, 446, Rieder, R. O., 499, Riemann, R., 57, Rierdan, J., 340, Rifkin, J., 2, Riggio, R. E., 403, Rigotti, N. A., 454, Rihmer, Z., 538, Rimal, R. N., 50, Rime, B., 216, Rimm, D. C., 535, Rindfuss, R. R., 346, Ripoll, K., 286, Riso, L. P., 152, , Name Index, , 631

Page 669 :
Ritz, T., 450, Rivas-Vazquez, R. A., 538, Roback, H. B., 490, 527, Robbe, H. W., 476, Robbins, A., 350, Robbins, A. S., 395, Robbins, E. R., 426, Robbins, J. M., 493, Robbins, S. B., 393, 394, Roberts, A. R., 298, 299, Roberts, B. W., 358, Roberts, D. F., 317, Roberts, L. J., 259, 283, Roberts, P., 350, Robie, C., 299, Robins, L. N., 485, Robins, R. W., 147, Robinson, B. E., 395, Robinson, D. G., 505, Robinson, F. P., 25–26, Robinson, J. P., 2, Robinson, M., 2, Rockwell, S. C., 411, Rodin, J., 460, 510, 512, Rodriguez, M., 409, Roediger, H. L., III, 530, Rogers, C. R., 51–53, 63, 165, 524–526, Rogers, M. P., 92, Rogers, R. W., 187, Rogers, S. J., 277, 278, 283, 286, 349, Roggman, L. A., 363, Rohde, P., 502, Rohner, R. P., 320, Roig, M., 122, Rojewski, J. W., 375, Roloff, M. E., 297, Romano, S. J., 511, Romney, D. M., 314, 315, Ronald, A., 468, Rook, K. S., 263, Rose, A. J., 308, Rose, C. A., 527, Rose, D., 541, Rose, D. P., 463, Rosen, B., 387, Rosen, D. H., 417, Rosen, G. M., 8, Rosen, L. D., 2, Rosen, R., 438, Rosen, R. D., 8, Rosenbaum, J., 351, Rosenbaum, M., 490, 527, Rosenblatt, A., 60, Rosenbluth, S. C., 294, Rosenfarb, I. S., 508, Rosenfeld, L. B., 241, Rosenfield, S., 310, Rosenhan, D. L., 484–485, Rosenheck, R. A., 519, Rosenman, R. H., 445–446, Rosenthal, R., 175, Rosman, B. L., 512, Ross, C. A., 494, Ross, C. E., 20, 381, Ross, L., 177, Ross, M., 154, 155, 156, Ross, S. R., 162, Rosso, I. M., 507, Roter, D. L., 472, Rothbaum, F. M., 178, Rothblum, E. D., 294, , 632, , Name Index, , Rothman, A., 444, Rotter, J., 49, Roughton, B., 397, Rounds, J., 379, Rousseau, D. M., 383, Rowe, D. C., 57, 58, Rozanski, A., 446, 448, Rozee, P. D., 298, Rubenfeld, K., 330, Rubenstein, C. M., 261, 263, 264, 265, Rubenstein, D., 435, Rubin, Z., 251, 257, Ruble, D. N., 314, 315, Ruble, T. L., 305, Rubovits, D. R., 98, Rudisch, B., 449, Rudorfer, M. V., 541, Rusbult, C. E., 245, 248, Ruscher, J. B., 183, Rush, A. J., 527, 538, Russell, G. F. M., 509, 510, Russo, E., 476, Russo, N. F., 320, Ruzek, J., 535, Ryan, C., 416, Ryan, R. M., 20, Rynes, S., 387, S, , Saad, L., 376, Sabatelli, R. M., 286, Sabourin, S., 275, Sachau, D., 157, Sackeim, H. A., 541, Sadker, D., 317, Sadker, M., 317, Sadock, B. J., 527, Saghir, M. T., 426, Sagrestano, L. M., 387, Sakinofsky, I., 344, Salkovskis, P. M., 493, Salonen, J. T., 463, Salovey, P., 84, 125, Salthouse, T. A., 356, Saltzman, J. L., 150, Salvendy, J. T., 527, Sammons, M. T., 518, Samovar, L. A., 206, 209, 210, 223, 227, San de Acedo, M. L., 307, Sanbonmatsu, D. M., 156, Sanchez, L. M., 542, Sande, M. A., 468, Sanders, G., 427, Sanderson, W. C., 488, Sandler, B. R., 303, Sandler, I., 72, Sandler, J., 535, Sandnabba, N. K., 314, Sandy, J. M., 118, Sanislaw, C. A., 504, Sankis, L. M., 483, Sanna, L. J., 72, Santerre, C., 129, Sapolsky, R. M., 93, Sarason, B. R., 95, 498, Sarason, I. G., 95, 98, 99, 100, 498, Sarwer, D. B., 460, 462, Satterwhite, R. C., 305, Saunders, S. M., 528, Savary, L. M., 144, Savitsky, K., 162, , Saxe, G. N., 494, Saxe, L., 212, Sayers, S. L., 449, Scanzoni, J., 287, 347, Schachter, S., 13, 14, 15, 239, Schaefer, E. C., 240, Schaefer, J. B., 89, Schafer, W. D., 341, Schaffer, D., 384, Schaie, K. W., 355, 356, Schaninger, C. M., 283, Schank, D., 460, Scheflin, A. W., 532, Scheidlinger, S., 527, Scheier, M. F., 96, 97, 106, 248, Scher, S. J., 160, Scherer, K. R., 211, Scherer, M., 128, Schermerhorn, A. C., 289, Schiefelbein, V. L., 338, Schiffman, J., 507, Schilit, W. K., 124, Schimel, J., 60, 150, Schirmer, L. L., 255, Schlegel, A., 338, Schlenger, W. E., 3, 82, Schlenk, E., 471, Schlenker, B. R., 154, 162, 163, Schmidlin, A. M., 210, Schmitt, J. P., 248, 328, 397, Schmitz, J. M., 454, 456, Schneer, J. A., 381, Schneider, B. H., 363, Schneider, D. L., 212, Schneider, F., 505, Schneider, J. P., 412, Schnoll, S. H., 475, Schoenfeld, G. A., 50, Schofield, P. E., 191, Scholing, A., 533, Schooler, D., 322, Schooler, J. W., 530, Schoon, L., 375, Schor, J., 2, Schramke, C. J., 451, Schreiber, F. R., 496, Schroeder, A., 73, Schroeder, D. H., 97, Schuchter, S. R., 360, Schuckit, M.. A., 458, Schultheiss, D. P., 374, Schultis, G. A., 7, Schultz, J. H., 129, Schulz, U., 452, Schumacher, P., 110, 264, Schunk, D. H., 159, Schutz, R. W., 340, Schwab, S., 309, Schwartz, B., 2, 8, Schwartz, G. E. R., 129, Schwartz, J. C., 237, Schwartz, J. E., 106, Schwartz, L., 493, Schwartz, L. M., 454, Schwartz, P., 257, 275, 279, 413, 427, 428, Schwartzberg, N., 290, Schwarz, N., 22, Schwarzer, R., 452, Scott, W., 7, 501, Scroppo, J. C., 496, Scully, J. A., 79

Page 670 :
Searle, A., 451, Seccombe, K., 351, Sedikides, C., 154, 155, 156, Seecombe, K., 283, Seff, M. A., 278, Segal, M. W., 240, Segall, A., 470, Segerstrom, S. C., 88, 96, 451, Seguin, J. R., 511, Seidlitz, L., 73, Seifer, M., 427, Self, D. W., 473, Seligman, M. E. P., 3, 10, 20, 21, 93, 96, 107,, 108, 153, 154, 156, 491, 500, 528, 542, 547, Seltzer, J. A., 291, 292, Selwyn, P. A., 467, Selye, H., 86–87, Semans, J. H., 439, Senecal, C., 122, Sepekoff, B., 413, Serafica, F. C., 381, Servan-Schreiber, D., 492, Sesso, H. D., 445, Seta, C. E., 72, Seta, J. J., 72, Seto, M. C., 297, Sexton, K., 248, Shakesby, P. S., 28, Shalev, A. Y., 91, Shallenberger, W. R., III, 17, Shapiro, A. F., 277, 278, Shapiro, D. H., Jr., 129, Sharp, L. K., 127, Shavelson, R. J., 147, Shaver, O., 249, Shaver, P. R., 237, 252–256, 256, 216, 261,, 262, 264, 265, Shaw, D., 259, Shaw, J., 141, 142, Shaw, L. H., 264, Shear, M. K., 535, Sheehan, P. W., 531, Sheehan, S., 503, Sheiham, A., 450, 451, Sheldon, K., 350, Shelton, R. L., 306, Shepperd, J. A., 23, 155, Sher, K. J., 457, Sher, L., 72, 500, Sher, T. G., 283, Sherer, M., 50, Sheridan, J. F., 451, Sherif, M., 183, 191, Sherk, D. L., 162, Sherman, A. M., 351, Sherman, D. A., 177, Shike, M., 463, Shoda, Y., 158, Shotland, R. L., 297, Shouldice, M., 296, Shulman, R. B., 538, Shurgot, B. A., 241, Shurkin, J. N., 549, Shuval, J. T., 80, Sidanius, J., 248, Siebert, A., 24, Siegel, J. M., 99, 100, Siegel, O., 340, Siegle, G., 7, 501, Siegler, I. C., 35, 178, 353, 448, Sigler, R. T., 299, , Signoreielli, N., 317, 318, Silberman, E. K., 522, 537, Silberstein, L. R., 510, Silk, K. R., 518, Silke, A., 179, Sillars, A. L., 209, Silver, E., 508, Silver, H., 505, Silver, M., 411, Silver, R. C., 361, Silverman, I., 311, Silverman, M. M., 309, 344, Silverman, P. R., 361, Sime, W., 83, Simeon, D., 489, Simon, R. I., 509, Simonton, D. T., 356, Simpson, C. H., 316, Simpson, G. M., 538, Sinclair, R. C., 188, Singer, B., 528, Singh, D., 241, Singh, P., 237, Sinnott, J. D., 356, Sirois, F. M., 122, Skay, C. L., 122, Skerrett, P. J., 460, Skillman, G., 316, Skinner, B. F., 47–48, 50, 63, 532, Skinner, P. H., 306, Skolnick, P., 490, Skrondal, A., 477, Slashinski, M. J., 296, Slaski, M., 125, Slater, M. A., 493, Slavney, P. R., 493, Sloan, D. M., 216, Slovic, P., 120, Smale, B. J. A., 398, Smart, L., 149, Smeaton, G., 245, Smiler, A. P., 319, Smith, A., 175, Smith, A. K., 378, 382, Smith, A. L., 487, Smith, A. P., 451, Smith, B. W., 450, Smith, C. A., 82, Smith, D. M., 293, Smith, E. A., 398, Smith, E. E., 188, Smith, E. R., 174, 175, Smith, G. S., 458, Smith, J. C., 129, Smith, J. W., 535, Smith, M. L., 547, 548, Smith, M., 496, Smith, P. B., 156., 190, 194, 217, Smith, R. E., 159, Smith, R. H., 240, Smith, S. E., 285, Smith, S. M., 530, Smith, T. P., 7, Smith, T. W., 277, 446, 447, 448, 451, 542, Smith, W. P., 129, Smock, P. J., 270, 288, 292, Smolak, L., 510, Smoll, F. L., 340, Smyer, M. A., 353, Smyth, J. M., 127, 129, Snibbe, A. C., 291, , Snir, R., 395, Snodgrass, S. E., 213, Snowdon, D., 353, 354, Snowdon, L. R., 544, Snyder, E., 414, Snyder, M., 164, 174, 208, 236, Sobal, J., 511, Solberg, E. C., 2, 20, Solomon, D. A., 498, Solomon, J., 363, Solomon, S., 59–60, 61, 62, 150, 179, 294, Solowij, N., 476, 477, Sommer, K. L., 146, Sommers-Flanagan, J., 317, Sommers-Flanagan, R., 317, Sonnenberg, S., 388, 389, Sonstroem, R. J., 466, Sorenson, J. L., 468, Soriano, M., 544, Sotiriou, P. E., 27, Soule, R. G., 2, South, S. J., 258, 272, 283, 286, 291, Sovio, U., 109, Sowell, T., 387, Spalding, L. R., 347, 348, Spanos, N., 495–496, 530, Spaulding, L. R., 239, 248, 251, 413, 417, Spector, L., 421, Spence, J. T., 305, 328, 395, Sperry, R. W., 312, Spiegel, D., 91, 255, 494, Spiegler, M. D., 534, Spiro, A., 351, Spitzberg, B. H., 296, Spokane, A. R., 379, Sportolari, L., 412, Sprafkin, J. N., 317, Sprecher, S., 18, Sprecher, S., 240, 243, 256, 257, 258, 419,, 423, 424, 426, 427, Springen, K., 241, 322, 408, Springer, S. P., 312, Srebnik, D., 423, Sroufe, L. A., 256, Stack, A. D., 109, Stack, S., 261, 291, Stafford, L., 246, Stajkovic, A. D., 50, 159, Stamler, J., 462, 463, Stampfer, W. J., 464, Staneski, R. A., 215, Stanley, S. M., 275, Stanton, A. L., 451, Stanton, G. C., 147, Starcevic, V., 493, Starker, S., 7, Starrels, M. E., 278, Stattin, H., 340, Staudinger, U. M., 93, Steadman, H. J., 508, Stecker, R., 107, Steele, C. M., 75, Steele, J. B., 489, Steelman, L. C., 43, Steiger, H., 511, Stein, M. B., 91, 490, Stein, N., 325, Stein, P. J., 272, 273, Steinberg, L., 278, 349, 365, 367, 368, 369, Steiner, J., 512, Steiner, M. J., 431, , Name Index, , 633

Page 671 :
Steiner-Pappalardo, N. L., 255, Steinhausen, H., 510, 513, Steinhilber, A., 89, Steinmetz, H., 312, Stein-Seroussi, A., 155, Stelfox, H. T., 539, Stephens, R. S., 476, Sternberg, K. J., 363, Sternberg, R. J., 251–252, 256–257, 258, Stevens, G., 240, Stevens, N., 248, Stevic-Rust, L., 456, Stewart, A. J., 345, 348, 358, Stewart, F. H., 431, Stice, E., 511, Stillion, J. M., 361, Stith, S. M., 298, Stoffer, G. R., 16, 17, Stone, A. A., 509, Stone, J., 211, 212, Stone, L., 236, Stone, W. N., 527, Stoney, C. M., 445, Strack, F., 22, Strauman, T. J., 141, 142, Strelau, J., 57, Strickland, A. L., 359, Strickland, C. J., 344, Striegel-Moore, R. H., 340, 460, 510, Stroebe, W., 187, 261, 362, Stroessner, S. J., 183, Stroh, L. K., 386, Strong, S. R., 548, Stroud, L. R., 109, Strube, M. J., 154, Strupp, H. H., 519, Stuart, P., 393, Stuart, S. P., 528, Stunkard, A. J., 460, Stutzer, A., 20, Suarez, E. C., 447, Suarez-Orozco, C., 343, Suarez-Orozco, M. M., 343, Subaiya, L., 288, Subothik, R., 412, Suchday, S., 74, Sue, D., 423, Sue, S., 543, 544, Suh, E., 22, Suhomlinova, O., 286, Suinn, R. M., 493, Sullivan, A., 415, Sullivan, G. M., 490, Sullivan, J. C., 226, Sullivan, P. F., 499, 513, Sullivan, Q., 243, Sulloway, F., 42–43, Suls, J., 35, 73, 98, 444, Super, D. E., 347, 379–381, Surra, C. A., 272, Susman, E. J., 338, 339, Susser, E., 506, Sutherland, V. J., 93, Swain, S., 249, Swan, G. E., 455, 456, Swaney, K., 379, Swann, W. B., Jr., 155, 174, 176, Swanson, J. L., 375, Swap, W. C., 240, Sweeney, D., 322, Sweet, J., 285, , 634, , Name Index, , Swim, J. K., 182, Swinford, S., 299, Switzer, G. E., 487, Swoboda, F., 386, Sygnatur, E. F., 393, Szasz, T., 482–483, Szkrybalo, J., 314, Szmukler, G. L., 509, T, , Tabachnick, B. G., 546, Tabas, G., 492, Tajfel, H., 184, Takanishi, R., 344, Takeuchi, D. T., 543, Tamminga, C. A., 505, Tang, M., 375, Tang, S., 270, Tannen, D., 225, 330–333, Tanner, J. M., 340, Tansky, J. W., 50, Tardif, C., 363, Tardiff, K., 539, Tata, J., 392, Tatsuoka, M. M., 65, Tavris, C., 11, 108, 323, Taylor, D. M., 181, 182, Taylor, E., 55, Taylor, R. J., 352, Taylor, S. E., 85–86, 113, 143, 152, 155, 173,, 174, Taylor, T. A., 215, 217, Tchividjian, L. R., 164, Teachman, J. D., 271, 277, 290, 292, 347,, 348, Teasdale, J. D., 108, 500, Tedeschi, R. G., 93, Tedrow, L. M., 290, Tekle, J., 172, Tellegen, A., 22, 57, Temoshok, L., 450, Tennen, H., 93, 118, Tesch, S. A., 347, Tesser, A., 143, Testa, K., 530, Tharp, R. G., 131, 133, Thase, M. E., 500, 527, Thayaparan, B., 468, Thayer, J. F., 164, Theisen, T., 400, Theorell, T., 388, 389, Thibaut, J. W., 247, Thoennes, N., 298, Thomas, G., 174, Thomas, K. M., 386, 387, 389, Thomas, M., 410, Thompson, J. K., 511, Thompson, M., 319, Thompson, T. L., 317, Thorndyke, P. W., 28, Thornton, A., 270, Thorson, J. A., 359, Throckmorton, B., 403, Thune, I., 466, Tice, D. M., 109, 122, 145, 157, 158, 163, Tienda, M., 351, Tigner, R. B., 28, Ting-Toomey, S., 221, Tjaden, P., 298, Tobin-Richards, M. H., 341, Todd, Z., 249, , Toffler, A., 4, Toguchi, Y., 155, Tolmacz, R., 254, Tolman, D. L., 324, Toomey, R., 504, Tori, C. D., 129, Torrey, E. F., 43, 507, Toscano, G. A., 393, Tosi, H., 79, Townsend, J., 411, Tractenberg, M. A., 468, Trammell, D., 124, Trapnell, P. D., 35, 43, Travis, C. B., 243, 256, Travis, F., 129, Treas, J., 278, 427, 429, Trebou, D., 275, Treiber, F., 129, Trent, K., 286, Triandis, H. C., 145, 237, Trivedi, M. H., 466, Trochim, B., 14, Trope, Y., 154, 172, 174, Tropp, L. R., 185, 325, Trost, M. R., 311, Trussell, J., 424, 425, 431, Trzesniewski, K. H., 147, Tsai, M., 316, Tsuang, M. T., 485, 505, Tucker, V., 429, Tucker-Ladd, C. E., 6, 76, Tugade, M. M., 83, 117, Tulving, E., 28, Turban, D. B., 174, Turkheimer, E., 58, Turner, E., 282, Turner, J. C., 184, Turner, J. R., 80, 98, 452, Turner, S. M., 489, 542, Twenge, J. M., 3, 7, 145, 148, 149, 151, 162,, 235, 277, 307, 308, Tyrrell, D. A., 451, U, , Uchino, B. N., 95, 255, Uehara, E., 543, Uemera, A., 316, Uleman, J. S., 177, Ullman, S. E., 296, Ulrich, M., 277, Umberson, D., 351, Ungerleider, T. J., 476, Ursano, R. J., 91, 522, Uzzo, R. G., 92, V, , Vaillant, G. E., 43, 96, 106, 113, Valent, P., 89, Valentine, J. D., 495, Valian, V., 325, Vanable, P. A., 467, 468, Vanbeselaere, N., 157, Van Brunt, D., 359, Vandenberg, S. G., 306, Vander Laan, K. L., 128, van Ijzendoorn, M. H., 363, van Kammen, D. P., 537, van Laar, C., 248, Van Willigen, M., 20, Varrett, L. F., 254, Vartanian, L. R., 322, Vaughan, K., 318

Page 672 :
Vaughn, B. E., 363, Vaughn, C., 508, Vaux, A., 95, Vazier, S., 180, Veccia, E. M., 210, Veenhoven, R., 19, 20, Veerman, T. J., 388, Veevers, J. E., 278, Vega, W. A., 543, Veneziano, R. A., 320, Verderber, K. S., 203, 204. 205, 218, 222, 224, Verderber, R. F., 203, 204, 205, 218, 222, 224, Verette, J., 248, Vernberg, E. M., 91, Vgontzas, A. N., 92, Viau, V., 87, Vick, B. S., 179, Vinogradov, S., 527, Vinokur, A. D., 393, Vinsel, A., 217, Vinson, D. C., 457, Vittengl, R., 215, Vohs, K. D., 158, Volavka, J., 538, Volk, K., D., 418, Vollmer, W. M., 463, Von Baeyer, C. L., 162, Vorauer, J. D., 263, Voutilainen, S., 463, Voydanhoff, P., 278, Voyer, D., 307, Voyer, S., 307, Vrugt, A., 210, W, , Wachtel, P., 2, Wadden, T. A., 459, 460, 462, Waddill, P. J., 28, Wade, C., 11, Wade, P., 544, Wagner, A., 92, 498, 500, Wagner, D. M., 287, Wagner, S. H., 322, Waite, L., 287, 288, 291, Wakefield, J. C., 485, Waldfogel, J., 282, 381, Waldron, M., 58, Waldrop, D., 50, Walker, A. J., 271, Walker, E. F., 508, Walker, K., 249, Walker, L. S., 470, Wallace, C. J., 535, Wallace, H. M., 145, Wallace-Broscious, A., 381, Waller, N. H., 35, Wallis, C., 225, 323, Wallman, G. Y., 545, Wallterstein, J. S., 288, Walsh, F., 279, Walster, E., 176, 240, 244, Walter, C. A., 354, Walters, E. E., 511, Wampold, B. E., 529, 547, Wang, H., 288, Warn, J., 387, Warner, L., 431, Warner, R. M., 330, Warr, P., 21, Warwick, H. M. C., 493, Waters, E., 256, 275, , Watkins, C. E., 67, Watkins, C. E., Jr., 377, Watson, D., 34, 35, 73, 98, 131, 133, 451, Watson, J. B., 44, 48, Way, N., 426, Weatherall, A., 277, Weaver, M. F., 475, Webster, D. M., 177, 180, Wechsler, H., 454, 456, 458, Weems, C. F., 490, Wegener, D. T., 186, 187, 188, 189, Weil, M. M., 2, Weimer, B. L., 255, Weinberg, C., 7, Weinberg, M. S., 414, 417, Weinberger, D. A., 112, Weinberger, J., 522, 529, Weiner, B., 152, 153, 173, Weiner, H., 493, Weiner, M. F., 527, Weinfield, N., 256, Weinrich, J. D., 293, Weinstein, N. D., 155, 453, Weintraub, J. K., 106, Weisaeth, L., 89, Weiss, D. S., 91, Weiss, R., 260, Weiss, R. S., 269, 285, Weissman, M. M., 487, 488, 489, Weisz, J. R., 178, Weiten, W., 80, 81, Weitzman, L., 381, Welch, H. G., 454, Welchans, S., 298, Wells, L., 543, Wells, R. B., 192, Wenger, M. J., 27, Wertenbroch, K., 122, Wessely, S., 538, Wessinger, E., 398, Wesson, D. R., 475, West, D. S., 460, 463, West, S. G., 429, West, W. B., 129, Westbay, L., 252, Westefeld, J. S., 261, Westen, D., 43, Wethington, E., 350, Wheaton, B., 80, 98, Wheaton, B., 452, Wheeler, L., 177, 217, 250, Whiston, S. C., 375, Whitaker, C., 538, Whitaker, D., 410, Whitaker, R., 539, Whitbourne, S. K., 347, 348, 350, 352, 358, White, K. B., 297, White, L. K., 277, 278, 279, 283, 349, 351, White, P., 189, Whitehead, B. D., 285, Whiteman, S. D., 278, Whitfield, C. L., 530, 532, Whitley, B. E., 182, 327, Wickrama, K. A. S., 288, Widiger, T. A., 483, Wiebe, D. J., 470, Wiederman, M. W., 243, 407, 428, Wielawski, I., 529, Wiesenthal, D. L., 76, Wigfield, A., 340, Wiggins, J. S., 35, , Wilgosh, L., 323, Wilis, R. P., 27, Willett, W. C., 460, 462, 464, 465, Willetts, M. C., 351, 423, 426, 428, Williams, C., 277, Williams, C. D., 454, Williams, C. L., 325, Williams, J. E., 176, 305, 446, 447, Williams, J. M. G P., 491, Williams, K. B., 392, Williams, K. E., 50, Williams, K. N., 197, Williams, L., 210, Williams, L. M., 530, Williams, M. H., 547, Williams, N. A., 451, Williams, R. B., 127, Williams, S. L., 159, Williams, V. P., 127, Williamson, D. A., 513, Willimon, W. H., 4, Wills, T. A., 95, 118, 119, 255, 448, Wilner, A., 350, Wilpert, B., 390, Wilsnack, S. C., 530, Wilson, A. E., 152, Wilson, G. T., 461, 510, Wilson, H. E., 143, Wilson, R. S., 353, Winefield, A. H., 393, Wing, R. R., 461, 462, Winick, C., 472, 474, Winter, D. D. N., 4, Winzelberg, A. J., 129, Wiseman, C. V., 511, 513, Wister, A. V., 278, Witmer, D. F., 211, Wittenberg, M. T., 263, Witvliet, C. V., 128, Wolak, J., 411, Wolf, A. S., 508, Wolff, K., 360, Wolff, T. J., 413, Wolinksy, F. O., 470, Wolk, A., 462, Woloshin, S., 454, Wolpe, J., 532, 533–534, 535, Wolsic, B., 20, Wonderlich, S. A., 511, Wood, E., 315, Wood, J. V., 143, 152, 155, Wood, M. D., 457, 458, 459, Wood, N., 152, Wood, W., 186, 188, 189, 244, 251, 305, Woods, J. M., 67, Woolfolk, R. L., 129, Woolis, R., 484, Worden, J. M., 361, Workman, E. A., 92, Worth, L. T., 187, Worthen, J. B., 29, Worthington, E. L., Jr., 128, Worthington, R. L., 377, 385, Wortman, C. B., 351, 360, 361, Wright, J. C., 227, Wright, J. H., 527, Wright, R. A., 244, Wright, S. C., 181, 182, Wu, S., 185, 237, Wu, Z., 291, Wurf, E., 140, 141, , Name Index, , 635

Page 673 :
Wylie, M. S., 530, Wynder, E. L., 463, X, , Xiaohe, G., 236, Y, , Yager, J., 249, Yalom, I. D., 527, Yamamoto, J., 544, Yang, A. S., 293, Yang, H., 451, Yanovski, S. Z., 461, Yapko, M. D., 530, Yi, H., 458, Yoder, J. D., 310, 391, Young, A., 424, Young, D. A., 477, Young, E. A., 86, , 636, , Name Index, , Young, J, E. 264, 261, Young, K. S., 109, 110, 543, Young, R. D., 142, Young, S. M., 188, Young-DeMarco, L., 270, Younkin, S. L., 96, Yurgelun-Todd, D., 477, Yurtzy, S. H., 492, Z, , Zajonc, R. B., 240, Zakzanis, K. K., 477, Zane, N., 543, 544, Zang, D., 451, Zanna, M. P., 162, 429, Zatzick, D. F., 542, Zautra, A. J., 72, 450, Zebrowitz, L. A., 348, Zechmeister, E. B., 27, , Zeig, J., 518, Zellman, G. L., 410, Zentall, S., 410, Zerbinos, E., 317, Zhang, L., 391, Zhao, S., 485, Zigler, E., 344, 345, Zilbergeld, B., 438, Zimbardo, P. G., 5, 165, 179, 194, 262, 263, Zimmerman, B. J., 50, Zimmerman, J., 134, Zisook, S., 360, Zittleman, K., 317, Zorumski, C. F., 541, Zuckerman, M., 66, 157, Zuo, J., 270, Zuroff, D. C., 348, Zvonkovic, A. N., 280

Page 674 :
Subject Index, A, ability-achievement gap, 323, abnormal behavior, 482–485, criteria of, 483–485, medical model of, 482, See also psychological disorders, abstinence sex ed programs, 410, abusive relationships, 299, academic performance, improving, 24–29, self-efficacy and, 50, self-esteem and, 148, stress and, 92, acceptance, as stage of dying, 359, parental, 149, 364, accidents, alcohol use and, 458, mortality rates for, 453, sedative use and, 475, accommodation, 223, achievement, self-esteem and, 148, acquired immune deficiency syndrome. See, AIDS, acronyms, 28, acrophobia, 488, acrostics, 28, ACTH, 88, active listening, 27, 218, actor-observer effect, 258, adaptation, diseases of, 87, stress and, 93, adaptational outcomes, of stress, 89, addiction, drug, 473, 474, to Internet, 109–110, adjustment, defined, 12, adolescence, 278, 338–345, cognitive changes in, 340–341, conflicts with parents in, 349, eating disorders in, 510–511, 512, emotional turmoil in, 343–344, growth spurt in, 338, 339, personality changes in, 341–344, physical development in, 338–340, risk taking in, 341, 343, sexual risk behavior in, 425, search for identity in, 342–343, suicide in, 344-345, timing of puberty in, 340, 341, adolescents, birth control among, 429, homosexual, 417, loneliness among, 261, overweight, 460, parents and, 365, 367, sex information sources for, 409, sexual activity of, 426, STDs among, 425, adrenal glands, 88, 338, adultery, 427–429, adulthood, 345–352, early, 346–347, late, 350–352, middle, 348–350, occupational development in, 379–381, adversarial culture, 225–227, advertising, 187, 188, 197, 317, , aerobic exercise, 355, affiliation, need for, 13–14, affirmative action programs, 387, affluence, 2, African Americans, conformity in, 308, elder care among, 355, eye contact in, 209, family relationships of, 351, gender stereoptypes and, 305, gender-role socialization and, 315, 316, physique in, 241, ritual kin of, 351–352, self-esteem in, 151, stress and, 75, TV watching by, 317, in workforce, 385, 386, age, actual vs. subjective, 348, happiness and, 20, marriage and, 270, 274, 275, Age of Propaganda (Pratkanis & Aronson),, 186, age stereotypes, 176, aggression, 60, 108–109, 225, alcohol and, 458, exposure to, 226, Freud’s view of, 38, gender differences in, 308, 311, hormones and, 313, narcissism and, 149, observational learning and, 49, sexual, 411, toward women, 325–326, vengeful, 179, aggressive communication, 228, 229, aggressive pornography, 296–297, aging, 348–349, 352–358, cognitive changes and, 355–358, personality changes and, 358, physical changes and 352–355, sexual activity and, 427, Aging with Grace (Snowdon), 354, agoraphobia, 488–489, agreeableness, 35, 58, 59, Aguilera, Christina, 162, AIDS, 424, 431, 433, 467–469, caregivers for men with, 83, prevention of, 468, transmission of, 468, 475, alarm reaction, 86–87, alcohol dependence, 458, alcohol use/abuse, 456–459, contraception lack and, 429, date rape and, 296, health risks of, 458–459, self-discrepancies and, 142, stress and, 92, 109, See also drinking, Alcoholics Anonymous, 528, alcoholism, 458, 459, gender differences in, 309, treating, 534, allegiance effect, 528, alprazolam, 537, alternative rewards, developing, 109, alternatives, generating, 119, altruism, 61, , Alzheimer’s disease, 353, 354, ambient stress, 73–74, amenorrhea, 510, American Association of Sex Educators,, Counselors, and Therapists (AASECT),, 438, American Indians, 344, American Psychiatric Association, 485, American Psychological Association, 376, amnesia, dissociative, 494, amphetamines, 475, Amway, 197, anal intercourse, 424, 432, anal stage, 40, analytic mentality, 178, analytical psychology, 41–42, androcentrism, 305, androgens, 313, 408, 409, androgyny, 327–328, anger, 108–109, 320, defense mechanisms and, 112, heart disease and, 446–448, at job loss, 393, 394, in marriage, 285, as response to stress, 83, as response to traumatic events, 82, as stage of dying, 359, Anger: The Misunderstood Emotion (Tavris),, 108, angina, 445, 448, animal research, 51, Aniston, Jennifer, 166, annoyance, as response to stress, 83, anorexia nervosa, 510–513, answer changing, on tests, 16–17, antecedents, of responses, 132, 134, antianxiety drugs, 537, 539, antidepressant drugs, 538–539, antipsychotic drugs, 537–538, anxiety, affiliation need and, 13–14, choice overload and, 3–4, conditioning of, 46, death-related, 150, 359, defense mechanisms and, 38–39, 112, Freud’s view of, 38, about public speaking, 219–220, as response to stress, 83, as response to traumatic events, 82, 449, Rogers’s view of, 52–53, 524, self-defeating behavior and, 160, self-discrepancies and, 142, sexual performance and, 437, sexual, 40, 41, 320, terrorism-related, 60, 449, test, 84, 112, 159, anxiety disorders, 486, 487–491, biological factors in, 490, client-centered treatment for, 524–526, cognitive factors in, 491, conditioning of, 490, drug treatment for, 537, 538, etiology of, 490–491, gender differences in, 309, psychoanalytic treatment for, 522–524, stress and, 92, 491, systematic desensitization for, 533–534, types of, 487–490, anxiety hierarchy, 533, 534, , Subject Index, , 637

Page 675 :
anxiety sensitivity, 490, appeals, emotional, 187, appearance. See physical appearance, appearance pressure, 322, appraisal, of stress, 72–73, 81, 82, 98, appraisal-focused coping, 114, 115–118, approach-approach conflict, 76–77, approach-avoidance conflict, 77–78, approval, self-esteem and, 150, aptitudes, 374, Arapesh, 314, archetypes, 41–42, argument culture, 225–227, Argument Culture, The (Tannen), 225, arguments, two-sided, 187, arousal, emotional, 84–85, optimal level of, 84–85, as response to traumatic events, 82, arthritis, 450, Asian Americans, elder care among, 355, self-esteem in, 151, in workforce, 385, See also minority groups, assault, sexual, 297, Asserting Yourself (Bower & Bower), 229, assertiveness, 224, 227–231, assertiveness training, 228–231, assumptions, irrational, 116, 117, asthma, 450, atherosclerosis, 445, attachment, love as, 252–256, attachment styles, 363, adult, 252–256, infant, 252–253, 363, loneliness and, 262, attention, aging and, 356, arousal and, 84, marijuana use and, 477, to nonverbal cues, 216, 218–219, selective, 152, 220, stress and, 89, attitudes, changing, 185, 189, 194, sexual, 419, 437, 439, similarity in, 245, attraction, factors in, 239–245, stimulus value and, 274, tactics of, 241, 242, attractiveness, 240–244, advantages of, 176, aging and, 348–349, 352, of communication sources, 187, culture and, 176–177, eating disorders and, 511, factors in, 240–241, gender stereotypes and, 322, happiness and, 20, psychiatric patients’ adjustment and, 17, stereotypes about, 176–177, attribution process, 177–178, attributions, controllable vs. uncontrollable, 153, defensive, 178, 179, 183, defined, 173, errors in, 177–178, 183, internal vs. external, 152, 153, 173–174, loneliness and, 264, 265, in romantic relationships, 258–259, self, 152-153, 264, , 638, , Subject Index, , stable vs. unstable, 153, authoritarian parenting, 149, 364, 365, 367, authoritarianism, 182. 193, authoritative parenting, 149, 364, 365, 367, authority, obedience to, 192–194, autoeroticism, 423, autogenic training, 129, automatic processing, 152, 184, autonomic nervous system (ANS), 85, 87–88, availability heuristic, 120, aversive stimuli, 48, avoidance, 48, 392, of conflict, 221, 223, as response to traumatic events, 82, avoidance-avoidance conflict, 77, awareness, levels of, 36–37, , B, baby boom generation, 354, 381, 396, baldness, 352, barbiturates, 475, bargaining, as stage of dying, 359, baseline data, 131, basking in reflected glory (BIRG), 156–157, battering, 297–299, beauty, 240, behavior, defined, 11, behavior modification, 25, 131–135,, 230–231, 455, 462, 533, 548, behavior therapies, 518, 529–536, 543, aversion therapy, 534–535, effectiveness of, 536, general principles of, 532–533, social skills training, 535–536, systematic desensitization, 533–534, behavioral confirmation, 175, behavioral contract, 135, behavioral disengagement, 108, behavioral genetics, 57–58, behavioral perspectives, on personality,, 44–51, behavioral rehearsal, 536, behaviorism, 44, belief in a just world (BJW), 179, beliefs, 186, belligerence, 285, benefit finding, 118, benzodiazepines, 475, 537, bereavement, 360, bereavement overload, 361, better-than-average effect, 155, biases, pointing out, 189, Big Five personality traits, 34–35, birth order and, 42–43, evolutionary perspective on, 58–59, heredity and, 57, 58, marital success and, 275, binge eating/purging, 510, biological perspectives, on personality,, 55–59, biomedical therapies, 518, 536–540, 543, antianxiety drugs, 537, antidepressant drugs, 538–539, antipsychotic drugs, 537–538, effectiveness of, 539–540, 541, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), 540–541, mood stabilizers, 539, biopsychosocial model, 444, bipolar disorder, 497, 498–499, treatment for, 539, BIRG (basking in reflected glory), 156–157, birth control, 429–431, birth control pills, 430–431, , birth order, 42–43, 58, bisexuals, 250, 293, 408, 413, BJW (belief in a just world), 179, blaming oneself, 111, blaming the victim, 178, 179, 183, blood pressure, 460, 463, ambient stress and, 73, heart disease and, 445, BMI, 459, 460, body image, 322, 408, disturbed, 510, body language, 210, body mass index (BMI), 459, 460, body weight. See weight, bonding, infant, 256, boomerang generation, 278, boredom, 93, Boston Couples Study, 257, brain, aging and, 353, gender differences in, 312, schizophrenia and, 505–506, 507, brain-imaging studies, 506, brainstorming, 119, breakups, of relationships, 257, breast cancer, 255, Brockovich, Erin, 194, brontophobia, 488, Bryant, Kobe, 187, 297, bulimia nervosa, 510–514, Burden of Sympathy, The (Karp), 484, burnout, 90, 389, 395, Bush, George W., 206, Buspar, 537, bystander effect, 193, , C, caffeine, 463, 475, Campbell Interest and Skill Survey (CISS),, 377, cancer, 444, alcohol and, 458, diet and, 463, oral contraceptives and, 431, physical fitness and, 466, smoking and, 454, stress and, 449-450, cannabis, 473, 474, 476–477, car accidents, 352, alcohol and, 458, mortality rate for, 453, carbohydrates, 464, cardiovascular disease. See heart disease, career advancement, barriers to, 386, career choice, models of, 378–381, career counseling, gender bias in, 317, career development, 379–381, career information, 376, career patterns, 349, career planning, 374–378, 399–403, careers, gender and, 323, 377, interest inventories for, 377, See also occupations, caregivers, stress for, 83, caregiving, of elderly parents, 278, Carter, Jimmy, 356, Carter, Rosalyn, 356, case studies, 17, 350, catastrophic thinking, 111, 115–117, 493, catatonic schizophrenia, 503–504, catecholamines, 88, categorization, social, 176, 182–183

Page 676 :
catharsis, 109, cause-effect relationships, 14, 18–19, 22–23, cell phones, 203, 205, cerebral hemispheres, 312, cervical cap, 430, change, as source of stress, 78–80, channels, communication, 186, sensory, 202–203, chat rooms, 238, cheating, on partner, 428, child abuse, repressed memories of, 529–530, child care, 323, 348, 390, childlessness, 271, 277, 347–348, childrearing, 58, 349, 362–369, culture and, 145, dimensions of, 363–364, See also parenting, children, adult, 349, of alcoholics, 459, arrival of, 277, day care for, 363, 383, effect of divorce on, 288–289, effect of remarriage on, 289–290, exposure to aggression, 226, gender-role socialization of, 314–318, grief in, 361, of homosexual parents, 417, marital violence and, 298, maternal employment and, 282, media influence on, 226, 317–318, overweight, 460, personality development of, 39–41, 44, 47,, 48, 52, 53, 58, psychosocial stages of, 39–41, resilience in, 366–367, sex information for, 409, 410, traumatic events and, 366–367, China, 203, 236, 237, chlamydia, 433, chlorpromazine, 536, 537, 538, choices, overabundance of, 2–3, as source of conflict, 76–77, choking under pressure, 89, cholesterol, 462, 463, 464, heart disease and, 445, 446, chronic diseases, 355, 443–444, See also cancer; heart disease, Cialis, 438, City Stress Index, 74, clarifying, 218, 525, class attendance, academic success and, 26,, 27, classical conditioning, 45–47, of anxiety disorders, 490, in behavior therapies, 533, 534, observational learning and, 49, claustrophobia, 488, client-centered therapy, 524–526, 543, 548, clinical psychologists, 520–521, clinical psychology, 12, Clinton, Bill, 391, clitoris, 421, 437, close relationships. See relationships, clozapine, 538, clutter, dealing with, 121–122, Coca-Cola, 203, cocaine, 475, cocktail party effect, 152, cognitive abilities, gender differences in,, 306–307, , cognitive appraisal, of stress, 81, 82, cognitive behavioral therapy, 154, cognitive distortions, 176–178, 182–183, cognitive misers, 152, 173, 177, cognitive therapy, 265, 526–527, 535, cohabitation, 270, 291–292, 295, 428, coitus, 424, collaborating, 224, collective unconscious, 41–42, collectivism, 145, 151, collectivist cultures, attractiveness in, 177, attributions in, 178, interpersonal conflict in, 221, marriage in, 236–237, self-disclosure in, 217, self-effacing bias in, 156, self-enhancement in, 155, college education, occupation and, 376–377, 384, underemployment and, 384, college students, alcohol use of, 456, 458, loneliness and, 261, Coming Out to Parents (Borhek), 417, commercials, TV, 317, commitment, in romantic relationships, 252, 256, 257, to career, 380, commitment, to mental hospital, 508–509, communal relationships, 248, communication, adjustment and, 204, aggressive, 228, 229, assertive, 227–231, barriers to effective, 220–221, computer-mediated, 204, conversation skills, 214-215, defined, 202, effective, 213-219, in emergencies, 205, gender differences in, 309, with health providers, 470–471, improving, 333, via Internet, 237–238, interpersonal, 202–204, 237–238, 329–333, marital satisfaction and, 283–285, persuasive, 185–189, problems in, 219–221, 331–333, public, 225-227, self-disclosure in, 215-217, about sex, 410, 418–419, 434–435, submissive, 227–228, technology and, 203–204, 205, See also nonverbal communication, communication apprehension, 219–220, communication channels, 186, communication styles, gender differences in,, 329–333, community mental health centers, 546, 547, companies, researching, 401–402, comparison level, 247, compensation, 42, competing, in interpersonal conflict, 223, competition, between groups, 183, self-esteem and, 151, compliance, 192, compromising, 223–224, compulsions, 489, computer literacy, 385, computers, effects on workplace, 382, 388, concordance rates, 415, 499, 505, 506, , conditionability, 56, conditioned fears, 490, 491, conditioned reflex, 45, conditioned response (CR), 45–46, conditioned stimulus (CS), 45–46, 490, conditioning, classical, 45–47, 490, 533, 534, of maladaptive behavior, 533, operant, 47–49, 314, 490, 533, for self-control, 131–135, condoms, 429, 430, 431, 468, confidentiality, of clients, 542, confirmation bias, 174–175, 177, 180, 403, conflict(s), avoidance of, 221, 223, between groups, 183, 185, ego-based, 223, intergenerational, 365, internal, 37–38, 76, 522, interpersonal, 221–224, managing, 223–224, 257–258, 259, marital, 283–285, 348, among motives, 76–77, parent-adolescent, 278, 343, 349, in relationships, 254, 257–258, 331, types of, 76–77, 222, work-family, 395, conform, pressure to, 80, 192, 193, conformity, 190–192, Asch’s study of, 190–191, compliance vs., 191, culture and, 194, gender differences in, 308, resisting, 191–192, confrontations, 221, 222, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, 313, congruence, in personality, 52, 53, conscientiousness, 35, 58, 59, conscious, Freud’s view of, 36–37, consistency, as aspect of personality, 34, in person perception, 180, constructive coping, 113–114, appraisal-focused, 114, 115–118, emotion-focused, 114, 125–130, problem-focused, 114, 118–125, Consumer’s Guide to Psychotherapy, A, (Beutler et al.), 549, contagious diseases. 443-444, contempt, 285, context, for communication, 203, continuing education, 382, contraception, 429–431, contract work, 383, control, illusions of, 155, parental, 149, 364, control group, 14, controlled processing, 152, 184, conversation skills, 214–215, conversion disorder, 492, coping, 88–89, defensive, 111–113, defined, 106, with loss, 360–362, self-esteem and, 148, styles of, 106–107, with unemployment, 392–394, coping strategies, 106, constructive, 113–130, counterproductive, 107–113, coronary heart disease, 445–449, corpus callosum, 312, , Subject Index, , 639

Page 677 :
correlation, 15, correlation coefficient, 15–16, correlational research, 15–19, 451–452, correspondence bias, 177, corticosteroids, 88, cosmetic surgery, 241, 322, counseling, 546, counseling psychologists, 520–521, counselors, 521–522, counterconditioning, 534, counterproductive behaviors, 160–161, couples therapy, 439, courtship, 274–275, covenant marriage laws, 287, cover letters, for résumés, 400, crack cocaine, 475, cramming, 27, C-reactive protein (CRP), 445, 446, credibility, of sources, 186, crime, violent, 308, 458, critical thinking, 10, 11, criticism, of spouse, 285, crowding, 73, cults, 5, cultural worldviews, 59–60, 61, 150, culture, 145–146, adolescence and, 338, aging and, 357, assertiveness and, 227, attribution errors and, 178, career choice and, 375, close relationships and, 236–237, communication and, 203, conflict resolution and, 221, death system and, 359, eating disorders and, 511–512, emotional expression and, 208, eye contact and, 209, gender differences and, 311, gender-role socialization and, 314, mental health services and, 543–544, mourning and, 360, nonverbal communication and, 206, personal space and, 207, persuasive messages and, 188, physical attractiveness and, 177, self-disclosure and, 217, self-enhancement and, 155, self-serving bias and, 156, social influence and, 194, stress and, 74–75, See also collectivist cultures;, individualistic cultures, cunnilingus, 423, cutting off reflected failure (CORFing), 157, cybersex, 412, cynicism, 448, , D, date rape, 295–297, 298, dating, 257, attractiveness and, 240, sex and, 426, tactics for, 241, 242, day care, 363, 383, death, attitudes about, 358–359, inevitability of, 59, 60, death anxiety, 62, 150, 359, death rates, for diseases, 444, death system, 358–359, deception, detecting, 206, 211–212, 213, , 640, , Subject Index, , nonverbal behavior and, 208, in personality tests, 66, decision making, arousal and, 84, of workers, 390, decoding, 202, deductive reasoning, 341, defense mechanisms, 38–39, 53, 522, 524,, 111–113, 178, 179, 183, defensiveness, 220, 285, dejection, 83, 112, delusions, 503, demand-control model, 388, 389, demand-withdraw pattern, 259, dementia, 353, demonic possession, 482, denial, 111, 112, 359, 392, 394, 453, dependence, on drugs, 473, 474, dependent variable, 14, depressants, 474, depression, attribution style and, 152, choice overload and, 3, cognitive therapy for, 526, exercise and, 466, gender differences in, 309, grieving and, 360–361, heart disease and, 449, learned helplessness and, 108, 154, negative thinking and, 500–501, postpartum, 277, as response to traumatic events, 82, self-esteem and, 148, as stage of dying, 359, stress and, 92, terror management view of, 60, unemployment and, 394, See also mood disorders, depressive disorders, 497–498, drug treatment for, 538–539, electroconvulsive therapy for, 540, desensitization, to violence, 226, development, in adolescence, 338–345, in early adulthood, 346–347, of family, 275–279, in late adulthood, 350–352, in middle adulthood, 348–350, personality, 39–41, 42–43, 47, 48, 52–53,, 63, deviance, as criteria for abnormality, 483, diabetes, 445, 460, diagnosis, 483, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental, Disorders(DSM), 485, 486, diaphragm, 430, diazepam, 537, Dictionary of Occupational Titles, 376, diet, health and, 462–463, dieting, 461–462, disabilities, happiness and, 21, disagreements, 222, 257, disasters, coping with, 255, risk for, 73, as stressors, 91, 92, discipline, parental, 48, 227, 368–369, disclosure, mutual, 217, disconfirmation bias, 188, discontinuity, 381, discrimination, 181, against homosexuals, 415–416, job, 385, 386, 388, , modern vs. old-fashioned, 181–182, as source of stress, 75, disease(s), chronic, 355, 443–444, happiness and, 23, infectious, 443–444, mortality rates from, 444, psychosomatic, 92, sexually transmitted, 423–425, 431–434, See also AIDS, disobedience, 194, disorganized schizophrenia, 504, displaced workers, 393, displacement, 39, 109, display rules, 208, dissociative amnesia, 494, dissociative disorders, 486, 494–496, etiology of, 495–496, types of, 494–495, dissociative fugue, 494, dissociative identity disorder (DID),, 494–496, distance learning, 382, distinctiveness, as aspect of personality, 34, distortion, motivated, 220, diversity, in workforce, 385–386, diversity training programs, 387, division of labor, by gender, 326, in marriage, 280–281, divorce, 270, 274, 275, 285–290, adjusting to, 288, causes of, 283, effects on children, 288–289, decision to, 286, 288, infidelity and, 429, loneliness and, 261–262, predictors of, 283, 285, effect on women, 381, divorce laws, 287, divorce rates, 285–286, domestic partnerships, 415, domestic violence, 298–299, door-in-the-face technique, 196, 197, dopamine, 505, 506, double standard, of aging, 348, 352, sexual, 297, downsizing, 393, downtime, using, 125, Dr. Laura, 5–6, dream analysis, 523, drinking, 160, 456–459, by college students, 456, health risks of, 458–459, problem, 458–459, reasons for, 457–458, short-term risks of, 457–458, social costs of, 459, drives, 38, 53, driving, aging and, 352–353, drunk, 458, drug companies, 539, drug research, 540, drug therapies, 521, 536–540, antianxiety drugs, 537, antidepressant drugs, 538–539, antipsychotic drugs, 537–538, effectiveness of, 539–540, mood stabilizers, 539, for mood disorders, 500, for posttraumatic stress disorder, 535

Page 678 :
drug use/abuse, 472–477, basic concepts in, 473–474, stress and, 92, 109, drug-centered lifestyle, 474, drugs (recreational), dependence on, 473, 474, effects of, 473, 474, risks of using, 473–474, tolerance to, 473, See also specific drugs, drunk driving, 458, DSM diagnostic system, 485, 486, dual-earner households, 282, 383, 348,, 395–396, dying, stages of, 359, , E, Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy (Willett), 465, eating, stress and, 109, eating disorders, 141, 322, 509–513, course and outcome of, 513, etiology of, 511–513, gender differences in, 309, prevalence of, 510–511, self-efficacy and, 159, stress and, 92, types of, 510, eating habits, 462–464, eclectic therapy, 542, 548, ecstasy (MDMA), 477, ECT, 540–541, education, continuing, 382, earnings and, 384–385, occupation and, 375, 376, educational attainment, happiness and, 20, effectiveness, time management and, 122123, efficiency, 122, 124–125, in person perception, 179–180, ego, 36, 37, ego-based conflicts, 223, ego depletion model, 158, ego integrity, 350, ego threats, 149, ejaculation, 339, 421, premature, 437, 439, elaboration likelihood model, 188–189, Elavil, 538, elder care, 278, 355, elderly. See aging, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), 540–541, e-mail, 203–204, 211, 216, emetic drugs, 534, emoticons, 211, emotional arousal, polygraph testing of, 212, 213, self-efficacy and, 160, emotional expression, gender differences in,, 308–309, emotional intelligence, 125–126, Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter, More Than IQ (Goleman), 126, emotional responses, classical conditioning of, 46, Ellis’s ABC model of, 115–116, emotions, 81–82, in adolescents, 343, appealing to, 187, basic, 207–208, clarification of, 525, communicating, 206, defined, 82, , disclosing, 215-216, expressing, 208, facial expressions for, 207–208, male role and, 320, negative, 108–109, 112, 360, 448, 497,, 82–83, positive, 83–84, reading others’, 213, releasing, 126–127, in schizophrenia, 503, self-discrepancies and, 141, suppressed, 126, in response to traumatic events, 82, empathy, 214, 224, of therapist, 525, empiricism, 13, employees, background checking of, 400, diversity of, 385–387, flexible schedules for, 390–391, independent, 382–383, temporary, 383, wellness programs for, 390, employers, researching, 401–402, employment, seeking, 399–403, employment agencies, 402, employment opportunities, for women, 324, empty nest, 278–279, 349, encoding, 202, encounter group movement, 527, encounters, initial, 239-244, encouragement, 160, endocrine system, 87–88, 312–313, 338, End of Stress as We Know It, The (McEwen),, 75, endogamy, 272, Enron, 194, environment, heredity and, 59, 63, environmental problems, 4, epidemics, 443, epidemiology, 485, epinephrine, 73, erectile difficulties, 436–437, 438–439, erogenous zones, 422, erotic preferences, 408, 419, est training, 8, estrogen, 354, 408, 409, 430, ethnic groups, psychotherapy and, 543, support networks in, 351, in workplace, 385, 386, 387, See also culture; minority groups, ethnic stereotypes, 176, 183, ethnicity, gender-role socialization and, 315, 316, self-esteem and, 151, 307–308, stress and, 75, etiology, 483, etiquette, for cell phone use, 203, euphoria, from alcohol, 457, in bipolar disorder, 498–499, from hallucinogens, 476, from sedatives, 475, from stimulants, 475, European Union, 397, evolutionary perspective, on attraction, 243–244, on fight-or-flight response, 85–86, on gender differences, 311, on mate selection, 273–274, on obesity, 460, on personality, 58–59, , evolutionary psychology, 58–59, exchange relationships, 248, exchange theory, 247–248, 274, excitement phase, of sexual response cycle,, 420, executive recruiters, 402, exemplification, 163, exercise, aging and, 355, benefits of, 465–466, lack of, 465, program for, 466–467, self-efficacy and, 50, weight loss and, 462, expectations, for females, 320–324, gender-role, 310, happiness and, 23, for males, 318–320, for parenthood, 277, perceiver, 174–176, person perception and, 180, 183, role, 279–281, self-esteem and, 148, experimental group, 14, experimental research, 13–14, 15, explanatory style, 96–97, 153–154, 500, 501, expressive style, 331, expressiveness, 305, extinction, in classical conditioning, 46–47, in operant conditioning, 48, extradyadic sex, 427–429, extramarital sex, 427–429, extraversion, 22, 34, 42, 56, 57, 58, 59, eye contact, 172, 208-209, 216, 218, , F, facial expressions, 207–208, facial features, attractiveness and, 240–241, failure, as source of stress, 76, reflected, 157, false memory syndrome, 530–532, familiarity, as factor in attraction, 240, family, balancing work and, 395–396, career choice and, 375, eating disorders and, 511–512, nuclear, 271, personality and, 58, schizophrenia and, 508, sexual identity and, 409–410, See also marriage; parenting, family life cycle, 275–279, family structures, 271, 290, fantasies, sexual, 422, 423, 435–436, fantasy, as defense mechanism, 111, 112, 113, fat, in diet, 463, 464, fat cells, 461, fatalism, 107, fathers, involvement with children, 320, fear appeals, 187, fear(s), conditioned, 490, 491, irrational, 488, as response to stress, 83, as response to traumatic events, 82, feedback, self-concept and, 144–145, fellatio, 423, femininity, 305, 327, 328, fertility awareness, 430, fiber, in diet, 464, , Subject Index, , 641

Page 679 :
fight-or-flight response, 85, firstborns, 42, fitness, physical, 465–466, fitness training, 466, five-factor model, 358, fixation, 40, flash mobs, 191, 192, flashbacks, drug, 476, emotional, 82, flexibility, in problem solving, 119, flirting, 297, fluoxetine, 538, flying, terrorist threat and, 120, food consumption, 459–464, food pyramid, 464, 465, foot-in-the-door technique, 195–196, Foreman, George, 187, foreplay, 421, forewarning, of persuasion attempts, 188, forgetting, 27–28, forgiveness, 128, Frank, Ann, 176, fraternal twins, 57, Free Agent Nation (Pink), 383, free agents, 383, free association, 522–523, Friendshifts (Yager), 249, friendships, 248–250, gender differences in, 249, 351, initial attraction in, 239–245, for older adults, 351, See also relationships; social support, frigidity, 437, frustration, 40, 76, 79, 83, 108, frustration-aggression hypothesis, 108, fugue, dissociative, 494, fundamental attribution error, 177–178, 183, , G, GABA, 490, gambling, online, 110, game playing, 221, 297, games, 398, gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB), 296, gay marriage, 415, gays. See homosexuals, homosexuality, gaze, 209, gender, defined, 303–304, gender bias, in media, 317–318, in occupational tests, 377, in schools, 317, gender differences, 306–310, in attraction, 240, 241, 243, in aggression, 308, 311, in attaining identity achievement, 347, biological bases of, 311–313, in brain organization, 312, in career development, 381, in cognitive abilities, 306–307, in communication styles, 309, 329-333, in conformity, 308, defined, 304, in depressive disorder, 498, in divorce adjustment, 288, in eating disorders, 510–511, in emotional expression, 308–309, environmental origins of, 313–318, in eye contact, 209, in facial expression, 208, in fight-or-flight response, 85–86, in friendships, 249, 351, , 642, , Subject Index, , in happiness, 20, hormones and, 312–313, in infidelity, 428, in loneliness, 262, regarding love, 251, in marriage age, 272–273, in matching effect, 242, in mate selection, 273–274, in mathematical abilities, 306–307, in meaning of touch, 210, in mood disorders, 498, 500, in nonverbal communication, 309, in orgasm patterns, 421, in personal space, 207, in personality traits, 307–309, in posture, 210, in psychological disorders, 309–310, in reading nonverbal cues, 213, in seeking medical treatment, 470, in seeking psychotherapy, 519, in self-disclosure, 217, in self-esteem, 151, 307–308, in self-views, 146, in sexual satisfaction, 426, in sexual socialization, 411, 413, in sexual standards, 297, in sexuality, 308, 418, in spatial abilities, 307, 311, in verbal skills, 306–307, in violence, 308, 320, in vulnerability to posttraumatic stress, disorder, 495, gender discrimination, 323, 324, gender-free society, 329, gender identity, 304, gender-identity disorders, 486, gender roles, 304, 313–314, 318–324, gender-role identity, 304, 327, gender-role socialization, 314–318, gender-role transcendence, 328, changing, 270, 326–327, housework and, 281, observational learning and, 49, gender schemas, 315, gender stereotypes, 176, 304–306, 322, gender-typed individuals, 327, general adaptation syndrome, 86–87, generalized anxiety disorder, 487–488, generativity vs. stagnation, 348, genetic predisposition/vulernability, to anxiety disorders, 490, to eating disorders, 511, to homosexuality, 414, 415, to mood disorders, 499–500, to obesity, 460, to schizophrenia, 505, genetics, behavioral, 57–58, genital stage, 41, genital warts, 433, genitals, 422, during intercourse, 420–422, oral stimulation of, 423, at puberty, 338, 339 409, giving up, 107–108, glass ceiling, 325, 386, Glass Ceiling Commission, 386, glass escalator, 325, globalization, 393, glory, reflected, 156–157, glove anesthesia, 492, goals, clarifying, 124, setting, 133, 165, , superordinate, 185, unrealistic, 76, 166, gonads, 338, 408, gonorrhea, 433, Goodall, Jane, 356, government, pro-marriage movement and,, 287, grandeur, delusions of, 503, grandparent role, 349, gratification, 40, delaying, 158, Green, Reg and Maggie, 128, grief, as response to stress, 83, as response to traumatic events, 82, grieving, 360–361, group membership, social identity and, 184, group therapy, 527–528, 535, growth needs, 53, growth spurt, adolescent, 338, 339, guilt, 112, 36, 39, sexual, 413, 434, , H, habits, health-impairing, 452–467, hair, aging and, 352, Haldol, 537, hallucinations, 503, hallucinogens, 473, 474, 476, hand gestures, 210, hangovers, 457, happiness, correlates of, 19–23, marriage and, 291, materialism and, 2, measurement of, 19, self-esteem and, 147–148, hardiness, 95–96, hassles scale, 71, hate crimes, 181, 415–416, hate speech, 225, headhunters, 402, health, happiness and, 20–21, health advice, ignoring, 160, health care, 354, costs of, 541, health-impairing habits, 452–467, health maintenance organizations (HMOs),, 541–542, health providers, communicating with,, 470–471, health psychology, 444, hearing problems, 352, heart attack, 445, 446, 448, 449, heart disease, 444, 445–449, aging and, 354, depression and, 449, diet and, 462–463, emotional reactions and, 448–449, exercise and, 466, job stress and, 389, 390, mortality rates for, 444, personality and, 445–448, smoking and, 454, stimulant use and, 475, weight and, 460, hedonic adaptation, 23, hedonic treadmill, 23, height, aging and, 352, hemispheric specialization, 312, hepatitis, 433, heredity, anxiety disorders and, 490

Page 680 :
eating disorders and, 511, environment and, 59, 63, homosexuality and, 414, 415, mood disorders and, 499, obesity and, 460, personality and, 56, 57-58, schizophrenia and, 505, See also genetic predisposition, heritability ratios, 57, heroes, need for, 61, heroin, 474–475, herpes, 433, heterosexism, 250, heterosexuals, 250, 408, 413, hexagonal model, of career choice, 378, hidden agenda, 214, 221, hierarchy of needs, 53–54, High Price of Materialism (Kasser), 2, highly active antiretroviral therapy, 468, Hill, Anita, 391, Hispanic Americans, elder care among, 355, family relationships of, 351, gender-role socialization and, 315, 316, gender stereotypes and, 305, in workforce, 385, self-esteem in, 151, stress and, 75, histrionic personality, 493, HIV infection, 424, 431, 432, 468, hobbies, 397, holistic mentality, 178, home, working at, 383, homogamy, 272–273, homophobia, 320, 415–416, homosexual relationships, 239, 241, 248,, 259–251, 292–295, 348, homosexuality, attitudes toward, 415–416, concealing, 126, disclosing, 416, origins of, 414–415, prevalence of, 293, homosexuals, 408, 413, adjustment of, 417, adolescent, 344, AIDS and, 468, heterosexual activity of, 426, as parents, 295, 417, percent of population, 413, romantic relationships of, 250–251, sexual behavior in, 422, 423, 424, 427, honesty, 214, “hooking up,” 426, hopelessness theory, 500, hormone-based contraceptives, 430–431, hormones, 312–313, 87-88, aging and, 354, homosexuality and, 414, puberty and, 338, sexuality and, 408–409, hospitals, mental health services of, 546, hostility, 40, 225, between groups, 183. 185, heart disease and, 445–448, managing, 127–128, household chores, 323, 348, gender and, 315–316, in marriage, 280–281, How to Grow Up When You’re Grown Up, 347, How to Stubbornly Refuse to Make Yourself, Miserable About Anything (Ellis), 116, Hughes, Howard, 489, 493, , human immunodeficiency virus. See HIV, human nature, 51, 55, human potential movement, 51, human service agencies, 546, Human Sexuality Today (King), 425, humanism, 51, humanistic perspectives, 51–55, evaluation of, 55, Maslow’s self-actualization theory, 53–54, Rogers’s person-centered theory, 51–53, humor, as stress reducer, 117–118, hunting-and-gathering societies, 311, 326, Hurried Child, The (Elkind), 341, hydrophobia, 488, hypertension, 460, 463, hypnosis, memory and, 530, hypoactive sexual desire, 437–438, 439, hypochondriasis, 492–493, hypothalamus, 87, , I, id, 36, 37, identical twins, 55–56, 57, identification, as defense mechanism, 39, group, 192, identity, career choice and, 374, gender-role, 327, search for, 342-343, sexual, 408, 409–411, social, 184, identity crisis, 342, 346, identity statuses, 342-343, 347, career maturity and, 381, illness, biopsychosocial model of, 444, life changes and, 79, reactions to, 469–472, stress and, 87, 92–93, See also disease(s); health-impairing habits, illusions, of control, 155, defense mechanisms as, 112-113, imitation, 49, 314, immune functioning, marijuana and, 476, stress and, 88, 95, 96, 450–451, impatience, 446, impotence, 437, impression formation, 172–180, impression management, 162–164, 208, in job interviews, 403, impressions, first, 172, 174, 180, 403, income, children and, 283, education and, 384, happiness and, 20, job identity and, 374, incongruence, in personality, 52, 524–525, independent variable, 14, independent view of self, 145–146, India, 236, 237, individual differences, 310, individual psychology, 42–43, individualism, 145, self-esteem and, 151, individualistic cultures, adversarial approach in, 225, attributions in, 178, interpersonal conflict in, 221, love in, 237, self-disclosure in, 217, , self-enhancement in, 155, self-serving bias in, 156, industrial/organizational (I/O) psychology,, 373, infant attachment, 252–253, 363, infectious diseases, 443–444, inferiority complex, 42, infidelity, 427–429, inflammation, heart disease and, 445, 446, influence, normative vs. informational, 191, Influence: Science and Practice (Cialdini),, 189, 195, influenza, schizophrenia and, 506, information, memorizing, 27–29, information processing, 152, aging and, 356, ingratiation, 163, ingroup favoritism, 184, ingroups, 176, 182–183, inhibitions, 126–127, 263, conditioned, 56, inkblot test, 67, insanity, 508, insight therapies, 518, 522–529, 543, client-centered, 522–524, cognitive, 526–527, effectiveness of, 528–529, 548, group, 527–528, psychoanalytic, 522–524, instrumental style, 331, instrumentality, 305, integrity vs. despair, 350, intellectualization, 111, intelligence, aging and, 355, constructive coping and, 115, emotional, 125–126, gender differences in, 306, happiness and, 20, occupation and, 374, intercourse, sexual, 421, interdependence theory, 247–248, interdependent view of self, 145–146, interest inventories, 377, interests, occupation and, 374–375, 377, interference, in learning, 27–28, Internet, infidelity and, 428, interpersonal communication and,, 203–204, job boards on, 402, for overcoming loneliness, 264, relationships via, 237–238, sexual activities and, 17–18, 412, as source of news, 205, as source of sex information, 411, surfing, 397, Internet addiction, 109–110, 264, Internet sex addiction, 412, interpersonal climate, 214, interpersonal communication, 202–204, See also communication, interpretation, in psychoanalysis, 523, interviews, job, 402–403, In the Wake of 9/11 (Pyszczynski, Solomon,, & Greenberg), 61, intimacy, 245–246, in friendships, 249–250, love and, 251–252, 256, 257, sex and, 308, 320, 411, intimacy statuses, 346–347, intimacy vs. isolation, 346–347, intimidation, 163, , Subject Index, , 643

Page 681 :
introducing oneself, 215, introversion, 42, 56, inverted-U hypothesis, 84–85, investments, in relationships, 247, IQ score, aging and, 355, coping ability and, 115, happiness and, 20, irrational thinking, 116, 117, irritability, as response to traumatic events,, 82, irritable bowel syndrome, 450, Is It Worth Dying For? (Eliot & Breo), 448, ischemia, 445, 448, IUD, 430, , J, Japan, 194, 236, 360, jigsaw classroom, 185, job discrimination, 323, 385, 386, 388, job interviews, 402–403, job loss, 388, 393, 394, job openings, 402, job satisfaction, 376, happiness and, 21, marital satisfaction and, 281, job search, 399–403, job skills, 382, job stress, 387–391, Jones, James Earl, 187, judgment(s), errors in, 176, of others, 223, snap vs. systematic, 172–173, withholding, 214, just world, belief in, 178, 179, juvenile delinquents, 344, , K, kinesics, 210, kissing, 422–423, Korea, 177, 194, , L, labor force. See workforce, latency stage, 41, latent memory, 41, law, psychological disorders and, 508, laws, marriage, 287, leadership, 35, learned helplessness, 107–108, 154, 500, learning, by classical conditioning, 45–47, lifelong, 382, observational, 49, by operant conditioning, 47–49, lectures, 26–27, leisure activities, 397–398, lesbians, 293, 295, 408, 414, 422, 424, 428, See also homosexuals, homosexuality, Levitra, 438, lie detector, 212, 213, life changes, 78–80, life expectancy, 319, smoking and, 454, Life Experience Survey (LES), 98–101, Life Orientation Test, 96, likeability, of sources, 187, liking, reciprocal, 244, link method, 29, listening, 202, 209, 216, barriers to, 220, effective, 218–219, in lectures, 26–27, , 644, , Subject Index, , in relationships, 332, lithium, 539, loneliness, 152, 260–265, causes of, 262, correlates of, 263–265, overcoming, 264–265, prevalence of, 261–262, types of, 260–261, longitudinal studies, 358, loss, coping with, 360–362, of job, 388, 393, 394, as source of stress, 76, love, 250, as attachment, 252–256, cultural views of, 237, gender differences in, 251, happiness and, 21, marriage and, 236, sex and, 411, 418, triangular theory of, 251–252, unconditional, 52, See also romantic love, Loving Someone Gay (Clark), 417, lowball technique, 196, LSD, 476, lung cancer, 454, luxuries, 2, lying, 211–212, , M, major depressive disorder, 497–498, maladaptive behavior, 483, male role, 318–320, malingering, 492, malnutrition, schizophrenia and, 506, managed care, 541–542, mania, 497, 498–499, manic-depressive disorder, 498–499, mantra, 128, MAO inhibitors, 538, marijuana, 476–477, marital satisfaction, 349, 426, children and, 277, over family life cycle, 276–278, work and, 281–282, marital status, happiness and, 21, 22, marital success, predictors of, 274–275, marriage, adjusting to, 347–348, age at, 270, 274, 275, 347, 291, alternatives to, 290–295, arranged, 236–237, communication problems in, 283–285, culture and, 236–237, defined, 270, dissolution of, 285–290, financial problems in, 282–283, gay, 293, 415, government regulation of, 287, health benefits of, 291, interracial, 272, masturbation in, 423, motivation toward, 272, 273, open, 427, postponing, 271, 276, role expectations in, 279–281, sex before, 425–426, sex in, 426–427, stages in, 275–279, violence in, 297–299, work and, 281–282, marriage mandate, 320, Masculine Self, The (Kilmartin), 319, , masculinity, 305, 319, 327, 328, masculinity crisis, 319, mass communication, 205, masturbation, 339, 423, 439, matching hypothesis, 242, mate, desired characteristics in, 240, 241, 243, mate selection, 243–244, 246, 272–274, materialism, 2, 4, 60, mathematical abilities, gender differences in,, 306–307, Mating Game, The (Regan), 256, Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional, Intelligence Test, 125–126, MDMA, 477, meaning, search for, 3, 4, 5, media, role in gender-role socialization, 317–318, as source of sex information, 410–411, traumatic events and, 205, violence in, 226, medical advice, adherence to, 471–472, medical consultation, 470, medical model, 482, meditation, 128–129, Mellaril, 537, memories, repressed, 529–532, memorization, 27–29, memory, aging and, 356–358, arousal and, 84, marijuana use and, 477, principles of, 27–29, memory loss, 494, with age, 353, 357, men. See gender differences; gender roles;, masculinity, men’s rights movement, 319, menarche, 339, menopause, 354, menstruation, 339, mental abilities, aging and, 355-358, gender differences in, 306–307, mental ability tests, 64, mental health professions, 521, mental health services, 542, 543–544, 545,, 546, mental hospitals, commitment to, 508–509, population in, 537, pseudopatients in, 484–485, mental processes, 12, mental rotation, 307, mentors, 347, 349, mere exposure effect, 240, mescaline, 476, messages, 202, persuasive, 186, 187–188, Messages: The Communication Skills Book, (McKay, Davis, & Fanning), 214, meta-analysis, 306, method of loci, 29, Michelangelo phenomenon, 145, Michelle Remembers (Smith & Pazder), 496, midlife crisis, 349–350, mifepristone (RU 486), 431, military, women in, 391, mindfulness, 152, 173, 177, 178, 184, 189, minding, of relationships, 246, mindlessness, 152, 184, minerals, 464, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality, Inventory (MMPI), 65, minority groups

Page 682 :
mental health services and, 543, prejudice against, 181–182, self-esteem of, 151, stereotypes of, 176, 183, stress and, 75, in workforce, 385, 386, See also ethnic groups; specific minorities, Mismeasure of Woman, The (Tavris), 323, M’Naghten rule, 508, mnemonic devices, 28–29, models (modeling), 49, 160, for gender roles, 314, for social skills, 536, modernization, 74, money, happiness and, 20, marriage and, 282–283, monogamy, 271, mood disorders, 486, 487, 496–502, bipolar disorder, 498–499, cognitive factors in, 500–501, etiology of, 499–502, genetic vulnerability to, 499–500, interpersonal roots of, 501–502, major depressive disorder, 497–498, neurochemical factors in, 500, prevalence of, 498, stress and, 502, mood stabilizers, 539, morphine, 474, mortality rates, exercise and, 466, from health-impairing behavior, 453, for major diseases, 444, mortality salience, 60, 61, motherhood mandate, 320–321, mother-infant bonding, 256, motivation, persuasion and, 189, reinforcement and, 47, motives, Maslow’s hierarchy of, 53–54, for self-understanding, 154–155, sexual, 418, mourning, 360, Multicultural Manners: New Rules of, Etiquette for a Changing Society (Dresser),, 203, multimodal therapy, 548, multiple personality disorder, 494–496, Mundugumor, 314, music videos, 317, 411, myocardial infarction, 445, myocardial ischemia, 445, 448, mythopoetic movement, 319, , N, narcissism, 148–149, narcotics, 473, 474–475, Nardil, 538, narrative methods, 28, 29, National Business Employment Weekly, 402, National Television Violence Study, 226, Native Americans, 354, natural selection, 58, 243, 311, naturalistic observation, 16–17, nature vs. nurture, 63, in gender differences, 311, in personality, 57–58, need for self-actualization, 53–54, needs, hierarchy of, 53–54, negative correlation, 16–17, negative emotionality, 35, negative reinforcement, 47–48, 369, , negative self-talk, 111, 115, 167, 264, negative thinking, 500–501, 526, neglectful parents, 149, 364, 365, 367, NEO Personality Inventory, 66, neurodevelopmental hypothesis, of, schizophrenia, 506–507, neurons, 353, neuroses, 522, neuroticism, 34–35, 58, 59, 60, 493, marital adjustment and, 275, stress and, 98, neurotransmitters, 490, 500, 505, news programs, 205, newsgroups, 238, nicotine, 475, nicotine substitutes, 456, no, saying, 121, noise, in communication, 203, in environment, 73, nonverbal communication, 202, 205–213, assertive, 229, culture and, 206, deception and, 211-212, elements of, 206–211, gender differences in, 309, 331, impression formation and, 172, in job interviews, 403, self-disclosure and, 216, significance of, 213, norepinephrine, 73, 500, normality, criteria of, 483–485, norms, social, 37, 38, 413, note taking, in lectures, 26–27, novelty, in relationships, 259, nuclear family, 271, Nun study, 353, 354, nursing homes, 354, nurturing role, 310, nutrients, essential, 464, nutrition, 462–465, nutritional deficiencies, 463, , O, obedience, 192–194, obesity, 241, 459–461, fear of, 510, observation, naturalistic, 16-17, person perception and, 172, observational learning, 49, of gender roles, 314, obsessions, 489, obsessive-compulsive disorder, 489–490, occupation, choosing, 347, 374–378, marriage and, 281–282, occupational choice, Holland’s model of, 378–379, Super’s model of, 379–381, occupational interest inventories, 377, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 376, 401, occupations, high-growth, 383–384, high-stress, 388, 389, information about, 376–377, personal characteristics and, 374–375, for women, 324, Oedipal complex, 40–41, 414, olanzapine, 538, omega 3 fatty acids, 462–463, opening lines, 215, openness to experience, 35, 58, 59, operant conditioning, 47–49, , of anxiety disorders, 490, in behavior therapies, 533, observational learning and, 49, socialization and, 314, opiates, 474, opinions, expressing, 214, optimal level of arousal, 84–85, optimism, 113, 96–97, happiness and, 22, unrealistic, 155, optimistic explanatory style, 96–97, 153–154, oral contraceptives, 430–431, oral presentations, 220, oral sex, 423, oral stage, 40, organic mental disorders, 486, orgasmic difficulties, 437, 439, orgasmic phase, of sexual response cycle, 421, orgasms, age and, 427, faking, 422, gender differences in, 421–422, osteoporosis, 354, 355, 463, 510, outgroup derogation, 184, outgroup homogeneity effect, 176, outgroups, 176, 182–183, outlining, 28, outsourcing, 383, overcommunication, 220, overcompensation, 42, 111, 113, overdose, 474, alcohol, 457, cocaine, 476, heroin, 474, sedative, 475, overeating, 134, 160, 459–461, overlearning, 27, overweight, 459, See also obesity; weight, Oxycontin, 474, , P, panic disorder, 488–489, Paradox of Choice, The (Schwarz), 8, paralanguage, 210–211, paralysis, 492, paranoid schizophrenia, 503, paraphrasing, 218, parasympathetic division, 85, parent, death of, 361, parental control, 364, parental investment theory, 243, parenthood, 277–278, 348, happiness and, 20, parenting, 226–227, 349, 362–369, child’s self-esteem and, 149, effective, 367, parenting styles, 149–151, 364–365, 367, career choice and, 375, infant attachment and, 252–253, parents, of adolescents, 278, aging, 278, 351, conflict with adolescents, 343, discipline by, 48, feedback from, 144, homosexual, 295, 417, role in gender-role socialization, 315–316, role in personality development, 58, as source of sex information, 409, 410, paroxetine, 538, partner abuse, 297–299, passion, 252, 256, passive aggression, 228, , Subject Index, , 645

Page 683 :
pathology, 482, patriotism, 61, Paxil, 538, peer pressure, 367, peers, role in gender-role socialization, 316–317, as source of sex information, 410, penis, 420, 424, 431, penis envy, 40, perception, distorted, 503, expectations and, 174–176, person, 172–180, of self, 143–145, perfection, paralysis of, 122, perfectionism, 275, 511, perform, pressure to, 80, 89, 386, performance, arousal and, 84–85, periodontal disease, 450, Permanent Partners (Berzon), 434, permissive parenting, 149, 364, 365, 367, persecution, delusions of, 503, person perception, 172–180, cognitive distortions in, 176–178, perceiver expectations and, 174–176, role of attributions in, 173–174, key themes in, 179–180, online, 180, self-fulfilling prophecies in, 175–176, snap judgments in, 172–173, personal orientations, 378–379, personal space, 206–207, personal unconscious, 41, personality, 34, Adler’s view of, 42–43, in adolescence, 341–344, aging and, 358, authoritarian, 182, Bandura’s view of, 49–50, behavioral perspectives on, 44–51, biological perspectives on, 55–59, cancer-prone, 450, career choice and, 378–379, eating disorders and, 511, evolutionary perspective on, 58–59, family environment and, 58, five-factor model of, 34–35, Freud’s theory of, 35–41, fundamental traits of, 34, 35, happiness and, 21–22, healthy, 54, heart disease and, 445–448, heredity and, 56, 57–58, humanistic perspectives on, 51–55, Jung’s theory of, 41–42, marital success and, 275, Maslow’s view of, 53–54, multiple, 494–496, occupation and, 374, psychodynamic theories of, 35–44, Rogers’s view of, 51–53, self-monitoring and, 164, somatoform disorders and, 493, stability of, 358, personality development, Adler’s view of, 42, 43, behavioral perspectives on, 44, 47, 48, 63, Freud’s view of, 39–41, 63, Rogers’s view of, 52, 53, 63, personality structure, Eysenck’s view of, 56, 57, 63, Freud’s view of, 36–37, 63, Rogers’s view of, 51–52, 63, , 646, , Subject Index, , personality tests, 64–67, personality traits, 34–35, gender differences in, 307–309, aging and, 358, attraction and, 245, basic, 34, 35, 56, 57, gender and, 327–328, heritability of, 57, 58, related to parenting styles, 364–365, person-centered theory, 51–53, person-centered therapy, 524, persuasion, 185–189, central route to, 188–189, elaboration likelihood model of,, 188–189, elements of, 186–188, message factors in, 187–188, peripheral route to, 188, 189, receiver factors in, 188, source factors in, 186–187, pessimism, 117, pessimistic explanatory style, 96, 107–108,, 153–154, 500, pets, as source of support, 95, phallic stage, 40–41, pharmaceutical industry, 539, phobias, conditioning of, 46, 490, preparedness and, 491, self-efficacy and, 159, types of, 488, phobic disorder, 488, systematic desensitization for, 533–534, physical appearance, aging and, 352, impression formation and, 172, in job interviews, 403, stereotypes based on, 176–177, television portrayal of, 318, physical attractiveness. See attractiveness, physical dependence, on drugs, 473, 474, physical development, in adolescence,, 338–340, physical fitness, 465–566, physique, attractiveness and, 240–241, 322, pituitary gland, 88, 338, planning, 124, plateau phase, of sexual response cycle,, 420–421, play activities, 330, gender and, 315–316, 317–318, pleasure principle, 36, policy conflicts, 222, political campaigns, 226, politics, mortality salience and, 60, polygraph, 212, 213, pornography, 296–297, positions, sexual, 424, positive correlation, 16–17, positive emotionality, 22, 34, positive psychology movement, 55, 93, positive reinforcement, 47–48, 132, 369, Positively Gay (Berzon), 417, postpartum depression, 277, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 82,, 90–91, 95, 96, 296, 361, risk factors for, 495, treatment for, 535, posture, 210, poverty, 74, 283, practice, distributed, 27, preconscious, 37, prefrontal cortex, 506, , pregnancy, 339, fear of, 413, pregnancy rates, 424, prejudice, 75, 181–185, causes of, 182–184, discrimination and, 181, reducing, 184, sexual, 415–416, terror management and, 60, 61, in workplace, 386, 387, premature ejaculation, 437, 439, prenatal development, gender differentiation in, 313, homosexuality and, 414, schizophrenia and, 506–507, sexual differentiation in, 408–409, preparedness, 491, pressure, choking under, 89, to perform, 80, 89, 386, social, 192, as source of stress, 80–81, to succeed, 319–320, Pressure Inventory, 80, primacy effect, 180, primary process thinking, 36, primary sex characteristics, 338, 339, 409, problem solving, 116, aging and, 356, in adolescence, 340, mathematical, 306, systematic, 118–119, procrastination, 122, 160, 470, productivity, aging and, 356, 357, stress and, 388–389, profeminism, 319, professions, as careers, 374, job growth in, 383–384, progesterone, 430, progestin pills, 430, 431, prognosis, 483, progress, paradox of, 2–4, progressive relaxation, 129, projection, 39, projective tests, 66–67, pro-marriage movement, 287, Promise Keepers, 319, proteins, 464, proxemics, 206, proximity, 239–240, Prozac, 538, psilocybin, 476, psuedoconflicts, 222, psychiatrists, 518, 521, 546, psychoanalysis, 36, 522–524, 543, psychoanalytic theory, 35–41, psychobabble, 8, psychodynamic theories, Adler’s, 42–43, evaluation of, 43–44, Freud’s, 35–41, Jung’s, 41–42, psychological dependence, on drugs, 473,, 474, psychological disorders, classification of, 485, 486, diagnosis of, 483, Freud’s view of, 38, 41, gender differences in, 309–310, legal aspects of, 508–509, prevalence of, 485, 487

Page 684 :
treatment of, 517–549, See also specific disorders, psychological tests, 64–67, for career decisions, 377, psychologists, 520–521, psychology, defined, 11, health, 444, positive, 55, 93, as profession, 12, research methods in, 13–19, as science, 11–12, theoretical diversity of, 62–63, psychopathology, 482, psychopharmacotherapy, 536, psychosexual stages, 39–41, psychosocial development, stages of, 342,, 346–347, 348, 350, psychosomatic diseases, 92, Psychotherapy Maze, The (Ehrenberg &, Ehrenberg), 529, psychotherapy, barriers to seeking, 519, behavioral approaches to, 518, 529–536,, 543, benefits of, 529, biomedical approaches to, 518, 536–540,, 543, blending approaches to, 542, client-centered approach to, 524–526, clients for, 518–519, cognitive approach to, 526–527, cost of, 547, cultural barriers to, 543–544, definition of, 517, 518, eclecticism in, 542, 548, effectiveness of, 528–529, 536, 547, 548, elements of, 518–522, group, 527–528, multimodal, 548, outcome of, 529, process of, 549, psychoanalytic approach to, 522–524, recovered memory controversy and,, 529–532, sources of, 545, 546, types of, 518, utilization rates for, 519, See also therapists, puberty, 338–340, 409, pubescence, 338, 339, 340, pubic lice, 433, public communication, 225–227, public speaking, 219–220, pulmonary diseases, 454, 476, punishment, in operant conditioning, 48, 134, of gender-inappropriate behavior, 314, parental, 368–369, Pursuit of Happiness: Who Is Happy—And, Why (Myers), 21, put-downs, 231, puzzles, 398, Pygmalion effect, 175, , Q, questions, diagnostic, 175, quetiapine, 538, , R, race, eye contact and, 209, racial profiling, 183, racial stereotypes, 75, 183, , racism, 75, 388, modern, 181, 182, radio, advice on, 5–6, news programming on, 205, Raelian UFO cult, 5, rage, as response to stress, 83, Raising Cain (Kindlon & Thompson), 319, rap music, 411, rape, 295–297, 458, rational outness, 416, rational-emotive behavior therapy, 115, 526,, 548, rationalization, 39, raves, 477, reactance, 197, reaction formation, 39, reading, improving, 25–26, leisure, 397, Real Boys (Pollack), 319, reality, denial of, 111, reality principle, 36, reasoning skills, 341, receiver, of message, 186, 188, 202, reciprocal liking, 244, reciprocity principle, 196–197, Reconcilable Differences (Christensen &, Jacobson), 282, recreation, 397–398, recreational drugs, 472–477, reference groups, 143, 151, reflex, conditioned, 45–46, refractory period, following orgasm, 421, 427, regression, 39, rehearsal, 27, reinforcement, 47–48, 132, 314, 369, reinforcement contingencies, 132-133, reinforcers, personal, 132, 134, reinterpretation, of events, 118, rejection, 167, poor social skills and, 501, rejection anxiety, 263-264, relationship maintenance, 246–247, relationships, 236–238, abusive, 299, building, 244–245, cohabiting, 270, 291–292, communicating in, 434–435, communicating about sex in, 418–419, culture and, 236-237, exchange theory of, 247–248, failure of, 257–258, Internet and, 237–238, maintaining, 245–248, minding, 246, priorities in, 294, self-disclosure in, 216–217, sex in, 426–427, See also friendship; homosexual, relationships; marriage; romantic, relationships, relaxation procedures, 129–130, relaxation training, 533, reliability, of psychological tests, 65, religion, happiness and, 21, remarriage, 289–290, repressed memories, recovery of, 529–532, repression, 39, reproductive fitness, 58, 311, research methods, 13–19, resilience, 83–84, in children, 366–367, , resistance, in psychoanalysis, 524, 548–549, resolution phase, of sexual response cycle,, 420, response tendencies, 44, responsibility, delegating, 121, résumé, 400–401, retention, improving, 27–29, retirement, 381, adjusting to, 350–351, revenge, 179, rewards, in relationships, 247, rhymes, for memorization, 28, rhythm method, 430, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), 182, risk taking, in adolescence, 341, 343, risks, underestimating, 453, ritual kind, 351–352, rituals, surrounding death, 360, road rage, 108, 209, 226, rock music, 411, rohypnol, 296, role changes, in early adulthood, 346, role conflicts, 281–282, role expectations, for females, 320–324, for males, 318–320, in marriage, 279–281, role models, 141, 314, role overload, 396, roles, marital, 280, multiple, 323, romantic love, 250–259, as attachment, 252–256, course of, 256–259, culture and, 236–237, theories of, 251–256, triangular theory of, 251-252, romantic relationships, ending of, 257–258, happiness and, 21, initial attraction in, 239–245, maintaining, 258–259, See also relationships, Rorschach test, 67, rumination, 498, 500, Rutherford, Tom, 530, , S, sadness, as response to stress, 83, safe sex, 432, salaries, 377, 384, 403, gender gap in, 324, 325, sales techniques, 195–197, salivation response, 45, salt intake, 463, 464, sandbagging, 157, sandwich generation, 278, scarcity principle, 197, scheduling, 24, 25, 124, schizophrenia, 486, 487, 502–508, brain abnormalities and, 505–506, 507, course and outcome of, 504–505, drug treatment for, 537–538, emergence of, 505, etiology of, 505–508, family dynamics and, 508, genetic vulnerability to, 505, neurochemical factors in, 505, neurodevelopmental hypothesis of,, 506–507, positive vs. negative symptoms in, 504, prevalence of, 502, , Subject Index, , 647

Page 685 :
schizophrenia (continued), prognosis for, 505, stress and, 92, 508, subtypes of, 503–504, symptoms of, 502–503, Schlessinger, Laura, 5–6, school killings, 361, schools, role in gender-role socialization, 317, sex education in, 410, sexual harassment in, 325, scientific method, 13, secondary process thinking, 36, secondary sex characteristics, 338, 339, 340,, 409, sedatives, 473, 474, 475, segregation, job, 386, selective attention, 152, 220, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, (SRRIs), 538–529, selectivity, in person perception, 180, self, independent view of, 145–146, interdependent view of, 145–146, public, 161–162, self-actualization, 53–54, self-assessment motive, 154, self-attributions, 152–153, 264, self-awareness, 160, blunting of, 142, self-blame, 82, 111, 148, self-cognition, 152, self-concept, 51–53, 140–145, career development and, 380, defined, 140, factors shaping, 142–146, realistic, 113, Rogers’s view of, 525, working, 140, self-consciousness, 89, self-consistency, 154–155, self-control, 125, 458, behavior modification for, 130–135, parental acceptance and, 364, Self-Creation (Weinberg), 7, self-deception, 39, 112, self-defeating attributional style, 264, 265, self-defeating behavior, 122, 160–161, Self-Defeating Behaviors (Cudney & Hardy),, 161, self-destructive behavior, 160, 452, Self-Directed Search (SDS), 377, 379, self-disclosure, 215–217, in friendships, 249, via Internet, 238, in romantic relationships, 258, self-discrepancies, 141–143, self-effacing bias, 156, self-efficacy, 49–50, 82, 158–160, acquiring, 159–160, correlates of, 159, traumatic events and, 367, Self-Efficacy Scale, 50, 65, self-enhancement, 155-157, self-esteem, 141, 146–151, academic, 151, adjustment and, 147–148, as anxiety buffer, 60, Big Five traits and, 35, building, 164–167, career maturity and, 381, cultural differences in, 151, cutting off reflected failure and, 157, defined, 146, , 648, , Subject Index, , development of, 149–151, ethnicity and, 151, gender differences in, 151, 307–308, gender schemas and, 315, happiness and, 22, importance of, 147–149, men’s, 319, narcissism and, 148–149, need for, 59, 60, parental acceptance and, 364, punishment and, 369, self-handicapping and, 157, social identity and, 184, stability of, 147, threats to, 112, threats to mortality and, 150, Self-Esteem (McKay & Fanning), 165, 166, self-fulfilling prophecies, 175–176, 244, 357, self-guides, 142, self-handicapping, 157, 160, self-help books, 6–9, self-help groups, 112, 528, self-image, distorted, 143, 144, self-improvement, 155, self-indulgence, 109–111, self-modification, 130–135, self-monitoring, 164, 208, self-motivation, 25, self-perception, 141, 152–157, self-perception theory, 196, self-preoccupation, 220, self-presentation, 161–164, self-preservation instinct, 59, self-promotion, 163, self-punishment, 134, self-realization, 5, self-regulation, 158–161, self-report inventories, 65-66, self-schemas, 140–141, self-serving bias, 156, self-socialization, 314–315, self-stimulation, 423, self-understanding, 154–155, self-verification motive, 154–155, selves, possible, 141, sender, of message, 202, senility, 353, sensate focus, 438–439, sensation-seeking scale, 66, sensitivity training, 544, September 11 attacks, 3, 61, 205, serotonin, 490, 500, 505, 538, sertraline, 538, service economy, 392, service occupations, 383–384, set-point theory, 461, settling-point theory, 461, sex, attitudes about, 419, casual, 426, 427, communication about, 410, 418–419,, 434–435, defined, 303, extramarital, 427–429, knowledge about, 409–411, 418, love and, 411, 418, online, 110, premarital, 425–426, safe, 432, sex chromosomes, 313, sex drive, 409, sex education, 410, 434, Sex Matters for College Students (Caron), 410, sex research, 407, 419, , sex therapy, 438–439, sexism, 181, 182, 324–326, in psychodynamic theories, 43, sexual abuse, repressed memories of, 529, sexual activities, 422–424, aging and, 354, in committed relationships, 426–427, enhancing, 434–436, online, 17–18, 412, sexual aggression, 297, sexual attitudes, 424, gender differences in, 308, sexual desire, 313, lack of, 437–438, 439, sexual differentiation, 408, sexual dysfunctions, 92, 320, 436–438, 477, sexual harassment, 325–326, 386, 391–392, Sexual Harassment on the Job (Petrocelli and, Repa), 391, sexual identity, 408, homosexual, 416–417, psychosocial influences on, 409–411, sexual impulses, Freud’s view of, 38, sexual maturation, 338, sexual motives, 418, sexual orientation, 250, 293, 304, 346, 408,, 413–417, in adolescents, 426, job discrimination and, 385–386, 388, See also homosexuality, homosexuals, sexual prejudice, 415, sexual response, 419–422, sexual revolution, 424, sexual values, 408, 434, sexuality, women and, 323–324, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), 423,, 431–434, prevalence of, 431, prevention of, 432, 434, principal types of, 432, 433, rates for, 424–425, shaping, 133, 230, 536, shyness, 160, 263, Shyness (Zimbardo), 262, siblings, relationships with, 351, sick role, 470, 493, Silkwood, Karen, 194, similarity, as factor in attraction, 242, 244–245, in marriage partners, 272, Simpson, O. J., 297, single parents, 396, singlehood, 270, 276, 290–291, Sixteen Personality Factor (16PF), Questionnaire, 65, 67, skills, mastering, 159, social, 265, 501, 535–536, study, 24–25, skin, aging of, 352, sleep problems, stress and, 92, small talk, 215, smiling, 172, smoking, 160, 454–456, cancer and, 454, health risks of, 454, 455, heart disease and, 445, mortality rate for, 453, prevalence of, 454, quitting, 454–456, stopping, 50, stress and, 109, snap judgments, 172–173, sociability, stress and, 95

Page 686 :
social activity, happiness and, 21, social categorization, 176, 182–183, social change, fear of, 182, social class, gender-role socialization and ,, 316, social clock, 345, 350, social cognitive theory, 49–50, 314, social comparison, 166, downward, 155–156, social comparison theory, 143, social constructionism, 310, social desirability bias, 66, social exchange theory, 247–248, 274, social identity theory, 184, social influence, to comply, 192–194, to conform, 190–192, culture and, 194, normative vs. informational, 191, tactics of, 195–197, social isolation, 345, 346, social learning theory. See social cognitive, theory, social norms, 37, 38, 413, social phobia, 488, 491, social pressure, 190–194, Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS),, 78–80, problems with, 97–98, social role theory, 310, 314, social skills, group therapy for, 528, loneliness and, 262, 263–264, 265, occupation and, 374, poor, 501, social skills training, 265, 535–536, social support, 249, adherence to medical advice and, 471, coronary risk and, 448, job loss and, 393, lack of, 502, loneliness and, 261, for older adults, 351–352, posttraumatic stress disorder and, 495, stress and, 94–95, 119, in traumatic events, 255, social workers, 521, socialization, 217, 313–314, gender-role, 314-318, sexual, 411, 413, socioeconomic status, occupation and, 375, self-esteem and, 307, sociometer theory, 148, sodomy, 424, somatization disorder, 492, somatoform disorders, 486, 491–493, etiology of, 493, types of, 492–493, source, of message, 186–187, spanking, 368, spatial abilities, gender differences in, 307,, 311, speaking, public, 219-220, spectatoring, 435, speech, functions of, 330, speech patterns, 211, spermarche, 339, spermicides, 430, sponge, contraceptive, 430, sports, 398, 467, spotlight effect, 162, spouse, loss of, 360–361, SQ3R, 25–26, , stage of exhaustion, 87, stage of resistance, 87, stages, of dying, 359, Erikson’s psychosocial, 342, 346–347, 348,, 350, Freud’s psychosocial, 346–347, of family life cycle, 275–279, of occupational life cycle, 380–381, standardization, of tests, 64, status, Big Five traits and, 35, eye contact and, 209, mate selection and, 243–244, personal distance and, 207, posture and, 210, touch and, 210, stepfamilies, 289–290, stereotype confirmation, 75, stereotypes, 176–177, 183, 304, of elderly, 357, gender, 304–306, overriding, 184, racial, 75, Stiller, Ben, 496, stimulants, 473, 474, 475–476, stimulus, aversive, 48, stimulus-value-role (S-V-R) theory, 274, Sting, 496, stonewalling, 285, Stop Smoking Workbook, The (Stevic-Rust &, Maximin), 456, stress, ambient, 73–74, anxiety disorders and, 491, appraisal of, 72–73, 81, 82, 98, behavioral responses to, 88–89, brain-body pathways in, 87–88, cancer and, 449–450, chronic, 92, defined, 71, disease and, 444, divorce and, 288, effects of, 89–93, emotional responses to, 81–85, environmental, 73–74, 76, 107, as everyday event, 71, exercise and, 466, heart disease and, 448, humor as moderator of, 117–118, immune functioning and, 450–451, influence of culture on, 74–75, job, 387–391, managing, 105–106, 113–130, moderator variables in, 94–97, monitoring, 97–101, mood disorders and, 502, overview of, 94, physiological responses to, 85–88, positive effects of, 93, prolonged, 87, 92, 389, from retirement, 351, schizophrenia and, 508, as self-imposed, 74, Selye’s view of, 86–87, social support and, 255, tolerance for, 93, 94–97, types of, 75–81, work-related, 90, stress management, 105–106, 113–130,, 389–390, 448, stress resistance, self-efficacy and, 50, stressors, acute, 75, , chronic, 75–76, minor, 71, stroke, 444, 446, Strong Interest Inventory (SII), 377, study skills, 24–25, subjective well-being, 19, 350, submissive communication, 227–228, substance-related disorders, 486, 487, sugar, in diet, 464, suicide, adolescent, 344–345, job loss and, 393, SRRI use and, 538–539, superego, 36, 37, superiority, striving for, 42, superordinate goals, 185, supplication, 163, support groups, 362, surveys, 17–18, Surviving Schizophrenia (Torrey), 507, swinging, 427, Sybil (Schreiber), 496, symbols, archetypal, 42, sympathetic division, 85, 87–88, syphilis, 433, systematic desensitization, 533–534, 548, , T, tardive dyskinesia, 538, task performance, arousal and, 84–85, procrastination and, 122, stress and, 89, Tchambuili, 314, teachers, role in gender-role socialization, 317, sexual harassment by, 326, technology, interpersonal communication and,, 203–204, 205, progress and, 2, in workplace, 382, 388, technostress, 387, teenage pregnancy, 424, television, body image and, 322, commercials on, 187, news programming on, 205, role in gender-role socialization, 317–318, sexual content of, 411, time taken by, 2, viewing, 398, violence on, 226, temperament, anxiety disorders and, 490, Ten Principles of Good Parenting, The, (Steinberg), 369, “tend and befriend” response, 85–86, terror management theory, 59–62, 150, 359, terrorism, 3, emotional reactions to, 82, posttraumatic stress disorder and, 495, psychological impact of, 61, self-esteem and, 150, thinking rationally about, 120, as vengeful aggression, 179, test anxiety, 84, 112, 159, test norms, 64, testosterone, 313, 409, tests, aptitude, 377, changing answers on, 16–17, personality, 64–67, projective, 66–67, mental ability, 64, , Subject Index, , 649

Page 687 :
tests (continued), psychological, 64, reliability of, 65, validity of, 65, textbooks, gender roles and, 317, text-messaging, 205, THC, 476, Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), 67, therapist(s), approach of, 547–548, in client-centered therapy, 525–526, in cognitive therapy, 526–527, false memory syndrome and, 530–532, finding, 544–549, gender of, 546–547, in group therapy, 527, for multicultural clients, 544, professional background of, 545–546, in psychoanalysis, 522–524, sexual exploitation by, 546–547, types of, 520–521, therapy. See psychotherapy, thinking, in adolescence, 340, attributional, 152–153, catastrophic, 111, 115–117, critical, 10, 11, distorted, 513, irrational, 167, 264, 503, negative, 500–501, 526, wishful, 112, thinness, 322, thioridazine, 537, 538, Thomas, Clarence, 391, Thorazine, 537, Three Psychologies: Perspectives from Freud,, Skinner, and Rogers (Nye), 52, TICKS (two-income households with kids),, 395, time, lack of, 2, Time Bind, The (Hochschild), 396, time log, 123, time management, 24, 120–125, Time Management from the Inside Out, (Morgenstern), 124, tobacco use, 454–456, toilet training, 40, token economy, 133, tokens, minorities as, 386, tolerance, of drugs, 473, touch, 210, 211, touching, sexual, 422–423, toy preferences, 315, tradeoffs, self-defeating, 160, tranquilizers, 537, transactional analysis, 221, transcendental meditation (TM), 128, transdermal patch, 430, transference, in psychoanalysis, 524, transvestic fetishism, 483, traumatic events, children and, 366–367, coping with, 449, prevalence of, 91, reactions to, 90–91, social support in, 255, See also posttraumatic stress disorder, travel, 397, treatment, seeking, 469–470, triangular theory of love, 251-252, tribadism, 424, trichomoniasis, 433, tricyclics, 538, trust, in infants, 363, trustworthiness, of sources, 186–187, , 650, , Subject Index, , tsunami disaster, 361, 362, twin studies, 55–56, 57, of depression, 499, of homosexuality, 414, 415, of obesity, 460, of schizophrenia, 505, 506, Type A personality, 446–447, Type B personality, 446, , U, ulcers, 450, unconditional love, 52, unconditional positive regard, 525, unconditioned response (UCR), 45–46, unconditioned stimulus (UCS), 45–46, unconscious, Freud’s view of, 37, 38, 41, 522, Jung’s view of, 41–42, underemployment, 384, undifferentiated schizophrenia, 504, undoing, 111, unemployment, 21, 392–394, unipolar disorders, 497, University of Minnesota twin study, 56, 57, urbanization, 74, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 376, Usher, 166, uterus, 420, , V, vacations, 397, vacillation, 77–78, vagina, 420, 421, 424, validity, psychological tests, 65, Valium, 475, 537, 539, valproate, 539, values, 222, sexual, 408, variables, 13–14, correlations between, 15–16, 18–19, vasocongestion, 420, ventricles, of brain, 506, 507, verbal abilities, gender differences in,, 306–307, Viagra, 438, victims, blaming, 178, 179, 183, of rape, 295–297, video games, 317, 398, Vienna Psychoanalytic Society, 42, Vietnam veterans, 90–91, 95, violence, alcohol and, 458, gender differences in, 308, 320, intimate, 295–299, in media, 226, as source of stress, 74, in workplace, 393, viral hepatitis, 433, vision, aging and, 352-353, visual dominance, 209, visual mnemonics, 29, vitamin E, 463, vitamins, 464, vocal characteristics, 211, volunteer activities, 398, vulnerability, as response to traumatic events, 82, stress and, 502, See also genetic, predisposition/vulnerability, , W, wages, gender gap in, 325, Watkins, Sherron, 194, , wealth, happiness and, 20, weaning, 40, websites, personal, 180, sexually oriented, 17–18, weight, 322, 459, aging and, 352, eating disorders and, 510, women’s, 511, 513, weight loss, 461–462, Weight Loss Through Persistence, (Kirschenbaum), 462, well-being, subjective, 19, wellness programs, 390, What Color Is Your Parachute? (Bolles), 399, what-is-beautiful-is-good stereotype, 176, What You Can Change & What You Can’t, (Seligman), 10, whistleblowers, 194, Why Marriages Succeed or Fail (Gottman),, 284, Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers (Sapolsky), 93, wife battering, 297–299, wishful thinking, 112, withdrawal illness, 473, 474, 475, withdrawal method, 430, withdrawing, 223, 264–265, women, aggression toward, 325–326, eating disorders and, 511–513, seeking psychotherapy, 546, sexism and, 324–326, sexual ambivalence of, 323–324, sexual harassment of, 391–392, STDs and, 431, in workforce, 271, 282, 321, 323, 424, 347,, 385, 386, 396, See also gender differences; gender roles, work, 382, adjusting to, 347, alcohol and, 459, family roles and, 395–396, happiness and, 21, hazards of, 387–394, stress and, 90, transitions in, 349, See also careers; occupations, work environments, 378, 379, 390, hostile, 391, work-family conflicts, 348, 395–396, workaholics, 395, 446, workforce, changing, 382–383, 385–387, diversity in, 385, women in, 271, 282, 321, 323, 324, 347,, 385, 386, 396, working memory, 356, workplace, androcentrism in, 305, sexual harassment in, 391–392, trends in, 382–384, 388, violence in, 393, workweek, 387, 397, worldviews, cultural, 59–60, 61, 150, writing, about emotions, 127, , XYZ, Xanax, 537, yoga, 128, You Just Don’t Understand (Tannen), 331, Zen, 128, Zeta-Jones, Catherine, 187, Zoloft, 538

Page 688 :
TO THE OWNER OF THIS BOOK:, We hope that you have found Psychology Applied to Modern Life, 8e useful. So that this book can be, improved in a future edition, would you take the time to complete this sheet and return it? Thank you., School and address: ________________________________________________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, Department: ________________________________________________________________________, Instructor’s name: ____________________________________________________________________, 1. What I like most about this book is: ____________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, 2. What I like least about this book is: ____________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, 3. My general reaction to this book is: ____________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, 4. The name of the course in which I used this book is: ______________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, 5. Were all of the chapters of the book assigned for you to read? ______________________________, If not, which ones weren’t? __________________________________________________________, 6. In the space below, or on a separate sheet of paper, please write specific suggestions for improving, this book and anything else you’d care to share about your experience in using this book., ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________, ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 689 :
DO NOT STAPLE., TAPE HERE., , DO NOT STAPLE., TAPE HERE., FOLD HERE, , NO POSTAGE, NECESSARY, IF MAILED, IN THE, UNITED STATES, , BUSINESS REPLY MAIL, FIRST-CLASS MAIL, , PERMIT NO. 34, , BELMONT C A, , P O S TA G E W I L L B E PA I D B Y A D D R E S S E E, , Attn: Michele Sordi, Psychology Editor, , Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 10 Davis Dr, Belmont CA 94002-9801, , FOLD HERE, , OPTIONAL:, Your name: __________________________________________________ Date: __________________________, May we quote you, either in promotion for Psychology Applied to Modern Life, 8e, or in, future publishing ventures?, Yes: __________ No: __________, Sincerely yours,, Wayne Weiten and Margaret Lloyd